WEBVTT - Forward or back? Where does Harry Petty fit?

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>This Sunday Night's King's Birthday Eve matched the biggest meeting

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of Carlton Essendon in twenty five years, with both teams

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>at the business end of the ladder for the first

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>time together since the turn of the millennium. Josh Barnes

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>will join me coming up to preview the blockbuster and

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>then less than twenty four hours later, the decimated Pies

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and devastated D's will hope to fill the g again.

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Glenn McFarlane is coming on to chat about the ins

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and outs of both teams chances as well. But first

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 1>here's Josh. Well. After a mid season break and then

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a mini pre season, Josh Barnes is back on the

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 1>heralds Unfooty podcast today.

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Barnsey, it was a bit like one of those ones

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 2>where they send them down to the VFL for three

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 2>weeks to do some training and get the body right

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 2>all that sort of stuff. Have I missed anything in

0:00:57.720 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 2>the last few weeks, Andy, what's been happening?

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Not a whole lot. I think Melbourne had the week

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 1>off last week, so yeah, they played like it. Oh

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>they played Yeah, that depends on your definition. That was

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>quite the watch. Must admit didn't get all the way

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>through that. Hopefully it's an aberration. We'll wait and see,

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>but we're not going to talk about that. We're going

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk about what bills as being the biggest game

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of the year could be the biggest game of the century.

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>If you ask people in the inner North and northern

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>suburbs of Melbourne, it's Cardon and Essendon on Sunday evening.

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's going to be massive. I'll be there and

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm excited to see what can happen. It's a bit

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 2>more positive than Melbourne chat. Isn't any talking about Sunday night.

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 2>But it's going to be the biggest game between these

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 2>sides since definitely at least since twenty eleven when they

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 2>played elimination Final Cut and won that easily. They've got

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 2>to take over ninety thousand in the stands that day.

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 2>They played in the preliminary final in two thousand andy

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 2>if you remember that, remember well that pretty easily on

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 2>their way to that dominant premiership. A proad from that.

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 2>These two haven't really have played two meaningful matches this

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 2>century really when you look at it, so this is

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 2>going to be a monster of a game. They got

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:12.799
<v Speaker 2>a three thousand there last year. For this Queen's Birthday,

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 2>e fixed out they're going to beat that both they

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 2>all report so far on ticket sales and it's going

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 2>to be a huge one. Who would have thought we'd

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 2>have Essendon second and Carlton fifth heading into Queen's Birthday.

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's interesting because I think Essendon has definitely

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>flown under the raidar you know that people haven't talked

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>about them and still aren't talking about them as a

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>genuine contender necessarily come the end of the year. But

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>they are definitely talking up Carlton because Carlton, you know,

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>they've they've got everybody excited. They almost they got to

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a prelim last year when people didn't expect them to

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and they've really built on that this year with some

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty stellar forward player and their mid film in Patrick

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Cripps is you know, if not the best, he has

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to be in the top five players in the competition.

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's going to be an exciting one. It's

0:02:56.520 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years since that nine to ninety nine pre limb,

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that famous cart and winning the Prism, when everyone expected

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Essendon to just go right on with the business. And yeah,

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years later, maybe lightning will strike twice and

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll get another Crackerjack game.

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I was not a firm believer, but a quite

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 2>believer in Essendon coming into this year. It's easy to

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 2>forget that they were sixth on the ladder Round fifteen

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 2>last year. They fell away badly. We all know that

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 2>there's no hiding from that. They were awful in the

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 2>last few rounds, particularly they're huge loss to GWS, but

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 2>there was a lot of injuries, a lot of running

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 2>out of gas I think by the end of last year,

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 2>and I thought they were better side than what they

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 2>showed in the last few weeks, and they've proven that

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 2>so far this season. They've turned things around. I think

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 2>the obvious thing that we just spoke about before we

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 2>started recording this is their percentage is still on the

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and two ESSEN, which is usually an indicator

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 2>of how you actually are as a team. Is youer percentage?

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, it's not that positive. I don't think anyone

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 2>really believes that they're a flag contender, but if they

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 2>beat Carlton this week in a huge game like that,

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 2>they have to be sort of stamped as a serious

0:03:58.720 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 2>team to watch.

