WEBVTT - Round 22 Takeaways

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Well keep squeaking closer and at the moment, I think

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the start of every show week so we've got to

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:07.320
<v Speaker 1>have a look at the ladder and outstarting to shake it.

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:09.240
<v Speaker 1>The shape up and as we said last week, points

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:11.840
<v Speaker 1>differential is so important. They look at the nature the ladder.

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>At the moment, you've got the top four which is

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>stantoning more and more settled. I mean as far as

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>forms concerned, certainly are was pretty locked in. You'd think

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:22.319
<v Speaker 1>so dolphins sit there, they've got the ability to go

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>up but still down. Then you've got Knights, Rabbit O's

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and Bulldogs that sit in the eighth. The Cowboys just

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>outside with Manly. It's it's interesting like the Cowboys after

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, most people yask them just blindly. Do the

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys play finals? They said absolutely, no way, but they've

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>got a dream run hand.

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 2>Off the back of conceding eighty points. If you go

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 2>have a look at that run like Titans, Eels, Tigers,

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 2>they win those, they're back of the conversation when you

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 2>look at that. I think it's starting tape show. I

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 2>think the Canary Bulldogs ten weeks ago, I don't think

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:58.200
<v Speaker 2>we would have been very confidence saying the Dogs can

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 2>do anything this year, No way, but I think they

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 2>can now got back a bit of their DNA defensively

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 2>with their line speed at work rate. But the big

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:08.400
<v Speaker 2>point for them is why I think they are a threat.

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 2>They're halves and their back rolls. They were devastatingly good

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:15.320
<v Speaker 2>on the weekend and I think they can have enough

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 2>threat there to cause some damage. They they play a

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 2>good brand of foot foot they can unsettled penrate.

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 3>The Roosters and the Warriors.

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 2>South City for me, is the team that if it

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 2>doesn't win a couple could be on the slide. Dogs

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 2>versus House In a couple of weeks, there's a couple

0:01:33.800 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 2>of big games that will determine. I think Cowboys can

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 2>slip in, but if they beat the Titans this weekend,

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna give them a chance. But I think it's

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:45.680
<v Speaker 2>all down to how they bounce back this weekend against.

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>The big times. The best house than the Bulldogs, uh

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Souse has got paramatter, then they've got the Dogs. Dogs

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>have got the Roosters there that house, that that that

0:01:57.680 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>game that that when they come up against each other

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>what they call an old fashioned four point.

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Penrith and the Warriors yeah, you go to start looking

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 2>at those things as well.

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 3>You do.

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting in playing the Roosters this week for the

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 1>Dogs because you see sides to go in these great

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>runs and when the loss, it sometimes burst the balloon.

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's a critical game for them.

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:18.959
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I know you give the Dogs a chance

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 3>against the Roosters big time.

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, big time. The Roosters are exactly the side that's

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in their wheelhouse. They can They'll go with the Roosters

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and look to upset the Roosters with their rushing defense.

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:29.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 2>I think the Roosters with a lot of confidence with

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 2>the eighty points. This is a game that the Roosters

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 2>play the Dogs and then Penrith next week. I sit

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 2>here thinking the Roosters have all the ingredients, but if

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.519
<v Speaker 2>they can't beat Penrith or at least play close enough

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 2>to the point they rattled them a little bit, that

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 2>is a huge game in their Premiership credentials.

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.639
<v Speaker 1>Penrith, you said, ignore that first couple of weeks coming

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>out of state of origin. It's a little bit of

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>tread water refocusing. Boy that they were good and clear.

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>His performance. I just love the variation what he played

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>with I don't think I don't think Ivan can drop

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Jack Cougar again. I just I just think it's what like,

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not just what Jack gives the football side, right,

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>he gives them a very pragmatic they know what they're

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>going to get with Jack Cougar. But what the great

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>thing about Jack Cougar is what he gives Nathan. He

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>just gives Nathan a freedom. I watched when Jack's playing

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>in the side, Nathan, Nathan is a lot more hecky

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to say this. There's more variation. He's game, but he's more.

