WEBVTT - Murderers and mindhunters: Dr. Ann Burgess Pt.1

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>The public has had a long held fascination with detectives.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>Detective see a side of life the average persons never

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>exposed her. I spent thirty four years as a cop.

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>For twenty five of those years, I was catching killers.

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>That's what I did for a living. I was a

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>homicide detective. I'm no longer just interviewing bad guys. Instead,

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the public into the world in which I operated.

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>The guests I talk to each week have amazing stories

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>from all sides of the law. The interviews are raw

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and honest, just like the people I talk to. Some

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of the content and language might be confronting. That's because

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>no one who comes into contact with crime is left unchanged.

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Join me now as I take you into this world.

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another episode of I Catch Killers. Today's guests

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 1>had a profound effect on my career as a homicide detective.

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>She would not know that, but I'm sure there are

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other homicide detectives worldwide who feel exactly.

0:00:58.200 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 2>The same way I do.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Her contributions to law enforcement, training and criminal investigations have

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>had a broad and lasting impact, not only in her

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>own country.

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 2>But also across the world.

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>She played a crucial role in the advancement of criminal

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>profile techniques, helping law enforcement agencies identify and apprehend suspects

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>based on behavioral patterns and psychological theories. We're talking real

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>mind Hunter stuff here. What we're talking about is getting

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>into the mind of killers, including notorious serial killers, by

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>understanding what motivates them, how they think, which allows law

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>enforcement officers to track these killers down and, in the

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>case of serial killers, save further victims. Today, we're going

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to be talking to someone who I consider an absolute

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 1>legend in law enforcement, and I don't hand out those

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>accolades lightly. Her groundbreaking work has seen her portrayed as

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a main character and the hugely successful Netflix series mind Hunter.

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Our guest today is doctor Anne Burgess, who started her

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>career as a psychiatric nurse, obtained her PhD in nursing,

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and is a professor. She helped develop the methodology that

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>FBI agents used to interview, study, and profile serial killers.

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not kidding when I say it's an absolute privilege

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 1>to be able to sit down and speak with doctor Burgers.

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Would you prefer doctor Burgers or doctor Anne Burgers. What

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>are you comfortable with?

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Well, whatever you normally do I'm fine with anything.

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, Hello, Anne, I'm Gary.

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Hi Gary, delighted to be invaded and happy to

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 3>be here. Gary.

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm going to embarrass you up front. I can't

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>say how I'm excited to sit down and speak with you.

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Having been a homicide detective for over twenty years, I'm

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>familiar with your work and what emanated from the FBI,

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and I've got to say I'm a big fan because

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the thing that excited me most was trying to get

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>into the mind of killers, and you're at the forefront

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of understanding what goes on in that field.

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 3>We're trying to that's what we've been doing, and we're

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 3>still trying to get inside the mind see if we

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 3>can learn more about these serial killers.

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right from upfront to understand each killer. And we're

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>going to delve deeply into what you've learned. But I

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>suppose it's a science or it's an area of study

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 1>that the more you learn, the more you realize you

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Every time you think you've noiled it, I'm

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>sure you see something else.

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, that's the way it is, and that's why we

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 3>just keep going because there are just new avenues to pursue.

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a little bit for our listeners, tell us

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about your career so they get an

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>understanding the work that you've done. And when I say

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>your career, we're not talking past tense. I know you've

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>just come from lecturing a group of students before you

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>sat down here, so you're still very, very active.

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I basically started out my career as a nurse.

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 3>As a psychiatric nurse, you specialize in nursing in various fields,

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 3>and so I picked psychiatric nursing and so for many

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 3>years that's what I did. I would do psychotherapy. I

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 3>was a what's called a clinician, but I also was

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 3>an academic, and I've been at Boston College was where

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 3>I first started into some research, and that was on

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 3>rape victims. So I really that was because of a

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 3>colleague of mind, Linda Holmstrom, who said that this was

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 3>going to be an important area for women. And this

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 3>is back in the seventies, and that was true, that

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 3>the Women's movement actually was the Second Movement was just starting,

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 3>and she had been to some of what are called

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.479
<v Speaker 3>consciousness raising groups where women would gather and talk about

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 3>things they had never talked about before. And of course

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 3>much of it had to do with rape, had to

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 3>do with incest, that kind of thing, and so she

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 3>was instrumental in saying we need to do a study.

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 3>And she had tried to find rape victims and was

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 3>having no l up. They're very they hide, they really do,

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:07.919
<v Speaker 3>they don't pronounce themselves. So that she I said, the

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 3>only place I think we can find them is at

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:14.239
<v Speaker 3>a hospital, at an emergency room, and so I started

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 3>contacting hospitals and that's where we were able to get

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 3>into Boston City Hospital, which was a very good hospital,

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 3>large urban hospital. It's where police would take rape victims,

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 3>and so that's where the study started. And over a

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 3>year we saw one hundred and forty six people between

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 3>the ages of three and seventy three, so we had

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 3>a wide span the majority, of course where you'd expect

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 3>late teens, early twenties, but then we had some that

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 3>were children, and of course some that were elderly. So

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 3>that is what started me not only an academ but

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 3>also as a research area. And from there, the FBI

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 3>concurrently was being told they had to start screening their

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 3>agents in rape investigation, and so they had nobody that

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 3>was had any expertise in it, and why should they

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 3>They were all investigators. So the another nurse who was

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:21.359
<v Speaker 3>also a detective out in Los Angeles, had been keeping

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 3>up with her nursing skills. She worked at an emergency room,

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 3>and she said to Roy Hazelwood, who had said he

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 3>had this new assignment he was going to have to

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 3>teach rape investigation. He didn't know where he'd find anyone

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 3>or anything. And she caught him after class and said,

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 3>there's a new article out in the American Journal of

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Nursing and it's by someone out on the East Coast.

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 3>Why don't you contact her? And that's what he did,

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 3>and he invited me to come down to teach their agents,

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 3>their special agents about rape victims. So that's how my

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 3>research in the area of victims connected with the FBI,

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 3>who were having to train repe investigators. And from there

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 3>is where the project on a criminal personality study started

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 3>with Bob Wrestler and John Douglas, and that's how I

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 3>got into the profiling. What they needed was somebody that

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 3>knew methodology. They were not trained as science listeners, as researchers,

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 3>and so they needed to bring in somebody that could

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 3>set up a research study. So that's very basically how

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 3>I got from point A to point B.

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.559
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm sure when you started out nursing, you didn't

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>in visage that you'd be working for a large majority

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of your career very in depth with the FBI.

