Speaker 1: Lord, this is Outside. Good morning, and welcome to Outsiders.
Speaker 2: The show that is to woke identity, politics and the
Speaker 2: threat of World War three. What presidential candidate Kamala Harris
Speaker 2: is to self awareness and judging one's own abilities.
Speaker 3: What weaknesses do you bring to the table and how
Speaker 3: do you plan to overcome them while you're in office?
Speaker 4: That's a great question, Joe. Well, I am certainly not perfect,
Speaker 4: so let's start there. And I think that I perhaps
Speaker 4: a weakness, some would say, but I actually think it's
Speaker 4: the strength as I really do value having a team
Speaker 4: of very smart people around me who bring to my
Speaker 4: decision making process.
Speaker 5: Oh dah, Kamala's grighteous weakness is her strength.
Speaker 1: Where have we heard that before? Well, my weaknesses are
Speaker 1: actually strengths.
Speaker 3: Oh, yes, very good, there you go.
Speaker 6: Yes, now, Kamala seems to be borrowing her lines from
Speaker 6: the comedy series The Office. No wonder, Even her most
Speaker 6: ardent supporters at CNN are beginning to have a few doubts.
Speaker 7: Her habit is to kind of go to world word
Speaker 7: salad city, and she did that on a couple of answers.
Speaker 7: One was on Israel, Anderson asked a direct question, would
Speaker 7: you be stronger in Israel than Trump. And there was
Speaker 7: a seven minute answer, but none of it related to
Speaker 7: the question he was asking.
Speaker 1: You could say that again.
Speaker 2: And as the Democrats wonder what on earth they have
Speaker 2: ended up with? That's round The latest outside is news.
Speaker 2: So an election in Queensland reach and James, do we
Speaker 2: have a result yet? Are we happy with the result?
Speaker 2: What do we think about it? Has the giggler been
Speaker 2: replaced by the fool? That's what I like.
Speaker 6: That's a bob state.
Speaker 7: What we do?
Speaker 5: We have a change in government, but something smiley. He's
Speaker 5: not smiling anymore. Stephen Miles is refusing to admit so.
Speaker 5: He had the most bizarre speech last night where he
Speaker 5: didn't congratulate the Liberal National Party, he seemed to have
Speaker 5: zero regrets about Labor's terms in offers, and he didn't
Speaker 5: concede defeat even though defeat looked James.
Speaker 1: Is he an election denier about.
Speaker 6: Refuse question?
Speaker 1: Except the results all hell might break loose?
Speaker 8: Yeah?
Speaker 6: Well, look, I mean what we saw there last night
Speaker 6: was like school on Sunday, no class. You know, a
Speaker 6: terrible performance by Stephen Miles, but only matched by the
Speaker 6: election result. But you know, you've got to look at
Speaker 6: this here. This was supposed to be a big blowout
Speaker 6: for the Libs, for the L and P party. It wasn't.
Speaker 6: Let's probably clear about that. A bout.
Speaker 1: You mean, it was going to be a huge success.
Speaker 6: Huge success. Yeah, that's what I mean. And you know
Speaker 6: they got in, they got in, they got over the line.
Speaker 5: But you know, if you watched this show, you would
Speaker 5: have heard heard that we warned.
Speaker 6: This because reading you know. You know, also you do
Speaker 6: have to say Stephen Miles, you know, he has, for
Speaker 6: whatever reason, an awful lot of support around Southeast Queensland,
Speaker 6: around the Brisbane area, you know, stuff like the fifty
Speaker 6: cent public transport fairs, which we also have money money,
Speaker 6: you know, people love the free money, you know, around there.
Speaker 6: But it was broun places like Townsville and all the
Speaker 6: places that are really beset by youth crime that the
Speaker 6: L and P absolutely wrapped it in. But really there's
Speaker 6: two Queensland, you know, There's that Southeast Queensland and then
Speaker 6: there's the rest of the state. This you know, obviously
Speaker 6: there's a lot of federal implications for this. Number one.
Speaker 6: I think it is great news just for the country,
Speaker 6: even if it is great news for at the Albanzi.
Speaker 6: It's also great news for the country that the Greens
Speaker 6: Dove seem to have gotten a single seat. They were
Speaker 6: hoping to go they lost too. They were hoping to
Speaker 6: pick up two more and get to four. They got nada.
Speaker 6: They got nothing. They have book guests, so that's great.
Speaker 6: That's good news for the country. Albanese. You will be
Speaker 6: smiling about that too, because let's.
Speaker 1: Talk about that in a second.
Speaker 2: But I just want to quickly play Miles here a
Speaker 2: part of that speech last night Queenslanders.
Speaker 1: I gave this election everything I had.
Speaker 9: If you consider what we were up against, this is
Speaker 9: an extraordinary result. It was always going to be a
Speaker 9: challenging election for Labor, but I have no regrets about
Speaker 9: the campaign or indeed my last ten months as premier.
Speaker 1: Okay, so he seems pretty happy with himself.
Speaker 2: Let's have a look at Chris of Fooley, the so
Speaker 2: called conservative liberal leader.
Speaker 10: Ladies and gentlemen, tonight Queenslanders had voted for Hope. I
Speaker 10: had voted for a fresh shirt. I mean I had
Speaker 10: voted for a majority Ellen p governor.
Speaker 2: So let's not forget James and Rieder that this is
Speaker 2: the character who was for a treaty, then maybe against
Speaker 2: a treaty. I lost track of where he stood on
Speaker 2: those things. This is Rita. What's something we've talked about
Speaker 2: a lot in James, the fake conservative liberal party leaders
Speaker 2: at a state level who have led another disappointing result.
Speaker 2: They don't get great results.
Speaker 5: These characters Rita, well, they're not conviction politicians. And you
Speaker 5: could characterize this victory as really a defeat of Labor.
Speaker 5: The Queenslanders were sick of a consecutive Labour terms that
Speaker 5: were sick of what was happening with crime, cost of living,
Speaker 5: the energy policy, and they've picked given the other side
Speaker 5: to go. It happens, so it now remains to be seen.
Speaker 5: I don't think we can judge him yet. Let's see
Speaker 5: now that he has power, how he exercises that power,
Speaker 5: whether he is pushing those ideals that voters backed him on,
Speaker 5: and let's see where he stands on the crucial issue
Speaker 5: of nuclear energy, because he has been obstructionists when it
Speaker 5: comes to that for Peter Dutton, for the coalition federally.
Speaker 5: Now that is in power, let's hope that we actually
Speaker 5: see some sense.
Speaker 1: But when have we seen this? When do we ever
Speaker 1: see this?
Speaker 2: If they don't perform in opposition, they don't perform in
Speaker 2: the position.
Speaker 6: Well, yeah, the thing is that they keep taking these
Speaker 6: sort of left wing populist views, you know, they keep
Speaker 6: sort of trying to fend that off. They keep trying
Speaker 6: to the great problem with these leaders, and we see
Speaker 6: this in New South Wales, we see this in other
Speaker 6: states too, is that we have these leaders who go
Speaker 6: and they try to get votes from people who will
Speaker 6: never vote for them because they're not liberals, they're not conservatives,
Speaker 6: and they will vote for the Labor of Greens alternative
Speaker 6: every day of the week rather than offering a real difference.
Speaker 6: And that's why I think we've got this real problem
Speaker 6: in this country where you know, with the exception I
Speaker 6: think of Peter Dutt on a federal level, on a
Speaker 6: state level, it's very much this kind of uniparty type
Speaker 6: of situation where you know, look at Mark Speakman here
Speaker 6: in New South Wales. I'm sure reading you could talk
Speaker 6: to Victoria similarly. You know, you see it elsewhere where.
Speaker 6: There's no point of difference and it's just a bit.
Speaker 6: It's just all me too.
Speaker 5: If you want a UNI party, you look at Victoria
Speaker 5: and you say the end result in Victoria, the biggest
Speaker 5: state debt in the country. The place is broke. We
Speaker 5: can't even afford to hold our events anymore. We bid
Speaker 5: for won the Commonwealth Games. We had to give them
Speaker 5: up because we couldn't afford to hold them. That is
Speaker 5: an embarrassment. The taxes, the state taxes are through the
Speaker 5: roof payroll land tax People are hurting, People are leaving
Speaker 5: the state's businesses are closing. And that's what happens when
Speaker 5: you've got a uniparty because people don't actually have a choice.
Speaker 5: And you look at the coalition at the last state
Speaker 5: election that Victoria, really, how were they any different. They
Speaker 5: had the same radical gender policies, They had the same
Speaker 5: energy policies. In fact, they signed up to state Labour's
Speaker 5: emission targets, which are even higher than the federal labor targets.
Speaker 5: They wanted a treaty, they want every single policy area
Speaker 5: except for getting rid of a road that's been built.
Speaker 5: They were on the same page. So you've got to
Speaker 5: actually stand for something and Peter Dutton has shown this.
Speaker 5: Everyone looked at that federal result and said this has
Speaker 5: to be a minimum two term labor government because the
Speaker 5: gap so wide and he has shown when you actually
Speaker 5: stand for something, when you go against the media, when
Speaker 5: you go against that prevailing narrative, and you've got conviction,
Speaker 5: and you articulate your case like he did with the Voice,
Speaker 5: like he's doing with energy policy.
Speaker 2: And is well back here and isra And let's put
Speaker 2: it in a nutshell, if you are prepared to fight
Speaker 2: the culture wars as a liberal, you can win. And
Speaker 2: Peter Dutton is going to win the next election. He's
Speaker 2: showing he can fight the culture wars.
Speaker 1: He's doing it.
Speaker 2: He's got to do it on more issues. He's got
Speaker 2: to fight the transgender issue. He's got to come out
Speaker 2: on that strongly. He's got to get on the right
Speaker 2: track on this misinformation, disinformation garbage, this censorship rules that.
Speaker 1: Labor are bringing in.
Speaker 2: But James give us the ramifications of the Queensland so
Speaker 2: called victory or partial victory or you know, small victory
Speaker 2: for the Liberals.
Speaker 1: What's this mean for Albanisi.
Speaker 6: Yeah, look, it's not great news for Alberanizi. It would
Speaker 6: have been weirdly better news for Albanesi if the Liberals
Speaker 6: had a really huge blowout, because Queens leaders do tend
Speaker 6: to split that vote. One thing though, that I think,
Speaker 6: just to go back to your point of Peter Dutton Rowan,
Speaker 6: is that you know, we are now at this point
Speaker 6: now where we see Peter Dutton has been playing the
Speaker 6: long game and Anthony Albinizi plays the news cycle. And
Speaker 6: I think we are starting to see that paid dividends.
Speaker 6: We're starting to see that with the news poll, you know,
Speaker 6: fifty to fifty, with all the polls now really pretty
Speaker 6: much split. It's not enough for Peter Dutton to form
Speaker 6: a majority government at this point. But boy Ethny Albinizi
Speaker 6: is just slowly but surely losing altitude week by week.
Speaker 6: And I think that's because it doesn't focus his strategy.
Speaker 6: His temperament, I think is to think about this as
Speaker 6: a long term marathon, whereas I think, you know, albin
Speaker 6: Easy gets very panicky personally and starts trying to just
Speaker 6: run through each news cycle.
Speaker 5: And I think that's what we're saying before. It's about
Speaker 5: having conviction when you're just playing the news cycle, when
Speaker 5: you're just trying to get a win on the board
Speaker 5: that week, and make you actually get yourself into this
Speaker 5: sort of strife when you don't really stand for anything.
Speaker 5: Now I'm not saying Anthony Alberaneze doesn't stand for anything.
Speaker 5: We know where he is politically. He's been in Late
Speaker 5: Labor's socialist left faction for decades. That's his politics. He's
Speaker 5: tried to present himself as some sort of a moderate.
Speaker 5: No one's buying that anymore. Remember the front page, I'm
Speaker 5: not woke, I'm not sure, I'm not going to be
Speaker 5: governing for the far left nonsense. He has been leading
Speaker 5: a radical leftist government and at some point that's going
Speaker 5: to cost him. And I think it's already beginning to
Speaker 5: show Labor only hold five of the thirty federal seats
Speaker 5: in Queensland. He'll be wanting to increase that obviously, but
Speaker 5: looking at this result overnight, that's in doubt.
Speaker 6: Yeah.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, Well.
Speaker 2: The lesson for Peter Dutton from all this is going
Speaker 2: on these cultural issues and you can win big, win
Speaker 2: big is what we need for this country. We had
Speaker 2: the Lydia Thorpe outburst during the week Soshually we jumped
Speaker 2: up and down in the Great Hall of Parliament.
Speaker 1: The King was there.
Speaker 2: I'll be talking about this in more detail during Clown
Speaker 2: Show later on in the show, but James, we've had
Speaker 2: the King sitting there.
Speaker 1: We've had Lydia thought prancing around.
Speaker 2: We've had you know, it's the anniversary of the voice
Speaker 2: Idiot's screaming about land rights and so on and so forth.
