WEBVTT - The Rita Panahi Show | 12 May

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>On Scornlands Ostrodia.

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:11.000
<v Speaker 2>This is the Wader Panalty Show. Good evening and welcome

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 2>to the Reader Panety Show. Coming up tonight the.

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Leadership battles that will decide the future of the Coalision.

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Adam Crichton will be here to cover today's top.

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Headlines, including a proposed congestion tax for Melbourne.

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump secures the release.

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Of an American hostage from her mass as rumors run

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 3>wild of a deepening rift between the US President and

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Benjamin Netting.

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Yahoo Josh Hammer will have the latest from the US and.

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:41.639
<v Speaker 3>Later in the hour, Kinsey Schofield on the overprivileged Miss

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Grants arrested at Columba Columbia University and Left is Losing.

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 2>It features the.

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Former leader of the Free World. He ain't well of the.

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 4>Projects, the benefits? How do you lead the world? Harv

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 4>An ambusted instruction? How do you leave that? Of the

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 4>best Healthcarenral?

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 3>But first, the Liberal Party will vote for a new

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 3>leader this week. The choice is likely to be between

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 3>two contenders, Shadow Treacher Angus Taylor.

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 2>And acting Opposition leader Susan Lee.

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Now the pair are locked in a tight contest, with

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.559
<v Speaker 3>both of them promising to end the so called civil

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 3>war between the party's conservative and moderate factions. Ahead of

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 3>tomorrow's party room ballad Angus Taylor has said he'll reward

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 3>talent over factional allegiances, bring more women into the party's leadership,

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 3>and make the Liberal Party campaign fitter, flatter, faster and

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 3>more focused. Meanwhile, Susan Lee has said that if the

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 3>party elects her as leader, it would send a very

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 3>strong signal that we understand that things must be done differently.

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 3>She also told colleagues that the Liberal Party must respect

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 3>modern Australia, reflect modern Australia and represent modern Australia.

0:01:57.920 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Sounds like Malcolm Turnbull in a skirt.

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 3>Joining me now for more on this is chief economist

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 3>and senior Fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs, Adam Crichton. Adam,

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 3>how do you see this contest?

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Look?

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, I'm not going to pick a personal favorite, but

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:15.519
<v Speaker 5>I do notice that in both their statements they've said

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 5>nothing about policy yet, so I don't know who's going

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 5>to have the best set of policy. They've just they've

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 5>just made the usual slogans and a dine phrases. I mean,

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 5>who do I think they will probably go with? I mean,

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 5>I imagine Susan Lee because she's a woman, and it's sad

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 5>that that's a factor. I think personally, I think people

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 5>you know, should be choosing leaders on who's the best leader,

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 5>not the sex of the person. But certainly, you know,

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 5>the conventional political wisdom would be, you know, go with

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 5>a woman because the Labor Party will find that harder

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 5>to attack. But you know, I don't think the party

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 5>generally needs a lot of unity at the moment. It'd

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 5>be fine with me if there was a lot of debate,

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 5>a lot of squabbles going on, both in public and private,

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 5>so the party can work out what they actually stand for.

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's been.

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.919
<v Speaker 5>A massive loss, there's no shying away from that. And

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 5>my view is to get back to their core Liberal party,

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 5>liberal party principles of low taxation, free speech, individual rights,

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 5>enterprise and so forth. They seem to have lost that,

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:11.799
<v Speaker 5>and so whichever leader is for that, that's.

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 2>The one that I would before.

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, the identity crisis is significant within the Liberal Party.

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Precisely who they are, what they stand for. That seems

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.239
<v Speaker 3>to be a confusing issue, and I think that was

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 3>behind this really lackluster, weak, unprincipled election campaign where they

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 3>were labor lite and they've had major donors tell them

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 3>that and if you're going to run another labor lighte campaign,

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 3>don't expect to see any donations from that group. On

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 3>Susan Lee, who has added an extra s to her

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 3>given name because of numerology.

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 2>That's fantastic, isn't it. Wells just got a.

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Long track record of being on the wrong side of

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 3>debates from the voice to the Middle East issue, to

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 3>cultural war issues. This is just last year. Now some

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 3>things you can say, well, she's changed her mind. That

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 3>was five years ago, that was ten years ago.

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 2>This was last year.

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 3>This is her promoting the deeply flawed activist gender wage report.

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 6>I'm pleased to see the scrutiny that is being applied

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 6>today with the release of this data to organizations in Australia.

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:24.559
<v Speaker 6>My message to corporate Australia is it's not good enough

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 6>to have a morning tea and cupcakes and pink icing.

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 3>We had conservative women like myself Janet Albrigson, We had

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 3>senators like alex Antique Mamcanavan picking holes in this ridiculous report.

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 3>It had holes you could drive a truck through. Deeply flawed,

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 3>and yet we've got the deputy leader going there and

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 3>advocating it like an activist.

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is my problem with her, that.

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 3>She's led by the bureaucrats and she needs to be

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 3>convinced that a position is an actual liberal position.

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 2>The Voice is a perfect example.

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 3>She was pro voice and then she became an outspoken

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 3>critic when the party adopted that position.

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 2>It's not exactly authentic.

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 7>No, look, certainly that's true.

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 5>And you know, to be fair, I know I've been

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 5>away for four years out of the country, but Susan

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 5>Lee has been around for a while, and I must

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 5>say I don't really know what she does stand for.

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 5>Whereas Angus Taylor, I could name a few things. I mean,

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 5>he didn't run a great campaign. Yes, look, I think

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 5>I think Susan's a bit of a weather vein in

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 5>terms of, you know, whatever's to work politically.

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:28.760
<v Speaker 2>At the moment.

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 5>And yes, you're right that report, you know, the so

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 5>called gender gape, So the gender pay gap completely vanishes

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 5>statistically once you measure everything properly.

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that was what was troubling about that, and it

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 3>was only last year.

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 3>We spoke to Senator Matt Canavan on Outsiders yesterday and

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 3>he talked about the tyranny of group think.

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 2>It's what we saw.

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 3>At the last election, arguably, but where it was very

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 3>difficult to ascertain what the difference between the two parties was.

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 3>But we keep hearing these calls for unity, unity, disunity

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 3>is death. You've argued, perhaps the obsession with unity can

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 3>be counterproductive.

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, look, it certainly is. I mean, as I said earlier,

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 5>I don't think they really need unity at the moment.

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 5>They need to work out what they stand for, and

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:15.679
<v Speaker 5>not just what they stand for, but also to see,

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:18.479
<v Speaker 5>you know who on the backbench might even make a

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 5>better leader than the two that we've already mentioned. There

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 5>could be some talented people there, and if there's unity,

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 5>they won't be able to speak out. They'll just have

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 5>to do whatever the leader does. But we have an

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 5>obsession with unity I think in the political system, I mean,

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 5>the parties are actually can be a problem. I mean,

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.479
<v Speaker 5>factionalism is not a great thing. I mean, if you

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 5>go back to George Washington or to Tokeville, you know

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 5>they argued against parties because they're extremely confrontational and combative

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 5>and they often don't work in the interest of the country,

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 5>but they work in the interests of themselves and so

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 5>sometimes I think it'd be better to have a Parliament

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 5>of one hundred and fifty independents and not have parties,

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 5>so they'd be actual debate in the Parliament rather the

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 5>debate's already being sort of.

