1 00:00:05,880 --> 00:00:07,680 Speaker 1: Welcome to Fear and Greed Q and A, where we 2 00:00:07,720 --> 00:00:11,559 Speaker 1: ask and answer questions about business, investing, economics, politics and more. 3 00:00:11,600 --> 00:00:15,280 Speaker 1: I'm Suan alma. An interest rate hike is looking much 4 00:00:15,320 --> 00:00:17,600 Speaker 1: more likely when the Reserve Bank Board meets next week 5 00:00:17,840 --> 00:00:21,000 Speaker 1: after a jumping inflation in the December quarter. CPI data 6 00:00:21,040 --> 00:00:24,680 Speaker 1: from the Bureau Statistics yesterday, so the headline annual figure 7 00:00:24,760 --> 00:00:27,720 Speaker 1: climbed from three point two to three point eight percent, 8 00:00:28,200 --> 00:00:31,560 Speaker 1: while the underlying inflation increased well, depending what's three point 9 00:00:31,560 --> 00:00:33,120 Speaker 1: two percent, it's either of the three point three percent 10 00:00:33,159 --> 00:00:36,320 Speaker 1: if you're using monthly data three point four percent if 11 00:00:36,320 --> 00:00:38,839 Speaker 1: you're using quarterly data. Warren Hogan is Managing director of 12 00:00:38,920 --> 00:00:42,640 Speaker 1: EQ Economics and Economic Advisor at Judo Bank. Warren, Welcome 13 00:00:42,640 --> 00:00:43,880 Speaker 1: back to Fearing Greed Q and A. 14 00:00:44,440 --> 00:00:45,159 Speaker 2: Thanks for having me. 15 00:00:45,159 --> 00:00:47,640 Speaker 1: Sean RT hike next week. 16 00:00:48,520 --> 00:00:49,280 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think so. 17 00:00:50,479 --> 00:00:54,480 Speaker 3: We're certainly getting inflation now picking up again, and you 18 00:00:54,560 --> 00:00:57,320 Speaker 3: know it's heading back towards four and maybe five percent 19 00:00:57,320 --> 00:00:59,480 Speaker 3: in headline terms in the next six to nine months. 20 00:01:00,920 --> 00:01:02,680 Speaker 3: So yeah, they need to get on with it. The 21 00:01:02,720 --> 00:01:05,800 Speaker 3: cashwrot it's not at the right level. The problem is 22 00:01:05,800 --> 00:01:09,640 Speaker 3: is that inflation now. I think we can say confidently, 23 00:01:09,680 --> 00:01:11,480 Speaker 3: I've been pretty confident of it for about three or 24 00:01:11,520 --> 00:01:15,840 Speaker 3: four months. But inflation troughed or bottomed out early in 25 00:01:15,880 --> 00:01:19,200 Speaker 3: twenty twenty five above their target. When you take out 26 00:01:19,200 --> 00:01:21,679 Speaker 3: the noise of government and everything, the underlying pulse of 27 00:01:21,680 --> 00:01:25,160 Speaker 3: inflation probably got down to three maybe two point nine 28 00:01:25,160 --> 00:01:28,600 Speaker 3: if you're lucky, And now it's rising and it's up 29 00:01:28,640 --> 00:01:30,520 Speaker 3: around three and a quarter to three and a half 30 00:01:30,520 --> 00:01:33,120 Speaker 3: and heading one way, especially given how strong the economy 31 00:01:33,200 --> 00:01:36,560 Speaker 3: was in Q four. So yeah, they have got to 32 00:01:37,440 --> 00:01:41,679 Speaker 3: first of all reverse the rate cuts of last year. 33 00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:44,919 Speaker 3: So that means getting on with it. And of course 34 00:01:45,680 --> 00:01:48,080 Speaker 3: the earlier you move, the less you have to do. 35 00:01:48,520 --> 00:01:50,520 Speaker 3: And I mean, if they want to relive that and 36 00:01:50,640 --> 00:01:54,880 Speaker 3: relearn that lesson from history, it's a real shame. But 37 00:01:55,320 --> 00:01:57,800 Speaker 3: that's the They should really go forty points next week. 38 00:01:58,680 --> 00:01:59,960 Speaker 2: But I doubt that were. 39 00:02:00,960 --> 00:02:01,920 Speaker 1: Where did they go wrong? 