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>He's more all in on plays. Sometimes I watch him sometimes, Nathan,

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't he won't push himself too far into

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>a set because he's got to look after that last

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>tackle option and whatnot. When jackson the side, he's willing

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to really take the line on more and more and

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>takes some risks because he knows Coiger can pick up

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the slack and finish the set for him. That makes sense,

0:03:57.760 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have to nurse him through the game.

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 2>I get your point about the variation and unlocking and

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 2>things like that, but unless I think Blaze to Lungey

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 2>holds a key if his defense is improved for me,

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 2>he is back in because they don't need to improve.

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 3>All that much to win the premiership. But Nathan for me, needs.

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 2>To touch the ball more than ever before. He doesn't

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 2>need to have someone else to help him out. He's

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 2>a gun like. He is an absolute the best player

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 2>in the competition, so he doesn't need help. In my opinion,

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it's where the blaze to lungey. Its defense

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 2>is good enough to bounce back. That's my key, and

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:36.479
<v Speaker 2>if he does that in New South Wales Corp, he

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 2>is straight back in the team.

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It's an interesting one to watch Nathan's football with Jack

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>alongside him. He hops in there, rolls the.

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 3>Greend final when he came on the field.

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I get that he'll get him because as you know, Coop,

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're a guy I had to manage to

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>many sometimes for full field and as a playmaker. That's

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>sort of playmaker. You need mental rest through the game.

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 2>But you can have Cogger on the bench you can

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 2>get that impact if the game is not going in

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 2>your favor.

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that if they.

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Should start a game with Nathan moving in and out

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:10.919
<v Speaker 2>of the normal rhythm, I.

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Think what we're about to see with Nathan. Just watching

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 1>him in that game on Saturday night, Nathan is about

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to take ball playing to another level that I don't

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>think Rugby League or even maybe Ruby Nions have ever seen.

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Just some of the things he was doing, some of

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the subtle variations, the late straightens, the deception.

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 2>You can tell, like even some of his kicks, that

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 2>this isn't something that he's just oh, you know, I'm

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 2>going to try this, Like he has been master in

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 2>his craft for.

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 3>Weeks and weeks and weeks.

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 2>He's now got the confidence to pull out banana forty

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty kicks, stop steady ball playing, no looking sort of

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:50.479
<v Speaker 2>long passes. He's been working away in the background. Yeah,

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 2>and I agree he's about to have a really good

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 2>back end of these.

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Thinking about him after that game the other night, and

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking about certain things he's obviously been working on and

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>little adjustments, some little experiments. I reckon you're going to

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>see little there's going to be moments in Nathan's career

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>where you'll see him take half a step backwards, like

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>he's lost a little bit of form. But in my opinion,

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>it's he working at working at new little ways of

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>doing things that makes sense, Like I'm not a golfer

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>koper at all, but I love Tiger Woods's book and

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>it says about Tiger Woods once he was out there

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>playing one day and he just he was winning majors,

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 1>but he just felt that he didn't have full control.

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>So he went to it to a swing coach and said,

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to change everything. And he said, are you

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>willing to do this? It's going to this is going

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to set you back two years in your career. He said,

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm willing to do it because I want that subtle improvement.

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to actually be perfect. And I'm not saying

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 1>that Nathan will. You know it's going to take six

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>months there. But you see little last year at that started.

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Last year, his football just went back a little bit.

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 1>But I think it was him trying to progress his

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>football in the long term.

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's the key part is chase perfection.

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anyone in this in world gets to perfection.

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 2>As long as you've got a mindset to continually improve

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 2>and get better, it just lives lifts the standard. And

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 2>that's the point you're talking about. Like Nathan's not all

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden just trying tricks. He's actually doing the

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 2>building blocks of ballplane and then doing the tricks on

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 2>top of it, like his cake is multi layered compared

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 2>to any other door player in the competition.

