WEBVTT - The Late Debate | 23 April

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Welcome, Wait bad.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us. I'm James Macpherson with Liz Storer

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 2>and Caleb Bond coming up tonight. Former NRL star John

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 2>Hoppowate avoids jail for driving offenses. But wait until you

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 2>hear what the court did dish out as a punishment,

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 2>and when we get to the papers, the Albanesi government's

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 2>plan to curry favor with the Trump administration over defense,

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>and people racing to rearrange their finances ahead of an

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 2>anticipated Labor Greens alliance after the election. Speaking of the

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Labor Party, they're under fire today for failing to disendorse

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 2>a candidate who accused the Pope of supporting pedophilia. Helen Medel,

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 2>who's running for the Labor seat for Labor in the

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Queensland seat of Flynn, made the comment on Twitter five

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 2>years ago. Was in response to someone else's tweet about

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Pope Francis visiting Iraq to promote justice. She tweeted in response,

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 2>don't know how he can promote common values. I hope

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 2>no one else embraces the value of ongoing support of pedos.

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Now the Coalition have demanded senior Labour MPs condemn the

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 2>comments and disindorse the candidate, but Claire O'Neil, among others,

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 2>has refused to do so. Here she is speaking on

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 2>television this morning.

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 3>She made some intemperate comments five years ago, and I

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 3>think if we're counting out anyone who's ever said anything intemperate,

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 3>then most people in Australia are probably never going to

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 3>be eligible to sit for parliament.

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, now the comments were slanderous. Helen Medel, for her part,

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 2>has conceded she could have chosen her words more carefully,

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 2>which is something of a concession. But the question remains,

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 2>should she be condemned and disindorsed or is this trawling

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.639
<v Speaker 2>through people's social media history and a kind of weird

0:01:56.760 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 2>archaeological dig something that should stop. Calebin Lie.

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Of course it has to stop.

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean, for heaven's sake, if we're going to judge

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 4>everyone on something they've said in the past, as Clara

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 4>O'Neill says, everyone would not meet the standard to get

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 4>into politics. And I think that's part of the problem

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 4>now is you have a lot of people who don't

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 4>even make it to the preselection stage of politics because

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, the party's gone back and dug up something

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 4>and said, Ah, you know, it'll come out that when

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 4>you were twenty four years old you slept with someone

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 4>who was with someone else, and it'll all like it

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 4>is ridiculous now that the level of puritanism that has

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 4>seeped into politics, which means we miss out on what

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 4>could be genuinely good people, and the kind of people

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 4>who might be inclined to go into politics are the

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 4>kind of people who are also inclined to have strong opinions.

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 4>And sometimes those opinions you will agree with, and sometimes

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 4>those opinions you will disagree with. Sometimes those opinions you

0:02:52.720 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 4>will disagree with viscerally, and you will think that what

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 4>they have said is awful or repugnant or disgusting, but

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't change the fact that they ought to have

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 4>the right to say it. And I have to say

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 4>good on the Labor Party for standing by their candidate

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 4>and saying no, actually, we're not going to be puritans

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 4>one hundred percent at the time and say that everyone

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 4>has to be cast out because they said something that

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 4>was a little bit below the belt. If only the

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 4>Liberal Party had taken the same position on Ben Britton

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 4>a couple of weeks ago, who they got rid of

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 4>because he, as a former soldier, said that he didn't

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 4>think women should be on the front line. So the

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 4>Liberal Party turfed him the next day when this came

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 4>back from a podcast that was recorded a year ago,

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 4>they dumped him.

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>And now they're trying to tell.

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 4>It was Jane Hume was taking this up this morning

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 4>on Sunrise. Now the Liberal Party is trying to tell

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 4>the Labor Party how they should be conducting their affairs

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 4>with their candidates. Get over it. If you don't like

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 4>what she said about the Pope, don't vote for her,

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 4>as simple as that.

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 5>Indeed, although in this case she was just downright wrong,

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 5>like Pope Francis for all his faults. And you all

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 5>know I haven't been a massive fan of the last pope.

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 5>It would be very difficult, I think near impossible to

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 5>name a pope who.

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 6>Did more in this space.

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 5>He genuinely invited victims to the Vatican begged for their forgiveness.

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 5>He changed the laws within Vatican City which meant that

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 5>anyone found guilty of child sexual abuse, the definition of

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:33.679
<v Speaker 5>which he expanded, would get twelve years in the clink.

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 5>That became the maximum sentence. He abolished the rule of

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 5>pontifical secrecy, so that could no longer be exploited as

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 5>a loophole to cover up pedophiles that were found within

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 5>the church. And in twenty twenty one, after he convened

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 5>this massive get together of bishops and cardinals, over two

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 5>hundred of them at the Vaticans sitting down just to

0:04:57.520 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 5>address this one issue and how can we root this out?

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 5>Their code of canon law underwent the most extensive revision

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 5>in four decades, again just on this particular issue. That's

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 5>how passionate he was about addressing this issue within the church.

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 5>He certainly wasn't a denier. He certainly wasn't someone who

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 5>defended anything or covered it up. That isn't to say

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 5>there are people in the church who have been found

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 5>guilty of that.

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 6>But she certainly went after the wrong guy here.

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 5>I just have to point that out in fairness to

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 5>the now departed Pope.

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 2>I do have one question about this, and I agree

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 2>with what both of you have said, But she made

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 2>a comment about the pope and pedophilia. Would the Labor

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Party have stood by her if she'd made a comment

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 2>about Islam and pedophilia?

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 4>Do you think it's a very good point I highly doubted,

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:51.679
<v Speaker 4>and that's.

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 6>Too many votes in that.

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 4>But then that's the problem is there is a double standard.

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 4>There's no denial of that. I think every religion should

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 4>be up for debate and ridicule and anything else. I mean,

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 4>you know, you can put the Life of Brian on

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.919
<v Speaker 4>television during Christmas or Eastern and no one sort of

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 4>bats an eyelid. But can you imagine trying to put

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 4>something critical of Islam or lampooning Islam on during Ramadan

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 4>for instance? You know you'd have your broadcast license taken

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 4>away from you probably, Or you try to draw Mohammad

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:21.359
<v Speaker 4>in a cartoon and we know what happens to you.

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 4>Then if you work for Charlie Hebdo in France, you

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 4>get killed. I mean people get killed over.

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 2>The Labour candidate was lucky that she had.

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 4>Correct But on principle, I think you should be able

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 4>to say anything you want. Good on the Labor Party

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 4>for not buckling to pressure. I'll tell you what though,

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 4>when we're talking about the Labor Party in buckling to pressure,

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 4>good old Anthony Albanezi faced a little bit today, but

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 4>he pretended none of it existed. Because it turns out

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 4>in his electorate of Graindler, which I used to live in.

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 4>By the way, I was redistributed into Sydney. So I

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 4>now have to deal with voting for tenure plipusik or not.

