WEBVTT - Credlin | 7 September

0:00:08.300 --> 0:00:10.799
<v Speaker 1>Good evening. Welcome to the program. Parliament back for a

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>fortnight is what's coming up tonight on Credlin. More questions

0:00:14.620 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>tonight over the warnings that went unheeded in the months

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:21.250
<v Speaker 1>before the Bondi terror attack. ASIO Chief Mike Burgess revealing

0:00:21.290 --> 0:00:25.849
<v Speaker 1>his deep frustration that concerns were ignored just days after

0:00:25.970 --> 0:00:31.380
<v Speaker 1>whistleblowers revealed here on Credlin serious internal pressures inside the AFP.

0:00:32.020 --> 0:00:35.580
<v Speaker 1>PLAS Defence veterans back in Canberra today fighting against Labor's

0:00:35.740 --> 0:00:39.779
<v Speaker 1>unfair attack on health services, laying down their service medals

0:00:40.140 --> 0:00:43.790
<v Speaker 1>as they demand action from the Albanese government. And the

0:00:43.830 --> 0:00:46.709
<v Speaker 1>fight to stop the flow of illegal tobacco into Australia.

0:00:47.130 --> 0:00:50.710
<v Speaker 1>Tony Burke in the House today declaring law enforcement's key.

0:00:51.250 --> 0:00:54.660
<v Speaker 1>But what of those warnings from Border Force veterans that

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>staff cuts have left officers defenceless in the fight? And

0:00:58.980 --> 0:01:01.660
<v Speaker 1>One Nation doubling down on calls for reform to our

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>superannuation system. It's your money and it's set to become

0:01:05.220 --> 0:01:07.580
<v Speaker 1>a key battleground at the next election.

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:12.220
<v Speaker 2>Well, who holds most of the superannuation funds? The unions.

0:01:13.150 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 3>The union is associated with the Labor Party. So I'm

0:01:16.830 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 3>sure they don't want to see people access their money.

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>We will stay with that issue because today in Canberra

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.500
<v Speaker 1>there was a newer policy announcement from One Nation which

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:32.539
<v Speaker 1>kicked superannuation back into the headlines. And the way the

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:36.009
<v Speaker 1>debate played out gives you the best insight yet into

0:01:36.030 --> 0:01:39.950
<v Speaker 1>the ideological motivations of the left and the right when

0:01:39.990 --> 0:01:43.510
<v Speaker 1>it comes to this $ 4. 5 trillion pool of of our

0:01:43.569 --> 0:01:48.250
<v Speaker 1>national retirement savings. On the right, Coalition and One Nation

0:01:48.270 --> 0:01:52.930
<v Speaker 1>believe it's superannuation's your money. It's salary that you forego

0:01:53.050 --> 0:01:56.870
<v Speaker 1>now to be put aside for your retirement. Now, they

0:01:56.910 --> 0:02:00.550
<v Speaker 1>may disagree about how much you can access before you

0:02:00.590 --> 0:02:04.870
<v Speaker 1>retire and for what purpose, but there's no doubt that

0:02:04.890 --> 0:02:08.910
<v Speaker 1>they are not conflicted as to its ownership. Your super,

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.750
<v Speaker 1>your money. Labor, on the other hand, well, they speak

0:02:12.770 --> 0:02:16.030
<v Speaker 1>with a forked tongue. They like to crow about their

0:02:16.110 --> 0:02:19.950
<v Speaker 1>history as the party that introduced compulsory super. But for

0:02:19.990 --> 0:02:24.340
<v Speaker 1>the left of politics, superannuation has always been about what

0:02:24.700 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>they can do with your money rather than you. When

0:02:28.580 --> 0:02:33.460
<v Speaker 1>Paul Keating created compulsory super back in 1992, his pitch

0:02:33.500 --> 0:02:36.950
<v Speaker 1>to the public was all about boosting incomes in retirement,

0:02:37.510 --> 0:02:40.650
<v Speaker 1>about getting people off the pension and But his real

0:02:40.710 --> 0:02:43.430
<v Speaker 1>agenda was about finding a way to give Labor and

0:02:43.450 --> 0:02:48.340
<v Speaker 1>the unions a new power base. You see, Keating recognized

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:52.220
<v Speaker 1>that with union membership in free fall, the days when

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.460
<v Speaker 1>union bosses could thump the table and grind the country

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.700
<v Speaker 1>to a halt were declining. In the 1970s, over 50%

0:02:58.700 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of the workforce was in a union. Now it's just 7.9%

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:08.610
<v Speaker 1>of workers in the private sector More, of course, if

0:03:08.630 --> 0:03:11.230
<v Speaker 1>we add in the public servants in the public sector,

0:03:11.250 --> 0:03:14.750
<v Speaker 1>but even so, that's a massive drop. But all credit

0:03:14.810 --> 0:03:18.940
<v Speaker 1>to him, Keating saw this coming and he saw industry

0:03:19.020 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>super as a way to maintain and grow the influence

0:03:23.340 --> 0:03:28.059
<v Speaker 1>of unions. That's exactly what's happened. As more and more

0:03:28.100 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>workers had super and the pool of funds in super grew,

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:36.340
<v Speaker 1>as industry funds became the workplace default, they became more

0:03:36.540 --> 0:03:39.630
<v Speaker 1>and more influential. When they had money to invest, they

0:03:39.650 --> 0:03:42.950
<v Speaker 1>bought up blocks of shares in companies and then with

0:03:42.970 --> 0:03:48.180
<v Speaker 1>that shareholding weight, started to direct company policy. It's why

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>so many of the big companies today are just as

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>likely to spend money promoting the voice than to push

0:03:54.140 --> 0:03:58.260
<v Speaker 1>the Albanese government on their reckless spending or demand lifts

0:03:58.700 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in productivity. It was a cunning plan at the time,

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:07.150
<v Speaker 1>but it's worked and it's transformed Labor's relationship with business

0:04:07.170 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and So much so that Labor's now the party of

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.220
<v Speaker 1>big business and it's the coalition that's the party of

0:04:13.260 --> 0:04:17.810
<v Speaker 1>the worker and small business. So enter One Nation today

0:04:17.850 --> 0:04:20.990
<v Speaker 1>ready to get into the superannuation fight with a policy

0:04:21.010 --> 0:04:24.390
<v Speaker 1>to allow people doing it tough to access more of

0:04:24.430 --> 0:04:27.550
<v Speaker 1>their money now and not just when they retire.

0:04:28.150 --> 0:04:32.030
<v Speaker 3>Those people that are working, are renters or paying a

0:04:32.050 --> 0:04:37.380
<v Speaker 3>mortgage will, by choice, can apply to their superannuation fund.

0:04:38.150 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 3>to withdraw up to 3%, one quarter of their superannuation,

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 3>moving forward.

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 2>This is the people's money. This is their money. This

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 2>is not the government's money. This is their money.

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 3>If it comes to a point of someone being out

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 3>in the streets and living in a tent or can't

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 3>or on the cusp of losing their home, I would

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.940
<v Speaker 3>rather see them get that help and assistance that they

0:05:01.980 --> 0:05:04.250
<v Speaker 3>need now, not later in life.

0:05:06.190 --> 0:05:09.339
<v Speaker 1>Well, almost immediately, the Treasurer went on the attack.

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 4>Labor built super, we strengthened it, and now we will

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:17.060
<v Speaker 4>have to defend it from those opposite. It is now

0:05:17.140 --> 0:05:21.089
<v Speaker 4>beyond any doubt that any coalition with one nation in

0:05:21.150 --> 0:05:24.730
<v Speaker 4>it will cut super. They will end super as we

0:05:24.790 --> 0:05:28.830
<v Speaker 4>know it and make Australians poorer as a consequence because

0:05:29.230 --> 0:05:33.260
<v Speaker 4>what they're proposing today means less money and less economic

0:05:33.300 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 4>security for Australians in retirements.

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:40.860
<v Speaker 1>At the heart of Chalmers Spray is Labor's view that

0:05:40.900 --> 0:05:45.300
<v Speaker 1>your superannuation is not your money, temporarily managed by others

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>for your benefit, but a national asset to be deployed

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 1>by the government in the service of what it considers

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.930
<v Speaker 1>to be the national interest. So invested in things that

0:05:55.089 --> 0:05:59.030
<v Speaker 1>are important to Labor, their priorities, things like renewable energy

0:05:59.110 --> 0:06:03.630
<v Speaker 1>or affordable housing for people on welfare. So someone else's home,

0:06:04.190 --> 0:06:07.230
<v Speaker 1>just not your home. And that's a real worry because

0:06:07.710 --> 0:06:12.340
<v Speaker 1>by far and away, the biggest insurance against poverty in

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>retirement is whether or not you own your own home.

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:20.339
<v Speaker 1>Homeowners can live frugally on the pension. But if you're

0:06:20.420 --> 0:06:23.779
<v Speaker 1>trying to pay rent or a mortgage on the pension, well,

0:06:23.820 --> 0:06:26.990
<v Speaker 1>it's near impossible. And that's the point that One Nation

0:06:27.020 --> 0:06:27.990
<v Speaker 1>was making today.

0:06:28.010 --> 0:06:30.430
<v Speaker 5>And if you lose your house, it's the best asset

0:06:30.450 --> 0:06:30.930
<v Speaker 5>you've got.

0:06:31.010 --> 0:06:31.190
<v Speaker 6>I mean.

0:06:31.779 --> 0:06:33.980
<v Speaker 5>Believe you me, sink or not, if you haven't got

0:06:34.020 --> 0:06:35.460
<v Speaker 5>a house later on in life and you're still having

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.250
<v Speaker 5>to pay rent, you're in a vastly more precarious position

0:06:38.290 --> 0:06:39.029
<v Speaker 5>than a person.

0:06:38.790 --> 0:06:39.490
<v Speaker 2>Who owns a house.

0:06:39.890 --> 0:06:41.510
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, Laura, not.

0:06:41.430 --> 0:06:43.570
<v Speaker 2>Only has 66,000 people.

0:06:43.730 --> 0:06:45.330
<v Speaker 1>Got access to it, but they are on a tax

0:06:45.390 --> 0:06:47.190
<v Speaker 1>rate between 17% and 22%.

0:06:47.190 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 5>That's what Uncle Jim takes off them on the way out,

0:06:50.540 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 5>and he's the one talking about a threat to super.

0:06:54.339 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>The reality is, with people starting to buy homes later...

