WEBVTT - #2023 "I've Done My Research" - Dr. Bill Sullivan

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.679
<v Speaker 1>I get a team. It's a new project. Doctor Bills back.

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say my absolute favorite, but that's

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>probably not fair, but definitely in my top five favorites.

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:12.959
<v Speaker 1>And we have a lot of people here and appreciate you, sir.

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.239
<v Speaker 1>It's great to have you back. I love chatting with you.

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I was just pumping up your tires. Have you heard

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 1>that expression pumping up your tires?

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 2>No, but I can gather what it means.

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's an Australian expression for kind of you know,

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>telling you you're amazing.

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So if you're pumping up someone's tires, you're making

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>them feel good. But it's you know, in this case,

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>it's genuine how have you been?

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 2>I've been great?

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 3>And let me just say it's it's always a pleasure

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 3>to come back to your podcast. It's you know, I

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 3>really enjoy speaking with you.

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 4>Is it?

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>What are you not necessarily about this one? But in general,

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.919
<v Speaker 1>like doing this is probably the easiest, and by easiest,

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I just mean the less, the least pressure, the most comfortable.

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>This is almost the easiest way to do right.

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Probably most of the other interviews are more formal, and

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 3>they play into my credentials in biomedicine, and the advice

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 3>that I might be giving is, you know, more like

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 3>standard of care type of thing.

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 2>So it is a pleasure to.

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:21.119
<v Speaker 3>Come on here in a little more of an informal

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 3>atmosphere and you know, just shoot the breeze about various topics.

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 1>I used to work in television for a little bit,

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and by a little bit I mean a few years,

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>but like a weekly thing, and my weekly thing was

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 1>anywhere between five and seven minutes. So I'd literally leave home,

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>drive into the city. You know, you've done it before,

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you've done television, and you go in and you get

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you sit in makeup, and they put stuff on you,

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and you get prepped and they wire you up and

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>then and it's just this, it's a really impractical, impossible

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 1>way to deliver quality information and build any kind of

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>connection and rapport because you walk onto the TV set

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>between ads, you sit down, they count you down, and

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>then they kind of intro the show, and then they

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>intro you, and then they talk to you for three

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>or four minutes, and half the talking is them, and

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>then it's like that's quite carperence, you know, and it's like, oh,

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.920
<v Speaker 1>there are so many things that we can't say, you know,

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>we really it's a really difficult way to share genuine

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:34.920
<v Speaker 1>insight and helpful information because the practical reality of the

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>situation is you've got almost no time to talk.

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 2>That's true.

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 3>You got time enough for maybe three or four bullet points,

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 3>and you don't have time to discuss caveats or pitfalls

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 3>with any of those. So your message really has to

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 3>be filtered to a degree where sometimes it's almost meaningless.

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 3>So it can be frustrating at times.

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly, especially when especially the interviewer or interviewers have

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 4>they've got a little b in their bonnet about a

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 4>particular angle, or they want to know, they want to

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 4>dive in on something, and they have an opinion and

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 4>they almost want your endorsement when you're like, well.

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>It isn't exactly that. And then but don't you think though,

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like you know, now, we're about opinion,

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>we're not about science or information. But yeah, that's what

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I love about this. I mean for me being able

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to talk. You know, you and I can talk for

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes, we can talk for an hour, We can

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>go wherever we want to go. We don't need to

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>throw to an ad we don't need to keep the

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>sponsors happy. We have sponsors, but you know, there's no interruption,

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you know. So for me, the free range kind of

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>capacity to be able to just conversationally go wherever we

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>want is quite liberating in especially in a time twenty

0:03:56.160 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty five where everything is five second posts in ten

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>second reels and sound bites and grabs. You know.

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Now, it's really refreshing to be able to go deeper

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 3>on some of these issues and you get at the

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 3>nuance of some of these topics. And the other bonus

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 3>is that when you post these on your Facebook, Craig,

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 3>your listeners are fantastic. They ask some intelligent questions or

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 3>ask for resources, and it's great to be able to

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:23.479
<v Speaker 3>have that venue to follow up on.