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 4>I don't know whether that's a good thing or not.

0:06:57.800 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 4>I could have cast a vote against the Prime Minister,

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 4>but never mind. But on his how to vote card

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 4>he has put all the Labor Party at that anyway,

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 4>has put the Greens second in this particular candidate Hannah

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 4>Thomas has carried on about how you know Israel's conducting

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 4>genocide etc. And she's even said that if you vote

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 4>with the Greens you are voting with Palestine. I mean,

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 4>you know. She couldn't make it any clearer that she's

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 4>essentially a one issue candidate who's saying if you vote

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 4>in Australia for an Australian party is somehow voting overseas.

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 4>We know what her jigg is.

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 4>The Australian pointed out today that despite Albo carrying on

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 4>about how we won't do any deals with the Greens

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 4>of course if they end up in minority after the election,

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 4>he's put the Greens second in his own electorate. So

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 4>he was asked about this at his presser this morning,

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 4>and he claimed that he didn't even know the name

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 4>of the candidate.

0:07:57.440 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 7>I wouldn't have been able to tell you if you'd

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 7>have asked me. He the canate was last time an

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 7>in this seat. I wan on primaries. I won on primaries.

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 7>That's why the system works. I got more than fifty

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 7>percent of the vote. I look forward to people voting

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 7>at number one for me and then filling in all

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 7>the numbers just as they do to make sure it's

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 7>a formal vote.

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 6>And I don't intend to.

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 7>Promote the name or the candidate of the Greene Party candidate.

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 4>You don't know the names of the candidates that you're

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 4>up against. I mean, could you make it any clearer

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 4>that you take the electors of Graindler for granted by saying, ah, well,

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 4>last time I won by fifty percent of the primary

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 4>vote anyway, so it doesn't bloody matter. I mean, I'm

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 4>just standing here because well, I clipped the ticket, and

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 4>I get to take the money and hopefully it'll be

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 4>PM again come May three. He doesn't care about the

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 4>people if he's electric because he hasn't even looked at

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 4>the ballot paper to see who he is running against,

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.840
<v Speaker 4>and it in bizarrely had a crack at The Australian

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.559
<v Speaker 4>for pointing out that the Labor Party had preferenced the

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 4>Green second Ingraindler saying, I can't believe that the Australian

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 4>is giving so much promotion to the Greens candidate.

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:15.599
<v Speaker 6>I mean, please.

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 4>Mate, what is he does he take us? Well, clearly

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 4>does take us for mugs if a he expects us

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 4>to believe that he doesn't know the name of the

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 4>opposition in his electorate. And you know clearly he is

0:09:24.800 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 4>backing in a candidate that he's a one issue candidate.

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean she's made it very clear. Also she moved

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 4>here as a foreign student and claims that she lives

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 4>on unseeded lands. So I mean, I don't know, go

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 4>back to where you came from, love, You didn't have

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 4>to come and sit on someone else's land that you

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 4>think doesn't belong to you, was stolen from them. But

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 4>he's backing a one issue candidate, which is on Palestine.

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 4>And we'll have some more on that in tomorrow's OS

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 4>a little bit later as well, because it turns out

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 4>her relationship with Anthony Albanezi is a little bit frosty,

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 4>which makes it even weirder that he's backing her in here.

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:00.080
<v Speaker 4>But imagine trying to say, oh, don't even.

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 2>There's only two options here, right, Either the Prime Minister

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 2>is lying or he has no clue at all what's

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 2>going on, which is pretty much the way he's run

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 2>the country for the past three years. His claim that well,

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 2>I get voted in on primary votes anyway, I don't

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:19.199
<v Speaker 2>need preferences begs the question. So if you don't need preferences,

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 2>why put the Greens number two, especially when you made

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 2>such a big deal at the debate just the other

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:26.680
<v Speaker 2>night about the fact that you would not do any

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 2>deals with the Greens and he could always at the

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.959
<v Speaker 2>last minute change his how to vote card and amend

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 2>it if it's an honest mistake. This just goes to

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 2>show what most Australians believe about the Prime Minister, that

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 2>he's duplicious.

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 6>No, I honestly don't think he's lying.

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 5>He is safe as houses Greenler has been in a

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 5>labor seats. It's nineteen forty six. The guy doesn't need

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 5>to know their names. I find it strange that you

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 5>then extrapolate that with him just oh, he doesn't give

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 5>us stuff about people in his constituency. No, if my

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 5>seat was that safe of houses, the names of my

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 5>opponents are entirely inconsequential. And of course he's going to

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 5>put the Greens second, because when you look at everybody

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 5>else running in his seat, it is absolutely out of

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 5>the question. He's got a One Nation candidate, he's got

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 5>a Trumpets of Patriots candidate, he's gotten Independent, and then he's.

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 6>Got the Libs.

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:28.199
<v Speaker 5>So naturally he's going to choose his closest bedfellow, which

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 5>is the Greens, which again poses no problem because she's

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 5>never gonna get up in his seat, which he holds

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 5>by a whopping seventeen point three percent.

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Certainly that while he's got policy differences with Trumpet of

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots and One Nation, he stood in Parliament and

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 2>he's accused the Greens of stoking social division. He's had

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 2>the most serious charges to make against the Greens, so

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 2>to put them second in his electric and I don't

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:56.199
<v Speaker 2>buy the idea.

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 6>No, he is more in common with them than any

0:11:58.720 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 6>of the above.

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Fact, he's accused them of creating social division, which is

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 2>a very serious accusation, far more than we disagree on

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 2>tax policy, or we've got different ideas about the housing cristis.

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 4>And I think it brings up the point that he

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 4>keeps saying, we will, under no circumstances do a deal

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 4>with the Greens. But if the how to the Vote

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 4>card has the Greens second, I mean what you are

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 4>saying is that if I don't get the electorate, I

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 4>would prefer the Greens to be the next mob to

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 4>get the electric But yeah, but it doesn't it doesn't make,

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't matter.

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 6>It was making in a storm and a deep I

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 6>think it was either.

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 4>Twenty ten or twenty thirteen that there was a serious

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 4>threat of the Greens taking Graindler and the Daily Telegraph

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 4>had on the front page Save our Elbow, because it.

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Was a serious thing.

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 4>So it's not out of the question that one day

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 4>someone can come and take a seat like that. I mean,

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 4>it's an inner city lefty seat. It's the kind of

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 4>place where the Greens would eventually like to try to

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 4>take it, I would think. But if he's saying I'd

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 4>never do a deal with this mob, and then number

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.680
<v Speaker 4>two on your how to vote card, I mean you're

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.319
<v Speaker 4>not really making it. You've given up the game as

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 4>to who you would prefer to be in power if

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 4>you weren't in power.

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 2>And you can't tell me you wouldn't pay attention even

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 2>if you were going to win by a landslide, that

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 2>you wouldn't pay attention or to your opponent we ought to.

