Speaker 1: Late Welcome to the Late Bay.
Speaker 2: Well, good evening and thanks for joining us on.
Speaker 3: James Macpherson with Liz Storer and filling in for Caleb
Speaker 3: bond Is Joe Hildebrand. We've got a lot to talk
Speaker 3: about tonight, including the people of Paris planning to defecate
Speaker 3: in their famous river to protest how much money has
Speaker 3: been spent on it for the Olympic Games.
Speaker 2: We'll talk about that crazy story a little later.
Speaker 4: The most French thing ever, Like that's as French as
Speaker 4: if you sort, what's the most.
Speaker 5: You can send to prove how clean and beautiful and
Speaker 5: country are you?
Speaker 6: The latest policy? Your jump of the steps of Parliament.
Speaker 2: So there you go.
Speaker 3: This topic is not for a lot later in the program,
Speaker 3: but these two can't.
Speaker 2: Wait to talk about it.
Speaker 3: So get to what's making news in the papers tomorrow,
Speaker 3: including massive land and housing development on the Gold Coast
Speaker 3: being held up by six koalas, and a government penny
Speaker 3: pinching program turns out to be responsible for a massive
Speaker 3: blackout in Queensland that left half a million homes without power.
Speaker 2: All of that when we get to the papers. But first,
Speaker 2: if you.
Speaker 3: Think China is a security concern for Australia spare a
Speaker 3: thought for the United States. The New York Post has
Speaker 3: just published a report detailing how Chinese entities have brought
Speaker 3: up farmland surrounding nineteen US military bases, including strategic nuclear sites. Now,
Speaker 3: while the Chinese entities make up only about one percent
Speaker 3: of foreign land owners in the United States, it's the
Speaker 3: proximity of these landholdings to military bases that has raised concerns.
Speaker 3: Donald Trump agreed it was a major concern when the
Speaker 3: issue was brought to his attention by doctor Phil recently.
Speaker 1: The red is where Chinese government has funded buying major
Speaker 1: farmland and then superimposed on that are some of our
Speaker 1: most strategic military bases. And you can see we've allowed
Speaker 1: them to come in and buy up agricultural land, wind farms,
Speaker 1: no wind, no blades on some of the towers, but
Speaker 1: they're surrounding our military bases. We've allowed that to take place.
Speaker 2: So, John Liz, it's obviously a massive concern.
Speaker 3: I mean, from those locations you can report and record
Speaker 3: and report military troop movements. They'd make ideal locations to
Speaker 3: launch drones if you wanted to do that.
Speaker 2: And of course there's a lot of talk.
Speaker 3: About Chinese surveillance, whether it's through electric vehicles, whether it's.
Speaker 2: Through computer systems.
Speaker 3: And we might look a little later at what Andrew
Speaker 3: Hasty brought our attention to over the weekend talking about
Speaker 3: wind turbines even used as props for surveillance. So it's
Speaker 3: a massive issue where you've got nineteen military bases effectively
Speaker 3: surrounded by Chinese landholdings that are connected to the Communist Party.
Speaker 7: So many questions. Firstly, what are the Chinese doing.
Speaker 6: Owning that much farmland anywhere?
Speaker 7: Secondly, how hard is it for the government to just
Speaker 7: be like, not near our military bases. We don't want
Speaker 7: to discourage foreign investment. We still want your money, China,
Speaker 7: but not within spittings distance of our military bases.
Speaker 4: And thirdly, how does doctor phil know all this?
Speaker 7: That was my talking at Why are you taking a
Speaker 7: very famous but a psychologist raising this instead of the
Speaker 7: government being like red flag, I.
Speaker 6: Think we've screwed up here.
Speaker 7: How hard is it for the government to say you
Speaker 7: can't buy any land that close to our military bases.
Speaker 7: But then, of course it just reminds me of the
Speaker 7: fact that Port of Darwin is still in CCP's hands.
Speaker 7: Landmark is totally in the CCP's hands. They're the ones
Speaker 7: who have got a hold of it. And not only
Speaker 7: is that an actual port, which is incredibly important in
Speaker 7: any kind of wartime, I mean what wins wars logistics,
Speaker 7: which is why ports are so carefully guarded and very
Speaker 7: much attacked during wartime.
Speaker 6: So they're right on top of it. Our military bases
Speaker 6: are all around the Port of Darwin. For that, we're fine.
Speaker 7: We're fine for it, and even the albert Easy government
Speaker 7: last year when they had their review into it. And
Speaker 7: this actually isn't an elbow bashing because the Morrison government
Speaker 7: had a review into it and decided it was perfectly
Speaker 7: fine as well, because apparently Australia, it's not in our
Speaker 7: national interest to protect our national interests if it means
Speaker 7: upsetting our biggest threat.
Speaker 6: Come again, just for people at.
Speaker 3: Home, we'll put a map up on the screen so
Speaker 3: you can have a look at these US bases and
Speaker 3: the landholdings around them owned by Chinese entities, so you
Speaker 3: can since spread right across the US there and it's.
Speaker 7: So clearly on purpose.
Speaker 3: About some wind farms that had been created by the Chinese,
Speaker 3: but there were turbines without any blades wind farms where
Speaker 3: there is no wind.
Speaker 2: It's quite clear there's an alternative can id of.
Speaker 4: Say, I'm just loving the America show, like I just
Speaker 4: like America is just so completely off the chart, Like
Speaker 4: you've got China that has clearly got an advanced script
Speaker 4: of the next James Bond film and just going, oh,
Speaker 4: what did the villain do in that? Oh, turbine less
Speaker 4: armless wind turbines that we can use to spy on Roswell,
Speaker 4: Like it's just madness. I have no doubt the Chinese
Speaker 4: are up to some nefarious doings. I have no doubt
Speaker 4: the Americans are alive to it and wherever they would
Speaker 4: run all sorts of into yearance to make sure that
Speaker 4: they couldn't get a handle of what's going on. But
Speaker 4: the Chinese are everywhere anyway. I mean, the truth is
Speaker 4: everyone kind of knows what everyone's doing all the time,
Speaker 4: and it's just a matter of how many resources you
Speaker 4: have and how far you are prepared to go. So
Speaker 4: the Chinese, you know, they probably don't need to use,
Speaker 4: you know, the security cameras at the Australian War Memorial
Speaker 4: or offshore wind turbines to find out what we're doing.
Speaker 4: They probably just going through the front door. God knows
Speaker 4: what they've got going on at Kubby Station because they
Speaker 4: bought that a few years ago.
Speaker 3: On that course, you look at America though, I mean
Speaker 3: remember they had those Chinese balloons just going across mainland
Speaker 3: United States as America just looked up and watched and
Speaker 3: Biden refused to do anything about it.
Speaker 2: You've got what's happening with.
Speaker 4: But America would have all sorts of stuff in China
Speaker 4: as well. It could be harder because it's a less
Speaker 4: free sciacity on our side.
