Speaker 1: On Scylands Australia. This is the Wader Panalty Show.
Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the reader Panehy show. Coming
Speaker 2: up tonight.
Speaker 3: The Albanezy government under renewed pressure to increase defense spending.
Speaker 2: Dan Wilde would be here to discuss the day's.
Speaker 3: Top headlines, including the ABC squandering more than a million
Speaker 3: dollars in taxpayer money on unnecessary legal fees.
Speaker 2: The Great Douglas Murray.
Speaker 3: Joins me shortly with a message for self loathing lefties
Speaker 3: in the West. M Horowitz will have the latest from
Speaker 3: the US, and later in the hour Kinsey Schofield will
Speaker 3: tell us why George Clooney was rubbing shoulders with King
Speaker 3: Charles and left is losing it features this charmer stopped.
Speaker 4: Come on my page and say that people should be
Speaker 4: in this contrivilibly.
Speaker 2: Don't do it. This is ridiculous, it's inhuman.
Speaker 3: But first, the Australian government is under intense pressure to
Speaker 3: increase defense spending after NATO leaders back Donald Trump's increase
Speaker 3: spending demands. Despite many NATO leaders agree to spend five
Speaker 3: percent of their respective GDPs on defense, the Albinezer government
Speaker 3: is refusing requests to lift our defense spending to three
Speaker 3: point five percent of GDP. Let's bring in Deputy executive
Speaker 3: director at the Institute of Public Affairs, Dan Wild. Dan
Speaker 3: is Australian danger of becoming an outlier here, We're becoming
Speaker 3: some sort of a recalcitrant ally that is not doing
Speaker 3: our bit for defense.
Speaker 5: Well that's right, rider, Yes we are in danger of
Speaker 5: becoming an outlier.
Speaker 6: We probably already are one.
Speaker 5: And look, the point here is that, yes, we need
Speaker 5: to increase our defense spending as a percentage of our GDP,
Speaker 5: and yes we need to make sure that that is
Speaker 5: being spent on more effective things. But we shouldn't just
Speaker 5: be doing it because the United States or Donald Trump
Speaker 5: has requested it of us.
Speaker 6: We need to do it for its own sake.
Speaker 5: We have been underspending and under investing in our defense
Speaker 5: capabilities for a long time now, and so we need
Speaker 5: to make sure that we're catching up.
Speaker 6: We also need to make.
Speaker 5: Sure that we are a reliable ally to the United
Speaker 5: States and our other Western partners, which we have not been.
Speaker 6: And I think a part.
Speaker 5: Of this reason REATA is because there is a very
Speaker 5: anti American sentiment that exists in sections of the Labor Party,
Speaker 5: and there is certainly an anti Donald Trump sentiment that exists.
Speaker 5: And look, Trump, whether you like him or not, he's
Speaker 5: not going to be president in three and a half
Speaker 5: years time. So you've got to get along with the
Speaker 5: president that's there at the moment, and too many within
Speaker 5: the Labor Party are not interested in doing that.
Speaker 3: Well, the way things are going in the US, we're
Speaker 3: likely to see a president JD. Van So they think
Speaker 3: things are kind of changing in America, they'll be sadly mistaken. Now,
Speaker 3: this was very interesting, I thought during Donald Trump's press
Speaker 3: conference in the early hours of this morning at NATO,
Speaker 3: where he noted that Spain was one of the countries
Speaker 3: that refused to abide by his increased spending demands and
Speaker 3: Donald Trump had a remedy for that. And I think
Speaker 3: the Albaneza government should pay very careful attention to these comments.
Speaker 2: Of course, you know a Spain.
Speaker 7: Are you satisfied with today?
Speaker 8: Oh?
Speaker 9: I think Spain's are terrible what they've done, No, I do.
Speaker 9: They're the only country that won't pay the full up
Speaker 9: they want to stay at two percent. I think it's terrible.
Speaker 9: And you know, they're doing very well. The economy is
Speaker 9: very well, and that economy could be blown right out
Speaker 9: of the water with something bad happening. Know, Spain is
Speaker 9: the only country that are you from Spain, good congratulations.
Speaker 9: You're the only country that is not paying. I don't
Speaker 9: know what the problem is. It's I think it's too bad.
Speaker 9: So we'll make it up. You know what we're going
Speaker 9: to do. We're negotiating with Spain on a trade deal.
Speaker 9: We're going to make them pay twice as much. And
Speaker 9: I'm actually serious about there.
Speaker 3: You go, well make it up. Is that what Australia
Speaker 3: can look for or what do I wonder? And we
Speaker 3: haven't yet negotiated a trade deal, a a deal on
Speaker 3: tariffs with the US. And I do wonder whether our
Speaker 3: reluctance to do anything about our defense spending is part
Speaker 3: of the reason Donald Trump is refusing to meet for
Speaker 3: the Anthony Now been easy.
Speaker 5: I think that's likely. And you know Trump has used
Speaker 5: and even said this. He said this repeatedly, that one
Speaker 5: of the purposes of tariffs is to get revenue, and
Speaker 5: the other purpose of tariffs is to use it as
Speaker 5: leverage and as a bargaining chip for other matters. He's
Speaker 5: been very explicit about that. So it shouldn't come as
Speaker 5: a surprise that that's exactly what he's doing, or what
Speaker 5: he said he's going to do in the case of Spain.
Speaker 6: So yes, we need to be aware of that.
Speaker 5: But like I said before, whether Trump was president, whether
Speaker 5: Kamala Harris or Joe Biden or anyone, we needed to
Speaker 5: increase our defense spending no matter what. And like I say,
Speaker 5: we need to spend it on more effective things like drones,
Speaker 5: for example, And I don't understand why we don't have
Speaker 5: that capability in our country. So, you know, whatever the
Speaker 5: US president that says, he'll say, but we need to
Speaker 5: do the right thing for our country, which means increasing
Speaker 5: our defense spending.
Speaker 3: Now let's hear from the Senator for Sea Patrol, as
Speaker 3: some have called her, her thoughts on the US president.
Speaker 2: Here is the Greens Sarah Hanson Young.
Speaker 10: I think the world is a much more unstable and
Speaker 10: insecure place with Donald Trump as US president.
Speaker 2: He is dangerous.
Speaker 1: And on one.
Speaker 10: Hand, you just say, oh, he's just a medium megalomaniac,
Speaker 10: it's just all about the attention. I think that's true,
Speaker 10: But I also think he's very dangerous and I think.
Speaker 2: His far right views, his.
Speaker 10: Erraticness, together with his obsession with attention makes the world
Speaker 10: a really unsafe place.
Speaker 2: Dan, what's your response to that.
