WEBVTT - The Rita Panahi Show | 30 May

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:04.960
<v Speaker 1>On scoring Wields Ostrodia.

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 2>This is the Reader Panekee Show.

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Good evening, Welcome to the Reader Panahe Show.

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.319
<v Speaker 4>I'm Caroline Derusso, the great Reader Panahe will be back

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 4>next week, but for tonight you've got me in the

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.479
<v Speaker 4>hot seat. Here's what we've got coming up on the

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 4>show tonight. The jury in the Trump trial is out

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 4>on deliberation. You will not believe what the judge has said.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 4>We will give you the latest on all that the

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 4>Albanesi government scrambles to try and fix the visa system

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 4>they broke. Meanwhile, Labor is still split over the issue

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 4>of gas, as some members are finally mugged by the

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 4>reality that we will still need gas and will do

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:44.480
<v Speaker 4>for a while. And speaking of gas, you'll never guess

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 4>what North Korea filled these balloons up with. But before

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 4>we get to that, we have just clicked over a

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 4>week since the UK general election was called and today.

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Parliament will be formally dissolved.

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 4>As they say, a week is a long time in politics,

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 4>and it feels as though much has happened, but most

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 4>of it seems like white noise. We've had the Libdem

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 4>leader Ed Davy oddly fall from a paddle board into

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 4>Lake Windermere.

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 3>The point of that.

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 4>Exercise totally escapes me, but I'm sure some political nuff

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 4>he thought it was a good publicity stunt.

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 3>You'll recall that recently Labor whip Diane.

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 4>Abbott was stood down over anti Semitism allegations and was

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 4>barred from standing as a Labor candidate, and then yesterday

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 4>it was reported that the bar was overturned on the

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 4>outcome of the investigation. And well, we think she's allowed

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 4>to run, but it's hard to get a straight answer.

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Even the Tories aren't quite sure about the result of

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 3>the investigation and have asked questions themselves.

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 4>In any event, she's still better off than Jeremy Corbyn,

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 4>who's been formerly binned from the Labor Party. He was

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 4>banned from standing as a candidate and was then expelled after.

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 3>He confirmed he would run.

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 4>As an independent. Corbyn believes he could retain Islington North

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 4>as an independent, and one wonders whether this campaign will

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 4>become a focal point or a pain point for Labor

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 4>on the foreign policy front, given the conflict in the

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 4>Middle East and Corbyn's cushy relationship with Hamas. All of

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 4>this is going on while a veritable congoline of Tory

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 4>MPs decide to put themselves out to pasture before their.

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Constituents do it for them.

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 4>And if that isn't enough, rukis and dysfunction, Rishi Sunac

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.959
<v Speaker 4>is on the blower to Boris Johnson to discuss the

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 4>risk that Kiir Starmer and Labor post to the country.

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 4>It's a very interesting chitchat given Sunac resigned as Chancellor

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 4>in July twenty twenty two, which saw the Johnson government

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 4>fall within days. Oh how short and convenient memories are

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 4>in politics. And then there's Nigel Farage, who isn't standing

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.519
<v Speaker 4>for election for reasons which are not entirely clear. Apparently

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 4>he was going to run, but it's hard to win

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 4>a constituency, so he didn't.

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 3>And then he's worried about the other side cheating.

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 4>But he will still help Rishi Sunac's salvage of the

0:02:56.360 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 4>Tory campaign. So instead of spending six weeks stuck in

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 4>a constituency, he's going to travel around the country, not

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.799
<v Speaker 4>just supporting reform candidates, but also trying to get proper

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 4>debate going. I'm not quite sure I follow that maze

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 4>of reasoning, except that debate is never far from mister Farage,

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 4>that is for sure, and ladies and Jens, this is

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 4>just the musical chairs. We haven't even really got stuck

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 4>into the policy platforms yet. But rather than try and

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 4>appeal to voters, Sunak appears to be playing to older

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 4>Brits with promises to raise the pension tax free allowance

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 4>and return to the nostalgia of national service. They seem

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 4>like odd policy announcements after being so long in government,

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 4>but perhaps that political calculus is less focused on the

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 4>future of the country and more focused on who's actually

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 4>likely to turn out to vote now. The polls have

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 4>shown a slight improvement for the Tories recently, and when

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 4>I say slight, I mean the plunge appears to have

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 4>been arrested, not enough to retain government, but perhaps enough

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 4>to ensure the morning after papers label and an election defeat

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 4>as a loss rather.

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Than a total unmitigated she lacking.

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 4>Now it is an old, tired government, but is it

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 4>worse than the alternative? And that appears to be an

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 4>inevitable choice for many Brits. The Tories have been, let's

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 4>be honest, roundly disappointing in recent times, but Labor is

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 4>directionless and hapless, broadcaster and commentator Esther Crak who described

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 4>the choice between Sunac and Starma as like having to

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 4>choose between cholera and dysentery. A recent poll showed, amongst

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 4>other things, that Sir Kir was more trusted by voters

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 4>and mister Sunac to change a tire, assemble flat pack furniture,

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 4>and offer to pay for the first round in the pub.

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 3>The Labor leader also beats.

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 4>His Tory rival on who is more likely to lend

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 4>money if usked and to win popular game shows such

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 4>as Celebrity Master Chef or I'm a Celebrity, Get Me

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 4>out of Here.

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 3>With such serious issues at.

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 4>Play at the moment, it seems almost inappropriate to be

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 4>so cavalier about this decision making. Or maybe it's just

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 4>an exercise in if you don't laugh, you'll.

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 3>Cry the sherry.

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 4>On top of all of this is an article in

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 4>The Australian by Troy Branston lamenting Kirstarmer's lack of charisma. Now,

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 4>when someone as blamage as Troy Bramston notices a lack

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 4>of charisma, you know a.

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 3>Party League leader is Pete Vanilla. But then again, maybe

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 3>that's all Kirstarma needs to be. Well, that's the first week.

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 4>It's a long time until the election on July four,

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 4>and it's anyone's guess where this circus ultimately ends up.

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 4>Let's bring in mensi's Research Center senior fellow and columnist

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 4>Nick cat Nick before we dive into domestic news. What's

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 4>your view on the UK general election campaign so far.

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 5>I don't think I can add much to that brilliant

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 5>summary you just gave, Caroline, except to say that because

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 5>we're talking about all the peripheries, all the show and

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 5>the circus of it is a worry for Britain because

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 5>they've got some serious po the issues to deal with,

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 5>not Lisa, which actually is energy. Electricity prices are through

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 5>the roof there. But it's got all that feel, hasn't it,

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 5>of a tired government coming to the end of its

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 5>third term labor thinking they can just waltz in and

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 5>they don't have to do terribly much to get into power,

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 5>which is worrying because they are going to be I think,

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 5>by far the most left wing government Britton's ever seen

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 5>if they were to be elected. But let's see, you've

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 5>got a few weeks to play out.