Speaker 3: So we're happy, you know, I don't fight on China,
Speaker 3: but for the Chinese to just have free range over
Speaker 3: the United States.
Speaker 2: Then you've got the border issue where you've got.
Speaker 3: Thousands of people pouring into America Chinese.
Speaker 4: I do think there's a lot of Chinese of the studded.
Speaker 2: Border, some of the masks.
Speaker 3: And then you've got other issues that relate to security,
Speaker 3: like the drug issue that Biden has allowed to come
Speaker 3: into the country. You've got crime is out of control.
Speaker 3: But back to the military basis, what the US did do.
Speaker 3: Rather than secure military bases from potential Chinese surveillance, they
Speaker 3: renamed a number of US military bases at a cost
Speaker 3: of thirty nine million dollars because they wanted some to
Speaker 3: be named after black men and women. So you can't
Speaker 3: say that used to paying attention to the military basis
Speaker 3: and racism souls.
Speaker 7: You know, two birds in one. But also that seems
Speaker 7: to be a little more, little more meat on the
Speaker 7: bones regarding this all they're letting millions of illegal aliens
Speaker 7: into America in order to vote. Check out Elon Musk's
Speaker 7: tweet over the weekend he said.
Speaker 6: Another conspiracy turns out to be true.
Speaker 7: Strange that Arizona requires proof of citizenship for state but
Speaker 7: not federal elections, in which he shared we had an
Speaker 7: article talking about how welfare offices and other agencies in
Speaker 7: forty nine US states are providing voter registration forms to
Speaker 7: migrants without requiring proof of CITIZENIP citizenship. I mean, we're
Speaker 7: just watching it happen in real time. People have been
Speaker 7: saying for years that this was the DEM's aim, and
Speaker 7: now here we have it just in black and white.
Speaker 6: It's happening.
Speaker 4: Vote early, vote often. I still don't think it's the
Speaker 4: actual rules, though, I think it's it's not that they're
Speaker 4: allowing it, they're just not being as robust as they
Speaker 4: should with demate.
Speaker 6: They flew them in.
Speaker 7: They literally got caught flying them in.
Speaker 6: Well say, order to let them in, and we I'm.
Speaker 3: There, wasn't something I don't when I legal immigrants go
Speaker 3: into the office they need to go to to get
Speaker 3: their welfare benefits that are provided. They're also being given
Speaker 3: Oh by the way, would you like a voting slip?
Speaker 3: And they're being given that.
Speaker 4: So who's doing this? Then the Arizona.
Speaker 6: Thirty nine states are doing it.
Speaker 4: Arizona is the one they use. So if it's a
Speaker 4: democratic conspiracy, then John McCain's people must be all in
Speaker 4: on it.
Speaker 3: Just before we move off this topic of security, let's
Speaker 3: have a listen to what Andrew Hasty did say about
Speaker 3: the potential for Chinese surveillance to take place through offshore
Speaker 3: wind farms that are being approved in Australia. Have listened.
Speaker 8: China produces the vast majority of the world's wind turbines,
Speaker 8: so that's a good chance quite a few of the
Speaker 8: wind turbines installed will be from China, potentially transforming it
Speaker 8: from a wind zone into a vector for intelligence gathering. Finally,
Speaker 8: we found our neestments two weeks ago that the head
Speaker 8: of the Australian Submarine Agency, Admiral Jonathan Mead, was not
Speaker 8: consulted by Energy Minister Chris Bowen and his department, and moreover,
Speaker 8: the US Navy was not consulted either.
Speaker 3: You've got to wonder what the Americans must be thinking
Speaker 3: of Australia at the moment. They've approved their US nuclear
Speaker 3: subs for our use and we're having a infantile argument
Speaker 3: over the safety of nuclear power.
Speaker 4: We've got only save on submarines, is only save kilometers underwater,
Speaker 4: you know above Brown on the stable land. Anything could
Speaker 4: happen anyway. But yeah, and that's the same the same
Speaker 4: as the Port of Darwin as well, which is why
Speaker 4: we didn't tell the Americans that we were selling that.
Speaker 6: Or nine year whatever it is, to the hiring it out.
Speaker 4: And I believe, if memory serves, Barack Obama got, you know,
Speaker 4: got very passag with Malcolm turmul and say how you
Speaker 4: want to give us a heads up next time you're
Speaker 4: going to sell Because of course it's not just that
Speaker 4: there's a strategic.
Speaker 6: Asset three half a minute where there are.
Speaker 4: Annual joint training exercise between China's not worried about our military.
Speaker 4: Sorry about that spoiler alert. It's worried about the Americans
Speaker 4: and so it can you know. So that is that
Speaker 4: is the strategic advantage of having not just having the
Speaker 4: asset there, but being in proximity to the training exercises
Speaker 4: that come through every year.
Speaker 3: Let's talk about what should happen to these people that
Speaker 3: keep on vandalizing monuments and statues around our country. In
Speaker 3: Hyde Park in Sydney, in the early hours of Sunday morning,
Speaker 3: two people tried to saw off the legs of a
Speaker 3: Captain Cook statue that was situated there. I think we've
Speaker 3: got an image of the foot you can see they
Speaker 3: started to grind through the leg of Captain Cook before
Speaker 3: someone observed and called the police. Now they caught the
Speaker 3: two people who've been denied.
Speaker 2: Bail, so that's a start.
Speaker 3: They were not let out on bail, which is a
Speaker 3: good thing. But this stuff keeps on happening.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and I think it.
Speaker 3: Keeps happening because people know they're going to get led
Speaker 3: off with a slap on the wrist. It's about tom
Speaker 3: we really crack down on these people. They should get
Speaker 3: jail for that.
Speaker 7: Well, so far, no one's been made an example of
Speaker 7: to my knowledge. So the fact that these guys have
Speaker 7: been denied bail, that is something. But let's see what
Speaker 7: they actually get in terms of a material wrap on
Speaker 7: the knuckles that make somebody else think twice.
Speaker 2: I reckon the law.
Speaker 3: Should be changed so that if you vandalize a historical monument,
Speaker 3: in this case allegedly vandalized, it is before the courts.
Speaker 2: But if you.
Speaker 3: Vandalize a historic monument, you should be punished according to
Speaker 3: the traditions of the time in which that statue. Oh,
Speaker 3: I like that person actually lived.
Speaker 2: So if you.
Speaker 3: Vandalize a Captain Cook statue, you're punished according to the
Speaker 3: laws of the seventeen hundreds. I reckon that would give
Speaker 3: people reason to pause before they do this kind of thing.
Speaker 4: But that would mean that they just got transported back here,
Speaker 4: so it'd still be stuck with them. Yeah, I think
Speaker 4: I think a more adjustment. I'm very much an eye
Speaker 4: for an eye tooth to twoth. It's all in the Bible.