Speaker 2: We've had various people have come out and say, oh,
Speaker 2: she should be kicked out of parliaments, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 1: What did you make of it, Jens.
Speaker 6: Well, it's funny because while that was happening, I was
Speaker 6: getting texts from both liberal and Labor MPs, all of
Speaker 6: whom were saying, this is a complete disgrace. Lydia Thorpe
Speaker 6: has made this event all about her, as she always
Speaker 6: tends to do. It was about the most bipartisan I
Speaker 6: think that the that the Parliament has ever been, certainly
Speaker 6: this term of government she loves. It is all about
Speaker 6: her and it is you know, nothing that she has
Speaker 6: done here, Absolutely nothing she does And I don't care
Speaker 6: if somebody at the Guardian says, oh, she's sticking up
Speaker 6: for you know this. Nothing she's doing is actually going
Speaker 6: to help the life of one indigenous person in this
Speaker 6: country and that's what it's all about.
Speaker 5: Wow, that you could say that for the entire activist
Speaker 5: class in that space, I think she's hardly alighted.
Speaker 6: No, but she's just making She was.
Speaker 5: On every just about every TV network in the UK.
Speaker 5: The coverage she got.
Speaker 2: Was well, that is fascinating as well that it really
Speaker 2: struck a chord around the world. And this is this
Speaker 2: is her genius, if you like, and getting publicity for
Speaker 2: her cause and she managed to get that free speech
Speaker 2: role in favor of free speech. Did she break any
Speaker 2: rules or laws, not that I'm aware of. The hilarious
Speaker 2: gag about she swore allegiance to the pairs of Queen
Speaker 2: Elizabeth Radle than the heirs of Queen Elizabeth. I mean
Speaker 2: that's kind of a student kind of prank. I don't
Speaker 2: know where that will get anyone. But the key thing here.
Speaker 5: She kind of backtracked on that and said, oh, that
Speaker 5: was just a pronunciation issue because she's not that good
Speaker 5: with the language.
Speaker 6: Because there was actually potential legal jeopardy for her with
Speaker 6: the Senate.
Speaker 1: If she had absolutely so that's really interesting. That was
Speaker 1: pretty interesting.
Speaker 2: But let's also talk about a Legra Spender and Simon
Speaker 2: Holmes cords. There are questions around how much influenced Simon
Speaker 2: Holmes a court has.
Speaker 1: Over the teals.
Speaker 2: This is going into the next federal election, it's really important.
Speaker 2: From my opinion, the Teals are complete frauds. They should
Speaker 2: be turfed out. They supported anwa they called for frequently
Speaker 2: shown the letter where they wrote calling for more money
Speaker 2: to go to ANOIR if there was no other way
Speaker 2: of financing aid to Gaza. They have voted or you know,
Speaker 2: have an extensive record, James voting with the Greens. So
Speaker 2: what were these questions and why is it so important
Speaker 2: a Teals voters James.
Speaker 6: Well, so there's this whole really interesting thing that happened
Speaker 6: this week here where Tom Connell here Sky asked a
Speaker 6: leaguers spender at the National Press Club, you know what
Speaker 6: what was that all about? When you call up the
Speaker 6: Financial Review and said you should take Simon Holmes a
Speaker 6: Court off of your covert power list. And she said, oh, yeah, no,
Speaker 6: I did do that because you know, I thought that
Speaker 6: it was important that we don't see Simon Holmes Court's
Speaker 6: pulling the streams. But of course, you know there's every
Speaker 6: question and that she was actually told to do that
Speaker 6: by Simon Holmes. The Court. He was the only one
Speaker 6: who've known that he was on the list.
Speaker 1: That's a good poet.
Speaker 5: Indeed, and why will Simon Holmes the Court I'm hearing
Speaker 5: at an event, perhaps even on a panel for the
Speaker 5: supposedly center right think tank the CIS.
Speaker 1: I would would.
Speaker 5: Really like some sort of understanding of why you would
Speaker 5: do that. That would be like some leftist think tank
Speaker 5: having Pauline Hansen as a special guest. That would be
Speaker 5: counter intuitive, I would have thought. So, Simon Holmes, the Court.
Speaker 1: Is getting around, That's all you can say. It's really active.
Speaker 2: For a non political leader of a non political party
Speaker 2: or whatever he pretends to be, he certainly gets around.
Speaker 5: And the other think he has met with a few
Speaker 5: Liberal MPs over the journey as well, so let's not
Speaker 5: pretend it's just the Tills. And frankly they're the ones
Speaker 5: I'm far more concerned about, because you know what the
Speaker 5: Teals are. They're essentially the Greens in nicer clothes rules
Speaker 5: who are flirting with this. They're the ones who need
Speaker 5: to be out of the party.
Speaker 2: And personally, I would like to see a debate between Roeox,
Speaker 2: who's the candidate to taking the Liberal Party candidate taking
Speaker 2: on Allegra Spender in the Teal electorates of Wentworth formerly.
Speaker 1: Malcolm Turnbull's stronghold.
Speaker 2: So let's see if Allegra Spender really is all she
Speaker 2: cracks herself out to be, why doesn't she debate Roeox.
Speaker 2: She can do it here on Outsiders, we'd happily hosted.
Speaker 5: Ready a Simon Holmes, a course professor, debate.
Speaker 2: What the teals have actually delivered for the people who
Speaker 2: wentworth and indeed for the people of this nation since
Speaker 2: they've held the balance of power there, Simon, not absolutely, Simon,
Speaker 2: Come on, Simon, I know now you're no longer Canada. Simon,
Speaker 2: come on, come on outside. As I've asked you before,
Speaker 2: but you've always said, oh no, no, no, I'm not
Speaker 2: I wouldn't appear in front of the cameras.
Speaker 1: Okay, that's joining us now.
Speaker 2: British Commander Richard Kemp, Colonel Richard Kemp live from London.
Speaker 2: The big news, of course, over the weekend, Israel has
Speaker 2: finally responded to the Iranian provocations. I would have preferred
Speaker 2: to see Israel go much much further, Richard. I would
Speaker 2: have liked to see them take out the eye of Toller's.
Speaker 2: I would have liked to see them destroy the evil
Speaker 2: Iranian Islamic regime so that the people of.
Speaker 1: Iran could be free.
Speaker 2: Finally, it's been too many decades that these monsters have
Speaker 2: been in power. But there was some retaliation from Israel
Speaker 2: held back. It would appear Colonel Richard Kemp by the Americans,
Speaker 2: Is that correct?
Speaker 1: By the Biden administration?
Speaker 11: Yeah, I mean the strike this morning in Israeli time
Speaker 11: was absolutely extraordinary. It was a remarkable effort. It included
Speaker 11: destroying air defense systems in Syria and Iraq which were
Speaker 11: on the path to Iran, then destroying Iran's air defense
Speaker 11: systems and effectively knocking out the entire offense capabilities of Iran,
Speaker 11: I believe, and also very severe damage to Iran's capability
Speaker 11: of producing missiles. They've obviously used missiles against Israel, and
Speaker 11: Israel I think has at least for a period of time,
Speaker 11: put a stop to any further production. So a serious attack,
Speaker 11: but I agree with you, it could have been much
Speaker 11: more devastating, and probably should have been. I think the
Speaker 11: calculation made by the Israeli Prime Minister was that he
Speaker 11: would do as much as he could get away without
Speaker 11: without incurring the wrath of the US President in the
Speaker 11: lead up to an election, and then in the hope
Speaker 11: maybe of a different, a completely different type of administration
Speaker 11: in Washington from January than of completing the job, which
Speaker 11: it would include the levels of devastation that you just
Speaker 11: mentioned and that I would agree with Rita.
Speaker 5: Now, what's the backstory on this? ANWAH worker who was
Speaker 5: killed the un is confirming that one of their staffers
Speaker 5: was killed. Israel says that he was a Hermas Force commander,
Speaker 5: that he led the killing and kidnapped kidnapping of Israelis
Speaker 5: from a right side bomb shelter near a kabutz. His
Speaker 5: name is Mohammad Abu Atawi. Do we know if he
Speaker 5: was a commander in Hamas whilst being employed by Aunra.
Speaker 11: Well, I would certainly take Israel's word for that. Israel
Speaker 11: does not make statements of that sort, unlike Hamas. They
Speaker 11: don't make statements like that that aren't true. So I
Speaker 11: would certainly assume that they know that for a fact,
Speaker 11: otherwise they wouldn't say it. And of course we've had
Speaker 11: plenty of previous examples of under employees involving themselves in
Speaker 11: Hamas terrorist activities, including actually going into Israel on the
Speaker 11: seventh of October and taking part in the horrific attacks
Speaker 11: that occurred there, including kidnapping, and we know that the
Speaker 11: at least one under a teacher held an Israeli hostage
Speaker 11: in his house by Gaza. We know also this is
Speaker 11: not just Under I mean under it should be ashamed
Speaker 11: of what they've done, but it's the UN as an entity.
Speaker 11: And you look at what UNIPHIL has done. UNIPHIL has
Speaker 11: been there to prevent the demilitarizer Britain, the militarization of
Speaker 11: Southern Levenon since I think it was nineteen ninety one
Speaker 11: or nineteen ninety six, and they've totally failed. And there
Speaker 11: are some reports that it's just they've actually been assisting
Speaker 11: his Balla in their activities in Southern eleven And so
Speaker 11: the whole infrastructure, the whole edifice of the UN really
Speaker 11: does need to be re examined.
Speaker 6: I think, James, what do you make, Colonel, of the
Speaker 6: reports that have come out in the last few hours
Speaker 6: that Ali come any the leader of Iran is said
Speaker 6: to be gravely ill, terminally ill, he may only have
Speaker 6: months to live. Does this raise any prospect of regime change,
Speaker 6: particularly if there's a leadership vacuum after a change of
Speaker 6: government in the United States, assuming a Republican victory. What
Speaker 6: do you make of that? And you know, I mean,
Speaker 6: surely the Iranian people must be sick of seeing their
Speaker 6: money being poured into tunnels in Lebanon and into weapons
Speaker 6: and so on, rather than into bettering their own lives.
Speaker 11: Well, knowing about Israel's ingenuity at dealing with people who
Speaker 11: attack their country, I think the conspiracy theorists could be
Speaker 11: forgiven for thinking maybe Harmioni's been slipped some kind of
Speaker 11: drug by But yes, I think I think things are
Speaker 11: conspiring now against Iran. Iran is certainly on the back foot.
Speaker 11: They've had their two main proxies, Hamas in his blare
Speaker 11: very very badly damaged on the verge of defeat in
Speaker 11: the case of Hamas and seriously damaged in the case
Speaker 11: of his Blah. They've had that their inability to defend
Speaker 11: their country against Israel again demonstrated this morning in Israel
Speaker 11: time by the one hundred aircraft that were used to
Speaker 11: carry out an attack one thousand miles from Israel's territory.
Speaker 11: They were unable to do anything about it. All of
Speaker 11: them returned completely intact. So that does bring into question
Speaker 11: that the benefit to Iran of the huge amounts of
Speaker 11: money that the Iatolas have spent on not only on
Speaker 11: their own defense, but also on their proxies. And I
Speaker 11: think that the weakening of the regime that we saw
Speaker 11: this morning will not be missed by the dissidence in Iran.
Speaker 11: There's a huge opposition to Harmoni and his regime in
Speaker 11: Iran and this can only encourage that. So I think
Speaker 11: we can hope that at some point, maybe in the
Speaker 11: not too distant future, possibly can coinciding with Hamani's demise.
Speaker 11: I don't know, we could hope to see a different
Speaker 11: regime in Iran at some point, maybe in the next
Speaker 11: few months.
Speaker 2: Rich And I'm going to ask you to do something
Speaker 2: very unpleasant, and that's to delve into the murky mind
Speaker 2: and thinkings of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and try
Speaker 2: and it's why you've mentioned we all want to see
Speaker 2: the Uranian people free.
Speaker 1: We all want to see the end of the terror.
Speaker 2: Regime of the Aya tollers that brings peace to the
Speaker 2: Middle East and peace to the world.
Speaker 1: Potentially.
Speaker 2: Why on Earth are the Obama Biden Harris team so
Speaker 2: determined to prop up Iran.
Speaker 1: I don't get it.
Speaker 11: Because they Obama essentially conceived a hugely misguided strategy of
Speaker 11: trying to rebalance the power in the Middle East by
Speaker 11: giving more power, more influence to Iran. And he's done that,
Speaker 11: and Obama started off, and Biden's continued at no doubt,
Speaker 11: under Obama's guidance since his office. And they, you know,
Speaker 11: they've they've been desperate to return to this nuclear deal
Speaker 11: with which basically allows Iran to create nuclear weapons, although
Speaker 11: they would deny that's the case, but that's what the
Speaker 11: deal does. In effect, they've released billions of dollars of
Speaker 11: frozen assets to Iran to fund the nuclear program and
Speaker 11: also to fund regional aggression. So this is their thinking.
