WEBVTT - The Media Show | 31 January

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>This is the Media Show with Jack outing Hello and

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the Media Show. Tonight we discussed why the

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:12.840
<v Speaker 1>ABC didn't send a single reporter to the Outswitch commemoration event,

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>will take a look at chaos in the US media,

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and as always, we sit down with The Australian's media

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>watchdog columnist Jared Henderson, who reveals a questionable choice of

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>guests at the ABC. But first to a war between

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>police who failed to tell you about a mass casualty

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>terrorist plot and the journalists who broke the news.

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 2>The Daily Telegraph is reporting a caravan laden with explosives

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 2>and a note with addresses of Jewish targets, including a synagogue,

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 2>was found on a property north of Sydney on January

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 2>the nineteenth. SoC sources have told the paper a note

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 2>reading f the Jews was also found inside New South Wales.

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Police are treating it as a credible terror threat.

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>The Daily Telegraph splashed the story with the headline primed

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>for Massacre, alongside exclusive and chilling details about how police

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>had been quietly investigating an alleged plot to blow up

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Jewish targets for several days, but then came the fallout.

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Jewish groups were so furious that their places of worship

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>were on terror hit lists, but no one from New

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>South Wales Police had given them a heads up. Now

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>in response to that, the anger is where the story

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>really begins. From a media perspective.

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 3>The fact that this information is now in the public

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 3>domain has compromised our investigation and it's been detrimental to

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 3>some of the strategies we may have used.

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, that was controversial Police Commissioner Karen Webb, who has

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>presided over a litany of failures in her short time

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>at the helm of the police force. Now you have

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a right to know if there is a terror plot

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and only the most bumbling of incompetent leaders would attack

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the journalists for informing the public. Her comments also turned

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>out to be false. The investigation was never going to

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>be compromised by media reports. After The Daily Telegraph was

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>criticized publicly for its scoop, the journalists took the unconventional

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>step of explaining the behind the scenes steps they took.

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 4>Can I just get your thoughts?

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 5>Firstly?

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 4>Was on what Karen Webb, the Police Commissioner, had to

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 4>say today. The fact that this information is now in

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 4>the public domain has compromised our investigation and it's been

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 4>detrimental to some of the strategies we may have used. Now,

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 4>you guys broke this story last night. What did you

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 4>make of that comment from the police commissioner that.

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 6>Got us a little bit angry. I'll be really honest,

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 6>because the steps that were taken by this paper Masthead.

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 6>Yesterday the editor contacted seen in New South Wales police

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 6>said that he had some information that the Telegraph was

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 6>looking to publish but didn't want to compromise it. Literally said,

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:55.679
<v Speaker 6>did not want to compromise any investigation. Nothing was said,

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 6>and then later in the afternoon the editor was contacted

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 6>and said, look what you have can be released. So

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 6>I mean and if at any time Karen Webb thought

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 6>this was being a compromise, she could have picked up

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.079
<v Speaker 6>the phone and asked the editor Benny English, saying can

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 6>I ask you not to publish because there is a

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 6>danger or there's an ongoing threat? And I'm telling you

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 6>that I don't know how many times we have not

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 6>published when asked by the police, and this would be

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 6>exactly the same case. So what she was doing yesterday

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 6>when she wasn't at a press conference when all this

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 6>was being announced she could have picked up the phone

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 6>and stopped it at any time. We would have cooperated.

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Police tried to spin Web's comments, saying that they were misunderstood,

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>but to us they were very clear. We don't know

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>if it was in competence or malice, but Sherry Markson

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>broke this story yesterday on skynews dot com do Au.

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>New South Wales police failed to inform any Jewish community

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>or security organizations of the fact that a caravan laden

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>with explosives had been found in Sydney. Sky News can

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>reveal the police also didn't inform the potential intended targets

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of the threat. So the New South Wales Police told

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the Daily Telegraph to run the story. Now, in my view,

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that indicates that it wouldn't compromise the investigation, and then

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>they turned on the paper the moment that the Jewish

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>community became rightfully infuriated with having to find out in

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 1>the media that someone wanted to blow them up. And

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>this mess is not an isolated example of Police Commissioner

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Web's history with the media. When a police officer unlawfully

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>killed this poor grandmother, Claire Noland, by tasering her to death,

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Web oversaw a decision to take the word taser out

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of the early press release. Now she should have been

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>sacked by the new South Wales government on the spot

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the moment she did that, But she's been allowed to

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>bumble on for some time, making terrible decisions one after another,

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>like this moment she stood up at a press conference

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.599
<v Speaker 1>and thanked an alleged murderous cop for telling her where

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>he hid the bodies of his alleged victims.