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 5>I genuinely wouldn't if you had that big a margin.

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 5>And he's got other things to take up his brain

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 5>space as PM, don't we know that?

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 6>Well? On Sunday we learned that Daniel Andrews COVID curfew.

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 5>Was not based on any expert health advice whatsoever. It

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 5>wasn't even their idea, much less their recommendation. We found

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.719
<v Speaker 5>this out, of course, thanks to emails obtained by the

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 5>Victorian opposition, thanks to a FOI.

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 6>Now we know that it.

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 5>Was Dan Andrews in his cabinet who decided to lock

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 5>up five million Victorians during the hours of eight pm

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 5>to five am, four goodness knows. I mean this was

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 5>in twenty twenty as well as twenty twenty one. If

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 5>you're in Victoria, I'm sure you remember it well. Now

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 5>the only person left serving in the Labor Party that

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 5>was on that cabinet is a woman by the name

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 5>of now premiere just sent to Allan.

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 6>So when the press got to talk to her.

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 5>Today, they weren't going to miss out on the opportunity

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 5>to ask her. What the heck were you guys thinking,

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 5>Lady Hardy kurfew was introduced in twenty twenty wasn't based

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 5>on poligizing.

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 6>Instead the decision of a state by cabinet. Why do

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 6>cabinet make that decision to.

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Be introduced with her?

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 8>Well, let's reflecting back on that period of time, and

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 8>I know it was a tough time for so many Victorians.

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 6>So who made the decision? Was it Daniel Agris who

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 6>made a decisions?

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 8>He's a curfew as part of that process working with

0:14:56.320 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 8>public health officials on this particular map, The advice from

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 8>the public health officials, from the then Chief Health Officer

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 8>was look at doing what needed to be done to

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 8>limit movement.

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 5>Except that they never recommended that by limiting movement you

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 5>would introduce a curfew that required people to have a

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 5>permit to leave their own homes for crying out loud.

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 6>Woman, of course, that was just more obfiscation.

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 5>She didn't actually make herself accountable.

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.440
<v Speaker 6>For the decision that was made that affected.

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 5>Millions of Victorians over the course of two years, it's

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 5>just more of nothing from this woman.

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 6>Can we fast forward to the election.

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 5>Because I'm sure that we are finally going to see

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 5>the back of Labour's rule and reign in the state

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 5>of Victory.

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't be too sure about that, because depending on

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 4>how things go in the federal election, they'll circle on

0:15:53.720 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 4>Jacinta Allen and hunt her and put Ben Carroll in

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 4>the seat in the hope that that'll save them. And

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 4>something tells her it may well, it may it may

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 4>well actually do it, which would be a disgrace. But

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 4>Jacinta Allen, being that the last person left and there

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 4>were seven of them on this crisis cabinet, six of them,

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 4>including the former premier Daniel Andrews, are no longer in politics.

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 4>What does that tell you about how they feel about

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 4>how things went down and the fact that they could

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 4>see the writing on the wall. So you've only got

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 4>one left in Cina Allen and she refuses to front up.

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean this came out on Sunday in the Sunday

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 4>Herald's Son and the work that David Davis did. I mean,

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 4>he's been fighting for four and a half years to

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 4>get hold of these documents through the courts, the tribunals, whatever.

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 4>The government has tried their darndas to stop this stuff

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 4>coming out, but he was like a dog with a bone,

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 4>and thank God for that. He's done excellent work on

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 4>this count. But this came out on Sunday. Today is Wednesday.

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 4>It's the first time that Cinta Allen has fronted the

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 4>cameras since this story came out, so she's had plenty

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 4>of time to come up with an answer to tell

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 4>the press. And she could not give a straight answer

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:09.120
<v Speaker 4>as to who made the decision or why the decision

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 4>was made. I mean, she should fall on her sword.

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 4>She's the only one left. She should be able to

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 4>tell us exactly what happened in that room. There's a

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 4>reason she doesn't want to tell us exactly what happened

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 4>in that room, because if we knew how the sausage

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:26.120
<v Speaker 4>was made, we would be outraged. Some people certainly already are,

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 4>but they're trying to protect their own bums.

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>It's as simple as ever.

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.679
<v Speaker 2>And this is why a royal commission into what happened

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 2>during the pandemic is so essential. So that people like

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 2>to sen to Allan and Dan Andrews, who's left politics,

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 2>as Caleb pointed out, and others are compelled to answer

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 2>these questions rather than obfuscate. For her to respond as

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 2>you saw there by saying, well, let's reflect, there was

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 2>a tough time for Victorians. That was exactly the of

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 2>the questions you created, the tough times, Why and why

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:58.360
<v Speaker 2>did you lie about it? Trying to brush it off

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 2>as well. You know, we were advised to limit movement,

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 2>as you said, Liz, there's a big difference between you know,

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe some social distancing and a curfew that required people

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 2>to have government permission to leave their own homes.

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 6>The experts were like, this wasn't even our idea. We

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 6>didn't even float this. They made it up.

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 5>And when we talk about tough times for Victorians, I'll

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 5>never forget this piece.

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 6>Of research that came out.

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 5>These researchers did a massive poll in Victoria in September

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty in which they found that nine point five

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:38.360
<v Speaker 5>that's almost one in ten Victorians said that they had

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 5>seriously considered taking their own lives in the last thirty

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 5>days prior to this survey that they were now undergoing.

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 6>That's how bad it was.

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 5>Over twelve percent of Victorians said that they'd either started

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 5>or increased relying on substance abuse in order to deal

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 5>with this emotions that they were going through being locked

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 5>up like animals in their own state. When we talk

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 5>about tough times for Victorian's premier just center Allan, you

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 5>weren't one of them, but you were making the rules

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 5>that everyone suffered under, and for some it ended for good.

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 5>I just find that this cast off comment today utterly

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 5>vile in the face of the very real suffering that

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 5>is not even five years old yet that many people

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 5>would be living with the scars of to this day,

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 5>having even lost loved ones.

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 6>More research was done.

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:44.719
<v Speaker 5>About the first sixty people that did take their lives

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 5>in the state of Victoria during that first year of lockdown,

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 5>et cetera, et cetera, and so on. And you want

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 5>to face the press today, after days of prepping your

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 5>response to this question that you knew you would be

0:19:57.720 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 5>asked just to be like.

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 6>Oh, we were just doing the best we could. It

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 6>was such tough times.

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh my goodness, it's a little bit pointed out. She's

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 2>spent four and a half years of taxpayer money to

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 2>add insult Stoffid injury, trying to never have to answer

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 2>this question because it never was to be revealed.

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 4>And that's not to mention the eight hundred people who

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 4>died because they bungled hotel quarantine system, of course.

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>And I went through one.