0:06:57.670 --> 0:07:01.190
<v Speaker 1>With higher interest rates and house prices today and the

0:07:01.270 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>impact of divorce hitting couples as well, home ownership can

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 1>be just as precarious for older Australians as it can

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>be for first home buyers. Hence Hanson's announcement today. But

0:07:13.260 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>giving people access to more of their super would dilute

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.420
<v Speaker 1>the power of industry funds. And because they pay money

0:07:19.460 --> 0:07:22.260
<v Speaker 1>to the unions and the unions donate money to the

0:07:22.300 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Labor Party, what One Nation wants to do Well, that

0:07:26.340 --> 0:07:29.250
<v Speaker 1>upsets the gravy train, doesn't it? In more ways than one.

0:07:29.900 --> 0:07:33.550
<v Speaker 1>With their boards dominated by community activists and former union officials,

0:07:34.190 --> 0:07:38.070
<v Speaker 1>the industry funds have long been pushing public companies that

0:07:38.110 --> 0:07:41.740
<v Speaker 1>they invest in to walk away from things like coal

0:07:41.770 --> 0:07:45.780
<v Speaker 1>and gas and to push the left's social agenda as

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>much as turn a profit. See now why Labor hates

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.620
<v Speaker 1>this as much as they do. And back to super's

0:07:53.660 --> 0:07:57.179
<v Speaker 1>original aim of getting people off the pension, well, even there,

0:07:57.220 --> 0:08:01.770
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't been successful. After 34 years of compulsory super,

0:08:01.830 --> 0:08:06.450
<v Speaker 1>so my entire working life, we've still got around upwards

0:08:06.490 --> 0:08:11.750
<v Speaker 1>of 75 or 80% of retirees accessing some sort of

0:08:11.870 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>pension or welfare support, at least two thirds of retirees. Now,

0:08:17.700 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think One Nation's policy today has enough detail

0:08:20.220 --> 0:08:22.740
<v Speaker 1>out there. I don't think there's any modelling, for example,

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:27.810
<v Speaker 1>or specific information in it on the inflationary risk. But

0:08:27.850 --> 0:08:31.290
<v Speaker 1>as a concept, this will hit home to precisely the

0:08:31.330 --> 0:08:35.050
<v Speaker 1>sort of people they wanted to. People who have left

0:08:35.650 --> 0:08:39.510
<v Speaker 1>or are thinking of leaving Labor. But more than that,

0:08:39.570 --> 0:08:43.310
<v Speaker 1>as I've explained, it will terrify Labor insiders who build

0:08:43.350 --> 0:08:46.460
<v Speaker 1>a huge machine of power and influence off the back

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of workers' money via industry super that will be left

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:53.300
<v Speaker 1>thinking that it all might just come unstuck. The more

0:08:53.340 --> 0:08:59.390
<v Speaker 1>that Australians understand, they're just pawns here. That superannuation's never

0:08:59.450 --> 0:09:03.370
<v Speaker 1>been about them at all. That's perhaps why we're already

0:09:03.450 --> 0:09:07.510
<v Speaker 1>seeing ads like this pop up as a rearguard action

0:09:07.550 --> 0:09:11.620
<v Speaker 1>from the industry funds who want to protect their cosy world.

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 6>Watch out for clickbait ads designed to pull you away

0:09:15.100 --> 0:09:15.939
<v Speaker 6>from your super fund.

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.219
<v Speaker 4>Thousands of Aussies have already lost large chunks of super

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 4>in collapse schemes.

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:21.939
<v Speaker 2>You don't want to be next.

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, watch this space. There'll be more of those coming fast.

0:09:35.170 --> 0:09:36.620
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to Canberra. As I said, it's

0:09:36.670 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a Monday of a sitting fortnight, the first day at

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the big house. Let's go there now. Political reporter Trudy

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:43.860
<v Speaker 1>McIntosh with the headlines.

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 7>Federal Parliament's back with a bang. One Nation reignites a

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:49.540
<v Speaker 7>fight over superannuation.

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.770
<v Speaker 2>This is the people's money. This is their money.

0:09:52.890 --> 0:09:57.530
<v Speaker 4>A full frontal attack on superannuation as a full frontal

0:09:57.630 --> 0:09:59.290
<v Speaker 4>attack on Australian workers.

0:09:59.770 --> 0:10:02.650
<v Speaker 7>One Nation is proposing to allow renters and mortgage holders

0:10:02.690 --> 0:10:06.050
<v Speaker 7>to divert 25% of their super contributions into their pocket

0:10:06.270 --> 0:10:07.330
<v Speaker 7>for up to three years.

0:10:07.730 --> 0:10:09.980
<v Speaker 5>How is that not just going to pump up inflation,

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:12.030
<v Speaker 5>keep rates high and hurt the people you're.

0:10:11.929 --> 0:10:12.390
<v Speaker 8>Trying to help?

0:10:12.510 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 5>It's neutral.

0:10:13.500 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 2>It's neutral. So you're not going to pump up inflation

0:10:16.100 --> 0:10:16.780
<v Speaker 2>with it at all.

0:10:17.410 --> 0:10:20.390
<v Speaker 7>Labor is under pressure again to dump the controversial Allied

0:10:20.450 --> 0:10:24.300
<v Speaker 7>Health Cap for veterans. Outside Parliament, veterans who served our

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:25.820
<v Speaker 7>nation lay down their medals.

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 5>But the promises these medals represent cannot be honoured in

0:10:29.660 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 5>ceremony and then abandoned in policy.

0:10:33.300 --> 0:10:38.700
<v Speaker 7>Later, meeting with Minister Matt Keogh, calling for the $ 5, 000

0:10:36.780 --> 0:10:39.490
<v Speaker 7>limit on veterans' Allied Health treatments to be dumped.

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Leaving that meeting, I felt disappointed. To be honest, I

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 2>feel kind of betrayed. The battle has only just begun

0:10:46.820 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 2>and Minister Keogh should know that.

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 7>And social media giants could soon be forced to allow

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 7>Australians to opt out of algorithms.

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 9>I definitely want Australians to have more choice over their

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 9>feeds than what they currently have.

0:10:57.940 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 7>The full details of the so-called digital duty of care

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 7>reforms are yet to be revealed.

0:11:03.340 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 6>This minister or the government or the prime minister control

0:11:07.179 --> 0:11:09.260
<v Speaker 6>my algorithms or anyone's algorithms?

0:11:09.820 --> 0:11:11.260
<v Speaker 5>Well, there's a lot of questions.

0:11:10.940 --> 0:11:11.580
<v Speaker 1>To answer in that.

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 7>The Greens are pushing for a tougher opt-in approach. These

0:11:15.090 --> 0:11:19.650
<v Speaker 7>toxic algorithms have been designed to be addictive. Trudy McIntosh,

0:11:19.809 --> 0:11:21.069
<v Speaker 7>News 24, Canberra.

0:11:22.990 --> 0:11:25.309
<v Speaker 1>Well, if I'm honest, it was a pretty flat start

0:11:25.370 --> 0:11:27.970
<v Speaker 1>to the sitting fortnight today. A few important issues around,

0:11:27.990 --> 0:11:30.530
<v Speaker 1>but nobody was landing much of a punch at all

0:11:30.570 --> 0:11:33.490
<v Speaker 1>in question time. Here to discuss this and more, News24

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:37.929
<v Speaker 1>political contributor Chris Ullman. As I said, a flat sort

0:11:37.970 --> 0:11:41.890
<v Speaker 1>of news day, flat sort of parliament. This afternoon, Labor

0:11:41.929 --> 0:11:45.700
<v Speaker 1>was trying to hold ground over those budget tax changes

0:11:45.750 --> 0:11:48.820
<v Speaker 1>and the crisis that the Prime Minister and Jim Chalmers

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:53.079
<v Speaker 1>have inflicted on housing. Claire O'Neill, the housing minister who

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.830
<v Speaker 1>failed upwards after buggering things up with Home Affairs, well,

0:11:57.260 --> 0:12:02.130
<v Speaker 1>she said the downturn is an opportunity for Australians. In

0:12:02.150 --> 0:12:05.220
<v Speaker 1>the nine years those opposite were in power, house prices

0:12:05.270 --> 0:12:08.780
<v Speaker 1>in Sydney almost doubled, Speaker, in nine years. We have

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:12.460
<v Speaker 1>seen house prices grow by about 50% in the last

0:12:12.520 --> 0:12:15.699
<v Speaker 1>six years, Speaker. Now that's the context that's really important

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.459
<v Speaker 1>here and I know that those opposite don't have anything

0:12:18.540 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>sensible to say about this. I tell you what, Chris,

0:12:22.260 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>if I was in the tactics committee for the coalition,

0:12:24.140 --> 0:12:26.660
<v Speaker 1>I'd be getting her on her feet as often as

0:12:26.740 --> 0:12:30.610
<v Speaker 1>possible in as many question times as possible because I

0:12:30.610 --> 0:12:33.349
<v Speaker 1>think she's really struggling. I mean, this whole set of

0:12:33.390 --> 0:12:36.030
<v Speaker 1>budget changes on housing are a lemon. I don't know

0:12:36.070 --> 0:12:37.270
<v Speaker 1>how they keep selling a lemon.

0:12:39.530 --> 0:12:41.830
<v Speaker 6>Well, Peter, there's two things going on here which makes

0:12:41.870 --> 0:12:45.179
<v Speaker 6>it very confusing and All the way up to the budget,

0:12:45.220 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 6>the government was talking about making houses more affordable, and

0:12:48.420 --> 0:12:50.490
<v Speaker 6>that's what you assume it was trying to do with

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.370
<v Speaker 6>the cuts to negative gearing. But it also wants to

0:12:53.390 --> 0:12:55.430
<v Speaker 6>send the message that nobody's house is going to drop

0:12:55.650 --> 0:12:58.710
<v Speaker 6>in value. Now, those two things cannot possibly be true

0:12:58.910 --> 0:13:00.699
<v Speaker 6>at the same time. Then we had a mess of

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 6>other policies and interest rate rises, which, of course... is

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 6>making it difficult for anyone who wants to enter the

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:09.700
<v Speaker 6>housing market at the moment. So, yeah, there's an absolute

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 6>confusion in the government's own messaging. It should really just

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 6>lean into the fact that we were trying to bring

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.420
<v Speaker 6>down the price of houses and at least then the

0:13:18.470 --> 0:13:20.780
<v Speaker 6>message would be clear. But then, of course, the problem

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:22.490
<v Speaker 6>that they've got is with all those people who own

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.090
<v Speaker 6>houses and the value of those houses is falling and

0:13:25.110 --> 0:13:27.569
<v Speaker 6>the houses that people actually want to buy, well, they're

0:13:27.590 --> 0:13:29.530
<v Speaker 6>not falling much in price anyway.

