WEBVTT - #2087 The Bacon Paradox - David Gillespie

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll good eight boys and girls, moms and dads, kids.

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>It's quat Anthony Harper's You Project. It's David Kevin Patrick,

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>James Gillespie from the Sunshine State and other places. Happy

0:00:16.400 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>New Year, my friend. How are you?

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Happy New Year to you. Oh good refreshed. I've

0:00:20.880 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 2>been on holidays, as I was saying to your fair,

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 2>feeling all charged up, ready to go. Been working on

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 2>my new book. So I've been playing with some ideas there.

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>How to Get Rich Painlessly? Is that the book?

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 2>Is that?

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>The one? How to get Jack ripped and rock hard?

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>How to be more like David Gillespie.

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Kind of the opposite. Actually, it's how to survive when

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 2>AI comes for your job. Also, it's yeah, looking at

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 2>what you should be doing if you don't want a

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 2>robot to take your job.

0:00:55.960 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>That is such an interesting and relevant and timely conversation

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to have and topic to explore. I didn't know you

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>were doing that. I knew you were doing another book.

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know I was doing that before the holiday either.

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 2>But that's just where I got to.

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Right, give us without giving away anything, give us like

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>two minutes on that if you can like a okay,

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>So a bit of a like the concept in your head.

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's sort of. I started with the idea of

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 2>the parallels between this and the railroad boom that happened

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:36.119
<v Speaker 2>in the late eighteen hundreds in the United States. So

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 2>that was a massive change in US society and eventually

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 2>world society in that you went from so if you

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 2>were the local blacksmith in a town, you know, out

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 2>of nowhere middle of the USA, your competition for work

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 2>was pretty much as far as anyone could walk before

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 2>the railroad. So you could be as good or as

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 2>bad as you like to charge whatever you liked, because

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 2>unless someone else set up shop in your little town,

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 2>you were pretty much competition free. And the railroad changed

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 2>all of that. Suddenly the blacksmith in little you know, Poke,

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 2>New Jersey or whatever was not competing with whoever was

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 2>within walking distance. He was competing with everybody in the country,

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:31.239
<v Speaker 2>and in particular, he was competing with factories that employed

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 2>thousands of people. And that was the big change that happened,

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 2>and it was a massive change in the way the

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 2>economy of that country and eventually the world worked. And

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 2>I feel we're seeing something similar happening here with Ai

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 2>it's the railroad for the knowledge worker. It's going to

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 2>be at least as disruptive. Is being at least as disruptive,

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 2>and so sort of in my head called this book

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Escape from the Middle, because I think there is develop

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 2>being a large chunk of the middle of society and

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the job scheme where you are unlikely

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 2>to survive unless you move to either end. And what's

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 2>at either end is the things that AI can't do.

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 2>So there are two big and important things that AI

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 2>can't do, and I think we've briefly talked about this

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 2>one before. One of the things, one of the things

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 2>that can't do is invent things. So and as I mentioned,

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you gave an AI training on all

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 2>the documents that existed in eighteen fifty, it would never

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 2>invent the motor vehicle. It would just invent a better

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 2>orse drawn cart. And it might be significantly better. It

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 2>might have round the wheels or better whips or better

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 2>horses or something I don't know, but it wouldn't invent

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:04.839
<v Speaker 2>a car because it can't invent things. And so there's

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 2>obviously going to be jobs for inventors, people who can

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 2>join the dots outside the square and imagine things that

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 2>don't exist, and then there's going to be jobs for

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 2>what I would call the artisans, you know, the people

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 2>who make things that aren't as good as a machine

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 2>on purpose. You know, even today, even today, people are

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 2>quite happy to pay ten dollars for pretty rough sort

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 2>of bread, a loaf of sourdough bread, which are surprising

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 2>given they can buy a perfectly perfect piece or loaf

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 2>from a supermarket for two dollars.

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, Well you can buy buy an Australia

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:52.159
<v Speaker 1>that looks like it was made by your grandma with

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>the lights out for one hundred bucks or I don't know.

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>People buy Austrais now will probably get one from the

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>op shop that's incredible for fifty cents.