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 4>Of those lockdowns in Melbourne. I only had to do one,

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.199
<v Speaker 4>thank god. But it started in August twenty twenty one

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 4>went through to October. I think it was about seventy

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 4>eight days and I just moved to Melbourne and it

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 4>was I have to say, one of the worst periods

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.199
<v Speaker 4>of my life in terms of I felt depressed and

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 4>I had a few sessions with a psych in that time,

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 4>because it is just so anathema to being a human

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.360
<v Speaker 4>to be locked away, particularly the circumstance I was where,

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:51.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, I went to work in a new workplace

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 4>and I'd go into the office and I'd be lucky

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.199
<v Speaker 4>to have ten people there on a good day. So

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 4>I didn't know anyone. I couldn't make any friends, I

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 4>couldn't make any contacts or do anything. You know, it

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.959
<v Speaker 4>was dead set awful. And of course, if you've had

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 4>any troubles with mental health yourself, the numbers on the

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 4>bottom of the screen for Lifeline. But you know, what

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 4>was done to people in that period of time was

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 4>genuinely awful, and I know a lot of people don't

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:15.879
<v Speaker 4>want to think about it because it was that bad,

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 4>but they have serious questions to answer. Well, just into

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 4>ours the only one, but she has serious.

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 2>Quest and not just just into Allen. When we get

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 2>to the papers a little later, the front page of

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow's Herald's Son deals with more hypocrisy that took place

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 2>during the pandemic. Let's go to the UK now, where

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 2>transactivists have taken to the streets of London to protest

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court's decision to define a woman according to

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 2>biology rather than self selection, which means that trans women

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 2>are not women after all. Now we're told that we

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 2>have to support trans ideology because it's polite, it's respectful,

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 2>it's loving, and of course trans people are vulnerable people.

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 2>But check out some of the signs on display in

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 2>this march in London. Activists held signs saying things like

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 2>the only good turf that's a trans exclusionally exclusionary radical

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 2>feminist or someone who opposes trans ideology. A good turf

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 2>is a dead turf. Other signs had bullet holes in them,

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 2>saying I will make you listen, and another sign said

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 2>are your transphobe? Why not try a do it yourself lobotomy.

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 2>So these signs are being waived about on the street.

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Obviously some people were upset and reported them to police

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 2>because clearly those signs are inciting violence against people who

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 2>don't believe trans women are women. As the UK Supreme

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Court ruled, Well, the police initially said they would not

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 2>be investigating because well, you know, for a variety of reasons,

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:49.439
<v Speaker 2>until the UK Telegraph got hold of the story, and

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 2>now the met will investigate. A couple of questions, Caleb

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 2>and Liz, could you imagine if the situation was reversed.

0:22:56.640 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Instead of holding a sign saying the only good only

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 2>good turf is a dead turf, imagine if someone will

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 2>a signed saying the only good trans person is a

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 2>dead trans person. The police would be there so fast. Well,

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 2>we know exactly what would happen, because there's a woman

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 2>in prison at the moment. Lucy Connelly who dared to

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 2>tweet that a hotel containing migrants should be burned to

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 2>the ground. She was promptly arrested and as I said,

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 2>she's serving two and a half years in prison, but

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 2>police took the media to get onto their case before that,

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 2>even bother investigating these signs inciting violence. And of course,

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 2>as JK. Rowling can well attest in the UK, and

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 2>as people like Curile Smith, Rachel Wong and Sell Grover

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 2>here in Australia can testify, this level of hatred was

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 2>not something recent posts the UK Supreme Court decision. People

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 2>who've taken up the issue of trans ideology and defense

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 2>of women's rights have had to put up with this

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 2>nonsense for years now and it.

0:23:58.040 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 6>Doesn't seem to be going away.

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 5>What's so well, So until we see a strong response

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 5>like this, they've got no reason to back down.

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 6>And the fact is what people need to be.

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:12.719
<v Speaker 5>Worried about is these people feel genuinely validated in these views.

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 5>It's just like the whack jobs that we've seen in

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:19.000
<v Speaker 5>America saying the same about Trump. Oh they're only good.

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:21.320
<v Speaker 5>Fascist is a dead fascist. I want to see him

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 5>strung up by his legs. We've shown you footage of

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 5>countless people now wishing that guy dead.

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 6>And when you see someone talk like that, they genuinely

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 6>believe it.

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 5>And one wonders if it's just a matter of time

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:39.400
<v Speaker 5>before they decide to take matters into their own hands.

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 5>But I certainly hope that the Supreme Court in the

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 5>UK has some very good security because they are the

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 5>ones who have made this decision. And it's not like

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 5>people like this are just going to be targeting turfs

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 5>willy nilly. But the people who have made this decision

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 5>according to the law in the UK, imagine how much

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 5>the hatred is that is being fermented in their direction

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 5>at the moment.

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:09.120
<v Speaker 4>How is this not incitement to violence? And if you're

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:12.360
<v Speaker 4>waving around a sign that says, you know, a certain

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 4>group of people ought to be dead, surely that is

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 4>encouraging people to make that so unlike you say, if

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 4>you had a sign that said the only good trans

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 4>person is a dead trans person, they'd be on you

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 4>like that. You had a sign that said the only

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 4>good black person is a dead black person, they be

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 4>on you like that, and as well they should, because

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 4>you're waving around a sign that is encouraging other people

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 4>to go and kill other people. You were saying that

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 4>is the right thing to do. And for the coppers

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.239
<v Speaker 4>in the UK to say in the first instance that

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 4>they thought these signs were from another event that wasn't

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 4>in London and so that they weren't going to do

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 4>anything about it. And it took the Telegraph actually showing

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 4>them the time stamps and saying no, this photo was

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 4>taken on the weekend. Oh okay, well will review it now.

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 4>I mean if it was any other group, there'd be

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 4>no review. They would have been arrested on the spot.

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.679
<v Speaker 4>It is pathetic to know, oh, we'll review those. What

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.239
<v Speaker 4>is there to review? I mean, surely that is an

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 4>open and shutcase. And I know we've had discussions about

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 4>hate speech here in this country, but if that's not

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 4>hate speech in the UK that you get arrested. If

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 4>you post a fruity meme on social media, or you

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:29.360
<v Speaker 4>pray silently five doors down from an abortion clinic, you'll

0:26:29.400 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 4>have the roses on you. But your way of a

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 4>sign around saying someone should be dead and you don't,

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 4>it just seems extraordinary, quite the opposite to being dead, though, Berts,

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:42.959
<v Speaker 4>we don't have enough of them anymore. The birth rate

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 4>across the world is falling. Here in Australia now one

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 4>point five is the fertility rate.

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>That means for.

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 4>Every woman there are one point five children. So of

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 4>course the replacement rate just to maintain the population as

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 4>it is is two, because if two people having a child,

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 4>you need two children in order to replace both of them.

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 4>But we can't make that anymore. It's one and a

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 4>half children per woman. I feel sorry for the half

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 4>a child that keeps being born. Of course, that's not

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 4>how statistics were, but in the US it is now

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 4>one point six, and that is an historic low. So

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 4>there was reporting on the weekend that the White House

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 4>was looking at ways to incentivize people to have more children.

