WEBVTT - The Rita Panahi Show | 25 March

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>On Sky Wields Australia.

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 2>This is the Winder Paney Show.

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:11.319
<v Speaker 3>Good evening and welcome to the Reader Paney Show. Coming

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 3>up tonight, we have a digital only special and we've

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 3>got the best of the best, the fabulous Panel featuring

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 3>gab Power and Caroline Markers, the always insightful Kosure Gata

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:24.479
<v Speaker 3>on the latest from the US, and we do have

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 3>a token mail tonight. My second favorite Texan Alex Stein

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 3>will be here too.

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 4>Let's jump right into it. Johnny min Now is host.

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Of The Power Hour, Gabriella Power and Sky News Senior

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 3>reporter Caroline Marcus Ladies.

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 4>Let's start with the University of Sydney.

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 3>They're looking to hire a teen academics to help indigenize

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:52.519
<v Speaker 3>and decolonize their courses. One of the new roles is

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 3>for a senior Education Design Officer who would be executing

0:00:56.440 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 3>transformative curriculum projects aimed at embedding average regional and Torres

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Strait Islander knowledge perspectives, texts and media within curricula projects.

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 4>Caroline, I'll start with you.

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Our students are prospective employers calling out for Sydney. You

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 3>need to do this to decolonize the curriculum.

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 5>I very much doubt it. I certainly haven't seen any

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 5>such calls reader, But it's gener typical of our academia,

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 5>isn't it. I mean, what does this even mean? Does

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 5>decolonizing the curriculum mean you have to change the language

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 5>because English is the language of the colonizers. After all,

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 5>we're going to be expecting the students to do their

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 5>courses in one of the many Aboriginal languages that there

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 5>are in this country. Look, it's part of this sort

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 5>of ridiculous move to decolonize everything. Just the other day

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 5>we saw reports of moves to decolonized breastfeeding whatever that means.

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 5>What Universe City of Sydney, which is the country's oldest university,

0:02:03.320 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 5>should really be doing is de anti semitizing its campus

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 5>because it was It holds the terrible honor of having

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 5>the longest running pro Palestinian encampment on its grounds, which

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 5>featured members of his book career and extremist Islamist group

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 5>that the university failed to expel from its grounds who

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 5>were part of these encampments, and its vice chancellor has

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:37.239
<v Speaker 5>had to apologize for Jewish students and staff for failing

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 5>them so instead of putting their resources and their energies

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 5>into tackling that racism. They introduced this whole new kind

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 5>of segregation. It would seem a move to segregate Indigenous

0:02:53.919 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 5>students from other races Australians, White Australians, foreign students. It's

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 5>you know, it's completely mystifying to me, but it also

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 5>doesn't surprise given what we see in institutions around this country.

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 4>Gabby.

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:15.959
<v Speaker 3>We've seen universities using our money, our tax pay money

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 3>to push this sort of activism, and I would say

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 3>they're also selling false hope. We have so many junk

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 3>degrees that really don't help the graduate find a good

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 3>job and saddle them with debt, waste years of their time,

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 3>and I'd like a little bit of focus on that

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 3>because they seem to be just money making machines that

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:41.839
<v Speaker 3>are also in the business of activism.

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, and I couldn't agree more with what Caroline said.

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 6>Sydney University needs to do a better job of focusing

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 6>on getting rid of its anti Semitism after those disgusting

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 6>displays that we saw last year where anti Semitism was

0:03:56.280 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 6>allowed to fester. We saw those anti Israel encampments taking

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 6>place Jewish students targeted and this just comes as no

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 6>surprise that this is what Sydney University is doing. And

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 6>if somehow decolonizing the curriculum was going to somehow achieve

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 6>better outcomes for Indigenous Australians, and of course I'd support it,

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 6>I absolutely would.

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I think everyone would.

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 4>But it is activism.

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 6>It is going to make no difference to the lives

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 6>of Indigenous Australians. And I completely agree with what Just

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.039
<v Speaker 6>Enterprise has had to say on this issue today. She

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 6>said that the University of Sydney is trying to ingrain

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 6>separatist notions. She said that this is just another example

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 6>of a demonstration of an inner city elites just entrenching

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 6>ideas of separatism on our education system. And her point

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 6>that she makes is that the latest Closing the Gap

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 6>data suggests that Indigenous Australians are still behind other Australians

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 6>in year twelve completion rates, and also that targets for

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 6>Indigenous children to be developmentally on track are worsening. And

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 6>so these ideas, oh, these issues rather should be taking priority,

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 6>not these ideological concerns such as decolonizing the curricula. And

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 6>she's absolutely correct. The priorities are completely wrong. Warren Mundine,

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 6>of course, like the no vote last year, also claims

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 6>that this is just in doctrination. We're not seeing universities

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 6>challenging ideas, challenging concepts that you know, this should be

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 6>a place where we are really way more free and

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 6>engage in freedom of academic study. This is absolutely outrageous,

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 6>but again it doesn't surprise me. It comes after and

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 6>it's not Sydney Union that's alone in this. We just

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:48.159
<v Speaker 6>saw recently Mcquarie University. It's now under a view for

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 6>making sure that students were marked on their ability to

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 6>deliver an acknowledgment of country. Its something that is just

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 6>so tokenistic.

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Yep, we voted no in the race based referendum, but

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 3>the universities, the academics are just ignoring the people's will

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 3>and are pushing ahead. They're doubling down on this race

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 3>based activism. Now let's turn our attention to Minique Ryan's

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 3>seat of Qyong, where some of our supporters have been

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 3>busy destroying signs promoting the liberal candidate. They're Melia Hamer. Yesterday,

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 3>this vision of Monique Ryan's husband Peter Jordan, tearing down

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 3>a poster made headlines around the country. Are you a

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Monique Ryan supporter of ripping down people's signs?

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 7>Are you?

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 8>Is that what you're doing?

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 9>It belongs to me. Hey, you can take it off

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 9>the property, but it belongs to me.

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 10>If it goes back up, it'll be taken down again.

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 11>There you go, Monique Ryan, There you go community values.

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 3>You can see he's not very apologetic there. But after

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 3>that vision made it to the media, he did apologize.

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 3>But now a number of other instances of the til

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 3>MP supporters vandalizing Amelia Hamer post have come to light,

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 3>including this one interat This is not a very good

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 3>look for the MP gab even though she's not the

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 3>one who's participating in this, it is her campaign. Her

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 3>own husband was caught doing this. Ah, how do you

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 3>think the electorate is going to view this?

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 6>How embarrassing for Minnie Ryan and her husband. Thank goodness,

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 6>he was caught on camera for trying to take down

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 6>that poster, walking away claiming that it was illegal. But

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 6>I was speaking to people in Victoria in that electric

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 6>yesterday and they were saying they were telling me that

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 6>this is nothing new.

