WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 25 September

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>From the Skying Center. This is Paul Murray life. They

0:00:08.520 --> 0:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>did it. Oh wow, how in seed inflation? Haha?

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.959
<v Speaker 2>Just soon knew I've sat here for How could I

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:24.439
<v Speaker 2>have doubted them? The lead story everywhere Celebrate Australia because

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:25.760
<v Speaker 2>everything is awesome.

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Inflation has hit a three year low.

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Inflation did move today down at.

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 4>First glance, It's time for celebration.

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 5>Headline.

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Monthly inflation has tumbled to two point seven percent.

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I was taking the piece with the celebration thing. They

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>actually did that on Channel nine. They actually pretended that

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the back is broken, that everything is fine, everything is

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 1>awesome now. Yes, the inflation rate is down. It is

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>now finally somewhere between a two and a three. The

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>treasurer is giving out gold stars to him.

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 6>The new inflation numbers for August showed that headline and

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 6>underlying inflation both went down substantially. These are very welcome,

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 6>very encouraging, and very heartening numbers.

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>But just like mission accomplished was not true when George W.

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Bush was on the aircraft carrier in about Iraq, mission

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is not accomplished when it comes to inflation. Can you

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>believe that a major news organization would frankly lie to

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 1>you like the one that you just saw in their

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 1>six PM years so in abbot with the government that

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>they would actually go mission accomplished. So let's actually have

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a look at all of the things that they count

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that went down in the past month. Now to get

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>such a dramatic drop dairy, No, that wouldn't be it.

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>What about furnishings about a point, it's okay, that's not

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that amazing. Yeah, good feels down. Okay, that's very very volatile.

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know, a couple of months it could be way.

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's what happened. Now they, by the way, of

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>all of the things that they count, are the only

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>four things that went down in the past month. The

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:14.519
<v Speaker 1>electricity thing went down because, as you know, you're paying

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 1>for it. The government on budget night announced that there

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 1>was going to be three hundred million or three hundred

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>dollars each and every house, be it a mansion or

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a one bedroom unit in the bush, will come off

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>your power bills. The reality seventy five dollars a quarter

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>or twenty five dollars a month. Now, yes, as a

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>big number, it's hundreds of millions of dollars. When it's

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>an individual circumstance like yours. It doesn't touch the sides

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>because even though the cost of electricity is down for

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>one month, because it is artificially being pushed down, the

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>cost of building the preferred version of the electricity grid,

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it continues. In fact, there are more renewables being about

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>now than ever before. We all know why, and we

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>all know who pays the price. Now the CSIRO tells

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>us it could be half a trillion dollars. The CSIRO

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>used to tell us it was a trillion dollars. Green

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>energy groups tell us it's multiple trillion dollars, all of

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>which eventually comes back to you as the person who

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>pays the bill. So the cost of order is all continuing.

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>You may still be much higher than you were twelve

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>months ago, but because it's not continuously going up, they

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>get the result that they did today. Now it won't

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 1>surprise you that I will show you the devil that

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>is in the detail, the reality of what is actually

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>happening in the economy, and how this was something that

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>will not convince the Reserve Bank to cut rates because

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>four things came down, but more than a dozen things

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>went up. Have a look in the past month, holiday

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>travel and accommodation up by more than the headline number. Alcohol

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>up by more than the headline number. You know, food,

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that pesky stuff still way above the headline number. When

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:02.839
<v Speaker 1>it comes to alcoholic beverages, new homes that people live in,

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>health education, all of those cost to double the number.

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Then we start to get into our old mates. The

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>insurance system rents fruit and vegetables. Now, fruit and vegetables

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and fuel have been incredibly volatile. Now, fuel has of

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>course gone way up at different parts of this year.

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Fruit and vege has gone way down at parts this year.

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Fuel is now starting to come back down. Fruit and

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>vege is starting to raw back up. And tobacco, well,

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>it keeps going up because of this government's position when

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it comes to taxation, which is why Mission accomplished is

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>so irresponsible. It is legitimately irresponsible to say because it's

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>not natural, in the same way that George W. Bush

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>found a way to say mission accomplished. But the war

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>went on for another what ten and ten years? So

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>will be the fight when it comes to inflation. The

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>Reserve Bank tells us this thing doesn't actually get to

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>where they believe it needs to be until maybe maybe

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the back end of not this but next year. And

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>because all of those things keep going up while other

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>things that they're able to either have the variability of

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>things like fuel prices or they're able to buy their

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>way through. When it comes to monthly electricity changes, it

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>means there is no rate cut coming, okay, because the

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:26.919
<v Speaker 1>reduction in inflation is not real. So what does this

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>all mean.

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 7>Well, the recent data, I think you degree have been

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 7>a little mixed, but overall they reinforce the need to

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 7>maintain a restrictive monetary policy stance and remain vigilant to

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 7>the upside risk to inflation. The Board needs to be

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 7>confident that inflation is moving sustainably towards the target for

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 7>any decisions are made about a reduction in interest rates.

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 1>So there are over at Channel nine. They might be

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 1>telling you mission accomplished, but the reality is until interest

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>rates are cut. As I have shown you a few

0:05:56.720 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>times this week, the total number of people who are

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>paying off their house, the amount that they have to

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 1>pay off, well, it's the best part of what sixty

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>one percent more in the overall amount of money that

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 1>we are spending on our home loans that we did

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>two years ago. So forgive me if I am not

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:23.160
<v Speaker 1>actually celebrating and it's not mission accomplished, you know, and

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the show will often point out the each way elbow.

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I think we came up with the term.