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 4>And Donald Trump was asked about this yesterday and.

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>He indeed said it sounded.

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 4>Like a good idea. It sounds like a good idea

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 4>to me, was the direct quote. Now, a couple of

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 4>the ideas that the White House has been looking at

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 4>is a baby bonus, which, of course you will remember

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.360
<v Speaker 4>John Howard did as Prime Minister and Petti Costello as

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 4>Treasurer in this country during their term, and that started

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 4>out as a tax break and then eventually went up

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.439
<v Speaker 4>to a five thousand dollars cash in hand payment for

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 4>having a child. And the suggestion in the US is

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 4>that it would be a five thousand US dollar payment

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 4>so that's more like ten thousand Australian dollars. Other ideas

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 4>is that they would give out to Fulbright scholarships to

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 4>women who are married and have children, and that's a

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 4>scholarship to go overseas and work overseas and study overseas, etc.

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 4>The US does that to maintain relations with other nations.

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 4>There could be other things, such as educating women on

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 4>when they're ovulating so they know when they're more likely

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 4>to have a child. I suspect the one that would

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 4>get more people over the line is a baby bonus,

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 4>because when we did it here in Australia, there was

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 4>a gradual increase in the fertility rate and the peak

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 4>it hit was almost back to the replacement rate. We

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 4>nearly hit the replacement rate here in Australia thanks to

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 4>the baby bonus that was then later dismantled by the

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 4>rad government. So they're saying in the US, what can

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 4>we possibly do to bring this back? And of course

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 4>we know how close Elon Musk has been with Donald Trump.

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 4>He's one man who's sort of taken things into his

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 4>own hands. He's got fourteen children now by I think

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 4>seven or eight women, so he's doing his bit to

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 4>populate the world, but he has spoken extensively about this before.

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 9>The birth rate is very low in almost every country

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 9>and something unless that changes, civilization will disappear. America had

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 9>the lowest birth rate I believe, ever, that was last year.

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 9>Places like Korea the birth rate is one third replacement rate.

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 9>That means in three generations, career will be three or

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 9>four percent of its current size. Humanity is dying, and

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 9>it's just not something we evolved to react to.

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 4>Now it says humanity is dying. That's not entirely true.

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 4>Sub Saharan African countries is still having lots of children.

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 4>But this is part of the problem, is that if

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 4>you look across the western world, or not even the

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 4>Western world, the developed world, where of course the pendulum

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 4>I think has swung too far away from the ability

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 4>to have a family because the economy doesn't serve the

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 4>people anymore. The people serve the economy, so people work

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 4>for much longer, and you have to have both the couple,

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, both people in couple at work in order

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 4>to sustain themselves, let alone children. So the circumstances in

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 4>which people feel comfortable to have a child have slowly

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 4>been slipping away, so governments say we'll give you an

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 4>incentive to have a child, And yes, there is evidence

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 4>that it worked in Australia, but I still think it's

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 4>a band aid measure. If you really want people to

0:30:20.480 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 4>have children, you have to create a society in which

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 4>they want to have children, and I think we've done

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 4>too much to go past that point. I'm not sure

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 4>we'll ever actually get that to it.

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Mark Stein wrote a brilliant book on this about fifteen

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 2>years ago called America Alone, and then the follow up

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 2>after America, arguing that demography is destiny and if you

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 2>want to know what the world will be like fifty

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 2>years from now, we'll just look at who's having children today.

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 2>And the problem, of course in the West, as you said, Caleb,

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 2>is that in Western nations we're not replacing ourselves. So

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 2>a baby bonus is a right idea. You have to

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 2>wonder whether it goes far enough. Nations like Hungry, which

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 2>we talked about on the program recently, have offered Liz,

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 2>I think it's tax free for the rest of your

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 2>life to women who have three or more children. So

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 2>there's other things that can be done, and leavers that

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 2>can be pulled. But even if nothing is done, just

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 2>the conversation that creates the message children are welcome and

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 2>having children is a good thing, not just for yourself

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 2>but for society at large. Is a valuable thing in

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 2>and of itself. So just for Western nations to be

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 2>having the conversation, I'm not saying that's all that's needed,

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 2>but that's a step in the right direction, because so

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 2>many people having children are demonized because it's inconvenient, it's

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 2>economically not viable. You're fled out affording ourselves these days

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 2>without anybody else. The irony is that we're telling women

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 2>they've got to get back to work to help the economy.

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 2>But of course if women are working rather than having children,

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 2>then ultimately you get economic decline. Anyway, Well, I.

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 5>Think so much of this has to do with the

0:31:56.720 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 5>fact that Western societies stopped celebrating children. If you even

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 5>watch our advertisements from decades ago, there were families in them.

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 5>There were kids running around in the backyard. Marriage was

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 5>either the butt of the joke in the ad movies,

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 5>married people plenty of kids running around. We see this

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 5>even in the subliminal messaging all around us on a

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 5>daily basis. Everything's about singles and potentially looking for love.

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 5>Women are not finding men who want to get married and.

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 6>Who want to have children.

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 5>You do wonder what has happened to us as a society,

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 5>because healthy, thriving people naturally want to couple up, naturally

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 5>want to reproduce, and that has either been beaten out

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 5>of people ideologically through all sorts of whether it's radical

0:32:50.960 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 5>feminists or guys have been raised to see a family

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 5>as a noose around their neck.

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 6>I'll leave that off for as long as I can,

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:00.080
<v Speaker 6>might hit forty.

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 5>Then think about it, at which point all the women

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 5>in their age bracket are like, well.

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 6>What are we supposed to do?

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 5>This is something that I've spoken to so.

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 6>Many men and women about.

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 5>Even the ones who genuinely want to get married, who

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 5>genuinely want to have a family, they can't find the

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 5>right person to do it with. And that's where we

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:24.479
<v Speaker 5>see countries like Japan starting their own dating apps because

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 5>they're another country that has a massive birth deficit. One

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 5>of the most interesting workshops that I saw when I

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 5>went to ARC in London earlier this year big Conservative

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 5>get together, was this fellow who's sorry, Matt, I don't

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 5>remember your name, but I do remember your workshop, and

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 5>I think you'd prefer that anyway. He was specifically talking

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 5>about the birth rate in Western countries and how every

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 5>single one of them is a massive birth and we

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 5>can rich and moan about immigration all we like, but

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 5>we are not having babies.

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 6>And until you address that root cause, then nothing's going

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:07.480
<v Speaker 6>to change.

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:11.359
<v Speaker 5>Particularly, I loved about this idea that the Trump administration

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:14.839
<v Speaker 5>is floating, as it includes the National Medal of Motherhood

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 5>for women with six kids or more.

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:21.520
<v Speaker 6>So, my mom, you would qualify for this. But this

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 6>is part of what I'm talking about.