40 00:02:02,000 --> 00:02:02,320 Speaker 2: Warren? 41 00:02:02,400 --> 00:02:05,240 Speaker 1: Because we seemed six months ago to be on this 42 00:02:05,320 --> 00:02:10,360 Speaker 1: trajectory of lower rates. People were cont well, you're an 43 00:02:10,360 --> 00:02:12,880 Speaker 1: exception to this, so you know, to your credit, you 44 00:02:13,080 --> 00:02:15,640 Speaker 1: weren't along these lines. But you know, economists thought we'd be. 45 00:02:15,720 --> 00:02:18,680 Speaker 1: There'd be more rate cuts in the offing. Now you 46 00:02:18,800 --> 00:02:21,040 Speaker 1: always argued that they'd gone I mean, they shouldn't have 47 00:02:21,040 --> 00:02:23,639 Speaker 1: cut rates. Where did they go wrong? And they being 48 00:02:23,639 --> 00:02:25,160 Speaker 1: the Reserve Bank. But it's broader than that. 49 00:02:25,720 --> 00:02:26,640 Speaker 2: It is broader than that. 50 00:02:26,760 --> 00:02:28,960 Speaker 3: And you know, I could be very unfair on a 51 00:02:28,960 --> 00:02:32,400 Speaker 3: lot of people right now what I want, because you know, 52 00:02:32,760 --> 00:02:34,480 Speaker 3: I've been doing this for thirty years, and I spent 53 00:02:34,520 --> 00:02:36,839 Speaker 3: a good chunk of my career as a bond strategist, 54 00:02:36,880 --> 00:02:38,720 Speaker 3: which means half the work was having a view and 55 00:02:38,760 --> 00:02:40,720 Speaker 3: half the work was watching everyone else's view. So I've 56 00:02:40,720 --> 00:02:46,320 Speaker 3: been in a unique position to study other economists. And 57 00:02:46,360 --> 00:02:49,079 Speaker 3: I mean most people's view of the future is essentially 58 00:02:49,120 --> 00:02:52,160 Speaker 3: some version of the present colored by the recent past. 59 00:02:52,320 --> 00:02:55,600 Speaker 3: So the first point for all economists is I think 60 00:02:55,639 --> 00:02:59,880 Speaker 3: they're referencing the world and what is going to be 61 00:02:59,880 --> 00:03:02,520 Speaker 3: normal as the world it existed between the GFC and 62 00:03:02,520 --> 00:03:06,240 Speaker 3: the pandemic, and that is just simply that was the 63 00:03:06,320 --> 00:03:08,800 Speaker 3: unusual period. They need to at least go back to 64 00:03:08,840 --> 00:03:11,480 Speaker 3: that sort of nineties and noughties period. But I'd argue 65 00:03:11,520 --> 00:03:13,520 Speaker 3: you had taken even broader sweep. So the first thing 66 00:03:13,639 --> 00:03:16,360 Speaker 3: is as the inflation started to come down, as we 67 00:03:16,400 --> 00:03:19,000 Speaker 3: sort of did that massive increase in interest rates, which 68 00:03:19,040 --> 00:03:21,480 Speaker 3: all of us were surprised how little damage it did 69 00:03:21,480 --> 00:03:24,400 Speaker 3: to the economy four hundred plus basis points of rat hikes. 