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Now we know he hates it. We know that even

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>his mates in the media turn around and say, oh,

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not catching on really really well, when you actually

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:37.119
<v Speaker 1>they said the same about airbas elbow. They didn't they Now,

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the negative gearing thing. But I wanted

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to do this differently than everyone else has. Now, sometimes

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>there are nights where sort of one big story is

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>going to get all of our different opinions on it,

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>and just like when there's a big news story that

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>will be at each and every hour, the same will

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 1>approach when it comes to opinion. But there's a couple

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of points I want to make about what I think

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 1>is firstly really going on here, and secondly, why the

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>negative gearing stuff is going to be a political problem

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>rather than the one that the lefties think is somehow

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be a political solution to their fight with

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the Greens. Firstly, we know what he said about negative

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>gearing after they lost in twenty nineteen, and he wanted

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to win in twenty twenty two. Gearing now gliding without

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>help tobisky.

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 8>Negative gearing is a good thing, but it wasn't there

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 8>years negative gearing. We had a policy that we took

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 8>to the election where we were not successful.

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 9>Why was negative gearing and capital gains tax breaks a

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 9>bad idea in twenty nineteen and a good idea in

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 9>twenty twenty seven.

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 8>Well we found a better idea a range of them.

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>But we know that labor never gives up on an idea,

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>literally if it includes giving the old Press secretary to

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Bob Hawk. Barry Cassidy used to be on the ABC

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a job taking care of the Museum of Democracy. Remember

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>this was an appointment they made towards the end of

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the rudgullared Rudd era that was then canceled. But then no,

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>we had to come back and do that. Remember forty

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>five percent emissions, Well that was too much in twenty nineteen,

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>but by twenty twenty two it became forty three percent.

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>We all learned today that negative gearing is apparently back

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>on the table.

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Confirmation and denial from the Prime Minister today over property

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 3>investor tax rebates, Anthony Alberezi said modeling was being done

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 3>over scaling back negative gearing that.

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 6>Is, a routine Treasury assessment of negative gearing causes the

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 6>government some political discomfort. Changes to negative gearing back on

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 6>the table as the government tries to pass its housing bills.

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, stick with me again, a different take on

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>all of this. Let's firstly work out why are we

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about this tonight? How did this become public because

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>reporters at the Channel nine newspapers had an exclusive. Now

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>whether the exclusive came from Treasury, whether it came from

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the treasurer, whether it came from the Prime Minister's office,

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 1>whether they found some briefing notes on a bus stop,

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>who knows, but they were the of why all of

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>this was on today. It quoted multiple labour figures who

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>thought this was a good idea. But then we had

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a scenario where the Prime Minister pretended that he had

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>no idea what this was about. And that means one

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of two things. He's either lying about not knowing, or

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>he has no idea what is going on inside his government.

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Both are terrible, both should be disqualifying. But I would

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>imagine both will magically disappear by a press gallery that

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>largely has always loved the idea of somehow raising the

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:38.559
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen election as the one where your bill should win.

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 1>And let's just pretend he did win, and the policies

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that we know have been rejected will just repackage like

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>they did around two hundred and seventy five dollars when

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>it comes to power cuts to achieve basically the same result,

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a shortened when it comes to emissions, when it comes

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:55.439
<v Speaker 1>down to negative gearing. We're going to pretend that a

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>never so slight change is apparently vastly different than what

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>was rejected a couple of years is a go again

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister interview this afternoon, and I'll tell you a

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>little thing about how these interviews come about because I

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>used to do radio in the afternoon. I've seen those reports.

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 1>And what we do is we.

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 8>Value the public service. So from time to time, I'm

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 8>sure the public service are looking at policy ideas. Will

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 8>you rule out.

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 7>Changes to the getting hearing and property cases?

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 10>This too?

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 8>On East, Well, what we're doing is doing the legislation

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 8>that we had before the Senate, So I talk about

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 8>what we're doing, not what we're not doing. And what

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 8>we're doing is trying to get through that legislation.

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Now, what's weird here is that if a story like

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>this comes out in a newspaper and the government truly

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>has no idea about this announcement, they'll generally hide someone

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>like the Prime Minister so he could actually work out

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>what's going on inside his own government. But the fact

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that he was in front of the cameras today kind

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of tells you that this is the balloon they're trying

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:01.439
<v Speaker 1>to put into the air. He also did not one,

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>but two radio interviews in Sydney this afternoon. Now, I

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>remember what it was like to do drivetime talkback radio

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in Sydney, and I know that the Prime Minister is

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>not normally somebody who is booked in advance. Instead, generally speaking,

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister's office will reach out to said radio

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>host just a couple of hours before due to interview

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>because they want to get a message out because they

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>expect good news has happened earlier in the day. Now,

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>if both of those shows want to tell me differently,

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>my guess is the Prime Minister was offered to about

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the ABC and t GB very late in the day

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to day. Why would they do that if they were

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to hide the story. Instead, they're trying to buy

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>into the story. Instead, they're trying to spin the story,

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:50.440
<v Speaker 1>which is why again Jim Charmers answered the question like this.

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 6>Today we've got a housing policy and that's not in it.

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 6>It's not unusual for governments to get advice from time

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 6>to time from department on issues which are in the

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 6>public domain.

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>So is the Prime Minister truly clueless when he's doing

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>press conferences and radio interviews today where he knows the

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 1>front page of the paper that was in Sydney and

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Melbourne when the sun came up this morning would be

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>what he talked about. Or are we doing exactly the

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>same thing that when it came to the Stage three

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>tax cuts, Pretend it's out there. See what happens to

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>many people blow up? Okay, so we've got the ABC

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:30.320
<v Speaker 1>on board, we've got mission accomplished, a board on Channel nine. Yeah,

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 1>we can probably push through here. And as you saw

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>when it came to those tax cuts, despite the fact

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that we were right and it was too little, it

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>was too late, it did not change things when it

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:43.359
<v Speaker 1>came to cost of living. All of those media organizations

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>who liked the policy were the ones who told you

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>not what would happen per week or by fortnite, and

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>said they gave you the one big number, that was

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the annual number as they were doing the bidding of

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the government. They will now proceed to do the bidding

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of the government when it comes to negative gearing. That's

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>point number two now to number three, the four D

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>chess of the Prime minister. Even fiddling with this issue,

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>well it boggles my mind. You see, he may think

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that there is absolutely no scenario under which he will

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>not be the prime minister after the next election, even

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>if he has to go into a minority government with

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>less than seventy seats, because it's basically a left wing

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 1>cross bench, they'll all back him in and there's no

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>way he won't be the greatest prime minister of all

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>time for as long as possible, bek as nobody will

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>ever elect the Libs in his mind. But I want

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to show you just how bad this could be for

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the government if they keep the negative gearing question hanging

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and they let the opposition define what some of these

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>changes may be. Have a look again the reporting of

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 1>the second shooter drop at the Channel on newspapers today

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>was they actually listed the number of seats that are

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the top seats in the country in terms of the

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>percentage of taxpayers in that electorate have a negatively geared property.