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 4>Yet well back home, we continue to get nothing but

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 4>bad news out of the Department of Immigration. The implementation

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 4>of Direction ninety nine is at the very best misguided, Nick,

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 4>and today the Prime Minister has confirmed that it will

0:06:41.720 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 4>be reviewed. Can you explain to our audience what is

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 4>Direction ninety nine, what are as consequences and what on

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 4>earth was the Minister thinking.

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 5>I can't explain the last bit, but what the Minister

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 5>was thinking, but I'll give you the rest.

0:06:57.720 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 6>I mean.

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 5>Direction ninety nine was an edict from the Minister to

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 5>the Administry of Affairs Tribunal who deal with immigration appeals,

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 5>saying that if somebody spent a bit of time in Australia,

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 5>if they've got some ties to the Australian community, and

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 5>that's all left very vague, then we should give that

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 5>weight as against other factors like their criminal record. So

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.679
<v Speaker 5>you know, the AAT Commissioner to have taken the Minister

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 5>seriously and they've done exactly that in these high profile

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 5>cases where people with rape offences, child abuse offenses, violent crime,

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 5>drug dealing, people that would all you know, would have

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 5>been before Direction ninety nine would have been out on

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 5>their ear. Now they can stay because they've got some

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 5>connection with the Australian community. I thought the only connection

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 5>that really mattered was whether you're prepare to take out

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 5>citizenship and take an oath of loyalty to the country.

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 5>That's how it used to be. But now apparently you

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 5>don't need to do that. Not called the Direction ninety nine.

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 4>But you think the minister's incompetence in this is absolutely indefensible.

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 3>But apparently not. Here's Clara O'Neil going into bat for

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 3>her colleague.

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 7>Actually, Minister Giles has stepped in here. He's taking action

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 7>as a good minister would do. He's doing the right thing.

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:11.239
<v Speaker 7>He's stepped in at the right moment.

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>He stepped in.

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 3>At the right moment.

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, A lot of people would dispute that he put

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 2>in this direction, this ministerial direction last January. Then they

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 2>use the laws, this direction that was put in by

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 2>your government to stay in this country. So do you

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 2>think it's maybe too late that Andrew Giles is acting now?

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 7>I just reiterate what Minister Giles has said yesterday. Those

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 7>visas were canceled by the part that government plays in this.

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 7>An independent tribunal overturned those decisions.

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 4>Nick, When is the Prime Minister going to show some

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 4>leadership here and put the safety of Australians before his mate.

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 5>Look, you know, we call this incompetence and that's what

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 5>it looks like from our point of view. But actually,

0:08:55.880 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 5>let's not forget that Albanezi and Andrew Giles they actually

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 5>philosophically wants an open border policy. They've only been forced

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 5>to do the turnback thing because of the electoral reasons,

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 5>but that cuts across the grain to them. I mean

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 5>what they've done here in making it easier for all

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 5>sorts of migrants, whether desirable or not, to stay in

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 5>the country, that's exactly what they think. I mean, it's

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 5>the same as the Democrats in the United States, isn't it.

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.319
<v Speaker 5>Look at the open borders there. It's in their mindset.

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 5>So it's not in competence as so much as ideological

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 5>madness in my view.

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 4>Now on to the ABC and the fallout from the

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 4>Laura Tingle racism SAKA continues. Yesterday, ABC News director Justin

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:45.319
<v Speaker 4>Stevens released a statement which said the following, amongst other things,

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 4>Laura Tingle's remarks at the Sydney Writers Festival at the

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 4>week and lacked the context, balance and supporting information of

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 4>her work for the ABC, and will not have met

0:09:56.000 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 4>ABC's editorial standards. Although the remarks were conversational not made

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 4>in her work capacity, the ABC and its employees have

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 4>a unique obligation in the Australian media.

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Yet there doesn't seem.

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 4>To appear to be any acknowledgment of this failure from

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 4>Miss Tingle in her op ed length statement.

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 5>Does any No, No, she's full of self justification in there,

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 5>and she's been misunderstood and it's the Murdock Press and

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 5>all that sort of stuff. It's what you expect. We've

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 5>seen this play out before, haven't we That an ABC

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:36.719
<v Speaker 5>reporter or commentator, you know, makes some outrageous statement or

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:41.959
<v Speaker 5>does some misreporting, say for instance, on Donald Trump and Russia,

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.439
<v Speaker 5>and it's just ignored. They get away with it. It's

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 5>a travesty and absolute travesty. And I wonder what it

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 5>would take to actually bring some discipline to the ABC,

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 5>because it seems that management are trying their best to

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 5>look like they're saying the right things, but you know,

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 5>it's very gentle slat with a wet letters leaf. I

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 5>think to Laura Jingle from ABC Management and there's no

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 5>consequences for us. She's too powerful.

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 4>Speaking of no consequences, and the Greens continue to take

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 4>a rather myopic and jaundice view of the conflict in Gaza.

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 4>Here's Adam Bant at the weekend struggling to admit that

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:22.719
<v Speaker 4>Hermas is a terrorist organization.

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 8>Do you also agree Hamas is a terrorist organization that

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 8>needs to be dismantled.

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 6>Well, they're listed as a terrorist organization and our point

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 6>is now, well, it's it's just a fact.

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Supported.

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:36.959
<v Speaker 1>Do you think they're a terrorist organization? We're not.

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 6>We're not arguing to change they were saying they're listed

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:40.479
<v Speaker 6>as a terrorist organization.

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Agree the terrorist organization?

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 6>Well, but the point is what are you going to

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:50.439
<v Speaker 6>do with the Palestinian civilians? Do not cannot be collectively punished.

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 8>Having some trouble saying that Hamas is a terrorist organization.

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 4>And then Nick yesterday the Greens engaged in an epic

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 4>display of wedge politics, seeking to put up a motion

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 4>to recognize Palestinian statehood. The Coalition, Labor and part of

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 4>the cross Bench they oppose the motion to suspend parliamentary

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 4>business to debate recognition of a Palestinian state. Now there

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:15.079
<v Speaker 4>were two things which I thought particularly interesting to my mind,

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 4>the part of the cross bench which voted with the

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 4>major parties and the ones who abstained, and then the

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:24.719
<v Speaker 4>Greens tantrum in the aftermath about labor preferences.

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 3>It was a rather instructive vote, wasn't it.

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely. And the fact that Adam Bant and the Greens

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 5>are prepared to play politics with a crucial foreign policy

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 5>issue like this, it just shows we're in a very

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 5>very dangerous position if they get the balance of power

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 5>in the next election. And I think you're right. You know,

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 5>what I think is going on here is that nobody

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 5>in the Greens or is really taking the foreign policy

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 5>issues seriously. They're just after another Totalstinian people are their

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 5>latest totem. You know, was the polar Bear one day

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 5>and the climate the next, and today it's the Palestinian people.