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 4>But what is.

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 6>Different about it is that this sign was getting taken

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 6>down in broad daylight. The vision that you just played

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 6>there is what has been occurring. If you've got a

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 6>Liberal Party poster at the front of your home, it's

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 6>likely not going to last twenty four hours. People from

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 6>different campaigns are tearing them down and it's.

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 4>Just such a poor reflection.

0:07:58.640 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think the.

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 6>People in Kunon know what they're getting with Monique Ryan.

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 6>We saw her side with the Greens in parliamentary votes,

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 6>and this election is going to be such a different

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 6>one than the previous election, where the Tears were just

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 6>campaigning on climate change. Everyone is concerned about the cost

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 6>of living crisis, and so I think Monique Ryan is

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 6>really going to struggle. Obviously, this is not a good

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 6>look for her. It's highly embarrassing and it says a

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 6>bit about Monique's Menique Ryan's husband I should say.

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, yes, I'm surprised he wasn't wearing a mask when

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 3>he was out there taking posters, because we know how

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 3>much Monique Ryan loves a mask.

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:37.359
<v Speaker 12>Caroline.

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 3>It's quite amusing because at the twenty twenty two election,

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Monique Ryan actually released a statement pledging and I quote

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 3>here not to alter or damage the election collateral or

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 3>electoral properties of other candidates, but it seems a husband

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 3>and a number of her supporters don't share those sentiments.

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 5>Well, either they've decided to move away from that promise

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 5>or should they're just acting on their own accord. What

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:10.559
<v Speaker 5>I found pretty shocking in that video was how brazen

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 5>it was of her husband. Not only did it happen

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 5>in broad daylight, but I mean he's walking across the

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 5>street with this huge poster on his arm. The person

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 5>who caught him on camera was the homeowner's son. He

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 5>asks him repeatedly, who are you?

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 4>What's your name?

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 5>And he refuses to say, as if that wouldn't come

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 5>out at some point it was, and then he obviously

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 5>issues this belated apology once he is called and the

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 5>footage goes on air and it goes viral. A little

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 5>bit late for that, But you know, the other thing

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 5>that the Teals campaigned on was, of course, integrity. Not

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 5>just Monique Ryan, but all the Teals promised to have

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 5>more integrity as a party. Wanted to call it out,

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 5>wanted to call out the bullying, the shouting, And yet

0:09:56.160 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 5>we see time and time again how either the Teals themselves,

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 5>or their supporters, or even their spouse in this case

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:07.839
<v Speaker 5>engage in that same kind of conduct which has the

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:12.319
<v Speaker 5>polar opposite of integrity. You know, we've seen Zalie Staggle

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 5>shout abuse at the Opposition leader Peter Dutton, having to

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 5>withdraw her comments for calling him a racist on the

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 5>floor of Parliament. We've seen a legros spender, the Teal

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 5>MP for Wentworth just yesterday have to apologize for failing

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 5>to declare another three trusts that she had she hadn't

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 5>disclosed or log that came after seven companies that she

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 5>failed to disclose. She said these were oversights, but this

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 5>is not what they themselves campaigned on and people do

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 5>need to see, voters, do you need to see that

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 5>they're getting a politician like any other politician in many

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 5>respects and sometimes even worse.

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Now, let's get the latest on the disaster that is

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 3>Disney's reimagining of a snow White, the film with the

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 3>lead actress Rachel Zegler campaigned for Kamala Harris.

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 4>That hasn't helped.

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 13>Think oh for Kamala Harris, and it's actually non negotiable.

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 13>Our rates are on the line, folks, are reproductive rates.

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 13>Come on Gov Up Blue and if you disagree with

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 13>the sentiment.

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:34.200
<v Speaker 4>Just set the on follow button. I don't need your business. Thanks.

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, the reviews are in, and it's a film that

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 3>has been widely panned. Even the most progressive publications really

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 3>had nothing nice to say about it. It seems nothing

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 3>will save this disaster. Let's look at some of the reviews.

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Just some of the summaries here. Lazy and visually repellent,

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 3>said The Independent, Exhaustingly all full and toe curlingly terrible,

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 3>said The Guardian. The most controversial Disney adult nightmare ever

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 3>said Rolling Shown. A strange hot mess, said the Huffington Posts.

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 3>And good enough for TV, said Vanity Affairs. That's possibly

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 3>the most positive review we've found there. The box office

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 3>figures aren't great either. It earned eighty seven million on

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 3>its global debut against the estimated two hundred and fifty

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 3>million it costs. Now, we see it will make more money,

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 3>but you compare that to what The Lion King released

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 3>back in twenty nineteen May. Just in America, in its

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:46.079
<v Speaker 3>first weekend, it was one hundred and ninety one million,

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 3>So their expectations, obviously when they spend that sort of money,

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 3>were a lot higher. Caro, it is a hot mess.

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 3>Can they salvage something out of this?

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 5>Oh? I don't think so, I really don't. I mean,

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:05.439
<v Speaker 5>eclomy shocks. But when you have the lead actress playing,

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, the title role in the film, coming out

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 5>and alienating half of its potential audience by saying that

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 5>Trump supporters, Trump voters and Trump himself should never know

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 5>peace f Donald Trump. That's another one of her lines

0:13:22.679 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 5>in the lead up to this film. What do you

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 5>honestly expect? I mean, they had to stop actually promoting

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 5>this film because the promotions itself were so bad. I mean,

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 5>it's not just the politics of the main actress. It's

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 5>everything from casting someone who is of mixed race in

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 5>a role that is literally supposed to be about a

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 5>woman whose skin is as white as snow, from taking

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 5>out the seven wolves from the title of the movie

0:13:52.800 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 5>because that's now seen as too problematic somehow. You know,

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 5>Rachel Zegler was supposed to believe is just so striking

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 5>that even the supermodel like Gal Goodot is supposed to

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 5>be homicidically jealous of her. I mean, we're supposed to

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 5>completely suspend our disbelief in this movie, apparently, And I

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 5>just feel like she has this intense hatred for the

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 5>material that she's working with.

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 3>She called it weird.

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 5>She said, the Prince literally stalks snow wide in the movie,

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 5>and they didn't want to do that. So it's just

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 5>everything from the contempt for the original material, to the politics,

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 5>to the casting has been a huge problem for this.

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 5>And I have to say, I'm very much at the

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 5>age where I'm reading fairy tales to my children and

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 5>it is refreshing to go back to those old classics

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:52.359
<v Speaker 5>that existed before a time of political correctness and wokeness,

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 5>you know, went mental with these stories and just engage

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 5>in some good old fashioned storytelling for children. So I

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 5>will not be showing them this remake. I think I

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 5>will stick with the original.

