WEBVTT - Senator’s explosive Brittany Higgins spray

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Before we begin. This episode contains detailed allegations of sexual

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>assault from the Australian. Here's what's on the front. I'm Christinamio.

0:00:21.200 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>It's Tuesday, July ninth. The government is upping the Defense

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Forces drone game, but former commanders say it's not doing

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:36.519
<v Speaker 1>enough to protect against airborne attacks. The Historic Defense Strategic

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Review delivered last year recommended urgent investment in anti drone capabilities,

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>but they say a lack of funding could leave personnel

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and bases vulnerable for.

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 2>At least a decade.

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>It's time to change the rules. That's according to Labor

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Party MPs and officials who've backed an overhaul of century

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>old caucus voting rules. It follows the resignation of Western

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Australian Senator Fatima Payman, who crossed the floor to side

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 1>with the Greens on the issue of Palestinian statehood. That

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>story is live right now at the Australian dot com

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>dot AU. An Australian senator alleges Brittany Higgins conspired with

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>David Cherraz to leak false information to some of the

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 1>government's most senior ministers. Linda Reynolds says the former Liberal

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>staffer and her new husband orchestrated a campaign to ruin

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>her career and bring down the Morrison government following her

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>alleged rape by Bruce Lherman inside Parliament House. That's today's episode,

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Senator Gallagher.

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 3>I did answer your questions to the point that you

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 3>ground me to the ground and ended me ended up

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 3>in hospital.

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 4>But I'm answering questions.

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 1>That's Western Australian Senator Linda Reynolds at a Senate estimates

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>hearing held a couple of years ago. She's being questioned

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>by Labour Senators Katie Gallagher and Penny Wong, and things

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:01.639
<v Speaker 1>are getting tense.

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, you just stage that we put you in hospitals.

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 3>You just said I put you in hospital, Senator Reynolds.

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:15.959
<v Speaker 2>Well, if so, you're visitor is Notiggins or Senator wal Nobody.

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Questions. Nobody takes pleasuring.

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 1>A few months earlier, a young Liberal staffer named Britney

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Higgins had publicly alleged she was raped in Linda reynolds

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>Parliament House office by one of her colleagues. We don't

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>now that colleague was Bruce Lhriman. He worked as an

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>advisor to Reynolds, who was the Defense Minister. In twenty nineteen.

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Brittney Higgins also alleged in that interview with the Project

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that her assault had been covered up by the government

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of the day.

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 4>I would try and raise it and I would try

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 4>and bring it up.

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 5>Then it was always it always sort of came back

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.959
<v Speaker 5>to sort of being a me issue.

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 2>And if you can't deal with it then then you

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 2>can leave.

0:02:56.360 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>It was suggested that the Labor Party, which was in

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>opposition at the time, had seized upon the allegation for

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>political gain. That's because Labor used the Senate estimates process

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:08.679
<v Speaker 1>to put the heat on Reynolds.

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 3>My final question, Senator Reynolds, was it your decision to

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 3>send miss Higgins to Perth for the duration of the

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 3>election campaign? Senator Gallagher, again, that's also subject sleech investigation.

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 3>How hans As that was your final question, Thank Senator Gallagher,

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 3>that was beneath you.

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Lehreman was subsequently charged with rape and stood trial

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Act Supreme Court later in twenty twenty two,

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>but the proceeding was sensationally aborted due to dura misconduct,

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and the former Director of Public Prosecutions, Shane Drumgold, declined

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to pursue a retrial out of concern for Britney Higgins's

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>mental health. That means Lehreman was never criminally convicted of

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>rape and has always denied any sexual contact occurred. He

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>sued Network ten and the Project presenter Lisa Wilkinson for

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>defamation earlier this year and lost. Federal Court Justice Michael

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Lee found on the balance of probabilities that Bruce Larriman

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>did rape Britney Higgins in Linda Reynolds's office in twenty nineteen.

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 4>Having escaped the lines dead, mister Lehman made the mistake

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 4>of coming back.

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 5>For his hat.

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>He also found there was no cover up of the

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>alleged assault by Linda Reynolds or her former chief of

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:26.679
<v Speaker 1>staff Fiona Brown, or anyone else in the former coalition government.

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 4>As we will see when examined properly and without partiality,

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 4>the cover up allegation was subjectively short on facts, but

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 4>long on speculation and internal inconsistencies. Trying to particularize it

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 4>during the evidence was like trying to grab a column

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 4>of smoke.

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Now, an explosive legal document filed by Linda Reynolds could

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>flip the whole thing on its head, she says. Higgins

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and Chiraz were out to destroy her career and bring

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>down the government when they leaked information to some of

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the PM's most senior ministers. Linda Reynolds is suing Britney

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Higgins and her husband David Schiraz for defamation in the

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Western Australian Supreme Court. She says critical comments posted by

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 1>the pair to social media damaged her reputation and that

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>she suffered from severe anxiety and serious physical symptoms as

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a result. The matter will go to trial in August

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>after a long and ultimately unsuccessful mediation process. Sharaz has

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>already indicated he doesn't have the funds to defend the claims,

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>meaning his new wife will go it alone. But Reynold's

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>statement of claim, obtained by The Australian's Legal affairs correspondent

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Ellie Dudley, reveals the senator sees this as much more

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>than a nock to her reputation. She appears to suggest

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>there was a political conspiracy, but she didn't have anything

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to do with it. A voice actor is reading an

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>excerpt from the senator's statement of claim about the allegedly

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>defamatory social media posts made by Higgins and Charatz.

