WEBVTT - The Late Debate | 3 January

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>Lately than gentle manner. Welcome to the late debate. Good evening,

0:00:08.080 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the late debates. I'm killed. Richard's with me

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>on the desk tonight, Evelyn Ray and Lucy Zelig. Now

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>we're supposed to be transitioning towards renewable power. Well are

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>we transitioning or why are we just wobbling in an

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>uncertain direction? Also tonight, when there's a lone wolf kind

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of terrors, such as the person that we saw in

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>this horrible event in New Orleans killing fifteen people, how

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>safe are we in Australia and could they be activated

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:37.559
<v Speaker 1>by what's happening in the Middle East? Those stories coming up.

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>But firstly tonight, what are you going to do in

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five? Well, I know one thing for certain

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you'll be doing. You will be voting, possibly in March,

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>but perhaps as early as April, it could be that early.

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>And how are we going to vote? Well, it may

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>depend on whether your twenty third pair of chromosomes are

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>xx or x y. Because we're told men and women

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>are interested in different things. Women more aggrieved about the

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>cost of living than men, and there's a gender split

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 1>on key election issues. Generally, men apparently more in favor

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of nuclear power and more concerned about left wing ideology,

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 1>women more concerned about the cost of living and less

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>inclined to trust governments. So, Lucy, is there a gender

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>split in this election?

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 2>My gosh, who would have thought men and women are different?

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:26.119
<v Speaker 3>Shock me, Kel, this is a revelation.

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 2>What do we do with it? I mean, look, I

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 2>was listening to Caroline de Russo talk about this earlier

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 2>with Danika de Georgio, and I tended to agree with

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 2>her line of thinking in that you know, I know

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 2>that we like to argue, and I guess in many respects.

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Now we're a modern, involved society. The roles have changed

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 2>in the household. I certainly still adopt a very traditional

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 2>role in my household. I'm the one doing the groceries,

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 2>the cooking, the cleaning, and all those sorts of things.

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 2>And my husband is the hunter gatherer, providing for his family.

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 2>God bless him. But you know, I'm the one that's

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:55.919
<v Speaker 2>seeing the daily costs. I'm the one going and seeing

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 2>just how much I'm getting for one hundred dollars, which

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 2>is barely two bags of groceries. I'm the one usually

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 2>seeing the bills come in and all of those sorts

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 2>of things. So and I also think to a agree

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 2>that it's a lot of this fear mongering around nuclear

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 2>that has very much kind of, I guess potentially scared

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 2>women off and they've seen the surface level of it,

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 2>and that's sort of, you know, really gotten to them.

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 2>And when I speak to most women, and a lot

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 2>of them very intelligent, a lot of them in the

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 2>corporate world, et cetera. To be fair to them, a

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of them are as invested in finding out what

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 2>nuclear is all about, right, and the impacts and you know,

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 2>the safety issues surrounding it that existed were you know

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 2>in the days of Fukashima and Chernobyl that we've evolved

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 2>from that that we do have a plant in Lucas Heights,

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 2>for example, that's been running without much issue. So I

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 2>think that those are the key kind of fundamental points

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 2>where we can see a bit of a divide there.

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 2>But I'd encourage most women to have a look at

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 2>nuclear and to really explore a lot around it, and

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 2>you'll understand why very quickly that countries like the United States,

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 2>why they have bipartisan support for something like this, and

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 2>why it is the most reliable and stable form of

0:02:58.280 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 2>energy going forward.

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Research that's been done, Evelyn suggests that the parties neither

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 1>party has got policies that really appeal to women, that

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>both parties are actually failing to reach women voters.

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 4>What do you think, Yeah, it's an interesting one.

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 5>I mean, if you look statistically, women tend to vote

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 5>more left side of politics, and men tend to vote

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:22.639
<v Speaker 5>more right, which is why if you look at American politics, they,

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.959
<v Speaker 5>you know, the Democratic Party, focus so hardly on things

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 5>that they think women are going to like, like abortion

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 5>and those have viv I know that's very true, but

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 5>you know, I think it comes down to like the nature.

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 5>You know, you're not allowed to say this, it's taboo,

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 5>but you know, men and women are different, you know,

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 5>color it's shocking.

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm actually great grateful.

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 5>That we're able to say that live on TV.

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 4>Men and women are different.

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 5>And I think the reason why perhaps women vote more

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 5>left is because we.

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 4>Are by nature more nurturing, more caring.

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 5>So these socialist policies tend to tug at our heartstrings,

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 5>you know, these things like well, we want to make

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 5>everybody not be poor, and that's a noble and moral

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 5>way for us to think. But I think the anchoring

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 5>part is when you get like that you know, voice

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 5>of reason or the reality check that that it doesn't

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 5>actually work out that way in the end. And perhaps, like,

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, it's good that we're having these discussions so

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 5>that women can learn more if they perhaps haven't heard

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 5>about nuclear maybe their circles haven't heard the other side

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 5>or the other opinion. And now that women are more

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 5>aggrieved about the cost of living, which has come out

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 5>of here, they can start having conversations with people outside.

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:39.559
<v Speaker 4>Of you know, their usual talking structures.

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 5>And here, you know, the other side. It's not scary

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 5>being right wing. It's not you know, we're not demons,

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 5>we're not we're not this awful wing all come exactly.

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 5>And so these conversations are really good because I think

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 5>the women vote is so important for policies, and I

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 5>think sadly we've perhaps got it so wrong because we've

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 5>convinced women for such a long time that you know,

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 5>anyone the right basically hates them, which is not true.

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 5>So good, good that this is coming out and hopefully

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 5>change can happen.

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Well, the political wonks are very fond of saying the

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>liberal party has got a women problem, but this research

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>is suggesting, Lucy, both parties have got a women problem.

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there's a failure of politicians to connect

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>generally with women.

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a failure on the voter's part to

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 2>be honest, because, you know, and I asked the.

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 3>Women, Yeah, we'll just on voters in general.

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 2>And I remember asking this question the other day on

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Talkbak radio with two GB and saying, how much do

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 2>you know about the people you're voting for? And this

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 2>applies to both men and women, right. I genuinely believe

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of people that are going to the polls,

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 2>and we had this debate very much so last night

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 2>about whether or not this is going to be a

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 2>referendum on energy and how much the impacts of inflation,

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 2>costs of living, et cetera, will wager into how they

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:54.799
<v Speaker 2>cast their votes come May, if it is May. But ultimately,

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 2>for me, I think it's up to voters to really

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 2>do their research.

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 2>I watched a shocking piece of footage on another program

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 2>a couple of weeks ago in which they were interviewing

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 2>people on the streets of Melbourne and asking them who

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 2>the premiere of the state was oh yeah, and people went,

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 4>They started showing.

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 3>Photographs and the girl that I how old this person?

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 5>We're talking like probably twenties, twenties to thirties, probably late twenties.

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 3>And they showed photographs to this young woman and.

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Can you recognize this person?

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 2>And you know what she said? She goes, she looks

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 2>all right, And I went, what And these are people

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 2>who are going to the polls that are going to

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 2>decide the future.

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 4>Of our country.

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 2>That's why, you know, in America they espoused that view

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 2>of you know, this is one of the most important

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 2>and key elections of our lifetime. I very much feel

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 2>that way about this election for us.

