WEBVTT - The Rita Panahi Show | 5 September

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>On Scorne Lives Australia.

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 2>This is the Reader Panalty Show.

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Good evening and welcome to the Reader Panety Show.

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 4>Coming up tonight, Climate catastrophus and anti Israel crusader Greta

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 4>Blumberg under fire for her latest.

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Active incoherent activism.

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:24.440
<v Speaker 4>The Kamala Harris honeymoon looks to be coming to an end.

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 3>I'll speak to Kosher Gator about that and much more.

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 4>Kinsey Schofield later in the hour with the latest royal

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 4>and celebrity news, and I'll speak to a man making

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 4>a real difference at the Cold Face working with the

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 4>growing number of homeless people in Melbourne and Sydney and

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 4>Lefti's Losing It features several Democrat soy boys and MSNBC

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 4>Hack and Our Faith, CNN propagandis is back.

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 5>What if folks in the reality based reality beat reality

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 5>based media do in the coming week? Trump made a

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 5>committed Teresa You said the president is using mind control.

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 6>What does putin on Trump?

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 4>Let's start with a fantastic piece from Robert gob Leeson

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 4>in Today's Australian where he talks about the country's economic

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 4>woes intensifying further with yesterday's GDP figures showing we're heading

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 4>for a.

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Repeat of stagflation.

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 4>He says a slow down in consumer spending should have

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 4>substantially reduced inflation, but it failed, and it failed because

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 4>of four key reasons. First, governments have thoughted the impact

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 4>of the RBA's slow down measures by massive spending both

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 4>at state and federal level, funded by borrowing.

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:37.839
<v Speaker 3>Secondly, the government.

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 4>Encouraged wage rises across the board, trying to end the

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 4>cost of living problems, but in turn this further pushed

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 4>up prices given all that government spending. Thirdly, Australia is

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 4>being turned from one of the lowest cost energy countries

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 4>to one of the highest in the world. And finally,

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 4>we have introduced industrial relations legislation with the specific aim

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 4>to increase costs and lower productivity. Joining me now is

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 4>mensies A Research Center Senior Fellow and Danube Institute visiting.

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Fellow Nick Kita.

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 4>Nick, it appears our economic woes are almost entirely self inflicted,

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:26.239
<v Speaker 4>from the daft energy policies to inflation inducing spending policies.

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 7>Indeed, inflation always and everywhere begins in Canberra when it

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 7>comes to Australia or Washington. In the case of the

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 7>United States government spending and government policy is key to this.

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.239
<v Speaker 7>And yet I haven't at once even heard Charmers come

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 7>close to acknowledge that he could be the problem. And

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 7>the interesting thing is Robert god believes and makes a

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 7>comparison with the nineteen seventy stagflation, and who was Prime

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 7>minister then, GoF Whitlam. GoF Whitlam at least got that

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 7>the government had to cut it spending. And in nineteen

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 7>seventy three he told all the men around the cabinet

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 7>table they were going to travel economy class from now on,

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 7>and the complaint came back allway too important, and he said, well,

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 7>I'm a great man, and I could travel economy class

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 7>all my life and I would still be a great man. You,

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 7>on the other hand, a little men, and you could

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 7>travel in business class all your life and you'll still

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 7>be little men. So it's just an illustration to show

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 7>that he got it. I mean, he didn't actually do

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 7>it much about spending, but in those days people acknowledged

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 7>what Charmers and Albanezi refused to not acknowledge that they

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 7>are the problem. Not Ukraine, they are the problem. They

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 7>are responsible for energy policy, which you say is a

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 7>big part of this and responsible for this enormous level

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 7>of government spending.

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's economics one O one.

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 4>If you pump money into the economy, you're going to

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 4>cause inflation. And they have taken several measures, several policies

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 4>that are just pumping money in and then their shock

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 4>that is isn't coming down even though people are hurting

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 4>and interest rates are biting. It's almost maddening because this

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 4>stuff isn't terribly complicated.

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Now, let's go to the City of Melbourne.

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 4>They've kept secret a report outlining the public's concerns regarding

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 4>the expansion of bike lanes, which former Lord mess Sally

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 4>Cap was pushing hard. The council paid Redbridge, the polling company,

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 4>ninety thousand dollars to conduct a detailed surveys on CAP's plan,

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 4>and while the surveys did find some support for the

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 4>general idea, when it came to operational specifics, the response

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 4>was overwhelmingly negative. Melbournian said the lanes would make it

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 4>harder to drive around the city and would make them

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 4>less likely to visit the CBDA, which incidentally is dying

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 4>in this town. And within weeks of the report being completed,

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 4>Sally Cap did pause her plan to roll out an

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 4>extra forty killing me of CBD by lanes.

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 3>But Nick, this.

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 4>Report was kept hidden until pressure from a freedom of

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:11.279
<v Speaker 4>information request. What impact do you think this is going

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 4>to have on the upcoming maryoral election because the current

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 4>Lord Mayor was Sally CAP's deputy and that's our good friend,

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 4>Nicholas Reese.

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 7>Well, you know the politics of Melbourne City Council better

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 7>than I do. But look it sounds to me as

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 7>if the rate players of Melbourne should get in there

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 7>and eject this mayor right away. Sorry Nicholas, but you

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 7>have to go. You've become you've joined the Zelots when

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 7>it comes to cycle tracks. Let me say, reader, I

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 7>am a great enthusiast for cycle tracks, at least I

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 7>used to be before the Zelot's got control of it.

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 7>Margaret Thatcher incidentally starting to introduce them in Britain on

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 7>the simple logic that if you put people on a

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 7>bicycle it takes up a lot less road space than

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 7>a car. But the trouble is you've got these people

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 7>in charge, you don't understand how to build bike lanes,

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 7>to put them in appropriate places, and it ends up

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 7>slowing down the traffic, Whereas the only justification for putting

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 7>bikes bike lanes in is if it speeds up the

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 7>traffic by taking cars off the roads. If you can't

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 7>do that, that is the measure, because that's how business

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 7>needs to measure productivity. Whether delivery vans can get into

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 7>the city easy in cheaply. All this, in the end

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 7>goes back to the consumers and the prices we pay.

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 7>If we make it hard for delivery vans and don't

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 7>make it hard for business, well that.

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Is a huge issue in itself.

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 4>If you speak to the traders getting any sort of

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 4>deliveries into the CBD, it becomes very problematic indeed, and

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 4>they are.

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Just hostile to cars.

