1 00:00:00,800 --> 00:00:04,520 Speaker 1: Five double A Nice with Matthew Pantalis. All right, let's 2 00:00:04,519 --> 00:00:07,080 Speaker 1: talk algall bloom because, as you would have heard on 3 00:00:07,120 --> 00:00:10,559 Speaker 1: five double A News and other news sources as well, 4 00:00:10,920 --> 00:00:13,640 Speaker 1: the committee in investigating the bloom, where it came from, 5 00:00:13,640 --> 00:00:15,400 Speaker 1: what we can do about it moving forward, all the 6 00:00:15,400 --> 00:00:20,200 Speaker 1: rest of it. Is probably gobsmack to have heard yesterday 7 00:00:20,400 --> 00:00:23,919 Speaker 1: that one of the chief scientists responsible for testing waters 8 00:00:23,920 --> 00:00:27,680 Speaker 1: for algall bloom was on vacation for a month, and 9 00:00:27,760 --> 00:00:31,160 Speaker 1: he's entitled to be on leave, but it seems everyone 10 00:00:31,200 --> 00:00:36,880 Speaker 1: else sat on their hands. That's just unbelievable. Somebody needs 11 00:00:36,920 --> 00:00:41,879 Speaker 1: to explain government wise exactly what is going on with 12 00:00:41,960 --> 00:00:44,239 Speaker 1: that head of the committee that heard the evidence from 13 00:00:44,360 --> 00:00:47,720 Speaker 1: the Green Supper House, MP Robert Simms on the line, Robert, 14 00:00:47,720 --> 00:00:48,520 Speaker 1: good evening. 15 00:00:48,920 --> 00:00:50,960 Speaker 2: Good evening, Matthew, and good evening to your listeners. 16 00:00:51,000 --> 00:00:54,040 Speaker 1: That's just unreal, isn't it. So one bloke goes on 17 00:00:54,240 --> 00:00:56,680 Speaker 1: holidays and nobody's delegated the work. 18 00:00:57,720 --> 00:01:00,360 Speaker 2: Well, I must admit I was pretty gobsmacked when I 19 00:01:00,360 --> 00:01:03,400 Speaker 2: I heard that evidence. It sounds like what happened is 20 00:01:04,200 --> 00:01:07,080 Speaker 2: a member of the team was away and there wasn't 21 00:01:07,120 --> 00:01:11,959 Speaker 2: anybody within the EPA that had the expertise to be 22 00:01:11,959 --> 00:01:14,000 Speaker 2: able to step in and fill that gap, and so 23 00:01:14,080 --> 00:01:18,440 Speaker 2: consequently testing didn't happen for that year. Now that really 24 00:01:18,680 --> 00:01:21,800 Speaker 2: concerned me, and I put it directly to the chief 25 00:01:21,800 --> 00:01:24,240 Speaker 2: of the department and said, well, look, is this something 26 00:01:24,280 --> 00:01:26,280 Speaker 2: that you're worried about, is the boss of the department, 27 00:01:26,319 --> 00:01:28,440 Speaker 2: and will you be ensuring that this doesn't happen again? 28 00:01:28,480 --> 00:01:31,240 Speaker 2: And he said, well, look, we have you know, we 29 00:01:31,319 --> 00:01:34,440 Speaker 2: are reviewing our processes to make sure this doesn't occur. 30 00:01:35,360 --> 00:01:37,679 Speaker 2: But in my mind, that demonstrates there's obviously a lack 31 00:01:37,720 --> 00:01:41,119 Speaker 2: of resourcing for the EPA. If they're in a situation 32 00:01:41,200 --> 00:01:43,440 Speaker 2: that one person happens to be away, whether they're on 33 00:01:43,560 --> 00:01:46,080 Speaker 2: a holiday or you know, they might be sick or whatever, 34 00:01:46,720 --> 00:01:50,400 Speaker 2: the whole show shouldn't fall over. That is a real 35 00:01:50,440 --> 00:01:54,200 Speaker 2: worry and that's why we're calling today for the government 36 00:01:54,240 --> 00:01:56,040 Speaker 2: really to step up and make sure that they've got 37 00:01:56,080 --> 00:01:59,480 Speaker 2: appropriate resources for the EPA. I mean, might I say 38 00:01:59,600 --> 00:02:04,120 Speaker 2: it's Matthew, because not only does it seem like the 39 00:02:04,160 --> 00:02:06,360 Speaker 2: EPA is struggling, but I also had to look back 40 00:02:06,400 --> 00:02:10,480 Speaker 2: through the budget papers recently and I saw that Sarti 41 00:02:10,560 --> 00:02:12,919 Speaker 2: has actually had its funding reduced a lot as well 42 00:02:13,000 --> 00:02:16,639 Speaker 2: over the last fifteen years, and so you know, we're 43 00:02:16,639 --> 00:02:21,760 Speaker 2: seeing the support for these vital services being diminished at 44 00:02:21,760 --> 00:02:24,639 Speaker 2: a time when it's really critically important for us date 45 00:02:24,680 --> 00:02:26,520 Speaker 2: that we have this this testing happening. 