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 3>This information did come with the assistance of the accused,

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 3>for which we're very grateful and I'm sure the families

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 3>are very grateful.

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Well. Joining me now is this week's panel, Managing Director

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of pr Council Christy McSweeney and former media editor at

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>The Australian Darren Davidson. Darren, let's bring you in. What

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:33.599
<v Speaker 1>do you make of this entire saga, this shoot the

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>messenger approach from the police who are attacking the journalists

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>for a story for informing the public about this very

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:42.960
<v Speaker 1>real danger.

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 7>It's an absolute shocker. I mean, firstly, full credits about English,

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 7>Mark Murray, the Daily Telegraph team, and also Sharry Markson

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 7>for that brilliant follow up to the story disclosing that

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 7>the police had not bothered to tell not only the

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 7>Jewish community but the intended target. Look, it might be

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 7>convenient for the police to operate in secrets, but that's

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 7>really not good enough in this instance. I think that

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 7>the broader point here this is another example of why

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:13.799
<v Speaker 7>much of the concern about the rise of anti Semitism

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 7>around Australia at the moment, and we've seen these kind

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:20.799
<v Speaker 7>of coordinated attacks overnight in Sydney recently in recent weeks,

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 7>is due to too much secrecy and a lack of

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 7>demonstrated action in public by the New South Wales Police

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 7>and the authorities. Yes, absolutely the public deserves for disclosure,

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 7>but it deserves to see that the police and the

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 7>public deserves to see evidence of the police that they

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 7>are doing all they can to stop this problem, and

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 7>that if they did, that would send a clear message

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 7>that investigations are underway and bad actors will not only

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.239
<v Speaker 7>be caught and punished. But we don't have that because

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 7>we're operating in this kind of atmosphere of secrecy. And

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 7>I think finally as well, my last part and on

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 7>this would be we need to know from the Prime

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 7>Minister how much information did he have about the planning

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 7>of a mass terrorist attack and what action did he

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 7>actually take when he got that information. We still don't

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 7>know that.

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. And Chris Sie there's lots of questions over that.

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>There are some reports, perhaps a bit of speculation that

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the New South Wales Police didn't even bother to brief

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that National Security Cabinet and if that becomes short up,

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that is an absolute disgrace. But what I want to

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>get your thoughts on as a communications expert, Webb's performance,

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the way that she is communicating to the public very

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>important part of that top job there. How would you

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>rate it and do you have any tips for her?

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 8>Well, if she could go on on holiday and put

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 8>someone up. Some chowd too have performed better, giving the

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 8>public confidence that the New South Wales Government and the

0:07:55.880 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 8>New South Wales Police a lock step together in reducing

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 8>the escalation of the ongoing anti Semitic activity in Sydney,

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 8>and of course we see it here in Melbourne.

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 9>Two.

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 8>The high levels of anxiety and stress of parents in

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 8>the Jewish community whose children are now this week back

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 8>to school, traveling in their school uniforms, taking public transport.

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 8>That anxiety and that fear and that lack of confidence

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 8>in the police after we've seen these issues come to

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 8>light this week is very very real. Chris Mins, of course,

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 8>has been a significant leader in making strong decisions and

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 8>using strong language that Australians have been desperate to hear

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 8>and that have been missing at a federal level. The

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 8>other point I'd like to make here too is that

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 8>this is a joint state federal counter terrorism operation. When

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 8>issues of this significant nature are undertaking by state and

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 8>federal police, the minister is informed generally every step of

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 8>the way, both the federal minister and the state police

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 8>minister and the Premier and highly likely the Prime Minister.

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 8>There is nothing in my experience at an operation of

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 8>this level inside federal and state government that tells me

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 8>they would not know, and if they didn't, there are

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 8>more problems going on in those governments than we know about.

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, if Albo did know, as you're saying that it's

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.079
<v Speaker 1>customary for these ministers be briefed, and then he should

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>have been briefed by by the relevant minister in this situation,

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>that is an absolute disgrace and I think to Darren's point,

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it is weird that he won't just say what he

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>knew that he's been dodging it at the press conferences

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>this week, and I think that's very problematic. He owes

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 1>everybody an answer about that. But let's move on, because

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>this week Australian media crews flew to Poland to cover

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>an Oulswitch commemoration event.