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So I think there are And so obviously that's

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 2>not the whole book, but that's where my thoughts are going,

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 2>and some of the drafts I've done on the manuscript

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 2>about thinking about, Okay, well, what does that imply for

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 2>the kinds of jobs that you should be looking at now,

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 2>what does it imply for the other jobs, and what

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 2>does it imply for society in general? You know, if

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 2>that kind of change is going to happen in society,

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 2>then what has to change about the way everything is done? Yeah?

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So this is an ironic question in your book

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>about essentially preparing for the dangers of AI or you know,

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to mitigate the personal damage to you in your

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>career or whatever. How are you using AI now in

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>the writing process? Now that we have such an amazing

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>tool available that you didn't have available for most of

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>your books.

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 2>For research, its ability to research is incredible, you know,

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 2>the I think one of the things that I brought

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 2>to the table when I first started writing. And so

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 2>when I wrote my book about sugar back in two

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 2>thousand and seven, the Internet wasn't very useful for research,

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 2>and very few people were using it that way. So

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 2>sure people were searching for the nearest top dog stand

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 2>or something, but they weren't doing the thing that I did,

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 2>which was to say, okay, well, here's this database of

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 2>medical journals that says this thing, and then here's this

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 2>database of medical journals read by a completely different set

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 2>of professionals that say this other thing. But if both

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 2>of those things are true, then this third thing must

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.679
<v Speaker 2>be true. And let's see if that's the case, whether

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 2>this third database agrees with that. I did a lot

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 2>of that kind of thing, which is drawing connections that

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 2>nobody else was drawing, and then put that together in

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:11.559
<v Speaker 2>the form of notes to myself, which ultimately came became

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 2>a book. Well, today, a good AI does all of

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 2>that in seconds. And the skill of the researcher is

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 2>in staying out of the rails it tries to shove

0:07:25.760 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 2>you down. So it's so convincing in its ability to

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 2>do what I just described that it's very very easy

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 2>to just accept it and not ask questions and not

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 2>push the boundaries and ask what ifs. And I think

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 2>that's the skill I bring to the table when using

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 2>a tool that's that powerful on that fast.

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, it's so interesting, Like I have not been

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>very good at at the prompts, you know, the questions

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and the and then the secondary and third question, and

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you know is learning how to how do I ask

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>this in a way where I actually get what I

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily want as in to get it to agree

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>with me, but to get the real answer that I want,

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>not the convenient, politically correct right answer, but to get to,

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>like you said, to actually find out what I want

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to find out. So yeah, I think that ability to

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>be able to ask great questions and write the the.

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's a cheap the chief over there, ask it

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 2>to write the prompt.

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Give me an example of that.

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, so say you want to find out all the

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 2>research about a particular So say there's a study you're

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 2>interested in, and you want to find out all the

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 2>research that agrees or disagrees with that study. Now, if

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 2>you just type that in and you may or may

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 2>not get a particularly good response, but generally the way

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 2>to do it is say this is what I want. Now,

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 2>construct me a prompt that would be written by a

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 2>well educated researcher in this space. Wow, And it'll write

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 2>a prompt and it'll be a lot longer, and think

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 2>of a lot of things that you wouldn't think of

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 2>as limitters that you should be putting in place. And

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 2>it'll also probably have you start thinking about, Oh, it's

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 2>saying do do do these things? Don't do these things

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.959
<v Speaker 2>in its prompt. It'll essentially right an essays a prompt,

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 2>but in reading it before you use it, think about, oh, yeah,

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 2>that's something I didn't think of. Maybe I should tell

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 2>it not to do that, or I should tell it

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 2>to do that. You'll get a much better prompt if

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 2>you do that.

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the limitation with AI, probably the most

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>common limitation, is that we just don't know how to

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>use it. Well, yeah, you know, like how to exactly

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>what you're talking about. Now, I'm like, well, that actually

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. Why don't I do that? Why didn't I

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>think of that? And so it's got way more capacity

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>than I'm that I'm getting from it, not because it

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>can't generate better answers for me, but because I don't

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>know how to get them.