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Biggest threat to them at the moment the Roosters. I mean,

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>there's there's sides closing in left, right, and center. You

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>are the Roosters who are suddenly playing the best football

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>seen play for a long one.

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Trent Robinson in when he's one, Comps has timed his

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 2>run like that.

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 3>They feel like they're timing.

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about the Sharks in the second and the war.

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>So those two sides are closing in as well the Roosters.

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>The reason why I think the biggest threat is because

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>they're they're a sort of side that tipify. That's that's

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>saying on their day, that makes sense, like they come

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>up against anyone and on their day.

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't like that comment because it depends on which

0:07:58.280 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 2>side of the bed you roll out whether he can

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 2>win or not. Right, But the one thing I like

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 2>about the Roosters is the season has been trending in

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 2>the right direction, and every decision around winning in September

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 2>for me is can you beat Penrith. That's ultimately what

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.239
<v Speaker 2>it is, because if you're going to try and sidestep them,

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 2>then it's hopeful thinking. I feel like most people talk

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 2>about Tedesca and Sam Walk and rightly so. But if

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 2>you look at Penrith, I think the far Who White

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 2>and the Ford pack the Roosters have could be the

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 2>team that just really dominates physically. The Panthers back Moses

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Lioda is a damn good player, Lindsay Smith the damn

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 2>good player, Lim Henry's a good They're all good players.

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 2>But the fact is Fisher, Harris and Leota have always

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 2>been there and I feel like the far Who.

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 3>White is now growing into the alpha that.

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 2>I feel like he could actually if you look at

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 2>the eighty points on the weekend, go have a look

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 2>at the tries that were scored, or the line break scored,

0:08:57.559 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 2>or something that happened when it was Victor Radley and

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 2>far Who what either one or two play the balls

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 2>doing something in the leader. I think there's something that

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 2>the Roosters have an advantage over Penrith. But the one

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 2>thing that Penrith has over the Roosters is the record. Yeah,

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 2>the Rusters have not beaten Penrith for a long time

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 2>and in a big game, and there are I don't

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 2>care how confident you are and how good you're playing

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 2>unless this game in two weeks time the Roosters can

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 2>do something that says we can meet you anywhere, anytime

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 2>and will beat you as opposed to on their day.

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 2>I think that game in two weeks determines whether the

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Roosters can win it or lot.

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Sam Walker is having He's had a real jump in

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>his performance state of origin.

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Just a sugarhead of confidence that he needed right.

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>And he came out of origin and he's just come

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>out like that performance was something good. I like that.

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>I like that when he's barking at Marke you Mark

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>give it him a bit of a spray there. I

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>think I think it's probably symbolic of where CMC's he's

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>standing in the team.

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely, but the.

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Big don't keep We're talking about the moment and I

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think it won't be a distraction for him. But

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>it's good talking point. Ten years, What do you think?

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:10.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't like ten years. I don't like ten year

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>deals for players and they like it for clubs. It's

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>rarely that one party doesn't lose out. I don't like it.

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>For a player because circumstances changed so much. You know

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>which on field circumstances, whether it be injury. You don't

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>think too much about form because some form doesn't matter

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>who they are. Can have a little depth, but class

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>always comes back. But even things that happen off the field,

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>which a fact which effect on field performance. All those factors.

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 1>He put up a good argument for ten years on

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, but I just don't. But I don't like it.

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>It's a look I've said to people before. It's a cage.

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>In Sami's case, it's a golden cage, but it's still

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a cage.

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Ye, No, I agree with you. I wouldn't be signing

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:53.079
<v Speaker 2>anyone to a ten year deal. It's just my personal circumstances.

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 2>In fact, I'd be waiting into the game against better

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 2>than two weeks time before signing any condrect, just to

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 2>see how he goes. Like, if you think about a

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 2>ten year contract, these are the little clauses or return

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 2>on investment that you probably should get from ten years.

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 2>You've got to play the majority, let's call it, three

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 2>hundred games, Like you've got to be available, you got

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 2>to be ready to play all those three hundred games.