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Seinenth on the percentage ladder. So Adelaide's percentage in fourteenth

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>is significantly better, Brisbane in thirteenth is significantly better. So yeah,

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting one, isn't it. So that they're they're

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>winning games that maybe you know that that predicted result

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>the lovely Melbourne Finals stat that the players all clung

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to last year. But yeah, they're winning games that maybe

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that the stats show that they shouldn't be winning. And

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>often when you get to the end of the year,

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>they're the ones that get you into the finals and

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 1>you build on from there.

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and this comes after they lost to Gold Coast

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 2>obviously on the weekend, and that was a back and

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 2>forth final quarter really only decided by that fifty min

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 2>penalty in the final ninety seconds or so of the game,

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 2>and that was one that they probably could have won really,

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 2>so if they'd pinched that, they'd be clear in second

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 2>and holding on. How have you rated the Blues lately

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 2>anywhere where do you sort of see them?

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the Blues are definitely in the top three contenders.

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, their their list profile and all if you

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 1>want to go get into the jarg and it seems

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>to suggest that they are up there. They're still winning

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>games even with a significant injury at list. You know,

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>their injury list has been spoken about as being you know,

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>in the other than say Richmond and Collingwood. They're they're

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the most hampered by sgiven injuries, but they seem to

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 1>still find players to feel those spots and to win

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>their way. So now I think Carlton, as they get

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>players back, you know, if they can stick around, if

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 1>they can sneak into the top four by the end

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of the year, they are a genuine chance.

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think they're They're sort of in that part

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 2>of the season right now where you just have to

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 2>win and forget about how you're playing. Almost given there.

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 2>They've been holding onto this injury list for ten weeks now. Really,

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 2>every time they start clearing players more get added on.

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 2>It's been a real battle for them along. They're not alone,

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 2>as you said, Richmond and Colin would have probably worse

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 2>off than them, but it's been a real struggle and

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 2>they've just managed to find ways to win, find ways

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 2>to get overline and stay in touch with the top four.

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 2>The top four that, as we just discussed, is not

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:04.840
<v Speaker 2>very impressive really at the moment, Sydney is head and

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 2>shoulders above everybody else in the ladder. But in second

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 2>we spoke about, so their percentages is not not that good.

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Geelong has been bad for five weeks now Port Adelaide,

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 2>nobody ever believes in them. They've struggled when it counts.

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 2>So there is a top four spot there for the taking, really,

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 2>and Carlton I think should grab it.

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>This could be one of those years, and we spoke

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:29.359
<v Speaker 1>about twenty sixteen was one of those years. And going

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>back even further like nineteen ninety was one of those

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>years where the teams who are there or thereabouts who

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>don't win the premiership will possibly look back on it

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and say that was the year that we could have

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>because there wasn't a standout. You know, Sydney are at

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the moment, but can they keep it going all season?

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Everyone else is sort of you know from second to

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>ninth or tenth. You know they're interchangeable. So you know,

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you just wonder can a team twenty sixteen style the

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Bulldogs finished seventh, You know, can a team who finishes

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>in that sort of area Bob and have a really

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>good run top in that four week finals? I think

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>there aren't the standouts and I think that makes it exciting.

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Now, last time you had me on here and he

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 2>before I was sent down to the two through a

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 2>good month to sort myself out. I was on the

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 2>record saying that the top three at the time were

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 2>clearly above the rest. I was GWS, Sydney and Geelong

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 2>at the time. What marks do you give me over

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 2>the past four or five weeks.

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, Geelong seemed to go overseas with you, I think.

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, to be honest, I flew back in on Saturday

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 2>from Dublin and I think as I was crossing back

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 2>into Australia along was down by twenty five points to Richmond,

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 2>and then they started picking it up.

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>So it can't be a coincidence. Well, you know, don't

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>go away again. So yeah, Geelong they look you know,

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 1>they looked great at the start of the year. As

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>soon as they start losing, they look old and slow.

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>But it's a profile that's happened to Geelong for ten years,

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>so they could pick it up again. The signs aren't

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>great GWS. I don't think GWS there ever ever go away.

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, they've lost a few games, they're still middling,

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>they're still in there. Wait for them to pick it up,

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>wait for Jesse Hogan to burst out and kick another six,

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and you know, win games. I mean I think Sydney

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is as you said, still, you know there's some daylight second,

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>but third to tenth anyone could win it.

