WEBVTT - Geraldine Brooks on Anthony Albanese's legacy

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>From Schwartz Media. I'm Ruby Jones. This is seven AM.

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 1>When Geraldine Brooks sat down for her first in a

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>series of conversations with Anthony Albenesi. It was just before

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Christmas and his popularity had plummeted. The Prime Minister's net

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>approval rating had dropped to minus seventeen, while Peter Dutton's

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>had improved to zero. Albanesi's critics see him as weak

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and ineffective, a narrative reinforced by the failure of the

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Voice referendum and the perception of inaction on climate change.

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a stark contrast to his past as a passionate

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>activist who was once arrested at an anti logging protest. Today,

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:50.400
<v Speaker 1>author and contributor to The Monthly Geraldine Brooks on the

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>public perception of Anthony Alberesi and whether he's delivering on

0:00:54.360 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the legacy he set out to leave. It's Friday, February

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight. So, Jordane, as you were setting out to

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 1>profile the Prime Minister and the alban easy to spend

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>all this time with him, do you remember the image

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that you had of him in your head at the time,

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>at the very beginning, who you thought he.

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Was, Yeah, because for a long time I was actually

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 2>living in his electorate, so he's a very familiar cat

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:36.839
<v Speaker 2>to me. He was my member, as golf Whitlam always

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 2>used to like to say my member. And he was

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 2>a guy who was very open and didn't mind socializing

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 2>with journalists. So I'd actually seen a bit of him

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 2>in the past, and I think that I can't disassociate

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 2>him from the guys I grew up with, which were

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 2>lower middle class Catholic boys who went to the school

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 2>next door to mine de la.

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Salle, Ashfield.

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 2>They were nice boys, idealistic, very much caught up in

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 2>the social justice movements of the time, and so he

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 2>reads as like the neighborhood guy to me.

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>And how do you think he was seen by the

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>public when he first became Prime minister three years ago.

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 2>I think he was seen as this likable, decent guy

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:28.360
<v Speaker 2>who understood struggle, the houser who'd grown up with the

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 2>mum with severe disabilities and been super responsible in looking

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 2>after her, and that he was considered a bit of

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 2>a champion of the labor left. He was known as

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 2>such an activist in his university days and he brought

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 2>that with him when he was assistant secretary to the

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 2>New South Wales Labor Party, always seen as that guy

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 2>who wasn't afraid to take on the Tories, but with

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.559
<v Speaker 2>this basic likability and decency.

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Since that moment, though, his approval ratings have declined dramatically. Well,

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Peter Dutton's have gone up. So what do you think

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>has changed?

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think the electorate's very childish at the moment,

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 2>and I think this is true in almost all liberal democracies.

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 2>You see it in New Zealand, you see it in Europe.

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 2>You certainly see the disastrous consequences in the United States

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 2>where more than half the electorate just voted for chaos

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 2>and cruelty. I think there's a throw the bums out

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 2>hangover from COVID, and yes, of course there's a reason

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 2>for that. Inflation is really killing people, and the cost

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 2>of education and the increasing cost of healthcare and interest

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 2>rates and all of this kind of falls on the incumbent.

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 2>And then I think that Albanese has suffered also from

0:03:56.880 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 2>the defeat of the Voice to Parliament. It's been very

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 2>hard for him to recover his mojo from that, and

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 2>I think that Dutton played a very sinister hand there

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 2>because all the indications were that this would be a

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 2>bipartisan thing. It was actually a very small ask, and

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 2>yet Dutton was able to see an opportunity to characterize

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 2>it as something huge and mischaracterize it as divisive when

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 2>it was actually incredibly divisive of him to not support it.

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 3>And I think Albo got played.

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you think that Anthony Ebineze does see as

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>his government's biggest successes.

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 2>I think he sees a lot of groundwork, and I

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 2>think it's true that they have laid groundwork for really

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 2>significant quality of life changes for people. They're characterized a

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 2>small ball, but I tell you what, it's not small bore.