70 00:03:25,120 --> 00:03:27,000 Speaker 3: The fact is their reference point for where we're going 71 00:03:27,040 --> 00:03:28,880 Speaker 3: to settle is I think wrong. The other one is 72 00:03:29,639 --> 00:03:32,320 Speaker 3: we are seeing the most profound structural changes in our 73 00:03:32,360 --> 00:03:38,120 Speaker 3: economy in all economies are taking place because of demographic 74 00:03:38,200 --> 00:03:41,000 Speaker 3: changes changing the way the economy works. We've gone from 75 00:03:41,080 --> 00:03:46,080 Speaker 3: forty years of having excess supply of labor, a deficiency 76 00:03:46,080 --> 00:03:49,880 Speaker 3: of demand, and unemployment being the main macroeconomic challenge to 77 00:03:49,960 --> 00:03:53,080 Speaker 3: a world that's one hundred and eighty degrees different. It's 78 00:03:53,160 --> 00:03:55,520 Speaker 3: labor shortages. I've been going on about this, but it 79 00:03:55,680 --> 00:03:59,520 Speaker 3: just it's a hard concept to grasp for economists because 80 00:03:59,520 --> 00:04:03,480 Speaker 3: it's not in the Kynesian or monitorists or classical economic theories. 81 00:04:04,440 --> 00:04:08,240 Speaker 3: But it's real, and of course that gives you some 82 00:04:08,400 --> 00:04:11,960 Speaker 3: very important risk management guidelines about where you want to 83 00:04:11,960 --> 00:04:14,160 Speaker 3: get things wrong. And of course that was my point. 84 00:04:14,200 --> 00:04:16,080 Speaker 3: We needed it was not the time to do the 85 00:04:16,160 --> 00:04:19,360 Speaker 3: narrow path. If anything, we're moving to a world where 86 00:04:19,360 --> 00:04:20,240 Speaker 3: you needed to do more. 87 00:04:20,240 --> 00:04:21,440 Speaker 2: Not less. And you can see that. 88 00:04:21,520 --> 00:04:24,800 Speaker 3: I mean, we just simply didn't raise rates enough, and 89 00:04:24,880 --> 00:04:27,320 Speaker 3: cutting them last year was just madness. 90 00:04:27,920 --> 00:04:31,400 Speaker 1: Without getting too techy on us, Warren, when you say 91 00:04:31,440 --> 00:04:37,680 Speaker 1: we're in a period where labor markets are strong, unemployment 92 00:04:37,839 --> 00:04:40,839 Speaker 1: isn't really an issue, How does that mean an economist 93 00:04:40,880 --> 00:04:45,240 Speaker 1: needs to think differently vis a v when it's all 94 00:04:45,279 --> 00:04:45,960 Speaker 1: about inflation. 95 00:04:47,120 --> 00:04:49,120 Speaker 3: Yeah, well, I think that's the first thing, is that 96 00:04:49,160 --> 00:04:52,520 Speaker 3: we decided to sort of put the emphasis of monetary 97 00:04:52,560 --> 00:04:57,320 Speaker 3: policy towards unemployment and inflation, or a little bit away 98 00:04:57,320 --> 00:05:00,320 Speaker 3: from inflation towards unemployment at just the wrong time, you know. 99 00:05:00,320 --> 00:05:02,440 Speaker 3: And I suppose that's just the human condition that after 100 00:05:02,480 --> 00:05:04,600 Speaker 3: thirty years of unemployment being the problem, you finally get 101 00:05:04,600 --> 00:05:06,840 Speaker 3: around us sort of trying to deal with it, and 102 00:05:06,880 --> 00:05:10,520 Speaker 3: it's changes. But the fact is that we knew this anyway, 103 00:05:10,560 --> 00:05:13,400 Speaker 3: so it's not an excuse. Inflation has always got to 104 00:05:13,440 --> 00:05:15,800 Speaker 3: be dealt with first. And Michelle Bullock has said this 105 00:05:15,920 --> 00:05:19,360 Speaker 3: time and again, you guarantee the lowest possible unemployment rate 106 00:05:19,400 --> 00:05:23,600 Speaker 3: over time by not letting inflation undermine the effectiveness of 107 00:05:23,640 --> 00:05:24,279 Speaker 3: your economy. 