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I put gws still alongside Carlton's two signs that

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 2>should make the top four from here, I think in

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 2>the right position. As we've said, teams above them should

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 2>probably start filtering down at some stage. So I think

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 2>those are three your top four, really, Sydney Giants and

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 2>the Blues. I think that's where I sort of sit and.

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Then put it on the record Barnsey. Who will finish fourth?

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Then well that's a big question, isn't I mean, I

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 2>don't really know, to be honest. I think gee Long

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 2>as a fair chance if they get through this month, okay,

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 2>but they didn't get through last month's okay. Port Adelade

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 2>seems to win a lot of games. Freemantle's coming with

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:03.560
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a rush at the moment. The way

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 2>they're playing their footy looks pretty good. I don't think

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Colin can make it that high from here. Melbourne you

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 2>can probably right off of that, and then you've got

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 2>the Western Bulldogs is probably the last team in contention

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:16.839
<v Speaker 2>on the ladder at the moment for a top fourth spot.

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't see from them. I can't rely on them

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 2>too much, so I don't know. I think it's probably

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 2>going to be either one of Geelong or portolatle get

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 2>enough wins against poor teams. Geelong has a after this

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 2>next month. They have a good draw thanks to finishing

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.079
<v Speaker 2>in the middle of the ladder last year, they should

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 2>probably come home reasonably strongly, so maybe they'll finish fourth.

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 2>But they can't seem to win games at home as

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 2>easily as they used to, so who knows. That's not

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 2>really answering your question is no, I think Freemantle is

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 2>the best of those options in terms of their form

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 2>at the moment.

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Sydney Carlton, GWS Frio is the Josh Barnes top four.

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Would that be the biggest nightmare for ticket sales? Is

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 2>GWS and Freemantle both in the top four.

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, particularly if they finished second and third and they

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>both get home sorry first and third they both get

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>home prelims, or if they finished fourth and fifth, so

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>they you know, anyway, third and fifth.

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:08.959
<v Speaker 2>That's why we're going to near Carlton Ands and do

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot of heavy lifting. Think the way things are

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 2>shaping out on his gold coasts in the top eight

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 2>at the moment, we're going to be relying heavily on

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 2>the Blues and Bombers. That's hopefully they can kick start

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 2>that absolutely week.

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah on Sunday, It's going to be an exciting one.

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Barnsey enjoy thanks for joining me. Thanks Eddie, and here

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>on the Herald Sun Footy podcast where we just talked

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>King's Birthday eve with Josh Barnes and let's talk King's

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Birthday Glen McFarlan, welcome.

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 4>Hey, you and Andy are right, two massive games and geez,

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 4>I think the Sunday night might be completely out of

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 4>his shadowing the Monday one.

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>At this stage, Well it is, yeah, I mean I

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>think there'll be a bigger crowd. You've got two more informed.

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Teams, the twins playing against each other.

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, and then the Monday you've got a Collingwood team,

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, crippled by injury, and you've got a Melbourne

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>team coming off crippled by poor form. Well just a

0:10:58.120 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, embarrassing, a shameful.

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 4>I can't remember many games like that where I watched

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 4>and I just thought, this football club has been obliterated.

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 4>And you look at that midfield. That midfield is a

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 4>premiership winning midfield. We've seen it and they were completely

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 4>torn apart.

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's not that it's not a team that is,

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the end of their powers with all

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got, you've got essentially as midfield that is, at

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>their height of their late ENnies, there should be Yeah,

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 1>they should be dominating.

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely and they have. They have done that in the past.

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 4>And now you look at it. There was always a

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 4>couple of little floors with Melbourne forward lines all even

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 4>when their premiership yet it was a floor as well.

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 3>But now what.

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking at is I'm looking at floors both, you know,

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 4>not just forward, not just back, but in the midfield

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 4>as well, so every line. And we're talking about a

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 4>couple of games they've had. Two of the last three

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 4>games have been terrible mel really bad. It's like falling

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 4>off a cliff in a way. And I don't think

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 4>you can blame Alice Springs, and I know internally they're

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 4>not blaming Alice Springs. The venue has been the reason

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 4>behind that, you know, shocking result against Fremantle.

