WEBVTT - The Late Debate | 24 February

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Lately.

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Welcomely to the Late Blase Loo.

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:08.479
<v Speaker 3>Good evening and thanks for joining us on the Late Debate.

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:11.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm James Macpherson with Caleb Bond and back from her

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 3>week in London.

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Liz Storer, Liz.

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:14.159
<v Speaker 4>How let go?

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>You're at the art conference? I was tell us about it?

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>What was the het?

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 4>You was absolutely fabulous.

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 5>Being from Sky News, it was like catching up with

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 5>a pile of friends because we've had half The speakers

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 5>were more than half, i'd say, on Sky News airwaves

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:30.639
<v Speaker 5>for many years now, so it was kind of like

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 5>a family reunion.

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, there are some great speakers.

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 3>Before we get into the night's news, just give us

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 3>the highlights.

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Who did you really enjoy?

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 4>Oh my gosh, that would be hard.

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 5>But for me personally, it was Nigel Farage, just because

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 5>personally he is someone who just exudes authenticity.

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 4>At ARC, you've got a lot of the born to rule.

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 5>Types, which well I call them that because they kind

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 5>of are. But on a personal level, Nigel is someone

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 5>that here's authenticity. He's down to earthners. He had the

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 5>audience laughing more than anybody else, just because he is

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 5>who he is and he stands for what he stands

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 5>for and obviously being in the UK and speaking as

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 5>the leader of the Reform.

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 4>Party, he had everyone on the edge of his.

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 5>Seat because you're quite possibly listening to the next Rome.

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, and he knows how to give a stab speech,

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 6>does not Oh yeah, baraj And he actually said it

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 6>his sixtieth birthday party that he was the only bloke

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 6>on gb News who does his show without auto Q

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 6>because it's a bit hard to read when you're half pissed.

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Very good.

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, on that note, let's get into tonight's program. We

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 3>all know that Donald Trump does not miss when taking

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 3>potshots at his opponents. Wait until you see his latest

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 3>meme taking aim at slackers within the public service.

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty good.

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 3>Plus, we'll get to what's making news tomorrow, including more

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 3>revelations from Tony Burke's citizenship extravaganza and the cost of

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 3>living crisis doesn't seem to be affecting people in our

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 3>national capital. Wait until you hear what the paper as

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 3>a reporting public servants are spending on furniture. All of

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 3>that when we look at tomorrow's news. But first, dignitaries

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 3>gathered this week just gone in Darwin for the commemoration

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 3>of the eighty third anniversary of the bombing of Darwin.

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Japanese bombs rained down on that city, killing two hundred

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 3>and three thirty Australians and wounding four hundred. So it's

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 3>a pretty important anniversary. And it began predictably, like landing

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 3>a jet on Virgin Airways at Sydney Airport with a

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 3>welcome to country. They're welcome to country went fully five minutes.

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 3>You can imagine what that was like for people sitting

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 3>in the Darwin sun. And then after that, well every

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 3>guest speaker knew exactly what was expected of them.

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 7>Jana nelivid no Niji respect, gelimerg and Billy Lira Daoba Nari.

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 2>I give our.

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 7>Respect to the Laroche of people, elders, men and women,

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 7>to all first nations custodians present. I also pay my respect.

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 5>Can I acknowledge the Larakaia people and pay my respects

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 5>to their elders past and present?

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 3>And I acknowledge also, of course the Larakaa people whose

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 3>soil it also was if the adversary had succeeded or.

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.799
<v Speaker 6>Was lost, like to acknowledge the Larakaa people, the nutritional

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 6>liners of the land on which we meet.

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 8>We meet in Larrakia.

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 3>Kadri and James, thank you very much for your welcome country,

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 3>and I shee quite a few friends from the Larrakia people.

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 8>Bila Bara, good to see you.

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Seven speakers in a row all felt the need to

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 3>acknowledge local Indigenous people before they spoke about what they

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 3>were there to commemorate. But then, like a cool breeze

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 3>on a hot Northern Territory summer's day, the Chief Minister,

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 3>Leo Leah Finocchiaro goot up to the podium and she spoke.

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 9>I'd like to pay special acknowledgment to the veterans here today,

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 9>to territorians, to serving men and women, to the families

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 9>and descendants of survivors, ladies and gentlemen, but also importantly

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 9>to our children well.

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Q outrage Labor MP Manuel Brown said the Chief Minister's

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 3>failure to acknowledge Indigenous people was quote very concerning concerning

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 3>how what was he worried was going to happen? What's

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 3>he afraid of not to be outdone. Local indigenous elder

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 3>Richard Fedjoe Senior told local media that the Chief Minister's

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 3>o mission of acknowledgment of country was quote disgraceful. I

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of think that if you have to divide Australians

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 3>into black and white at every public ceremony, that's kind

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:49.679
<v Speaker 3>of disgraceful and very concerning. But to the Chief Minister's credit,

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 3>she did not take a backward step in the.

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Face of criticism.

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 3>She told media and I quote, I'm proud to have

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 3>acknowledged veterans at the bombing of Darwin, and as Chief Minister,

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 3>I represent all Territorians. There is absolutely no need for

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 3>every speaker at an event to do an acknowledgment of country.

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 3>And in fact, the repetition that people are so used

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 3>to under labor is less impactful. Caleb, she won the

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 3>election last year, but when she's up for reelection, I'll

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 3>tell you what, she's got my vote just on that.

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 6>Well, though, you'll have to move to the Northern Territory first,

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 6>but I look forward to you going through.

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 2>With that promise so you can go and actually vote

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 2>for it.

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 6>But it's what she says at the end of that

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 6>sentence that the repetition has made it less impactful, which

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 6>is what I've been saying for so long that you know,

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 6>if you had an occasional welcome to country performed by

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 6>an Indigenous person at a major event, we'd all sort

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 6>of move on and not particularly give a rats about it.

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 6>But it gets shoved down your throat everywhere you go,

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 6>and it's not good enough to have it once, You've

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 6>got to have it twice, three times for seven times

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 6>in this case, right.

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 2>And I've felt this for years that you.

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 6>Know, you have an acknowledgment at the beginning of an

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 6>event whatever, but then everyone gets up afterwards and feels.

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Like they need to say it. Well, the acknowledgment has

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 2>been done.