Speaker 11: It's totally illogical thinking to any rational person, but that's
Speaker 11: what they that's what they said. That's the path that
Speaker 11: Obama set them on, and that's the path that Joe
Speaker 11: Biden and Kamala Harris have continued down. And I've no
Speaker 11: doubt if Kamala is elected president in November, she will
Speaker 11: continue on that route.
Speaker 6: Coll I mean, we've talked about Israel's infiltration of Iran
Speaker 6: and Hezbolla, but what about Iranian infiltration of the West.
Speaker 6: How concerned are you about reports that there are officials
Speaker 6: in the Biden administration who may be potentially can't rise.
Speaker 6: We even saw somebody lose their security clearance under murky circumstances.
Speaker 6: That Iran may have voices and eyes and ears within
Speaker 6: are the higher restlands of the American defense and intelligence
Speaker 6: of community.
Speaker 11: I think that's very likely to be the case. And
Speaker 11: you know, we've seen recently a reported leak of Israel's
Speaker 11: plans about a few days ago, which was allegedly leaked
Speaker 11: by somebody who's pretty senior in the administration, who is
Speaker 11: Iranian themselves. So we certainly grounds I think for grave
Speaker 11: suspicion there. And of course if it applies to the
Speaker 11: United States, that would be their number one target for infiltration,
Speaker 11: then we can also assume it would apply to our
Speaker 11: governments as well here in the UK, maybe even yours
Speaker 11: in Australia, depending on how much emphasis they place on
Speaker 11: wanting to penetrate our governments.
Speaker 1: Richard Kemp always great to talk to you.
Speaker 2: As I said, it's fascinating what is happening, and clearly
Speaker 2: the election of Donald Trump would be a major burn
Speaker 2: to peace in the Middle East and peace throughout the world.
Speaker 2: Colonel Richard Kemp always great to chatty you, thank you
Speaker 2: so much for coming on. Outside is at that late
Speaker 2: night there in London after the break Reader's Reality Check
Speaker 2: and we'll speak to Matt Canavan about the Queensland election results.
Speaker 1: In a tick. You're on Outsiders.
Speaker 5: You're watching Outsiders with your host Roland rambunctious Dean James
Speaker 5: Jubilant Morrow and I'm Rita Pany here from such programs
Speaker 5: as The Riata Patty Show Monday to Thursday's at eleven
Speaker 5: and Left is Losing at Friday nights at nine point thirty.
Speaker 1: And let's start with a little preview of.
Speaker 5: What's coming up in this week's Left is Losing and
Speaker 5: he can be sure this Kamala fan will be featured.
Speaker 5: Watch as this young woman, so broken by woke lunacy,
Speaker 5: screams in the face of a toddler in a stroller.
Speaker 1: These are the.
Speaker 5: People who think they're your moral superiors.
Speaker 1: And she wasn't done yet. She comes back.
Speaker 5: For more, even as the dad holding his frightened child asks,
Speaker 5: isn't she ashamed of her behavior? Yes, there's not much
Speaker 5: joy left in the Democrats campaign.
Speaker 1: There never was.
Speaker 5: This is the party of self loathing, identity politics and
Speaker 5: neo Marxist idiocy. As one rather sage commentator said this week,
Speaker 5: the Democrats have become the party of weak men and
Speaker 5: miserable women. And here's an update on another lefty losing it.
Speaker 5: We featured a couple of weeks ago a young woman
Speaker 5: in New Jersey who attacked a Greek restaurant where she
Speaker 5: mistook the Greek flags for Israeli once.
Speaker 6: Pre palaesigning.
Speaker 2: What she looking at?
Speaker 6: Do you know down lo a genocide? You're not in
Speaker 6: the genocide? No stubbor, are you taking?
Speaker 1: I'm taking out now?
Speaker 12: I believe this month.
Speaker 13: Take this one now right here?
Speaker 6: What anyone do? They can't do this.
Speaker 4: There's genocide and I don't stand for Zionism.
Speaker 1: I'm mont Claire.
Speaker 6: I don't support it.
Speaker 1: There's a genocide.
Speaker 6: You know that, right? They're killing children. What's a purpose?
Speaker 6: You proud of your heritage? You're understanding of genocide?
Speaker 1: Right? Were you?
Speaker 6: Porn?
Speaker 5: Dune Space says it all. It's actually bewildered. And this
Speaker 5: is how dumb these lefty activists are. That woman and
Speaker 5: the Matthews put that video up herself, even after she
Speaker 5: she was told she'd mixed up the Greek and Israeli
Speaker 5: flags and now she's been charged.
Speaker 1: That's the update.
Speaker 5: Authorities had investigated the incident back in March, but had
Speaker 5: no leads until the TikToker posted the now viral video
Speaker 5: earlier this month, boasting about her actions and the mix
Speaker 5: of hoops. Now here is a woman our own, Lydia Thorpe,
Speaker 5: who can always be relied upon to be a lefty
Speaker 5: losing it, whether she's attacking the King, having a meltdown
Speaker 5: outside an immigration detention center, all claiming Australia is quite
Speaker 5: literally at war with itself. Let's have a look at
Speaker 5: Lydia's top five meltdowns, beginning with this rousing speech and the.
Speaker 1: Prime missaid know is exactly what he is doing.
Speaker 12: He was fascists to come out and get me, So.
Speaker 6: Where is my support?
Speaker 1: Fuck you?
Speaker 5: The time she held a protest at the Sydney Gain
Speaker 5: lesbian Marty gro outraged by the fact that police were
Speaker 5: allowed to take part. Now would be remiss of us
Speaker 5: not to feature this performance side of Melbourne at strip
Speaker 5: club and establishment that has now banned Senator Lydia Thorpe
Speaker 5: for life.
Speaker 14: Would say, I want to.
Speaker 12: Say to you what man that stands with it like that.
Speaker 3: Someone's been in Parliament, you've been a present in this
Speaker 3: country and your get out of my face.
Speaker 1: You're marked.
Speaker 5: Gotta say that was my personal favorite, but it didn't
Speaker 5: make the top two, coming in at number two. Well,
Speaker 5: is there an attack on King Charles and Queen Camilla antics
Speaker 5: that earned her coverage around the world?
Speaker 15: You know, now Land that give us by your style
Speaker 15: from us, how bones our scar, our baby, how people
Speaker 15: we want to training in this country.
Speaker 5: And coming in at number one for Lydia Thorpe's biggest
Speaker 5: meltdown though I'm sure this might be topped at some
Speaker 5: point this year, but it's her performance at the Let
Speaker 5: Women Speak protests led by Kelly J. Keen in Canberra
Speaker 5: last year, where Lydia Thorpe trying to stop women speaking
Speaker 5: and then ended up crawling away quite literally.
Speaker 1: I did Kingdom as the pilot opposite.
Speaker 16: They know what biological facts there.
Speaker 14: They sate when don't like that, gentlemen, that.
Speaker 5: Is a member of the Australian Upper House, a senator
Speaker 5: in the Australian Parliament who doesn't even believe Australia is
Speaker 5: a legitimate country. We can laugh all we like at
Speaker 5: the lefties losing it in America, Yes, but ours area
Speaker 5: sitting in parliament.
Speaker 2: Great stuff, Richa, and I'll be looking at those antics
Speaker 2: again later on in Clown Show with a bit of
Speaker 2: a different take on that. Now joining us now to
Speaker 2: break down the Queensland election even further is National Senator
Speaker 2: Matt Canavan.
Speaker 1: Matt, always great to see you. We've just had the.
Speaker 2: News that Stephen Miles has now conceded, So congratulations to
Speaker 2: the Liberal Party down now the new government of Queensland.
Speaker 2: So Matt, take us through your thoughts what this means
Speaker 2: for Queensland, is what this means for the Liberals and
Speaker 2: what this means for Anthony Albanezi.
Speaker 1: Well, and it's a great day up here in Queensland.
Speaker 17: The sunshine's always great for this shining just a little
Speaker 17: bit brighter this morning, because I think we've needed this change.
Speaker 1: We've needed it for a while over a decade of
Speaker 1: Labor government.
Speaker 17: The only thing they seem to have excelled at is
Speaker 17: scaring people about Campbell Newman, who of course was premium
Speaker 17: more than ten years ago now and that scare campaign
Speaker 17: now has been completely popped because we have an LMP
Speaker 17: government people that will to see it for themselves and
Speaker 17: I think it'll be much much better than the cheap
Speaker 17: political tricks we've had to suffer through over these last
Speaker 17: ten years.
Speaker 1: A lot to do for the.
Speaker 17: LNP, but they've they've got this victory now and congratulations
Speaker 17: to David Chriso fully and his team. They've won and
Speaker 17: now there's a lot to clean up after ten years
Speaker 17: of labor. In terms of its implications federally, look, I
Speaker 17: don't think there's too much so there's not normally too
Speaker 17: much implications from state or federal elections. The reality is
Speaker 17: that up here at a federal level we've done very
Speaker 17: well for a long long time. I think we've got
Speaker 17: excellent members of Parliament, long entrenched members of Parliament. I
Speaker 17: think Anthony Empaneze has known up here as a left
Speaker 17: wing lunatic from inner city Sydney and his type of
Speaker 17: politics doesn't go down too well north of the Tweed,
Speaker 17: so I think he'll have a huge challenge Anthony. He
Speaker 17: was going to have that challenge, I think, regardless of
Speaker 17: the result last night. But look, we've got to be
Speaker 17: tested now. Right when you're getting the government, you're going
Speaker 17: to be tested. We've got to prove ourselves to the
Speaker 17: Queensland people, and I took some inspiration from David speech
Speaker 17: last night.
Speaker 1: He's got some big visions and wants to do some
Speaker 1: great things.
Speaker 6: I think, James, what do you make mat of the
Speaker 6: way that the Labor vote has now shifted? You saw
Speaker 6: this really interesting thing here where now Labor is the
Speaker 6: party in Queensland of just simply the inner city urban
Speaker 6: metropolitan seats. I'll note that of the seven seats that
Speaker 6: leb held in twenty twelve, three of them have gone
Speaker 6: back to the l and P in this election of
Speaker 6: Mulgrave Rockhampton. And I think, Mackay, what do you make
Speaker 6: of the message about Labor and their broadly it would
Speaker 6: seem to be out of touchness, particular when you look
Speaker 6: at how Steven Miles acted after the vote was cast.
Speaker 6: With the broader electorate.
Speaker 1: Well, it's been to see change.
Speaker 17: I mean those three seats you've mentioned we haven't held
Speaker 17: for one hundred years, of more some of than we've
Speaker 17: never held, and the Labor Party in crisis made up
Speaker 17: here in North and central Queensland because they just failed
Speaker 17: to represent these I mean, politics is all like, well,
Speaker 17: you've got to represent your constituents, and the Labor Party
Speaker 17: over many years now have decided to deride and want
Speaker 17: to shut down the coal industry. They've done nothing to
Speaker 17: help farmers suffer under huge amounts of green tape. And
Speaker 17: of course the Bruce Highway is in a third world
Speaker 17: state right now. It's probably got more potholes than the
Speaker 17: Moon has. And so you add all those things up
Speaker 17: and people have revolted against the Labor Party up here
Speaker 17: and they lose. It's like Rockampton, which we haven't one
Speaker 17: for one hundred years, Makai which we've never won, and
Speaker 17: we've smashed them there. So we've just got to now
Speaker 17: deliver for those people, fix those issues that I mentioned,
Speaker 17: And I mean, I think another thing here that's happened
Speaker 17: is the Labor Party being cons become so obsessed with
Speaker 17: the threat of the Greens and inner city Brisbane they've
Speaker 17: forgotten about the rest of the state and that strategy
Speaker 17: has been shown to be completely bankrupt. Because another great
Speaker 17: result from last night we should not forget is the
Speaker 17: complete destruction of the Greens Party here in Queensland, and
Speaker 17: they've lost at least half their seats, they might lose
Speaker 17: all of their seats just yet. And I think we've
Speaker 17: reached peak Greens I mean, voting for the Greens is
Speaker 17: a bit of a luxury good and we're definitely not
Speaker 17: living a life of luxury anymore after ten years of
Speaker 17: labor here in Queensland, after just two years of labor federally,
Speaker 17: we're suffering under high cost of living, high interest rates,
Speaker 17: and people that no lotin that can no longer afford
Speaker 17: the luxury of voting green.
Speaker 5: Now you've got net zero puts prices up behind you there,
Speaker 5: and you've got a very interesting admission this week from
Speaker 5: the Australian Energy Market Operator about all these policies that
Speaker 5: we are embracing the renewables, not actually guaranteeing lower prices.
Speaker 5: That's what we've been told. That's been the cell that
Speaker 5: this was going to reduce prices.