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 5>They've got nil understanding, zero understanding of the history and

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 5>the politics of this, as Julia Gillard wisely pointed out

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 5>last weekend, and they're simply trying to make get their

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 5>supporters on board with this virtuous statement over something they

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 5>know absolutely zero about. And they're ignoring and closing their

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 5>eyes to the terrible terrible events of October seventh.

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 4>Here here now onto the corporates and the new cycle.

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 4>Nick is littered with corporates taking positions on matters they

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 4>probably shouldn't and then receiving an uppercut from.

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 3>The public for their effort.

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.439
<v Speaker 4>An interesting piece in the AFR about US corporations who

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 4>are deciding to stay mum on non call business. Are

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 4>they finally learning.

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, this is interesting, isn't it. They're backing away from

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 5>this ESG business, which you know, a couple of years

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:08.319
<v Speaker 5>ago was supposed to be the new way of accounting.

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 5>Everybody was supposed to do their accounts according to this.

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 5>This is just not workable, is it. In the end

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 5>of the day, I don't think that we're seeing the

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 5>end of woke capitalism by any means, And in fact,

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 5>I'm probably only just beginning, because the sort of people

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:28.359
<v Speaker 5>that are now filling their offices, or the different diversity

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 5>and inclusion staff and so forth, they've got it just

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 5>in sheer numbers. There are so many of them. They're

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 5>influencing these companies. But at the end of the day,

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 5>you know, reality does hit. I mean, they have to

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 5>make a profit, and if ESG is really seriously damaging

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 5>the bottom line, they're not going to do it.

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 3>I think that's fair.

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 4>And ultimately nothing brings anyone crashing down to reality, quite

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 4>like some corporate insolvency. But still over in the US

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 4>and the dury in the Trump trial, they're deliberating the moment.

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 4>Let's just say the last day or so has been

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 4>rather eventful.

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 3>First, Trump said.

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 2>This, what's happening here is weaponization at a level that

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 2>nobody seen before ever. In listening to the judges. From

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 2>the judges, as you know.

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 9>Very conflicted and corrupt.

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 8>Because of the confliction, very very corrupt, Mother.

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Teresa could not be these judges.

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 8>These judges are rigged.

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 3>The whole thing is rigged.

0:15:30.160 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 5>The whole country's have messed between.

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 4>And then the judge's direction to jurors that raise some eyebrows.

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Here.

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 9>It is one thing in particular that this judge said

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 9>that these jurors could do. He just delivered what is

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 9>being called really the pinnacle of all of this. He

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 9>said that there is no need to agree on what

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 9>has occurred. They can disagree on what the crime was

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 9>among the three choices. Thus, this means that they could

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 9>split four four four and the judge would still treat

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 9>them unanimously.

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 4>And then lastly, this was the hot take from a

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 4>commentator at MSNBC.

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 10>As you've noted with respect judge Mushan, I mean, I am,

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 10>I am like now you know, I have like a

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 10>man crash on him. He is such a great judge

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 10>that it's hard to see that the jurors wouldn't have

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 10>the same impression. And he's just you just keep on thinking.

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 10>If you looked in a dictionary for judicial temperament, that's

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 10>what you get.

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Nick, Can this chial get any more ridiculous?

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 5>That's weird that MSBC quote, isn't it? That really is

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 5>very strange. Look, no, you can't. And Trump is right,

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 5>you know he said that even mother Teresa couldn't escape

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 5>the charges and couldn't get off this one. And he's

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 5>absolutely right that the whole thing is terribly rigged against him.

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 5>But is that, Caroline, you know about the law. Is

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 5>that right? Are they going to say, okay, we've got

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 5>three child is you can pick anyone. You don't have

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 5>to all agree that he's guilty of one of those charges.

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 5>Just if anybody thinks he's guilty of something, that'll do

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 5>That's just not justice, is it? That surely have been

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 5>challenged in a higher court. But you know, it is

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 5>a circus at the end of the day. And Trump

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 5>wether he'll you know, whatever the sentence, whatever the verdicts,

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 5>you know, he's a winner out of this.

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 4>I think, yeah, I think that's fair, definitely politically in

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 4>any event. And no, I haven't seen a court in

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 4>this country or a judge in this country give that

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 4>sort of direction.

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm not quite sure how far they would get.

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 4>But moving on, and there are a number obviously of

0:17:40.880 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 4>fragile geopolitical situations around the world, and the Korean peninsula

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 4>well that one there's been dicey for decades, but recently

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 4>a balloon has erupted. What on earth is this about?

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, this is supposed to be retaliation, isn't it that

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 5>the North Koreans are retaliating for the South Koreans sending

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 5>a little USB sticks across on balloons with k Pop

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 5>on them. And they're added by sending lots of rubbish

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 5>and feces in these balloons which fall to the ground.

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 5>It rather confirms our thoughts about North Korea, doesn't it.

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 5>I mean a lot of people get to go there

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 5>and those who do aren't given free access to walk around. Still.

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 5>But you know, if this is the best that Korean culture,

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 5>North Korean culture could provide to the South in return

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:29.920
<v Speaker 5>for wonder all usb sticks of K pop, it really

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 5>does confirm our thoughts about what sort of regime and

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 5>what sort of country it is.

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 8>It's just.

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 5>On that level. But it's also pretty disgusting. And I

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 5>can't even say what's in those bags on television?

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, look, it was not something that I was

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 4>expecting to read about today, and I was a little

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 4>shocked myself even by what we know about North Korean

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 4>standards on those sorts of matters. Anyway, Nick Kata, thank

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 4>you so much for your time.

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 5>Thank you, Jeren.

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 4>Joining me now is renewable energy project developer and consultant

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 4>Peter Kerr.

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Peter, welcome to the show, Thanks Keren, thanks for having

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 3>me now.

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 4>Peter, your neck deep in the energy market here in

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 4>Wa and across the country. There seems to be a

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 4>myriad of energy infrastructure projects which have been proposed. Obviously,

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 4>they're not all equal, and it's been reported this week

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 4>that a proposed offshore wind farm in Victoria that Shell

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 4>was going to build has been quietly shelved. The federal

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 4>and Victorian governments have been big on offshore wind power.

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Why this one make the cup?

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 11>I think there are two reasons.

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 8>The first is all those Shells one of the biggest

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 8>energy companies in the world, They're not the leading offshore

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 8>wind players, so they're probably beaten to the punch by

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 8>some of the more experienced types. The second one is

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:55.719
<v Speaker 8>that their CEO has recently made a big play about

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 8>winding back some of Shell's renewable energy ambitions. So I

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 8>suspect this project was marginal for them, okay, and became

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 8>surplus to requirements.