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 6>I mean it's implicit in that acknowledgment having been done

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 6>that everyone agrees that we've now acknowledged the people who

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 6>are in the room, or perhaps not even in the room.

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 6>You don't need to all do it. And the reason

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 6>they all do it is not because they actually mean it,

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 6>but because it has become the pro form a thing

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 6>that you do when you get up to speak.

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 2>And so if you're only.

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 6>Doing it because it's expected of you, it literally means nothing.

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 6>It's not an acknowledgment of Indigenous people. It's an acknowledgment

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 6>of the fact that you are expected to acknowledge the

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 6>Indigenous people. I mean, it's almost like rote learning. You

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 6>just haven't see it into your brain. And then every

0:06:43.200 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 6>time you now, if I speak.

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm and I add my respect.

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 2>So there's no point. There is absolutely no point to it.

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 4>Get over yourself.

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 5>You don't have to add yours, just not while the

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 5>first person does it, and call it quits. They had

0:06:58.120 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 5>exactly the same situation.

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 4>This years ago.

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 5>I went to an ANZAC dawn service at Willara Council.

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 5>Name and shame, baby, you guys ask for it, exact

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 5>same thing. Every single person that.

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 4>Morning wasn't about the ANZACs.

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 5>It was about pain, respects, pain, respects, paying respect for

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 5>crying out loud. I was ready to scream. This was

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 5>before the days. I just started audibly booing people right.

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 5>And here's the thing. It's at the particular events that matters,

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 5>because what it is doing is detracting from the actual purpose.

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 4>Of the gathering.

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 5>You may have heard, if you're watching the Anti Semitism Summit,

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 5>an audible grown when Drayfus got up and decided it

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.680
<v Speaker 5>was a good idea that it was an appropriate.

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 4>Setting to do a welcome to country. No, it's not.

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 5>You are co opting somebody else's worthy cause for your

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 5>own little hobby horse.

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 4>It is inappropriate.

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 5>And when we talk about the Battle of Darwen, we

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 5>are talking about to this day, the nineteenth of February

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 5>nineteen forty two. We are talking about the singus biggest

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 5>attack on Australian soil by a foreign power. The japsent

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 5>two hundred and forty two aircraft in two separate attacks

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 5>that bombed the port of Darwin to smither greens. Thirty

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 5>of our aircraft went up in frames. Eleven of our

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 5>ships were sunk. And this was of course during World

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 5>War two, to make sure the Allies couldn't use it

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 5>as a base anymore. Ports are very important. We know

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 5>that what winds, wars, logistics, and nothing is more important

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 5>than a port during wartime. So this is an important day.

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:51.679
<v Speaker 5>It is as sacred as Anzac Day, Memorial Day. And

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 5>as you said, six out of the seven speakers waste

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 5>time making it about like what we're on stolen land.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 5>For crying out loud, We were trying to defend it.

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 6>Stop on the Japanese Joyce's point, you reckon, they would

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 6>have cared about the local indigenous.

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 5>I mean boom for crying out loud, Just boom when

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 5>we are trying to commemorate, celebrate, recognize people who gave

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 5>their lives for our freedom, et cetera.

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 4>And so on.

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 5>These kind of important events have no time for the

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.439
<v Speaker 5>people that try and co opt it with this nonsense.

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 5>Maybe if it's NDoc week, there's a time and a place.

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 4>This ain't it to shut up?

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 3>This episode, though, proves why everybody does it, because the

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 3>one person who does not do it, that's all.

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>You hear about.

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 3>We don't know anything about what the Chief Minister spoke about.

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 3>In fact, we probably would have forgotten this event was

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 3>on had it not been for the fact that she

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 3>neglected to perform. And perform is such a great word

0:09:55.840 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 3>because it is performativenowledgement our country. It's amazing how this

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 3>has become compulsory in just a few short years. I remember,

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, I guess it was fifteen twenty years ago,

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 3>working for an organization. They were holding a big conference

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 3>and they were debating should we do an acknowledgment of

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 3>country for the first time?

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.000
<v Speaker 1>The question once upon it was a question should And

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I remember.

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 3>And I was ahead of my time. I sat at

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 3>the desk and I said, just be aware if we

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 3>do this once next year. If we decide not to

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 3>do it, how will that go down? And of course

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 3>now they have to do it every single year because

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 3>the moment you don't, it's disgraceful.

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>It's very concerning your erasis.

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:35.839
<v Speaker 6>And a maid of mine is on the board of

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 6>an investment outfit and he was asked at their agem

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 6>a couple of years ago to give an acknowledgment of

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 6>country before he spoke to their investors, and he said,

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 6>I'm not going to do that. He said, who do

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 6>you think.

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Our investors are?

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 6>You know, largely older Australians, mostly conservative people, and you

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 6>want me to stand up in front of them and

0:10:57.480 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 6>give an acknowledgment of country?

0:10:59.080 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Is it that?

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 6>He's absolut ridiculous And so we didn't do it, and

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 6>that's what we need to do.

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 2>We need to push back.

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 6>It's okay to not have to specifically point out other people.

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 6>And that's where the jig is up because they say,

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 6>you know, indigenous manage. So it's a disgrace that I

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 6>was not specifically talked about in that speech. Well what

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 6>about every other person who lives in the Northern territory?

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 6>They want special treatment? That's the point, Yeah, of all.

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 5>The premiers, I mean she's the chief minister, but same

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 5>thing if you're talking about the Northern Territory, of all

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 5>the premiers Australia wide, to actually stand up to this

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 5>virtues seedling nonsense, it's the chief Minister in the Northern

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 5>Territory saying that I've had enough.

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 4>To Germany now, where.

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 5>They've just had their federal election and tell you it's

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 5>a meal over there. They've got six hundred and thirty

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 5>people in their Bundestag, which is their federal parliament. So

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 5>unlike cass we've just got one hundred and fifty one

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 5>in the House of Reps, seventy six in the Senate.

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 4>These guys, there's a lot going on.

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 5>But as we knew would happen, the Conservatives have come

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 5>out massively on top. The Christian Democrats have gotten almost

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 5>thirty percent of the vote. But here's the thing. They

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 5>don't have enough to majority rule. They've got to now

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 5>cobble together a coalition in order to rule. So you'd

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 5>ask yourself, okay, what seems like the best thing to

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 5>do at the moment. The former ruling party, the SPD,

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.440
<v Speaker 5>they won by such a landslide. They posted their worst

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 5>results since World War Two. Talk about a historical defeat.