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>As you can see one, two, three, four, five, six

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>are labor seats. Of those, a significant number are marginal

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>seats or could become marginal if ten percent start to

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>think that something is about to happen with their major

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>financial investment. So I'll give you a tip about what

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I think is going to happen here. I think that

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>they've put the balloon up and I think that they

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>want to say that they're going to do something in

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and around negative gearing, because particularly with younger voters and

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>people that are more Greens favored, this is one of

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of the big Uga boogers of the Australian property system.

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>If they do anything, I don't think it'll be for

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>anyone currently involved. They'll try to grandfather things and say

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>everyone in the current agreements nothing will change, but that's

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>what Shortened tried in twenty nineteen. They will also turn

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>around and say it only applies to new people who

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>have got three or more places. Well, I'll show you

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the numbers in a second about how little that will

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>actually change. The picture. But above all the reason this

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is particularly stupid, no matter how many clever people say

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>this is the smart thing to do. About one point

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>two million people in Australia have a property that they

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>have negatively geared. That means there's one point two million

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>families in Australia where somebody is expecting as part of

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the inheritance that they will hand on to their child

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>or their child to be able to hand onto their

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 1>grandchild is the investment property that they currently own. If

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the system is grandfathered, the tax will only apply to you.

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Your kid or grandkid will not be able to inherit

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that system, which means one point two million property owners

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>becomes two point four million kids. Potentially it becomes six

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>eight minion grandkids. But this is genius politics, right because

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the ACT people love it, because the ABC people love it,

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>because the Radio National crowd love it. Well. The suburbs

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>in the multiple labor seats that would move as a

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>result of this policy, as they did in nineteen well,

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to happen. Fourth point, on this

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>particular issue, the people who say get rid of negative

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>gearing say it because it costs the federal budget something

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>like twenty two billion dollars a year in the overall

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>tax concessions when it comes to houses. But in and

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>around that number is the number that negative gearing, meaning

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>tax that is returned to the property investor. Again, it's

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>about twenty two billion dollars, or that's the expectation of

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>where it will be in a couple of years time.

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 1>So hey, get rid of negative gearing because won't that

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>mean there'll be more homes to buy? Or well, no,

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and let this opinion person in the Telegraph explain why.

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:09.360
<v Speaker 1>As much as we love to hammer landlords for being

0:17:09.400 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>greedy and hiking rents and making families live in substandard

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>properties because they have no other choice, the fact is

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:17.879
<v Speaker 1>that those landlords are the only ones who can deliver

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>more supply. Make no mistake, messing with negative gearing rules,

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>whether capping the number of properties per eligible person or

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 1>taking away the tax benefit altogether, will deter landlords from

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>entering the market, meaning there will be fewer properties that

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>people will buy, not to live in but to rent out. Well,

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>then again people say, no, no, you've got to get rid

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 1>of negative of gearing because if there were no investors,

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>then all of the homes that they currently invest in

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>would suddenly become available for me and my mates to

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 1>be able to bid for. Well, not necessarily, because you see,

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>we have a little problem in Australia, which is, let's

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>imagine there there's ten people that are going to be

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>bidding for a house. Let's imagine two of those people

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 1>are property investors. So okay, there's now just eight people

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that are bidding for the house. Great, I've got a

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>better chance of winning. The only problem is during the auction,

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.199
<v Speaker 1>two new people are going to turn up, so the

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>same number of people will still be bidding against you.

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Because there's this thing called immigration. You see, one point

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 1>two million people who currently own a negatively geared investment

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>property would be replaced within four years under the current

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>immigration system, as we've shown. Now take out the COVID

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 1>anomalies of twenty twenty twenty twenty one. Essentially over four years,

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you'd get to one point three million people who come

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>into the country. Now, yes, some are old, some are kids,

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but you get the point I'm making here, which is,

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>if you've got every property investor to not be able

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to continue to invest in the properties in which they

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>invest and then negatively gear it would be completely wiped

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 1>out within four years by all of the people that

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>are coming into the country. Oh what you see. That's

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the problem with the policy is that it sounds like

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 1>it is the absolute solution. But if you've got as

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 1>many people coming through one door as you're trying to

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 1>push out another door, it doesn't actually change the number

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of people who are trying to buy the same number

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of houses. And if all of those people are just

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to buy houses for them to be able to

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>live in, what happens to the thirty percent of people

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in this country who are trying to rent a property.

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>You see, they don't have enough money for a deposit,

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and if somebody doesn't own the property and then rent

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it out and yes, potentially use negative gearing to help

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>keep that going so that one day they play financial coplunk.

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>In twenty years, all of that manner gets put together

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and then upon their death it gets handed over as

0:19:55.440 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>an inheritance. You get my point. That's why the politics

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of negative gearing is as dangerous as it is now.

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>You'll get many pointy headed people, most of the media,

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>most of the social influences saying this is absolutely the

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 1>way to go. If only there was a recent referendum

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:19.439
<v Speaker 1>where exactly the same thing happened, but sixty percent of

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 1>the country voted no. Also worth nothing here tonight, and

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.400
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty of information. Again, I could go through all

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff right about how many and how much,

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'll get to that a little bit later. Now,

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Tanny plibisic. We know that she's making some weird decisions

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to resources projects. At the moment. We

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>know the gold mine that she's holding up in and

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>around Bathost. We know the gas spasin in the Beeloop

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 1>that is currently also about to be held up. But

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 1>a decision which has happened in the past couple of

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>days is not one, but three coal mines have been extended.