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 4>The Council has been hostile to cars for a long

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 4>time and the traders are suffering because of it. Now,

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 4>let's talk about Greta thun Work the Swedish climate activists.

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 4>She was arrested during a pro Palestinian demonstration in Copenhagen yesterday,

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 4>and she and her fellow activists were protesting against the

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 4>University of Copenhagen for cooporating with Israel. Israeli academics and

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 4>institutions but the products of this corporation, Nick are things

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 4>like studies into climate change and global warming prevention with

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 4>the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Seems like Greta's hatred of

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 4>Israel is stronger than her supposed love for the environment.

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, exactly, red that you could go. We could fill

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 7>dozens of shows with Jenna Thumberg's hypocrisy before we even

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 7>start on the hypocrisy of the rest of them. Does

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 7>she not see the irony that she's been arrested for

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 7>trying to occupy a university campus. When I thought this

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 7>were against occupations, I thought that was the whole thing

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 7>was about. But anyway, she's been arrested, and she's probably

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 7>got what she wanted because these, after all, they're not

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 7>demonstrations deliberately trying to aim some and some sort of

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 7>what they see as evil, because there is no evil,

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 7>and they don't understand the situation anyway. What they're all about,

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 7>of course, is drawing attention to themselves. So being arrested

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 7>by two burly Copenhagen policemen seems to be playing right

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 7>into her books. Pictures of her being pulled along. Yeah,

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 7>I hope they keep her in for a while actually

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 7>just let her reflect on how stupid she's been.

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 4>Well, it seems to be her full time occupation, just

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 4>getting arrested and arrested and released. I don't know what

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 4>else she does with her days, but she seems to

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 4>be more focused on anti Israeli activism at the moment

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 4>than anything else now. Australian supermodel el McPherson announced in

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 4>an interview that her breast cancer is now in clinical remission,

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 4>but her announcement has sparked some controversy after she advocated

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 4>for an alternative treatment method.

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:57.079
<v Speaker 8>Australian supermodel elmcpherson has been blasted by medical experts as

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 8>irresponsible after revealing she refused chemo THEARHAH for breast cancer

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 8>and opted for what she called a holistic approach.

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 9>In her new.

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 10>Memoir, the sixty year old.

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 8>Said she ignored doctors who suggested an aggressive treatment plan

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 8>when she was diagnosed seven years ago, including chemo, radiation,

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 8>hormone therapy and a reconstruction. Instead, she only had a lumpectomy.

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 11>My big issue is that celebrities can have a very

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 11>big voice, and I really urge people out there to

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 11>listen to the medical team around them.

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 6>And follow that advice.

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 8>The fashion star says she's in remission.

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 4>Nick five years ago, I would have joined in the condemnation,

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 4>but I've got to say one hundred percent with her today.

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 4>Trusting in the science in the medical community, I think

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 4>has diminished somewhat after the lunacy we saw from so

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 4>many during COVID, some of the absolutely hair brained things

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 4>we were told to do, and I think that I've

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 4>got a completely different attitude to it.

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested in your take.

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 7>I'm with you on this one, reader, and I probably

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 7>would have said the same as you five years ago,

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 7>but not now. And at first of all, let's say

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 7>that I'm delighted to hear she's in remission, and I

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 7>wish you're all the best. And it's very bold and

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 7>brave move she took, because you know, you know, finding

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 7>other advice is a challenging thing and I'm glad she's

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 7>done it. But it's her choice. And this idea that

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 7>she has to behave differently because she's an actress or

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 7>she's in the public eye, that's just absolute nonsense. And

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 7>you're right, I mean trust in doctors has declined. Opinion

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 7>polls show this, which is dreadful because we should all

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 7>be able to trust our gps, but when they were

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 7>acting under orders, and gps were being sacked for giving

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 7>alternative advice suggesting that, say, a healthy eighteen year old

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 7>probably didn't need to take the vaccine after all, because

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 7>there was no foreseeable risk of them actually, you know,

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 7>dying of COVID. We got all this rubbish, and it's

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 7>contradictory advice, much of which turned to be wrong. There

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 7>is such a thing as vaccine injuries. I've met those

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 7>people and it's tragic. So we ought to at least

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 7>be able to get a second opinion, and under COVID

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 7>we weren't allowed to get a second opinion. It was illegal.

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's not just the vaccines, it's all the measures

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 4>that we saw. So many doctors wholeheartedly pushed. Not all

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 4>of them, I've got to say, there were plenty who

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 4>were against it, and some who did speak out were

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 4>absolutely slammed by segments of the media. But things like

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 4>wearing masks outdoors and confining people indoors when the probably

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 4>the safest place for them to be would be out

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 4>in the sunshine in the fresh air, as opposed to

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 4>being inside where the virus would be circulating.

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 3>There was just so much poor advice.

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 4>Over that period and contradictory advice that they did one

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 4>to eighty flips on.

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I can understand why the trust.

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 4>In those experts isn't what it used to be.

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Niketa, I thank you for your time. Evening, thank you.

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 4>This evening street Side Medics launched in Melbourne, providing free

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 4>healthcare for homeless people. It's the brainchild of a former

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 4>Young Australian of the Year, doctor Daniel Naur, who joins me. Now, Daniel,

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 4>you've been running this operation in Sydney and in.

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 3>New South Wales since twenty twenty.

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 9>Tell me why this.

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Service is necessary.

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:28.559
<v Speaker 4>We've got universal health care, we've got bulk billing. Why

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 4>do we need to have the services you provide at

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 4>on the streets helping homeless people receive medical care.

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, reader, I could talk about this for hours. To

0:12:38.400 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 6>be quite honest with you, there's so many reasons why.

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:44.359
<v Speaker 6>But to start with, there are a number of significant

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 6>and challenging barriers that limit access to healthcare for people

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 6>experiencing homelessess. I am one of the people that believe

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 6>we have probably the best healthcare system in the world,

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 6>but that healthcare system is inaccessible for so many people,

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 6>and for people experiencing homelessess, it's even harder. And the

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 6>barriers are the costs involved, transportation required, the level of

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 6>documentation and Medicare and ID. It's the notion that you

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:11.520
<v Speaker 6>have to be at this place at this time, for

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 6>this duration, at this hour. It's previous negative experiences, it's

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 6>stigma and embarrassment, but also it's health priority. For people

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.559
<v Speaker 6>experiencing homeosists are more likely to be concerned about when

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 6>am I getting my next meal, shelter, security, companionship, and

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 6>not why am I short of breath or why am

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 6>I having chest pains?