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.919
<v Speaker 3>Well, we were supposed to have the upper house, the Senate,

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 3>be the states and have instead of having party allegiances,

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 3>allegiancens to each individual state, but of course that hasn't happened.

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 2>It's just gone down party line.

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 3>So that's where the unrepresentative swill line about the senator began.

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 2>And I think Paul Keating was spot on.

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, how can you have someone in Tasmania whose

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Upper House vote is worth what twenty times of that

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 3>on someone in New South Wales. Now let's have a

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 3>look at this post election assessment from Federal Vice President

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 3>of the Liberal Party. If you own a Scott, this

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 3>might give some indication as to why the party has

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 3>completely lots its direction under the current leadership, why they

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 3>ran such a woeful labor lighte campaign.

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 2>She's rejected comments made by.

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Former Liberal Prime Minister Tony Abbott and former Nationals Deputy

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Prime Minister John Anderson who said that not all cultures

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 3>are created equal. I would have thought that was a

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 3>fairly self evident statement, but she said there is good

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 3>and bad in all cultures. It's ignorant to dismiss cultures

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 3>or to rank cultures.

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 2>It should be an aspiration for all.

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 3>People to do better, to do better, to strive to

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 3>be better, and to celebrate diversity and uniqueness. Are God,

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 3>where's my bucket?

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Adam? The Liberal Party lost.

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 3>In a landslide listening to that sort of advice, and

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 3>it looks like those smaller voices are being emboldened as

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 3>opposed to being ashamed of their contribution to that loss.

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, certainly, the empirical record is very clear some cultures

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.959
<v Speaker 5>are superior to others. Western culture, with you know, small

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 5>government and individual rights, has produced extraordinary economic growth over

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 5>the century. So there's really no doubt about that. So

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 5>I disagree with her there. I think our culture is

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 5>much better, just inherently. But look, you know where she

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 5>might have a point is if you want to win

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 5>elections in a country where thirty one percent of people

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 5>have born overseas, and that would include many Muslims, many

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 5>Chinese people, you know, maybe trumpeting how great your own

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 5>culture is is not so helpful.

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I don't think.

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 3>It was trumpeting, And I would argue, if you've moved

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 3>to Australia, particularly from a Muslim majority country, then there's

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 3>a reason why you've moved here, and perhaps if those

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 3>cultures were giving you precisely what you needed, whether it's

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 3>in lifestyle or opportunity or freedom, then perhaps you would

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 3>have stayed.

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:24.839
<v Speaker 5>Look a very good you work, very good point. That's

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:25.960
<v Speaker 5>a very good point. I just think that if a

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 5>liberal party ever wants to win, you know, in ten

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 5>twenty years those southwestern seats in Sydney, ever.

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Why can't they win by appealing to the fact that

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:38.240
<v Speaker 3>these people are one socially conservative when the labor has

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:40.959
<v Speaker 3>veered to the far left on those cultural issues and

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 3>the Liberals are too terrified to debate them on it.

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 3>And also, these people are, often particularly new migrants of

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 3>this country, are hugely aspirational. They come here seeking a

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 3>better future for their children. They want to work, they

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 3>want to build wealth, they want to be independent, they

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 3>don't want to be reliant on welfare. And that's again

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 3>something else you can appeal to. But this election, we

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 3>had the Liberal Party, opposing tax cuts personal income tax cuts.

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 5>It's pretty I mean, it was a very center left campaign.

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 5>I would say all this stuff about it was too

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 5>trump is I mean, the point to a single policy

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 5>that shows that it was very center left. So if

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 5>there's a problem, then it's that, not not that it

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 5>was too rightly.

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 3>But the post mortem analysis from all the usual hacks

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 3>is that they need to veer further left.

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 2>Every time they veer.

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Left, they lose and lose badly. We've seen it with

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:36.559
<v Speaker 3>previous campaigns, and we've seen it in Victoria, wa elsewhere,

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 3>and the learnings from it seemed to be completely missing.

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Now let's talk about Goldstein, your seat and mine. The

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 3>former til MP there, Zoey Daniel. She prematurely declared victory.

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Remember that that was kind of hilarious. Look at her

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 3>celebrating it.

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:58.199
<v Speaker 2>Was great, yay. Well, she seems in denial over the loss.

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Adam tim Wilson has declared victory.

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Everyone accepts that the media is reported on it.

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 3>But Zoe Daniel, in her latest post on X has

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 3>again refused to admit defeat, stating that there are still

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 3>up to ten thousand votes to count, and she also

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 3>said the AEC has not yet declared the seat, calling

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 3>on her supporters to respect the process and voters until.

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 2>A definitive position is clear.

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 3>I didn't see her respecting the process when she was

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 3>dancing around celebrating the Massif someone in her in a

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 3>circle needs to have a word with her, maybever embarrassing.

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you, being a neighbor, I could just wreak across

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.079
<v Speaker 3>and go, Zoey, let's have a word.

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 5>She must be pretty shattered. But look, she's going to

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 5>lose a big salary soon. I'm not sure actually when

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 5>the official date that it gets cut off. Maybe it's

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 5>when it's declared, I don't know.

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 8>But look, she'll be okay.

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 5>She's going to get a job in the SOUL or

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 5>the wind power industry, is the head of comms, or

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 5>back at the ABBC sorry, or maybe even back at

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 5>the ABC. So I think she'll be fine financially, but

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 5>she's probably personally a bit shattered and embarrassed.

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 3>That was It was now to an outrageous proposal by

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:09.040
<v Speaker 3>the Productivity Commission, the ironically named Productivity Commission. They're talking

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 3>about imposing a road congestion tax on those visiting Melbourne CBD.

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 9>By the twenty fifties, more than nine million people will

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 9>call Melbourne home.

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 8>Where As more and more people are trying to come

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 8>into our cities, the challenges our roads get super busy.

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 9>The Productivity Commission putting forward a proposal to bring in

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 9>a congestion levy, a charge for motorists to try to

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 9>limit the number of cars and trucks and encourage people

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 9>to walk or ride instead.

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 5>New York has just introduced such charge. What we've seen

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 5>is that travel times have fallen on all the routes

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 5>that are going into the city.

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Adam.

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 3>The fact that this mob called themselves the Productivity Commission

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 3>is absurd, as is the notion that this tax is

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 3>working a treat in New York. Yeah, of course it's

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 3>reducing traffic because poor people, ordinary working people can't afford

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 3>to drive into the city anymore. So if you want

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 3>to exclude poor people from the CBD from driving into

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 3>the CBD, then go right ahead.

