WEBVTT - Sharri | 2 June

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:03.199
<v Speaker 1>Live on Sky News.

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 2>This is Sharry Good Evening. The Coalition doesn't rule out

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 2>backing Labour's sup attacks. Deputy Liberal leader Ted O'Brian is

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 2>on the show tonight. He also faces my questions about

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 2>dumping or demoting for talented women. This is an exclusive

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 2>interview and it's coming up. The Trump administration demands Australia

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 2>lift its game on defense, but alban Easy says he won't.

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Joe Hudebrand and Steve Price shortly and to the horrific

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 2>terror attack in America. This towards a peaceful demonstration of

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 2>the hostages, supporting the hostages. This shows the reality of

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 2>globalizing the interfighter. I've got more to say about that

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 2>in a minute, and Ray Hadley joins me. He's going

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 2>to fire up at Chris Bowen's latest ridiculous plan green tariffs,

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 2>but first tonight, Albinizi is refusing to commit to boosting

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Australia's defense spending, despite an urgent call from American Defense

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Secretary Pete Hegseath. The Trump administration says Australia needs to

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 2>spend an extra forty billion dollars a year on the military.

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 2>This would take our defense spend to three and a

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 2>half percent of GDP. Now Hegseth delivered this message to

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Defense Minister Richard Miles directly in Singapore over the weekend,

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 2>and he gave these pointed remarks in his speech to

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 2>the Shangri La Dialogue.

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 3>NATO members are pledging to spend five percent of their

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 3>GDP on defense, even Germany, so it doesn't make sense

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 3>for countries in Europe to do that while key allies

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 3>in Asia spend less on defense in the face of

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 3>an even more formidable threat.

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Now Miles indicated he was willing to discuss this, but

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 2>Albanezy has ruled it out.

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 4>What we'll do is we'll determine now defense policy, and

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 4>we've invested just across the forward to an additional ten

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars in defense. What we'll do is continue to

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 4>provide for investing in our capability but also investing in

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 4>our relationships in the region.

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 2>And his position is despite other leaders globally increasing defense spending,

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Kirstarmer raised his military budget to two and a half

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 2>percent of GDP while cutting back on foreign aid in

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 2>order to do so, and that was before he met

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 2>with Trump in February, and kirs Starmer says his ambition

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 2>is to reach three percent in a second term. Now,

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 2>as you'll recall, the Coalition had pledged an increase of

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 2>defense spending to two and a half percent of GDP

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 2>by the end of the decade, with an aspirational goal

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 2>of three percent over ten years, and Labour's current spend

0:02:55.080 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 2>is just two percent of GDP now. Even before the administration,

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 2>former defense and national security officials including so Angus Houston,

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Dennis Richardson, Michael Pizzullo, and Kim Beasley, had all called

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 2>for defense spending to increase to at least three percent

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 2>of our GDP, and so Albanezi is now under pressure,

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 2>not just from the Trump administration, over our investment in

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 2>defense now. To be fair, an immediate jump to three

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 2>and a half percent right away would be difficult, would

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 2>be excessive, especially given our depleted budget position. We're heading

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 2>towards a trillion dollars in debt thanks to Labour's reckless

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 2>decision to pay hex debt in order to buy off

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 2>younger voters. But it's not so much a question about

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 2>the size of the spending, but what defense is spending

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 2>the money on. That's an equally crucial issue now. Defense

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 2>analyst Peter Jennings suggests that we need to grow the

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 2>size of the army, the air Force, in the Navy.

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 2>He says, we also need to buy a small fleet

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 2>of conventionally powered submarines as an interim stop gap, and

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 2>we have to secure our missile and air defense for

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 2>our nation. And it's not only heg Seth and the

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration that's concerned about our military capabilities. You'll recall

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 2>the Australian Strategic Policy Institute's report just last week expressed

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 2>grave concerns about under investment our ability to keep pace

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 2>with future challenges, and it spoke of insufficient munitions and

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 2>missile and defense systems. It said we had an underdeveloped

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 2>domestic weapons manufacturing system.

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 5>We need to be looking at what we can produce locally.

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 5>We need to be looking at what the rest of

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 5>the world has been doing since Russia's war on Ukraine,

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 5>particularly in the area of cheaper, mass produced capabilities like

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 5>drones encounter drones. We have a number of companies in

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 5>Australia that have the ability to produce these capabilities. They

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 5>are cheaper, they can be mass produced, and they're able

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:07.480
<v Speaker 5>to be done more quickly.

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 2>And ass to be highlighted that for the cost of

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 2>a single Virginia class submarine, Australia could produce or could procure,

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 2>over twenty four thousand Ukrainian made maritime strike drones and

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 2>they have a range of over one thousand kilometers. It's

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 2>precisely this sort of equipment that's so important for modern warfare.

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 2>And you only have to look at what Ukraine was

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 2>able to achieve with similar drone equipment overnight, those Ukrainian

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:44.920
<v Speaker 2>drones hitting more than forty Russian nuclear capable long range bombers.

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:51.159
<v Speaker 2>That single attack destroyed, it said, thirty four percent of

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 2>Russia's fleet of air missile carriers. And the success of

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 2>the attack came after Russia launched an air assault in

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Ukraine last week, and we know that it's preparing for

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 2>a summer on slaught. Now that's the same sort of

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 2>attack Israel should also be launching, by the way, on

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Iran's nuclear capabilities. Now, President Zelenski praised the strike. He

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 2>said it was Ukraine's longest range operation so far, and

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:23.359
<v Speaker 2>let's hope we see more of it because Ukraine clearly

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 2>can't rely on the United States to always come to

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 2>its defense. And now to the devastating terror attack on

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 2>a rally to free Israeli hostages in Colorado. This was

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 2>a peaceful Sunday afternoon walk to show solidarity with the

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:48.919
<v Speaker 2>hostages and their families. And there are still fifty eight

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 2>hostages held captive by Hamas a terror organization after more

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 2>than six hundred days. Now that shouldn't be controversial, of course,

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 2>and Israelis kidnapped need to be freed. Yet an activist

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 2>yelling end Zionists and free Palestine launched what the FBI

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 2>has described as a terror attack on this peaceful protest

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 2>that included many elderly people. Here's how it unfolded. The

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 2>man firebombed the crowd of innocent Americans using molotov cocktails

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 2>and flamethrowers. People were set a light. It was mayhem he.

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 6>On.