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:53.239
<v Speaker 2>So I never never, I've got to say.

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>In prepping for the podcast and understanding your background and

0:07:57.520 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the type of things that you did, it made me

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>reflect on my early times in homicide. I was fortunate

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>enough to work with a partner of Paul Bradley as

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a young detective who had spent twenty years as a

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>psychiatric nurse, and it was interesting just as we're both

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>setting out as learning the traders detectives. I always had

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>fascinating discussions with Paul about what are we dealing with

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>here and the type of expertise that he brought into

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the field. So yeah, I do understand the benefits of it,

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and that shaped me in the way that I was

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at crimes, having someone just a bounce some ideas off,

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>because I think and you would see it, with all

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the law enforcement offices you dealt with, we have a

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 1>tendency there's some black and white thinking and to think

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit abstract doesn't come naturally to a lot

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of police officers. I would suggest, I would agree, whinding

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>back on your studies with sexual assault victims rape victims

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that one thing, and correct me if I'm wrong, But

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's when the thinking started to change that

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>rape wasn't about the sexual act, it was about the control.

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 3>That was really one of our major papers that rape

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 3>certainly happened in a sexual context, that it had more

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 3>to do with dominance, power and anger. And that was

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 3>one of the articles we wrote and published, and I

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 3>think that really caught on. People began to understand a

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 3>little bit more that it wasn't just a sexual act.

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think opening your mind up to what's

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>made evating the crime just with that, I won't say subtle,

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>because it's a significant shift in thinking, does change the

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>way you follow an investigation.

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 2>Victimology.

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>That's one thing in homicide that I was fortunate enough

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to work under some very good mentals, and I really

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.079
<v Speaker 1>didn't get the importance initially that they were put in

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>on victimology. I'd just like to talk to you about

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>victimology because now, having been what I consider an experienced

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>homicide detective, understand the importance of it. So victimology and

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the homicide investigation or yeah, of Cereal rapist, any serious crime.

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>What can the victim tell you about the perpetrator of

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 1>the crime?

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, they tell an awful lot. And that's where I

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 3>think the payoff is because up until that point, everybody

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 3>just thought O rape was the same thing as sex.

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 3>And until you listen to what the victim tells you

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 3>about what occurs between how they get targeted if you

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 3>will you want to use that word, or how they

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 3>get selected, and then what they do, what they say,

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 3>how they behave all of that, they're not going to

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 3>tell you. The offender's not going to tell you. You have

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 3>to get it from the victim. And when you talk

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 3>with enough victims, you begin to see the patterns. And

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 3>that's what I think the payoff was is, so we

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 3>learned about the offender from the victim, So we try

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 3>to emphasize that, and I think that the profilers done

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 3>at Quantico really caught on to that and they use

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 3>that as the key piece of information to start with.

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 3>You know, after they have a victim, why was that

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 3>victim target and why was he or she usually a she?

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 3>And what type of person victimized her, so you and

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 3>then where should we look for a possible suspect. And

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 3>they began to see that they could use these patterns

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 3>as a way to better classify who they were looking for,

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:34.839
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's what sharpened their investigative techniques. It's

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 3>the victimology, the study of the victim, and that goes

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 3>for any type of crime. It doesn't have to be

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 3>just rape, but certainly was in our situation of because

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 3>nobody had talked about the victim early on, and so

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 3>our Lindham Our work was very very important. And then

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 3>the traumatic aftermath and the fear. I mean it was

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 3>really based on fear. They fear that they were going

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 3>to be killed, especially if the stranger not necessarily a

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 3>domestic rate, but certainly a stranger rate.

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>During the course of my career I got to because

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>it was homicide and serial violent crime, and got to

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>work on quite a few serial rapists and the way

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that they target their victims. And quite often it was

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the type of victim that alludes to the fact that

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>we had a serial rapist, whether the female that was

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>in the ones that I investigated, they are always female victims,

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>but they were when I say vulnerable. They were exposed

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>in that they were walking home late at night, that

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>type of stranger sexual assault. So they get that thinking

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>about why they targeting victims. Do you think it also

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>links the crimes together too, because I know in my

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:55.319
<v Speaker 1>early days in policing, and I spent over the thirty

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>years in policing, we sort of operated in silos. We

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't link a fan is to give us say, quite

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>often they'd be a ripe reported in this area, and

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>then they'd be a ripe report in another era, and

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>they'd be two groups of groups of detectives working in

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>isolation and not really comparing notes right right.

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 3>And actually what has even helped advance the science even more,

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 3>of course is DNA that they're finding that they always

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 3>they can change their MOO. That was confusing. I know

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 3>that Douglas put that a lot of emphasis on that

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 3>the signature, what was the signature of the offender that

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 3>he had that was psychologically based, But he could change

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 3>the m O. But he couldn't change the signature because

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 3>it was it was part of him. So those were

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 3>some of the things that we learned in the It

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 3>had to be a serial type offense.

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Could you give us an example of the type of

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:51.719
<v Speaker 2>thing break that down.

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, there would be I'm thinking of John Simonis. He

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 3>was one of the big ones cases that we had.

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 3>They took years for them to find him and his

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:08.079
<v Speaker 3>m all would he put as much effort into his

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 3>message of gaining access to a victim, and so that

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 3>could change, but he always would have them. He had

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 3>to immobilize them. He had to have people aware of

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 3>what he was doing. He was an exhibitionist. He wanted

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 3>the husband or the children to witness the rape. I

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 3>mean it was really so psychological if you you know,

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 3>that's where one of the things is. They wanted to know, well,

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 3>what did I think of that? And I said, I

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 3>bet you go back in his childhood and find out

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 3>that he had witnessed something in the family. And sure enough,

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 3>there had been some whether it was ever confirmed, but

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 3>something between the father and the sister, and he had

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 3>witnessed that, and so he carried that out in his

0:14:56.440 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 3>own rapes. So there's a one where he didn't change

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 3>his Uh, he didn't change his signature, but he might

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 3>change you know, where he found a victim. He might

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 3>have found her inside a house, or he could find

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 3>him on the street. That that kind of thing.

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and that that helps you link the crime, understand

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the type of person you're looking for and what maivates

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a person.

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I will say they used their good detective work.

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 3>You probably would appreciate that the profilers all were interested

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 3>in the car, the type of car that the and

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 3>of course the car was very important in detective work

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 3>in those days. And sure enough they had pinpointed the

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 3>type of car be very flashy, it'd be like a

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 3>sports car because that seemed to match the personality that

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 3>of the type of person that they were looking for.