108 00:05:25,200 --> 00:05:26,919 Speaker 2: So you just and I. 109 00:05:26,880 --> 00:05:29,720 Speaker 3: Think there's also just a broader cultural political thing out 110 00:05:29,720 --> 00:05:32,520 Speaker 3: there where no one wants to say things like a 111 00:05:32,600 --> 00:05:34,839 Speaker 3: tough love. I mean, when I started in the nineties, 112 00:05:36,160 --> 00:05:38,360 Speaker 3: bank economists seem to not have a problem getting out 113 00:05:38,360 --> 00:05:41,960 Speaker 3: there and giving prescriptions that would be quite painful adjustments 114 00:05:42,000 --> 00:05:44,119 Speaker 3: in the economy, and of course our economy was going 115 00:05:44,120 --> 00:05:47,839 Speaker 3: through painful adjustments in the ninety but that's just not 116 00:05:47,960 --> 00:05:50,040 Speaker 3: something that people seem to be willing to do. I mean, 117 00:05:50,040 --> 00:05:52,599 Speaker 3: we could see it with the market forecast for the 118 00:05:52,680 --> 00:05:55,240 Speaker 3: inflation numbers, where they are all sitting on the RBA's 119 00:05:55,320 --> 00:05:57,479 Speaker 3: forecast a point eight or a whole bunch of people were, 120 00:05:58,839 --> 00:06:00,600 Speaker 3: but none of the evidence is telling us that was 121 00:06:00,640 --> 00:06:02,400 Speaker 3: the right number anyway. 122 00:06:02,440 --> 00:06:04,359 Speaker 2: I think there's just this lack. 123 00:06:04,200 --> 00:06:07,720 Speaker 3: Of willingness to sort of talk about being confrontational and 124 00:06:07,800 --> 00:06:10,520 Speaker 3: say things that will be frowned upon and found upon 125 00:06:10,560 --> 00:06:12,360 Speaker 3: by the government too. I mean, we've got to remember 126 00:06:12,440 --> 00:06:18,159 Speaker 3: this narrow pass strategy was essentially endorsed and probably driven 127 00:06:18,160 --> 00:06:19,760 Speaker 3: by the government. I mean, the government has to take 128 00:06:19,760 --> 00:06:22,839 Speaker 3: responsibility here as well, not just for their spending and 129 00:06:22,920 --> 00:06:25,560 Speaker 3: the state governments as well, because that's all playing a role, 130 00:06:26,520 --> 00:06:29,320 Speaker 3: but of course for endorsing the RBA strategy. I mean, 131 00:06:29,360 --> 00:06:31,320 Speaker 3: if I was in government, I would have said, deal 132 00:06:31,360 --> 00:06:36,200 Speaker 3: with this inflation now now they didn't have the judgments 133 00:06:36,240 --> 00:06:38,600 Speaker 3: around four point thirty five as a peak cash rope 134 00:06:38,640 --> 00:06:40,680 Speaker 3: versus five versus where everyone else went to, which was 135 00:06:40,720 --> 00:06:43,520 Speaker 3: about five and a half. That was a judgment call 136 00:06:43,600 --> 00:06:46,640 Speaker 3: which failed. I think it was the wrong call. But 137 00:06:46,760 --> 00:06:49,280 Speaker 3: here we are, and the problem now is I mean, 138 00:06:49,279 --> 00:06:51,440 Speaker 3: my analogy is you've got a sow on your leg. 139 00:06:51,560 --> 00:06:55,479 Speaker 3: You can put some stinging antiseptic on it, but if 140 00:06:55,520 --> 00:06:57,359 Speaker 3: you choose not to, then you're probably going to have 141 00:06:57,360 --> 00:06:59,480 Speaker 3: to have an operation. And if you choose not to 142 00:06:59,480 --> 00:07:01,560 Speaker 3: have the operation, the leg's going to be removed. Well, 143 00:07:01,600 --> 00:07:05,400 Speaker 3: we've missed the stinging antiseptic. We're currently in the operation phase, 144 00:07:06,440 --> 00:07:09,080 Speaker 3: and that's going to probably result in a garden variety 145 00:07:09,160 --> 