Speaker 1: Live on Sky News. This is Sharry.
Speaker 2: Good Evening and welcome to the program. Caleb Bond in
Speaker 2: for Sharry Marxon this week. Well, we're waiting to see
Speaker 2: if Trump can get his big beautiful bill over the
Speaker 2: line after a handful of Republicans dared to stand in
Speaker 2: the way. If that happens during the show, I'll make
Speaker 2: sure to let you know. Plus the bizarre suggestion to
Speaker 2: ban men from childcare work, I'll explain why that is
Speaker 2: illogical and offensive in just a moment. And UK Prime
Speaker 2: Minister Sakia Starmer has celebrated, if we can call it that,
Speaker 2: one year in power. But why on earth was the
Speaker 2: Chancellor in tears in Parliament today? Tom Slater will explain
Speaker 2: why later on in the show. Now, sometimes when bad
Speaker 2: things happen, there's a tendency to look for some kind
Speaker 2: of immediate solution. For instance, in Victoria, youths brawl with machetes,
Speaker 2: so the state government says they'll ban them. Now, does
Speaker 2: that stop knife crime, of course not. Does it stop
Speaker 2: the sale of machetes, of course it doesn't. Bit like
Speaker 2: Howard's legal to sell cigarettes that haven't come through the
Speaker 2: proper channels, and yet you can get them like turning
Speaker 2: on the tap. It would seem these sorts of knee
Speaker 2: jerk reactions are quite common, and I saw calls for
Speaker 2: another one today in light of the horrifying allegations against
Speaker 2: childcare worker Joshua Dale Brown. He's of course been charged
Speaker 2: with seventy child sex offenses relating to eight alleged victims
Speaker 2: at a childcare center in Melbourne, and that is awful,
Speaker 2: no question. But Louise Edmonds, who's a founding member of
Speaker 2: the Independent Collective of Survivors, came out today and said
Speaker 2: men should be banned from working in childcare centers. Is
Speaker 2: she was on the Today Show this morning.
Speaker 3: So there is grave concerns and we shouldn't be looking
Speaker 3: at the equality space and the inn sector. We actually
Speaker 3: have to look at the safety first and foremost of
Speaker 3: our most vulnerable citizens, which are our children, and a
Speaker 3: lot of them are voiceless. So children start communicating well
Speaker 3: at around two years old. The children under two years old,
Speaker 3: they cannot speak.
Speaker 2: Now, there's already no equality in the childcare sector, but
Speaker 2: I'll come back to that in a moment. She went
Speaker 2: on to suggest that in the meantime, parents should be
Speaker 2: able to stop men from working with their children.
Speaker 3: But what can be put in place into daycare centers
Speaker 3: is first and foremost, overnight literally is a child intimate
Speaker 3: care waiver. So all day care centers can literally say
Speaker 3: to the parent, do you opt in or do you
Speaker 3: opt out at this very moment to actually have a
Speaker 3: male care outlook after your child.
Speaker 2: Now. I understand that Louise is a survivor of abuse herself,
Speaker 2: and I sympathize with her, but you cannot just ban
Speaker 2: men from working in childcare. I mean that is to
Speaker 2: suggest that every man is a potential pedophile until proven otherwise.
Speaker 2: How can you ever actually prove otherwise? I mean, how
Speaker 2: many years do you have to live on the planet
Speaker 2: without having interfeed with a child until you can say, yeah,
Speaker 2: he's fine. There are so many men, through the course
Speaker 2: of their work who love children and want to help
Speaker 2: children and be role models and raise them up to
Speaker 2: be the best future adults that they can be. But
Speaker 2: people like Louise think they have no place in the world.
Speaker 2: You know, I get that parents of children who are
Speaker 2: alleged victims of mister Brown would be feeling awful at
Speaker 2: the moment, but also consider how the small number of
Speaker 2: men who do work in childcare must be feeling right
Speaker 2: now too, when they have people popping up in the
Speaker 2: media basically suggesting that they're pedophiles by default. They wonder
Speaker 2: so few men work in childcare. The Sydney Morning Herald
Speaker 2: reported today that between two and four percent of early
Speaker 2: childcare educators and preschool teachers in Australia are male. And
Speaker 2: I'm sure there are plenty more who'd love to do
Speaker 2: the job because they genuinely want to make children's lives better,
Speaker 2: but they're too afraid how some people might perceive them.
Speaker 2: They know that someone's going to look at them and go, oh, gee,
Speaker 2: you must be a pedo because you want to work
Speaker 2: with little kids, and so they go, that's not famil
Speaker 2: leave it to someone else. And that's really sad. It's
Speaker 2: sad that men are made to feel bad about themselves
Speaker 2: simply because they are men. And yes, it's undeniable that
Speaker 2: the majority of child sex offenders are men, but the
Speaker 2: vast majority of men are not child sex offenders. They're
Speaker 2: good people who want to do good things. And you
Speaker 2: must consider as well that it's not just sexual abuse
Speaker 2: that might be going on in childcare centers. It's all
Speaker 2: kinds of child abuse. Now I don't want to go
Speaker 2: into great detail because it's pretty horrific, but there was
Speaker 2: a case in New South Wales a couple of years
Speaker 2: ago where a childcare worker used a young kid less
Speaker 2: than two years old like a mop to clean up
Speaker 2: vomit literally on the ground. That's physical abuse, and it
Speaker 2: was done by a woman. In fact, a report in
Speaker 2: twenty eighteen to the Criminology Research Advisory Council found that
Speaker 2: women were more likely than men to maltreat children. It's
Speaker 2: head quote. There were important patterns noted in relation to
Speaker 2: gender and indigenous status. Overall, Indigenous and non indigenous females
Speaker 2: had substantiations that substantiations of cases of maltreatment of children
Speaker 2: more of them than Indigenous and non indigenous males. The
Speaker 2: report also found that the vast majority of child male
Speaker 2: treatment and abuse happens in the home at the hands
Speaker 2: of parents, rather than places like childcare centers. So banning
Speaker 2: men is in some kind of catch all to stop
Speaker 2: children from being abused, and frankly, it's offensive. Men are
Speaker 2: already demonized enough in the modern world without being excluded
Speaker 2: from workplaces on the basis of something over which they
Speaker 2: have no control and having to deal with people looking
Speaker 2: at them assuming that they're a pedophile. If you ban
Speaker 2: men from working in childcare centers, then surely you'd have
Speaker 2: to ban them from being teachers too. And I know
Speaker 2: the kids might be a bit older, but it's the
Speaker 2: same thing really, it's a job of caring for children.
Speaker 2: And the other thing, of course, is that children need
Speaker 2: men in their lives, particularly young boys. They need male
Speaker 2: role models to look up to. There are more than
Speaker 2: a million single parent families in Australia and eighty percent
Speaker 2: of them are single mothers. I mean, for some kids,
Speaker 2: childcare or school might be the only opportunity for them
Speaker 2: to spend any significant time around a man. You can't
Speaker 2: take that away from kids. Seems as though the role
Speaker 2: and value of men in the world is continually being diminished.