Speaker 5: Well, I think the problem here is there's just a
Speaker 5: series of assertions without any substance. I mean, what are
Speaker 5: the far right views that Donald Trump holds? Is removing
Speaker 5: nuclear facilities from Iran? A far right view? Is securing
Speaker 5: your borders. A far right view is having an alternative
Speaker 5: economic system that brings manufacturing back to your country a
Speaker 5: far right view. What exactly are the far right views
Speaker 5: that Donald Trump is claim to hold and this idea
Speaker 5: that he's erratic and so forth. I mean, maybe he is,
Speaker 5: maybe he isn't, But I just think that it's a
Speaker 5: strategy that he uses to try to get the outcomes
Speaker 5: that he wants.
Speaker 6: So I think it is unhelpful.
Speaker 5: To have a senator to be making these claims on
Speaker 5: like a very personal level. I mean, you're entitled to
Speaker 5: have your views and to express them, but to be
Speaker 5: sort of having a personal attack on the United States president,
Speaker 5: I think doesn't help our country. And like I say,
Speaker 5: those comments, which is more entitled to make, but they
Speaker 5: don't have any substance, and they're sort of based upon
Speaker 5: really the vibe of it rather than pointing to any
Speaker 5: think concrete, Yes.
Speaker 3: Just intellectually vacuous. And the Greens are the government's coalition partners.
Speaker 3: They've got their balance of power in the Upper House.
Speaker 3: They are going to be working together undoubtedly throughout this term.
Speaker 3: So it's also reckless in many ways to be making
Speaker 3: comments like that, and she went on to question the
Speaker 3: alliance Australia has with the US. Now I want to
Speaker 3: move on to the ABC. A Federal court judge has
Speaker 3: found that journalist Antoinette Latoufe was unfairly sacked by the
Speaker 3: ABC midway through her five day radio contract. Latoufas claimed
Speaker 3: she was unlawfully dismissed by the ABC in December of
Speaker 3: twenty twenty three after she reshared an Instagram post about
Speaker 3: the war in Gaza which accused Israel of using starvation
Speaker 3: as a weapon of war.
Speaker 2: Daniel, It's worth.
Speaker 3: Noting here that the ABC sacked her, but it has
Speaker 3: protected and stood by more high profile reporters. And I
Speaker 3: think just as importantly, they spent one point one million
Speaker 3: dollars of our money defending this case when they could
Speaker 3: have settled it for eighty five thousand dollars.
Speaker 2: Where is the accountability here?
Speaker 6: Well, exactly.
Speaker 5: I mean to me, this is a case of can't
Speaker 5: they both lose? And I think it's you know, the
Speaker 5: ABC is you know, you live by the sword and
Speaker 5: you die by the sword. You know, the ABC has
Speaker 5: a history of trying to silence those that don't share
Speaker 5: its worldview. It's clearly a double standard, as you've rightly
Speaker 5: pointed out that they've stood by other high profile hosts
Speaker 5: or so called journalists and reporters, but haven't done so
Speaker 5: in this case. And as you also say, well, it's
Speaker 5: not their money, it's it's our money. It's the tax
Speaker 5: pays money that has gone into this case. So you know,
Speaker 5: the ABC likes to hold itself up as being this
Speaker 5: sort of beacon of impartiality, of being above the fray,
Speaker 5: of you know, being an important sort of beacon of
Speaker 5: truth in our society. But you know, when it comes
Speaker 5: down to it, they are hypocritical and there is clearly
Speaker 5: a double standard that applies here. But you know, like
Speaker 5: I say, it's lived by the sword, die by the sword.
Speaker 3: Now staying in Victoria, Melbourne street sweeper sacked by Daribin
Speaker 3: City Council after objecting to acknowledgment of country announcements well
Speaker 3: here's one his unfair dismissal case. Shawn Turner told the
Speaker 3: meeting that if you need to be thanking anyone, it's
Speaker 3: the people who have worn the uniform and fought for
Speaker 3: our country to keep us free.
Speaker 2: Daniel.
Speaker 3: It's just absolutely appalling that he had to take legal
Speaker 3: action to protect his rights. I think this is just
Speaker 3: shameful behavior from Darbin Council.
Speaker 5: Oh, it was that absolute disgrace. And you know, this
Speaker 5: street sweeper is an absolute hero. I mean he is.
Speaker 5: What he has said is what the vast majority of
Speaker 5: mainstream Australians believe.
Speaker 6: I mean, this guy should.
Speaker 5: Be the leader of the liberal factly, you know, he's
Speaker 5: got a finger on the pulse on these issues. So
Speaker 5: you know, the idea that someone should be sacked for
Speaker 5: saying this show is not only how out of touch
Speaker 5: that particular council is, but you know it's this broader
Speaker 5: thing of the activist left will shout you down, they'll
Speaker 5: kick you out of your job, they'll take your money,
Speaker 5: they'll ruin your reputation if you don't sign up to
Speaker 5: their divisive social activism. So look, I hope that this
Speaker 5: is yet another example of how mainstream Australians have just
Speaker 5: had an absolute gutful of the overuse of welcome the
Speaker 5: country and acknowledgment of country ceremonies. And to be honest,
Speaker 5: I just think it's time to put the practice to
Speaker 5: bed and do something that can unify us as a
Speaker 5: society rather than doing what's you know, ultimately dividing us.
Speaker 2: Well.
Speaker 3: I do recall Professor Marshall Langton saying that if the
Speaker 3: voice was defeated, we would have no more of these
Speaker 3: welcome to countries.
Speaker 2: But here we are.
Speaker 3: And on Marshall Langton, she has proclaimed her new art
Speaker 3: exhibition in Melbourne as anti colonial. Dan, will you be
Speaker 3: rushing to see this exhibition? It's called sixty five thousand
Speaker 3: Years A Short History of Australian Art.
Speaker 5: No, I think my invite got lost in the mail
Speaker 5: or something like that to go there. Look, I think
Speaker 5: the problem the problem reader is like Aboriginal art. There's
Speaker 5: nothing wrong at all with Aboriginal art and it's got
Speaker 5: a lot to contribute and I think a lot of
Speaker 5: people have an interest in it.
Speaker 6: The issue here is when you turn.
Speaker 5: It explicitly into political activism, which is what Marshall Langton
Speaker 5: is doing. But most people just get immediately turned off
Speaker 5: by it. I mean, if you're a regular person and
Speaker 5: then you see this, this is an anti colonial exhibition,
Speaker 5: well you're not going to rock up to it. What
Speaker 5: would you rock up to? Be brat and basically called
Speaker 5: a racist? Now, I think it's a shame because art
Speaker 5: should unite us. It should be something that can speak
Speaker 5: to enduring values and a shared experience of the human condition.
