WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 17 April

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Guying Center. This is Paul Murray Live. Hello, wead welcome

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to the show before the long weekend, before another long weekend,

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>both of course with incredible importance to Christian Australians this

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>weekend and then to all Australians next weekend. Happy Easter.

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:19.319
<v Speaker 1>And of course this time next week I'm going to

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 1>be living a dream because we are going to be

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>in Western Australia. We will be on our way to

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Calgooley and I want you to join us next Sunday. Okay,

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>not this but next Sunday night, the twenty seven in Calgooley.

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>If you can make it, get yourself there, ourtown. It's

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>skynews dot com dot you ourtown at skynews dot com

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>dot you love to get into the orange dirt. We

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>will do so next weekend, looking forward to it. Sixteen

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>days until the federal election. Tuesday is when the first

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 1>votes will be cast. In an election where there is

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>a fork in the road, there is a way to

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>continue what we are doing with the problems we've had

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>over the past three years, or a chance, as the

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>opposition will say, to put the country back on track.

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>At the other an easy world today again, just basking

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in the terribleness of the performance that he had last

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>night at the debate, where negative gearing was back on

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the table, and let me explain how that should work

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the election. Today unbelievable. The headline

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>is no new spending announcements, but relax, he's made plenty

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>since January.

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 2>A seven point two billion dollar announcement today five million

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 2>dollars ten million dollars, two hundred million dollars, three billion dollars,

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 2>three hundred and fifty million dollars, two billion dollars, thirty

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 2>seven million dollars, eight hundred and forty two million dollar,

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:40.839
<v Speaker 2>two point four billion dollars eight point five billion dollar,

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 2>four point eight billion dollar, one billion dollars, three point

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 2>four billion dollars, two point eight billion dollars, two hundred

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 2>million dollars, one hundred and fifty million dollars, one billion dollars,

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and forty five million dollars, six million dollars,

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 2>three million dollars, ten billion dollars, twenty four million dollars,

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 2>nine million dollars, fifteen million dollars.

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>As I said on Monday night, that's the show. It's

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>time to go. What a list it keeps growing and

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.239
<v Speaker 1>growing and growing old. But our only account since the

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>start of the election. No, no, all of those huge

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>promises made to change the subject, to change the polls,

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>it slowly has worked. But all of that spending since

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the start of this year extraordinary and we're on our

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.920
<v Speaker 1>way to one point two tea for trillion dollars debt.

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>As for the Opposition leader and Peter Dubnin, he was

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>focused today. I'm trying to get more kids to use

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the final part of their high schooling. If they want

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to try to marry that in with becoming a trade

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>this would be the way to go today. The announcement

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>was to put back what of course Coalition governments have

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 1>long believed in, which is specific trade schools, not ones

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:50.519
<v Speaker 1>automatically linked to unions or the education unions. He's the

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>announcement made today by I think the Deputy leader as well.

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 3>So our announcement of two hundred and sixty million dollars

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 3>for twelve new Australian trade colleges across the country starts

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 3>right here in Patterson today. This once in a generational

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 3>form of our schooling system is about bringing excellence in

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 3>skills back into schools now.

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>As for the media and how they tried to spin

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:18.519
<v Speaker 1>it for Labor to day, despite the fact that the

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>train wreck of a performance the Prime Minister put on

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>at the debate last night, where he was proven as

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>a liar time and time again when he was trying

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to go on the attack. Those were lies as well.

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>But of course the majority of the access media, Oh,

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>he was great, he was wonderful. He was a dead rubber.

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>There was nothing to see here. Please, if you saw

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>it with your own eyes or saw, of course what

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>we played you, which was the tapes last night, there

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>would be a few more than these type of softballs

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that you'd throw at the Prime Minister today.

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 4>Do you think that Peter Dunn is a climate denier

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 4>based on the debate last night? And also, you know

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 4>there's just over two weeks to go in the campaign,

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 4>a lot of public holidays in that time. Are you

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 4>confident that you can score some votes, especially in seats

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 4>like this help?

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 5>But levels, why do people underestimate you so much? Given

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 5>that you flip the poles in a couple of weeks,

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 5>You're in the lead and your opposition leader has been

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 5>caught seemingly woefully unprepared. She's my last day with you

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 5>on the campaign for a while, so I called that

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 5>you will indulg to the other side.

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:19.479
<v Speaker 2>Believed or not the other side you won't be as happy.

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Lut see how that all works. Perfect example about the

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 1>access right, And she was one of the reporters who

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>got the little one on one because of course she

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>was towing the line. Can you believe this? We are

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 1>two weeks away from either re hiring one of the

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>worst governments we've ever had or changing to a new one.

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>The tough questions should be for both sides all the time.

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>They should be about the flaws in their ideas. Instead

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just about could you please say something terrible about

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the bad guy? I need it for my story. But no,

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>the tough questions well, they of course were all for

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Peter dunn't despite the fact in the debate last night,

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to the ratings more than a million people ended up

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 1>seeing plenty more on socials as well. So that's why

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it's worth I think noting how good Peter Dutton was

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>last night.

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 4>Now, yesterday's the bit you said you don't know President

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump. How would you get that deal if you

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 4>don't even know the guy?

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 6>You're not a dentist or an engineer. But I suspect

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 6>that you'd take their advice on their subjective expertise. But

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 6>last night, when you were asked about climate scientists, you

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 6>said you accepted climate change was happening, but you couldn't

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.919
<v Speaker 6>bring yourself to say that you trusted climate scientists.

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 5>How do you plan to bring in more trades and

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 5>jobs when you refuse to back policies and incentives like

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 5>free tay.

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 7>You haven't visited any potential nuclear science including the one

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 7>here at Ladell just an hour away. You recently said

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 7>that town is dead, which caused quite an upset. They're

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 7>also concerned about earthquakes. It's not a very good look

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 7>a nuclear plant built somewhere where there are dozens of

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 7>earthquakes and just the last year alone. When are you

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 7>going to visit them in person to allay their concerns?

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, why do they underestimate you earthquakes a nuclear plant.

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>That's the difference. It is impossible, based off the questions

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>that are asked for the opposition to be able to

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>get on the front foot. Now, the reality is you

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have to necessarily engage with the question that you ask.

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 1>You the answer that you want to give, but of

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>course they have no interest in hearing the answer because

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>they want to focus on the question. The question. Of course,

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 1>that is the gotcha again. I don't mind tough questions,

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>but if they are not equally being applied here, then

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously we know what is going on now. Elections. They

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>are fought in what we can all see on the

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>nightly news. They can be heard on some of the

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>commentary and the radio. You get a bit of a

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>skewy view when it comes to social media, because remember,

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the algorithm is feeding you more or less depending on

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the things that you already look at. But this weekend

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 1>is an opportunity for you to have conversations with family.