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 3>And sure enough it was a red trans am that

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 3>caught their attention at two separate places. And so that's

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 3>how they they So even though we have.

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Look, I love the good detective stories and again it

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>makes me reflect on reflect on my career. The things

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that you learn I couldn't understand with these experienced detectives

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>that I was working with initially, are just so focused

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>on the car, and I'd be thinking, all right, we've

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>gone over the car, and they'd be fixated with there

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>was a red car or whatever, and they'd be fixated

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>on it. But quite often that it leads to leads

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to a successful result. And when you do unravel a

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>serial offender, little things that come to mind that you

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>look back at it with hindsight and if you had

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>better better thought process and the type of work that

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you guys have been doing over there. One serial rapists

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>who were working on the victims were always attacked on

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the Tuesday and Thursday night. And then when we finally

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>caught the offender, he was married, had kids, normal home life,

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>but he was supposed to be going to evening college

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>during the Tuesday and days and that's when he's struck.

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So you see patterns like that. And I remember when

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>we had him targeted as a possible suspect and then

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>we realized that he's got a or not an alibi,

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>but an excuse to be out of his home on

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>those two nights. That sort of firmed it up as

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>we're heading in the right direction. I also, and you

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>mentioned DNA, and I probably want to talk about that

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>later a little bit more detail, but I was listening

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to one of the many interviews that you've done and

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you said the benefit of DNA is not only yeah,

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>it's advanced criminal investigation in huge ways, but it also

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 1>helps eliminate suspects, and I thought, that's someone that understands

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that world because the DNA, it's so helpful because you

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>can spend so much time focusing on one person and

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>if you can compare it to the DNA, makes a difference,

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't it.

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 3>I think it makes huge difference. And I think that's

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 3>really one of the best benefits of DNA is to

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 3>exclude people a course is very helpful for them.

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, too well to be excluded.

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 1>I learned or it shaped my career early in homicide.

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>We were targeting the person you ticked the boxes of.

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>This is a good suspect that it was a sexual

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 1>assault and murder of an elderly lady. It was a

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>horrendous crime. Someone had broken into his house. We got

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a suspect that ingratiated himself into the crime in that

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>he was a witness and said he was walking his

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 1>dog and his dog got off the lead and he

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>ran past the place, which gets us suspicious. He gave

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a detailed description of someone he saw coming out of

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:40.879
<v Speaker 1>the place, which he just couldn't He was describing the

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>earring this bloke had on from across the road. Details

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>like that the victim was a member of a church group.

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 1>He went to the same church. He also also knocked

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>on a door of another elderly lady a couple of

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>weeks after the murder and asked for a cup of

0:18:57.560 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a glass of water because he was hot. We couldn't

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>work get how this person got access into the place.

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 1>We look at his criminal history and he's got past

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 1>offenses in another state for sexually assaulting a elderly lady.

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>You can understand. To take this point of view, We've

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:18.120
<v Speaker 1>got this bloke, had him under surveillance, picked him up,

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>got his DNA. First DNA case I worked on. First

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>time we used DNA and the laboratory comes back because

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>seaman was left at the scene. No, that's not your man,

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 1>and we were gobsmacked. We demanded the game go down

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to the laboratory to have it. Can you explain this

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>DNA stuff to us? And we're staring at this screen

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 1>not fully understanding it. But it taught me a lot

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that you can be headed off in the wrong direction

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>on investigations because because of the circumstances.

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Would you agree with.

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 3>That, I absolutely would agree with that, And I can

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 3>think of many times when they are looking for a

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 3>suspect and exactly as you say, and they get the

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 3>DNA back and it excludes the person. So but it's

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.159
<v Speaker 3>helpful if you can get the DNA early enough so

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:06.439
<v Speaker 3>that you don't get so invested in the case because

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 3>you are left of how can this be? It must

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 3>be this guy.

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, it taught me a lesson from you know, you've

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>got to keep an open mind.

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, criminal profiling.

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of everyone's got a view on what

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 1>criminal profiling is. And you see some shows, fictional shows

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, and it's almost like you can describe the

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>person to the tea and you virtually everything other than

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 1>the name you provide. Can you explain to all of

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>us what criminal profiling is all about. When someone says,

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm a criminal profiler, or have you got a criminal profile?

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Could you explain what it actually is? Because I think

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you're one person that's earned the right to explain what

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it is.

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 3>And I think it depends on what one's background is,

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 3>because we work. When I talk about criminal profiling, and

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about out what has done through investigators, not

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 3>through psychologists. And I think psychologists who like to be

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 3>they are going to profile through their understanding of personality

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 3>and psychiatric lingo and things like that. So I see

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 3>that as very different than the investigators whose work is

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 3>finding suspects, and I think that gives them a heads

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:26.640
<v Speaker 3>up to be able to understand that you're looking for

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:32.120
<v Speaker 3>someone that has committed you're looking for suspect that has

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 3>committed an ex crime, rape or a murder or something,

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 3>and you have to bring all of the skills. You

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 3>have special skills. Investigators have special skills that other disciplines

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:48.360
<v Speaker 3>do not have, and vice versa. So I may try

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 3>to make it very clear that we're talking about behavior.

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:57.439
<v Speaker 3>It started out with In fact, even the FBI Academy

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 3>called their department the Behavioral Science Department unit. They later

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 3>have changed it to call it now it's more criminal

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 3>investigative or support services or things. So over time they

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 3>have changed and advanced. I would like to say that

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 3>they had advanced using the work that they had learned from.

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 3>So what our work was in profiling was to get

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 3>a large amount of data that could be analyzed to

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 3>either support or not support what we had been learning.

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 3>And we learned some things that weren't right, you know,

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 3>we weren't doing it right, that the patterns were different,

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 3>and so that's where research comes into it and the

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 3>methodology that we use. That's what they needed me for

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 3>was the methodology. And because they were researchers, you know,

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 3>they didn't have any courses in that, so that I

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 3>think with what made a big difference in their type

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 3>of fling. So answer your question, you need to know

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 3>what type of profiling the person does and that's going

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 3>to match to his back or her background. Well, but

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 3>that's why I think you have so many different definitions

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 3>of profiling.

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I work very closely with a criminal psychologist, doctor Sarah Yule,

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>throughout my police career, especially in homicide. She's a good

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>friend of mine, and I don't think a lot of

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the police fully understood how you could use someone like

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Sarah's skills, and she was the first one that was

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:36.919
<v Speaker 1>attached to a law enforcement agency specifically to help with investigations.