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. And if you are a listener and you don't,

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you're not part of the Facebook group. So it's just

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:35.799
<v Speaker 1>the You Project podcast Facebook group. And yeah, we post

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>every episode that goes up, We talk about it and

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>feel free to jump in there. And if you've got

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a question or you've got any thoughts on potential guests,

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>hit us up and we'll see how we go. But

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>we love having that community, and I love creating something

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, thankfully for the most part, very positive.

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>We have very very little negativity in that space, which

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>is just a little bit of a light in the

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the social media darkness sometimes. So I'm very grateful to

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that for all of that from all of our listeners.

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of such things, I was looking at something on

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>something came across my social media landscape, and that was

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 1>some guy being hysterical about the fact that this new

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>study is out and we're not going to dive into

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the study. I just want to talk about this thing.

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>This where you know, there's there's apparently that the COVID

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>vaccine is causing all this cancer and blah blah blah,

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's a new research study. It's out from

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>South Korea. And I thought, well, one, either that's crap,

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>or two they're you know, they're misinterpreting something or or

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't exist right. And quite often these things when

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you go to try to find that research, the research

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't exist. Anyway, the paper does exist, and I had

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a look at it, and yes, the video clip was

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>quite misrepresentative to say the least, But does that frustrate

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>you being a researcher and being someone who's only interested

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>in truth and facts and science where you see things

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>or things get brought to your attention which are super

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>duper misleading and very very incomplete.

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well it concerns me on a number of levels

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 3>because when and just full disclaimer, I have not read

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 3>that study. In fact, Craig was one of the first

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 3>to bring it to my attention today. It's brand new,

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 3>so I don't have you know, I can't speak one

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 3>way or the other on it. All I can tell

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 3>you is there's a lot of other studies that have

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 3>been done that's say, the exact opposite, absolutely no link

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 3>between COVID nineteen and increased cancer. So it's probably a

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 3>red herring. But the upshot of the question boils down

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 3>to this sensationalism or you know, a study that comes

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 3>out that may bolster someone's by or preconceived notions gets

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot more press than the many other studies that

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 3>are that show the opposite result. And this is known

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 3>as confirmation bias. And when you're cherry picking data and

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 3>just representing one side of the story that happens to

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 3>align with whatever your personal beliefs might be, that does

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 3>a disservice to the entire biomedical community. It does a

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 3>disservice to your listeners. I think it's irresponsible to not,

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, weigh both sides of the equation with you know,

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 3>an equal you know, an equal amount that correlates with

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 3>the amount of evidence that's out there. You know, if

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 3>you're going to say this one study shows this, I

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 3>think it's responsible to say there are many other studies, however,

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 3>that do.

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:50.239
<v Speaker 2>Not show this effect.

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 3>I think that is just giving the audience fair and

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 3>balanced information.

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, totally great. And even the ULSA is in that pipe,

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>which that the highlight real thing that I saw on

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>social media didn't mention this. Authors basically say this doesn't

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>in any way reflect causation and it may not. Like

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of more research that needs to be done,

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>so they actually weren't claiming anything but that paper if

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>people want to look at it, it is one year.

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Risks of Cancer associated with COVID nineteen vaccination was published

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>September twenty six. But if you want to save yourself

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>some time, I had a scan this morning and it's

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>relatively inert. It doesn't really say a whole lot more

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>than what we've just spoken about. Speaking about things that

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>might affect our body. There has been will definitely affect

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>our body. There was a bit of controversy about what's

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>called thailand ol in the States, and we call it paracetamol,

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and an alleged link between that and autism. And I

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>might get some of this wrong. I'm not all over it,

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 1>but I'm pretty sure RFK, who for some reason is

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>like the health minister or something. What is his job?

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>How the fun did you get that job?

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 3>That's a really great question. Well, he got that job

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 3>because he's a Trump loyalist. Basically, he is woefully unqualified

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 3>to be the Secretary of HHS, which is the American

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Health and Human Services. This is a guy who literally said,

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 3>no one should be taking medical advice from me. But

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 3>that's his freaking job. It's to give medical advice. So

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 3>your question is really on point. How in the world

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 3>did we come to this point. It's an excellent question,

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 3>and it boils down to politics. Unfortunately, it does not

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 3>boil down to what's in the public's best interest.