Speaker 2: This is just another example of it. We need more
Speaker 2: men in teaching and childcare, not fewer. In primary schools,
Speaker 2: states have as much as four hundred and fifty percent
Speaker 2: more women than men in their teaching ranks. In high
Speaker 2: schools there are as many as seventy percent more women.
Speaker 2: We need more men. Like Hiua Jaldiani. He is the
Speaker 2: head of the science faculty at Saint Peter's College in Adelaide,
Speaker 2: and he's such a positive force in the lives of
Speaker 2: his students that last year, ten year twelve boys, with
Speaker 2: the support of their parents, spoke to his family and
Speaker 2: organized to cook him breakfast one day to thank him
Speaker 2: for his support during the year. They rocked up to
Speaker 2: his house at quarter to six in the morning and
Speaker 2: mister Jaldiani walked out of his bedroom to find his
Speaker 2: house full of students cooking him and his family breakfast,
Speaker 2: which they then ate together while one of the boys
Speaker 2: played his piano. They wanted to do a good turn
Speaker 2: for someone that they clearly respect. I mean to me,
Speaker 2: that sounds like a sterling group of young lads honoring
Speaker 2: a man who has clearly left an indelible mark on
Speaker 2: their academic lives, so much so that they went out
Speaker 2: of their way to organize a surprise breakfast with his family.
Speaker 2: But some spoilsport father who's done wasn't even involved, ran
Speaker 2: off to the advertiser to say that the breakfast was
Speaker 2: quote deeply troubling on several levels and that he quote
Speaker 2: felt uneasy that this is a culture that this is acceptable.
Speaker 2: I mean, even a touching tribute to a beloved teacher
Speaker 2: is somehow inappropriate to some people because it happens to
Speaker 2: be a male teacher. I reckon, we need more mister
Speaker 2: Jaldiani's in the world, more male teachers that command so
Speaker 2: much respect from their students that they'll get up at
Speaker 2: Sparrow's fart to cook him breakfast. And I should say
Speaker 2: I wrote about that story in my advertiser column a
Speaker 2: few weeks ago, and mister Jaldianni sent me a lovely
Speaker 2: note to thank me. I feel a bit guilty that
Speaker 2: I haven't written back to him, So mister Jaldianni, if
Speaker 2: you're watching, thank you, and I promise I'll right back
Speaker 2: to you this weekend. But he is proof of just
Speaker 2: how valuable men are in education and childcare. He is
Speaker 2: proof of the great benefit that men have to offer.
Speaker 2: Being a man is not the problem. Well, Penny Wong
Speaker 2: spent the better half of her morning trying to convince
Speaker 2: us that Trump is actually keen to meet with alban Easy.
Speaker 4: We're obviously very flexible about those arrangements. President is a
Speaker 4: very very busy man. But I was pleased that Secretary
Speaker 4: Rubio were clear that you know obviously that they're keen
Speaker 4: for a meeting.
Speaker 2: The Foreign Minister also sounded a little ambiguous about defense spending.
Speaker 4: The circumstances are such, I know there will be more
Speaker 4: capability required. I think we all understand that, and we
Speaker 4: will fund the capability that Australian needs.
Speaker 1: So is there.
Speaker 5: Significance in him not raising with that yesterday?
Speaker 4: Am I looking too much into this?
Speaker 1: Well?
Speaker 4: I can only report that from the meeting. Obviously there's
Speaker 4: a lot to.
Speaker 2: Discuss with me now to discuss. As Director of Strategic
Speaker 2: Analysis Australia and adjunct fellow at the Institute to Public Affairs,
Speaker 2: Peter Jennings, Peter, let's start with this non existent Trump meeting.
Speaker 2: I mean, how long can Albow go without one of
Speaker 2: these meetings before it does start to impact things like
Speaker 2: ORCUS and national security more broadly.
Speaker 6: It's clearly doing that already, Caleb, and I would say that,
Speaker 6: you know, in the history of the Australia US Alliance relationship,
Speaker 6: there wouldn't be a time in the past where a
Speaker 6: president and a Prime Minister have not actually spoken for
Speaker 6: you know, six or seven months and met to talk
Speaker 6: about these issues. And it's very clearly now beyond just
Speaker 6: the challenges of scheduling a meeting. I mean, I think
Speaker 6: that we are getting a sense of disapproval out of Washington,
Speaker 6: d C. And the President doesn't see it as a
Speaker 6: priority to meet with mister Albanezy, even though he's meeting
Speaker 6: many many other world leaders. And so we should read
Speaker 6: this as a problem, just as the Americans telling us
Speaker 6: that we are significantly underspending on defense is a problem.
Speaker 6: And to refer back to your earlier comments, how is
Speaker 6: it that our foreign minister can go to Washington and
Speaker 6: not even want to raise that as an issue? Instead,
Speaker 6: the question is or was it raised with you? But
Speaker 6: surely we have an honest enough relationship that we can
Speaker 6: talk about these things, so that there are problems in
Speaker 6: the relationship and our government needs to be stepping forward
Speaker 6: to work out how to deal with them.
Speaker 2: Well, because Wong says that Rubio Marco Rubio, the Secretary
Speaker 2: of State in the United States, didn't raise the defense
Speaker 2: spending with her, why would that be, well.
Speaker 6: Why wouldn't she raise it with him? I mean, there's
Speaker 6: a review of aucas They've told us that our spending
Speaker 6: is significantly under what we should be aiming at. They're
Speaker 6: concerned that we're losing our military capabilities. Why wouldn't we
Speaker 6: be raising that first and foremost with the Americans. If
Speaker 6: we think there's a positive story to tell, Penny Wong
Speaker 6: should be telling it.
Speaker 1: They know there's a problem.
Speaker 6: The reason no one's talking about it is they know
Speaker 6: there's a serious problem, and the Prime Minister is digging
Speaker 6: a hole for himself by saying that he's not going
Speaker 6: to make any changes. There's a sort of a lack
Speaker 6: of maturity, I think, apart from anything else, and how
Speaker 6: we are dealing with the US right now, and this
Speaker 6: is not your normal bilateral relationship. There are principal security provider.
Speaker 6: We are utterly dependent on them for our security, for
Speaker 6: much of the military technology that we have, for our
Speaker 6: intelligence supply, and for the orchestra relationship. And yet somehow
Speaker 6: we can't bring ourselves.
Speaker 2: To talk to them. But this is the point, right Peter,
Speaker 2: in your view, what is behind the pig headedness of
Speaker 2: the Prime Minister and the government not to simply say, yeah, sure,
Speaker 2: will increase our defense spending. I mean, if Trump can
Speaker 2: go off to NATO and get every country but Spain
Speaker 2: to sign up to five percent of GDP, they all
Speaker 2: conside that that's the best thing for them, and for
Speaker 2: the United States and for the broader world. What is
Speaker 2: it about Alban Easy makes him think he's special.