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 5>Coletely agree with those arguments.

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 2>It's very regressive.

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 5>And also they're getting ahead of themselves. The traffic in Melbourne,

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 5>it's bad, but it's not like Manhattan, I mean, so

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 5>they just want to introduce a tax clearly they just

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 5>like it.

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 2>They're just anti car. Their anti car.

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 3>They want to see bike lanes which nobody is using.

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 3>They want to see more public transfer. You know what,

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 3>you can't take home six bags of shopping on your bike,

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 3>particularly if you live in Narry Warren.

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.319
<v Speaker 5>But the head of the Productify, the head of the PC,

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 5>the Productivity Commission, she was a big champion of Lockdown's actually,

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 5>of course, so I'm not surprised that she also supports

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 5>this sort of tax. I mean, we need less tax

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 5>in this country, not more. I mean, if they want

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 5>to boost productivity, why are they talking about stamp duties

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:50.319
<v Speaker 5>in Victoria.

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just bought a place.

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 5>Have to pay fifty grand just for someone to go

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 5>that's it.

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 2>That's it.

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 8>I mean, that's a.

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Shoe, and that prevents you from easily selling that property

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 3>and buying something else.

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 2>Because you'll have to pay it each and every time.

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 5>A massive problem.

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 2>But just silence for the productivity, the productivity.

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 3>We need to have some truth in what people call

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 3>themselves and their bodies, and calling the Productivity Commission that

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 3>name is an insult to productivity and to the English language.

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 2>Adam Crichton, thank you so much for your time. Thanks

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 2>joining me.

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Now is a steem geologist and author professor in primer

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 3>in Let's start with the ABC. Former ABC board member

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 3>Joe Gersh has called on the taxpayer funder broadcaster to

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 3>conduct a comprehensive review of its election coverage. Here is

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 3>that the ABC will become a mouthpiece of government under

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Labour's supermajority, become I think we got there some time ago.

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Twenty eight thousand of those home Remarchael.

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 10>What would your mother say hearing you interrupt her?

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Just I've been interrupted the entire time. Just please, it's okay.

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm unflappable, Sarah.

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 10>I'm going to ask you one more time, and everyone

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 10>is listening to me. Ask this question, how many social

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 10>and affordable houses will you build?

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, we will fund social and for right.

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 8>That's it.

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 2>You're not getting an answer, You'll get an answer out

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 2>of me. And who can forget this on election night?

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 10>Let's just talk about this sensibly. Just into We saw

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 10>you wearing a make Australia a Great Again hat at

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 10>a time when Donald Trump poison to the world. We

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 10>saw you give a speech in which you used a

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 10>Donald Trump value statement to make Australia, Great together.

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Ian.

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 3>When the ABC is critical of a labor government, it's

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 3>always from the left, never from the right, never from

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 3>the conservative point of view. And I would argue their

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 3>conduct during the Voice referendum. Their coverage of that issue

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 3>was far more reprehensible than what we saw during the

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 3>election campaign. It was so relentlessly pro Voice and often

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 3>hysterically so.

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 2>It was pro Yes in just about every bit of coverage.

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 8>Well, that interview was vulgar, it was partisan, and the

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 8>ABC has been like that for a long while and

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 8>the last time I appeared on the ABC it was

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 8>an ambush. Of course, that is their standard tactic. Now.

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 8>When Sarah talks about what would your mother think about this?

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 8>I look at her and think, well, only a mother

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 8>could love that. You can't behave like that on taxpayer

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 8>funded television. That is just not the way you behave.

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 8>And I think to set behavioral standards like that shows

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 8>you that the ABC has got right to the bottom.

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 2>It has.

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 3>But even if they do agree to this comprehensive review,

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 3>we know who's going to be doing the review, and

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 3>we know what the recommendations are going to be.

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 2>The entire exercise will be pointless because that will.

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Come up with no bias, no learnings, and just more

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 3>of the same.

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 8>Well, I can suggest some wonderful names for the review.

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 8>Some of the people that are on this network, like

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 8>Krager for exactly, plast think he would do quite a

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 8>good thing.

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.360
<v Speaker 2>He would love that role. He would do it for free.

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 2>He would do it for free.

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 8>Hard Graves would be another way. So there are some

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 8>people around who would take a very different view to

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 8>the soft glove approach that a review would be. In

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 8>the trick with the review, it's to appoint the people

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 8>to do the review. You've got to drive that. Once

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 8>you've appointed the right people, you know the way it's

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 8>going to go. And that's the way the ABC review

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 8>is going to be. And I was once a listener

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.120
<v Speaker 8>to the ABC, especially ABC FM Classic.

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>And it's just terrible.

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 2>They pretle on piece of music.

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 8>It wasn't it wasn't. So I think we've got to

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 8>scrap the ABC except for ABC Regional Radio and put

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 8>it out the subscription like Sky.

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:53.199
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's never going to happen. And the conservative so

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 3>called Conservative Coalition governments who had plenty of opportunity to

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 3>reign in the ABC to fund aspects of it to

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.360
<v Speaker 3>hold them account and will refuse to do so. And

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 3>it would be I think her foolish to expect the

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Labor Party to be doing anything.

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 8>WNG really what you say, and that's what's happened.

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Now, let's talk about these shock revelations about the Antarctic

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 3>ice shelf. A study published in Science China Earth Sciences

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 3>has found that between twenty twenty one and twenty twenty three,

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 3>the Antarctic ice sheet, far from disappearing, has been experiencing

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 3>record growth almost one hundred and eight gigatons or one

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 3>hundred and eight billion metric tons of ice per year.

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 2>How do we explain this?

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 3>Because I thought these this was going to be the

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 3>end of the world, these rising sea levels and everyone

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 3>was going to drown, and now we've.

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 8>Got record gross Well, we have cycles, and these cycles

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 8>are where the ice sheds grow the ice sheets contract.

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 8>Now in the Antarctica, you've got another parameter which journalists

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 8>never meant. They never chase it up in questions, they

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 8>never put it down in any articles about Antarctica, and

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 8>that is there are one hundred and fifty geothermal centers

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 8>and volcano underneath the ice sheet and if you're going

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:15.919
<v Speaker 8>to heat the ice from below, what's it going to do?

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 8>It will melt a very slight temperature raised from the

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 8>top of the ice sheet. If you raise the temperature

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 8>from minus twenty to minus eighteen, the ice won't melt.

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 8>But if underneath the temperature seven to fifty degrees celsius,

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 8>it will melt.

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 2>So when you.

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 8>Ignore the volcanic factor, then you end up shock, horror, surprise.

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 8>We have psychical climates on planet Earth. We've known that

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 8>for over one hundred years, and nothing should shock you

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 8>if you're aware of the literature.

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 3>Oh well, well, you're speaking there like some sort of

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:53.680
<v Speaker 3>a geologist, some sort of leading john.

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 8>What would climate? We've only been studying it for two

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 8>hundred years and looking at four and a half billion

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 8>years of what would What would.