46 00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:31,320 Speaker 1: SARDI was the organization that lost the phishlings, wasn't it? 47 00:02:31,080 --> 00:02:33,400 Speaker 1: Could Could the lack of funding be a reason? 48 00:02:34,560 --> 00:02:37,360 Speaker 2: Well, look, I don't know, but I suspect that it 49 00:02:37,440 --> 00:02:40,200 Speaker 2: might be a fact that it's contributing to some of 50 00:02:40,240 --> 00:02:43,760 Speaker 2: the problems that we've seen. I mean, it has seen 51 00:02:43,800 --> 00:02:47,200 Speaker 2: its funding diminish over a number of budgets now, and 52 00:02:47,760 --> 00:02:50,200 Speaker 2: you know, really that should be stepped up. I think 53 00:02:50,240 --> 00:02:51,959 Speaker 2: we need to see much more of an emphasis on 54 00:02:52,480 --> 00:02:56,320 Speaker 2: research and the Environmental Protection Authority really needs to be 55 00:02:56,360 --> 00:02:59,040 Speaker 2: I think doing more regular testing. The way that it 56 00:02:59,080 --> 00:03:00,720 Speaker 2: works at the moment is operates on a bit of 57 00:03:00,760 --> 00:03:04,360 Speaker 2: a cycle, and so there's testing that happens yearly, but 58 00:03:04,480 --> 00:03:07,800 Speaker 2: different areas get tested, different zones get tested every five years, 59 00:03:07,840 --> 00:03:10,760 Speaker 2: and maybe that cycle needs to be reviewed to ensure 60 00:03:10,800 --> 00:03:12,920 Speaker 2: that we're not missing anything as we're dealing with the 61 00:03:12,919 --> 00:03:13,600 Speaker 2: algal bloom. 62 00:03:14,160 --> 00:03:18,160 Speaker 1: You know, in the real world of businesses doing their 63 00:03:18,200 --> 00:03:21,200 Speaker 1: thing around the state. I've worked for organizations a number 64 00:03:21,200 --> 00:03:23,760 Speaker 1: of organizations, and it doesn't matter where you work. Here 65 00:03:23,840 --> 00:03:27,000 Speaker 1: and other places I've worked. If somebody goes on holidays, 66 00:03:27,880 --> 00:03:34,079 Speaker 1: the department, head, supervisor, whatever ensures somebody else knows that 67 00:03:34,160 --> 00:03:38,320 Speaker 1: person's job. And so if somebody's away, whether it was payroll, 68 00:03:38,440 --> 00:03:44,360 Speaker 1: whether it was I don't know, looking after stationary, somebody 69 00:03:44,400 --> 00:03:47,000 Speaker 1: else knows to do that job. It might not be 70 00:03:47,080 --> 00:03:50,120 Speaker 1: their job, but they're the person that comes in and 71 00:03:50,200 --> 00:03:52,360 Speaker 1: fills in. You know, they get taken out of that 72 00:03:52,400 --> 00:03:55,800 Speaker 1: and somebody else knows that person's job. So there's always 73 00:03:55,800 --> 00:03:59,640 Speaker 1: somebody there who can step in if somebody's away. Its 74 00:04:00,160 --> 00:04:03,520 Speaker 1: comprehensible the public service doesn't do this well. 75 00:04:03,560 --> 00:04:07,880 Speaker 2: Look, I mean, I think obviously highly specialized skills that 76 00:04:08,080 --> 00:04:10,920 Speaker 2: you know this person has, but there's a real gap 77 00:04:10,960 --> 00:04:13,560 Speaker 2: in the organization if someone isn't able to step in 78 00:04:13,760 --> 00:04:16,280 Speaker 2: and do that work. And certainly no criticism of the 79 00:04:16,320 --> 00:04:19,680 Speaker 2: scientist for being on leave. People go and leaves, that 80 00:04:19,880 --> 00:04:23,960 Speaker 2: life happens, that's totally totally signed, but the organization is 81 00:04:24,000 --> 00:04:27,240 Speaker 2: to have a plan in place to manage that. And 82 00:04:27,279 --> 00:04:29,240 Speaker 2: so it was quite quite baffling to hear that we 83 00:04:29,279 --> 00:04:33,240 Speaker 2: had a period where there wasn't testing and that that 84 00:04:33,240 --> 00:04:36,040 Speaker 2: that could you know, if that sort of happens long term, 85 00:04:36,080 --> 00:04:39,440 Speaker 2: that could demonstrate or produce real problems. I think we've 86 00:04:39,480 --> 00:04:41,000 Speaker 2: got to step it up in the future. 