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 5>You've gone from being the ruling party to losing so badly.

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 5>They are now in tatters. So you'd think that the

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 5>now ruling party, the CDU, would go, well, who came second,

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:58.239
<v Speaker 5>They seem like the best bet to form a coalition

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 5>with and now rule. And in Germany, who came second

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.439
<v Speaker 5>was the AfD with about twenty.

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 4>Percent of the vote.

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 5>Now together they would form a very comprehensive parliament.

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 4>And while the CDU is sent to right.

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 5>And the AfD is considered far right, I just say

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 5>they're legends, but it's a matter of opinion. The CDU

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 5>is refusing. They said they will form a coalition with

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 5>the party who literally just lost by a landslide before

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 5>they even consider partnering up with the AfD.

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:39.079
<v Speaker 4>What a slap in the face to the German people.

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 4>So the ruling.

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 5>Party that has just been tossed out the window posted

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 5>their worst results since World War Two. They have just

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 5>been tossed out so comprehensively. And now the guys that

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 5>did get up with almost thirty percent of the voter

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 5>saying we're going to pony up with these guys. I mean,

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 5>Germans must have their head in their hands right now.

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:05.959
<v Speaker 5>This election had eighty four percent participation rate. They don't

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 5>have mandatory voting over there. Eighty four percent participation rate,

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 5>which is the higher since nineteen ninety, which was the

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 5>reunification of Germany. So everyone was like, let's get on board,

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 5>let's get to the ballot box. Germans want to see

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 5>drastic change in their country, most noticeably on immigration, that's

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 5>no secret. And the CDU prior to this election, we're

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 5>trying to tighten up the immigration laws. But they got

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 5>newke by the SPD and the Greens, so now they're

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 5>in power and they're like, we're going to team up

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 5>with the SPD. I would be screaming my lungs out

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 5>if I was German right now.

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 3>It's amazing how the AfD that's the alternative for Germany,

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 3>have been characterized as far right when really their key

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 3>policies are they not. They want to be free of

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 3>the European Union. Yes, Germans doesn't run their own country

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 3>rather than be told by Brussels what to do. And

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:08.239
<v Speaker 3>they want to crack down on illegal immigration and particularly

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 3>asylum seekers who are in Germany committing crimes. They have

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 3>stabbings almost every week. There's been terrorism recently, and that's

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 3>not an uncommon thing. Now, those wouldn't seem to be

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 3>far right. And for people to say, well, you know,

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 3>Germany's moved far right, I would argue, no, German leaders

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 3>have moved away from representing Germans, and Germans simply want

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 3>their country back.

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>If that's far right, I think a lot.

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Of people not just in Germany but in western countries

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 3>right around the world would consider themselves the same.

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 5>In the Netherlands, Kayler, people were voting for geart builders.

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 5>We heard the same in France when they were voting

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 5>fully penned, they're all they're far right. Absolutely, Oh disgusting,

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 5>it's nonsense.

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Well o F.

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 6>Schultz who is currently the chancellor, and Liz was just

0:15:57.560 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 6>telling you about how well he did last time and

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 6>how bad he did this time. He's put it quite

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 6>six sinkly before I carry on, take a look at this.

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 8>The last time the election result was better and I

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 8>was partly responsible for that, and this time the result

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 8>is bad and I am responsible for that as well,

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 8>and I want to say that. But what's important for

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 8>me to say from this position is to congratulate the

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 8>cd U, c s U and their chancellor, candidate Frederick Mertz,

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 8>and congratulations on your election result, and.

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 6>He mentions merge. There he he is saying we've won

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 6>this election.

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 8>We have won this election. I'd also like to say

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 8>a word of respect for political opponents. Yes, the electoral

0:16:53.560 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 8>campaign has been it's been necessary when it came to

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 8>debates to really focus upon the many important issues facing us,

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 8>the economy, foreign security policy, migration of internal security. But

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 8>now we're going to speak to each other and as

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 8>soon as possible we need to get a viable government together.

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 6>As for why the cd you wouldn't join up with

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 6>the AfD, I think it's got a bit of the

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 6>whiffs of what may will happen in the UK between

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 6>the Tories and Reform about it, where existing political powers

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 6>don't want to seed ground to a rising rebel power

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 6>that could well come in and take their power away

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 6>from them, so they say, okay, well, instead of letting

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 6>them in, what we'll do is actually marry up with

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 6>who are essentially our ideological enemies in.

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Order to protect ourselves.

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 6>Why would you not say, okay, these are the people

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 6>who perhaps We don't agree with them one hundred percent,

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 6>but we agree with them a.

0:17:57.600 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Lot more than we agree with this mob over here.

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 6>And sure they're rebels and they've come through and they've

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 6>taken ground from the rest of us whatever, but that's

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 6>where the future is going. And if it's all good

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 6>and will to say, okay, well, we're not going to

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 6>do it this time, or form a government with someone else.

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 6>But I think in the long term you'll be punished

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 6>for that in the same way that if the Tories

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 6>don't wake up to themselves and go, okay.

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 2>If we are in union with the Reform.

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 6>Party, we've got a much better chance of a continuing

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 6>to exist and b creating a government than that can

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 6>defeat labor in the UK.

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Surely that is a good thing.

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 6>Why would the CD you not go, well, let's join

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 6>up with closer ideological mates to achieve better INDs for

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 6>our country.

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 5>And it's so shortsighted because and the same will happen

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 5>if the Tories don't come to their senses in the

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 5>UK is because.

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 4>In three short years.

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.679
<v Speaker 5>Their AfD have doubled their share of the vote. They

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.719
<v Speaker 5>went from ten percent to twenty percent. Because people can

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 5>see the decline of Germany at a rate of knots,

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 5>and they want these people, though they're smeared as radicals,

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 5>to turn the country around. Now you've got the CDU

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 5>who were slapping them in the face.

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 4>Should they just pony up with their SPD.

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 5>People are going to get more of the same, okay.

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 5>And so by the next federal election in Germany, as

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 5>the AfD have already tweeted, because the writings on the wall,

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 5>you won't partner with us. Come the next federal election,

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.640
<v Speaker 5>we are going to wipe the floor with you, as

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 5>we did at the state elections, which is why Chancellor Schultz,

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 5>Chancellor no More, called this snap election. He put up

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 5>a vote of confidence knowing it would lose in order

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 5>to call this snap election. That's how bad things had gotten.