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Now. Six people were injured in this attack, but it's

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 2>the ages that get me. They were sixty seven to

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 2>eighty eight years old. The elderly eighty eight one is

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 2>in a critical condition. It's also been reported that children,

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 2>some children suffered burns. Again, these are Americans. Nine one

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 2>one was flooded with emergency calls around one twenty six

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 2>pm and the suspect is an activist, Mohammad Solomon. He's

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 2>forty five. He was arrested by police at the scene.

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Now it's been reported, although not confirmed, that he was

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 2>an illegal immigrant who entered the US from Egypt during

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 2>the Biden administration. And Fox News says he overstayed his

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 2>visa and we.

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 7>Can break to our viewers now per three senior DHS

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 7>and I sources to Fox according to our colleague Bill

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 7>Malusian doing some great work, that he is an Egyptian

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 7>national who is in the US illegally because of a

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 7>visa overstay, who came during the Biden administration.

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Now, the FBI is taking this very seriously. They had

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 2>this to say.

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 8>This attack happened at a regularly scheduled weekly peaceful event.

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 8>Witnesses are reporting that the subject used a makeshift flamethrower

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 8>and threw an incendiary device into the crowd. The suspect

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 8>was heard to yell free Palestine during the attack.

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 2>An organizer of the event, Gene Unger, told The Wall

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Street Journal that several members in her group were injured,

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 2>including one who's a Holocaust survivor. She said, the next

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 2>thing I saw was big flames from behind me. There

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 2>was a woman on fire and people rushing to try

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 2>and help her, and other people had flames on their legs.

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 2>And all this just a week and a half after

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Sarah Milgram and Uron Lashinsky were murdered in Washington by

0:09:54.400 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 2>a man also yelling Free Palestine. And this is the

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 2>face of the Free Palestine movement, vandalizing synagogues, murdering Jews

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 2>outside a Holocaust museum, and burning the elderly during a

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 2>peaceful walk. Jewish advocate Hen Mazi got it right when

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 2>he said that this free Palestine movement is nothing more

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 2>than a violent threat to Jews. He wrote on social media.

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 2>You can't claim to be nonviolent and pursue the annihilation

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 2>of an entire country and its people. You can't claim

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 2>to be nonviolent and pursue ethnic cleansing of Jews. And

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 2>you can't claim to be nonviolent and attack people around

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 2>the world in the name of Palestine. And of course

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:49.319
<v Speaker 2>he's right. Enablers say the current anti Semitism is only

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 2>because of Israel's actions over the past twenty months, but

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 2>don't forget that this global mass protest movement began immediately

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 2>after October seventh, before Israel had acted at all. It

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 2>was kickstarted by a massacre of Jews, the barbaric murder

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 2>of entire families as they begged for their lives in

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 2>safe rooms wearing pajamas, and that massacre was endorsed by

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 2>tens of thousands around the world who took to the

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 2>streets week in, week out from day dot Now, in

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 2>my view, this is the playbook that we're experiencing. Criticize

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 2>Israel with false claims of war crimes, famine, and deliberately

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 2>targeting civilians, turn Israel into the global oppressor, dehumanize Israeli's

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 2>call for an uprising that begins as a protest movement

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 2>and then morphs into a global into fada. Justify violence

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 2>against those who support Israel, against Zionists, against all Jews.

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 2>This is what we're experiencing now. This is the current

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 2>wave of anti Semitism. It's inextricably tied with anti Zionism.

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 2>AJACK executive director Colin Rubinstein said that Colorado and events

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 2>like it show the inevitable link between hatefield rhetoric and

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 2>hatefield violence erupting in our university's streets and media. The

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Colorado attacker wanted to kill Zionists. Here in Australia, hatefield

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 2>rhetoric against Zionists is becoming normalized. And it's true that

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 2>the terror attacks, the violence, even the murder of Jews

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 2>in America and other Western countries are being excused by

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 2>left wing activists. The Australian reported how the assassination of

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:53.319
<v Speaker 2>two Israeli diplomats outside a Jewish museum in Washington has

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 2>been met with a torrent of celebratory and incendiary responses

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 2>from high profile Australian pro Palestinian activists. Because this is

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 2>the reality of globalizing the intero Fata, we're seeing violence

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 2>against Jews excused. The world, I'm sorry to say, is

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 2>in a dark place right now. The left is morally bankrupt.

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm heartbroken and angry about it. I'm trying not to

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 2>feel despair for the future because the new wave of

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 2>anti Semitism is excused as a political protest movement, as

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 2>free speech, but it's no different. It's the same murder

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 2>of Jews, the same violence towards Jews that we've seen

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 2>in the past. The left can't pretend this is different.

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 2>They can't turn violence into justifiable acts on account of

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 2>it being anti Zionism and supposedly fashionable. This is anti

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Semitism and we can't let them get away with it.

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 2>I'll come back to that topic a bit later with

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 2>Ray Hadley, but now let's bring in our panel as

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:12.959
<v Speaker 2>always in a Monday Sky News host Steve Price and

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Joe Hildebrand. How are you to you both, Good to

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 2>see you both. I want to get back to the

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 2>defense spending issue. This is clearly emerging as a conflict

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 2>between the Trump administration and the Albanezy government. Steve Richard

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Miles seemed to be open to the idea of increasing

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 2>our defense spending, but the Prime Minister shut that down.

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Was he right to do so?

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think Richard Miles was in a very difficult position.

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 9>He was in Singapore and he's looking Pete Hesketh I

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 9>to eye and Heskeer says, look, the European countries are

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 9>all going to five percent, as you pointed out, Shari,

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 9>that's their ambition anyway, but Australia is sitting in at

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 9>around two maybe get to two point three. Well, he's

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 9>had to look at Hesketh and go, okay, well, you know,

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 9>maybe we should will about it, and you know, we'll

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 9>try and get there. I mean, it's very different when

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 9>your eyeballing the person who is making the comments to you.

0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 9>And this is where it's going to be a really

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 9>interesting test for Joe's made Anthony Albanisi when he's sitting

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 9>face to face with Donald Trump and Donald Trump says,

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 9>hang on, Pete Heskett told you you have to get

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 9>to two point five or three point five whatever the

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 9>figure might end up being. What is Anthony Albaniz he

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 9>going to say to Donald Trump? Well, he's not going

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 9>to say what he said publicly in Australia today, and he,

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 9>rather foolishly, I think, believes that somehow Donald Trump won't

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 9>find that out.

