WEBVTT - The fight for Dan Duggan - Part 2: The extradition battle

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>This is part two of a two part episode. If

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you haven't already, go back and take a listen to

0:00:05.519 --> 0:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>our first episode.

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Free Dan Duggle, Free Dan Duggy.

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>For years, Dan Duggan's case has turned on one question

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>after another, what happened in South Africa, what he knew,

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and whether, as an Australian citizen, the United States has

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the right to prosecute him at all. But by the

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:28.479
<v Speaker 1>time his case reached the Federal court this year, the

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>fight was about something more immediate, whether Australia would let

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:33.199
<v Speaker 1>him go.

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Our government should make it clear that being an Australian

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 3>citizen matters, and then when another country comes for you,

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 3>they'll protect you as best they can, and they'll protect

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 3>your family, they'll protect.

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 4>Your asc it.

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Nicole Johnston and you're listening to seven AM Today

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>journalist Michael Sainsbury and saffaring Duggan on why they believe

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the Australian government really Approvedan's extradition and how his supporters

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>came to see the case as part of a wider

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>struggle between the United States and China. It's Monday, April

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven. Michael, Could you take us inside this recent

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>extradition hearing what happened in court, So the.

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 5>Recent extradition hearing was challenge to the extradition that Mark

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 5>dreyfus had signed off for a year earlier. As you know,

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 5>things take a while.

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 6>It's court an Australian man who served as a US

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 6>fighter pilot. He's set to face court in the US

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 6>after his extradition was approved by Federal Attorney General Mark Dreyfusi.

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 5>Chans Lori has argued that the offenses that he was

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 5>charged with were not offenses in Australia at the time

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 5>that the allegations were made.

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 7>The main tank of his case that's just been decided

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 7>on really focuses around the idea that in order to

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 7>be extradited, the offense for which of which you're accused

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 7>needs to be an offense in Australia and in the

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 7>United States Dan is accused of.

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 5>Australia did not have explicit comparable laws about training foreign

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 5>militaries until twenty eighteen, and then we updated that again

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 5>in twenty twenty one to make it even more explicit.

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 5>But that's six years after the case.

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 7>Dan was arrested in twenty twenty two, and at which

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 7>time it was then possible to say that the historic

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:37.799
<v Speaker 7>activities were now an offense in Australia. So Dan really

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 7>would have had to be a clairvoyant at the time

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 7>that he was giving this training to know that in

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 7>the future it was going to render him subject to extradition.

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 7>So what that is is it really has the effect

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 7>of making the Extradition Act a retroactive act, and that

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 7>means that Australian citizens can do something that's legal today,

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 7>it may become illegal in a few years time and

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 7>they run the risk of being and extradited to a

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 7>foreign country and tried under the foreign country's laws.

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Regardless of all of that, though the Federal Court rejected

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the argument why did they do that?

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 8>Are?

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 5>They rejected on a very literal approach and I think

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 5>you often find with the single judge on the Federal

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 5>Court that they will do that. And the difficulty with

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 5>international law is quite often treaties overlay treaties which overlay

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 5>underlying local legislation self a little bit kind of complicated,

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 5>and you end up going to kind of the black litter.

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:30.640
<v Speaker 9>Of the law.

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 10>The hearing was all over in a matter of minutes.

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 10>The judge essentially threw out the family's application, which was

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 10>based on legal arguments relating to the extradition. The judge

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 10>also ordered that the dug and family paid legal costs,

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 10>and that is a huge blow in itself.

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>So if Dan Duggan is said to the US, what

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>would he face? What could happen there?

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 5>If he goes to the US. The way the charges

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 5>have been stacked up, there's a maximum of sixty five

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 5>years each of these counts. I think there's three of

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 5>them carry a sentence up to twenty years each. Other

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 5>people have said, you know, why doesn't he just go

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:10.119
<v Speaker 5>in and fight the charges there?

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 11>Would he?

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 5>He's an Australian citizen. He should prosecute every option under

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 5>the Australian legal systems available to him before he goes

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 5>and puts himself in the hands of a foreign legal system.

