WEBVTT - Humphrey vs Maric, Moraes vs Bice, and likely DPPs! | Breaking Even with Al Paton 0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:07.960 Hello everyone, and welcome to another edition of Breaking Even 0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:12.080 with Al Payton on your official Supercoach AFL podcast feed. 0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.200 I'm Al Payton, joined today for a huge episode heading 0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:16.920 into round four by Patch. 0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:19.639 Welcome again, Hello, well, delighted to be here. Thank you 0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:21.400 for having me on once again. 0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:24.200 And the DPP king himself. I'm sure that will come 0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:26.599 up plenty of times during the podcast, Tim Mitchell, great 0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:27.000 to have you on. 0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:29.080 Hey, Al, Yeah, it's all hotting up, isn't it? Only 0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.000 a couple of weeks away from those first DPP editions, 0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.080 so looking forward to getting stuck in. Who knows, maybe 0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:35.720 you'll week Christian petrarch I might get there. 0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:38.760 Yeah, that has impacted some of my trade thoughts this week, 0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.320 but yes we'll get into all that stuff. A reminder 0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.600 of course, like subscribe on wherever you're listening or watching 0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:47.360 of course on Code Sports YouTube channel. And a reminder 0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:51.360 again that the Super Coach Plus free trial has expired. 0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:54.880 So yeah, rather than getting blocked by when you try 0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.080 and see all your break evens and all the stats 0:00:57.080 --> 0:00:59.600 that we love in Supercoach, thirty dollars roughly or just 0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:03.960 under that for twelve months subscription is definitely money well spent. 0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.679 That'll also covey when Super Coach BBL comes around later 0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:08.800 in the year because it last full twelve months. So 0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.080 get on to that. But we'll get into your questions 0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:13.040 very shortly. But first, of course, we have to do 0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:17.520 the HbF injury Report. Every super coach knows that managing 0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.399 injuries is a key to success. This is the injury Report, 0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.280 proudly brought to you by HbF, your Health Dream Team. 0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:26.200 Some very interesting names on the injury list this week. 0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.319 We'll start off with Xavier Lindsay, who as we speak 0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:30.720 is the most traded out player in Super Coach. Of course, 0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:32.600 I think about fifty thousand of us brought him in 0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:34.520 last week and he was on the bubble, look fantastic 0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:36.479 as a rookie and looked really good early in that game, 0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:38.040 I think gain two kicks in the first two minutes. 0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.679 Then went down with a knee injury, shocking news for 0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:42.920 first year player. We thought he might be gone for 0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:44.720 the year, but Melbourne now saying it's a one to 0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:47.360 two week injury, so we'll probably get into that what 0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:49.560 do we do with him? But yeah, certainly much more 0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:53.000 positive on the injury front there, and Melbourne probably will 0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.320 see some changes this week. Obviously Lindsay will be out, 0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.720 but because he Picket is available after serving his suspension, 0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:00.200 and there's a few other players who are down for 0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:03.640 fitness tests like a Kayla windsor Jake Lever, so yeah, 0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:05.920 we might see some changes at the D's this week. 0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.040 Another big injury do you Remembergovern We know can be 0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.360 injury prone and he's out for two to four weeks 0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:14.960 with an adductor injury, so that might be very interesting 0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.200 for another one of our top targets this week over 0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.000 the Eagles and at Brisbane. Kyle Lohman is out for 0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:22.519 another week, missing another week with his ankle, so that 0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:24.840 might help Olivoy Ashcroft potentially. And I did see on 0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:26.679 their injury list to the Kitty Coleman still down a 0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:27.840 four to six weeks away. 0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:33.400 That's very annoying for someone who didn't start because of 0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:35.600 the impeding return of Kitty Coleman. 0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.120 But anyway, who you go for us Patch. 0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.040 I have some very sad and devastating news out of Essendon, 0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:42.919 which thank you for giving me on the run sheet. 0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:47.880 Tom Edwards has done his ACL. I don't know if 0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:49.960 it's been confirmed yet, but it's all but confirmed from 0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.280 training and he will miss the rest of the season. 0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.480 Jack Caldwell has also done a hamstring which they haven't 0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.560 given a timeline at time of recording, but it's probably 0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:01.560 not good for him, maybe it's good for lacious artists. 0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:04.400 Who knows one to watch there. Tristan Cherry scared a 0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:10.000 lot of people with a hamstring issue in a week awareness. Yeah, 0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.359 I'm not sure in the game, not entirely sure what 0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:16.560 it was, but yeah, Scanner is clear, so he's good 0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:22.080 to go. And Tom Stewart is a test to tell 0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.200 us who knows who knows? Well? 0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:27.639 The interesting one up in Sydney, Al's Calum Mills. Sounds 0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:29.840 like he's at least another month away from returning. I 0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.359 know a lot of super coaches had him in their plans. 0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:36.440 Obviously heavily discounted defensive option for us this year, but 0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.560 sounds like he's still, yeah, potentially three four, if not 0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.800 longer away, So we're going to have to sort of 0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.400 put those plans on the back burner and potentially look 0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.600 at some other options to well. Thankfully, the defensive rookies 0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:50.720 are cooking now, so might be able to just hold 0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:52.720 onto them a bit longer and wait for Calum meals, 0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:56.360 but yeah, we've got to put him. Unfortunately we won't 0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:58.440 have him for another month or so. The other big 0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.160 injury news to come out of the last few days 0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.720 is that Zach Butters's test probably since at the time 0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:08.160 of recording, more likely than unlikely that he's going to play. 0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:11.200 So whether that has any impact on Christian Maris, who's 0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.280 a really popular rookie who I'm sure we're going to 0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:16.599 talk about today, Jason Francis and yeah, and Jason or 0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.080 Francis as well. God he's gone well, isn't he? And 0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.360 if we head over to the west, Sean Darcy and 0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:23.640 Hayden Young both due to play Waffle this week too, 0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:28.160 so as good as Luke Darcy was for Dos Luke 0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.760 Luke Jackson, Sorry it was on Sean Darcy. Is his 0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:33.720 pending return sure to have some impact there? 0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:37.039 Yeah? Absolutely. That's a wrap on this week's injury report. 0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.640 Thanks to aage BF make the Smart move join HbF 0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.000 your health Dream Team. So a couple quick segments before 0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:45.440 we get into the questions. One is full and Primo Watch. 0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:47.479 Have just put a couple of guys on here that 0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:50.760 we can be keeping an eye on their price coming down. 0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.400 Kieren Briggs is an interesting one, obviously coming back from 0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.279 that really horrible concussion we're around. 0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:57.440 He scored I think five points. 0:04:57.600 --> 0:04:59.840 He's already lost a bunch of money and he's got 0:04:59.880 --> 0:05:02.400 a break even of two hundred and two this week, 0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:04.960 so projected to lose another fifty k. So if you 0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:07.160 need a cheap ruckman, and I know there's some Matt 0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.480 Flynn owner's still out there, perhaps the wires move there 0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:12.880 is to hold off a week and you can maybe 0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:14.920 get Briggsy next week at a discant of price. And 0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.560 he scored okay, so hopefully he'll least get you through 0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.160 to maybe the mid year buys and then you can 0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:20.760 figure out what you. 0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:22.080 Do with your rucks. 