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And also you've got to get around the thing

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 2>that all ais are written for, which at the end

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 2>of the day, they are a sales tool. And just

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 2>like social media, their metric is engagement, which is how

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 2>long can I keep you engaged with this? And for

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 2>that reason that's why they're such sycophantic so and sos

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 2>and tell you that everything you do is fabulous, you know,

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 2>So you'd be used to this by now. Whenever you

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 2>put something in and so what do you think about this,

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 2>it'll say, Oh, my god, Craig, that's the best writing

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:54.839
<v Speaker 2>I've ever seen in my life. How on earth did

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 2>you produce? That? Is just a few tips the.

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Main reason, and that's my best friend.

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 2>It never comes up. It never goes Oh Jesus, Craig,

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 2>you're really stuffed at this time.

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>What is wrong with you? That is? That question is shit?

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.199
<v Speaker 2>Where's piece of garbage I've seen in my life? Have

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 2>you thought about giving up?

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>You don't? You know?

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 2>It never does that. It wants to pretend to be

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 2>your friend because it wants to keep you engaged. And

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 2>that's why a lot of ais. Now, no matter what

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 2>you ask, the very next it'll give you the answer

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 2>and then the right at the bottom and I'll say, oh,

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 2>would you like me to do this? That or the

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 2>other is sort of an extension of what you're thinking

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 2>to just keep you going for the next question, and

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 2>it'll keep doing that for everything you do. So if

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 2>you put in the next question, you'll say, oh, now

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 2>that we've done that, do you want to do this

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 2>next thing? Yes?

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Well, when I put in something that's I don't know,

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I guess anything in performance or human behavior or the

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>mind of this. So that firstly it's going to say, hey, Craig,

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>great question, Thanks well, thank you for judging my question positively.

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that. And then once it answers the question

0:12:14.120 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>or responds to my directive or prompt or whatever. Then

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it says, so, would you like me to write just

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a snapshot of what I just wrote, you know, something

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that you could use as a synopsis or an overview,

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>or it goes, would you like me to turn this

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>into a whiteboard post? Which is my Instagram right Not

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that I ever use it for that, but I I

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>will bounce ideas off it. Right now, I'll put up

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a post and I'll go what's wrong with this? What's

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>right with this? You know?

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Be critical by the way, Craig, you know I'm sensing

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 2>in you, and I get this from a lot of

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 2>people hesitation to admit that you use AI, and Andy,

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.439
<v Speaker 2>I sense it there. You're sneaking around the edges of it.

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 2>And I don't think anyone should be hesitating about admitting

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 2>to using AI. That's like talking to a scientist or

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 2>a mathematician and them fudging the fact that they used

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 2>a calculator. It's just a tool, and you know it

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 2>will be as good or as bad as the person

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 2>in whose hands it is.

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I definitely use it, definitely, and I'm open about that.

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>But what I don't do is I don't get it

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to write things for me, and then I pretend that

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I wrote what it wrote, like I.

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Don't do that. Yes, but I tell.

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>You where is a bloody can of worms is in

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>universities at the moment, they're all running around with their

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:49.119
<v Speaker 1>undies on their heads because you've got all these typically

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>older men and women who are the bloody the powers

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 1>that be, who are all kind of fifty fifty five

0:13:56.400 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>sixty plus, who do not really understand AI, who are

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>ultimately the decision makers making decisions and rulings on shit

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't fully understand. So that's that's a name.

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, the problem there is that the entire model of

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 2>university has just been thrown out the window. And this

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 2>is one of the things I'm looking at in the book,

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 2>is you can't do university or school for that matter,

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the way it used to be done, because it's no

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 2>longer acceptable to say to a student, regurgitate this stuff

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 2>that you came and theoretically listened to for ten weeks,

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 2>because student can point it at your lectures and regurgitate

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 2>whatever you damn well want, having learned exactly nothing. So

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 2>the traditional methods of examining all the tasks you set

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 2>for students to be examined, just don't do anything. They

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 2>don't prove that the student learned anything, and in all probability,

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 2>the student didn't learn anything. What the student learned how

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 2>to do is how to get an AI to do

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 2>the work for them. And I think it's a fundamental

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 2>break in the model of the way university is conducted.