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.520
<v Speaker 5>That why we're sending somebody off to face a legal

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 5>system in the US. It's falling apart.

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there's any similarities with this case and

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Julian Assange.

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 5>There are obviously similarities because they're Australian citizens who the

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 5>US is trying to get their hands on. It's interesting

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 5>with Julian sign the US sent a whole team of

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 5>lawyers over to England and to wherever he ended up

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 5>getting led off, some small island in the Pacific. But

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 5>for Dan's case, the US have got the Australian taxpayer

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:02.559
<v Speaker 5>through the Attorney General's Department to prosecute the US's case.

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 5>So Australian taxpayers have been paying to try and get

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 5>Dan extra to the US for something that if you

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.679
<v Speaker 5>did do it, it was an Australian citizen at the time

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 5>and the US should really have any jurisdiction over him.

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>The court case is one part of this, but in

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the end it is the Australian government who decides whether

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>dug It will be extradited. So why have they chosen

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to do it? And what are they saying about it publicly?

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.280
<v Speaker 5>They're not saying anything publics that have been very, very

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 5>very it's all been very process driven. It's been driven

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 5>very much by the Attorney General's Department.

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 8>Could I ask what, what, if any role your department

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 8>has had in the extradition proceedings and incarceration of Daniel Togm.

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 9>So the department's responsible for the Extradition Act and handling

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 9>of the United States extradition requests.

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 11>When your department receives an extradition request, do you do

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 11>a due diligence to determine whether or not the offense

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 11>which founds the extradition requests has a comparable offense under

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 11>Australian law? Is that part of a due diligence process

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 11>when you receive an extradition request.

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 9>I'll get Musimberg to speak about this matter. But there

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 9>was a provisional arrest request in the first instance, and

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.919
<v Speaker 9>we do consider dual criminality. Ultimately that is a matter

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 9>that is considered by a magistrate, and it is before

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 9>a magistrate.

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we're very close to the US. I think that

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 5>there's a feeling that we don't want to upset them

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:47.119
<v Speaker 5>and this is just, in their eyes, just a little

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 5>case that it's not worth poking their neck up for.

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 12>And we have raised the case of mistress change at

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 12>all levels of government, and we've used all of our

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 12>diplomatic efforts at every level.

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 5>In the end, Albanez, you did apply diplomatic pressure in

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 5>the Assantaige case, but you know that was a very big,

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 5>loud public case. This isn't so much and doesn't seem

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 5>like they feel like wasting any political capital to look

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 5>after an Australian citizen, which is I think is a

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 5>bit of a distress. At any point, the Attorney General

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 5>can get rid of this, They can just say no.

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 5>The side of the we're not going to extradide.

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Coming up is a geopolitical contest between the US and China.

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>What's really driving this case. Michael Duggan and his supporters

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>say that this is much bigger than one man that's

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>caught in a geopolitical battle over China.

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 2>He's being used as a pawn in an ideologic war

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 2>between the United States and China, and the Australian government

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 2>agencies have allowed this to happen as willing participants.

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Would you agree with that or how seriously should we

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>take a claim like that?

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 5>Look, I think that's true. Is certainly in the initial

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 5>writing of the indictment. That was certainly a time when

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 5>the US, particularly but other people in the West were

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 5>starting to get worried about much more worried about China politically.

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 13>Turned now to the case of two Chinese American scientists

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 13>accused of espionage. Last year, the United States federal agents

0:08:36.280 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 13>arrested Shi Shao Seng, the chairman of Temple University's physics Department.

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 5>They knew that there was a lot of former military

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 5>people out there doing things that they didn't necessarily want

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 5>them to do. So there was a concerted effort by

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 5>the US and eventually the UK and in Australia to

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 5>try and wind all this back and pull it. In

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 5>Dan's case, it had already started. The process as started,

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 5>and there's no reason for the US to halt the process.