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 4>So are you finding people have not had things that

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 4>could be easily remitty checked and they grow into much

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 4>bigger issues for them.

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:44.679
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, absolutely, so primary health care or preventative healthcare is

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 6>really happening. We see people that have had diabetes for

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 6>thirty years and presenting with all the complications. It could

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 6>have been prevented. Or people with hepatitis C that's at

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 6>the acute stage that can lead to soorrhosis, but it

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.680
<v Speaker 6>hasn't been caught, and so really what we try and

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 6>do is provide opportunistic healthcare. We partner with local community

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 6>based organizations that provide food or shelter to people experiencing

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 6>homelessness and we park alongside them. Here in Melbourne, we've

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 6>partnered with the Salvation Army in Burke Street. They've been

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 6>providing a fantastic service for Melbourne for many years. Over

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 6>five hundred meals a day will be served. We'll park

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 6>alongside them and we'll have our vent there, which doesn't

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 6>require Medicare, doesn't require ID, so.

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 4>These people don't need any ID or Medicare or an appointment,

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 4>or you.

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 3>Go to them where they are.

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 4>And we've seen, particularly in this city in Melbourne, the

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 4>homelessness problem grow.

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Is it getting worse?

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 4>And are you finding it difficult to meet the demand

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 4>that's there?

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Look, there is no doubt in my mind that

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 6>homelessness is a pandemic across the world. This isn't an

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 6>Australia only problem. You go to America, you go anywhere.

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but we're are wealthy countries that expect us to we.

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 6>Are we are And you know what, Australia's homelessness population

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 6>is growing at a very concerning rate. Melbourne unfortunately is

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 6>not any better there are. You know, the data that

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 6>we have on homelessness is relatively poor and it's old.

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 6>You know, we say that thirty odd thousand people experiencing

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 6>homelessness in Victoria. I would bet it's probably more than

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 6>double that. Yeah, are we struggling to meet the needs? Look,

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 6>we take our clinics to the areas that needed the

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 6>most and we don't turn anyone away, and we slowly

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 6>grow our services to make sure that we can need

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 6>the needs of the community. Are we reaching the full potential? Certainly,

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 6>not yet, But that's my biggest goal is making sure

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 6>that streets Ademetics grows across the nation to be an

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 6>organization that can meet the need of the Australian community.

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 4>Now, last night at the official Melbourne launch, the Prime

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Minister was there.

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 3>He is a big fan of what you do.

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 4>He introduced you and spoke glowingly about your work. He's

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 4>recently moved Clara O'Neil to the Minister for Housing and

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 4>the Minister for Homelessness. Do you have faith she'll be

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 4>able to do something significant in this area?

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 6>I do? I do. I think the more eyes and

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 6>the more people working in this space, the better. One

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 6>of the things I am passionate about is a Homelessness Commissioner,

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 6>and I think that it's absolutely essential and it's needed now.

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 6>And the reason I say that is there are so

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 6>many organizations that are doing amazing work, but in bubbles,

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 6>in silos, there is collaboration, but there isn't unity. We

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 6>aren't one body working together to improve the space. And

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 6>so I think that you know, I certainly welcome the

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 6>idea of a Homelessness Minister, and I'm sure Minister Clearer

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 6>Knew would do a fantastic job, but it would be

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 6>amiss of us not to consider putting a Homelessess commissioner.

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 6>And I would say that it needs to happen sooner

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 6>rather than later.

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 4>When you speak to the Prime Minister about this issue,

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 4>what is his response?

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 3>What are you.

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 4>Seeing from the federal government and the state government elements

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 4>about tackling this crisis.

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So the federal government have been strong supporters of

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:09.679
<v Speaker 6>streets Admetics for the last three years. We've received funding

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 6>from the federal government and as you saw last night,

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:16.360
<v Speaker 6>the Prime Minister has vocally said that he will continues

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 6>to support streets Admedics and the sure of its growth.

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 6>We haven't seen as much support from the state of

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.239
<v Speaker 6>governments yet, but I have no doubt that there will

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 6>be appetite for that, and we're working with the state

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 6>government to make sure that we can meet their needs

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 6>and work on solutions together. So I think the appetite

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 6>is there, and I think that we have proven that

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 6>a model like streets Ametics works, and we have proven

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 6>that when you collaborate with other organizations you can do

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 6>great things.

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, and you are doing amazing work. You're literally saving

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 4>lives out there.

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 3>What is your.

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:51.679
<v Speaker 4>Message to people who come across this problem and they

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.120
<v Speaker 4>really don't know what to do to help.

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So I think the number one message I'd give

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:02.199
<v Speaker 6>in those circumstances is that is a human being that

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.880
<v Speaker 6>is asking for help. You'd be surprised how many people

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 6>will walk by someone has sake another dollar and they'll

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 6>walk right by them. I've spoken to so many people

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.719
<v Speaker 6>experiencing homelessness and they tell me how demoralizing that is,

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 6>the fact that they are a human being asking someone

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 6>else for help, and so many people lack to even

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 6>recognize that. They've asked if someone was walking and said,

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 6>excuse me, you'd stop. They're no different. So I think

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.720
<v Speaker 6>that The number one message I'd have is stop, stop

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 6>and say I'm so sorry I don't give money out,

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 6>or I'm so sorry I don't have any cash. I'm

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 6>so sorry. I can buy you a meal of but

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 6>I'm not comfortable giving you money. But stop and have

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 6>that conversation and get down to the level acknowledge them.

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 6>That would be the most important thing, and you'll be

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 6>surprised what a friendly year, a supportive or encouraging few

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 6>words can do to someone.

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Doctor Daniel North, thank you so much for your time

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 3>this evening. Thank you still to come.

0:18:55.200 --> 0:19:00.160
<v Speaker 4>Lefty's Losing It and Kosher Gaeta on Kamala Harris's Achilles Hill.

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 3>Which could cost her the election. Welcome back.

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 4>Now it's time for left Is Losing It. Here we

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:20.119
<v Speaker 4>have a former Democrat turned mega man, Adam Francisco, trying

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 4>to conduct an interview when an enraged Kamala loving soy

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 4>boy launches an attack.

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 3>This is hilarious because he's the best person.

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:31.360
<v Speaker 11>Look at this weird guy. He's never left the weight

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 11>in his life the US.

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:33.439
<v Speaker 9>Are you really gonna hit me?

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 11>Are you really gonna hit me? You want to go

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 11>to jail for a sack?