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 2>You've probably got to win multiple Grand finals in ten years.

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 2>That's fair at multiple prelim finals and more than one,

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Like you've got to have one or two in the

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 2>cabinet over ten years. And you've also got to be

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 2>the best player both on and off the field, like

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 2>you've got to set the training stands culturally, you've got

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 2>to be the main guy that they lean into. So

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 2>like Jerry Evans ten year deal, well, no real grand

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 2>finals in there since his first year.

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 1>Personal form yes, but as far as effecting the side now, no.

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Tal malolo like what he got Dallium two sixteen Grand

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:48.719
<v Speaker 2>final the next year.

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>A couple of years where he was the Cowboys were

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:52.839
<v Speaker 1>going what are we going to do?

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So like the history of the game, is there

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 2>anyone that's really return on investments those as we've spoken about.

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Delivering a couple of yours mates? Yeah, camera Jammy Smith's

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>one definitely, Billy out a couple of years out, years.

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.319
<v Speaker 2>Out for his shoulder, Like he does play three hundred

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 2>games for the Storm, but two years out is a

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 2>big thing. Darren Lockier is probably a return brother directing

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 2>your brother was a return.

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't think so. I don't think I wouldn't

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>sign him ten years like a lifestyle No. No, But

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>for ten years there were injuries there. Joey had years,

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple of growing years where he was carrying injury.

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>He got close. But but I mean Darren Lockyer, right,

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Darren Locke, you just sent me that's a there's an

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:40.199
<v Speaker 1>argument for Locky without a shadow of doubt like you

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>had day doing close to eighteen months. We had a

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>little dip going from full back to six and the

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>adjustments of that that made it was only probably the

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>back end of that premiership winning side into premiership winning

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>year in two thousand and six that he went okay.

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 3>Starting reinvented himself.

0:12:56.240 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Freddy is one. He got sort of the start

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Super League war. He went from Penrith to

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the Roosters because the a r L Super League alignment.

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Freddie won a competition, got him in the competition in

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and two. We had a couple of tough

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>years going in and.

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 2>I feel like the Ruses are damned if they do

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 2>and damned if they don't, because if they don't, then

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 2>I imagine he could get that ten year deal at

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 2>X amount of dollars anywhere else, but you also want

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a returner investment of clause or

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 2>whatever it is. So I think I think the game

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 2>against Penith in two weeks site is going to be

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 2>a big thing for everything.

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>We've got a lot to talk about it, but let's

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>just stay on this for a second, because we've oftentimes

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>being to talk about contracts and how things work. But

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I think this is interesting at the moment what we're

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>seeing now in the game. It's traditional when you talk

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>about contracts, they're looking to sign people say, you know,

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>three year deal, three year deal, million dollars a year.

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Well that's starting to change now. What we're starting to

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>see is that the very best players, the elite players,

0:13:56.000 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the halfbacks to be specific, agents now asking for a

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>percentage of the salary cap, which is very interesting. So

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to let people know, you know how much we're going

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to sign for, you know, well, hit this player player A.

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>He wants ten percent of the salary cap. So at

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the moment, the sellar cat's twelve point one million, that

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>means he gets basically one point million dollars a year.

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Next year the salary caps up sixteen millions, one point

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>six and so on, and the one that's really come

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to evidence and I'm not saying this in any way

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>shape or breaking news, has been spoken about quite a

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>lot a lot. Tommy did he's percent a sellar cap

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Cowboys. If the salary cap goes to twenty million,

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>for instance, he be on two point four and so

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>on and so forth. It's very interesting. I'll ask you

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>this question, well.

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 2>The other the alternative and what used to happen in

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 2>a broadcast cycle where the sealer cap goes up. You

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 2>might be on X and the broadcast your salary cap

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:52.480
<v Speaker 2>goes up by ten percent. Your X plus ten percent

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 2>is a threshold or a lever that they put in contract.

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it's it's been around for a while.

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 2>It's just a different way saying twelve percent of the

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 2>overall salary cap versus a twelve percent increase on your

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 2>current deat.