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 5>Society that honors motherhood like that is an incredible achievement.

0:34:29.480 --> 0:34:32.839
<v Speaker 6>Thank you for doing this. That is wonderful.

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 5>That is a society that is going to see more

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 5>of that happening. But we don't do this in the

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 5>West anymore. The alban Easy government, the closest they come

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 5>to encouraging motherhood is free mother care. We want universal

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 5>free daycare rather not mother care.

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 6>So you can get back to.

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 5>Work and work for the man and earn us some

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 5>more tax dollars and we the state will raise your

0:34:58.239 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 5>children for free.

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 6>If that is your idea of.

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:06.399
<v Speaker 5>Supporting families and women having babies in your nation. You've

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 5>just signed its death warrant right there, and then it's disgusting.

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, just before we go to a break, we were talking

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 2>about Elon Musk, who's doing his best to repopulate the world.

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 2>He's also going to do his best to get Tesla

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 2>back on track, telling investors this week that he will

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 2>start focusing again on his car company, ending most of

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:27.399
<v Speaker 2>the work he's doing with the Donald Trump administration, hanging

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 2>up doze finding savings in government departments. He said that

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:34.799
<v Speaker 2>as of May, he will only do one or two

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 2>days a week and in the doze role and focus

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:40.880
<v Speaker 2>the rest of his time back on Teesla. This comes

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 2>after they've released their first quarter trading results, which do

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 2>not show a pretty picture. There's a lot of red there,

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 2>including their net income as you can see, down by

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 2>seventy one percent in the first quarter of this year. Obviously,

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of things happening here. Caleb Evs aren't

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 2>as popular as they were, there's competition for China. Tariffs

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 2>from the Trump administration ironically have affected Musk's company, and

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:09.879
<v Speaker 2>also there's been the personal backlash because of his association

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 2>with Trump. What do you think of this, Can he

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 2>rescue Tesla? It's still worth seven hundred and fifty billion

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:18.279
<v Speaker 2>dollars US, so it's not like the thing is falling apack.

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think rescuing it's going to be a task.

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 4>Though part of it is, of course, the personal brand

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 4>of Elon Musk that has hit it in recent times.

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 4>But the reality is now that anyone who wants an

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:30.439
<v Speaker 4>EV already has an EV. And the kind of people

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:33.759
<v Speaker 4>who were early into the market bought those Tesla's, they've

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:35.719
<v Speaker 4>already got their EV. So it's just the rest of

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 4>the market to fiddling around based on subsidies basically. And

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:42.479
<v Speaker 4>those people are buying cheap evs out of China. They're

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:45.879
<v Speaker 4>not buying expensive vehicles like Tesla. So unless Tesla can

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 4>compete with the Chinese market and produce cheap evs, I

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 4>think they've run their race.

0:36:50.880 --> 0:36:52.799
<v Speaker 2>We're going to go to a break. When we come back,

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:55.839
<v Speaker 2>we'll look at what's making news tomorrow, including the Albanezi

0:36:56.400 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 2>government's idea too, the Trump administration in a deal on

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 2>defense that's coming up in just a moment. Welcome back.

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's take a look at tomorrow's newspaper. Front pages will

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 2>start colored with the Australian newspaper.

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 4>Indeed, we will Elbow's mate that he doesn't know the

0:37:15.480 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 4>name of the Greens candidate in Graindler makes another appearance

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:20.919
<v Speaker 4>here and says Anthony Alberize has claimed was we told

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 4>you before that he's not responsible for his own how

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 4>to vote cards and has never heard the name of

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:28.800
<v Speaker 4>his Greens challenger. As it emerged the anti Israel candidate

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 4>preference by the Prime Minister was part of a blockade

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:35.840
<v Speaker 4>of his Graindler electorate office. Green's hopeful Hannah Thomas on

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:39.319
<v Speaker 4>Wednesday said the Prime Minister was quote unquote arrogant for

0:37:39.400 --> 0:37:41.879
<v Speaker 4>claiming he wouldn't be able to tell you who she was,

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 4>adding mister alberizi had failed to act on the cost

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 4>of living, climate and gaza. She also said Graindler voters

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 4>had hoped for a Whitlamesque prime minister but had been

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 4>let down by mister Alberze's performance as a leader. I

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 4>mean you can even blockade out the front of his office,

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 4>which kept his electoral office closed for months and threatened

0:38:02.520 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 4>the safety of his staff, and you still get his

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 4>number two on the how to vote card. I mean

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:09.560
<v Speaker 4>it must be hard to get on his bedside.

0:38:09.640 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 2>You can't tell me. No one in his electric office

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:16.239
<v Speaker 2>knows who this candidate is and her involvement in blockading

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 2>the office. Oh the staffers word well, and they don't

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:20.839
<v Speaker 2>talk to the PM at all.

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 5>But once again, given his other options, he was always

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:27.359
<v Speaker 5>going to choose the Green. She could set his car

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:30.759
<v Speaker 5>on fire, she'd still be number two because he was

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:32.359
<v Speaker 5>never going to make it one nation.

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 6>He was never going to make it the Independent. He

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 6>certainly wasn't going to make the Libs.

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 5>Can you imagine the Libs being preferenced by the Prime

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:42.759
<v Speaker 5>Minister number two on his And it wasn't going to

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 5>be trumpets of patriots either. So naturally, I just like

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 5>I said before, I think we're making a storm out

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:49.839
<v Speaker 5>of a teacup here.

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 6>It had to be her.

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 2>He certainly knows who she is.

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 1>But if it doesn't matter.

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 4>He could have made one nation his second preference. It

0:38:56.560 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't have changed anything. If that's the argument, is that

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:01.719
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't really have it and just put anyone there.

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 4>Another story on the front of the Ods tomorrow, Anthony

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 4>Alberinezi will move to make Australia a key supplier of

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 4>critical minerals and rear earths to help like minded nations

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 4>make weapons without relying on China through a one billion

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:16.720
<v Speaker 4>dollar plus strategic reserve to be used by re elected

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:19.360
<v Speaker 4>labor government as a bargaining chip to win an exemption

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 4>from Donald Trump's tariffs. The Prime Minister on Wednesday unveiled

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:26.760
<v Speaker 4>plans for an initial one point two billion dollar investment

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:29.000
<v Speaker 4>or I think they mean on Thursday, because of course

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 4>today is Wednesday in national reserve that will stockpile critical

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 4>minerals such as lithium, nickel and cobalt so they are

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 4>available for Australian manufacturers and select nations such as Japan,

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 4>Japan Sorry, and South Korea and fair enough. I think

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 4>if Donald Trump has taught us one thing and much

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:50.600
<v Speaker 4>of the world one thing is that much like he

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 4>is America first, we should all be Australia first, and

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 4>Japan first, and Korea first and West first as well.

