WEBVTT - Giving birth as a national duty

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Ruby Jones and you're listening to seven AM. Condoms

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and other contraceptives are set to become more expensive in

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>China as the Communist Party tries to boost population growth.

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 1>With the economy slowing, birth rates declining, and for population aging,

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the government is now trying all kinds of ways to

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>make women have more babies, from taxing contraception to new

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>laws on marriages, to cash bonuses and propaganda campaigns. Reproduction

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 1>is now seen as a national security issue, and the

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>success or failure of the new policies will have far

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 1>reaching consequences for China's economic and military strength and for

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>countries like Australia who rely on China continuing to grow.

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>Today seeing an analysts at the Makata Institute for China Studies

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Daria in Biombardo on the threat to women's autonomy in

0:00:50.920 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>China's new phase of population control. It's Friday, December twelfth.

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Now. Despite government leaders stressing that things are looking up,

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Chinese economic growth has recently faltered. For a long term boost,

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 2>state and party leader Sijiping is relying on domestic consumption. However,

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 2>there is a problem. China's population is aging.

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 1>So Daria in China. Right now, we've got a population

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 1>who are getting older. At the same time the birth

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>rate is slowing down dramatically. So what does it mean

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>for China to have those two factors at play.

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, the population is not only getting old,

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 3>but it's also shrinking. So China has been classified as

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 3>an aged society according to you know you and parameters,

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 3>which means that more than fourteen percent of the population

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 3>is now above the age of sixty five. And so

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 3>that means that eventually also the workforce will start shrinking,

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 3>and that's a problem for China's economic prospects.

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>A plummeting population rate could threatn economic growth. The current

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>situation is a major concern for the authority.

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 3>It's definitely a domestic economic concern, but it also you know,

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 3>impacts China's international ambitions as a global superpower. So it's

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 3>something that has reverberations across all sectors of society.

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>And I suppose tell me a bit more about what

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it kind of looks like when those things happen, Like,

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>what is the kind of demographic situation.

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, you obviously have a lot of people entering retirement

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 3>age and sort of requiring support from the state. Now

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 3>we don't hear about this very much, but in the

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 3>sort of local governments in China, the finances are actually

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 3>pretty tight. A lot of local governments are in debt,

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 3>so the situation is already quite die, especially when it

0:02:56.639 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 3>comes to pensions. The pension fund's risk running out very soon,

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 3>and then once the labor force starts shrinking, it means

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 3>that there will be less people paying tax.

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, can we take a step back and talk about

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>how China got here? Because I think a lot of

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the time when we think about China and we think

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>about children, we obviously think about the one child policy,

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>which dates back to the eighties. For the next thirty years,

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>at least, all couples may only have one single child each.

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>The Chinese have been very swift in implementing this policy

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>throughout China. So how has that affected the population and

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing today?

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 3>So the birth rate had already started shrinking before the

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 3>one to hold policy was sort of enforced. But then

0:03:43.240 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 3>for you know, more than thirty years, we had these

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 3>extremely corrosive measures that were imposed on families and especially women.

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Financial finds and a lot of surveillance across society, but

0:03:56.760 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 3>also often forced abortions, forced serilizations, which was very traumatic

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 3>for women, and a lot of those women have very

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 3>fresh memories. And so now you've kind of experienced this

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 3>one eighty from the authorities not trying to push for

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 3>more birds. The restrictions have never gone away, it's just

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 3>that now the ideal family is one with two or

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 3>three children.

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So how has that affected the way that women

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>think about families and motherhood.

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.839
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think that it's not just the one child

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 3>policy that has influenced this, but the number of marriages

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 3>every year continues to deep like it's basically never been

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 3>this slow. We have a much much larger section of

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 3>people with higher education. You know, the vast majority of

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 3>young women these days are very highly educated. They're probably

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 3>located in urban centers, and so the standards of living

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 3>have changed. People have different expectations from their life now,

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 3>and there is this sense that having a child will

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 3>severely impact your standard of living, especially for a young

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 3>urban couple, because having children in China's become so expensive.

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 3>By some estimates, it's actually more expensive to raise a

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 3>child in China than it is in the US or

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.799
<v Speaker 3>in Japan right now, and especially things like the cost

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 3>of education. So you know, it's so many factors that

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 3>play into this decision. Organizations like national family planning organizations

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 3>or the Women's Federation, they basically want to make it

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 3>cheaper for young people to get married, so they offer

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 3>the opportunity to just get married on mass and all

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 3>expenses covered, and they also receive a patriotic marriage badge

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 3>from the authorities. But you're probably only going to convince

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 3>people who wanted to get married in the first place,

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 3>didn't have the money to do so. I don't think

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 3>that's convincing anyone who didn't want to get married in

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 3>the first place.

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, the government's not just trying to encourage women

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to have children, it's trying to coerce them. While this

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is happening, while attitudes towards marriage and motherhood are changing,

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 1>particularly among young people in China, there is this coordinated

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>national push by the Chinese Communist Party to try and

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>reverse that. So tell me a bit more about what

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that actually looks like what we're hearing from President she

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and the campaigns that are underway.

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 2>We will implement policies to stimulate the birth rate, and

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.919
<v Speaker 2>we will lead a national strategy to find solutions to

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 2>our aging population.