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Universities and schools should be focusing on the reality that

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 2>these tools exist and teaching kids how to do the

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 2>things we've just been discussing, which is, Okay, there's a tool, Now,

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 2>how do we make it do what we wanted to

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 2>do to add value? Not let's all pretend everyone's not

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 2>getting their assignments written by AI, because I guarantee you

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 2>they all are. And don't sit there, you know, on

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 2>your academic high horse saying oh, yeah, but I've got

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 2>this piece of software that checks it and tells me

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 2>if an AI wrote it. Well, that's bs. The first

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 2>thing any student learns is to tell the AI to

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 2>make sure that an AI detection software can't detect the

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 2>thing it writes.

0:15:55.280 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, yeah, one hundred percent. So I mean like

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>this really has kind of accelerated a lot in the

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>academic space in the last two years where they're really

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know, I know that Monash where

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm at there, they're reviewing it a lot, and as

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is my understanding, which is very limited. But what I know,

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>lots of conversations, lots of meetings, lots of potential strategies,

0:16:26.040 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>ideas what what's you're off the top of your head,

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>like you sht your gut feel about, how is education

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>going to work? And look, if not as it has been,

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>which it can't be as it has been because this

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>new tool makes that kind of learning essentially redundant and impossible,

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>what's going to work moving forward?

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 2>It's going to have to go back to the way

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 2>it was before everyone started doing education online, back to

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 2>the good old days, Craig. You know when I was

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 2>in university and undergraduate days in the nineteen eighties and

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 2>you actually had to show up, you know, and and

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 2>hand right your exam responses. Let's see Nai do that.

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 2>But I certainly, you know, in my undergraduate degree, had

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 2>to show up, had to go to an exam in person,

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 2>had to sit there for four hours and hand write

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:26.360
<v Speaker 2>out answers.

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you think like that would do it, especially if

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>they obviously had no computers and no phones and no

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>tablets with them, Like if they needed to go in

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and write essays, do exams, answer questions with no help,

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that's going to there. They're either going to get you know,

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>they're either going to learn or they're going to crash

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and burn.

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Do you think now that one stopped I'm using AI,

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 2>you'd still I mean, if I was back then but

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 2>had AI available to me, I'd be using it to

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 2>help me study. Yeah, because but but and so it

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 2>would be still help.

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but you've got to be able to go into

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the exam room without AI and prove that you actually

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>know the.

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Stuff, at least for that hour.

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and well yeah, and literally you know, write an

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 1>essay or whatever.

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 2>In response to a question you haven't seen.

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:30.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, and that you can only do that with

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, knowledge, with quiet knowledge.

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 2>So I think that's where we're going to end up.

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 2>I can't see any alternative to significantly greater requirement for

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 2>in person And if you were to write assignments, I

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 2>think the only sort of assignments you could write would

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 2>be By the way, when I went to university and

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 2>did undergraduates, there were no assignments at all. You did

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 2>a full year of study, you did a full year subject,

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:57.439
<v Speaker 2>and you did a four hour exam at the end

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 2>of it, and that was that really, So you know,

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 2>you could go back to that, but if you wanted

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 2>to do assignments, they could be more like we had

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 2>a discussion in class today about X or Y topic.

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 2>What did you think of Craig's take on that. Let's

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 2>see an AI do that one.

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, right, right right, yeah. I've I've spoken to Melissa

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>who runs my life about this, and she's my ra

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>on my PhD. And and obviously we're using AI in

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.239
<v Speaker 1>some bits, like in the research bits, but all of

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 1>my all of my papers are coming out of the

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>research that I've done, which isn't anywhere on the internet.

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 1>It's all, you know, so there's there's not really even

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 1>a possibility of cheating. But I said to her, you

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>could design a PhD depending on that, you know, especially

0:19:56.560 --> 0:20:00.360
<v Speaker 1>when you do something like psychology, where do you get

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to depending on the university and how much leeway they

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>give you. You can design a study. You can write

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 1>your own research questions, come up with your own aims

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and hypotheses, and do I think you could almost if

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you knew how to do it. Not that you'd get through,

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>but you could literally do a PhD in a week

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>if you knew how to just you know what I'm saying.

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree with you. I think you could. I

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 2>think if you you know, it wouldn't necessarily get through

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 2>some universities, But look, I think if you knew what

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 2>you were doing, you could crank out. You know, I

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 2>don't know, what's the length of a PhD is at

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:46.440
<v Speaker 2>sixty seventy thousand words something like that, you could crank

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 2>that out in a night. You know. That's just the

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 2>trick is making it something that is PhD worthy.