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's nearly eighty years to the day camps behind

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 5>me were emptied, freed by the Allies of the barely

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 5>seven thousand survivors of the more than one million Jews

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 5>who are murdered here at Auschwitz. World leaders gathering here

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 5>for the anniversary, witnessing the evidence like shoes, luggage, prosthetics

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:18.599
<v Speaker 5>and Zyklon B canisters.

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Now, it was an incredibly important event considering the anti

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Semitic attacks that we are seeing here in Australia. Our

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Foreign Minister was there, and countless world leaders, including King

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Charles French, President Emmanuel Macron, just to name a few.

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>But for our national broadcaster, they could not be bothered

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to even send one reporter. The Australian broke this story,

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>James Madden Wrights. Neither of Australia's public broadcasters, the ABC

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and SBS, will be on the ground in Poland for

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the commemoration of the eightieth anniversary of the Liberation of

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 1>Our Switch on Monday. It's likely to be the last

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>such service attended by survivors of the unspeakable events that

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>occurred at the concentration event. Camp and journalist James Madden

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>goes on to make this point to put the Outswitch

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>decision in context. In twenty twenty three, the ABC sent

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven staff at a cost to the taxpayer of

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty thousand dollars to the four day

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Indigenous Garma Festival in Arnham Land. Let's bring the panel

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>in now, Darren. That's a fantastic scoop by James Madden

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>who got that before the event, so we knew what

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that plan was. And then the ABC refused to explain

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to him, refuse to give any comment back to the

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>public because they're unaccountable. Of course, what do you make

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of that decision and particularly the contrast in the way

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that they cover these progressive lefty love in events for

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 1>indigenous issues and rights. But we've got this very important

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>issue with all of these world leaders. I cannot think

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>of something more newsworthy on that day to cover no representation.

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely beggars believe particularly you know, as we've just discussed,

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 7>I mean, the rise of this grotesque wave of anti

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 7>Semitism in Australia at the moment, it just you know,

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 7>the underscores why it's never been more important than ever

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 7>before to remember in this post war world and what

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 7>happened eighty years ago, and you know, what happened on

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 7>October the seventh was reflected in those events eighty years ago,

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 7>and people need to know about what happened, what the

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 7>Nazis did to the Jews. It's really really important. It's

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 7>an absurd misjudgment by the ABC and their news director.

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 7>They should be there, and Channel seven, Channel nine and

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 7>the other three to air broadcasters were there. They have

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 7>a very well resourced, as James Madam reported in his piece,

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 7>European Bureau, which is funded by as we all know,

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 7>the Australian taxpayer. They've got the handout at the moment

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 7>asking for more money to top up the billion dollar

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 7>plus check that they get every single year from the

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.719
<v Speaker 7>Australian taxpayer. So there really is no excuse for this

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:57.199
<v Speaker 7>on a number of levels, whether it's resourcing or the

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 7>news value of the event. I think the other point

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 7>to make is there were many survivors from that concentration

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 7>camp who came to Australia, and Australia, to its absolute credit,

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 7>opened its arms to those survivors. So, you know, I

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 7>do not understand why the ABAC would not cover the

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 7>event for both those members of the Jewish community here

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 7>in Australia that have been making lives for themselves in

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 7>many decades and the younger generations in Australia that are

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 7>growing up now that need to know about what happened.

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 7>We saw the misinformation and the lack of historical knowledge

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 7>and context around what happened in World War Two around

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:36.079
<v Speaker 7>the time of October the seventh. You know, a lot

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 7>of people don't understand what happened, and that's why it's

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 7>really important to cover the anniversary from eighty years ago.

0:13:41.960 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Christy, it seems like one of these one of

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 1>these things that everyone should just agree that this is

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 1>something that's newsworthy. And Darren makes a grow point. They

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>get a billion dollars every year to cover the news.

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>They're constantly crying about not having enough. They want in

0:13:55.000 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>date inflation indexed payments from the government. But if they

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>are not capable of balancing their books and managing this

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 1>enormous budget in the way that these quintessential events are covered.

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how can the Australian taxpay have confidence that

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>it's been run properly.