0:09:56.640 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Hmmm. Yeah, it's like, yeah, like me being a direct

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>point of the creative director of the bolsho or ballet

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:06.719
<v Speaker 1>or something. I don't know. It's like, no, Craig, you're

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>not a good bit for that. You have no talent,

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you're not creative, you can't dance. So the allegation or

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the message was that it causes potentially there's a lot

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't cause, but there's a potential link to increased rates

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>of autism with women, pregnant women, was it? I think, yeah,

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>pregnant women using tailanol. Where did that claim come from?

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 1>And what's the actual skinny on it? What's the truth?

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 3>So this this was a disastrous press conference on a

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:47.719
<v Speaker 3>number of different levels. First of all, they completely mischaracterized

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 3>what autism really is as a you know, as a condition,

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 3>and very insensitively painted everyone on the spectrum with a

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 3>very wide, you know, a very broad brush, and it

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 3>really misrepresented and offended a lot of people with who

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 3>are on the ASD spectrum. It's autism spectrum disorder. But

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 3>getting to the point about the drug, a set of

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 3>menafin or what we call tailanol in the States, paracetamol,

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 3>I guess is what you guys referred to it as

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:27.079
<v Speaker 3>all the same drug, same molecule, And this press conference

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:32.079
<v Speaker 3>pointed to a series of very dubious studies that were

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 3>summarized in a review article suggesting that there may be

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 3>a link between people who are pregnant taking tylenol and

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 3>then having children who have an increase increased risk for

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 3>developing autism. So there was no nuance provided here and

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 3>no mention of studies that proved otherwise. So it was

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 3>a really irrespondsible announcement. Just unbelievable that this came from

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 3>an HHS secretary in the States, because that position commands

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 3>a great deal of attention worldwide. You know, many people

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:17.319
<v Speaker 3>outside of the US pay attention to what our Human

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 3>and Health Services Office states. So this has the potential

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 3>to be, you know, quite devastating for families because what

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 3>it might end up doing is steering pregnant people away

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 3>from taking a medication that could be very important with

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 3>respect to curing pain and fever during a pregnancy. Pain

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 3>and fever are known to produce miscarriage, stillbirths, birth defects,

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 3>and wait for it, autism. So by discouraging people from

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 3>taking this medication, you actually may be increasing the risk

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 3>of autism. So it boils down to your question, where

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 3>did this come from? Well, it came from this one

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 3>dubious review article that cherry picks studies that showed a

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 3>very tiny risk which was not emphasized in this press conference.

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 3>The risk is extremely small of autism being developed, and

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 3>they failed to mention two studies that were much larger,

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 3>much better controlled, and did what we call a sibling

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:37.439
<v Speaker 3>pair analysis, which controlled for a confounding variable of genetics,

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 3>because that is the main driver of autism. If you

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 3>talk to anyone with a medical or scientific background, it

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 3>boils down to genetics. But this paper, what this press

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 3>conference was trying to say, Actually, I think I have

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 3>a quote here from Trump, who had to chime in,

0:13:56.200 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 3>of course. He said tail and all is quote not good,

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 3>quite like hell, not to take it, and even admonished

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 3>women to just tough it out. You know, just you

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 3>have a fever of one hundred and five, just tough

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 3>it out. You're going to tell the fetus to tough

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 3>it out too, you know. It was extraordinarily insensitive and

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 3>irresponsible from from a biomedical scientist's position. And we can

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 3>we can go over some of the data which I

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 3>think might help your listeners understand a little bit better

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 3>where I'm coming from.

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 2>But does everything make sense so far? Great?

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Plain? Yeah, Yeah, I just I know Trump has no filter,

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>but it just to me, I'm like, even he must

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>realize sometimes surely, surely you're not the guy to comment

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and even if you think something, you don't know it

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and I don't anyway. Yep, all right, give us give

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>us some of the stuff. Anton.