00:07:11,720 Speaker 3: recession at some stage in the next two years. But 146 00:07:11,800 --> 00:07:13,840 Speaker 3: if we do not face this challenge now and take 147 00:07:13,840 --> 00:07:16,239 Speaker 3: the cash right back well about four probably to five, 148 00:07:17,280 --> 00:07:19,840 Speaker 3: we're risking letting it get away from us like we 149 00:07:19,840 --> 00:07:21,880 Speaker 3: did in the late nineteen eighties, and we will end 150 00:07:21,960 --> 00:07:25,760 Speaker 3: up having that leg taken off, which that's the disaster 151 00:07:25,920 --> 00:07:28,880 Speaker 3: a financial crisis. This country is not well placed to 152 00:07:28,920 --> 00:07:32,560 Speaker 3: deal with a major financial crisis in the next five years. 153 00:07:33,360 --> 00:07:35,360 Speaker 1: How much has fiscal policy got to do with this. 154 00:07:36,200 --> 00:07:37,040 Speaker 2: At least half. 155 00:07:37,320 --> 00:07:40,600 Speaker 3: I think the failures of monetary policy, both the structural 156 00:07:41,160 --> 00:07:46,240 Speaker 3: and that of execution. You know, if they were doing 157 00:07:46,360 --> 00:07:48,520 Speaker 3: what they should do, and that is take the world 158 00:07:48,520 --> 00:07:51,120 Speaker 3: as given and just get it done. You take the 159 00:07:51,120 --> 00:07:52,560 Speaker 3: cash right to five and a half and have a 160 00:07:52,600 --> 00:07:56,000 Speaker 3: mild recession and then would bounce out of it. Then 161 00:07:56,040 --> 00:07:59,040 Speaker 3: I think we'd still have some issues. But the combination 162 00:07:59,240 --> 00:08:02,720 Speaker 3: of the rbaight and not trying this experiment, as well 163 00:08:02,760 --> 00:08:05,800 Speaker 3: as the government's governments, not just the federal but the 164 00:08:05,800 --> 00:08:09,840 Speaker 3: states doing this. The recurrent spending. They had a massive 165 00:08:09,840 --> 00:08:13,320 Speaker 3: infrastructure taskt investment task, and I will never get in 166 00:08:13,360 --> 00:08:16,160 Speaker 3: front of a government that wants to build effective infrastructure. 167 00:08:16,160 --> 00:08:17,840 Speaker 2: We're a growing nation, we need it. 168 00:08:17,920 --> 00:08:19,840 Speaker 3: But they had an obligation to hold back on their 169 00:08:19,840 --> 00:08:22,960 Speaker 3: recurrent spending, their consumption spending, but they didn't. They all 170 00:08:22,960 --> 00:08:26,360 Speaker 3: expanded the size of their not some of the states did, 171 00:08:26,400 --> 00:08:29,360 Speaker 3: the public service and public sector. But there's the federal 172 00:08:29,400 --> 00:08:31,760 Speaker 3: government of all these programs, and of course the inflation's 173 00:08:31,800 --> 00:08:35,040 Speaker 3: now driving those program costs up and that's causing their budget. 174 00:08:35,040 --> 00:08:36,200 Speaker 2: So we're in a vicious cycle. 175 00:08:36,800 --> 00:08:38,679 Speaker 3: And that's what the whole point of an interest rate 176 00:08:38,800 --> 00:08:41,120 Speaker 3: is is that we have an economy that is a 177 00:08:41,160 --> 00:08:44,800 Speaker 3: self adjusting has all these self adjusting mechanisms to try 178 00:08:44,840 --> 00:08:46,920 Speaker 3: and seek an equilibrium, but a key one of those 179 00:08:47,040 --> 00:08:49,839 Speaker 3: interest rates. Now, we don't let markets determine those interest rates. 