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'll have more to say about that in a moment,

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and more to say about just how brain dead some

0:06:58.960 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff is on social media. But as I say,

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that we showed you last night, how

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in fact can we bring back There's a little collection

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we put together last night of Peter Dutton's best moments

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in the debate. This was impressive stuff.

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 8>Let's roll we approached the third of May, many Australians

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 8>will be asking themselves are you better off today? Than

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 8>you were three years ago. People have seen food prices

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.480
<v Speaker 8>go up by thirty percent. Their mortgages have gone up

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 8>on twelve occasions over the last two years. The government's

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 8>brought in a million people, all of whom want homes,

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 8>and all of whom are competing against young Australians for

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 8>that rental property or to purchase a home. That's a

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 8>million people, which is seventy percent higher than any two

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 8>year period in our country's history. And to your government

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 8>has modeled negative gearing changes NCGT changes. The Treasurer has

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 8>done that.

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>That's not right. Well, it is a publish service.

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 8>This Prime Minister has a problem with the truth. And

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 8>it's not just in relation to this debate. There are

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 8>many aspects that you could pick up during the course

0:07:57.720 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 8>of this campaign. With the Prime Minister constantly telling people

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 8>they're much better off now just defies the reality in

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 8>their own lives. There are thirty thousand small businesses which

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 8>have gone bankrupt over the course of the last three years,

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 8>a record number in our country's history. Over the last

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 8>twelve months, households have been in a recession for seven

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 8>consecutive quarters almost two There's been a threefold increase in

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 8>the expansion of the public service compared to the regular years.

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 8>We have the highest per capita rate of public servants

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 8>in the world.

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>And the Prime Minister was stepping on rakes. The hardest

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of which, which hit in right between the eyes, was

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a failure to deliver on his own promise of two

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>seventy five dollars off your power bills and an inability

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 1>to answer this question four times.

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:42.959
<v Speaker 8>You and Chris Bowen keep saying that renewables are the

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 8>cheapest form of power.

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>When will we see our power bills come down?

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 2>They are Well, what we know is that renewables are

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 2>the cheapest form of power, not because of what we say,

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 2>but because of what the Australian Energy market operator says.

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:57.839
<v Speaker 1>So when do the bills come down?

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 2>And what the market is is delivering? See, Peter has

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 2>to have government, state, taxpayer funded. We stick with your

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 2>taxpayer funded, taxpayer funded proposals.

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>What we're dealing with here.

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 2>During the former government, twenty four out of twenty eight

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 2>coal fire power stations announce their closure. We need to

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 2>get supply and certain in energy security. We can't wait

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 2>till the twenty forties a nuclear Just.

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 8>Stick with your plan, mister albinezy.

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>When will the bills come.

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Down under our plan? We know that renewables are the

0:09:33.800 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 2>cheapest form of power, and that is why we are

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 2>doing that, rolling it out, including through gas. Peter Ray's gas.

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Gas is now thirteen dollars. It was thirty dollars and

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 2>when we came, when we kind of thirteen is cheaper

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 2>than thirty.

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 8>When do we see the bills come down?

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, what we need to do is to roll out renewables,

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 2>make sure there's energy security, make sure it's backed up

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:02.200
<v Speaker 2>by batteries, by high joe, and by gas. That is

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 2>what all of the private sector is backing and investing in.

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Take your pick four times. When will they come down?

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>He can't promise when, which means they're not going to. Otherwise,

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>if you could find a way even to lie about

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>it like you did last time, he would. Then he

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>turns around and says, oh, pet, he dudn't. His plan's

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>going to cost billions of dollars taxpayer money. The only

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>reason your power bill has allegedly gone down by twenty

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>five dollars a month is because the taxpayer is paying

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the power companies to reduce your bill by twenty five

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month. That's what happened last year, That's what's

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>going to happen this year. All of that, of course,

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>then feeds into a fake number about the inflation figures,

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>which figures into the fake calculations being made about whether

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the economy is turned the corner or not. But how

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>did Channel seven think it when last.

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 9>Night Anthony Albanizi and Peter Dutton have shifted their folks

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 9>to a tax on tax after failing to deliver a

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 9>blow during the second election debate.

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Now we all remember a good old fashioned scare campaign

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>from the twenty and sixteen election. That was the one

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>where the political genius always playing four D chess, the

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.959
<v Speaker 1>ghost Malcolm Turble had the eight week campaign, the double disillusion,

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>lowering the bar for the number of people who could

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>make it into the Senate Crossbach. That's the one where

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>he took the majority. The Tony Abbott hadn't turned it

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>into just winning and he was willing to call in

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the police because of lies like this.

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 10>Now the Liberals have set up a Medicare privatization task force.

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 10>Everybody knows you don't set up a Medicare privatization task

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 10>force unless you aim to privatize Medicare.

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Of course it was a lie. It is still a lie,

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>but as it was in twenty sixteen, it was a

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>lie that they shark down Australia's throats.

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 11>Put your hand on your heart and look Australians in

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 11>the eye and say that the Coalition has a policy

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:09.560
<v Speaker 11>to privatize Medicare.

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 12>I can say to the people of Australia that this

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 12>election and their vote on July the second, will determine

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 12>the future of Medicare.

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 11>Is the Coalition privatizing As.

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 12>You've asked me to talk to the Australian people here,

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 12>and I just want to take another thirty seconds and

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 12>answer the first question. On July the second, Australians will

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 12>have a choice. It'll be about the future of Medicare.

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 12>You can vote Labor and make sure that we keep

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 12>the price of our healthcare system.

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Now, his reward for that lie is that now he

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:40.319
<v Speaker 1>gets to have a weekly comment piece about Australian politics

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:42.839
<v Speaker 1>on the very same show that he was telling those lies.

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>But as we know, here we go again medi Scare,

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Yet again Medicare. Only one side's going to save it,

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the other one's going to flush it down. The too.

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>This is despite the fact that the last time the

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Liberals were in power, of all doctors' visits were bulk billed,

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 1>no extra payments. Under the current government that is now

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven percent, So on their watch it has gone

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 1>backwards on no no oh, But apparently it's the Liberal

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>party that is going to see a reduction in the

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>amount you can bulk bill.

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 2>We never ever, ever want an American style health system

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 2>in this country. Is the guy who said, along with

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 2>the Coalition last time they came in a government, there'll

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 2>be no cuts to health and no cuts to education.

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 2>They read fifty billion dollars out of health. They tried

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 2>to stop bulk billing altogether. People should be under no

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 2>illusion there will be cut to health, there will be

0:13:44.080 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 2>cut to education, that will be cut to the ABC

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 2>if the Coalition are elected now.

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>This is despite the fact that how many times can

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:58.559
<v Speaker 1>Peter Dunton say that's not going to happen.