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's our fault. Maybe it's the media. We are

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>not communicating with the right people. Are we letting down

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that If young people don't know, right, if the twenty

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:59.559
<v Speaker 1>year old don't watch Sky News, if they're somewhere along

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the line, they must be getting information, and the old

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:04.799
<v Speaker 1>news sources seem not to be playing that role.

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 5>I think a lot of younger generations kind of follow

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 5>what their parents do, and I know, like, you know,

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 5>my parents not Now I've radicalized.

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>The fifteen year old sode exists to say no, Dad,

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you're wrong. That's what fifteen year olds do all the time.

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>They don't follow their parents all the time.

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.559
<v Speaker 5>But I do think and statistics do show, particularly young women,

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 5>they usually do what their dad does, what their father does.

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 5>And so what our parents of our generation used to

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 5>do was just basically do what our parents did and

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 5>who our parents voted for. And once upon a time,

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 5>you could trust the ABC, you could trust these mainstream

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 5>media things. And I think now that there's been a shift,

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 5>you know, they need to start going outside. I'm not

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 5>telling to be disrespectful to your parents, but look at

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 5>other different news sources like Sky and news like listen

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 5>to us but you and stuff. Yeah, that's right, So

0:07:58.480 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 5>that's an important one.

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's move on to what we will actually be

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:04.679
<v Speaker 1>voting on. And one of the issues is, as Lucy said,

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>energy And at the moment, the big switch is meant

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to be on where there's this transition that is taking

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>us in nice, steady, organized steps from the old coal

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>fired power to renewable power. But is it happening. It's

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Chris Bowen's baby. He's supposed to be organizing this, and

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>every time he talks, he says very confident things, but

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the energy bosses disagree. Today, the energy bosses have called

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>for market certainty, that's what they call it, market certainty.

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>As the nation switches towards renewables. Now they're saying they

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:36.959
<v Speaker 1>want to know what's going to happen, what the plan is,

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and what happens next. Why are they feeling uncertain?

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 2>They've got every right to feel uncertain, kel because Anthony

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Albanezi a lah the Voice, hasn't done a very good

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:50.719
<v Speaker 2>job of explaining what this path to part of me

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.559
<v Speaker 2>to renewable energy is. Actually I'm not sure he knows.

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't, and it's the issue with it.

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 2>And the one of the key things that I took

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 2>from this article that came out via the Australian Tales

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Great Report in response to the Australian CEO Survey twenty

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 2>twenty five, the leading executives warned they were seeing investors

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 2>pull investment from Australia into countries with more stable and

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 2>supportive policies. So what does that mean? Most of the

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 2>top perform economies economies in the world have adopted nuclear

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 2>and very successfully. Right, And what we're seeing here is

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 2>this petulance and this resistant resistance from the Labor Party

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.559
<v Speaker 2>side to acknowledge a they need to lift the moratorium,

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 2>B that we need to have a transparent, educated and

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 2>honest discussion surrounding what the best pathway forward is. We

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 2>know that renewables aren't stable, we know that they're not reliable,

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 2>that they aren't the cheapest form of energy, and that

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 2>we need to start acknowledging these facts. Right. So there's

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot of issues surrounding this, and I think the

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Labor Party, unfortunately have been thrust into a situation now

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 2>where they're being shown for who they are when it

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 2>comes to this, which is very disorganized and incompetent.

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And these are the CEOs who sit in the board

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>rooms and make the decisions about the money that will

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>fund the sources of energy that we have. So them

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>being uncertain, them being unhappy is bad news.

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 4>It certainly is bad news. It's a massive red flag.

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.079
<v Speaker 5>But you know, if something is cheaper, something's more reliable,

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 5>and something's more efficient, newsflash, you don't have to force

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 5>it on people.

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 4>People will willingly go to it.

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 5>But the reality is it isn't cheaper, it isn't more reliable,

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 5>and it isn't efficient. I don't know about people at home.

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 5>I've said this example before, but it's a perfect one.

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 5>We used to have dial up internet and then we

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 5>went to broadband, and now.

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 4>We have starlink. I have starlink.

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 5>I think it's absolutely fabulous, especially because I live in

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 5>the bush and I get perfect internet.

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 4>Long thank you.

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 5>But the thing is, no one had to put a

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 5>gun to my head, or make legislation in the government,

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 5>or make my life a living hell.

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 4>To get me to that point.

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 5>I willingly went to that point because it was better,

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 5>it was more reliable, more efficient, and it was cheaper.

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 3>It's that simple with this debate.

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>And the force that does that is the market force.

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>You put these things on the market and let the

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>market decide what they want to buy and what they

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>want to pay for. But that's not happening in this case.

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Because renewables are so heavily subsidized, we can't tell what

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the market wants, and these CEOs, I assume, can't tell

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>what the market will take because of the huge amount

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of government subsidies floating in this area.

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 2>But this is why, Kelly, you've hit the nail on

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 2>the head. But this is why they're demanding more reliable

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 2>and I guess clearer pathways forward on what this is

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 2>going to actually look like. And unfortunately in Labour's case,

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 2>in particular Chris Bowen's case and his insistence on pushing

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 2>renewables onto the Australian public is that it's putting it's

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 2>putting politics ahead of progress, right, it's not acknowledging that

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 2>we do have another viewpoint, another argument in this debate,

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 2>which is of course nuclear energy. And I guess that

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people have looked at it and you

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 2>know some of their major concerns are around the timeframe, right,

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:54.079
<v Speaker 2>so how quickly will we be able to do this?

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 2>And then it also broadens the scope to the other side,

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 2>the darker side of the argument, which is depending on

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:01.319
<v Speaker 2>who you speak to. I mean I caught up with

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 2>David little Proud from the leader of the Nationals Party,

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 2>and when I put to him why it's important for

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 2>us to remain in that Paris agreement, Why the coalition

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 2>supports the Paris Agreement, given that we have some of

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 2>the cleanest coal in the world, for example, and that

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 2>we know that this time frame, this rush that labor

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 2>really has a sin in the scare mongering that they

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 2>have us in is something that isn't required. Right, we

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 2>can take our time in that transition phase. But he

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 2>pointed out to me and said, look, if we don't

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 2>continue our I guess our partnership in our subscription to

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 2>the Paris Agreement, what we're going to see is an

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 2>increase in tariffs and that's going to hit Australian taxpayers

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 2>hard in their pockets. So there's a lot of kind

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 2>of moving parts to consider in all of this.

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 1>It is, in fact that's the problem. We think if

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll just pull out of the Paris Agreement, which is

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:50.719
<v Speaker 1>what Trump is quite likely to do, or abandon that

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>zero but the way the rest of the world then

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:57.079
<v Speaker 1>reacts may be not good for us. So, as David

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>little Proud was telling Lucy, we have to take our

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 1>steps seat easily while we're talking about what's happening in

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Australia is not quite so serious, but it's still happening.

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>There was a Melbourne couple who drove from Melbourne seventeen

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred kilometers to get up to Barren Bay. They went

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.079
<v Speaker 1>to a beach called Tiagra Tiger was a little bit

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:16.440
<v Speaker 1>north of Byron Bay and they'd heard that it was

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a nude bathing beach, so they went there. They took

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>off their gear, walked onto the beach and people wearing

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 1>swimmers came up to them and said, that doesn't happen

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>here anymore. So the question is, are we becoming a

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>nation of prudes? Nude beaches shut out in the nanny state? Now,

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>what's actually happened in this particular case. It used to

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>be under Barron Bay, a barren Shire council. They said

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 1>it was optional, you didn't have to wear any clothing

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:42.199
<v Speaker 1>on the beach if you didn't want to. That was challenged,

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>it was renewed, but suddenly New South Wales Parks and

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Wildlife discovered they controlled the beach. It was their beach,

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>so they immediately said goes back to being a normal

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>beach where your swimmers. So what do we do about

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>nude beaches? Are we being a nation of prudes? Or

0:13:56.280 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>is this something that we suggest say it's okay these days.