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 8>It's really interesting that the ABC senior management at a

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 8>board and chair level have been on a pr offensive

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 8>almost for the last six months, trying to overcome this

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 8>very real issue of city newsrooms in the ABC only

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 8>choosing to cover certain stories and perhaps to cover those

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 8>stories not objectively. They have made a lot of noise

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 8>about improving that, but this here just demonstrates that even

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 8>if that is being said with the true intention of

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 8>doing so, it's not filtering down to people who make

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 8>those editorial decisions. This is a country that should recognize

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 8>that as a significant international event for the Australian national

0:14:56.680 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 8>broadcaster to have a presence at if the commercial networks,

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 8>who are struggling against the current media revenue environment can

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 8>outline that as a significant expense to undertake in order

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 8>to demonstrate to Australians that we as a nation view

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 8>this history as important, as relevant, and perhaps never more

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 8>relevant than it is now, particularly as Darren mentioned, to

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 8>educate young people who are not getting any information whatsoever

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 8>that has legitimate opinion and history contained in it. All

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 8>media organizations in this country should take a decision to

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 8>educate younger people to show as much accurate content as

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 8>they can about these major events. And Australia has significant

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 8>minister or representation at these events too, that alone should

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 8>be recognized in this event being covered definitely.

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately there instead just making dumb tiktoks with all that

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>count Christy McSweeney, Darren Davidson, thank you so much for

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>joining us. We're going to take a quick break. But

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>when we return, what is the fuss about Donald Trump's

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 1>new press secretary? Welcome back to Stars and Gripes, where

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>we tear apart the actions of the bidder activists masquerading

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>as journalists in the United States. First up is the

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>media's reaction to Donald Trump's new Press secretary, Caroline Levett.

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>The left pretends to be a champion of women until

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they find one who is a conservative. Once that happens,

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>they love nothing more than tearing down women with the

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>most petty and vacuous of insults. Levit appears to be

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a fierce operator, but she is also twenty seven and

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>arguably quite glamorous. So of course the kind and progressive

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>voices at the View reacted to her appointment like this.

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.080
<v Speaker 10>I think, Sam, she's probably been put in there because according.

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>To Trump, she's at ten.

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 11>You know, that's what it is.

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 9>I want to be clear though it's not her first job.

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 10>It was her first press briefing.

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 12>She worked on the previous.

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 13>This is the first time I think it has been

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:15.719
<v Speaker 13>the She may be, but my point is that job

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 13>would not maybe have been open to her.

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 14>I want to clarify that.

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, and the abuse continued.

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.360
<v Speaker 13>I would like this young lady who's this is her

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 13>first job, I would like her to do a little

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 13>homework because she said something yesterday that really pissed me off.

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 13>And that was she said, there will be no wokeness here.

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 13>Let me explain something to you, because without that wokeness,

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 13>you might not have that job. Because because women were

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 13>not invited to that table, women were not invited to

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 13>many tables.

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 9>In this nation.

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>The reason we fought.

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:01.399
<v Speaker 13>And busted all behind to make sure that you didn't

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 13>have to worry about this. And now to hear you

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 13>talk about it, and to hear anybody talk about the wolkness,

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:10.640
<v Speaker 13>the wolkness was put in place for a reason.

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Attacking a woman for her looks or age isn't very progressive.

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in sky New's contributor, Kosher Gata Kosher. Particularly

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that last clip that we played. It was so condescending

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:27.199
<v Speaker 1>the way that she was scolding her as if she

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.360
<v Speaker 1>was a schoolgirl, suggesting she needed to do her homework.

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I just I find it so hypocritical when the so called,

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, caring progressive voices just turned so nasty like that.

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 9>Yes, and as you mentioned, with conservative women, there's a

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 9>long list of that booth of Trump's previous press secretaries, females,

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:53.919
<v Speaker 9>Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Keeley Mcaneni, other figures like her. His

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 9>campaign manager the first time, Kelly M. Conway. Sarah Palin

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 9>very famously had to bear the brunt of a lot

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 9>of this. So people are used to that, I think

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 9>in their bubble of the audience that the view speaks to,

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 9>that's probably kind of what the group think is. So

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 9>she won defense, I guess is that she was speaking

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 9>to her audience. When you take it outside of that

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 9>bubble the way you are right now and we all

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:17.719
<v Speaker 9>can see what it is. It was also interesting too,

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 9>because she was conflating two ideas. This word wokeness. Didn't

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 9>look like she really understood what it meant, or certainly

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 9>the way Caroline Levitt meant it when she made that statement,

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 9>and she was conflating it with civil rights and how

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 9>women didn't have the right to vote or own property

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 9>and all of that. That has nothing to do with wokeners,

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 9>which is of course about putting people in there because

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 9>of their immutable characteristics rather than the merit that they

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:39.960
<v Speaker 9>bring to the table.

