Speaker 1: Late Welcome to the Late Debase. Good evening and welcome
Speaker 1: to the program. I'm Caleb Bond with Liz Storer and
Speaker 1: Joe Hildebrand. Well, look, I am not renowned for my
Speaker 1: exercise regimen, but I have decided maybe I need to
Speaker 1: take it up because the Guardian has come up with
Speaker 1: the best reason ever to exercise. Apparently it turns your
Speaker 1: right wing. We'll tell you a little bit more about
Speaker 1: that later in the show. The Chinese premiere is also
Speaker 1: on his way to Adelaide with a gift. We'll tell
Speaker 1: you what it is when we get into the papers.
Speaker 1: And how long does it take to solve homelessness?
Speaker 2: We have found the answer.
Speaker 1: But first you would think if someone commissioned you to
Speaker 1: build a toilet block, it would be pretty straightforward. You know,
Speaker 1: I've got to get the cistern and put it in
Speaker 1: the right place. So I've got to get the sink
Speaker 1: and put it in the right place. It probably needs
Speaker 1: a few walls, a door on the front. All seems
Speaker 1: pretty straightforward. Well, no, that's not a case. If you
Speaker 1: go to Allenby Garden's Reserve in Adelaide to a toilet
Speaker 1: that was put up by Charles Sturt Council. Now, this toilet,
Speaker 1: by the way, has apparently been in place for years,
Speaker 1: but it's only just come to the attention of the
Speaker 1: locals that the doors on the cubicles look a bit
Speaker 1: like this. Hey, look at this photo here of the
Speaker 1: cubicle door on the front of this toilet. It is
Speaker 1: entirely true. That is a woman in the toilet about
Speaker 1: to do her business, and well anyone walking past could
Speaker 1: notice it.
Speaker 3: Now, congrats on getting the though.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Look, I had to go and investigate for myself.
Speaker 1: You know where it's really important stuff right now. Apparently
Speaker 1: the council actually did some work on this toilet block
Speaker 1: recently because it was vandalized, and even at that point
Speaker 1: none of the council workers bother to look at it
Speaker 1: and go hang on, that is a mesh door on
Speaker 1: the front of the toilet. Now that the locals have
Speaker 1: realized what's going on, they are outraged.
Speaker 4: I think it's a bringin freeman upon someone's privacy.
Speaker 1: It should refixate half.
Speaker 4: I come here all the time with my three children
Speaker 4: and I wouldn't feel comfortable sending them to the toilet here.
Speaker 1: I think it.
Speaker 4: Scares me more as there is a playground like behind us,
Speaker 4: and knowing that there's kids who are vulnerable.
Speaker 1: If you want something to be done badly given to
Speaker 1: a council. I can only imagine that the meeting between
Speaker 1: the CEO and whoever designed this thing, when they worked
Speaker 1: it out recently, when something.
Speaker 5: Like this, I'm familiar with the event itself. Mister Wilson.
Speaker 5: What I'm trying to ascertain is are you absolutely sure
Speaker 5: that the two hundred meters track is two hundred meters long?
Speaker 5: It is because it's half the four hundred meters track,
Speaker 5: which is four hundred meters long.
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 6: The two hundred meters is half the four hundred meters.
Speaker 1: You can measure it.
Speaker 5: Ye, no, no, no, no, But the four hundred meters track
Speaker 5: is exactly four hundred meters long, is it?
Speaker 7: That's right?
Speaker 5: So the two hundred meters track is exactly two hundred
Speaker 5: meters long, of course, But what you're telling me is
Speaker 5: that the one hundred meters track is a one hundred meters.
Speaker 6: Long slightly different arrangement?
Speaker 5: Is a meter a slightly different concept?
Speaker 8: Is it?
Speaker 5: In one hundred against two? Well, I don't understand, mister
Speaker 5: Wilson quite why in the construction of a one hundred
Speaker 5: meters track, you would want to depart too radically from
Speaker 5: the constraints laid down for us by the conventional calibration
Speaker 5: of distance.
Speaker 1: The brilliance of John Clark on the Games, and one
Speaker 1: wonders Joe why you would want to depart too radically
Speaker 1: from the concept of a I don't know, not a
Speaker 1: door that you can see through on the front of
Speaker 1: a toilet Cuba.