0:15:00.560 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 3>I actually that that reminds me of something, Craig. I

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 3>would love to hear your interpretation, you know, as being

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 3>a representative of all of Australia, which I'm sure you are. Yeah,

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 3>what you what your country thinks of what has happened

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 3>with respect to you know, this press conference and so on,

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 3>How how your government agencies responded. I'm sure they refuted

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 3>the claims and encouraged your medical professions to continue giving

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 3>paracetamol during pregnancy for pain and fever, as did like

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 3>every other worldwide uh medical organization. So we can circle

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 3>back to that at the end, because I'd love to hear,

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, an outsider's perspective on how you're perceiving the US.

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Now, yeah, let's let's get to that light. But definitely,

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're just my thoughts, but yeah, so give us,

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>give us the deeper kind of understanding of what we're

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>not understanding with this tile now autism kind of issue.

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely, so, first, a little bit of common sense,

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, that can dispel it pretty quickly. Two thirds

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 3>of pregnant women in the US take Thailand all for

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 3>pain and fever, and the standard of care is to

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 3>give as little as possible for as short as possible. Okay,

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 3>that's that's just the standard of care. That's not a

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 3>great revelation that RFK made. So when you consider the

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 3>sheer number of pregnant women in the US taking Thailand

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 3>all already, and the fact that two thirds of our

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 3>kids do not have ASD you know, it's actually less

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 3>than one it's actually less than three percent, and only

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 3>one fourth of that three percent have the severe and

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 3>profound autism that RFK misled people to believe that's what

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 3>everybody with autism is like, gross misrepresentation. You can see

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 3>right off the bat that these number don't make any sense.

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 3>They don't align, you know, in any meaningful way. Many

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 3>people use thailanol without incident. Autism cases have been documented

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 3>prior to the introduction of tailanol. It wasn't mass marketed

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:16.919
<v Speaker 3>until the late fifties, but there's plenty of cases in

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 3>the literature for autism, spectrum disorder, and even profound autism.

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 3>So that doesn't make any sense. The studies that they

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 3>were citing were correlational, just like the South Korean study

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 3>that you mentioned claiming a correlation between the COVID vaccine

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 3>and certain cancers. It's not causation. There's a wonderful meme

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 3>that circulates that illustrates the dangers of drawing conclusions from

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 3>correlative studies.

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 2>You can make a.

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 3>Graph of rising autism diagnoses and the amount the popularity

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 3>of organic foods in marketplace and low and hold they correlate. Okay,

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 3>both of those graphs go up in the same direction.

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 3>So what RFK might have you believe if he was

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 3>reading this graph based on his interpretation of this data,

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 3>is that, oh, organic foods cause autism. So correlation doesn't

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 3>mean anything unless you have a biological mechanism, So we

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 3>have to keep that limitation in mind. The association, as

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:33.719
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned before, is also very small. It's one point

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 3>one times more. That translates to less than ten percent

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 3>greater risk. To put that in perspective, let's consider the

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 3>increased risk that smoking does for lung cancer. That's a

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 3>ten to twenty times greater risk, which translates to almost

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 3>a thousand percent greater risk. So these studies that they

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 3>were citing were marginal at best. Okay, no dose dependent

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 3>effect was ever recorded, which means, like you would expect

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 3>that the more tail and all taken during pregnancy, the

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.120
<v Speaker 3>higher the risk or more severe autism should show up.

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 3>That's not the case. There's that that doesn't hold up,

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 3>and there's no mechanism that's been proposed. If you're going

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 3>to tell me Thailand all causes autism, I want you

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 3>to tell me at a molecular level how that's happening.

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 3>And nothing like that exists. Same with the COVID nineteen

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 3>vaccine and this cancer link. Okay, fine, tell me how

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 3>in the world that can possibly happen. I haven't heard

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 3>any plausible model. So those are the things that I

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 3>need in place before my government makes some kind of

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, sledge hammer demand that we should stop using

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 3>a seat of menafin during during pregnancy.

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 2>I've got yeah, go ahead, ask a question.

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just sorry, I'm just I'm being completely silly here,

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>but I'm thinking about correlation versus causation, right, I'm thinking, well,

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do a graph. In fact, I probably

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>might do this on social media because I'm a fucking idiot.