0:13:29.590 --> 0:13:32.900
<v Speaker 1>So it's the worst of all possible worlds, really. And

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the numbers don't work out, right? Ross Green was saying

0:13:35.540 --> 0:13:38.780
<v Speaker 1>the other day, you've got about 12 million dwellings in

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:42.300
<v Speaker 1>this country. All of those are own or part-owned, so

0:13:42.340 --> 0:13:44.370
<v Speaker 1>no one wants to be paying off something that's losing

0:13:44.410 --> 0:13:49.809
<v Speaker 1>value or own something that's losing value, vis-a-vis about 150,000

0:13:49.809 --> 0:13:51.849
<v Speaker 1>people trying to get into the market. Well, look at

0:13:51.890 --> 0:13:55.110
<v Speaker 1>those raw numbers. You really are pissing off a hell

0:13:55.130 --> 0:13:58.530
<v Speaker 1>of a lot more Australians if their greatest assets starting

0:13:58.550 --> 0:14:01.179
<v Speaker 1>to fall in value and the ones trying to get

0:14:01.300 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in at the same time that they're copying higher interest rates.

0:14:05.620 --> 0:14:07.500
<v Speaker 1>We're told by all the banks at the mortgage book

0:14:08.140 --> 0:14:10.660
<v Speaker 1>they're writing less loans, so they're not going out there

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.459
<v Speaker 1>in the market. And you've got this stagnation on the

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:17.980
<v Speaker 1>clearances over the weekend of auctions, about 54% in Victoria,

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:21.420
<v Speaker 1>about 20% and 30% in places in New South Wales

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and Queensland. I mean, the market is very, very sluggish.

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:28.530
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, the other issue you've got is one of the

0:14:28.570 --> 0:14:31.410
<v Speaker 6>other policies you had meant that people could borrow more.

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:35.830
<v Speaker 6>borrow more on a house before they bought it, which

0:14:35.910 --> 0:14:37.850
<v Speaker 6>means that those people are the ones who, if you

0:14:37.870 --> 0:14:41.490
<v Speaker 6>were recently into the marketplace, then the price of your

0:14:41.530 --> 0:14:43.190
<v Speaker 6>house is now worth less than.

0:14:43.130 --> 0:14:44.060
<v Speaker 3>What you paid for it.

0:14:44.110 --> 0:14:47.150
<v Speaker 6>So you've got negative equity, which makes people really concerned

0:14:47.170 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 6>about everything else in their lives, which makes them worry

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.980
<v Speaker 6>about spending more money in the real economy. So, yeah,

0:14:54.020 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 6>what we've got here is a whole lot of policy

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:59.210
<v Speaker 6>confusion from the Labor Party, which has landed us really

0:14:59.230 --> 0:15:01.830
<v Speaker 6>in the worst possible place. and will have an effect

0:15:01.890 --> 0:15:02.870
<v Speaker 6>on the entire economy.

0:15:04.690 --> 0:15:07.510
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried about this digital duty of care. I mean,

0:15:07.530 --> 0:15:10.630
<v Speaker 1>it's one thing to put in rules for those under

0:15:10.670 --> 0:15:13.230
<v Speaker 1>the age of 16 and what they can access, although

0:15:13.250 --> 0:15:15.850
<v Speaker 1>I might add there's been no big fines for all

0:15:15.890 --> 0:15:19.750
<v Speaker 1>the talk levelled on big tech. But now we've got

0:15:19.770 --> 0:15:24.070
<v Speaker 1>a conversation that the government wants to have an algorithm

0:15:24.450 --> 0:15:28.230
<v Speaker 1>regime for adults about what we can see, what we

0:15:28.270 --> 0:15:32.050
<v Speaker 1>can read, the access of information that we might have

0:15:32.090 --> 0:15:35.670
<v Speaker 1>from here and overseas. So little detail, Chris, but what

0:15:35.730 --> 0:15:38.590
<v Speaker 1>concerns me is when government gets in the way of

0:15:38.810 --> 0:15:42.620
<v Speaker 1>information flows, there's always an ulterior motive.

0:15:44.620 --> 0:15:46.780
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Peter, and again, there's two things going on here, right?

0:15:47.060 --> 0:15:49.260
<v Speaker 6>If I get the opportunity to opt in or opt

0:15:49.380 --> 0:15:52.220
<v Speaker 6>out of algorithms, well, that's my device, my choice, and

0:15:52.300 --> 0:15:55.010
<v Speaker 6>I can kind of get the idea on that. But

0:15:55.150 --> 0:15:57.780
<v Speaker 6>there's more to this digital duty of care. And that

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 6>is that at some stage, the government wants to decide

0:16:00.980 --> 0:16:03.619
<v Speaker 6>what big tech should be allowed to show us. And

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 6>then we get into the whole area of misinformation and

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:13.110
<v Speaker 6>disinformation and a government deciding or the e-safety commissioner deciding

0:16:13.670 --> 0:16:17.030
<v Speaker 6>what those things are, what constitutes harm. And that's where

0:16:17.090 --> 0:16:19.170
<v Speaker 6>I have the real issue. So I think that out

0:16:19.230 --> 0:16:21.670
<v Speaker 6>the front of this, like so many things, is something

0:16:21.710 --> 0:16:23.650
<v Speaker 6>that might well sound good. Look, yeah, I could get

0:16:23.670 --> 0:16:26.910
<v Speaker 6>to decide myself about algorithms. But no, what lies beneath

0:16:27.220 --> 0:16:29.860
<v Speaker 6>all of this is the government deciding who gets to

0:16:29.900 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 6>see what inside Australia. And that, as ever, is where

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 6>all the danger really lies.

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:37.900
<v Speaker 1>And I'll use the example during the voice debate, Chris,

0:16:37.940 --> 0:16:41.380
<v Speaker 1>when I got hold of an FOI about the full extent,

0:16:41.420 --> 0:16:43.750
<v Speaker 1>you know, all 26 pages of the Uluru Statement to

0:16:43.770 --> 0:16:45.710
<v Speaker 1>the Heart. And I put it out here on this

0:16:45.770 --> 0:16:48.230
<v Speaker 1>program and I wrote about it. And I was Taken

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:51.050
<v Speaker 1>off Facebook, it was removed from a whole lot of

0:16:51.110 --> 0:16:54.350
<v Speaker 1>social media platforms. We all had to sort of sign

0:16:54.390 --> 0:16:56.350
<v Speaker 1>up to the Prime Minister's view that it was just

0:16:56.390 --> 0:16:59.290
<v Speaker 1>a gracious thing to do. It was a one-page poster. Well,

0:16:59.310 --> 0:17:03.870
<v Speaker 1>it was not. We fought it. The lawyers here in

0:17:04.030 --> 0:17:06.350
<v Speaker 1>News 24 fought it and we were able to speak

0:17:06.430 --> 0:17:08.710
<v Speaker 1>our mind and put that information out there. As I said,

0:17:08.850 --> 0:17:13.490
<v Speaker 1>information from the government via an FOI, but that's what

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.409
<v Speaker 1>will come, guarantee you, that is what will come if

0:17:16.470 --> 0:17:17.850
<v Speaker 1>this stuff becomes law.

0:17:19.730 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 6>And Peter, do you have to have much of an

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:25.060
<v Speaker 6>imagination to think that at some stage the crime against

0:17:25.140 --> 0:17:27.020
<v Speaker 6>the climate is going to be to say that you

0:17:27.060 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 6>don't like the government's energy policies, that that will be classified.

0:17:30.500 --> 0:17:33.140
<v Speaker 1>As misinformation and disinformation? Spot on, Chris.

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 6>And we know that's where we're going.

0:17:36.220 --> 0:17:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, that was the Climate Change Authority late last week.

0:17:38.900 --> 0:17:42.620
<v Speaker 1>You know, they were critical about anyone talking about the

0:17:42.660 --> 0:17:47.310
<v Speaker 1>impact of climate policy on electricity prices or reliability for

0:17:47.330 --> 0:17:49.810
<v Speaker 1>the grid. They even made a reference that they don't

0:17:49.850 --> 0:17:53.090
<v Speaker 1>like the debate about renewables in regional communities either.

0:17:54.890 --> 0:17:56.669
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, no, this is absolutely where this is heading. So

0:17:56.690 --> 0:17:59.010
<v Speaker 6>that's why it disturbs me. Can I say as an

0:17:59.190 --> 0:18:02.570
<v Speaker 6>overall principle, I'm a libertarian, right? I think that we

0:18:02.590 --> 0:18:04.810
<v Speaker 6>should have as much free information as possible in a

0:18:04.869 --> 0:18:07.580
<v Speaker 6>society and we should debate all these things out. And

0:18:07.650 --> 0:18:09.980
<v Speaker 6>can I say the thing that disturbs me most about

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 6>Australian politics is the only difference between left and right

0:18:13.140 --> 0:18:16.149
<v Speaker 6>nowadays are the things that they want to ban. I

0:18:16.180 --> 0:18:18.690
<v Speaker 6>don't think people should burn the Australian flag. Do I

0:18:18.730 --> 0:18:19.490
<v Speaker 6>think it should be banned?

0:18:19.810 --> 0:18:20.050
<v Speaker 1>No.

0:18:20.430 --> 0:18:22.290
<v Speaker 6>I don't think that the federal government should be telling

0:18:22.330 --> 0:18:25.850
<v Speaker 6>us what constitutes misinformation and disinformation because from what I

0:18:25.890 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 6>can see and where I stand, most of the misinformation

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 6>I see comes out of the government and its authorities.

0:18:32.730 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm a bit with you on the flag

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.700
<v Speaker 1>and I look to see those groups that do ban it.