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 2>No exactly. I mean we've all got the Internet, that's

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 2>for sure. Donald Trump certainly has the Internet at his finger.

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 10>It does. It's very proficient at it, Joe.

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 2>The issue is that it's not only the size of

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 2>the spending, because billions have been wasted on old submarine

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 2>contracts and repaying the French, but it's also where we're

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 2>directing us spent to and this needs to be better

0:15:58.400 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 2>thought out, doesn't it.

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think the biggest problem with Australia's defense capability

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 11>it's obviously built around submarines because we're an ireland nation,

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 11>we're an island continent. And there's been basically three different

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 11>positions on submarines in as many terms of office. So

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 11>you had Tony Abbott going with Japanese submarines, then that

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 11>got scraped, Malcolm Turnba went with French submarines that got scrapped,

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 11>and then we had Scott Morrison going with aucust submarines,

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 11>which I think are fantastic by the way, but it

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 11>means every time you change horses, you're adding another you know,

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 11>five ten whatever years to the actual time when it

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 11>gets rolled out to the point where as you said,

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 11>people are saying now we need indroim submarines while we

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 11>wait for the real submarines to come. But the issue here,

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.239
<v Speaker 11>I think Anti Albaneze has said that Australia will determine

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 11>how much it spends on defense, not America, and I.

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 10>Think that is absolutely right. I think it is very unusual.

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 11>I know Trump does things in very different ways and

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 11>there's a new normal, but normally one country doesn't tell

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 11>another country what to do. Normally, these are discussions you

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 11>would have behind closed doors at events like the G

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 11>seven that he is going to meet Trump at and

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 11>of course they're going to talk about defense spending, and

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.879
<v Speaker 11>Alba will also be talking about Donald Trump jacking up

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 11>tariffs on Australian steel at the same time, just.

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 2>To point out, because I think that's a fair enough

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 2>point that America can't make demands of Australian policy and spending,

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 2>but Australia is relying on America to come to our

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 2>aid in the event of some sort of military conflict.

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 2>So you know, there is an argument for America to say, well,

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 2>you guys have to pull your weight. You can't just

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 2>rely on us, and the demands of the United States

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 2>to step into foreign walls are increasing. Steve, Well, that's right.

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 9>I mean, if you've got an ally and your best ally,

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 9>and we've been in every conflict with the Americans from

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 9>the beginning of time, you've got to pull your weight.

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:54.119
<v Speaker 9>And I think there's got to be a bigger discussion

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 9>here about is the Defense Department itself, and I'm talking

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 9>about the public servants and the generals that run that department.

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.360
<v Speaker 9>Do they actually know what they're doing? I mean, they

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 9>don't seem to be out there vocally lobbying to get

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 9>more money from the government. They might be doing it

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 9>behind the scenes, but if the Americans say, hang on

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 9>a minute, you're going to spend more otherwise, you know,

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 9>our relationship might not be what it should be.

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 10>But the problem for the.

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 9>Left is the left of the Labor Party hate the

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 9>fact that we rely on the Americans as allies in

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 9>any conflict. They'd rather be like New Zealand than pretend

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 9>no one ever wants to come here. Well, the difference

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 9>between us and New Zealand is we're loaded with minerals

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:36.160
<v Speaker 9>that other people want. I mean, let's get real.

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.360
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, sorry to interrupt your while we're

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 2>speaking about defense spending, as you just mentioned, Steve, I mean,

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 2>what about all the wasted money, the money that defense

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 2>are spending giving their personnel cosmetic surgery and boob jobs

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 2>and all sorts of other ridiculous Yeah. I mean, obviously

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 2>that tax pay shouldn't be funding.

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:58.720
<v Speaker 11>Obviously that looks pretty silly on the face of it.

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 11>The difference is, of course, that when you are talking

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 11>about actual defense material that you know, buying a nuclear submarine,

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 11>the amounts are just so skyrocketingly eyewateringly huge. You could

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 11>cancel all the boob jobs and sex changes in the world,

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 11>and you wouldn't. You'd barely be able to buy a bullet.

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 11>But I would just say Australia has proved its loyalty

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 11>to the US more than any other ally, including its

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 11>oldest ally France. We went to war with the US

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 11>in Iraq when France refused to, including the special relationship

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 11>it has with the UK. We went to Vietnam with

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:33.439
<v Speaker 11>America when the United Kingdom refused to.

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't think under the al we'd be doing this

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 2>well Australia.

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 11>What I'm saying is Australia has paid for its alliance.

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 10>With the years.

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 11>And I'm half American, my father's American. I support America

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 11>one hundred percent. But Australia has paid for that alliance

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:53.959
<v Speaker 11>with their blood, with our soldier's blood in wars that

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 11>other countries said has nothing to do with us. It's

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 11>not our fight, it's not our region. We think it's misguided.

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 11>He could have said the same thing very easily.

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 10>We didn't.

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 11>We stood up and we went over there and we

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 11>paid with our lives. So we've been extremely good our lives.

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 2>No, indeed we have. Indeed, now Barnaby Joys has called

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 2>for Kevin rud to be removed as ambassador after Trump's

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 2>latest plan to increase tariffs and steel and aluminium, which

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 2>of course would hurt Australian industries.

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 12>Have a look Kevin Rudd is. Look, he's a good guy,

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 12>but he's he's not kicking a goal in the United States.

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 12>There's a difference in the relationship between him and in

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 12>the Trump administration. I believe the first thing you've got

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 12>to do is give Kevin another job somewhere else.

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Steve, what do you think about this?

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 9>Well, I've had my say about Kevin run over and

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 9>over and over over many years. He and I don't

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.719
<v Speaker 9>get on. I think Kevin's in the wrong job. It

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 9>was a captain's pick by Anthony alban Easy. It was

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 9>when Joe Biden was still there and Labour was hoping

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 9>Kamala Harris would win the residential election. He's a square

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 9>peg in a round hole. Anthony Albanese should have the

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 9>courage to move him on. Find him, as Barnaby said,

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 9>find him another job somewhere where he's better suited, because

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 9>he's obviously not kicking any goals at all in the

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 9>relationship with the United States. I mean the best person

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 9>we have over there and negotiate with Donald Trump's Greg Norman,

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 9>which is ridiculous when we've got an ambassador living in Washington.