Speaker 6: Well, One, his heart is not in defense. It's just
Speaker 6: not a priority for him and never has been. Two,
Speaker 6: he doesn't want to admit publicly that we have a
Speaker 6: problem with China, because in the alb and Easy world,
Speaker 6: we've stabilized our relations with China. No one else believes that,
Speaker 6: But he doesn't want to admit he's made a mistake. Three, Caleb,
Speaker 6: he discovered during the election campaign that there was some
Speaker 6: political benefit to him to be seen to be at
Speaker 6: a distance from Trump, and unfortunately he's carried that into
Speaker 6: the election.
Speaker 1: He's won.
Speaker 6: So you know, now he needs to get back to
Speaker 6: normal diplomacy, and that means talking to the president. I
Speaker 6: think there is a combination of a lack of interest
Speaker 6: in security and a certain stubbornness which is making up
Speaker 6: and Easy just refused to deal with what is now
Speaker 6: I think a serious problem in our alliance relationship.
Speaker 2: Well, you mentioned China. Fiji is pushing back against China's
Speaker 2: efforts to set up a military base in the region
Speaker 2: that the Prime Minister yesterday was speaking at the National
Speaker 2: Press Club He also said that he would offer his
Speaker 2: countrymen to fill our ad of shortfalls, which is a
Speaker 2: pretty extraordinary move. Of course, that the PM's going off
Speaker 2: to meet with Jijingping this month, and that'll be his
Speaker 2: fourth meeting with g with zero of course with Donald Trump,
Speaker 2: these sorts of things should be coming up for discussion,
Speaker 2: but one imagines they won't be. Well.
Speaker 6: First, you good on Sidavini Rambuoka for saying what he said.
Speaker 6: You know, he is clearly now one of the older
Speaker 6: statesmen of the Pacific Islands region, and I think a
Speaker 6: person who's very close to Australia and close to the
Speaker 6: Australian military. So I welcome his comments and I think
Speaker 6: he also reflects what quite a number of Pacific Island
Speaker 6: leaders are thinking. As for Albanezi's visit to Beijing, wouldn't
Speaker 6: it just be terribly embarrassing calib of what happens is
Speaker 6: that he'll have had four face to face meetings with
Speaker 6: President g before one face to face meeting with most
Speaker 6: important alliance partner and by the way, our biggest economic
Speaker 6: investor in Australia, that's the United States. Something is going
Speaker 6: terribly wrong here with how Albineez he's thinking about his priorities.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean, Donald Trump probably won't call him a
Speaker 2: handsome boy, so he's got that. On the Chinese Ledger
Speaker 2: right before we go, Peter that the US has stopped
Speaker 2: some of its weapon deliveries to Ukraine in an attempt
Speaker 2: to redirect resources to put America's interests first, and in
Speaker 2: a telling sign that the Kremlin welcomed the reduction of shipments,
Speaker 2: saying that it would help end the war sooner. And
Speaker 2: of course that is what the Kremlin would want, but
Speaker 2: they want that to be in their favor. What sort
Speaker 2: of rain do you think Trump is trying to pull here?
Speaker 6: I'm puzzled to really know. And the trouble is that
Speaker 6: with much of the Trump administration's management of this issue,
Speaker 6: what you hear on Friday will be changed by the
Speaker 6: time we get to Monday. You know, my view is
Speaker 6: by far the most important American interest right now in
Speaker 6: this is that Ukraine is not defeated by Russia, and
Speaker 6: if that means supplying them with weapons, that's what the
Speaker 6: Americans should be doing. The Ukrainians are not asking for
Speaker 6: American boots on the ground, They're just asking for the
Speaker 6: weapons to continue to fight the war, and that's in
Speaker 6: America's interest, in Europe's interest, So i'd hope that's where
Speaker 6: the Pentagon would come out on this matter. One thing
Speaker 6: I think at points to calib is that they don't
Speaker 6: have enough domestic production capacity for their own weapons, and
Speaker 6: that's something we should be thinking about as well. It
Speaker 6: means to say that if we're pressed, we can't just
Speaker 6: imagine that a phone called to Washington is going to
Speaker 6: break through and create an instant supply for us when
Speaker 6: America has to meet its own priorities in a conflict.
Speaker 6: And so there should be some defense spinning lessons that
Speaker 6: flow to Australia as a result of.
Speaker 1: This as well.
Speaker 2: Indeed, Peter Jenning's great to see you as always. Now,
Speaker 2: the Albanizi government's Arts Council has reinstated controversial artist Coloreds
Speaker 2: Bassi to the twenty twenty sixth venice by ANIALI. Take
Speaker 2: a look. I've mispronounced that. I know. Sorry, I'll come
Speaker 2: back to that commitute. But take a look at some
Speaker 2: of the work he's done. Part of the reason he
Speaker 2: was originally dumped from the prestigious role. I mean he's
Speaker 2: done art works of terrorists for heaven's sake, let's bring
Speaker 2: in now WA Opposition leader Basil's implus and Director of
Speaker 2: Forest and Wood Communications Australia, Marcus Bastian Basil, it wasn't
Speaker 2: good enough for him to be sent off in February.
Speaker 2: That's when they originally yanked him off the line up.
Speaker 2: Now in July they say he's okay. Am I missing
Speaker 2: something here? Is something changed in the last five months
Speaker 2: that means it's now okay to have artists representing Australia
Speaker 2: who do art and terrorists.
Speaker 7: These are very good questions you pose caylerb And there's
Speaker 7: a bit of a saying, isn't there Actually there's across
Speaker 7: all walks of life. Go with your instinct, go with
Speaker 7: your gut and creative Australia's gut or instinct was not
Speaker 7: to allow this artist to be a part of that
Speaker 7: international competition back and festival back in February. Their instinct
Speaker 7: was right, their gut feel was right. And I think, look,
Speaker 7: we all have great love and respect for the arts
Speaker 7: and creative sector right around Australia, but I think there
Speaker 7: are some of us that feel there's one rule for
Speaker 7: the arts community and another rule for everybody. Else and
Speaker 7: that somehow, under the guise of creative freedom or creative artistry,
Speaker 7: they're allowed to do anything they want, even if even
Speaker 7: if the standards in the rest of the community would
Speaker 7: mean no way would that be allowed in schools, in
Speaker 7: other public places, in most other areas.
Speaker 1: Of our community.
Speaker 7: And so they should have stuck with their initial decision.
Speaker 2: This is the Arts Minister Tourney Burke, defending the decision.
Speaker 1: Take a look.
Speaker 8: I don't put myself out there as an art critic,
Speaker 8: but when the criticism that was done at the time
Speaker 8: said these were not pro terrorist works, and the artist
Speaker 8: himself says there is nothing in this that's meant to
Speaker 8: in any way endorse terrorism, then I don't think politicians
Speaker 8: can say, well, you're all wrong, and.