Speaker 3: I just love everything about this story. I love firstly
Speaker 3: the quote that kind of almost tells you everything and
Speaker 3: nothing at the same time, which is where local resident
Speaker 3: Felicity Graham tells seven years these doors have apparently been
Speaker 3: here for years and no one thought it was an issue.
Speaker 3: So I don't know. I don't know how you could
Speaker 3: have I could see that, like would there be a
Speaker 3: thing like I can almost imagine like the you know,
Speaker 3: the council Child Safety commissioners saying, oh, no, we can't
Speaker 3: possibly it's a playground nearby. We have to make sure
Speaker 3: that children can be seen at all times, including on
Speaker 3: the toilet, which is kind of creepy. But there are many,
Speaker 3: many things. Firstly, one excuse from council has been that
Speaker 3: it was response to focus groups where ratepayers were demanding
Speaker 3: more transparency. But I find that with these sorts of issues, Caleb,
Speaker 3: I know you have problems with counsels not taking responsibility
Speaker 3: for their decisions, and I think this is happening in
Speaker 3: this time because no matter what happens, no matter you know,
Speaker 3: what's gone wrong, there never seems to be anyone who's
Speaker 3: actually personally at fault. They always just blame the system.
Speaker 1: Oh so, how many more can we get into? I'm
Speaker 1: going to actually, but it's the fact that it took
Speaker 1: so long for anyone to notice. But you've got to
Speaker 1: wonder when a council commissions something to be built, surely
Speaker 1: someone brings a design to them, right, And how at
Speaker 1: the point of the design coming to them did no
Speaker 1: one go hang on the doors a see through? Then
Speaker 1: from that point forward, how did no one go hang
Speaker 1: on the doors a see through. Either this is the
Speaker 1: least used toilet block in the history of man, in
Speaker 1: which case just knock it over, or the people of
Speaker 1: Allenbe Gardens are a bunch of pervs and they didn't
Speaker 1: mind the fact it was see through.
Speaker 6: What's going on?
Speaker 4: Well, obviously no one can believe it took them this
Speaker 4: long to be like, Ah, toilet doors are see through.
Speaker 4: That's actually a euphemism I've used for something that's really useless.
Speaker 4: This is as useless as a glass door and a
Speaker 4: toilet cubi gold. It's supposed to be funny. Okay, you're
Speaker 4: not supposed to actually run with it.
Speaker 6: It's good grief. Also, it looks like some sort of caging.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it actually looks like the world's high indore looks
Speaker 3: like the world's least secure juvenile detention center, completely.
Speaker 4: Perforated, so you can't do anything in your cell that
Speaker 4: everybody else isn't privy to.
Speaker 6: I mean, this is just so noticeable and yet it's
Speaker 6: been there.
Speaker 1: And you just saw the inside of it. That's from
Speaker 1: inside the cubicle. So you're sitting there taking a dumb
Speaker 1: or whatever, and you go, hang on a minute, I
Speaker 1: can see the outside wall.
Speaker 4: About these things, because in some toilet cubicles it's just
Speaker 4: the gap in the door, like.
Speaker 6: It can be really tiny. But if they're flimsily made,
Speaker 6: you can be in the cubicle going hang on a minute.
Speaker 4: If I can see you, you can see me through
Speaker 4: this tiny crack that is clearly big enough for us
Speaker 4: to make icontract.
Speaker 1: You had one job. I mean, if a council can't
Speaker 1: even build a toilet block properly, what can we trust
Speaker 1: them with millions and millions of dollars in ratepayers money
Speaker 1: and they can't even build toilets properly.
Speaker 3: Well, I'm sure they could at least build a park, Caleb,
Speaker 3: because they don't even have to build a park. It's
Speaker 3: just there. You just have to do nothing.
Speaker 6: It's just that.
Speaker 3: It's a beautiful part when.
Speaker 4: You're given forty million real government thank you.
Speaker 3: For coming to my segue. Yes, and you say that
Speaker 3: Labor Government has ordered Hornsby Shire Council to repay thirty
Speaker 3: six million dollars from a controversial grants fund for which
Speaker 3: it built a park that never was. It's the money.
Speaker 1: It means they didn't kill the park.
Speaker 3: It's a bit it's a bit like it's a bit
Speaker 3: like Jerry Seinfeld and the reservation. They took the money,
Speaker 3: they took the resumes, they took the money to build
Speaker 3: the park, but they just didn't build the park. So
Speaker 3: they got the job half right, but just didn't fire through.