Speaker 5: And certainly our aboriginal art can do that, just as
Speaker 5: all art can when it's done in in its most
Speaker 5: excellent form. So again it's another example of how really
Speaker 5: a pathetic you know, a pathetic social activist is just
Speaker 5: trying to drive another wedge into our society.
Speaker 3: Dan wil thank you for your time tonight, joining me
Speaker 3: now is the best selling author of groundbreaking books, including
Speaker 3: The War on the West, The Strange Death of Europe,
Speaker 3: and his latest on democracies and death cults.
Speaker 2: Douglas Murray, welcome back.
Speaker 3: One of your best sellers is called The Strange Death
Speaker 3: of Europe, and we about to see the Strange.
Speaker 2: Death of New York.
Speaker 3: With a radical Socialists or On Mandani winning the city's
Speaker 3: democratic mayoral primary, it.
Speaker 1: Is quite extraordinary. Mandani was thought of such a rank
Speaker 1: outlier and such a fringe figure such as sort of
Speaker 1: student politician, as well as being a very very radical
Speaker 1: figure that people didn't really seem to think you could
Speaker 1: possibly get this far. Yet here he is winning the primary.
Speaker 1: This is somebody who has repeatedly shown himself to be
Speaker 1: a sort of sub AOC style radical leftist. He has
Speaker 1: terrible track record, in fact, he doesn't have much of
Speaker 1: a track work record and actually performing at anything, but
Speaker 1: he's got a horrible track record of statements. That was
Speaker 1: recently asked his views about one of the slogans about
Speaker 1: eradicating the Jewish state and just seemed not really to
Speaker 1: have anything much to say in condemning that. And New
Speaker 1: Yorkers are understandably getting worried. New York has taken a
Speaker 1: heck of a battering in recent years as radical left policies,
Speaker 1: including from the Biden eras border policies led to migrant
Speaker 1: waves into New York, that the COVID policies led to
Speaker 1: an incredible exodus from the city of wealthy people and others.
Speaker 1: You know, it's a question can New York really cope
Speaker 1: with a term under such a radical figure, or will
Speaker 1: New York just stop being New York effectively. I mean,
Speaker 1: as we've said many times, retail. You know, there's no
Speaker 1: law in nature that means that a country or a
Speaker 1: city just remains at the peak forever if it keeps
Speaker 1: on being battered by politicians who hated.
Speaker 3: And we've seen the decline in many Western cities are
Speaker 3: great cities, and it's sad to see, particularly a place
Speaker 3: like New York. But ma'am, Darnie does have plenty of
Speaker 3: high profile supporters, from supermodels to popular streamers.
Speaker 2: Let's hear from just a couple of them.
Speaker 11: Text to your friends and family, because we need everybody
Speaker 11: to come out and make sure you're drinking water.
Speaker 1: If this's a very.
Speaker 7: Hunted this election is going to be decided by young voters.
Speaker 7: The average New Yorker is thirty eight years old.
Speaker 5: The last mayoral race was decided by seven thousand voters.
Speaker 7: That means that your vote really matters.
Speaker 11: I supported him because he's the only non Zionist candidate
Speaker 11: on that stage.
Speaker 12: I thought he needed to be bond and sold. But
Speaker 12: people are energetic, people aren't tired of Zionism, and I'm excited.
Speaker 2: To see what he's got.
Speaker 6: I'm not a socialist myself.
Speaker 12: I don't want everyone to be a communist getting free stuff,
Speaker 12: but I think he has some cool ideas.
Speaker 2: There you go.
Speaker 3: He doesn't like the fact that he's a communist who
Speaker 3: wants governments to run supermarkets, but he hates Zionism. So
Speaker 3: he got Sneako's vote.
Speaker 2: And he had certainly got Emily's vote.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, isn't it extraordinary He's running to be
Speaker 1: mayor of New York and the things he's really best
Speaker 1: known for is his anti Israel activism. But of course
Speaker 1: that attracts a certain type of person, as we just saw.
Speaker 1: Imagine though, I mean, this is an election to do
Speaker 1: with a mayor who can oversee quite a lot of
Speaker 1: stuff to do with the running of the city. But
Speaker 1: the mayor of New York doesn't have a foreign policy.
Speaker 1: So isn't it revealing when people like that that that
Speaker 1: guy there, sneak O. Isn't it? Yeah? That he he says,
Speaker 1: I like because he's he's not a Zionist. Well that
Speaker 1: that just means that that he gets the support of
Speaker 1: people who think, great, this guy doesn't like Jews. I
Speaker 1: don't like Jews. Let's vote for him, because what else
Speaker 1: does it mean, what, what's what's not being a Zionist
Speaker 1: got to do with being mayor of New York. Only
Speaker 1: that Mandani has repeatedly demonstrated his own prejudices. And by
Speaker 1: the way, I will predict reata with considerable certainty, and
Speaker 1: we can lay a bed on this that any criticism
Speaker 1: of Mandani in the coming days and weeks will be
Speaker 1: batted back by him and his support as being in
Speaker 1: some way bigoted, as if criticizing a bigot is in
Speaker 1: some way itself the problem. They will say, he's a Muslim,
Speaker 1: he's a recent immigrant. How dare you say anything against him?
Speaker 1: And that will, I guarantee be the playbook it will
Speaker 1: run on.
Speaker 2: Oh, no doubt. I'm not having that bet because you
Speaker 2: would win it.
Speaker 3: Now I want to take you to London, where pro
Speaker 3: Palestinian supporters continue to clash with the police.
Speaker 2: Let's have a look. Now.
Speaker 3: These were members or supporters of the Palestine Action Group
Speaker 3: at Trafalgar Square. Now this group is expected to be
Speaker 3: banned Douglas by the government, prescribed as a terrorist organization
Speaker 3: after its members allegedly vandalized two planes at an RAF base.