180 00:08:50,280 --> 00:08:52,160 Speaker 3: The central bank does, but it has to be good 181 00:08:52,200 --> 00:08:55,320 Speaker 3: and be prepared to raise rates when things are going 182 00:08:55,360 --> 00:08:57,800 Speaker 3: really well. I take the punch bol away from the 183 00:08:57,840 --> 00:09:00,760 Speaker 3: party and vice versa, but there's just no dumach for it, 184 00:09:01,160 --> 00:09:02,720 Speaker 3: and we're going to pay the price for that. 185 00:09:03,720 --> 00:09:06,680 Speaker 1: So it's so the same question asked in two ways, 186 00:09:06,800 --> 00:09:10,240 Speaker 1: what should the Reserve Bank do in the next eight 187 00:09:10,200 --> 00:09:13,960 Speaker 1: eight months? The first part part two? What will they 188 00:09:14,000 --> 00:09:16,080 Speaker 1: do in the next eight een month? And is there 189 00:09:16,120 --> 00:09:16,600 Speaker 1: a difference? 190 00:09:17,200 --> 00:09:19,600 Speaker 3: If I was walking into the board meeting next Monday, 191 00:09:20,040 --> 00:09:23,880 Speaker 3: I would be suggesting forty and thinking about two twenty 192 00:09:23,920 --> 00:09:26,320 Speaker 3: fives at the following term meetings. That is, get the 193 00:09:26,360 --> 00:09:28,000 Speaker 3: cash right to four and a half percent by the 194 00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:29,120 Speaker 3: time of the budget in May. 195 00:09:30,320 --> 00:09:32,320 Speaker 2: That's about, I think, as. 196 00:09:32,200 --> 00:09:34,440 Speaker 3: Aggressive as you'd want to be, because that's going to 197 00:09:34,440 --> 00:09:36,400 Speaker 3: have a big short term impact. But as we know, 198 00:09:36,520 --> 00:09:39,000 Speaker 3: that short term impact, that cash file effect and that 199 00:09:39,320 --> 00:09:44,080 Speaker 3: confidence effect doesn't necessarily last. So you've got to do it. 200 00:09:44,120 --> 00:09:46,160 Speaker 3: You've got to bite the bullet, you've got to hold 201 00:09:46,200 --> 00:09:48,000 Speaker 3: your breath. Whatever it is is going to take a 202 00:09:48,080 --> 00:09:49,880 Speaker 3: year to we'll find out, but you got to do that. 203 00:09:50,000 --> 00:09:53,600 Speaker 3: But then your pause and your hope that that's enough. 204 00:09:53,640 --> 00:09:55,560 Speaker 3: There's a lot of things that are moving around in 205 00:09:55,559 --> 00:09:59,480 Speaker 3: this world, including our currency and trade and geopolitics, but 206 00:09:59,559 --> 00:10:02,840 Speaker 3: they we need to take control of our country and 207 00:10:02,880 --> 00:10:05,840 Speaker 3: our economy. You can't sit there and worry about what 208 00:10:05,880 --> 00:10:09,680 Speaker 3: Trump's doing. When the RBA statement from May last year 209 00:10:09,800 --> 00:10:12,800 Speaker 3: was one of the worst I've ever seen. It's just 210 00:10:12,840 --> 00:10:15,160 Speaker 3: the way they just drop their bundle in front of 211 00:10:15,160 --> 00:10:16,080 Speaker 3: the Trump tariffs. 212 00:10:16,240 --> 00:10:17,359 Speaker 2: It's just unbelievable. 