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, no, because you'd have to watch it with them

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 3>and that would be painful. Yab Caroen mentioned the fact

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 3>that that the seven Dwarves aren't in this and again,

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 3>this supposedly progressive, tolerant, compassionate point of view, or we

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 3>can't have dowarves. That's depriving seven actors of jobs, actors

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 3>who don't actually get that many offers. And this is

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 3>a film, a motion picture where they would have earned

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 3>good money. Would have had amazing publicity and they're deprived

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 3>of that because I don't know, because woe Hollywood has

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 3>decided even featuring dwarves in a title is somehow politically incorrect.

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, and it kind of goes to Caroline's point that

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 6>that's clear that there was some contempt for the original material,

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 6>the fact that the dwarves weren't featured. Some of the

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 6>comments that Rachel Zegler made, and you know, there is

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 6>so much to say about her, just infuriating to watch

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 6>some of the clips that you just played earlier, rita

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 6>of her on the camp in the election campaign last year,

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 6>promoting Kamala Harris. And you know, I think it's really

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 6>on her to go back and correct the record now

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 6>because she was spreading a lot of fear and disinformation

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 6>that it was a campaign saying that, you know, reproductive

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 6>rights are on the line. Now that we've got Donald

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 6>Trump as president. I think she owes the American people

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 6>an apology that actually reproductive rights were not on the line.

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 6>There's no national abortion ban. Trump is putting measures in

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 6>place to actually support people going through IVF. But I

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 6>doubt Rachel Zegler is ever going to give Trump credit

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 6>or correct the record herself, but she has made so

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 6>many comments which show that she does have contempt for

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 6>the original material. As Caroline suggested, she seems to be

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 6>quite impressed that it's this woke remake and people aren't

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 6>buying it. You know, you went through the figures earlier,

0:16:57.520 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 6>but only forty three million dollars in ticket sales for

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 6>the opening weekend on a film that costs two hundred

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 6>and fifty million dollars.

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 4>That's not a lot of money.

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 6>You went through and highlighted some comparison, So The Lion

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 6>King in twenty nineteen one hundred and ninety one million dollars,

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 6>Beauty and the Beast in twenty seventeen one hundred and

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.679
<v Speaker 6>seventy four million dollars. People do not want to watch

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 6>this new woke remake of this movie, and it's been

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 6>in trouble for a while. You know, they scaled back

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 6>the premiere that they were supposed to have. There's been

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 6>a lot of controversy over the kind of political commentary

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 6>that Rachel Zegler has made and speaking to lots of

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:38.199
<v Speaker 6>different people, even some of my friends that have no

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:42.360
<v Speaker 6>interest in politics, go why they're ruining this movie? It's

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 6>a film that we all loved, it's a fairy tale,

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.439
<v Speaker 6>and then all of a sudden it's being rewritten. And

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:50.400
<v Speaker 6>you know, some of the comments that Rachel Zegler has

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 6>made are just going viral online for all the wrong reason.

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 6>She's so out of touch, and I think it really

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 6>puts a bit of pressure on Disney about where it's heading.

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 6>Are they going to get keep doing these remakes where

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 6>they have to try and make them work or change

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 6>the narrative and change the story completely doesn't make any sense.

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, they could just write a new story.

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 3>I means, you don't have to take a classic fairy

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 3>tale that's been loved for generations and destroy it. You

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 3>can just write a new story about an empowered girl

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 3>who wants to be a great leader and not call

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 3>it snow white. Now, talk about Gwen Stefani. She could

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 3>be your sister, Carrie. You to look very much alike.

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 3>But this poor woman is facing This is a massive

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 3>pop star, has been for well decades now, but she's

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 3>facing this tsunami of hate, probably unlike anything she's experienced

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 3>in her career. Or because she praised a video featuring

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Tucker Carlson. This was on X and she called it

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 3>an enlightening, intelligent, beautiful interview. Caro, it was an interview

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 3>where they were discussing God, Christianity, and yet for the

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 3>feral left, just the fact that Tucker Carlson was involved

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 3>was enough to see her viciously trolled.

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and she's been called now this full on MAGA

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 5>supporter just because she.

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:20.360
<v Speaker 6>Tweeted that there's nothing wrong with that.

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 5>Not that there's anything wrong with that, but this is

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 5>how the left and they cancel culture operates because it

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:31.719
<v Speaker 5>was acceptable to enjoy Gwen Stefani's music when she was

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 5>a Democrat supporter, which she was and a donor. She

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:38.120
<v Speaker 5>hasn't even said that she is a Trump supporter, by

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 5>the way, she hasn't even come out and had to

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 5>say that. It's just these little clues that people are

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 5>picking up on that Ooh, she may be an evil

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.640
<v Speaker 5>red hat wearing supporter. We can't support her. And people

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 5>are saying, oh, she must follow her husband, Blake Shelton's

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 5>politics because he's probably a Republican. He's a country singer.

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 5>I mean, isn't that quite sexist in itself? Ultim believe

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 5>that she can't have her own views as a woman,

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 5>she must be taking her husband's views, but far from me.

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 5>It to be it for me to suggest that, you know,

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 5>democrats may be sexist. Look, no, it's ridiculous. Gwen Stefani

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 5>is a cult icon, but she's constantly had these jabs

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 5>being taken at her and from her music being problematic

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:30.119
<v Speaker 5>because it featured Japanese Harry Heiri girls and ridiculous, just ridiculous.

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 3>The whole thing is ridiculous. So we've run out of time, Gab.

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 3>But Blake Shelton's involvement is also hilarious. The fact that

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 3>he's a country singer, so you must definitely be a

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 3>Republican and if he's marrying her, then she must be

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 3>a Republican. But yeah, this is the celebrity world. This

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 3>is the feral Left. They think they own singers, actors, athletes,

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 3>and any of them deviating from that group think of

0:20:57.400 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 3>the left, they get attacked like this is a warning

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 3>to others.

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 4>Ladies.

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 3>It's been a pleasure, thanks for your time tonight. Now

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:08.479
<v Speaker 3>it's time for left is losing it. This next clip

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 3>is delicious. It's got my favorite ingredient, a big fat

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 3>dose of instant karma. Watch here are some deranged Karen

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 3>accosts a man on the New York subway for the

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 3>crime of wearing a mega cap.

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 4>She felt emboldened to be.

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 3>A nasty blee, after all, she's in deep blue New York.

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:31.199
<v Speaker 3>But listen as others in the carriage tell her to

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.639
<v Speaker 3>back off, and they also tell her that people like

0:21:34.760 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 3>her are the reason why Trump won. Enjoy and the

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 3>best bit is about to come because this maga hating

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 3>loser is about to land flat on her face.