Speaker 3: How do you see the way Western governments have handled
Speaker 3: this uprising since October seven, particularly the British, because they've
Speaker 3: seem to have been particularly weak.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean they're all weak reta and it's because
Speaker 1: they don't know what to do. They've imported large populations
Speaker 1: of people who have brought their own sectarian politics to
Speaker 1: countries like Britain. Whether it's to do with Kashmir, Pakistani
Speaker 1: populations who've come to the UK or bang on about Kashmir,
Speaker 1: or the same people and others who will bang on
Speaker 1: about Middle Eastern politics, they've just brought their rife ethnic
Speaker 1: and religious hatreds with them, and the British state, like
Speaker 1: so many other countries, doesn't know what to do now
Speaker 1: other than do a bit of kumbaya. Why don't we
Speaker 1: all love the multi culty society bit. But actually, these
Speaker 1: people we're seeing there, I mean they call themselves Palestine
Speaker 1: Action and they attack RAF bases. They're just a combination
Speaker 1: of two groups of people radical mostly and absolutely hollowed
Speaker 1: out Western far leftists who believe that their life will
Speaker 1: have some kind of meaning if they pretend that the palestinees,
Speaker 1: if that's a thing, a name, a place, a state,
Speaker 1: should be foremost in all of their concerns, and you know,
Speaker 1: it's a very interesting test for a country like Britain.
Speaker 1: Can the police and others actually rein in radical groups
Speaker 1: who bring our cities to a halt because of imported
Speaker 1: bigotries and hatreds or will they just continue to allow
Speaker 1: them to run riot. So far they've just allowed them
Speaker 1: to run riot. We'll see, But if Arma were to
Speaker 1: ban them, that would seem to me to be a
Speaker 1: very good thing. You know, no other groups are allowed
Speaker 1: to shut down cities repeatedly, be hooligans, deface things, invade
Speaker 1: military bases and much more. I think there should be
Speaker 1: a price for that, and I'm very happy if Palestine
Speaker 1: action goes same way as the people they admire so
Speaker 1: much and get prescribed like Hamas and other terrorist groups.
Speaker 3: Now, Douglas, I've always made the argument that if you
Speaker 3: don't like the West and its values, then don't emigrate there.
Speaker 3: If you want to see Shariah law, then there are
Speaker 3: plenty of Muslim majority countries you could live in.
Speaker 2: But I want to play the.
Speaker 3: Response to that argument from a character called Shakil Afsa,
Speaker 3: who did very well. I've got to say the last
Speaker 3: general election in the UK, in the Hall Green constituency
Speaker 3: in Birmingham. He got the second largest vote running as
Speaker 3: an independent.
Speaker 2: Let's have a listen, City.
Speaker 13: Of Birmingham will not tolerate the disrespect of our profit.
Speaker 13: Peace be upon him and there will be outcomes from
Speaker 13: your actions. You will have repercussions for your actions. We
Speaker 13: have been trained from Bert that we must befriend the
Speaker 13: honor of our profit and we will let our life
Speaker 13: on the line.
Speaker 12: Okay, you know the other argument is okay, so if
Speaker 12: you don't like it here, I go to your own confu.
Speaker 11: But why would we do that when our fathers were
Speaker 11: instrumental in rebuilding this country after World War Two? It
Speaker 11: was our grandfathers who worked in the factory twenty twenty hours,
Speaker 11: it was our grandfathers who came here, and it was
Speaker 11: our grandfathers who brought you the.
Speaker 12: Lovely Coreer, which is a national dish.
Speaker 11: So how can you tell us to go. We're not
Speaker 11: going nowhere.
Speaker 1: We are here to stay.
Speaker 11: Like I said, we're not here to take part. We're
Speaker 11: here to take all that.
Speaker 2: Douglas, what's your response to that?
Speaker 3: The argument is their forefathers helped rebuild the UK and
Speaker 3: they're entitled to take over.
Speaker 1: Well, he can scram. As far as I'm concerned, my
Speaker 1: forefathers did a lot more, for a lot longer than his.
Speaker 1: And if he wants to talk about the importance of
Speaker 1: Pakistani labor in the post war period, very happy that
Speaker 1: other British people go head to head and point out
Speaker 1: what our forebears did for a lot longer and a
Speaker 1: lot better to actually build Britain. Britain isn't built on
Speaker 1: a couple of generations of immigration. It's built on centuries,
Speaker 1: in fact, millennia of men women who did extraordinary things.
Speaker 1: And to watch that being trampled on by this person,
Speaker 1: I just will play it around any other way. If
Speaker 1: a white British person were to go to Pakistan and
Speaker 1: say I'm very sorry, but actually my forbears built this country,
Speaker 1: not you, and I'll do whatever I want and we'll
Speaker 1: have a kind of white takeover of Pakistan or anything
Speaker 1: like that, it would be absolutely condemned by everyone. It
Speaker 1: wouldn't be tolerated at all. I just fed up of
Speaker 1: hearing demagogues like that. I'm sorry, the country doesn't belong
Speaker 1: to him and people like him, and I hope he
Speaker 1: doesn't push the British people as much as he's trying
Speaker 1: to because he might not like what he gets back.
Speaker 3: Well, what I say, Douglas, I'm as worried about the
Speaker 3: self loathing generations we are breeding in the West as
Speaker 3: much as those coming from far away lands who want
Speaker 3: to change the West. Watch what these young men say
Speaker 3: when asked whether they would fight for their country.
Speaker 14: Let me tell you this, I would fight against the UK,
Speaker 14: I would probably say, no, you.
Speaker 11: Don't think I would.
Speaker 1: Why would you fight against the UK?
Speaker 10: Because I would like the world to be liberated from
Speaker 10: Western imperialism.
Speaker 7: I would fight against this country in.
Speaker 1: The war.
Speaker 3: Liberated from Western imperialism.
Speaker 2: Douglas, how do we get here?
Speaker 1: First of all, that soyboy you just saw, I'm not
Speaker 1: sure he'd be much used in any arm I can't
Speaker 1: see him storming any beaches or climbing any ramparts. So
Speaker 1: it's purely hypothetical for him. It's just a statement of
Speaker 1: the Basically, he's saying that because he's been taught to
Speaker 1: say it, and he doesn't have a mind to his own.
Speaker 1: He's just repeating a sort of man trey he's been
Speaker 1: taught in some secondary university or college or something like
Speaker 1: that about colonialism and everything else in Western imperiod. It's
Speaker 1: all just such dated stuff by now. And of course,
Speaker 1: you know, those of us who watch people like that
Speaker 1: with the suitable amount of contempt that they invite always
Speaker 1: have to resist the temptation. Don't we to just wish
Speaker 1: that perhaps they would find themselves in a position where
Speaker 1: they meet the people who they think are their great
Speaker 1: allies and are shown a different type of custom and
Speaker 1: a different type of welcome. If that guy ever got
Speaker 1: his way, which he's not going to but actually sort
Speaker 1: of lived in some kind of post Western world, well
Speaker 1: good luck to him, because he'd find out awfully fast.
Speaker 1: The Chinese Communist Party don't particularly care for people like him.