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:07.360
<v Speaker 11>So yeah, it's still going ahead. But with other bigger

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 11>players in their shore wind market.

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no fair enough.

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 4>And still on Victoria, we've seen the Energy Minister Lily

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 4>dan Brose. She's moved a little bit on gas, but

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 4>she still seems to be at odds with her federal counterpart,

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:24.640
<v Speaker 4>Madeline King, that Victorian labor government has had some pretty

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 4>strident anti gas policies in recent years. How impactful is

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.239
<v Speaker 4>that not only for their energy market but for their

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 4>economy going forward.

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 11>Look, maybe if I step it back.

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:40.119
<v Speaker 8>It's a debate we often hear in the renewal industry,

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 8>there's no lack of desire to want to move as

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 8>quickly as you can from fossil fulls to renewable energy

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 8>and one of those people, but there is a pragmatic

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 8>part of the industry that acknowledges that gas will be

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 8>a major part for many years to come off the

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 8>transition to renewals, and so I think that's where the

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 8>challenge is. And if you're not planning carefully that transition,

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 8>you can have unintended consequences, and that is higher gas

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 8>prices if you're not bringing on you know, supplies or

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 8>at least maintaining adequate supplies. And so yeah, at the moment,

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:20.959
<v Speaker 8>for example, in Victoria, gas prices domestically for industry are

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:23.199
<v Speaker 8>at least fifty percent higher than they are here in

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 8>Western Australia, and so that goes to the bottom line

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 8>of businesses. Yeah, so I think, you know, no one disagrees,

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 8>you know, with the idea of getting to renewable engine

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 8>or a largely renewable system, But how do you get

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.120
<v Speaker 8>there is the challenge and is.

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 4>That then an issue definitely obviously to Victoria in this

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 4>particular circumstances, because there still seems to be that bit

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 4>of political friction and political angst about it, particularly given

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 4>the way they've demonized gas in recent times, but more

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 4>broadly in Australia, is that something that we need to

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:03.360
<v Speaker 4>consider a cross the country. How much gas do we need,

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:05.479
<v Speaker 4>how much new gas do we need and how long

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 4>we're going to need it for?

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So the trick you know, if you talk to

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 8>the pragmatic part of the industry, and I'm not just talking,

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 8>you know, the fossil fuel industry. So there's a group

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 8>in Western Australia called the Sustainable Energy Network, So.

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:20.639
<v Speaker 11>They are hand on heart. They want to get as

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 11>fast as they can to renewable energy.

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 8>They're modeling, and most modeling, pragmatic modeling will say you

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 8>can get to renewables of about eighty to ninety percent

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 8>of your system pretty quickly.

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 11>The last ten percent is pretty hard, right, and it

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 11>will be hard for decades.

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 8>And so rather than having the debate about, you know, gas,

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 8>should we not have it, Let's go as hard as

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 8>we can on renewables, get to eighty or ninety percent,

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 8>and then let's deal with the ten percent problem later.

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 8>But in the interim, we're burning less coal an extra gas, yes,

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 8>but it overall is a better outcome because you're racing

0:22:56.600 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 8>towards renewables and I think this gas has been demanized

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 8>and it can be in a very effective part of

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 8>an overall balanced energy system.

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, okay, And I suppose there's an ancillary issue to

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 4>that around the discussion of having more and new gas

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 4>supplies coming on. Obviously, the federal Environment Minister tanivsk is

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 4>talking about a national EPA Environmental Protection Agency. To what

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 4>extent do you think that, you know, adding that extra

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:35.880
<v Speaker 4>regulation and potentially that extra delay could make that process

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 4>more difficult, and that ten percent at the end more difficult.

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 8>Look, I think it's not just environmental approvals. It is

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:48.119
<v Speaker 8>a range of approvals. Whether it's a network access approval,

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 8>whether it's a community development approval, whether it's environmental heritage.

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 11>They all layer on top of each other.

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 8>So at the moment in Australia, you're generally, even for

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 8>the best planned wind farms from go you know an

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 8>idea through to sending electricity out on the grid, it's

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 8>about seven to ten years, which is too long. So yeah,

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 8>I think there are some concerns about the complexity of

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 8>the development process, and this may at the margin add

0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 8>to it.

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 11>So I think there are some suggestions, and you.

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 8>Know, I'd be one of those that would welcome a

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 8>reconsideration of the holistic nature of this layering of approvals

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 8>on realbal projects.

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 4>Right and onto labour's future made in Australia policy. We

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 4>know that that there is very much centered around fast

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 4>tracking the transition and removing some of those.

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 3>National security issues which sit.

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 4>Around foreign manufacturing. To what extent do you think that

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 4>that policy can actually work and will that production of

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 4>manufacturing be able to occur without government subsidy?

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 8>Look, probably the thing to say is that every bit helps,

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 8>and more broadly, that initiative is actually quite small in

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 8>the scheme of things, so at the margin, I think

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 8>it helps. I don't think domestically production is necessarily going

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 8>to succeed without subsidies, and I think that's the government's intent.

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:18.719
<v Speaker 8>The thing to say is that Australia has always been

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 8>a trading nation. We've relied on imports and exports. That's

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 8>who we are, just by the nature of our geography,

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 8>and so we are always going to rely on some

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 8>form of assistance. I don't think you can do it

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 8>all the time. The notion, however, and this is where

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 8>renewables get you. The notion that you might take more

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 8>control of your energy supplies rather than say, having to

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 8>import oil is a good.

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 11>Long term notion. And so yeah, it's a small piece.

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 8>I don't think it's going to be either a huge

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 8>blocker or a huge enabler, other than to say it

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 8>is support in the right direction.

0:25:58.720 --> 0:25:58.880
<v Speaker 11>Now.

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 4>Lastly, onto nuclear and the CSIRO has gone back to

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 4>the drawing.

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Board this week.

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 4>They're asked to redo their home CSIR right by the coalition. Look,

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 4>I think most people, most people wouldn't well, wouldn't disagree

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 4>that the moratorium could come off.

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 3>And can we at least.

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 4>Talk about it, Like whether you actually go ahead and

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 4>have nuclear power?

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 3>I think is step two.

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:25.919
<v Speaker 4>But I think most people would say, well, we should

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 4>at least be able.

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 3>To talk about it. Is there a world.

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 4>Where nuclear either in the large scale form or the

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 4>small scale form can work in Australia.

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 8>In Australia, look, I don't see it financially stacking up

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 8>given the advantages we have.

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 11>Around renewed energy and gas.

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 8>I just don't think, and we've not got a big market,

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 8>it definitely will play a part in industries and countries

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 8>where they're pre existing, absolutely, so I'm not against it.

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 8>I think the challenge is a little bit that it's

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 8>a distraction in Australia will take at least twenty years

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:04.400
<v Speaker 8>from the start to get something up.