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Environmental groups are losing their brain. But I wanted to

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about it Andrew Forrest for a second.

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Forrest is, of course a billionaire. For some reason,

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the media think he is Australia's greatest billionaire because he's

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>always been interviewed, he's always giving speeches. He's alway telling

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>us about how everything in the world should change. But

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you know where I draw the line. I really draw

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the line is when a bloke who is a billionaire

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>because of mining that continues to pollute because of mining,

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.719
<v Speaker 1>is given an interview on a television show this morning

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 1>to oppose an extension of somebody else's mind, not his,

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 1>but somebody else's mine. That's what happened on the Today Show.

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I think.

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 9>I don't really mind if you love your kids or

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 9>not mate, but f kerm, if you love your kids,

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 9>I would not be approving coal mines.

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, just one more time, Okay, the billionaire who is

0:21:56.040 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>a billionaire because of mining, mining that pollute, let me

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>double check. Two point five million tons of CO two

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 1>into the atmosphere according to the Fortescue Climate Report of

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three. The millionaire, the bidionnaire who made billions

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>out of mining that pollutes the planet, is telling you

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 1>somebody else's mind should not extend. One more time.

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 9>I don't really mind if you love your kids. Are

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 9>not mate, but fair inkerm If you love your kids,

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 9>I would not be approving cold minds.

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, I hope that he's consistent about this, because that

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>would mean he's about to sell his business, right, He's

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>about to shut down his own business because of no

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>no plans for that. Instead, I keep being the billionaire

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 1>because of mining that by his own report, two point

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>five metric tons two point five yeah, metric tons of

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>CO two are going to end up in the sky

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to see here. I also know that he's particularly close

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>at times to the Chinese government. Remember when he brought

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 1>along the Chinese ambassador to a COVID thing at the

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>height of the pandemic, when you know China was the

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 1>source of the pandemic. That certainly they canceled their domestic flights,

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>but they kept the international ones going and that's fine.

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 1>He can be a close business associated who understands the

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>relationship on the trade level between China and Australia, But

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>does he deliver the same message actually, can we plan

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:38.439
<v Speaker 1>that for a third time? Does he say this in

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the meetings with anyone that he talks to from China

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 1>as a billionaire who is a billionaire because of mining.

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 9>I don't really mind if you love your kids or not, mate,

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 9>But Kim, if you love your kids, I would not

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 9>be approving coal mines.

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>See, they're probably the ones that need to hear it,

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>because according to Reuters, the International News Service, China has

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 1>more than a billion tons a year in brand new

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>coal mines that haven't even opened yet. And those of

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you that are eagle eye, not once, not twice, but

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 1>three times way may well have noticed that there was

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:22.159
<v Speaker 1>a bloody big truck behind Andrew Forrest as he was

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 1>telling us, if you love your kids, no more coal

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.240
<v Speaker 1>mines when he was on the Today Show today And

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>here I am in Las Vegas, and how great is

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas? Guess where he actually is? At a mining

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>exhibition from the National Mining Association in the United States.

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:44.920
<v Speaker 1>The speakers at this convention, well, okay, they've got to

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 1>be a bunch of left wingers, right, who are really

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>there to talk about sustainable green energy. No, the guy

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>from Dirty Jobs is going to be there, Darnaka Patrick,

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 1>who was of course a race car driver and recently

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>came out as be pro Trump, is there. Oh, mister

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>wonderful from Shark Tank is going to be there. He's

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 1>got a very anti Trump, pro environmental message that no

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>doubt he will be delivering on stage two. Among others,

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>billionaires who are billionaires because of mining, who were invited

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:23.439
<v Speaker 1>by Australian television shows to do a live cross to

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:27.480
<v Speaker 1>have a go at other people's minds whilst standing in

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>front of mining trucks. I don't get it. I don't

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>know what secret source, but he has a secret source

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 1>that for some reason means even when all of this

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>is pointed out, I'll be the one they'll have a

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>go out in the next week or so. Now. Doctor

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:53.439
<v Speaker 1>Nick Coatesworth, of course, was the Deputy Chief Medical Officer

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 1>during the height of the COVID issues. Now he works

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>over at channeline and mentioning him a lot tonight, Jeez,

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I expect Okay, I'm here. Don't worry. I'm here for life,

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>here for life. Now we've got doctor Nick Coatesworth who

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 1>works over at Channel nine now, which means he popped

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>up on channel and radio today where he was talking

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>about the misinformation laws. He believes that this is the

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 1>wrong thing, the censoring of the Internet. And this is

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>what he said on to GB today.

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 4>Anything that's misinformation and disinformation that affects preventive healthcare or

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 4>for example, public health or pandemic response.

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 5>And I just looked at that and thought, Gee, after

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 5>what we've been through and all the uncertainty about what

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 5>misinformation and disinformation was, how can we actually have a

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 5>law that starts to define those sort of things in

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 5>a way that can be contested in a sort of

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:50.639
<v Speaker 5>legal sense.

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Now, what about this from Victoria. How dirty is Victoria?

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 1>It desperately needs a new government, but it doesn't need

0:26:58.400 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in a new government. It kind of needs a whole

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>by to new systems. You see the iback the Corruption Commission,

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 1>it's said multiple times that there is a very fine

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>line between some people who are allegedly public servants i e.