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's not like they're playing against Alice Springs. In

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Alice Springs, correct, I don't have to travel as well.

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:08.959
<v Speaker 1>They travel further than Melbourne travel correct.

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 4>So with that with Alice Springs as well, when you

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 4>look at it, like in terms of traveling, I think

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 4>Melbourne you know, probably have got lesser travel than Freemantle

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 4>will actually get there. And the bottom line is it

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 4>was a I wasn't there, but I watched every kick.

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 4>If I'm sure you would have, I would have given

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 4>it away. But with that, like last year was a

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 4>really awkward conditions up there last year, this year clear

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 4>perfect conditions, not oppressive, not bad weather. So there's no

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 4>excuses in regard to that. So and I can tell

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 4>you now Melbourne is locked in for the next two years,

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 4>so they're not going anywhere, so that the Alice Springs

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 4>game will go ahead.

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 3>So all the debate about, oh.

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 4>Why are they playing at Alice Springs, Well, if they

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 4>weren't playing at Alice Springs, they'll probably be playing at

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 4>Marvel that game.

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Freemant will play Marvel okay too, so well.

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>And also it doesn't you should be able to play,

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you should you're not selling. As my point before, you're

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>not selling a home game to up the stadium to

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>play Freemantle on the correct.

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 4>Correct and fret I'd never played there before as well, so.

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 1>And they just made Melbourne look witch's hats. Yeah, and

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>they ran around them and there's no system and you know,

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Freemantle we're on. But still there's no excuse for ninety

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>two points.

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 4>I spent first half of the game trying to work

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 4>out how good freemanl I was and by the end

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, well, yeah, they're good, but how bad Melbourne were?

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 4>And I kept thinking there'd be a spike. There was

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 4>no spike. They can't kick goals and this in this instance,

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 4>and you take Lever out of the defense, they can't

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 4>save goals at the Melbourne that Melbourne. You know, you

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 4>look at Stephen Mays, who's been a remarkable player for Melbourne.

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 4>He looked out of sorts. And when Stephen May looks

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 4>out of sorts, I know you're a Harrison Petty forward,

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 4>that kind of guy. I'm not sure which way you're going,

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 4>but I think you'll find that at some stage you'll

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 4>have to go back.

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Is that not papering over cracks though?

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 3>It's a few cracks. We're talking. We're talking serious cracks

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 3>at the moment.

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So you take Harrison Penny out of the forward line,

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 1>who do you put in there?

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 3>For a start?

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>You've tried Ben Brown, He's hardly got any he's left

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and even at his best for Melbourne, the system never

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>really worked.

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Hasn't worked for anymore, that's right.

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, Shane McCadam is a ghost in the forward

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>line since he can't.

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 3>Get near the horribly out of touch.

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's Fulson who they brought in to be

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the Grundy replacement, that was brought in to be the

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Jackson replacement, but they haven't wanted to give him I

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 1>think he was a little bit injured but then really

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>wanted to give.

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Him the go.

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 4>So there's a lot of internal debate going about what

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 4>happens with Harrison Petty.

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 3>That's the thing.

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 4>The coach is very keen and you know, very interested

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 4>in keeping him where he is at the moment, but

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 4>you know, out of necessity they might need to go

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 4>back and does he stay at the end of the year.

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 4>There's all you know, we know how hard Melbourne Adelaide

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 4>came for Harrison Petty last year. Do they come as hard?

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 4>They certainly don't offer as much, do they. That's the thing.

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>No, they don't because they offered what they offered based

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>on one game against Richmond last year.

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 4>It's a good game, good if you can get that

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 4>situation where you play a couple of good games and

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 4>all of a sudden they come for you. But he's

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 4>a better player than what he's playing. That's what I think.

0:14:57.560 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 4>The most important thing is he is a good player.

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 4>Is he a defender?

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Is he a forward?

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, we don't really know, but they're gonna have to

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 4>find out pretty soon.

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>They are. And I think they're playing against Collingwood who

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have a forward line correct. You know, they've got

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>injuries all over the ground. So if they can't, you know,

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>make a statement again, I think it needs to be

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>more than just beating Collingwood. It needs to be making

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a statement. Doesn't have to be a huge result, but

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>they need to show that they are a better.

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 4>Team because Collingwood, even without the players, they're very spirited.