0:18:38.060 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think that tells me everything I need to

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.540
<v Speaker 1>know about them. It helps me make my decision as

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.300
<v Speaker 1>to why I mightn't support their cause or I might

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:50.010
<v Speaker 1>think that they're dubious in their arguments. Just quickly, Super,

0:18:50.369 --> 0:18:52.389
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm a little bit younger than you, but

0:18:52.690 --> 0:18:54.950
<v Speaker 1>we're in the same era. We both probably... Everyone's a

0:18:54.950 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit younger than me nowadays. Yeah, well, I said

0:18:59.260 --> 0:19:02.140
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. It is a little bit. But we've

0:19:02.180 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>basically had super for most of our working life. The

0:19:04.780 --> 0:19:07.449
<v Speaker 1>whole pitch of Keating all those years ago was that

0:19:07.510 --> 0:19:09.930
<v Speaker 1>you get to retirement age and there would be less

0:19:09.970 --> 0:19:12.530
<v Speaker 1>of a call on the pension. Well, there's not much

0:19:12.609 --> 0:19:14.790
<v Speaker 1>less call on the pensions. Two thirds of Australians do

0:19:14.830 --> 0:19:19.540
<v Speaker 1>require the pension. You've got then this cash cow for

0:19:19.730 --> 0:19:22.460
<v Speaker 1>the left. You know, the industry super funds are all powerful.

0:19:22.859 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>They buy big whacks of companies. They basically tell companies

0:19:25.540 --> 0:19:28.340
<v Speaker 1>what to do. There's a money go round that comes

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 1>out of industry super funds to the unions and across

0:19:31.540 --> 0:19:34.780
<v Speaker 1>to the Labor Party as a donation. I think Hanson's,

0:19:35.380 --> 0:19:37.859
<v Speaker 1>you know, found something with this topic. I think it's

0:19:37.900 --> 0:19:40.950
<v Speaker 1>a good one to exploit. Not enough detail out there,

0:19:41.350 --> 0:19:43.490
<v Speaker 1>but this will really disturb Labor. And you can see

0:19:43.530 --> 0:19:46.430
<v Speaker 1>how quick they've come out today to sort of whip

0:19:46.490 --> 0:19:47.810
<v Speaker 1>it up into some sort of fight.

0:19:49.570 --> 0:19:49.969
<v Speaker 6>Well, the short story.

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:50.980
<v Speaker 1>She's got it right, right?

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 6>It's our money. What happens is that we get 12%

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.419
<v Speaker 6>of our wage garnish sheet and told that we're not

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:58.219
<v Speaker 6>allowed to touch it until the age of 65. Now,

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:00.330
<v Speaker 6>what's magic about the number 12%? Well, there was a

0:20:00.350 --> 0:20:03.410
<v Speaker 6>debate over that for ages. So why not 9%? Why

0:20:03.430 --> 0:20:05.429
<v Speaker 6>not be able to get some of it before you

0:20:05.450 --> 0:20:07.070
<v Speaker 6>hit retirement, if what you're going to do is an

0:20:07.109 --> 0:20:09.830
<v Speaker 6>investment in your house, well, that's a very good investment.

0:20:09.869 --> 0:20:12.590
<v Speaker 6>We all know that. So she has got a powerful

0:20:12.810 --> 0:20:15.150
<v Speaker 6>argument here. I think a lot of people will give

0:20:15.390 --> 0:20:18.710
<v Speaker 6>a head nod and any idea that it's an attack

0:20:18.850 --> 0:20:21.730
<v Speaker 6>on the superannuation system and it will destroy it is

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 6>a whole lot of puff and nonsense. But again, as

0:20:24.300 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 6>I say, misinformation and disinformation seems to be the daily

0:20:29.580 --> 0:20:31.100
<v Speaker 6>fare of this government.

0:20:32.820 --> 0:20:35.060
<v Speaker 1>All right. I want you to Go abroad with me

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:40.350
<v Speaker 1>for a moment. That significant decision electorally in Germany, a

0:20:41.070 --> 0:20:46.230
<v Speaker 1>huge win here for the far-right party AFD, Alternative for Germany. Yes,

0:20:46.290 --> 0:20:49.580
<v Speaker 1>it's at a state level. Yes, AFD looks like it

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>will fall short, although counting's continuing, to get the absolute

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:54.940
<v Speaker 1>majority it needs to govern in its own right. But

0:20:55.060 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>this is seismic, Chris.

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:01.050
<v Speaker 6>44% of the vote is a huge amount of the vote.

0:21:01.109 --> 0:21:03.790
<v Speaker 6>And won't it be telling if it cannot form government

0:21:03.850 --> 0:21:06.229
<v Speaker 6>because all of the other parties of government have decided

0:21:06.270 --> 0:21:08.889
<v Speaker 6>that they will have a firewall, which is the policy

0:21:09.070 --> 0:21:12.869
<v Speaker 6>in Germany, where they won't accept even the vote of

0:21:12.910 --> 0:21:16.910
<v Speaker 6>the AFD on policies that they agree with. So that

0:21:17.020 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 6>party is in the best position to form government, except

0:21:19.900 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 6>it now needs probably 5% or 6% of what's left

0:21:23.820 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 6>from some minor party to be able to make government work.

0:21:27.580 --> 0:21:31.290
<v Speaker 6>So Yes, it is a seismic change in Germany, but

0:21:31.330 --> 0:21:33.810
<v Speaker 6>look at all the things that are driving it. Migration,

0:21:34.290 --> 0:21:37.150
<v Speaker 6>cost of living, look around the world and where we

0:21:37.230 --> 0:21:41.150
<v Speaker 6>see the rise of these parties, it is the failure

0:21:41.330 --> 0:21:45.330
<v Speaker 6>of other parties within government to give people anything like

0:21:45.369 --> 0:21:47.889
<v Speaker 6>the things that they care about, to talk about the

0:21:47.950 --> 0:21:50.490
<v Speaker 6>things that matter to them, to say things that have

0:21:50.670 --> 0:21:54.139
<v Speaker 6>meaning to them. So there's a reason why there's a

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.700
<v Speaker 6>rise of the right. It's a complete failure on the left.

0:21:58.410 --> 0:22:00.229
<v Speaker 1>And, of course, we had Merkel, if you remember not

0:22:00.260 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 1>so long ago, crowing about letting into Germany one million

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:09.030
<v Speaker 1>undocumented arrivals that came in via southern Europe.

0:22:10.690 --> 0:22:13.010
<v Speaker 6>With Angela Merkel, I think that history will see her

0:22:13.070 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 6>as one of the worst leaders that Europe has ever had.

0:22:15.930 --> 0:22:16.300
<v Speaker 1>Why?

0:22:16.390 --> 0:22:20.420
<v Speaker 6>Because she put energy policy into gas from Russia. She

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:24.220
<v Speaker 6>trusted foreign policy that nothing would change with the Russians.

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 6>She decided that she would have a migration policy that

0:22:26.780 --> 0:22:30.050
<v Speaker 6>allowed a million people to march into the country. And

0:22:30.070 --> 0:22:32.950
<v Speaker 6>she had an energy policy where she started to rely

0:22:33.010 --> 0:22:35.830
<v Speaker 6>on wind and solar and shut down nuclear at the

0:22:35.869 --> 0:22:38.300
<v Speaker 6>same time. So if you fail on energy... If you

0:22:38.340 --> 0:22:41.540
<v Speaker 6>fail on foreign policy, if you fail on national security,

0:22:41.859 --> 0:22:44.500
<v Speaker 6>how can you be a credible leader or have any

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 6>kind of legacy other than she left Germany in an

0:22:47.900 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 6>absolutely disastrous state? And if we learn anything, we should learn,

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 6>don't do what she did.

0:22:55.740 --> 0:22:57.940
<v Speaker 1>I'll leave it there. Thank you, Chris. Of course, at

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:00.310
<v Speaker 1>the end of the week, we've got to September 11.

0:23:00.310 --> 0:23:02.490
<v Speaker 1>Have something to say about that on Thursday on the eve,

0:23:02.590 --> 0:23:05.470
<v Speaker 1>but I'm also reminded too there was a Hamburg cell,

0:23:05.490 --> 0:23:10.420
<v Speaker 1>the most significant terror cell coming out of Germany involved

0:23:10.460 --> 0:23:13.260
<v Speaker 1>in September 11. I think there's a lot of problems

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:16.139
<v Speaker 1>there and they're getting manifest worse by the moment. All right,

0:23:16.180 --> 0:23:19.570
<v Speaker 1>now to the fallout from Revelations last week to me

0:23:19.619 --> 0:23:24.129
<v Speaker 1>by an AFP whistleblower that things were bad inside the

0:23:24.270 --> 0:23:28.260
<v Speaker 1>AFP for some time, inside counterterrorism. He puts in a submission,

0:23:28.300 --> 0:23:31.139
<v Speaker 1>yet he is not called as a witness to the

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:34.510
<v Speaker 1>Royal Commission. And this was all well ahead of the

0:23:34.570 --> 0:23:38.650
<v Speaker 1>terror attack in Bondi last December. It follows warnings from

0:23:38.869 --> 0:23:42.389
<v Speaker 1>ASIO boss Mike Burgess, who says he was also deeply

0:23:42.470 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>frustrated that his warnings also went ignored. Alex Kawana is

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:52.300
<v Speaker 1>the President of the Union, which represents AFP police officers.

0:23:52.859 --> 0:23:55.469
<v Speaker 1>I had him on the program briefly on Thursday. but

0:23:55.490 --> 0:23:58.230
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to get him back tonight, Alex. Thank you

0:23:58.250 --> 0:24:01.230
<v Speaker 1>for your time. We mentioned last week that the union

0:24:01.369 --> 0:24:04.970
<v Speaker 1>warned the Albanese government a month before the terror attack

0:24:05.430 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that the AFP was suffering, quote, chronic and worsening shortages

0:24:10.540 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>of counter-terrorism officers. What prompted you to make such a

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>dire warning to government at the time? And what was

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>government's response to you?

0:24:21.050 --> 0:24:23.010
<v Speaker 10>Thank you for having me, Peter. Look, we warn the

0:24:23.050 --> 0:24:27.330
<v Speaker 10>government purely based on the funding that the AFP was receiving.

0:24:27.630 --> 0:24:31.610
<v Speaker 10>And there comes a time where AFP members can't continue

0:24:31.650 --> 0:24:33.830
<v Speaker 10>to do more with less. And no AFP member is

0:24:33.869 --> 0:24:35.530
<v Speaker 10>going to say no to a job, particularly when it

0:24:35.550 --> 0:24:39.540
<v Speaker 10>comes to national security or the safety of Australians. So

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 10>they were putting members in a really difficult position where

0:24:42.180 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 10>we don't have the funding or the capability to be

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:47.380
<v Speaker 10>able to prevent some of these crimes.