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 11>Literally, how good is that?

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 4>Can you believe?

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 3>That crazy woman chase that poor kid? As I said,

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:35.400
<v Speaker 3>instant karma. Now, the Democrats are in all sorts of trouble.

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 3>Their approval rating is under thirty percent in the twenties,

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 3>and the party is now being taken over by the

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:46.679
<v Speaker 3>lunious far left radical commis to ever be elected to

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 3>public office in the United States. Among them is this

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 3>charmer from the great state of Texas. Let's listen to

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 3>how Jasmine Crockett used to sound.

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 14>No one could have told me that when I went

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:00.719
<v Speaker 14>down to Austin. Now, what's it's like a little bit

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 14>over a year ago that I would be running for Congress.

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 14>So it's not what my plan.

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:09.239
<v Speaker 3>Was, what a nice girl, but marvel here at the

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 3>accent switch or code switch as the kids call it.

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 4>The trans kids. They want to play the sports lord,

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.400
<v Speaker 4>have mercy. That is the biggest issue that we had,

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 4>says Win.

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 14>Since Win find the little trans child that is ruining

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 14>your life, like I mean.

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm just like talk about Kamala two point zero, God forbid.

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 3>And now that she's adopted this ghetto persona. Despite her

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 3>private school education, including at the very expensive, very exclusive

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:42.440
<v Speaker 3>ro It's College, Jasmine has been accused of in citing violence.

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 14>On March twenty ninth, It's my birthday and all I

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 14>want to see happen on my birthday is for Eli

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 14>to be taken down.

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 4>Yes, what a nice girl.

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 3>And here she talks about wanting to punch opponents, including

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Ted Kruz.

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 14>I think that you punch.

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 4>I think you punch you.

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 14>Okay, we're punching, but.

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 4>Like it's dere Cruz.

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 14>I mean like this dude has to be knots over

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 14>the head like hard, right, Like there is no niceties

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 14>with him, like at all, Like you you go clean.

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:13.480
<v Speaker 15>Off on him, right?

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, the modern Democrats are the party of Neo Marxis,

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 3>like IOC and Bernie Sanders. They're leading the party right now,

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 3>leading them straight to the depths of hell.

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 4>Isn't just about Republicans either.

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 8>We need a Democratic party that fights harder for us too.

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:42.679
<v Speaker 9>We have a message for mister Trump, and.

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 7>That is.

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 2>We will not allow you to move this country into

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 2>an oligarty.

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 3>No wonder Gavin Usam is trying to relaunch himself as

0:24:55.760 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 3>a moderate, not the far left governor of California. He's

0:25:00.640 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 3>got a fair bit of baggage. Even CNN can see that.

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 3>What chere as he claims that no one in his

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:11.119
<v Speaker 3>office would use the woke term LATINX latinxes, I like

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 3>to say, except well someone did.

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 15>By the way, not one person ever in my office

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 15>has ever used the word LATINX.

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 4>So can we finally put that to bad Yeah?

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>But where did that even know?

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:22.640
<v Speaker 15>More LATINX everybody? Well, I just didn't even know where

0:25:22.640 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 15>it came from. And like, what are people talking about?

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 4>But there was a person who used LATINX. It was

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 4>actually a really important person.

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 5>It was him, right, Yeah, that's right.

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 4>And look, these aren't minor shifts.

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 6>These are progressive issues that Gavin Newsom used to champion

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 6>until fairly recently, and now he's not just walking away

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 6>from them, he's sort of acting like they were never legitimate.

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 15>I hope we can really putterly paint a picture in

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 15>terms consciousness of how impactful this has been on the

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:54.640
<v Speaker 15>LATINX community. LATINX community, the LATINX and black communities got

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 15>politicians that are banning not assault rifles, but the word LATINX.

0:25:59.000 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 4>They're not even serious joining me now?

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 3>Is Sky News contributor Kosha geta kosher We just saw

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Gavin News him there. He must see a golden opportunity

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 3>here to appear like the moderate, the sane, sensible choice.

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:19.439
<v Speaker 3>But given how rady cool he has been a San

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Francisco mayor as California governor, can you really pull it off?

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 4>Or is there's just too much baggage.

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:28.479
<v Speaker 16>There's a lot of baggage, and in this era we

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 16>live in with unlimited videotape and clips immediately come out

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 16>to counter them. It's really hard to just completely brush

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 16>under the rug what you've done. But I do think

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 16>the right should dismiss him at their own peril because

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:43.359
<v Speaker 16>he is a very savvy operator. He presents very well,

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 16>he's good looking, has the hair, is now he's doing

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 16>this thing of inviting right wing people onto his podcast.

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 16>It's all part of the strategy because he does see,

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 16>as you say, a void in there, there is an

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 16>obvious leader. He's crafting his entry onto the national stage

0:26:57.440 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 16>for obvious reasons, and we'll.

0:26:59.240 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 4>See if it works.

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 16>Well, see if it works. I find it difficult just

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 16>because his record is so far left outside of the

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 16>means from the party, and that will come out.

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:12.479
<v Speaker 3>Like he's had just significant failures in California. But like

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 3>you said, he's going to have the media on his side.

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 3>He's very good looking, he's charismatic. People who are not

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 3>particularly engaged in politics would I think, be a little

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 3>bit bamboozled by his presentation. He seems like someone who

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 3>is competent. But then you look at what's happening in

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 3>California and it's a mess.

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 16>It is, and I think the wildfires as an example.

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 16>You know, things feed because memories are short, but just

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:39.199
<v Speaker 16>the video and the imagery around that is going to

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 16>live on for a very long time. And he presided

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 16>over that along with others. So I do think he's

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 16>got an uphillar battle, but do not discount him.

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:51.399
<v Speaker 3>Now mentioned Jasmine Crockett's ill considered comments. Earlier, Attorney General

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 3>Pam Bondi has had this warning for the Democrat after

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 3>she was accused of inciting violence.

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Now you have this congresswoman Crockett who is calling for

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>attacks on Elon Musk on her birthday. Let's take him

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>out on my birthday, she says. Yet she turns and says, oh,

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not calling for violence. Well, she is an elected

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>public official, and so she needs to tread very carefully.

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk has death threats against incredible death threats, many

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 3>of them. You would think any politician would not be

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 3>pouring fuel on that fire. And those comments where you

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 3>think they amount to incitement or not, they're unwarranted.