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 5>I'm happy if you want to call me a prude,

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 5>but I think it should be open to everybody. I

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 5>don't think that we should have mid beaches. I happen

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 5>to think that we should have a high public standard.

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 5>You know, they tell the government to stay out of

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 5>the bedroom. Well, I would like the bedroom out of

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 5>public view, thank you very much. If you look at

0:14:20.560 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 5>a particular nude beach Enviarron Bay, I don't know if

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 5>it's the same one as this, but back.

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 4>In twenty seventeen there were.

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Multiple reports about sex pests that were.

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 4>Loitering around these places.

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 5>There was a woman who saw people performing sexual acts,

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 5>you know, and then another group in you know, with

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 5>multiple people, like a group scenario. You had men blocking

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 5>women on the path. I honestly think that the world

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 5>will be better if we had high standards. If you

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 5>reward bad behavior, you get more of it. And I

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 5>think we should as a society have a high standard.

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 5>And I'm more than happy you call me a prude,

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 5>but I think nude beats beaches.

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 4>Should be gone beach okay.

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's why there was a complaint. There was a

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>complain to lude behavior and so they said, you know,

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>stop it being a nude beach, and Buyern Council said no, no, no, no,

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it's still going to be a nude beach. But then

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Parks and While Life said no it won't be. So

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>are we a nation of proof. I mean, as an

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>old family man, I come from a generation that thinks

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>when you make a beach a nude beach, it means

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>families can't go. And so what you're doing is you're

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>not actually creating a beach for people who want to

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>be nudes, you're closing it for families. Am I wrong?

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 2>It's an interesting one because you know, I have traveled

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot in Europe and it's really quite commonplace. It

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been uncommon to and I go completely nude. I'll

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 2>just make that clear. But it's very normal to see

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 2>women kind of walking around topless. I mean, you don't

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 2>necessarily see men completely nude. But it's interesting how we

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 2>have completely kind of different cultural views when it comes

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 2>to this. I completely disagree with any forms of solicitation

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 2>or issues or sex pests floating around. I think once

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 2>that becomes an issue, shut it down. And the other

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 2>school of thought also in this is that you know

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 2>they're public beach is right, So I guess if you

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 2>know that it's a nude beach, you know what you're

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 2>going to be getting when you get there. But is

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 2>it fair to completely shut down a nude beach?

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 5>Actually also to find around nude that's anywhere else.

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's true, But you know, is it completely fair

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 2>to shut down a beach and say, well, no, if

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 2>you don't want to come here nude and be an exhibitionist,

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 2>then you can't come.

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 5>I mean, that's I have a view that if it's

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 5>a nudist beach, I'm not going to be going there.

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm not going to be visiting there. You know, I'm

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 4>not going to be.

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 5>Going on gluing myself on the hard walk shut down

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 5>on the nude beaches.

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>But you want to know ahead of time if that's

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>what you going to be coomed.

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 4>That's right.

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, in a perfect well you're finding very quickly kell.

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 4>Not hard to get.

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't take you long if you go there to

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>work out what's going on. Let's turn to what's happening

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>in the world of employment, which is also changing. We're

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>told that the things that are happening in the world

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of employment will be different in twenty twenty five, and

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that will be different will be diversity,

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>equity and inclusion.

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 5>That's the de Well my band words we did this week.

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, they've said that there's a lot of hype about

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>what's changing in workplaces and this will change. Now a

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies are now saying they're not so much

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:13.159
<v Speaker 1>abandoning diversity, equity inclusion the DEI, but they're going to

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>change the way it operates, some very large companies, so

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 1>they've announced changes to these programs so you won't be

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.440
<v Speaker 1>chosen for a job necessarily on the basis that you're

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the right gender or the right race or whatever. Are

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>they going to really move away from DEI? Do you think, Lucy,

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>or is this just a smoke scheme.

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 2>You're a word smith, and you know all of the

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 2>wonderful cliches that we have, and we discussed this earlier.

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 2>If you polish a turn or put lipstick on a pig,

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 2>it's still a pig, and it's still a turd. I

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 2>don't know that they're necessarily going to move entirely away

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:46.439
<v Speaker 2>from this. It's something that they have created as a

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 2>pillar in an attempt to try and you know, showcase

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 2>to everybody just how virtuous they are. I want the

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 2>person for the job that is rewarded with the job

0:17:57.240 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 2>based on merit, right, That's who I want for the job.

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's really critical and key you know,

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 2>I speak to someone that specializes in government contracts and

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:07.880
<v Speaker 2>she said it's an absolute nightmare for her because she

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 2>has gotten requests where she said, I look down at

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 2>the paperents as well, we're looking for an indigenous engineer. Well,

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, but based on what I mean, there have

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 2>been job adds that again that I saw this week

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 2>that are targeting specifically in people from indigenous communities, right,

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 2>which I think is just it's a total kind of

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.719
<v Speaker 2>sham of a process then, because what you're saying is

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 2>is that we're not valuing the quality and the skill

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 2>sets that someone has in this role, where putting their

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:38.239
<v Speaker 2>ethnicity or their race, their heritage above all else. And

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, we saw DEI was a perfect example at

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:43.760
<v Speaker 2>the assassination attempt, right, those women in the Secret Service

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 2>trying to protect Trump. If that wasn't the most glaring

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 2>and obvious example of why we shouldn't have these things

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:52.440
<v Speaker 2>in place. And I don't know what is well.

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:57.239
<v Speaker 1>The d I apparently gave us Kamala Harris work out

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>terribly well for the Democratic Party or necessarily terribly well

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>for America. It is the case, though, that there are

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 1>big companies Walmart and America as an example Evelyn, where

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>they actually shut down their DEI department. It's gone. It

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 1>does not exist in Walmart anymore. Might it happen?

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 5>Look, I think that, to be honest, they've done such

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 5>a number on people that people would be so scared

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 5>to not do this, especially businesses.

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 4>Like it's like a mob attack.

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 5>If people don't do Dei HighRes, the mob basically comes

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 5>with their pitchforks and their little fires, and you're done.

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 4>But it's interesting. I think EI has been.

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 5>Around a really long time, and I think it's only

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 5>been getting it so much traction recently because everyone's sick

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 5>of the woke stuff.

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 4>But I witnessed DEI in the police. I probably was

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 4>a Dei high.

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 2>I was my job.

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 4>I mean I was eighteen, I had.

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 5>No life experience, but you know what, I was a female, so.

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 4>I probably got in because I'm happy to say that.

0:19:58.720 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 4>And that's the thing.

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 2>I am good at your job too.

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 4>It worked out all right. But you know what's funny.

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 5>You know, It's something that I've noticed is that everybody

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 5>says that DEI hires are fantastic.

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 4>Everybody has to have it.

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 5>But as soon as you say to someone you're a

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 5>dee I hire.

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 4>Oh no, I'm not. And they get offended by it.