Speaker 1: The sharier law lovers definitely don't like him. You know,
Speaker 1: you just sort of in a way you hope that
Speaker 1: they'll get a little taster of it someday, and it'll
Speaker 1: be the firm smack of reality, maybe the first smack
Speaker 1: they've got, but certainly not the first one they've deserved.
Speaker 3: It reminds me of those pro Palestinian supporters who thought
Speaker 3: they were going to march into Palestine through Egypt and
Speaker 3: the locals gave them the sort of.
Speaker 2: Reception they weren't expecting.
Speaker 3: They were I think expecting the red carpet treatment, and no,
Speaker 3: they got a very North African welcome and they were shocked.
Speaker 3: They couldn't believe the locals would behave like that. Before
Speaker 3: you go. It's been a big week for the Trump administration.
Speaker 3: The bombing of Iran's nuclear sites is fresh calls for
Speaker 3: Donald Trump's impeachment from the Democrats, from the likes of
Speaker 3: AOC and we've also just had Donald Trump overnight at
Speaker 3: the Hague securing increased defense spending from NATO partners. Do
Speaker 3: you expect to see the peace steal between Israel and
Speaker 3: Iran enduring for any sort of time.
Speaker 1: We'll see. The Iranian Revolutionary government is not in a
Speaker 1: very strong position at the moment. The Iatola Kameni is
Speaker 1: about the last person left at the head of it.
Speaker 1: The end of the military and the terrorists infrastructure that
Speaker 1: he and his predecessor built up for four and a
Speaker 1: half decades. Now, he's not in a strong position the era.
Speaker 1: The skies above Iran are completely dominated by the Israeli
Speaker 1: Air Force and indeed by the American Air Force. In
Speaker 1: the last ten days or so, they don't have control
Speaker 1: of their own skies. The Uranian Revolutionary government, the Israeli
Speaker 1: and American Air Force can do whatever they want, and
Speaker 1: the Mullers basically can't do anything much in response. If
Speaker 1: the Iranian Revolutionary government were to break this cease fire,
Speaker 1: Israel be completely within its rights to retaliate immediately. I
Speaker 1: think there is a slightly difficult corner for the Israelis,
Speaker 1: which is whether or not they actually feel that they
Speaker 1: finished the job, not just on the nuclear sites, but
Speaker 1: on the ballistic missiles and others that the Iranian Revolutionary
Speaker 1: government has been firing at the people of Israel for
Speaker 1: the last couple of weeks and has done so many
Speaker 1: times in the past. If the Israelis felt the job
Speaker 1: isn't done, they will need some kind of reassurance that
Speaker 1: it'll be that basically, that the rocket fire will stop
Speaker 1: and much more. It's a difficult corner that and I
Speaker 1: can understand, you know, the tensions on all sides. But
Speaker 1: you know, President Trump did an extraordinary and historic thing,
Speaker 1: as indeed did Prime Minister Netta Yahoo in the last
Speaker 1: couple of weeks since we spoke. The whole world has
Speaker 1: said for years that Iran cannot get a nuclear bomb,
Speaker 1: and most of the world sat by or negotiated away.
Speaker 1: As the Mollez got closer and closer to getting the
Speaker 1: world's most dangerous weaponry. The Israelis acted and then the
Speaker 1: Americans backed them up and finished most of that job,
Speaker 1: if not all of it. And as I've said for
Speaker 1: many years, evidably there's criticism, but they have done something which,
Speaker 1: if it's shown to have been complete, if it has
Speaker 1: actually just freud the nuclear terrorist infrastructure of the Maulers,
Speaker 1: is absolutely historic. That the idiots claiming that Trump should
Speaker 1: be impeached should just come out and say that they
Speaker 1: have no problem with the idea of a nuclear Iran
Speaker 1: and a nuclearized Middle East. And if they think that,
Speaker 1: they're even bigger fools than you and I took them for.
Speaker 2: Douglas Murray, thank you so much for your time tonight.
Speaker 1: It's a great pleasure.
Speaker 2: As always, coming.
Speaker 3: Up Lefties Losing It plus a surprisingly tender moment between
Speaker 3: Donald Trump and a Ukrainian journalist at the NATO summit.
Speaker 3: Army Horowitz is up next. Welcome back. It's time for
Speaker 3: lefties losing it And here are a couple of American
Speaker 3: traitors who want the Islamist Iranian regime to wipe out
Speaker 3: these to blow up more than one hundred million Americans
Speaker 3: in red states like Texas and Florida.
Speaker 8: Dear Iron, this is my official application of states that
Speaker 8: you should.
Speaker 14: Wipe out because we did not vote.
Speaker 4: For that orange cheetoh man over here in Los Angeles, Alabama.
Speaker 8: Out here, Florida out of here, Arkansas boom, Oklahoma, get
Speaker 8: them gla, Ohio, Kansas gone, Kentucky No, Arkansas ran the
Speaker 8: Tennessee Fire.
Speaker 2: Texas double double.
Speaker 3: You know, those low life losers mentioned my home state
Speaker 3: of arkansat twice.
Speaker 2: That's a declaration of war where I come from.
Speaker 3: And let's see another unhinged lefty who somehow diluted herself
Speaker 3: into thinking she's morally superior because she doesn't believe in
Speaker 3: law and order, she doesn't believe in borders. She's happy
Speaker 3: to see the return of the human trafficking tried at
Speaker 3: the us is southern border because apparently it's what Jesus wanted.
Speaker 4: Don't come on my page and say that people should
Speaker 4: be in this country legally. Don't do it.
Speaker 2: This is ridiculous, it's inhumane.
Speaker 15: You are a human being, and don't.
Speaker 2: You dare use Jesus's name or God's.
Speaker 5: Name in this and say that this is what he
Speaker 5: would want and pretend to be a Christian because you're not.
Speaker 2: This is pure evil. You are scum of the earth.
Speaker 2: These are people, these.
Speaker 12: Are mothers, these are fathers, these are human beings, and
Speaker 12: all you care about is where they are geographically.
Speaker 2: Shame on you do better, be better now.
Speaker 3: This is one way to deal with a lefty losing
Speaker 3: it And.
Speaker 14: Tell me why I'm gonna get sixer?
Speaker 15: No I'm not, I no, no, Why.
Speaker 2: Did she get up?
Speaker 3: You knew she was gonna get zapped again as as
Speaker 3: soon as she got up.
Speaker 2: He doesn't get much sillier than this.
Speaker 3: This is Sex and the City star Cynthia Nixon campaigning
Speaker 3: for a radical socialist? Is there a more dim witted
Speaker 3: profession than acting this?
Speaker 2: Just intellectually barren in this election.
Speaker 7: Day, I'm on my way to vote.