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 9>So maybe Kevin's time is up. I think Barnaby's probably right.

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, indeed, And it's interesting to think had Kamala Harris won, well,

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Dutton might be in power now you know that it

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 2>was such a big impact that Trump had on the

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:40.360
<v Speaker 2>election here.

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, absolutely, look at what's.

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Albaneze and Kevin's relationship like at the moment.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 10>Joe good very strong.

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 11>Albaneze was one of the few lieutenants who remained completely

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:54.439
<v Speaker 11>more says Kevin Rudd throughout the whole fiasco. And my

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 11>position was very much the same as Arbineza, which is whatever, Kevin.

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:00.160
<v Speaker 2>As long as you're on the page, Joe.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 11>No, no, no, But I mean I think the entire

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 11>Labour Party has actually come to the same conclusion belatedly.

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 11>It took a decade out of office to do it,

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 11>but that whatever Kevin Rud's personal shortcomings were, he was

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 11>the democratically elected Prime Minister of Australia.

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 10>He had a mandate and he shouldn't have been.

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 2>Removed in a first term coup.

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 11>My understanding is that behind the scenes a lot is

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 11>going on. I understanding he was instrumental in getting that

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:27.199
<v Speaker 11>phone call between the PM and Donald Trump in the

0:22:27.440 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 11>twenty four hours after the tariffs deal were announced, that

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 11>that was a pre arranging.

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Probably just waiting to see who would win the election

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:38.400
<v Speaker 2>before he organized the f No, well.

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 11>I mean if Trump applied, I mean, if if Kevin

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 11>rud is not doing his job as ambassador, then no

0:22:43.720 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 11>other countries ambassadors doing their job either, because the same

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 11>tariffs were announced to every single country.

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 4>In the world.

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Sure, all right, Steve Price, Johoda Brandt. Great Now, As

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, one of Susan Lee's first moves as our

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 2>position leader was dumping for talented women from shadow cabinet

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 2>in favor of either inexperienced replacements or factional allies. And

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:11.120
<v Speaker 2>there are now fewer women in Susan Lee's shadow cabinet

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 2>than there were under Peter Dutton, the same number as

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 2>under Scott Morrison. This is despite her previous public demand

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 2>for fifty to fifty quotas for men and women. Now

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 2>I've interviewed Ted O'Brian. He's going to be on the

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 2>show later tonight. But Here's part of what he had

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 2>to say when I asked him about this issue. Isn't

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 2>it a bad sign that you needed as deputy leader

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:37.439
<v Speaker 2>to make those calls on your second day after the

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 2>shadow ministry was announced.

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh, Shari, I suppose partly, maybe as a deputy leader,

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>But in truth, it's just about relationships and speaking to colleagues.

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 2>That's about Tetobrian trying to clean up the mess by

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 2>ringing around to calm the waters. Now among those dumped

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 2>from Shadow Cabinet is Tasmanian Senator Claire Chandler. She was

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 2>previously the Shadow Minister for the Arts, Government Services and

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Sciences and Claire joins me on the show. Now, Claire,

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 2>thank you very much for your time. You achieved a

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 2>lot during your time as in Shadow Cabinet. How disappointed

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 2>have you been since you were told the news last week?

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 8>Oh?

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 13>Thank you first of all for having me on the show, Sharion. Look, sure,

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:32.679
<v Speaker 13>I was certainly disappointed on Wednesday when I received the

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 13>news that I wouldn't be back around the Shadow Cabinet table.

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 2>But look, politics is.

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 13>A game of ups and downs. As I think a

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 13>few of my colleagues have said over the last few

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 13>days and I'm only thirty five. I've just been re

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 13>elected to the Senate for another six years, and I'm

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 13>very hopeful that I'll have the opportunity at some point

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 13>again to serve around the shadow cabinet table. But for

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 13>the next little while, I'm very much looking forward to

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 13>having the freedom to speak my mind on the back

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 13>bench about the issues that I care about and the

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 13>issues that Tasmanians and Australians care about.

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I'm sure you will speak your mind here

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 2>on Sky News as well to our audience. Now, I

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 2>reported on the show on Thursday night that Susan Lee

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 2>ghosted Jane Hume. She refused to take her phone calls

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 2>or text messages. And I understand that you also contacted

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 2>the new Liberal leader saying that you'd be happy to

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 2>serve in shadow cabinet, but you didn't hear back. Is

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 2>that right? Yes, that's right. Can you expand on that

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 2>a bit more? What did you say when you approached

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 2>us saying that you would be happy to serve.

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 13>Well, look, particularly given I had previously been in a

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 13>shadow cabinet role, like you said at the outset, with

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:53.199
<v Speaker 13>the Shadow Ministry responsibilities for government services and science and

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 13>the arts, digital economy. I would have been very happy

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 13>to continue at that level, and you know you can't.

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 13>You don't always get things if you don't ask for them.

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 13>So I thought it was appropriate to make sure that

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 13>the new leader knew that I was still keen to

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 13>continue in that capacity.

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 2>But you never heard back.

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 10>No.

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 2>You voted for Angus Taylor in the leadership ballot, I understand,

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:22.919
<v Speaker 2>and you did go public as saying that you intended

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 2>to vote for him. Do you think that had a

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 2>role to day? Do you think that had a role

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 2>to play in why you were demote it?

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:34.959
<v Speaker 13>Look, it may well have done Shari at the end

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 13>of the day. That's probably a question for the opposition

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 13>leader to answer rather than me. But look, like I say,

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 13>politics is a nonlinear career path, and sometimes you experience

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 13>disappointments and you pick yourself up and you dust yourself

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 13>off and you get on with the task at hand.

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 13>And there is no doubt that everyone in our liberal

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 13>party room, where the you are in shadow cabinet, in

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.919
<v Speaker 13>the shadow ministry, or indeed on the back benches I

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 13>now am, we have a huge task ahead of us

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 13>to make sure that we are in the best possible

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:13.120
<v Speaker 13>position to win the election in three years time. There

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 13>is a lot of policy work that needs to be

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 13>done and I'm sure all of my colleagues and I

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 13>will be putting our shoulder to the wheel to make

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 13>sure that that happens.

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Well on that front, you know, what direction do you

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 2>think the party needs to move in to appeal to

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 2>more Australians. Well, look, I.