213 00:10:17,400 --> 00:10:20,760 Speaker 3: I mean, anyway, the point is they need to go 214 00:10:20,920 --> 00:10:24,800 Speaker 3: hard now and if they can get seventy five to 215 00:10:24,800 --> 00:10:27,600 Speaker 3: one hundred points of tightening into the economy, we might 216 00:10:27,640 --> 00:10:29,680 Speaker 3: get out of this with a mild recession. And the 217 00:10:29,720 --> 00:10:32,400 Speaker 3: other thing is the jobs that we're going to lose 218 00:10:33,080 --> 00:10:37,040 Speaker 3: in this downturn. We're going to lose anyway, the government 219 00:10:37,120 --> 00:10:40,600 Speaker 3: should be focused on how to reskill, reorientate these people 220 00:10:40,679 --> 00:10:43,600 Speaker 3: who are going to lose old economy jobs. For the 221 00:10:43,920 --> 00:10:46,920 Speaker 3: thousands and hundreds of thousands of vacancies that are sitting 222 00:10:46,960 --> 00:10:50,160 Speaker 3: in this economy for the human centered jobs that have 223 00:10:50,320 --> 00:10:53,520 Speaker 3: purpose and will pay well in the future. But it's hard. 224 00:10:53,600 --> 00:10:55,400 Speaker 3: Reskilling is hard. None of us is good at it. 225 00:10:55,400 --> 00:10:57,079 Speaker 3: I don't want to do it, but that's what we 226 00:10:57,160 --> 00:10:57,480 Speaker 3: got to do. 227 00:10:57,600 --> 00:11:02,040 Speaker 1: So that's what they should do. But I presume you 228 00:11:02,040 --> 00:11:03,079 Speaker 1: don't think they will do that. 229 00:11:03,559 --> 00:11:05,400 Speaker 3: Well, I don't know what they're going to do because 230 00:11:06,840 --> 00:11:10,079 Speaker 3: they're operating in a model we just don't know. I mean, 231 00:11:10,120 --> 00:11:12,640 Speaker 3: that's the thing. The model's changed. They're not the RBA 232 00:11:12,760 --> 00:11:17,160 Speaker 3: we once knew, you know. I think this is the 233 00:11:17,280 --> 00:11:21,480 Speaker 3: last opportunity the RBA board and the senior management of 234 00:11:21,480 --> 00:11:25,720 Speaker 3: the RBA have to prove themselves if they if they 235 00:11:25,760 --> 00:11:28,640 Speaker 3: shirk this, then if the next change of government will 236 00:11:28,640 --> 00:11:31,520 Speaker 3: just ask for us for them so and look, even 237 00:11:31,880 --> 00:11:35,000 Speaker 3: without it, if this government politically decides to play funny buggers, 238 00:11:35,000 --> 00:11:36,600 Speaker 3: they could try and lay a lot of blame on them. 239 00:11:36,600 --> 00:11:40,640 Speaker 3: So either way, they've they've got to take responsibility. But 240 00:11:41,720 --> 00:11:45,120 Speaker 3: I think they'll probably go twenty five twenty five. Actually, 241 00:11:45,160 --> 00:11:46,920 Speaker 3: I think they probably will do three twenty fives in 242 00:11:47,000 --> 00:11:48,640 Speaker 3: a row. I think it's that serious. I mean, it 243 00:11:48,640 --> 00:11:50,560 Speaker 3: depends on the data they're going to the problem is 244 00:11:50,559 --> 00:11:54,040 Speaker 3: they've used every excuse in the book, every global event, 245 00:11:54,280 --> 00:11:56,720 Speaker 3: every soft data reading has an excuse not to do 246 00:11:56,760 --> 00:11:59,200 Speaker 3: what they needed to do, and the media is egged 247 00:11:59,240 --> 00:12:02,400 Speaker 3: the mine as government, and no one wants to speak 248 00:12:02,400 --> 00:12:04,120 Speaker 3: out about it because, as I saw on Twitter for 249 00:12:04,200 --> 00:12:06,920 Speaker 3: much of the last two years, you get attacked because 250 00:12:06,920 --> 00:12:08,760 Speaker 3: our society can't handle what experts. 251 00:12:08,760 --> 00:12:10,240 Speaker 2: I've got to say. 252 00:12:10,640 --> 00:12:13,880 Speaker 1: Now, while I'm changing Tachi totally, you've just launched your 253 00:12:13,880 --> 00:12:17,200 Speaker 1: own series of equ briefings and workshops basically helping businesses 254 00:12:17,280 --> 00:12:21,120 Speaker 1: and leaders navigate the changing economy. Anyone listening understands that 255 00:12:21,160 --> 00:12:23,880 Speaker 1: you are very frank in your views. What are the 256 00:12:23,920 --> 00:12:24,959 Speaker 1: workshops about? 