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 6>You do?

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:39.479
<v Speaker 11>Look like Thomas Crooks.

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:41.159
<v Speaker 12>You look like Thomas Crooks.

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 4>Can we just get one more look at that running attack?

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Please?

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 4>Now let's go to MSNBC, where the reliably hysterical Joe

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:11.479
<v Speaker 4>Scarborough is trying his dundest to be even more un

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 4>hinged than joy Raid.

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 13>If you believe an American capitalism, you should be worried

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 13>about Donald Trump being elected.

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 6>We always talk about democracy.

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 13>We always talk about democracy. Madisonian democracy undert because Madisonian

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:30.400
<v Speaker 13>democracy is under that, but American capitalism also under threat.

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 4>Yes, it's Donald Trump who is a threat to capitalism,

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 4>not the far left ideal Logue who wants to bring

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:41.360
<v Speaker 4>in Soviet style price controls and her commy sidekick who

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 4>talks about being unashamedly socialist.

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 14>Don't ever share away from our progressive values.

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 15>One persons socialism is another person's neighborliness.

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 4>Now to CNN, who are bringing back a far left

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 4>activist who rails against disinformation while pumping out nothing but disinformation. Yes,

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 4>CNN is bringing back the human potato, Brian Stelter.

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 3>They've hit rock bottom and started digging.

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 5>Trump might have committed treason. You say the president is

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 5>using mind control? What does putin have on Trump, the

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 5>US president possibly working for the Russians? Is President Trump

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 5>a rasist? Is the Trump presidency a criminal presidency? There's

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 5>no way to tweet yourself out of impeachment, impeachment, impeachment,

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 5>and impeachment, impeachment. What I hear on Fox is that

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 5>the media is obsessed about impeachment, impeachment, impeachment, impeachment, impeachment, impeachment.

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 5>Trump and some of his allies are promoting a hete

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 5>movement against the American press. Why does Sarah Sanders still

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 5>have a job. Is it time for newsrooms to think

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 5>of new ways to convey Trump's lack of credibility? You

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 5>might say the media hasn't earned your trust either. Okay,

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 5>look up the stats for yourself.

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 3>God bless CNN. They are slow learners.

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:52.439
<v Speaker 4>They keep it getting vivek Ramaswami on for hostile interviews.

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.879
<v Speaker 4>But the man is too clover, too quick, and too eloquent,

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 4>and unlike the folk at CNN, he's not suffering for me.

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:06.680
<v Speaker 4>The teds no selective amnesia here. He annihilates Kamala Harris's rebrand.

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 11>Claims about Kamala Harris, I want to finish that discussion.

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 11>She said she didn't favor a ban on fracking. Now

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 11>the reality is she was one of the strongest proponents

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 11>of that ban, so much so that when she was

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 11>in California she sued the Obama administration over granting fracking permits.

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 16>She didn't just.

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 11>Favor the abolition of private health insurance. She was a

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 11>co sponsor of the bill with Bernie Sanders as a

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 11>US Senator for Medicare for All for Americans. The reality is,

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 11>when you think about the Green New Deal, she was

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 11>the chief proponent, not just as a co sponsor of

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 11>the legislation, but going further and saying she would end

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 11>the filibuster in the Senate to ram that through. So

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 11>the reality is she can say what she wants to say.

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 11>Now those are actions she has taken. Is someone allowed

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 11>to evolve, Of course they are, But she deserves to

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:54.239
<v Speaker 11>explain exactly why she's changed those positions, Exactly what her

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 11>position is. If it's not a ban on fracking, what

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 11>exactly is it? What exactly is her health care plan?

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 11>If she no longer favers abolishing private health insurance, which

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:04.640
<v Speaker 11>just four short years ago when she ran for president,

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 11>she did. And that's the kind of scrutiny that's been missing.

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 11>I think Donald Trump has received plenty of scrutiny, and

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.360
<v Speaker 11>I give credit to him for sitting for hostile interviews

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:13.439
<v Speaker 11>that Kamala Harris has not.

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 4>Now plenty more lefties losing it content with my next guest,

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 4>and let's start with looking at Donald Trump sitting down

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 4>with Fox News host Sean Hannity for a town hall

0:23:24.080 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 4>event earlier today in the crucial swing state of Pennsylvania.

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 4>He talked about the economy, the border, foreign policy, and

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 4>he talked a little smack about Harris's VP pick, Tim Walls.

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 13>There's something weird with that guy. He's a weird guy.

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 13>JD is not weird. He's a solid rock. I happen

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 13>to be a very solid rock.

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 14>We're not weird.

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:50.919
<v Speaker 13>We're other things, perhaps, but we're not weird.

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 6>But he is a weird guy.

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 13>He works on the stage. There's something wrong with that guy.

0:23:57.359 --> 0:23:59.959
<v Speaker 13>And he called me weird. And then the fake newsman

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 13>you're picking it up. That was the word of the day. Weird, weird, weird.

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 13>They're all going, but we're not weird guys. We're very

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 13>solid people. They want our country to be great again.

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 14>I mean, it's very simple.

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.880
<v Speaker 4>Now, this town hall was supposed to be a debate,

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 4>but Kamala Harris refused the invitation.

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 14>Let me just tell the audience so everybody is fully aware.

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 14>Is that tonight the Fox offered a debate opportunity between

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:25.960
<v Speaker 14>you and Kamala Harris and I was not going to

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:28.479
<v Speaker 14>be here, but it was going to be Brett and Martha.

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 14>This was supposed to be a debate, right, so I

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 14>would have preferred I figured, I.

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 13>Think he's a nice guy, but I would have preferred

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 13>a debate. Thanks a lot, but this is the best

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 13>we could do.

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Sean joining me.

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 4>Now, Sky and contributor Kosher, Gaeta Kosher, How did you

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 4>see this.

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 3>At town hall? It was interesting. Trump was in well

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 3>the usual form we see at the rallies.

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 16>He was up and about nothing if not interesting in

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 16>Trump anything that he does. You know, I think being

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 16>on Fox News with Chinad his friendly territory for Trump. However,

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 16>at the stage with sixty days to go, it's all

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 16>about driving the media cycle and getting the message out

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 16>and Kama Harris and Tim Walter leaving that field wide

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.160
<v Speaker 16>open for Trump and g D. They're doing everything from

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 16>podcasts to this town hall and he was hitting his

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 16>messages energy since this was in Pennsylvania and the whole

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:22.399
<v Speaker 16>fracking flip flop, immigration, the economy, just general swapes at

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:24.880
<v Speaker 16>them around leadership ability as well, that you know they're

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 16>too scared. They didn't take the opportunity to debate over

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 16>here tonight, the weird thing, all of that. So I

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 16>think he hit all his messages and the media will

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 16>pick up nuggets on that.