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, Professor the implymer? Thanks for your time tonight.

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Thank you still to come.

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Matt Lefty's losing it plus as Donald Trump. So here's

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 3>the release of an American hostage from her mask. Rumors

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 3>run rife of a rift between the US President and

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Benjamin ettan Yahoo Josh Hammer.

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 2>As the details.

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 3>You're watching the Reader Panny Show, and it's time for

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 3>lefties losing it. I'll be bringing you a Biden extravaganza shortly.

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 3>But let's start with one of our favorites, stillan mulvainy

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.399
<v Speaker 3>who has made a creer out of mocking what he

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 3>calls girlhood and this fight causing more than a billion

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 3>dollars worth of damage and almost destroying bud Light. With

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 3>an endorsement, he is now promoting another iconic brand for

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 3>such a.

0:20:57.400 --> 0:20:58.959
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen you in that dress?

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 7>Sure, funny, this is the one that I always pull

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 7>out on my relationships.

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Started to get a little serious.

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, yes, I'm sure they'll have the ladies flocking to

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:18.080
<v Speaker 3>buy those overpriced Versace garments.

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 2>Well done, Donatella.

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.719
<v Speaker 3>Let's check in on a protest that took place in

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 3>recent days where masked anti Israeli activists stormed Columbia University,

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:39.360
<v Speaker 3>taking over the library. They may have learned something in there, well,

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 3>they weren't interested in sticking around the library too much

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 3>knowledge there. It wasn't long before they were trying to

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 3>escape with shouts of let us out, let them out,

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 3>but security wanted to see id before allowing the protesters

0:21:54.440 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 3>to leave. Remember the days when you needed to have

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:18.239
<v Speaker 3>an IQ above room temperature to attend university. Now, the

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 3>most dangerously dumb seem to be recent graduates.

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, where else will you hear something this silly?

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Do you have depict a country in the Middle East

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 2>to live in? What country would you choose? I would

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 2>say are On, but I know that it's not the

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 2>best for women.

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Probably are On here.

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they want to live in an Islamist hellhole where

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 3>women are second class citizens. Let's see what other profound

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 3>insights these two have to provide.

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Are you guys ask for a free pastime?

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes? Yes, okay? So what is your favorite free pawsign?

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 2>They chant from the river to the sea, palestign will

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 2>be free? Do you guys know, like what river and

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 2>what sea that chant? It refers to? Like the Mediterranean?

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm gonna go Arabian for you?

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 8>And what river like?

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know river and ams, but I know it's

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 2>the one that's near there.

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 3>Let's hear from President Trump now diagnosing another Democrat, Chuck Schumer,

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 3>this time with TDS trumped arrangement syndrome.

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 2>What's here as jd.

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Vance cracks up, is trying not to crack up, but

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 3>he's losing that battle.

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Trump really is the funniest president if you don't.

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 8>And the Democrats are fighting it only because they want

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 8>to fight. They have Trump derangement syndrome. You know, with

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 8>somebody else. They wouldn't fight if you had a normal person,

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 8>if you had some stiff sitting behind you, they'd be fine.

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 8>But they have Trump arrangement syndrome. There. You know, Senator

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 8>Schumer has become a Palestinian. Welcome. I don't know when

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 8>they're going to give him the ceremony, whatever the ceremony

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 8>may be. It's a terrible what's happened to the Democrats.

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Now to the ladies of the view, who were joined

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 3>by former President Joe Biden and his wife, doctor Jill,

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 3>and good lord, it was a sickly sycophantic love festing

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 3>his nephew.

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:22.719
<v Speaker 11>Today here beyond happy to have you here today for

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 11>a lot of different reasons.

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 2>But my question is how are you looked like he

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 2>was falling asleep there.

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 3>Biden did struggle through the program with help from his

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 3>handler Amina, his wife, doctor Jill, and he was not

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 3>above engaging in more divisive rhetoric, painting America as inherently

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 3>racist and sexist.

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Apparently that's the only reason Kamala lost.

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, I was surprised. I wasn't surprised because they went

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:55.719
<v Speaker 4>the route of the sexistuit of the whole room. I mean,

0:24:55.760 --> 0:25:00.200
<v Speaker 4>this is a woman, she's this, she's a real I've

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 4>never seen quite as successful and a consistent campaign, under

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:08.959
<v Speaker 4>cutting the notion that a woman couldn't lead the country

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 4>and a woman of mixed race.

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:13.199
<v Speaker 2>Yes, he really said that.

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 3>And he also seems to think that he would have

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 3>besioned Donald Trump if he hadn't drummed out.

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 2>I mean, there is delusional and then there's this knowing

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 2>what you know?

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 11>Now, do you think you would have beat him?

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he's still has seven million fewer votes. Yes, a

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 4>lot of people didn't show up number one, number one,

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 4>number two, the uh, they're very close in those those

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 4>toss up states. It was. It wasn't a slam dunk.

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 4>And so look, you know, every time I've been on

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 4>the show, which you've been fortund I've been fortunate beyond

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 4>more than once. Thanks for having me. Is that we talk.

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 4>You guys don't focus on as much. And I think

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 4>it's good pulling numbers, but thankful this way he's had

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 4>the worst hundred days any presidents ever had.

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, fact, that's a fact. Is a joy.

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 3>The man who managed this solve the ruinous border crisis

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.440
<v Speaker 3>within weeks of being in office has had the worst

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 3>hundred days on record. Even Old Joe, in his feeble

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:23.440
<v Speaker 3>mental state, doesn't really believe that, though he did try

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 3>to blame his failings on the border on Donald Trump.

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Listen to this lunacy you got on.

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 4>The telephone, any call. Republicans do not support it. It's legal,

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 4>it'll work, it'll make Biden look good. Don't do it.

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 4>They backed off, They backed off.

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Impeached for something like that, Well, impeached.

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 3>That's a new and imaginative reason to impeach Trump for

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 3>things Biden failed to do. As Donald Trump showed, you

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 3>didn't need the flawed border bill to fix the border.

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 3>You just needed a president knew what he was doing.

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Unlike this, dude, Listen to this incomprehensible gibberish.

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 4>All the projects, the projects, the benefits. How do you

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 4>lead the world having best instruction? How do you leave

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:19.199
<v Speaker 4>the world without him the best health carerent role? How

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:21.400
<v Speaker 4>do you lead the world without having the best education?

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 2>So, how do you lead the world and do not

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 2>have that done. What do you say to that?

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 3>Joining me now is Newsweek's senior editor at Large and

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 3>Article three Projects Senior Council Josh Hammer.

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Josh, if the goal of that exercise was.

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 3>To convince the American people that Joe Biden was and

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 3>is cognitively sound, well it was a massive failure.