0:39:57.560 --> 0:40:00.799
<v Speaker 4>So he has some way or another actually encouraged us

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 4>to take a little more self reliance, which of course

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:05.839
<v Speaker 4>is need good for the US and the rest of

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:09.279
<v Speaker 4>the Western world. More broadly, the question is, though, will

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 4>it be enough to get an exemption on tariffs?

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Who would know what it is enough though, to do

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 2>is to remove whatever advantage the Coalition may have had

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 2>on defense, which they pretty much squandered by leaving their

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 2>big announcement to the last week and a half of

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 2>the campaign. And then Labor have come up with this, which,

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 2>as you said, seems like a perfectly sensible solution stands

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 2>us in good stead helps with the Trump administration. So

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:41.319
<v Speaker 2>whatever advantage or bounce Dutton was hoping for from his

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:44.919
<v Speaker 2>defense policy announcement, it's sort of gone from the front

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 2>pages and Labor back on the front foot.

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 6>Overshadowed so soon.

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:51.439
<v Speaker 5>It does make you wonder, given this ticks a lot

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 5>of boxes, why it took them so long to come

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:56.759
<v Speaker 5>up with. I mean, that's such a good bargaining chip.

0:40:56.840 --> 0:41:00.560
<v Speaker 5>Everyone needs these and a we've found out great way

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:02.879
<v Speaker 5>to use them as a bargaining chair.

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Is it any coincidence that Labor put this out what

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:08.240
<v Speaker 2>the day after? Of course, the Coalition announced their defense

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 2>policy so immediately nullified it.

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 4>I feel like that's been a large part of this

0:41:13.520 --> 0:41:16.120
<v Speaker 4>campaign though, is why has it taken so long for

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:18.319
<v Speaker 4>so many policies to be announced? I mean, in this

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:21.279
<v Speaker 4>world now where you don't just have election day, you

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 4>essentially have an election period. I mean people went to

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:28.799
<v Speaker 4>the polls on Tuesday, so people voted on Tuesday, and

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:32.640
<v Speaker 4>we still haven't had the full suite of policies released yet.

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:35.440
<v Speaker 4>I mean they're expecting record numbers of people to prepole.

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 4>Half the bloody country is going to pre poll before

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:41.239
<v Speaker 4>we get to election day, and there will be policies

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 4>trickling out in the next week or so. It kind

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:46.360
<v Speaker 4>of makes a mockery of the whole idea of having

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 4>an election day, I think. But also what's the strategy

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:52.239
<v Speaker 4>from the parties to leave things so late when they

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 4>know that people are voting.

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 5>Now, That's exactly what I said last night when the

0:41:56.239 --> 0:42:00.719
<v Speaker 5>front headline was oh, twenty one billion, extra one hundreds

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 5>the limbs are gone.

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 6>Why on earth would you wait this late?

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:08.320
<v Speaker 5>An excellent policy, something people are passionate to get behind.

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 5>Yay national security. We haven't done enough. Everybody knows this.

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 5>It's such an obvious, strong and clear policy. Why would

0:42:18.080 --> 0:42:21.320
<v Speaker 5>you wait until what ten days out to the election?

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Greg greg Sheridan's got an answer to that on the

0:42:23.440 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 2>front page of Tomorrow's Australian. He reckons the coalition were

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:29.359
<v Speaker 2>waiting to see what money was left over to spend

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 2>on defense, which is he points out, is exactly the

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 2>wrong way to do defense. You defend the country first,

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 2>then you work out what money you've got left to

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 2>spend on social welfare things. No point having social welfare

0:42:39.960 --> 0:42:41.719
<v Speaker 2>if the Chinese invague something else.

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 4>I think that the coalition has just not really had

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:47.839
<v Speaker 4>to go lay before at all. Which I don't understand

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:52.080
<v Speaker 4>is the tax on unrealized capital gains. It is insane,

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:53.800
<v Speaker 4>but it says in the front of the ODZ tomorrow

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 4>super tax plan risks twenty five billion dollar exodus after

0:42:57.680 --> 0:42:59.920
<v Speaker 4>twenty five billion dollars could be withdrawn from self mana

0:43:00.200 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 4>superannuation funds this year as people race to reduce their

0:43:03.480 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 4>account balances below a two million dollar threshold that the

0:43:06.680 --> 0:43:10.359
<v Speaker 4>Greens were require sorry in exchange for supporting Labour's new

0:43:10.440 --> 0:43:14.360
<v Speaker 4>tax on unrealized capital gains. Jeff Wilson, the architect of

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:17.719
<v Speaker 4>a successful attack on Labour's franking credits policy before the

0:43:17.719 --> 0:43:21.280
<v Speaker 4>twenty nineteen election, said he'd been fielding calls from clients

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:24.719
<v Speaker 4>about shifting money out of self managed funds and said

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:27.920
<v Speaker 4>the opposition was now missing a golden opportunity to unseat

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:33.000
<v Speaker 4>a first term government by not attacking Labour's unrealized capital gains.

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 4>He goes on to say, I think there has been

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:38.400
<v Speaker 4>a misunderstanding by the coalition of how brutal this unrealized

0:43:38.400 --> 0:43:41.360
<v Speaker 4>capital gains tax policy will be on the economy. Labour

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:44.279
<v Speaker 4>should be losing the election on this issue. Shareholders are

0:43:44.280 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 4>calling me very concerned about the taxing of unrealized gains

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:51.960
<v Speaker 4>and I mean the idea that you would tax something

0:43:52.280 --> 0:43:57.719
<v Speaker 4>that doesn't yet exist. He's fundamentally insane. I mean, the

0:43:57.760 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 4>government is going to take money from you when you

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:04.919
<v Speaker 4>haven't actually made the profit yet, and yet no one

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:05.759
<v Speaker 4>is talking about it.

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 2>But did you see the explanation in tomorrow's paper from

0:44:08.680 --> 0:44:11.239
<v Speaker 2>a Liberal Party spokesperson as to why they haven't made

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 2>an issue of this. They said, well, most of the

0:44:13.200 --> 0:44:14.879
<v Speaker 2>people who have got more than two million in their

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:18.040
<v Speaker 2>super funder in teal seats and they've not mentioned it

0:44:18.080 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 2>to us as being a problem. So for that reason

0:44:20.680 --> 0:44:21.760
<v Speaker 2>they're not bothering.

0:44:21.920 --> 0:44:23.279
<v Speaker 4>And of course the other thing as well as if

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:25.360
<v Speaker 4>they pull all their money out of the stock market

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 4>and go property, we'll go property.

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:29.880
<v Speaker 1>What do you think that does to property prices?

0:44:29.960 --> 0:44:31.839
<v Speaker 4>For goodness, let's go to.