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 4>That's very telling.

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>They want to say I got it on.

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 5>Merit exactly, and that's because everybody knows within themselves that

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 5>that's how they should be employed based off that and

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 5>nothing else.

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's turn back to the story which has been dominating

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the news again today, the story of that dreadful attack

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in New Orleans where fifteen people died in a really

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>horrible incident. Now the FBI now telling us it was

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>a man acting alone, it was not a terror cell around.

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 1>And the problem with these lone wolf sort of actors,

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 1>these lone wolf terrorists, they could be terribly hard to find.

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Mike Puzzulo was the head of the Department of Home

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Affairs in Australia and he is warning us now that

0:20:57.040 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>isis will quote exploit Palestinian anger after the New Orleans

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 1>terror attack, So he's warning us to be careful. The

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>terror rating in Australia at the moment is probable. That

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>means over fifty percent. It is more likely than not

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>we will have one of these attacks. And it's these

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>lone wolf factors that it's so hard for the experts

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the intelligence experts, the police intelligence to identify it before

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>they strike, isn't it.

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 2>It certainly is. And it goes back to the conversation

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 2>that we're having on last night's program right about you know,

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:31.919
<v Speaker 2>what can we be doing? Have you certainly agree that

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 2>there's more measures that we could be putting in place

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 2>to prevent these kinds of attacks. But we've always discussed

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 2>very openly and honestly about the catalyst for these attacks

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 2>and what we can attribute them to. And the fact

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 2>of the matter is is that we've imported terrorism into

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 2>our countries. Mass migration across the West, especially in Europe

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 2>for example. I mean, you only have to look at Denmark,

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 2>for example, who has some of the most toughest immigration

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 2>policies in the world. Do you know who's scoffed at them?

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 2>The United Kingdom, Germany and Sweden, by the way, all

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 2>three of them are now in the grips and the

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 2>throes of an immigration a migration crisis, right they don't

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 2>know what to do with the crime. They've got open

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 2>borders in Germany. I mean, it's an absolute circus. So

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 2>the sooner we start admitting to ourselves what the root

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 2>cause of this is and addressing that and recognizing that

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 2>having strong borders in your country isn't a form of racism,

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 2>that it is designed to protect your nation against entities

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 2>that want to enter and espouse hatred for that specific

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:34.360
<v Speaker 2>country and submit allegiance to their own values above Australia's,

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 2>for example.

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 4>Then we'll start to.

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Have an honest conversation around it and a more logical

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:39.640
<v Speaker 2>conversation around it.

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Mike Pozzulo, is, the head of the Department of Home Affairs,

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 1>was a man who was an absolute expert on this

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>when he was in that job, very highly regarded. I'd

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>like to share with you a quote of what he

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>said today in that article. He said, we cannot afford

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to take our eye off al qaeder Isis and their

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>spin off groups. These groups will also look for opportunities

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to exploit sentiment with large Muslim populations in Western countries.

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I tell you what, it was one puzzling me when

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I looked at that Penny Wong has taken a very

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 1>strong pro Palestinian stance. Does that make us any safer

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>or are we still exposed to these attacks?

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 5>Look, I actually have a fairly different take, and I

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 5>think what you know he said is one hundred percent.

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 5>And from my experience in law enforcement, you know, this

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.919
<v Speaker 5>is an opportunity for a lot of things to potentially

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 5>come from this. But I think that we can't just

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 5>blame Isis, and I think it's really important that we

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 5>remember that this problem would have still existed before these

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 5>things happened. There are always opportunistic criminals out there. There

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 5>are always opportunistic people who will, you know, try to

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 5>influence and sway groups of people.

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 4>But what we have to.

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 5>Remember is when you import somebody from another country, you

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 5>don't just import you know, exquisite like spices and different cuisines.

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 5>You import ideas, You import loyalties to their motherland, You

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 5>import ideologies. So regardless of this, I think the problem

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 5>would have still existed. And one thing that I'm really

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 5>worried about is that we're going to get the Palestinian

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 5>protesters who are there to legitimately protest for the rights

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 5>of the innocent Palestinian children, which is tens of thousands

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 5>who are dying in this war.

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 4>You're going to I'm worried that we're going to create.

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 5>A problem where we're going to conflate people who are

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 5>just legitimately from a Palestinian background, who are there and

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 5>we're going to assume because of statements like this, or

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 5>there all must be ISIS terrorists or they all must

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 5>be you know.

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 4>Sympathetic to ISIS.

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:45.400
<v Speaker 5>So what we have to be careful of is while

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 5>this information is true and I've seen it with law enforcement,

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 5>and there will be opportunistic moments from this, we need

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 5>to be very careful to separate the two and be

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 5>very careful not to label everybody who is going to

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 5>be protesting for Palestine as ISIS sympathizers or they've already

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 5>got their foot in the door, because I think there is.

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 4>Loyalty to homeland.

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 5>If you're Palestinian and you're seeing things, of course you're

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 5>going to be on the streets for that. If you're

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 5>from Israel and you're seeing all this stuff, you're going

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 5>to be doing the same thing.

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 4>It's it's in us to do that.

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>So the one thing we can take out of this,

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes some good comes out of evil, is that

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>we're now more aware, and certainly the authorities, the people

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in responsible positions in our country are now more aware

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and will be more alert and will take more care.

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's turn to the question of who owns what In Australia.

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>For a long time, the villains have been the baby Boomers.

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Baby Boomers born nine forty six to nineteen sixty four

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.719
<v Speaker 1>were sought to be thought to be the people who

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 1>bought property cheap, and now they're all millionaires because property

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>has gone up so much in value. They've occupied the

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>positions that have blocked promotion to everyone else. Well, it

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>turns out it's not quite the case anymore. The next

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 1>generation to come along is Generation Next born nineteen sixty

0:25:56.960 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>five to nineteen seventy nine. They are now australa His

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>wealthiest people as the boomer started to retire. This is

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>an new report from KPMG, the huge accounting company. They

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>say the wealth is being transferred from one generation to

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the next generation. I wouldn't be surprised about this. Just

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>seems to me to be a fairly natural progression that happens.

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 2>I agree, and I don't think it's necessarily an accurate

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 2>depiction of what's really going on. Whether you have people

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 2>who are passing away and then leaving that certain property

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:32.199
<v Speaker 2>to members of Gen X, you know, I feel that

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 2>it's not necessarily, as I said, an accurate reflection of

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 2>what's really happening. So ultimately I missed out from all

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 2>of this, but I think about six years so I'm

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 2>not able to share in all of that wealth.

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 4>Share a whole millennial London.

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 2>I've made this point a million times right about my parents.

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:53.360
<v Speaker 2>You know who came to this country. My dad came

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 2>here with eight dollars in his pocket, was able to

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 2>create a very successful company. Doesn't have to worry about money.

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 2>I keep saying to him, Dad, go and spend it.

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm not waiting for them to pass away so that

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 2>I can live. And I think that a lot of

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 2>people are kind of relying very heavily, and sometimes by

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 2>no fault of their own, but relying very heavily on

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 2>that inheritance because of just how difficult the pressures are

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 2>in the cost of living and to enter the housing mind.