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 1>But like in the last ten years, we've seen both

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 1>electric cars, the use of electric cars go through the roof,

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and diabetes.

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Now I'm not obviously Craig, you know those electric cars

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 3>are causing diabetes.

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean that can't just be a coincidence, Professor

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Bill Happy, I mean.

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Go publish it, Go publish it.

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I think I've just solved the type two

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>diabetes crisis. We just got to, I think, go back

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 1>to internal combustion engines, get rid of electric cars. Problem solved.

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 1>You welcome world. That sounds ridiculous, but it's not that

0:20:57.600 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>far away, is it.

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.119
<v Speaker 2>No principle, that's exactly what's happening here.

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 3>Because what you need to think about in these studies

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 3>tailan al. They're claiming there's an association with autism. There's

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 3>no plausible mechanism for how that can happen, at least

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 3>nothing that I've read. So what that might be indicating

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:25.360
<v Speaker 3>to us is that it's an indirect effect. What are

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 3>these pregnant people taking the tilenol for. Is it an infection?

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Is it some kind of pain disorder. Maybe that's what's

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 3>causing the autism. You know, that's a study that's worth

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 3>following up on. But you don't come out and say,

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Thailand All's causing it, because that could be a total

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 3>red herring, meaning it could be totally an indirect effect,

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 3>and you're going to miss out on what the direct

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 3>effect is. Okay, you can, you can take away tailand

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 3>all from pregnant women, but still not fix this problem

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 3>because that wasn't the issue to begin with. So that's

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 3>that's why these these types of reckless announcements are just

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 3>so dangerous and not serving the public well. And the

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 3>biggest sin that they committed at this press conference was

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 3>that bigger and better studies have been done and there's

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 3>no link whatsoever between the use of a set of

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:30.199
<v Speaker 3>menace and during pregnancy and the risk of autism. And

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 3>what those studies have found point to the confounding variable

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 3>of genetics, and the way they do that is they

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 3>compare siblings, which is something these other studies never did.

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 3>And when you compare siblings, which rules out the genetic

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 3>factor or you know, allows it to be considered, there's

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 3>no link whatsoever that the set of metaphemetic medication was

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Speaker 3>not a player here. So what are these two studies? Well,

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 3>there was one in Sweden conduct in twenty twenty four.

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 3>It's the largest study on this topic ever conducted to date.

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 3>It involved two point five million children monitored over twenty

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 3>six years. You couldn't ask for a better and more

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 3>comprehensive study, and they found no link when they did

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 3>disibling pair analysis. And if one study is not good

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 3>enough for you, well in Japan there was another study

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 3>done just this year two hundred thousand children. It's not

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 3>in the millions, but two hundred thousands in appreciable study.

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 3>I would call that a good size. Again, found absolutely

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 3>no link when the sibling pair when genetics was considered.

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 3>All the scientific and medical societies that I'm aware of,

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 3>including the American Academy for Pediatrics, American College of Obgyn,

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 3>and the World Health Organization, all of them denounced this

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 3>press conference and reiterated that tailanol is absolutely safe to

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 3>give for pain and fever during pregnancy, and in fact

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 3>it should be given because that can cause complications if

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 3>you don't treat it, and there's no other medicine that's safer,

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 3>and there's no compelling evidence of the link, you know,

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.159
<v Speaker 3>based on these two very large recent studies that have

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 3>been conducted. The AAP, the American Academy of Pediatrics characterized

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 3>this press conference as quote filled with dangerous claims and

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:28.719
<v Speaker 3>misleading information. And that's just inexcusable in our government officials.

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>You know what's interesting is that like the actual lack

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>of transparency and scientific kind of integrity, Like they're standing

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>up there going, this is the real science. This is

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>what they don't want you to know. And it's really

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>just a it's just as you were talking about before.

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>It's really just confirmation bias playing out where we're looking

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>at this thing which is not a very well run

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>study with this dodgy what we call an Australia dodgy

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>evidence or whatever interpretation of results versus these mega studies

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that we're not talking about that actually contradict what we're

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about. I mean, it's the funny thing about science

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and scientists is that every scientist has got an opinion

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and emotions and an identity and a brand. And I'm

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 1>not saying I'm doing a PhD. So I'm not throwing

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>me and you under the bus. But the problem is

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's so hard to find people who are truly

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:44.360
<v Speaker 1>truly I mean especially in the public space. I mean

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>perhaps where they don't care about the outcome. They just

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>want the outcome, like whatever that is, Like they don't

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>have an emotional or a financial or a career kind

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:57.120
<v Speaker 1>of interest.