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I like Sarah's input because she would think outside the

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>square from what we do as police. Where I used

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:50.160
<v Speaker 1>her to the best benefit I thought was preparing for interviews,

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:54.119
<v Speaker 1>talking about and not so the saying you tell me

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>what question to ask this person. I'm a detective. I

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>know what questions I want to ask, But how I

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 1>might that person, whether that person would relate more to

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 1>a female officer, whether that person might relate to a

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:09.919
<v Speaker 1>person in authority, that type of thing. Is that a

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>tool that you think is worthwhile using in criminal investigation?

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely? I think that more cases are sabotaged. Whatever words

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 3>you want from an interview, I've seen a lot of

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 3>cases just go down the drain because investigators are not

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 3>really trained in that. I think they need training in that.

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 3>And I've talked with I've seen cases where because I

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 3>just think back to what you learned. Did you really

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:42.239
<v Speaker 3>ever learn to interview a victim when you're early on

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 3>in your career or did you kind of learn it

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 3>as you went along? See, I think who would be

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 3>the person you bring in is very helpful to be

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:54.719
<v Speaker 3>able in that particular area of how to get the

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 3>most information. One of the big problems in criminals is

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 3>they will lie and you have to think through is

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:07.719
<v Speaker 3>he telling me the truth or is he not? So

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 3>that's why we want to get into their thoughts. Thoughts

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:16.120
<v Speaker 3>drive behavior, right, that's a basic premise of that's how

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 3>we all work. And so how do you get to

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 3>those thoughts? And that's where we put so much we

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 3>tried it through behavior. We're doing something different. Now we're

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 3>trying to get them before they act in any kind

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 3>of social media posts written things they've done, and we're

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 3>using AI to give us new information. And it's amazing

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 3>how we miss things when we just do an interview

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 3>after you put it through AI for example, you know. Yeah,

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 3>And that's trying to see this is before they have

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 3>it's when they're personally putting down information. We looked at

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 3>twenty three called manifestos. These were all written before they

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 3>were incarcerated of the murderers, and then see how they

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 3>pat what their patterns are. I mean, it's a fast way,

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 3>if you will, of trying to get inside their thinking,

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 3>because it's their thinking that gets them off base, right,

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:25.159
<v Speaker 3>it's their thinking. Yeah, so how and so we have

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 3>what we call a step way to murder and there

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 3>are about six steps that they go through, so that

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 3>if we can get early on, we might be able

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 3>to prevent. Everything is in the service of prevention. Can

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 3>you get them when they just have a grudge, you know,

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 3>or do you have and maybe they're still doing their

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 3>research and they go through these rather predictable.

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 1>Stages in regards to six steps to murder.

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Can you break that damn for us?

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it starts, it always starts with a grudge there

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 3>it's something that bothers the person that they are very

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 3>upset and angry about. And then that can develop into

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 3>what we call an ideology where they align themselves with

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.360
<v Speaker 3>a group that may or may not happen. And then

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:15.120
<v Speaker 3>they do research and that's where in the research they

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 3>look around they find out other people are feeling that,

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 3>and we break it down into which called in cells.

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Are you familiar with in cells nationalists or extremists? I

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 3>think there are three. And then they begin to plan.

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 3>This is when they now have enough information and they

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 3>plan a killing. So that's the I think that's a

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:41.199
<v Speaker 3>third of the fourth. Uh, they might they get a

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 3>date and all these manifestos they said it's going to

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:47.199
<v Speaker 3>be whatever the data is. Now that can change and

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 3>it can change for various reasons. But they will then

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 3>go on and in all of the cases, of course,

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 3>they did kill and that would be the last step

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 3>where they do it. And we use the the Elliott

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Elliott case out of where he videotapes himself in the

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 3>car and it's just after he has killed his three

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 3>roommates and he's now going to go he's a misogynist

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 3>and he's going to go to a sorority house and

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 3>he goes, he can't they won't let him into the

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 3>sorority house. Luckily, well, he kills three women outside. That's

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Elliott Rogers. I don't know if it's he would be

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 3>what's called also an inceel, and he's one of the

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:33.399
<v Speaker 3>We kind of use him as the example of the

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 3>steps to violence or the steps to murder, and pretty

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 3>much we were that's our research now where we're really

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 3>trying to see if we can get them early enough

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 3>before they act and catch them either when they're planning it,

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.719
<v Speaker 3>because many most of them give and give a warning.

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 3>So that's where the interview is hard, because you have

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 3>to know how they whether they're telling you the truth

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 3>or not a lot of times to tell you what

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 3>they think you want to hear is the problem.

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I had respect for you before. It's just gone

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>up even higher. That you understand the importance of interviewing,

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>because that's one thing that I think detectives we don't

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>get the training, and it is crucial, It is absolutely crucial.

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:21.959
<v Speaker 1>And I found that the most stimulating part of my

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>career in criminal investigation was sitting down in the interview room.

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>And I was fortunate enough to have people that I

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>really respected, and I just I was like a sponge

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>learning from them the way that they approached the interview

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and the thought process that went into how we're going

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to approach.

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 2>That level of detail.

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>They had before they stepped into the interview room, so

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 1>they could pick up and drop things when it suited them,

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>like contradict the person's version of events. And I love

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you say people lie in interviews and

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>don't tell the truth, because I've had I've worked with

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>some people and they come out and go, oh, but

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>he seems like a nice man. It looks like he's

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>telling the truth. And I haven't got any But I

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to pull my hair out because it would just

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>frustrate me. Frustrate me so much. But the approach that

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you take in the interview room, the atmosphere you create.

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to refer to a fictional TV show,

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>but I've been binging on mind Hunter in the lead

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 1>up to this rewatching it. There was one part in

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 1>season one and the character, I think it was the

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>character portrayed portrayed on you and they were interviewing a

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>suspect and it was a female involved in a murder

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>where there was the husband and the brother in law

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of something. And she would used the words splashed as

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>in it was splashing about blood as in stabbing.

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 2>And the point that was made.

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Just with that one comment that she was there when

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that crime occurred. She wasn't relaying it.

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 3>I tried the person was still alive. Yes, that's one

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 3>of our cases, one of the early cases. I was

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 3>also going to say, you have to we train, or

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 3>the FBI trained for doing an interview versus doing an interrogation.

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 3>There are two different.

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Well that's another great point.

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, and so you have to know there's techniques

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 3>for each one that are very important I think for

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 3>investigators to learn, and I bring in when I'm teaching it.

