Speaker 1: On Scorne Lives Australia.
Speaker 2: This is the Reader Panalty Show.
Speaker 3: Good evening and welcome to the Reader Panety Show.
Speaker 4: Coming up tonight, Climate catastrophus and anti Israel crusader Greta
Speaker 4: Blumberg under fire for her latest.
Speaker 3: Active incoherent activism.
Speaker 4: The Kamala Harris honeymoon looks to be coming to an end.
Speaker 3: I'll speak to Kosher Gator about that and much more.
Speaker 4: Kinsey Schofield later in the hour with the latest royal
Speaker 4: and celebrity news, and I'll speak to a man making
Speaker 4: a real difference at the Cold Face working with the
Speaker 4: growing number of homeless people in Melbourne and Sydney and
Speaker 4: Lefti's Losing It features several Democrat soy boys and MSNBC
Speaker 4: Hack and Our Faith, CNN propagandis is back.
Speaker 5: What if folks in the reality based reality beat reality
Speaker 5: based media do in the coming week? Trump made a
Speaker 5: committed Teresa You said the president is using mind control.
Speaker 6: What does putin on Trump?
Speaker 4: Let's start with a fantastic piece from Robert gob Leeson
Speaker 4: in Today's Australian where he talks about the country's economic
Speaker 4: woes intensifying further with yesterday's GDP figures showing we're heading
Speaker 4: for a.
Speaker 3: Repeat of stagflation.
Speaker 4: He says a slow down in consumer spending should have
Speaker 4: substantially reduced inflation, but it failed, and it failed because
Speaker 4: of four key reasons. First, governments have thoughted the impact
Speaker 4: of the RBA's slow down measures by massive spending both
Speaker 4: at state and federal level, funded by borrowing.
Speaker 3: Secondly, the government.
Speaker 4: Encouraged wage rises across the board, trying to end the
Speaker 4: cost of living problems, but in turn this further pushed
Speaker 4: up prices given all that government spending. Thirdly, Australia is
Speaker 4: being turned from one of the lowest cost energy countries
Speaker 4: to one of the highest in the world. And finally,
Speaker 4: we have introduced industrial relations legislation with the specific aim
Speaker 4: to increase costs and lower productivity. Joining me now is
Speaker 4: mensies A Research Center Senior Fellow and Danube Institute visiting.
Speaker 3: Fellow Nick Kita.
Speaker 4: Nick, it appears our economic woes are almost entirely self inflicted,
Speaker 4: from the daft energy policies to inflation inducing spending policies.
Speaker 7: Indeed, inflation always and everywhere begins in Canberra when it
Speaker 7: comes to Australia or Washington. In the case of the
Speaker 7: United States government spending and government policy is key to this.
Speaker 7: And yet I haven't at once even heard Charmers come
Speaker 7: close to acknowledge that he could be the problem. And
Speaker 7: the interesting thing is Robert god believes and makes a
Speaker 7: comparison with the nineteen seventy stagflation, and who was Prime
Speaker 7: minister then, GoF Whitlam. GoF Whitlam at least got that
Speaker 7: the government had to cut it spending. And in nineteen
Speaker 7: seventy three he told all the men around the cabinet
Speaker 7: table they were going to travel economy class from now on,
Speaker 7: and the complaint came back allway too important, and he said, well,
Speaker 7: I'm a great man, and I could travel economy class
Speaker 7: all my life and I would still be a great man. You,
Speaker 7: on the other hand, a little men, and you could
Speaker 7: travel in business class all your life and you'll still
Speaker 7: be little men. So it's just an illustration to show
Speaker 7: that he got it. I mean, he didn't actually do
Speaker 7: it much about spending, but in those days people acknowledged
Speaker 7: what Charmers and Albanezi refused to not acknowledge that they
Speaker 7: are the problem. Not Ukraine, they are the problem. They
Speaker 7: are responsible for energy policy, which you say is a
Speaker 7: big part of this and responsible for this enormous level
Speaker 7: of government spending.
Speaker 3: Well, it's economics one O one.
Speaker 4: If you pump money into the economy, you're going to
Speaker 4: cause inflation. And they have taken several measures, several policies
Speaker 4: that are just pumping money in and then their shock
Speaker 4: that is isn't coming down even though people are hurting
Speaker 4: and interest rates are biting. It's almost maddening because this
Speaker 4: stuff isn't terribly complicated.
Speaker 3: Now, let's go to the City of Melbourne.
Speaker 4: They've kept secret a report outlining the public's concerns regarding
Speaker 4: the expansion of bike lanes, which former Lord mess Sally
Speaker 4: Cap was pushing hard. The council paid Redbridge, the polling company,
Speaker 4: ninety thousand dollars to conduct a detailed surveys on CAP's plan,
Speaker 4: and while the surveys did find some support for the
Speaker 4: general idea, when it came to operational specifics, the response
Speaker 4: was overwhelmingly negative. Melbournian said the lanes would make it
Speaker 4: harder to drive around the city and would make them
Speaker 4: less likely to visit the CBDA, which incidentally is dying
Speaker 4: in this town. And within weeks of the report being completed,
Speaker 4: Sally Cap did pause her plan to roll out an
Speaker 4: extra forty killing me of CBD by lanes.
Speaker 3: But Nick, this.
Speaker 4: Report was kept hidden until pressure from a freedom of
Speaker 4: information request. What impact do you think this is going
Speaker 4: to have on the upcoming maryoral election because the current
Speaker 4: Lord Mayor was Sally CAP's deputy and that's our good friend,
Speaker 4: Nicholas Reese.
Speaker 7: Well, you know the politics of Melbourne City Council better
Speaker 7: than I do. But look it sounds to me as
Speaker 7: if the rate players of Melbourne should get in there
Speaker 7: and eject this mayor right away. Sorry Nicholas, but you
Speaker 7: have to go. You've become you've joined the Zelots when
Speaker 7: it comes to cycle tracks. Let me say, reader, I
Speaker 7: am a great enthusiast for cycle tracks, at least I
Speaker 7: used to be before the Zelot's got control of it.
Speaker 7: Margaret Thatcher incidentally starting to introduce them in Britain on
Speaker 7: the simple logic that if you put people on a
Speaker 7: bicycle it takes up a lot less road space than
Speaker 7: a car. But the trouble is you've got these people
Speaker 7: in charge, you don't understand how to build bike lanes,
Speaker 7: to put them in appropriate places, and it ends up
Speaker 7: slowing down the traffic, Whereas the only justification for putting
Speaker 7: bikes bike lanes in is if it speeds up the
Speaker 7: traffic by taking cars off the roads. If you can't
Speaker 7: do that, that is the measure, because that's how business
Speaker 7: needs to measure productivity. Whether delivery vans can get into
Speaker 7: the city easy in cheaply. All this, in the end
Speaker 7: goes back to the consumers and the prices we pay.