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:49.159
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, reader, at what point do we just start, you know,

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 7>charging doctor Jill Biden, so called doctor job Biden. I mean,

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 7>at what point does she just start getting charged with

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 7>with elder ab so? I mean, that is clearly what

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 7>is going on here. I mean I look at clips

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.400
<v Speaker 7>like this and I genuinely ask, and actually my wife

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 7>and I were talking about this, like, actually, like what

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 7>are they trying to do? I genuinely do not know

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 7>what they're trying to do. Now, there are a lot

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 7>of rumors floating around here. It's not entirely clear which

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 7>rumors are true which are not true. Apparently the Biden

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 7>family is actually hurting financially, and I have a guess

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 7>as to why. It's because the big guy is not

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 7>in power anymore and Hunter Biden is not able to

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 7>basically use that Frank Flynn to bring money into the

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 7>Coffers of the Biden crime Family bank accounts, Right, So

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:34.199
<v Speaker 7>there are all sorts of rumors that Biden is going

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 7>to try and take a massive book contract nout, that

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 7>he's going to write a single page of this book

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 7>because he's looking for ways to make money. So I

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 7>maybe maybe that's what's going on here. Honestly, I think

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 7>that's probably going on here. Rita is actually even sadder

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 7>than that. I think we're looking at as a man

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 7>who has been in the public sphere here in the

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 7>United States for more than half a century. Joe Biden

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 7>first became a US cenator from Delaware in the early

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 7>nineteen seventies. He simply does not know anything else other

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 7>than going out before cameras, other than trying to be

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 7>a public figure. The problem is that he's literally just

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 7>not capable of doing it mentally, intellectually, physically.

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>At this point there.

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 7>And it's really, really, really profoundly sad. But I guess

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 7>if you're Biden and you're trying to get a book

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 7>contract and you're willing to basically embarrass yourself before Global

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 7>TV lines to get a few more dollars into the

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 7>Biden crime family coffers, I guess they're.

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Looking at this and thinking, well, we managed to fool

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 3>the world for four years whilst he was the most

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 3>powerful man in the world. We had the bulk of

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 3>the media in on this ruse that he was in charge.

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 3>He was cognitively sound, he was up to the job.

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 3>And I think with these books coming out now about

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 3>his time in office, and some of those books being

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 3>penned by leftist authors, he's trying to counter that, but

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:51.479
<v Speaker 3>it's not working. Every time he's in front of the camera,

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 3>you are reminded of why he should have never been

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 3>in that role. Now, let's talk about US President Donald

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Trump announcing on the way he can that India and

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.719
<v Speaker 3>Pakistan have agreed to a ceasefire. He wrote, after a

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 3>long night of talks mediated by United States, please to

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 3>announce that Indian and Pakistan have agreed.

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 2>To a full and immediate cease fire.

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 3>Congratulations to both countries on using common sense and great intelligence.

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for your attention to this matter. Now, how

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 2>tenuous is this piece? This ceasefire? Josh?

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 3>And what can you tell me about President Trump's offer

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 3>to work with these nuclear armed nations to come up

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 3>with a solution over Kashmir?

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 7>Well, this is an extraordinarily complicated and extraordinarily emotionally religiously

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 7>fraught conflict bearer in the Cashi or Pakistan. India have

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 7>been at lagger heads Rita, as you know, for longer

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 7>than half a century. It has been a very, very,

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 7>very long time. And both these countries our nuclear powers.

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 7>Anytime you have two nuclear powers that are directly firing

0:30:56.800 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 7>each other and not necessarily firing via proxy, as Russia

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 7>and the United States have been doing Ukraine for the

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 7>past three years, but literally just directly, no proxy, just unfettered,

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:09.760
<v Speaker 7>but you know, shots fired across the border that has

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 7>potential to be absolute disastrous. So if there is an

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 7>actual ceasefire and it's it's a very fluid connect situation.

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 7>With the last I checked, it looks like things were

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 7>a lot calmer than they were at least earlier in

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 7>this past week, then that is news to be celebrated

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 7>all throughout the world. I think that America, fundamentally, and

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 7>Donald Trump is the right person to do this, has

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 7>to reassess its relationship with these two particular countries. So

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 7>back during the Cold War, India was part of the

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 7>broader Soviet sphere of influence there, they were cozy with

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 7>communists China, with a part tiight South Africa, and so

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 7>war there. So the United States made a decision to

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 7>ally with India's rival Pakistan. That decision might have been

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 7>correct at the time, it has not been particularly sound,

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 7>shall we say, in retrospects. Let's not forget that Osama

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 7>bin Laden was actually found in Pakistan. Pakistan is increasingly

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 7>a radical Islamist nation in there. America's ally in this

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 7>conflict is no longer Pakistan. It really actually is India.

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 7>America and the Western general, Australia, western style countries really

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 7>ought to stand shoulder to shoulder with India.

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>What my money's worked this conflict there.

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 7>I think that Donald Trump's the right guy to make

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 7>inroads there with Moody and the leadership in New Delhi,

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 7>and I look for those inroads to hopefully continue.

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump has announced that an American Israeli hostage held

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 3>by HAMA since October seven, twenty twenty three, is coming home.

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Trump wrote, I'm happy to announce that Eden Alexander, an

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 3>American citizen who has been held hostage since October twenty

0:32:37.640 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 3>twenty three, is coming.

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Home to his family.

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm grateful to all those involved in making this monumental

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 3>news happened. This was a step taken in good faith

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 3>towards the United States and the efforts of the mediators

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Katar in Egypt to put an end to this very

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 3>brutal war and return all living hostages and remains to

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 3>their loved ones.

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Josh. This development comes out as.

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Reports of a growing rift between Donald Trump and Benjamin

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Netting Yahoo emerge. What can you tell me about what

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 3>this means for the war between Hamas and Israel? Is

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 3>there a truth that there is a rift between these

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 3>two leaders.

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 7>So there's an enormous amount of rumors, and it is

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 7>very very difficult to know what exactly is certain and

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 7>what is not certain. Now, apparently the asking price that

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 7>Hamas essentially again this is just a rumor, This is

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 7>not verified, but allegedly the asking price that Hamas asked

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 7>President Trump and Or to free the last American hostage

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 7>there was to put pressure on Netta Yahu to establish

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 7>a definitive time frame to wind down the military operations

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 7>in Gaza.

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>The obvious problem is that Prime.

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 7>Mister Naton Yahu and the Israelities are not ready to put

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 7>a definitive time frame on the operations in Gaza because

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 7>Hamas is not close to being eradicated yet. Now they

0:33:55.880 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 7>are deeply, deeply hurting compared to where they were on

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 7>October sixth, twenty twenty three. That should not be surprised

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 7>to anyone there. But yes, I think it's fair to

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:08.240
<v Speaker 7>say that they're likely are increasingly signs of a rift.