0:25:57.240 --> 0:25:57.479
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 1>It's like, how do we just get to truth without

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>putting all the bullshit, without putting all the confirmation bias

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and the intolerance and the agendas. And yeah, that's and

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>for the average punter who listens to this, who isn't

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a scientist or a researcher, or a medical professional or

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a health professional, no wonder, it's confusing and no wonder.

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes we don't know. It's like we've got more information

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>than ever and more confusion than ever. It's tricky, I

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 1>think for the average person to know who to trust,

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:40.200
<v Speaker 1>who to pay attention to. You know, even with us

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're not pointing people in a direction, We're trying

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:47.439
<v Speaker 1>to have a rational conversation about something that's been big news.

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and that doesn't bid well for the future, not

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 3>just the US, but globally. And you know, I think

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 3>this is a global trend as we become more and

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 3>more saturated with information, and we have a bunch of

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 3>non experts or adjacent experts getting out there and just

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 3>saying a bunch of stuff that is not true, or

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:15.479
<v Speaker 3>is downright misleading, or is a flat out lie. And

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 3>they're doing this for attention or for money, and it's

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 3>or maybe they think they are doing it for a

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 3>good cause. But what it boils down to at the

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 3>end of the day, like you said, the public is

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 3>not getting the information they need. You know, we can't

0:27:35.840 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 3>be experts in everything. We rely on experts to tell

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 3>us what's up and to give us evidence based policy

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 3>and guidelines so that we can protect ourselves and our families.

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 2>And if we.

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Destroy that system of trust, you know, I don't know

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 3>where we go as a species moving forward. We're going

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 3>to implode because people will be making decisions that just

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 3>aren't based in reality and that can be absolutely devastating

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 3>for them and their family. And that's what really breaks

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 3>my heart. You know, I've been studying, like, you know,

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 3>biomedicine for thirty some years now, and then people come

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:21.560
<v Speaker 3>and show some YouTube video to me of someone who

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 3>has absolutely no experience or hasn't been in the trenches

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 3>on this and they ask me what I think, and like,

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 3>why would you even consider taking this person's advice?

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 2>What credentials do they have?

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, what have they done in their lives to

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 3>contribute to biomedicine.

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 2>And it's just such a.

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Misorientation of you know, of what we should be paying

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 3>attention to.

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 2>And it's quite scary.

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, I was not caught car mechanic to do

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 3>heart surgery on me, and vice versa. We have to

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 3>be able to trust and rely on experts. And when

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 3>you have a government telling you not to trust the experts,

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 3>you've got a real serious problem in your hands.

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>That's true. I feel like for you, I feel your pain,

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm listening to you and I'm thinking, you know

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and you're not You're not perfect, but you know a

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>lot and this is your field and you are an expert,

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think it must be must be frustrating for you.

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not at your level, will probably never be at

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>your level in anything. But you know, I've owned multiple gyms,

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I've worked in the fitness industry in my whole life.

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I've trained thousands of humans, work with tens of thousands

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of bodies, and sometimes you know when people are talking

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>about training or something that I absolutely know, not I

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>think or I guess. It's like no, I know this

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>for certain because I've been in the middle of this

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 1>thousands of times and somebody says something and it's completely untrue.

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not like, oh, it's a little bit wrong, it's

0:29:55.560 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>completely wrong, but they say it with such conviction, right

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:04.479
<v Speaker 1>or Probably the most misused phrase on the Internet in

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>regards to science or alleged science or health or wellness

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 1>information is research tells us. All somebody's got to do

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>is preface any fucking statement with research tells us, and

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>then people think that's science. I'm like, research doesn't tell

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>us that. Or when people go, oh, I've done my

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:29.479
<v Speaker 1>own research, I go, what does that mean? Tell me

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>what your research entailed, because no, disrespect, I'm pretty sure

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you've done no research. Maybe you jumped on the internet

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and looked at things that isn't research.