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, My mine's different because

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I've got to write papers and get them published. But yeah,

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>so mine is by publication, not by thesis. But for

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>people who do it by thesis, it's like, yeah, you could. Yeah,

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>you're probably right if you if you had a big

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>crack and took a you know, some nicorette gum or

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>something and sat down for twelve and a half hours,

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you could probably start to finish your pH d. Yeah,

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>what about This wasn't what we were going to chat

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>about tonight.

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 2>You probably fail an oral examination of it though, which

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of leaves a bit of a clue to how

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 2>PhD should be assessed as well.

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, you make a good point, Like in mind,

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I had five assessments along the way. Four assessments along

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the way where called academic reviews, where you go and

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>stand in front of a board and you you've got

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:59.679
<v Speaker 1>to defend your thesis and talk about your study, your

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>re arch, how you did it, why you did it,

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>how it was designed, why it was designed, why this,

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>why this science needs to be brought into the world,

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>why it's different, blah blah blah, all that stuff. You

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:13.959
<v Speaker 1>have to do that four times, which I've done it,

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and that as someone who does this for living, talk

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>publicly and speak in front of audiences. That's the scaredest

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I've ever been speaking to a group. I've never felt

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I've never felt dumber, I've never felt more insecure, I've

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>never felt more out of my you know, my environment,

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>because I'm, as you've well established, with my audience. Thanks

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>so much. I'm not a real academic and I'm talking

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to real academics than I do.

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Graig, Well, you know.

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, but it's just fucking terrifying, but that is Yeah. Look,

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>there are a few what they call academic milestones along

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the way, but yeah, other than that, I think you could.

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>You could. Isn't there a famous story about blokes who

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>wrote all these academic papers that were completely bullshit and go.

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh yes, yes, yeah, very much on purpose.

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, got accepted into Q one journal, which everyone that's

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:19.679
<v Speaker 1>the highest level, like the most highly regarded, you know,

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>peer reviewed, kind of well credentialed. Yeah, and they wrote

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:29.919
<v Speaker 1>these bullshit papers based on bullshit data and outcomes and

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>got them actually published. And they did it just to

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:34.880
<v Speaker 1>prove that that was possible.

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, Look, a significant percentage of so called quality

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:45.439
<v Speaker 2>research probably falls into the category of bullshit. I do

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 2>remember there was a study about what percentage it was,

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 2>and it was a surprisingly large one. I don't have

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 2>it off the top of my head, but yes, just

0:23:54.880 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 2>because it's in a journal doesn't mean it's true.

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So we'll leave our conversation about the food pyramids next time.

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 1>But my last question read all of this is it

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>seems like an understandably a lot of people who work

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in the creative space, you know, writers, musicians, you know,

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 1>all different kinds of artists are not a fan of

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 1>AI at all because you know, like some of the

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of course it's subjective, but some of the art that's

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>produced by AI, as if you thought a person did that,

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you'd go, well, that's fucking incredible. And some of the music,

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and you know, some of the writing and some of

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the poetry that it can produce and

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>songs that it can write. So that's not a it's

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>not a great outcome for them, I guess, yeah, But

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess that would be harder to take if they

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>hadn't all been stuffed by online use of their work.

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Now, I mean, I don't know, what does a Spotify

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 2>artist get is point zero zero zero zero zero zero

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 2>one cent every time it's played? You know, the entitlement

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 2>to be paid for your work is at best theoretical now,

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 2>I would say largely, And you know, the remnants of

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 2>it are the industry. I mean, I guess when my

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 2>when my books get published, is that there's publishing houses

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 2>that still make money out of doing this and still

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:39.919
<v Speaker 2>send you a few cents on the doll of my

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 2>way for doing it. But you know, unless unless you're

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 2>writing you know, Minion selling blockbusters you're not. No one's

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 2>making a fortune out of publishing anything, And which is

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 2>why I always find it really amusing when someone accuses

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:04.479
<v Speaker 2>me of taking a position just for the royalties. That

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 2>is hilarious.

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 1>People don't get it.