Speaker 7: If we make it hard for delivery vans and don't
Speaker 7: make it hard for business, well that.
Speaker 3: Is a huge issue in itself.
Speaker 4: If you speak to the traders getting any sort of
Speaker 4: deliveries into the CBD, it becomes very problematic indeed, and
Speaker 4: they are.
Speaker 3: Just hostile to cars.
Speaker 4: The Council has been hostile to cars for a long
Speaker 4: time and the traders are suffering because of it. Now,
Speaker 4: let's talk about Greta thun Work the Swedish climate activists.
Speaker 4: She was arrested during a pro Palestinian demonstration in Copenhagen yesterday,
Speaker 4: and she and her fellow activists were protesting against the
Speaker 4: University of Copenhagen for cooporating with Israel. Israeli academics and
Speaker 4: institutions but the products of this corporation, Nick are things
Speaker 4: like studies into climate change and global warming prevention with
Speaker 4: the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Seems like Greta's hatred of
Speaker 4: Israel is stronger than her supposed love for the environment.
Speaker 7: Yeah, exactly, red that you could go. We could fill
Speaker 7: dozens of shows with Jenna Thumberg's hypocrisy before we even
Speaker 7: start on the hypocrisy of the rest of them. Does
Speaker 7: she not see the irony that she's been arrested for
Speaker 7: trying to occupy a university campus. When I thought this
Speaker 7: were against occupations, I thought that was the whole thing
Speaker 7: was about. But anyway, she's been arrested, and she's probably
Speaker 7: got what she wanted because these, after all, they're not
Speaker 7: demonstrations deliberately trying to aim some and some sort of
Speaker 7: what they see as evil, because there is no evil,
Speaker 7: and they don't understand the situation anyway. What they're all about,
Speaker 7: of course, is drawing attention to themselves. So being arrested
Speaker 7: by two burly Copenhagen policemen seems to be playing right
Speaker 7: into her books. Pictures of her being pulled along. Yeah,
Speaker 7: I hope they keep her in for a while actually
Speaker 7: just let her reflect on how stupid she's been.
Speaker 4: Well, it seems to be her full time occupation, just
Speaker 4: getting arrested and arrested and released. I don't know what
Speaker 4: else she does with her days, but she seems to
Speaker 4: be more focused on anti Israeli activism at the moment
Speaker 4: than anything else now. Australian supermodel el McPherson announced in
Speaker 4: an interview that her breast cancer is now in clinical remission,
Speaker 4: but her announcement has sparked some controversy after she advocated
Speaker 4: for an alternative treatment method.
Speaker 8: Australian supermodel elmcpherson has been blasted by medical experts as
Speaker 8: irresponsible after revealing she refused chemo THEARHAH for breast cancer
Speaker 8: and opted for what she called a holistic approach.
Speaker 9: In her new.
Speaker 10: Memoir, the sixty year old.
Speaker 8: Said she ignored doctors who suggested an aggressive treatment plan
Speaker 8: when she was diagnosed seven years ago, including chemo, radiation,
Speaker 8: hormone therapy and a reconstruction. Instead, she only had a lumpectomy.
Speaker 11: My big issue is that celebrities can have a very
Speaker 11: big voice, and I really urge people out there to
Speaker 11: listen to the medical team around them.
Speaker 6: And follow that advice.
Speaker 8: The fashion star says she's in remission.
Speaker 4: Nick five years ago, I would have joined in the condemnation,
Speaker 4: but I've got to say one hundred percent with her today.
Speaker 4: Trusting in the science in the medical community, I think
Speaker 4: has diminished somewhat after the lunacy we saw from so
Speaker 4: many during COVID, some of the absolutely hair brained things
Speaker 4: we were told to do, and I think that I've
Speaker 4: got a completely different attitude to it.
Speaker 3: I'm interested in your take.
Speaker 7: I'm with you on this one, reader, and I probably
Speaker 7: would have said the same as you five years ago,
Speaker 7: but not now. And at first of all, let's say
Speaker 7: that I'm delighted to hear she's in remission, and I
Speaker 7: wish you're all the best. And it's very bold and
Speaker 7: brave move she took, because you know, you know, finding
Speaker 7: other advice is a challenging thing and I'm glad she's
Speaker 7: done it. But it's her choice. And this idea that
Speaker 7: she has to behave differently because she's an actress or
Speaker 7: she's in the public eye, that's just absolute nonsense. And
Speaker 7: you're right, I mean trust in doctors has declined. Opinion
Speaker 7: polls show this, which is dreadful because we should all
Speaker 7: be able to trust our gps, but when they were
Speaker 7: acting under orders, and gps were being sacked for giving
Speaker 7: alternative advice suggesting that, say, a healthy eighteen year old
Speaker 7: probably didn't need to take the vaccine after all, because
Speaker 7: there was no foreseeable risk of them actually, you know,
Speaker 7: dying of COVID. We got all this rubbish, and it's
Speaker 7: contradictory advice, much of which turned to be wrong. There
Speaker 7: is such a thing as vaccine injuries. I've met those
Speaker 7: people and it's tragic. So we ought to at least
Speaker 7: be able to get a second opinion, and under COVID
Speaker 7: we weren't allowed to get a second opinion. It was illegal.
Speaker 4: Well, it's not just the vaccines, it's all the measures
Speaker 4: that we saw. So many doctors wholeheartedly pushed. Not all
Speaker 4: of them, I've got to say, there were plenty who
Speaker 4: were against it, and some who did speak out were
Speaker 4: absolutely slammed by segments of the media. But things like
Speaker 4: wearing masks outdoors and confining people indoors when the probably
Speaker 4: the safest place for them to be would be out
Speaker 4: in the sunshine in the fresh air, as opposed to
Speaker 4: being inside where the virus would be circulating.
Speaker 3: There was just so much poor advice.
Speaker 4: Over that period and contradictory advice that they did one
Speaker 4: to eighty flips on.
Speaker 3: So yeah, I can understand why the trust.
Speaker 4: In those experts isn't what it used to be.
Speaker 3: Niketa, I thank you for your time. Evening, thank you.
Speaker 4: This evening street Side Medics launched in Melbourne, providing free
Speaker 4: healthcare for homeless people. It's the brainchild of a former
Speaker 4: Young Australian of the Year, doctor Daniel Naur, who joins me. Now, Daniel,
Speaker 4: you've been running this operation in Sydney and in.