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Can I say, if you are a baby boomer, the

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>policy you should adopt his skin ski in spend the

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>kids inheritance. Now, get on with it now. Robbie Williams

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 1>British entertainer, hugely successful, hugely popular, worth about ninety pounds sterling,

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:35.679
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of money. He appeared in Sydney New

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Year's Eve, he's just given a concert in Federation Square

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>in Melbourne, and he was sad, we say, not entirely

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 1>polite at that concert. He's accused. He's attacked his critics

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>who accused him of over promoting his new movie during

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the ABC telecast New Year's e Fireworks, and he did

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 1>he's got a new movie coming out, so he gave

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>it a mention. He said, I am here to sell

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:03.120
<v Speaker 1>my If a movie you twitch, you book Robbie Williams,

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you get Robbie Williams. And he's in the business of

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>selling his movies and selling his records. You're Robin Williams.

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>A Robbie Williams fan.

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't mind him. I didn't have much issue with

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 2>his performance. V I don't know about you. I was okay.

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:15.159
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was a bit tacky when he was

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 2>talking about, you know, his film and all the rest

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 2>of it. But you know, sometimes I don't want to

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 2>get caught up in and we can be guilty of

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 2>this at times of just finding fault with everything. We've

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:26.920
<v Speaker 2>become grenches, like you know, everyone was hammering in for

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.120
<v Speaker 2>what he said and his performances. I tended to find

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 2>it a bit humorous and quite funny, especially his quote

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 2>where he said the menopausal audience I attract. They are

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 2>violent efforts. You never know when they're going to go off.

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is a man ev that's got all

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 2>the money in the world. As Kel mentioned, he can

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 2>do what he likes and say what he likes, and.

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>We would expect him, nevertheless, to show some respect for

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the audience, which hep is not to have done. You

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:52.360
<v Speaker 1>are Robbie Williams fair evalent.

0:28:52.600 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 5>My dad is and he doesn't watch me on the TV,

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 5>which we'll talk about later. But but my dad, so

0:28:58.520 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 5>I grew up listening to him.

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 4>Not huge fan.

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 5>To be honest, if I heard him, I probably wouldn't listen.

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 5>I'd flick the channel or something. But I have no

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 5>problem with him saying this. You know what, I'd probably

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 5>react the same way of annoying menstrual women were.

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 4>Snagging at me for something. I go, I don't really care,

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 4>so no problem from my end.

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Look, if he wants to plug something, that's what he does.

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>He's in the business to earn money. So the movie

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>was actually shot in Melbourne. It's a bioo pick that

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>tells the story of his life and if you get

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>if you're in that position and you get an opportunity

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to plug your movie or your book, or your new

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:32.920
<v Speaker 1>CD or your new album, whatever it is, then you

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 1>do it. I mean, I've had a new book come

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>out and every time I appear in the program, I'm

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>holding up the cover and flogging the book like crazy.

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 1>It's what do you do?

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 2>And again we have to be able to laugh at ourselves.

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 2>The only thing I will say is don't miss with

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 2>a woman and her allmans and I know what.

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not safe now as Australia is going to has

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>already been the legislation's past Parliament access to the social

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>media for under sixteen year olds as a model for

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the world, but the world following talk about that next

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the social media story at a moment, but first in Britain,

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a call for a national inquiry into child sexual exploitation.

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>The request has been rejected by the Starma Labor government.

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Despite a long and ugly history of young girls being

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>groomed and raped by gangs of mostly Pakistani Muslim men

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in cities across the North of England, abuse that was

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>ignored for years by authorities who feared being labeled racist.

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>One estimate says that in Rotherham alone, something like one thousand,

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>four hundred young girls were abused over a sixteen year period.

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's just one of a number of cities, mostly

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>in the North, where the police and the care services

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>are accused of serious failings. Now Evelyn Elon Musk has

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>now brought into this debate. What's he had to say?

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's interesting he actually tweeted free Tommy Robinson and

0:30:56.560 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 5>then underneath that tweet he's attached a documentary. Now, this

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 5>documentary was one that Tommy Robinson released which basically gets

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 5>into the nuts and bolts of this particular type of

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 5>crime that is rampant across the UK at the moment.

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 4>Tommy Robinson is now.

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 5>In prison because part of him releasing this documentary was

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 5>him being in breach of court orders. The police told

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 5>him to not post this he would be in breach

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 5>and he posted it. This is kind of what has

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 5>flared this situation up. So Originally in twenty twenty two,

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 5>an independent inquiry was made into this type of thing.

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 5>Now from that there are about twenty recommendations that were given.

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 5>Now as a result of that, people are saying it's

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 5>not good enough. Because nothing has happened since this independent

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 5>inquiry and so they've tried to resurface it again. Now

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 5>as a result of this, you have absolute online outrage

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 5>at just the information that is coming ahead. We also

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 5>have Kemy Badnock, who was called for a national inquiry

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 5>and she has come out and said that she wants

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 5>an inquiry into the grooming scandal that took place across

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 5>the UK towns and cities, arguing that one was long

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 5>over due. So she's come out and said that, which

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 5>is massive, which is really good, which hopefully.

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 4>Will get things happening.

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 5>But I just wanted to go through some of the

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 5>information that has come out as a result of this,

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 5>because it's amazing the CEO what the owner of Twitter

0:32:24.720 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 5>can do, because it took someone of that magnitude to

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 5>just put a comment on this issue for it to

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 5>go viral across the world and stories have been flooding in.

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 5>And one story is that it's actually close to over

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 5>two one hundred and fifty thousand white girls over the

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 5>last twenty years, and that's what we know of that

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 5>have been involved in these grooming rape cases. To just

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 5>let that sink in, over two hundred and fifty thousand

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 5>that we know of. There is a story of a

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:01.479
<v Speaker 5>thirteen year old girl who was arrested for being drunk

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 5>in an apartment with seven Pakistani adult men. Now how

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 5>this came about is a neighbor heard a scream. Police

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 5>have attended and upon attending found a nearly naked thirteen

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 5>year old girl at the scene who was drunk. She

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 5>was arrested and she was found guilty in court. But

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 5>the worst part about this, and what everybody is saying,

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 5>is that every time this is spoken about, is that

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:28.719
<v Speaker 5>their feared being called a racist.

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 4>There was a girl by the name of Samantha Smith.

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 4>She went on gb.

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 5>News okay, and she spoke about the gangs in Telford

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 5>over there, and the next day police attended her address

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 5>and knocked on her door and intimidated her.

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 4>To stop talking about it.

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 5>There was also an MP who shared a tweet basically

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:49.479
<v Speaker 5>saying these girls in Rodin should shut up and that

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 5>they should shut their mouths because of racism.

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>On the top of all of those stories, the thing

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that is really staggering, Lucy, is that the Starma government

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 1>won't act, won't actually say let's have a national inquiry

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and a child sexual exploitation. That's hard to understand, isn't it?

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 2>For what reason?

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Kel?

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, when you hear a story like this, and

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 2>if this is the first time, apologies viewers, because it

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 2>is very confronting. But if this is the first time

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 2>that you're hearing this, it will be incredibly shocking and

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 2>off the back of that when you put it into

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 2>the context of the entire story, and then you've got

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 2>someone like who's very bright, by the way, I love

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 2>her very much, Chemi badnock and very strong when I host.

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Can I just say for people who don't know, she's

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the leader of the opposition, correct, the leader of the

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Conservative Party, So that's who we're talking about, that's.