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 16>Absolutely. So the bar for legal standard for incitement is

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 16>very very high for good reason in the US. And

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 16>as long as they're playing with words, you know, it's

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 16>just words. But they do skirt awfully close to that

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 16>line and be that as it made. It's not about

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 16>legal adjudication, it's about just what a leader of a

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 16>constituency should behave like. But the thing is that they

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 16>do have a political shield where they know that it

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 16>is difficult for Pamboni or somebody on the other side

0:28:57.680 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 16>to really go after them and litigate them even if

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 16>that's true. So they use that and that's why you

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 16>see her. You see Maxine Waters comes to mind. She

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 16>used to see pushback. You had Chuck Schumer reaping the

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 16>whirlwind against the Supreme Court on the steps. You had

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 16>Governor Phil Murphy of New Jersey seeing openly that he's

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 16>eating in a betting and illegal on top of his garage,

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 16>which is against the laws. So they're definitely coming very

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 16>close to that line. And we'll see how much the

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 16>other side pushes back.

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 3>And this is after a Republican was shot during a

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 3>baseball game, Steve Scilice, and it seems to have really

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 3>not sent the message home that they do have lunatic

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 3>supporters who could take something that he said, even if

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 3>it's kind of ingest, kind of not and do some damage.

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 4>Now we talked about.

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Who's going to be the next lead day is at AOC?

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 4>Is it Bernie Sanders?

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 7>Is it?

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Gavin Usen? Kamala Harris is the one who's leading the polls.

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 3>This is how badly the Democrats going. The failed presidential

0:29:56.720 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 3>candidate is the most popular option for twenty twenty eight,

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 3>according to a recent pole. Surely she can't run again.

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Do you think she has the appetite to do it?

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 3>And would they be stupid enough to run her again?

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Because she was a uniquely terrible candidate appetite.

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 16>I think she very well made invisibility. We've seen that

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 16>before because she has never won anything competitive. She's great

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 16>at getting appointed.

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 5>She's really good at.

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 16>Climbing the internal machinery of the Democrat Party. Yes, her

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 16>positions in California were elected, but in California, as long

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 16>as you're the chosen one within the Democrats are pretty

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 16>much guaranteed that position. And we've seen how she's done

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 16>every other which way. I think those pools just have

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 16>recency bias, that she's frashened people's minds. So she palls well,

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 16>but it's.

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 4>Not gonna last.

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 3>And I think there's a little bit of sympathy because

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 3>she did lose and lost badly, lost the popular vote,

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 3>lost every swing state. So I would imagine if you're

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 3>a Democrat, you'd feel a little bit sorry for her.

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 3>And this was a poll of Democrats and left leaning independence.

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 3>Now let's play this clip of Bill. He's among those

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:04.239
<v Speaker 3>who can read the data and read it well and

0:31:04.320 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 3>see the blue states are losing population, They're losing people,

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 3>and they're losing power.

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 2>California is projected to lose three seats, New York two

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 2>also going to lose a seat. Minnesota, Oregon, Rhode Island,

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Illinois or blue states. Who's getting these Texas, Florida, Idaho,

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 2>and Utah. I mean, this looks like game over.

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 4>It's very interesting, isn't it.

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Because there has been a lot of fear that all

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 3>these Californians and New Yorkers, all these left leaning people

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 3>moving to places like Tennessee and Texas and Florida, we're

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 3>going to turn those states purple or perhaps blue down

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 3>the track that were going to take their voting records

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:45.960
<v Speaker 3>with them. But perhaps it's actually going to work the

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 3>other way, that their population shift is going to see

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 3>more power for the red states.

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 16>So there's another counter dynamic at play. So the thing

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 16>underputting this, as you see is it's mass exodus from

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 16>states and cities and counties that they ruined with far

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 16>left policies, and then they themselves don't want to live

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 16>in them, whether it's taxes or cultural things or everything else.

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 16>So they believe and crime yeap things that really affect

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 16>your day to day real life, and there is that

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 16>problem on the downstream trickle effect of that in local

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 16>elections and the people that end up coming in they

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 16>do drift the lifestyle of the red states more blue.

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 16>But the counter dynamic over here that Bill Maher is

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 16>touching on is just a straight up mathematics because the

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 16>House seats are based on apportionment. If suddenly two percent

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 16>of the population moves from California to wherever Florida, then

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 16>they lose to house seats Florida gains. And also he

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 16>didn't mention this, but it would impact the electoral votes potentially,

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 16>which is based on the same thing census counting of

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 16>the population in each state, and that magical path to

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 16>victory of two seventy nine. It could look differently in

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 16>a few years if enough of this recalibration happens.

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 3>I do wonder if that trend is going to continue

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 3>now that Trump is president, because.

0:32:58.120 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 4>Is his impact going to be in our to keep people.

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 3>In blue states or are they going to be even

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 3>more likely to flee to the red states where they

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 3>can see this alignment between that state and the White

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 3>House and the policies that are being advocated.

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 16>It's a good point because if the big picture improves

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 16>the or role economy and wages and the job market

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 16>and crime and all of that that's under his purview,

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 16>maybe it'll make the left wing states more tolerable to them,

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 16>because there is a lot to love about those states.

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:28.280
<v Speaker 16>California and New York have amazing things about them that

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 16>people I'm sure the bar is hire to finally leave them.

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 16>The problem is they think local politics and especially schools,

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 16>where that's the stuff that really hits home. And as

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 16>long as they keep letting boys play in girls sports

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 16>and things like that, I do think you'll see families

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 16>pick up and move.

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 3>Now, this is a big stuff up for the Trump administration,

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 3>and really, if this reporting is accurate, then heads need

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 3>to roll. The leftist activist editor in chief of The

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Atlantic magazine, Jeffrey Goldberg was included on a message chain

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 3>in which top Trump administration officials discussed strikes against the

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:08.839
<v Speaker 3>Hucci terror group in Yemen. Kosha this would be a

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 3>stunning breach of national security. One of the men in

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 3>that message, China Defense Secretary Peter Hegsitt, was asked about

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 3>the breach.

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 8>Can you share how your information about war plans against

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 8>the Hoopis and Yemen was shared with a journalist in

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:29.760
<v Speaker 8>the Atlantic, and where those details classified details.

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 9>So you're talking about a deceitful and highly discredited so

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 9>called journalists who's made a profession of pedaling hopes his

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 9>time and time again to include the I don't know

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 9>the hopes is of Russia Russia, Russia, or the fine

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:51.719
<v Speaker 9>people on both sides hopes or suckers and losers hopes.

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 9>So this is the guy that pedals in garbage is.

0:34:54.840 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 1>What he does.

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Kosher whoever's responsible, I don't care who was an innocent mista,

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 3>whether it was incompetence or malicious.

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:05.799
<v Speaker 4>They have to go.

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 3>If this is accurate, it is such an enormous breach,

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 3>and you would just think in the second Trump term,

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:15.280
<v Speaker 3>mistakes like this can't happen.