Speaker 4: And so if you are caught demolishing a statue or
Speaker 4: a facing statue, you have to replace the statue. So
Speaker 4: you have to stand where the statue was and light
Speaker 4: the buskers at Circular key stand completely still. Well, the
Speaker 4: pigeons are around I don't know seven years or something.
Speaker 4: That was the standard transportation.
Speaker 3: What about those just stop oil protesters who spray orange
Speaker 3: die everywhere? I reckon, if you're convicted of doing that,
Speaker 3: then your home gets sprayed with orange die, so everybody
Speaker 3: knows you're one of those people.
Speaker 4: Yep, okay, or you could just boil them all that.
Speaker 6: You've bought a sprayer already, haven't you. I'm ready to
Speaker 6: go du on orange pain.
Speaker 3: You know. The stupid thing is is that these these
Speaker 3: idiots are encouraged by council members who when this happens,
Speaker 3: council members, we're not encouraging this, but we shouldn't replace
Speaker 3: the statue. We shouldn't repair it. It's too expensive, and
Speaker 3: we know people don't like this. It's just going to
Speaker 3: encourage more bad that is the problem.
Speaker 4: So they know, and I know that if they can
Speaker 4: get it, that's all right. So they know if they
Speaker 4: can get away. And by the way, local councils are
Speaker 4: also a colonial institution, So the councilor the Green's councilor
Speaker 4: who supported that needs to quickly sack herself because otherwise
Speaker 4: she's a colonial oppressor.
Speaker 3: But that's like Lydia Thorpe being in the Senate and
Speaker 3: then riling against the sovereignty of.
Speaker 4: A Starting to see a pattern here, aren't we? Yes,
Speaker 4: absolutely take they take all the privileges and then rail
Speaker 4: against anyone else even daring to acknowledge our history for
Speaker 4: good and bad and that. But that is the problem.
Speaker 4: So they know, all these protesters, all those actives know vandals,
Speaker 4: know that if they can just get away with knocking
Speaker 4: it down, it's never going to go back up. And
Speaker 4: you know, we don't need to go around putting up
Speaker 4: extra statues of Captain Cook now, but it's a really
Speaker 4: important historical marker of who we were back then, what
Speaker 4: society's values were back then, and we should show that.
Speaker 4: And these guys, if they want to just wipe out
Speaker 4: all the history they don't like, they're actually performing this
Speaker 4: really dark or Wellian thing. They're so stupid they don't
Speaker 4: get it, but it's actually going again. They're actually whitewashing
Speaker 4: all the questionable or bad or dodgy things or whatever
Speaker 4: that are in our history, as well as some good things,
Speaker 4: of course, which they wouldn't understand. Into year zero.
Speaker 2: It's like pol Pott and they don't know history anyway.
Speaker 3: Do you think they know that Captain Cook died before
Speaker 3: the first fleet?
Speaker 2: Actually, I'm sure they don't even know that.
Speaker 4: A little bit of strife in Hawaii. Apparently on his
Speaker 4: third voyage he was it wasn't even a captain, by
Speaker 4: the way, when he came out, he was a lieutenant captain.
Speaker 4: He was just called captain because he was in charge
Speaker 4: of a ship. But on his third, third big voyage
Speaker 4: of Discovery went to Hawaii. It was starting to get
Speaker 4: really people think maybe he had like some winstead of
Speaker 4: goat or something. He was getting very crotchety and starting
Speaker 4: to have himself, and he thought he could reason with
Speaker 4: this local chief in Hawaii and bring him back to
Speaker 4: the boat for some negotiations. And all the nats well
Speaker 4: and all the.
Speaker 6: Other whole knife in the neck, wasn't it.
Speaker 4: I think they clubbed him over the head. They probably
Speaker 4: got a few knives in there as well, but they, yeah,
Speaker 4: there was. They all just piled on. They thought they
Speaker 4: thought that he was abducting their king. He thought that
Speaker 4: he was. You know, that the natives were restless, as
Speaker 4: they said said in the old days, and that if
Speaker 4: they could just negotiate and talk to the king, because
Speaker 4: they've been there before heaps of times as well, and
Speaker 4: there was some suggestion that when they were there the
Speaker 4: last time, the locals thought because it happened to coincide
Speaker 4: with some weird prophecy of the gods rocking up at
Speaker 4: a certain point, they thought they thought that these guys
Speaker 4: must be the ghost of their ancestors or some weird
Speaker 4: deities or whatever. And then when Cook came back the
Speaker 4: second time in the same voyage, so he went there,
Speaker 4: the naves were great, everyone's happy, blah blah blahlah blah,
Speaker 4: locals loved hi, blah blah blah. And he goes, yeah,
Speaker 4: I'm Captain Cook, I'm the man. Awesome. He goes off,
Speaker 4: comes back again a couple of weeks later, whenever it was,
Speaker 4: and it's the wrong time of the calendar and something.
Speaker 4: They're oh, no, I definitely, And then he's like, oh
Speaker 4: my god, what's happening quick, Let's talk to the chief.
Speaker 4: Come on, you remember us, we were such good friends
Speaker 4: last time. Come over to the boat. We'll talk away
Speaker 4: from all these people. Now there's taking our chief away.
Speaker 4: And now he's taking actor's stealing acting bash him a death.
Speaker 4: That's how he died.
Speaker 3: The thing about Captain Cook is he was actually a
Speaker 3: great and courageous man.
Speaker 4: I mean, he was a phenomenal navigator. It was an
Speaker 4: absolutely amazing navigator. To these idiots at like.
Speaker 2: One am, two am in the morning and.
Speaker 3: Paris Statue and claim they're we're not.
Speaker 7: Comparing apples with and no one would suggest that we were.
Speaker 6: Well.
Speaker 7: Since October seventh, we have talked at length of the
Speaker 7: atrocious carnage of that day, literally unthinkable to you or I.
Speaker 7: And yet in all of that, what very few people
Speaker 7: had any time.
Speaker 6: To pay attention to was how on earth in such a.
Speaker 7: Massive breach of Israeli territory take place. We know that
Speaker 7: Massad is the most feared intelligence agency in the world.
Speaker 7: We know that that border is arguably the most guarded
Speaker 7: border in the world.
Speaker 6: Israel itself is a fortress.
Speaker 7: It has to run itself that way, otherwise it would
Speaker 7: never have survived for as long as it has.
Speaker 6: The Iron Dome also the most.
Speaker 7: Sophisticated ballistic missile weaponry in the world. Anyone who's been
Speaker 7: to Israel knows, man, you cannot walk for five minutes
Speaker 7: without seeing another idf soldier with arm to the back
Speaker 7: teeth because they are ready twenty four to seven for
Speaker 7: any kind of breach of their national security.
Speaker 6: Well, last week, an article from.