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:10.760
<v Speaker 7>Maybe there is not a rift at this exact moment,

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 7>but there are a lot of ten situations. The latest

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:15.240
<v Speaker 7>rumors over the past twenty four to thirty six hours

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 7>are that Qatar, of all countries, might be gifting a

0:34:18.480 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 7>Boeing seven forty seven to be an Air Force one

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:24.440
<v Speaker 7>backup plane or something along those lines. They're Qatar, shall

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 7>we say, is a problematic country. They are somewhat infamous

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 7>when it comes to double speak. They like to play

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:33.839
<v Speaker 7>the nice role of mediator when it comes to these negotiations,

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 7>but they also are major funders of Hamas and the

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 7>Muslim brotherhood there. The Trump Organization recently into big deal

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 7>to develop a new golf course there in Doha, so

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 7>it's a little difficult to know exactly what is going

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:46.759
<v Speaker 7>on here. At the end of the day, though, the

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:50.839
<v Speaker 7>American people and especially MAGA voters. Republicans really do stand

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 7>overwhelmingly with Primauisternenti Yahu in Israel. So if for no

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 7>other reason than that reason, Rita, I expect that US

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 7>Isra relations will continue to be quite close.

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:04.400
<v Speaker 3>Now, a lot has happened in the recent days, is Josh.

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 3>We've got a lot to cover, including the US striking

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 3>a trade deal with the UK. This was pretty big news,

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 3>but it was a long before the usual suspects in

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 3>the media were out to downplay the significance of the deal.

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Let's have a listen to MSNBC.

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 12>This is relatively low hanging fruit. If you can't get

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 12>a trade deal with the longest standing and loyalist United

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 12>States ally anywhere in the world over generations, you're going

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 12>to be in trouble when you're dealing with some of

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 12>the more obstruperous countries around the world, the ones that

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:41.240
<v Speaker 12>are more willing to resist your entreaties.

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Josh, if it's so easy, then why didn't previous administrations

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 3>do it?

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Why didn't Joe Biden do it?

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Why did the Obama administration do it? What can you

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 3>tell me about this deal?

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 7>Okay, so this deal I believe really should shatter a

0:35:57.400 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 7>lot of illusions as to a President Trump, MAGA more

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 7>generally believe about trade and what they do not believe

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 7>about trade. I think a lot of people look at

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:06.879
<v Speaker 7>President Trump, they look at him as the so called

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 7>tariff guy, and they say, this guy doesn't believe in trade.

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:10.240
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't want to trade with anyone.

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 7>He wants every single product, every good, every leg of

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 7>every supply chain to be made here in the United States.

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not true.

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 7>What nationalists, realists, what MAGA believes is to oppose these

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 7>multilateral trade boondoggles, these World Trade Organizations style trade deals

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 7>that loop in twenty thirty countries there and you essentially

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 7>at some point lose control over the granular details as

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 7>to what is being traded there.

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:36.840
<v Speaker 1>What MAGNA supports are.

0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 7>Prudential, specific, granular bilateral trade deals. Country A and Country

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:44.879
<v Speaker 7>B agreed to lower trade barriers in exchange for blah

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 7>blah blah blah blah. That's the sort of thing that

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 7>the US and the UK worked out. So the fact

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 7>that this happened and happened fairly quickly, actually barely over

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 7>a month after so called Liberation Day at the Rosegarn

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 7>the White House there, that actually ought to be an

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 7>incredibly auspicious and positive sign when it comes to other

0:36:58.520 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 7>countries that.

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Are looking to negotiate.

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:02.880
<v Speaker 7>Though, by the way, you know, in response to that

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 7>clip that we just heard from from that you know,

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:08.239
<v Speaker 7>you know, rather upset leftist shall we say there, I

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 7>would like to just say one thing. You know, the

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 7>UK and the US do have a special relationship, but

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:16.319
<v Speaker 7>the US also got it it's independence from the UK

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 7>over two hundred years ago. And in fact, if you

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 7>go back and look at the American founding, Alexander Hamilton

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 7>published his report on Manufacturer and he presented it to

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 7>Congress as the nation's first Treasury Secretary in seventeen ninety one,

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 7>specifically making the argument that the United States had to

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 7>be trade independent of Britain because otherwise it would not

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:37.240
<v Speaker 7>be successful nations. So it's actually a very long history

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 7>of America trying to get independent from Britain. There, So

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:42.399
<v Speaker 7>actually it's probably a bit of a bigger deal from

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 7>a kind of a longer form historical view than this

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 7>kind of you know, hurt left wing commentator would care

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:48.800
<v Speaker 7>to point out.

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Shall we say, And I'm would say there's plenty of

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:56.440
<v Speaker 3>other countries, including my own Australia, that would think we

0:37:56.560 --> 0:38:01.799
<v Speaker 3>are as bigger allies and to the US as the

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:04.720
<v Speaker 3>UK is. So for the UK to get this still first,

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 3>I think we'll be wanting to be next in line

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:12.000
<v Speaker 3>to strike a deal. Are there other deals that are imminent?

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Are you hearing other countries are close to an agreement?

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 7>Well, Scott be send the tradery secretary. I mean, he

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 7>was in Switzerland this past weekend, so you know, he

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:25.239
<v Speaker 7>was meeting with the Chinese. Chinese counterparts in Switzerland there. Look,

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 7>I mean Donald Trump put on social media, on truth

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 7>social the White House actually put out a formal official

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:33.319
<v Speaker 7>statement saying that a trade deal had been reached with China. Now,

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 7>there's not a whole lot in the way of details there,

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 7>but presumably there's something because I mean this came out

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:40.839
<v Speaker 7>not necessarily just from social media, but the White House

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 7>literally put it on white House dot gov from their

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 7>verified social media accounts there.

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:46.719
<v Speaker 1>So hopefully we learn more.

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 7>I mean, that's that's probably gonna happen in real time

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:50.359
<v Speaker 7>here in the next twenty four or forty eight hours

0:38:50.400 --> 0:38:52.759
<v Speaker 7>or so. But it looks like US China could have

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:55.919
<v Speaker 7>an off ramp to this trade war sooner rather than later,

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:58.520
<v Speaker 7>which is probably a good thing for consumers. As long

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:01.880
<v Speaker 7>as Donald Trump and MAGA and America get concessions out

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 7>of it. As long as there's something to actually point

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:05.840
<v Speaker 7>to and say this is actually a win, then I

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:07.400
<v Speaker 7>will be optimistic for it.

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:09.360
<v Speaker 1>But again, the devil will be in the details in

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that one.

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:16.919
<v Speaker 3>Now we're seeing more leftist officials being arrested. Funnily enough,

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:19.799
<v Speaker 3>when you break the law, you'll end up in handcuffs.

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Here is Newark Mayor raz Baraka, who was arrested at

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:30.279
<v Speaker 3>an ICE facility. That's the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 3>detention facility that opened last week. Josh, the mayor, claims

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:49.959
<v Speaker 3>he did nothing wrong and he's vowing to shut down

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 3>the ICE facility there.