0:24:49.310 --> 0:24:51.790
<v Speaker 1>So I've had a lot of people come forward from

0:24:51.810 --> 0:24:56.129
<v Speaker 1>that original whistleblower now, Alex. I've received a number of

0:24:56.230 --> 0:24:58.830
<v Speaker 1>emails and things have been fed in and I'm not,

0:24:59.450 --> 0:25:01.950
<v Speaker 1>I suspect, saying anything that you haven't heard directly from

0:25:01.990 --> 0:25:08.260
<v Speaker 1>your members. They feel, this is particularly the uniform counter-terrorism

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.340
<v Speaker 1>police at the end of, I guess, the front line

0:25:11.619 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of things. They feel let down by the system and

0:25:15.140 --> 0:25:18.090
<v Speaker 1>the command in the AFP. They feel that out of

0:25:18.109 --> 0:25:21.730
<v Speaker 1>this terror attack in Sydney, they're likely to be the

0:25:21.830 --> 0:25:24.510
<v Speaker 1>ones that wear the blame, even though they weren't getting

0:25:24.530 --> 0:25:28.110
<v Speaker 1>the resourcing they needed, the staffing positions were left vacant

0:25:28.490 --> 0:25:31.780
<v Speaker 1>and the warnings were made. This has a lot of

0:25:31.820 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>hallmarks to me, Alex, in relation to the Brereton report.

0:25:36.420 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, senior brass in the Defence Department get let

0:25:39.580 --> 0:25:43.140
<v Speaker 1>off but the ordinary soldier is the one facing the scrutiny.

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>And I fear your members fear that they are the

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:49.860
<v Speaker 1>ones facing the scrutiny in this Royal Commission. Is that fair?

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 10>Look, it's not fair that the members face the scrutiny.

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.459
<v Speaker 10>Certainly the government had a big part to play when

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:59.780
<v Speaker 10>it comes to funding and the capability gaps due to

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 10>the funding. We're the lowest paid police force in Australia

0:26:02.530 --> 0:26:05.230
<v Speaker 10>and we, like every other police force in Australia, we

0:26:05.290 --> 0:26:09.389
<v Speaker 10>are suffering from the shortage of police officers and On

0:26:09.450 --> 0:26:13.230
<v Speaker 10>top of that, the government continues to cut the funding

0:26:13.250 --> 0:26:17.270
<v Speaker 10>to the AFP. So the AFP bosses are actively telling

0:26:17.330 --> 0:26:20.350
<v Speaker 10>people it's OK to say no to jobs. Who wants

0:26:20.410 --> 0:26:22.330
<v Speaker 10>to say no to a job where it could be

0:26:22.890 --> 0:26:26.430
<v Speaker 10>something as grave as what happened at Bondi? Nobody wants

0:26:26.470 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 10>to do it because they're worried about the scrutiny, both

0:26:28.660 --> 0:26:32.369
<v Speaker 10>internally and externally. So there comes a point where Government

0:26:32.390 --> 0:26:35.379
<v Speaker 10>needs to look at what they're doing. Are we getting

0:26:35.420 --> 0:26:37.619
<v Speaker 10>the correct amount of money for the job that the

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.380
<v Speaker 10>government and the community wants the AFP to do?

0:26:42.060 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, we heard from Tony Burke today. He expects the

0:26:44.500 --> 0:26:47.590
<v Speaker 1>AFP to basically solve the problem of the government's making

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:52.570
<v Speaker 1>in relation to illicit tobacco gangs and the fire bombings

0:26:52.609 --> 0:26:55.689
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing in Victoria as a result of of

0:26:55.800 --> 0:27:00.020
<v Speaker 1>crime gangs basically running the trade now, a multi-billion dollar trade.

0:27:00.660 --> 0:27:04.780
<v Speaker 1>Just on the AFPA, the AFPA, your association, you made

0:27:04.820 --> 0:27:07.300
<v Speaker 1>a submission to the Royal Commission but I'm told you

0:27:07.340 --> 0:27:10.389
<v Speaker 1>were not called. Were you given a reason why you

0:27:10.410 --> 0:27:11.890
<v Speaker 1>were not called to give evidence?

0:27:13.369 --> 0:27:15.930
<v Speaker 10>No, we weren't given a reason. I suspect it's because

0:27:15.950 --> 0:27:18.369
<v Speaker 10>there were much more prominent people that they wanted to

0:27:18.390 --> 0:27:20.290
<v Speaker 10>speak to but we weren't given a reason.

0:27:20.990 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, who's more prominent than the union who represents the

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:29.179
<v Speaker 1>AFP officers who are at the front line of Australia's

0:27:29.260 --> 0:27:30.700
<v Speaker 1>counter-terrorism response?

0:27:31.770 --> 0:27:37.369
<v Speaker 10>Look, it's a good question. We would have been happy

0:27:37.450 --> 0:27:39.409
<v Speaker 10>to provide evidence at that Royal Commission.

0:27:41.150 --> 0:27:44.149
<v Speaker 1>So they can call Netball Australia, but not the boss

0:27:44.310 --> 0:27:46.950
<v Speaker 1>of the AFP. I mean, Chrissie Barrett has not given

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.859
<v Speaker 1>public evidence. Does that surprise you?

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 10>Look, I'm not surprised. I don't know what the remit

0:27:57.500 --> 0:27:59.940
<v Speaker 10>of the Royal Commission is if it's not to question

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:03.470
<v Speaker 10>both the brass or the leaders of the AFP, of

0:28:03.490 --> 0:28:07.090
<v Speaker 10>New South Wales Police, ask me questions, what my members

0:28:07.150 --> 0:28:08.570
<v Speaker 10>are feeling and how they were feeling at the time.

0:28:09.170 --> 0:28:14.490
<v Speaker 10>I really think that I don't want to slander anybody

0:28:14.530 --> 0:28:16.750
<v Speaker 10>from the Royal Commission, but I think it's really important

0:28:17.030 --> 0:28:20.160
<v Speaker 10>for transparency that that all of these people, we're all heard,

0:28:20.220 --> 0:28:22.899
<v Speaker 10>we all have an opportunity to put something forward that

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:27.790
<v Speaker 10>they can consider. I don't think that what Commissioner Barrett

0:28:27.810 --> 0:28:30.250
<v Speaker 10>would be putting forward, same as Commissioner Lanyon, what he

0:28:30.270 --> 0:28:32.070
<v Speaker 10>would be putting forward, I don't think any of that

0:28:32.109 --> 0:28:34.109
<v Speaker 10>would be irrelevant. I think it would be very relevant.

0:28:36.060 --> 0:28:38.700
<v Speaker 1>In my time working in Canberra, Alex, I've got a

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>bit of an understanding of what your officers do in counter-terrorism,

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>particularly those that are undercover. And I listened carefully to

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>those comments from Mike Burgess, the ASIO boss, to say

0:28:49.140 --> 0:28:51.620
<v Speaker 1>that he warned the government and the government didn't listen.

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:56.220
<v Speaker 1>Morale must be pretty flat after the events of last year.

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:00.780
<v Speaker 10>Look, morale has been pretty flat for a little while.

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:03.900
<v Speaker 10>We continually get asked to do more and the government

0:29:03.940 --> 0:29:07.750
<v Speaker 10>continues to to give the AFP more tasks to do,

0:29:07.830 --> 0:29:10.510
<v Speaker 10>but we're not seeing the increase in funding. We did

0:29:10.570 --> 0:29:13.990
<v Speaker 10>hear about Minister Burke wanting the AFP to solve the

0:29:14.030 --> 0:29:17.130
<v Speaker 10>problems with the illicit tobacco trade. We can't say yes

0:29:17.150 --> 0:29:19.610
<v Speaker 10>to that. We can't do that without a significant injection

0:29:20.050 --> 0:29:23.010
<v Speaker 10>in that space. And we're not just talking about an

0:29:23.050 --> 0:29:26.010
<v Speaker 10>injection of funds. We need resources, we need capability, we

0:29:26.030 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 10>need technology. It comes with a whole gamut of things where.

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 2>We can't just.

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:34.930
<v Speaker 10>turn a switch and it happened overnight. It takes some

0:29:34.970 --> 0:29:37.690
<v Speaker 10>time to build up to that capability. So I think

0:29:37.750 --> 0:29:40.180
<v Speaker 10>it's having a significant effect. Well, I know it's having

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:43.300
<v Speaker 10>a significant effect on my members. Psychosocially, members are putting

0:29:43.340 --> 0:29:46.500
<v Speaker 10>in more hours away from their families than ever before

0:29:46.980 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 10>in order to keep the Australian community safe. And they're

0:29:49.500 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 10>not feeling as though they're getting the respect or the

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:54.900
<v Speaker 10>love that they need from the government for that.

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:59.209
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for your frank comments, Alex Kawana. Thank you

0:29:59.250 --> 0:30:02.209
<v Speaker 1>again for joining me Thursday night and again tonight. All right,

0:30:02.230 --> 0:30:04.260
<v Speaker 1>after the break, I'll get into those comments from the

0:30:04.300 --> 0:30:07.340
<v Speaker 1>ASIO boss, Mike Burgess, in a moment, but also veterans.

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:09.719
<v Speaker 1>I tell you, when you see them lay down their

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>medals out the front of Parliament House because they cannot

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>accept the government's changes to their allied health, well, it

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>says everything, doesn't it? That minister's still in his job, though.

0:30:20.340 --> 0:30:29.150
<v Speaker 1>Good on the Prime Minister. After the break. Welcome back. Well,

0:30:29.170 --> 0:30:32.110
<v Speaker 1>you heard that conversation just before with the AFP union

0:30:32.390 --> 0:30:36.210
<v Speaker 1>about police at the front line of the illicit tobacco fight. Well,

0:30:36.390 --> 0:30:39.680
<v Speaker 1>border force too. Staff are raising the alarm on staff

0:30:39.740 --> 0:30:42.980
<v Speaker 1>cuts and their inability to fight the illegal trade. The

0:30:43.020 --> 0:30:46.020
<v Speaker 1>treasurer says, got to all do more, doesn't he? But

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>now to those revelations from ASIO boss, Mike Burgess, revealing

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:53.110
<v Speaker 1>his profound frustration that repeated warnings about the threat of

0:30:53.170 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>antisemitism have that it posed to Australia prior to Bondi

0:30:56.820 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>went unheeded. He says he was concerned about the trajectory

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of Australia's threat environment and he made it known publicly. Now,

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a matter of deep regret, he says, but security

0:31:08.100 --> 0:31:11.660
<v Speaker 1>was a shared responsibility. Others should have taken up the

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.610
<v Speaker 1>call for action. So they should have. Joining me now

0:31:14.620 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to discuss this and more, veteran Veteran, of course, and

0:31:17.580 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Shadow Minister for Defence Personnel, Phil Thompson. Phil, we know

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>we went from probability of, sorry, a possibility of a

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>terror attack in the lead up to probable, so possible

0:31:30.220 --> 0:31:34.850
<v Speaker 1>to probable. Probable is basically all but likely. And Burgess

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:39.270
<v Speaker 1>says he made his concerns known to government, but not

0:31:39.310 --> 0:31:42.790
<v Speaker 1>enough was done and not enough was listened to from

0:31:42.830 --> 0:31:46.820
<v Speaker 1>the head of our Domestic Intelligence Authority, What does that

0:31:46.930 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>say to you?