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 13>Don't think it's a question of us going further to

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 13>the left or further to the right, although I'll note

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:40.719
<v Speaker 13>that a few of my colleagues have had views on

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 13>what direction we need to go in, and indeed a

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:45.879
<v Speaker 13>few in the media and in the political commentariat have

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.199
<v Speaker 13>had their views. At the end of the day, the

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 13>values of the Liberal Party that Robert Menzies articulated are

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 13>absolutely timeless. But here and now in twenty twenty five,

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 13>we need to figure out a way to take those values,

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 13>to apply them to the problems that Australians are having,

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 13>and come up with real and tangible solutions in accordance

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 13>with those values, and then explain what those solutions are

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 13>to the Australian people. And I look back on our

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 13>last or our last election result, I don't think we

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 13>talked enough to Australians about the solutions that we were offering,

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 13>and I think, frankly, particularly in some policy areas, we

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 13>needed to be developing more and better solutions. And look,

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 13>I think the Liberal Party has had a tough time

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:35.399
<v Speaker 13>in recent years. You look back to the pandemic and

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 13>I know that was five years ago, but economically, the

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 13>way that that challenged our very ethos as a party

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.800
<v Speaker 13>was massive. We were putting a great deal of public

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 13>money out the door.

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 2>We had to create big.

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 13>Government by the necessity of the circumstances that we found

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 13>ourselves in. Now is the time that we have to

0:28:55.680 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 13>recenter ourselves and particularly I think recraft that economic narrative

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 13>and talk to Australians about why small government is better

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 13>for them and why big government is just going to

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 13>get in the way, is going to make their lives harder,

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 13>not make.

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Their lives easier.

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 13>That's a really important message that I think we need

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 13>to focus on for the next three years because I'm

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 13>not sure that Australians necessarily understand the merits of those

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 13>values now, because frankly, I don't think we've been good

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 13>enough at talking about them.

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 2>You're completely right and when you look at the budget

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 2>position now, it's in such a horrific position and the

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 2>spending is going out the door. The alban Easy government's

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 2>approach is to increase taxes. They're going to look for

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 2>other areas they can raise taxes. But the political challenge, Claire,

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 2>is that when the coalition said well we need to

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 2>embark on budget repair, we need a cut spending, that

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 2>was weaponized against the coalition. So you know that's the difficulty,

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 2>isn't it trying to sell the argument that there does

0:29:55.960 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 2>need to be spending cuts.

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 13>Oh, look, that's always going to be a challenge. But

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 13>like I say, Shari, we have three years now where

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 13>we have to get back to basics in terms of

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 13>how we're communicating with Australians, what our values are, what

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 13>the problems are that they're facing, and how we'll use

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 13>those values to solve those problems. And there's a lot

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 13>of work that we need to do to get back

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 13>into a position where we can win elections. But like

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 13>I say, I think.

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 2>We can do it.

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 13>It's going to be an awful lot of hard work

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 13>and we have a very short time to do it.

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 13>So frankly, I think it's almost to the point where

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 13>we need to stop talking about what the problems are

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 13>and start looking at some solutions. And I'm sure that

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 13>that policy work is underway by all of my colleagues

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 13>in the Shadow ministry.

0:30:43.240 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 2>All right. Indeed, Claire Chanda, looking forward to having you

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 2>still Unsky News, irrespective of whether Susan late Lee decided

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 2>to keep you in the Shadow Cabinet or not. Thank

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 2>you very much for joining us tonight. Now still to

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:59.959
<v Speaker 2>come deputy liberally to Tet O'Brien faces my questions about Dumpy.

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 2>The four women, including Claire Chandler. That exclusive interview coming up,

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 2>plus radio legend Ray Hadley back on the desk as

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Chris Bowen weighs up green tariffs as if our economy

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 2>isn't suffering enough already raise after this quick break, welcome back. Well,

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Chris Bowen is back to fueling climate alarmism, not ruling

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 2>out green tariffs and carbon intensive imports.

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 14>I know you've been looking at the option of Australia

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 14>imposing a carbon tariff or a carbon border adjustment mechanism

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 14>as the Europeans are looking at is what's you thinking

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 14>on that at the moment.

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, we've been again clear that we want to ensure

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 5>Australian industry it's best place to compete in a decarbonizing world.

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 2>And radio legend Ray Hadley is here and he's laughing.

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 15>I think he wakes up every morning thinking what kind

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 15>of did he get in the paper today?

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 10>What's the headline I need to equate to.

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 15>I mean everyone's been jumping up down about Donald Trump,

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 15>including US and the tariffs.

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 10>He says he's doing it to protect Donald Trump, that

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 10>is the American industry.

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 15>So if he puts on building products a tariff which

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:13.920
<v Speaker 15>we send the coal from Australia to Japan to their

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 15>coali fied power station and their of course nuclear plants.

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 15>They make the steel, they make the aluminium, we bring

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 15>it back here, he wants to put a tariff on

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 15>it because the Chinese aren't in accord with us the

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 15>way climate change is thought of.

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 10>So who's the end loser here?

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 15>The builders, the developers and those people who are building

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 15>homes or units.

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 10>I mean, it's sheer madness.

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 15>You can't have Anthony Albanizi saying well, hang on a

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 15>sec this is silly.

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 10>We can't do this. We simply can't do it.

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 15>And then he comes out for an entirely different reason

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 15>to meet the ridiculous quota that he wants to do

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 15>on carbon.

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 10>I mean, it's just but this.

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Is also what I'm worried about. Ray. There's going to

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 2>be all these new tariffs and taxes that were never

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 2>mentioned in the campaign will be sprung on us.

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 15>Well, the green tariff was never mentioned because he was

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 15>in witness protection, as I told you recently. I mean

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 15>they hit him from view and then remarkably the people

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 15>in his electorate gave him an even bigger majority.

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Bizarre. They need to watch the more Sky news.

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 15>Perhaps we have to say more people out there to

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 15>identify what Chris Bowen's all about.

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 10>He's a deal.

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Now. I've been very critical of Susan Lee's shadow cabinet.

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I've heard, yes, what do you think about this and

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 2>the people she's dumped and who she's promoted.

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 15>Well, it's remarkable that she should say one thing before

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 15>she was leader and they do exactly the opposite. Now,

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 15>I heard you earlier talking to Clear about all of this,

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 15>and I just don't understand how Peter Dutton was punished

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 15>for being I guess anti women. That's how he was

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 15>viewed by some in the electorate. There were more women

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 15>in his cabinet there are, and Susan Lee shadow cabinet,

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 15>who's been calling for a quota for goodness knows how

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 15>long now the women that she has dumped just centerprice.