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's very interesting to explain it like that as

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>far as salary cap, because it almost you start to okay, right,

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>he really had a real feeling of how much a

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>player is worth. Didn't's twelve percent? Okay? What is Sam

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Walker for this? For this rooster side?

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 2>You know he's Sam, But salary caps are different because

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 2>of different players.

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>And already in the side things like that, because.

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 2>The good clubs and like to be fair. Nathan clearly

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 2>could walk into Penrith and say give me this now.

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well let me let me pose that to you.

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Right if didn't's on twelve percent Coops and Nathan's coming

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>off contract and they're a situation Penrith, they say, look, Nathan,

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, mate, we can't give

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>him more than thirteen percent. What could he get if

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>he went to right, what do you think.

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 3>It could get?

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 2>Basically whatever he wants, Like if he came available to

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Perth or the p andng like, he's getting whatever he wants.

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Would you put would you push towards?

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 2>But this is the point, Matthew, Like, you can go

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 2>anywhere and get maximum value. If that's your drive, then

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 2>the game is set up for you to be able

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 2>to achieve that. But if your driver is to be

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 2>great and create a legacy at the club, you're not

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 2>going to get as much as what your market. I

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 2>get that, So I think Nathan is probably doing it

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 2>the right way compared to some of the other alternative ways.

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Of it being it'd just it'd be very interesting to

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>see how far a club would push if you if

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you did, if Nathan was the sort of personality. So

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that right, let's get auction right twenty percent? Who would

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>buy it? Who would take it? Because someone to take

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>him at twenty And I'll tell you why, coop, Because

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>what they'll say is it's going to be worth it,

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>because he's going to get guys alongside him the worth

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>six hundred, but he'll get on playing like nine hundred

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars players.

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Correct.

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 2>We have seen world Sport do things like that, like

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Beckham when to La Galaxy right for a sort of

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 2>cheaper compared to what he was.

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 3>On at Real Madrid or whatever it was.

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Roaldo correct, correct.

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 2>And I feel like Nathan is, how can I say

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:17.879
<v Speaker 2>this a more subtle approach, Let's get this done and

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 2>if it doesn't work out, let's respectfully go and have

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 2>a conversation as opposed to shop front window give me

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 2>eighteen percent.

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but it's just an interesting thing what we're seeing

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:28.880
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. Yeah, it's just.

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think that happens at the top and then

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 2>the domino effect of everything else comes in. So once

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 2>you start chewing up a big party, a cap for

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 2>twelve thirteen percent. Then that affects the other decision makers. Now,

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:47.479
<v Speaker 2>if you're Nathan, you can actually get return on investment

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:50.199
<v Speaker 2>because you'll improve the four hundred thousand dollars player to

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 2>six hundred purely because of him. Now, part of a

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 2>ten year deal probably should be a little clause on there.

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Do you improve the players around you or are you

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 2>just a great individal your playoffs?

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's what's expected in a ten you do, and.

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>That's what separates great players from there, from the from

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.719
<v Speaker 1>the icons. The icons make everyone around the better players

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>these I thought their performance on the weekend and I

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>watch I watched the Titans being part of it with

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a more critical eye. And there's been times this year

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that with the Titans performance and you'd asked to coach

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Josh Hana disappointed in the effort. Bastually, I was watching

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the Titans on the weekend and I thought aspects of

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the game were good. That which shows you how good

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors were. The Warriors returning to that power based football,

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>winning the spirit of the play the ball, getting more

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 1>sixter gains, getting way Egan had a dummy half, you know,

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>Chanel and Tomorrow Martin having you know, they had so

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>much time to play. I thought I never knew. I

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:57.399
<v Speaker 1>never knew Tomorrow was that good a ball player.

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you won't like to hear this, but I felt it.