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 7>You know, reader, if I didn't know any better, if

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 7>I saw this clip in a vacuum of a government

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 7>official storming, aren't storming a federal immigration facility there with

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 7>anarcic intention, with the intention of undermining and subverting and

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 7>dare I say, seeking to on a smaller scale, potentially

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:14.399
<v Speaker 7>overthrow one facet of the federal government. You know, if

0:40:14.400 --> 0:40:17.919
<v Speaker 7>I were being a little bit more, you know, shall

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:20.520
<v Speaker 7>we say a little a little more diabolical. I might

0:40:20.560 --> 0:40:22.279
<v Speaker 7>say this is that this looks a heck of a

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 7>lot like an insurrection, because that's basically what it is.

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:28.719
<v Speaker 7>I mean, this is essentially a blue state mini insurrection there.

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 7>And I mean, you know who the hecker of the Democrats,

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 7>who the hecker of the left this year? You know,

0:40:33.760 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 7>to say that Donald Trump and the whole January sixth

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 7>and know this was kind of a republic threatening insurrection.

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 7>I mean, what, just what incredible hypocrisy. But the worst

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 7>part about it to me is that this says so

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 7>much about the actual state of the politics of the

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 7>Democratic Party, meaning what plays politically well for them? What

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 7>is politically for the fact that the mayor of Newark

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 7>saw fit to do this there, this means that he

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 7>thinks this is politically beneficial because that guy wants to

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 7>run for governor Jersey. He used this as a stepping

0:41:03.000 --> 0:41:06.080
<v Speaker 7>stone for a state ride run. What does it say

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 7>that a stunt like this, an insurrectionist stunt seeking to

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:12.959
<v Speaker 7>get arrested, a photo op and handcuffs that apparently makes

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 7>you a star in today's Democratic Party? What does that

0:41:15.360 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 7>say about that party? Obviously nothing particularly good.

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:18.279
<v Speaker 1>That's for sure.

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 3>I could not believe the antics afterwards, Josh, because he

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:28.360
<v Speaker 3>was on every network playing the victim, pretending like this

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:34.080
<v Speaker 3>was political persecution. As you said, he invaded that facility,

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 3>refused to leave. He was given plenty of choices and

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:41.360
<v Speaker 3>plenty of chances to actually get out of there without

0:41:41.400 --> 0:41:44.799
<v Speaker 3>being arrested, and he refused. I mean, what, really, what

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 3>other choice did authorities have in those circumstances.

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:51.280
<v Speaker 1>They had none. I mean, this guy wanted to be arrested.

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:54.799
<v Speaker 7>He literally had every intention of going there and being

0:41:54.880 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 7>arrested for the cameras because he knew that he would

0:41:57.120 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 7>get off their two tier assistant adjustice. Again, it's newer

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 7>New Jersey. It's a very blue jurisdiction there, Democrat governor

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:07.440
<v Speaker 7>and on and on there. But again, he wanted this showdown.

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:10.240
<v Speaker 7>He literally wanted this because he thought that would play

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:12.239
<v Speaker 7>well for state wide voters. By the way, New Jersey

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 7>is actually a politically interesting state. New Jersey's actually not

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 7>quite as blue as people think it is. In fact,

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:19.319
<v Speaker 7>if you look at the twenty twenty four election, Donald

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 7>Trump versus Kamala Harris, Kamala Harris wins that state. I

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 7>forgot the exact margin, but it's roughly five points five

0:42:25.760 --> 0:42:27.799
<v Speaker 7>five and a half points, which actually is really not

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:30.320
<v Speaker 7>a particularly wide margin at all, And in fact, Republicans

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:33.480
<v Speaker 7>have actually been making inroads in the New Jersey state

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:37.040
<v Speaker 7>legislature as some of these suburbs and ex serbs of Philadelphia,

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:39.279
<v Speaker 7>New York City trend a little bit rhtter in a

0:42:39.280 --> 0:42:41.360
<v Speaker 7>more maga direction. There, there's a lot of people speculating

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:43.600
<v Speaker 7>that New Jersey could actually be in play at a

0:42:43.600 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 7>presidential level in twenty eight or twenty thirty two at

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:48.759
<v Speaker 7>the latest. So you know, the mayor, you know, you know,

0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:50.799
<v Speaker 7>the mayor might think that he is doing this as

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:53.359
<v Speaker 7>a as a political stunts to benefit his career there

0:42:53.360 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 7>in the Garden States, but he might actually be in

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 7>for a rough surprise, believe it or not.

0:43:00.080 --> 0:43:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for your time tonight, My pleasure

0:43:03.160 --> 0:43:03.759
<v Speaker 2>Coming up.

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:07.840
<v Speaker 3>The overprivileged child of a Hollywood star among those arrested

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 3>at Columbia University, Kinsey Schofield, is up next.

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back joining me now.

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:28.359
<v Speaker 3>Celebrity and royal commentator Kinsey's Schofield. Kinsey, the daughter of

0:43:28.520 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Maggie Gillenhall Gillenhall, Ramona, has been arrested during the chaotic

0:43:34.239 --> 0:43:38.359
<v Speaker 3>anti Israel protests at Columbia University last week. She has

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:43.080
<v Speaker 3>reportedly been given a desk appearance ticket for criminal trespassing.

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:47.120
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, nepotism is so en rate now, Rita, It's not

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:50.200
<v Speaker 11>just a mug shot anymore. It's a headshot for her

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 11>next roll as Misunderstood Nepo baby number three. What a

0:43:54.480 --> 0:43:57.719
<v Speaker 11>fascinating social experiment here in the States when your last

0:43:57.800 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 11>name gets you into night clubs, move and courtrooms all

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:02.480
<v Speaker 11>in the same week.

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Now, Alex Baldwin's wife, Hilaria has penned a new memoir

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:13.880
<v Speaker 3>titled Manual Not Included, where she talks about life with

0:44:13.920 --> 0:44:18.000
<v Speaker 3>her Hollywood husband and their seven children. Let's look at

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:20.640
<v Speaker 3>her ridiculous antics.

0:44:20.040 --> 0:44:23.760
<v Speaker 2>With the paparazzi. Who I suspect she organized herself.

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 1>You have a book that just came out.

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 6>How are you feeling.

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:29.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm feeling good, feeling.

0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Good, busily that's true, Thank you so much.

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 2>The kinsey.

0:44:34.600 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 3>Of course, we all cross the street holding books in

0:44:37.680 --> 0:44:41.360
<v Speaker 3>that manner. I mean, the whole thing was so absurd.

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:43.919
<v Speaker 3>Who's she kidding with these antics?

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay?

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 11>Hilaria now claims in her new book that her fluctuating

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:53.759
<v Speaker 11>Spanish accent is due to a medical condition ADHD in dyslexia.

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I have to ches.

0:44:56.640 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 11>Marco well before I would ever believe this. Hilary from

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:04.839
<v Speaker 11>Boston is giving Blue Origin energy right now.

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:09.000
<v Speaker 2>This is Oh my god.