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, you don't need a lab code to do that.

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>No no?

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, so is there any light at the end

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of the tunnel, Like what is the what is the panacea?

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Like how do we is it just people like you

0:30:56.720 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and me talking about this publicly and like pushing back

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and trying to shine a lot on that.

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'll answer that question, but I do want to

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 3>touch on a point you made, and it's just my

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 3>personal opinion.

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 3>I haven't done my googling on this, Craig. So I

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 3>would imagine research shows that it's our negativity bias that

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 3>has a lot to do with this, because experts and

0:31:24.520 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 3>doctors are wrong from time to time, or you know,

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 3>they say one thing, new studies come out and they

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 3>change their mind you know.

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 2>That's how that's how we progress.

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 3>Right, If we never changed our minds, that means we're

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 3>not learning from new data that came out, So that

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 3>should be part and parcel part of the process. And

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 3>I think that's misunderstood. And when we hear about a

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 3>doctor who did something bad, or you know, a scientific

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 3>study that was later proven wrong, that sticks to us

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 3>like glue, and we forget about all the thousands of

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 3>studies that have held up. We forget about the tens

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 3>of millions of doctors who are giving good advice every day,

0:32:06.240 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 3>saving lives every minute.

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Those don't make the news.

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 3>All that really gets sensationalized are the negative stories. And

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm not saying they shouldn't be reported. But I am

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 3>saying that we as media digestors, need to keep in

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 3>mind that we are being only shown a sliver of reality,

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 3>and that sliver is usually something that is going to

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 3>drive a headline or drive clicks. It's probably a little sensationalized,

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 3>and we need to be cognizant of that, and keep

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 3>in mind that there's lots of stories not being reported

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 3>because they're not exciting that show that experts are getting

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 3>it right all the time, So we have to you

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 3>know me, I think that's a big part of the problem.

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 3>It's a built in bias in our brain. I'm not

0:32:55.960 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 3>blaming anybody. It's not our fault, but we should recogni

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 3>that and try to be more savvy and intelligent when

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 3>we're listening to these influencers or watching these tiktoks. Got

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 3>to check out their credentials and we have to fact

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 3>check them in robust ways that rely on evidence and

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 3>scientific or medical consensus.

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 1>My training partner, God bless him, he's the current reigning

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Australian conspiracy theory champion. He sends me about ten conspiracy

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>theory videos a day. Shout out to the crab. His

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 1>name is Mark I lovingly call him the crab because

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>he looks like a crab and he moves like a crab.

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, he's way down the rabbit hole, Like he

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>only comes out of the rabbit hole for lunch, you know,

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and then then back.

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, oh, yeah, I think we all trust

0:33:56.000 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>like that. He trusts nobody. He sent me. I shouldn't

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 1>say this, but I'm going to throw him under the bus.

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>He sent me one yesterday on this guy like who

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, worked for the Air Force or NASAU

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 1>or someone, and talking about yeah, flat Earth, And I'm like,

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 1>come on, bro, surely we draw a lot. Surely, surely

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:22.319
<v Speaker 1>we draw a line at flat Earth, even you. And

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:26.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, yeah, so it's it is. I mean, we've

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>never had the level of access to information, good and

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>bad information, misinformation, actual information, pseudoscience, real science, hysteria, data like,

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's all coming at us unless you're very discerning

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 1>or educated. It's often, you know, I'm mildly educated, and

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>it's still hard for me to figure out what's what.

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, I actually feel a little sympathy for

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 3>conspiracy theorists. I mean, the glom into something that seems exciting.

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:06.280
<v Speaker 3>That seems different. I think their intentions are often genuine.

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 3>You know, they're trying to help, you know, they think

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 3>they got something, you know, fascinating or important to share,

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:17.360
<v Speaker 3>even though it's demonstrably false.

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 2>For some reason, they are immune to hearing.