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 5>But there's a big reason for US to halt the

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 5>process because if this can happen to Dan, it can

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:12.959
<v Speaker 5>happen to a lot of other Australians. If we put

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 5>Australians in jeopardy and are prepared to hand them across

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 5>to a foreign legal system for things that they did

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 5>a long time ago that weren't crimes here, you know,

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 5>it opens a floodgate for foreign governments to be able

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 5>to reach into our legal system and interfere with it.

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>So, Michael, what is the next stage of this case,

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>what happens next? And what is really at stake here?

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 1>What's the big picture?

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 5>A man's life is at stake. That's surely that should

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 5>be enough. But in terms of what happens next, the

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 5>extradition has now been improved again by the court, but

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 5>there's an automatic right to an appeal to the full

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 5>bench of the Federal Court within twenty eight days. So

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 5>Dan's lawyers are obviously giving every consideration to that. Beyond

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 5>that is the possibility of an appeal to the High Court.

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 5>Those are the things that are being thought about at

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 5>the moment. It does stand appeal or do they decide

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 5>to take their chances in the US.

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Suffering? How long will you and Dan keep fighting it?

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 2>We will continue to pursue every avenue available. This is

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 2>a family that we are. I'm going to keep together

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 2>and we will keep going on. It will not break us,

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 2>and we will continue down every avenue we possibly can.

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 2>But it's devastating having to tell the children that your

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 2>father's not coming home. At the moment, majority of adults

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 2>can't understand what's going on, so how can you explain

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 2>it to a child. We are a type family. We

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 2>do not give up. We never give up. We follow

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 2>the next step and we just continue to stay together

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 2>and pursue every avenue that we possibly can.

0:11:14.520 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>What is the message that you have to the Australian government.

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>What would you say to them about Dan and about

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 1>how they're handling the case.

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm so disappointed in our government. I feel like I'd

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 2>get no answers. It's been going on long enough. It

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 2>is at the bequest of another country, and.

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like.

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:46.959
<v Speaker 2>No one's trying to help us. They just want it

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 2>all to go away. No one's trying to help. I

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 2>hardly get any responses back. It takes months and months

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 2>to get a response back from our government or Attorney

0:11:55.520 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 2>General if any. I think the message that I get

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 2>from them is that they can't do anything, and that

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 2>is incorrect. The Attorney General and the Prime Minister can

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 2>overturn this at any moment, so to give the message

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 2>that it's in court continually is not good enough. You're

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 2>at a very high ranking, you run our country, and

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 2>it's not good enough for me, an Australian citizen to

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 2>not be able to address something as big as this,

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 2>and especially in our world today, you know. And the

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 2>hardest things here are you know, is that I feel

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 2>like I've lost all ability to dream, to look forward

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 2>to book the next holiday.

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 11>That's hard.

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 2>It's hard not knowing where you're going to be in

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 2>the next day, where you're going to be in the

0:12:57.640 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 2>next week, where you're going to be in the next month.

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Living Groundhog Day is hard.

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 1>It's the uncertainty, yeah, and that's what breaks everyone, the

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty suffering. Thank you so much for speaking with us.

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 4>Also in the news, world leaders including Anthony Albanesi have

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 4>condemned an act of political violence after the White House

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 4>correspondence dinner was interrupted by gunfire. The president evacuated as

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 4>guests hit under tables. Police say the suspected gunman charged

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 4>through a Secret Service checkpoint armed with multiple guns and knives.

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:55.599
<v Speaker 4>One officer was shot but was saved by his bulletproofest.

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump says the Secret Service did a better job

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 4>protecting him than the fascination attempt in twenty twenty four

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 4>and Angus Taylor has called out coordinated booing at Anzac

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 4>Day ceremonies in Sydney, Melbourne and Perth, while at the

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:15.439
<v Speaker 4>same time sympathizing with those behind the booze. The opposition

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.359
<v Speaker 4>leader says he feels welcome to countries have been overused

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 4>and he would like to see them use less. There

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 4>are calls from indigenous leaders for those responsible to be named,

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 4>photographed and banned from future Anzac Day services. Thanks for

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 4>listening to seven am, we'll be back tomorrow.