0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.040 Then Elder Yu's had a really underwhelming start to the year. 0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:27.320 Luke Davis Uniac, he's got a break even of one 0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:29.919 fifty four. He already lost forty k, and he's going 0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:31.960 to lose some more money, so he's down to five 0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:33.840 forty eight and probably might be able to get him 0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:35.599 around the five hundred K mark, and then I think 0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:37.480 would be very interested. I got him mid year last 0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:39.280 year to Discando was about five to seventy. I think 0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:41.640 at that stage and he was fantastic and the run home, 0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:43.800 so we know we can do but yeah, he hasn't 0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:45.200 done it yet, but that could be good for us 0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.360 in terms of looking for a cheap primo. What's where 0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:49.960 do we stand on Nickday because he didn't play last 0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:53.039 week obviously, so he's still got that. As we noted 0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:54.960 last week on one hundred and fifteen break even, it 0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:56.800 says it, but one hundred and fifteen, so probably not 0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:58.440 going to get much cheaper than his current six oh 0:05:58.480 --> 0:05:58.960 two k. 0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:01.680 Not the way players it gets. Thursday night could be 0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:03.440 an ugly watch if you don't have Nick Daekos in 0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:05.559 your team. So I've got this hope as a Blues 0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:07.800 fan that Carlton's going to find some way to tag him, 0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:09.560 send George Hewett to him or something and try and 0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.240 limited his influence. But yeah, there's a fair chance Nick 0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:14.120 Dacos gets out this week. I don't see him getting 0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.240 a lot cheaper. I've got Kieran Briggs on the radar though, 0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:20.160 because and speaking of Carlton, like Mark Pittnay is only 0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.320 a week away, and I think that there's going to 0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.479 have to be some possibility that as good as Tom 0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:26.400 the Conning's been for us. We might need to be 0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:28.320 looking for an exit plan in the next couple of weeks, 0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.360 and I think Kieran Briggs for one hundred and fifty 0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:33.280 k prop it might be a pretty good option when 0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:34.000 he bottoms out. 0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:35.520 Yeah, and the other one, I know, you were just 0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.520 keeping a sneaky oen with Sid Draper. Obviously rookie priced 0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.039 high rookie price to start the year, and he actually 0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:42.800 started losing a bit of money because he kept being 0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.200 the sub. But you know, there was a he sort 0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:46.560 of thought, well, maybe in a few weeks we could 0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:47.920 get him for you know, one hundred and forty K 0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:49.880 or something, But that looks like it probably won't happen now. 0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:51.560 He just got on too early on the weekend. I 0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:53.640 think he was on in the first quarter or played 0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:56.839 about three quarters anyway, so that many actually scored. Okay, 0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.000 so his break evens thirty nine, But you wouldn't imagine 0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:00.719 he's going to lose a lot for sort one hundred 0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:02.640 and eighty two K, which he is now having lost 0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.320 about eight or nine K on the weekend. So still 0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:07.320 like him, though, I think when he gets into that 0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:09.320 Adelaide midfield, he's going to be a really good scorer 0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:11.720 for us, and one that we might want to consider 0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:14.320 it that elevated rookie price, especially if he gets DPP 0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.600 in a few weeks, which is looking like a real possibility. 0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:16.880 Yeah. 0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:18.320 And the other one we didn't mention on the injury 0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:20.280 report was josh uh S Shelley out for four to 0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.600 six weeks, so that's what allowed him to get on 0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:24.400 obviously last week when he was subbed off. So maybe 0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:26.679 he comes into the two. 0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:31.040 Ranking forward yeah, maybe please know, please no? I also 0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:32.880 hope not, but yeah, that's got to be a possibility, 0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.560 doesn't it. Ranking forward Drake a bit more midfield time, and. 0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.480 We'll have a quick round of rookie rule level, which, 0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.560 as we saw last week, can really catch you out 0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.120 even or maybe especially in a best eighteen round. So 0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.440 say with you, Patch, would you field Zach Reed or 0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:46.520 Luke trainer this week? 0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:50.120 Well, Zachari's on the bar this weellab Probably not Zach Reed. 0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:52.880 Good call, good call, Thank you. Patch helped me out there. 0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.960 Try another one, Levoy Ashcroft, tim or Mitch Nevitt Well, so. 0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:01.920 Much depends on whether Nevert's sub Again. I haven't had 0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:03.720 a close look at the fixtures, just yet there's to 0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.240 see how whether that pans out. Levio as Cross was 0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.640 pretty underwhelming against the Cats, but I think with difficult 0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.120 opposition plus those really tough conditions that we saw up 0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:13.720 in queens Lean, and I think we can forgive him 0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.320 for that one. So probably go lee by just and 0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:18.600 then he does play the Tigers this week. Might be 0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:20.480 score against the Tigers. 0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.160 And I never Yeah, the Cats play Friday night, so 0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:24.280 we should know at least early in the remurning. Now 0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:26.520 I'll try another one, Pertsch, if you had to choose 0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:30.760 between Riley Bys or conno O'Sullivan in your defense, we 0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:34.520 like him, Christian Marius, We've got to leave airscroft twice. 0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:35.480 We'll ignore that one. 0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:37.240 This segment's going really well. We'll try to just gip 0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.200 straight to the last one. And this especially for our 0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.000 friend Dossie. Would you feel Sam Davidson or Elijah shuittid 0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:42.360 you a forward? 0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:42.840 Ron Tip? 0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.640 Is that really question? Well, Davidson, he's not. 0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:46.800 Everyone got it right. Last week. 0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.440 Yeah, we picked Jason horn Francis as F one and 0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:51.800 we picked Sam Davidson as F six, F seven, and 0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:55.320 one is outscoring the other for about four hundred k less, 0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:56.600 so definitely Davidson. 0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:58.920 Yeah, I don't think you'll be leaving it Fields anytime soon. Right, 0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:00.240 we'll get into the guts of the show, which is, 0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.360 of course your questions. Keep an eye for that tweet 0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:05.439 every week on the Tuesday Wednesday morning and we'll get 0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:08.480 to as many questions as we can. So yeah, I 0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:10.280 mean I've just found this week there's four or five 0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.120 players I really want to trade in. Obviously we only 0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.760 have a maximum of three trades. Probably ideally wouldn't use 0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:15.959 a boost I but I didn't have to. But I'm 0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:18.719 probably going to be hard to avoid. But we'll see 0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.960 what people want to know. So Humphrey's or Merrick is, Yeah, 0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:26.280 I think a few people really the big one, yeah, 0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:28.480 because they're both what sort of two sixty two seventy 0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:29.840 k I only got five k difference. 0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:34.359 Yeah. And Ryan Marritch at the Eagles has been fantastic, 0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:36.960 well fantastic on the weekend. He scored seventy one in 0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:39.440 round two after being the sub round one one twenty 0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.760 three on the weekend after taking kickouts and being the 0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.160 distributor off half back and Bally Humphrey has been playing 0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.000 as the third or fourth midfielder at the Suns and 0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:52.120 just looks like dare I say, shades of Dustin Martin. 0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:57.880 So both are pretty much the exact same price both. 0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:01.719 You know, Humphrey will get mid status. He's just a 0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.720 thought at the moment. Marriage is mid forward. There's not 0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.520 a lot splitting them, and so many questions this week 0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:08.880 we're all about yeah. 0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:10.280 Because I think this, you know, which I'm sure we'll 0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:10.520 touch on. 0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:12.440 There's two or three really good rookies as well, so 0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:13.800 by the time you get one or two of those, 0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:16.160 probably can only get one of these guys. 0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:18.760 Yeah, so putting you on the spot, who do you like? 0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:22.600 I still don't know. I was hoping i'd have an 0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:24.959 answer by this stage of the week. At the moment, 0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:29.480 I'm leaning towards marriage. That early DPP is a bit 0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.960 friendlier for my team, and I just feel like I'd 0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:36.200 rather someone playing off half back than someone playing kind 0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.560 of a mid forward role. And Humphreys has scored two tons, 0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:41.720 looked really good past the eye test, but he has 0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:46.680 played Essendon and Melbourne who are not good this year, 0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:49.120 and I don't doubt he'll continue. 