Speaker 1: Late General, welcome the late pays.
Speaker 2: Well, good evening and thanks for joining us. Son James Macpherson,
Speaker 2: with Liz Storer and Caleb Bond coming up tonight. Donald
Speaker 2: Trump has declared there's only two genders, but the Irish
Speaker 2: politicians have just legislated to recognize seventy two. In fact,
Speaker 2: they took twenty five minutes to name them all in parliament.
Speaker 2: Will show you that, not the whole twenty five minutes.
Speaker 2: A little later, plus, when we look at what's making
Speaker 2: news tomorrow, Anthony Albanese's hand picked envoy on Islamophobia sees
Speaker 2: he's worried Muslims are being forgotten with all the focus
Speaker 2: on anti Semitism. What a surprise. And in Tasmania confusion
Speaker 2: rains over drug driving laws. We'll get to all of
Speaker 2: that shortly. I think it was Benjamin Franklin who said
Speaker 2: there are three certainties in life, death taxes and local
Speaker 2: Australian councils using rate payer money for their own ideological fetishes. Well,
Speaker 2: the Mount Barker Council in Adelaide has decided to spend
Speaker 2: five thousand dollars of rate payer money on January twenty six,
Speaker 2: but not to celebrate Australia Day. No, Instead, they are
Speaker 2: going to hold a Survival Day. The council advertised the
Speaker 2: event on their Facebook page. The advertisement read marking Survival
Speaker 2: Day twenty twenty five. The Ruby Hunter Foundation Incorporated and
Speaker 2: the Perramang Council that's the local indigenous group, invite you
Speaker 2: to gather at Laratanga Pavilion in Mount Barker on January
Speaker 2: twenty six to respectfully mark Perramang What a Survival Day.
Speaker 2: This year's free Survival Day community event is believed to
Speaker 2: be the only one happening in the Adelaide Hills Woo
Speaker 2: and will feature a VIP Elders tent well like whoa
Speaker 2: VIP elders.
Speaker 3: Like the ones I saw at the tennis yesterday?
Speaker 1: The VIP tent. Do they have free grol because I'm in?
Speaker 2: I don't think you can get in, Caleb because you're
Speaker 2: not an elder of the wrong skin color. There'll be speakers,
Speaker 2: There'll be music, dance, poetry, stores and on and on
Speaker 2: it goes. Now a couple of things. The event is
Speaker 2: not free, it's subsidized by five thousand dollars from local ratepayers.
Speaker 2: And the event's not that popular, as evidence by the
Speaker 2: fact that Mount Barker Council removed comments from their Facebook
Speaker 2: post not long after it was put online. In fact,
Speaker 2: one Mount Barker counselor decided to go on Facebook and
Speaker 2: conduct her own poll, you know, to see what residents
Speaker 2: constituents might think. She surveyed six hundred and forty five
Speaker 2: locals and found eighty five percent of them did not
Speaker 2: support their money being spent in this fashion. Well that's
Speaker 2: when the local mayor, David Leach found out about it
Speaker 2: and ordered her to remove the pole because apparently polling
Speaker 2: constituents as to how they would like their money to
Speaker 2: be spent breaches behavioral standards. Now, when councilor Rebecca Hewitt
Speaker 2: tried to talk about this in the next council meeting,
Speaker 2: the mayor David Leach reportedly continually interrupted her, claiming that
Speaker 2: just by talking about it, she was causing harm to
Speaker 2: Indigenous people. When asked by the media how he knew this,
Speaker 2: the mayor applied quote, I know that her words have
Speaker 2: resulted in harm because Aboriginal people who are my friends
Speaker 2: and people I meet on the street tell me they
Speaker 2: have been harmed by these words. And so Survival Day
Speaker 2: will go ahead in Mount Barker paid for by local
Speaker 2: rate payers. Of course, local opinions will be ignored. In fact,
Speaker 2: it breaches behavioral standards to even solicit local opinion, and
Speaker 2: any discussion to the contrary will be deemed harmful because
Speaker 2: the mayor Caleb has friends.
Speaker 3: Well, I am glad to know that the standard has
Speaker 3: now been set that if the mayor has spoken to
Speaker 3: someone who has told him that they are harmed by
Speaker 3: a counselor saying that spending five thousand dollars of public
Speaker 3: money on an event to say that Australia Day is bad,
Speaker 3: that is that is.
Speaker 1: Harmful because they said so.
Speaker 3: Well, the existence of David Leech I find personally harmful.
Speaker 1: I'm harmed and hurt by it.
Speaker 3: And so David Leach must cease to be mayor if
Speaker 3: he really wants to stop.
Speaker 1: I feel harm. I mean if I say overel.
Speaker 2: Hard, surely it means I think the measure.
Speaker 1: All feelings are.
Speaker 3: Valid, particularly mine, of course, So that's it. That's the
Speaker 3: end of David Leach's career. Leach by name, Leech by nature,
Speaker 3: it would seem. And when he was asked, because he
Speaker 3: has disputed this polling that the counselor did on Facebook
Speaker 3: consider that that's nonsense. I actually think the majority of
Speaker 3: rate payers actually do support a spending money on Survival.
Speaker 1: Day or Invasion Day, whatever you want to call it.
Speaker 3: And he was pressed on that, how do you know that?
Speaker 1: Have you taken your he reckons? They've done market.
Speaker 3: Research that tells them that the majority of people in
Speaker 3: the council supports.
Speaker 1: Such a thing. I'd love you to.
Speaker 3: Produce that piece of market research, David, please if you
Speaker 3: can find it. My email address is Caleb dot Bond
Speaker 3: at skynews dot com dot au. I am more than
Speaker 3: happy to show it here on SCAR News tomorrow night.
Speaker 3: If you can send me that market research. I will
Speaker 3: wait for it, mister Leach, because something tells me it
Speaker 3: doesn't exist, because only last week the IPA released to
Speaker 3: Poul showing that sixty nine percent of Australians support Australia
Speaker 3: Day being on January twenty sixth, So I don't know
Speaker 3: what sort of market research they're doing up in Mount Barker.
Speaker 4: Well, the thirty one percent remaining are obviously concentrated in
Speaker 4: Mount Park, so that's where getting his market research from.
Speaker 4: But this is such a classic case of having your
Speaker 4: cake and scoffing it too, because the Mark Council Mount
Speaker 4: Barker Council actually are still having a citizenship ceremony on
Speaker 4: January twenty six to celebrate Australia Day as well. So
Speaker 4: it's literally just like whether you love or hate Australia Day,
Speaker 4: here at the Mount Barker Council, we have something for you.
Speaker 5: Now.
Speaker 4: I genuinely believe that these events will just fade out
Speaker 4: into obscurity because much like the what were they calling it,
Speaker 4: the Australia Day Council of South Australia, both these are
Speaker 4: in South Australia.