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:42.360
<v Speaker 1>It's such a good point. I don't think anyone's suggesting

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it's woke to give a woman a job. Very very

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>duplicitous the way that she tried to word that and

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>spin that. But let's move on. Because Vice President JD.

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Vance sat down for an extended interview with Face the

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Nation's Margaret Brennan, and the journalist got increasingly more agitated,

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and she failed to pen down on a bunch of

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 1>gotcha questions, and it all started getting really tense when

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the topic of immigration came up.

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 14>If you had a violent murderer in a school, of course,

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 14>I want law enforcement to go and get that person

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 14>out of.

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 10>The point of the question, you change the regulation this week.

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 10>That's the point of the question exactly. Giving the authority

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 10>to go into church and go into school, the empowered

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:27.360
<v Speaker 10>law enforcement to enforce the law everywhere to protect Americans,

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 10>in fact, a chilling effect arguably to people to not

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 10>send their bids to school.

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 14>I desperately hope it has a chilling effect on legal.

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 10>The US Conference of Catholics Bishops are actively hiding criminals.

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 14>I think the US Conference of Catholic Bishops has frankly

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 14>not been a good partner in common sense immigration enforcement

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 14>that the American people voted for, and I hope, again

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 14>as a devout Catholic, that they'll do better.

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>The reporter kept editor or editorializing, now it wasn't an

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>interview at this stage, but a debate, and JD. Vance

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't seem to care.

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 14>We absolutely cannot unleash thousands of unvetted people into our countries.

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 10>People are good, These people are vetted.

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 14>Just like the guy who planned a terrorist attack in

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 14>Oklahoma a few months ago. He was allegedly properly vetted,

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 14>and many people in the media and the Democratic Party

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 14>said that he was properly vetted. Clearly he wasn't. I

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 14>don't want my children to share a neighborhood with people

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 14>who are not properly vetted. And because I don't want

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 14>it for my kids, I'm not going to force any

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 14>other American citizens' kids to do that either.

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 10>No, and that was a very particular case. It wasn't

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 10>clear if he was radicalized when he got here or

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 10>while he was living.

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 14>I don't really care, Margaret. I don't want that person

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:39.919
<v Speaker 14>in my country, and I think most Americans agree with me.

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Kosher, let's bring you back in. What a brilliant retort

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to a journalist who is honestly making the point, making

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the argument, well, if they were radicalized in America, then

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>that's somehow it doesn't make a difference. That's obviously going

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>quite viral in the way that he just punched through

0:21:58.880 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the question.

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:05.400
<v Speaker 9>It has. It's become an Internet genre all onto itself

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 9>after that, and there's all sorts of means out there

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 9>that are really funny. I don't really care. Margaret is

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 9>kind of a new rallying cry to his side of

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 9>the debate. But you know, what she was doing is

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 9>what the left side of certainly in America and really

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:20.679
<v Speaker 9>other liberal democracies have been doing on the immigration debate,

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 9>which is they purposely sort of hide in the weeds

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 9>that this program is legal, that program is legal. We

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 9>do have a vetting apparatus. Hence it was all done

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 9>versus what the other side is trying to do is

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 9>zoom out, look at the big picture, which is that

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 9>mass migration is at unprecedented levels in America, illegal and yes,

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 9>even legal even if it is ostensibly illegal. Program of

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 9>asylum seekers and refugees. Is that helping the national interest?

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:47.880
<v Speaker 9>That is kind of what Trump advanced is their signature issue.

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 9>That's what he was trying to bring it back up to,

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 9>and she was trying to getmired into Well, they were vetted,

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:54.719
<v Speaker 9>and this person got radicalized later but not before he

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 9>was entered, and nobody cares, and so that summed it up.

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, Kase, if they were vented, obviously whatever they

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>did to vet didn't work. And that's the whole point.

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think the people are seeing through this. But look,

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you've seen the treatment that jd Vance gets. But how

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>does the media interview politicians on the other side of

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum. Here's MSNBC at its finest. Well, actually, let

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 1>me ask you about that. On this point.