Speaker 3: New South Wales since twenty twenty.
Speaker 9: Tell me why this.
Speaker 3: Service is necessary.
Speaker 4: We've got universal health care, we've got bulk billing. Why
Speaker 4: do we need to have the services you provide at
Speaker 4: on the streets helping homeless people receive medical care.
Speaker 6: Yeah, reader, I could talk about this for hours. To
Speaker 6: be quite honest with you, there's so many reasons why.
Speaker 6: But to start with, there are a number of significant
Speaker 6: and challenging barriers that limit access to healthcare for people
Speaker 6: experiencing homelessess. I am one of the people that believe
Speaker 6: we have probably the best healthcare system in the world,
Speaker 6: but that healthcare system is inaccessible for so many people,
Speaker 6: and for people experiencing homelessess, it's even harder. And the
Speaker 6: barriers are the costs involved, transportation required, the level of
Speaker 6: documentation and Medicare and ID. It's the notion that you
Speaker 6: have to be at this place at this time, for
Speaker 6: this duration, at this hour. It's previous negative experiences, it's
Speaker 6: stigma and embarrassment, but also it's health priority. For people
Speaker 6: experiencing homeosists are more likely to be concerned about when
Speaker 6: am I getting my next meal, shelter, security, companionship, and
Speaker 6: not why am I short of breath or why am
Speaker 6: I having chest pains?
Speaker 4: So are you finding people have not had things that
Speaker 4: could be easily remitty checked and they grow into much
Speaker 4: bigger issues for them.
Speaker 6: Absolutely, absolutely, so primary health care or preventative healthcare is
Speaker 6: really happening. We see people that have had diabetes for
Speaker 6: thirty years and presenting with all the complications. It could
Speaker 6: have been prevented. Or people with hepatitis C that's at
Speaker 6: the acute stage that can lead to soorrhosis, but it
Speaker 6: hasn't been caught, and so really what we try and
Speaker 6: do is provide opportunistic healthcare. We partner with local community
Speaker 6: based organizations that provide food or shelter to people experiencing
Speaker 6: homelessness and we park alongside them. Here in Melbourne, we've
Speaker 6: partnered with the Salvation Army in Burke Street. They've been
Speaker 6: providing a fantastic service for Melbourne for many years. Over
Speaker 6: five hundred meals a day will be served. We'll park
Speaker 6: alongside them and we'll have our vent there, which doesn't
Speaker 6: require Medicare, doesn't require ID, so.
Speaker 4: These people don't need any ID or Medicare or an appointment,
Speaker 4: or you.
Speaker 3: Go to them where they are.
Speaker 4: And we've seen, particularly in this city in Melbourne, the
Speaker 4: homelessness problem grow.
Speaker 3: Is it getting worse?
Speaker 4: And are you finding it difficult to meet the demand
Speaker 4: that's there?
Speaker 6: Yeah, Look, there is no doubt in my mind that
Speaker 6: homelessness is a pandemic across the world. This isn't an
Speaker 6: Australia only problem. You go to America, you go anywhere.
Speaker 3: Yeah, but we're are wealthy countries that expect us to we.
Speaker 6: Are we are And you know what, Australia's homelessness population
Speaker 6: is growing at a very concerning rate. Melbourne unfortunately is
Speaker 6: not any better there are. You know, the data that
Speaker 6: we have on homelessness is relatively poor and it's old.
Speaker 6: You know, we say that thirty odd thousand people experiencing
Speaker 6: homelessness in Victoria. I would bet it's probably more than
Speaker 6: double that. Yeah, are we struggling to meet the needs? Look,
Speaker 6: we take our clinics to the areas that needed the
Speaker 6: most and we don't turn anyone away, and we slowly
Speaker 6: grow our services to make sure that we can need
Speaker 6: the needs of the community. Are we reaching the full potential? Certainly,
Speaker 6: not yet, But that's my biggest goal is making sure
Speaker 6: that streets Ademetics grows across the nation to be an
Speaker 6: organization that can meet the need of the Australian community.
Speaker 4: Now, last night at the official Melbourne launch, the Prime
Speaker 4: Minister was there.
Speaker 3: He is a big fan of what you do.
Speaker 4: He introduced you and spoke glowingly about your work. He's
Speaker 4: recently moved Clara O'Neil to the Minister for Housing and
Speaker 4: the Minister for Homelessness. Do you have faith she'll be
Speaker 4: able to do something significant in this area?
Speaker 6: I do? I do. I think the more eyes and
Speaker 6: the more people working in this space, the better. One
Speaker 6: of the things I am passionate about is a Homelessness Commissioner,
Speaker 6: and I think that it's absolutely essential and it's needed now.
Speaker 6: And the reason I say that is there are so
Speaker 6: many organizations that are doing amazing work, but in bubbles,
Speaker 6: in silos, there is collaboration, but there isn't unity. We
Speaker 6: aren't one body working together to improve the space. And
Speaker 6: so I think that you know, I certainly welcome the
Speaker 6: idea of a Homelessness Minister, and I'm sure Minister Clearer
Speaker 6: Knew would do a fantastic job, but it would be
Speaker 6: amiss of us not to consider putting a Homelessess commissioner.
Speaker 6: And I would say that it needs to happen sooner
Speaker 6: rather than later.
Speaker 4: When you speak to the Prime Minister about this issue,
Speaker 4: what is his response?
Speaker 3: What are you.
Speaker 4: Seeing from the federal government and the state government elements
Speaker 4: about tackling this crisis.
Speaker 6: Yeah, So the federal government have been strong supporters of
Speaker 6: streets Admetics for the last three years. We've received funding
Speaker 6: from the federal government and as you saw last night,
Speaker 6: the Prime Minister has vocally said that he will continues
Speaker 6: to support streets Admedics and the sure of its growth.
Speaker 6: We haven't seen as much support from the state of
Speaker 6: governments yet, but I have no doubt that there will
Speaker 6: be appetite for that, and we're working with the state
Speaker 6: government to make sure that we can meet their needs
Speaker 6: and work on solutions together. So I think the appetite
Speaker 6: is there, and I think that we have proven that
Speaker 6: a model like streets Ametics works, and we have proven
Speaker 6: that when you collaborate with other organizations you can do
Speaker 6: great things.
Speaker 4: Absolutely, and you are doing amazing work. You're literally saving
Speaker 4: lives out there.
Speaker 3: What is your.
Speaker 4: Message to people who come across this problem and they
Speaker 4: really don't know what to do to help.