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Not labor operatives, but they end up doing things that

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>are very favorable to the Labor Party or some of

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 1>its key supporters. Now, this is institutional corruption. This is

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the stuff I've talked about a lot. It's about one

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of the many reasons why the queens At government has

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to go. Any government that's been around for too long

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 1>has got too many people with too many tentacles in

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>lots of different places. That's why you need the pipes

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>to be flushed out every now and then. Well, the

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>pipes in Victoria are clocked because a story that involves

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the fire chief of Victoria and the fire Union in

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Victoria was the focus of a report from the Corruption Commission. Today,

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 1>it has concluded that allegedly Victorian public servants found that

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>they hacked the fire chief's emails to help the union boss.

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Corruption watchdog has found the emails of Victoria's fire chiefs

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>were hacked not once, not twice, but five times and

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the hackers were public servants who were motivated to misuse

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the information to further the interests of the firefighters union

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:19.679
<v Speaker 1>and its state secretary. Anyone lost their job as a

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>result of this. I'll have to get back to you.

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's raining on the rock, that beautiful and wonderful

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>song that John Williamson and many others have sung over

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the years, while it is doing so right now. In fact,

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 1>some record rain has been falling in and around the

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Northern Territory, particularly the Red Center. The footage is beautiful

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and here's some of it that was I think up

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 1>on the ABC's Facebook page in the past couple of days.

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>In fact, about thirty four millimeters has landed in that

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>part of Australia, which is a record when it comes

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to September. So the rain bomb is on its way

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>east now finally before we get into our discussion tonight,

0:28:57.760 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be a great one of course,

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Conry carry ot cha bromibition we all know. Be

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>it a family barbecue, a dinner party. If you're the

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>type of person who ends up going to those, maybe

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>just mates at the pub or certainly kind of an

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>informal ish thing at work. Most of us pull our

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>punches when it comes to our opinions because we know

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to say the wrong thing, then you're

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>out the door and formal warnings and all the rest

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of it. And you didn't mean to be offensive. You

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>say something that, again is just today considered the hanging

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>offense that two weeks ago was what people said to

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>each other. Again, I'm not talking about harassment stuff, you

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about opinions, right. Well, there's a new survey which

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>has come out from the United States. It's not a survey, actually,

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a serious academic work which actually shows us the

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>difference between what people say in public versus what they

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>actually believe in private. Now, I won't bore you with

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>how they did this, but it's really really interesting because

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a majority of Americans fifty eight percent believe that most

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 1>people cannot share their honest opinions about sensitive topics in

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>society today. Not only but sixty one percent of Americans

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>admit to self silencing private opinion and that's really fascinating

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to see. Okay, so I want to show you how

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>this works. What you're going to see is you're going

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to see an issue and then you're going to see

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>two dots. That one that's got to star in it

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>is the private opinion, So publicly what the best part

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of twenty two percent of people say I trust the government?

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Really four percent? And this, by the way, isn't just

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of maga people, because once you have

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a look here, every one of these questions is Democrats, Republicans, independence,

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>It's broken down by race, it's broken down by finances,

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and literally thirty grand, sixty grand, one hundred grand, one

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty grand all of them are four percent

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 1>or less when it comes to trusting the government. Is

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>society better off when individuals will experts are the ones

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that are making the decisions for everyone? Sixty seven percent

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of people say, oh no, probably, you know, maybe experts

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:11.480
<v Speaker 1>are In reality, seventy five percent of people say, let

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>me do me, and thank you for the advice, but

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>let me do me. And this isn't just a right

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>wing thing, because you know how lefties are like a revolution, man,

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>we're going to change the system man. Well, twenty percent

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of people publicly say that it's okay to resort to

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>violence in order to save the country, when actual opinion

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 1>is just four percent of people believe it. The government

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>should restrict to the expression of views deemed discriminatory offensive

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>at a dinner party, like a quarter of people and say, yes,

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>we should shut it down, censor it, clothes that get

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>rid of that post reality, five percent of people actually

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>think that's what we should do. All of this is

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>important because it's it's it's again a little reminder about

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the great difference between the opinion columns in The Guardian,

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the polite chat are on Q and A, and the

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>reality of where people are left, right, center, rich, poor

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and all in between. Now, obviously you can't do a

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>survey on each and every issue, which is why you

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't just let the loud lefty voices be the only

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>ones that can be heard. It's why you should be

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>here each and every night. It's why you should share

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the content of this and all the other shows. It's

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>skynews dot com dot au. Go to the YouTube page,

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>find it and share it as far and wide as

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you can, because that's the stuff they want to shut

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>down when it comes to the misinformation or censoring of

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the internet. Laws on censorship, by the way, the government

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>should restrict the expression of views that are deemed to

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 1>be discriminatory or offensive. Again, I just showed you that

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>number is down at five percent. My apologies. Should you

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>be able to use your religion as an excuse to

0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>disobey the law? So I don't want to serve those

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 1>two people there, you two blokes getting married? Well that

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:55.719
<v Speaker 1>again thirteen percent say that's the case, but it's actually

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 1>two percent. A couple of dollars before we're done, Is

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 1>American society fair? Thirty seven percent? And publicly would say yes,

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>seven percent is the reality. Forty three percent of people

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 1>say that other people can be trusted, but the actual

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 1>opinion is less. And finally, the media, This is a

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>huge worry for America, America's democracy, presidential campaigns, all the

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>rest of it. Twenty four percent of people say they

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>trust the media left right, center, rich, poor, white, black, Hispanic.

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>It's actually seven percent. In fact, as you can see,

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>thirteen percent of young people, four percent of millennials, seven

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>percent of genics, five percent of boomers, and just four

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>percent of people older than that, there is a gulf

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>between what we say publicly and what we feel privately.

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>So every now and then let you in a opinionated

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>self fly because otherwise the only voices that get heard

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 1>are the loonies all day, every day. But that's why

0:33:56.960 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 1>we push back here each and every night. And I'm

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>so glad that the watching sec here on Paul Murray

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>live into the debate standing by Bromen, Bishop Stephen Conroy,

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for watching. The man who's always

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:15.439
<v Speaker 1>here to help Stephen Conroy, and of course the lady

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>who's more than happy to let him do what he wants.