Speaker 17: Absolutely reader, I mean the penny I think had already
Speaker 17: dropped for most Australians that this renewable scam is not
Speaker 17: delivering a better life for Australians. But it was still
Speaker 17: shocking to hear it confirms so clearly from one of
Speaker 17: the one of the greatest and loudest proponents of this
Speaker 17: scam over the past few years. So this guy, Daniel Westerman,
Speaker 17: is the head of the Australia Energy Market Operator, probably
Speaker 17: the most important regulator of energy markets in Australia. And
Speaker 17: for years he's been telling us all that firm renewables
Speaker 17: is the cheapest form of power. In fact, he said
Speaker 17: it on this channel just a few months ago. And
Speaker 17: when I had this is the first time that they
Speaker 17: should say we've had him under oath in the Senate.
Speaker 17: He doesn't come to cenate estimates because he's head of
Speaker 17: a corporation, not a government agency. It's all a bit weird,
Speaker 17: but he's under oath and he's actually admitted that no
Speaker 17: renewable energy the government. I asked him directly the government policies,
Speaker 17: would they reduce power prices and he said he can't
Speaker 17: guarantee that. And I mean we've been told by the
Speaker 17: Prime Minister four years that his strategy with lower power
Speaker 17: prices for Australians, he's best hand picked operator of the
Speaker 17: energy market has just admitted that's not going to happen.
Speaker 17: I mean, isn't it about time we finally conclude that
Speaker 17: this experiment has failed. The renewable energy experiments country has
Speaker 17: totally failed. It's just left us with higher prices d industrialization.
Speaker 17: They keep saying this is the least cost pathway for Australia.
Speaker 17: What they mean is it's what they do is they
Speaker 17: put in their model the constraints of eighty two percent
Speaker 17: renewable netser emissions by twenty fifty and they say it's
Speaker 17: the least cost pathway to get to those objectives, least
Speaker 17: cost pathway to get you lower power prices. And what
Speaker 17: they're really saying is that the Anthony Alberzi energy strategy
Speaker 17: is the least cost pathway to deindustrialize and impoverish Australia.
Speaker 2: In other words, Matt, the entire election of Anthony Albernezi
Speaker 2: is in my opinion, built on a complete fraud, and
Speaker 2: that fraud is articulated virtually every day by Chris Bowen.
Speaker 2: But tell me, linking the two things, where does Queensland's
Speaker 2: state government now sit on nuclear energy and the correct
Speaker 2: approach that you and your colleagues in the federal Liberal
Speaker 2: National Coalition are pushing.
Speaker 1: For nuclear energy. Where's all that sit at the moment?
Speaker 17: Well, look, David Christoph folly So said quite openly that
Speaker 17: he is not he doesn't have new courergy in his plans.
Speaker 17: Obviously we have at the federal level a different plan.
Speaker 17: As Peter Dutton expressed months ago, when we announce as policy,
Speaker 17: we don't need the state governments to be on board
Speaker 17: for this.
Speaker 1: In fact, in many.
Speaker 17: Years, years ago, many moons ago, when the Snowy Hydra,
Speaker 17: the original snow Hydro, not the fraud that is the
Speaker 17: Snowy two point over the original snow Hydro, when it
Speaker 17: was announced, the state governments of New Subse Victoria opposed
Speaker 17: it and John Curtin pushed through anyway. He pushed the
Speaker 17: legislation through and got it started. And aren't we all
Speaker 17: blessed to have the benefit of that of his courage.
Speaker 17: So I'm sure Peter Dunne will show similar courage and leadership.
Speaker 17: We'll see what state governments do across all of Australia
Speaker 17: and when Peter Dutton government is elected.
Speaker 1: And we pursue this.
Speaker 17: But we clearly need more energy needs and one thing
Speaker 17: that David Christo Fay has focused on is getting that
Speaker 17: callid Culfied POWERstation here in central Queensland going again. We
Speaker 17: need that because nuclear is great, all for it, Rahan,
Speaker 17: but we need our beautiful, clean, cheap coal to be
Speaker 17: used as well. We've got to put an end to
Speaker 17: this absurdity where we're exporting our natural resources overseas for
Speaker 17: others to benefit from and industrialize and take our jobs
Speaker 17: by using it.
Speaker 1: With that time we use it here in Australia.
Speaker 17: Just leaking back to that Senate inquiry we spoke about,
Speaker 17: I asked, I asked the head of the Energy Regulator room,
Speaker 17: why is it? Why is it that the United States
Speaker 17: now has power prices a third of ours, so our
Speaker 17: power process are now three times at higher than the
Speaker 17: United States. We have blessed with very similar resources, we
Speaker 17: have very same disperse populations, and we are paying three
Speaker 17: times more for power. He couldn't answer it, which is
Speaker 17: shocking enough in itself. Why has he looked at this?
Speaker 17: It's probably the most important question about our country, our
Speaker 17: country's productivity and our economy.
Speaker 6: It couldn't even give.
Speaker 1: An attempt to answer it.
Speaker 17: Yet, clearly the problem is in the US last year
Speaker 17: they produced more oil than any country in any year
Speaker 17: in history, in history, and they are benefiting from the
Speaker 17: low power prices a lot of the bounty that that generates.
Speaker 17: Whereas in this country, yeah, we're happy to export our gas,
Speaker 17: our coal to other are uranium as well to other nations, but.
Speaker 1: We don't use it ourselves. It's totally insane.
Speaker 17: And now that we've got over this peak green psychosis,
Speaker 17: maybe we can come back to the land of reality
Speaker 17: and common sense. And so if we're going to be
Speaker 17: one of the world's biggest coal exporters and we're happy
Speaker 17: to take the money from that, Queen's that cover mus
Speaker 17: have to take the royalties from that, maybe we should
Speaker 17: use some of ourselves for our own country to look
Speaker 17: after Australians first, one hundred percent, Matt Canavan.
Speaker 2: We need to get cole back into a part of
Speaker 2: our key part of our energy mix. One hundred percent
Speaker 2: agree with you. Australians deserve cheap energy, it's our natural resource.
Speaker 2: You are one hundred percent correct there, Matt Canavan. Great
Speaker 2: to chat to you. Congratulations on that win there for
Speaker 2: the Liberal National Party up there in Queensland. Great always
Speaker 2: to chat to Senator Matt Canavan. After the break we'll
Speaker 2: speak to the academic Nigel Bigger about colonialism. Lots more
Speaker 2: coming up here on Outsiders back, Tim you're watching Outsiders
Speaker 2: with Rita Panahee, with James Morrow and with myself Rowan Dean,
Speaker 2: and thank you so much for watching us every Sunday morning.
Speaker 2: We certainly do appreciate your company and being in your
Speaker 2: living rooms or wherever else we are. It's always great. Wacademia,
Speaker 2: the wacky world of academia. Now, we've talked about it
Speaker 2: so many times on the show, the crazy things that
Speaker 2: happen in our classrooms that so many parents and grandparents
Speaker 2: have no idea. They get glimpses of it when the
Speaker 2: kids come home talking climate nonsense or transgender nonsense, or
Speaker 2: this that or the other woke garbage.
Speaker 1: So what do you do about it?
Speaker 2: Well, someone who's come up with an idea, someone you've
Speaker 2: seen on the show several times before. Monica Smitt. Now, Monica,
Speaker 2: you will recall, was imprisoned for her anti COVID, anti
Speaker 2: lockdown activism by the draconian and Dan Andrews government back
Speaker 2: during COVID.
Speaker 1: That was an absolute disgrace.
Speaker 2: Monica's come out with a lobby group suggesting that kids
Speaker 2: should start filming what is going on in their classrooms
Speaker 2: so that their parents and grandparents can act, actually see
Speaker 2: what is happening. In specific specifically, she's referring too, and
Speaker 2: this story was in The Herald Sun, referring to the
Speaker 2: transgender the culture transgenderism within schools. If there are teachers,
Speaker 2: we know that this is happening. Obviously it's not all teachers,
Speaker 2: but there are teachers who are kind of pushing the
Speaker 2: ideology of transgenderism onto vulnerable kids. So monitors suggesting Rita
Speaker 2: that maybe the kids start filming this so we do
Speaker 2: know what is happening.
Speaker 5: What do you think, Well, I'm not sure how practical
Speaker 5: it is for kids to be filming, but I've got
Speaker 5: absolutely no qualms about it, just being routine that classrooms
Speaker 5: have a camera there for the protection of everybody, so
Speaker 5: there's nothing to hide there. There's no breach of privacy.
Speaker 5: It would be something that only the school and parents
Speaker 5: have access to, because these days with apps, every parent
Speaker 5: has an app for their child's school where they can
Speaker 5: plug into what they're doing in class support cards. Why
Speaker 5: would that be something that would be hidden from parents,
Speaker 5: particularly if there is any sort of conflict between what
Speaker 5: the student says is happening and what the teacher says
Speaker 5: is happening. It's there, It's clear as day, and I
Speaker 5: think parents are so blind to just how much far
Speaker 5: left activism is in the curriculum. It is just so
Speaker 5: entrenched now, and unless you talk to your kids, unless
Speaker 5: your kids are politically aware and they realize what's happening
Speaker 5: and they come home and tell you, and most kids aren't, often.
Speaker 1: It's too late.
Speaker 6: Well yeah, I mean, look, there's a few issues here.
Speaker 6: I agree with your suggestion about cameras actually in the classroom,
Speaker 6: because I don't think if you give kids the power
Speaker 6: to use cameras against their teachers, they will use them
Speaker 6: in all sorts of ways that probably won't be helpful.
Speaker 6: It's a bit poor part of ship. It's a bit now.
Speaker 6: But there's an interesting sort of point here. And if
Speaker 6: you look at what happened in the United States, and
Speaker 6: there was supposedly an epidemic of shootings of and murders
Speaker 6: of black Americans by police officers, and so there was
Speaker 6: this big trend to put body cams on all the cops.
Speaker 6: And have you noticed that there have been almost no
Speaker 6: cases where anybody has been accused of doing the wrong
Speaker 6: thing anymore, because the cameras actually exonerated the cops. There
Speaker 6: was somebody in the United States the other day and
Speaker 6: she was killed when she was coming at the cop
Speaker 6: with a knife, and that could have very easily been
Speaker 6: turned into a huge dispute. So I think that these
Speaker 6: cameras and just having the factual evidence about what goes
Speaker 6: on would go a long way to undercutting a lot
Speaker 6: of that sort of leftist indoctrination. But the real thing
Speaker 6: that has to be done is that you have to
Speaker 6: absolutely figuratively burn down the teachers colleges. You have to
Speaker 6: just you know, the whole curriculum that teachers are taught
Speaker 6: about how to teach, how to manage classrooms, the ideology
Speaker 6: they get, it's all Palo Freir Marxist garbage. There.
Speaker 2: Just pointed out successive liberal governments, a decade of liberal
Speaker 2: governered did nothing to them.
Speaker 1: That's what Peter Dutton needs.
Speaker 2: To come in to say to parents of Australia and
Speaker 2: grandparents of Australia.
Speaker 1: I will fix this.
Speaker 2: I will get rid of the left wing ideology on
Speaker 2: transgenderism within classrooms, climate change within classrooms, indigenous fantasy world
Speaker 2: within classrooms.
Speaker 1: Peter Darton has to fight those.
Speaker 2: Three cultural issues and he will get every parent, every
Speaker 2: grandparent in Australia on his side if he does that right.
Speaker 5: It's a huge issue in the States. States have been
Speaker 5: flipped on this issue. They've gone from Democrat to Republican.
Speaker 5: Governor Yunkean would be one key example based on this
Speaker 5: as being the critical issue because it impacts everybody. It
Speaker 5: impacts every parent, every grandparent, everybody cares about what's happening
Speaker 5: in education and the indoctrination that's poisoning these kids. We're
Speaker 5: seeing it in so many ways. The social contagion that
Speaker 5: comes with the trans lunacy, with these girls in significant
Speaker 5: numbers in some schools or going that way, and some
Speaker 5: of them getting medical treatments. We are seeing it with
Speaker 5: this loathing, self loathing of themselves and their country that
Speaker 5: we're on stolen land that were not a legitimate country.
Speaker 5: We're built on genocide. And also the climate cult. We've
Speaker 5: got kids suffering from climate anxiety. So it is impacting
Speaker 5: them in multiple ways, and it is absolutely an issue
Speaker 5: that deserves to be elevated.
Speaker 2: And I think well done to Monica Smidt for raising
Speaker 2: this issue.
Speaker 1: It's a good suggestion, it's an interesting.
Speaker 2: Suggestion, and it does drill down to this bigger issue
Speaker 2: that parents simply don't know what their kids are being.
Speaker 5: Can I say one more thing, though, Parents also need
Speaker 5: to talk about their values with their kids have given
Speaker 5: that responsibility over to the schools, and then you shouldn't
Speaker 5: be surprised if kid comes out as side.
Speaker 6: Why have we outsourced sex education and all of this stuff,
Speaker 6: you know, and you know, values around every sorts of things,
Speaker 6: human relationships and all of these sorts of things now
Speaker 6: being taught by you know, the teachers and the teachers coug.
Speaker 6: I mean, that's just a recipe for a disaster. It
Speaker 6: erodes the Paris Ball authority. But I think you know
Speaker 6: the backlash we see that with one of the things.