Speaker 7: The Jerusalem Posts reveals that a newly surfaced document has
Speaker 7: revealed that the IDF and Israeli intelligence did, in fact
Speaker 7: have detailed knowledge of Hamasa's plan to raid Israel and
Speaker 7: to kidnap two hundred and fifty people weeks before the
Speaker 7: October seven massacre.
Speaker 6: I read straight from the Jerusalem Post here.
Speaker 7: It says the document, which was compiled in the Gaza Division,
Speaker 7: outlined Hamasa's intentions and was known to top intelligence officials.
Speaker 7: According to a report by can News, the document, titled
Speaker 7: Detailed End to End Raid Training, was distributed on September
Speaker 7: nineteenth and twenty three and described in detail the series
Speaker 7: of exercises conducted by Hamasa's elite units. These exercises included
Speaker 7: raiding military posts and kabuts, kidnapping soldiers and civilians, and
Speaker 7: maintaining the hostages once they were in the Gaza strips.
Speaker 7: So the article goes on to talk about how Israeli
Speaker 7: officers had monitored these exercises. They documented the steps that
Speaker 7: Harmask planned to take once they'd breached the border and
Speaker 7: taken these hostages.
Speaker 6: To me, this makes a lot.
Speaker 7: More sense that they knew, right because ever since that attack.
Speaker 6: I was like, they can't have not know these guys,
Speaker 6: the live streaming, the killing of Jews.
Speaker 7: There is just no way the intelligence age weren't all.
Speaker 4: The question now is at which level of the intellig
Speaker 4: like how far up did this information go? In the
Speaker 4: side reporter is saying the the problem was that for
Speaker 4: some reason this information wasn't process properly and it didn't
Speaker 4: get to senior enough officials to act on it. Now,
Speaker 4: this could be either a true or be an ass
Speaker 4: covering exercise by said senior officials who said, oh well
Speaker 4: I never saw it. These guys must have gathered at all,
Speaker 4: but I never got to me. It seems extremely strange
Speaker 4: that it would have been received and not acted on,
Speaker 4: because I reckon Netanyahu's job is probably now could put
Speaker 4: I reckon He's gone as a result of this.
Speaker 3: All the it's inconceivable that it would have been received
Speaker 3: and not acted on. They've grossly overestimated their own capability.
Speaker 3: I think they also underestimated her Musk. Yeah that's for
Speaker 3: a report, and thought, well, maybe I think.
Speaker 4: They've got these guys aren't capable of such a sophisticated attack.
Speaker 7: No, that is I think that is a ridiculously keen
Speaker 7: anyone who knows anything about how brilliant Israel is at
Speaker 7: this stuff, whether it's masade, whether it's the Iron Doo,
Speaker 7: whether it's the idea crawling all over Israel again because
Speaker 7: they have to for their own survival. The fact that
Speaker 7: they were just like, oh, we just underestimate her musks.
Speaker 6: They take.
Speaker 7: Bullets and and and missiles from those guys every other day,
Speaker 7: so that that is just there.
Speaker 4: But they've never they've never faced something like this before.
Speaker 4: So they thought, and I know, I was in this
Speaker 4: area a year, two year or two ago, and you know,
Speaker 4: and again they thought it was just a matter. And
Speaker 4: this is the problem you fight. The greatest mistake is
Speaker 4: fighting the last war, not the next one. So they
Speaker 4: had all their air raid shelters, they had the iron dime.
Speaker 4: They're working on even new laser technology that was even
Speaker 4: more advanced than what they had already. These guys they
Speaker 4: just throw these you know, cheap homemade rockets or whatever,
Speaker 4: or these crappy conventional rockets that they throw over to
Speaker 4: us our stuff is so much more high TechEd, so
Speaker 4: much better. You know, we can we can smash them.
Speaker 4: And and then how on earth they were confronted by this,
Speaker 4: Whether they just thought no, that's too far fetched, whether
Speaker 4: it never got to the right person, it's just it.
Speaker 6: Was devastating to know that they did.
Speaker 4: Someone head has to roll for this.
Speaker 7: And now the following day there was another headline by
Speaker 7: the Jerusalem Post saying, now everyone is just playing the
Speaker 7: blame game because it trying to find.
Speaker 6: Out who that's right, how how it.
Speaker 7: Gotten and the investigations team is expected to present their
Speaker 7: findings to the Chief of staff within weeks.
Speaker 6: But I mean, how do you look.
Speaker 7: Your people in the face and say this happened on
Speaker 7: our watch, Look.
Speaker 4: To your daughter is dead because and we were told
Speaker 4: it was going to happen, and we didn't think it
Speaker 4: was a credible thing, or we didn't pass it on
Speaker 4: or whatever. And again that's why I think Nenyahu is cactus.
Speaker 4: I don't know Israeli law particularly well, but I imagine if
Speaker 4: this becomes known, there could be a pretty massive.
Speaker 2: Well, it depends action. They could destroy the level of.
Speaker 3: The negligence occurred. The other problem everything though is to
Speaker 3: have this kind of investigation, which is obviously incredibly serious,
Speaker 3: while you're still fighting a war.
Speaker 2: That's right, Yeah, because you don't want to and.
Speaker 7: While your war cabinet has just dissolved itself, that's right.
Speaker 7: So clearly there's some very different opinions that are at
Speaker 7: war within the war cabinet.
Speaker 2: You want a united nation when you're that's right.
Speaker 3: And Israel has internal squabbling, especially in your own defense.
Speaker 4: And long before this, Israel's parliament has been an absolute
Speaker 4: basket case. So what you've had is Netna, who's center
Speaker 4: right liquid party, has been having to go. It's the
Speaker 4: big never gets a majority, but it gets more than
Speaker 4: the others, and it's the only party that can manage
Speaker 4: to form a majority because the rest all over the left,
Speaker 4: the ultra conservative, hard right parties, sort of people who
Speaker 4: just believe in one Israel, no past. They won't have
Speaker 4: anything to do with the other parties, and so the
Speaker 4: Could is prepared to deal with them, is prepared to
Speaker 4: deal with them. Sol Could has to actually go further
Speaker 4: to the right. And Netah has also got prosecution hanging
Speaker 4: over his head, and the only way he's going to
Speaker 4: get out of that little pickle is if he's the
Speaker 4: prime minister. So he's got his own literal life is
Speaker 4: freedom depending on it, and so he's constantly forming all
Speaker 4: these increasingly impossible coalitions. Like when I was in Israel,
Speaker 4: and again this was a year year, almost a year
Speaker 4: and a half before the attacks, they were just having
Speaker 4: constant elections. It was election, not election, not election, not election,
Speaker 4: it was just one election after the other. People were
Speaker 4: thinking of that back then, they united momentarily in the
Speaker 4: wake of October seven and said, right, okay, we know Bibby,
Speaker 4: you know Netnaho is a tough guy. Maybe he's the
Speaker 4: guy we need. And then already the war cabinet is
Speaker 4: falling apart. He doesn't appear to have any strategy post
Speaker 4: actually beating her mass or even knowing what that looks like,
Speaker 4: like what's the benchmark for that, And so people are
Speaker 4: just coming loose. And a friend of mine who came
Speaker 4: back from Israel, you know, a couple of months ago,
Speaker 4: said pretty much everyone there just thinks they're furious that
Speaker 4: they're furious that was to happen, and want to know
Speaker 4: when the failures were. And it's clear now that there's
Speaker 4: no actual objective in place. To there's no endgame. What
Speaker 4: does victory even look like. Nobody knows, so I think
Speaker 4: he's gone.