Speaker 5: That what's going on morning in the morning.
Speaker 4: We were talking about this last week.
Speaker 5: Nobody's going to show up.
Speaker 4: It's going to be poorly attended. And these councils and
Speaker 4: other organizations who are insisting on pushing what is revealed
Speaker 4: by every poll on the topic as a wildly unpopular
Speaker 4: narrative nowadays, they're just going to stop doing.
Speaker 5: It because it's not lucrative.
Speaker 4: This is what I've said several times about Welcome to
Speaker 4: Country as well, until they can hear and see the
Speaker 4: disapproval of the people attending their events, whatever that event
Speaker 4: may be.
Speaker 5: They are going to keep it up. I encourage people
Speaker 5: to boo.
Speaker 4: I boo on planes, I boo in crowded theaters, I
Speaker 4: bow at the footy where a lot of people boo
Speaker 4: with me, because until the organizers can see these isn't working.
Speaker 4: We are trying to waterboard people with this narrative that
Speaker 4: something should be recognized that is actually meaningless and doesn't
Speaker 4: do anything to increase the quality of life for Indigenous
Speaker 4: people in Australia.
Speaker 5: They're going to keep it up.
Speaker 2: Well, I mean the proof is in their Facebook page
Speaker 2: bragging that this is the only one happening in the
Speaker 2: Adelaide Hills. Well, of course it's the only one happened,
Speaker 2: and that would be why no one really wants it.
Speaker 2: But the concerning part, of course, is that the mayor
Speaker 2: tries to shut down any discussion, claiming it's harmful to
Speaker 2: even talk about it.
Speaker 4: Yeah yeah, and same with the Facebook mess like the
Speaker 4: comments they posted this, and on the very same day
Speaker 4: that they posted it, January seventeenth, they then posted a
Speaker 4: comment underneath it saying we are now closing comments because
Speaker 4: they couldn't hack the feed back please and livered snowflake.
Speaker 3: But may have tried to tell the counselor about the
Speaker 3: Facebook posted. By having the post up, it was in
Speaker 3: breach of the rule and regulations and behaviors like Okay,
Speaker 3: so a counselor actually asks the community what they think
Speaker 3: about something the council.
Speaker 1: That is doing that is against the rules. You shouldn't
Speaker 1: be doing that. I mean, seriously, give me a break.
Speaker 3: Now we're saying all this stuff is going out of fashion.
Speaker 1: Survival day, this is done right. We have moved on.
Speaker 3: Wope is starting to die, and it's certainly dying over
Speaker 3: in America. One of the first things Donald Trump has
Speaker 3: done with his newfound presidency second time round is to
Speaker 3: get rid of all the DEI employees in the public
Speaker 3: service in America. And that should be noted that they
Speaker 3: are actually on leave at the moment, but the plan
Speaker 3: is that they will all be put out of work. Eventually,
Speaker 3: their departments will be pulled apart. Their services are no
Speaker 3: longer required because woke is dead in America. This is
Speaker 3: the order that has been sent out to staff telling
Speaker 3: them what's going on. They're going to send an agency
Speaker 3: wide notice to employees informing them of the closure and
Speaker 3: asking employees if they know of any efforts to disguise
Speaker 3: these programs by using coded or imprecise language. Seen a
Speaker 3: notification to all employees or DEA officers that they are
Speaker 3: being placed on paid administrative leave, effective immediately, as the
Speaker 3: agency take steps to close, slash, end all DEI initiatives, offices,
Speaker 3: and programs, and take down all outward facing media such
Speaker 3: as website social media accounts of texture of de IA officers.
Speaker 1: It is over. DEI is dead in America.
Speaker 3: And of course we talked last week about the fact
Speaker 3: that Facebook now has dismantled their DEI policies. Lots of
Speaker 3: companies now are walking away from DEI because they realized
Speaker 3: they don't have to suck up.
Speaker 1: To anyone anymore.
Speaker 3: It was always window dressing all this consumer We must
Speaker 3: have lots of minorities. It's only because that's what they
Speaker 3: thought the rest of corporate America was doing and what
Speaker 3: the rest of the corporate world was doing. And now
Speaker 3: that people actually feel in boldened to say no, we
Speaker 3: think that's a load of crap. Everyone else is coming
Speaker 3: out and saying it's load of crap. Who would have
Speaker 3: thought that this was never real in the first place.
Speaker 3: And something else Trump has done quite rightly, something I
Speaker 3: would like to see happen in this country. And Peter
Speaker 3: Dutton has talked about this that if and when he
Speaker 3: becomes Prime Minister he will only stand in front of
Speaker 3: the Australian flag. Well, Donald Trump now says that on
Speaker 3: American government properties, be they in America or overseas, so
Speaker 3: embassies and the like are to only fly one flag,
Speaker 3: the US flag. There'll be no more pride flags, no
Speaker 3: more trans flags, no more black Lives matters flags. There
Speaker 3: is one flag for the United States, he posted online,
Speaker 3: starting immediately, only the United States of America flag is
Speaker 3: authorized to be flown or displayed at US facilities, both
Speaker 3: domestic and abroad, and featured in US government content. The
Speaker 3: Flag of the United States of America united all Americans
Speaker 3: under the universal principles of liberty, justice, and democracy, These
Speaker 3: values which are the bedrock of our great country, shared
Speaker 3: by American citizens past and present. And just to add
Speaker 3: to it a little bit more, you know, Donald Trump,
Speaker 3: they said all the economy is going to be stuffed now.
Speaker 3: All the economists were coming out before the election and
Speaker 3: saying tariffs, it's going to be terrible for America. No
Speaker 3: one's going to want to invest in America because it's
Speaker 3: going to be so expensive to do so. But since
Speaker 3: becoming president, just yesterday, three trillion dollars have flowed into America.
Speaker 6: Tackle look total, before the end of my first full
Speaker 6: business day in Washington and the White House, we've already
Speaker 6: secured nearly three trillion dollars of new investments in the
Speaker 6: United States, and probably that's going to be six or
Speaker 6: seven by the end of the week. Tremendous amounts of
Speaker 6: money are coming in for for many things other than
Speaker 6: even AIAI seems to be very hot. It seems to
Speaker 6: be the thing that a lot of smart people are
Speaker 6: looking at very strongly, and our country will be prospering
Speaker 6: like never before.
Speaker 7: It.
Speaker 3: I feel a bit sorry for the Trump story. He
Speaker 3: sounds a bit lethargic there because he's had a very
Speaker 3: long time after the inauguration, all the balls he had
Speaker 3: to go to, etcetera.
Speaker 1: Soelf cut him a little bit of slack.
Speaker 3: But you know, he is starting to turn things around.
Speaker 3: I mean, he was turning it around before he was
Speaker 3: even inaugurated.