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 2>I fell into the trap of loving what the Titans

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 2>did against the Dragons and thought, you know what, at home,

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 2>they are a sneaky chance. No, the Warriors are so consistent,

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 2>so good at the hardest parts of the game. They've

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 2>got a great players, great culture to Marty Martin good,

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 2>But I feel like the best part of the Warriors

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 2>game is the one two punch of Aaron Clark and

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Fisher Harris. I think they are playing like Fisher Harriws swapped,

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:31.719
<v Speaker 2>didn't swap, but got exchange for Adam Fania Blake, and

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 2>most people at that time thought, well, Adam Vanila Blake

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 2>probably has a bigger impact on the contest. I think

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 2>we're starting to see why Andrew Webster got Fisher Harris. Yes,

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 2>he's a great performer on the field, but he is

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 2>driving this team to September and they are They are thereabouts.

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 2>I had a little bit of a dip at different stages,

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 2>but their consistency and savage line speed defensively to Martin,

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 2>Martin Good, the only question mark I have around the

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 2>Warriors is there centers Pompy and layer Tower defensively Can

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 2>they stop a Penrith machine or Sam Walker or.

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Tedesco on their day that that that for me will

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 3>be the key. But that they are, they are, They're good.

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Wade Egan was good off.

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 3>The back of Aeron Clark and Fish hours.

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Doing his punching through. Mate. There was a couple of bits.

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.880
<v Speaker 1>It was I think with about twelve thirty minutes ago

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 1>for a half time he did a little play dummy,

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 1>then went up and just a little hangball. It was

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>just pure class. And even the one we was tomorrow

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>did that beautiful short pass near the line. It was

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>just as good as short pass you see anyone throw.

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at what created that space, it

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>was why doing his typical thing, get out, look short

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and just roll the wrists over.

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 2>And if I give, like Victor Radlin a far who

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 2>wired a chance of taking down Penrith, I definitely give

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Aeron Clark and Fish horis the same thing. There is

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 2>not many chinks in Penrith, but it is maybe their

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 2>physicality truly through the middle. If there is a big

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 2>bop on the other side, and that blazes to lungy

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:05.360
<v Speaker 2>left edge defensively. That's the only two chings I can

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:06.239
<v Speaker 2>really find him.

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 1>It was interesting yesterday watching the Sharks play Coup was

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>how animated in the box.

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Was very reserved, very sort of subtle guy, but definitely

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 2>banging on the glass more than ever before.

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>One of two things. One is I think yesterday was

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>the game that in the last couple of years they

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 1>would have lost. Yep, would have dropped, but I'll see you.

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>The other one, I think that he has no problem

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>with the camera's been on him. I think he is.

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he's sending a message by his reaction players

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to his players.

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 2>So there was a piece of his press conference where

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:41.120
<v Speaker 2>people are saying, oh, are you in a better position

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 2>than ever before to win the comp and he's saying

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 2>things like, oh, the outside think that, but my feeling

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 2>for this team has not changed. And knowing Fitsy, it's

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 2>exactly that he's.

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Not talking to the paper.

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.400
<v Speaker 2>He's talking to his players, saying, hey, we're playing well,

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 2>but I've always believed in you. Because if they get

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 2>to another really final and that's it, Well, if you

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 2>just keep doing the same thing, you're going to.

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Get the same outcome, right yep.

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I feel like he is pumping up his team, making

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 2>sure they're dialed intoing all the little things because I

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 2>think he believes that they actually can go past the

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 2>prelium final. But it is a big, big opportunity if

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 2>they don't or do, because if they don't, he's as

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 2>to make some changes, and if they do, he's found

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 2>the right recipe.

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting with Fitzi. My coaches have to have a

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:29.919
<v Speaker 1>certain amount of discipline to be the person they have

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to be to get their side to win a competition

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>or perform. He has some coaches who are pricks, or

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>most coaches are pricks, and but what they do is

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 1>they have to have the discipline to be have that

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>bit of bedside manner to get the best of their players.

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, Fitzy, it's the opposite. Fitzi is such

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a great guy that almost he's got to have the

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 1>discipline to not be his natural self, you know what

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean. At his run into the finals, Nihi is interesting, Coop.