Speaker 6: Well.
Speaker 3: A couple of years on from the COVID pandemic. It's
Speaker 3: amazing how little reflection there's been, especially in Western nations,
Speaker 3: when you consider not just the lives that were lost,
Speaker 3: but the impolt upon people's lives because of the pandemic response.
Speaker 2: But there started to be some reflection in the US.
Speaker 3: Anthony Feltchi recently was hall before Congress to defend his
Speaker 3: handling of the pandemic, and we learned, for instance, that
Speaker 3: social distancing had no basis in science at all. It
Speaker 3: was just something that he didn't even know where it
Speaker 3: had come from. And then the former head of the CDC,
Speaker 3: Robert Redfield, recently said that he regarded vaccine mandates as
Speaker 3: a terrible mistake because COVID clearly was not a huge
Speaker 3: threat to young people, and he said that the risks
Speaker 3: of vaccine mandates for young people with something that ought
Speaker 3: not to have been pushed upon people.
Speaker 4: Well.
Speaker 3: Some more developments have taken place recently, with both Texas
Speaker 3: and Kansas suing the Piser company alleging that Fireser made
Speaker 3: misleading statements about the vaccine, And now there's been a
Speaker 3: poll in the US that's brought forth some quite extraordinary findings.
Speaker 3: The poll has found that fully a quarter of Americans
Speaker 3: who took the vaccine now regret having done so, and
Speaker 3: a third of Americans believe that the vaccine is a
Speaker 3: cause of deaths that is resulting in excess mortality being
Speaker 3: experienced in many Western nations. It's further reason is why
Speaker 3: in Australia it's outrageous that we don't have a Royal
Speaker 3: commission into the pandemic response. There are clearly a lot
Speaker 3: of questions from a lot of people about so much
Speaker 3: that happened during that period, and here in Australia we
Speaker 3: seem to be just sailing on as if nothing ever happened.
Speaker 3: But easy government want to have an inquiry with a
Speaker 3: pretty much predetermined response because it won't involve any of
Speaker 3: the states who made most of the decisions. At least
Speaker 3: in the US, people are starting, it appears, to ask
Speaker 3: some of the harder questions that it seems don't want
Speaker 3: to be asked here.
Speaker 7: Look, we're never going to get the Royal Commission, I'm
Speaker 7: convinced of that, but you're quite right and asking where
Speaker 7: is the same in Australia. We've seen several attorney generals
Speaker 7: in the States now suing Pfizer, saying you're lied to us, basically,
Speaker 7: and we've got the stats to prove it, We've got
Speaker 7: the documents of your own research to prove it.
Speaker 6: And we're just not.
Speaker 7: Seeing any premiere or certainly any of our federal government
Speaker 7: one to take up this gauntlet, which is just unbelievable
Speaker 7: when you consider last week we were talking about the fact.
Speaker 6: That Texas and Kansas is suing Pfizer.
Speaker 7: The week before that, we're talking about how the Ninth
Speaker 7: Circuit caught in the States had ruled that they mRNA
Speaker 7: vaccine actually wasn't a vaccine by virtue of being mRNA,
Speaker 7: therefore it could never and should never have been mandated.
Speaker 7: And then the week before that, we were talking about
Speaker 7: the astounding study by the Dutch researchers who had looked
Speaker 7: into excess mortality in the Western world, looked at the
Speaker 7: data from forty seven different countries and they reckon, actually,
Speaker 7: we think there's a link here when we're talking about
Speaker 7: excess mortality and this particular I just said.
Speaker 4: We should investigate. I I don't know if I actually
Speaker 4: when as far as I say we think there's a link,
Speaker 4: they just said we should investigate it.
Speaker 5: Well the research then you okay, maybe they did say that,
Speaker 5: but that is sure.
Speaker 4: They said this correlate. They said, this correlates with the
Speaker 4: time that the lockdown end and everyone was vaccinated, and
Speaker 4: we would be derelicting our duty if we didn't investigate
Speaker 4: to see it. I don't think they actually said we
Speaker 4: think there's a link.
Speaker 7: I'm happy if they said, oh, take your point. I
Speaker 7: found the research that they'd done that I was reading
Speaker 7: very very comprehensive, and they went so far as to
Speaker 7: say that previous studies that had been done, which they'd
Speaker 7: all poured over, had drastically understated fatalities as well as
Speaker 7: side effects.
Speaker 6: And they were just like, how much of this has
Speaker 6: slipped through?
Speaker 7: But when you consider that last July, our own Western
Speaker 7: Australian government published data showing that the COVID JAB had
Speaker 7: caused injuries around twenty four times the rate of ordinary
Speaker 7: scheduled vaccines. Isn't that alone enough for someone in the
Speaker 7: WA Parliament to go, I'm fighting for my people. That's
Speaker 7: not okay. You guys told us that this thing was
Speaker 7: one hundred percent safe. We mandated it for our state,
Speaker 7: and now we've picked up on the fact that there
Speaker 7: seems to be a lot more injuries caused by this
Speaker 7: one any.
Speaker 4: I don't know if anyone ever said it was one
Speaker 4: hundred percent SI I said it was much much cipher
Speaker 4: than in COVID, And now that's clear. It's clear, and
Speaker 4: a lot of people.
Speaker 7: So everyone lived through the last four years.
Speaker 2: People were told that it was safe, were told that
Speaker 2: it was safe.
Speaker 4: But again it's important to making discinis percent, you know,
Speaker 4: making a guarantee that there's absolutely no way anything would
Speaker 4: go wrong, which is what one hundred percent is, and
Speaker 4: saying this is actually your best option. It is much better.
Speaker 4: Certainly if you're older, that is much better to have
Speaker 4: this Yews.
Speaker 3: The bigger point, The bigger point is the continuing lack
Speaker 3: of curiosity.
Speaker 4: Right because everyone's because everyone's in it, Like I mean,
Speaker 4: Settle the rev.
Speaker 3: For Bit tried four times before he finally convinced our
Speaker 3: senators maybe we should have an inquiry into excess deaths
Speaker 3: in this country. And after the fourth attempt, when they
Speaker 3: finally agreed and they voted thirty one to thirty.
Speaker 2: In favor of having an inquiry.