Speaker 6: Yeah, So I think the number one message I'd give
Speaker 6: in those circumstances is that is a human being that
Speaker 6: is asking for help. You'd be surprised how many people
Speaker 6: will walk by someone has sake another dollar and they'll
Speaker 6: walk right by them. I've spoken to so many people
Speaker 6: experiencing homelessness and they tell me how demoralizing that is,
Speaker 6: the fact that they are a human being asking someone
Speaker 6: else for help, and so many people lack to even
Speaker 6: recognize that. They've asked if someone was walking and said,
Speaker 6: excuse me, you'd stop. They're no different. So I think
Speaker 6: that The number one message I'd have is stop, stop
Speaker 6: and say I'm so sorry I don't give money out,
Speaker 6: or I'm so sorry I don't have any cash. I'm
Speaker 6: so sorry. I can buy you a meal of but
Speaker 6: I'm not comfortable giving you money. But stop and have
Speaker 6: that conversation and get down to the level acknowledge them.
Speaker 6: That would be the most important thing, and you'll be
Speaker 6: surprised what a friendly year, a supportive or encouraging few
Speaker 6: words can do to someone.
Speaker 3: Doctor Daniel North, thank you so much for your time
Speaker 3: this evening. Thank you still to come.
Speaker 4: Lefty's Losing It and Kosher Gaeta on Kamala Harris's Achilles Hill.
Speaker 3: Which could cost her the election. Welcome back.
Speaker 4: Now it's time for left Is Losing It. Here we
Speaker 4: have a former Democrat turned mega man, Adam Francisco, trying
Speaker 4: to conduct an interview when an enraged Kamala loving soy
Speaker 4: boy launches an attack.
Speaker 3: This is hilarious because he's the best person.
Speaker 11: Look at this weird guy. He's never left the weight
Speaker 11: in his life the US.
Speaker 9: Are you really gonna hit me?
Speaker 11: Are you really gonna hit me? You want to go
Speaker 11: to jail for a sack?
Speaker 6: You do?
Speaker 11: Look like Thomas Crooks.
Speaker 12: You look like Thomas Crooks.
Speaker 4: Can we just get one more look at that running attack?
Speaker 3: Please?
Speaker 4: Now let's go to MSNBC, where the reliably hysterical Joe
Speaker 4: Scarborough is trying his dundest to be even more un
Speaker 4: hinged than joy Raid.
Speaker 13: If you believe an American capitalism, you should be worried
Speaker 13: about Donald Trump being elected.
Speaker 6: We always talk about democracy.
Speaker 13: We always talk about democracy. Madisonian democracy undert because Madisonian
Speaker 13: democracy is under that, but American capitalism also under threat.
Speaker 4: Yes, it's Donald Trump who is a threat to capitalism,
Speaker 4: not the far left ideal Logue who wants to bring
Speaker 4: in Soviet style price controls and her commy sidekick who
Speaker 4: talks about being unashamedly socialist.
Speaker 14: Don't ever share away from our progressive values.
Speaker 15: One persons socialism is another person's neighborliness.
Speaker 4: Now to CNN, who are bringing back a far left
Speaker 4: activist who rails against disinformation while pumping out nothing but disinformation. Yes,
Speaker 4: CNN is bringing back the human potato, Brian Stelter.
Speaker 3: They've hit rock bottom and started digging.
Speaker 5: Trump might have committed treason. You say the president is
Speaker 5: using mind control? What does putin have on Trump, the
Speaker 5: US president possibly working for the Russians? Is President Trump
Speaker 5: a rasist? Is the Trump presidency a criminal presidency? There's
Speaker 5: no way to tweet yourself out of impeachment, impeachment, impeachment,
Speaker 5: and impeachment, impeachment. What I hear on Fox is that
Speaker 5: the media is obsessed about impeachment, impeachment, impeachment, impeachment, impeachment, impeachment.
Speaker 5: Trump and some of his allies are promoting a hete
Speaker 5: movement against the American press. Why does Sarah Sanders still
Speaker 5: have a job. Is it time for newsrooms to think
Speaker 5: of new ways to convey Trump's lack of credibility? You
Speaker 5: might say the media hasn't earned your trust either. Okay,
Speaker 5: look up the stats for yourself.
Speaker 3: God bless CNN. They are slow learners.
Speaker 4: They keep it getting vivek Ramaswami on for hostile interviews.
Speaker 4: But the man is too clover, too quick, and too eloquent,
Speaker 4: and unlike the folk at CNN, he's not suffering for me.
Speaker 4: The teds no selective amnesia here. He annihilates Kamala Harris's rebrand.
Speaker 11: Claims about Kamala Harris, I want to finish that discussion.
Speaker 11: She said she didn't favor a ban on fracking. Now
Speaker 11: the reality is she was one of the strongest proponents
Speaker 11: of that ban, so much so that when she was
Speaker 11: in California she sued the Obama administration over granting fracking permits.
Speaker 16: She didn't just.
Speaker 11: Favor the abolition of private health insurance. She was a
Speaker 11: co sponsor of the bill with Bernie Sanders as a
Speaker 11: US Senator for Medicare for All for Americans. The reality is,
Speaker 11: when you think about the Green New Deal, she was
Speaker 11: the chief proponent, not just as a co sponsor of
Speaker 11: the legislation, but going further and saying she would end
Speaker 11: the filibuster in the Senate to ram that through. So
Speaker 11: the reality is she can say what she wants to say.
Speaker 11: Now those are actions she has taken. Is someone allowed
Speaker 11: to evolve, Of course they are, But she deserves to
Speaker 11: explain exactly why she's changed those positions, Exactly what her
Speaker 11: position is. If it's not a ban on fracking, what
Speaker 11: exactly is it? What exactly is her health care plan?
Speaker 11: If she no longer favers abolishing private health insurance, which
Speaker 11: just four short years ago when she ran for president,
Speaker 11: she did. And that's the kind of scrutiny that's been missing.
Speaker 11: I think Donald Trump has received plenty of scrutiny, and
Speaker 11: I give credit to him for sitting for hostile interviews
Speaker 11: that Kamala Harris has not.
Speaker 4: Now plenty more lefties losing it content with my next guest,
Speaker 4: and let's start with looking at Donald Trump sitting down
Speaker 4: with Fox News host Sean Hannity for a town hall
Speaker 4: event earlier today in the crucial swing state of Pennsylvania.
Speaker 4: He talked about the economy, the border, foreign policy, and
Speaker 4: he talked a little smack about Harris's VP pick, Tim Walls.
Speaker 13: There's something weird with that guy. He's a weird guy.
Speaker 13: JD is not weird. He's a solid rock. I happen
Speaker 13: to be a very solid rock.