87 00:04:41,320 --> 00:04:45,719 Speaker 1: Yeah, absolutely. Are you concerned is the committee hearing about 88 00:04:45,839 --> 00:04:50,200 Speaker 1: the situation at Haslam where you had local fishes blockading 89 00:04:50,240 --> 00:04:52,560 Speaker 1: the boat ramp there as you'd be well aware. The 90 00:04:52,600 --> 00:04:57,120 Speaker 1: decision to move oysters from a part of the old 91 00:04:57,160 --> 00:05:01,159 Speaker 1: Franklin Harbor where the algal bloom was present, we understand 92 00:05:01,240 --> 00:05:04,200 Speaker 1: to the other side of the peninsula where it wasn't 93 00:05:04,279 --> 00:05:09,400 Speaker 1: that just seems a crazy brave decision. Yeah. 94 00:05:09,480 --> 00:05:12,800 Speaker 2: Look, I must admit, Matthew, we haven't heard any evidence 95 00:05:13,480 --> 00:05:19,200 Speaker 2: around that yet, but certainly, you know, monitor that situation closely. 96 00:05:19,760 --> 00:05:24,480 Speaker 2: But you know, I think in general, in terms of 97 00:05:24,520 --> 00:05:27,640 Speaker 2: some of the action that the government's taken around you know, 98 00:05:28,680 --> 00:05:31,280 Speaker 2: reducing fishing and the like, I do think a lot 99 00:05:31,320 --> 00:05:35,000 Speaker 2: of those things make sense in light of the challenging 100 00:05:35,080 --> 00:05:37,240 Speaker 2: circumstances that we face. But the question's got to be 101 00:05:37,240 --> 00:05:40,560 Speaker 2: why didn't they provide that certainty much earlier? And I 102 00:05:40,560 --> 00:05:42,440 Speaker 2: am concerned they're in a bit of drip feeding of 103 00:05:42,440 --> 00:05:44,520 Speaker 2: elements of the plan, which has probably created a lot 104 00:05:44,520 --> 00:05:47,359 Speaker 2: of confusion as well for people that industry. 105 00:05:47,560 --> 00:05:51,719 Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, absolutely, the government's saying it's been monitoring and 106 00:05:51,760 --> 00:05:55,120 Speaker 1: it's on the ball with that. Does this indicate that 107 00:05:55,720 --> 00:05:56,760 Speaker 1: information is wrong? 108 00:05:58,160 --> 00:06:02,560 Speaker 2: Oh? Look, I think what it demonstrates, and I think 109 00:06:02,600 --> 00:06:05,280 Speaker 2: this is a clear theme that has come through this 110 00:06:05,360 --> 00:06:08,760 Speaker 2: committee is that we were dealing with this event is 111 00:06:08,800 --> 00:06:12,440 Speaker 2: an unprecedented event, and that we didn't really have a 112 00:06:12,440 --> 00:06:14,880 Speaker 2: clear plan in place to manage it, you know, And 113 00:06:14,880 --> 00:06:17,279 Speaker 2: that's been the key themes come through from the discussions 114 00:06:17,279 --> 00:06:22,520 Speaker 2: we've had Premiere and Cabinet of that committee, PERSA, the EPA. 115 00:06:22,880 --> 00:06:24,960 Speaker 2: Everybody seems to have been a bit wrong footed by 116 00:06:24,960 --> 00:06:27,279 Speaker 2: this and obviously something we haven't deal it with before. 117 00:06:27,320 --> 00:06:29,760 Speaker 2: But we've got to really, i think, review all of 118 00:06:29,800 --> 00:06:32,839 Speaker 2: our processes and procedures within state government to make sure 119 00:06:32,880 --> 00:06:35,039 Speaker 2: that if an event like this presents in the future, 120 00:06:35,480 --> 00:06:38,359 Speaker 2: and you know, with climate change, these sorts of events 121 00:06:38,520 --> 00:06:42,320 Speaker 2: are going to unfortunately potentially be more likely, and we've 122 00:06:42,320 --> 00:06:44,719 Speaker 2: got to see it being treated as an emergency and 123 00:06:44,760 --> 00:06:47,520 Speaker 2: there needs to be a quick coordination across all levels 124 00:06:47,520 --> 00:06:49,800 Speaker 2: of department, you know, rather than there being this kind 125 00:06:49,839 --> 00:06:52,680 Speaker 2: of whose job is it? And lots of paper shuffling 126 00:06:52,680 --> 00:06:56,560 Speaker 2: happening between different years of government would break down those stilos. 