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, we look at Nicolay, he's playing better football

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:58.959
<v Speaker 1>now than he won the Delian medal in my opinion,

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>him and Tricky and Blake Braley, that combination just working beautifully.

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Will Kennedy too, But Niko always with Nico, you know

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Niko very well. He's a guy, you know that the

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>confidence doesn't come natural as natural as other guys. But

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I think symbolic that he's on top of his game

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>as if actually thirty two from thirty two of his goalkicking,

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's.

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 2>And the guys, Yes, they spoke to him after it

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 2>and they said, is it in the back of your mind?

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 2>And this is a little bit of the mind shift

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 2>of Nico Hines. He goes, well, normally I'd try and

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 2>avoid it, I try and not talk about it, but

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 2>you know what, stuff, it's there and I'm going after it.

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 2>That is symbolic for him about playing generally, like yes

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 2>there's milestone there. Yes there's a sense of accomplishment. But

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 2>normally he would go, oh, I don't know if I

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 2>can do it. Maybe hopefully it works, please please, whereas

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 2>now he's going, you know.

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 3>It's stuff, it going, I'm kicking good. Where were the

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 3>balls on the field? Is try a score?

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm going after it is a bit of a shift

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 2>in Nico's mind and it's making him play the best

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 2>he's ever played.

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>The Knights went over the Broncos. The story coming out

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to most people with the Broncos the Broncos, he's further

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:12.120
<v Speaker 1>evidence that they're going. They're officially out. I mean they've

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>been out the last month. I think the story with

0:24:15.920 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>having a Navocastrian bias, I think it was the Titans Knights.

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Because the Knights and now the Finals, you jump back

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 3>on board.

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely so if you look at the Knights versus the Broncos,

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I just thought I described it like this. I thought

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the Knights had a sharp threat and I thought that

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos had a soft threat. Now let me explain

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:39.159
<v Speaker 1>to this. And when I say soft threat, I'm not

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>talking cowardice or anything like that. I'm talking the fact

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>that what's the way the Knights attacked. Everything that the

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Knights did not fletcher sharp, No, I mean sharp, decisive.

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Everything they did cook, The way they moved the ball around,

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>every sequence, every play had a direct purpose if you

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean. They've worked it somewhere and you

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>knew what they were doing. The fact that was very

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 1>deliberate what they're doing, given the fact there be someone

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>looking to run that nice straight line and everything was

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>beautifully synchronized. Watching what I mean the soft threat from

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos. The soft threat is using talent and just

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>moving the ball around the field hoping to find something.

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>If that makes sense, Yeah, I thought that was a

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>difference between the two sides could.

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Well explained completely understand it. I took one thing out

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 2>of the Knight's performance on the weekend is Caylen Ponger

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.400
<v Speaker 2>is a real deal. He's been a great player for

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:35.640
<v Speaker 2>a while and he's won a dally Am and everything,

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 2>but he truly has the Knights hopes dreams in the

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 2>palm of his hand, not just through his performance but

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 2>his leadership. He's actually now understanding his influence in the game.

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 2>And if you go and watch every try that is

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 2>scored by the Newcastle Knights on the weekend, watch Kaylen

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 2>in the background, he's yahooing and clapping the guys that

0:25:56.800 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 2>actually created the momentum and the opportunity. Feel like when

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:04.199
<v Speaker 2>he gets in those positions, he's as deadly as anyone.

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, I want to talk. I want to talk about

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins there, but the Dolphins actually, as I said,

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm back on the Dolphins. I thought the weekend people going,

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>oh you know, that wasn't a greater performance against the

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Dragons made it. The Dragons are starting to play some

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.679
<v Speaker 1>very decent football. I don't worry too much into that.

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about that next week. More. We've got to

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>think about the dally Ams. We will talk about next week.

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>We've run out of time. There's so much to talk about,

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>so much to talk about, so little time. Anyway, you

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>guys just once enjoy the replay three six. Do you

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>have a good mind