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 8>A coalition government will again deliver quality healthcare. Nine billion

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 8>dollars will be invested into Medicare.

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 1>But they just keep doing it anyway, and no one

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>at these press conferences says, okay. Prime Minister Peter Dudden

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>has said how many times that it isn't going to happen,

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>but you keep saying it is going to happen when

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>an actual fact, on your watch, the total number of

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>people who were able to bolt bill their trip to

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the doctor has gone down, So Medicare has gone backwards

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>on your watch. But you're saying vote for us because

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you think under the next guy who's promising to spend

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>more than you in this area, that it's going to

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>go backwards. But no, no, they just repeat, repeat, because

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>they're shameless and they think that they have a fig leaf.

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>What was the one, Bob, If you have a Medicare

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Privatization task Force, then you're definitely privatizing Medicare. And they

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>just say that that fig leaf was like some sort

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of a fur coat. And then they fight and fight,

0:14:57.320 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and they just say it and say it and say

0:14:58.520 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it and say it and say it and say they

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>repeat a lot a trillion times, no matter how provably

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>false it is. Yet they're never called out for it,

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>never ever called the lie trackers that they had. No,

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that's not in this that's never counted, never, despite the

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>fact that it is demonstrably not true. Well, let's now

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>play them by their own game. Okay, let's use albo

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>logic on albo. Let's talk about housing. Let's talk about

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>people who buy an investment property, not fifteen, but the

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>extreme majority of people who have one. Maybe some who

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>have two. But the idea that we're talking about everyone

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>who's in the property market's got fifteen and they're just

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>milking money off the future general, it's not true, you

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>know it. If you're lucky enough to have been able

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to work hard enough to be able to have an

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>investment property, and without investment properties, there's no rent and

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>as we know, the rental market pretty damn tight right now.

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>But let's get to the back and forth of part

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of the debate last year now last night, Now the

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>debate was the moment between Peter Dutton and Anthony Abernezi

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>about the Labor Party trying to put together a working

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>group to get some information from Treasury about getting rid

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of negative gearing, the same policy they had in twenty nineteen.

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Put simply, would you model getting rid of negative gearing

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>if you weren't planning to get rid of negative gearing?

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Here it was in the debate last night. Was it modeled?

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 2>It certainly wasn't commissioned by us to.

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 8>Do so, It was modeled by the government. It was

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 8>publicly it's publicly available that this Prime Minister has a

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 8>problem with the truth.

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>So was Prime Minister bsing yes, because here is the

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>true measure of Australia, not speaking years ago, but speaking

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>last year about whether or not he had asked the

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>people who worked for him, the same people who put

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>together the budget, to have a look at getting rid

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of negative gearing.

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 13>It is not unusual at all for governments or for

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 13>treasurers to get advice on contentious issues which are in

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 13>the public domain, including in the Parliament. It is not

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 13>unusual for treasurers to do that. But we have made

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 13>it very clear through the course of this week that

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:38.239
<v Speaker 13>we have a broad and ambitious housing policy already and

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 13>those changes aren't part of it.

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>So the Prime Minister lied last night on two fronts,

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>One that this ever happened and two that they never

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>asked for it. No, they did ask for it. That

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>is what was admitted by Jim Chalmers last year. Remember

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the logic of the medi Scare campaign that exists to

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 1>this day. You wouldn't have a working group of privatizing

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 1>medicare unless you were planning to privatize medicare, then why

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>would you get Treasury to have a look at getting

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 1>rid of negative gearing if you weren't planning to get

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>rid of negative gearing. But again, the Prime Minister assuming

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>that you don't remember and the reporters are too lazy

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>to even go on a basic Google search for what

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>had happened last year, which they are. This is what

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 1>he was telling them today, in between questions of why

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:22.360
<v Speaker 1>do they underrest to meet you?

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:27.680
<v Speaker 11>Do you till out meeting the greens demands on negative gearing?

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 2>I rule out negotiating with the Greens. That's even further

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 2>for you.

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I real out.

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:38.360
<v Speaker 2>I have responded to that lots of times, asked again, Well,

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 2>you can ask you again. You get the same answer.

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 2>We have our housing policy that we are taking forward

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 2>the Greens. I am not negotiating with the Greens. We

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:48.760
<v Speaker 2>make it very clear.

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Because this bloke is such a political genius. Is he

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to avoid we will not cut negative gearing because

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to avoid their will be no carbon tax

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>under a government lead? Why would you not just say,

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 1>with absolute clarity, we will not get rid of negative gearing.

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>But of course that wouldn't count because Peter Dutner said

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.679
<v Speaker 1>we are not cutting medicare, but they still claim that

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>he is anyway. So if there's no rules and the

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>gloves are off, then guess what. The gloves are off

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 1>and there are no rules. So today Jim Chalmers again

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>last year admitting not only did they look at getting

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:31.919
<v Speaker 1>rid of negative gearing, but he asked them to have

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a look at getting rigative negative gearing. Today he's trying

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to pretend that there's a difference between what is the

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>semantic game he plays.

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 13>There is a difference between commissioning modeling, which is what

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:46.679
<v Speaker 13>the PAM was asked about last night, and getting advice

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 13>from the Treasury getting views from the Treasury on issues

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 13>that are in the public domain.

0:19:54.760 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>So apparently there's some semantic difference. No Hawk said you're

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>going to privatize medicare because you've got a working group

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that's looking into privatizing medicare. Well, they started getting rid

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of negative gearing, so why not libs they're planning to

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 1>get rid of negative gearing. The Prime Minister, when asked directly,

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>will not say we are not getting rid of negative gearing.

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>But even if he did, it doesn't matter because you've

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>said we are not going to cut Medicare and it

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. It doesn't even count that there's no evidence

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.199
<v Speaker 1>of it whatsoever. It doesn't count that you're actually planning

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:30.119
<v Speaker 1>to spend more money than they are currently promising to do.

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>So this is how topsy turvy and ludicrous this election

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>has been. So Okay, let's play labor at its own game.

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:43.959
<v Speaker 1>They of course pretended that one of the reasons they

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>were able to say that Peter Dunton was going to

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>do something about Medicare was they were able to Frankenstein

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>together a grab from more than ten years ago. Well,

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>we just so happened to have a little bit of

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>tape of the current Treasurer of Australia and his sometimes

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>views when it comes to negative gearing.

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 13>Any housing policy that doesn't deal with negative gearing and

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.679
<v Speaker 13>capital gainst tax is a shame. Housing affordability which doesn't

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 13>make important and considered changes to capital gains and negative

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.479
<v Speaker 13>gearing has a hole in the middle of it.

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>If you want to.

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 13>Deal with housing affordability, you need to start with negative

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 13>gearing and capital gains.

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what's the Bob Hoork thing? Play the Bob Hawk thing? Right,

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Remember what was what was the Bob Hawk thing? What

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>did Bob Hawk say? Which is the basis of medical

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 1>scare for twenty sixteen, nineteen, twenty two and twenty five.