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 11>A lot of people have been today and the last

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:25.880
<v Speaker 11>few days crediting your campaign and crediting all the reporting

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 11>during the campaign that identified Project twenty Project twenty twenty

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 11>five is essentially what looked like a blueprint for the

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 11>incoming Trump administration to dismantle the American government.

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:38.959
<v Speaker 1>They denied it.

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 11>They said they had nothing to do with it, said

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 11>they'd never heard of it. Does it seem to you

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 11>like that's actually what they're doing?

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 5>How it is?

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:47.159
<v Speaker 15>It doesn't seem it is.

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>What an absurd television show just stating as a fact

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 1>that Donald Trump is dismantling the American government? And what

0:23:56.480 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a soft hole. Leading question from Rachel Maddow. Okay, maybe

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that was just her intro though, soften him up before

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>getting to the really tough questions.

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 11>What do you think America's listening to you right now

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 11>thinking about what might have been had you been vice

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 11>president instead of j Defence, What might have been had

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 11>Kamala Harris been the president? Right now? Donald Trump, people

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 11>hearing you talking about the pushback and the fight and

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 11>that mattering, what does that mean in practical terms? The

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 11>average person watching you right now who agrees that this

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 11>needs a big pushback what should they do.

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, and you know that overused term the frog and

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 14>the boiling water.

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 12>We've been in the damn pot way too long.

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>He is given literally the easiest possible questions and he

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>still manages to say the most stupid things possible. Kosher,

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what to say about that. First, I

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>mean the fact that this show just goes to air

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>with allegations. It's actually not even an allegation. It was

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>just a statement of truth that the American government is

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>being dismantled, you know. Put that to one side. The

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 1>second aspect of this is the questions, the raised eyebrows,

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the way that they're just so glad to have this

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>bloke here. It's such a juxtaposition between the way that

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>they interview anybody on a conservative side of.

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 9>Politics indeed, and the thing that's interesting about MSN we see,

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 9>similar to the view they've got their audience niche that

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 9>they speak to, and they're producing a product for that audience.

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 9>They are declining. They declined precipitously after the election. I

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 9>think they were averaging one point three million viewers last year,

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 9>and after the election that was down to eight hundred thousand.

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:34.640
<v Speaker 9>They've had a little bit of a recovery coming up

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 9>after the inauguration, and Rachel Maddow is their biggest star,

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 9>she's their highest rated host. She was down to one

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 9>day a week and had the sweet deal actually interns

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:44.880
<v Speaker 9>of what she was getting paid to do that, which

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 9>was why they reported they brought her back to five

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:49.199
<v Speaker 9>days a week to help try and resuscitate that in

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:51.479
<v Speaker 9>the era of Trump News that we live in, and

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 9>in that mold, she's going to try and get some

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 9>people from the other side and try to skewer them

0:25:57.960 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 9>as we saw, but I don't think they'll be successful

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 9>because the current people in the administration are actually very

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 9>savvy with adversarial media, more so than Republicans were in

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 9>the past. Then on this side, she's going to have

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 9>very friendly, softball interviews with the other side of the aisle,

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 9>and that seems to be their recipe. We'll see if

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 9>they're able to hold on to the little bit of

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 9>a rebound that they had in ratings, because if not,

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 9>I don't know how long this is sustainable. Just as a

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 9>business model.

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's really good for us. It's free content, so

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I hope they keep going. The world's tech giants have

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 1>had a pretty major change of heart backing the Trump

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>presidency in and it has angered a lot of journalists.

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>But this week Meta even settled its lawsuit with Trump

0:26:34.200 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>at a cost to them of forty million dollars, which

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>linked the decision to ban the president from the social

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>network kosher how far we've come. At one point you

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>had the president banned from Facebook. Now the bloke's Mark Zuckerberg.

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>He's standing up next to the president as if they're

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>best mates. He's saying all the right things to get

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>on on his right side. What do you make of it?

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 9>It's quite funny. He was they're standing at the inauguration.