Speaker 1: It is now.
Speaker 2: He wasn't quite that outspoken when the band was originally
Speaker 2: slapped on in February. But Marcus, I'm a free speech man.
Speaker 2: I believe you should be able to do and say
Speaker 2: whatever the hell you want, basically as long as it's
Speaker 2: under your own steam. I mean, if he wants to
Speaker 2: go overseas and show art works of terrorists, that's his business.
Speaker 2: But why are we the tax payer paying for it?
Speaker 9: Well, I think there's a serious problem which is at
Speaker 9: the heart of the creative community and perhaps the bodies
Speaker 9: that provide the funding though people who sit within those bodies.
Speaker 9: There's questions that really should be asked on who is
Speaker 9: part of these boards, who is part of these groups,
Speaker 9: whoill provide the funding and the checklists for giving these
Speaker 9: guys the green light for venice. I mean, ultimately forty
Speaker 9: years ago we sent people like Sydney and Noland.
Speaker 1: Goodness grows to me.
Speaker 9: We had Arthur Street up in nineteen ninety nine, we
Speaker 9: had Howard Arkley, but really in the twenty first century
Speaker 9: it's been a fairly lackluster group. There's been a few exceptions,
Speaker 9: but ultimately this current fellow is just a political commentator
Speaker 9: who happens to have taken up a creative industry, and
Speaker 9: unfortunately our industry is heavily, heavily subsidized by the Australian taxpayer.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and look, I believe in funding for the arts
Speaker 2: because I think the arts is a fundamentally good thing
Speaker 2: for this country and we do have a great history
Speaker 2: of the arts in Australia. But too often now it
Speaker 2: seems that it's the sort of elite lefties using government
Speaker 2: money that the rest of us give them to then
Speaker 2: give money to other elite lefties to produce art that
Speaker 2: no one really has any interesting unless they're an elite lefty.
Speaker 2: It's the same as the ABC. It's ridiculous. Now here's
Speaker 2: an interesting proposition. Should taxpayers be footing the bill for
Speaker 2: weight loss drugs because the Labor government is reportedly calling
Speaker 2: for these drugs, you know, a zenpic and whatever. They're
Speaker 2: diabetic drugs originally, but they're now using them largely for
Speaker 2: weight loss to be added to the pharmaceutical benefit scheme
Speaker 2: to try and control obesity in Australia. I know they're expensive, basil,
Speaker 2: but surely these things don't actually treat the underlying issue.
Speaker 2: I mean, if you can lose weight fast, that's great,
Speaker 2: But if it's an issue of what you're eating or
Speaker 2: exercise or I mean a epic doesn't fix that.
Speaker 1: Well, that's what common sense would tell you, wouldn't it.
Speaker 7: Common sense would tell you that if a zen pic
Speaker 7: can help somebody who is struggling with hereditary issues of obesity,
Speaker 7: they're unable to do anything to shift that weight and
Speaker 7: it is really affecting their health, and this drug is available,
Speaker 7: then by all means it should be available and supplied
Speaker 7: to them.
Speaker 1: No arguments, they're But if it's.
Speaker 7: Somebody who just can't be bothered but rather sit on
Speaker 7: the couch and watch Sky News all night with a pizza,
Speaker 7: maybe a couple of.
Speaker 1: Bits, tell them not to do.
Speaker 7: A few ice creams afterwards, maybe some popcorn and then
Speaker 7: wash it down with arna't know whatever, donuts or something. Well,
Speaker 7: that person shouldn't be getting a zimpig. We want them
Speaker 7: to watch sky News, of course, of course, but we
Speaker 7: prefer that they brought a treadmill into the living room.
Speaker 7: God on the treadmill and turns you on. Then, Taylor,
Speaker 7: that's the way to watch it.
Speaker 2: I want to photo of you, Basil in your living
Speaker 2: room on the treadmill watching Sky News. Make sure you
Speaker 2: get it to us and we'll get it on here
Speaker 2: when we can.
Speaker 1: Then you can eat the donuts.
Speaker 2: If you do exactly, exactly exactly, you get the reward
Speaker 2: for the work. But Marcus, it's interesting it would seem
Speaker 2: as though the government would much prefer you to smoke
Speaker 2: in this country because of course, in the United Kingdom,
Speaker 2: the NHS hands out vapes for free because they say
Speaker 2: it's better than smokeoking. They want people to get off
Speaker 2: the smokes, so they'll hand out vapes for free. Here
Speaker 2: in Australia, we make it ridiculously difficult to get your
Speaker 2: hands on a legal vape. But when it comes to
Speaker 2: being fat, no, no, no, we'll give you drugs to
Speaker 2: fix that up. It just doesn't make sense.
Speaker 9: Well, Caleb, I want a reaction from Australia's fat people,
Speaker 9: whether they're comfortable being you know, the next kiddie pig
Speaker 9: for the grand sort of medical experiment that will be
Speaker 9: a zenpic subs of ours by the Australian tax payer.
Speaker 9: I mean, next we're going to have Albow doing calisthenics classes,
Speaker 9: you know, beamed into the workplaces of all Australians. I
Speaker 9: mean it's starting to feel a little bit like the
Speaker 9: taxpayer is the bearer of all these wonderful new solutions
Speaker 9: from sort.
Speaker 1: Of one thought bubble to the next.
Speaker 9: We shouldn't be funding this, we should be we should
Speaker 9: be doing exactly as Basil said, which is allowing those
Speaker 9: who want to sit at home and have a big
Speaker 9: pizza and some coke and watch Sky News to just enjoy.
Speaker 2: Their life and joy to k well. The vision of
Speaker 2: Albanisi doing the calistenics class is a bit like I
Speaker 2: think it was the twenty nineteen federal election and Bill
Speaker 2: Shorten took up running and there were all these you know,
Speaker 2: there's this vision of him running in front of the
Speaker 2: Opera house and the man boobs and jumping up and
Speaker 2: down and all this sort of stuff. You know what
Speaker 2: they should do, you would both remember the old life
Speaker 2: being it ads. They need to bring back that norm normally,
Speaker 2: bring that norm that'll fix the country up.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 2: The Education Minister Jason Claire, I was talking earlier about
Speaker 2: this childcare business. He's announced new childcare reforms in the
Speaker 2: wake of this horrific case a man in Melbourne charged
Speaker 2: with seventy alleged child abuse offenses. So clear says he
Speaker 2: wants to standardize working with children checks across the country
Speaker 2: and cut funding from centers that don't follow the rules.
Speaker 2: But he was also asked, and this what I was
Speaker 2: talking about earlier, whether the sector should ban mails from working.
Speaker 10: This was his response, I don't think that's going to
Speaker 10: be the solution here. And the former Deputy Onbudsman brief
Speaker 10: Education ministers on Friday. That's where CCTV reforms coming from.