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 10>Now the Liberals have set up a Medicare privatization task force.

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 10>Everybody knows you don't set up a Medicare privatization task

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 10>force unless you aim to privatize Medicare.

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, Jim Chalmers says, what about.

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 13>Any housing policy that doesn't deal with negative gearing and

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 13>capital gainst tax is a shame. Housing affordability which doesn't

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 13>make important and considered changes to capital g a and

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 13>negative gearing has a hole in the middle of it.

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 13>If you want to deal with housing affordability, you need

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.360
<v Speaker 13>to start with negative gearing and capital gains.

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Play them of their own game, and you've got the

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>tape to prove it. Now, wait watch and see where

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>that goes in the next few days. Oh and of

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>course they'll say it was all an evil idea which

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>came out of sky News the prime time. Don't know,

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just the same standard they use for something that

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>is demonstrably not true. Everyone knows it's not true, but

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.199
<v Speaker 1>for some reason, they never get asked about it, But

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Jim Chalmers says that about negative gearing. But now and

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister won't rule it out. What's going on

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>here this weekend. You have the opportunity to spend time

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>with friends and family, and you're going to talk about

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the election. So try and remember as many of these

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>as possible, about the difference between a bloke who promised

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to make their country better, but in actual fact it

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>was fifty four thousand people who lost their job in March.

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Better numbers for the jobs today. One point six median

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:57.280
<v Speaker 1>homes are in mortgage stress, two out of three cannot

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>afford their rent. Three point seven million household will run

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 1>out of food, Twenty nine and a half thousand businesses

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 1>have gone bust, highest supermarket prices ever, highest taxes on alcohol,

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>smokers and petrol, and budget deficits for the next forty years,

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>not ten plus one point two t four trillion dollars

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in debt that is on its way. Those numbers, particularly

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>about homelessness, are worth talking about. Those numbers, particularly about

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>people have food insecurity, are worth talking about. You'll remember

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that a couple of weeks ago on the show, we

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>had a blowke here by the name of Morgan Cox.

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Morgan was on the Q and A program a few

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago where he was talking about his experience and

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>about how he is one of those that is the

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>true victims of this government and the way they are

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:45.719
<v Speaker 1>being ignored when it comes to cost of living. So

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>this weekend, when you talk about politics, talk about Morgan.

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 14>One more rank increase and my family, my one year

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 14>old baby worth facing homelessness and we've got nowhere to go.

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 14>My family's already been forced out of Sydney for the

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 14>same reasons. I want to know, is the government going

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 14>to cut immigration to match housing availability or are we

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 14>just going to keep going until every regular working Australian

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 14>is homeless.

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>That question shook the nation, so then we spoke to

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Morgan on this program.

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 14>I had to sometimes I have to ring a charity

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 14>place and ask them for some help of the electricity

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 14>and they are able to give me some credit. If

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 14>it keeps going like even another year like this, just

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 14>one more year, I think millions of people.

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 5>Will just be destroyed.

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 14>They'll be just finished, They'll be living in camp well.

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Morgan is back in the news today because he's decided

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to have a protest. The place he's decided to do

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it is on the Central Coast, and he has done

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>so out the front of the Prime Minister's investment property.

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>He's decided to do so because he wants to keep

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the issue of people like himself in this election campaign.

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Joy now from the Central Coast. Morgan, why did

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you decide it's time to bring even more attention to

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>your plight and to do it where you're doing it?

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 14>Well, of course I'd prefer to be our home with

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 14>my family over Easter, but I felt it's really important

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 14>that the elections on and the fact of the matter

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 14>is the little people we're just not being heard and

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 14>this is a desperate situation and it's getting worse rapidly.

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 14>So I just I really really need to get this

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 14>out there, you know, for nothing else then, so that

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 14>I can tell my kids at least I tried, you know,

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:42.919
<v Speaker 14>at least I tried to get them to bring them

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 14>up in a country where they can afford to live. Yeah,

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 14>it's a.

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>No, I guess, yeah, no, I apologize. Sorry, the car

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 1>distracted just both then I understand obviously, and look, we

0:25:57.000 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>understand your passion, but you've decided to do it at

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the front not of the primin house, but house the

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister owns. What do you say to those that

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>are going to give you flack for where you've chosen

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to do this, that you're not a curability that you're

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 1>doing it on the central Coast.

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 14>Well, first of all, there has to be, you know,

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 14>a situation where I can do it, And there is

0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 14>a situation here where I can do it. There's the

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 14>space that I can do it in. And I'm not

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 14>breaking any laws. I'm not really hurting anybody or upsetting anybody.

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 14>I've spoken to all the neighbors and they're all quite

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 14>nice and lovely people and they are fine with it.

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:34.680
<v Speaker 14>So this was just the opportunity that I had, and

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 14>like I said, I just I want to do something,

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 14>you know, for the future of the kids.

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Morgan, when we talked about your own personal circumstances

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>when we spoke last time, So let's let's again look

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>at those raw numbers. One point six million people in

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.400
<v Speaker 1>mortgage shifts, meaning they can't afford their repayments, two out

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of three can't afford rent because it keeps going up.

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 1>Three million people this close to homelessness, as we've discussed before,

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:59.639
<v Speaker 1>that's people like yourself and three point seven million people

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 1>going to run out of food, probably have by now,

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and they're not going to have a great easter. Yet

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we're halfway through the election and I was talking about

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>any of that stuff. Really are they? That's right?

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 14>That's why I'm doing this, That's why I'm here. I

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:15.880
<v Speaker 14>just I didn't know what else to do to bring

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 14>attention to this. But it seems like it should be

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 14>the number one issue at this election for sure, and

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 14>I don't understand why everyone isn't talking about it all

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 14>the time. I keep seeing a lot of stuff on

0:27:28.760 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 14>climate change, and I just don't understand how that they

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 14>can think, for instance, that we should be concerned about

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 14>the weather in a hundred years when next week we

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 14>don't know if we're going to be living in a tent.

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. Now you've appeared with us, you've appeared on the ABC.

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 1>What response have you had? You know, you're not really

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>massive on social media, but but how what responsive you

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>had for being willing to be as public as you

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:52.919
<v Speaker 1>are in all of this.

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.679
<v Speaker 14>I think most people have been overwhelmingly supportive. I've had

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 14>a few people come out and say I'm racist or

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:05.240
<v Speaker 14>I'm anti immigrant or whatever. By the way, my partner

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:08.640
<v Speaker 14>is an immigrant, and I'm not against immigration at all.

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 14>I just want the government to manage the country. I mean,

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 14>what else is their job? Yeah, that's all just as

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 14>many houses. We need this many people.