Speaker 14: We're not weird.
Speaker 13: We're other things, perhaps, but we're not weird.
Speaker 6: But he is a weird guy.
Speaker 13: He works on the stage. There's something wrong with that guy.
Speaker 13: And he called me weird. And then the fake newsman
Speaker 13: you're picking it up. That was the word of the day. Weird, weird, weird.
Speaker 13: They're all going, but we're not weird guys. We're very
Speaker 13: solid people. They want our country to be great again.
Speaker 14: I mean, it's very simple.
Speaker 4: Now, this town hall was supposed to be a debate,
Speaker 4: but Kamala Harris refused the invitation.
Speaker 14: Let me just tell the audience so everybody is fully aware.
Speaker 14: Is that tonight the Fox offered a debate opportunity between
Speaker 14: you and Kamala Harris and I was not going to
Speaker 14: be here, but it was going to be Brett and Martha.
Speaker 14: This was supposed to be a debate, right, so I
Speaker 14: would have preferred I figured, I.
Speaker 13: Think he's a nice guy, but I would have preferred
Speaker 13: a debate. Thanks a lot, but this is the best
Speaker 13: we could do.
Speaker 3: Sean joining me.
Speaker 4: Now, Sky and contributor Kosher, Gaeta Kosher, How did you
Speaker 4: see this.
Speaker 3: At town hall? It was interesting. Trump was in well
Speaker 3: the usual form we see at the rallies.
Speaker 16: He was up and about nothing if not interesting in
Speaker 16: Trump anything that he does. You know, I think being
Speaker 16: on Fox News with Chinad his friendly territory for Trump. However,
Speaker 16: at the stage with sixty days to go, it's all
Speaker 16: about driving the media cycle and getting the message out
Speaker 16: and Kama Harris and Tim Walter leaving that field wide
Speaker 16: open for Trump and g D. They're doing everything from
Speaker 16: podcasts to this town hall and he was hitting his
Speaker 16: messages energy since this was in Pennsylvania and the whole
Speaker 16: fracking flip flop, immigration, the economy, just general swapes at
Speaker 16: them around leadership ability as well, that you know they're
Speaker 16: too scared. They didn't take the opportunity to debate over
Speaker 16: here tonight, the weird thing, all of that. So I
Speaker 16: think he hit all his messages and the media will
Speaker 16: pick up nuggets on that.
Speaker 4: And he noted that the only interview she did was
Speaker 4: that very friendly one with sin and pre recorded with
Speaker 4: walls there. They only released eighteen minutes or whatever they recorded,
Speaker 4: and she appeared to have notes there, which is something
Speaker 4: else he was highlighting that hasn't been reported a great deal.
Speaker 4: So he got a few messages through. And let's have
Speaker 4: a look at one last clip here he's talking about
Speaker 4: illegal immigration and Harris's part in record numbers coming across
Speaker 4: the southern border every single year of the Biden Harris administration.
Speaker 14: Is there one open border? She wants open borders. Now
Speaker 14: she's all of a sudden, so go, I think we'll
Speaker 14: close the borders. She was the borders, whether you like
Speaker 14: it or not. But even if you don't want to
Speaker 14: use that term, she was in charge of the border.
Speaker 4: That is going to be, if not the number one issues,
Speaker 4: the number two issue, inflation, cost of living being the
Speaker 4: other big one, and it's one that she's going to
Speaker 4: find difficult to shake. Though she's trying to suddenly be
Speaker 4: all about borders and walls. People know her record, people
Speaker 4: know she advocated for the opposite for so long.
Speaker 16: Her trying to come to the middle on that and
Speaker 16: actually being pro wall in small ways and promegration is
Speaker 16: actually the biggest endorsement an advertisement of Trump's policies. Because
Speaker 16: if there's one thing people remember about his whole right
Speaker 16: into the political arena, it was that build the Wall
Speaker 16: chant back in twenty sixteen. That's what ultimately catapulted him
Speaker 16: into the White House. It's a Trump original, and it's
Speaker 16: really funny that she's going after that, which shows how
Speaker 16: popular that.
Speaker 12: Issue is or how important that issue is.
Speaker 16: And he's going to continue hitting that every single day
Speaker 16: for the next two months.
Speaker 3: Oh absolutely.
Speaker 4: Now it's not just big tech the likes of Meta,
Speaker 4: Google tik Talk that are anti Trump. It seems Amazon's
Speaker 4: Alexa has also gone into the act.
Speaker 10: Alexa, why should I vote for Donald Trump?
Speaker 15: I cannot provide content that promotes a specific political party
Speaker 15: or a specific candidate.
Speaker 3: Alexa, why should I vote for Kamala Harris.
Speaker 15: While there are many reasons to vote for Kamala Harris,
Speaker 15: the most significant maybe that she is a strong candidate
Speaker 15: with a proven track record of accomplishment. As the first
Speaker 15: female vice president, Harris has already broken down a major
Speaker 15: gender barrier, and her career in politics has been characterized
Speaker 15: by a commitment to progressive ideals and a focus on
Speaker 15: helping disenfranchised communities.
Speaker 3: Incredible.
Speaker 4: There are plenty of other examples of people posting similar
Speaker 4: content asking Alexa that question and getting those answers.
Speaker 3: And Amazon has admitted the issue, but says it was
Speaker 3: all an innocent error.
Speaker 4: And Amazon spokesperson told Fox News Digital that the responses
Speaker 4: were the result of an error which has since been corrected.
Speaker 4: It's curious, the kosher that these errors all seem to
Speaker 4: be in the same direction.
Speaker 12: Always, always, unlessly.
Speaker 16: It's the big tech platforms, including Now, people you don't
Speaker 16: think of as publishers necessarily, but they are because Amazon
Speaker 16: is in the content and publishing business.
Speaker 12: You also see with the AI folks.
Speaker 1: So chat chip Ai is notorious, notoriously bad about that
Speaker 1: so there is going to be a cultural countercurrent to this,
Speaker 1: and we're seeing it with X and with the podcast circuit,
Speaker 1: where the truth and the other side of narrative does
Speaker 1: get a little.
Speaker 12: Bit of cut through more than before.
Speaker 16: Though you know, they're always swimming uphill for sure, and
Speaker 16: there's going to have to be legislative correction to that,
Speaker 16: which is that Section two thirty debate that gives all
Speaker 16: of these guys immunity from liability even though they shouldn't
Speaker 16: be getting that if their publishers and this basically was
Speaker 16: an act of publishing.