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 5>He was his own party had fallen together, the coalition

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 5>that he had put together had fallen apart, and he

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 5>was left.

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 4>With no option but.

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 5>To basically put up a motion of no confidence in

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 5>himself called this snap election. So the AfD, noting how

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 5>well they've done in the polls and seeing the writing

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.439
<v Speaker 5>on the wall and the state election, which is what

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 5>caused this kerfuffle in the first place and just saying, fine,

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 5>you don't pony up with us.

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 4>You wait.

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 5>Come the next federal election, Germany will be begging for

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 5>us and we will answer the court.

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 3>The other interesting thing about this is the Christian Democrats

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 3>have won the election with twenty nine percent, but I

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 3>believe that's the first time they've ever got less than

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 3>thirty percent. So they've won the election, but I mean

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 3>winning with a declining primary vote, and maybe the reason

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 3>is because they're considering partnering with the Socialist Party who

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 3>were just voted out, which is this conservative light that

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.239
<v Speaker 3>people around the western world are so frustrated with. To

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 3>your point, in the UK, that's exactly the problem with

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 3>the Tories, that they were conservative lights.

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 1>In Australia, we're going to have the same issue.

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 3>And if you don't want to well, far right parties

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 3>will then take care of things like sovereign borders, take

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 3>care of things life, listening to the will of the

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 3>people rather than trying to please globalists. It's not difficult

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 3>to head off the far right if you simply look

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 3>after your constituency. Governments haven't been doing that. And one

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 3>final point, the AfD you said they doubled their vote in.

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Just three years. Absolutely true.

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 3>But I mean they only began in twenty thirteen, so

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 3>in twelve years they've gone from not existing to having

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty percent of the primary vote. Shows just how much

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 3>anger there is in countries like Germany about what's been

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 3>allowed to happen under left wing progressive government.

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 6>And it's anger at the people who've allowed that to

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 6>happen for years and years and years and years and years.

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 6>It's the same reason that Albanezi his government was elected

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 6>with the lowest ever primary vote for a government in Australia,

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 6>because there is declining confidence in those major parties because

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:49.880
<v Speaker 6>people can see in front of them.

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 2>What's happened to them.

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:53.640
<v Speaker 6>But I've got to say, how good is the German language?

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 6>Like I love that their parliament is the Bundestag.

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 2>Mean, where else in the world do you get the

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of language you get out of the Germans.

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 3>But those two guys the least charismatic I know politicians.

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Where was the German hood spa you normally get out

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 2>of them? I better get up and go.

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 6>And it's such a violent language in so many ways

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 6>you would have thought perfect for being a politician.

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 5>Having that calm interpreter steals from it make it.

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.479
<v Speaker 6>Look like you've got some passion when you're just saying, well,

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 6>I went down to the shops today. Let's go over

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 6>to the UK, which of course we're talking a little

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 6>bit about before we brought you the story a few

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 6>weeks ago that the Starma government in the UK was

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 6>basically telling Apple that they had to hand over the

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 6>data of all of their customers. They asked for a

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 6>backdoor into the iCloud system that would allow the UK

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 6>government to literally look at everything that you were storing

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 6>in the cloud, photos, documents, ie messages, et cetera. The

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 6>government would be able, with no questions asked to go

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 6>in and look at anyone's data at any time. Now, Apple,

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 6>to their credit, said we're not so sure about that.

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 6>So they've come up with a workaround which has now

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 6>come through in the UK, which is, instead of giving

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 6>the government the back door that they wanted, which would

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 6>have presumably given them access to your data in Australia

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 6>or the US or wherever you might be as well,

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 6>they have decided to end proper end to end encryption

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 6>in the UK. So if you're in the UK and

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 6>you're using an Apple product. You can no longer have

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 6>proper end to end encryption, which means if the government

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 6>wants to get access to your data, they can do so,

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 6>but they have to go to Apple and ask for

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 6>permission to do that, because if it's into end encrypted,

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 6>it means not even Apple can access it. But this

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 6>was a major plank of the product that Apple was offering,

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 6>that you had absolute security of your messages and your

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 6>photos and your data, etc. And no one else would

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:57.199
<v Speaker 6>be able to access it. Then mister government comes knocking

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 6>and says, no, I don't like that. Now I can

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 6>underst and like governments may not like that because of

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.120
<v Speaker 6>course it makes it harder to fight crime. But you've

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 6>got to think long term with these things. Today it's

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 6>because you want to stop pedophiles. Tomorrow it's because you've

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 6>got a social credit system and we've got a backdoor

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 6>into all of your data and we want to know

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 6>whether you're saying bad things about the government. Good on

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 6>Apple for not going the whole hog here and allowing

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 6>them to have it. Elon Musk said on his platform

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 6>mix that it would have happened in America if Donald

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 6>Trump had not won, and to be honest, I wouldn't

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 6>be surprised by that at all.

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we talked about this a few weeks ago.

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 2>The precedent it would.

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 6>Set if the UK was able to get that level

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 6>of access, because you can bet your bottom dollar, every

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 6>other government would start asking for it. But the worst

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 6>part of this is that we know that Apple has

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 6>done this, but we don't actually know entirely why they've

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 6>done it, because under the UK law, it is illegal

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 6>for Apple to even talk about the fact that the

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:02.880
<v Speaker 6>govern came to them and asked for a backdoor into

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 6>people's data.

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 3>It is in such and that's the part that screams

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:10.280
<v Speaker 3>sinister right that even the government requesting this power has

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 3>to be kept top secret. That should ring alarm bells everywhere.

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:17.400
<v Speaker 3>It's an amazing thing where Apple have withdrawn a product

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 3>from the market rather than comply with a government request.

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 1>And I suppose they had to.

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Firstly, for the reason you said that this would set

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 3>an incredible precedent, not just in the UK but around

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 3>the world, and not just for Apple but for all

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 3>tech companies. But second, this is asking Apple to absolutely

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 3>destroy their integrity with customers that they would offer end

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 3>to end encryption, but then secretly comply with a government

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 3>regulation requiring end to end encryption to be disclosed to government.