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:05.640
<v Speaker 15>I mean, that's the dumbest thing I can possibly think of.

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 15>Clear Chandler thirty five years of age, brilliant. Yeah, and

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:15.359
<v Speaker 15>then Jane Hume and Sarah Henderson vastly experienced older than

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 15>the other two women. One's thirty five, ones in the

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:22.439
<v Speaker 15>early forties, and they're talking about generational change. Well, here's

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 15>a chance generational change and four very.

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 10>Capable women exactly. I mean, I don't get it.

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it was a problem when Susan Lee said

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 2>younger in terms of political experience. I mean, younger is

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 2>a term that refers to age. So is she saying

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Sarah Henderson and Jane Humor too old because they're in

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 2>their fifties and sixties, and that reinforces a really dangerous

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:46.760
<v Speaker 2>view that women lose their value as they get older.

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 15>Well, let me say this, having worked in the media

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:52.839
<v Speaker 15>for over forty years, some of the best people I've

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 15>worked with have been older people, men and women, and

0:34:56.480 --> 0:34:58.280
<v Speaker 15>really young ones men and women.

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 10>You can't just cast the and say she's too old.

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 15>He's too old, she's too young, she's too inexperienced.

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:07.760
<v Speaker 10>Because they are on face value.

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 15>You could hear it tonight on your program, Clear Chandel,

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 15>she's a brilliant young woman. Brilliant I don't mean it'd

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:15.879
<v Speaker 15>be derogatory saying a young woman compared to me, I'm

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 15>double her age. But when you call me young Raya,

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.359
<v Speaker 15>well that's because I'm more than double your age.

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 10>But anyway, you are not.

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 15>We wage it into ages, come on anyway, so you

0:35:27.040 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 15>can't afford to do that.

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 10>Just sits in there. But Jipper price for goodness sake.

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 15>I know they all voted her cause for angers and

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 15>that's the problem.

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 2>That's the issue. They supported Angus Taylor, but yet there

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 2>were men who supported Angus Taylor who Susan kept in

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 2>shadow cabinet. So this is a problematic move and it's

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:46.800
<v Speaker 2>going to continue to be problematic. And it wasn't wise

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 2>politically because now there are so many enemies and people

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 2>who are upset over it.

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 15>Well, I said to you that I don't think Susan

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 15>will lead them to the next election. I think there'll

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:57.839
<v Speaker 15>be things happening in the meantime, and that I'm not

0:35:57.880 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 15>denigrating her.

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 10>She's also a very capable woman. By judgment. Her first

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 10>few calls have been pretty ordinary.

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 2>No indeed, all right, well, look I want to ask

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:10.319
<v Speaker 2>you about a couple of international things. Now. Greta Thunberg

0:36:11.160 --> 0:36:15.320
<v Speaker 2>now wants to sail into Gaza on a diesel powered vessel.

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 2>By the way, if we've got that clip of Greta

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Thunberg saying that she's ready to go into Gaza to

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 2>save the day, here it is.

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 6>Hello, I am currently standing on the Madeline, the ship

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:36.880
<v Speaker 6>that on Sunday, June first, will attempt to again sail

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 6>towards Gaza and to try to break the siege and

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:45.280
<v Speaker 6>open up a humanitarian corridor by delivering aid like food

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 6>and medical supplies.

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, right, shouldn't Israel just give her official transport

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 2>to Gaza. See how she goes dealing with the harmas terrorists.

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 15>She wants to be a bit careful sailing into She's

0:36:58.000 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 15>not sailing, she's motoring into Gaza, as Andrew Bolt pointed

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:01.640
<v Speaker 15>out in his.

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 10>Column this morning.

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 15>But the simple fact of the matter is she might

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 15>be a bit worried about getting shot by Hamas because they,

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 15>as you've reported, are shooting people as they go to

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 15>get aid, which is sent to Gaza by the Israelis.

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 10>And so you know people say wet their gunment, Well, I.

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 15>Mean, who else runs around Gaza city with a submachine

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 15>gun if you're not a member of a terrorist organization,

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 15>which is, by the way, the July elected government and

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 15>has been for seventeen years a mass So look, she

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 15>used to drive me mad on climate change. Now she's

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 15>driving me mad. She stuck head into what's happening in

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 15>Gaza at the moment. And you know, I could care

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:42.319
<v Speaker 15>less orhether she goes there or doesn't go there. What

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 15>you're going to take a jar of peanut butter in

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 15>the Labe of Breda.

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:47.640
<v Speaker 2>And that footage you were just referring to, If we've

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 2>got it that we can show it as overlay, we

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:53.319
<v Speaker 2>can bring it up on the screen. But you know

0:37:54.040 --> 0:37:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Israel has been has set up. Know that the Israeli footage,

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 2>this is drone footage We're going to show you here.

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 2>It is where Israel set up and this is distressing content.

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Israel set up a new aid center and Palestinian masked terrorists.

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:12.759
<v Speaker 2>We don't know for sure if they're Hamas or another

0:38:12.840 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 2>terrorist group have been shooting civilians who are going to

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 2>get aid. Ray this is what you're referring to. Just

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:20.239
<v Speaker 2>a minute.

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:21.920
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, sorry to get ahead of you, but if you're

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:26.319
<v Speaker 15>framing a market, it's odds on, it's Hamas, it's odds on.

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:29.280
<v Speaker 15>You know, they're they're they're on the ground and they're

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 15>killing the people from Garsa to take away the aid

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 15>that's being trucked.

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:34.800
<v Speaker 10>In there by Israel.

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 15>I mean, and the mainstream media tends to ignore this.

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 15>It doesn't happen now. It's just one lunatic, like the

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:44.800
<v Speaker 15>lunatic in the United States of America, you know, doing

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 15>something to another race of people in that part of

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 15>the world.

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 10>No, it's not.

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 15>They're a terrorist organization, as disclosed by every government, including ours.

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 15>They won't be decried by Penny Wong or Anthony al

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 15>but easy. I mean, say it for what it is.

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 15>They're democratically elected. They're a terrorist organization. We shouldn't be

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 15>dealing with them, or even not thinking about dealing with them.

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 2>No, indeed, democratically elected. Back in two thousand and seven,

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:13.799
<v Speaker 2>bat time for another election, I'd say Ray, thank you

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 2>very much, thank Lod having me on the show. We'll

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:16.720
<v Speaker 2>see you next Monday.