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Correct, and if you add an extra one or two

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>million people to it, then all the people that are

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:24.399
<v Speaker 1>currently just barely holding on, well, they compete with everyone

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 1>else who might be able to jump in front of

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:29.679
<v Speaker 1>them in terms of their capacity to be able to

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>pay that rent or to bid for that house, in

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of the election, and in both sides here, what

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>would you say to both the Prime Minister and Peter

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Dunton about how they need to focus and have either

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of the leaders shown you anything resembling what should be

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the focus for people like your good self.

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 14>Honestly, I'm just really sad and disappointed at everything that

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 14>I'm hearing. I feel like they just need to come

0:28:57.960 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 14>back down to earth and talk to some of the

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 14>regular people, the working people. There is literally millions of

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 14>us in poverty and struggling, and we don't even have

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 14>a chance to talk to them. We're just we shut out.

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 14>That's why I've gone to this desperate sort of measure.

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 14>I didn't know what else to do. And like I said,

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 14>do you know, it's not just us, and now it's

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 14>also into the future. So our kids, our families, where

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 14>are they going to live if we just don't have

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 14>enough homes? This is a desperate situation for millions of people.

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Now. Earlier today, you had a banner that was on

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the caravan. I think the police told you to take

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it down. That's their business, But that was because you

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>were trying to promote a website, because you want people

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to have the ability to tell their stories. What does

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it cost of living casualties dot com dot au tell

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>us about what you want out of this website and

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>is anyone else helping you along the way. It's not

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a front for a political party or anything like that.

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 14>I'm just asking no, no, I have no affiliation with

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 14>any political party, and frankly, I'm disappointed in all of them.

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 14>I dare say that they asked me to take it

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 14>down because it had Albow's name on it, not because

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 14>of the website. And the website is just a very

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 14>simple website where people can go and they can just

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 14>enter in text their stories and they can select a

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 14>few options if they want it published or not, and

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 14>they can select things that they might like the government.

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 14>I just came up with a few ideas. There might

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 14>be more. People can ask me if they want me

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 14>to add things, but a few ideas that they'd like

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 14>the government to maybe address the issues, and just so

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 14>that their voice can be heard. My intention is to

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 14>take that to politicians and if there's enough of us,

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 14>you know, perhaps they'll listen.

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>How long's the kara? Then, therefore, is this how you

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>spend the next four days?

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 14>Unfortunately, it might be. It depends. It depends on the situation.

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 14>And you know what, I'd really love to hear from

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 14>some politicians. I'd love to hear from Albow or Dutton

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 14>or really anyone that will listen, because the whole point

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 14>of being here is just that we can be heard.

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 14>And you know, I'd love to take him on the

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 14>tour of the homeless camps that are around my place,

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 14>and I'd love to introduce them to some really lovely

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 14>people that are just suffering horribly, and I'd like to

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 14>just bring him back down to earth.

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, there's plenty of people that are running, plenty of

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>people that are defending and plenty of people who are

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>after our conversations now know who you are. By the way,

0:31:27.160 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>if you want to help Morgan out, one thing you

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>can do is give him some work, all right. He

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>works in hi Fi. We've spoken about this before. His

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>website is Smart High Fi dot com DOTU. It's audio

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>visual installations. His telephone number this is me doing the plug.

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 1>By the way, he didn't ask for this is one

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and three two nine one oh four. The

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>best way to keep his family fed and a roof

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 1>over their head is for them him to have work.

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>He'll do it anywhere from Newcastle down to Wollongong, but

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>he'll probably go even further. Morgan, all the best mate. Again.

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>That website when it comes to cost of living casualties,

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>what is it again?

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 14>It's just cost of living casualties dot com dot au

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 14>and yeah just a text just answer some texts, tell

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:08.440
<v Speaker 14>us his story and I'll try to pass it on

0:32:08.480 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 14>to some politicians and hopefully we can get some change.

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Good on your Morgan, all the best mate, Happy Easter

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and all the best of your family. Thanks Mane.

0:32:15.960 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 14>You as well, Thank you Morgan.

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Cox there on the Central Coast now again he's been

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>pushed to a point where he thinks that's the way

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to make his point. And you've got to imagine a

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 1>person who is pushed that far to do that and

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the inconvenience that comes from it, and you've heard his

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 1>reasonings for it. That's his website. That's how you can

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>help him when it comes to work. And I'd love

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to know what you think, Paul. It's gonews dot com

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>dot you should cost a living and people like Morgan

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 1>be the focus of this election or the distractions of

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna can't many care. They're going to get rid

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of negative gearing. We'll get to both next here on

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Paul Murray Life. Thanks for watching. Sunday Nights we're hardcore

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>politics and Thursday before a long weekend, we are hardcore politics. Baby.

0:32:57.960 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>You give it to you straight for the next few days,

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>army with the arguments. For the next few days. With

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the family, with the friends. Be polite, everyone loves their family.

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>No blow ups. But you know, if it gets to

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the subject, we'll give you a little bit of information.

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Christy McSweeney is of course from the pr Council. She

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>joins us now from beautiful Melbourne and the reason we're

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>in HD just always looking amazing none other than Darren Barnett.

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>A lovely to see you as well.

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 15>I thought that was heading Paul, Thank you very much.

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, now there's a million polls, but I want

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to bounce around here, so my apologies to the team

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes. I'll be honest about where the election

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 1>odds right, and they are in terms of the betting markets,

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and it is the Labour Party at a dollar twenty

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 1>two to win with sports Bet, the Coalition at four

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars thirty, so an obvious favorite. Now lad Brokes Labor

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Party dollar twenty two, tab dollar twenty five, the Libs

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 1>blowing out to well plus four dollars in all of those,

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 1>so what was previously Libs then became fifty to fifty

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Now book you say, is pretty strong in the way

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of Labor. If you're a hardcore supporter, I think the

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 1>momentum may change. Look bit responsibly butt four dollars a

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>reasonable price if you think you're running towards towards maybe

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:10.919
<v Speaker 1>a different direction. There's also a whole collection of poles,

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:12.800
<v Speaker 1>including our mates at Redbridge. And remember we talked to

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Costa Marris from Redbridge and Michael Kroger on Sunday nights

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and say to the nation, they are having a look

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>at a whole collection of swing seats and they are

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:23.439
<v Speaker 1>tracking whether they are heading the Liberal way or whether

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.919
<v Speaker 1>they are heading Labour's way. Now, don't worry, you don't

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 1>have to squint, but I'll do the work for you. Basically,

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty one forty nine in lots of different directions, in

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 1>all of the seats. Now I'm talking about Robertson on

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the central coast of New South Wales, Reed suburban Sydney, Shortland,

0:34:40.320 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Hunter Bruce suburban Melbourne, Goldstein, the Teal seat

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in Melbourne, Bullwinkled, the new seat in Western Australia, Hawk,

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>which is the contest between Labor and the Greens.