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 11>So look, I don't disagree with the premise.

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 8>I guess what's the harm in at least planning for

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 8>maybe planed c if you need it in twenty fifty,

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 8>well let's at least start now having those you know,

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 8>those conversations. I think you know, we only have to

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:25.959
<v Speaker 8>look at the waste dump issue in Australia. We've been

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 8>unable to resolve that for thirty forty years, so these

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 8>are long duration we are.

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Going to have to sort it out for aucust.

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 8>So that conversation, so that conversation need to say yeah

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 8>and look, so one hundred percent, why not have a

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 8>genuine conversation. I guess the trick is not to pretend

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 8>like it's in the next twenty years in terms of

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 8>energy or is the panacea.

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 11>But yeah, look it may in the future be a

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 11>long term need. But let's not get distracted right now.

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 11>But yeah, you can chew gum and walk at the

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 11>same time, right.

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Like, so excellent insights, Thank you so much.

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 4>Thanks still to come unhelpful news on inflation, But wasn't

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 4>the surprise the government seems to think it was. Welcome

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 4>back to the show. Joining me now is journalist and

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 4>analyst Tarek Brooker. Tarik, can we receive some very unhelpful

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:28.479
<v Speaker 4>news on inflation yesterday? It was reported as being a surprise,

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.959
<v Speaker 4>but I'm not entirely sure who was surprised. What were

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 4>the key takeaways in those figures for you?

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 12>I think the key takeaway was that we are seeing deflation,

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 12>outright deflation, so falling prices in things like recreation and

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 12>culture and in household goods and services. But even with

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 12>all those advantages that we're seeing, it's not putting enough

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 12>downward pressure on inflation to get this resolved quickly. And

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 12>I think that when you look at the graph of inflation,

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 12>whether it's the RBA's preferred measure, which is the trim

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 12>mean or headline rate of inflation, they're not going in

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 12>the right that they've stopped going in that downward trajectory

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 12>and they've started to sort of bottom out and in

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 12>some cases rise, and that's that's not what the rbas

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 12>want to be seeing, and that's not what Australians in

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 12>general want to be seeing.

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 3>No, they don't.

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 4>And we also keep hearing about the future for potential

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:23.959
<v Speaker 4>rate hikes or at the very least a longer period

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 4>of time before there's a rate cut. Given some parts

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 4>of the economy are already softening despite the inflation, the

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 4>bba's job is becoming increasingly difficult, isn't it.

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 12>It is, and I think that that job is only

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 12>going to get harder. And this is the point that

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 12>it's some you know, a various numbers of prominent economiests

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 12>have made you know that they're saying that, you know,

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:48.320
<v Speaker 12>the budget is in a lot of ways inflationary, and

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 12>while we will see the electricity subsidies and increases to

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.959
<v Speaker 12>rent assistance put downward pressure on inflation as it's measured

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 12>in the CPI, we could see more upward pressure on

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 12>underline inflation as a result. So this really sort of

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 12>in a lot of ways traps the RBA in a

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 12>very very challenging position, particularly when you factor in that

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 12>we could see a significant rise in unemployment because we

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 12>are seeing that deterioration in things like job ads and

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 12>job vacancies across both the public metrics and those done

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 12>by the private sector.

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 4>And inflation and the cost of servicing debt are obviously

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 4>putting increasing strain on household budgets. Are we starting to

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 4>see any movement in housing stock or housing prices or

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 4>anything like that.

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 12>We are seeing not so much in prices as of yet.

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 12>We have seen in for example, on the call Logic

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 12>figures in Melbourne, we have seen prices start to flatten

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 12>out and in some cases decline. But in terms of stock,

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 12>that's where I think things get interesting. We are if

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 12>you look at the prop track, which is real estate

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 12>dot COM's new listings figures, we are starting to see

0:30:57.760 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 12>some very strong rises in the number of new lists

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 12>in Sydney and Melbourne in particular. Now while the number

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 12>of overall listings on market still remains quite subdued in

0:31:08.520 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 12>most places well with the exception of Melbourne. We are

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 12>just seeing that very very interesting divergence, you know, in

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 12>the places where we are seeing those high levels of

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 12>mortgage stress, where we are seeing those people with the

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 12>larger loans, places like Sydney and Melbourne, we are seeing

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 12>more stock come to market, but in the smaller capitals

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 12>where loans tend to be a lot smaller, we haven't

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 12>seen those same issues.

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 4>Now, the issue with inflation doesn't only affect households. We

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 4>are seeing business getting squeezed as well with obviously increased

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 4>costs of.

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Production and wages.

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 4>What are the current pain points in your view for

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 4>business and what is the impact on real wage growth.

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 12>Well, businesses are a bit stuck really because we've seen

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 12>we've seen inflation come down, we've seen their ability to

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 12>pass on rising costs come down, even though if you

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 12>look at some of the various surveys, so for example,

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 12>the NAB business that we're still seeing those input costs

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 12>at a relatively high level, but wage demands and while

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 12>wages may have peaked, wage demands remain quite high. And

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 12>as the chart on the screen shows, workers have a

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:19.880
<v Speaker 12>long long way to go before they regain where wages

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 12>were prior to the pandemic. Let alone the blowoff top

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 12>that we saw following the introduction of lockdowns, and at

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 12>the current rate, we're talking about a pathway that could

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 12>potentially take years, if not well, could potentially take well

0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 12>over a decade. And that's really not great news for

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 12>Australian workers who are on this long, long path back

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 12>to normality.

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely and not great for living standards either in the

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 4>introm Now onto housing more broadly, and despite us suppose

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 4>that what it seems like a cacophony of voices lamenting

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 4>this housing crisis, home construction nears a two year low.

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 4>Can you explain to us what we're seeing and how

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 4>is it possible, given so much focus of the discussion

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 4>on housing at the moment, that this is actually happening.

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 12>It's honestly, it's honestly a bit of a mess because

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 12>we saw construct housing construction in terms of completions peak

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 12>all the way back in twenty seventeen and that cycle,

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 12>that building cycle hasn't yet come to an end, and

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 12>that's a rather significant issue now. As the child on

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 12>the screen shows, in terms of completions per capita, we're

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 12>actually at a very very low level, but relative to

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 12>the rest of the world, we're actually doing quite well.

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 12>So Australia is a little bit of a contradiction. We've

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 12>got this ginormous juggernaut of a construction sector that manages

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 12>to at times outbuild multiple rivals put together in terms

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 12>of per capita outcomes, but it's not employed very efficiently.