Speaker 4: I don't felt that I have ever been more excited
Speaker 4: to vote for anyone than I am to vote for
Speaker 4: Zoran Mondani.
Speaker 3: That was Cynthia before the vote, and afterwards she was celebrating,
Speaker 3: celebrating like a Turkey celebrates Christmas. She posted Zora and Mamdani,
Speaker 3: a Muslim democratic socialist has won the.
Speaker 2: NYC primary for mayor.
Speaker 3: Exclamation mark joining me now is a filmmaker and journalist's army,
Speaker 3: Horowitz army. What do you make of Cynthia Nixon's advocacy here?
Speaker 3: She wasn't alone, Zora and Mamdani has plenty of influential
Speaker 3: famous backers.
Speaker 2: What are you dancing to at the moment.
Speaker 12: Si, I was listening to the rockin' out to mister
Speaker 12: cartermom aka Zoran Mandavi. Yes, the great wrapper of yesteryear.
Speaker 12: So I couldn't help myself. Yes, Mandani is not only
Speaker 12: a weight loss drug, but it's also the incoming mayor,
Speaker 12: most probably of New York City. Yes, he has quite
Speaker 12: a few, like you're trying to get to before I
Speaker 12: disturb you. Quite a few celebrity backers, right, He's got
Speaker 12: Emily Radajowski, the woman made herself famous while she was
Speaker 12: naked in a video. Lord who made Who's your neck
Speaker 12: of the woods? She makes great news?
Speaker 2: Yes, New Zealand person.
Speaker 12: Absolutely, and the afore mentioned Cynthia Nixon a whole Cynthia
Speaker 12: Nixon just quick quick aside that when I had my daughter,
Speaker 12: she was oh no, no, four or five years old. We
Speaker 12: were at the park one day and she was holding
Speaker 12: a string cheese and looking at it about to have
Speaker 12: her lunch. That was her food. Cynthia Nixon's son ran
Speaker 12: up to her, grab the cheese stick, laughed and ran
Speaker 12: away and ate it. As Cynthia Nixon said, was laughing
Speaker 12: and said, Oh, don't worry, I'll get you next time. No, Cynthia,
Speaker 12: I got you this time. Look, Cynthia Nixon is a
Speaker 12: horrible person that that son who stole my daughter's cheese stick.
Speaker 12: This is something who she calls an observant jew that's
Speaker 12: kind of like I'm anna observant Zoastrian. This is somebody
Speaker 12: who spent time in a hunger strike against the genocide
Speaker 12: and Israel. Notably the hunger strike lasted five days, but
Speaker 12: heal it can make two days. Also a member of
Speaker 12: JVP Jewish Boys for Peace, which who I've interviewed, complete
Speaker 12: and total supporters of Hamas. So yeah, that's kind of
Speaker 12: Cynthia and Nixon. But this tracks with Mandavi. Mandavi is
Speaker 12: a he's a support. He has said his own words,
Speaker 12: he wants to globalize the empty FATA. Well, you know,
Speaker 12: I does take it. One second. He fought up with
Speaker 12: a series of uprising against Israel, which was a series
Speaker 12: of terrorist attacks which killed hundreds and hundreds of these
Speaker 12: reelius civilians. He wants to globalize this he founded, he's
Speaker 12: one of the founding member of one of the chapters
Speaker 12: of s JP Students for Justice of Palestine, who are
Speaker 12: open HAMA supporters against people that I have I have interviewed. Look,
Speaker 12: he has openly called for the genocide of Israel, right,
Speaker 12: he doesn't shy away from that at all. And you know,
Speaker 12: even more disgusting than that is he sent out a
Speaker 12: series of robo calls and I was sitting at a
Speaker 12: baseball game my cousin. He got one of these robo calls,
Speaker 12: and my cousin didn't know. I thought he was interacting
Speaker 12: with somebod who worked for the actually worked for the
Speaker 12: for the campaign. He said, look, I'm worried. I'm a Jew.
Speaker 12: I can't vote for mine, Donnie. And then, in a sick,
Speaker 12: twisted way, this person said this robo call said I'm
Speaker 12: an Orthodox Jew and I had a friend who died
Speaker 12: in October seventh. They actually weaponized and took this the
Speaker 12: cruel murder of civilians for a weird, horrible political win.
Speaker 12: I mean, this is Cynthia Nixon, this is Mindani.
Speaker 2: Well, Mamdani did particularly well.
Speaker 3: It has to be said with young voters, affluent voters,
Speaker 3: low income voters didn't really back him, but college educated,
Speaker 3: affluent voters did back him.
Speaker 2: That's got to be a concern.
Speaker 3: But I'm interested to get your take on what President
Speaker 3: Donald Trump has had to say about this. After his
Speaker 3: big win in New York's Democratic meryal primary, Trump wrote,
Speaker 3: Democrats have crossed the line by elevating a one hundred
Speaker 3: percent communist lunatic. He also added, We've had radical lefties before,
Speaker 3: but this is getting a little ridiculous. But army, this
Speaker 3: is the modern left in America. The Democrats loudest voices
Speaker 3: are Iosa and Bernie and Jasmine Crockers and now this
Speaker 3: guy who could be leading in yc.
Speaker 12: Oh God, who would imagine I'd be pining for the
Speaker 12: days of Bill de Blasio. Yeah, Look, I remember we Look,
Speaker 12: we would have a series of discussions you and I
Speaker 12: after the election. Right, in what direction are the Democrats.
Speaker 1: Going to go?
Speaker 12: Well, it seemed like they picked their lane, right, they
Speaker 12: really did.
Speaker 1: Look.
Speaker 12: Zorman Jave is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America.
Speaker 12: Now the DSA, this is not some like watered down
Speaker 12: version of like social democrats in Europe. But this is
Speaker 12: not the Finnish politicians on bikes. These are hardcore Marxist.
Speaker 12: Let me read you a list of the affiliations of
Speaker 12: the DSA support if you read this, the DSA, this
Speaker 12: is from their website, is a multi tendency coalition. Don't
Speaker 12: know what that is of Marxist Leninists, trotsky Is, eco socialist,
Speaker 12: orthodox Marxism as opposed to reform Marxism, evolutionary socialism, socialist feminism,
Speaker 12: and eco socialisms, or simply crazy people. Now they can
Speaker 12: add that list global g hottis because that's exactly what
Speaker 12: they have. Look, he's calling for state run groceries, right,
Speaker 12: state run grocery. Look, this is why it at the
Speaker 12: people in breadlines from the Soviet Union time or now
Speaker 12: currently in Venezuela, what they think of state run groceries. Okay,
Speaker 12: by the way, state run groceries. He wants no profit margin.