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:18.319
<v Speaker 16>It's not good and they have very little margin fair

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 16>so on the merits of it already because it's about

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 16>a military strike national security. Potentially we haven't seen all

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 16>the messages that were in there, but potentially there was

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:31.239
<v Speaker 16>classified or highly sensitive at least materials being used in

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:33.319
<v Speaker 16>that channel. And then this journalist who is not a

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 16>friend of the administration at all, accidentally or maybe it

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:36.680
<v Speaker 16>was sabotage.

0:35:36.719 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 10>I don't know.

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:39.759
<v Speaker 16>We'll find out. We may never find out. I think

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 16>the issue is if it was Mike Walls in particular,

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 16>that's one thing that's out there in the reporting. He

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:48.880
<v Speaker 16>also does bring a lot to the table national Security advisor,

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 16>and so the role he's playing with negotiating all these

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 16>deals globally, I'm sure President Trump will weigh that opposite,

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:57.840
<v Speaker 16>you know, this breach if it were at staff for

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:00.359
<v Speaker 16>a little bit different. And I'll also make the point

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 16>that it would show I think leadership if they did something,

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 16>especially if it's a staffer, because the same has not

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 16>happened in other branches, like the Supreme Court never told

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 16>us who lickd the Dobs decision, which was definitely malpractice

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 16>or sabotage. And if he does that over here, I

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:16.799
<v Speaker 16>think it's a good message, but we'll find out.

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 3>It's incredible because the journalist that's involved in this, Jeffrey Goldberg,

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 3>is no ordinary journalist, no ordinary editor. He has been

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:32.200
<v Speaker 3>at the forefront complicit in multiple hoaxes and anti Trump propaganda,

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 3>including the Fine People hoax. So for him to be

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 3>the one involved, I think is astonishing. We will have

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 3>to wait and see just what the real truth is

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 3>behind this story.

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 4>Now, let's talk about the peace.

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 3>Still between Russia and Ukraine that's being negotiated, and the

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 3>New York Post reports that despite the very tense meeting

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:58.800
<v Speaker 3>with the US president last month, Ukrainian President Zelenski believed

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Trump remains Ukraine's strongest weapon against Russian President Vladimir Putin.

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 3>President Zolenski believes Trump is looking for a big win

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 3>on the world stage by ending the war, and he

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 3>said if he wants to, Trump can squeeze concessions from

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 3>the Russians because he seems to be the only one

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 3>that Putin fears. Zelenski said that to Time magazine. It

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 3>was his first interview since that Oval Office dust up.

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 3>It's been interesting to see how the fallout from that

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 3>has progressed. We saw Europe beating its chest and making

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:40.840
<v Speaker 3>all sorts of pronouncements about boots on the ground, but

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 3>it's gone back to the US negotiating this piece. Still,

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 3>it's gone back to precisely what the White House wanted all.

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:50.240
<v Speaker 16>Along, return to the fundamentals. After all that doest settled.

0:37:51.040 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 16>He's right, I think a lot of the points he

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:55.680
<v Speaker 16>made President Zelenski in that piece where he says that

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 16>ultimately the US is his strongest weapon true because without

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:02.520
<v Speaker 16>the US, they don't stand a chance. Was famously put

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 16>out into public and that meeting.

0:38:05.040 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 4>It's true.

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 16>I think he was honest when he said that Trump

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 16>is the one person Putin fears, and we can litigate

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 16>that word, but at least he wasn't saying Trump is

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 16>Putin's puppet, which is something that the other side has

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 16>been saying for far too long, and he is right.

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 16>The third thing he said is that the US can

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 16>squeeze Russia if they want. I think that's the key here.

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 16>That the administration may not necessarily want that because they

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 16>look through the lens of realism. They want to recalibrate

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 16>US and Russia relationships. Doesn't mean it's perfect, doesn't mean

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 16>everybody is perfect, but is that a better strategy for

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 16>advancing US interests when you look at China and everything else?

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:39.840
<v Speaker 16>And that's kind of where he's going, So that's what

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:42.879
<v Speaker 16>they're looking at. Legacy does matter to Trump for sure,

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 16>and the administration they want the win for political and

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:47.919
<v Speaker 16>legacy reasons. All of that is true. And if there's

0:38:48.040 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 16>enough alignment across all the players on the chessboard, then

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 16>hopefully a deal happens soon.

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 3>And do you get the impression that what's best for

0:38:55.760 --> 0:38:57.840
<v Speaker 3>the US is going to be at the heart of

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:03.279
<v Speaker 3>this steal. Of course, going to try to negotiate Advanche

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:07.240
<v Speaker 3>is still for Ukraine, but it also has to benefit America,

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:08.800
<v Speaker 3>because that's everything that.

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 4>Trump cares about.

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:16.440
<v Speaker 3>And this point about putin fearing Trump that Zelenski made well,

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 3>the fact that he didn't do anything during Trump's first

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:24.279
<v Speaker 3>term and now seems to be cooperating for now. It

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 3>says something because we've seen him behave very differently with

0:39:27.640 --> 0:39:28.479
<v Speaker 3>Biden and.

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 16>Barackob undeniably, and that point was made about the campaign.

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:36.359
<v Speaker 16>People get it intuitively, and I think that's also why

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 16>the Trump administration they're going to try and negotiate, hopefully

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 16>as something with a lasting impact, because if the strategy

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 16>is that he fears only the person in the White

0:39:44.280 --> 0:39:48.919
<v Speaker 16>House now, that will end in three quarter years from now,

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:52.279
<v Speaker 16>and so putting in place something that is stickier would

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 16>be beneficial for everybody.

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:57.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, there was that rumor that did the rounds and

0:39:57.239 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 3>that the Trump camp did nothing to spell it that

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:06.800
<v Speaker 3>he threatened to bomb Moscow if Vladimir Putin's forces invaded

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 3>Russia during his first term, and.

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 4>Fuchsion obviously took that seriously.

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Whether whether he was ever going to follow through or

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 3>not is a different story, but the doubt was enough

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 3>to see him refrain from doing that.

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 4>Koshagta, thank you so much for your.

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 3>Time tonight, Joining me now is comedian and host of

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 3>Primetime with Alex Stein on Blaze TV. Alex Elon Musk's

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:31.320
<v Speaker 3>transgender son has.

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:32.840
<v Speaker 4>Featured in teen Vogue.

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:37.359
<v Speaker 3>Vivian Jenna Wilson is also very active online.

0:40:37.560 --> 0:40:39.760
<v Speaker 5>Would you give us some of your political beliefs?

0:40:39.960 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Kill everyone now, condone first degree murder, advocate cannibalism, felther

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 1>my politics, felt is my life?