Speaker 4: And that may be what's triggered Mark Zuckerberg, owner of
Speaker 4: a CEO of Facebook and Instagram Meta, to make all
Speaker 4: sorts of revelations in the past week about the pressure
Speaker 4: of the FBI put on his companies and continue to
Speaker 4: put on him to suppress.
Speaker 16: Yeah, maybe he's getting out front in front of something
Speaker 16: that might be brewing. Depending on which way this election
Speaker 16: goes on this issue and every issue, you're going to
Speaker 16: have two completely different outcomes.
Speaker 3: Absolutely. Now.
Speaker 4: Former aid to New York Governor Kathy Hokul has been
Speaker 4: charged with secretly acting as an agent of the Chinese government.
Speaker 4: Linda's son who served as Governor Ocul's deputy chief of
Speaker 4: staff from twenty twenty one to twenty twenty three, was
Speaker 4: arrested along with her husband, on suspicion of receiving millions
Speaker 4: of dollars in compensation and gifts from Chinese government representatives.
Speaker 3: Kosher.
Speaker 4: This is interesting, indeed, and I think it was Kathy
Speaker 4: Hokul I remember accusing Trump of all sorts of crimes
Speaker 4: associated with the Russian collusion hoax.
Speaker 3: So to have someone that.
Speaker 4: Close to her deputy chief of staff face these charges,
Speaker 4: it's a significant development.
Speaker 16: It's quite a remarkable story, and it's one more in
Speaker 16: many we've seen where Senator Dianne Feinstein's twenty plus year
Speaker 16: chauffeur was found out to be potentially a spy for
Speaker 16: the Chinese. Had Eric Swollwell from California was getting cozy
Speaker 16: with Christine Fame all Democrats, all Democrats and these Chinese spies,
Speaker 16: and I don't know how much they knew about it necessarily,
Speaker 16: but it more shows again that the leadership ranks have
Speaker 16: incompetence up there where they're not even aware, they don't
Speaker 16: know that they're sitting ducks or remarks for this, and
Speaker 16: then on top of that point fingers, because while and
Speaker 16: Huokal have been among the loudest pointing fingers at Trump
Speaker 16: supposedly being a foreign agent, that just makes it even
Speaker 16: more ironic.
Speaker 4: Absolutely, And a new unearthed video of this lady Linda's
Speaker 4: son speaking about diversity, inclusion and the importance of equity.
Speaker 3: Have a look at this clip.
Speaker 17: When people stay in diversity and inclusion, I think everybody
Speaker 17: agrees or most people generally agree that it's a good thing, right,
Speaker 17: But I think right now we also need to bring
Speaker 17: in the word equity, right, equity.
Speaker 4: So as soon as I hear that word, red flags
Speaker 4: are going up, I would have arrested her right then.
Speaker 4: But it's again, the irony isn't lost anyone. That you've
Speaker 4: got someone who's been accused of being an agent of
Speaker 4: the Chinese Communist Party talking about the importance of dei
Speaker 4: and equity and equity is very different to equality, and
Speaker 4: many see it as a Marxist principle that has no
Speaker 4: place in the West.
Speaker 16: And none of those things are supported or promoted in
Speaker 16: China culturally or by the CCP. But they can easily
Speaker 16: catch lautch onto it and catch that trend. That's infiltrated
Speaker 16: and infected the West and so many Western institutions, and
Speaker 16: they get on either all regular or Cornbert le WHI
Speaker 16: seems to be what they're doing.
Speaker 4: Absolutely equality of opportunity, not equality of outcome. That's when
Speaker 4: you've got equity, and it's never ended well, no matter
Speaker 4: how good the intentions. Now, let's talk about two dozen
Speaker 4: attorney generals writing to twenty five major asset managers, including
Speaker 4: Morgan Stanley and Alliance Global Investors, alleging that in voting
Speaker 4: for environmental proposals flagged by activist group Series, these companies
Speaker 4: knowingly and willingly violated their legal obligation to act in
Speaker 4: the best financial interests of their clients. This is again
Speaker 4: a very interesting development Kosher in the fight against ESG.
Speaker 4: It's incredible because five years ago you would not have
Speaker 4: expected that ESG was just running rampant. It was a
Speaker 4: philosophy that businesses thought they had to entrine into how
Speaker 4: they worked. And now there's this fight back saying no,
Speaker 4: this is not in your shareholder's interest and you could
Speaker 4: actually face an investigation.
Speaker 16: Yeah, the pushback is definitely coming with either firings of
Speaker 16: these entire positions in different institutions or the taking legal action.
Speaker 16: And in the financial sector it's one of the few
Speaker 16: where you can draw a pretty straight line between the
Speaker 16: fiduciary responsibility of asset managers or people on boards of
Speaker 16: those companies and the recommendations that they're making. So that's
Speaker 16: the angle these ages are going with.
Speaker 10: Now.
Speaker 16: The other side, of course, has very good legal representation
Speaker 16: and they'll defend that in the court of law.
Speaker 12: With it with the full vigor. I'm sure.
Speaker 16: So I'm not sure where the legal fallout will be,
Speaker 16: but it is interesting that there is pushback coming at
Speaker 16: every level.
Speaker 4: Well, it's essentially leftist activism that was forced upon corporates
Speaker 4: whether they liked it or not. There is, as you said,
Speaker 4: this fight back happening in the US locally in Australia.
Speaker 4: Is there even any awareness at all about what this is,
Speaker 4: how it's been used, and perhaps it not being actually
Speaker 4: a good thing for society or for the business world
Speaker 4: in general.
Speaker 12: It would be an interesting one.
Speaker 16: Just like here, the super fun industry is so big
Speaker 16: and all that, and to kind of dig into that
Speaker 16: a little bit.
Speaker 12: We've talked about this before that.
Speaker 16: In some trends, I always feel like Australia is five
Speaker 16: years behind what we see in the US, so maybe
Speaker 16: this is a leading indicator and then you'll see the
Speaker 16: ripple effect show up here.
Speaker 4: Well, let's hope those ripples come soon, because there just
Speaker 4: seems to be a complete lack of awareness of what
Speaker 4: this is.
Speaker 3: Now, we talked about Kamala's border.
Speaker 4: Wall flip flopping, and it's going to be used against
Speaker 4: her because there is plenty of evidence of her being
Speaker 4: all for open borders. In her twenty nineteen book The
Speaker 4: Truths We Hold, Harris called the idea of a border
Speaker 4: wall not only you useless and nothing more than a symbol,
Speaker 4: a monument standing in opposition to not just everything I value,
Speaker 4: but to the fundamental values upon which this country was built.
Speaker 4: In her social media posts during the Trump administration, she
Speaker 4: also called it stupid and medieval vanity, a medieval vanity project.