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 15>Hawks where I grew up Sunbury.

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:58.720
<v Speaker 1>There we go Sunday mcew and Casey Bentelon, Gilmour, Hughes

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Patterson and Lincoln Yari. Again, fifty one forty nine, still

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:05.759
<v Speaker 1>nice and tight. Yes, you can see in places like

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Robertson it was liberal by some margin. Now it's just

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in favor of Labor. A lot of things that you

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>see in that way. So let's talk about these particular polls,

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 1>whether you trust them, whether you don't, Christy, does it

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>show a tight race or does it show the momentum

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that the bookies seem to believe is there in the election.

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 11>Look, I think it is very very tight. And the

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 11>reason why I think it's tight, and I've said it before,

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 11>is that the same people Redbridge who and give us

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 11>that poll are the same people who identify and they're

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:39.320
<v Speaker 11>great mates of mine in Melbourne and great friends.

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 13>Of the show.

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 11>They're the same people who identify how far the soft

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:47.520
<v Speaker 11>vote has blown out. And that soft vote is still

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:51.479
<v Speaker 11>sitting at about twenty five percent, and one in three

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 11>voters voted for independent at the last election, and some

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 11>of those are going to switch back. So if we

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:00.439
<v Speaker 11>combine the thirty percent of people who I don't vote

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 11>for a major party and might be assessing the major

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 11>parties and the twenty five percent of people who haven't

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 11>made up their mind, it is still very very close.

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:15.719
<v Speaker 11>And I still do think that small margin there reflects

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 11>the general electorate, despite the Labor Party gaining momentum in

0:36:20.800 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 11>the campaign.

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because that's the question, isn't it, Darren. It is

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:26.759
<v Speaker 1>always about momentum. What is very different I think about

0:36:26.760 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 1>this election than others is when you basically have this

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 1>set down week, where are they still going to appear? Yes,

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 1>are we going to try to read into who got

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:37.319
<v Speaker 1>the biggest cheer at the Sydney East. But basically from

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 1>now till the other side of Anzac Day, most people

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to unplug and it means they had to.

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 1>They have the chats with the families and we'll see

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>whether that produces an even greater momentum for where the

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>book you say it's going, or it starts to push

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 1>us back to where we were just a month ago.

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:53.800
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of that pot?

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:56.360
<v Speaker 15>Well, if you look at the seat by seat betting,

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 15>and I've only looked at sports bet but a lot

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 15>of these seats now have become much more Even so,

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:10.320
<v Speaker 15>the seats New South Wales have been along robertson Gilmore,

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 15>early on Macquarie and where where we're in it, Patterson

0:37:13.600 --> 0:37:16.440
<v Speaker 15>is still in it. A lot of them now are

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 15>slightly favoring labor and they were favoring liberal as little

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.319
<v Speaker 15>as two or three weeks ago. The same goes in

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 15>Victoria for Chisholm. The same goes for a couple of

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 15>the Teal seats, So the Cape Cheney seat in WA,

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 15>the Manique Ryan's seat, the Jry Daniel's seat. When momentum

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:39.879
<v Speaker 15>is not running with you, it's just one of those

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 15>quirks of elections. And I'd say to sit to you

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:46.400
<v Speaker 15>before we came on air the twenty ten election, Gillard

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 15>Abbott that when momentum started to swing towards the Coalition,

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 15>it just seemed that all of those tight races the

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 15>Liberals just got over the line.

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Was all before two weeks. I mean, for those that

0:37:58.880 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>are trying.

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:01.840
<v Speaker 15>To are up fifty five forty five at the end

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 15>of week one of that campaign, great point. Then all

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 15>the leaks started and then momentum really just swung the

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 15>other way, and that thirty six hour marathon to the line,

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 15>all of those things just momentum sat with Abbott. So

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 15>my point is that and all those seats just ended

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 15>up falling by a fairly small margin. Unless Dutton can

0:38:22.600 --> 0:38:26.320
<v Speaker 15>take the momentum, I think he is in a world

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:26.760
<v Speaker 15>of trouble.

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, this is it because again, you know, margin of

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:32.919
<v Speaker 1>era means you know, on a good day you might

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 1>push to the high sixties, maybe over seventy. On a

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:38.399
<v Speaker 1>bad day you can actually go backwards and actually further

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to that point. I actually asked sports bet, not sponsors.

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I just asked the people that are there. They say,

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:47.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the current market that are about changing seats,

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that Labour would only lose four seats. Those would be

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Ben Long, Lions, Gilmore and Aston. However they would win

0:38:57.960 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 1>one back from the Greens. The Coalition would win one

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 1>off the Greens in Brucebane. They'd take back what essentially

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 1>were already their seats, the seats of Monash Claire Moore,

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:13.240
<v Speaker 1>which are all people who were elected Nats or Libs

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:16.959
<v Speaker 1>and then became independents. Monique Ryan. Look, it's a dollar

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy nine to a dollar ninety three, but they're suggesting

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that she would lose to Amelia Hayman and maybe Kauper.

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 1>That would be a coalition loss going to an independent.

0:39:27.360 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 1>But the market there dollar eighty to a dollar eighty seven.

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 1>So see what happens, all right, So it is, it

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 1>is fascinating. You're so right. The start of that, the

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>start of that Gillard campaign five and in twenty nine

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought.

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:42.240
<v Speaker 15>Were insurmountable after week one, and granted there were leaks

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 15>and their other things. Do you think it always happened,

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 15>but we're pretty cruisy after a week and we certainly

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:50.879
<v Speaker 15>were just watching the track pols fall off.

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, thank good miss Kevin Rudd was the Foreign minister

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 1>coming out of that, because nothing bad happened as a

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:56.359
<v Speaker 1>result of that honor. But it was Tony Abbot who

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 1>pulled down the first female prime minister. Okay, now let's

0:39:59.640 --> 0:40:02.319
<v Speaker 1>get too the debate and your thoughts on that last night.

0:40:03.160 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Albo didn't have a good night. I know that.

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, the media was always going to say it's

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a draw because if it's a draw, it's a win,

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 1>because that's not a change of momentum. And here's the deal.

0:40:10.719 --> 0:40:14.320
<v Speaker 1>No debate has ever produced a knockout moment except for

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden, who was dead in the middle of the debate. Right.

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:20.759
<v Speaker 1>Other than that, you can always say there's this bit

0:40:20.800 --> 0:40:22.880
<v Speaker 1>for us and there's this bit for them. But I

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 1>honestly see, and of course, you know, I want a

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:29.320
<v Speaker 1>change in government. But Christie I saw, and we showed

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:33.359
<v Speaker 1>an awful lot of pretty successful hits the following day. Yes,

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't had to deal with the climate change stuff. I

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 1>thought he dealt with it pretty quickly. Will he be

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 1>forgiven by the Left for it. No, they've got their grab,

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 1>they run forever. But this negative gearing thing, I said,

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:44.759
<v Speaker 1>if the Libs can have the medi scares shoved down

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:49.280
<v Speaker 1>their throat since twenty sixteen, you can shove negative gearing

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 1>changes right back down Labour's throat.