0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:49.320 To have the role. 0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:55.800 And well they didn't deserve it. Yeah, there's no doubt 0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.080 that Humphrey has past the eye test, but I'm just 0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.680 not convinced he'll stay at a hunt. He might drop 0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.240 to eighty five or ninety still good, still valid to 0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.840 trade into. Marriage, might only average the same. I don't 0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:10.000 think there's a wrong answer at the stage. Humphrey feels 0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.559 like the higher risk, higher reward guy, where he could 0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.120 be your F six. There's a chance that is r 0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:17.800 F six if he keeps the role and keeps scoring 0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.600 and keeps playing really well and developing. Marriage probably less so, 0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:23.400 but I feel like I'm more confident in marriage over 0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:26.679 the next four weeks making cash than the smallest sample 0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:27.280 size I've. 0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.559 Seen it from, I mean from humph Most likely both 0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:31.559 of these guys are probably a four to six week 0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:33.360 kind of player. Yeah, make a bunch of cash and 0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:35.640 then you trade them in, you know, when an upgrade 0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:37.600 season comes around round eight and nine, that kind of time. 0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:39.920 But yeah, there's a possibility one or both could hang 0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:41.839 on at least you through to the mid season boys, 0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.080 And for me, I think marriage is probably a little 0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.080 bit safer. But yeah, very hard to pick. What do 0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:48.880 you think, Tim? You mentioned the Gold Coast straw, but 0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:50.240 it doesn't get hard for a. 0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:52.559 While, does that well, They got Adelaide this week, which 0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:54.200 I think is going to be a pretty good litmus 0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.440 test of Bailey Humphrey and his development into this this 0:11:57.520 --> 0:11:59.440 midfield role. Like he's coming up against one of the 0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:02.400 sort of better perform midfields in the first few rounds 0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:04.920 of the season in Adelaide. So I don't know, Like 0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:07.200 I'm in this tricky position where I didn't start Bailey 0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:09.720 Smith because I'm an idiot, So I've got to try 0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.040 and fit Bailey Smith in this week into my trades, 0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.280 which makes it even more difficult. But I think people 0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:18.760 who have grabbed one of Riley Bis and Christian Marias already, 0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:21.280 who are the two popular rookies this week, are in 0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.600 a really good spot now because like, presumably you've only 0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:27.160 used one, maybe two boosts, but this looks like a 0:12:27.160 --> 0:12:29.439 perfect week for me to use a boost. And if 0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.320 you've already got one of those rookies, you can then 0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:34.679 get on both Humphrey and Marriage and you can enjoy 0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:37.760 one hundred and fifty K cash generation and an average 0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:40.440 of probably around ninety from both of them for the 0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.320 next four or five weeks. We go into Best twenty 0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.520 two as well next week, which I think you'd be 0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:49.439 more comfortable fielding those guys over some of the other rookies, 0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.840 especially in midfield, which is probably what Nudge's marriage ahead. 0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.880 Like Bailey Humphrey might get mid status, he's sort of 0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:58.679 around the threshold for the amount of time that he's 0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.240 spent in midfield so far. But Aerck is already a 0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:04.400 forward mid so you can get one of those rookie 0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:09.079 midfield as off potentially like Avan. So the other thing 0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.200 to consider too, West Coast has conceded ninety one scoring 0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.800 shots in three rounds and I think forty two behind 0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.640 in that time, so he's going to get an absolute 0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:21.199 glight nair of kickouts and that's probably going to give 0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:24.320 him a you'd think a floor of eighty minimum even 0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:25.160 if he doesn't get that much. 0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:26.680 Bullet or McGovern as well. 0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:26.920 Well. 0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.360 The concern people have that is that mcgovin goes out 0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:30.920 so he has to be a little bit more accountable. 0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:33.760 But Ryan Marrick is Ryan Marrick isn't playing in defense 0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:36.920 to be accountable. He's there for his foot skills and 0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:38.840 he's there to get the ball going for the Eagles, 0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:40.480 So I think he's going to be a really good 0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:41.720 pick for a few weeks, and if you had to 0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.000 pick one and hold off on the other, I'd probably 0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:46.040 take another look at Humphrey against Adelaide and see how 0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.920 he goes against a proper midfield as opposed to the 0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:51.120 two teams that they face so far. Gold Coast. 0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:52.640 Yeah, I mean, I think I agree with all that. 0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:54.560 I suppose one thing that I've heard people flowed the 0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:56.960 idea of is because I think it's probably easy to 0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.199 get marriage into my midfield rather than find a spot in. 0:13:59.160 --> 0:13:59.840 The forward line. 0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.199 But you could move a you know, a Bailey Smith 0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:04.559 or a Caleb Daniel into the mids for a few weeks, 0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.640 create opium, do it that way and then just sort 0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:09.880 of you know, shuffling deck chairs a bit and make 0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:11.719 sure that you know, in a few weeks time, you 0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:12.800 get everyone back where you want them. 0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:14.240 But there is a way you could potentially do it. 0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:16.280 Humphrey, do you how do you get them in? And 0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:20.160 that's the next question from Luffy wish is it worth 0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:22.880 trading Jason horn Francis if it means you can get 0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:25.680 both of them or one of them, Even some people 0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:28.040 might not have the one hundred and twenty k required 0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:31.040 to get from a rook up or even from a 0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:33.560 late zabuer lindsay up, that's eighty K. That's still a 0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:38.600 decent jump, ol. Could we trade Jason horn Francis out? 0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:41.200 I sort of think these are separate questions in a way. 0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:44.040 I think the answer to the first one is yes. Obviously, 0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:45.600 it's been a bit of an ongoing saga that I 0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:47.200 didn't have horn Francis in my team, but most of 0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:52.000 the preseason caved. 0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:51.880 Did you get when I asked you that question? 0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:55.720 And now yeah, obviously wish I'd stack to my guns 0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.760 because he's been very averaged to start the season so far. 0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:00.880 I think I put in the trade this week someone 0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:03.920 like Seth Campbell or Ben Long or Keminidia scoring better 0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:05.960 than him so far to start the season. I'm sure 0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:07.600 he will come good. He's not going to be like 0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.040 this all year, but I don't think he's going to 0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:11.800 all of a sudden average one hundred and twenty like 0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:13.640 someone like a Bayley Smith. I can understand why you 0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:14.960 just think I just have to get this guy, because 0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:16.800 if I don't have him, he could just absolutely kill me. 0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:19.520 But I don't think harn Francis is going to do that. 0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:21.360 If you look at his scoring for all of last year, 0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.280 he averaged basically one hundred and most of his scores 0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:26.240 were eighties and nineties, and he had half a dozen 0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:28.080 like one forties, and that's what sort of pushed his 0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:31.160 average up. So, yeah, one of those might come this week, 0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:32.880 and you know that'll hurt if you trade him out. 0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:35.240 But I think if you think overall you're going to 0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.240 improve your team and maybe you know, get all this 0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:38.880 cash coming in, I think there's a. 0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:42.320 Path that ma actually makes sense. 