Speaker 3: You would think representatives of the Australian people would be curious.
Speaker 3: If there's excess mortalities, maybe we should find out why.
Speaker 3: You know how many days they allowed for the inquiry.
Speaker 3: One day they allowed one day to look into it.
Speaker 3: The lack of curiosity is the thing that really annoys it. Yeah,
Speaker 3: and because there are a lot of our answered questions,
Speaker 3: we don't know a lot that would I couldn't be
Speaker 3: asking the questions and have the right people.
Speaker 4: Even and even during lockdown. And again this is something
Speaker 4: that I was very interested in as well. But there
Speaker 4: are people saying during the lockdown, so you will actually
Speaker 4: cause all you will do is either front end or
Speaker 4: back end load a whole batch of deaths. So you know,
Speaker 4: and again we've san people people, people are not getting
Speaker 4: treated and have things like you know, the fact that
Speaker 4: no one would have an immunity. Anyone with kids at
Speaker 4: the moment knows that everyone is sick all the time
Speaker 4: and it's not going away. It's just one thing after another.
Speaker 4: It's because there's no immunity to the little viruses that
Speaker 4: usually would circulate every winter and everyone would be exposed
Speaker 4: to And so you build that natural immunity, there any
Speaker 4: number of things, you know, the social media, and again
Speaker 4: thousands of kids have just slipped out of the school system,
Speaker 4: you know, kids exposed to neglect and poor health in
Speaker 4: the home because they can't go to school or they're
Speaker 4: not being identified. So it could be I'm convinced that.
Speaker 4: I'm certainly there are excess mortality is I'm convinced there
Speaker 4: was a result of a whole bunch of COVID measures,
Speaker 4: lockdowns and things like that. I'm not sure that it's
Speaker 4: all just due to people getting back.
Speaker 3: When you consider the impact that had on lives, the
Speaker 3: questions need to continue to be asked. Both in the
Speaker 3: United States and in Australia, governments continue to advise that,
Speaker 3: particularly for older people or people with pre existing health conditions,
Speaker 3: the vaccine is the best protection from COVID. Let's move
Speaker 3: on to the UK, where Nigel Farage has thrown a
Speaker 3: cat amongst the pigeons by nominating for the election. Prior
Speaker 3: to his introduction, it was pretty much a foregone conclusion
Speaker 3: that labor would romp it in and they still will.
Speaker 3: But it's now a bit more interesting, isn't it, Liz,
Speaker 3: Because all of a sudden Nigel Farage is making a
Speaker 3: few people nervous, I think with his policies. He's calling
Speaker 3: for net zero to be abolished, for massive crackdowns on immigration,
Speaker 3: for the UK to withdraw from all these globalist organizations.
Speaker 3: And there's no suggestion of the that Farage will win
Speaker 3: an election. He might not even win a seat, and
Speaker 3: yet people are very upset with him.
Speaker 7: No, but in the last three polls, in just four days,
Speaker 7: has his UK Reform Party in second place? Now nowhere
Speaker 7: near Labor. Okay, Labor are going to win the election.
Speaker 7: I bet my two front teeth on it. You can
Speaker 7: quote me on that and claim those teeth and I
Speaker 7: will give them to her if they don't.
Speaker 4: They're very nice teeth.
Speaker 7: By sure, you have overtaken the Tories, the Conservative Party,
Speaker 7: which isn't that conservative, which is why they're on their
Speaker 7: way out, to have overtaken them in leaps.
Speaker 6: And bounds in just a matter of weeks.
Speaker 7: The election, you will remember, is coming up very soon
Speaker 7: on July the sixth, and Reform UK, since Nigel Farage
Speaker 7: has announced he's back in the game, has absolutely savaged
Speaker 7: the polls.
Speaker 6: It is incredible to see.
Speaker 7: So what does the establishment do when they feel un threat. Well,
Speaker 7: it looks like they're going for Russian collusion hopes number two.
Speaker 7: They tried it on on Trump. It worked pretty well
Speaker 7: for them in that election.
Speaker 6: And now the Daily.
Speaker 7: Mail did a front page article saying that Nigel Farage,
Speaker 7: apparently Zelenski himself, said this has been infected by the
Speaker 7: virus of Putinism.
Speaker 6: Do me a favor.
Speaker 7: Here's a clip of Nigel Farage ten years ago on
Speaker 7: the floor of the European Parliament. Have a listen and
Speaker 7: tell me whether you think he's just a spitting facts
Speaker 7: or b whether he's caught the virus of Putinism.
Speaker 9: This EUM par ever, seeking to expand, stated its territorial
Speaker 9: claim on the Ukraine.
Speaker 4: Some years ago.
Speaker 9: Just to make that worse, of course, some NATO members
Speaker 9: said they too would like the Ukraine to join NATO.
Speaker 9: We directly encouraged the uprising in the Ukraine that led
Speaker 9: to the toppling of the president Yanikovich, and that led,
Speaker 9: of course, in turn to Vladimir Putin reacting. And the
Speaker 9: moral of the story is, if you poke the Russian
Speaker 9: bear with a stick, don't be surprised when he reacts. Now,
Speaker 9: just to continue with that today, we are rushing through
Speaker 9: an association agreement an undue speed with the Ukraine, and
Speaker 9: as we speak there are NATO soldiers engaged in military
Speaker 9: exercises in the Ukraine. Have we taken leave of our senses?
Speaker 9: Do we actually want to have a war with Putin?
Speaker 9: Because if we do, we're certainly going about it the
Speaker 9: right way.
Speaker 7: Ten years later, instead of being hailed as a prophet,
Speaker 7: he's now being accused of being an ally of Putin.
Speaker 7: Here he was just yesterday slamming the Daily Mail's article.
Speaker 7: He said the BBC didn't publish it because it knew
Speaker 7: it didn't have any legs.
Speaker 6: To stand on.
Speaker 7: But the Daily Mail is so determined to make this
Speaker 7: a story they're actually the ones colluding with the Kremlin.
Speaker 6: Now have a listen.
Speaker 10: We then get a message this afternoon on the Daily
Speaker 10: Mail who say to us that they, the Daily Mail,
Speaker 10: have been in touch with the Kremlin. Yes, that's right,
Speaker 10: the Daily Mail getting in touch with the Kremlin. And
Speaker 10: they say that someone who works with the Foreign Minister
Speaker 10: Sergey Lavrov described me as an ally and they planned
Speaker 10: this to be the next big story tomorrow. Now they know,
Speaker 10: damn well, I've never been an ally of the administration.
Speaker 10: I very much doubt the quote is even truthful.
Speaker 7: And I'm very much doubt that anyone's going to fall
Speaker 7: for this, not after the Rusian collusion.
Speaker 6: Come out to be.
Speaker 4: That's right, completely evil, evil EU trying to suck Ukraine
Speaker 4: into its evil clause. It's not like the Ukraine has
Speaker 4: actually want to join the EU.