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:10.799
<v Speaker 3>I think I'm going to have to get you to

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:13.440
<v Speaker 3>read this book and just tell us the low lights

0:45:13.920 --> 0:45:16.520
<v Speaker 3>and talking about low lights. There's been a lot of

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:22.320
<v Speaker 3>conjecture about Meghan Markle's podcast appearance with her good friend.

0:45:22.440 --> 0:45:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Particularly about this point of.

0:45:25.680 --> 0:45:30.520
<v Speaker 3>The interview where she appeared to be wiping away nonexistent tears.

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Have a look.

0:45:40.920 --> 0:45:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Now, different commentators have zoomed in on her face and

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:48.040
<v Speaker 3>they say they can detect no tears.

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:49.959
<v Speaker 2>So what was she wiping away?

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:50.400
<v Speaker 8>In ZI?

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:54.359
<v Speaker 11>This is so disappointing coming from Megan Michael, who has

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:58.320
<v Speaker 11>gloated in past interviews that she just needs three seconds

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 11>to secrete a fake tears out.

0:46:00.400 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Of her left eye.

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:05.240
<v Speaker 11>You'll notice her in Queen Elizabeth's funeral that there's only

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 11>any type of saltwater discharge exiting her left eyeball throughout

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 11>the entire event. She's just being lazy here. I think

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:16.760
<v Speaker 11>she probably doesn't want to ruin that electric spraytnd of hers.

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, apparently it was a makeup free appearance. But yeah,

0:46:22.600 --> 0:46:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I think her acting skills may be slipping because I

0:46:25.960 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 3>did not see a tear there.

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:28.279
<v Speaker 2>Maybe if I.

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Looked closer, one would appear, but I don't think so.

0:46:32.440 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Now the Sussexes have copped it from comedian Colin Just

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:40.480
<v Speaker 3>on Saturday Night Live. He's showing that one of the

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 3>conditions of Trump's new trade deal with the UK is

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:45.880
<v Speaker 3>that Harry and Meghan have to go back.

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:47.360
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty cruel, Kinsey.

0:46:48.600 --> 0:46:51.080
<v Speaker 11>Look, there's no way President Trump would accept that deal.

0:46:51.200 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 11>He's called Megan Markle nasty and says he feels sorry

0:46:54.120 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 11>for Prince Harry because his wife is a lot to

0:46:56.200 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 11>deal with, you know. Trump says he hates the way

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:00.880
<v Speaker 11>that Harry dealt with the Lake and judging by his

0:47:00.960 --> 0:47:04.359
<v Speaker 11>friendliness towards King Charles, he won't appreciate the way Harry

0:47:04.440 --> 0:47:07.839
<v Speaker 11>continues to run his mouth against the monarchy today and

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:10.839
<v Speaker 11>say what you want about the Trump dynasty, but they

0:47:10.840 --> 0:47:13.640
<v Speaker 11>are incredibly close and loyal to one another.

0:47:16.160 --> 0:47:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Now more troubles for Paul Megan.

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 3>She has been threatened with a ten million dollar lawsuit

0:47:22.239 --> 0:47:27.320
<v Speaker 3>after a woman suffered catastrophic burns allegedly from the Duchess's

0:47:27.560 --> 0:47:30.000
<v Speaker 3>do it yourself bath salt recipe.

0:47:30.000 --> 0:47:32.239
<v Speaker 2>This is a recipe.

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:36.120
<v Speaker 3>That Kinsey featured on her Netflix's show What else can

0:47:36.120 --> 0:47:36.960
<v Speaker 3>you tell me about this?

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:37.640
<v Speaker 11>Well?

0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:38.279
<v Speaker 2>I could tell you.

0:47:38.360 --> 0:47:40.600
<v Speaker 11>I spoke to two attorneys about this. Both said this

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:44.800
<v Speaker 11>potential lawsuit could no pun intended have legs. Attorney Christopher Melcher,

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:48.520
<v Speaker 11>who's ally based on Hollywood, here that Netflix could have

0:47:48.640 --> 0:47:51.360
<v Speaker 11>and probably should have, put a disclaimer on the screen

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:54.279
<v Speaker 11>to save their own skin, saying, you know, consult a

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:59.320
<v Speaker 11>doctor or seek medical advice if you're looking for something specific.

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:02.239
<v Speaker 11>Meghan foamd this is crazy, he said. She's willing to

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 11>resolve the matter without litigation if a financial settlement can

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:08.280
<v Speaker 11>be reached. Feels like a little bit of a shakedown,

0:48:08.560 --> 0:48:10.920
<v Speaker 11>but if her demands are not met, she intends to

0:48:11.000 --> 0:48:14.120
<v Speaker 11>launch a lawsuit seeking settlement damages of a minimum of

0:48:14.160 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 11>seventy five thousand dollars to cover medical expenses.

0:48:19.760 --> 0:48:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Ah, this is going to be fascinating because if there

0:48:22.000 --> 0:48:24.080
<v Speaker 3>is some sort of a settlement, I expect to see

0:48:24.080 --> 0:48:27.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot of other people coming forward with their own stories.

0:48:28.000 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 3>You don't want to incentivize that kind of behavior if

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:35.240
<v Speaker 3>it's not genuine before you go, Kinsey acted. Tom Cruise

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:39.200
<v Speaker 3>has shut down questions about Donald Trump's movie tariffs. At

0:48:39.239 --> 0:48:42.480
<v Speaker 3>a recent press event in Soul for Mission Impossible, the

0:48:42.520 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Final Reckoning, he told the Tends that he'd rather answer

0:48:46.640 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 3>questions about the movie.

0:48:49.680 --> 0:48:52.120
<v Speaker 11>This is why I think people like Tom Cruise, why

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:54.680
<v Speaker 11>he has this longevity when it comes to his career,

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:56.560
<v Speaker 11>because he's like, I'm not going to get political. I

0:48:56.600 --> 0:48:58.600
<v Speaker 11>want to focus on the facts. I'm here to promote

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:02.040
<v Speaker 11>my movie. And I think that that's why his career

0:49:02.080 --> 0:49:03.120
<v Speaker 11>is as long as it is.

0:49:05.400 --> 0:49:08.680
<v Speaker 3>He's had plenty of bad press, Kinsey, particularly with his

0:49:08.800 --> 0:49:13.560
<v Speaker 3>personal life scientology, but he's still a box.

0:49:13.280 --> 0:49:14.879
<v Speaker 2>Office hit, and I think you're right.

0:49:15.040 --> 0:49:17.319
<v Speaker 3>Part of it is he does big films, but part

0:49:17.360 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 3>of it is he steers clear of politics. He lets

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:25.040
<v Speaker 3>other people worry about that so he doesn't alienate half

0:49:25.040 --> 0:49:29.239
<v Speaker 3>the population with his political views, whatever they may be.

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Kin Ziscofield, always a pleasure. Thanks for your time tonight,

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:36.960
<v Speaker 3>and that's it from me. Up Next is Newsnight. I'll

0:49:36.960 --> 0:49:38.520
<v Speaker 3>see you at eleven tomorrow night.