0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:44.120 Would I go all the way down to a marriage 0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.000 or a Humphrey though that's that's a big drop. 0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.840 There's a world where you do that trade like you 0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:53.360 do horn Francis to Marrick this week, and then in four, five, 0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.600 six weeks time you revert back. Yeah, and yes you're 0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.560 burning two trades, but you've made two hundred k. You've 0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.760 improved team this week, and really the only costure is 0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:04.760 going to be that extra trade to then get Jason 0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.720 horn Francis back. But there's a chance that yeah, in 0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.400 five or six weeks time, their price is actually meet 0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:12.800 and you can do that trade as a straight swap, 0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.600 which I think is worth entertaining if you haven't burned 0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:17.720 a bunch of trades on doing silly things like me. 0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:19.840 Yeah, I mean I think if you've got someone like 0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:23.600 Sam da Coning, who yeah, he thinks it has to go, 0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:26.080 if you can do some DVP and swap him to 0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:27.720 a marriage or something, I'd rather do it that way, 0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:29.440 or obviously if you can get up from a rookie. 0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.280 But yeah, see, this is this is my issue, sorry, Patch. 0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.280 Like I've got Sam to Conning, who I think is 0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:36.880 expendable and I'm willing to write off as a flop. 0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:38.880 I traded him in, I didn't start him, and unfortunately 0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.280 it just hasn't worked out. I've still got Jaden Short 0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:43.040 sitting there in my defense as well, who I'd like 0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.360 to trade out. But the only DPP I've got to 0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:50.800 swing back to my defense is your brother Ben Patton. 0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.080 So I can trade one of them and swing Paton back, 0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:56.760 but I then have to trade in a defender if 0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.640 I want to trade a second one, which means I 0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:03.440 can't get at one of Marrek, Maria's and Humphrey this week. 0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.200 So I'm gonna have to sacrifice and get a defender. 0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:08.280 So I hope people aren't in that same situation. As 0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:10.760 me where Yeah, your two most expendable players are both 0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.000 deaf only because yeah, I'm a bit snooker this week 0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:15.880 as to which way I'm going to go to try 0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:16.720 and make it all happen. 0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.359 Yeah, question here from Belinda is it time to trade SDK? 0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.280 I mean perhaps we just universally saying. 0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:21.720 Yeah, yeah, yeah. 0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:23.520 I think were Stanley will play this week. They've got 0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:25.879 gone ree Stanley kicked a couple of goals and was 0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.640 apparently very good in the VFL, So I think we're 0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.480 about to see the end of that SDK rock experiment 0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:34.840 for now, and he'll probably play on Jacob van Roy 0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:35.680 and maybe this week. 0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:37.760 Yeah, yeah, yeah, that wouldn't be great. 0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:39.680 And he's I think he's broke even skinning up to 0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:41.360 a round one hundred, so he could actually lose money. 0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.240 It's he'll probably lose ten k at least this week. 0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:46.440 Yeah, for a mid process, it's not exactly what they're 0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.040 supposed to be doing, you know. Question from Scout is 0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:51.480 there a world which you could justify fading Bailey Smith? 0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:53.080 So this is kind of getting to what you're saying 0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.160 that you've kind of committed to having one trade used 0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.560 on him means you can't get Marriage and Humphrey or 0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:00.600 potentially you know, either of them. In this case, would 0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:04.640 you potentially leave Bailey Smith and grab the two one 0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:05.320 or two of those. 0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.680 I think Bailey Smith is the higher priority because he 0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:12.000 all signs at this stage appointed him being a top 0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:13.560 eight forward. I'm in the same boat as to him. 0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:15.639 I don't have him. I'm bringing him in this week. 0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:19.040 That might cost me the chance to bring in Marriage 0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:21.320 or Humphrey. But I think at this stage the priority 0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:25.920 is cash flow and it is to you know, make 0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:28.600 sure you're not missing the guys that are going like 0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:30.800 a Bailey Smith, I think is the one guy in 0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.199 this category that looks like he's going to be in 0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:35.400 the very top part of his position and he's super 0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.800 cheap and you need to jump on. And That's where 0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.160 I'm landing at the moment, And maybe in twenty four 0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.159 hours I've changed my mind, but that I think at 0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.640 this stage you need you know, marriage and Humfrey should 0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:50.159 be a lower priority than these rookies. And you know 0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:52.640 the Bailey Smith, I mean, you. 0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:53.879 Know, the way we play the game. We want to 0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:56.240 make cash so we can trade up to get keepers. 0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:58.000 And if you can just get Smith now, who is 0:18:58.000 --> 0:18:58.440 a keeper. 0:18:58.560 --> 0:18:59.800 I think, yeah, exactly. 0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.119 Yeah, he still can't kick, but he was still scoring 0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:04.560 a hell of a lot of points. Like if it 0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.520 hadn't been for I think too late free kicks against 0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:09.840 and a drop mark in the center when that game 0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.080 was really close against Brisbane which cost him about ten 0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.320 or fifteen points, he probably would have tonned again on 0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:19.000 the weekend, which I think he went about ten percent 0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:22.159 by foot, Yeah, which that game probably suited him in 0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:24.760 a way because unless you were Dane's orco just about 0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:26.960 everyone went at about ten percent by foot, which meant 0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:30.119 that he's scoring maybe leveled out, but yeah, it just 0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:32.520 looks like I must have and he's been a really 0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:34.640 painful watch the first couple of weeks not having him, 0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.640 especially after I took him out about twenty minutes before. 0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.160 He's one forty eight and round one, So definitely got 0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:41.560 a remedy that this week. 0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:43.800 Question you touched on this team, and its certainly something 0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:45.879 I'm weighing up this week too. This is from Jimmy 0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:49.520 wondering if Marius is a consistent, viable option trying to 0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.080 get another mid rookie locks and my trades aren't all 0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:55.000 spelt spent on rookie. So you know, I'm sort of 0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:58.400 tossing up if I want marriage, I want Humphrey. Potentially, 0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:01.080 what am I doing with Jay's on Francis? If I 0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.520 had to pick, probably need to get both of Marius 0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:07.120 and Bis or could you get. 0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:08.480 One and let the other one go? 0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:14.560 No, you need both. I think I think you need 0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.240 both unless Mares drops back to the sub which I 0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:21.040 don't see happening. He was so good against he. 0:20:21.040 --> 0:20:23.240 Was about their only good player. I was sitting and going, 0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.720 who is who is that? I don't recognize who that is? Oh, 0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:27.840 it's a second game. But that's cutting us up. That 0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.520 checks out. I mean, he won't play us and Don 0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:33.520 every week. Part of me is trying to justify that 0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:36.880 he can pass him because that makes me feel better 0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:39.680 about my trade plans. But I think he's going to 0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:41.560 be one of the better rookies we get at that 0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:43.399 bargain base of prices. To him, said you kind of 0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.040 I have to have him. You have to have bias. 0:20:46.480 --> 0:20:48.720 Is there a world you could not get bias if 0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.119 you've got Look, I've only got three rookies in defense anyway, 0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:55.639 And now suddenly trainer and rider primos I did that. 0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:59.800 And then remember that the flex exists, and I'm like, well, 0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:02.280 I kind of I can sit one of them, there can't. 0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:06.320 I damn, Yep, you're right, Sorry l sorry al. 0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:09.280 If I was only getting one, i'd get buis of 0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.440 the two, I'd be more prepared to fade Maraus. 