Speaker 1: The work that Trump has.
Speaker 3: Done in what two months since he was elected, just
Speaker 3: to change the culture of the United States, which has
Speaker 3: now moved on to the corporate world, et cetera. Has
Speaker 3: been absolutely extraord He's.
Speaker 2: Done more in one day for the United States than
Speaker 2: Joe Biden did in four years for the United States.
Speaker 2: So imagine what the world is going to be like.
Speaker 3: He's done.
Speaker 2: America will be like.
Speaker 3: He's done more good for the He's necessarily done more
Speaker 3: than Biden has done for it.
Speaker 1: But what Biden did wasn't good.
Speaker 2: But you look at the good Trump has done in
Speaker 2: one day. Imagine after four years the absolute turnaround. It's
Speaker 2: quite miraculous in terms of getting rid of all the
Speaker 2: DEI stuff. I mean, it turns out saving public money
Speaker 2: is quite easy if you've got a brain. Just feel
Speaker 2: sorry for all of these fours DEI officers. Could you
Speaker 2: imagine having on your resume as you go for your
Speaker 2: next job previous employment US government DEI officer, No one
Speaker 2: is going to want to know anything about you.
Speaker 4: Move to a Democrat state, you'll find at home.
Speaker 2: We're welcome you.
Speaker 3: I just take it off my resume because whether it's
Speaker 3: there or not, it still says you've.
Speaker 1: Got no qualification.
Speaker 2: So what's the difference.
Speaker 4: In the lefty land, though, they will still be able
Speaker 4: to find places of employment. But like you say, they
Speaker 4: are now useless in terms of finding an actual, real job.
Speaker 4: Who the heck would want to hire these people? If
Speaker 4: you're a DEI manager or a DEI anything, what is
Speaker 4: your actual job instead of overseeing the brainwashing the indoctrination
Speaker 4: of your entire department.
Speaker 2: It's worse than regarded as useless. They're now an object
Speaker 2: of derision. And that's the great thing that Trump has done.
Speaker 2: He's not only said this is wrong, he's pointed out
Speaker 2: why it's ridiculous, and he's made amongst conservatives way you
Speaker 2: destroy the d which it always was.
Speaker 4: So I'm saying they will definitely find homes because what
Speaker 4: is happening as we speak. Yes, the conservatives are back
Speaker 4: on top. Yeah baby, let justice roar. But the lefties
Speaker 4: will be recalibrating. They will absolutely be going back to
Speaker 4: the drawing board.
Speaker 5: They will be getting together in clusters.
Speaker 4: The Democratic States are going to be beaming with that
Speaker 4: blue light as they get together and ensure that they
Speaker 4: are taking care of their own and preparing for the future.
Speaker 5: So I have no doubt those.
Speaker 4: People will have jobs to go to, just certainly not
Speaker 4: in a red state and certainly not in the Trump administration.
Speaker 4: But pay close attention to the first point we read
Speaker 4: out there send an agency wide notice to employees informing
Speaker 4: them a closure and asking employees if they know of
Speaker 4: any efforts to disguise these programs by using couded or
Speaker 4: imprecise language.
Speaker 5: Now, the reason why the Trump.
Speaker 4: Administration has done this is because they are well aware
Speaker 4: that in many Biden administration departments, these DEI type projects
Speaker 4: that were bleeding money weren't called DEI projects. They would
Speaker 4: be under some sort of oh Weather, Department of People
Speaker 4: and Culture, etc.
Speaker 5: And so on.
Speaker 4: So he's trying to weed out the ones that are
Speaker 4: trying to exist beneath the surface and aren't so like,
Speaker 4: we fly the flag and we preach the sermons. But
Speaker 4: speaking of preaching the sermons and speaking of DEI hires,
Speaker 4: check out the church that the new administration chose to
Speaker 4: attend the day after the inauguration. They took themselves to
Speaker 4: an Episcopalian church in Washington, DC, and what you're about
Speaker 4: to hear is some of the sermon from their bishop,
Speaker 4: Marion Edgar Budy.
Speaker 5: She's the first woman to hold the position.
Speaker 8: In the name of our God, I ask you to
Speaker 8: have mercy upon the people in our country who we're scared.
Speaker 9: Now.
Speaker 8: There are gay, lesbian, and transgender children in Democratic, Republican
Speaker 8: and independent families, some who fear for their.
Speaker 5: Lives for shame. So there you are.
Speaker 4: I don't know much about the Episcopalian church, but there's
Speaker 4: your bishop in Washington pleading with the new president of
Speaker 4: the United States to I don't know, do what for
Speaker 4: what the scriptures very clearly call a lifestyle of abomination.
Speaker 4: So I don't know where this woman's coming from. This
Speaker 4: our God that she's referring to certainly is not.
Speaker 5: The Christian God. But it gets worse. She then moved
Speaker 5: on to, you know, you should really.
Speaker 4: Let illegal aliens stay in the country. This woman wasn't
Speaker 4: satisfied with flying the rabo flag in her own church
Speaker 4: and on the world stage as the world is watching.
Speaker 2: No.
Speaker 5: No, she then turned to this other hot topic.
Speaker 4: And instead of unifying America around what could have been
Speaker 4: an incredibly strong, awesome Christian message at the dawn of
Speaker 4: a new era underneath this new administration, No, she's lecturing
Speaker 4: the guy on basically doing a one eighty on one
Speaker 4: of his key election promises.
Speaker 8: The people who pick our crops and clean our office buildings,
Speaker 8: who labor in poultry farms and meatpacking plants, who ashed
Speaker 8: the dishes after we eat in restaurants and work the
Speaker 8: night shifts and hospitals. They may not be citizens or
Speaker 8: have the proper documentation, but the vast majority of immigrants
Speaker 8: are not criminals.
Speaker 5: There's few things I had as much as blasphemy.
Speaker 4: From a poolpp But didn't you love the faces of both.
Speaker 5: Trump and Vance? Like the eye roll? The internal eye
Speaker 5: roll was palpable.
Speaker 4: But coming back to Australia and speaking of DEEI we
Speaker 4: know that Dutton has made some great calls in terms
Speaker 4: of there'll only be one flag should I be in government,
Speaker 4: and also making sure that Australia Day is celebrated as
Speaker 4: a proud day in our nation. All good things and
Speaker 4: we've all been applauding. But when asked today about whether
Speaker 4: or not him cracking down on PC behavior and entering
Speaker 4: into the culture wars, finally a budding prime minister happy
Speaker 4: to do so, he said that that would not extend
Speaker 4: to following in Trump's footsteps, i e.
Speaker 5: Leaving the Paris Accord here he was today.
Speaker 9: I think that the debate about the twenty thirty five.