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.679
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, hats off to Apple for doing this in

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.199
<v Speaker 5>order to keep their integrity basically.

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 4>And trying to make a way around.

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 5>This order in such a way that also that it's.

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 4>Only exclusive to the UK.

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 5>What the UK government was essentially demanding was all.

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 4>Access to any data in the iCloud.

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 5>So we're talking your text, your photos, your voice, memos,

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:17.880
<v Speaker 5>absolutely everything on your device and what's not on your device.

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 5>If I have access to what is on your phone,

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 5>I know exactly who you are, what your priorities are,

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 5>what you google, what you spend your time looking at.

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 5>I know what kind of toilet paper you buy. Because

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 5>I have access to your bank codes, I have access

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 5>to everything. So what the UK was asking for was

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 5>this ultimate power to have access not just to the

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 5>UK users data, but worldwide.

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.159
<v Speaker 4>So again, what Apple's pulled off here.

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:53.400
<v Speaker 5>Is saying okay, we've had to ditch end to end encryption,

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 5>and to read their posts about this as well, they

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 5>are so sorry. They are legitimately saying, hey, look, we

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 5>fought as hard as we could. This is what we

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 5>eventually came up with. But this is the best we

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 5>can do by you. But it's UK users only. Everybody

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:12.919
<v Speaker 5>else's end to end encryption is still in tact, so

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 5>it's it's a win for Apple, but everyone in the

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 5>UK should be switched onto this because even if this

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 5>failed completely, this is what I say about when our

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 5>government puts up their misinformation disinformation bill.

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 4>They've shown their hand.

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 5>You know what they wanted if they could get it.

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 5>You know what they tried on okay, and so UK

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 5>uses now no, that is the extent to which this

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:44.920
<v Speaker 5>tyrannical government wanted to do this. Michael Schellenberger, a regular

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 5>on Sky He tweeted today the UK seems like a

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 5>free nation.

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 4>It's not.

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 5>It's run by a tyrant Prime Minister Kirs Starmer. Shame

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 5>on him for his totalitarian demand and bravo to Apple

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 5>CEO Tim Cook for defying the government. Please share this

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 5>to warn the world that UK is no longer safe

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 5>for free people.

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 4>And sorry to say, but is he wrong?

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's wrong.

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 3>But while the UK government can't get access to people's

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:16.200
<v Speaker 3>encrypted data, seems like we might get access to Jeffrey

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:20.679
<v Speaker 3>Epstein's client list. Here's Trump's attorney general Pam BONDI have

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 3>a listened.

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:26.159
<v Speaker 10>The DOJ maybe releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients.

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 4>Will that really happen.

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 10>It's sitting on my desk right now to review. That's

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 10>been a directive by President Trump.

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm reviewing that.

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 10>I'm reviewing JFK files, MLK files. That's all in the

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 10>process of being reviewed because that was done at the

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 10>directive of the president from all of these agencies. So

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 10>so have you seen anything that you said, Oh, my gosh,

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 10>not yet. I was briefed on that yesterday. I can't

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 10>talk about that that publicly, but you know, President Trump

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 10>is given a very strong directive and that's going to

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 10>be followed.

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so a lot of documents. Yeah, all right, so

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 2>people can expect actual movement on this.

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not just empty promises.

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 10>Donald Trump doesn't make empty promise, right, I think. I

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 10>think promises made promises, Captain. That's why we're all there

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 10>to carry out his directive about making America safe and prosperous.

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 3>A lot of people very excited about this list being

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 3>made public. Although when I was fifteen years old, there

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 3>was a TV special beamed.

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Right around the world.

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 3>El Capone's secret vault was exploded open live on television.

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 3>One hundred and eighty one stations broadcasted. You know what

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 3>they found in his vault? Some dirt and some empty

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 3>whiskey bottles and that was it. So I don't know

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 3>the I thine thing could be a bust anti time.

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 6>Why do you think the bloke just magically died in prison.

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 6>I don't think it was because he had some empty

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 6>whiskey bottles of dirt in a vault somewhere. I think

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 6>the bloat knew a lot, and that's why, of course

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 6>they don't want this to come out. There must be

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 6>people in the US, actually not in the US, all

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 6>over the world, and I don't thinking about some people

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 6>in the UK who we know have been linked to

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 6>mister Epstein that would be looking for a new set

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 6>of underwear at the thought that this list will be revealed,

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 6>because we're talking about people who are associated with Epstein

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 6>of course before he was convicted, but also long after

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 6>he was convicted, Prince Andrew being one of them who

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 6>was seen publicly with him after he was convicted.

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 2>There is a.

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 6>List, as long as you're arm, which hopefully we will

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 6>see of the people who associated with a man by

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 6>going to his private island on his plane, where he

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 6>would entertain them, and the ways he would entertain them.

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 6>I suppose we may well find out. We certainly know

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 6>what he was up to on that island with his

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 6>mate Gulain Maxwell. But these are some of the most

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 6>powerful and richest people in the world. We need to

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 6>see this list. We want to see this list because

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 6>it's going to lead to some very uncomfortable questions. I

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 6>suspect data that has been released though out of South

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 6>Australia which has led to a stroke of common sense,

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 6>would you believe it is exactly how bad the youth

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 6>crime crisis is there. Of course we talk a lot

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 6>about Victoria, we talk a lot about Queensland, but South

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 6>Australia is in the grips of a youth crime crisis

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 6>as well.

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Data that the Advertiser collected under.

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 6>Freedom of information shows that nearly twenty five thousand children

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 6>or teenagers were charged with a crime over the past

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 6>five financial years, and so thank Heavens, Peter Malanawskis, the Premier,

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 6>has personally vetoed plans to increase the age of criminal responsibility.

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 6>Of course, the age of criminal responsibility at the moment

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 6>is ten. There was a report done last year that

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 6>suggested it should be raised to twelve. He has not

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 6>that on the head in acknowledgment of what is going

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 6>on at the moment. Good on him, but I suppose

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 6>we should also ask the question what about Victoria, because

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 6>they are raising the age of criminal responsibility from ten

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 6>to twelve. There was then meant to be another increase

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 6>to fourteen by twenty twenty seven.

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Cindra Allen seems you've gone a.

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 6>Bit cold on that now given the youth crime crisis

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 6>she is facing. But the fact remains that they are

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 6>increasing it to twelve. You've got a labor government in

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 6>South Australia that says no, that's not tenable, but one

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 6>in Victoria.