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:36.679
<v Speaker 4>And he noted that the only interview she did was

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 4>that very friendly one with sin and pre recorded with

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 4>walls there. They only released eighteen minutes or whatever they recorded,

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 4>and she appeared to have notes there, which is something

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 4>else he was highlighting that hasn't been reported a great deal.

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 4>So he got a few messages through. And let's have

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 4>a look at one last clip here he's talking about

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 4>illegal immigration and Harris's part in record numbers coming across

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 4>the southern border every single year of the Biden Harris administration.

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 14>Is there one open border? She wants open borders. Now

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 14>she's all of a sudden, so go, I think we'll

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 14>close the borders. She was the borders, whether you like

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 14>it or not. But even if you don't want to

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 14>use that term, she was in charge of the border.

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 4>That is going to be, if not the number one issues,

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 4>the number two issue, inflation, cost of living being the

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 4>other big one, and it's one that she's going to

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:30.439
<v Speaker 4>find difficult to shake. Though she's trying to suddenly be

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 4>all about borders and walls. People know her record, people

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 4>know she advocated for the opposite for so long.

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 16>Her trying to come to the middle on that and

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 16>actually being pro wall in small ways and promegration is

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 16>actually the biggest endorsement an advertisement of Trump's policies. Because

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 16>if there's one thing people remember about his whole right

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 16>into the political arena, it was that build the Wall

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 16>chant back in twenty sixteen. That's what ultimately catapulted him

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 16>into the White House. It's a Trump original, and it's

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 16>really funny that she's going after that, which shows how

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 16>popular that.

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 12>Issue is or how important that issue is.

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:08.360
<v Speaker 16>And he's going to continue hitting that every single day

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:09.160
<v Speaker 16>for the next two months.

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh absolutely.

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 4>Now it's not just big tech the likes of Meta,

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 4>Google tik Talk that are anti Trump. It seems Amazon's

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 4>Alexa has also gone into the act.

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:23.880
<v Speaker 10>Alexa, why should I vote for Donald Trump?

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 15>I cannot provide content that promotes a specific political party

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 15>or a specific candidate.

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Alexa, why should I vote for Kamala Harris.

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 15>While there are many reasons to vote for Kamala Harris,

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:45.360
<v Speaker 15>the most significant maybe that she is a strong candidate

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 15>with a proven track record of accomplishment. As the first

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 15>female vice president, Harris has already broken down a major

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 15>gender barrier, and her career in politics has been characterized

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 15>by a commitment to progressive ideals and a focus on

0:27:58.040 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 15>helping disenfranchised communities.

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Incredible.

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 4>There are plenty of other examples of people posting similar

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:08.360
<v Speaker 4>content asking Alexa that question and getting those answers.

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:11.919
<v Speaker 3>And Amazon has admitted the issue, but says it was

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:13.360
<v Speaker 3>all an innocent error.

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 4>And Amazon spokesperson told Fox News Digital that the responses

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 4>were the result of an error which has since been corrected.

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 4>It's curious, the kosher that these errors all seem to

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 4>be in the same direction.

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 12>Always, always, unlessly.

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 16>It's the big tech platforms, including Now, people you don't

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 16>think of as publishers necessarily, but they are because Amazon

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 16>is in the content and publishing business.

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 12>You also see with the AI folks.

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>So chat chip Ai is notorious, notoriously bad about that

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 1>so there is going to be a cultural countercurrent to this,

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing it with X and with the podcast circuit,

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>where the truth and the other side of narrative does

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>get a little.

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 12>Bit of cut through more than before.

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 16>Though you know, they're always swimming uphill for sure, and

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:01.280
<v Speaker 16>there's going to have to be legislative correction to that,

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 16>which is that Section two thirty debate that gives all

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 16>of these guys immunity from liability even though they shouldn't

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 16>be getting that if their publishers and this basically was

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 16>an act of publishing.

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 4>And that may be what's triggered Mark Zuckerberg, owner of

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 4>a CEO of Facebook and Instagram Meta, to make all

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 4>sorts of revelations in the past week about the pressure

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 4>of the FBI put on his companies and continue to

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 4>put on him to suppress.

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, maybe he's getting out front in front of something

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 16>that might be brewing. Depending on which way this election

0:29:36.800 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 16>goes on this issue and every issue, you're going to

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 16>have two completely different outcomes.

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely. Now.

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 4>Former aid to New York Governor Kathy Hokul has been

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 4>charged with secretly acting as an agent of the Chinese government.

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 4>Linda's son who served as Governor Ocul's deputy chief of

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 4>staff from twenty twenty one to twenty twenty three, was

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 4>arrested along with her husband, on suspicion of receiving millions

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 4>of dollars in compensation and gifts from Chinese government representatives.

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 3>Kosher.

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 4>This is interesting, indeed, and I think it was Kathy

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 4>Hokul I remember accusing Trump of all sorts of crimes

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 4>associated with the Russian collusion hoax.

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 3>So to have someone that.

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 4>Close to her deputy chief of staff face these charges,

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 4>it's a significant development.

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 16>It's quite a remarkable story, and it's one more in

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:34.719
<v Speaker 16>many we've seen where Senator Dianne Feinstein's twenty plus year

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 16>chauffeur was found out to be potentially a spy for

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 16>the Chinese. Had Eric Swollwell from California was getting cozy

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 16>with Christine Fame all Democrats, all Democrats and these Chinese spies,

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 16>and I don't know how much they knew about it necessarily,

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 16>but it more shows again that the leadership ranks have

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 16>incompetence up there where they're not even aware, they don't

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 16>know that they're sitting ducks or remarks for this, and

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 16>then on top of that point fingers, because while and

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 16>Huokal have been among the loudest pointing fingers at Trump

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 16>supposedly being a foreign agent, that just makes it even

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 16>more ironic.

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, And a new unearthed video of this lady Linda's

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 4>son speaking about diversity, inclusion and the importance of equity.

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Have a look at this clip.

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 17>When people stay in diversity and inclusion, I think everybody

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 17>agrees or most people generally agree that it's a good thing, right,

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 17>But I think right now we also need to bring

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 17>in the word equity, right, equity.