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 3>I have a retired FBI person who's really good, really

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 3>good on the difference, and he will roleplay it as

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 3>and he plays the subjects to the subject and one

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 3>of the agents to have to interview him or have

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 3>to interrogate him.

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I prepared and it was shown to me. That's something

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I've adopted and I've tried to pass it on because

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I would lecture about interviewing on courses, and I would

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>prepare before I went into the interview room for a

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of scenarios. One is that the offender is going

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to put their hands up and confess, So then it's

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.240
<v Speaker 1>about gathering all the facts that you need to present

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it to court and make sure it's a done deal.

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Then the second, and this can change during the course

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of the interview. The second thing. Okay, if the offenders denying,

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>what type of line the questioning, how you're going to

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>approach it. I think you need to be flexible when

0:32:12.120 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you step into the interview.

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Room, absolutely, and you have to know your material. You're

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 3>so right, you have to know because then you can

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 3>catch them in a lie. That's what the agent would do.

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 3>And then once you catch them in a lie, he

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 3>doesn't dare to do it, he better not do it again.

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you can drop that at the appropriate time

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>when you point out that they've just lied. Sometimes their

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>lies are as good as a confession if you can

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>contradict what they've got. But anyway, you just get me

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>excited about my police career. It makes me want to

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 1>go back in and be a homicide detective. So the

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>early days when you and my understanding, John Douglas and

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the team were going out and interviewing serial killers getting

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of information, and that was going to let

0:32:57.560 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>against the grain or the thinking at the time that

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 1>will what are you going to get we've locked them up.

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 1>What are you going to get from these people? What information?

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>They interviewed a cross sector, not a cross section, but

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>they interviewed quite a few serial killers that were in

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>custody by the nature, and I would imagine that most

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>people I know in that that field, they like to

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 1>talk because they're board in jail, so it's pretty easy

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>get if you walk in there, they're they're happy to

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>talk to you. The information they got when it was

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>shown to you, I think you looked at them thought

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that it's amazing, but the it hadn't got the structure,

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the academic structure, or the way that they were extracting

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the information. Can you talk us through that, how you

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>came to be working with those guys and what you

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>brought to the table from the information they had.

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Sure they needed what we got an interview, They needed

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 3>a questionnaire so that we collect the data systematically, and

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 3>that that's in my end counter that that doctor Wendy

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Kark tries to do that. It's kind of funny the

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 3>way they do it. But at any rate, we had

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 3>fifty seven pages. It was five sections color coded, and

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 3>it had to do with the crime element itself. They

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:14.800
<v Speaker 3>had to do with the victim. It had a section

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 3>that just was on the forensics, any forensics that were found,

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 3>and last one was on aspects of the crime that

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 3>we were interested in, and so we take all of that. Now.

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 3>What they would do, though, is they would collect all

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 3>of the records that they possibly could, and that's where

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:36.680
<v Speaker 3>there was the advantage. So it wasn't just going in

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:40.280
<v Speaker 3>and doing a cold interview, you know, it was having

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 3>all the information so they knew when they could whether

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 3>he was telling the truth or not because the records

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 3>would have contained that. And then all of that was

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 3>run data, and that's how we came up with the

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:58.839
<v Speaker 3>patterns we call patterns and motives and serial homicide. That

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:01.279
<v Speaker 3>was big question they had. They didn't know what was

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:04.800
<v Speaker 3>the motive in these many of these killings, and we

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 3>determined it had to have a sexual motive, even though

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 3>it didn't look like a sexual crime. So many of

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 3>the myths were or the biases were dispelled there getting

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:18.839
<v Speaker 3>here to go in and even though the victim may

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:22.400
<v Speaker 3>be fully dressed, et cetera, et cetera, we began to

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 3>realize and talking with them afterwards, to make your point

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 3>about what can you learn if in talking with the

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 3>is that they would have the victim dress themselves, they

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 3>would rape, they'd have the victim dressed themselves, and then

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 3>they killed so that it looked like it wouldn't look

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:44.879
<v Speaker 3>like a sexual kitten. And you wouldn't think of that, right.

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:50.919
<v Speaker 3>So that was just one little example of why we

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:53.959
<v Speaker 3>were able to it. But we needed that information from them,

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:56.440
<v Speaker 3>and that was tell me about what you did and

0:35:56.480 --> 0:36:00.439
<v Speaker 3>how it was, and just keep encouraging them to talk

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 3>about it and in a naturalistic way. And they, as

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 3>you said, they like to talk. There would be things

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 3>though that they wouldn't say, they wouldn't reveal, and I

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 3>always wanted and you always knew that had to be

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 3>something very personal, and that's where a lot of the

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 3>trauma stuff was found. When they couldn't about that. They

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 3>could boast about what they did to the victim, and

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 3>they can do, but when you ask them about their

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 3>own life, childhood, growing up. Those were some of the

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 3>very the very acts that they couldn't talk about, and

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:37.320
<v Speaker 3>it usually was going to be something related to some

0:36:37.560 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 3>sexual act that had been done to them.

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting that the sexual side of it that comes

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 1>into comes into the killings. I was investigating serial killer

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:51.399
<v Speaker 1>three children that we've been battling through the courts for

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a very, very long time, three Indigenous children, and part

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:58.359
<v Speaker 1>of the problem was there was an argument that, well,

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 1>how can you link these crimes evidence on one of

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the murders, and my position was that they're linked. The

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 1>children were all known to each other, They're living in

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the same street in a small country town. They disappeared

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>over a five month period. Two of the bodies were

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 1>recovered dumped in a bush track on the outskirts of town.

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>The first victim's clothing that she's wearing at the time

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:23.279
<v Speaker 1>of her disappearance was dumped in the river at the

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 1>end of that dirt road. I'm thinking, yeah, yeah, a

0:37:27.840 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty common sense that this is in a very small

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 1>country town, these crimes are committed by it by one person,

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and I would argue with legal people that would be

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>because we're trying to push the matter through.

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:45.919
<v Speaker 2>The courts and the one stumbling block I had there.

0:37:45.440 --> 0:37:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Was a sixteen year old girl, sixteen year old boy,

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and a four year old girl, and the legal minds

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:54.239
<v Speaker 1>were saying, well, you know, the victims not even the

0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 1>same sex, different age and all that. Sarah yure, she

0:37:57.600 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>looked through it, and when she tells me it's so

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:02.880
<v Speaker 1>common sense, I'm sort of kicking myself. Wire didn't formulate

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 1>this idea to start with. She said that it's a

0:38:05.960 --> 0:38:08.759
<v Speaker 1>serial killer, but killing the end result because he was

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>driven by sex. The person what he was looking for.