Speaker 10: That's where increasing penalties and more information for parents is
Speaker 10: coming from. We've got to bring all of these recommendations together.
Speaker 10: That's happening now.
Speaker 2: I'm not really sure what all of this is going
Speaker 2: to do, but I can't believe that we're even talking
Speaker 2: about the idea of banning men from working in childcare
Speaker 2: centers basal.
Speaker 1: It doesn't make sense.
Speaker 7: I mean that then suggests by extension, that every man
Speaker 7: is capable of these sorts of horrific crimes against our
Speaker 7: absolutely most vulnerable and that is our youngest Australians. We
Speaker 7: know that not to be the case. We know there
Speaker 7: are many Australian men working and making significant contributions in
Speaker 7: the early childhood education space and long should that continue
Speaker 7: because we all know, as well as the great women
Speaker 7: who do that work, the importance of having male role
Speaker 7: models in that space, also at very young ages for
Speaker 7: the key.
Speaker 1: And it's a ridiculous suggestion.
Speaker 7: And what's most offensive about the suggestion, as I say,
Speaker 7: is it somehow makes a decision about.
Speaker 1: All men in Australia and it is just wrong.
Speaker 2: Before we go jints, the Prime Minister has given Triple
Speaker 2: J the elbow treatment he's come up with his teen
Speaker 2: nominations for Triple J's Hottest one hundred of Australian Songs.
Speaker 2: The top of the list is am I ever going
Speaker 2: to see Your Face Again? By the Angels Here it
Speaker 2: is you. I think a lot of the country would
Speaker 2: be saying the words that often follow that that part
Speaker 2: of the song. And the next on the list was
Speaker 2: Flame Trees by Cold Chisel. Quickly both of you. Basil,
Speaker 2: what's your favorite Australian song?
Speaker 7: Are you going to be surprised by this? I am Australian.
Speaker 7: By the Seekers, this is hugely controver. I think it
Speaker 7: should be our national anthem. It's a better tune and
Speaker 7: the lyrics are stronger and better than our current national anthem.
Speaker 7: I really think it should be our national anthem.
Speaker 2: Look, if it's not God Save the King, I'd probably
Speaker 2: go with that too. Marcus will about yours?
Speaker 9: That's strong from Basil. Paul Kelly to Her Door. Kelly's
Speaker 9: an icon. It's a terrific song. It's an absolute banger.
Speaker 2: I gotta say it was a bit upset there was
Speaker 2: no slim Dusty on the list. This is one of
Speaker 2: my favorite slim Dusty tunes.
Speaker 1: My Goally influence and Meling Penless summary. Sunshine hands flow.
Speaker 2: When the rain tumbles down in July. We just don't
Speaker 2: get proper Australiana like that anymore. Marcus Basil, thank you
Speaker 2: for joining me as always. All right, coming up after
Speaker 2: the break the latest updates on Trump's big beautiful bill.
Speaker 2: Expert in the field Tim Lynch will run this through
Speaker 2: it all soon, but first a new poll is exposed
Speaker 2: in bare detail. Which age group has deserted the Coalition.
Speaker 2: I'll tell you next with Pauline Hanson. The Coalition's bad
Speaker 2: luck is far from over. We're talking about music before.
Speaker 2: Far from over. There's a good song by Frank Stallone,
Speaker 2: so thisster Stallone's brother anyway, but it is far from over.
Speaker 2: There's a new poll showing that younger voters are abandoning
Speaker 2: the Coalition on mass This survey found that just nineteen
Speaker 2: percent of voters between eighteen to thirty four support the party,
Speaker 2: compared to forty percent for Labor. The only age demographic
Speaker 2: that the Coalition beats Labor in is sixty five and older,
Speaker 2: which I suppose is not surprising, but it is to
Speaker 2: some degree concerning with me. Now is one nation leader
Speaker 2: Pauline Hanson. Pauline, it really frustrated me throughout the election campaign,
Speaker 2: and I'm a young man that there was no message
Speaker 2: really from the Coalition that would speak to something that
Speaker 2: young people would be interested in or need. The number
Speaker 2: one issue in this country is housing affordability and if
Speaker 2: the Coalition could get on top of that, and of
Speaker 2: course the continuation of conservatism. For people to believe in Conservatism,
Speaker 2: they need to have some ownership over something, and that
Speaker 2: means owning a home where you can get married and
Speaker 2: raise a family. I mean, these are the building blocks
Speaker 2: of Australian society. It is bred and but a youth policy,
Speaker 2: I don't know why the Coalition isn't getting on top
Speaker 2: of this stuff.
Speaker 5: You were a spot on with that, and I was
Speaker 5: about to say that with housing affordability, job security, which
Speaker 5: is another thing Labor has bought a lot of the
Speaker 5: young votes with the hex debt, so getting rid of
Speaker 5: that and also propping up their deposit on the house
Speaker 5: to actually get in the housing market, which I think
Speaker 5: is going to see a lot of the young ones
Speaker 5: fall over with that because they've still got to pay
Speaker 5: make the repayments to their debt. But the Liberal Party.
Speaker 5: It doesn't surprise me, Caleb. Where in twenty eighteen I
Speaker 5: put a policy forward about getting apprenticeships, going one hundred
Speaker 5: thousand apprenticeships, which finally I had to take the Coalish
Speaker 5: and kicking and screaming to introduce the policy on apprenticeships,
Speaker 5: which they finally did and one hundred thousand apprenticeships was
Speaker 5: created with that policy. They weren't interested in that. They
Speaker 5: don't have any idea about the young ones, and I'll
Speaker 5: teach nothing too. There was a young fellow who wanted
Speaker 5: to join the Liberal Party, so anyway, because he'd had
Speaker 5: a photo with me, they wouldn't have him part of
Speaker 5: the party.
Speaker 2: Because he had a photo with me. They're actually.
Speaker 5: Yeah, because he had a photo with me when he
Speaker 5: was fifteen, so they wouldn't take him on.
Speaker 4: You know, I'm proud.
Speaker 5: I'm proud to say that I've launched the Young One
Speaker 5: Nation Party this year and it's been fantastic to hear
Speaker 5: from them what their concerns are. You have to bring
Speaker 5: them on the journey with you have to involve them,
Speaker 5: you have to ask them what they want, how they
Speaker 5: see their future, and that's moving forward with the Young Ones.
Speaker 5: We connected a lot with the young ones through our cartoons.