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 11>It says it's been a complete failure of government. And

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 11>Mike Burgess said that he said it publicly. He made

0:31:56.580 --> 0:31:58.980
<v Speaker 11>his comments public. Well, he also would have said it

0:31:59.020 --> 0:32:04.219
<v Speaker 11>privately to his minister and to the government. And for

0:32:04.260 --> 0:32:07.060
<v Speaker 11>him now to say that it's regrettable and more action

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:09.990
<v Speaker 11>should have been taken, that is all well and good,

0:32:10.030 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 11>but people lost their lives. People were killed. Now, there

0:32:12.910 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 11>needs to be very transparent recollection of exactly what was

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 11>said to government and why they didn't do what they

0:32:20.620 --> 0:32:23.620
<v Speaker 11>were told. And if they did do everything they think

0:32:23.660 --> 0:32:25.740
<v Speaker 11>they should have, then where was the failure? Because we

0:32:25.770 --> 0:32:27.690
<v Speaker 11>shouldn't be seeing terrorist attacks happen on our shores.

0:32:29.130 --> 0:32:31.250
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, Burgess, at least front of the Royal Commission,

0:32:31.630 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the head of the AFP was not called to give

0:32:33.980 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>public evidence. The Prime Minister hasn't been there, the Home

0:32:36.940 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Affairs Minister, the Attorney-General, no state or federal police minister either.

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 1>How is that credible?

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:48.730
<v Speaker 11>It's not, and it doesn't paint a transparency of the

0:32:48.770 --> 0:32:51.530
<v Speaker 11>government at all. And the Prime Minister, through all of

0:32:51.590 --> 0:32:55.979
<v Speaker 11>his ministers, including the head of the AFP, should be

0:32:56.060 --> 0:32:59.980
<v Speaker 11>fronting a Royal Commission because they must answer stuff under oath,

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 11>they must tell the truth, and the Australian people deserve

0:33:02.540 --> 0:33:07.420
<v Speaker 11>answers to understand exactly what occurred, what knowledge was passed

0:33:07.530 --> 0:33:11.290
<v Speaker 11>on and where the failure was because not just the victims'

0:33:11.370 --> 0:33:15.570
<v Speaker 11>families deserve to hear that, but also the Australian public

0:33:15.870 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 11>should have faith in its security agencies, the AFP, as

0:33:19.930 --> 0:33:20.900
<v Speaker 11>well as their government.

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>And sadly.

0:33:22.350 --> 0:33:24.830
<v Speaker 11>We're seeing more and more people around the country lose

0:33:24.890 --> 0:33:28.650
<v Speaker 11>faith of politicians, of their government, because of acts like this.

0:33:29.050 --> 0:33:31.350
<v Speaker 11>The Prime Minister should be saying, I will be there

0:33:31.750 --> 0:33:34.310
<v Speaker 11>and my ministers will be there and we'll be fronting up,

0:33:34.370 --> 0:33:36.190
<v Speaker 11>sitting down, and that's what leadership is.

0:33:37.730 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Morrison, Turnbull, Gillard, Rudd, John Howard, all of them

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:46.490
<v Speaker 1>have fronted a Royal Commission when asked. They've made themselves available.

0:33:46.530 --> 0:33:48.870
<v Speaker 1>And we're not talking about losses of life there broadly.

0:33:49.290 --> 0:33:51.470
<v Speaker 1>We were, of course, with Pink Bat. Sadly, three young

0:33:51.510 --> 0:33:54.350
<v Speaker 1>men lost their lives. But this is a terror attack,

0:33:54.730 --> 0:33:58.209
<v Speaker 1>the worst ever terror attack, our shortest ever or one

0:33:58.250 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of our shortest ever royal commissions, and no-one who really

0:34:01.910 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 1>makes the big calls, who allocates the resources, who makes

0:34:05.340 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the decisions, has fronted.

0:34:07.180 --> 0:34:10.140
<v Speaker 5>It just.

0:34:10.219 --> 0:34:13.860
<v Speaker 11>It's unfathomable because... The Prime Minister, he should be leading

0:34:13.900 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 11>the charge in leadership here and he needs to face

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:20.299
<v Speaker 11>up to a Royal Commission and answer hard questions and

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 11>we need to find out exactly what's happening. A terror

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 11>attack at this scale anywhere in the world would have

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.950
<v Speaker 11>scrutiny all over it and I don't care what colour

0:34:29.969 --> 0:34:33.350
<v Speaker 11>shirt is in politics. If you're the leader of the

0:34:33.390 --> 0:34:34.770
<v Speaker 11>day and you're in charge.

0:34:34.989 --> 0:34:38.810
<v Speaker 1>You front up. Spot on. All right, well, talk to

0:34:38.870 --> 0:34:42.630
<v Speaker 1>me about your veterans out today. the front of Parliament House,

0:34:43.310 --> 0:34:45.910
<v Speaker 1>I think it's heartbreaking to see veterans put their medals down,

0:34:46.570 --> 0:34:49.569
<v Speaker 1>that they can't with pride wear those medals that we

0:34:49.590 --> 0:34:53.310
<v Speaker 1>as Australians want to give to them, to honour them,

0:34:53.370 --> 0:34:56.129
<v Speaker 1>to decorate them for their service, but they're down there

0:34:56.170 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 1>on the ground because they don't have faith with the

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>politicians in that building and the way in which they've

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>promised them the world on deployment and then treat them

0:35:05.020 --> 0:35:09.879
<v Speaker 1>like rubbish when they need them most. It breaks my heart.

0:35:10.630 --> 0:35:14.590
<v Speaker 11>To see veterans and family members stand out at the

0:35:14.630 --> 0:35:16.550
<v Speaker 11>front of Parliament House and place their medals.

0:35:16.370 --> 0:35:16.870
<v Speaker 1>On the ground.

0:35:17.489 --> 0:35:23.779
<v Speaker 11>But it's that serious. We're talking about this cap, $ 5, 000

0:35:22.700 --> 0:35:25.879
<v Speaker 11>cap for allied health. I honestly believe people will die

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:29.020
<v Speaker 11>because of this. And the Prime Minister, in all of

0:35:29.060 --> 0:35:33.420
<v Speaker 11>his statements, doesn't answer the question. The Minister for Veterans

0:35:33.460 --> 0:35:35.819
<v Speaker 11>Affairs is clearly out of his depth and shouldn't hold

0:35:35.860 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 11>the position. But once again, we're seeing a failure of

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 11>leadership from the Prime Minister. He should sack the Minister

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:44.180
<v Speaker 11>and scrap the cap. But right now, we've got veterans

0:35:44.219 --> 0:35:47.359
<v Speaker 11>travelling on their own purse, their own money, or from

0:35:47.390 --> 0:35:48.580
<v Speaker 11>all around the country to come.

0:35:48.450 --> 0:35:49.259
<v Speaker 1>Here and beg.

0:35:49.660 --> 0:35:52.070
<v Speaker 11>And that shouldn't be happening because less we forget is

0:35:52.110 --> 0:35:52.969
<v Speaker 11>more than words to me.

0:35:53.230 --> 0:35:58.410
<v Speaker 1>It's a commitment. This is not going away, is it? No,

0:35:58.630 --> 0:36:02.799
<v Speaker 1>and nor should it. Good on you, mate. And just quickly,

0:36:02.930 --> 0:36:07.010
<v Speaker 1>the announcement yesterday from the Coalition, penalties for burning the flag,

0:36:07.210 --> 0:36:11.700
<v Speaker 1>for desecrating war memorials, and also, I think, really importantly,

0:36:11.739 --> 0:36:17.169
<v Speaker 1>enshrining January 26 in law as Australia's National Day.

0:36:18.950 --> 0:36:21.790
<v Speaker 11>I've been trying to get the flag burning to be

0:36:21.930 --> 0:36:25.689
<v Speaker 11>a criminal offence now for several years from the back

0:36:25.730 --> 0:36:28.069
<v Speaker 11>end of government all through opposition, and so I'm really

0:36:28.110 --> 0:36:31.370
<v Speaker 11>glad we've put this bill together, enshrining Australia Day. It's

0:36:31.390 --> 0:36:34.180
<v Speaker 11>an important day for our nation, making sure that if

0:36:34.219 --> 0:36:36.020
<v Speaker 11>you desecrate.

0:36:35.780 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Our war memorials, you will be punished.

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:40.060
<v Speaker 11>And we need to start having some national pride here,

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 11>and this is what this bill will do.

0:36:42.739 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 1>Just quickly, give me the argument why not being able

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:50.230
<v Speaker 1>to burn the flag... and I don't like the flag

0:36:50.250 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 1>being burned, is not an infringement on free speech. Because

0:36:54.180 --> 0:36:57.060
<v Speaker 1>the argument on the other side from libertarians is it's

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:59.940
<v Speaker 1>an infringement on free speech. Shouldn't happen. We don't like

0:36:59.980 --> 0:37:02.100
<v Speaker 1>to see it happen. But that is a right in

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:04.780
<v Speaker 1>a free country. Give me the alternative argument.

0:37:06.219 --> 0:37:09.380
<v Speaker 11>So I don't think free speech goes to burning of

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:12.980
<v Speaker 11>a flag, graffitiing a war memorial. I think that is

0:37:13.380 --> 0:37:17.069
<v Speaker 11>too far. We drape the Australian flag over the coffins

0:37:17.110 --> 0:37:20.069
<v Speaker 11>of those that have been killed in battle. This means

0:37:20.110 --> 0:37:23.750
<v Speaker 11>something to our nation and it's also a flag that

0:37:23.790 --> 0:37:27.010
<v Speaker 11>is much more than fabric. It brings us together. It's

0:37:27.030 --> 0:37:29.650
<v Speaker 11>what glues us. So I think you can have your

0:37:29.690 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 11>free speech, you can be upset, you can say what

0:37:31.620 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 11>you need to do, you can protest and march, but

0:37:33.840 --> 0:37:35.819
<v Speaker 11>you can't put torch to our flag.