0:06:55.440 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 3>So Sudinping is framing childbirths within the context of national rejuvenation,

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:05.239
<v Speaker 3>you know, and that the message is obviously that having

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 3>children is not just a personal choice, but you know,

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 3>it has to be a contribution to the country. It's

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 3>for the future security of the country. And so officials

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 3>are told or like directed to guide people first to

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 3>marry because childbirths outside of wetlock is still frowned upon,

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 3>but also to have children at a proper age, so

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 3>called proper age. So you have this kind of sharing

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 3>of pseudo scientific theories around motherhood and how motherhood is

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 3>healthier for women, or that you know, at some point

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 3>is actually great if you could study and have children

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 3>at the same time, which is the complete opposite of

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 3>what authorities were saying up until ten years ago. Do

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 3>you see these campaign celebrating mothers and messages about family duties,

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 3>especially for women. So that kind of narrative around women's

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 3>rights in general quality has turned back again to traditional

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 3>confusion values of women's primary role or as caregivers. There

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 3>is a small effort to get men to contribute a

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 3>bit more to household duties and then care duties it's

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 3>probably short sighted. It will take a long time for

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 3>that to change, especially when women are still the ones

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 3>who have to sacrifice their careers and that's something that

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 3>happens as soon as they have a child.

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So there's this attempt to try and change the

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>way that people think about marriage, right, but there's also

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>there's some I guess more heavy handed approaches at play

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>as well. Out then new laws, new policies tell me

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>about those.

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So at the moment, there's this combination of support

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 3>and pressure on paper. The government is trying to expand

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:57.160
<v Speaker 3>child care services, to offer subsidies. Actually this year, for

0:08:57.200 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 3>the first time, we had a national level cash subsidy introduced,

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 3>and so the support is kind of being announced and

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 3>it's there in some places, but not everywhere. And so

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 3>at some point you need to pair this support with

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 3>more coercive measures, and you know, you start, for example,

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 3>having tighten access to abortion or contraception. There is a

0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 3>push to decrease the number of abortions in China because

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 3>it's still the country with the highest number of abortions globally.

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 3>But then you know, they do things like taking contraceptives

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 3>of the tax exempt item lists, so it's likely that

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 3>next year the cost of condoms and things like that

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 3>is going to increase.

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I wanted to ask about that because some of

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>these measures do seem quite punitive and coercive. So how

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>are people responding to having the state intervene in this way?

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 3>I would say mostly with skepticism. It's obviously, especially among

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 3>young people and women, there is a sense that actually

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 3>the party is not interested in solving the basic structural

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 3>issues that they're facing, like high living costs or long

0:10:12.960 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 3>working hours, or these issues with gender equality, but simply

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 3>just trying to pressure them more. And this can easily backfire.

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 3>What a lot of women are saying is that they're

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 3>not convinced. They still don't want to get married, and

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 3>they still don't want to have children.

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>And you said that this is really for the CECP

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>at least about the security of the country. So what

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, what happens. I suppose if this attempt to

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>get people to have families, to get married, to have

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>more children, if that doesn't work, how concerned is the

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>CECP about that.

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 3>I think the CCP and the leadership more broadly are

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 3>quite worried because they have seen this play out already.

0:10:56.240 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 3>In other countries, and this trend of population and shrinking

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 3>is almost irreversible. I mean, once it starts happening, it's

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 3>really really hard to turn around. So, you know, China's

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 3>sort of development is funded on this sustained you know,

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 3>economic growth, and that risks being impacted by this demographic shift.

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 3>So I think that the ambitions that Sidinping has for

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 3>China's a global superpower are looking more shaky from a

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 3>domestic perspective when looking at this issue in particular, and

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 3>what about.

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>What it means for women in China more broadly. I

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>mean for it to be more difficult for you to

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>get contraception or get an abortion. I mean, these are

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>significant things that impact women's life. So how do you

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>think about the future for women when they're kind of

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in this situation?

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 3>There are really worrying trends. One of the things that

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned in the report is even a court case

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 3>that happened a year and a half ago, I believe,

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 3>And in that court case, specifically, the judge rule that

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 3>a woman had infringed on her husband's reproductive rights because

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 3>she had an abortion without his consent. And you know,

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.319
<v Speaker 3>the domestic violence rates in China are still very high,

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 3>and this is just quite concerning on so many levels,

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 3>like it could impact even women's education prospects and definitely

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 3>women's labor rights. I mean, even if the government can

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 3>promise that they will give more paternity leaves so that

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:37.439
<v Speaker 3>fathers also can look after children, companies are not really

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 3>doing that right now, and there's not enough subsidies for

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 3>private companies to do that, and so it is worrying

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 3>what's happening in China. But I also see it as

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 3>a bit of a global trend, you know, where you

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 3>see this focus on women's rights and gender equality retreat,

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 3>there are similar narratives across Europe and the United States

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 3>of returning to traditional family values and especially restricting women's autonomy.

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, Daria, thank you so much for your time, Thank

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:34.719
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Also in the news, Anthony Alberenzi has

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>defended his government's use of expenses, saying the rules are

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>set at arm's length from government. The Prime Minister and

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Communications Minister Anika Wells have been repeatedly asked about her

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>spending while the pair are out trying to promote the

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>new social media band for teenagers, which went into effect

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday. When he was asked if the rules should

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 1>be changed, Mister Abenezi said he's not. The Finance Minister

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and property developers in Queensland are set to be able

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to make political donates again as the state government introduces

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 1>new legislation to lift a ban.

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 2>The practice was.

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Outlawed in twenty eighteen by the former Queensland Labor government

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>after the Crime and Corruption Commission recommended that local councils

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>should not be able to receive money from developers, and

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 1>they expanded it to include state candidates. Debate on the

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>legislation will begin when Parliament resumes in the new year.

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Ruby Jones. This is seven am. Thanks for listening.