Speaker 6: We what are you.
Speaker 7: Talking about them acchoosing for raj being some.
Speaker 4: First statement twenty fourteen statement he said that EU was
Speaker 4: trying to acquire Ukraine as part of its territorial expansion. True,
Speaker 4: the AU and NATO and is absolute bollocks and the
Speaker 4: Ukraine that wants to be part of these organizations.
Speaker 3: All right, guys, we've got to go to a break,
Speaker 3: so we're gonna have to end that conversation there just
Speaker 3: before we do go to a break. Last week, we
Speaker 3: had a lot of fun answering your questions for the
Speaker 3: new online Sky News series Ask me Anything, And there
Speaker 3: are a few tough questions in there, Liz.
Speaker 2: Like who's going to win the US selection?
Speaker 3: Maybe that wasn't so tough, But also people asked how
Speaker 3: much research we do before this show, which elicited some
Speaker 3: interesting responses. Now, if you haven't yet seen our Ask
Speaker 3: Me Anything segment. You can do so by going onto
Speaker 3: the Sky newsapp or go to sky News dot com
Speaker 3: Dodau and find the segment in the stream Opinion Shows section.
Speaker 3: It's available to subscribers of our app for five dollars
Speaker 3: a month.
Speaker 2: We're going to go to a break.
Speaker 3: When we come back, we'll look what's making news in
Speaker 3: tomorrow's papers that's coming up in just a moment. All right,
Speaker 3: welcome back. Let's take a little what's making news tomorrow
Speaker 3: so you hear it first from us.
Speaker 2: Liz, you've got the Gold Coast bulletin, Yes.
Speaker 7: Where billionaire Bob l is taking it to the Koalas
Speaker 7: he wants to build houses. Let him get on with
Speaker 7: a job, Ladies and gentlemen, Bob gives Feds l Billionaire
Speaker 7: Bob l is blaming six Koalas for holding up a
Speaker 7: huge housing development and thousands of critically needed homes. Quote
Speaker 7: it's a project that could house ten thousand, paper's end.
Speaker 4: Quote.
Speaker 7: Tell you what if it's not the spotted rare tope
Speaker 7: oad or some possum that's just crawled out of a
Speaker 7: hole in the ground that our government thinks is more
Speaker 7: important than solving the housing crisis.
Speaker 6: It's six koalas.
Speaker 7: I mean love koalas, but who among them eat six dinner?
Speaker 6: They are ten houses right now.
Speaker 4: Fealthy, drug addult sex pests. Koalas are absolutely they are
Speaker 4: stoned all day. They chew the leaves symbol and they
Speaker 4: got and they got. They're riddled with chlamydia as well.
Speaker 4: I know that's true. Yeah, next time you give one.
Speaker 2: I don't think about that.
Speaker 3: This particular, this particular plot of land is between I
Speaker 3: think Kumra and pimper Mar, which is a massive growth
Speaker 3: corridor between Brisbane and the Gold coasts. So for them
Speaker 3: in the middle of a housing crisis, not this is
Speaker 3: not seed with this development for the sake of half
Speaker 3: a dozen koalas.
Speaker 4: Like he's identified the six koalas, like he's got the
Speaker 4: actual I meantick pins racist. But to me, they all
Speaker 4: look the same, Like I don't know how he how
Speaker 4: does he tell them about it?
Speaker 2: Literally? Have people who go on these from.
Speaker 4: That they've tagged.
Speaker 2: Them, tag things, tag trees.
Speaker 4: Definitely not just one kohal of moving very quickly.
Speaker 6: They look for it.
Speaker 4: Have you, Like I said, they're drug adult stoners and
Speaker 4: they're filthy sex beets.
Speaker 2: So Joe, you've got the datagraph.
Speaker 4: I certainly do, and we have a big splash in
Speaker 4: the Daily Telegraph. This is why we haven't touched on.
Speaker 4: Maybe a bit too hot to try it. But Dutton's
Speaker 4: powder keg Steven Drill, who I believe is a held
Speaker 4: Sun reporter actually, but the News Corp Metros have got it,
Speaker 4: said exclusive the opposition leader's son and the little white
Speaker 4: bag of trouble. Yes, we don't know what it's a
Speaker 4: white bag of could be anything, could be talcum powder,
Speaker 4: could be a little bit of sugar, you know, like
Speaker 4: to put it in your coffee, or maybe a bit
Speaker 4: of sweet and low if you you know you're trying
Speaker 4: to cut out a bit of a spark gime. I
Speaker 4: carry little sash jays of salt because I like when
Speaker 4: I get my hash brown from the McDonald's drive through,
Speaker 4: it's never quite enough solveds in it, so I get
Speaker 4: I have a nice little bag of salt that I
Speaker 4: put on the hash brown.
Speaker 3: Just as was asked for common and they said this
Speaker 3: is a private matter for the Dutton family, which I
Speaker 3: think is entirely I.
Speaker 4: Think it is. I think maybe all politicians starts to
Speaker 4: be off limits even though it's in the Quantas chairman's lounge.
Speaker 6: That is different.
Speaker 4: Of course it's different. Yes, it's different when it's the
Speaker 4: other side. I forgot say different when.
Speaker 7: It's literally Hello, we all knew that the Labor government
Speaker 7: and Quantas seem to have some sweet deal going too.
Speaker 4: And there was his son enjoying, enjoying, enjoying whatever he
Speaker 4: was enjoying. It didn't come in a little bag.
Speaker 3: I think they're entirely that. Let's go to the front
Speaker 3: page of the Sun in Melbourne vapes.
Speaker 2: Let's talk about that.
Speaker 3: Script flip for vapes reads the headline vapes we made
Speaker 3: available at pharmacies without prescription after the Albanezy government backtracked
Speaker 3: on its plan to ban the commercial sale of e
Speaker 3: cigarette so it could strike.
Speaker 2: A deal with the Greens.
Speaker 3: Two interesting things from that one the Labor government doing
Speaker 3: deals with the Greens. That could be more of that
Speaker 3: when we get to an election result.
Speaker 4: But this will be the only one, Yeah, sure it
Speaker 4: will be.
Speaker 3: But of course, Joe, I know you've got a personal
Speaker 3: interest in this.
Speaker 2: I think.
Speaker 4: I said this was insane because yeah, that's why I
Speaker 4: always have said, make it harder for adults to get
Speaker 4: vabes who virtually all reform smokers as far as I know,
Speaker 4: to get based is insane because this is what more people.
Speaker 4: Every single one of my ex smoker friends is now
Speaker 4: on the vapes and they're doing that instead of smoking,
Speaker 4: and they're far healthier. Unless they're going to grow a
Speaker 4: second head in a couple of years, I don't know,
Speaker 4: but I just want to mark this down.