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, But so to the extent that AI is screwing

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 2>that in the sense that it's using your work in

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:23.640
<v Speaker 2>a derivative fashion, I'm sure I guess it is. Prove it.

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 2>And what percentage of what it does are you entitled to?

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:35.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, you entitled to point zero seventeen times one

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 2>cent for it? You know, it's you know, I've been

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 2>involved in situations where people have flat out plagiarized things

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 2>that I've written in other books by other publishers, and

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 2>you can see it's not like is this derivative or paraphrase.

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 2>It's like, here's a chunk of text from my book,

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 2>and there it is in the other book exactly the same.

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 2>And publishers have said to me, yeah, not really worth

0:27:02.640 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 2>briefing the lawyers on that, you know, and they're right.

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I am. One of my books was

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 1>published by Penguin and it sells for thirty dollars and

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>people are like, thirty dollars. That's a fair bit for

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a paperback, Like, well, yeah, it's two hundred and eighty pages.

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, and I go by the way, I get

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>three dollars.

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 2>Well they get they get forty seven doubts.

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well they get twenty seven dollars. I get three.

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>So don't be mad at me. I'm not getting rich

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of this, so you know, but anyway, it is what

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 1>it is. So when are you back on deck? When

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 1>are you like when you're big boy pants and starting work?

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 2>Ah, Monday, Monday. I'll get back at it next Monday. Hey,

0:27:57.560 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 2>you know what we didn't talk about today, And I

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 2>don't know whether it's in you to your listeners, and

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 2>if so, we can hold it over the next time.

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 2>Is the bacon paradox?

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, well, I mean, if you're up for it, I'm up.

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah.

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>My best mate rang me today and his name's Vin.

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Shout out to Vin, and he's like, tell gillespo I

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 1>love him even more. I'm like, why is that he

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>goes bacon because it's just a big you know, Trady Bogan,

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>like fucking bacon sandwiches. That's his thing, you know. He's like,

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, bacon. Tell him he's a great man. I'm like, oh,

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 1>let him know, Vin, all right. So I haven't even

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>read it. I don't even know what it's about. So

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>tell me the bacon.

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Story, all right. So you must have in all your

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 2>years traveling through the health industry, come across people saying, oh,

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 2>you shouldn't eat bacon because of the nitrates. Of course, yes, definitely, yes,

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Well that's bs. And the article I wrote about that,

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 2>called the Bacon Paradox, is about that, which is, you know,

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 2>so that's the big reason people give you, or one

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 2>of the big reasons why you shouldn't beginning bacon. And

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, there's sort of two camps, the ones who

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 2>won't touch bacon at all and the ones who then

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 2>go hunting for nitrate free bacon, which does exist, by

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 2>the way. And the article is about pointing out some

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 2>facts about nitrates that most people seem to not understand

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 2>or ignore, which is one is, yes, there are nitrates

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 2>added to bacon as part of the curing process, but

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 2>they're insignificant compared to the nitrates you would consume from say,

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 2>rocket salad or be troot or spinach. So, just to

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 2>give you a sense of scale, one hundred gram serving

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 2>of rocket or b troot or asparagus or salary. If

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 2>you had to consume an equivalent amount of bacon to

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 2>get the same amount of nitrates as in those things,

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 2>you'd have to consume five kilos of bacon.

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's hilarious. Hang on, how on stop? So one

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred grams five kilos. Yeah, so gram for Graham, it's

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>got fifty times less, fifty times less. Yeah, yeah, that's

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>so funny.

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 2>So you know, if nitrates were truly the toxic assassin

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 2>we are told they are, a salad would be a

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 2>suicide note. So you know, clearly there's a bit of

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 2>an issue there. Now, if you put that to people,

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 2>they do one or two things. They say, oh yeah, yeah,

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 2>but there are artificial nitrates in bacon. Well, no, they're added,

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 2>but they're exactly the same chemical. They're the same molecule.