Speaker 6: One of the reasons why many people are voting for
Speaker 6: Trump is the reason in America is because you know,
Speaker 6: this has introduced politics. So left is interested politics into
Speaker 6: places that they don't belong, like the classroom, and a
Speaker 6: vote for Trump isn't up yours to that sort of
Speaker 6: push to make everything political, to just make things normal
Speaker 6: again exactly.
Speaker 2: Now, speaking about education, now, I don't know if this
Speaker 2: documentary will be educational or whether it'll be more fantasy.
Speaker 2: But Stan Grant is involved in a Captain Cook documentary.
Speaker 2: Journalist Stan Grant used to work here at Sky. He's
Speaker 2: a good bloke. I wouldn't agree with him on many
Speaker 2: political things. But he's featured in a contenttion, this new
Speaker 2: documentary that aims to challenge the false narrative. This is
Speaker 2: the blurb of Captain Cook by celebrating the history between
Speaker 2: wait for it, Muslims and Indigenous Australians in the pre
Speaker 2: colonial period. So we're now suggesting that Islam reached these
Speaker 2: shores before Captain Cook. I don't know if this is
Speaker 2: true or not, but it'll be interesting to see what
Speaker 2: they have to say.
Speaker 1: Rita will it benefit of.
Speaker 6: This is this is this is a sort of ridiculous
Speaker 6: nonsense revisionism. The Muzzoms arrived there, were peaceful, had a
Speaker 6: wonderful relationship with the local average, and then the terrible
Speaker 6: white folks arrived. Well, you know, but what.
Speaker 2: I would like, what interests me about this is if
Speaker 2: we're going to do this, that's great. Let's let's investigate this,
Speaker 2: but let's also, finally, please have some documentaries that are
Speaker 2: honest about the sixty thousand year history of this nation.
Speaker 2: How many people were here? Is it just the current
Speaker 2: Indigenous Australians or were there people before them and people
Speaker 2: before them and people before them.
Speaker 1: Let's get to the truth.
Speaker 2: If we're going to start having these documentaries and investigations, great,
Speaker 2: bring them on, but let's have areas that have been
Speaker 2: no go areas in the past. Now, let's look at
Speaker 2: them as well and find out the truth if we
Speaker 2: really do want truth telling. After the break, we'll speak
Speaker 2: to Professor Nigel Bigger about what else colonialism. Inn Ty, Hello,
Speaker 2: you're watching Outsiders with Rita. This is going to be
Speaker 2: a huge victory Panahe James, we got beautiful numbers. There's
Speaker 2: such beautiful numbers. Morrow and myself Rowan, she's such a
Speaker 2: stupid woman. I mean, what can I say? She's just
Speaker 2: not very bright.
Speaker 1: Dean.
Speaker 2: Yes, in ten days time, Donald Jay Trump will be
Speaker 2: the forty seventh President of the United States, as I've
Speaker 2: been predicting here on this show since early twenty twenty two.
Speaker 2: Back in twenty twenty two, nobody, and I mean nobody
Speaker 2: thought that Donald Trump could possibly ever run again, let
Speaker 2: alone win the presidency. But I have always believed that
Speaker 2: he is one of the greatest presidents of our lifetimes,
Speaker 2: and that the American people would turn to him again
Speaker 2: once the true disaster of woke left wing ideology crippling
Speaker 2: every aspect of their American prosperity and destroying world peace,
Speaker 2: open borders.
Speaker 1: When it all became apparent.
Speaker 2: Let me also remind you on that note that The
Speaker 2: Spectator Australia in our cover story piece next of November fourteenth,
Speaker 2: twenty twenty one, week after they were elected, accurately predicted
Speaker 2: that Joe Biden and Camal Harris what they.
Speaker 1: Would do to world peace, they would destroy it. Yet,
Speaker 1: for the.
Speaker 2: Last four years, even as it became self evident that
Speaker 2: Donald Trump's popularity had not waned and was in fact increasing,
Speaker 2: we had at all the usual suspects of the left
Speaker 2: lying about him, demonizing him, calling him a fascist only
Speaker 2: the other day, all of which is nonsense and fatally
Speaker 2: underestimates him. But that just sums up the left in general,
Speaker 2: so no surprises there. What has been most baffling and
Speaker 2: infuriating is how so many on the right side of
Speaker 2: politics here and in America have over the years sneered
Speaker 2: at Donald Trump and joined in labeling him disgusting, unfit
Speaker 2: to be president, qualifying every comment they make, calling him
Speaker 2: a disgrace, obnoxious, and so on. As we have frequently
Speaker 2: pointed out on this show, this phenomenon is so common
Speaker 2: it has its own name. Teds Trump derangement syndrome, and
Speaker 2: of course, as with any syndrome, it.
Speaker 1: Has its poster girl.
Speaker 2: I haven't played her for a while, but here she
Speaker 2: is the day of Trump's first inauguration back in January
Speaker 2: twenty seventeen.
Speaker 16: Donald J.
Speaker 18: Trump is now President of the United States.
Speaker 1: Ah, I miss her. Hope she's getting invoice for January
Speaker 1: next year.
Speaker 2: Hilariously, Trump himself mentioned the no girl just the other day.
Speaker 8: Then that's when that crazy woman started screaming, remember with a.
Speaker 6: Glass States of America. Donald, I wonder whatever happened to her.
Speaker 8: She's probably I just wonder where she is right now.
Speaker 6: Well, graciously, I'm.
Speaker 19: So sorry to my world.
Speaker 6: I'm so sorry to my world.
Speaker 2: This is not what we want.
Speaker 1: That's funny, So sorry to her world. We laughed at.
Speaker 2: Trump arrangement syndrome will be with us for at least
Speaker 2: the next four years, unless, of course, Kamala Harris manages
Speaker 2: to pull off an unlikely and implausible victory. As you know,
Speaker 2: I still have serious doubts about the integrity of the
Speaker 2: vote at the last US presidential election, in particular around
Speaker 2: suspicious late night ballast harvesting and other anomalies. But let's
Speaker 2: hope we don't see a repeat of all of that.
Speaker 2: But only yesterday we learn, for example, that according to
Speaker 2: the Daily Mail quote, a criminal investigation has been launched
Speaker 2: after thousands of suspected fraudulent voter registrations were discovered in
Speaker 2: the critical swing state of Pennsylvania. Now James will have
Speaker 2: a lot more on going to this in detail later
Speaker 2: on in the show. In Donkey vote, fraudulent voter registrations
Speaker 2: knocked me down with a feather. My suspicion and hope
Speaker 2: is that the Trump vance results will be a landslide
Speaker 2: and large enough to withstand whatever cheating is likely to occur.
Speaker 2: But we'll see back to all those conservatives suffering from
Speaker 2: Trump derangement syndrome, some of our most esteemed form of politicians.
Speaker 1: Journalists and commentators.
Speaker 2: I witnessed it at close hand for many years, and
Speaker 2: what appears to be at the heart of it is
Speaker 2: not personality. For many, they simply don't understand Donald Trump's honesty.
Speaker 2: They don't understand his lack of a filter, and his
Speaker 2: extraordinary sense of humor, and his every day common man,
Speaker 2: common touch humanity, instead viewing those qualities as evidence of aborishness
Speaker 2: and narcissism for them. They preferred the appearance of civility
Speaker 2: and seriousness. Watch and enjoy this brilliant comparison between Obama
Speaker 2: the elite's idea of a proper president, and Trump went
Speaker 2: in office under very similar circumstances.
Speaker 18: The United States has conducted an operation that killed Osama
Speaker 18: bin Laden Haboo A car Aldred Daddy is dead. The
Speaker 18: United States launched a targeted operation against that compound.
Speaker 8: They did a lot of shooting, and they did a
Speaker 8: lot of blasting, even not going through the front door.
Speaker 8: You know, you think you go through the door. You're
Speaker 8: a normal person. You say knock, knock.
Speaker 2: May I come in?
Speaker 18: After a firefight, they killed Osama bin Laden and took
Speaker 18: custody of his body.
Speaker 1: He died like a dog that does.
Speaker 18: Not mark the end of our effort, A beautiful dog,
Speaker 18: a dog to give thanks for the men who carried
Speaker 18: out this operation.
Speaker 8: And I don't get any credit for this, but that's okay.
Speaker 10: I never do that.
Speaker 15: But here we are.
Speaker 18: May God bless you, and may God bless the United
Speaker 18: States of America.
Speaker 1: And I'm writing a book.
Speaker 15: Although we were twelve, all.
Speaker 1: The vurder and there you have it in a nutshell.
Speaker 2: Obama looked the part, spoke the part, but he was
Speaker 2: a disaster for America and the world. He disgracefully armed Iran.
Speaker 2: We're talking about that earlier. He weakened Israel. He trashed
Speaker 2: America's reputation, Russia began to move in on Ukraine, and
Speaker 2: of course, as is now widely acknowledged Barack Obama, it's
Speaker 2: acknowledged within the black community, Bariko, and did nothing for
Speaker 2: Black Americans. If you want to see a real narcissist,
Speaker 2: it was, of course Barack Obama who claimed that thanks
Speaker 2: to him, the oceans would stop rising. Donald Trump, on
Speaker 2: the other hand, maintained world peace, gave America energy security,
Speaker 2: brought jobs to Blacks and Hispanics in record numbers, and
Speaker 2: were it not for COVID, would easily have been re elected.
Speaker 2: Yet still, thanks to the relentless demonizing of him by
Speaker 2: the left and even by many conservatives, as I said,
Speaker 2: we still get no shortage of TEDS victims. Here's one
Speaker 2: typically liberal, presumably well off, white woman court filmed on
Speaker 2: a porch camera in the States the other day ranting
Speaker 2: at a house that has a Trump placard on the lawn.
Speaker 20: Are you the one that walks by here and all
Speaker 20: they screaming with people.
Speaker 16: No, I haven't mind.
Speaker 19: I recently okay to people scream yeah, I'm not you
Speaker 19: are going for the.
Speaker 6: No, why are you voting for him? Because I believe
Speaker 6: he is a moral candidate.
Speaker 19: Oh my gosh, thank you for that one.
Speaker 8: That's more.
Speaker 16: That's how your side at.
Speaker 6: Oh my god, in your opinion, that's how.
Speaker 7: Yeah, that's I'm sorry.
Speaker 13: Have a nice day, have a nice day, gotcha.
Speaker 1: God bless you, God bless you.
Speaker 2: But just ask the black community who that will be
Speaker 2: nineteen four?
Speaker 1: Who you voting for Trump? I'll come on, bro, Harris
Speaker 1: those backwards? Bro what Harris Man, we're not We're not
Speaker 1: voting for that.
Speaker 2: Now you can voted for Trump.
Speaker 21: Man what man, We're not none of that man.
Speaker 1: Truck be looking out for the black community. Man, we ain't.
Speaker 1: We ain't going there. I respect respect. So you're like,
Speaker 1: you don't like an open border?
Speaker 6: No, we need that border. And what are your thoughts
Speaker 6: on when Trump got shot? Man, Hey, don't try to
Speaker 6: take my boy out.
Speaker 2: Make America great again?
Speaker 1: Hell yeah, make America great again? And Trump or Kamala
Speaker 1: Trump be honest?
Speaker 6: Yeah? So why Trump? Though?
Speaker 1: Why Trump? Because we used.
Speaker 15: To get paid.
Speaker 1: It like he used to keep immigrants out. So you know,
Speaker 1: we were able for us to get jobs. It's hard
Speaker 1: for us to get jobs now.
Speaker 22: If it's a choice, I'll go with Trump.
Speaker 1: She ain't no good.
Speaker 2: I'll put it like that, open borders, jobs, the economy, immigration.
Speaker 2: Donald Trump is also winning the Hispanic vote apparently in Florida,
Speaker 2: and many people are putting it down to this.
Speaker 1: Sid have a look.
Speaker 2: Apart from the gags and the sound economic and border policies,
Speaker 2: there is a real empathy to Donald Trump that the
Speaker 2: pretentious Obama, the dottery Biden, and the Stepford candidate Kamala
Speaker 2: are completely devoid of.
Speaker 22: Justin you are the best looking guy, and I got
Speaker 22: your message this morning.
Speaker 1: Have lunch the White House with Donald Trump.
Speaker 22: So when you're better, which will be very soon, you're
Speaker 22: going to come to the White House and I'm going
Speaker 22: to be with you, and we're going to spend a
Speaker 22: lot of time together. We're going to talk about the
Speaker 22: history of the White House and even the history of
Speaker 22: our government, the history of our country, because I know
Speaker 22: you like that. But we're gonna have a good time.
Speaker 22: We're gonna have lunch and you're gonna bring your friends
Speaker 22: and your parents and it's going to be something special.
Speaker 22: So get better quickly because I really want to spend
Speaker 22: some time with you.
Speaker 6: Take care.
Speaker 2: Thanks justin all of which, the humor of the gags,
Speaker 2: the empathy played out last weekend with Trump's extraordinary McDonald's stunt, And.