0:40:49.600 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Take whatever you like, and the twenty year old had

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:56.320
<v Speaker 3>plenty of nasty things to say about his father. He said,

0:40:56.360 --> 0:41:00.880
<v Speaker 3>he's a pathetic man child. I'm not giving anyone that

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:03.319
<v Speaker 3>space in my mind. The only thing that gets to

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 3>live free in my mind are drag queens. Alex Vivian's

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:14.240
<v Speaker 3>story is part of the reason why Elon Musk changed

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 3>from a Democrat to a Republican, why he's so determined

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 3>to do something about their woke mind virus, as he

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 3>calls it, because his son started transitioning as a youngster.

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:31.719
<v Speaker 10>Well, you're exactly right. I mean, having your son to

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 10>become a girl would be very traumatic, and I think

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:36.239
<v Speaker 10>that you would be able to easily see that it

0:41:36.239 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 10>would be the indoctrination that these children are getting in

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:41.279
<v Speaker 10>the normal public schools or even the private schools. But

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 10>what's happening here, Rita, and this is the problem that's

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:46.920
<v Speaker 10>happening in most schools when a young person decides to transition.

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:49.760
<v Speaker 10>We wouldn't let an eighteen year old, if you're under eighteen,

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 10>get a tattoo. Why do we let young kids transition?

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 10>The reason they do it, Rita, is because they want attention.

0:41:54.640 --> 0:41:56.399
<v Speaker 10>And when your dad is one of the richest people

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:58.840
<v Speaker 10>in the world that is busy running ten different companies,

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:01.839
<v Speaker 10>how else can you get your father's attention other than

0:42:02.120 --> 0:42:05.360
<v Speaker 10>trying to do something that's incredibly extreme, like changing your sex.

0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:08.760
<v Speaker 10>So in a way, it is very sad. This story

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:11.799
<v Speaker 10>is very sad, But maybe it radicalized Elon Musk to

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 10>speak out against this and actually change the narrative and

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:18.799
<v Speaker 10>you know, change the whole trajectory that we're currently on

0:42:19.000 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 10>when it comes to this gender ideology and doctrination.

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:27.839
<v Speaker 3>Now we've spoken about the box office disaster that is

0:42:27.920 --> 0:42:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Disney's Snow White, and the lead actress's delusions of grandeur

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 3>are not helping here. She compares herself to a priceless

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 3>piece of art, the winged victory.

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 7>To everyone who hates when I win. The winged victory

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:51.439
<v Speaker 7>came to the Loop in pieces, and people still line

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:52.680
<v Speaker 7>up to see her.

0:42:54.800 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 4>And I can only help.

0:42:57.680 --> 0:43:01.880
<v Speaker 7>That despite my flaws, by my craps and my breaks,

0:43:01.960 --> 0:43:08.759
<v Speaker 7>and there are many of them, at every premiere and

0:43:08.840 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 7>everything I do, people will wait in line to see Alex.

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:17.919
<v Speaker 3>What has been the reaction to Disney is that life

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:19.359
<v Speaker 3>is expensive one goal.

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:23.919
<v Speaker 10>Well, the reaction has been absolutely horrible. It is the

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 10>worst box office from a Disney live action remake that

0:43:28.160 --> 0:43:30.840
<v Speaker 10>they've ever done. In Dumbo didn't do very well, but

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 10>this is actually performing much lower than Dumbo. And this

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 10>couldn't happen to a better person. In my opinion, Rachel

0:43:37.480 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 10>is literally the star of a Disney movie, and she

0:43:40.719 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 10>acts like she's some sort of victim, and that's the

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:45.719
<v Speaker 10>sort of mentality that is just poisoning people's minds, Like

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:48.439
<v Speaker 10>she acts like her life is so bad considering she's

0:43:48.440 --> 0:43:51.920
<v Speaker 10>a multi millionaire actress living out every struggling actresses or

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:54.799
<v Speaker 10>actors dream, and she just kind of, you know, hand

0:43:54.840 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 10>waves it like she's still some sort of victim, when

0:43:57.120 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 10>in reality, she should be a movie star, she should

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 10>be happy, she should be you know, a political or

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:05.480
<v Speaker 10>positive but she's not that way. She loves Kamala Harris.

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:08.719
<v Speaker 10>She was, you know, as woke as they are, and

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:11.000
<v Speaker 10>you know, you know, they're saying, you know, go woke,

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:13.359
<v Speaker 10>get broke, and Disney's going to lose money on this movie.

0:44:13.400 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 10>And I believe it only made less than a million

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:18.400
<v Speaker 10>dollars in China, which is a huge indication that it

0:44:18.400 --> 0:44:19.640
<v Speaker 10>will not do well globally.

0:44:22.320 --> 0:44:25.319
<v Speaker 3>Oh goodness, may she didn't have a post saying if

0:44:25.360 --> 0:44:28.880
<v Speaker 3>you're going to vote for Trump, just unfollow me, and

0:44:28.920 --> 0:44:30.480
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of people have just taken that

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:34.640
<v Speaker 3>advice and not supportive of her projects. And in fact,

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:37.120
<v Speaker 3>if the film is as bad as they say, you're

0:44:37.160 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 3>not going to go along and watch it anyway. Now,

0:44:39.680 --> 0:44:43.440
<v Speaker 3>another project that isn't doing it too well is Michelle

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:47.319
<v Speaker 3>Obama's podcast. The figures haven't been great and she's out

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:49.560
<v Speaker 3>there promoting, and you've got to give her credit for that.

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:52.880
<v Speaker 3>She's out there doing interviews, and in this one, she's

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:55.600
<v Speaker 3>asked about her political ambitions.

0:44:55.760 --> 0:44:58.920
<v Speaker 12>When people ask me what I ever run, the answer

0:44:58.960 --> 0:45:02.600
<v Speaker 12>is no, you know, I mean you then if you

0:45:02.760 --> 0:45:06.440
<v Speaker 12>ask me that, then you have absolutely no idea the

0:45:07.200 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 12>sacrifice that your kids make when your parents are in

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:14.880
<v Speaker 12>that world. I think we've done enough, question asked and answered,

0:45:15.239 --> 0:45:17.480
<v Speaker 12>never going to happen, Alex.

0:45:17.560 --> 0:45:21.000
<v Speaker 3>The Obamas have done enough. I think we can agree

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:21.239
<v Speaker 3>with that.