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:41.020
<v Speaker 1>Powerfully said, Phil Thompson. Thank you. All right, after the break,

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:45.009
<v Speaker 1>the One Nation leader, Pauline Hanson, and her embattled Victorian

0:37:45.050 --> 0:37:47.469
<v Speaker 1>leader will talk to James Ashby and more. And we'll

0:37:47.510 --> 0:37:50.730
<v Speaker 1>also look at this issue of a breakdown at the

0:37:50.790 --> 0:37:54.290
<v Speaker 1>borders with staff, not enough of them, keeping us safe.

0:38:00.300 --> 0:38:02.260
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to those claims in relation to the one

0:38:02.420 --> 0:38:07.259
<v Speaker 1>leader in Victoria about historic drug use claims. Claims, that's

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:09.940
<v Speaker 1>all they are now. But let's go now to warnings

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:14.100
<v Speaker 1>from veteran Australian Border Force officers who said understaffing, the

0:38:14.140 --> 0:38:18.020
<v Speaker 1>loss of experienced staff and weak intelligence capabilities have crippled

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:22.590
<v Speaker 1>the government's fight against illicit tobacco. despite more than $ 350

0:38:21.890 --> 0:38:25.410
<v Speaker 1>million in funding. In Question Time today, Tony Burke tried

0:38:25.469 --> 0:38:29.290
<v Speaker 1>to tell us that law enforcement not cutting the excise

0:38:29.530 --> 0:38:32.490
<v Speaker 1>was key to ending organised crime.

0:38:33.290 --> 0:38:37.610
<v Speaker 6>You still have a massive price differential between what organised

0:38:37.670 --> 0:38:39.010
<v Speaker 6>crime are able to do.

0:38:39.350 --> 0:38:41.470
<v Speaker 1>And what would be available in a shop.

0:38:42.130 --> 0:38:45.590
<v Speaker 6>That is why the way to deal with this has

0:38:45.610 --> 0:38:47.410
<v Speaker 6>to be through law enforcement.

0:38:49.070 --> 0:38:50.310
<v Speaker 1>I think he needs to get out of his office

0:38:50.330 --> 0:38:52.250
<v Speaker 1>and get into a tobacco shop like I have in

0:38:52.290 --> 0:38:55.250
<v Speaker 1>recent days. And, yeah, you'll see what's really happening out

0:38:55.290 --> 0:38:58.030
<v Speaker 1>there in Australia. Here to discuss this and more, journalist

0:38:58.070 --> 0:39:01.189
<v Speaker 1>at The Australian, Mohamed Al-Farez. Mohamed, thank you for your time.

0:39:01.270 --> 0:39:05.140
<v Speaker 1>This is your story. And I was staggered that so

0:39:05.180 --> 0:39:10.279
<v Speaker 1>many insiders in the border force area have become so

0:39:10.400 --> 0:39:14.859
<v Speaker 1>open about the critical staff shortages and the frontline resourcing

0:39:14.940 --> 0:39:18.630
<v Speaker 1>being cut. This is damning for the government.

0:39:19.730 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, the problem is that claim of, you know, tracking

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:28.850
<v Speaker 5>organised crime, it doesn't really line up with what law

0:39:28.890 --> 0:39:33.460
<v Speaker 5>enforcement itself is saying. The Australian Border Force has, you know,

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 5>recently told an inquiry that enforcement alone cannot solve this

0:39:37.580 --> 0:39:42.899
<v Speaker 5>tobacco problem. And, you know, the Australian Federal Police Federation

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.900
<v Speaker 5>also warned that police can't simply arrest their way out

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:49.670
<v Speaker 5>of this crisis. And, you know, They're saying the underlying

0:39:49.870 --> 0:39:53.910
<v Speaker 5>policy settings, including the tobacco excise, have to be addressed.

0:39:54.930 --> 0:39:58.210
<v Speaker 5>So if the government genuinely says it's taking advice from

0:39:58.250 --> 0:40:02.089
<v Speaker 5>law enforcement, the question is, how does it reconcile that

0:40:02.290 --> 0:40:06.710
<v Speaker 5>with the repeated warnings from those agencies that enforcement on

0:40:06.770 --> 0:40:07.770
<v Speaker 5>its own isn't going to work?

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's all the stuff that you had in

0:40:12.020 --> 0:40:15.589
<v Speaker 1>your story, insiders blowing the whistle, but it's everything we

0:40:15.610 --> 0:40:17.990
<v Speaker 1>see on the news most nights. I mean, if you

0:40:18.010 --> 0:40:21.149
<v Speaker 1>live in Victoria, there's a fire bombing at least once

0:40:21.230 --> 0:40:25.230
<v Speaker 1>or twice a week. We've got whole shopping strips being

0:40:25.290 --> 0:40:30.469
<v Speaker 1>taken out. We've got now... Allegations of people being contract

0:40:30.570 --> 0:40:34.990
<v Speaker 1>killed in New South Wales are wrong individuals being killed.

0:40:35.750 --> 0:40:38.629
<v Speaker 1>We're told the money's being parceled out to young people

0:40:38.670 --> 0:40:40.899
<v Speaker 1>who are taking on these jobs and it all goes

0:40:40.980 --> 0:40:43.620
<v Speaker 1>back to the movement of drugs and the movement of

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:48.440
<v Speaker 1>illicit tobacco and organised crime. Yeah, that's right.

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:52.259
<v Speaker 5>And, you know, the evidence is what's happening right now.

0:40:52.950 --> 0:40:56.780
<v Speaker 5>We've had years of increasingly strong enforcement, yet the illicit

0:40:56.800 --> 0:40:59.779
<v Speaker 5>tobacco market is still thriving, crime is rising, and we're

0:40:59.820 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 5>seeing more firebombings. And, you know, it's 300 firebombings this year,

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:09.140
<v Speaker 5>over the year, sorry. So the question is whether we

0:41:09.180 --> 0:41:12.830
<v Speaker 5>keep doing more of the same and expecting a different result.

0:41:15.060 --> 0:41:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Last time I spoke to you, we talked about Dr Jihad,

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of course, a man imprisoned with connections to ISIS in Iraq,

0:41:22.000 --> 0:41:23.500
<v Speaker 1>and you reported on, I think it was him and

0:41:23.540 --> 0:41:28.100
<v Speaker 1>another 12, 13 all-up Australians there. There was a story

0:41:28.140 --> 0:41:31.379
<v Speaker 1>last week that he's about to face what we think

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:35.880
<v Speaker 1>will be a mass trial in Iraq and that Baghdad

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is urging countries to, quote, take responsibility for their nationals.

0:41:39.540 --> 0:41:40.440
<v Speaker 1>So does this mean.

0:41:43.930 --> 0:41:47.410
<v Speaker 1>That if he is, let's say, sentenced, he'll come back

0:41:47.450 --> 0:41:50.129
<v Speaker 1>to Australia to serve his sentence. If he's released, he'll

0:41:50.190 --> 0:41:53.210
<v Speaker 1>ask to come back to Australia. Have you got an

0:41:53.330 --> 0:41:54.130
<v Speaker 1>update for us?

0:41:55.489 --> 0:42:00.230
<v Speaker 8>So last we've heard is that Iraq has finalised their

0:42:00.270 --> 0:42:06.350
<v Speaker 8>investigations into more than 5,700 ISIS suspects, and among those,

0:42:06.410 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 8>of course, are what we believe is 13 Australians.

0:42:10.940 --> 0:42:14.919
<v Speaker 5>Now, whether Dr Jihad receives a death sentence, we know

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:19.930
<v Speaker 5>where Australia stands with capital punishment. So potentially that could

0:42:19.969 --> 0:42:22.310
<v Speaker 5>lead to an intervention. But what we do know is

0:42:22.370 --> 0:42:28.489
<v Speaker 5>that the embassy in Iraq is following these cases closely. And,

0:42:29.330 --> 0:42:32.730
<v Speaker 5>you know, we expect these trials to happen soon and

0:42:32.770 --> 0:42:34.590
<v Speaker 5>we're keeping a very close eye on it.

0:42:36.219 --> 0:42:39.100
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'll look for your byline in the Australian, Mohamed,

0:42:39.140 --> 0:42:40.969
<v Speaker 1>and we're like, We'll follow it then and have you

0:42:40.989 --> 0:42:43.070
<v Speaker 1>back on the program. Thank you for your time again tonight.

0:42:43.730 --> 0:42:45.910
<v Speaker 1>All right, after the break, we'll get to those allegations

0:42:45.950 --> 0:42:48.670
<v Speaker 1>against One Nation Leader after the break with James Ashby.

0:42:48.710 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 1>But the academics warning on migration. He says you have

0:42:53.120 --> 0:42:58.460
<v Speaker 1>to stop people from applying onshore to change their visa type. Well,

0:42:58.900 --> 0:43:01.190
<v Speaker 1>I've been saying that for a couple of years. Bring

0:43:01.210 --> 0:43:09.430
<v Speaker 1>it on. My panel after the break. Let's get straight

0:43:09.450 --> 0:43:11.370
<v Speaker 1>into it with my panel. Let's bring them in. Former

0:43:11.390 --> 0:43:14.500
<v Speaker 1>Liberal MP Nicole Flint and One Nation Nationals Director now,

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:18.239
<v Speaker 1>James Ashby. Well, let's go to the issues around Warren

0:43:18.380 --> 0:43:20.819
<v Speaker 1>Pickering today, if I can. Lawyers have been called in

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:24.980
<v Speaker 1>to defend One Nation's Victorian leader after his former partner

0:43:25.020 --> 0:43:28.700
<v Speaker 1>of 18 years accused him of taking illicit drugs when

0:43:28.739 --> 0:43:33.430
<v Speaker 1>they were together. His ex-partner's testimony has been described as

0:43:33.650 --> 0:43:40.709
<v Speaker 1>unreliable by lawyers and Mr Pickering denies these historical... Will

0:43:40.770 --> 0:43:44.290
<v Speaker 1>James put this into context 20 or so years ago

0:43:44.310 --> 0:43:48.109
<v Speaker 1>and he has lived a big life after he left

0:43:48.170 --> 0:43:53.290
<v Speaker 1>this partner? Are these reasonable questions? Do people deserve him

0:43:53.370 --> 0:43:57.529
<v Speaker 1>to deal with them and respond and perhaps get them

0:43:57.570 --> 0:43:58.150
<v Speaker 1>out of the way?