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 9>He donated money to the inauguration fund, and then simultaneously

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.119
<v Speaker 9>at the same time this lawsuit was going on and

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 9>he settled, So that kind of two sides of the

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:12.679
<v Speaker 9>coin thing is quite funny. It is a remarkable turnabout,

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 9>for sure. I don't think anybody could have predicted the

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 9>level with which obviously Trump's comeback, which is much widely reported,

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 9>has been because not only politically, just all these offshoots

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 9>and tentacles are also part of his comeback story. I

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 9>suspect part of why they settled is also because if

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:30.719
<v Speaker 9>it were to go to trial, there would be a

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 9>lot of discovery there and probably not the best communications

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 9>internally within Facebook that led up to that decision to

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 9>take to cancel the account of a sitting United States President,

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 9>which is what he was at that time in the

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 9>wake of January sixth, all sorts of infringements first First Amendment, discrimination, etc.

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:49.679
<v Speaker 9>And they probably it's just in their interest to not

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 9>be going to trial with again who is currently the

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 9>sitting president, and it's just much easier to settle.

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Kosha gotta thank you, sorry much a quick break, But

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>when we return, we sit down with Media watchdog columnist

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Henderson. Welcome back. Now joining me as he is

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>each and every week, is The Australian's Media watchdog columnist

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Jared Henderson, Now Jared. The ABC, as they tend to do,

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>they always seem to pick the most controversial, controversial people

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to be in probably sometimes the most inappropriate panels. What

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>have you got for us?

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 12>But I've got Sarah Schwartz who's become sort of famous

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 12>on the ABC. She represents the Jewish Council of Australia, which,

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 12>as far as I can work out looking at their

0:28:33.600 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 12>own website, they represent about one percent of Australian Jews.

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 12>That's what they sort of claim. Academics and people like that.

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 12>But of course the ABC loves them because they really

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 12>like a Jew who's opposed to Israel. So a Jew

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 12>who's a now designerst Jew, they love them. Like if

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 12>you've got a Liberal Party guy who now criticized the

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 12>Liberal Party, they always get on the ABC. And so

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:58.479
<v Speaker 12>what's happened here is that Sarah Swart's got the other day,

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 12>got eight minutes very soft interview on ABC TV News

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 12>Breakfast just sort of bagging, just bagging Israel and bagging

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 12>other Jews in Australia for supporting Israel and essentially blaming

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 12>Peter Dutton for anti Semitism. Now that's a real stretch.

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 12>So you've got you've got people fire bombing places, and

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 12>you've got people scrawling anti Semeri, anti Semitics messages on walls.

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 12>But according to Sarah Schwartz, it's all Peter Dutton's fast.

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's look at this for the audience. We've got

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to grab and let's take a listen.

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:35.080
<v Speaker 16>I will not stop speaking about how Peter Dutton and

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 16>the Coalition are misusing and exploiting the rise in anti Semitism,

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 16>because I think that that is something that is fueling

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 16>division and racism and anti semitism towards Jewish people. And

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 16>you know, he has a very big incentive to misinterpret

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 16>what I say, and the murder press does as well,

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 16>because I don't think that they are actually committed to

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 16>addressing racism.

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Now, Jared, the interesting thing about this is the ABC

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>has a little spreadsheet where they put down the names

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of people from different voices, and they would say, oh, well,

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we've had a Jewish person on tick. Now we can

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>get somebody from the from the other side of the debate.

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, that's right. I mean it's a sort of a

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 12>disguise because Sarah Sworts is a very controversial figure in

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 12>the Jewish community outside the Jewish community. I mean, if

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 12>you're going around calling Peter responsible for any Semitism, you've

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:25.480
<v Speaker 12>got to be pretty controversial. But she goes down the

0:30:25.520 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 12>list of Jewish speakers, you see, and nothing the other

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 12>list she balanced that was someone from the Greens or

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 12>a teal that balances, or someone from the left of

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 12>the Labor Party that balances, which is just fake. But

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 12>it comes up in their in their figures when they

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 12>will calculate them all up a sort of even balance.

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 12>But of course it's not.

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Well. Now, let's talk about ABC Radio National. What have

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you found well?

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 12>Early on Saturday morning last I was listening to Nick

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 12>Bryant X, a BBC guy, he's very clever guy, and

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 12>he was talking on the new program he's running Saturday Extra,

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 12>and lo behold, I heard him talking to an American commentator.

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 12>It was quite reasonable, and Brian came up with the

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 12>idea that Trump's losing his energy. He's sort of going

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 12>to hand over the I think there's a clip of

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 12>it here. He's going to hand over. He's going to

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 12>hand over the presidency.

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Who elon Musk, he's notorious for being low energy. Let's

0:31:18.840 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 1>have a listen.

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 15>One of the quickest ways to get fired in the

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 15>first Trump administration is to get more attention than Trump.