Speaker 2: So they've made it easier. You don't need a prescription.
Speaker 4: You're still going to go to a chemist, but you
Speaker 4: don't have a tradition, so they can They can provide
Speaker 4: it like they would provide you know, quadri or whatever.
Speaker 4: And wasn't it just a buzzkill when they crack down
Speaker 4: on the good stuff there too? But I would just
Speaker 4: like to mark for posterity ten forty five pm a
Speaker 4: s T on Monday, the twenty fourth of June. This
Speaker 4: is the first time I've ever supported a Greens policy.
Speaker 4: Wow loucket down. Oh except for except for the time
Speaker 4: when I actually was a koala and I was a
Speaker 4: drug adult sex pig. Then I supported quite a few
Speaker 4: of them in my sensible adult dotage. I should point
Speaker 4: out the kick to the Greens they've actually done something.
Speaker 3: Good with Armicists are very unhappy about this because the
Speaker 3: people going to the.
Speaker 7: Oh wow, getting visceral to the front page of the
Speaker 7: Courier Mail now revealed what government did not want you
Speaker 7: to know about energy prices. Jeez, that's a long list.
Speaker 6: Cheap states power failure.
Speaker 7: State government Penny Pinching was responsible for the catastrophic twenty
Speaker 7: twenty one explosion that crippled the Collide Power station, plunging
Speaker 7: half a million homes into darkness and forcing up energy
Speaker 7: prices for all. So it goes on to explain the
Speaker 7: explosion was caused by the failure of a battery backup
Speaker 7: system with the twenty seventeen procurement process for it quote
Speaker 7: flowed from start to finish end quote.
Speaker 6: I love how sooner or.
Speaker 7: Later we all find out every single problem we have
Speaker 7: in our lives is thanks to government ineptitchy.
Speaker 4: I actually once got the best email I ever got.
Speaker 4: It was many many years ago, and I was a
Speaker 4: reporter at the Daily Telegraph and someone sent me as
Speaker 4: a comment said, thanks, Joe, I always know the Telegraph
Speaker 4: is doing its job properly. When I realized that everything
Speaker 4: that's wrong in my life is the fault of the
Speaker 4: state government, even though I live in Queensland.
Speaker 3: The big thing about this story, though, is we're continually told,
Speaker 3: you know, our aging coal fired power stations, they're failing, and.
Speaker 2: It's just this one of these things.
Speaker 3: We're just oh, we don't know why they're failing or
Speaker 3: getting things. And now we find out this explosion, which
Speaker 3: happened in twenty twenty one half a million people lost power,
Speaker 3: was because the replacement art was never fit for purpose.
Speaker 3: It was never going to do the job, but it
Speaker 3: was cheap, and so the government run power station. They
Speaker 3: decided by that because we don't want to spend the
Speaker 3: money and it's not cool ideologically to spend money on
Speaker 3: power stations powered by coal anyway, and.
Speaker 7: They thought for months Cus Energy has bought for months
Speaker 7: to make sure.
Speaker 6: You never found out about this. Well, now you're front
Speaker 6: page buddies.
Speaker 3: Never go to the Australian just quickly. The other story
Speaker 3: that's been making news right across all of the papers
Speaker 3: tomorrow is of course the next Governor General's two hundred
Speaker 3: thousand dollars pay rise, and the fact that it's on
Speaker 3: pretty much every front page tomorrow should be a clue
Speaker 3: to the government.
Speaker 4: Every single national and metro newspaper has this. It is
Speaker 4: completely indefensible. I do not know how anyone thought that
Speaker 4: this was a good idea. I don't know how this
Speaker 4: bill was even introduced in Parliament without someone thinking, you
Speaker 4: know what, I'm going to jump out the window instead.
Speaker 4: It's madness. And look at the headlines.
Speaker 3: I've now got forty three percent to pay rise. Not
Speaker 3: bad gee, you'd be upset if you were the previous
Speaker 3: government to.
Speaker 7: Cut ribbons and hold babies and be in a pile
Speaker 7: of boring photos and no one's ever going to look
Speaker 7: at I mean, it's just a figurehead.
Speaker 4: They should go, They should go and release more detainee
Speaker 4: criminals just to distract from this.
Speaker 2: We're going to go to a break. When we come back.
Speaker 3: You won't believe what the people of Paris have planned
Speaker 3: as a protest against the money spent cleaning up their
Speaker 3: river for the Olympic Games.
Speaker 2: It's coming up in a moment. Welcome back.
Speaker 3: Will Joe Hildebrand tell us about what the Parisians have
Speaker 3: planned as a protest prior to the Olympic Game.
Speaker 4: Thank you very much, James. Yes, the patient man's time
Speaker 4: has always come and This is something I've been trying
Speaker 4: to get onto this show for weeks. You thought I
Speaker 4: was crazy, you thought it was fake news, you thought
Speaker 4: I was making it up. But no, the mayor of
Speaker 4: the French capital of Paris, in case you didn't know,
Speaker 4: has postponed her plunged into the sand that's the river
Speaker 4: there after furious Parisians that's the local population, and threatened
Speaker 4: to defecate in it to protest against the billions being
Speaker 4: spent to clean the same ahead of the Olympics next month.
Speaker 4: So the government wants to spend billions of dollars to
Speaker 4: clean the river, which you think everyone be pretty happy with. No,
Speaker 4: not the Parisians. They're a bit bullshy, and they.
Speaker 5: Say, hey, there, there's been millions of dollars when you
Speaker 5: could be spending it on the cross, aren't And they've
Speaker 5: said we and the mayor and a bunch of people
Speaker 5: were going to swim in it to prove how clean
Speaker 5: it was. And the praiser says, oh no, no, maybe, no, no,
Speaker 5: don't we were defecating it.
Speaker 4: And do you know what they've actually got upot Because
Speaker 4: this is the exact plot of the movie Under Paris.
Speaker 4: Take a look We've got some footage of the very
Speaker 4: very event, and that was the mayor just there. So
Speaker 4: there you go.
Speaker 3: That actually looks preferable to the protest that's planning. Maybe
Speaker 3: a choice between the two, I would swim with the
Speaker 3: sharks lives rather than.
Speaker 7: That.
Speaker 4: Is the car cars that at Paris.
Speaker 7: Rade runners continue to cut down ules cameras. I don't
Speaker 7: know how they pronounce them over there. Basically, these cameras
Speaker 7: are designed they're in London to find people who don't
Speaker 7: have cars that are up to the latest emission standards,
Speaker 7: and therefore they're fined for that, which is restricting freedom
Speaker 7: of movement as well as cranking costs up on.
Speaker 6: The poor, poor people. Right here, they.
Speaker 7: Are taking out the cameras.
Speaker 3: She goes, So that's what people think of those cameras.
Speaker 3: That's it from us tonight. Stick around. Coming right up
Speaker 3: is the Reja Penehy program.