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, and she was appointed last year the head of

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 2>the Tories. You know, when you see issues like this

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 2>come about and you see government resistance to launching an

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 2>inquiry into this to get to the root cause of it,

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 2>to get to the bottom of why there was this

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:52.359
<v Speaker 2>systemic failure from authorities to act in this regard. I mean,

0:34:52.520 --> 0:34:54.279
<v Speaker 2>a thirteen year old girl in an apartment, of.

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 5>These Sathers who were arrested, who tried to take their

0:34:57.160 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 5>children back, I.

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Just I feel sick at the thought of this. This

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 2>is disgusting. Our children are our most vulnerable and they

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 2>are the most worthy of the greatest protections that we

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 2>have to offer them. This has been a catastrophic failure.

0:35:08.880 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 2>It's a huge scandal. It's probably why they don't want

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 2>to launch an inquirity into it, because they feel as

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:17.879
<v Speaker 2>though it's going to make them look like failures and

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:18.319
<v Speaker 2>they are.

0:35:18.560 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Some of the people who did this have been caught.

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 1>By my account, there's something like fifty nine men in

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Rotherham who have been charged with mostly with multiple offenses.

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>They're now in prison. They're serving a total jail time

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 1>of two hundred and nineteen years. So there's a sense

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 1>in which the people who did it have been caught.

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 1>It's the people who covered it up and who ignored

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 1>it that's the worry, isn't it.

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 5>Everly, it's certainly a worry when you have law enforcement,

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:44.120
<v Speaker 5>the people who are supposed to protect you from this

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 5>basically saying that, you know what, I've deem racism as

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 5>a bigger threat than the threat of being ganged rape.

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 4>That's very dangerous, and that's.

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 2>Instead of being a racist there they are of doing

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:57.359
<v Speaker 2>their jobs, and that's right.

0:35:57.560 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Young girls.

0:35:58.280 --> 0:35:59.800
<v Speaker 4>Shame on all of you exactly.

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 5>The fact that fathers who are trying to intervene were

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 5>arrested as well, Like, it's astronomical, the outleabit interestingly, and

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 5>I'm making no suggestion here, but there are lots of

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 5>people online who are sort of saying that the reason

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 5>why this wasn't dealt with properly is because who was

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 5>in power during these years, who was in charge of

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:28.280
<v Speaker 5>the public the prosecution department. It is, it's a snowball,

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 5>and to be honest, I think they're afraid of what's

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 5>going to be at the end of that, which is

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:36.759
<v Speaker 5>why there's so much censorship around it. But coming from

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:39.800
<v Speaker 5>law enforcement, and I worked in child sex crimes as well,

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 5>it's I feel like this is the tip of the

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:44.920
<v Speaker 5>iceberg and that's what terrifies me the most and needs

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 5>an inquiry.

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, now you know what's going on, you've heard of

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in Britain. I mean, you could be part

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:53.479
<v Speaker 1>of it by going online and simply if you want

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:56.359
<v Speaker 1>make your voways heard as well. And at least there

0:36:56.360 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 1>are people now calling, such as the leader of the Opposition,

0:36:59.080 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Andy laud Musk, calling for that full National Public Enquiry.

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:05.839
<v Speaker 1>How long can that be resisted? We'll see. Let's move

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>back to the subject of social media, because that's where

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 1>all of the news about this case is being spread.

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 1>At the moment. Social media in Australia is now not

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 1>open to anyone under the age of sixteen. Well, the

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 1>law doesn't come into effect for a while, but the

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>law has been passed by our federal Parliament and when

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:23.279
<v Speaker 1>it was past we were told this, we're leading the

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 1>world in this. This is the model for the world.

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 1>The world will follow, But it appears the world is

0:37:28.160 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 1>not following. Let me tell you about Peter Kyle. He

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:34.880
<v Speaker 1>is the UK's Technology Secretary and he has abandoned any

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 1>plans to introduce social media age bands. He's looked at

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>our legislation, He's looked at our plans and he said,

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 1>not for us just yet. Why the hesitation do you

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:45.320
<v Speaker 1>think losing?

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:47.279
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, and I get the sense that the

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:50.320
<v Speaker 2>panel has a different view to mine when it comes

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 2>to this. I know that there was certainly a lot

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:56.320
<v Speaker 2>of issues, concerns and questions raised around the Albanese government's

0:37:56.360 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 2>intention to move forward with this particular legislation. In our Australia,

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 2>but it did have bipartisan support. Peter Dutton and the

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:07.319
<v Speaker 2>Coalition supported his decision. Where I start to kind of

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 2>lend my feelings in all of this too, is when

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:13.799
<v Speaker 2>you hear things like and we've seen such a rise

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 2>in it, but the most recent case where a mother

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:20.800
<v Speaker 2>in Townsville admitted and revealed with everybody overnight that her daughter,

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Addielle Boyd, a twelve year old, beautiful twelve year old girl,

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 2>took her own life over cyberbullying. And it's a really

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:30.640
<v Speaker 2>difficult conversation to have because I'm a parent and I've

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 2>got a daughter, and I often wonder about what this

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 2>young girl might have been exposed to and what our

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:40.320
<v Speaker 2>young children are being exposed to in the deep dark web.

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, my children have on occasion just watched a

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 2>YouTube video and it's gone on and on and on

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 2>into another area and I've only overheard it because I've

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 2>been in the kitchen or something and there's been swearing,

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.880
<v Speaker 2>there's been violence. There's been videos that as you go

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 2>down the rabbit hole that have emerged that I've gone,

0:38:55.640 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 2>this is entirely inappropriate for my daughter to be watching.

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 2>So I got rid of it. So there's the school

0:39:00.560 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 2>of thought where you say, as the parent, I did

0:39:03.160 --> 0:39:05.240
<v Speaker 2>the right thing, and it's up to me to censor

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 2>my child from what I deem to be inappropriate for her.

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:10.799
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, I think that when you

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 2>allow your child to have access to social media and

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 2>to all of these platforms, I think it's a big

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 2>risk and I personally will not be allowing my child

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:22.479
<v Speaker 2>legislation or not to have any form of social media

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 2>until they come And that's the point.

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:26.760
<v Speaker 1>It's the responsibility of parents to make these decision.

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 2>But mquel it helps having that line where because I

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:31.759
<v Speaker 2>know and a lot of other parents have complained of

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 2>the same issue that have had the similar stance to mine,

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:36.759
<v Speaker 2>where they've said, it's all well and good for us

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:38.280
<v Speaker 2>to have this view, but then they go to school

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 2>and other parents don't have that view other parents, and

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:43.399
<v Speaker 2>then that's easy for you to then turn around and say, well,

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 2>that's the rule in our house. But then what that

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 2>creates is an environment where your kids start going behind

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:50.279
<v Speaker 2>your back and being sneaky. I don't want to have

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 2>that issue, And at the end of the day, what

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 2>it does is act as a safety in it where

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 2>you can say it's illegal, you can't have it, and

0:39:57.560 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 2>that's the end of the conversation.

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:01.239
<v Speaker 1>So the problem is kids are kids, and we know

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 1>what kids can do, and you tell them you can't

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:05.719
<v Speaker 1>do that, and that's like a red ragtua bull. And

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 1>the argument has been it will be unworkable. It will

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 1>be unworkable because it will be unenforceable. I mean, kids

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 1>will tell lies about what their age is when they

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 1>go on to websites, and the kids who don't tell

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>lies will know friends at school who do tell lies,

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and so they've got it on there iPad. It's really

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:25.840
<v Speaker 1>hard to see how it's going to work in practice,

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:28.359
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, I don't think the Obelize government has

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 1>worked out how it's going to work in practice.