Speaker 9: Target is a very real one because at the moment
Speaker 9: Australians can't afford to pay their grocery bills, they can't
Speaker 9: afford to pay their insurance bills, they can't afford to
Speaker 9: pay their school fees, and the bills just keep sacking
Speaker 9: up under Anthony Alberinsia. Now the Prime minister's proposing to
Speaker 9: drive up electricity prices even higher, but he just won't
Speaker 9: tell you by how much.
Speaker 2: Would a coalition government remain in the Paris.
Speaker 9: Court, Yes, we will, and I've said that before.
Speaker 5: Someone make that make sense.
Speaker 4: You just contradicted absolutely everything you said prior to that
Speaker 4: last little bit there. Don't talk Trump's talk and hope
Speaker 4: that it's going to whist you into Parliament as Prime
Speaker 4: minister if you're not going to walk the walk. We
Speaker 4: all know Australia is failing dismally at every target under
Speaker 4: the Paris Agreement anyway, So whose interests are you serving?
Speaker 4: Trump has pulled out of the Paris Accords because he
Speaker 4: is America first. It is not serving America's best interest
Speaker 4: and so he's out. Well, guess what, it's not serving
Speaker 4: Australia's best interests either. So who's interests are are you
Speaker 4: looking after here? Because it's not ours.
Speaker 2: Well, I think he's looking after his own interests. He's
Speaker 2: starting to make great headway in the polls. He looks
Speaker 2: for all money, like you'll actually turn Elbin Eesy into
Speaker 2: a one term prime minister. And so whatever he might
Speaker 2: believe privately about the Paris Accords, he's not touching that.
Speaker 2: Have you noticed he's done nothing.
Speaker 4: Then you're insinuating that leaving the accords would lose him,
Speaker 4: but we know that the opposite is true.
Speaker 2: I'm not insinuating that. I think I'm simply saying I
Speaker 2: think he's being very pragmatic as a politician. He hasn't
Speaker 2: touched transgender issues either. Another obvious one. But why would
Speaker 2: he take heat from the media when he's clearly got
Speaker 2: his nose in front. He's happy to just keep trucking.
Speaker 2: Don't upset the apple card.
Speaker 3: Well, he's also got the teal set on his shoulder.
Speaker 3: And that's the push and pull of the Liberal Party
Speaker 3: at the moment, in the same way that the Labor
Speaker 3: Party has experienced this in terms of a desire to
Speaker 3: go further to the left to try and abate Green's
Speaker 3: votes in the inner city.
Speaker 1: The Liberal Party now.
Speaker 3: Has to wrestle with the idea of whether they go
Speaker 3: further to the left to try and a bake till
Speaker 3: votes in the inner city and not just the unity
Speaker 3: some of the richer suburban parts of Australia as well.
Speaker 3: That's the biggest problem for him is that there are
Speaker 3: very powerful people within his party who absolutely believe that
Speaker 3: we must remain as part of the Paris Accord. And
Speaker 3: if you go around starting to say, well, I'm going
Speaker 3: to do something about that, he'll have to deal with
Speaker 3: the fallout of it within the party. It will be
Speaker 3: ripped into That's the troubled line that he is trying
Speaker 3: to walk. But I think the problem is that if
Speaker 3: you cannot clearly state what a position is for your party,
Speaker 3: and that was not a clear statement that was on
Speaker 3: one hand, I believe this, but on the other I'm
Speaker 3: going to do this, you end up in this blomonde.
Speaker 1: You've not actually leaving it in anything at all.
Speaker 5: It is so weak, it's so pathetic.
Speaker 4: You can't say, as this headline did today, oh Australia
Speaker 4: has had enough of DEI and when they're sick of
Speaker 4: the PC stuff, and it doesn't pay the bills and
Speaker 4: then at the same time be like, even though there's
Speaker 4: a lot of momentum behind it, at the moment, I'm
Speaker 4: not going to pull out of the most expensive commitment
Speaker 4: our nation's ever made, which is not to us but
Speaker 4: to global powers. This is a World Economic Forum agenda,
Speaker 4: This is a United Nations agenda. The people who pull
Speaker 4: these strings none of us elected, and we don't care
Speaker 4: about what they think is best. We want what's best
Speaker 4: for our nation. I just think it's so incredibly hypocritical
Speaker 4: that he is writing Trump's coat tails and loving all
Speaker 4: the Oh, yes, let's diss DEI, let's get into these
Speaker 4: culture wars, when the most expensive part all the culture was, buddy,
Speaker 4: is the climate stuff. So if you're going to keep
Speaker 4: worshiping at that altar, how many people in that spiel
Speaker 4: that you just did are going to make life more
Speaker 4: affordable under a liberal government if you're the boss?
Speaker 2: Well here why he couldn't wait to just dismiss that question.
Speaker 2: You notice he didn't try to justify why he would
Speaker 2: remain part of the Paris Accords. He just said, yes,
Speaker 2: we'll be part of it. Move on. But I do
Speaker 2: like what Anthony Albanezi said, because Albanzi now of course,
Speaker 2: is running a scare campaign. Not scary for us. It
Speaker 2: would be wonderful if the Liberal Party ditched the Paris Accords.
Speaker 2: But Albanezi is saying, dont's going to walk away from it.
Speaker 2: Listen to what Elbanezi said. He said, if you walk
Speaker 2: away from the Paris Accords, you'll be standing with Libya,
Speaker 2: Yemen and Iran. Well, wouldn't that be bad to stand
Speaker 2: with those guys? Head on a second, hasn't our government
Speaker 2: been voting in the UN to stand Iran and Libya
Speaker 2: in terms of like Israel votes? Or talk about hypocrites,
Speaker 2: I mean they're everywhere and or.
Speaker 1: All those billions and billions and billions.
Speaker 3: Of dollar is that our closest ally gave to Iran
Speaker 3: under the Biden administration. I mean, for Heaven's sake, we
Speaker 3: would actually we wouldn't be standing with it. We would
Speaker 3: be standing with our closest olly, which is the US
Speaker 3: away from the Paris Accord.
Speaker 2: But of course they walked away from their strongest ally,
Speaker 2: the US when it came to Israel.
Speaker 1: It's all over the shop.
Speaker 3: But the thing is, the Liberal Party needs to decide
Speaker 3: who they want their voters to be. Are you still
Speaker 3: going to go after these teal seats in and around
Speaker 3: the inner city, or do you go, Okay, our people
Speaker 3: now are the country people that are served by the
Speaker 3: Nationals and have been served by the Nationals forever, and
Speaker 3: working class suburban people what has been traditional labor territory.
Speaker 3: Because if you go out to the western suburbs of
Speaker 3: Sydney and say if we get rid of the Paris
Speaker 3: Accord and get rid of the idea of ned zero
Speaker 3: and we can burn more coal, your power bill will
Speaker 3: be cheaper, they will be all over it. But if
Speaker 3: you go walking around the eastern suburbs of Sydney saying
Speaker 3: stuff like that, or the Northern Beach, you'll get a
Speaker 3: very different response. The Liberal Party needs to decide who
Speaker 3: it thinks its people are, because at the moment I
Speaker 3: think it's a bit confused.