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:21.240
<v Speaker 1>He's none of them to carry over trem problem and Bishop,

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going to start for let me first start

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:26.840
<v Speaker 1>with you, Stephen, about negative gearing. So you saw what

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>happened to Bill Short in twenty nineteen. You also saw

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>what I just had to say, particularly about the number

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of labor seats that sit in the top ten of

0:34:37.000 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>negative gearing. You also know that the people that are

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:43.880
<v Speaker 1>rah rah for this don't quite understand that the people

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 1>who currently have it in part have it so they

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>can have an inheritance for their kids. Right. So let's

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>not get too into the weeds about the ideas in

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and around negative gearing. Let's talk about whether this is

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the idea that say, Leeves Labor or kinda is going

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to hurt them until they come up with the position

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>which Shortened actually had, which was everyone who's currently in

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the system, nothing's going to change. But by the time

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:16.399
<v Speaker 1>people actually heard that, they had already completely rejected any

0:35:16.480 --> 0:35:22.919
<v Speaker 1>idea of the changes. Well, look a little bit of history.

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 11>When we went to the twenty sixteen election under Bill Shorten,

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 11>and I was still in polmed at the time, and

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 11>we had proposed capital gains tax changes, and we almost

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:37.920
<v Speaker 11>won that election. We came from Awes came to almost

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 11>when the election. He certainly was a contributor. Then in

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 11>nineteen we piled and doubled down and tripled down with

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 11>a few other changes as well, and so we left

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 11>ourselves open and vulnerable to a much broader attack, and

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 11>the words franking credits became part of the political discussion,

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 11>and almost nobody'd ever heard of a frankin credits until

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 11>almost near the election. Man Labor decided to move down

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 11>that path. So I don't think capital gains tax changes

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 11>are as electorally damaging as was proven in twenty sixteen

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 11>versus twenty nineteen. Sure the opposition will try and cover it. Yeah, sorry,

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:27.360
<v Speaker 11>So negative dearing wasn't as damaging in sixteen, but a

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 11>pile on a whole ranging issue is left in vulnerable

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 11>and night.

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 1>That's because but also you had Turnbull who was knocking

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>off at midday. He didn't he probably agreed with it

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to some degree, versus Morrison who absolutely went all points

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of the compass to make the point.

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 11>And so I think Dunton will run a Morrison style.

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 1>Came one hundred percent, which is why on this issue. Yeah,

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 1>which is why if they're going to do something on this,

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:52.319
<v Speaker 1>so do it quickly, because if they're going to let

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it swing around for weeks before it becomes months before

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it I'm telling you, I'm telling you how this is

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be interpreted. And then Stephen in I would

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 1>describe you want to give us the history lesson.

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:11.720
<v Speaker 11>Today is ordering messy and tidy, bordering on messy.

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you're correct, well, but again right someone intentionally puts

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:17.360
<v Speaker 1>this into the paper.

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely.

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:20.839
<v Speaker 1>The Prime Minister doesn't disappear today. He does a press

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:24.359
<v Speaker 1>conference and then rings in to radio shows in the afternoon. Again,

0:37:24.360 --> 0:37:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I remember when I hosted one of them. Generally speaking,

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it's the breakfast show of the morning show that books

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:31.279
<v Speaker 1>those things. When you hear the Prime Minister in the

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 1>afternoon anywhere, it's because it's been offered and you go, yeah,

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, so he wanted to be heard today. But

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 1>what he said today was I don't know. I'm not

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:42.440
<v Speaker 1>in charge. I'm not really, I'm not I'm not applying

0:37:42.520 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>for this information anywhere, which either means he's lying or

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>is incompetent earth because you think by three o'clock you've

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:52.320
<v Speaker 1>wrung the treasurer. Oh no, he's on a plane to China. Sorry,

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure they've got WiFi. Look the bottom larties.

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 10>What about the history lesson Paul Keating abolished negative goearing

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 10>back in the eighties, reenterprises went through the roof and

0:38:03.000 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 10>you had to bring it back and the snake charmers. Well,

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:10.719
<v Speaker 10>he got his doctorate, didn't he, and studying Keating. I

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 10>wonder if he looked at that part of the history.

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:17.920
<v Speaker 10>But this again is desperation politics on behalf of the

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 10>Prime Minister and the Treasurer first of all as a minister,

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 10>and Steven will remember this I used to have a

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:27.279
<v Speaker 10>rule that nobody starts in a new work in the

0:38:27.320 --> 0:38:30.719
<v Speaker 10>department unless I personally know about it and you get

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 10>a port lightly report about it, so you don't get

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 10>any nasty surprises. So nobody can suddenly come out and say, oh,

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:39.400
<v Speaker 10>we're going to have negative geary without you.

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 1>And you also know, if anything's on the front page

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of the newspaper, if it's not the Prime Minister themselves,

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:47.879
<v Speaker 1>it's somebody on their behalf who's ripping you a new

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 1>one because you didn't tell them what's happening, which to

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:54.040
<v Speaker 1>me makes it seem like this is the soft launch

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of the idea.

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:58.799
<v Speaker 10>Let me tell you when Shorten lost the election in

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 10>twenty nineteen, I was actually the next day I was

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 10>out collecting for the Salvation Army in a shopping center.

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 10>And I can't tell you that people who came up

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 10>with relief all over their face because they knew what

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 10>those tax proposals meant to them and they're saving. So

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 10>when you're desperate, and you'll know in the negotiations on

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 10>this proposal that the government can own forty percent of

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 10>your house, which is a ridiculous policy. The thing that

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 10>the Greens are saying we will only agree to that

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:36.839
<v Speaker 10>if you get rid of negative queering and you get

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 10>rid of the deduction with regard to capital gains tax.