0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:14.919 I mean, Swan's have a few players coming back, but 0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:16.960 we did not early that Mills was now a fair 0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.479 way off. So yeah, and I mean yeah, I mean 0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:21.040 he was a sub only two weeks ago, so you think, 0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:23.639 is he guaranteed best twenty two But he's been pretty 0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:24.160 good in his way. 0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.960 Well I think what he had one point three points 0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:28.760 per minute as sub and then he won them the 0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.080 game against Fremantle, so I'd say his job security is 0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:35.360 reasonably safe. Yeah. You go through the port team though, 0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.080 like I don't. I don't think it'll be Maraas this week, 0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:39.680 but in a couple of weeks time he could easily 0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.320 be sub again too. But it is going to come 0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.440 back in so someone's got to drop out. Maybe it's 0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.399 Berry that goes to sub this week, in Coppran drops 0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.760 out of the team, but yeah, there's definitely going to 0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:51.920 be a possibility in a few weeks time. If Maraas 0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:54.640 has one quiet game, but he goes back to Subbury, 0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:56.639 he goes back to the sandful hopefully he's made a 0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:57.359 bit of cash by then. 0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:59.640 Though, Yeah, I do agree with that, and I think 0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:01.439 if you if you have to pass on what it 0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.160 is like, Rice is the one you need and Marius 0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:05.480 is the one he would pass on. 0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:07.800 Because the game for playing behind the ball now and 0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:09.120 that's where By splays. 0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.960 So mature Asia footy factory. 0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:13.680 I should say Maray is though, Like, I don't buy 0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.439 into the talk that him and Butters like or Butters 0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:18.280 is going to eat into his scoring too much. Yeah, 0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:20.119 Butters is going to score well, but Maris didn't have 0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:23.399 a center bounce against Essendon, so he's not going to 0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:25.600 get His role is not going to change significantly because 0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:28.639 Zach Butter's his back. So if you're worried, if you're 0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.040 trying to use Butters as your justification for not picking him, 0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.080 I don't think that's the right reason to leave him out. 0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:35.680 I think they played Maray's wing and pushed Jase berg 0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:37.640 On into which. 0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:38.040 Was yeah great. 0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:41.240 Yeah, jays Bergen's DPP went up by about fifty percent. 0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:43.760 Yeah for death because he played yes, solely as a 0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:45.720 defender against they played very well. 0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:47.639 All right, We've been getting to some other questions mix 0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:49.520 asking about Humphrey as well. He's asking his horn France, 0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:52.000 his top six forward. Yeah, I know it's borderline. I mean, 0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:53.000 he's around the mark. 0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:54.600 Other day, but there's a few other forwards that we 0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:56.920 think you're pretty good. So well, this leads into the 0:22:57.000 --> 0:23:00.720 DPP discussion. So Christian Petrarca is sitting at about thirty 0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.760 six point five percent at the moment. So if Christian 0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:06.520 Patrakal was to get forward status becomes a must have instantly, 0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:09.280 Sydney had to buy on the weekend. So Chad Warner 0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:11.760 is still above thirty five percent as well. We'll watch 0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.080 with interest where he plays against North Melbourne this week. 0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:18.200 But if those two become forwards and then yeah, we're 0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:20.040 thinking Bailey Smith's going to be around that mark, and 0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:23.240 then a couple of Nick Martin's potentially in that mix too. 0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.960 Although we had to check because I've never seen this before, 0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:28.480 but he's a defender that's played more than thirty five 0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:30.800 percent in the forward line and the midfield so far 0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.359 this year. So TPP, he could be a unicorn. He 0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.720 could be he could be our first triple position player, 0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:38.000 but that's not going to happen. You can only have 0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:41.199 two positions, so I think he gets whichever one is 0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:43.760 higher of the two out of ford and midfield. If 0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.160 that still ends up being the case, but it's gonna 0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:47.679 be some really good players to the full line. Like 0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:50.119 I've gone from thinking Horn France is a lock to 0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.280 be top three to maybe top eight, top ten. 0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.360 Were thinking, you think lock bet away going to go away. 0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.480 The gay in McCrae one hundred averaging hundred and twenty 0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:01.800 gave Daniel just you know, we're sort of not really 0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:03.600 paying much attention to him because everyone's got him, but 0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:05.080 he just rolls out every week in scores one hundred 0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:05.360 and ten. 0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:07.119 So there's three spots taken. 0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:10.240 Yeah, they said that. I was watching that North Melbourne 0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:12.159 game on the weekend against Saturday and on Sunday, and 0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:14.800 I think the Fox commentator said no, sorry, I was 0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:17.240 listening on radio and the radio commentator said Caleb Daniels 0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:19.800 had the worst kicking Dave's life. And then I checked 0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:22.720 and then I checked the scores and he was on 0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.199 about one hundred and tenths, so like he's just a 0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:27.639 walk up triple figure just about most weeks, isn't he. 0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:29.760 So it's going to be really competitive, And yeah, Horn 0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:32.400 Francis has gone from like I said, top two, top 0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:34.879 three guarantee to question mark if he's in sort of 0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.040 the top eight after the first few weeks. Yeah, he's 0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:39.000 going to bounce back. It's just a matter of win and. 0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:40.840 Then hopefully by that time he's averaging. 0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:42.520 You know, he's like forty fifth or something now, so 0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:44.679 we have to get past a lot of guys. So 0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:46.560 I think there's a difference between him and someone like 0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:49.919 Harry Sheezel, who we're just I think we're confident that 0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.359 he will end up in that top six. Maybe you're 0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:53.720 not a clear number one like we thought at the 0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.240 stage of a year, But yeah, would be very reluctant 0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:58.359 to trade him, whereas one Francis maybe, I mean, like, 0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.159 I don't think keeping him is a terrible idea, but 0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:02.280 I think you could you could maybe do something with 0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:05.080 that trade and end up ahead. Nichols asked the question 0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.240 about how do we get Rail into our teams must 0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.679 have player. I'm not sure if he quite must have, 0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.640 but I'm very tempted after last year, you know, blew 0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:13.680 my team up completely. 0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:14.960 Well, would you do it to yourself again? 0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:16.080 Jeezuz look good so far. 0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.159 He's at number one averaging mid so far and the 0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:21.960 mid premos are not doing much. So yeah, like Gold 0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:23.600 Coast draw the next few weeks. You mentioned Adelaide, this 0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:25.480 week's not great, but then they've Richmond I think in 0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:28.280 North in the next few as well, maybe Ports. 0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:30.560 So don't you do this every year? 0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:31.960 Year? 0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:33.880 He came out and scored like four tons in a row, 0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:35.800 and don I think he got injured when he was 0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.400 flying last year? After eight rounds he was the number 0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:39.960 one eight or nine rounds, he was the number one 0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:43.080 player in super coach, And I think logically, like you 0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.200 made the right call. Oh, they're playing two games in Darwin. 