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Sixteen year old girl sexually attracted to that lady, the

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:20.400
<v Speaker 1>sixteen year old boy sexually attracted to the girlfriend of

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:22.839
<v Speaker 1>the sixteen year old boy, and the four year old

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 1>girl sexually attracted to the mother of the girl. So

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Sarah broke it down. This person was prepared to kill

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:35.279
<v Speaker 1>for their sexual gratification. And then once I started articulating that,

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:37.759
<v Speaker 1>people started to get it and understand, Okay, this is

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 1>how those crimes are linked. Different ways of looking at things.

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, absolutely yeah, And we would find that, and you

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 3>would when you had I would always ask when you

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:54.680
<v Speaker 3>had multiple victims, is which one did you like for something?

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Which one did you like sexually, which one did you like?

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 3>You know, and you would find some differences there when

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 3>you had when they were all sexually murdered, is there

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:07.400
<v Speaker 3>had been one that really stood out and it was

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 3>fascinating the one that and this one killer he had

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 3>killed ten or eleven and I was really amazed at

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 3>the one that he picked was the most sexually gratifying

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 3>after he killed her. And that what's important is it

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 3>can be in the act of killing. I'm trying to

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:29.799
<v Speaker 3>think if we had any that they would talk about that.

0:39:30.000 --> 0:39:31.960
<v Speaker 3>It was hard to get them to talk about it.

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 3>But that's that's where some of the payoff would be

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:38.440
<v Speaker 3>in learning more about what it meant to kill, what

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:41.279
<v Speaker 3>ultimate question.

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, getting to understand one of the killers over there, Camper.

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:48.360
<v Speaker 3>At Temper, Yeah, yeah.

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 2>Tell us a bit about that.

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>It was portraying the mind Hunter series, and I've read

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:55.799
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit about him. I think it was

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 1>fairly close to the type of personality was tell us

0:39:58.640 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>about those crimes.

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, Kemper always would kill very fast because he didn't

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 3>want the victim to suffer, right, I mean, that's that's

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 3>amazing that you know, figure that one out, and so

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 3>he would kill and then he would do the sex.

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 3>So he was a thataviliac. He'd got more out of

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 3>doing things to the victim after he killed. And I

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 3>would compare him to Monte Rissel, who was just the opposite.

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:28.799
<v Speaker 3>He was a rape murderer. He would rape first and

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:32.440
<v Speaker 3>then kill, whereas Kemper was just the opposite. And that

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:37.839
<v Speaker 3>he now he had he had both domestic murders as

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:44.239
<v Speaker 3>well as stranger murders. He had remember his grandparentsparents. Yeah,

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:47.799
<v Speaker 3>his grandparents were first, and he shoots grandmother in the

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:51.720
<v Speaker 3>back and she turns him back to him to return

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:54.799
<v Speaker 3>to whatever she was doing, and then he waits for

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:59.440
<v Speaker 3>grandfather and claims, well, he knew that he would grandfather

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 3>would be up to see grandmother and dead. Well, I

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 3>suppose that's true, but still there is more to it

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 3>than that. And men who look at who he kills

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 3>last as his mother, and he thought that there would

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 3>be the end, but of course it wasn't, and he

0:41:15.640 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 3>luckily did turn himself in. He's still alive, you know.

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I've watched, I've seen him actually interviewed.

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:25.719
<v Speaker 4>I'm saying I've wanted to kill my mother since i

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 4>was eight years old and I'm not proud of that.

0:41:28.320 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 4>And then a month later I'm up living with my

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:32.879
<v Speaker 4>grandparents in the mountains, and ten months later I murdered them,

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:34.880
<v Speaker 4>and I knew I was paranoid at that moment. I

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 4>knew anybody that came up there and give me a

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:39.320
<v Speaker 4>funny look or fishy eye or quizzical look out of

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:41.319
<v Speaker 4>blowing their brains out thinking they were coming to get me.

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 4>And if had been in a city, I would have

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 4>been a mass murder at age fifteen. I would have

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:47.839
<v Speaker 4>killed until he gunned me down. I wouldn't have been

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:49.320
<v Speaker 4>able to reason my way out of it. I was

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 4>scared to death and I was violent. I felt my

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 4>back hit that wall. I was the rabbit that always ran,

0:41:54.120 --> 0:41:57.760
<v Speaker 4>that always backed away, always burns bridges. Suddenly there weren't anymore,

0:41:57.800 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 4>and my back hit that wall, and I came out

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 4>screaming and kicking and shooting. When more months after I

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:06.560
<v Speaker 4>was out, I was back into the fantasy bag. I

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:10.440
<v Speaker 4>was losing a grasp on something that was too violent

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 4>to keep inside forever. As I'm sitting there with a

0:42:14.040 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 4>severed head in my hand, talking to it or looking

0:42:17.440 --> 0:42:19.759
<v Speaker 4>at it, and I'm about to go crazy, literally I'm

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:23.400
<v Speaker 4>about to go completely flywheel loose and just fall apart.

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:28.239
<v Speaker 4>I say, wow, this is insane, and then I told myself, no,

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:31.320
<v Speaker 4>it isn't. You're saying that, and that makes it not insane.

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:36.960
<v Speaker 1>It's quite chilling, isn't it. But that yes, And that's

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the work that you're looking into and the work that

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you uncover in homicide investigations. What's going on in their mind?

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, they're very bright, that's the problem, is there. Very bright.

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:51.799
<v Speaker 3>He's very articulate. I mean, he could stand up like

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 3>he's giving a lecture.

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:55.759
<v Speaker 2>And you'd be fascinated. Wouldn't you sit there?

0:42:55.800 --> 0:42:57.839
<v Speaker 1>If you stood up there and gave an election, you'd

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:00.000
<v Speaker 1>be sitting there going this is incredible.

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 3>But yes, he's not charming in a psychopathic way, but he's,

0:43:05.520 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 3>as you say, more captivating. Interesting.

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, the way he relays it. What was when

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you first started working I got the scenes with the FBI,

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and probably it would have been difficult for you because

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>we're talking the seventies at this stage when you started

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:26.320
<v Speaker 1>with the FBI started working with the fbies.

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Mainly in the eighties the end of the seventies.

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, there would have been some resistance to even a

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 1>female coming in and a nurse coming in to help

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:39.000
<v Speaker 1>these fbiddes. What type of resistance did you get there?

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:42.800
<v Speaker 3>And part of that I was kind of intrigued with

0:43:42.920 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 3>that is I wasn't a threat. See, oh she's a nurse.