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 10>So this is part of that debate as well. Now

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 10>you've heard me say before it's going to be an

0:39:47.760 --> 0:39:51.839
<v Speaker 10>early election. They're doing all things that governments do. They're

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 10>cleaning up the number of bills they've got before the hearts,

0:39:54.600 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 10>they're cleaning off the barnacles. They're trying to get to

0:39:57.520 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 10>a position where they've got some open aired go with

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:05.840
<v Speaker 10>whatever the thrust is going to be. So this policy,

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:08.080
<v Speaker 10>and I agree with you, they've just run it up,

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 10>runned up the pole and let it fly for a

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:13.359
<v Speaker 10>bit and let's see what the reaction is. And I

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:15.600
<v Speaker 10>think some of the old ads that we use by

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 10>Morrison would be very effective again. And I think that

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:22.800
<v Speaker 10>the same arguments that we used. And let me explain

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 10>this bit. There are people who are waging towery illness.

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 10>They don't get any opportunity to have tax reductions, they

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 10>don't have any opportunities to try.

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 1>For everything else.

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 10>Seeing it, these are the people who say I want

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:41.920
<v Speaker 10>something for my kids or something for my grandkids, and

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 10>so they can get into the business of having a

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 10>little business themselves, and that's exactly what it is.

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:51.799
<v Speaker 1>And also steven thirty seconds in response to this right,

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 1>which is essentially property investment or shares. But let's just

0:40:56.120 --> 0:41:00.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about property investment is generally speaking, the only way

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that you are able to create a level of intergenerational

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:08.880
<v Speaker 1>wealth that means you or your kid will not be

0:41:09.000 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>where you started out in life. All right, you might

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to with the cost of the house you

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 1>own and the house you invest in, hand over hundreds

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of dollars that your parents never gave you.

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>You would think the Prime Minister, who is literally in

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 1>this system, who is from where he was, would at

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 1>an absolute fundamental level understandard. Instead, where I think they're

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 1>going to land is multiple properties. But I've done the

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 1>numbers and all of that. That's fewer than like one

0:41:34.200 --> 0:41:37.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty thousand people that are currently in the system.

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't actually solve all of the other problems

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 1>because the migration question that I showed before means that

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>all this greater at a dinner party, But the dinner

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 1>party has already contradicted itself. Yeah.

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:58.320
<v Speaker 11>No, Look, I've found fascinating that report cited earlier about

0:41:58.360 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 11>public and private part of always understood that people's public

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:06.239
<v Speaker 11>expressions and polling does not match.

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Their private views.

0:42:08.200 --> 0:42:11.920
<v Speaker 11>If they did, Labor would have won every single election

0:42:12.360 --> 0:42:18.360
<v Speaker 11>for the last years. The public always say education and health,

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 11>they're the issues that we're are casting our vol but

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:23.239
<v Speaker 11>we all know it's their pockets.

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, we just don't want to say that. I

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 1>just don't want to pay for it. I want to

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 1>dealve into that because I know you've both read it

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 1>all and have the same view that I do. Let's

0:42:31.000 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 1>take an earlier break so we can come back and

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:34.439
<v Speaker 1>have that chat and a whole bunch of other things,

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>including banning Chinese cars. Apparently it may will be happening

0:42:38.200 --> 0:42:41.600
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, but not under racist Trump, under

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:49.920
<v Speaker 1>racist Biden. I want to see. Yes, just as you

0:42:49.960 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 1>expect from Bishop and I. We solved the world's problems

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 1>during the breaks as well. Stephen Conroy is always welcome

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in the man Cave, but we know it's Grand Final

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 1>week and he loves a public holiday on a Friday.

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:03.160
<v Speaker 2>For no apparent reason. The Games the next time and

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:06.879
<v Speaker 2>no one and you're not going to parade, all right, So.

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, China, So the United States knows that when it

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:16.480
<v Speaker 1>comes to electric cars, China's capacity to build more of

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:18.279
<v Speaker 1>them for less because of course slave labor et cetera,

0:43:18.280 --> 0:43:23.279
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, means that that market is currently being flooded. Australia,

0:43:23.320 --> 0:43:26.279
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I'll double check this for tomorrow, but

0:43:26.520 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 1>now Chinese cars and Japanese cars are basically the same

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how many years old. In Australia, the

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Chinese ones are now, of course cheaper versions of petrol,

0:43:34.120 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>but more likely to be any type of electric car. Well,

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration is getting a little trumpy here, Broman,

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:44.840
<v Speaker 1>because they're saying that the remote control factors that do

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>exist in some of the technology some of the time

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 1>is a national security risk because guess what, China ain't

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:52.359
<v Speaker 1>their friend.

0:43:52.800 --> 0:43:56.759
<v Speaker 10>Well, nice, you woke up to it. Yes, I mean

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:59.440
<v Speaker 10>we woke up to that fact with Whilwei, but we

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:02.400
<v Speaker 10>didn't say the same lesson to the rest of the

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 10>stuff we import, like solar panels, like wind turbines, and

0:44:07.200 --> 0:44:10.759
<v Speaker 10>a whole heap of other stuff. And I think we

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:13.960
<v Speaker 10>are in serious trouble because I remember, if my memory

0:44:14.040 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 10>serves me, before the end of the Bilton Road initiatives

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:18.960
<v Speaker 10>with the.

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Old and yes, he was.

0:44:23.160 --> 0:44:27.040
<v Speaker 10>Going to bring in money to build with this railway thing.

0:44:27.080 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 10>He's doing Chinese technology, of course, and I got sent

0:44:31.080 --> 0:44:33.880
<v Speaker 10>to me very good information. It said he could stop

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 10>the trains China, to stop the chains. Absolutely, And I

0:44:39.600 --> 0:44:42.560
<v Speaker 10>think we have been very naive allowing someone who's a

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 10>potential enemy to have the ability to shut down our

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:49.240
<v Speaker 10>entire electricity guid to stop cars dead in the street,

0:44:50.719 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 10>to be spying on us to seek information.

0:44:53.400 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, don't forget.