Speaker 2: So you talk about the Liberal Party needing to know
Speaker 2: where they stand, to tell you where Anthony Albanese and
Speaker 2: Chris Mins was standing. Just the other day. They were
Speaker 2: standing out the front of a childcare center in Sydney
Speaker 2: that had been firebombed and grafited with anti Semitic language.
Speaker 2: They stood there and they said, all the right things
Speaker 2: that this was disgusting, it was abhorrent. Chris Mins called
Speaker 2: the perpetrators bastards, which was just upping the language to
Speaker 2: make it appear like he was doing more than just
Speaker 2: using language. But eventually it was all froth and no
Speaker 2: beer because they decided to hold a national Cabinet meeting
Speaker 2: only to resolve that they would talk to one of
Speaker 2: the IT guys in the federal government to compile the
Speaker 2: database so they could keep track of all the anti
Speaker 2: Semitic attacks that they plan on doing something about one day.
Speaker 2: Anthony Albanzi, however, did have some good news about anti semitism.
Speaker 2: The head of the Australian Federal Police has said that
Speaker 2: they are investigating the possibility that maybe these antisemitic attacks
Speaker 2: are being paid for by foreign actors who are just
Speaker 2: looking for dupes here in Australia, just common criminals who
Speaker 2: are looking for some easy cash, and those are the
Speaker 2: people who are carrying out these attacks. There's no social
Speaker 2: cohesion problem. There's no anti Semites in Australia. No no,
Speaker 2: There's no people acting on a religious ideology which would
Speaker 2: cause them to think that they're obeying God by hating
Speaker 2: on Jews. None of that, it's just local criminals looking
Speaker 2: for a quick buck from foreign actors. Here's the Prime Minister.
Speaker 7: It is important that people understand where some of these
Speaker 7: attacks are coming from, and it would appear, as the
Speaker 7: AFP Commissioner said yesterday, that some of these are being
Speaker 7: perpetrated by people who don't have a particular issued, aren't
Speaker 7: motivated by an ideology, but are paid actors. Now it's
Speaker 7: unclear who or where the payments are coming from. The
Speaker 7: AFP Commissioner will continue to do his job as the
Speaker 7: head of Operation Aveelaide.
Speaker 2: This guy is unbelievable. So he's decided no, no, there's
Speaker 2: no anti semitism problem in Australia. It's all paid actors.
Speaker 2: And did you notice the little jig he did there
Speaker 2: when he announced that, and the smile that came across
Speaker 2: his face as all of a sudden he had some
Speaker 2: good news on this issue. And his good news was
Speaker 2: it's nothing to do with me, it's nothing to do
Speaker 2: with social cohesion. It's a foreign actors issue. I'm off
Speaker 2: the hook. I don't have to do anything. We have
Speaker 2: a database. We'll leave it at that.
Speaker 3: It was like Gavin Newsoon when he did and he
Speaker 3: was talking about, Oh, we're going to stop people from
Speaker 3: coming and taking all the real.
Speaker 1: Estate after the fires. Oh I finally found my escapecoats.
Speaker 3: What Rick Kerschel said yesterday in the National Cabinet meeting
Speaker 3: was not that these are being perpetrated by paid actors.
Speaker 3: He said it was a line of inquiry. Now on
Speaker 3: the front of the Daily Telegraph tomorrow it says that
Speaker 3: the state police forces.
Speaker 1: Were not aware of that line of inquiry.
Speaker 3: So it's certainly not something that they have looked at
Speaker 3: in any of the cases that they have dealt with,
Speaker 3: or something that they have come across. And nor did
Speaker 3: Rick Kershaw suggest that it was happening. He simply said
Speaker 3: they were looking at the possibility of it.
Speaker 1: That's one thing.
Speaker 3: Then the Prime Minister comes out and says, well, we've
Speaker 3: got to understand where these are coming from. And he's
Speaker 3: now saying it as though it were a fact. Well,
Speaker 3: it's not a fact yet. The police haven't established that
Speaker 3: it's a fact. They're simply looking at the motivation behind
Speaker 3: potential motivation behind some of these attacks. We don't have
Speaker 3: an answer to that question yet, so we can't go
Speaker 3: around saying well that is what has happened and even
Speaker 3: if it were the case.
Speaker 1: If that is what has happened, we should not.
Speaker 3: Be surprised that foreign interference may like, or some countries
Speaker 3: or cultures in particular, may like to sow the seeds
Speaker 3: of social division in Western countries because they want to
Speaker 3: pull apart the social cohesion in our countries so they
Speaker 3: can replace it with something else. I don't think it's
Speaker 3: any better if it is coming from paid actors who
Speaker 3: are getting foreign money, because the end game is exactly
Speaker 3: the same.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Sharon Haskell, she went
Speaker 2: on ABC Radio today and criticized the Australian government to
Speaker 2: repeat of previous criticism that they've done nothing about anti Semitism.
Speaker 2: In fact, they are giving permission to anti Semites in
Speaker 2: this country. Have listened to what she said?
Speaker 10: Obviously the attitude of the current Australian government towards Israel
Speaker 10: is inflaming a lot of these emotions and giving, I guess,
Speaker 10: some acceptance.
Speaker 5: When you do not fight it.
Speaker 10: I mean, what are they waiting for for someone to die,
Speaker 10: for someone to be murdered.
Speaker 2: Well, they weren't actually waiting for someone be murdered. They
Speaker 2: were just waiting for a children's play center to be
Speaker 2: firebombed before they did anything, and when they did something,
Speaker 2: they produced a database. Tony Burke was not copying any
Speaker 2: of that. He says. The government is acting on all
Speaker 2: of this.
Speaker 11: The whole reason we established Operation Avelite was to make
Speaker 11: sure there were dedicated resources specifically for this. We have
Speaker 11: zero tolerance for bigotry in this country. We have zero
Speaker 11: tolerance for the anti Semitism and the violence that we've seen.
Speaker 11: And no matter what view people have on conflicts on
Speaker 11: the other side of the world, if there's one thing
Speaker 11: I hear from every Australians that they do not want
Speaker 11: bigotry imported here.
Speaker 2: I'm trying to understand when you keep saying you have
Speaker 2: zero tolerance for a certain thing, and that thing for
Speaker 2: which you have zero tolerance continues to happen over and
Speaker 2: over again. There's been an anti Semitic attack in this
Speaker 2: country almost every day since January first. At what point
Speaker 2: do the government say, you know what, it keeps happening.
Speaker 2: It's clear that we are tolerating this. You can't say
Speaker 2: you don't tolerate something that keeps on happening over and
Speaker 2: over when you're the government and you're in charge.