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 4>You saw what the Dogs did before against Sydney. The

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 4>Dogs were terrific against Sydney the week before, so I

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 4>think it was you know, and the Dogs lost a

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 4>few players again last week as well, but it was

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 4>a very creditable performance from Collingwood. They could have put

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 4>the Dogs away in the first quarter, just didn't kick straight.

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 4>So a lot of interesting looks at you know, how

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 4>far some of the guys that are out from Collingwood

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 4>until they come back, and you know they'll get Will

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 4>Hoskin Elliott back this week. He was close to playing

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 4>last week, so he'll play Reeth McGinness maybe from that concussion.

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 4>Then there's a bit of a gap until the Cavalry

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 4>comes back and so got to get through that period

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 4>of time.

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 3>Big watch on Jamie Elliott as well.

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 4>There's been a lot of talk about whether he whether

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 4>that vascular issue in his foot is really causing concern

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 4>and whether you know, there's some speculation that he might

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 4>not play again.

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 4>The clubs will put out a statement later today, but

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:16.600
<v Speaker 4>having spoken to a few people there yesterday that they're

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 4>optimistic that he can still play a part in this season.

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 4>You know, in the medium term that he that he

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 4>can get back onto the field. He's certainly carrying an

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 4>issue there and will be a fitness thing there as well.

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 4>But fascinating game because the Pies will come you know,

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 4>minus some players, but with plenty of spirit.

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 3>And will the Demons have that same spirit? That's the key.

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And there's a there's recent history between the two teams.

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 3>There is. They don't like each other, let's be honest.

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's the first time they've met since the.

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 3>She there is too, isn't it.

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 4>How do you reckon Melvin crowd are going to treat

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 4>Bradon Maynard the interesting?

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean that they'll do the usual booing every time

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>against the ball. And I don't think I don't think

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>on the flip side, I don't think there's a that

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Melbourne is the sort of team that comes up after them.

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 4>Jack Viney, There's not many. There's not many, is there.

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 4>I was just going to say something bad then I

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 4>was going to say, are they a nice footy team?

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 3>In a way they are?

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 4>They used to have that hunger, that that you know,

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:11.919
<v Speaker 4>real ruthless element to it.

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 3>It seems to have dissipated.

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:16.239
<v Speaker 4>I think, you know, Max is pretty ruthless, but not

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:18.479
<v Speaker 4>in an aggressive way. He's ruthless with the way he

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 4>that he gets through Jack Viney is he's ruthless at

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 4>the player.

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 3>And you know, in a fair way, there's not many others.

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Stephen May. Maybe there's not many others.

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, as we said, the Sunday night game is

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>fascinating because I think it could be absolute cracker Jackie versus.

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 3>Fifth ninety two thousand, maybe.

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>But the Monday game is fascinating just for the permutation.

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 1>It is the end of the rest of the season.

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:41.959
<v Speaker 4>Because you looked at it earlier this year would have thought, well,

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 4>Collinod and Melbourn going to be right there and the

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 4>whips are cracking, and you know, you look at the

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 4>ladder now there and they're both in a fair bit

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 4>of trouble when you look at it. So you're looking

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 4>at their their ninth and tenth, ninth and tenth the pies.

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 4>You know they've both got the you know, both got

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 4>the seven wins, and you look at their both percentages

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 4>around about the same. Gee, they're eerily similar to percentages

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 4>one oh four point six Collingwood one oh four point

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 4>three Melbourne. So surprised that they're there at this stage.

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 4>There's still plenty of time, but they want to get

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 4>a move on now. Some of these clubs really want

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 4>to start getting a move on now.

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so we'll both be biting our fingers.

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 4>It's ten yes, Monday, mon. I'll be there Sunday night

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 4>and they're Monday as well.

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 3>Looking forward to it absolutely. Cheers Maacket, Thanks Andy, cheers.

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>That'll do us. On this edition of The Herald's Unfooty Podcast,

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm Andy Belaiz and my thanks to Josh Barnes and

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>Glenn McFarland Today, as always, keep an eye out for

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the latest trade buzz in Moneyball on Wednesday morning. People

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>one will have his mid season review Thursday midday, a

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>full suite of Super Coach live blogs from every game,

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and then, of course robbos can't misstackle on Sunday night.

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Catch you next time.