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 2>If you need to see doctor and you've got a

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 2>hurting kid in one of these eighty seven new Medibank

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 2>urgent care clinics has opened in your neighborhood and you

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 2>can get your kids seen rather than sitting in an

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 2>hospital and emergency room for twelve hours. These are the

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 2>things that impact people's lives. I think he's kept every

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:24.039
<v Speaker 2>promise he made about women's issues in terms of decreasing

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 2>the wage gap, and he accomplished that by not only

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:32.799
<v Speaker 2>several increases in the minimum wage, but also increasing wages

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 2>in aged care and childcare, which are predominantly female areas

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 2>of employment. Their housing crisis has been addressed in numerous

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 2>ways with rent subsidies and money for your social housing.

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 2>And yeah it wasn't as much as the Greens were

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 2>asking for, but it was a significant amount of money.

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 2>But his argument is that they've laid a basis for

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 2>consequence expansions of real assistance to struggling middle class and

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 2>lower middle class families and the things that they haven't

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 2>been able to do yet. They need a second term

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 2>and they don't want to see what they have done reversed.

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 2>And Dutton is insistent that he's going to reverse a

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 2>great deal of it.

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>And so these kinds of policies are things that you've

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>mentioned like urgent care clinics and increasing wages, money for

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.359
<v Speaker 1>social housing. Do you think that these are policies that

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>are cutting through? Do you get the sense of the

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>electorate thinks of this government has laid this basis for

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>really being able to help them.

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 2>No, I think they're clearly not cutting through. And I

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:46.799
<v Speaker 2>think you know, there's been a relentlessly negative tattoo beaten

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 2>on the drums against Alvinzi and very little scrutiny or

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 2>equivalent scrutiny given to Peter Dutton and this ridiculous nuclear

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 2>fantasy he has that somehow we can go from zero

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 2>to one hundred on an industry that we don't have here.

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Albanize has also been copying it from.

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:08.799
<v Speaker 2>The left, and you know, some of that is because

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 2>he hasn't made the kind of persuasive case for the

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 2>urgency of our predicament with climate change and is still

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 2>approving new gas pipelines and expanding existing coal mines and

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 2>then seeing you know, the failure to bring the environmental

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 2>protection legislation forward in an aggressive way and really fight

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 2>for the votes that we needed to pass it. These

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 2>things they drown out the work that is being done.

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 2>And I don't think he's putting a strong enough case

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 2>for what the second term will bring and what his

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 2>real passions are. You know, I've heard him speak passionately

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 2>about his legacy and his legacy wanting to be to

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 2>take action against climate change that's irreversible. He doesn't bring

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 2>that out with the passion that I believe he feels.

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>After the break Albaneze's failure to push back against the

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>negative narratives.

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 4>What legacy would you like to leave in your story

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 4>in your Australian and the Australian story.

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 5>Oh jee, I think acting acting on climate change. I think, yeah,

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 5>it's a big challenge, but it's an incredible opportunity to

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 5>grab it and sees it. So I think getting on

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 5>that road so that it can't be reversed.

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Geraldine Anthony Aberineze says he wants his legacy to be

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>action on climate change. So how does that square then

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>with some of these decisions that he's made around the

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Environmental Protection Act and approvals for new colon gas projects.

0:08:59.400 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, I don't.

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 2>I think he isn't doing the work that Alita needs

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:07.839
<v Speaker 2>to do. You don't follow public opinion, You forge it,

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 2>you know. I think he says, well, if people click

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 2>a switch and the lights don't go on, you won't

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:19.319
<v Speaker 2>stay in government. Well you might if you've made the

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 2>case that the most consequential thing that's ever happened to

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 2>people on this planet is happening right now, which is

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 2>that human beings are living with hotter temperatures than any

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 2>human being has ever experienced in history, and that if

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 2>we don't take action on that, we won't have an

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 2>economy and I think that albans is really sincere about

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 2>wanting his legacy to be doing something to combat climate

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 2>change that's irreversible, and yet it seems to be contradicted

0:09:53.400 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 2>by his unwillingness to really make the incredibly hard decisions

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.079
<v Speaker 2>and stand up to the fossil fuel industry.

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>And one particular criticism of Albanezi caving to pressure from

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the fossil fuel industry was when he dropped the Environmental

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Protection Bill at the end of last year. So what

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>did he say to you about why that was.