Speaker 5: It's waking them up to it because they've been brainwashing
Speaker 5: the educational system for the last three decades thirty years,
Speaker 5: and it has infiltrated our system no critical thinking. But
Speaker 5: it's been bought, the vote's been bought. We need to
Speaker 5: educate the kids, explain about politics, which we don't do
Speaker 5: enough in the universities and or in an educational system.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you're quite right, and I mean the point you
Speaker 2: raised about the hex steat is true to them. Anecdotally,
Speaker 2: I've heard quite a number of people who voted for
Speaker 2: Labor just on that basis alone, because they thought, well,
Speaker 2: he's going to wipe some of my student dead off,
Speaker 2: so I'd be stupid from a selfish point of view,
Speaker 2: I would be stupid not to vote for that. So
Speaker 2: I can understand why they did. But there are things
Speaker 2: that I think could be a Solder's youth policy that
Speaker 2: you don't typically think of as youth policy. The one
Speaker 2: that really worries me is public debt. I mean, you know,
Speaker 2: this financial year will hit a trillion dollars in federal
Speaker 2: government debt, and who's going to have to pay that off?
Speaker 2: Young people? So why can't we turn things like that
Speaker 2: around and say, look, your parents and your grandparents are
Speaker 2: basically consigning you to a life of financial servitude to
Speaker 2: the government because you're the one who's going to pay
Speaker 2: off all this debt. We've got to turn this around
Speaker 2: so that you've still got a country to look after
Speaker 2: when you're older, Caleb.
Speaker 5: People, a lot of people, not even young ones, but
Speaker 5: the older generation, don't understand that it's the taxes that
Speaker 5: we pay, whether through the GST or any taxes that
Speaker 5: we pay buy an item or anything like that, the
Speaker 5: tax that we pay through our income tax that actually
Speaker 5: gives us the services, and it's the money that goes
Speaker 5: in the government for them to spend for our services
Speaker 5: and what we need to run the country. People don't
Speaker 5: see beyond that. They don't understand. They don't understand if
Speaker 5: the government runs out of money, they can't afford to
Speaker 5: pay for decent hospital, healthcare, age age homes, all the
Speaker 5: rest of it. People don't look that far. People have
Speaker 5: come so self centered these days. It's all about me,
Speaker 5: what is in it for me? And the whole fact
Speaker 5: is because they're doing it so tough, if they have
Speaker 5: to say, right, I've got to do the best for me.
Speaker 5: How do I survive?
Speaker 1: It's the country's.
Speaker 5: Changed so much since I was, you know, a girl
Speaker 5: growing up here and a young woman. And that's how
Speaker 5: I see the problem. Miss it until the government reigns
Speaker 5: in their spending and stops taxing the people. And this
Speaker 5: is another thing, our tax that we had for income splitting,
Speaker 5: so those young families, whereas the wife can stay home
Speaker 5: for the children. So whoever wants work, whether all the
Speaker 5: male wants to stay home for the children, I don't care.
Speaker 5: Income split so that will actually save the money. You know,
Speaker 5: split their income, so you're paying tax on the two
Speaker 5: on you know, two people share the income. So anyway,
Speaker 5: these are things that need to be changed.
Speaker 2: I mean in Albanezi thinks his legacy is going to
Speaker 2: be universal childcare. But I mean just so every time
Speaker 2: they put the subsidy up, the cost of childcare goes up.
Speaker 2: It's not over.
Speaker 5: I can't call it.
Speaker 2: It's not good policy. While we're talking about government spending.
Speaker 2: Jeff Chambers in the OSS he's done a follow up
Speaker 2: piece on his public service expose from yesterday. Today. He's
Speaker 2: revealed that there's been an explosion in federal bureaucrats under
Speaker 2: the Albernese government. Look at that graph there from twenty
Speaker 2: nineteen up to now. The department is set to hit
Speaker 2: a record two hundred and thirteen thousand staff in twenty
Speaker 2: twenty five twenty six. My favorite bit was the gender X,
Speaker 2: which was added as a gender category in twenty seventeen
Speaker 2: instead of just male or female. Number of people in
Speaker 2: the public service who say the X has gone from
Speaker 2: one hundred and six in twenty seventeen to nine hundred
Speaker 2: and seventy four now, so good on them. Have actually
Speaker 2: gone backwards in terms of indigenous employment as well. But
Speaker 2: what on earth are all these people doing, Paulin, Well.
Speaker 5: Over the past five years, since all the since this
Speaker 5: government's been in, they've introduced five thousand new regulations into
Speaker 5: our country. So they've increased the public service for service delivery,
Speaker 5: for compliance and everything that goes with it, marketing, the
Speaker 5: whole lot. So that's an increase of forty one thousand
Speaker 5: people they've put in for this alone, so you know,
Speaker 5: they're actually making our life worse. You're putting more public servants.
Speaker 5: That means more taxpayers. Moneys has to pay the wages,
Speaker 5: and they're on top of that, you've got all superannuation
Speaker 5: on top of it. Then all your benefits and everything.
Speaker 1: Goes on top of it.
Speaker 5: This is a drain on the taxpayers. Delists that money
Speaker 5: that's Albanisi has also increased. And i'll tell you why,
Speaker 5: because public servants will vote for labor because they've got
Speaker 5: a job for life and they're just going not to
Speaker 5: sack them. And when Dunton, when the Liberal Party backed
Speaker 5: away from the forty one thousand in Canberra, they were
Speaker 5: going to make go and work in their in their
Speaker 5: workplaces and they backed away from the policy. Big mistake
Speaker 5: that they made. They should have followed through on that.
Speaker 5: You can't have someone traveling around the country in a
Speaker 5: caravan claiming that they're working from home, which isn't the case,
Speaker 5: and we're paying the moneys for that.
Speaker 1: So the whole it's a whole stupid thing.
Speaker 5: But who I feel sorry for out there is the
Speaker 5: white Anglo Saxon male. If you're white in this country,
Speaker 5: you're flat out getting a job with the public service
Speaker 5: because they've put on you know, all these people thirty
Speaker 5: eight thousand where either cultural languens sorry I can't say it,
Speaker 5: from different language background. And then you have aboriginals, then
Speaker 5: you have y linguistic thank you, and then you have
Speaker 5: the aboriginals, then you have all the cultural diverse people,
Speaker 5: and then you have one hundred and seventeen thousand women.
Speaker 5: So where's the men and that's the whole problem. And
Speaker 5: then you have all the gender x these people, you know,
Speaker 5: people with disabilities. If you're white male in this country,
Speaker 5: good luck to you, mate, because you're flat out going
Speaker 5: to get a job.
Speaker 1: A look at the door.
Speaker 2: They need where is going. I needed to find jobs.
Speaker 2: They need to find jobs, paul In for all these
Speaker 2: people that they imported into the country over the last
Speaker 2: few years. Mardy, Pauline Hanson, thank you for joining me.
Speaker 2: Great to see you as always coming up. Sorry after
Speaker 2: the break. Liverpool is in mourning after their star footballer
Speaker 2: Diogo Jota is killed in a car crash with his
Speaker 2: brother ten days after he was married. Tom Slater will
Speaker 2: have more on that a little later, and more on
Speaker 2: the big beautiful Bill the Voter is going on at
Speaker 2: the moment. If there's any updates, we'll let you know.