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 10>I'll be here, look forward to it.

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Thanks very much and still to come. TikTok bosses claim

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 2>their app is educational for children. This is social media

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:30.360
<v Speaker 2>giants pushback against the under sixties Van plus. Teto brian

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:34.320
<v Speaker 2>doesn't rule out backing labors super tax My exclusive interview

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 2>up next, welcome back. Well, let's return to the possible

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 2>deal between the Liberal Party and Labor over the superannuation tax.

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:45.759
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:48.840
<v Speaker 2>The Australian reports today that Deputy Liberal Leader and Shadow

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Treasurer Tet O'Brien is open to a deal on Labour's

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 2>plan to tax super providing they abandoned the idea of

0:39:56.760 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 2>taxing unrealized gains and index the threshol well I spoke

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 2>to Ted and asked him about this a little earlier.

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Tet O'Brien, thank you so much for your time, your

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:11.799
<v Speaker 2>first interview since your new role is Shadow treasurer. Is

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:14.280
<v Speaker 2>it true you're open to doing a deal with Labor

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 2>on the super tax and does this mean you're seriously

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 2>considering supporting raising taxes on superannuation? No, Shahi.

0:40:25.560 --> 0:40:29.760
<v Speaker 1>In fact, we think that Labour's super tax is super

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:32.800
<v Speaker 1>big and super bad. I can't think of one element

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of it I like candidly. And if though that Labor

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>does want to speak to the Coalition, then they'll have

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:43.839
<v Speaker 1>to walk away from a lot of those aspects of

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:47.400
<v Speaker 1>what they put forward. There's no doubt in opposition. We

0:40:47.440 --> 0:40:50.800
<v Speaker 1>will be constructive where we can, but critical where we must,

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:54.760
<v Speaker 1>And when it comes to this super tax, at the moment,

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I see no choice but to be absolutely critical.

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 2>So to be clear, you will be opposing the super

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 2>tax as well as the tax and unrealized capital gains.

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:11.760
<v Speaker 2>All elements of this you will be opposing, Sherry.

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:16.359
<v Speaker 1>I can't preempt the final decision that ultimately will come

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:20.359
<v Speaker 1>through the Party room, but what I can say is

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that there are aspects of this policy that Labor has

0:41:24.120 --> 0:41:28.240
<v Speaker 1>put forward which are absolutely egregious. You mentioned a couple there,

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:32.439
<v Speaker 1>in particular the unrealized capital gains and secondly the lack

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of indexation. They are probably the most egregious of the lot.

0:41:37.920 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 1>As for though where the party room eventually settles, they'll be.

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 2>A matter for the party room.

0:41:43.400 --> 0:41:46.280
<v Speaker 1>But I can be very clear that in speaking with colleagues,

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:50.759
<v Speaker 1>they like me see no goodness in this whatsoever.

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Because the Australian is reporting today that you would be

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 2>open to doing a deal with Labor and supporting the

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 2>tax superannuation if they lifted the unrealized capital gains tax?

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:06.280
<v Speaker 2>So is that reported in the Australian Today wrong?

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 1>The report in the Australian Today was accurate. Where I

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:16.120
<v Speaker 1>made it clear that when it comes to all policies,

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>including this one, the Coalition will always be open. However,

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean a blank check. If indeed Jim Chalmers

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 1>wants to come and have a discussion with the Coalition

0:42:28.200 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 1>about his supertax, well he would have to firstly walk

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 1>away from the unrealized capital gains component. At least he

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:41.040
<v Speaker 1>should be compromising on indexation. Now, if he caves in

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:42.720
<v Speaker 1>on all of those things and wants to talk about

0:42:42.760 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>super reform, chari let's have a chat about super.

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Reform, all right. We'll we go a bit to those

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 2>discussions because we've had some conflicting positions here. So just

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 2>to be clear, if he walked away from the unrealized

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 2>capital gains component, then you would consider supporting the superannuation tax.

0:43:00.040 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 1>If Jim Chalmers confirms he will walk away from the

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:09.759
<v Speaker 1>unrealized capital gains component and the indexation, then I think

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:13.480
<v Speaker 1>we can have a conversation. That does not mean that

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 1>he will necessarily get support, but that's at least the

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 1>basis for a conversation, because right now it is so unreasonable,

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:26.200
<v Speaker 1>this is such a bad policy that there is no

0:43:26.320 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 1>possibility of any arrangement between the Coalition and Labor. But

0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:33.799
<v Speaker 1>if Labor sees the light and walks away from a

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:37.839
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of issues here, especially those I mentioned, then

0:43:37.880 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly we can have a discussion now whether they will

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:42.840
<v Speaker 1>or not, Shahi, your guess is as good as mine.

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 2>But TED wouldn't supporting the supertax even if they walked

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:50.279
<v Speaker 2>away from unrealized capital gains, and even if they supported indexation.

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't the coalition supporting the supertax indicate that the coalition

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:57.839
<v Speaker 2>does support higher taxes? And wasn't this one of the

0:43:57.880 --> 0:44:00.600
<v Speaker 2>issues that the coalition had during the election campaign.

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, if Labor did walk away from the components

0:44:07.600 --> 0:44:10.239
<v Speaker 1>of its current measure, Shari, it would depend on what

0:44:10.239 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 1>they put on the table for discussion. But you're right,

0:44:13.440 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 1>we had to learn some big lessons from the last election,

0:44:16.280 --> 0:44:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and we have and we continue to learn those lessons.

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 1>One of those lessons is we need to ensure that

0:44:21.800 --> 0:44:24.960
<v Speaker 1>we are staying true for being the party for lower taxes.

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:27.160
<v Speaker 1>And as I said before, there's no part of what

0:44:27.239 --> 0:44:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Labour's put forward here that I like at all. I

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:31.759
<v Speaker 1>mean the fact that taxes go up, you know, the

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 1>capital gains component, the indexation, the lack of integrity in

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:40.160
<v Speaker 1>what they put forward where actually they want to see

0:44:40.160 --> 0:44:43.759
<v Speaker 1>this past through the Parliament and then the Treasurer will

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:48.239
<v Speaker 1>decide the treatment of the Prime Minister. I mean, the

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:53.400
<v Speaker 1>whole thing is a dog. It really is so again,

0:44:53.640 --> 0:44:56.240
<v Speaker 1>but if Labour wants to walk all of that back

0:44:56.800 --> 0:45:00.799
<v Speaker 1>and engage in good faith talking about the possibility for

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:05.359
<v Speaker 1>super reform, of course will be constructive where we can

0:45:05.400 --> 0:45:07.359
<v Speaker 1>and critical where we must look.