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 12>Now there's a lot of reasons for that. There's red tape,

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 12>green tape, just you know, issues that have crept into

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 12>the sector over the years in terms of labor being

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 12>employed efficiently, and we've seen the output per worker in

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 12>terms of whether you're talking about the number of homes

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 12>being completed or the square majia each of homes being

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 12>completed fall over time. So I think that that's a

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 12>really important part of the conversation that the government and

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 12>policy makers and stakeholders need to be having, that we

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:19.200
<v Speaker 12>need to use our construction sector more efficiently in order

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 12>to do more with what we have to get closer

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 12>to that unfortunately quite unrealistic target the Albaneze government as

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 12>set of one point two million new homes.

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:30.799
<v Speaker 3>And just on that.

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:34.319
<v Speaker 4>You know, the governments can set construction targets and that's

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 4>one thing, but it really does appear that we just

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:40.240
<v Speaker 4>don't have enough skilled labor to carry out these works.

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Not only for housing, but given the huge number of.

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:47.280
<v Speaker 4>State and federal infrastructure projects that are also on foot

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 4>or are in the pipeline.

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Is that right? And are there any other impediments that

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:52.720
<v Speaker 3>you see?

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 12>There is the biggest impediment I see is the continued

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 12>rise of knockdown rebuilds. Now that doesn't sound like it's

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:01.759
<v Speaker 12>something it's going to be like a fit in really

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 12>all that significant. But if we go back, say to

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:08.800
<v Speaker 12>say twenty sixteen twenty seventeen, only roughly about six or

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 12>seven percent of dwelling completions were in effect knockdown rebuilds.

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 12>As of the latest comparable figures, that's now fifteen percent.

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 12>So we have to build a lot more in order

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:24.359
<v Speaker 12>to get net dwelling growth. So I think that's part

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 12>of the problem. And as I said previously, it's just

0:35:26.560 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 12>about employing our construction sector efficiently. Now our construction sector

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 12>employees over one point three million people. It is the largest,

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 12>is one of the largest construction sectors in the developed

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:39.840
<v Speaker 12>world per capita. And I think that we can do

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:42.799
<v Speaker 12>a lot more with what we have, even with the

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 12>burden placed by the increased levels of infrastructure construction, to

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 12>keep up with population growth. But I think that that

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 12>requires a lot of difficult conversations from policy makers and

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:56.959
<v Speaker 12>just an acknowledgment of the fact that we have gone

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:00.799
<v Speaker 12>backwards in a lot of important ways, and that those

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 12>issues need to be addressed.

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, absolutely, And on that, I've only got about a

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 4>minute left. You know, we know that housing is going

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:12.800
<v Speaker 4>to be a hot topic for the federal election approaching.

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 4>Both major parties are proffering policy on housing. But what

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 4>policy settings do you think will best alleviate the current crisis?

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:24.239
<v Speaker 12>I think, realistically there needs to be a conversation about immigration,

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:28.800
<v Speaker 12>because if it depends if you say, for example, amp

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 12>Shane Oliver's analysis that says we have a shortage of

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 12>two hundred thousand homes, if that's the case, in attempting

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:40.279
<v Speaker 12>to alleviate that shortage while we are still running a

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 12>migration intake of two hundred and fifteen hundred sixty thousand

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 12>as laid out in the federal budget, you're talking about

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 12>something that's going to take the best part of a decade.

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 12>So I think that there needs to be a conversation

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:51.360
<v Speaker 12>about how many homes do we need, do we actually

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 12>need to alleviate this shortage, and how are we going

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 12>to achieve that with the settings that are being employed.

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 12>So that's going to be a tough one for the

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 12>alban Eze government, and I think increasingly as we're seeing

0:37:01.640 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 12>with our premier Stephen miles in Queensland an increasingly difficult

0:37:05.600 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 12>conversation between the States and the federal government.

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, thank you so much for your observations. Really appreciate it.

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much, Terry Brooker.

0:37:15.920 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 12>No worries, thanks for having me.

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:20.799
<v Speaker 4>Still to come, potential fresh charges for Harvey Weinstein could

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 4>see more Hollywood types dragged into this scandal.

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 3>Plus Harry im Meagan At demanding not only an apology

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 3>from the royal family, but more praise and recognition. Are

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 3>they having a laugh?

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:45.440
<v Speaker 4>Joining me now is entertainment and royal reporter Kinsey Schofield.

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Kinsey.

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 4>Harvey Weinstein hasn't been in the news for a while,

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 4>but he was recently.

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 3>Back in court on the wrong end of some more charges.

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:54.040
<v Speaker 3>What's the update?

0:37:54.920 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 1>That's right? Havevey Weinstein appeared in a wheelchair before a

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:01.400
<v Speaker 1>judge on Wednesday afternoon in the scene NYC Court house

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>where President Donald Trump is currently on trial. Manhattan prosecutors

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:09.040
<v Speaker 1>told a judge that they're exploring new claims of sexual

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>misconduct made against Harvey Weinstein and are considering seeking a

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>new indictment against him ahead of his scheduled retrial on

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:21.880
<v Speaker 1>rape charges leader this year. Additional alleged victims have come

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:26.400
<v Speaker 1>forward with assault claims, and prosecutors are currently assessing which

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>while under the state's statue of limitations. The retrial on

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that rape charge that was tossed out by the court

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was just a month ago, is tentatively

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 1>scheduled shortly after Labor Day.

0:38:40.080 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 4>We'll see where that goes. But I feel like they're

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 4>still a bit to wash out there, Kinsey. Now onto

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:49.799
<v Speaker 4>our next topic, Northwest and the trials are having a

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:53.279
<v Speaker 4>go at North where she's Kim Kardashian and Kanye West daughter.

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Apparently her performance is Simba is not up to what

0:38:57.080 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 4>the armchair critics expected.

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:03.760
<v Speaker 3>Here's a.

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 13>Little king. I'm looking now, I'm working.

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 3>Kinsy, She's just a kid. What do you make of these?

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, she's performing. I just can't wait to be king.

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 1>This is the Hollywood Bulls thirtieth anniversary celebration for the

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Lion King. Criticism has been ridiculously harsh, but you know,

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 1>North was quick to join TikTok years ago. She worked

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:45.400
<v Speaker 1>on her father's latest album. She has clearly chosen this path,

0:39:45.800 --> 0:39:48.880
<v Speaker 1>so hopefully her parents are preparing her behind the scenes

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 1>for the negative attention. This industry will inevitably attract, but

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:54.719
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, her mother and father

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:57.320
<v Speaker 1>will open a lot of doors for her that genuinely

0:39:57.360 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 1>talented children will not have the privilege to enter. So

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 1>her life will be a blessing and a curse, with

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:05.240
<v Speaker 1>a few more perks than the average person.

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, but let's hope she still gets to be a

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 4>bit of a kid in the meantime, And it seems

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:15.800
<v Speaker 4>that not all is well in the Lopez Affleck household.