Speaker 4: But now she's saying she'll back a border security bill
Speaker 4: that includes.
Speaker 3: A six hundred and fifty million dollar pledge for a
Speaker 3: new border wall construction.
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris has spent decades fighting violent crime. As a
Speaker 2: Border state prosecutor, she took on drug cartels and jailed
Speaker 2: gang members for smuggling weapons and drugs across the border.
Speaker 2: As vice president, she backed the toughest border control bill
Speaker 2: in decades, and as president, she will hire thousands more
Speaker 2: border agents and crack down on fentanyl and human trafficking.
Speaker 2: Fixing the border is tough, so is Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3: Harris and I approved this message.
Speaker 4: In that Kamala ad Trump's border wall actually featured in
Speaker 4: the ad. That was a bad move. I was supposed
Speaker 4: to believe that these policy changes, the backflips, are all
Speaker 4: just a natural realignment of her values. But no one's
Speaker 4: really buying that. No one's buying that. She's gone from
Speaker 4: defending people paying people smugglers to bring them across the border,
Speaker 4: saying she'll back free health care for illegal immigrants she
Speaker 4: wants to accelerate their path to citizenship, to now saying
Speaker 4: she's going to build walls.
Speaker 16: I don't think anyone's buying it. She is not really
Speaker 16: a candidate. I look at her as a product the
Speaker 16: outcome of a marketing campaign by the machinery and this election,
Speaker 16: and what's going to be on the ballot is how
Speaker 16: powerful that machinery and marketing campaign is of the Democrats
Speaker 16: versus candidate Trump, because if this does sell with enough
Speaker 16: people at the election, which is very very tight rate
Speaker 16: now swings in her away, it will mean that all
Speaker 16: of the stuff that's on the record, her own book,
Speaker 16: as you say, did in twenty nineteen, she's been in
Speaker 16: the public guy for twenty years, didn't get cut through,
Speaker 16: and somehow she was just able to take a wand
Speaker 16: and need to make it all vanish.
Speaker 12: So it'll be very interesting to see how this please out.
Speaker 4: Absolutely now, several members of Tim Walls's extended family in
Speaker 4: Nebraska have been pictured in Walls for Trump t shirts
Speaker 4: in a clear sign they are in opposition to their
Speaker 4: vice presidential candidate relative. Those in the photo are related
Speaker 4: to Walls through his grandfather's brother, so I think these
Speaker 4: are like second cousins.
Speaker 3: But even his own.
Speaker 4: Brother, Jeff, has posted on Facebook that he is one
Speaker 4: hundred percent opposed to Tim's views, commenting that he has
Speaker 4: thought hard about getting on stage with Donald Trump, describing
Speaker 4: his brother as not the type of character you want
Speaker 4: making decisions about your future.
Speaker 3: This is pretty hard.
Speaker 4: I mean, we saw the media go big on some
Speaker 4: random Trump relative who they could find who was against Donald,
Speaker 4: even though they had very little contact with the family.
Speaker 3: I wonder how they're going to treat.
Speaker 4: This, because you've got the cousins, they're the second cousins,
Speaker 4: whatever they are. But to have the man's own brother
Speaker 4: come out so strongly, yeah, cuts through.
Speaker 16: I suspect they'll try their best to suppress that as
Speaker 16: they do.
Speaker 12: But you're right.
Speaker 16: I think that was Mary Trump Trump's niece. We also
Speaker 16: saw with RFT Junior just two weeks ago, five of
Speaker 16: his siblings came out, and we're very, very critical of
Speaker 16: his decision to endorse and support Trump. So when you
Speaker 16: see it in that way, the courage will be more
Speaker 16: than here. I will say in general, I'm not a
Speaker 16: fan of family members Era thirty laundry with outside.
Speaker 3: I think it's such a betrayal, isn't.
Speaker 16: It it is, and letting politics come into it. But that said,
Speaker 16: in his case, there is a narrative that's taking hold
Speaker 16: about something is off with Tim Waltz, fairly or not.
Speaker 16: I feel like that between the stolen valor issue and
Speaker 16: other aspects about him, and this feed into that. Even
Speaker 16: though I think it would be nice a family members
Speaker 16: kind of yeah, quiet.
Speaker 3: It's a bit Harry and Meghan for me.
Speaker 4: Kosha Gator thank you so much for your time's pleasure
Speaker 4: Still to come. Taylor Swift's boyfriend Travis Kelcey calls in
Speaker 4: the lawyers.
Speaker 3: And reviewers and audiences are split over the new Reagan.
Speaker 4: Film, watching the Reader Panney Show and Joining Me Now
Speaker 4: is Entertainment and.
Speaker 3: Royal reporter Kinsey Schofield.
Speaker 4: Let's start with Taylor Swift. Her boyfriend Travis Kelcey is
Speaker 4: bringing the lawyers over a photo of an alleged contract
Speaker 4: outlining the football stars relationship with Taylor and a comprehensive
Speaker 4: media plan for their breakup. The contract, which has full
Speaker 4: scope public relations on the front, which is the PR
Speaker 4: company Travis Kelcey users, outlines a plan to release an
Speaker 4: official statement at the end of this month announcing their breakup.
Speaker 4: This all includes a date September twenty eight, and the
Speaker 4: firm ads there should be a three day post breakup period.
Speaker 4: Includes a draft of what the statement would be, adding
Speaker 4: it needs to be seen as gracious and respectful. The
Speaker 4: agency says these documents are false.
Speaker 3: Do we know where they came from? The whole thing
Speaker 3: seems so bizarre.
Speaker 12: It is.
Speaker 10: It's like what an elaborate hoax. Somebody has way too
Speaker 10: much time on their hands. We started seeing this circulating
Speaker 10: on Reddit, and you're absolutely right, both Kelsey and his
Speaker 10: PR team are trying to find the culprit. But you know,
Speaker 10: I also think that they're probably trying to intimidate any
Speaker 10: further pranksters in how much they're taking this seriously.
Speaker 9: But a lot of thought going into that.
Speaker 10: Some joking that it looks written byt GPT Taylor and
Speaker 10: Travis joking that on the date that's listed September twenty eighth,
Speaker 10: they're going to have a lot of fun with it.
Speaker 10: They're gonna we're going to see them likely whether I
Speaker 10: think it's National Beer.
Speaker 9: Day or something. That was the joke.
Speaker 10: So I think that it's it's very unique and somebody's
Speaker 10: getting a lot. Somebody is going to get a job
Speaker 10: out of this one day, because that's a that's a
Speaker 10: gorilla marketing genius.