0:45:23.120 --> 0:45:25.040
<v Speaker 10>Oh, they've done more than enough. But you know, I

0:45:25.080 --> 0:45:28.319
<v Speaker 10>think there's real trouble in paradise. I think that's why

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 10>you know she's not going to run. It's because her

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 10>and Barock or you know, they're on the rocks, and

0:45:33.239 --> 0:45:35.000
<v Speaker 10>she wants to blame her children, and you know that's

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:37.919
<v Speaker 10>her prerogative. But if her and Barock were still in love,

0:45:38.120 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 10>I don't know why she wouldn't consider running for president,

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:44.520
<v Speaker 10>considering that she's probably more talented than Kamala Harris, and

0:45:44.560 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 10>that is you were just talking about earlier. You know,

0:45:47.160 --> 0:45:49.360
<v Speaker 10>that is who they predict to be the next candidate

0:45:49.640 --> 0:45:52.880
<v Speaker 10>for the next presidential election. So they have nobody to

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 10>put up or president that is actually likable, that has

0:45:56.239 --> 0:45:59.880
<v Speaker 10>really achieved anything that is noteworthy. So I wouldn't be

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 10>surprised if they tried to make her do this. But

0:46:03.680 --> 0:46:06.399
<v Speaker 10>she's not going to run because her and Obama are

0:46:06.440 --> 0:46:09.560
<v Speaker 10>obviously having relationship issues. So she has bigger fish to

0:46:09.600 --> 0:46:12.240
<v Speaker 10>fry than trying to run for president.

0:46:14.920 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 4>And that podcast.

0:46:16.800 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 3>You are familiar with the medium, You would have participated

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:25.440
<v Speaker 3>in many successful podcasts. What would you advise her if

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:27.359
<v Speaker 3>you were her producer?

0:46:27.520 --> 0:46:28.640
<v Speaker 4>How would you improve it?

0:46:28.719 --> 0:46:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Because thus far it has been not exactly been compelling,

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:33.400
<v Speaker 3>and it hasn't been pulling in the figures.

0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 10>I mean, if you want my honest opinion, how does

0:46:37.200 --> 0:46:41.160
<v Speaker 10>she make a successful podcast? It'd be easy just say

0:46:41.200 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 10>she loves Donald Trump. If she became conservative, it would

0:46:43.760 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 10>be the number one podcast. If she started talking like,

0:46:46.760 --> 0:46:48.959
<v Speaker 10>oh I love Trump, everybody would have to go listen

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:50.600
<v Speaker 10>to it. So I'm just saying, if she wants numbers,

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:52.799
<v Speaker 10>she wants views, she should do the opposite of what

0:46:52.840 --> 0:46:55.359
<v Speaker 10>we expected she should become. You know, she should be

0:46:55.680 --> 0:46:58.720
<v Speaker 10>you know, a big Trump supporter Trump podcast. Think about

0:46:58.840 --> 0:47:01.480
<v Speaker 10>the numbers that that would do.

0:47:01.520 --> 0:47:03.400
<v Speaker 3>You know what you're onto something she doesn't even have

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:04.160
<v Speaker 3>to go that far.

0:47:04.160 --> 0:47:04.919
<v Speaker 4>If she just.

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Deviates on one issue from the leftist group.

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:09.240
<v Speaker 4>Think, it can be anything.

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:13.120
<v Speaker 3>It could be men's in men in women's sport, it

0:47:13.160 --> 0:47:18.160
<v Speaker 3>could be net zero craziness, It could be any number

0:47:18.160 --> 0:47:21.560
<v Speaker 3>of policies. If she just took one of those and

0:47:21.600 --> 0:47:25.279
<v Speaker 3>took a contrary position to the left, yes, it would

0:47:25.280 --> 0:47:29.440
<v Speaker 3>have a huge reaction. Now, before you go, I'm going

0:47:29.480 --> 0:47:34.160
<v Speaker 3>to ask you about the Venezuelan gang bangers being sent

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:38.080
<v Speaker 3>back to their home country, despite the fact that we've

0:47:38.120 --> 0:47:41.719
<v Speaker 3>got activist judges, some of them appointed by Barack Obama,

0:47:41.800 --> 0:47:46.239
<v Speaker 3>like Judge Patricia Millet, who are frustrating the efforts of

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:51.080
<v Speaker 3>the Trump administration to deport these gang bangers. This judge

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:55.600
<v Speaker 3>has even said, Alex that these prisoners are being treated

0:47:55.640 --> 0:47:57.160
<v Speaker 3>worse than Nazis.

0:47:58.320 --> 0:47:59.480
<v Speaker 4>What's your response to that.

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:06.000
<v Speaker 10>It's ironic that she compared flying Venezuelan gang bangers back

0:48:06.000 --> 0:48:08.960
<v Speaker 10>to their home country of Venezuela as worse than the

0:48:09.080 --> 0:48:11.759
<v Speaker 10>Nazis retreated, Considering after World War Two, it's a well

0:48:11.800 --> 0:48:13.520
<v Speaker 10>known fact that a bunch of Nazis tried to run

0:48:13.560 --> 0:48:16.000
<v Speaker 10>away to Venezuela, So that doesn't even make sense. She

0:48:16.120 --> 0:48:18.960
<v Speaker 10>just doesn't even know her world's history. So trust me,

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:21.400
<v Speaker 10>those Nazis would love to be in Venezuela instead of

0:48:21.400 --> 0:48:25.160
<v Speaker 10>the Nuremberg Trial. So she's insane. She's trying to handwave

0:48:25.200 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 10>if I said that earlier, but she's trying to act

0:48:27.000 --> 0:48:29.600
<v Speaker 10>like the Holocaust wasn't a big deal anytime she says that.

0:48:29.680 --> 0:48:31.279
<v Speaker 10>And I hate that. I hate that they always use

0:48:31.320 --> 0:48:35.080
<v Speaker 10>that term Nazi because it's just so misused and it's

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:37.759
<v Speaker 10>not what's happening to these Venezuelan immigrants. I got a

0:48:38.200 --> 0:48:41.800
<v Speaker 10>free trip back home. I mean I would anybody would

0:48:42.120 --> 0:48:44.400
<v Speaker 10>accept a free plane trip back home. We should have

0:48:44.400 --> 0:48:45.840
<v Speaker 10>sent him back in the back of a bus my

0:48:45.880 --> 0:48:48.160
<v Speaker 10>personal opinion, but you know I'm not Tom Holman.

0:48:51.320 --> 0:48:53.840
<v Speaker 4>Alex Stean, thank you so much for your Tom tonight.

0:48:54.120 --> 0:48:55.520
<v Speaker 10>Thank you read always a pleasure.

0:48:55.840 --> 0:48:59.359
<v Speaker 3>And that's it for this special digital only edition. We'll

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:03.240
<v Speaker 3>be back to glob programming Wednesday evening, with Douglas Murray

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:08.440
<v Speaker 3>joining me at eleven pm.