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 15>But I'm intrigued by this caddy because it does seem

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 15>like he is willing to be eclipsed occasionally by Musk,

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 15>and I wonder what that tells us about his appetite

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 15>for the job. He's seventy eight, He's not seventy as

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 15>he was the first time round. There's a different energy level.

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 15>We saw that during the campaign. I wonder if he's

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 15>more willing to sort of outsource his presidency to people

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 15>like a Musk because he wants to spend a bit

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 15>more time on the golf course. Perhaps he hasn't got

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 15>the energy levels that he had the first time round.

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and charity. He's also politically inepty because everybody knows

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that jd Vance has been groomed for the top job,

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that it is a very t chick thing that's happening there,

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>And to make it seem like Elon Musk is, I

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's a bit deceptive, to be honest.

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 12>And I think there's a map of it. I mean,

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 12>after this, I turned on American television, was watching it

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 12>and there was Donald Trump. That very morning, he'd got

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 12>up in Washington, DC. He'd flow into North Carolina to

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 12>talk to people about the devastating floods that had there

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 12>some time ago. Then he flew to La Airport. Then

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 12>he took a flight around the areas of some of

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 12>the bushfires. Then he had a lengthy meeting. I was

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 12>watching it around for over an hour, but perhaps an

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 12>hour and a quarter. With there are about thirty people

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 12>in the room, including the mirror of Los Angeles. He

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 12>went through all the detail people, asking all these technical questions.

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 12>He sounded a bit like a property developer, but he

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 12>certainly knew what he was talking about. And then he

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 12>flew onto Los Angeles for the night to prepare for

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 12>something else the next morning. So that was the Friday

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 12>American time. I was watching it on Saturday. Australian time

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 12>is in Eastern time, and there's Nick Bryan saying the

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 12>man energy. I mean, I couldn't imagine anyone.

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>You can make a lot of allegations against Donald Trump,

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>him being low energy seems like the one thing you

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 1>cannot accuse that man of it.

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, now you've.

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Got another issue with mcbrian's show. So let's have a

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>listen to this grab and one of the promises that

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>he's made.

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 15>Weike committing to bringing you a diversity of voices, some

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 15>of you you'll agree with, some of whom you won't,

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:28.960
<v Speaker 15>but hopefully all of them will be insightful and make

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 15>more sense of our world. And we will try to

0:33:31.720 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 15>abide by one of the first rules in journalism, never

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 15>be boring. I hope you'll enjoy the New Saturday.

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Extra Jared a diversity of voices. That would be the

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>very first time that's ever happened on the ABC.

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 12>But the inter thing is that Nick Brian is saying

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:51.719
<v Speaker 12>that this is a brand new idea, and it is.

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 12>I didn't know how long it's going to last for

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 12>until there's opposition from management and colleagues and from the

0:33:57.080 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 12>audio left wing audience.

0:33:58.520 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 16>But he.

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 12>Now he's taken over from Frand Kelly, who always says

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 12>she was an activist and he's now come up with

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 12>this brand new idea, have a diversity of viewpoints. And

0:34:08.040 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 12>what I know about the notice about the new chairman,

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 12>Kim Williams is that he's addressed a lot of problems

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 12>at the ABC publicly, but he's never addressed the issue

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:17.720
<v Speaker 12>of the lack of viewpoint diversity because they all agree

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 12>with each other. Now in comes Nick Bryant, who's on

0:34:20.640 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 12>the left. XBC guys, BBC guys on the left, but

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 12>he's saying, I'm going to put a bit of balance

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 12>on my program. This is a brand new idea. So

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 12>there were over a billion dollars a year and they

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 12>get a guy x A BBC who comes on and says,

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 12>brand new idea, let's keep some different views on.

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 1>The point's talk to people we might disagree with who

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 1>have thought that could be interesting.

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 12>He very did last that, David, as as you imply it,

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 12>can he continue. There'll be a lot of opposition because

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 12>no one else does it, because you're in a conservative

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 12>free zone where essentially everyone agrees with everyone else. So

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 12>good luck to Nick.

0:34:50.840 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like a bit of a nasty place sometimes

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a conservative. Jared Hennison, thank you so much,

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:57.719
<v Speaker 1>as always for joining us. That's all the time that

0:34:57.760 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 1>we have for tonight, But up next is Newsnight.

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:01.959
<v Speaker 16>Then then