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 11>I thought, I agree with you, Paul. I thought Peter

0:40:57.120 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 11>Dutton did extraordinarily well last night. The only thing I

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 11>worry about is that it's a bit too little, too late,

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 11>going into the East to break and the holidays and

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 11>pre poll already being upon us. But I thought he

0:41:11.880 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 11>outdid the Prime Minister. I saw the Prime Minister look evasive.

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 11>I saw the Prime Minister look shaky. In debates such

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:24.279
<v Speaker 11>as this, at this time of the cycle, you want

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:27.359
<v Speaker 11>to have an agenda to put the front runner off

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 11>their game. And we have just spoken about how Labor

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:32.919
<v Speaker 11>seems to have gained the momentum. It did take them

0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 11>eighteen months to gain momentum, but they seem to have

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 11>it with them now and I think Peter dun't achieve

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:43.320
<v Speaker 11>that objective. I saw the Prime Minister not being able

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 11>to answer questions and not being able to quickly on

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:51.960
<v Speaker 11>his feet come up with a form of words around

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 11>the difference between commissioning modeling or what is modeling versus

0:41:57.400 --> 0:42:02.359
<v Speaker 11>advice and he couldn't tack that deftly. And when you're

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:05.840
<v Speaker 11>the Prime Minister and you can't tackle that deftly, that

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 11>means your confidence is a little bit shaken around that issue.

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:12.279
<v Speaker 11>And it does mean that Peter Dunton had got to

0:42:12.360 --> 0:42:15.880
<v Speaker 11>him if he couldn't wipe that back. Don't for his part,

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:20.239
<v Speaker 11>he had some slip ups as well, I'd say, particularly

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:25.839
<v Speaker 11>in this Indonesian issue. However, voters are not looking at

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 11>Australia's relationship with Indonesia. They don't know what Jants Defense

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 11>magazine isis into a national security but exactly exactly. So

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:42.359
<v Speaker 11>if it was, it's very difficult and complex for people

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:45.719
<v Speaker 11>to understand. So I don't think that's going to get

0:42:45.760 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 11>the traction that a lot of the commentary wants it

0:42:48.680 --> 0:42:49.000
<v Speaker 11>to get.

0:42:49.280 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that bumps in and out in a couple

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of days. Am I right here? Well?

0:42:52.040 --> 0:42:54.719
<v Speaker 15>I think you're right, but it's you don't want to

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:58.840
<v Speaker 15>cause own goals on your suits. One hundred percent national

0:42:58.880 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 15>security is a legal strong suit and you don't want that.

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 15>You don't want Bridget McKenzie saying that there's world leaders

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:10.280
<v Speaker 15>saying Dutton doesn't want to BPM and it's not quite right.

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:14.040
<v Speaker 15>The form of words matters and you need to get

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 15>you just need to get the language right. And I

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 15>think there's been three or four language errors which you

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 15>shouldn't make in a campaign. I thought, look, Dunton needed

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 15>to hit it out of the park and maybe he won,

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:32.760
<v Speaker 15>maybe it was lionball, but not enough to change the momentum.

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:35.320
<v Speaker 15>And as I said before, if the momentum doesn't shift,

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:39.400
<v Speaker 15>then I think it's going to be a really difficult

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:41.480
<v Speaker 15>time because people are going to switch off for a week.

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Well let's see if somebody is smart somewhere on the

0:43:43.960 --> 0:43:46.799
<v Speaker 1>internet to make the most of what Jim Chalmers has

0:43:46.800 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 1>said about negative gearing in the past.

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:52.239
<v Speaker 13>Any housing policy that doesn't deal with negative gearing and

0:43:52.280 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 13>capital gains tax as a sham. Housing affordability which doesn't

0:43:56.440 --> 0:43:59.720
<v Speaker 13>make important and considered changes to capital gains and negative

0:43:59.760 --> 0:44:02.080
<v Speaker 13>gear has a hole in the middle of it. If

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:03.920
<v Speaker 13>you want to deal with housing affordability, you need to

0:44:03.920 --> 0:44:06.080
<v Speaker 13>start with negative gearing and capital gains.

0:44:06.920 --> 0:44:08.720
<v Speaker 1>All of that is enough for the medi Scare campaign.

0:44:08.880 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Why is it not when it comes to a negative

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:12.759
<v Speaker 1>gearing one because you knows the Prime Minister didn't say

0:44:12.800 --> 0:44:17.160
<v Speaker 1>today we will not cut negative gearing quick breakback with more.

0:44:21.800 --> 0:44:23.720
<v Speaker 1>We are going to be in Cowgooley, not this Sunday,

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 1>next Sunday, and I want to fill the room, which

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is why I'm doing as many plugs as possible tonight

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 1>before you bugger off on holidays. Ourtown, it's gynews dot

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:34.280
<v Speaker 1>com dot Au. Ourtown. It's goynews dot com dot Au.

0:44:34.480 --> 0:44:36.120
<v Speaker 1>But plenty of people come up and tell me, including

0:44:36.120 --> 0:44:37.319
<v Speaker 1>there was a couple who told me I think we

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:40.800
<v Speaker 1>were in Tweed on Monday, that they went on a

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 1>big international holiday. But they still continue to watch the

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 1>program Easion every night with VPNs and all the rest

0:44:45.760 --> 0:44:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of it. Thank you. There are people who watch us

0:44:47.760 --> 0:44:49.480
<v Speaker 1>all over the place. But if you would like to

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 1>join us in Cowgooley in Western Australia, it is our town,

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:55.920
<v Speaker 1>it's goynews dot com dot Au, not this but next Sunday.

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Let's fill the room and fill the room fast. Christi

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:00.440
<v Speaker 1>McSweeney is here with Darren Barnett. We get away when

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:01.880
<v Speaker 1>we're in a Loser of the Week in a moment,

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:05.400
<v Speaker 1>but can we talk about election posters because we know

0:45:05.480 --> 0:45:09.239
<v Speaker 1>there's a story every day pulled someone pulled mind down. Well,

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 1>somebody pulled yours down, and then somebody else drew on yours,

0:45:11.640 --> 0:45:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and then we're all supposed to think that this means

0:45:14.800 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 1>something about whether they're going to win or not win,

0:45:17.760 --> 0:45:20.440
<v Speaker 1>or there's more posters. Can I say this in the

0:45:20.440 --> 0:45:22.680
<v Speaker 1>behalf of all Australians. Get rid of all of them

0:45:23.239 --> 0:45:26.960
<v Speaker 1>because they aren't about anything. We're not voting for your face.