257 00:12:25,240 --> 00:12:25,440 Speaker 2: Yeah? 258 00:12:25,600 --> 00:12:29,280 Speaker 3: So, look, I just think that twenty years into social 259 00:12:29,360 --> 00:12:32,439 Speaker 3: media and what we've just talked about means that businesses 260 00:12:32,520 --> 00:12:35,560 Speaker 3: have had thirty years whether the economy has been pretty good, 261 00:12:35,840 --> 00:12:38,040 Speaker 3: and you know, they focus on their own business and 262 00:12:38,080 --> 00:12:40,520 Speaker 3: things should go all right. But now the macro environment 263 00:12:40,559 --> 00:12:44,400 Speaker 3: is changing. Labor shortages, margin pressures, cost pressures, this is 264 00:12:44,400 --> 00:12:47,000 Speaker 3: the new operating environment. Business leaders need to stay on 265 00:12:47,000 --> 00:12:49,400 Speaker 3: top of it. I'm not suggesting they need to be 266 00:12:49,480 --> 00:12:51,680 Speaker 3: an expert, but they need good advice that they can trust. 267 00:12:51,679 --> 00:12:54,400 Speaker 3: And I think there's a I think there's going to 268 00:12:54,400 --> 00:12:56,680 Speaker 3: be a demand in the market for independent advice like this. 269 00:12:56,720 --> 00:13:00,040 Speaker 3: So the EQ Briefings a starting point for this to 270 00:13:00,040 --> 00:13:02,160 Speaker 3: to give a broad audience access to the work that 271 00:13:02,200 --> 00:13:06,560 Speaker 3: I'm doing and my team's doing, and that is best endeavors. 272 00:13:06,600 --> 00:13:08,880 Speaker 3: And I've always found through my thirty years the best 273 00:13:08,960 --> 00:13:12,720 Speaker 3: endeavors is more appreciated than people than accuracy or anything else. 274 00:13:13,040 --> 00:13:13,199 Speaker 2: Yeah. 275 00:13:13,240 --> 00:13:16,439 Speaker 1: Yeah, So EQ Briefings a sort of search engine. EQ 276 00:13:16,559 --> 00:13:17,800 Speaker 1: Briefings will get people. 277 00:13:19,040 --> 00:13:22,000 Speaker 3: Eqeconomics dot au. You can sign up there. I've got 278 00:13:22,040 --> 00:13:24,440 Speaker 3: a briefing today, but it's probably a bit late notice 279 00:13:24,440 --> 00:13:26,719 Speaker 3: for most. But there'll be month a month, there'll be 280 00:13:26,720 --> 00:13:29,920 Speaker 3: special topic briefings, and there's workshops which will be one 281 00:13:30,000 --> 00:13:32,800 Speaker 3: day in person workshops which are aimed at people who 282 00:13:32,800 --> 00:13:35,480 Speaker 3: wanted the deep dive into the background those structural factors, 283 00:13:35,559 --> 00:13:38,000 Speaker 3: those non economic factors that are reshaping the economy and 284 00:13:38,040 --> 00:13:41,880 Speaker 3: the business operating environment. So equeconomics dot au you can sign. 285 00:13:41,720 --> 00:13:43,719 Speaker 2: Up for all of them. They're up and running as 286 00:13:43,760 --> 00:13:44,320 Speaker 2: of tomorrow. 287 00:13:44,960 --> 00:13:46,679 Speaker 1: Fantastic Warren, Thanks for talking to Fear and. 288 00:13:46,640 --> 00:13:48,800 Speaker 2: Greed thanks Sean. Great to be on the show. 289 00:13:49,160 --> 00:13:53,560 Speaker 1: That was Warren Hogan, managing director of EQ Economics. I'm sure, Alma. 290 00:13:53,640 --> 00:13:55,400 Speaker 1: And this is fear and greed Q and a