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 4>So as soon as I hear that word, red flags

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 4>are going up, I would have arrested her right then.

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 4>But it's again, the irony isn't lost anyone. That you've

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 4>got someone who's been accused of being an agent of

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 4>the Chinese Communist Party talking about the importance of dei

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 4>and equity and equity is very different to equality, and

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 4>many see it as a Marxist principle that has no

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 4>place in the West.

0:31:56.600 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 16>And none of those things are supported or promoted in

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 16>China culturally or by the CCP. But they can easily

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 16>catch lautch onto it and catch that trend. That's infiltrated

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 16>and infected the West and so many Western institutions, and

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 16>they get on either all regular or Cornbert le WHI

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 16>seems to be what they're doing.

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome. That's when

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 4>you've got equity, and it's never ended well, no matter

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 4>how good the intentions. Now, let's talk about two dozen

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 4>attorney generals writing to twenty five major asset managers, including

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 4>Morgan Stanley and Alliance Global Investors, alleging that in voting

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 4>for environmental proposals flagged by activist group Series, these companies

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 4>knowingly and willingly violated their legal obligation to act in

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 4>the best financial interests of their clients. This is again

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 4>a very interesting development Kosher in the fight against ESG.

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 4>It's incredible because five years ago you would not have

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 4>expected that ESG was just running rampant. It was a

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 4>philosophy that businesses thought they had to entrine into how

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 4>they worked. And now there's this fight back saying no,

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 4>this is not in your shareholder's interest and you could

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 4>actually face an investigation.

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, the pushback is definitely coming with either firings of

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 16>these entire positions in different institutions or the taking legal action.

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:29.479
<v Speaker 16>And in the financial sector it's one of the few

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 16>where you can draw a pretty straight line between the

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 16>fiduciary responsibility of asset managers or people on boards of

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 16>those companies and the recommendations that they're making. So that's

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 16>the angle these ages are going with.

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 10>Now.

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 16>The other side, of course, has very good legal representation

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 16>and they'll defend that in the court of law.

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 12>With it with the full vigor. I'm sure.

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 16>So I'm not sure where the legal fallout will be,

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 16>but it is interesting that there is pushback coming at

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 16>every level.

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's essentially leftist activism that was forced upon corporates

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 4>whether they liked it or not. There is, as you said,

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 4>this fight back happening in the US locally in Australia.

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 4>Is there even any awareness at all about what this is,

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 4>how it's been used, and perhaps it not being actually

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 4>a good thing for society or for the business world

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 4>in general.

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 12>It would be an interesting one.

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 16>Just like here, the super fun industry is so big

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:22.759
<v Speaker 16>and all that, and to kind of dig into that

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 16>a little bit.

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 12>We've talked about this before that.

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 16>In some trends, I always feel like Australia is five

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 16>years behind what we see in the US, so maybe

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 16>this is a leading indicator and then you'll see the

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:32.879
<v Speaker 16>ripple effect show up here.

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's hope those ripples come soon, because there just

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 4>seems to be a complete lack of awareness of what

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 4>this is.

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Now, we talked about Kamala's border.

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:46.960
<v Speaker 4>Wall flip flopping, and it's going to be used against

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 4>her because there is plenty of evidence of her being

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 4>all for open borders. In her twenty nineteen book The

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:58.720
<v Speaker 4>Truths We Hold, Harris called the idea of a border

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 4>wall not only you useless and nothing more than a symbol,

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:06.760
<v Speaker 4>a monument standing in opposition to not just everything I value,

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:10.719
<v Speaker 4>but to the fundamental values upon which this country was built.

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 4>In her social media posts during the Trump administration, she

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:21.840
<v Speaker 4>also called it stupid and medieval vanity, a medieval vanity project.

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 4>But now she's saying she'll back a border security bill

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 4>that includes.

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 3>A six hundred and fifty million dollar pledge for a

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 3>new border wall construction.

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Kamala Harris has spent decades fighting violent crime. As a

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Border state prosecutor, she took on drug cartels and jailed

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 2>gang members for smuggling weapons and drugs across the border.

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 2>As vice president, she backed the toughest border control bill

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 2>in decades, and as president, she will hire thousands more

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 2>border agents and crack down on fentanyl and human trafficking.

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Fixing the border is tough, so is Kamala Harris.

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Harris and I approved this message.

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 4>In that Kamala ad Trump's border wall actually featured in

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:08.480
<v Speaker 4>the ad. That was a bad move. I was supposed

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:13.399
<v Speaker 4>to believe that these policy changes, the backflips, are all

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:19.240
<v Speaker 4>just a natural realignment of her values. But no one's

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:23.520
<v Speaker 4>really buying that. No one's buying that. She's gone from

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 4>defending people paying people smugglers to bring them across the border,

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 4>saying she'll back free health care for illegal immigrants she

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:35.959
<v Speaker 4>wants to accelerate their path to citizenship, to now saying

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 4>she's going to build walls.

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:41.320
<v Speaker 16>I don't think anyone's buying it. She is not really

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 16>a candidate. I look at her as a product the

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 16>outcome of a marketing campaign by the machinery and this election,

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 16>and what's going to be on the ballot is how

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 16>powerful that machinery and marketing campaign is of the Democrats

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 16>versus candidate Trump, because if this does sell with enough

0:36:57.280 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 16>people at the election, which is very very tight rate

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 16>now swings in her away, it will mean that all

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 16>of the stuff that's on the record, her own book,

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 16>as you say, did in twenty nineteen, she's been in

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 16>the public guy for twenty years, didn't get cut through,

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 16>and somehow she was just able to take a wand

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 16>and need to make it all vanish.

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 12>So it'll be very interesting to see how this please out.

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely now, several members of Tim Walls's extended family in

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 4>Nebraska have been pictured in Walls for Trump t shirts

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 4>in a clear sign they are in opposition to their

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 4>vice presidential candidate relative. Those in the photo are related

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:35.399
<v Speaker 4>to Walls through his grandfather's brother, so I think these

0:37:35.440 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 4>are like second cousins.

0:37:37.000 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 3>But even his own.

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 4>Brother, Jeff, has posted on Facebook that he is one

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 4>hundred percent opposed to Tim's views, commenting that he has

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 4>thought hard about getting on stage with Donald Trump, describing

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:55.359
<v Speaker 4>his brother as not the type of character you want

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 4>making decisions about your future.

0:37:58.960 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 3>This is pretty hard.

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we saw the media go big on some

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 4>random Trump relative who they could find who was against Donald,

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:11.320
<v Speaker 4>even though they had very little contact with the family.