Speaker 3: This is, of course Hornsby Shire Council, which I think
Speaker 3: is the mayor the local mayor's Philip Roddicker used to
Speaker 3: be the grand old There you go, the former flo
Speaker 3: If you're watching, not too late to get it done.
Speaker 3: I reckon, if you get that park built by sun up,
Speaker 3: maybe they'll.
Speaker 1: Let you pay you and I could go with a
Speaker 1: backup and do it.
Speaker 3: But yes, the Stronger Community's Grant Fund is set up
Speaker 3: in twenty seventeen to support councils that were forced to merge,
Speaker 3: and but ninety six percent of grants were awarded to
Speaker 3: councils in liberal and national seats.
Speaker 4: Can't be right, Marilyn Coalition would never.
Speaker 3: Sit the Flabor Party would never do something like this.
Speaker 6: Back in twenty eighteen, we're gonna build a park. We're
Speaker 6: gonna build a park.
Speaker 4: Here's a mock up of what that park was supposed
Speaker 4: to look like. What rate payers were, well taxpayers, I
Speaker 4: should say, we're supposed to be getting for forty million dollars.
Speaker 4: And here's what they have six years later.
Speaker 1: Fantastic, some unknown grass.
Speaker 4: As far as I'm concerned that I's just as beautiful.
Speaker 4: But listen, hornsby what are they hornsby Shire Council. If
Speaker 4: you were smarter, you would have spent the money quicker. Yeah, notably,
Speaker 4: this is a former council as I do I do
Speaker 4: you get a grant, you spend the grants, Okay, no
Speaker 4: mucking around. So now the federal government is like, can
Speaker 4: you give our money back? Because not only was there
Speaker 4: the whole pork barreling thing going on, but you haven't
Speaker 4: spent it and there's no park and the Shire can't
Speaker 4: justify to the federal government, Oh it's properly underway. No
Speaker 4: it's not even underway. So they want a refund. They've
Speaker 4: obviously spent four million of it lawn plans and whatever,
Speaker 4: but they're like, we want the other thirty six million back.
Speaker 3: Couldn't they have said we were going for more of
Speaker 3: a sort of Christine natural industrial backwater. This is what
Speaker 3: we had a mine all the long. And look there
Speaker 3: are no sea through toilet doors.
Speaker 1: No no no no no no no no. They should have
Speaker 1: built the sea through toilet and then they could have
Speaker 1: actually shown that they've made an effort to do something
Speaker 1: on that piece of land. I mean again, it's just
Speaker 1: another example of how maddening all of this is. And
Speaker 1: we did a story last night Shoe on the Sunday Showdown,
Speaker 1: great show, watch it every Sunday since well you never missed.
Speaker 1: You can watch these two great fellas, Sir Joe. And
Speaker 1: that's right, every Sunday. But I did this story last
Speaker 1: night about a fifth of councils in Victoria in this
Speaker 1: council term have either been sacked by the state government
Speaker 1: or they've had a state government monitor put in charge
Speaker 1: of them just to make sure they don't go off
Speaker 1: the edge because they're that badly behaved. They can't build
Speaker 1: toilets properly, they can't build parks when they're given forty
Speaker 1: million dollars in order to do so. They get sacked
Speaker 1: because they can't even get through a meeting. As I
Speaker 1: said last night, just abolish councils. All the powers councils
Speaker 1: have come from the state government, just absorbed all but
Speaker 1: to the state.
Speaker 4: Although whenever they do a local government who actually runs
Speaker 4: does rate it.
Speaker 3: I know that that's it. They absolutely should, and I
Speaker 3: have no problem that whatsoever. But strangely, when they do
Speaker 3: surveys of people usually come back they say, no, we
Speaker 3: want to get rid of state governments and keep local
Speaker 3: and federal, which is that would be just even worse.
Speaker 3: But my favorite part we never got to it last night.
Speaker 3: My favorite part of those councils who were just absolutely
Speaker 3: useless was Deriban Council in Melbourne, which is just the
Speaker 3: most dysfunctional lefty council you can possibly imagine, apart from
Speaker 3: maybe the city of Yarra itself. And there was this
Speaker 3: amazing exchange that council's chamber where one council is complaining
Speaker 3: to the acting mayor said we didn't I'll let you
Speaker 3: acting mayor just so you could be a dictator and
Speaker 3: the acting there are said back tough, but they don't
Speaker 3: even deny they're a dictator, Like isn't that It's like
Speaker 3: they waited it elect you, you know, read it elect
Speaker 3: your policeman to find out you're a sexophone. And I said, well, surprise,
Speaker 3: do you want to be there?