Speaker 6: I could do this all day.
Speaker 2: I wouldn't mind this show.
Speaker 6: I like this show, but I think I might come.
Speaker 23: Back and do it again.
Speaker 2: Thank you, Thank you, mister president, to many pot but are.
Speaker 22: Many people like us to eat?
Speaker 16: I mean, I can see we pray for you, and
Speaker 16: you want you want to.
Speaker 4: Be the president.
Speaker 10: Took up.
Speaker 22: When you think about it.
Speaker 14: I guess that's that.
Speaker 2: Yes, that's a master politician at work, but it's also
Speaker 2: a real human being, a genuine good bloke who understands
Speaker 2: the average punt.
Speaker 19: Man being a Trump supporter supported Donald Trump is the
Speaker 19: I mean, let me tell you something, bro Kamala hair supporters,
Speaker 19: y'all are never gonna feel like this. Y'all are never
Speaker 19: gonna be looking at your candidate and feel the way
Speaker 19: we do. Our boy, Donald Trump is working at shift
Speaker 19: at McDonald's.
Speaker 6: Bro working at shipped at McDonald.
Speaker 1: And of course Americans who love Donald Trump. No, he's the.
Speaker 2: Real deal because he has always been the same man.
Speaker 2: He has always been the same person with the same
Speaker 2: concerns and the same beliefs and the same solutions. How
Speaker 2: many politicians can you say that about? Virtually none, and
Speaker 2: especially not Kamala Harris, who flips her opinions more often
Speaker 2: than one of Trump's co workers flips burghers during the
Speaker 2: lump shift.
Speaker 1: Here's young Donald.
Speaker 21: You've said, though, that if you did run for president,
Speaker 21: you believe you'd win.
Speaker 1: Well, I don't know.
Speaker 6: I think i'd win.
Speaker 24: I tell you what, I wouldn't go in to lose.
Speaker 24: I've never gone into losing my life, and if I
Speaker 24: did decide to do it, I think I'd be inclined.
Speaker 24: I would say that I would have a hell of
Speaker 24: a chance of winning because I think people I don't
Speaker 24: know how your audience feels, but I think people are
Speaker 24: tired of seeing the United States ripped off. And I
Speaker 24: can't promise you everything, but I can tell you one thing.
Speaker 24: This country would make one hell of a lot of
Speaker 24: money from those people that for twenty five years have
Speaker 24: taken advantage. It wouldn't be the way it's been.
Speaker 2: Believe me, And here he is with Larry King in
Speaker 2: nineteen eighty seven.
Speaker 1: Remember this is nearly forty years ago.
Speaker 25: Japan is a money machine. Saudi Arabia is a money machine. Kuwait,
Speaker 25: these are money machines. The greatest ever created. The United
Speaker 25: States is if it were a corporation.
Speaker 1: It would be bankrupt.
Speaker 25: It's losing two hundred billion dollars a year for years now,
Speaker 25: it's been losing that. What right do we have to
Speaker 25: go out and defend Why aren't these countries, these wealthy
Speaker 25: money machines, paying us for the defense of their freedom
Speaker 25: and their nations. We've gotten thousands of phone calls, We've
Speaker 25: gotten tremendous support. I've never seen anything like it. I
Speaker 25: have literally never I never dreamt that this kind of
Speaker 25: reaction could have happened from taking a newspaper at essentially saying, hey,
Speaker 25: we're making a mistake and this is what we should.
Speaker 24: Be doing.
Speaker 1: With Trump.
Speaker 2: You know what you're getting, and forget about his supposed
Speaker 2: problem with women.
Speaker 1: What nonsense. Here he was recently.
Speaker 2: Being asked a question by women concerned about transgenderism and
Speaker 2: on the issue the vexed issue of biological men playing
Speaker 2: in girls and women's sports.
Speaker 1: Look at what's happened in swimming.
Speaker 6: Look at the records that are being broke.
Speaker 1: How do you stop it? Do you go to the
Speaker 1: sports leagues? Do you go to the eloge?
Speaker 6: You just ban it? The president bans it. You just
Speaker 6: don't let it happen.
Speaker 2: And here's Riley Gains, the female swimmer who lost her
Speaker 2: career because of a transgender swimmer.
Speaker 26: I hear people saying that they will be voting or
Speaker 26: for Kamala Harris because she is a woman. Well guess what,
Speaker 26: I am voting for Donald Trump because I am a woman.
Speaker 1: So much for the women problem.
Speaker 2: In my opinion, Donald Trump will be even better in
Speaker 2: his second term than in his first. This is a
Speaker 2: man who is authentic, genuine, charismatic, but above all pragmatic,
Speaker 2: man who understands people and doesn't give a rats about
Speaker 2: the pretensions and orthodoxies of the woke elites invested interests.
Speaker 2: In fact, he mocks them. But back to that Trump
Speaker 2: derangement syndrome. I'm afraid it really is bad, not only
Speaker 2: for your health, but it also has extremely adverse effects
Speaker 2: on your mental well being, your judgment, and if you're
Speaker 2: a rock star, it does terrible things to your vocal cords.
Speaker 2: Look what it's done to poor old Bruce Springsteen here
Speaker 2: at Kamala Harris's rally last week.
Speaker 1: Well, I'm just about starving the nish.
Speaker 6: I'm dying for some action.
Speaker 22: I'm singer sitting around here trying to write this book.
Speaker 2: Oh it's me that Trump victory really cannot come soon enough.
Speaker 1: Now let's bring in real treaty.
Speaker 2: Let's bring an academic and author, Professor Nigel Bigger. Nigel's
Speaker 2: out here in Australia. He'll be speaking Melbourne at the
Speaker 2: Windsor Hotel this Tuesday, twenty ninth October, and he'll also
Speaker 2: be in Brisbane later in the week for the Three
Speaker 2: Historians event.
Speaker 1: Tickets are available now on event bright. I urge you
Speaker 1: not to miss that.
Speaker 2: Nigel. Great to have you here on outside. Hasn't been
Speaker 2: looking forward to it very much. You're here in Australia,
Speaker 2: you're talking about colonialism. You couldn't have come at a
Speaker 2: better time. We've had Parliament last week. You will have
Speaker 2: enjoyed the antics of Lydia Thorpe tell Us briefly. I mean,
Speaker 2: colonialism now has got such a bad rap. It's a
Speaker 2: dirty word in so many quarters. Yeah, it's not the
Speaker 2: truth at all.
Speaker 1: Tell us the real truth of colonialism, Nigel, Well.
Speaker 20: The truth is that the British Empire, British colonialism, like
Speaker 20: any long standing states, and the British Empire lasted four
Speaker 20: hundred years. Yeah, it contained bad stuff, tragic, some of
Speaker 20: the menabal, some atrocious, but they also achieved some really
Speaker 20: ambirable things, not least the abolition of slavery worldwide from
Speaker 20: Brazil to New Zealand. So my messages is now the
Speaker 20: story of colonialism run the world and in Australia was
Speaker 20: not just a litany of racism, exploitation and oppression. For example,
Speaker 20: right now Australia and New Zealand and Canada and the
Speaker 20: US and Britain are among the most prosperous and liberal
Speaker 20: states on Earth and among the least racist according to
Speaker 20: the latest World Values survey. That's not a coincidence. All
Speaker 20: of them part of the British Empire, inherited liberal political
Speaker 20: traditions and institutions.
Speaker 5: But the anti colonial colonialists will argue that that prosperity
Speaker 5: is built on oppression and genocide and just values that
Speaker 5: we have to absolutely disown. Now, so what do you
Speaker 5: say to that? And this is a Western phenomenon. It's
Speaker 5: not just here in Australia or the UK. You've got
Speaker 5: Columbus Stay in the US now being called Indigenous People's Day.
Speaker 5: There's just this revolt from academia that's against our own civilization.
Speaker 20: Yes, so the argument goes that, for example, the British
Speaker 20: prospered on the backs of the slaves and the West Indies,
Speaker 20: and that profits from slavery are what made Britain prosperous.
Speaker 20: Economic historians, most of them, even Marxists, don't say that
Speaker 20: slavery made a major contribution, an enormous contribution. The contribution
Speaker 20: of slave trading and slavery to the British economy is
Speaker 20: reckoned by most economic historians to be quite modest, maybe
Speaker 20: ten percent of a certain period. But here's the thing.
Speaker 20: After the British were among the first peoples in the
Speaker 20: history of the world, let me repeat that in the
Speaker 20: history of the world to abolish the universal institution of
Speaker 20: slave trading and slavery. They spent blood and treasure for
Speaker 20: one hundred and fifty years suppressing slavery from Brazil to
Speaker 20: New Zealand. As I said, and according to one historian,
Speaker 20: in a fifty year peered. From about eighteen ten to
Speaker 20: eighteen seventy, the British spent as much suppressing Transatlantic slavery
Speaker 20: as they had gained in profits in the fifty years
Speaker 20: before our abolition.
Speaker 6: James, Professor, could you talk a bit about, you know,
Speaker 6: the uniqueness of the British empirical story versus said of
Speaker 6: other European and Asian imperial powers, and more about you know,
Speaker 6: what would have happened to Australia. I mean, the idea
Speaker 6: that Australia would never have been encountered by another civilization
Speaker 6: is just, I think a bit of a fantasy. We
Speaker 6: can all agree. But what would have happened if somebody
Speaker 6: else got here to Australia before the British.
Speaker 2: That's a great question.
Speaker 20: So for example, in the sixteen hundreds, the Iroquois and
Speaker 20: North America expanded imperially northwoods, displacing the Huron, who then
Speaker 20: displaced other peoples westward. And the Iroquois had a quaint
Speaker 20: method of assimilating conquered peoples. They adopted the women and
Speaker 20: the children, and the men they ate. When the Maori
Speaker 20: invaded the Chattam Islands in eight thirty five, they slaughtered
Speaker 20: ten percent of the Mario population and enslaved the rest.
Speaker 20: So you're absolutely right the world was coming to Aboriginal Australia.
Speaker 20: Aboriginal Australia was politically and technologically very underdeveloped. They were
Speaker 20: going to be overwhelmed by somebody. If it hadn't been
Speaker 20: the British, would have been the French, or the Americans,
Speaker 20: or God helped them the Murray. So I think the
Speaker 20: fact that Admiral Phillip was the first to land in
Speaker 20: Sydney Cove was about the most fortunate intrusions that the
Speaker 20: Aboriginal Australians could have had.
Speaker 2: Tell us about the other European colonial powers. Now you've
Speaker 2: mentioned that you actually, if we should really be celebrating
Speaker 2: every year Britain's destruction of the slave trade, we should
Speaker 2: have a thank Britain for destroying.
Speaker 1: The slave trade in the world. Would be the way
Speaker 1: I would view it.
Speaker 2: From what you've just told us, that Britain put so
Speaker 2: much effort into destroying we probably still would have slavery
Speaker 2: throughout the world were it not for Britain.
Speaker 1: But tell us about.
Speaker 2: The other European colonial powers and how Britain compared to
Speaker 2: them in terms of Enlightenment values.
Speaker 1: And so on.
Speaker 20: Well, for example, the Belgian congo is a byword for
Speaker 20: colonial atrocity, and that was absolutely awful. And the Portuguese
Speaker 20: they were into slavery long after the British had abolished it.
Speaker 20: So compared to those empires, the Belgian and the Portuguese,
Speaker 20: the British were much more humanitarian, much more liberal.
Speaker 2: Now, Nigea, we've just lost your lighting. I don't know
Speaker 2: what's happened there, but your book up on the screen.
Speaker 2: You descended into some dark crypt there that we'll put
Speaker 2: your book up.
Speaker 1: On the we might get you back in a second.
Speaker 2: Tell us about your book Colonialism, because people will want
Speaker 2: to read that. What do you go into particularly in
Speaker 2: the book that to do with the moral reckoning?
Speaker 1: Is this subtitle of the book?
Speaker 20: Yeah, sorry, but the curtains of my hotel do this automatically.
Speaker 20: I can't control them. The book is designed to give
Speaker 20: a kind of moral evaluation of the British Empire. Oh,
Speaker 20: it's four hundred year history, and to show people just
Speaker 20: how complicated it was. It was different things, different times,
Speaker 20: different places. And yes, of course it did bad things,
Speaker 20: as any long standing state, I'm afraid it would do.
Speaker 20: But I wanted people to hear the good stuff too,
Speaker 20: not just the ablition of Slim, but the fact that
Speaker 20: the British Empire committed itself in ninety thirday nine to
Speaker 20: fight the massively murderous racist regime in Nazi Berlin, and
Speaker 20: between nineteen May nineteen forty when France fell and June
Speaker 20: forty one, when the Germans, unwise they invaded the Soviet Union,
Speaker 20: the British Empire, including Australians, offered Nazi Germany the only
Speaker 20: military opposition in the world with the sole etception of Greece.