Speaker 2: But an expert in UIs politics, Professor Tim Lynch, will
Speaker 2: join me to discuss all of that shortly don't go away.
Speaker 2: Donald Trump's number one bit of legislation, the Big Beautiful Bill,
Speaker 2: is still being debated in the House now. Of course,
Speaker 2: there's been some pushback from Republicans, and it's been a
Speaker 2: real fear that several would rebel against the vote, but
Speaker 2: against it because it was his massive tax and spending
Speaker 2: build this thing, because they're concerned that it raises the
Speaker 2: debt ceiling too much and that it basically does nothing
Speaker 2: to alleviate the financial problems that America is facing. So
Speaker 2: certainly not over yet, and the struggle to get here
Speaker 2: I think highlights the fractures between the MAGA crew and
Speaker 2: other parts of the Republican Party. So with me now
Speaker 2: as an expert in all of this, Melbourne University professor
Speaker 2: of American politics, Tim Lynch Tim these cracks only going
Speaker 2: to get worse. And in the grand scheme of things,
Speaker 2: does it matter.
Speaker 11: Good evening caliber, Yes, they will get worse. And I
Speaker 11: don't say that because I'm some sort of profit it's
Speaker 11: because that all I think almost we have exception since
Speaker 11: the Second World War, every second term presidency, and Trump,
Speaker 11: though he had a gap in the middle, still I
Speaker 11: think meets the demands of this particular pattern. All end
Speaker 11: in failure, They end in in scandal, and had Watergate,
Speaker 11: Reagan had Iran Contra, George W. Bush had the global
Speaker 11: financial crisis, and of course Barack Obama. His second term
Speaker 11: was consumed with Trump's winning run for the presidency, So
Speaker 11: we shouldn't expect much of a second term, even though
Speaker 11: Trump is a remarkable political actor, and he's not.
Speaker 1: A successive second termer.
Speaker 11: And I think added to that historical pattern, calab It's
Speaker 11: just the fact that as we move towards Trump's exit,
Speaker 11: and I am confident that exit will come, certainly if
Speaker 11: it is dictated by the Constitution, which I'm confident it
Speaker 11: hope it will be, rather than by an assassin's bullet
Speaker 11: or some other nefarious plot, will end on January the twentieth,
Speaker 11: twenty twenty nine. That means his power will never be
Speaker 11: start to abb Now, I just wonder whether this big
Speaker 11: beautiful bill might be pete Trump, that this is the
Speaker 11: moment when he's at his maximum influence and power only
Speaker 11: several months in. There's still energy, there's drive, there's ambition.
Speaker 11: But if he can't get this through, certainly, if he
Speaker 11: can't get it through, but if he can't get it
Speaker 11: through cleanly. I think the fractures in the MAGA movement
Speaker 11: and the wider Republican conservative movement will start to start
Speaker 11: to appear.
Speaker 2: Because the man that got it through the Senate is
Speaker 2: the Vice President JD. Vance, and he has often talked
Speaker 2: about as the successor to Donald Trump, that he would
Speaker 2: end up being the Republican nominee at the next presidential election.
Speaker 2: So if these cracks open up, what are the chances
Speaker 2: that you could end up with a JD. Vance in
Speaker 2: the mold of Donald Trump running for election when this
Speaker 2: term ends, or does the sort of the establishment of
Speaker 2: the Republican part he to put it that way, try
Speaker 2: to risk back control from the mega crew.
Speaker 11: Ah, that's a great question. I think the establishment is
Speaker 11: the Mega movement. The establishment at the moment while he's
Speaker 11: president is Donald Trump, and what he's shown in his
Speaker 11: business career and in his presidential time is that he doesn't.
Speaker 1: Like the ideas of successors.
Speaker 11: I mean, you think how he's relegated his children between
Speaker 11: the first administration and the second. I don't think he
Speaker 11: holds a very powerful candle for JD.
Speaker 1: Vans.
Speaker 11: I think he's flattered that he's seen as the guy
Speaker 11: that brought him through, but I think he'd rather like
Speaker 11: to see a battle for his legacy because he knows
Speaker 11: whoever comes after him is going to be a very
Speaker 11: inferior version of Trump himself. So Marco Rubio is the
Speaker 11: other guy to watch. I think that whole cabinet is
Speaker 11: one of the most diverse in terms of gender and
Speaker 11: race in American history. But it's also it's like a
Speaker 11: bag of snake's caliph and they are all starting to
Speaker 11: forge alliances with each other to oppose one another. This
Speaker 11: will become more apparent as we move towards the mid
Speaker 11: terms and after he's really in lane duck territory there
Speaker 11: because he can't run again and the successor won't be
Speaker 11: anoint anointed and it's unlikely to be, and you'll get
Speaker 11: a much more fractious Republican Party. And we're seeing the
Speaker 11: intimations of that this evening with the difficulty of passing
Speaker 11: his big beautiful bill.
Speaker 2: We've only got a minute team. But of course, the
Speaker 2: other place where there's some fracturing in the party is
Speaker 2: Trump's foreign policy. I don't think you can argue with
Speaker 2: the results, though, I mean it worked in a round.
Speaker 2: Now he says he's trying to get the ceasefire going
Speaker 2: in Gaza. What do you think the likelihood is of
Speaker 2: that ceasefire holding very quickly?
Speaker 1: Well, who knows.
Speaker 11: What I think I'd say calib is that Trump has
Speaker 11: brought an ingredient that's been lacking since the Uranian Revolution
Speaker 11: of nineteen seventy nine. It's that idea that he's got
Speaker 11: a trigger finger, that he's prepared to take very strong
Speaker 11: military action, but that he's not interested in regime change.
Speaker 11: And partly this is his instinct, well it's what he's
Speaker 11: grown up thinking, but it's also a way of trying
Speaker 11: to balance two impulses within the MAGA movement or within
Speaker 11: broader Republican politics. And one is that you use American power,
Speaker 11: hard power abroad to realize American interests. You invade and
Speaker 11: conquer and do regime change of regime change.
Speaker 1: And the more rand.
Speaker 11: Pall guy that opposed the bill in the Senate, who says,
Speaker 11: no America should be doing less for the world. Trump
Speaker 11: so far, I think we should give him some credit
Speaker 11: for being able to balance these two things and seemingly
Speaker 11: to have set back the Uranian nuclear program. We don't
Speaker 11: know how long, but also to effect a ceasefire. Barack Obama,
Speaker 11: who spoke the language of peace, never got close to
Speaker 11: positive effect that Trump has.
Speaker 2: If you've ever seen anyone who probably deserves a peace
Speaker 2: price Jnald tru Well Obama, he certainly will. We've got
Speaker 2: to go unfortunately, Tim, but it's been great having you.
Speaker 2: Thank you for joining me. Don't go anywhere yet. The
Speaker 2: shocking death of Liverpool star Diogo Jota. Tom Slater will
Speaker 2: have the latest details next.
Speaker 7: Well.