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 5>I think they've made some suggestions how they're going to

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:34.839
<v Speaker 5>put this into practice, which is what's the scary part

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 5>about it.

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:36.919
<v Speaker 4>I agree with everything that Lucy said.

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:40.040
<v Speaker 5>I think that social media should be banned from children.

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 5>I think that, you know, it's just.

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 4>Law or not. That's a rule that will be in

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:46.400
<v Speaker 4>my house as well.

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 5>But I don't for one second think that they care

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 5>about the kids. And I'm sorry, I care about the kids.

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 5>I know everybody here does, and I'm sure most of

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:57.960
<v Speaker 5>you at home do. I do not for a second

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 5>think that any of this legislation is about the kids.

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 5>I think that it's the trojan horse every tyrants, every

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 5>tyrant comes digitized dressed as a hero. That's what happens.

0:41:10.200 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 5>And I think that if you look three years before

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:14.360
<v Speaker 5>they tried to do this in Australia, they tried to

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:16.399
<v Speaker 5>do it to adults. They tried to make adults upload

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:19.359
<v Speaker 5>one hundred points of ID for their social media.

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 4>It got absolutely blasted.

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 5>And fair enough, and fast forward three years and they're.

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 4>Like, Okay, we'll do it through the kids.

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 5>Because if anyone at home says I don't want this legislation,

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 5>it looks like you must hate the children. And that's

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:34.879
<v Speaker 5>exactly what they want you to think. But how they

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 5>enforce this, kel like you said, is through digital ID, is.

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:39.280
<v Speaker 4>Through the parents.

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 5>Who's like, who's going to do this and doesn't even

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:44.359
<v Speaker 5>say he wants facial ID to do for this.

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 4>So, you know what, I think that social media is bad.

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:48.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm all for education.

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:52.399
<v Speaker 5>I'm all for you know, getting it out there why

0:41:52.440 --> 0:41:56.480
<v Speaker 5>it's so bad, and perhaps educating schools and parents in

0:41:56.560 --> 0:41:59.040
<v Speaker 5>how to do this. That's great, that's fine. I'm not

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 5>for legislationating it. That's the family sphere is for mum

0:42:03.080 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 5>and dad.

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 1>You're not studying. Don't give me the answer. Okay, this

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 1>is Kel's answer. I'm quite appointed that Dutton and the

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Liberals decided to back this legislation because I think it

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:15.640
<v Speaker 1>is unworkable. There's a better way to go. What you

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:17.800
<v Speaker 1>what they should have done is to make it illegal

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to sell a smartphone to anyone under the age of sixteen,

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:25.360
<v Speaker 1>or for anyone under the age of to own smartphones.

0:42:25.560 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>The reason why that's fun to hang on. I know,

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I know you. I was talking when you were interrupting it.

0:42:31.160 --> 0:42:33.680
<v Speaker 1>That's very root of me. So I shouldn't do that.

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 1>But what the model is is we don't allow kids

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to buy cigarettes, so we say kids can't buy smartphones.

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:45.359
<v Speaker 1>They buy dumb phones. Dumb phones mean they can send

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:47.759
<v Speaker 1>texts to their friends, they can be contacted by mum

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and dad if they need to be, but they can't

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:52.880
<v Speaker 1>get onto the web. There's no little screen there on

0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:55.279
<v Speaker 1>the dumb phones. Now, if you passed the law about

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:57.799
<v Speaker 1>legislation that said we're classifying dumb phones and being like

0:42:58.040 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 1>alcohol like cigarettes, people under sixteen can't have them. It

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:03.799
<v Speaker 1>seems to be that might actually be workable and might

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>be enforceable, where I can't see how this is enforceable.

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:07.279
<v Speaker 1>You see the.

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:10.319
<v Speaker 2>Point, But you've just it's another problem, right, It's you're

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 2>putting down one mole on the mountain and then another

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:13.799
<v Speaker 2>one's popping up.

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Let me know that we have a model when the

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:20.800
<v Speaker 1>model is the model is how we deal with cigarettes

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a right, it's.

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Like prohibition, and we've seen what's happening with vapes. They're

0:43:25.120 --> 0:43:26.840
<v Speaker 2>still going to be able to access them. A black

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:28.759
<v Speaker 2>market's going to pop up. I'm just saying that it's

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:32.839
<v Speaker 2>another problem having yourself in another area. The only point

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 2>I'll make is, you know, we're saying that it's unworkable

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 2>and that we're just going to get kids who are

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 2>going to access phones and whatever else. Maybe in the

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:40.439
<v Speaker 2>short term, right, maybe in the short term you'll see

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 2>that it will be really difficult to convince the kids

0:43:42.640 --> 0:43:44.279
<v Speaker 2>that have either had it or on the cusp of

0:43:44.320 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 2>having it, that are excited about having it, and maybe

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:48.640
<v Speaker 2>they'll do the things under the table. And that's where

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:50.680
<v Speaker 2>as a parent you kind of have that responsibility to

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:54.400
<v Speaker 2>really pull them through that transition phase. But the longer

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:58.040
<v Speaker 2>this legislation sticks, the longer it goes that, you know,

0:43:58.080 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 2>the quicker than it will, I guess, become normal a

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:03.800
<v Speaker 2>part of the status quo. I agree with your points

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 2>about how challenging it's going to be to put it

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:09.440
<v Speaker 2>into practice, and how you know it's not going to

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:11.440
<v Speaker 2>be as workable as we would like it to be,

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:15.399
<v Speaker 2>and that that rests with Anthony Albansi. But to have

0:44:15.440 --> 0:44:17.759
<v Speaker 2>that safety and that comfort and that ability to be

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:19.920
<v Speaker 2>able to say to my kids, guess what, it's illegal.

0:44:20.160 --> 0:44:22.239
<v Speaker 5>So that's what I don't like, because I don't want

0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:25.360
<v Speaker 5>to normalize the fact that the government have more power

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:27.879
<v Speaker 5>or end authority over my kids than mom and dad.

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Can you said that you don't want them to have

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 3>it anyway?

0:44:32.560 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Say it doesn't reassure me when you say it rests

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 1>with Anthony Albersi for some reason that is true.

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 4>We can all agree on that kel.

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Very quickly before we go. Barcodes are about to change.

0:44:43.080 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 1>We've had barcodes on products since nineteen seventy four, and

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:48.759
<v Speaker 1>they're about to upgrade them to I suppose barcodes two

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:51.920
<v Speaker 1>point zero, and they could be useful to us, so

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that if you've got a barcode in a shop, then

0:44:54.520 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you put your phone over it and it works like

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:58.800
<v Speaker 1>a QR code and it will tell you things about

0:44:58.800 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the products. Is it a or it's just another part

0:45:01.560 --> 0:45:02.399
<v Speaker 1>of the conspiracy.

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 4>It is definitely another part of the conspiracy. I'm sorry, sorry,

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:06.520
<v Speaker 4>but it's true.

0:45:06.760 --> 0:45:08.359
<v Speaker 5>Look, if you look at the fine print of all

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 5>of this, you're basically going from what looks like a

0:45:11.160 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 5>normal barcode to what looks similar to a QR code

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:16.840
<v Speaker 5>and what that does. You can have a lot more information.