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 2>It's no, it doesn't matter whether it came from you know,

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 2>a bottle and a lab that they added to the

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 2>curing of the meat, or whether they ground up some

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 2>celery and got it. It's the same molecule. So there's

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 2>no that. But they would make another point, which is valid,

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 2>which is, ah, yeah, yeah, but what makes nitrates in

0:31:07.600 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 2>cella less dangerous is that the cella comes with some

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 2>vitamin C, and vitamin C is an adiocidant, which essentially

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 2>neutralizes the danger presented by nitrates. And that's true, it does,

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 2>which is exactly why they put vitamin C in the

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 2>curing of bacon. So all bacon that's cured with nitrate

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 2>either has vitamin C or a very closely aligned molecule

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 2>which is also an antioxidant. I think it's E three

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 2>six or something same thing. So that's why it's there,

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 2>and you'll see it on the label every single time.

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 2>It's there to make sure that the nitrate doesn't do

0:31:47.920 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 2>anything to you.

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>So in the which we'll talk about next time, but

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in the new inverted version of the food pyramid, essentially

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I say it's inverted because it's almost just the old

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>one upside down, bacon would rank as a healthy food

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>or as a relatively healthy food.

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, not an unhealthy food, let's put it that way.

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Although you know, there is something to be said for

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 2>being careful about where the pig was raised or what

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 2>it was fed. So pigs, like humans, are omnivores and

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 2>they absorb poly unsaturated fats if they're fed them. Now,

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 2>pigs in nature don't get access to much in the

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 2>way of poly unsaturated fat. So you know, a wild

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 2>pig or a pig that's able to feed itself in

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 2>nature is fine. But a farm harvested or farm raised

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 2>pig is going to be fed grains which are high

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 2>in a Mega six fats and so they're fat. It

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 2>is going to be high in a Mega six fat two.

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 2>So you want to trim the bacon of non free

0:32:55.480 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 2>range ham or bacon. In Australia, almost all of our

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 2>bacon is not free range, so it's about ninety seven

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 2>percent of bacon sold in Australia is grain fed. So

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 2>if you're going to eat the fat, make sure it's

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 2>not grain fed. So you'd have to go to some

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 2>links to make sure of that.

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>So pigs in the wild, while pigs, I guess we

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>call them or bores, do they eat meat like they can?

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I know they're omnivous.

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 2>They're omnivors. Yeah, they'll lead anything they can get. Wow,

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 2>So like humans, whatever is available.

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah yeah wow. Wow.

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 2>They haven't invented fire yet, so they probably find it

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 2>a bit more tricky to eat meat.

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think, yeah, just getting their hands or their

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 1>little what do you call them, trotters, trotters, thank you?

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Getting their trotters on a box of matches is somewhat

0:33:55.200 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>complex out in the middle of and what what brought

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that to your attention? Like what like when you come

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>up with and we'll go in a second, but like

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking, where did this idea come from? Like for that,

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>what caught your nitrates or just even the bacon the

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:14.919
<v Speaker 1>story in general.

0:34:17.000 --> 0:34:19.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I've seen it every now and then

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 2>you come across these things. One of the things that

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 2>irritates me that it is sort of vegetarian slash vegan propaganda,

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:31.360
<v Speaker 2>and an often part of that is this story about

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, oh, you can't eat bacon because of the nitrates.

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 2>And so I did look out of a long time

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 2>ago when I was writing a book about seed oils

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:44.520
<v Speaker 2>and looked into the nitrates on bacon. And then I

0:34:44.560 --> 0:34:46.919
<v Speaker 2>remembered the other day and I was thinking about something

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:49.879
<v Speaker 2>I might want to write. I thought, what, I don't

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 2>think I've ever actually written a piece about the nitrates,

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 2>So I thought I'd do it.

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what, I would love, love, love love

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:01.759
<v Speaker 1>for you to write an art colon, and I think

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:04.919
<v Speaker 1>it will get huge traction. And I'm not being facetious.

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know if you've seen the the saturation

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:17.360
<v Speaker 1>exposure that Oprah's getting at the moment with her new book. No, No, Okay.

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>So her new book is called Give Me a Minute.

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 1>A new book is called Enough, Your Health, Your Weight,

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and what It's Like to Be Free. It's co authored

0:35:28.880 --> 0:35:34.880
<v Speaker 1>with a doctor lady called it Anya or Anya Anya anyway,

0:35:36.160 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 1>She okay, I'm gonna I'm actually doing a podcast on Saturday.