Speaker 20: So the Empire has some heroic humanitarian achievements to its record,
Speaker 20: and those are the achievements that the anti colonists that
Speaker 20: he colonizes just don't want us to hear right now,
Speaker 20: and I want people to know about that.
Speaker 1: Professor Nigel Big Great to chat to you.
Speaker 2: We're going to leave it there because the lighting's gone
Speaker 2: in your room, but I hope the sunshine will come
Speaker 2: back into your room and you can enjoy the rest
Speaker 2: of your time in Australia. As I said, you can
Speaker 2: see nives ago to event bright to hear what he
Speaker 2: has to say, or by all means, by his book,
Speaker 2: they're on colonialism. I think one of the key moments
Speaker 2: of the Voice referendum debate was when Senator Jacinta Price
Speaker 2: came out and said, actually, as an Indigenous, part Indigenous,
Speaker 2: part proud Celtic, proud woodury woman, she was convinced that
Speaker 2: her life and that of her family and so on
Speaker 2: and her clan were that much better due to the
Speaker 2: British Empire having colonized and settled Australia rather than any
Speaker 2: of the alternatives.
Speaker 1: And I think most people would agree with her.
Speaker 2: There After the break, James's donkey voe lots more here
Speaker 2: Outsiders back in eighty.
Speaker 6: Hello, you're watching Outsiders. I'm James Morrow here as always
Speaker 6: with my fellow hosts. Rowan stopped the steal Dean and
Speaker 6: read a ballot integrity Panehe now, I want to bring
Speaker 6: you some really important news about election fairness in a moment,
Speaker 6: news that could determine the cour of the vote more
Speaker 6: than any other poll. But first, he may not be
Speaker 6: around on the public stage for much longer, so we
Speaker 6: need to have a little talk about Timmy Wolves. Let's
Speaker 6: just say that the self awareness isn't strong with this guy. Now,
Speaker 6: have a look at him, just a little while ago
Speaker 6: taking a shot at Elon Musk and Donald Trump.
Speaker 22: So I almost Midwestern on this the rally, and I
Speaker 22: think it was here in Pennsylvania that Elon was on
Speaker 22: the stage jumping around.
Speaker 6: That's right, I said.
Speaker 7: I used a Midwestern euphimism.
Speaker 1: I said, he's rancing and dancing around like a dip.
Speaker 1: And that is exactly what it was. That is exactly
Speaker 1: what it was.
Speaker 13: That guy.
Speaker 6: Wow, gosh, what a real tough guy man there with
Speaker 6: language and everything. But you know, when it comes to
Speaker 6: dancing or or sashet or flouncing or whatever else you
Speaker 6: want to call it, I kind of feel like old
Speaker 6: mad Tim Waltz maybe living in a glasshouse here. I mean,
Speaker 6: is he for real? Look at um? Anyway, enough of
Speaker 6: that because I've got some more important news for you.
Speaker 6: We know that the polls are tied, and I'm not
Speaker 6: going to bore you with the numbers, but we also
Speaker 6: know that states like Pennsylvania are absolutely critical to Donald
Speaker 6: Trump's chances of winning this election. So this news just
Speaker 6: out of Lancaster, Pennsylvania is really really important. Now Here's
Speaker 6: what's going on. According to local officials, they have uncovered
Speaker 6: a plot that would have had had it not been
Speaker 6: picked up, seen as many as twenty five hundred and
Speaker 6: possibly more fraudulent voter registrations entered onto the rules just
Speaker 6: days before the election. And you know this is being
Speaker 6: because even major media outlets like NBC News are reporting
Speaker 6: on it. Apparently what happened was this officials were reviewing
Speaker 6: the personal information, identification and signatures listed on registration forms
Speaker 6: and found a whole bunch of inaccurate information, signatures that
Speaker 6: did not match the ones they had for the voters
Speaker 6: on file, and forms that were seemingly completed by the
Speaker 6: same individual with the same handwriting. Now here's where it
Speaker 6: gets really worrying. The application forms were completed by paid
Speaker 6: canvassers as part of what the officials called a large
Speaker 6: scale canvassing operation dating back to June, and there may
Speaker 6: also be problems with registrations into other counties bordering Lancaster.
Speaker 6: Have a listen to what local district Attorney Heather Adams
Speaker 6: had to say announcing the investigation.
Speaker 16: Everyone District Attorney Heather Adams. On Tuesday afternoon, I was
Speaker 16: contacted by Christa Miller, who is our chief Clerk of
Speaker 16: Elections regarding potentially fraudulent voter registration applications that had recently
Speaker 16: been received by her office. At that time, she informed
Speaker 16: me that the election's office received approximately twenty five hundred
Speaker 16: applications at or near the deadline for registering to vote.
Speaker 16: While preparing to process these applications, staff noticed that numerous
Speaker 16: applications appeared to have the same handwriting, were filled out
Speaker 16: on the same day with unknown signatures, and some were
Speaker 16: previously registered voters excuse me, and the signatures on file
Speaker 16: did not match the signatures on the application.
Speaker 6: Now it gets even more disturbing. Have a listen to this.
Speaker 16: Indicators of fraud included inaccuracies with the addresses listed on
Speaker 16: the applications, false personal identification information, as well as false names.
Speaker 16: A number of the applications also contained names that did
Speaker 16: not match the provided social security information. In some cases,
Speaker 16: applications contained correct personal identification information such as the correct address,
Speaker 16: correct phone number, data, birth driver's license number, and social
Speaker 16: security number, but the individuals listed on the applications informed
Speaker 16: detectives that they did not request the form, they did
Speaker 16: not complete the form, and verified that the signature on
Speaker 16: the form was not theirs.
Speaker 6: So just how bad was all this?
Speaker 16: At this point? It is believed that the fraudulent voter
Speaker 16: registrations are connected to a large scale canvassing operations for
Speaker 16: voter registrations that date back to June. However, the majority
Speaker 16: of the applications received are dated August fifteenth, and after
Speaker 16: those canvassing for voter redgis, gusts were employed and paid
Speaker 16: to obtain voter registration applications. Thus, far, of the investigations
Speaker 16: that we have completed, we have determined that sixty percent
Speaker 16: have been fraudulent. That is, of the investigations that we've completed.
Speaker 6: This is, to say the least, an awful lot of
Speaker 6: strengthening democracy, as the left likes to say. And while
Speaker 6: we don't yet know who was behind this, officials have
Speaker 6: announced that this was an outside organizing group that was
Speaker 6: collecting the registrations with the polls on a knife edge.
Speaker 6: This is really disturbing stuff. Again, we don't know what
Speaker 6: group did this, we don't know why, what side they were,
Speaker 6: what their affiliation was, but whatever it was, it's not great.
Speaker 6: But I do want to end on a happier note
Speaker 6: here for everybody who is concerned about election integrity, because
Speaker 6: while this scheme has been uncovered and who knows how
Speaker 6: many more like are out there and might be running.
Speaker 6: The courts this week have granted a great blow for
Speaker 6: election integrity. In the last for eight hours, the US
Speaker 6: Fifth Circuit Court has ruled that ballots and I know
Speaker 6: this is a shocking idea that guess what have to
Speaker 6: arrive on or before election day to be counted. Shocking stuff.
Speaker 6: According to the ruling, federal law requires voters to take
Speaker 6: timely steps to vote by election day. Judge Andrew S.
Speaker 6: Oldham wrote for the unanimous panel, and federal law does
Speaker 6: not permit the state of Mississippi, where this judgment was
Speaker 6: first made, to extend the period for voting by one day,
Speaker 6: five days, or one hundred days.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 6: Again, this case was in Mississippi, but it will have
Speaker 6: big implications for states like Nevada, which is really important,
Speaker 6: as well as Texas, which have similar laws allowing late
Speaker 6: ballots to be counted after polling day. This, my friends,
Speaker 6: is a huge win I think for everyone who truly
Speaker 6: believes in democracy in the meantime, not long ago.
Speaker 2: Now, thanks James, and James is absolutely right. The question
Speaker 2: of the integrity of this forthcoming election is fundamental. As
Speaker 2: I said earlier, I still have many doubts and questions
Speaker 2: over the integrity of.
Speaker 1: The twenty twenty election.
Speaker 2: Whether what occurred would have made a difference to the outcome,
Speaker 2: we will never know.
Speaker 1: That's one for the historians, or maybe no one will
Speaker 1: ever know.
Speaker 2: But Rita, it is looking like Donald Trump will win.
Speaker 2: That is certainly where things are heading at the moment.
Speaker 2: But the key thing is that the Kamala Harris campaign
Speaker 2: really has been a disaster.
Speaker 1: However you look at it.
Speaker 2: She is just a woeful candidate, put all politics aside,
Speaker 2: just as a performing candid.
Speaker 1: That she is hopeless. I would say she.
Speaker 5: Is thoroughly hopeless. But we have seen a media campaign
Speaker 5: unlike anything I've ever seen in my life, where we
Speaker 5: had even media had been critical of her up until
Speaker 5: her elevation to being the Democratic candidate, completely do at
Speaker 5: one eighty completely memory hole everything we know about this
Speaker 5: we're not just as vice president, but her record before that,
Speaker 5: and present her as this visionary, confident, just capable leader
Speaker 5: who was going to turn things around. And for a
Speaker 5: while it seemed to be working and that was I
Speaker 5: think surprising to a lot of people. But that media
Speaker 5: campaign has continued, but you cannot hide the real Kamala
Speaker 5: from the American public, nor can you tell them to
Speaker 5: forget what they have known and experienced.
Speaker 2: But also, James I would argue that the wheels are
Speaker 2: coming off that media campaign. So you've had the Washington Post,
Speaker 2: for example, who've never before not endorsed the candidate in US,
Speaker 2: saying when not going to endorse.
Speaker 6: There's been two big non endorsements here this week. Number
Speaker 6: one of the Los Angeles Times has decided not to
Speaker 6: endorse anyone for presidentiational Democrats. They're traditionally Democrats. They endorsed
Speaker 6: every Democrats since Obama. They have adorsement of Republicans in
Speaker 6: George W. Bush. Now, there's really interesting because the news
Speaker 6: is broken that the family that owns the LA Times
Speaker 6: is upset about Kamala Harris's stance on Gaza. She's not
Speaker 6: far left enough for them. So that's really interesting now.
Speaker 6: But the thing that has everybody in a complete meltdown
Speaker 6: in the media, and you can watch the Democrat medium
Speaker 6: melting down here is the Washington Post where Jeff Bezos,
Speaker 6: the owner of that, well, everyone's now canceling their subscriptions
Speaker 6: to the Washington Post because they said, we're not going
Speaker 6: to endorse take a stance on this presidential campaign, and
Speaker 6: all the hard left colonists, all the Jen Rubins, everybody
Speaker 6: there on the editorial page with Trump arrangement system syndrome
Speaker 6: have completely lost their minds over this.
Speaker 2: In Australia too, we had Peter fitz Simon's Jane Carrow,
Speaker 2: all the lefties on Twitter, gag, I'm canceling my subscription
Speaker 2: to the Washingons. I'm sure the Washing most are very
Speaker 2: concerned about their subscriptions to City.
Speaker 5: These non endorsements. There's sort of a nothing burger because
Speaker 5: the Washington Post, the La Times, they have pushed this
Speaker 5: Democrat narrative relentlessly. They continue to do so so just
Speaker 5: because they're not.
Speaker 6: Doing it formally well exactly, and reader really.
Speaker 5: Doesn't mean anything other than than pretending that.
Speaker 6: I go to the New York Times. Now. There's an
Speaker 6: article of the New York Times right now which opens
Speaker 6: up and this is a pro Kamala argument saying that
Speaker 6: when she was made vice president of twenty twenty, she's
Speaker 6: looking at her intelligence briefings and the first thing she
Speaker 6: noticed was gendered language and ordered a review into gendered
Speaker 6: language in intelligence reports. We will have a Dei administration
Speaker 6: if she wins, it's going to be a disaster.
Speaker 1: Don't even think about it. After the break Canbra Clown Show,
Speaker 1: and it's.
Speaker 21: It up, Roll up, step right this way, your majesty
Speaker 21: Kings and Queens, ladies and gentlemen.
Speaker 2: It is the greatest show on earth, an emporium of
Speaker 2: earthly delights, a freak show to delight the most eccentric
Speaker 2: of tastes. It is, of course, the Canberra Clown Show,
Speaker 2: where this week, in front of our most esteemed guests,
Speaker 2: whose peregrinations brought them to this fair land from the
Speaker 2: wintry confines of Buckingham Palace, we were treated to the
Speaker 2: impassioned and petulant vitipurations of the possum skin clad Princess
Speaker 2: of perpetual indignation herself, Senator Lydia Thorpe.
Speaker 15: Against our people, get up the land that give us
Speaker 15: on this stall from us, how.
Speaker 21: Bones a star, the baby and people.
Speaker 1: We want to try country.
Speaker 2: There are those, in fact, most commentators who immediately jumped
Speaker 2: on their high horses and summoning up buckets of bile,
Speaker 2: dismissed Senator Lydia Thorpe as a buffoon, a fruit loop,
Speaker 2: a disgrace, a court, jester, a joker, a fool.