Speaker 4: I just I don't know about the level of blame
Speaker 4: that's being laid at these guys's door. We know that
Speaker 4: this is let's say there's twenty perpetrators.
Speaker 5: Nine of them have already been.
Speaker 4: Arrested by Strikeforce PEERL.
Speaker 2: You say already south West forteen months. Nine arrests in
Speaker 2: fifteen months is not like allready, But.
Speaker 4: We're talking about Strikeforce PEERL is New South Wales specific.
Speaker 5: Now.
Speaker 4: These guys have actually done a brilliant job at arresting
Speaker 4: these guys. Nine individuals we've got so far in fifty
Speaker 4: nine charges laid. Those instances haven't been over the last
Speaker 4: fifteen months. You're dating back to October Sex you're talking
Speaker 4: about police chases of.
Speaker 5: Fire bombing, etcetera, and so on.
Speaker 4: Anyway, what I'm trying to say is they've doubled detectives.
Speaker 4: There's now forty on Strikeforce PERL. There's three hundred patrols
Speaker 4: a day here in New South Wales with regards to.
Speaker 5: The hot spots suburbs.
Speaker 4: Particularly those suburbs which are heavily populated by Jewish people.
Speaker 5: So it's not that nothing is being done.
Speaker 4: And what I keep coming back to every time we
Speaker 4: keep laying it heavy on Albanisi, and let's be clear,
Speaker 4: none of us think that he's been very strong on
Speaker 4: this from the very beginning.
Speaker 5: That's not what I'm saying.
Speaker 4: What I am saying is the people perpetrating these attacks.
Speaker 4: I find it very hard to believe that they would
Speaker 4: even know the name of our prime minister, much less
Speaker 4: where is cabinets dead. They are not watching the press conferences.
Speaker 12: They are the MUDs that we are literally banking on
Speaker 12: the fact that their sentiments and their actions are born
Speaker 12: of the.
Speaker 4: Less than enthusiastic condemnation of these acts that we see
Speaker 4: from Albouran Easy.
Speaker 5: I just think it's.
Speaker 4: Such a stress sagging it like it's absolute gospel. Let
Speaker 4: me tell you, I genuinely believe these individuals would do
Speaker 4: it regardless.
Speaker 12: Okay, absolutely.
Speaker 4: If you want to argue that these people are genuine
Speaker 4: anti semi you hate Jews, it would.
Speaker 5: Make not one whit of difference if you go to it,
Speaker 5: make no difference whatsoever.
Speaker 2: Go to a pro Palestinian rally, as I have a
Speaker 2: couple of times here in Sydney. It is highly political.
Speaker 2: They are very well informed and every speaker updates to.
Speaker 4: Maggie that is so disingenuous. Most of the times we've
Speaker 4: played their clips, we talk.
Speaker 5: About how stupid they are. Clips don't even know what
Speaker 5: from the river.
Speaker 4: To the sea means, or which river or witch sea.
Speaker 4: You can't say they're stupid and then say they're highly educated,
Speaker 4: which is it.
Speaker 2: We've played clips of individuals twenty seconds thirty seconds of idiots,
Speaker 2: and you get an idiot in any crowd. But if
Speaker 2: you go to one of their allies and attend for
Speaker 2: an hour or two and listen to speaker after speaker,
Speaker 2: they are highly political. They know what's happening.
Speaker 4: Do you think it's the speaker type levels of protesters
Speaker 4: that are literally graffitiing kill.
Speaker 5: Israel and Lamara and misspelling Israel.
Speaker 1: People are not the sharpest.
Speaker 5: Knives in the drawers.
Speaker 4: They're not like, oh yes, they probably wouldn't even know
Speaker 4: the Prime minister people who attend these to you, Kaylor,
Speaker 4: But it is very possibly, But it's.
Speaker 3: But the point is that it's a culture that is
Speaker 3: allowed to fest to buy. A lack of action from
Speaker 3: the top doesn't mean these people are taking direct gospel
Speaker 3: from the Prime Minister.
Speaker 4: Well, the States are definitely taking It is a culture
Speaker 4: that is allowed to fester because you don't have leadership
Speaker 4: at the political levels.
Speaker 3: By the way, if you see James at a pro
Speaker 3: Palestinian rally, please get a photo of him in the
Speaker 3: kefi we want to be.
Speaker 1: Wanting to see.
Speaker 2: I saw I saw Greens leader David Shubridge at one
Speaker 2: and he said, oh hi James. Goodness, and of all
Speaker 2: the places to think that set me was he didn't
Speaker 2: express any surprise at me being there, and he's got
Speaker 2: taken a bed And then he came to a show
Speaker 2: with it on Sky and I interviewed him and as
Speaker 2: he left the set he said, well, I see you
Speaker 2: on Saturday. No, it was research.
Speaker 1: You are getting.
Speaker 3: Getting a wrap very quickly before we go to a break.
Speaker 1: I must apologize.
Speaker 3: I've got something stuck in my throat tonight and it's
Speaker 3: not help but laughing that I am now doing it James,
Speaker 3: but I must change my TAC because this is an
Speaker 3: important story out of the UK. A nurse has had
Speaker 3: to go after the workplace tribunal equivalent of course over
Speaker 3: there in the UK because the NHS her employer. He's
Speaker 3: saying that she must call a doctor who is a
Speaker 3: biological male, but says that he is a woman by
Speaker 3: she her. Now, this nurse came a cropper because she
Speaker 3: had walked into the female change room at her place
Speaker 3: of work on three occasions and found this doctor in there.
Speaker 3: On the third occasion, she took it up with the
Speaker 3: doctor and said, well, excuse me, you're a man, what
Speaker 3: are you doing in my change room? That led to
Speaker 3: an argument and then eventually has led to discipline. Now,
Speaker 3: all of this will feature around the idea that it
Speaker 3: is quote unquote, and this is what the doctor's lawyers
Speaker 3: are arguing quote unquote state sanctioned harassment if the nurse
Speaker 3: continues to call him a hymn instead of her, because
Speaker 3: they are suggesting that under workplace law it means that
Speaker 3: the NHS is not preventing another employee from doing something
Speaker 3: that they ought to be doing.
Speaker 1: They will argue.
Speaker 3: Of course, the nurse and her lawyers will argue, well,
Speaker 3: we are simply saying, what is a fact that this
Speaker 3: person is a biological male, therefore a man and shouldn't
Speaker 3: be in the female change rooms and.
Speaker 1: Ought to be called a man.
Speaker 3: I mean, it just seems like such common sense staff.
Speaker 3: But this is now going through courts in the UK.
Speaker 3: It will be going through will. It's already gone through
Speaker 3: courts here in Australia if you look at the Tickle
Speaker 3: versus Giggle case, which eventually ruled that a biological male
Speaker 3: should be given access to a women's only space in
Speaker 3: that case in the form.