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 1>As we record this, everyone, it's Thursday night, and I'm

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>going to explore some of these And so she doesn't

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>say people are obese. She says people have obesity, right,

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's a chronic disease. And she says, if you

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>have oben it's not because you're overeating, it's because you

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 1>have the disease that causes you to overeat. And she

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:14.319
<v Speaker 1>says willpower is not going to work if you have obesity.

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 1>She says, I was carrying a chronic disease that caused

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>me to overeat. And one of the reoccurring themes and

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 1>by the way, everyone listening to me, I think for

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the most part. In general terms, she's amazing the stuff

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that she's done. You know, I've done nothing compared to her.

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 1>She's a superstar. But I have worked a lot with

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 1>bodies and diets and food and people who are obese

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and people who are lean and fit and highly functional

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and poorly functional and all of that. But one of

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the things that she says emphatically is that, like when

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, talking to people about their weight or this

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 1>is fat shaming. And I'm like, well, no, no, no.

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:01.840
<v Speaker 1>If I'm talking to somebody about like the reality of

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 1>what they weigh or their size, and I'm coming from

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 1>a point of view of well, do you want to

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 1>be obese? The answer is usually know and how do

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you feel? And the answer is not, you know, it's

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 1>not always great. But for me to do that is

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:20.280
<v Speaker 1>apparently triggering and fat shaming, whereas I'm really I just want,

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 1>like you didn't accidentally end up in the spot like

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I've been obese. Now. When I was obese, it was

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 1>all about my choices and my behaviors, and when I

0:37:29.120 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 1>changed my operating system, i lost the weight and I

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 1>kept that off since I was fourteen, essentially, so you know,

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 1>whatever that is nearly fifty years. But it is some

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff that they're saying, Like I think I've

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 1>figured I'm not positive, but I'm pretty sure it was

0:37:47.239 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 1>like seventy four percent of people are hardwired to be obese,

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 1>right And I'm thinking, Okay, So if it's not about

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:58.800
<v Speaker 1>your lifestyle, it's not about your choices, it's not about

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 1>your habits, and it's not your fault, and then why

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:06.359
<v Speaker 1>do we have sixty six percent obese in America give

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:10.400
<v Speaker 1>or take right now? Overweight and obese in America right now?

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>And if we look one hundred years ago, I don't

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 1>know what the number would be, but I'm sure it

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>would have been less than ten. You know. It's just

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 1>like there's this whole weird psychology going on and this

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 1>if anybody says anything that's practical or to me, extremely

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 1>reasonable about let's not beat ourselves up, let's not self loath,

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>but let's be self aware. Let's be honest. Let's acknowledge

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the decisions that we make and the behaviors that we embrace.

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 1>The things that we do actually have a physiological consequence.

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's not because you're bad or terrible, but that

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:53.160
<v Speaker 1>is just that is a consequence of those choices and behaviors.

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:57.239
<v Speaker 1>But her message is essentially, oh, that's out of your control.

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:00.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, and what say solution.

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Drugs?

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 2>The drugs are all right, okay, Oh there we go.

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 2>So so obesity is an insufficiency of weight loss drugs.

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, no, it's biological. She uses that word a lot,

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and the other lady, the doctor lady, Oh, it's biological.

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>And people just you know, they don't understand. But when

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 1>they yeah, look, they really really like. She said.

0:39:28.680 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 2>One of her.

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Quotes was, I will be on this forever. This is

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:32.879
<v Speaker 1>me for the rest of my life.

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Well you have to be Those drugs stop working the

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 2>minute you stop taking them.

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, I reckon when you have a minute, or when

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you have sixty minutes. Have a look at some of

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:47.319
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that she's advocating. I reckon, you could have

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a field day with and not to you know, start

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a shit fight tour, but just to go Okay, So

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 1>let's address these things one at a time. So she

0:39:57.080 --> 0:40:00.239
<v Speaker 1>says this, Now, let's unpack that. Let's see if that's

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 1>true or not, or what part's true or what parts not,

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:08.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's very much seems to me about alleviating people

0:40:08.920 --> 0:40:15.240
<v Speaker 1>of any responsibility or accountability. Anyway, have a look interesting,

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll have a look at it all right, Well, say goodbye.

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Fair but always good to chat mate.

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Appreciate you, absolute pleasure. See you Graig, see buddy.