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 2>They were published in furtherance of a plan by the

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 2>defendant and mister Schiraz to use the defendants allegations of

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 2>a rape and the political cover up as a weapon

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 2>to inflict immediate political damage upon the plaintiff and the

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 2>then government.

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>Reynolds also says further posts made by Britney Higgins throughout

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the mediation process were designed to taunt and harass her,

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Senator claims they breach a deed signed by

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 1>Higgins in which they agreed not to publicly criticize or

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>disparage each other. Coming up more from Senator Linda Reynolds's

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>explosive statement of claim. Subscribers to The Australian get first

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>access to exclusive stories like this one. Join us at

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the Australian dot com dot au and we'll be back

0:06:47.240 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>after this break. We know from evidence presented in the

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>defamation action brought by Bruce Leherman against Network ten that

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>it was David Shiraz who pitched Brittney higgins interview with

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Wilkinson to the project.

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 2>At all times thereafter, mister Charraz acted as a conduit

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 2>for communication between Miss Wilkinson and executive producer Angus Llewellyn

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 2>and the defendant.

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>The month before the interview went to air, Higgins, Charraz, Wilkinson,

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and the project's producer, Angus Llewellyn hunkered down for a

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>five hour brainstorming session.

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 2>One for a chand thanks your gym and tonic. Now, yeah,

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 2>those friend.

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Rolls are actions they Recordings made of that session revealed

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the group kicked around ways to drum up interest in

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the interview. That included recruiting politicians who they believed could

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>put pressure on the government.

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 4>Got it. Do you have friendly.

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 2>And that could find questions at question time?

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 2>Certainly, Albo. Yeah, I tell you, curvasyly.

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Also on that list was Labor Senator Katie Gallagher, who

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you heard at the top of this episode. A charge

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of text messages between Higgins and Chiraz published by The

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Australian last year revealed this was a tactic the pair

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>had explored before. In those texts, Charraz, a former journalist

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and media advisor, boasted to his then girlfriend about his

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>close relationship with Gallagher. Higgins responded that Chiraz should go

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>ahead and share everything with her. The thing is, Gallagher

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>claimed in that Senate Estimates hearing that nobody from Labor

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>knew about Britney higgins alleged rape by Bruce Laherman before

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the story broke in an article by Samantha Maiden, and

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>later that night on the Project when the text between

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Higgins and Chiraz became public. The Finance Minister conceded she

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>did know some of the details, but them to herself,

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and that meant accusations that she'd misled parliament were unfair.

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 3>So no, the answer to the question about the allegation

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 3>of mislead is now, I did not mislead the Parliament.

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 3>I was responding to an assertion that was being made

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 3>by the Minister Reynolds at the time that we had

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 3>known about this for weeks and had made a decision

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 3>to weaponize it. That is not true. It was never true.

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 3>I explained that to Senator Reynolds that night. She accepted

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 3>that explanation.

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>In her statement of claim, Senator Linda Reynolds has kicked

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>things up a notch. She says some of the government's

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 1>highest ranking politicians were deliberately fed false information by Higgins

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and Chiraz.

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 2>It can be inferred that the defendant provided Senators Wong

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 2>and Gallagher with the information forming the basis of those

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 2>questions referred to above in circumstances where the defendant knew

0:09:58.280 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 2>this information was false.

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Reynolds also states that messages exchanged by the pair show

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 1>their strategy was designed to inflict maximum political damage. In

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>one text included in the senator's statement of claim, Sharaz rights.

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 5>Just need to make sure this whole thing comes out

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 5>in a sitting week, and she.

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Says it's backed up by comments made in that five

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>hour Brainstorm session with Lisa Wilkinson and Angus Llewellyn, where

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Shiraz suggested timing the broadcast of the project interview with

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a sitting week. Senator Linda Reynolds also says that conversation

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>is proof there was a target on her back. In

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 1>her statement of claim, she says Higgins wanted Lerriman to

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>be rendered unemployable and for Reynolds to be booted from

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Parliament as a result of her taking her story public.

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 5>I asked Britt, ultimately, what do you want out of this?

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 5>And she goes, well, I want Bruce to forever have

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 5>it difficult getting a job, like it's going to be

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 5>difficult for me. And then you said, best case scenario

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 5>Linda Reynolds.

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>The defamation trial gets underway in WA's Supreme Court on

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>August two. Brittney Higgins is expected to defend the allegations

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>against her. The case continues, and you can read our

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>ongoing coverage of all parties arguments, as well as Elie

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Dudley's full breakdown of Linda Reynolds' statement of claim right

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 1>now at the Australian dot com dot au