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 2>That arguably has a worth you were sorry.

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 6>Youth crime crisis, that thinks it's okay to increase the

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 6>age of criminal responsibility as if a ten year old.

0:32:28.360 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 6>And we're talking about here thirty children aged ten to eleven

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:35.479
<v Speaker 6>or twelve who were charged with sexual offenses.

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Which is shocking.

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 6>But you can't me that tell me that a teen

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 6>year old doesn't understand the basics of what is right

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 6>or wrong.

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 2>By ten, you know what is right.

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 6>Or wrong, and if you are committing a crime that

0:32:49.120 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 6>deserves to be charged and taken off to the youth court,

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 6>then ten to eleven twelve, who cares you should be

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 6>facing a court.

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a really good point.

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 3>Anybody who's raised kids knows very well eighteen ten year

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 3>old has a very good understanding of what is right

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 3>and what is wrong. It might not be nuanced, but

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 3>they know what's right and what's wrong. The other thing

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 3>about this that I find hilarious is that you've got

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 3>these left leaning governments in Victoria in South Australia who

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 3>in the Act, who keep wanting to raise the age

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 3>of criminal responsibility, and yet very much in favor of

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 3>children being able to elect to have a sex change

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 3>and take puberty blockers. So they can't tell the difference

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 3>between right and wrong, but they do know they've been

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 3>born into the wrong body.

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 1>That's just an astonishing leap of logic.

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 3>And of course, with these figures released Caleb, there's no

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 3>way that they could carry through with raising the age

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 3>of criminal responsibility when you've got data showing twenty five

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 3>thousand kids committing serious crimes over just the last five years.

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 3>You can't have that data and then say we're going

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 3>to raise the age and then have the Attorney General,

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 3>as he did today, say we won't tolerate groups of

0:33:56.640 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 3>young people committing violent acts and putting the community at risk. Well,

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 3>you can't have it both ways, so they've got to

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 3>leave it at ten. In South Australia and Victoria, if

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 3>they were smart, wouldn't go through.

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 5>Well, it doesn't make sense for DEVI eight, does it.

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 5>It's like a COVID thing. All the science wildly difference

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 5>between states. Look either a ten year old nos or

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 5>it doesn't, and therefore any state or territory that raises

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 5>it that is a nonsense. Whenever this comes up, I'm

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 5>reminded of the tragic case of James Boulger. It was

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:31.959
<v Speaker 5>a toddler who was murdered in cold blood by two

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 5>ten year old boys in the UK. I believe it

0:34:34.800 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 5>was in the eighties, but I'm always reminded of that case.

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 5>Those boys knew exactly what they were doing, and this

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:47.600
<v Speaker 5>whole idea that kids don't and that they could carry

0:34:47.640 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 5>out a heenous crime, oh, unbeknownst to me that it

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:54.359
<v Speaker 5>was wrong, is just factually incorrect.

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 4>It's like asking us to deny that men are men

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 4>and women are women.

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 5>Oh, a ten year old doesn't know single ten year

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 5>old who isn't aware at that stage that sexually assaulting

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 5>someone like you say, insane amount of these assaults are

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:13.879
<v Speaker 5>sexual in nature, which begs the question, what are these

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 5>kids being exposed to online on their TVs? This is

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 5>a case of monkey see, monkey do. No child is

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 5>actually like, Oh, I.

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 4>Know what sexual assault is and I'm going to carry

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 4>it out. No.

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 5>No, they've seen something, They've heard something they've been exposed to.

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 4>Their little minds have.

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 5>Been exposed to something they shouldn't have been.

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 4>And they're carrying it out.

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 5>You could say the same of the boys responsible for

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:39.760
<v Speaker 5>James Bulger's death.

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 4>But it makes absolutely no sense.

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 5>I'm glad it's been trashed in essay and every other

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 5>state has all the data they need to go.

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 4>This is fogus.

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:50.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're going to go to a break.

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 3>When we come back, we look at what's making news tomorrow,

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:57.879
<v Speaker 3>including fresh revelations about Tony Burks citizenship extravaganza that's coming up.

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:01.839
<v Speaker 1>In the moment. Welcome back.

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's take a look at what's making news tomorrow. Okay,

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 3>we've got the Daily Telegraph.

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Indeed I do.

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 6>And what an indication of how far we've fallen from

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 6>the biff we used to see on the footing field.

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 6>It says on the front of tomorrow's Daily Telegraph that

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 6>a couple of Canberra Raiders players are over in Vegas

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 6>had a bust up with inflatable bats.

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, you heard that right, inflatable bats. Sounds like five.

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 2>They've been disciplined for that. Apparently.

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:31.319
<v Speaker 6>I don't know when I did that stuff as a kid.

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 6>My parents were just glad I didn't have my fists out.

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:35.360
<v Speaker 6>But the other story on the front of the Daily

0:36:35.400 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 6>Telegraph says Burt gave his own window. Home Affairs Minister

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 6>Toney Burke directed his department to schedule industrial scale citizenship

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 6>ceremonies during a window when he was available to personally

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 6>preside over almost thirteen thousand people becoming Australians. Well well, well,

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:54.000
<v Speaker 6>the Home Affairs Secretary made the admission in a heated

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 6>Senate Estimates hearing as a fresh war of words exploded

0:36:57.200 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 6>over mister Book's citizenship bonanza, and the Teley goes on

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:02.839
<v Speaker 6>to say that they've looked at the data on where

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:05.480
<v Speaker 6>all these people came from who were sworn in over

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 6>the weekend as Australian citizens, and almost all of them

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 6>come from marginal seats.

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Happy it isn't that funny.

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 6>And of course we heard today about how d Lee

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 6>was not invited the member Independent Member for Fowler was

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 6>not invited to any of these ceremonies, but the Labor

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 6>candidate for Fowler was a number of other Labor MPs

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:31.360
<v Speaker 6>were invited along. But they said to die that she

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 6>wasn't invited because it wasn't held in her electorate. But

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:37.359
<v Speaker 6>all these MPs came from outside of They came from

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 6>their electorates to go to Home Bush. You know, you

0:37:40.160 --> 0:37:42.960
<v Speaker 6>couldn't get any more blatant. And then they're putting up

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 6>videos from the AEC instructing people on how to go

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 6>and enroll for vote.