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 3>About the truth, or they think it's a hoax, which

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 3>is another thing I get all the time, you know,

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:35.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, the conspiracy Whenever you show data or debunk something,

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 3>the easy out is while it's just a hoax or

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 3>you're lying. I mean, okay, well then it just boils

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 3>down to a matter of trust, and you know, you

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 3>can trust the conspiracy theorists or you can trust experts

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:51.280
<v Speaker 3>who live in the real world.

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, I don't know, but I do.

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 3>I have sympathy because I sense that a lot of

0:35:57.160 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 3>those conspiracy theorists have genuine feeling that they're trying to help.

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 3>They got some kind of top secret information that the

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 3>world needs to hear. But it's just so so terribly misguided,

0:36:11.000 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 3>you know that. Yeah, yeah, it's a little heartbreaking. But

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 3>to get back to your point, is there some light

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 3>at the end of this tunnel?

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 3>I was really encouraged to see so many scientific and

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:35.319
<v Speaker 3>medical organizations coming forward immediately, you know, against what these

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:40.840
<v Speaker 3>recommendations were that came from our own government. And that

0:36:41.360 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 3>was great to see because a lot of people are

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 3>no longer standing up to some of the lies that

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 3>we are being fed, some of the falsehoods that are

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 3>being propagated. So it was encouraging to see them take

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:55.720
<v Speaker 3>a stand and say absolutely not, this is this is

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 3>this is totally nuts. Here's why listen to your doctors,

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 3>not the guy who said, don't take medical advice from me.

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there seems to be I mean, from the outside

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 1>looking in and the very far away lens through which

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:14.840
<v Speaker 1>we observe the US, which of course has just filtered

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 1>through our media, is there a bit of pushback, more

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>pushback coming, Like we have this thing, all these rallies,

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:26.399
<v Speaker 1>no kings, this has been on our this has been

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:29.839
<v Speaker 1>occupying out TV screens for the last day or so.

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Just give me an insight into that.

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:36.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that happened today and it looked to be an

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:40.400
<v Speaker 3>extraordinarily huge event. Or no, I'm sorry, it happened yesterday,

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 3>but it looked to be an extraordinarily huge event. The

0:37:43.239 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 3>turnouts were far greater than I think anyone really expected.

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:52.880
<v Speaker 3>So I think, you know, there's an extraordinary amount of

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:56.240
<v Speaker 3>people in the US who see through all these lies,

0:37:56.560 --> 0:38:02.320
<v Speaker 3>who see through the propaganda and have a greater understanding

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 3>of what fascism and authoritarianism really is, and you know,

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:11.799
<v Speaker 3>conceive that this is a dangerous road that we are

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 3>going down. We have, you know, a president that is

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, just so unpresidential, so unprofessional, and so puerile

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:29.400
<v Speaker 3>in his remarks and actions that is just not befitting

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 3>the integrity of that office. To many people, this is

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:38.440
<v Speaker 3>a global embarrassment and they just can't believe, you know,

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 3>that it happened once, much less that it happened twice.

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 3>So I don't quite know what the future holds, because

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:53.320
<v Speaker 3>now that the Republicans have power of so many things,

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 3>they have both houses of Congress, they have the president,

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:02.920
<v Speaker 3>They've stacked the courts. It it almost seems like a

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 3>helpless situation that there's no way the Democrats are going

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:12.279
<v Speaker 3>to ever reclaim power because of all the gerrymandering and

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 3>things that are going on that don't really allow them

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 3>to have a fair fight. But seeing something like the

0:39:21.920 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 3>No King's rallies does give you a glimmer of hope,

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, that when you can visibly see a bunch

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:32.399
<v Speaker 3>of people out there saying we're not going to take this,

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 3>that's inspiring.

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:38.759
<v Speaker 1>There's something like, I don't know, two and a half

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand different like groups rallies around the country, so definitely

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 1>there's some momentum. So always good chatting to you, sir.

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate your wisdom and your insight and your time

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:59.440
<v Speaker 1>anytime and you're shakiness. Thank you so much. We'll say

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:02.319
<v Speaker 1>goodbye fair but thanks mate. I appreciate you for being

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 1>on the project and being such a fun part of

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 1>our team. Thank you.

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:08.880
<v Speaker 2>You got it, Craig, thanks again.