0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.400 He already has about twelve tackles a game, like he's 0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:49.840 going to have so much contested all up there, and 0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:52.120 then he sees and just fell Apart from that point, so, 0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:54.800 I don't know whether the only thing I can possibly 0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.360 think is that because he plays such a physical game 0:25:57.400 --> 0:25:58.960 that he gets to a certain point of the season 0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:02.400 where he has to regress a bit. But he looks 0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:04.480 like a different player this year, and I think he 0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:07.600 looks like to the eye, a little bit leaner than 0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:09.679 he maybe he's been in previous seasons as well, and 0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:12.359 that has enabled him to play like slightly more outside 0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.520 as well as still being a beast on the which 0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:18.040 I can see why people are keen, but yeah, i'd 0:26:18.040 --> 0:26:20.880 be I'd be weary based on like the history as well. 0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:23.119 I think he's a good trade in, but I think 0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:25.280 you don't blow your team up to get him in. 0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:27.159 I think if you're starting to pull stuff apart and 0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.040 you're trading out cheese or or you'd you know, I 0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.320 don't think he should be blowing it all up to 0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.080 get him in. He'll be good. I really like him. 0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:36.720 Five fifty k's the cheap is still be for a 0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:41.600 long time. You don't desperately need him. There will be other. 0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:45.000 Cheaper there's good midfield bargain's coming. Yeah, an upgrade season, 0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.159 So I don't think, yeah, you're desperately need to make 0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:47.560 that move. 0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:52.160 Yeah, we've got three people questioned about Elder You and 0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.040 you know we spoke before that Elder us on the 0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:56.280 watch list as someone who might drop off him price. 0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.480 People were asking if they should trade him. No, absolutely 0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:03.600 not going Elder You to Rowl is a waste of 0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:05.960 trade when people will be looking to trade elder you 0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:07.760 in in a couple of weeks. 0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.560 I hate that. And then only when the inevitable bounce 0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.000 back happens, it only hurts more knowing that you had 0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:16.000 him in your team four weeks, four weeks before you 0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:17.719 post one hundred and fifty, which you know is going 0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:18.040 to happen. 0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:19.760 Turn another trade to get him back. 0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:22.399 Yeah, and and paid more than you traded him out for. 0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:24.080 Yeah, we saw him last year. He had a slump, 0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:26.800 he bounced back and was fantastic on that run home 0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:30.200 by did Hime. It'll hurt, It sucks, but. 0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:32.040 Yeah, there's a lot of mouse to feed, but he's 0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:34.040 going to he'll start averaging one hundred and ten at 0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:34.800 some stage. 0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:38.080 Benny asking Petrack at Petrack, at Petrack, should I trade 0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:39.840 to a Rowl or a Sinclair? Should I hold? Will 0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:42.560 I get forward Dbph, will Simon Goodwin and play track 0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.239 as a midfielder. He's getting very frustrated, which I am too. 0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:48.200 I'm at Patrakorno. He's every think he's about ninety, but 0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:49.520 he had ninety eight round one, then a couple of 0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:52.840 sort of eighties, very high at forward time last week 0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.240 I'm not sure Simon Goodwin does know really what the 0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:56.840 answer is there for Melbourne at the moment in the 0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:58.120 midfield or the forward line, so. 0:27:58.480 --> 0:27:59.280 Very hard to predict. 0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:02.240 But the prospect of him getting forward status, I don't 0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:03.520 think we can trade him, can we, Tim? 0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:05.399 I think you've got to hold down until at least 0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:08.560 well it's pre round six they kick in, so you've 0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.320 only got to look at gather round I think, gather 0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:13.960 end round five and have a look until then way 0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:15.520 up if you gets DPP and then you can make 0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:17.480 a call either way. But I know you asked me 0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:18.960 earlier in the week whether I thought you should trade 0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:21.159 Horn Francis or Petraca, and at that stage my answer 0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:23.640 was Petraca because I thought, who's out of those two, 0:28:24.200 --> 0:28:26.439 who's going to be top six, top eight in their position? 0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:28.200 And I didn't think Petraca was going to get close 0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:30.199 in the midfield. But yeah, a whole different story now 0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.520 we know he's above thirty five percent threshold for forward status, 0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.520 so yeah, I'll definitely be holding onto Petraca and reassessing 0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:37.320 in a few weeks time. 0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.000 I think the D's draw actually in round seven or 0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:41.640 eight or something. They have West Coast and Richmond back 0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.440 to back. So yeah, if we hold on till then 0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:47.080 we should get some reward. And that's similar for Max 0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:49.360 Gorn Anthony. How's this for question? Should you trade out 0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:53.600 both Gorn and Cherry Anthony asking no. 0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:55.880 I have a lot of body you would you then 0:28:56.440 --> 0:29:00.360 set and forget say it? With the stop trading the US? 0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:01.360 Who would you even trade them? 0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:01.680 Yeah? 0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:02.480 I don't know. 0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:03.280 I don't know. 0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:07.160 Unless one was read makes the money, unless one was 0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:09.520 flex And then you can get to you'd have any 0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:13.080 free sure like you could go to Essen's got the 0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:14.240 buye this week. I was going to say to Zach 0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:15.880 merrit off the buye, but you go to one of 0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.600 the Sydney guys, can't You're coming off thereby or Nick 0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:21.600 Decos potentially this week coming off his buy Yeah, no, 0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:25.480 you just I still hate it though he's especially Gorne. 0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:27.640 There's been a bit of talk about it, but he's yeah, 0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:29.760 they've got they've got you along this week, You've got 0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:31.920 Essendon the week after, who are tougher to play against 0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:35.600 the rucks Frio who aren't a super easy if Darcy's back, 0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:39.160 But then it opens up with Richmond West Coast Hawthorne, Brisbane, 0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:41.000 Sydney like it opens right up. 0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:42.840 I flagged trading Gorne a few weeks ago, and I 0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:44.760 think it had to be after round one, so so 0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:46.800 like a lot of us got him purely for the 0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:49.120 free hit that he had against Lockie Keith yep, and 0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:51.760 then Lockie Keith won GWS the game, and Gorne went 0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:53.960 from about one hundred and forty two hundred and twenty 0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:56.520 nine really late in the game, only just got that 0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.040 borderline captaincy score, which was disappointing. I think if you're 0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.200 going to split his value had to be then now 0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:04.240 he's lost about fifty k, you're already cashing him in 0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:06.960 at a loss, and he's got Sam de Conning or 0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:10.120 Ree Stanley or Mark Blitzav's this week, so you've just 0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:11.840 got to hope this is the week it bounces back 0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:14.720 and Melbourne starts playing decent footy. But yeah, their midfield's 0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:17.640 been all at sea the first few weeks, so I 0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:22.280 think Maxcorn's too good a player to continue to put 0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:24.880 out eighty five to one hundred scores every week. But yeah, 0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:26.840 it's going to be a frustrating ride, and people like 0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:28.440 me that pulled their team apart to get him in 0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:31.160 for round one. Are sort of really suffering now showing 0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:33.000 through in my rank, because yeah, I committed to him 0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:36.360 and Shecheesel and locking Eel, thinking especially that you needed 0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:38.400 gone and locking Theil for the early runs. And it's 0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:40.000 been very painful first few weeks. 