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Like you couldn't make it any clear.

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 3>I thought the Albanizi government didn't care about citizenship ceremonies,

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 3>didn't They say.

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>To local goals as as you don't.

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:56.840
<v Speaker 3>Do it on Australia, just don't do it on the

0:37:56.840 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 3>twenty six or whatever you want.

0:37:58.200 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 2>It's up to you.

0:37:59.080 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 3>You have the power to all of a sudden. They're

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 3>seizing control and saying we will do it. This is

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 3>not surprising at all that Tony Burker organized this when

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:07.320
<v Speaker 3>he was in town.

0:38:07.320 --> 0:38:07.759
<v Speaker 1>In fact, he.

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:10.799
<v Speaker 3>Took three days off and he's got a pretty big portfolio.

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:12.879
<v Speaker 1>I must say them to have a.

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Spare three days to be an Olympic park shaking hands

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 3>of new voters.

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 5>Indeed, although I always laugh when people get really upset

0:38:22.080 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 5>about this stuff, like Peter or people reporting it like

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 5>really stern face, like isn't this They all do it? Okay,

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 5>I hate to tell you your team does it too.

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 5>It's like branch stacking, it's like pork barreling.

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 4>They all do it.

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 5>We love to bash labor and it's not our team.

0:38:40.680 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 5>We love to bash the other guys. But don't think

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:45.400
<v Speaker 5>for a second the Libs don't get up too. Similar

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 5>to the punk prage of the Herald Sun now wrong

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:55.840
<v Speaker 5>Track exclusive, Victorians reject SRL, ranking it last behind airport, rail, housing,

0:38:56.000 --> 0:38:59.279
<v Speaker 5>and none of the above as state's priority project. The

0:38:59.320 --> 0:39:03.280
<v Speaker 5>Allen government signature suburban rail loop project has been ranked

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:06.440
<v Speaker 5>last by Victorian voters in a new poll of most

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 5>urgent state projects. Just sixteen percent of voters back to

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 5>the multi billion dollar SRL, compared with thirty six percent

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 5>who said the Melbourne Airport rail should be a priority.

0:39:19.719 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 5>So support for it's at an all time low and

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:25.360
<v Speaker 5>this is costing them billion.

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:27.760
<v Speaker 3>The surprise to me in this story is that only

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:31.600
<v Speaker 3>thirty six percent of Victorians say that a rail link from.

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 1>The airport to the city is important.

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:35.480
<v Speaker 3>I would have thought it would be a lot more

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:37.400
<v Speaker 3>people than that trying to catch an uber or a

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:41.279
<v Speaker 3>taxi from Melbourne Airport, or you've got that skybus which

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 3>you get a lecture on the way into the city

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 3>telling you that you're on land that has never been seeded.

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 1>You compare that with Sydney. When you arrive at the airport.

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Here you get straight on the train or the metro

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 3>as easy as you could imagine. Only thirty six percent

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 3>of Melbournians think they need a rail line from the.

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 6>APAs to it now and it's maybe the same when

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 6>it is it's the same in Brizzy.

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 2>You can get straight on the on the train there same.

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:08.760
<v Speaker 5>When he throw can I say jumped on the train?

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 5>He throw half an hour straight off.

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:14.120
<v Speaker 4>And into the terminal. It was incredible that.

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:16.680
<v Speaker 6>You go the international city that is Melbourne Hey and

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:19.719
<v Speaker 6>the suburban rail loop. I think the original cost was

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:22.240
<v Speaker 6>what thirty four billion and then it would be another

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 6>fifty billion to run it over the first fifty years.

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:27.839
<v Speaker 6>A billion dollars a year to run this thing. How

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:31.800
<v Speaker 6>sixteen percent of Victorians wanted? I mean, could you find

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 6>a bigger waste of money?

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:34.399
<v Speaker 3>You know the funny thing when you mentioned the cost

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:36.759
<v Speaker 3>of the suburban rail link, you go googling trying to

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:37.879
<v Speaker 3>find what does that cost again?

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:39.759
<v Speaker 1>And you have to trawl through so many ucs. It

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:41.439
<v Speaker 1>keeps changing up.

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Stated just when you think you know, but there's been

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:46.759
<v Speaker 3>a cost flow out.

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 4>Now it's there.

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the front page of the Newcastle Herald.

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Really sad story much loved fishermen had shark online when

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 3>pulled overboard police say shark dragged man over and I

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 3>guess that's why it makes front page. I mean, it's

0:41:01.040 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 3>a sad story when anyone drowns, but the factor shark

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 3>was involved. And curiously, there's not the suggestion that he

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 3>was eaten by the shark. He was just dragged into

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 3>the water by the shark. Fast moving currents have hampered

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 3>the search for the missing fisherman believed to have been

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 3>dragged overboard by a shark off Port Stevens. He was

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:24.760
<v Speaker 3>involved in a game fishing tournament when he apparently hooked

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 3>a shark on Sunday.

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 1>The fishing gear.

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:31.719
<v Speaker 3>Became tangled around him and he got dragged into the

0:41:31.800 --> 0:41:35.799
<v Speaker 3>water and his body has not been found. So really

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 3>sad story in a really strange way to.

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Die.

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 5>I do love the way that Ozzie's rally in these

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:47.360
<v Speaker 5>situations though, so because of the currents, the search area

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:51.279
<v Speaker 5>has blown out to fifteen hundred nautical miles that's very big,

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 5>and forty boats of just everyday Puntz have joined the police,

0:41:56.680 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 5>spreading out trying to cover every inch of it to

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:02.360
<v Speaker 5>find him, but no success.

0:42:02.600 --> 0:42:02.799
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 6>I always think in these cases, what must go through

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 6>your mind when you see that coming, Because of course,

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 6>if you've been dragged overboard and you're all tangled up

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:16.920
<v Speaker 6>in your line like you know something's about to happen,

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 6>it's not like you just got hit like a bus

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 6>like that all over and you don't really remember, like

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 6>you've actually got to face the fact, then you're probably

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:24.879
<v Speaker 6>about to die.

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 2>I just being more terrifying than that.

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:30.279
<v Speaker 6>Let's go to the front of The Australian Tomorrow, where

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:33.240
<v Speaker 6>a funny story law firm staff.