Speaker 6: Like why else? One election?
Speaker 1: Don't?
Speaker 6: Then you might not be.
Speaker 1: They have your moment in the sun. I mean, you're
Speaker 1: not good enough to make it to the real deals
Speaker 1: date or federal politics. So you can just pile right here, mate. Okay,
Speaker 1: one exception over here. But you know, seriously, the number
Speaker 1: of people who end up on councils who just are
Speaker 1: there because I don't know, they get angry about the
Speaker 1: toilet block on the corner, which you know, in the
Speaker 1: case of Adelaide, was actually legitimate. But you know, they
Speaker 1: get elected on such small issues like the street needs
Speaker 1: a pothole fixed in it or something, and then they
Speaker 1: get there and they fix the problem and they go, oh,
Speaker 1: good god, what do I do for the next feet?
Speaker 4: It does attract a weird demographic, which is what does
Speaker 4: You've got the looney, the lonely, and the ambitious. You
Speaker 4: look at the lay party of any party and that's
Speaker 4: who you've got. And then you look at Parliament, which
Speaker 4: is just an extended version you know.
Speaker 6: What I'm talking about.
Speaker 3: But that's true. There are two types of people. There
Speaker 3: are ambitious, bloodless politicians and people who write letters to
Speaker 3: newspapers and that's it. It's like I'm writing to you
Speaker 3: about the.
Speaker 1: Stop side on Warren or a parade.
Speaker 3: It's been there. And then you've got the people who
Speaker 3: are like, you know, Mark Latham, It's like I'll kill
Speaker 3: everyone who gets in my way. He did not, actually,
Speaker 3: so you're not actually killing You're not. Definitely a few
Speaker 3: good sort.
Speaker 6: Of hip and shoulders working for a state MPs. I
Speaker 6: felt like half my job.
Speaker 4: Was telling all these people who write in about these issues,
Speaker 4: that's a local government issue.
Speaker 6: That's a local government issue.
Speaker 4: And I'll never forget speaking to one lady who was
Speaker 4: so convinced that I was yanking her chain and there
Speaker 4: was no other kind of government. And I'm like, had
Speaker 4: to literally try and explain to where the three tiers
Speaker 4: of government and how they work, and how her fence
Speaker 4: issue was actually not a matter for the state government.
Speaker 4: But let's get to Europe because in a.
Speaker 6: Win for the almost four hundred and.
Speaker 4: Fifty million people living in the European Union, the leftist
Speaker 4: cesspool that has been European Parliament for a very long
Speaker 4: time has been drained in this year's European elections. Every
Speaker 4: five years they get a chance to drain that swamp.
Speaker 6: And this year, gosh did they deliver.
Speaker 4: Now, if you watch any mainstream media, they're saying the
Speaker 4: far right.
Speaker 7: The far right parties I've taken.
Speaker 4: Over, or maybe just mainstream values one out because if
Speaker 4: they're that popular, then they must be mainstream.
Speaker 6: So bad was the blood letting or good? If you
Speaker 6: still ending where I am?
Speaker 4: That Belgian's Prime minister wasted no time resigning in tears
Speaker 4: the world's smallest violin place by globalist scum. And then
Speaker 4: of course there was President French President Emmanuel Macron, who
Speaker 4: again the results were so devastating he knew that, Okay,
Speaker 4: the French people are telling me, I am on the nose.
Speaker 6: He's called a snap election.
Speaker 9: Demagogue's and nationalists on the rises. Bad for our nation's
Speaker 9: bad for Europe, and it is bad for the place
Speaker 9: of France in Europe and in the world. Yes, far right,
Speaker 9: it's bad for the French people and for the French nation.
Speaker 9: At the end of the day, you not able to
Speaker 9: just pretend nothing.
Speaker 4: The far right are bad, but the vast majority of
Speaker 4: you clearly want it. Because Lepen's Conservative party has given
Speaker 4: that man a hiding he will never forget. And while
Speaker 4: he was dissolving parliament and calling a snap election due
Speaker 4: to take place next month, France was celebrating, as was Germany,
Speaker 4: as their af D party, known as the right wing
Speaker 4: party in the country, also was elected to the European
Speaker 4: Parliament five year.