0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:41.880 Well, I said to El earlier this week, the biggest 0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:45.400 problems in my team this year D one Harry Cheesel 0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:48.720 and one Locky Neil and F one Jason R. Roan. Yes, yes, 0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:50.440 they're the ones that had caused me the most grief 0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:52.240 and very frustrating. 0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:53.920 I don't know why you trade Cherry either, Like he 0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:55.840 was Jack Darling at a fair bit of rockwork, but 0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:57.360 that was only because Cherry was a bit backed up 0:30:57.400 --> 0:30:59.280 on the weekend. They weren't sure how bad his injury was. 0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:01.520 And he already said she's pine play this week. 0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:05.600 Yep, exactly. Mick Randall also asking about Cheese and Callahan. 0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:07.040 We've covered Cheese or Callahan. 0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:12.120 Callahan's got West Coast this week. No way you trade 0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:13.800 him this week. He could come out and put one 0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:14.960 hundred and fifty on West Coast. 0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:17.560 I reckon with Callahan. You're there until the bye now, 0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:19.840 just you're invested. 0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.480 He's not unless unless he gets that spike score again, 0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:25.040 Like he's probably not going to make as much of 0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:27.560 a profit as people had hoped because Conn and Ash 0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.240 went to him on the weekend, and there's the possibility 0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.360 that he also cops Marcus Windhagen next week. But I 0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:35.200 wouldn't want to trade him out this week because he 0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:37.120 could go absolutely astronomical. 0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:38.640 H if you brought him in. It shouldn't have been 0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:40.640 for that cash spark. It should have been for points 0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:42.680 throughout the first half of the season. Or some people 0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:45.600 think he'd be a keeper, but yeah, I. 0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:46.920 Think there's a chance, you know, he ends up. 0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.960 As so we did. We did flag this b wap 0:31:50.040 --> 0:31:51.960 last week. He said Callahan tags and then we said 0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:54.520 Kotra would go to bailey Dale and that happened as well. 0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:58.560 When I say we, I mean last week. 0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:00.000 So I mean the tags is something we really had. 0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.080 My team's crap, but my advice where. 0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:04.720 There's just so many of them this earlier in the year. 0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:06.880 Normally you know, they don't start really cranking up to 0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:08.840 around the middle of the year, but just you know, 0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:10.720 Callahan gets two good games and then I think he 0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:12.400 had a couple of good touches early in the game 0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:13.720 last week, and Zamach was like, man. 0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:16.680 He was about thirty or thirty five a quarter a time. Yeah, 0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:18.560 and scored twenty for the rest of the game. So 0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:21.760 and now had Hawthorne. Hawthorne obviously coming back and stealing 0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:23.520 all the points didn't help there either. 0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:25.920 God, this is so Mick. I've got nearly five hundred 0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:29.200 K in the kiddy. This Mick plays a different game 0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:29.880 to the rest of us. 0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:33.320 But people who don't know he's one about basketballs he 0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:35.760 plays very differently to just about anyone we know. 0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:37.920 So if we're keeping all those players, he's got five 0:32:38.000 --> 0:32:39.880 hundred CAD again, and spend on whoever he likes. 0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:42.960 Yeah, just trade Ben Patton to Nick Dakos and spend 0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:43.800 your money that way. 0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.720 Cam asking Tim tuk Miller a chance to get DPP 0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:47.120 as well. 0:32:47.120 --> 0:32:49.040 Potentially, I thought he was going to be close to 0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:51.280 thirty five percent than he is, So he's hovering about 0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:54.200 twenty five percent at the moment. So it's more his 0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:56.720 role is kind of starting around the midfield, maybe a 0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:58.640 bit of wing time, and then pushing forward, which is 0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:00.920 why he's kicking more goals and he had in previous season. 0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:03.400 So I think he's a chance mid year. I don't 0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.080 think he's going to make the pre round six DPPs. 0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:08.640 He would need to almost play exclusively forward in the 0:33:08.640 --> 0:33:11.680 next two rounds to get there, which if Damien Hardwick 0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:14.680 ause listening, please do that. But yeah, more more sort 0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:17.760 of for that that mid year edition of DPPs. I 0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:20.680 think for two can hopefully continues to play a bit 0:33:20.680 --> 0:33:22.800 more forward, but yeah, it might. Maybe it'll come down 0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:24.800 to where Sam Flanders ends up playing because he was 0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:27.200 really eased back on the weekend. So if he goes 0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:29.920 into midfield a little bit more, hopefully it's two's time 0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:32.200 for super coaches anyway that he eats into instead of 0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:33.640 maybe Bailey Humphreys and they. 0:33:33.600 --> 0:33:35.400 Obviously have that one fewer game because of the buye 0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:37.560 How many games do you need? Because it struck me 0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:40.560 with Zavie Lindsay, someone we thought would get defense DPP. 0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:42.240 But if he's missing the next couple. 0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:46.240 So it's three three for the first batch, so Lindsay's 0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:48.400 played three games. Yeah, so he could sneak in. 0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:49.560 Yeah, Okay, that's good today. 0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:51.720 All right, one more question to finish off, Pats Luke 0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:53.760 asking were talking about all his forwards who might be 0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:56.920 top six. Is Joyce Simpkin a viable option this week? 0:33:56.920 --> 0:33:57.680 He's everaging over. 0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:00.360 Yeah, he's been one of the best performing forward woods 0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:03.400 so far this season. I was I looked pretty closely 0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:06.800 at him to start the year, decided against going there. Yeah, 0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:09.080 he's playing in the midfield, he's playing well. I think 0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:11.960 he's a Bible option Checkie Bars. He's got that really 0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:16.600 nasty first batch of buys. But if you want to 0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:19.239 trade out Jason Horn Francis and you're committed to it, 0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:21.440 and you don't trust the two cheaper guys, and you've 0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:23.600 got Baily Smith already, then Simpkin would be the guy 0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:24.319 I trade him too. 0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:26.200 Yeah, No, I don't mind him. 0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:27.960 I just worry there's too many mouths to feed and 0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:31.160 no players as good as he's been in the first 0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:33.760 three round. There's better players in that midfield, Like Chesel 0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:35.640 was not going to average eighty for the whole year, 0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:38.840 So there's there's going to come a stage where Sheesell 0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:41.920 and Simpkins averages flip. I think, and even if simpkin 0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:45.239 average is ninety like that, there's just only so many 0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:47.080 points to go around in a team that realistically is 0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:51.160 probably gonna win what maximum eight games maybe, so that 0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:53.399 obviously is going to affect their their super coach scoring 0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:53.799 as well. 0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:55.560 George Woodloll might only be a week or so well, 0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:56.160 and that as well. 0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:59.240 Yeah, the ward Law factor, and well, there's there's plenty 0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:01.160 of good kids. They're probably They're probably going to want 0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:04.759 to put Pino Sullivan in there at some stage. So yeah, 0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:07.480 I think he started well, but I wouldn't be buying Simpkin. 