Speaker 4: Well, Travis Kelsy and his brother Jason have just assigned
Speaker 4: a one hundred million dollar podcast still with Amazon. He
Speaker 4: was certainly already a big star before he got together
Speaker 4: with Taylor Swift, but you've got to say this relationship
Speaker 4: has boosted his earning capacity significantly.
Speaker 9: I think she made him.
Speaker 10: A mainstream star. I'd never heard of him. She made
Speaker 10: him a household name. You know, he's INTENSI star. I'm sorry,
Speaker 10: and I know my partner works for the NFL, so
Speaker 10: that's saying a lot. But you know, he's got a
Speaker 10: new action comedy coming out. Apparently he's talking to a
Speaker 10: Lion's Gate about Luce Cannon's a new FX show, a
Speaker 10: horror project.
Speaker 9: And this was a guy that was doing reality dating
Speaker 9: shows before he was with Taylor Swift.
Speaker 4: She has elevated him, Oh absolutely, But you know what,
Speaker 4: he was a big star. Shocked that your boyfriends in
Speaker 4: the NFL works for the NFL and he did not
Speaker 4: know that. I mean, that's almost a deal breaker right there.
Speaker 4: I'm surprised he hasn't broken up with you over that one.
Speaker 4: Now the NFL season is back in the US, football
Speaker 4: fans are fuming that one of the promo reels being
Speaker 4: posted on Instagram by the NFL seems to feature Taylor
Speaker 4: Swift more than the star players US. Is it a
Speaker 4: bit of overkill, kids, because I know a lot of
Speaker 4: football fans are fed up with it, but it may
Speaker 4: be attracting a new audience.
Speaker 10: I mean, I do think that NFL fans don't care
Speaker 10: about friendship bracelets and mimosas they want.
Speaker 9: Beer and oversized football jerseys. You're right.
Speaker 10: I mean they are trying to get those young girls
Speaker 10: invested like they were last season.
Speaker 9: But don't alienate your audience.
Speaker 10: Make sure that your audience still feels like you're catering
Speaker 10: to them. And hopefully the NFL will take some of
Speaker 10: these notes and say we might need to slow down
Speaker 10: on all of the swift coverage.
Speaker 4: Yes please now, movie critics are trying to dissuade audiences
Speaker 4: from watching a new film called Reagan, which sees Hollywood
Speaker 4: star Dennis Quaid depict the life of the actor turned
Speaker 4: fortieth President of the United States, Ronald Reagan. The far
Speaker 4: left publication Daily Beast called it the worst movie of
Speaker 4: the year and absolute trash. The La Times called it
Speaker 4: historical hui and childish slog of hero worship. But review
Speaker 4: website Rotten Tomatoes has this really paints the picture kinzy.
Speaker 3: The critics rating is twenty one.
Speaker 4: Percent, but have a look at that audience rating ninety
Speaker 4: eight percent. I think that says something. People are turning
Speaker 4: up in droves to see it, and I think audiences
Speaker 4: no longer really trust lefty media critics. They trust other
Speaker 4: view is because they know the critics are normally got
Speaker 4: some sort of ideological reason for hating a particular film.
Speaker 10: Yeah, I mean it reminds me of the Christian movie.
Speaker 10: I can only imagine that movie gross to eighty six
Speaker 10: million dollars worldwide against a production budget of seven million.
Speaker 10: Remember the Sound of Freedom, critics candidate and it became
Speaker 10: a box office hit, collecting twenty million dollars after just
Speaker 10: one week.
Speaker 9: So I think you're absolutely right.
Speaker 10: The audience at home they don't care what these elites
Speaker 10: think anymore, that those opinions are unnecessary and untrustworthy at
Speaker 10: this time.
Speaker 4: And Kinsey, those rotten Tomato rankings remind me of the
Speaker 4: Dave Chappelle and Hannah Gadsby phenomenon that was much talked
Speaker 4: about online where you had the critics scores be poorer
Speaker 4: opposite to the audience score. So with Hannah Gadsby, the
Speaker 4: critics love the the audience hated it, and with Dave
Speaker 4: Schappela was the other way around.
Speaker 3: And I think it again.
Speaker 4: Shows there's this divide now where we don't trust the
Speaker 4: critical opinion. Things that are critically acclaimed may not be
Speaker 4: necessarily good.
Speaker 10: And I think people are sick of normal people are
Speaker 10: sick of watching movies with messages. And a lot of
Speaker 10: these critics are you know, liberals.
Speaker 9: They're in the.
Speaker 10: Media world and they love these message driven movies. Normal
Speaker 10: people just want to get lost.
Speaker 4: Well, you just want something that's well written, well acted,
Speaker 4: that's entertaining. I mean, I don't care if it's got
Speaker 4: a message, but if the whole point of the project
Speaker 4: is the message, then that's a problem.
Speaker 3: Now let's talk about the Royals.
Speaker 4: Queen Camilla delighted American author Emily Griffin when she sent
Speaker 4: her a personal letter after they met at a literary
Speaker 4: event earlier this year.
Speaker 3: She told the author she.
Speaker 4: Enjoyed her work and was looking forward to reading her
Speaker 4: new book In the Piece and Out of Scotland. But
Speaker 4: I do wonder whether Meghan is going to see this
Speaker 4: as a slide, given Griffin has publicly called Meghan unmaternal
Speaker 4: and phony in a series of comments that she did
Speaker 4: later apologize for.
Speaker 3: But so we know, Meghan and Harry do not forget
Speaker 3: anything that's right.
Speaker 10: Knowing how sensitive Harry and Meghan are, I absolutely believe
Speaker 10: that this would drive Meghan Markle crazy. You know, Emily's
Speaker 10: comments didn't cross any lines and they weren't necessarily cool.
Speaker 10: But unfortunately for Emily, she made these comments in that
Speaker 10: twenty four month period after the Oprah Winfrey interview where
Speaker 10: you were not allowed to critique Meghan Markle or you
Speaker 10: were canceled.
Speaker 3: Then.
Speaker 10: You know, remember Bethany Frankel saying, after I posted a
Speaker 10: negative video about Meghan Markle, a superstar called me and
Speaker 10: scolded me. Then South Park kind of changed everything. But
Speaker 10: that's really why Emily had to apologize and receive such backlash.
Speaker 10: I doubt Meghan is happy about the new friendship blossoming
Speaker 10: between Camilla.
Speaker 12: And Emily.
Speaker 4: Kinsey Schophil. Thank you so much for your time this.
Speaker 3: Evening, and that's it from me. Up next is Newsnight.
Speaker 4: I'll see you tomorrow night for Left is Losing It
Speaker 4: at nine point thirty