Speaker 12: They want they run a one to two percent profit margin.
Speaker 12: That's the graphic margin he wants to get rid of
Speaker 12: and have absolutely no food whatsoever. He's called for having
Speaker 12: no fee for transportation, Getting the subway, getting the bus,
Speaker 12: no problem at all. I remember just recently on that
Speaker 12: same yagging game I was talking about I was a
Speaker 12: subway that stopped for about fifteen minutes, and this woman
Speaker 12: said to me, you know, that's why I don't pay
Speaker 12: for the subway. I skipped. I don't pay. I hoped
Speaker 12: the thing that stops you makes you pay, because this
Speaker 12: is what we get to go.
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 12: No, the reason why we're stopping for fifteen minutes because
Speaker 12: you don't pay for the subway. He wants to make
Speaker 12: that across New York City. This guy is a legitimate
Speaker 12: crazy person, and now New York is poised to elect
Speaker 12: him the mayor of the city.
Speaker 3: To NATO now, ARMI and President Donald Trump shared a
Speaker 3: touching moment with a Ukrainian woman, a journalist who asked
Speaker 3: him a question during the NATO press conference.
Speaker 2: Let's have a look meet with the kids. I mean
Speaker 2: also actually, because he wanted to meet.
Speaker 9: Is your husband a soldier?
Speaker 1: Now he's he's there now.
Speaker 9: Yeah, Well that's rough stuff, right, that's tough, and you're
Speaker 9: living here and you're a reporter.
Speaker 1: I am good.
Speaker 9: So let me just tell you. They do want to
Speaker 9: have the anti missile missiles. Okay, as they call them
Speaker 9: the patriots, and we're going to see if we can
Speaker 9: make some available.
Speaker 2: Amy that's the side of the president. We don't always.
Speaker 12: Say no, that's true. Look, he really does feel for
Speaker 12: the people of Ukraine. I mean again, you know, it's
Speaker 12: so funny. It makes me think back to this whole
Speaker 12: Russia Gate thing, right that. Remember the Democrats planted their
Speaker 12: flag on that they were gonna die on the hill,
Speaker 12: that he was a Russian mole, he was a cat's
Speaker 12: paw for Putin. Yeah, I noticed that Russia invaded Ukraine twice,
Speaker 12: once under Obama and once under Biden, didn't evade it
Speaker 12: under Trump. Trump has no love for Trump has no
Speaker 12: love for Russia. He does want this to end, though,
Speaker 12: because there is a massive amount of killings. Both sides
Speaker 12: are dying right, clearly, one side in the wrong and
Speaker 12: one side of the right not trying to quit the two.
Speaker 12: There's no question that young people are dying in Russia,
Speaker 12: but in particularly in Ukraine, and right there you saw
Speaker 12: the affection he had for Ukrainians and the way he
Speaker 12: felt for the people who are fighting for their freedom
Speaker 12: and fighting against Russian tyranny.
Speaker 2: And before you go.
Speaker 3: He was also referred to as daddy during this NATO
Speaker 3: PRAHS conference.
Speaker 14: Markrat to the NATO chief, who is your friend? He
Speaker 14: called you daddy earlier. Do you regard your NATO allies
Speaker 14: as kind of children?
Speaker 9: Well?
Speaker 3: Trump wasn't playing the role of daddy earlier in the wig,
Speaker 3: It's got to be said, and he wasn't very happy.
Speaker 2: He was an angry daddy.
Speaker 12: Yeah, just wait till daddy gets home. Man, Oh god,
Speaker 12: I remember those words, and we're telling NATA those words. Also. Look,
Speaker 12: he really has transformed NATO. Do you remember remember the
Speaker 12: days and he said I'm gonna leave NATO and everywhere like,
Speaker 12: oh my god, he's crazy. He wants to leave NATO. Yeah. Look,
Speaker 12: six out of thirty one countries prior to Trumpere did
Speaker 12: not hit the two percent threshold they legally were supposed
Speaker 12: to hit. And since he became president the first time,
Speaker 12: not even now the first time, because of that threat,
Speaker 12: the vast majority of NATO countries are at that spending threshold. Finally,
Speaker 12: we're not paying for NATO's defense totally. So yeah, he
Speaker 12: kind of is there daddy. And by the way, he's
Speaker 12: not disliked by the heads of NATO. Mark Rutt, the
Speaker 12: current head of NATO, is the one who called him daddy,
Speaker 12: and Stoenberg before him praised him over and over again
Speaker 12: that he was able to get these intransigent European countries
Speaker 12: to finally pay up. So yeah, Daddy made it work.
Speaker 3: Amy Harwitz, thank you so much for your time. Tonight, Salty,
Speaker 3: come the latest on Jeff Bazils's lavish wedding and the
Speaker 3: billion dollar question about.
Speaker 2: That train up.
Speaker 3: Kinsey Skyfield is up next, Welcome back. Joining me now
Speaker 3: is to Die for podcast hosts Kinsey Schofield. Kinsey, There's
Speaker 3: been a lot of talk in the media about Jeff
Speaker 3: Bezos's lavish wedding in Venice. It's this Saturday, tell me
Speaker 3: the latest, and let's be honest, we all want to know.
Speaker 2: Is there a prenup?
Speaker 3: The last divorce costume billions, tens of billions.
Speaker 4: I am all over this for you, but I hate
Speaker 4: to disappoint you. There's still no word officially on whether
Speaker 4: Jeff Bezos and Lauren Chenchez signed a pre nup. And
Speaker 4: that's raising eyebrows because, like you said, Bezos didn't have
Speaker 4: one with ex wife McKenzie Scott and they're twenty nineteen.
Speaker 7: Divorce ended with Scott.
Speaker 4: Walking away with roughly thirty five billion dollars, instantly making
Speaker 4: her one of the richest women in the world, with
Speaker 4: Bezos now worth over two hundred billion. Legal experts say
Speaker 4: a prenup this time around would be a critical move.
Speaker 4: But by the way, can I find anybody willing to
Speaker 4: marry me for thirty five million dollars?
Speaker 7: I'm here already.
Speaker 3: Yes, you're settling for the thirty five million, not billion.
Speaker 2: Come on, can see we can get you the beat.
Speaker 2: We can get you with a beat. Thank you. I'm
Speaker 2: high now.
Speaker 3: Orlando Bloom is expected to be at this wedding, and
Speaker 3: he may be making his debut as a single man.
Speaker 3: What's happened with Katie Perry? Because only what a few
Speaker 3: weeks ago she was in space with the bride Lauren Sanchez?
Speaker 2: Is she not going to be at the wedding by
Speaker 2: Orlando site?