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:19.760
<v Speaker 5>You can only have about twenty five to forty characters

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:21.200
<v Speaker 5>for the old barcodes.

0:45:21.239 --> 0:45:22.720
<v Speaker 4>This can be up to seven thousand.

0:45:23.239 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 5>How they're selling it the trojan horse, I'm going to

0:45:25.520 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 5>use that one trojan horse here is basically that you know,

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:31.440
<v Speaker 5>we can tell you what allergy is there, we can

0:45:31.480 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 5>basically tell you whether it's off or not. We can

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 5>do stock take, we can do this. But if you

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:38.879
<v Speaker 5>look at the fine print, it's about climate. They've said

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:41.959
<v Speaker 5>that you can monitor climate footprints and all these things

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:42.600
<v Speaker 5>only have.

0:45:42.560 --> 0:45:43.440
<v Speaker 4>To go to Europe.

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:46.319
<v Speaker 5>Look at Europe how they've done carbon footprints, how it's

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:48.759
<v Speaker 5>bumped up prices of certain food depending on that.

0:45:49.239 --> 0:45:50.840
<v Speaker 4>I think that's where this is headed.

0:45:51.200 --> 0:45:54.239
<v Speaker 5>And I'm all for it being innovative, but I think

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 5>this is going to head in a wrong case for

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:56.200
<v Speaker 5>our meat.

0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:02.319
<v Speaker 2>I'm a farmer, I'm right, how's farting all the emissions?

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 2>We're in big trouble here.

0:46:03.600 --> 0:46:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Everybody a red meat or not. The fact is this

0:46:06.200 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 1>is going this. We've got no control over this. If

0:46:08.120 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 1>they decide they go to change the barcodes into these

0:46:10.320 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 1>QR codes, they will. It's going to happen after the break.

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Billionaire Clive Palmer is applying for trademarks on some very

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:25.680
<v Speaker 1>odd themes. Tenuine a tip. Billionaire Clive Palmer has applied

0:46:25.719 --> 0:46:29.960
<v Speaker 1>for copyrights patents on the word teal, which is the

0:46:30.040 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 1>name of the color which is the brand of the

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Climber two hundred group, and also on a party that

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 1>he wants to call the Clive and Pauline Party, apparently

0:46:39.400 --> 0:46:43.080
<v Speaker 1>without asking Pauline Hanson's permission first. They're very odd things

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to get trademarks on. What on earth is he up to?

0:46:47.640 --> 0:46:50.239
<v Speaker 2>I don't think anyone could answer that him and he's billionaires.

0:46:50.280 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 2>They're just their kookie, aren't they? And they've got the

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 2>capacity to do it. When you're worth over twenty billion dollars,

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:58.160
<v Speaker 2>you can do and say as you like. I think

0:46:58.200 --> 0:47:01.240
<v Speaker 2>he's deliberately trolling the tea. I think he's got certain

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:04.759
<v Speaker 2>plans for it. And you know funny that he also

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:06.959
<v Speaker 2>then included Pauline in the name of the party without

0:47:07.000 --> 0:47:08.360
<v Speaker 2>even asking her again.

0:47:08.160 --> 0:47:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Without asking her to the bottom of that. Okay, I'll

0:47:11.560 --> 0:47:13.839
<v Speaker 1>kill you by solution. My solution, Clive, is I'm going

0:47:13.880 --> 0:47:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to see if I can trademark the expression Clive Palmer,

0:47:17.400 --> 0:47:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and you can buy it back to me after I've

0:47:19.640 --> 0:47:22.480
<v Speaker 1>trademarked it. Let's move on to this woman, because there

0:47:22.520 --> 0:47:24.799
<v Speaker 1>is a woman who has been an actress. She's been

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a working member of the royal family, she's been a

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 1>non working member of the royal family. Now she wants

0:47:30.120 --> 0:47:33.359
<v Speaker 1>to become Nigella Lawson. Meghan Markel is doing a new

0:47:33.360 --> 0:47:37.479
<v Speaker 1>television show in which she cooks. It's called With Love

0:47:37.520 --> 0:47:40.840
<v Speaker 1>from Megan, It's just Big Mocked actually described as the

0:47:40.880 --> 0:47:43.960
<v Speaker 1>fakest thing I've ever seen her new Netflix show. Take

0:47:44.000 --> 0:47:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a look at this little preview.

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:52.239
<v Speaker 6>I've always loved taking something pretty ordinary and elevating it,

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:55.560
<v Speaker 6>surprising people with moments that let them know I was

0:47:55.600 --> 0:47:58.360
<v Speaker 6>really thinking of them.

0:47:58.600 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 1>What this is probably one of the most glamorous moments

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of my life. Now, Evelyn, do you want to learn

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:07.960
<v Speaker 1>how to cook from Megan Michael?

0:48:08.719 --> 0:48:11.200
<v Speaker 5>No, I don't, But to be honest, she looks like

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:12.280
<v Speaker 5>she can cook amazingly.

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:13.839
<v Speaker 4>I have no issue with that.

0:48:14.200 --> 0:48:17.960
<v Speaker 5>I just it is it looks very scripted. It looks

0:48:17.960 --> 0:48:20.080
<v Speaker 5>like she's acting. And this is the problem. You don't

0:48:20.120 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 5>know if she's acting or if she's genuine. And she's

0:48:22.200 --> 0:48:24.640
<v Speaker 5>kind of created this because of, you know, her being

0:48:25.000 --> 0:48:29.400
<v Speaker 5>known as a bit of a homewrecker. And I'm not

0:48:29.440 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 5>going to be watching it. If any off I do,

0:48:31.280 --> 0:48:33.480
<v Speaker 5>it's probably just because I want a sticky beak and

0:48:33.520 --> 0:48:38.000
<v Speaker 5>see whether there's any sign of, you know, a nice cake.

0:48:38.040 --> 0:48:40.520
<v Speaker 4>I might bake for myself. But that's about it, to

0:48:40.520 --> 0:48:40.960
<v Speaker 4>be honest.

0:48:41.200 --> 0:48:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Harry and Meghan are struggling to find a career because

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:46.400
<v Speaker 1>their career was bagging the British royal family and you

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:49.840
<v Speaker 1>can't do that forever. So Harry's made a documentary series

0:48:49.880 --> 0:48:52.880
<v Speaker 1>on Polo. He was mocked for that, and suddenly Meghan

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:54.520
<v Speaker 1>wants to be Nigella Lawson.

0:48:54.800 --> 0:48:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh she's got to do something right. I mean, I

0:48:57.680 --> 0:49:00.160
<v Speaker 2>think it looks quite lovely, to be honest. She's trying

0:49:00.200 --> 0:49:02.480
<v Speaker 2>to reinvent herself. She's got to deal with Netflix and

0:49:02.560 --> 0:49:05.160
<v Speaker 2>she's got to justify right, so she's got to produce content.

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Good luck, Megan.

0:49:06.440 --> 0:49:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Indeed, in fact, if you'd like to know all the

0:49:08.480 --> 0:49:11.359
<v Speaker 1>royal news that is coming next when Caroline Derresso will

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:13.759
<v Speaker 1>be here with the Royal Report for the time being,

0:49:13.840 --> 0:49:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that's enough from us and we thank you for your

0:49:16.200 --> 0:49:17.680
<v Speaker 1>company tonight. Good Night,