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:34.360
<v Speaker 2>The front page of tomorrow's herald Son. We were talking

0:44:34.400 --> 0:44:38.440
<v Speaker 2>about just center Allen dodging questions as to the curfew

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:40.600
<v Speaker 2>during the pandemic. Well, there's some more news about what

0:44:40.680 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 2>occurred during the pandemic In tomorrow's paper. Ambos above Law

0:44:45.560 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 2>reads the headline Inquiry uncovers a legal funeral sanctioned by

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:53.359
<v Speaker 2>bosses in COVID. The story reads that a secret send

0:44:53.400 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 2>off for an ambulance Victoria paramedic, in breach of strict

0:44:56.600 --> 0:45:00.920
<v Speaker 2>COVID rules but allegedly approved by bosses, been exposed as

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 2>part of an ongoing inquiry into the beleagued agency. Now,

0:45:04.560 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 2>this is a parliamentary inquiry into the ambulance service that

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:11.280
<v Speaker 2>was opposed by the Allen government. They tried to prevent

0:45:11.360 --> 0:45:14.400
<v Speaker 2>this inquiry. The inquiry has heard about the poor performance

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:17.080
<v Speaker 2>of the service as well as cultural problems. But this

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:20.239
<v Speaker 2>is the latest revelation from this inquiry. At a time

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:24.400
<v Speaker 2>when funerals who were restricted to just ten people in attendance,

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:26.520
<v Speaker 2>I read one story about a woman who died. She

0:45:26.560 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 2>had twelve siblings. They applied for an exemption so that

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 2>all the siblings could attend. They were denied, and now

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:35.000
<v Speaker 2>it turns out that members of the ambulance service were

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 2>holding funerals with more than more people than were permitted,

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:43.399
<v Speaker 2>in violation of laws that everybody else had to abide by.

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:45.279
<v Speaker 2>We're going to go to a break when we come back.

0:45:45.360 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 2>The NRL star who avoided jail over driving offenses. But

0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 2>wait until you hear the punishment that the court did

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:54.320
<v Speaker 2>give out to him. That's coming up in just a moment.

0:45:57.400 --> 0:46:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back. Well, if you follow NRL, John Happawa is

0:46:00.520 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 2>quite an infamous former NRL player. Caleb like, what did

0:46:04.080 --> 0:46:04.319
<v Speaker 2>he do?

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:07.320
<v Speaker 4>He stuck his finger out people's jacksies. I believe was

0:46:07.360 --> 0:46:09.719
<v Speaker 4>his modus operanda, and it seemed to work every now

0:46:09.719 --> 0:46:12.760
<v Speaker 4>and again. And he's been in trouble a few times

0:46:12.920 --> 0:46:16.440
<v Speaker 4>through his life. He's been charged with assault multiple times.

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:18.200
<v Speaker 4>He was charting, I think it was in twenty thirteen

0:46:18.200 --> 0:46:24.240
<v Speaker 4>with intimidating a parking inspector. He's had numerous driving indiscretions.

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:27.120
<v Speaker 4>His latest one that was that he was caught driving

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:30.560
<v Speaker 4>wild disqualified. So of course he's serving a sentence after

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:33.360
<v Speaker 4>a previous discretion and he gets behind the wheel of

0:46:33.360 --> 0:46:36.200
<v Speaker 4>the car again and he gets caught doing that. So

0:46:36.360 --> 0:46:39.000
<v Speaker 4>once again he gets trundled off to court and they

0:46:39.080 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 4>let him off with a suspended sentence. He had to

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:45.720
<v Speaker 4>do one hundred hours of community service. So this repeat offender,

0:46:45.800 --> 0:46:48.440
<v Speaker 4>John Hoppawate, what does he do for.

0:46:48.480 --> 0:46:52.239
<v Speaker 1>His one hundred hours of community service? Is learning to knit?

0:46:54.200 --> 0:46:57.040
<v Speaker 8>And then once you've learned that and you're doing that,

0:46:57.880 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 8>I can teach you her as he was.

0:47:05.239 --> 0:47:06.280
<v Speaker 4>Casting on already.

0:47:06.320 --> 0:47:09.640
<v Speaker 8>Didn't do is get a long row of ditches.

0:47:11.440 --> 0:47:15.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he is this rugby enforcer finger up the bummer,

0:47:15.960 --> 0:47:18.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, built like a brick you know what house,

0:47:19.040 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 4>and he's like, I know what I'll do.

0:47:20.800 --> 0:47:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I've been caught yet again.

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:24.080
<v Speaker 4>The court will let me go and learn how to

0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:29.080
<v Speaker 4>knit beanies for poor kids. You know, it's quite funny

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:31.400
<v Speaker 4>on one level, but how many times do you have

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 4>to be caught before they say, well, chuck in the

0:47:33.640 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 4>slammer for a little while and not seeing you to

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:37.600
<v Speaker 4>do knitting lessons with granny.

0:47:37.680 --> 0:47:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, he himself was making a joke out of it,

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:42.799
<v Speaker 2>telling journalists he was putting his fingers to better use now,

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:45.520
<v Speaker 2>So there you go. But I'm not sure how many

0:47:45.520 --> 0:47:49.640
<v Speaker 2>people have been victims of you know, bad drivers would

0:47:49.680 --> 0:47:52.319
<v Speaker 2>be happy to see that sort of punishment dissed doubt

0:47:52.360 --> 0:47:54.320
<v Speaker 2>to someone with multiple driving offenses.

0:47:54.560 --> 0:47:57.600
<v Speaker 5>Indeed, you wonder if he wasn't who he is, if

0:47:57.640 --> 0:47:59.840
<v Speaker 5>the sentence had been any different, not that it should

0:47:59.880 --> 0:48:02.680
<v Speaker 5>be before the law. But before we go tonight, the

0:48:02.719 --> 0:48:07.880
<v Speaker 5>Great Barrier Reef maybe the unexpected recipient of a United

0:48:07.960 --> 0:48:13.239
<v Speaker 5>Nations award. It's called the Prestigious Lifetime Achievement Award, which

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 5>is normally given to people like Sir David Attenborough. But

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:24.120
<v Speaker 5>tourism Tropical North Queensland has adopted a unique version of

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:31.000
<v Speaker 5>their understanding of what would make eligible nominee and they've

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:34.680
<v Speaker 5>decided to nominate the Great Barrier Reef as opposed to

0:48:35.239 --> 0:48:37.960
<v Speaker 5>a person. As far as I concerned, we here in

0:48:37.960 --> 0:48:40.440
<v Speaker 5>Australia don't want anything from the United Nations.

0:48:40.760 --> 0:48:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, but it don't at.

0:48:42.080 --> 0:48:43.759
<v Speaker 4>Least prove once and for all that the thing's still

0:48:43.760 --> 0:48:45.319
<v Speaker 4>alive and not did as we keep them.

0:48:45.680 --> 0:48:47.880
<v Speaker 2>There you go, That's all we've got time for stick arounds.

0:48:47.880 --> 0:48:49.799
<v Speaker 2>Coming up is the reader Pennehy show. Good Night,