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 3>I wonder how they're going to treat.

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 4>This, because you've got the cousins, they're the second cousins,

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 4>whatever they are. But to have the man's own brother

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:22.479
<v Speaker 4>come out so strongly, yeah, cuts through.

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:25.920
<v Speaker 16>I suspect they'll try their best to suppress that as

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 16>they do.

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 12>But you're right.

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:29.799
<v Speaker 16>I think that was Mary Trump Trump's niece. We also

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 16>saw with RFT Junior just two weeks ago, five of

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 16>his siblings came out, and we're very, very critical of

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 16>his decision to endorse and support Trump. So when you

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 16>see it in that way, the courage will be more

0:38:40.200 --> 0:38:42.360
<v Speaker 16>than here. I will say in general, I'm not a

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:45.760
<v Speaker 16>fan of family members Era thirty laundry with outside.

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 3>I think it's such a betrayal, isn't.

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.840
<v Speaker 16>It it is, and letting politics come into it. But that said,

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 16>in his case, there is a narrative that's taking hold

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:55.759
<v Speaker 16>about something is off with Tim Waltz, fairly or not.

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 16>I feel like that between the stolen valor issue and

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 16>other aspects about him, and this feed into that. Even

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 16>though I think it would be nice a family members

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 16>kind of yeah, quiet.

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 3>It's a bit Harry and Meghan for me.

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 4>Kosha Gator thank you so much for your time's pleasure

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:15.359
<v Speaker 4>Still to come. Taylor Swift's boyfriend Travis Kelcey calls in

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 4>the lawyers.

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:21.240
<v Speaker 3>And reviewers and audiences are split over the new Reagan.

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:32.400
<v Speaker 4>Film, watching the Reader Panney Show and Joining Me Now

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:33.839
<v Speaker 4>is Entertainment and.

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Royal reporter Kinsey Schofield.

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 4>Let's start with Taylor Swift. Her boyfriend Travis Kelcey is

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:44.919
<v Speaker 4>bringing the lawyers over a photo of an alleged contract

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 4>outlining the football stars relationship with Taylor and a comprehensive

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 4>media plan for their breakup. The contract, which has full

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:58.280
<v Speaker 4>scope public relations on the front, which is the PR

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 4>company Travis Kelcey users, outlines a plan to release an

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 4>official statement at the end of this month announcing their breakup.

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:12.440
<v Speaker 4>This all includes a date September twenty eight, and the

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:17.560
<v Speaker 4>firm ads there should be a three day post breakup period.

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 4>Includes a draft of what the statement would be, adding

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:25.319
<v Speaker 4>it needs to be seen as gracious and respectful. The

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:28.640
<v Speaker 4>agency says these documents are false.

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Do we know where they came from? The whole thing

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:33.600
<v Speaker 3>seems so bizarre.

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 12>It is.

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 10>It's like what an elaborate hoax. Somebody has way too

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 10>much time on their hands. We started seeing this circulating

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 10>on Reddit, and you're absolutely right, both Kelsey and his

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:49.520
<v Speaker 10>PR team are trying to find the culprit. But you know,

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 10>I also think that they're probably trying to intimidate any

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 10>further pranksters in how much they're taking this seriously.

0:40:58.239 --> 0:40:59.840
<v Speaker 9>But a lot of thought going into that.

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 10>Some joking that it looks written byt GPT Taylor and

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 10>Travis joking that on the date that's listed September twenty eighth,

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 10>they're going to have a lot of fun with it.

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:14.200
<v Speaker 10>They're gonna we're going to see them likely whether I

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:15.400
<v Speaker 10>think it's National Beer.

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:16.799
<v Speaker 9>Day or something. That was the joke.

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:20.680
<v Speaker 10>So I think that it's it's very unique and somebody's

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 10>getting a lot. Somebody is going to get a job

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 10>out of this one day, because that's a that's a

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 10>gorilla marketing genius.

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, Travis Kelsy and his brother Jason have just assigned

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 4>a one hundred million dollar podcast still with Amazon. He

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:42.400
<v Speaker 4>was certainly already a big star before he got together

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:45.720
<v Speaker 4>with Taylor Swift, but you've got to say this relationship

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:49.760
<v Speaker 4>has boosted his earning capacity significantly.

0:41:51.239 --> 0:41:52.240
<v Speaker 9>I think she made him.

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:54.680
<v Speaker 10>A mainstream star. I'd never heard of him. She made

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 10>him a household name. You know, he's INTENSI star. I'm sorry,

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 10>and I know my partner works for the NFL, so

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 10>that's saying a lot. But you know, he's got a

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 10>new action comedy coming out. Apparently he's talking to a

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:12.600
<v Speaker 10>Lion's Gate about Luce Cannon's a new FX show, a

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 10>horror project.

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 9>And this was a guy that was doing reality dating

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:20.040
<v Speaker 9>shows before he was with Taylor Swift.

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:25.399
<v Speaker 4>She has elevated him, Oh absolutely, But you know what,

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:28.440
<v Speaker 4>he was a big star. Shocked that your boyfriends in

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 4>the NFL works for the NFL and he did not

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 4>know that. I mean, that's almost a deal breaker right there.

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:37.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm surprised he hasn't broken up with you over that one.

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 4>Now the NFL season is back in the US, football

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:46.319
<v Speaker 4>fans are fuming that one of the promo reels being

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 4>posted on Instagram by the NFL seems to feature Taylor

0:42:51.080 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 4>Swift more than the star players US. Is it a

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 4>bit of overkill, kids, because I know a lot of

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 4>football fans are fed up with it, but it may

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:33.000
<v Speaker 4>be attracting a new audience.

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 10>I mean, I do think that NFL fans don't care

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:40.200
<v Speaker 10>about friendship bracelets and mimosas they want.

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:42.759
<v Speaker 9>Beer and oversized football jerseys. You're right.

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:45.000
<v Speaker 10>I mean they are trying to get those young girls

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:46.880
<v Speaker 10>invested like they were last season.

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:49.440
<v Speaker 9>But don't alienate your audience.

0:43:49.600 --> 0:43:52.320
<v Speaker 10>Make sure that your audience still feels like you're catering

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 10>to them. And hopefully the NFL will take some of

0:43:55.239 --> 0:43:57.839
<v Speaker 10>these notes and say we might need to slow down

0:43:57.880 --> 0:44:00.920
<v Speaker 10>on all of the swift coverage.