Speaker 1: Of a social media app.
Speaker 3: This is the stuff we're facing every day for just
Speaker 3: saying what is plainly true.
Speaker 2: It's even more pernicious than that. The nurse was suspended
Speaker 2: for bullying the transgender doctor because she was upset he
Speaker 2: was in the female change room. Now she's got to
Speaker 2: defend herself against these bullying charges. But the lawyers of
Speaker 2: the trans person are saying in the tribunal hearing, you
Speaker 2: cannot use male pronouns or refer to our client as
Speaker 2: a male. But that's her whole case. She was offended
Speaker 2: because it was a male. But they're saying, you'll turn
Speaker 2: the tribunal into a court of hate if you use
Speaker 2: male pronouns, which then means she's almost unable to argue
Speaker 2: her case. So the whole thing is quite pernicious.
Speaker 4: To show how much language matters. If you control the language,
Speaker 4: you control the people who have to use the language.
Speaker 4: And it's for this reason I don't even use the
Speaker 4: term trans woman anymore, because to me, that man is
Speaker 4: not any kind of woman period. And this is downright
Speaker 4: state sanctioned or state enforced compelled speech.
Speaker 5: If this woman is not allowed to say.
Speaker 1: And this is all.
Speaker 4: Made out about this fellow feeling harassed because she wasn't
Speaker 4: comfortable with him being in the female change rooms, nothing
Speaker 4: said about the women who across the Western world, in
Speaker 4: all kinds of restrooms and workplaces now are made to
Speaker 4: feel incredibly uncomfortable by having biological males in their private spaces.
Speaker 5: And I had to say it. There has been many.
Speaker 4: Cases of really dodgerama scenarios of women being filmed harassed
Speaker 4: in public toilets and other places by certain individuals who
Speaker 4: call themselves I'm a trans woman, got into those spaces
Speaker 4: and aren't behaving respectfully at all. This, of course triggers
Speaker 4: particularly women who have been abused by men.
Speaker 5: Or you don't know what this woman's backstory is at all.
Speaker 4: Maybe she's just standing up for free speech, as she should.
Speaker 5: But props to her for going through this.
Speaker 4: Because she could just as easily be like, you know what,
Speaker 4: I'm going to back down instead of no, no, I
Speaker 4: will fight this I'm literally fighting the state for the
Speaker 4: right to call a man a man.
Speaker 5: It's going to be very interesting to see how it ends.
Speaker 2: You're absolutely right, we're going to go to a break.
Speaker 2: When we come back, look at what's making news tomorrow,
Speaker 2: including Albanesi's anti Islamophobia envoy upset that Muslims are being
Speaker 2: ignored in the current of social cohesion debate to all
Speaker 2: of that. Welcome back. Let's look at what's making news tomorrow.
Speaker 2: I highly recommend you go out and get a copy
Speaker 2: of Tomorrow's Australian just but judging on the front page,
Speaker 2: there's some great stories, Caleb, you've got a couple of them.
Speaker 3: Indeed, Cohesion Crisis islam Invoys AA. The political furore over
Speaker 3: social cohesion has escalated with Anthony Albaneze's handpicked Islamophobia invoid
Speaker 3: declaring we shouldn't ignore the threat to Muslims simply because
Speaker 3: we haven't seen any mosques torched or cars vandalized. In
Speaker 3: other words, there hasn't been enough hate directed towards Muslims
Speaker 3: that he's obvious, but he.
Speaker 1: Still having in don't worry, we should have more of it.
Speaker 1: I don't know what does he watched it? Needs to
Speaker 1: be more obvious. I don't get it.
Speaker 3: But he goes on to say, you know that there
Speaker 3: are examples of the sorts of things we need to
Speaker 3: be worried about, including he specifically cites the twenty nineteen
Speaker 3: christ Church massacre as a source of worry.
Speaker 1: Here that was six years ago in another country. Throws here,
Speaker 1: that's the source of worry.
Speaker 3: Is that a lunar in New Zealand think the game
Speaker 3: somehow is causing is locked up?
Speaker 2: The link. The link is because this guy wrote a
Speaker 2: editorial piece. It's in the opinion pages tomorrow and he
Speaker 2: says the link is that the guy who shot up
Speaker 2: the christ Church mosque six years ago in New Zealand
Speaker 2: was an Aussie. Therefore, can you see the connection? That
Speaker 2: means obvious, there's a.
Speaker 1: Huge problem with phobia Australia.
Speaker 3: What does he want the mosques to be fire bombs
Speaker 3: so they can get a bit more action.
Speaker 1: I don't get it, and.
Speaker 5: This don't give anyone any ideas well.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but this was.
Speaker 3: The problem when he appointed these invoys, and you know,
Speaker 3: he appointed an anti Semitism invoy and then he had
Speaker 3: to appoint in his lamophobia one at the same time.
Speaker 3: Just to make sure an idiot, you know, kind of
Speaker 3: any favorite was all window dressing. And this is the
Speaker 3: inevitable conclusion of it.
Speaker 2: We get crappy to be fair to the anti islamophobia
Speaker 2: envoy who maybe he's a good guy, I don't know,
Speaker 2: but could you imagine the pressure he would be under
Speaker 2: from the Muslim community when there's so much talk about antisemitism?
Speaker 2: What are you doing? Make a statement, may say something,
Speaker 2: make it look like someone really hates So he's grasping
Speaker 2: its straws. But at least he's saying something he's.
Speaker 1: Got to get in the media.
Speaker 3: Another story on the front of the OS tomorrow double
Speaker 3: travel flag backlash. There, handing out of double sided Australian
Speaker 3: and Aboriginal flags at a citizenship sorry ceremonies on the
Speaker 3: Gold Coast has been axed by the Gold Coast City
Speaker 3: Council after complaints by residents and its own elected officials,
Speaker 3: who ray woke, as we keep saying, is slowly dying.
Speaker 1: Yet another example.
Speaker 3: We feel comfortable now to say, boh, we like having
Speaker 3: one flag under which we exist and it's a citizenship ceremony.
Speaker 3: For heaven's sake, you just became a citizen of Australia.
Speaker 3: So what flag would we hand you other than the
Speaker 3: Australian flag.
Speaker 4: Here here to the front page of the Daily Telegraph.
Speaker 4: Now where remember that massive chain of pubs, the Australian
Speaker 4: Venue that put out this statement saying, oh, we won't
Speaker 4: have Australia Day celebrations in our over two hundred venues
Speaker 4: in Australia. They're foreign owned, by the way, don't be
Speaker 4: fooled by the name Australian Venue Co.
Speaker 5: And then they came out, they backflipped big.
Speaker 4: Time and they said, oh, oh, we take it back.