0:44:00.239 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 12>Well, as you know, some of these are difficult to

0:44:02.739 --> 0:44:05.100
<v Speaker 12>respond to because of the family law court and I

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:06.899
<v Speaker 12>don't want to be found in contempt. I don't think

0:44:06.940 --> 0:44:10.489
<v Speaker 12>you do either. because a lot of these allegations were

0:44:11.090 --> 0:44:14.469
<v Speaker 12>put before the family law court some decades ago. And

0:44:15.950 --> 0:44:19.469
<v Speaker 12>you have to consider he was given sole custody of

0:44:19.510 --> 0:44:23.819
<v Speaker 12>the kids. So courts don't typically give men sole custody

0:44:24.050 --> 0:44:27.100
<v Speaker 12>of their daughter or the two youngest kids there for

0:44:27.140 --> 0:44:31.420
<v Speaker 12>a period. You know, he's had this delivered twice from

0:44:31.460 --> 0:44:35.219
<v Speaker 12>a judge where he's had that sole custody. So And

0:44:35.280 --> 0:44:39.210
<v Speaker 12>I will say this as well. Our Defence Force, he

0:44:39.230 --> 0:44:44.290
<v Speaker 12>spent a long time in defence. He's been negatively, what's

0:44:44.510 --> 0:44:46.490
<v Speaker 12>the terminology they use there?

0:44:46.550 --> 0:44:47.230
<v Speaker 1>Negative vetting.

0:44:47.630 --> 0:44:51.350
<v Speaker 12>So he's been through all that process. He's well trusted

0:44:51.410 --> 0:44:54.270
<v Speaker 12>by our Defence Force. Why shouldn't One Nation and the

0:44:54.310 --> 0:44:55.730
<v Speaker 12>people of Victoria trust this man?

0:44:57.630 --> 0:45:00.010
<v Speaker 1>Good point. And I will concur with you on negative vetting.

0:45:00.030 --> 0:45:02.569
<v Speaker 1>If there's something there, they certainly pick that up and

0:45:02.590 --> 0:45:06.919
<v Speaker 1>deal with it. Nicole, I think more broadly, if people

0:45:06.960 --> 0:45:09.339
<v Speaker 1>are upfront about their history, I think the world's very

0:45:09.380 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 1>different now and people live a life in social media

0:45:11.640 --> 0:45:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and many things before they run in politics. I look

0:45:14.420 --> 0:45:16.819
<v Speaker 1>at the case of the Secret Harbour by-election there where

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:20.310
<v Speaker 1>the gym owner you know, had a colourful past, if

0:45:20.350 --> 0:45:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I can call it that. But a lot of voters

0:45:23.100 --> 0:45:26.160
<v Speaker 1>are saying, well, not much different than me. And I

0:45:26.200 --> 0:45:29.650
<v Speaker 1>want someone like me to represent me in the parliament.

0:45:29.730 --> 0:45:31.250
<v Speaker 1>Do you think this matters as much anymore?

0:45:32.710 --> 0:45:35.810
<v Speaker 9>Well, I'd make three points about this, Peter. First of all,

0:45:35.850 --> 0:45:39.989
<v Speaker 9>these are really serious allegations and obviously they are allegations.

0:45:40.930 --> 0:45:43.489
<v Speaker 9>One nation, like all political parties, has challenges when it

0:45:43.530 --> 0:45:46.250
<v Speaker 9>comes to vetting people. It's one of the biggest challenges,

0:45:46.330 --> 0:45:50.469
<v Speaker 9>I think, when you're dealing with candidates. Secondly, I would

0:45:50.489 --> 0:45:53.330
<v Speaker 9>also say I think that it's up to voters and

0:45:53.390 --> 0:45:55.890
<v Speaker 9>voters will make the decision, they'll read the stories, they'll

0:45:55.930 --> 0:45:57.950
<v Speaker 9>make up their own minds and choose who they think

0:45:57.969 --> 0:46:00.490
<v Speaker 9>is best to represent them. But what I would like

0:46:00.550 --> 0:46:04.660
<v Speaker 9>to see... in every single state parliament and the federal

0:46:04.680 --> 0:46:08.410
<v Speaker 9>parliament every single day for every single person walking into

0:46:08.450 --> 0:46:13.350
<v Speaker 9>those buildings is drug testing for illegal drugs because there

0:46:13.430 --> 0:46:16.690
<v Speaker 9>is no place for drugs in our parliaments.

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:19.239
<v Speaker 1>James, what do you think of that one?

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:23.580
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, 100%. I agree. The amount of drunks we've got

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:26.900
<v Speaker 12>on our parliament floor at a federal level and state level,

0:46:26.980 --> 0:46:30.340
<v Speaker 12>they shouldn't be in that condition when passing legislation. So

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:32.420
<v Speaker 12>I 100% agree. If you want to be a politician,

0:46:32.440 --> 0:46:35.340
<v Speaker 12>you should be randomly drug tested on a regular basis.

0:46:35.420 --> 0:46:37.880
<v Speaker 12>And it's a lottery. Pull the names out of a

0:46:37.900 --> 0:46:40.100
<v Speaker 12>hat and off you go. I reckon there'd be quite

0:46:40.120 --> 0:46:42.479
<v Speaker 12>a few that fail at a federal and state level.

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:45.100
<v Speaker 12>And the problem is a lot of this drug use

0:46:45.140 --> 0:46:49.420
<v Speaker 12>we wouldn't even know is going on because it's everywhere

0:46:49.460 --> 0:46:50.540
<v Speaker 12>in society today.

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:51.560
<v Speaker 2>And we know that.

0:46:51.660 --> 0:46:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Why?

0:46:51.940 --> 0:46:56.060
<v Speaker 12>Because they're doing tests of our sewage treatment plants regularly.

0:46:56.390 --> 0:46:59.830
<v Speaker 12>And we're finding the wealthier the suburb, the more expensive

0:46:59.870 --> 0:47:03.690
<v Speaker 12>drugs that are being used, the lower socioeconomic suburbs, yeah,

0:47:03.730 --> 0:47:06.310
<v Speaker 12>you're finding a lot of pot and smack and other

0:47:06.750 --> 0:47:10.029
<v Speaker 12>different drugs out there. So, look, society is awash with

0:47:10.070 --> 0:47:12.830
<v Speaker 12>this stuff. I'd love to get it off the streets altogether.

0:47:13.350 --> 0:47:15.649
<v Speaker 12>And I think that if you ask Warren Pickering, he's

0:47:15.670 --> 0:47:19.509
<v Speaker 12>the same. Look, I don't know too many people. I'll

0:47:19.530 --> 0:47:21.550
<v Speaker 12>be honest with you. I haven't tried marijuana when I

0:47:21.570 --> 0:47:22.230
<v Speaker 12>was 15.

0:47:22.230 --> 0:47:23.470
<v Speaker 1>Am I an angel? No, I'm not.

0:47:23.989 --> 0:47:26.240
<v Speaker 12>And I reckon most people, if they're honest with themselves,

0:47:26.300 --> 0:47:28.460
<v Speaker 12>will say, yeah, I might have tried drugs when I

0:47:28.500 --> 0:47:31.620
<v Speaker 12>was younger. It's a different story when you're in your

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 12>40s and you've lived two decades working for defence and

0:47:36.300 --> 0:47:40.280
<v Speaker 12>living a moral life. We do silly things as kids

0:47:40.560 --> 0:47:43.820
<v Speaker 12>or as young adults. I'm not suggesting anyone's perfect. I

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:46.820
<v Speaker 12>don't think anyone on this panel's perfect. So, look, I

0:47:46.860 --> 0:47:49.529
<v Speaker 12>think that's the difference between One Nation and the other parties.

0:47:50.110 --> 0:47:51.410
<v Speaker 12>We'll at least fess up to that.

0:47:54.030 --> 0:47:56.830
<v Speaker 1>All right, I will admit to never trying drugs, so

0:47:56.870 --> 0:48:00.330
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we should shame anyone who's been, you know,

0:48:00.489 --> 0:48:02.990
<v Speaker 1>on the right side of some of these illicit things.

0:48:03.070 --> 0:48:05.739
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, let's go to the Daily Telegraph story. Ben

0:48:05.780 --> 0:48:09.900
<v Speaker 1>Robert Smith's lawyers, they are costing a lot less, Nicole,

0:48:10.420 --> 0:48:14.860
<v Speaker 1>than the Commonwealth lawyers in the same trial. I smell

0:48:14.920 --> 0:48:17.460
<v Speaker 1>a rat here. Absolutely.

0:48:17.560 --> 0:48:20.540
<v Speaker 9>The Commonwealth is supposed to be a model litigant. They

0:48:20.600 --> 0:48:24.040
<v Speaker 9>are not supposed to out-muscle people who do not have

0:48:24.160 --> 0:48:28.470
<v Speaker 9>the same resources. And so not only is it a day-by-day,

0:48:29.930 --> 0:48:32.890
<v Speaker 9>un-level playing field, it's also the fact that the Commonwealth

0:48:32.930 --> 0:48:36.589
<v Speaker 9>has spent, what, $ 300 million pursuing one of our most

0:48:36.660 --> 0:48:39.379
<v Speaker 9>decorated war heroes. It is an absolute disgrace, and we've

0:48:39.400 --> 0:48:42.000
<v Speaker 9>seen this too much from the Albanese government. whether it's

0:48:42.080 --> 0:48:45.160
<v Speaker 9>Linda Reynolds, Fiona Brown and now Ben Robert Smith, it

0:48:45.219 --> 0:48:48.460
<v Speaker 9>is disgusting and we should actually legislate to prevent the

0:48:48.520 --> 0:48:51.299
<v Speaker 9>Commonwealth from doing this to individuals.

0:48:52.489 --> 0:48:54.010
<v Speaker 1>I will leave it there. I'm out of time. Thank

0:48:54.030 --> 0:48:56.989
<v Speaker 1>you to you both. And I want to send condolences

0:48:57.050 --> 0:49:00.710
<v Speaker 1>to the wonderful Katzenbarnes family. Kiralee, you see her here

0:49:00.750 --> 0:49:04.430
<v Speaker 1>every Thursday. She lost her beautiful husband, Peter, at the

0:49:04.450 --> 0:49:07.230
<v Speaker 1>end of last week. He was a parliamentarian in Victoria

0:49:07.890 --> 0:49:09.890
<v Speaker 1>and in WA. I'll have something more to say about

0:49:09.910 --> 0:49:12.290
<v Speaker 1>that tomorrow. That's it. Here's the BOM program.