0:45:27.040 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Once we get to the ballot paper your name, yes,

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is there? Okay, that's all you have to remember if

0:45:32.719 --> 0:45:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to go for one person or the other. Now, Darren,

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:37.839
<v Speaker 1>you've been on the front line of these things where

0:45:37.920 --> 0:45:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you've seen seats that were longtime seats for the Liberal

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Party turned to the people like Karen Phelps in places

0:45:46.000 --> 0:45:50.400
<v Speaker 1>like Wentworth. Now I think ten years ago, yeah, probably

0:45:50.480 --> 0:45:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the posters was a thing right of your show of force.

0:45:54.440 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I just think people find them grossly irritating right now.

0:45:57.520 --> 0:46:00.239
<v Speaker 1>They don't find them half as intimidating the second time

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:02.279
<v Speaker 1>around with the Teals as they did the first. Am

0:46:02.280 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I wrong?

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:05.319
<v Speaker 15>I think that I think the Teals get more bang

0:46:05.360 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 15>for their buck out of digital advertising, whether it's when

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:11.560
<v Speaker 15>you turn on your phone and the next scroll down

0:46:11.719 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 15>gives you an allegra a spender or a row Knox

0:46:14.560 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 15>ad where I live and wentworth. Some of the advertising

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:21.040
<v Speaker 15>on the side of the old the bus shelters, some

0:46:21.080 --> 0:46:23.840
<v Speaker 15>of the digital advertising at Bondi Junction, some of that

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 15>stuff's quite useful. And some of the.

0:46:27.400 --> 0:46:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Petrol station that's smart. Whoever in the limbs is with that,

0:46:29.440 --> 0:46:34.719
<v Speaker 1>that's because everyone sees that. Literally, but poster someone someone's house, it's.

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:36.480
<v Speaker 15>Pretty irritating, I'll give you that. But I do get

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:38.239
<v Speaker 15>a laugh every time I see someone with a tooth

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:41.080
<v Speaker 15>blacked out. But I look at it in a different

0:46:41.120 --> 0:46:44.439
<v Speaker 15>way to most people, I think. But where I live

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 15>is absolutely chock a block and they all win, and

0:46:48.160 --> 0:46:51.359
<v Speaker 15>then oh this is on a power pole, this one's

0:46:51.360 --> 0:46:54.920
<v Speaker 15>onto this way. They all break the rules, they all

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:58.080
<v Speaker 15>suit themselves and it's kind of it's a zero some game.

0:46:58.120 --> 0:47:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And don't show the camera, but just show Aaron's face.

0:47:00.640 --> 0:47:04.320
<v Speaker 1>That's my favorite thing that I like on a poster. Absolutely, yeah, correct,

0:47:04.320 --> 0:47:06.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, I thought that'd be the case. Christy, your

0:47:06.480 --> 0:47:08.920
<v Speaker 1>thoughts about these posters, I mean, again, you've been to candidate.

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You've seen how these things go. I know where we've

0:47:11.560 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 1>always done, but it ain't eighteen twenty and I just

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:16.280
<v Speaker 1>cut on over one thinks, oh, if we have seventeen

0:47:16.320 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 1>more than the other one, we're going to win. It

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:21.440
<v Speaker 1>just annoys me, and it reminds me don't go near

0:47:21.480 --> 0:47:23.880
<v Speaker 1>your house at Halloween because you're a kook.

0:47:26.320 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 11>Well, yes, you're entirely correct, Paul. I have had my

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:35.319
<v Speaker 11>face plastered on posts all around the in and out

0:47:35.320 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 11>of suburbs of Hearth and so I've ticked that off

0:47:39.280 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 11>by list, and I'm very pleased that there's yet another

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:46.400
<v Speaker 11>election where that memory continues to fight and I become

0:47:46.600 --> 0:47:52.439
<v Speaker 11>less prominent so in terms of candidacy. But I will say,

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:55.680
<v Speaker 11>having been there and done it and having spoken to

0:47:55.719 --> 0:47:59.279
<v Speaker 11>people and what people respond to. It's really difficult in

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:01.680
<v Speaker 11>the political and at the moment because it's become so

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:06.320
<v Speaker 11>binary and so leader focused. It's incredibly hard for local

0:48:06.360 --> 0:48:09.399
<v Speaker 11>candidates to get local news out and to get their

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:14.200
<v Speaker 11>own personal brand out because everybody gravitates towards the leader now,

0:48:14.600 --> 0:48:19.000
<v Speaker 11>So it does work. Signage is a huge advantage. The

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:22.400
<v Speaker 11>more of it you have, the more repetition people have

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:26.279
<v Speaker 11>of your name, not necessarily your face, but your name.

0:48:27.239 --> 0:48:28.880
<v Speaker 11>I don't think it's a good idea for people to

0:48:28.960 --> 0:48:31.719
<v Speaker 11>signal I vote liberal or I vote labor on the

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:36.240
<v Speaker 11>front of my house, but signage certainly, as Darren mentioned,

0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 11>council bins, bus stops, billboards, that's all valuable.

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:43.239
<v Speaker 1>That's good or I got thirty seconds, so give me

0:48:43.280 --> 0:48:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a bumper sticker version. We'rere a loser of the week

0:48:45.560 --> 0:48:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Darren Bunnett. Rory McElroy, Oh how good? And yeah it

0:48:51.160 --> 0:48:51.520
<v Speaker 1>was a rip.

0:48:51.600 --> 0:48:53.520
<v Speaker 15>I can't even remember his name who finished runner up,

0:48:53.560 --> 0:48:54.759
<v Speaker 15>so he's the loser of the week.

0:48:55.640 --> 0:48:59.239
<v Speaker 1>Christy Win are.

0:49:01.080 --> 0:49:03.920
<v Speaker 11>Winner of the week. For me, I'm going to say

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:08.120
<v Speaker 11>I think I'm going to make it political. I'm going

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:11.400
<v Speaker 11>to say Benson Soulo where I live in Sint Kilda,

0:49:11.719 --> 0:49:14.400
<v Speaker 11>he does have three signs up within three streets, so

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:18.360
<v Speaker 11>I've identified the other three voters in my entire suburb

0:49:18.440 --> 0:49:22.080
<v Speaker 11>that vote Coalition. So thank you for putting those signs up.

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:22.800
<v Speaker 11>You're doing well.

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank you guys. Happy eater to everyone. Go Yankees and

0:49:25.880 --> 0:49:27.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll see you again. We're his Sunday night, Monday night

0:49:27.960 --> 0:49:29.719
<v Speaker 1>when I go anywhere, so we'll be back at our

0:49:29.760 --> 0:49:31.680
<v Speaker 1>usual time on Sunday. Have a great weekend.