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:48.480
<v Speaker 3>Now you know she doesn't what does she know?

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:48.799
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:51.440
<v Speaker 3>What do women know? So there was I am sure

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:54.200
<v Speaker 3>now that was never said to me, but I am

0:43:54.239 --> 0:43:57.000
<v Speaker 3>sure that was part of it. Now. Bob Wrestler tried

0:43:57.040 --> 0:44:02.360
<v Speaker 3>to get his projects started before a couple of years before,

0:44:02.760 --> 0:44:05.800
<v Speaker 3>and he was shot down in terms of we're investigators.

0:44:06.160 --> 0:44:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Leave the research. We're not research, we're not interested in that.

0:44:09.080 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 3>Leave that to the social work. So he had to

0:44:11.760 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 3>wait until, like I retired, and then it brought it

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:18.000
<v Speaker 3>up again, and this time he had William Webster, who

0:44:18.080 --> 0:44:24.479
<v Speaker 3>was young. He was academically inclined. He wanted to pull

0:44:24.600 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 3>the qualifications of the academy up, so he was very

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 3>much in favor of doing it. But he warned Bob,

0:44:32.239 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 3>he said, don't do any shoe box research and got

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 3>to make the feral look good. Don't do anything to

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:42.360
<v Speaker 3>embarrass us. You know that was always there, as which

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:44.239
<v Speaker 3>you can understand.

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:47.919
<v Speaker 1>I can imagine that's interesting. You picked up that. Yeah,

0:44:48.360 --> 0:44:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and you're saying you're not that you didn't hear them talk.

0:44:50.760 --> 0:44:52.719
<v Speaker 1>I can assure you they would have been talking about you.

0:44:53.000 --> 0:44:54.799
<v Speaker 1>It's a nurse, and they would have been a lot

0:44:54.840 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of comments. There was there's one crime

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:06.239
<v Speaker 1>where people started like there was that slow resistance in

0:45:06.400 --> 0:45:09.319
<v Speaker 1>what could you bring to an investigation, but when it

0:45:09.400 --> 0:45:11.959
<v Speaker 1>was demonstrated. I think there was one particular case where

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:14.319
<v Speaker 1>you show that could be used as an investigative tool,

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Like it's one thing to gather the data and understand

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 1>why these people are in jail. But the naysayers might say, well,

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:22.279
<v Speaker 1>who cares, We've locked them up, let's work on the

0:45:22.280 --> 0:45:25.880
<v Speaker 1>next one. But you demonstrated the skills that you guys

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:29.440
<v Speaker 1>were compiling and the information and the understanding that it

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 1>could be worked in a strategic way. Can you talk

0:45:32.120 --> 0:45:33.879
<v Speaker 1>about that particular case.

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 3>I'll see, well, you under one of the special cases.

0:45:38.080 --> 0:45:40.759
<v Speaker 3>I think that the Jolbert case was a very good

0:45:40.800 --> 0:45:45.440
<v Speaker 3>example of that, and that was the case of young boys.

0:45:45.880 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Two young boys were killed within a matter of three months,

0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 3>and that really terrified the community. These one was the

0:45:52.640 --> 0:45:57.239
<v Speaker 3>son of a military colonel, I think, and they would.

0:45:57.680 --> 0:46:01.439
<v Speaker 3>They were all in the morning, early morning, and that's

0:46:01.520 --> 0:46:05.479
<v Speaker 3>where wrestlers thought, this is somebody that either is coming

0:46:05.520 --> 0:46:08.600
<v Speaker 3>off work that he can he's going out and doing

0:46:08.640 --> 0:46:11.160
<v Speaker 3>this and sure not that match when we finally got hot,

0:46:11.239 --> 0:46:14.920
<v Speaker 3>when they finally identified it. But Russa put the profile

0:46:15.000 --> 0:46:18.360
<v Speaker 3>down almost to a t. He got everything. He said,

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:22.440
<v Speaker 3>this is something. It was out in Nebraska, and he said,

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:25.879
<v Speaker 3>this is going to be someone that is military on

0:46:26.200 --> 0:46:29.200
<v Speaker 3>the air base. They had offered air base was out there,

0:46:29.680 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 3>that he will be an E I think he's an

0:46:31.680 --> 0:46:34.200
<v Speaker 3>E four And that was the only thing he got wrong.

0:46:34.360 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 3>He was an E three, just one level, isn't that amazing?

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:42.840
<v Speaker 3>And that he would do this after he came home

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 3>from work, and he would have also do some work

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:53.759
<v Speaker 3>with young people. He was the junior director of the

0:46:53.920 --> 0:46:59.319
<v Speaker 3>Y of the Boy Scouts. He had murdered that day

0:46:59.719 --> 0:47:02.759
<v Speaker 3>and he went to the evening night with the parature

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:05.360
<v Speaker 3>all there talking about that. I mean, you can imagine

0:47:05.400 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 3>how that played out in his mind. I mean, that

0:47:08.120 --> 0:47:11.520
<v Speaker 3>was very and it was John jo Bert turned out

0:47:11.520 --> 0:47:14.960
<v Speaker 3>to be who the suspect was, and they got him. Luckily,

0:47:15.560 --> 0:47:19.839
<v Speaker 3>they put they used the technique of media. They put

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:22.960
<v Speaker 3>out the profile out there and said anybody that sees

0:47:23.000 --> 0:47:26.440
<v Speaker 3>anything suspicious please let us know. And by golly, there

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:30.000
<v Speaker 3>was a teacher that had watched that and she had

0:47:30.400 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 3>this strange person had had come near her and she

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:37.799
<v Speaker 3>thought was acting suspicious and she uh, she took down

0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:41.400
<v Speaker 3>his license plate number and called then and this is

0:47:41.480 --> 0:47:45.440
<v Speaker 3>it turned out to be. She was one digit shy,

0:47:45.880 --> 0:47:48.600
<v Speaker 3>but it was easy to run through they you know. Anyway,

0:47:48.719 --> 0:47:51.520
<v Speaker 3>that was the John jo Bert case, and they got

0:47:51.600 --> 0:47:54.839
<v Speaker 3>him who was out looking for another victim, and they

0:47:55.120 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 3>he would say he would go out all the time

0:47:58.000 --> 0:48:00.440
<v Speaker 3>just looking for a victim, and if the everything was right,

0:48:01.400 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 3>he would act. So that I think is where they

0:48:07.680 --> 0:48:12.680
<v Speaker 3>combined their strategies of some good detective work but also

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:15.400
<v Speaker 3>led it to some of the things that we were finding.