0:44:54.239 --> 0:44:57.719
<v Speaker 10>I just find the naivety that we've gone into these

0:44:57.800 --> 0:44:59.800
<v Speaker 10>relationships quite stunning.

0:45:00.120 --> 0:45:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Literally again, go check these videos out on YouTube. Right,

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking about bitchu and sort of weirder stuff, right,

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about people that can tell you about the

0:45:06.640 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 1>type of surveillance information that may well be in certain

0:45:09.560 --> 0:45:12.839
<v Speaker 1>cars right about. You know, the geo tagging where they

0:45:12.840 --> 0:45:14.680
<v Speaker 1>know where you are all the time, the microphone that's

0:45:14.719 --> 0:45:16.759
<v Speaker 1>on all the time. And I'm getting conspiratorial about it,

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:19.880
<v Speaker 1>but that's a reality of everything that is listening to

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:23.760
<v Speaker 1>us while we are doing nothing or right, Former Communications Minister,

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:26.239
<v Speaker 1>are we off with the pixies here or is there

0:45:26.239 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 1>an actual issue here that when you end up with

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 1>your market being overly penetrated by a product that you

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:35.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of don't really have a full chain of custody

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:38.440
<v Speaker 1>idea about that. That's where you draw the line.

0:45:40.239 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 11>Okay, it's absolutely something that we should have a good

0:45:43.080 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 11>hard look at. I mean, I know a bram and

0:45:45.000 --> 0:45:48.280
<v Speaker 11>I'll have to pretend the Liberal Party broke the mold

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 11>on banning Ghiwei first. But when I banned them in

0:45:51.080 --> 0:45:53.360
<v Speaker 11>a twenty eleven twelve from being part of the National

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:56.439
<v Speaker 11>Broadband Network, it was based on security intelligence, the blow

0:45:56.480 --> 0:46:04.200
<v Speaker 11>information and when you understand, particularly where you have software

0:46:04.320 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 11>upgrades that get pumped through the system, it is very

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:13.359
<v Speaker 11>very hard to keep track of what is being put

0:46:13.400 --> 0:46:16.480
<v Speaker 11>into your vehicle or into any of the other things

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:19.600
<v Speaker 11>our infrastructure. It's why you can't let the Chinese own

0:46:19.600 --> 0:46:22.600
<v Speaker 11>a whole range of important infrastructure now in this country,

0:46:22.920 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 11>because you just can't guarantee its security. At least make

0:46:27.680 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 11>them work harder and try and hack our infrastructure where

0:46:32.000 --> 0:46:35.919
<v Speaker 11>we don't try and defend they's just hand it over

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:38.600
<v Speaker 11>to them. So I think this is one that we

0:46:38.640 --> 0:46:42.440
<v Speaker 11>should take genuine advice on. Look at what's happening around

0:46:42.440 --> 0:46:46.279
<v Speaker 11>the world, look at what the Chinese have the capacity

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:48.879
<v Speaker 11>to do so. I think it's absolutely something that needs

0:46:48.920 --> 0:46:51.640
<v Speaker 11>to be put on the table a serious discussion. It's

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:54.760
<v Speaker 11>not a part of an issue anymore. It's become core

0:46:55.200 --> 0:47:03.680
<v Speaker 11>value issue, protecting integrity a whole range of structures.

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 10>And what happened in the Middle East, Stephen, is a

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:06.480
<v Speaker 10>wake up call for everybody.

0:47:06.040 --> 0:47:10.160
<v Speaker 1>On the pages. Yeah, yeah, the weaponars or I've literally

0:47:10.160 --> 0:47:11.880
<v Speaker 1>got a minute. I'm sorry to do so. A bumper

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sticker from both of you. In that report that I

0:47:14.120 --> 0:47:17.240
<v Speaker 1>mentioned before about the difference between public and private opinion,

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 1>which one surprised you the most or didn't really surprise

0:47:20.200 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you the most?

0:47:20.600 --> 0:47:24.840
<v Speaker 10>Problem Well, the one for me was statement four. Society

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 10>is better off when individuals get to make decisions for

0:47:27.719 --> 0:47:32.279
<v Speaker 10>themselves rather than having experts make decisions for everyone. And

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:34.839
<v Speaker 10>I found that, I'm absolutely fascinating.

0:47:34.920 --> 0:47:38.680
<v Speaker 1>So publicly, seventy five percent sorry, sixty seven percent would

0:47:38.680 --> 0:47:41.000
<v Speaker 1>think that, but seventy five percent privately. And you know,

0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the biggest jump it was actually in millennials. Fifty nine

0:47:43.680 --> 0:47:46.359
<v Speaker 1>percent becomes seventy seven So they're a lot more free

0:47:46.360 --> 0:47:48.359
<v Speaker 1>to me than you think. For you, Stephen, was there

0:47:48.360 --> 0:47:50.880
<v Speaker 1>a particular moment an item in that report.

0:47:52.320 --> 0:47:54.320
<v Speaker 11>Look, I thought the one a our media and you

0:47:54.400 --> 0:47:57.200
<v Speaker 11>highlighted the dangers as for our society as a whole

0:47:57.360 --> 0:48:02.120
<v Speaker 11>as very disturbing, and I think that we've all got

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:05.760
<v Speaker 11>to have a conversation about how we can establish trust

0:48:06.239 --> 0:48:10.440
<v Speaker 11>in the mainstream media, otherwise our society is.

0:48:10.400 --> 0:48:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Going to disintegrate. I'm with you. Thank you, guys, do

0:48:13.080 --> 0:48:14.960
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Thank you very much. We will see you

0:48:15.000 --> 0:48:17.279
<v Speaker 1>again next Wednesday night. Now I'll be here tomorrow night

0:48:17.280 --> 0:48:19.040
<v Speaker 1>spending time with the family. And also it's going to

0:48:19.080 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 1>be my beautiful bride's birthday, so happy birthday. ESK see

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:27.880
<v Speaker 1>you tomorrow Caleb's here. Then I'll see on Sunday.