0:44:01.800 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Yes please now, movie critics are trying to dissuade audiences

0:44:06.160 --> 0:44:09.680
<v Speaker 4>from watching a new film called Reagan, which sees Hollywood

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:13.720
<v Speaker 4>star Dennis Quaid depict the life of the actor turned

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:17.920
<v Speaker 4>fortieth President of the United States, Ronald Reagan. The far

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 4>left publication Daily Beast called it the worst movie of

0:44:22.120 --> 0:44:26.399
<v Speaker 4>the year and absolute trash. The La Times called it

0:44:27.280 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 4>historical hui and childish slog of hero worship. But review

0:44:34.040 --> 0:44:39.320
<v Speaker 4>website Rotten Tomatoes has this really paints the picture kinzy.

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:41.640
<v Speaker 3>The critics rating is twenty one.

0:44:41.520 --> 0:44:44.720
<v Speaker 4>Percent, but have a look at that audience rating ninety

0:44:45.000 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 4>eight percent. I think that says something. People are turning

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 4>up in droves to see it, and I think audiences

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:59.759
<v Speaker 4>no longer really trust lefty media critics. They trust other

0:44:59.840 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 4>view is because they know the critics are normally got

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:08.160
<v Speaker 4>some sort of ideological reason for hating a particular film.

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:11.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean it reminds me of the Christian movie.

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:13.959
<v Speaker 10>I can only imagine that movie gross to eighty six

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:18.320
<v Speaker 10>million dollars worldwide against a production budget of seven million.

0:45:18.640 --> 0:45:22.240
<v Speaker 10>Remember the Sound of Freedom, critics candidate and it became

0:45:22.280 --> 0:45:25.120
<v Speaker 10>a box office hit, collecting twenty million dollars after just

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:25.800
<v Speaker 10>one week.

0:45:26.120 --> 0:45:27.879
<v Speaker 9>So I think you're absolutely right.

0:45:28.440 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 10>The audience at home they don't care what these elites

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 10>think anymore, that those opinions are unnecessary and untrustworthy at

0:45:37.560 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 10>this time.

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 4>And Kinsey, those rotten Tomato rankings remind me of the

0:45:44.160 --> 0:45:48.680
<v Speaker 4>Dave Chappelle and Hannah Gadsby phenomenon that was much talked

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 4>about online where you had the critics scores be poorer

0:45:53.239 --> 0:45:57.279
<v Speaker 4>opposite to the audience score. So with Hannah Gadsby, the

0:45:57.360 --> 0:46:00.640
<v Speaker 4>critics love the the audience hated it, and with Dave

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:02.560
<v Speaker 4>Schappela was the other way around.

0:46:02.640 --> 0:46:03.719
<v Speaker 3>And I think it again.

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 4>Shows there's this divide now where we don't trust the

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:12.719
<v Speaker 4>critical opinion. Things that are critically acclaimed may not be

0:46:12.960 --> 0:46:14.320
<v Speaker 4>necessarily good.

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:19.000
<v Speaker 10>And I think people are sick of normal people are

0:46:19.000 --> 0:46:21.839
<v Speaker 10>sick of watching movies with messages. And a lot of

0:46:21.880 --> 0:46:24.239
<v Speaker 10>these critics are you know, liberals.

0:46:24.239 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 9>They're in the.

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:28.839
<v Speaker 10>Media world and they love these message driven movies. Normal

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:30.960
<v Speaker 10>people just want to get lost.

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:35.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, you just want something that's well written, well acted,

0:46:35.239 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 4>that's entertaining. I mean, I don't care if it's got

0:46:37.440 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 4>a message, but if the whole point of the project

0:46:39.719 --> 0:46:42.160
<v Speaker 4>is the message, then that's a problem.

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Now let's talk about the Royals.

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 4>Queen Camilla delighted American author Emily Griffin when she sent

0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:52.160
<v Speaker 4>her a personal letter after they met at a literary

0:46:52.200 --> 0:46:53.839
<v Speaker 4>event earlier this year.

0:46:53.960 --> 0:46:55.240
<v Speaker 3>She told the author she.

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:58.440
<v Speaker 4>Enjoyed her work and was looking forward to reading her

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:01.920
<v Speaker 4>new book In the Piece and Out of Scotland. But

0:47:02.160 --> 0:47:04.880
<v Speaker 4>I do wonder whether Meghan is going to see this

0:47:05.160 --> 0:47:10.360
<v Speaker 4>as a slide, given Griffin has publicly called Meghan unmaternal

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 4>and phony in a series of comments that she did

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 4>later apologize for.

0:47:15.640 --> 0:47:17.800
<v Speaker 3>But so we know, Meghan and Harry do not forget

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 3>anything that's right.

0:47:20.160 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 10>Knowing how sensitive Harry and Meghan are, I absolutely believe

0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:27.759
<v Speaker 10>that this would drive Meghan Markle crazy. You know, Emily's

0:47:27.800 --> 0:47:31.400
<v Speaker 10>comments didn't cross any lines and they weren't necessarily cool.

0:47:31.520 --> 0:47:35.000
<v Speaker 10>But unfortunately for Emily, she made these comments in that

0:47:35.040 --> 0:47:39.000
<v Speaker 10>twenty four month period after the Oprah Winfrey interview where

0:47:39.040 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 10>you were not allowed to critique Meghan Markle or you

0:47:42.200 --> 0:47:43.000
<v Speaker 10>were canceled.

0:47:43.480 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 3>Then.

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:46.600
<v Speaker 10>You know, remember Bethany Frankel saying, after I posted a

0:47:46.640 --> 0:47:49.680
<v Speaker 10>negative video about Meghan Markle, a superstar called me and

0:47:49.719 --> 0:47:53.400
<v Speaker 10>scolded me. Then South Park kind of changed everything. But

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:57.600
<v Speaker 10>that's really why Emily had to apologize and receive such backlash.

0:47:57.760 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 10>I doubt Meghan is happy about the new friendship blossoming

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 10>between Camilla.

0:48:02.680 --> 0:48:03.600
<v Speaker 12>And Emily.

0:48:05.560 --> 0:48:08.080
<v Speaker 4>Kinsey Schophil. Thank you so much for your time this.

0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:11.680
<v Speaker 3>Evening, and that's it from me. Up next is Newsnight.

0:48:11.719 --> 0:48:14.640
<v Speaker 4>I'll see you tomorrow night for Left is Losing It

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:18.200
<v Speaker 4>at nine point thirty