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:09.239
<v Speaker 2>I just want to ask you about a couple of

0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 2>the policies that you just admitted were a mistake during

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 2>the election campaign. Do you agree that it was wrong

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:18.880
<v Speaker 2>that the Coalition opposed Labour's tax cuts.

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:24.319
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Shari, I do believe it was wrong. I think

0:45:24.360 --> 0:45:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that was a mistake and I think that's a mistake

0:45:27.680 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>we all have to own and we need to learn

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:31.440
<v Speaker 1>from that.

0:45:32.400 --> 0:45:35.400
<v Speaker 2>I reported here on Thursday that you were making calls

0:45:35.480 --> 0:45:38.280
<v Speaker 2>during the day to try and calm the waders after

0:45:38.760 --> 0:45:43.279
<v Speaker 2>four women were demoted or dumped in the shadow ministry.

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, isn't it a bad sign that you needed

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:50.400
<v Speaker 2>as deputy leader to make those calls on your second

0:45:50.520 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 2>day after the shadow ministry was announced?

0:45:55.680 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh, Shari, I suppose partly maybe as a deputy leader,

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:04.880
<v Speaker 1>but in truth it's just about relationships and speaking to colleagues.

0:46:05.960 --> 0:46:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I do that all the time. It was my approach

0:46:08.960 --> 0:46:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in business for over twenty years. It's been my approaches

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I've been in Parliament and there's no doubt when shadow

0:46:17.880 --> 0:46:21.480
<v Speaker 1>ministries are announced there are a lot of people there

0:46:21.640 --> 0:46:24.919
<v Speaker 1>because we have such a depth and talent. Who could

0:46:24.880 --> 0:46:29.200
<v Speaker 1>promis you with a phone call that decision to dump?

0:46:29.440 --> 0:46:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Were you involved in that decision to dump or demote

0:46:31.760 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 2>the file women for shadow Cabinet and did anyone stand

0:46:35.239 --> 0:46:36.040
<v Speaker 2>up for those women?

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:42.680
<v Speaker 1>So, Shari, when it comes to the decisions on who

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:47.200
<v Speaker 1>serves in the shadow ministry, that's a matter only for

0:46:47.280 --> 0:46:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the leader.

0:46:48.400 --> 0:46:50.920
<v Speaker 2>So you didn't agree with the decision.

0:46:53.880 --> 0:46:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Now, of course I agreed with Susan's decision. I have

0:46:56.520 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to say that I think It's probably one of the

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:04.359
<v Speaker 1>toughest gigs for any leader, especially when you do look

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:06.520
<v Speaker 1>at the depth of the talent in the Liberal Party

0:47:08.000 --> 0:47:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to say, well, okay, I've got to form a shadow

0:47:11.520 --> 0:47:15.879
<v Speaker 1>ministry out of this. That's tough because ultimately there are

0:47:16.000 --> 0:47:20.279
<v Speaker 1>so many individual MPs and senators who absolutely have what

0:47:20.320 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 1>it takes. But a decision does have to be made.

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I think Susan has put together.

0:47:26.040 --> 0:47:29.560
<v Speaker 2>In hindsight, do you think of the wrong call to

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:33.000
<v Speaker 2>dump or demote far of the most senior and experienced

0:47:33.040 --> 0:47:38.560
<v Speaker 2>women from shadow cabinet. I mean, you talk about these

0:47:39.239 --> 0:47:40.560
<v Speaker 2>the most talented women.

0:47:43.840 --> 0:47:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I do not question whatsoever the talent of all colleagues,

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 1>including the ones to whom you refer by the way,

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:53.279
<v Speaker 1>But I think your question to me is do I

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:58.080
<v Speaker 1>believe ultimately that Susan has put together the right team? Yes,

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I do, my question and as you will, no, Shari.

0:48:04.200 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 1>As you know Shari, you know politics like business, like

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:12.440
<v Speaker 1>other walks of life, there are ups and downs. I

0:48:12.480 --> 0:48:15.439
<v Speaker 1>know from my own experience there have been times when

0:48:16.360 --> 0:48:19.320
<v Speaker 1>things haven't gone as well as I'd like, which again

0:48:19.400 --> 0:48:23.200
<v Speaker 1>is why relationships are important. Every single member of the

0:48:23.239 --> 0:48:26.239
<v Speaker 1>party has a really important role to play and it's

0:48:26.280 --> 0:48:27.319
<v Speaker 1>important they know that too.

0:48:27.440 --> 0:48:30.279
<v Speaker 2>Shari, All right, tedt O Brain really appreciate you coming

0:48:30.320 --> 0:48:30.760
<v Speaker 2>on tonight.

0:48:30.800 --> 0:48:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, Thanks very much.

0:48:33.680 --> 0:48:37.759
<v Speaker 2>Cheers and after the break. TikTok claims their app is

0:48:37.920 --> 0:48:41.840
<v Speaker 2>educational for children as social media giants pushback against the

0:48:41.920 --> 0:48:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Albanezi governments. Under sixteen's van that's next. But TikTok has

0:48:50.080 --> 0:48:54.640
<v Speaker 2>taken out major sprawling advertisements in Australian newspapers. They've got

0:48:54.800 --> 0:48:56.960
<v Speaker 2>four and a half pages in the finn Review to

0:48:57.040 --> 0:49:01.680
<v Speaker 2>promote so called educational benefit of their app, an entirely

0:49:01.800 --> 0:49:04.960
<v Speaker 2>questionable claim. And they've done this ahead of the Albanese

0:49:05.000 --> 0:49:09.160
<v Speaker 2>government's law banning under sixteens from social media. Or we

0:49:09.239 --> 0:49:11.759
<v Speaker 2>need to hope the coalition backs the laws so we

0:49:11.800 --> 0:49:15.319
<v Speaker 2>can give our younger generation back their childhood. I'll see

0:49:15.320 --> 0:49:17.920
<v Speaker 2>you at eight thirty tomorrow night after Chang Lai's doco.

0:49:18.200 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 2>And here's Pomari