Speaker 6: And then there was Ireland, the rowdiest bunch of the lot.
Speaker 4: And here is that newly elected member Malache speaking to
Speaker 4: the press. One message in.
Speaker 7: Euview, does your election.
Speaker 3: And a very clear message that.
Speaker 1: The revolution has been worn.
Speaker 6: What a win for the European Union.
Speaker 4: Check out as quick summary of this blood letting France,
Speaker 4: the National Rally wins. Germany, the AfD party surgers. Belgium,
Speaker 4: PM's gone Maloney's brother of Italy wins. You'll recall that
Speaker 4: she is best known as a staunch conservative. Austria, the
Speaker 4: FPO becomes the largest party in the country. Spain, the
Speaker 4: right was bidding the left by ten percent, sent in
Speaker 4: the end they won by more than that.
Speaker 6: And Luxembourg first.
Speaker 4: Ever seat for the ad R, which is also known
Speaker 4: as a Luso right wing party because that's.
Speaker 6: What they try to convince everybody else that mainstream values
Speaker 6: are now. I just love this. I just love this.
Speaker 4: Four hundred and fifty million people go to the polls
Speaker 4: once every five years, but we've never seen a European Union.
Speaker 6: Election like this.
Speaker 1: I love that you've come in read tonight to signify
Speaker 1: the bad leading and read in my ties.
Speaker 7: Revolution to.
Speaker 1: Get the joke out of the way. First, when I
Speaker 1: first heard about the AfD Party, I thought I'd never
Speaker 1: vote for them because AfD stands for alcohol free days,
Speaker 1: and that would never appeal to me. But it is
Speaker 1: so good to see. I want to use the term
Speaker 1: uprising because people think, oh, you know, you're coming to
Speaker 1: take the place direction. It was not a storm. People
Speaker 1: exercise their democratic vote to say we're not happy with
Speaker 1: the way that Europe and for that matter, that the
Speaker 1: rest of the world is going, and we're going to
Speaker 1: do something about it. This is a movement that has
Speaker 1: been on the move for quite some time now. You've
Speaker 1: seen it move through domestic politics in Europe, through various
Speaker 1: different countries, and Maloney's a great example of it in
Speaker 1: Italy and being elected as Prime Minister. You've got no
Speaker 1: doubt it will happen in France as well. And it's
Speaker 1: curious that mccron has decided to go at this point
Speaker 1: because they only had an election in twenty twenty two.
Speaker 6: Now he hadn't.
Speaker 1: He could just hang on and use the power he's
Speaker 1: got while he's got it. But he's realized things are
Speaker 1: so bad that he's like, I got to get out
Speaker 1: of here because it's going to be really bad if
Speaker 1: I don't do something now, almost to try and arrest
Speaker 1: the loss that may come later. But this is a
Speaker 1: great thing for Europe. It's people sticking the two fingers up,
Speaker 1: much like they did when UK left Europe through Brexit,
Speaker 1: and saying we don't like it, how about you have
Speaker 1: a go.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I can't figure out what the hell. Curious is
Speaker 3: not the sea word I would have used to describe
Speaker 3: Emmanual Macron's decision. I cannot figure out what the crazy.
Speaker 3: By the way, well that's what I would or Humphrey
Speaker 3: Applevie would say. Correct. But this seems to me insane,
Speaker 3: and it seems to me the action of someone who,
Speaker 3: if there's any rationality to it whatsoever, it would be
Speaker 3: the action of someone who's thinking, what, it's bad now,
Speaker 3: but it's only going to get worse, so I better.
Speaker 3: But that seems to me to be pretty insane, because surely,
Speaker 3: as you say, you'd stick it out and try to
Speaker 3: make it better. Other than that, you can only imagine
Speaker 3: that it's the reaction of someone who is in this
Speaker 3: sort of elitist bubble who thinks that everyone thinks it's
Speaker 3: this terrible thing that all these far right parties have
Speaker 3: got this surge of popularity. Therefore we must call it
Speaker 3: election straight away, so all the normal people who think
Speaker 3: exactly like me can come out to the ballot box
Speaker 3: and show them that they're in the minority and that
Speaker 3: they're dangerous, and that you know that people of France
Speaker 3: won't tolerate their extremist ideologies. And isn't that how you
Speaker 3: get Brexit presently?