Speaker 4: I mean, I should ask you what's in the water
Speaker 4: in Australia, because apparently this all.
Speaker 7: Blew up in Australia.
Speaker 4: According to TMZ, Orlando Bloom is going to be making
Speaker 4: his debut as a newly single man at the wedding.
Speaker 4: Of Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez source to say he's
Speaker 4: expected to bring the energy and hit the dance floor hard.
Speaker 4: There's even Taki and Leonardo DiCaprio could slip away for
Speaker 4: a little bar hoping on insider jokes. Ninety percent of
Speaker 4: the guest list is kind of boring, but that other
Speaker 4: ten percent, including Orlando and Jeff Bezos himself, is where
Speaker 4: the real fun is.
Speaker 7: It's going to be a great party.
Speaker 4: Now the split rumors they just want start, they're intensifying,
Speaker 4: and notably, she will not be attending the wedding.
Speaker 3: Well, the last thing you want to hear is that
Speaker 3: your strange husband is hanging out with Leonardo DiCaprio somewhere
Speaker 3: in Italy. That is just bad news all around. Now
Speaker 3: let's move on to the UK and there are reports
Speaker 3: that Prince Andrew will not be returning as a working
Speaker 3: member of the royal family under Prince William once he
Speaker 3: becomes king. The Prince and Princess of Wales reportedly see
Speaker 3: the disgraced Duke of York as a threat to the firm,
Speaker 3: and the future King does not want to explore any
Speaker 3: sort of scenario where he's going to be returning as
Speaker 3: a working royal.
Speaker 4: Honestly, no one in the loan of succession would welcome
Speaker 4: Prince Andrew into the fold. His sexual assault accuser recently
Speaker 4: committed suicide, and while he insists he's an innocent man,
Speaker 4: he was clearly close to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein,
Speaker 4: and in the court of public opinion.
Speaker 7: It's guilt by association.
Speaker 4: So I'm hoping that Prince William isn't villainized over these
Speaker 4: reports because to me it feels like common sense.
Speaker 2: And sticking with the Royals.
Speaker 3: George Clooney and his wife Amal have rubbed shoulders with
Speaker 3: King Charles this way tell us what was behind that?
Speaker 3: While was George clan George Clooney at Buckingham Palace.
Speaker 4: Well, you know what, I think the cloonies probably prefer
Speaker 4: crowns over complaints. George and Amal showed up hand in
Speaker 4: hand to Buckingham Palace looking right at home.
Speaker 7: I guess after one Royal wedding and.
Speaker 4: A few Netflix specials, they've officially rsv p'd no to
Speaker 4: Juan Acido and yes to team working Royals.
Speaker 2: You can't blame them.
Speaker 4: The King's trust has way back press and fewer Spotify casualties.
Speaker 4: But they were therefore the King's Trust Awards, and they
Speaker 4: looked relaxed. They were in good spirits as they spoke
Speaker 4: to King Charles before he greeted the other guests. And
Speaker 4: they are apparently longtime supporters of the King's Trust formerly
Speaker 4: the Princess Trust. And in twenty nineteen, Amole actually partnered
Speaker 4: with the organization to launch Amal Cloney's Women's Empowerment Awards.
Speaker 4: So this actually surprises me so much. It's giving you
Speaker 4: a sense of how Hollywood has really turned their back
Speaker 4: on the Sussexes.
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, if you've got the choice between the Sussexes
Speaker 3: and the real royal family, you're always going to pick
Speaker 3: the rules at you.
Speaker 2: We're not surprised.
Speaker 3: I want to ask you about Sean Diddy Combs. His
Speaker 3: legal team failed to call a single witness to the
Speaker 3: stand in his defense.
Speaker 15: Why is that?
Speaker 3: Closing arguments are scheduled to begin Thursday, and I'm hearing
Speaker 3: more and more conjecture that the defense is very confident
Speaker 3: that he's going to get off on the most serious charges.
Speaker 4: Look, did he may not be the most sympathetic figure,
Speaker 4: and no jury wants to let somebody shady off the hook,
Speaker 4: but being unlikable isn't the same as being guilty of
Speaker 4: racketeering and sex trafficking. The government has thrown a lot
Speaker 4: at him, but when you look closely, it's fair to
Speaker 4: question whether all of it will actually stick. When it
Speaker 4: comes to the racketeering charge specifically, prosecutors appear to be
Speaker 4: on shaky ground. Some might argue that they overcharged him.
Speaker 4: I mean, I guess I could say now, I do
Speaker 4: feel like they overcharged him because they dropped several of
Speaker 4: the counts today because they wanted to simplify the jury's
Speaker 4: you know, the jury's instructions, and now they're trying it
Speaker 4: did look like for a while that they were trying
Speaker 4: to make the facts fit the narrative versus the other
Speaker 4: way around.
Speaker 7: So I don't know. I do wonder. I'm at a loss.
Speaker 7: I don't know what's going to happen when it.
Speaker 4: Finds comes down to the jury taking this case and
Speaker 4: trying to determine what happens behind closed doors. But I
Speaker 4: do think when it comes to closing arguments, we're going
Speaker 4: to hear the defense double down on their original approach.
Speaker 7: Admit Diddy's not a saint, but.
Speaker 4: Remind the jury that being morally questionable isn't the same
Speaker 4: as being criminally liable.
Speaker 2: And before you go.
Speaker 3: Taylor Swift as surprised fans in Nashville as she took
Speaker 3: to the stage at Travis Kelcey's charity concert to seeing
Speaker 3: shake it Off.
Speaker 2: Let's have a quick look. I may have to reinstitute
Speaker 2: some sort of a.
Speaker 3: Taylor's Swift Travis Kelsey ban again on this program. Kinsey,
Speaker 3: I don't know if I can put up with too
Speaker 3: many more clips like that.
Speaker 7: Look, we talked about prenups.
Speaker 4: All I have to say to Taylor Swift is please,
Speaker 4: for the love of God, athletes are notorious for burning
Speaker 4: through their money the second they no longer have work
Speaker 4: in the NFL. Please get a prenum, Taylor, please listen
Speaker 4: to us.
Speaker 1: Well.
Speaker 2: I'm still hoping.
Speaker 3: I shouldn't say this, but I'm hoping for a fantastic
Speaker 3: album post breakup. I can still see a breakup happening
Speaker 3: and a number one album, and then she'll find love
Speaker 3: with someone more suitable. Kinsey Schofield, thank you so much
Speaker 3: for your time, and that's all the time we have tonight.
Speaker 3: I'll see you tomorrow. Night at nine pm. For Left,
Speaker 3: he's losing it. News Night is up next