0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:11.000 Yeah on Finasalvan quickly before we finish off wheel trading him. 0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:14.320 I don't know, well, it's going to end up depending 0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:16.280 what I do. Like I've played around with so many options, 0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:20.120 and I've tried to add mid status to Jayden Short 0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:21.400 so I can get rid of him instead of some 0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:23.600 of the others, and unfortunately he continues to be deaf 0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:26.560 only in my side. So I think Sam Deconning I'm 0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:28.040 definitely going to get rid of because yeah, I'm just 0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:31.680 willing to concede that he's a bust. But Phino Sullivan 0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:33.360 like he's going to pop at some stage. But I 0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:35.840 feel like it's going to be really slow burn. And 0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:38.040 We've been really privileged so far this year that a 0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:41.239 lot of rookies are making cash quickly and super Coach 0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:43.080 has gone from being a game where sort of cash 0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:45.120 is king. I like to say now that sort of 0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:47.319 quick cash is king and the quickie can upgrade your 0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:50.319 Side'd like to race to get premiums into your side. Now, 0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:52.280 it's not I'm going to sit until the midyear buys 0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:54.920 and I'm going to have my team completed by round fifteen, 0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:57.600 like the best coaches are completing their team by round ten, 0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:02.200 round eleven. So having someone like Pino Sullivan that I 0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:05.640 think made just under ten k on the weekend like 0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:10.120 that just doesn't fly anymore. Really, So yeah, getting choked 0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:14.440 up just the thought of trading I think we can 0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:15.960 pretty safely get rid of him if you have to 0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:20.160 do this week, and unless Nevert sub again, Like I'd 0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:22.640 be happier to keep someone like Nevitt that probably has 0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:26.319 the highest scoring him than Fino Sullivan that has the role, 0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:29.200 but we haven't seen the scoring potentially out of yet. 0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:32.040 Yeah, and your thoughts just quickly patch on that. 0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:34.120 But also does make me wonder about Xavier Lindsay, the 0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:36.759 most traded out player this week. No, I don't really 0:36:36.760 --> 0:36:38.200 want to get rid of him because we know he 0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:40.359 can score really well. But if he's going to miss 0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:42.759 a couple of weeks, it's that you know it's going 0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:44.000 to take him a while, and now he's got that 0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:45.400 low score and his system hate it. 0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:47.720 Yeah, or am I just justifying it to myself? 0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:50.640 I see it and as somebody who traded out status 0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:53.200 for that reason that I just wanted to keep the 0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:55.080 cash rolling and wasn't sure what it was going to 0:36:55.280 --> 0:36:57.279 look like when he got back. All of that still 0:36:57.280 --> 0:37:00.279 appliers to Lindsay, but it's also we've had some rice 0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:04.160 for changes now, and I think Lindsay's like one that 0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:06.239 we can bank on later on in the season. We 0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:09.480 want rookies that will be coming through progressively. He just 0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:11.440 moves back in the chain. We've already locked him in. 0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:14.520 I would be trading out if you started a bo 0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:17.839 Allen that's not playing, or you've got Lucas Camparalli or 0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:22.920 Phinosullivan or someone that's just yeah, someone else, I'd be 0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:25.799 looking to trade out. And on the Phino Sullivan, don't 0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:28.160 think he's a must trade out. Don't think he's someone 0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:29.960 you have to try and to keep it all costs. 0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.000 I think it's if it suits what you're trying to 0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:34.399 do that, Trod and ten k could be far more 0:37:34.480 --> 0:37:38.879 useful than you know, a Lucas Camprilei sitting on the bench. 0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:40.840 But you want to try and move on the rookies 0:37:40.840 --> 0:37:44.080 that aren't generating cash first, with Lindsay being I think 0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:45.120 the exception. 0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:48.000 Wish old statist. Now Joey card Well's out post. 0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:51.480 Bar four to six weeks. 0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:51.440 Status would be a really other thing. 0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:54.640 We haven't really even mentioned that touch on the Bombers 0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:57.399 then Hawthorn this week obviously have the boys the last 0:37:57.440 --> 0:37:59.560 week of best at an't scoring until we get through 0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:01.359 to those meat. So we've got a run of ten 0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:04.200 or so weeks and we're going back to best twenty two. 0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:06.880 So when you're making all these moves, maybe just have 0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:08.359 a think about what your team's going to look like 0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.239 next week when we don't get to drop off four 0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:14.520 or five really low rookie scores. You know, you lose 0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:16.839 one with best twenty two, which is great this year, 0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:19.040 something we haven't had before and obviously with flex there, 0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:22.520 but yeah, you're going to have to accept quite a 0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:23.480 few of those scores. 0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:25.080 That we've been Yeah, well it's like a trade will 0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:28.399 Day this week, who's been frustrating apart from one quarter 0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:31.239 against GWS where he's scored about eighty points. But then 0:38:31.239 --> 0:38:33.040 I look at my team next week and don't want 0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:37.120 to field Elijah Hewitt mate, not particularly so. Yeah, the 0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:38.960 other things you've got definitely got a way up this 0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:40.440 week before you make your moves. 0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:42.880 And in three weeks I'd probably rather have Lindsay in 0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:45.000 my midfield than Christian Rays. 0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:47.920 But I think that's also why, like and I've said earlier, 0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.640 people should be boosting this week, and if you can, 0:38:50.719 --> 0:38:53.200 you can grab Humphrey and Marrick because you'd be happy 0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:55.319 fielding both. Yeah, and if they're the reason that you 0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:57.960 can push a rookie off field, I think they could 0:38:57.960 --> 0:38:59.719 be really good for that period of best twenty twos 0:38:59.719 --> 0:39:01.360 and then you can weigh up what you do with 0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:03.640 them sort of post that going into the midyear bias. 0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:05.719 Should he use a boost again? If you've already used 0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:08.880 on how many boosts? This is a question from me 0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:15.239 to the panel. How many I'm looking at us this week? Yeah, 0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:18.040 it feels too early to be using two boosts, but 0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:19.759 is it. 0:39:19.760 --> 0:39:22.760 I don't think you'd want to be out of boost 0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:25.120 by around six. It'd be good to have a couple still, 0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:29.960 but yeah, I think it's just so important. This is 0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:32.200 the time to get your team right, especially the rookies 0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:34.080 and the cash cows. And if you use an extra 0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:37.959 boost and can turn a guy who's not making much money, 0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:41.920 like if you know Sullivan who's not playing into a 0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:44.840 Maraus or a Bis or Ryan Marritch and you know 0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:47.080 your one hundred and fifty k a head in a month, 0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:49.319 I think that's a boost well used. 0:39:49.600 --> 0:39:53.279 Yeah, I think I'm looking at using my second this week, 0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:57.520 which for me is which for me is conservative. So 0:39:57.920 --> 0:40:00.040 normally I would have been three by this point. So 0:40:00.840 --> 0:40:03.680 I think if you're on your second, you're okay. Three. Yeah, 0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:05.240 you're probably going to be in a bit of strife 0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:07.799 in a few weeks time when when all these good 0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:10.520 options are coming up and people are you going sort 0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:14.080 of two up, one down or one one up, two 0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:16.200 down to try and fit as many premiums into their 0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:19.000 team as possible, and you're already scraping the barrel having 0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:21.000 no boost spice at around six round seven. 0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:23.280 Lovely, Well, now that I've got permission to use a boost, 0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:24.759 can can we wrap up so we can go? 0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:27.719 We better wrap it up there, I mean, I feel 0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:29.480 like we say this every year, and every week it's 0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:30.880 like this week, I'll use a boost, I'll get all 0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:33.520 these bookies and everything right, and then and then I'll down, 0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:35.800 yeah exactly, won't use the trade for a few weeks, 0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:38.360 and then next week comes around and we'll see what happens. 0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:41.040 But thanks everybody for tuning in, Thanks Patch and Tim 0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:42.840 for jumping on again. And yeah, keep an eye on 0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:45.840 those DPP numbers. We've actually got every single player. 0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:46.040 In the league. 0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:49.240 You can look up there deep you know, time in position, 0:40:49.560 --> 0:40:51.839 We're all over the ground. So yeah, that's you can 0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:54.160 spend plenty of time digging into that. 0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:56.359 But if you thought Dane's orco was good, what about 0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:59.120 Cory Mobilio from Champion Data. It's sent a table three 0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:01.360 this week asolutely made by week. 0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:03.759 And plenty more content of course coming away, including the 0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:06.200 live team show on Thursday night. We'll talk through all 0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:08.759 the ins and outs and late captain tips there as well, 0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:10.799 so tune in for that. Until then, good luck with 0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:12.040 your trades and we'll talk soon.