127 00:06:56,720 --> 00:07:00,000 Speaker 1: Yeah, absolutely, all right, So when when does your committee 128 00:07:00,640 --> 00:07:03,000 Speaker 1: wind up? When do you expect you'll have a report 129 00:07:03,040 --> 00:07:04,760 Speaker 1: out on this? Yeah? 130 00:07:04,839 --> 00:07:07,440 Speaker 2: So, look, we haven't set an end date for the 131 00:07:07,560 --> 00:07:11,640 Speaker 2: committee yet. Parliament is self will wrap up in a 132 00:07:11,640 --> 00:07:13,520 Speaker 2: few weeks. We've got only a few more weeks left 133 00:07:13,520 --> 00:07:16,840 Speaker 2: of sitting, but that doesn't mean the Committee has to 134 00:07:17,080 --> 00:07:19,560 Speaker 2: finish its work. And I'm very keen to continue during 135 00:07:19,560 --> 00:07:23,600 Speaker 2: the summer, particularly for us to look at how the 136 00:07:23,600 --> 00:07:26,640 Speaker 2: Summer Plan is working in practice and be able to 137 00:07:26,640 --> 00:07:29,200 Speaker 2: interrogate that in a bit more detail, and we'll have 138 00:07:29,240 --> 00:07:31,440 Speaker 2: the benefit then of obviously seeing what's happening during the 139 00:07:31,480 --> 00:07:33,920 Speaker 2: summer month. So I think the Committee will continue into 140 00:07:33,960 --> 00:07:37,080 Speaker 2: the summer period. I'd like this maybe to consider making 141 00:07:37,160 --> 00:07:40,000 Speaker 2: an interim report though, or give some sort of update 142 00:07:40,040 --> 00:07:41,440 Speaker 2: to Parliament, and that will probably happen in the next 143 00:07:41,480 --> 00:07:43,440 Speaker 2: few weeks in terms of where things are at. And 144 00:07:43,480 --> 00:07:45,679 Speaker 2: then of course we've got the Federal Inquiry there. Report's 145 00:07:45,720 --> 00:07:48,040 Speaker 2: coming out soon as well, so there'll be a few 146 00:07:48,080 --> 00:07:49,400 Speaker 2: things coming out of this space. 147 00:07:49,480 --> 00:07:51,560 Speaker 1: Do you need to have it wrapped up before the 148 00:07:51,560 --> 00:07:52,200 Speaker 1: state election. 149 00:07:53,200 --> 00:07:57,360 Speaker 2: No, we don't. We'd need to have the committee if 150 00:07:57,520 --> 00:08:00,600 Speaker 2: Parliament is peroged. You know, governments when they head into 151 00:08:00,640 --> 00:08:04,040 Speaker 2: an election period, they can basically clear all of the notes, 152 00:08:04,080 --> 00:08:06,160 Speaker 2: pay for all of the agenda items the Parliament's been 153 00:08:06,160 --> 00:08:09,200 Speaker 2: dealing with, and start afresh in the new parliament. But 154 00:08:09,280 --> 00:08:11,840 Speaker 2: that often happens around the February time, during the issuing 155 00:08:11,880 --> 00:08:14,040 Speaker 2: of the RITZ, so at that point the committee would 156 00:08:14,040 --> 00:08:16,480 Speaker 2: be dissolved. But there's no reason why we can't continue 157 00:08:16,480 --> 00:08:19,440 Speaker 2: our work during December and January, and certainly I'll be 158 00:08:19,480 --> 00:08:22,040 Speaker 2: keen to do that if I can get my colleagues 159 00:08:22,040 --> 00:08:23,040 Speaker 2: to be available as well. 160 00:08:23,800 --> 00:08:25,400 Speaker 1: All Right, we'll wait and see and thank you so 161 00:08:25,520 --> 00:08:26,120 Speaker 1: much for your. 162 00:08:25,960 --> 00:08:28,360 Speaker 2: Time, rob Thanks Matthew, good to talk to you. 163 00:08:28,520 --> 00:08:31,760 Speaker 1: Likewise, all right, Robert Simms, Green's Upper House MP sharing 164 00:08:31,760 --> 00:08:33,240 Speaker 1: a committee into the Algill Bloom