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:18.439
<v Speaker 4>We understand j Lowe is canceling some shows and made

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:19.720
<v Speaker 4>some relationship termoil.

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 3>What's going on here?

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:24.799
<v Speaker 1>You're absolutely right, you know. She has had a bad year,

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:28.479
<v Speaker 1>three critically panned films, her worst selling album ever, She's

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 1>canceled concert dates across the States, and she's currently living

0:40:32.200 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 1>separately from her relatively new husband. But despite reports that

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:40.320
<v Speaker 1>plans for Jennifer Lopez's Las Vegas residency are now in jeopardy,

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:44.319
<v Speaker 1>the Daily Mail reports that negotiations are very much ongoing,

0:40:44.400 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and it was reported earlier this week that n GM

0:40:47.280 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Grand and Live Nation offered her one million dollars per

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:54.439
<v Speaker 1>night for ninety shows in twenty twenty five. So Ben

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Affleck's back tattoo might not be there when she gets home,

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:00.359
<v Speaker 1>but the bank account will be, so I think she's

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be okay.

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 3>And kisy onto.

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 4>Our favorite topic, the royals, and the commentary on the

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:12.239
<v Speaker 4>not Royal Royal touring Kenya continues, but this time it's

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 4>Nigeria's First Lady who offered her view on the Sussex's visit.

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:20.440
<v Speaker 3>What was her particular criticism, Yeah, this.

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Is really set the internet ablaze. She said, tell young

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:26.560
<v Speaker 1>girls and women, we don't accept nakedness in our culture.

0:41:26.719 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 1>That is not beautiful. She also stressed they do not

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 1>want to mimic and try to emulate film stars from America.

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:35.880
<v Speaker 1>They don't know where they come from. Why did Meghan

0:41:36.040 --> 0:41:40.360
<v Speaker 1>come here looking for Africa? Whether there was resentment towards

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Megan there, I'm not sure. I don't have an opinion

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.400
<v Speaker 1>on that, but I do think it's an odd coincidence

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 1>considering the fact that Megan was criticized for her wardrobe

0:41:48.840 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>being culturally inappropriate throughout that trip. And I mean friendly reminder,

0:41:53.480 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Meghan Markle is a Hollywood actress, so you know, it's

0:41:56.960 --> 0:41:58.399
<v Speaker 1>a very odd coincidence.

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely, And another story which just won't go away is

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 4>the Prince Harry visa saga. The information still hasn't been

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 4>publicly released, and it appears.

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:11.960
<v Speaker 3>The kid gloves are out for the Prince.

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 1>What's the latest, Well, I mean, it's again the Biden

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 1>administration protecting Prince Harry. The Telegraph headline read Biden administration

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:24.320
<v Speaker 1>pleads with court to keep Prince Harry's visa documents under wraps.

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:27.839
<v Speaker 1>This is found inside a fifty three page transcript from

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a court hearing all the way back in February. Again,

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:33.840
<v Speaker 1>this is the Heritage Foundation saying, the American public just

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:36.239
<v Speaker 1>wants to know the truth. How is Prince Harry here?

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Did he lie on his visa application? Or was he

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 1>given special privilege? The Biden administration fighting and their new

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 1>I guess their new argument is this, many of these

0:42:46.280 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 1>records are law enforcement records. They believe there is a

0:42:49.239 --> 0:42:53.319
<v Speaker 1>stigma associated with being mentioned in law enforcement records, and

0:42:53.360 --> 0:42:57.480
<v Speaker 1>they argue that publishing those files would expose confidential law

0:42:57.560 --> 0:43:02.359
<v Speaker 1>enforcement tools. The government insists even Prince Harry deserves some

0:43:02.400 --> 0:43:03.400
<v Speaker 1>form of privacy.

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 4>That's very interesting considering that the stigma doesn't seem to

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 4>be an issue when it comes to other people, because

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 4>we know the rules for everyone else. So it's very

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 4>interesting that this here seems to be the principal argument

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 4>in this case, and in so far as Prince Harry

0:43:22.080 --> 0:43:25.759
<v Speaker 4>is concerned. Now we've seen a continued and stunning lack

0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 4>of self awareness out of the Sussexes, but apparently now

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:34.239
<v Speaker 4>Harry's reportedly frustrated that the Royal family won't acknowledge his achievements. Now,

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:38.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm not quite sure where to begin with on this, Kinsey.

0:43:38.360 --> 0:43:40.839
<v Speaker 4>The entitlement is thick and fast here, isn't it.

0:43:41.760 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree with you, but I don't necessarily know

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:46.799
<v Speaker 1>if I believe this. I don't consider Prince Harry the

0:43:46.800 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>most intelligent person in the world, but I give him

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 1>more credit than to believe he was sitting around expecting

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a high five from the Royal family after calling a

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 1>room full of Nigerian scammers his in laws. I mean,

0:43:57.719 --> 0:43:59.920
<v Speaker 1>this guy's written to hot shacks all over the States,

0:44:00.239 --> 0:44:03.880
<v Speaker 1>banned from entering the States. This guy over here, like

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is accused of funneling money through the United States, and

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I think was also booted from the United States. So

0:44:10.960 --> 0:44:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Harry knows that he made some mistakes throughout that trip,

0:44:14.560 --> 0:44:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and he's got to acknowledge them if he wants to

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:21.759
<v Speaker 1>continue to play fake royal, you know, internationally, I.

0:44:21.719 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 4>Think that's that's probably a pretty good point. Maybe we

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 4>don't quite give him enough credit, But onto Princess Catherine,

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:31.800
<v Speaker 4>and she's been saying out and about during her recovery,

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:34.360
<v Speaker 4>and you know, as you well know some of the

0:44:34.480 --> 0:44:38.919
<v Speaker 4>scandalous rumors which have been circulating in recent months, it's

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:42.560
<v Speaker 4>probably some smart pr for her occasionally to be seen

0:44:42.600 --> 0:44:43.280
<v Speaker 4>in the flesh.

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:44.240
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that's fair?

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, I don't know if I think you're right.

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it is good pr for her, but I

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:53.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think that that's her objective because it's my understanding

0:44:53.440 --> 0:44:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that she was incredibly hurt by the conspiracy theories, I

0:44:57.480 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 1>mean emotionally hurt and just wanted to high away. But

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:03.680
<v Speaker 1>it is being reported that she has turned a corner

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to her health. The family is feeling

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:08.719
<v Speaker 1>positive about the direction. She is spending time in the

0:45:08.800 --> 0:45:12.480
<v Speaker 1>sunshine with her babies, and her children are especially grateful

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:15.399
<v Speaker 1>for the rare down time to just enjoy and love

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:17.880
<v Speaker 1>on both their mother and father, because how often do

0:45:17.960 --> 0:45:20.239
<v Speaker 1>they just get to come home and mom and dad

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 1>are both there, so I'm grateful that her health has improved.