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, he said that they didn't have the votes and

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:26.160
<v Speaker 2>they were passing a raft of bills in those final

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 2>days of parliament and that day they passed thirty to

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 2>bills and he didn't feel like it was productive to

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 2>bring forward a bill that he knew they didn't have

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 2>the votes to pass. He didn't push back aggressively, and

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 2>I think in some ways his own worst enemy, because

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:46.199
<v Speaker 2>you know, he allowed the premiere of Western Australia to

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 2>run around loading this as a victory over lat sipping Easterners,

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 2>when you know he could have pushed back and said, well,

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, where are the independence you know, why aren't

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 2>they voting with us on this.

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And that lack of pushback against a negative narrative that

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>might form around something that he or his government has done.

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that that has become a trait?

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 2>I think he needs to really look hard at messaging

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 2>at maybe too late, you know, there's narrative about him,

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe too sticky.

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>One of the biggest challenges I think Anthony Albernezi has

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>been addressing the housing crisis in Australia. He obviously bought

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a I think it was four point three million dollar

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>beach house recently. How much of an effect do you

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:44.319
<v Speaker 1>think that has had? How much has that damaged him politically?

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, the optics of that were absolutely terrible.

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:50.599
<v Speaker 2>And you know, he's probably the only person in Australia

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 2>who won't admit that many of his labor colleagues were

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 2>infuriated with him for the timing of that purchase.

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.559
<v Speaker 1>What did he say when you asked about it?

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 2>His time at some point will come to an end.

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 2>He won't be living in the lodge and he and

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 2>his new wife won't go back to the house that

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 2>he lived in with his former wife. And his point

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 2>is that you know, Hawk bought a house and keating

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 2>bought a house, but the times were different and housing

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 2>is at the forefront of everybody's mind now, and so

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 2>I just think it was an incredible own goal and

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 2>it would be better if he expressed some self reflection

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 2>about that.

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And so, going into this election, which could be called

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 1>any day now, what sense do you have of Albernesey's

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>ability to get this second term that he has been

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>so set on.

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm concerned. I'm concerned.

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 2>I think he has a better, healthier, more progressive vision

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 2>for the country, but I'm not sure that he's going

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 2>to be able to convince an electorate in a very,

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 2>very bad mood.

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>And so, after all of the time that you spent

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 1>with him, what is your sense of who Anthony Albanezi

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>is now? Do you still see much of the local

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>member or the politician he was in opposition or even

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:24.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, in his younger university days.

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Ah, I wish he'd tap that inna Alba a bit more.

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 2>I still think that he is an incredibly decent man,

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 2>and as I said before, in these times that is

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 2>not nothing that I thought to myself, maybe you're a

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 2>bit more relaxed than you.

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Should be in terms of the stakes. Of what's ahead.

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Do you mean, well, I think he needed to be

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 2>a bit more worried about the drop in the opinion polls.

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 2>He was inclined not to take it too personally, and

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a mistake. I mean, he was saying

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 2>global inflation has caused a turn against incumbent governments everywhere,

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 2>which is true.

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 3>But it's not enough to say that. I mean, you

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:09.319
<v Speaker 3>really have to fight for it.

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Jeraldine, thank you so much for your time.

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>You can read Geraldine Brooks essay on Anthony Albanezi in

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the March edition of The Monthly. It'll be on newsstands

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>next week and online for subscribers later today. Also in

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the News Today, Donald Trump has ordered the expansion of DOGE,

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Government Efficiency, in spite of mounting criticism

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>against the department and its overseer, Elon Musk. The new

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>auto directs federal agencies to publicly release government payments and

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>travel expenses, as well as work with DOGED when any

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>contracts that are deemed unnecessary. It follows the resignation of

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>more than twenty civil servants from the Department of Government

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Efficiency over the refusal to use their technical expertise to

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>quote dismantle critical public services and a Melbourne graffiti artist

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>who painted Pam the Bird across Melbourne City has been

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>granted bail. Twenty one year old Jack Gibson Burrow was

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>charged with fifty offenses of criminal damage over the blue

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and white bird that police allege Gibson Burrell painted on

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>landmarks including Flinders Street station clock and a number of trains.

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Seven Am is a daily show from Schwartz Media and

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>The Saturday Paper. It's made by Atticus Bastow, Shane Anderson,

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris Danegate, Daniel James, Eric Jensen, Sarah mcvee, Travis Evans,

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Sutton Vecho and myself Ruby Jones. Our theme music has

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>been at Beckley and Josh Hogan of Envelope Audio and

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll be back on Monday.