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Fury at email pay leaks. You may have seen a

0:42:35.560 --> 0:42:37.800
<v Speaker 2>bit of this over the weekend, but we have a development.

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 6>Legal giant Slater in Gordon has been forced to set

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:44.279
<v Speaker 6>up a formal process to deal with angry staff who

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 6>have been able to compare their pay and performance ratings

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:49.800
<v Speaker 6>with those of their colleagues thanks to a quote unquote

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:53.800
<v Speaker 6>malicious email the firm suspects was sent by a disgruntled

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 6>current or former employee. The top ranking class action firm

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:01.840
<v Speaker 6>has called in police and foreign experts to investigate the

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:05.600
<v Speaker 6>origins of the email, purportedly sent by interim Chief People

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:10.440
<v Speaker 6>Officer Marie Ruitz Matheson, But of course missus ruitz Matheson

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:13.200
<v Speaker 6>on Monday said that she didn't send it and claimed

0:43:13.200 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 6>that a cursory examination of the email and its attachment

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:20.239
<v Speaker 6>gave a clear indication as to the likely identity of

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 6>the sender.

0:43:21.239 --> 0:43:22.360
<v Speaker 2>On and on it goes.

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:23.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it.

0:43:23.320 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 6>Particularly matters at this point who sent the email. The

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 6>fact remains that everyone and Slater in Gordon now knows

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:32.160
<v Speaker 6>what everyone else is earning and what their.

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 5>Performance All nine hundred and six.

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:38.279
<v Speaker 6>Can you imagine what their weekends would have been like,

0:43:38.440 --> 0:43:41.000
<v Speaker 6>the phone calls, the text messages.

0:43:40.760 --> 0:43:42.320
<v Speaker 2>The emails flying around.

0:43:42.600 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 6>It's possibly like the worst thing from an HR perspective,

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 6>that could ever happen in a workplace.

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 4>What a way to leave?

0:43:52.200 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Where to go to a break? When we come back?

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump's latest meme about the public service slacking off

0:43:57.560 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 3>does not miss will show you that in just a second.

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:02.879
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back.

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:05.480
<v Speaker 3>One of the things that amazes me, Liz about Donald

0:44:05.480 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Trump is that he can do so much. I mean,

0:44:07.719 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 3>he's making all these executive orders, but.

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:12.320
<v Speaker 1>He's still got time to tweet memes.

0:44:12.680 --> 0:44:14.920
<v Speaker 5>Oh, it's the new language of the future. If you

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 5>don't know how to treat means, are you a world leader?

0:44:18.560 --> 0:44:20.040
<v Speaker 4>You would have heard that DOGE is.

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:23.400
<v Speaker 5>Going through the federal employees books, booting as many people

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:28.360
<v Speaker 5>as they possibly can, in some cases closing down entire department.

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 5>Seventy seven thousand federal employees have to date accept a

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:35.640
<v Speaker 5>Doge's offer just to be bought out. You'll get eight

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:40.799
<v Speaker 5>weeks pay. They're literally paying you to leave. And so

0:44:41.000 --> 0:44:44.560
<v Speaker 5>Elin muss issues and new edicts to those remainings, saying

0:44:45.000 --> 0:44:48.680
<v Speaker 5>explain what you did in your line of work, in

0:44:48.719 --> 0:44:51.800
<v Speaker 5>your department. Explain what value you brought to the table

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:57.160
<v Speaker 5>over the last week. This, of course, sparked incredible fury

0:44:57.239 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 5>amongst federal employees who are convinced that they do earn

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:02.840
<v Speaker 5>their dollars.

0:45:02.840 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 4>Which was cut short.

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 5>By Trump's meme which he said to truth social list

0:45:09.120 --> 0:45:12.040
<v Speaker 5>of there's a picture of SpongeBob SquarePants. If you're not

0:45:12.160 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 5>familiar with him, what have you been doing with your wives?

0:45:15.719 --> 0:45:19.880
<v Speaker 5>But there's a list saying got done last week, parodying

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:23.200
<v Speaker 5>what these federal employees would then be forced to hand

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:26.640
<v Speaker 5>to Elon Musk. Point one cried about Trump, point two

0:45:26.719 --> 0:45:30.360
<v Speaker 5>cried about Elon. Three made it into the office for once,

0:45:30.560 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 5>four read some emails, five cried about Trump, and Elon

0:45:35.160 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 5>some more so. While the conservatives are laughing about this

0:45:39.120 --> 0:45:42.760
<v Speaker 5>and the Trump administration and Doge is enjoying every minute,

0:45:42.840 --> 0:45:46.360
<v Speaker 5>Elon Musk has in fact tweeted that if he doesn't

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 5>hear back from these employees justifying their existence in the

0:45:50.080 --> 0:45:52.160
<v Speaker 5>employee of the government, he will.

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 4>Assume that they too have resigned.

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:54.840
<v Speaker 2>And they're all.

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Crying about this.

0:45:55.480 --> 0:45:58.799
<v Speaker 3>But Trump won an election promising to cut waste. You'd

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:00.400
<v Speaker 3>think if you were a manager in the pub service,

0:46:00.400 --> 0:46:04.480
<v Speaker 3>you would have implemented a productivity component to justify your existence.

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Two things I wonder about.

0:46:05.960 --> 0:46:09.680
<v Speaker 6>One, when Richard Dawkins coined the word meme to talk

0:46:09.719 --> 0:46:12.120
<v Speaker 6>about genetics, did he ever think it would end up

0:46:12.239 --> 0:46:15.759
<v Speaker 6>becoming an engineered joke? And two, In the Art of

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 6>the Surge, which is a great documentary looking at the

0:46:18.560 --> 0:46:21.840
<v Speaker 6>inside of the Trump campaign for the presidency the second

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:26.000
<v Speaker 6>time round, he's often shown directly dictating to aids what

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:29.239
<v Speaker 6>to post on social media. I want to know if

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 6>Trump actually came up with this himself and read it

0:46:32.120 --> 0:46:35.680
<v Speaker 6>out to someone and said make the SpongeBob meme and put.

0:46:35.520 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 2>It I reckon.

0:46:36.160 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I probably did.

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:39.000
<v Speaker 3>That's all we've got time for tonight stick around.

0:46:39.000 --> 0:46:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Coming up is The Reader Penney Show. Good Night,