Speaker 1: But all of that is.
Speaker 2: Just lazy journalism and shallow thinking, playing to the crowd,
Speaker 2: as it were, because like most people in the media,
Speaker 2: they all missed the point. Lydia Thorpe is no fool.
Speaker 2: Lydia Thorpe knows precisely what she is doing. In fact,
Speaker 2: I would go so far as to say if you
Speaker 2: dismissed Lydia Thorpe as a fool, you are the fool.
Speaker 2: Lydia Thorpe is the visible symptom of a farm or
Speaker 2: dangerous sickness, a disease that is poisoning this country.
Speaker 1: Lydia is the cough. She is not the can.
Speaker 2: You won't change anything by kicking Lydia out of Parliament
Speaker 2: unless you are also prepared to cure the cancer. And
Speaker 2: that cancer it has a name, identity politics. Identity politics
Speaker 2: is the poisonous ideology that suggests color of skin, or
Speaker 2: sexual orientation or other built in attributes define your personality,
Speaker 2: your character, and define your politics and determine your status
Speaker 2: in life as.
Speaker 1: Oppressor or oppressed.
Speaker 2: Identity politics are anathema in my opinion, to genuine individual liberty,
Speaker 2: rights and equality.
Speaker 1: Under the law, but first, let's just.
Speaker 2: Rewind the tape and maybe take a closer look at
Speaker 2: what all those outraged media should have been focusing on.
Speaker 2: Last Monday, King Charles and Queen Camillo were sitting in
Speaker 2: the Great Hall of the Australian Parliament, and directly behind them,
Speaker 2: far more prominent than the official flag of Australia, were
Speaker 2: not one but two Aboriginal flags, the Aboriginal flag itself
Speaker 2: and the Torres Strait Islands flag. In fact, there were
Speaker 2: ten flags on the podium that morning, six of which
Speaker 2: were Aboriginal flags. So let's take a close look at
Speaker 2: the flags that the King was so proudly sitting in
Speaker 2: front of.
Speaker 1: This is, of course, the national flag.
Speaker 2: Of Australia, adopted as such over one hundred and twenty
Speaker 2: years ago. The stars of the Southern Cross, the most
Speaker 2: visible constellation in the Southern Hemisphere, represent the different states,
Speaker 2: and the large star directly pointing up to the Union
Speaker 2: Jack symbolizes the joining together of those states as a
Speaker 2: commonwealth under the auspices of that crown. In other words,
Speaker 2: the flag represents the people, all the people, black, white,
Speaker 2: brown and yellow, young and old, of ancient heritage or
Speaker 2: newly arrived immigrants, all the people sharing this vast continent
Speaker 2: under that southern cross, and it symbolizes that we are
Speaker 2: ruled by the constitutional monarchy we have inherited from the
Speaker 2: British legal system.
Speaker 1: That is what this flag means.
Speaker 2: Parliamentary guidelines say, quote the national flag must always be
Speaker 2: flown in a position superior to that of any other flag,
Speaker 2: and that it quote should be treated with the respect
Speaker 2: and dignity it deserves as the nation's most important national symbol.
Speaker 2: Look at the layout behind the king last week and
Speaker 2: tell me if you think that those instructions have been
Speaker 2: followed or flouted by the Oulnesi government.
Speaker 1: I suggest the latter.
Speaker 2: More importantly, the Australian flag cannot be changed other than
Speaker 2: through a national referendum, regardless of that. In nineteen ninety five,
Speaker 2: the left wing Keating government deemed two additional flags to
Speaker 2: be national flags.
Speaker 1: John Howard, then.
Speaker 2: Opposition leader, correctly criticized this move as divisive, but did
Speaker 2: not reverse it when the Libs were in power. Under
Speaker 2: the Albanesi government, we now only ever, seem to get
Speaker 2: all three of these flags at once, thus without any referendum,
Speaker 2: in effect subverting and usurping the will of the Australian people.
Speaker 2: Thanks to the idiocy of the Dominic Perrete government, the
Speaker 2: Aboriginal Flag now flies permanently on top of Australia's second
Speaker 2: most iconic symbol, the Sydney Harbor.
Speaker 1: Bridge on the Very Bay.
Speaker 2: The first fleet landed in two flags, two nations. The
Speaker 2: symbolism could not be clearer. So what do these flags
Speaker 2: actually mean? Let's start with the best known, the Aboriginal Flag.
Speaker 2: What does it stand for? Well, let's ask the blowcoot
Speaker 2: designed it back in nineteen seventy two.
Speaker 13: His name is Harold Thomas. He's an artist and activist
Speaker 13: and back in nineteen seventy one he designed the flag
Speaker 13: to be a symbol of the Indigenous land rights movement.
Speaker 13: The colors are really important. The black represents the Aboriginal people,
Speaker 13: the yellow represents the Sun, the giver of life, and
Speaker 13: the red represents the Earth and the spiritual relationship Aboriginal
Speaker 13: people have to the land.
Speaker 1: So let's stop kidding ourselves.
Speaker 2: The Aboriginal Flag is a flag that was designed to
Speaker 2: represent a tiny percentage of the population of this nation,
Speaker 2: specifically black people, and to symbolize their political claim that they,
Speaker 2: not the Commonwealth, own the land. Of this consonant or
Speaker 2: under the sun. In other words, this is a flag
Speaker 2: that represents an identity politics. Next is the Torres Strait
Speaker 2: Islander flag, which is officially of significance to Australians.
Speaker 1: So what does it mean.
Speaker 2: Well, the green stripes at the top and the bottom
Speaker 2: symbolize the land, the blue section represents the waters of
Speaker 2: the Torres Strait, and the thin black stripes between the
Speaker 2: green and blue panels signify the people themselves, black people.
Speaker 1: And the white.
Speaker 2: Logo is a representation of a local headdress. Again, the
Speaker 2: symbolism is clear, the water and land belong to the
Speaker 2: black people.
Speaker 1: Again, identity politics. Now, let me be clear.
Speaker 2: There are many flags that represent all sorts of different
Speaker 2: groups within Australia. There's all the LGBT stuff that we
Speaker 2: have to put up with all over our major cities
Speaker 2: every year. There are States flags, there are community flags
Speaker 2: and so on and so forth. But King Charles, our
Speaker 2: constitutional monarch, the representation of our entire legal framework, of
Speaker 2: our rights as an Australian citizen, of our laws, of
Speaker 2: our history, of our shared communal ownership of this consonant.
Speaker 2: He does not sit in front of all those other
Speaker 2: flags when addressing the Great Hall of Parliament. But he
Speaker 2: does sit in front of these two flags, the Aboriginal flags.
Speaker 2: So forget all the outrage about Lydia thoughpe cavorting around
Speaker 2: in her possum skin cloak, whereas the b tutor advocate
Speaker 2: calls her in an article that for some strange reason
Speaker 2: included a photo of me on the front of it
Speaker 2: a loud black shela. Lydia is merely articulating, colorfully and creatively,
Speaker 2: certainly loudly, as well as somewhat rudely, but nonetheless probably
Speaker 2: within her democratic rights.
Speaker 1: What is being taught?
Speaker 2: She's simply saying what is being taught to every school
Speaker 2: child in this country, taught in every unit of promoted
Speaker 2: relentlessly by Corporate Australia and by the ABC, taxpayer funded
Speaker 2: an SBS and most of the mainstream media. Promoted every
Speaker 2: time a plane touches down, promoted in every unnecessary welcomed
Speaker 2: a country smoking, acknowledgment of country ceremony, promoted in roadside
Speaker 2: signs saying you are now in such and such country,
Speaker 2: promoted at the airports. The relentless ideology of shame and
Speaker 2: division based on land and race, and this agenda has
Speaker 2: been foisted upon the Australian people without our endorsement. Indeed,
Speaker 2: the only time our permission for this ideology was sought,
Speaker 2: we overwhelmingly rejected it at the Voice referendum a year ago.
Speaker 1: The real obscenity is not Lydia Thorpe.
Speaker 2: She's just the logical extension of where all this ends up.
Speaker 2: The real obscenity is the relentless, creeping leftist subterfuge of
Speaker 2: the elites and successive Australian governments indulging this divisive race
Speaker 2: based ideology, culminating in the Albanezy government giving two political
Speaker 2: flags greater visual importance than the Australian flag, thereby enshrining
Speaker 2: at the very heart of our national sovereignty in Parliament,
Speaker 2: in front of our constitutional monarch, the poison of identity politics.
Speaker 1: This has to stop or this nation is doomed. Lydia
Speaker 1: Thorpe is merely the symptom of a much deeper and
Speaker 1: greater problem.
Speaker 2: But it can be fixed. So let's try and end
Speaker 2: this clown show on a brighter note, a more optimistic note.
Speaker 2: This is how things should be and what the majority
Speaker 2: of Australians actually crave.
Speaker 1: Thanks to the seekers.
Speaker 27: Were charity love, hyperbod extreme exaggeration, hyperbole as pronounced by
Speaker 27: Julia Gillard.
Speaker 1: Now someone who's exaggerated their own importance.
Speaker 2: I think James might be our Prime Minister Anthony Alberanisi.
Speaker 1: He seems to think, well, let James tell.
Speaker 6: Us, well, yes, So this is all about more revelations
Speaker 6: about Anthony Alberisi and the Quantus Chairman's loud, which is
Speaker 6: the very special louds that people and politicians are who
Speaker 6: get to use at the behest of the chairman of Quantas.
Speaker 6: And this goes to the detail that Rember what all
Speaker 6: came out that Anthony Albery's son had a membership this Well,
Speaker 6: it turns out Elbow asked Quantis to put the lad
Speaker 6: that's all he asked for.
Speaker 5: That in itself is enormous, but he apparently asked for
Speaker 5: upgrades for personal travel. He obviously wants to play pay
Speaker 5: economy but be at the pointy end. And he had
Speaker 5: a direct line to Alan Joyce we're hearing from this
Speaker 5: new book. So this is going to be fascinating.
Speaker 6: Well, it is well known that Anthony alban Is he
Speaker 6: loves a perk, He loves the perks of office. He's
Speaker 6: always loved just a boy who would deny him.
Speaker 1: So let me get this straight.
Speaker 2: The boy from the single housing thing, he upgraded to
Speaker 2: the beach house at Copa Gabana, and he upgrade where
Speaker 2: he can drive on an upgraded road, one hundred million
Speaker 2: road down to the airport where he can sit in
Speaker 2: the service and get to the upgraded point of the
Speaker 2: front the end of the plane. Fantastic, What a great
Speaker 2: what a great labor hero And hate to think what's
Speaker 2: out of labor heroes of the past, would think Mel Gibbs.
Speaker 2: And of course he's been out there. He's got to
Speaker 2: be a hyperbowl for us on Kamala Harris.
Speaker 8: Have you.
Speaker 1: I know what it'll be like if we let her in?
Speaker 6: Yeah?
Speaker 2: Really?
Speaker 10: And that ain't good?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 23: Well, the miserable track record, which I'm calling track record
Speaker 23: no policies to speak out in the border, right, think
Speaker 23: she's got the IQ of a fence post.
Speaker 1: There you go read it, will you? Wonderful?
Speaker 2: No?
Speaker 5: I enjoyed that. I'd like to see him on some
Speaker 5: sort of a commentary team on cn MSNBC that would
Speaker 5: just balance him out a little bit.
Speaker 1: That he's says what he thinks. It may this is
Speaker 1: why he has.
Speaker 5: To do films himself. Now he's got to be the
Speaker 5: producer to direct her as a star, because once you
Speaker 5: come out as a conservative, no matter what how big
Speaker 5: a star you are.
Speaker 1: Je je running in a few seconds. But is Kamala
Speaker 1: stupid or is she able?
Speaker 2: Basically caught between her part, she's burdened by her own part.
Speaker 6: She's by her own past progressive.
Speaker 2: But she.
Speaker 6: Didn't go to a particularly great law school. She watched
Speaker 6: some law school that nobody's ever heard of. She didn't
Speaker 6: pass the California bar the first time around. She's clearly
Speaker 6: not across her brief. Whenever she asked a question, she freezes.
Speaker 5: She does, Yeah, well, forget about that.
Speaker 6: Yes, indeed, and public it's about a public record, and
Speaker 6: so yeah, I think that that she is probably double
Speaker 6: the first post.
Speaker 2: Deal there you yeah, here on outside of course, James
Speaker 2: is heading off to the States. So next week James
Speaker 2: will be joining us from America where it's all happening. Obviously,
Speaker 2: Reach and I will be here together, two of us. Yeah,
Speaker 2: James is off getting around there you go. That's outsiders
Speaker 2: next week, can't wait.
Speaker 1: We'll see you then.
Speaker 2: In the meantime, during the week, make sure you catch
Speaker 2: Reacher as well then, and we'll see you next Sunday
Speaker 2: at nine am se Yeah,