Speaker 5: We didn't mean to offend anyone. Please do dine at
Speaker 5: our pubs.
Speaker 4: Well they seem to have done a one eighty on
Speaker 4: their one eighty pub snubbet again this big splash reads
Speaker 4: hotel group shuns National Day once more?
Speaker 5: Would you guys make up your minds? A major hotel
Speaker 5: group forced.
Speaker 4: To apologize over a controversial Australia Day ban at its
Speaker 4: venues is still refusing to acknowledge the national holiday, instead
Speaker 4: encouraging ozzies to celebrate the quote long weekend end quote
Speaker 4: with no mention of Australia Day in its promotions. So
Speaker 4: Australian Venue Co again, the joke's in the name. This
Speaker 4: is a foreign owned corporation.
Speaker 5: They're just calling it.
Speaker 4: The long weekend, Long weekend celebrations, So let's celebrate because
Speaker 4: it's the long weekend and we do want business at
Speaker 4: our venues. Make sure you google these guys and make
Speaker 4: sure that they do not get a scent out of you,
Speaker 4: not just on Australia Day.
Speaker 5: But every day. Hence.
Speaker 4: Fourth, if you are not proud to call Australia home,
Speaker 4: if you are not proud of this incredible nation, I don't.
Speaker 5: Want you out of a cent of my money.
Speaker 2: And find out who's advising them, because I mean, they
Speaker 2: made the headlines once for being anti Australian and they
Speaker 2: sort of said, all right, we're sorry, We're sorry, we'll
Speaker 2: fix things. And now they're making headlines again for the
Speaker 2: same stupid mistake.
Speaker 5: The apology wasn't sincere. I'm so shot, Oh my goodness.
Speaker 4: Also on the front of the Daily Telegraph, this.
Speaker 5: Is an appalling story. One in four girls groomed online.
Speaker 4: More than a quarter of young Australian women under the
Speaker 4: a of eighteen have been sexually propositioned online or via
Speaker 4: phone messages. A groundbreaking national study has revealed. Wow, these
Speaker 4: are really disturbing findings. Another reminder just stay away from
Speaker 4: your devices, like seriously, do not talk to strangers as
Speaker 4: strange a danger applies online as it does in real life.
Speaker 5: I just could not believe these stats.
Speaker 2: I agree that's why parents need to monitor their kids'
Speaker 2: social media activity.
Speaker 5: Not the government. Not the government parents.
Speaker 2: Tasmanian Mercury going off script reads the headline woman charged
Speaker 2: with drug driving over cannabis prescription issued by New South
Speaker 2: Wales doctor. A high profile Tasmanian Defense Council has called
Speaker 2: on the government to provide clarity on the state's medical
Speaker 2: cannabis laws after a sixty year old woman was on
Speaker 2: Wednesday convicted of drug driving despite holding a legitimate prescription
Speaker 2: issued in another state. So, as I understand, the law
Speaker 2: in Tasmania allowed to drive having used medical cannabis provided
Speaker 2: you have a legitimate prescription. The issue here seems to
Speaker 2: be the prescription was from New South Wales and was
Speaker 2: therefore not recognized in Tasmania, so she was fined.
Speaker 3: Well, that seems a bizarre loophole in the lord, doesn't it.
Speaker 3: Because if you live in New South Wales but you
Speaker 3: spend a month in Tasmania.
Speaker 1: Does that mean you're not allowed to drive a car.
Speaker 3: For that whole month you're in Tasmania. I can't see
Speaker 3: how this is real. It's an obvious thing that needs
Speaker 3: to be changed.
Speaker 2: All right, We're going to go to a break when
Speaker 2: we come back. Trump has sorted out gender madness in
Speaker 2: the United States, but gender madness has gone into overdrive
Speaker 2: in Ireland. Will show you that. In just a secretary
Speaker 2: well at his inauguration, Donald Trump announced that it is
Speaker 2: now the official position of the United States government there
Speaker 2: are only two genders, male and female. But the Episcopalian
Speaker 2: Church weren't the only ones upset by this. Left is everywhere.
Speaker 2: We're having absolute meltdowns.
Speaker 13: He has now gleamed that there will only be the
Speaker 13: male and female gender that will be recognized in America.
Speaker 13: This sets back everything that the trans community has been
Speaker 13: working for. In these next four years, you are going
Speaker 13: to hear the most intense anti trans propaganda you've ever
Speaker 13: heard in your entire length. Protect your trans community, stay involved,
Speaker 13: and do not forget us, because history will try. Two
Speaker 13: he reasons.
Speaker 2: Her heart goes out to that poor young lady. Although
Speaker 2: she might like to move from the United States, where
Speaker 2: clearly she's going to be persecuted to Ireland, where she'll
Speaker 2: be absolutely loved. The Irish government has just introduced new
Speaker 2: hate speech laws that make it a crime to direct
Speaker 2: hate towards any one of seventy two different genders. So
Speaker 2: those genders now are recognized in law, and Senator Sharon
Speaker 2: Keegan read them all out in the Irish Parliament. It
Speaker 2: took her twenty five minutes to read out all the
Speaker 2: genders they're now recognizing. Will show you just a snippet
Speaker 2: of it, sped up to save some time.
Speaker 14: Search gender, circumgender, curry gender, cloud gender, cloud gender, co gender,
Speaker 14: compnytal gender, core gender, collor gender, com gender, comp gender,
Speaker 14: compost gender, congreu gender, constant gender, county gender, content gender,
Speaker 14: currow gender, cosmic gender, cosme gender, come you love gender,
Speaker 14: sigh and gender scio gender. And I must please forgive
Speaker 14: me if I do pronounce some of these wrong there
Speaker 14: are quite extensive, And if I do offend anybody reading
Speaker 14: this outed making mistakes, I apologize comp gender, comme gender,
Speaker 14: comple gender, congregender, constagender, county gender, content gender, courrogender, cosmic gender,
Speaker 14: cosme gender, semi gender, psychogender. Now gender, damp gender, deggender,
Speaker 14: gentle gender, denmy gender, any fluid?
Speaker 2: Could you get a better example of the stark difference
Speaker 2: now between the United States and everywhere else in the world.
Speaker 3: I'm finally starting to understand the idea of being gender fluid,
Speaker 3: because when I have a shower, I'm damp gender, and
Speaker 3: then when I go home tonight stand on the balcony and.
Speaker 1: Look at the sky, be cosmic gender. I finally understand
Speaker 1: it now. I didn't know would take the Irish parlorm
Speaker 1: to give me that education.
Speaker 3: But also that woman, I don't know, man, young person
Speaker 3: who young person said you're gonna get this anti trans
Speaker 3: propaganda yet like biological fact, a scary biological fact.
Speaker 2: We're got to go. That's all from us. Stick Around
Speaker 2: coming up because the reader Penny Show, good Night,