0:48:16.280 --> 0:48:20.879
<v Speaker 3>And that was a very important case. And then they

0:48:20.920 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 3>founded that that case was Bob would do that back

0:48:24.600 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 3>at Quantico, and one time a detective came up to

0:48:28.120 --> 0:48:30.040
<v Speaker 3>him after class and said, you know, this sounds like

0:48:30.080 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 3>a case that we had that we couldn't solve of

0:48:32.560 --> 0:48:36.040
<v Speaker 3>a young eleven year old boy up in Maine. And

0:48:36.120 --> 0:48:39.239
<v Speaker 3>Bob said, send us the material, and by golly, they

0:48:39.280 --> 0:48:43.359
<v Speaker 3>got it was they solved it with and he confessed,

0:48:44.040 --> 0:48:47.800
<v Speaker 3>so he really had three and he had prior little

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:52.040
<v Speaker 3>encounters with that kind of what we call the practice.

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:56.480
<v Speaker 3>He would ride his bicycle and like try to hit somebody,

0:48:57.080 --> 0:49:01.880
<v Speaker 3>and turned out that he had three other victims. Not murder,

0:49:01.960 --> 0:49:05.720
<v Speaker 3>but three other victims is practice. So that was put together.

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:09.480
<v Speaker 3>What they're going to start off doing something as a

0:49:09.520 --> 0:49:13.120
<v Speaker 3>way and it escalates up and they murder.

0:49:13.320 --> 0:49:18.560
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting and it's another interesting side of understanding the

0:49:18.600 --> 0:49:21.319
<v Speaker 1>crime and understanding because when you're looking back at a

0:49:21.440 --> 0:49:25.080
<v Speaker 1>person's criminal history, there might be a willful obscene exposure

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:30.279
<v Speaker 1>early and then it's a low level sexual assault, just

0:49:30.320 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 1>an assault but with a sexual overtone and then you're

0:49:33.160 --> 0:49:35.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at that history and they're not My take on

0:49:35.880 --> 0:49:38.439
<v Speaker 1>it from a detective point of view was okay, well,

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not rocking their boat anymore. They're not getting the

0:49:41.600 --> 0:49:45.040
<v Speaker 1>enjoyment from that level of crime, and it escalates, escalates

0:49:45.080 --> 0:49:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and gets to the point where the crime becomes more horrific.

0:49:48.719 --> 0:49:51.960
<v Speaker 1>But looking for those type of patterns, I would imagine

0:49:51.960 --> 0:49:54.359
<v Speaker 1>you see those type of patterns when you're looking at

0:49:54.360 --> 0:49:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the ind of the criminal minds. These serial killers like,

0:49:57.040 --> 0:49:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they just there would have to be

0:49:59.440 --> 0:50:02.480
<v Speaker 1>red flag leading up to them committing crimes of that nature.

0:50:02.520 --> 0:50:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Would that be fair to say, that'd.

0:50:04.760 --> 0:50:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Be fair to say. Yeah, Well, Kember even said he

0:50:08.840 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 3>was going to go looking and become what we would

0:50:11.640 --> 0:50:15.080
<v Speaker 3>call a mass shooter if he hadn't stopped that he

0:50:15.160 --> 0:50:18.960
<v Speaker 3>wanted to go and take out more people than just one.

0:50:19.320 --> 0:50:21.080
<v Speaker 3>And that's very scary.

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:26.040
<v Speaker 1>It is scary. Will look like I could hear. I

0:50:26.160 --> 0:50:28.759
<v Speaker 1>know it's it's in the evening over there. I could

0:50:28.800 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 1>keep you here all night, and I promised you a

0:50:30.960 --> 0:50:33.600
<v Speaker 1>certain time we might might take a break here. But

0:50:33.640 --> 0:50:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I just leave with the thought. I was speaking to

0:50:36.760 --> 0:50:39.000
<v Speaker 1>had her on the guests on My Catch Killers, Laura

0:50:39.160 --> 0:50:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Richard's crime and Analysts. Yeah, and she was talking about

0:50:44.080 --> 0:50:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the names that serial killers get.

0:50:45.680 --> 0:50:46.359
<v Speaker 2>And I like Laura.

0:50:46.440 --> 0:50:50.600
<v Speaker 1>She's got a practical sense and she understands the concerns

0:50:50.640 --> 0:50:53.399
<v Speaker 1>when they're stalkers. But she made the point about these

0:50:53.400 --> 0:50:56.440
<v Speaker 1>serial killers, they get names, and we're like it over

0:50:56.960 --> 0:50:59.839
<v Speaker 1>here in this country. We've got the backpacker killer, we've

0:50:59.840 --> 0:51:02.280
<v Speaker 1>got the granny killer. They all seem to get names.

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:05.640
<v Speaker 1>And she suggested that you should certain killers should be

0:51:05.719 --> 0:51:09.040
<v Speaker 1>called the small penis killer or something like that, just

0:51:09.760 --> 0:51:13.640
<v Speaker 1>not to make it, not to give them that grandiosa

0:51:14.040 --> 0:51:18.600
<v Speaker 1>with it, because with yeah, you can you can imagine

0:51:18.640 --> 0:51:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that would have been something Laura said.

0:51:20.600 --> 0:51:24.440
<v Speaker 2>But I understand, yeah, I understand.

0:51:24.080 --> 0:51:27.840
<v Speaker 1>That's where where she's coming from in that the profile

0:51:27.880 --> 0:51:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that they get and it's the police and the police

0:51:30.280 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 1>start working on this type of killer and the media

0:51:33.120 --> 0:51:36.439
<v Speaker 1>get hold of it. When we get back into part two,

0:51:36.520 --> 0:51:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about the use of the media

0:51:38.400 --> 0:51:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and the work that you do and how to use

0:51:40.160 --> 0:51:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the media properly, because I saw in the high profile

0:51:43.520 --> 0:51:47.080
<v Speaker 1>cases over here that the media is a real strategy

0:51:47.160 --> 0:51:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and a real tool, And any time I spoke in

0:51:50.480 --> 0:51:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the media, I was speaking what I believe directly to

0:51:53.880 --> 0:51:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the offender, and that was very strategic in the way

0:51:56.600 --> 0:51:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that you approach it. So we might delve into that

0:51:59.280 --> 0:52:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and quite a few other things if if that's something,

0:52:02.400 --> 0:52:14.759
<v Speaker 1>So we'll take take a short break now, okay, m hm.