0:45:24.080 --> 0:45:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to see her at trooping, but my people

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 1>are telling me it looks like more possibly an autumn

0:45:30.960 --> 0:45:34.400
<v Speaker 1>relaunch for the Princess of Wales. But oh my goodness,

0:45:34.400 --> 0:45:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I would be so thrilled if we got to see

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:36.720
<v Speaker 1>her at trooping.

0:45:38.480 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that would be amazing.

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:42.719
<v Speaker 4>And look, we do understand that her treatment is progressing,

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:47.279
<v Speaker 4>but we don't have any sort of return timeline yet,

0:45:47.320 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 4>do we. I mean, you've mentioned the autumn, but you

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:51.440
<v Speaker 4>know that could be anytime.

0:45:51.080 --> 0:45:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Right, absolutely, And the Palace is insisting that they're not

0:45:55.840 --> 0:45:58.680
<v Speaker 1>going to give us a date. And what I've also

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:01.560
<v Speaker 1>heard is that both Prince William and King Charles have

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 1>stressed to her it's all about you. You know, once

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:07.960
<v Speaker 1>your doctors clear, you do not feel any pressure to

0:46:08.040 --> 0:46:11.880
<v Speaker 1>return to work. Come back when you're ready. And you know,

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm sure she I'm sure she misses us too,

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:16.040
<v Speaker 1>but we certainly do miss her.

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:21.600
<v Speaker 4>She's box office, yeah absolutely, But the most important thing

0:46:21.680 --> 0:46:23.759
<v Speaker 4>I think is it that she gets well and if

0:46:23.760 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 4>she needs the time, she should absolutely take the time.

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Now this year we've really seen, obviously.

0:46:29.400 --> 0:46:33.719
<v Speaker 4>With both Charles and Catherine, the impact of what can

0:46:33.760 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 4>go wrong with a slim down royal family. Kinzie a

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:40.440
<v Speaker 4>great piece in the UK Telegraph suggesting that William might

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:41.399
<v Speaker 4>put more and.

0:46:41.440 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Younger royals up front.

0:46:43.600 --> 0:46:46.719
<v Speaker 4>Is that the solution both to the actual and the

0:46:46.760 --> 0:46:48.400
<v Speaker 4>perception issues.

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm sure you remember that interview where the Princess

0:46:52.760 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Royal Anne was like, that's a ridiculous idea, the suggestion

0:46:56.320 --> 0:46:58.719
<v Speaker 1>of a slim down monarchy, and the King actually made

0:46:58.760 --> 0:47:03.600
<v Speaker 1>those comments deck ago. What we see today isn't that execution.

0:47:03.760 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 1>It's just a tragic hand that they've been dealt. And

0:47:07.160 --> 0:47:10.120
<v Speaker 1>when we see Prince William engaging with all of his

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 1>cousins at the Buckingham Palace garden party, I think he's

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:17.400
<v Speaker 1>expressing his love for his family and unity. But the

0:47:17.480 --> 0:47:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Queen was very clear that half in, half out doesn't work,

0:47:20.760 --> 0:47:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's part of the reason that Harry and Meghan

0:47:22.760 --> 0:47:26.200
<v Speaker 1>continue to publicly fall on their faces. I don't really

0:47:26.239 --> 0:47:29.040
<v Speaker 1>believe that Prince William will attempt to bring any additional

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 1>family members center stage, but I do think he's going

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:35.799
<v Speaker 1>to keep his cousins close to him. But I think

0:47:35.840 --> 0:47:38.360
<v Speaker 1>it's going to stay those core members.

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:42.719
<v Speaker 3>And just on keeping those cousins close.

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:45.719
<v Speaker 4>I was fortunate enough to interview Peter Phillips earlier this year.

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:49.080
<v Speaker 4>He really is a sensible and steady set of hands.

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:52.600
<v Speaker 4>It's reported this week that he has been really valuable

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:55.279
<v Speaker 4>support to Prince William, particularly since.

0:47:55.000 --> 0:47:57.920
<v Speaker 3>The brothers have fallen out. I've only got about.

0:47:57.560 --> 0:48:00.360
<v Speaker 4>Thirty seconds left, But what's your view now?

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Peter's got great length experience, He's outside of that bubble,

0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and he has his mother's backbone. He cares deeply about

0:48:07.120 --> 0:48:10.279
<v Speaker 1>loyalty and their family, something Prince William also values more

0:48:10.320 --> 0:48:13.920
<v Speaker 1>than ever. So I stand. I love this. I love

0:48:13.960 --> 0:48:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the idea of these two.

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so do I.

0:48:18.239 --> 0:48:21.439
<v Speaker 4>Kinsey Schofield, thank you so much for joining us. Now

0:48:21.480 --> 0:48:23.799
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to leave you with a shout out to

0:48:24.040 --> 0:48:26.839
<v Speaker 4>those fighting the good fight against the ban on live

0:48:26.880 --> 0:48:27.760
<v Speaker 4>sheep export.

0:48:28.040 --> 0:48:29.720
<v Speaker 3>This week, the Labor Caucus gave.

0:48:29.560 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 4>The nod to the introduction of legislation to phase out

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:36.360
<v Speaker 4>live sheep exports by one May eight. In response, farmers

0:48:36.400 --> 0:48:39.200
<v Speaker 4>in wa are planning a mass convoy through the Perth

0:48:39.320 --> 0:48:42.760
<v Speaker 4>CBD tomorrow to protest the proposed.

0:48:42.160 --> 0:48:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Band and they aren't stuffing around.

0:48:44.920 --> 0:48:47.440
<v Speaker 4>They're not going to just sit back while their livelihoods

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:49.920
<v Speaker 4>are phased out and millions of millions of dollars are

0:48:50.000 --> 0:48:53.960
<v Speaker 4>ripped from regional communities. We talk constantly about the need

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:57.319
<v Speaker 4>to diverse fire trade and so it's just ludicrous to

0:48:57.400 --> 0:49:01.360
<v Speaker 4>ban a viable, world class industry so labor can indulge

0:49:01.400 --> 0:49:04.120
<v Speaker 4>the ideological proclivities of its left flank.

0:49:04.600 --> 0:49:05.360
<v Speaker 3>To show your.

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:08.319
<v Speaker 4>Support, please go to ww dot keepths sheep dot com

0:49:08.360 --> 0:49:12.880
<v Speaker 4>dot au forward Slash petition and sign their petition. In Australia,

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 4>we don't kick our farmers and this is one kick

0:49:15.600 --> 0:49:17.440
<v Speaker 4>from labor we need to stand against.

0:49:18.200 --> 0:49:20.760
<v Speaker 3>And that's that's it for me. Up next to his Newsnight,

0:49:20.840 --> 0:49:21.239
<v Speaker 3>good Night,