Speaker 2: British Prime Minister Sakia Stamer has marked his first year
Speaker 2: in power, not with a party Downing Street confirmed, but
Speaker 2: with a low key cabinet meeting. And I can't understand
Speaker 2: why there hasn't been much for the Labor PM to
Speaker 2: write home about, apart from bad news spiked online and
Speaker 2: at a Tom Slater is with me now, Tom, tell
Speaker 2: me how you described him in your latest piece. It
Speaker 2: certainly wasn't in glowing terms.
Speaker 1: No, absolutely not.
Speaker 12: I mean this is a prime minister who believes in
Speaker 12: nothing and has achieved nothing. I think he's shown over
Speaker 12: the course of this year, which really feels like ten.
Speaker 12: It's been that painful that you know, running the proverbial
Speaker 12: welkstore will probably be beyond his ken. It really has
Speaker 12: gone tremendously badly, tremendously quickly, and I think it's just
Speaker 12: a complete repudiation of all the people who said when
Speaker 12: this government came in replacing the Tory, supposedly that kind
Speaker 12: of Brexity populist blip was over, we were going back
Speaker 12: to politics as usual.
Speaker 1: Well, it turns out politics.
Speaker 12: As usual is useless, and he's breaking records for unpopularity
Speaker 12: at this point.
Speaker 1: He really could go down in history.
Speaker 12: I don't think it's hyperbole to say it as one
Speaker 12: of the most disastrous elected prime ministers we've ever had,
Speaker 12: just because of how quickly it has unraveled.
Speaker 2: It's been quite extraordinary. I mean, and the blokes had
Speaker 2: more flops than flip flops than Bondai Beach in the
Speaker 2: immigration stuff. You know, he turns around and he's basically
Speaker 2: just copying reform. He sees what he is coming to
Speaker 2: eat him and he goes, ah, well, I must be there.
Speaker 2: But the problem with pretending to be things you add.
Speaker 2: And it's the same when you work in media like
Speaker 2: we do. I mean, the viewers can sniff out at
Speaker 2: ten paces if you're not sincere, and voters can tell
Speaker 2: when a poly's not being sincere too.
Speaker 12: No, absolutely, and that was one of the most humiliating
Speaker 12: U turns recent He gave this big set piece speech
Speaker 12: on immigration where he said, if we continue down this
Speaker 12: road of high immigration, low integration, we're going to become
Speaker 12: an island of strangers. All the usual suspects got very
Speaker 12: upset by this. There was a lot of ostentatious offense taking,
Speaker 12: and in recent interviews he said that he regrets it
Speaker 12: that he didn't read the speech beforehand through his speech
Speaker 12: writers under the bus. And I think what we've seen
Speaker 12: with Kirs Staliner's this is a man whose only consistent
Speaker 12: political view has been that he would quite like to
Speaker 12: be prime minister. Now he's like the dog that caught
Speaker 12: the car. He doesn't know what to do with it.
Speaker 12: And I think that's why we're seeing it all just
Speaker 12: become such a mess so quickly.
Speaker 2: Now. The Chancellor of rachel reeves she has been emotional
Speaker 2: in the common stammers was repeatedly asked whether he would
Speaker 2: support her. She's visibly tearing up. What's going on.
Speaker 12: I mean, the backstory here is a little bit confusing.
Speaker 12: There's a lot of speculation in the press that this
Speaker 12: might have come after an argument with the Speaker of
Speaker 12: the House of Commons, perhaps an argument with the Deputy
Speaker 12: leader of the Labor Party, Angela Rainers. There's also some
Speaker 12: reference to some kind of un known personal issue that
Speaker 12: she's going through. But at the same time, I don't
Speaker 12: think it's unfair or callous. Of course, we all have
Speaker 12: our human moments, but this is another sign that they're
Speaker 12: just not up to it. They are cracking under the pressure.
Speaker 12: And it's whilst on the one hand, your heart goes
Speaker 12: out to it to a certain extent. This is why
Speaker 12: you expect a high caliber of resilience from your politicians,
Speaker 12: because when the going gets tough, they do have to
Speaker 12: face it down. Both her and Stal's even capable of
Speaker 12: doing that.
Speaker 2: We've been on a musical thing to don't You Billy Ocean,
Speaker 2: When the going gets tough, the tough kid going. Some
Speaker 2: breaking news tonight star Liverpool forward Diego Joto has reportedly
Speaker 2: died in a horror car crash along with his brother
Speaker 2: in Spain. Twenty eight years old. He only got married
Speaker 2: last week.
Speaker 12: Tom It's absolutely tragic, awful news coming out of Spain.
Speaker 12: I mean, Diego Jotta, he was riding high. I mean
Speaker 12: he had not only just got married to his childhood
Speaker 12: sweetheart a couple of weeks ago, you know, he just
Speaker 12: won the Premier League with Liverpool. It just shows what
Speaker 12: how cruel, fake and be sometimes. And your heart just
Speaker 12: goes out to his wife and his three young kids
Speaker 12: who are now going to have to pick up the
Speaker 12: pieces after this horrendous stragedy.
Speaker 2: Indeed just terrible. And before we go, I can age
Speaker 2: you go without asking about a course the Clesterbury business
Speaker 2: this week. I'm sure it's been big over there as
Speaker 2: it has been in the rest of the world, but
Speaker 2: there are calls for the BBC Boss team Davey to
Speaker 2: stick down after we lit the whole thing go to
Speaker 2: ear live streamed in full. Should he go?
Speaker 12: I think his position is fast becoming untenable. He was
Speaker 12: at Glastonbury when those blood curdling debating chants were sounding out.
Speaker 12: He tried to intervene, but they didn't pull the live feed.
Speaker 12: They pulled it down from Eyeplayer, but by that point
Speaker 12: the damage had already been done. This was being beamed
Speaker 12: into millions of people's homes and it's not the first
Speaker 12: time this is something like this has happened. The BBC
Speaker 12: has had one scandal after another. It seems to be
Speaker 12: institutionally blind, at the very least towards anti Semitism and
Speaker 12: the kind of hatred we've seen expressed. I think my
Speaker 12: only kind of concern or caveat is that this is
Speaker 12: clearly not necessarily from Tim Day. There's a broader problem.
Speaker 12: Is that kind of Israeli phobia, anti israel prejudice is
Speaker 12: the water that people at the BBC swim in, and
Speaker 12: that's a big problem to try and tackle.
Speaker 2: Tom. Thank you for joining me tonight, now, thank you
Speaker 2: for joining me all week as well. It's been great
Speaker 2: to fill in for Sharry. She'll be back with you
Speaker 2: next week. I'm off for a week off myself too,
Speaker 2: but I think I might go via the man cave
Speaker 2: and pick up that bottle of rum Paul Murray has
Speaker 2: sitting over.
Speaker 1: There a cheer.
Speaker 2: Watch out, Paul, Is it still there? Here? He is