Speaker 1: Hey, you get Donald Frans.
Speaker 3: Isn't that how you get the voice vote going down?
Speaker 6: How's your pitch in in?
Speaker 4: You saw them just there staring down the barrel saying,
Speaker 4: you know, we're going to the polls France, but in
Speaker 4: that very announcement saying how bad the far right are?
Speaker 4: I mean, the vast majority of your country mate just
Speaker 4: voted for the Penn's Conservative Party, so lost words, dead words?
Speaker 4: Why are you trying to now basically insult the vast
Speaker 4: majority of French chees who said we don't want you anymore?
Speaker 4: And noticeably, one of the things that every single one
Speaker 4: of these winning far right parties had in common was
Speaker 4: cutting down on im aggraation. We have not seen anything
Speaker 4: here in Australia like Europe has been seeing for a
Speaker 4: very long time, with illegal aliens changing the face of
Speaker 4: their countries forever, and the natives are absolutely sick of it.
Speaker 4: These parties stood very staunchly against immigration and they stood
Speaker 4: very staunchly.
Speaker 6: Against the Islamization of their countries.
Speaker 4: A lot of their catch cries is Ireland for the Irish,
Speaker 4: and so on and so forth. They all have this
Speaker 4: catchphase because that is what is resonating with people who
Speaker 4: are sick to death of seeing their taxpayer dollars squandered
Speaker 4: on people who aren't even legally in their country, seeing
Speaker 4: the healthcare system and other systems burdened by again just
Speaker 4: a massive influx of people, seeing a rise of crime
Speaker 4: on their streets. And this is very noticeable in France,
Speaker 4: which I think is another reason why I'm one has
Speaker 4: just gone I can't fix what I've broken.
Speaker 6: I'm just bowing out early.
Speaker 1: And I despise this characterization of it all as far right.
Speaker 4: And indeed, which is why I say, at what point
Speaker 4: you're just going to say its.
Speaker 1: Main stream that the idea, the idea of saying fair
Speaker 1: idea is to denigrate it right, And they take phrases
Speaker 1: like Ireland for the Irish and then suggest that that
Speaker 1: means that you have to be white to be Irish. Well, no,
Speaker 1: there's lots of Irish citizens who are.
Speaker 3: Not white, and at iris Iris on Irish do not
Speaker 3: have a strong history of multiculturalism in the order problem.
Speaker 1: If you have Irish heritage in your blood, you are
Speaker 1: probably whiter than most of us. But you don't have
Speaker 1: to be white in order to be Irish. It's simply
Speaker 1: saying the people who are here and who are citizens
Speaker 1: want to keep this country for them. And I was
Speaker 1: listening this morning, as I sometimes do because you've got
Speaker 1: to keep in touch with the enemy every now and again,
Speaker 1: to ABC News Radio and they were interviewing a bloke
Speaker 1: over in Europe about all of this, and he kept
Speaker 1: characterizing these parties as far right, and then he was
Speaker 1: talking about how, you know, the Green parties had a
Speaker 1: low turnout. Okay, okay, So if you believe in low immigration,
Speaker 1: you're far right, but if you believe in home well,
Speaker 1: you're simply a Green party. And this is what they
Speaker 1: do with the language far right is meant to denigrate.
Speaker 1: Green is very lovely. We care about the environment, but
Speaker 1: it's much like the Greens here in Australia. They're not green,
Speaker 1: they're watermelons. They're green on the outside and read on
Speaker 1: the inside. That is what people have stood up against.
Speaker 3: I think it's a mistake to even think about or
Speaker 3: you know, bandy accusations about the parties themselves or the
Speaker 3: people leading them. That's the mistake that the Democrats keep
Speaker 3: making over and over and over again with Trump, keep
Speaker 3: going after Trump his character, what he's done, what he
Speaker 3: hasn't done, which PAULN. Starr has or hasn't paid off,
Speaker 3: you know, whatever he's said caught on camera, and they're
Speaker 3: not looking at the reasons why people who you would
Speaker 3: not characterize as far right, and indeed people who had
Speaker 3: been in America's case, voting Democrat. And obviously you know
Speaker 3: here you've got, for example, the so called far right
Speaker 3: party in France is expected to get about thirty bit
Speaker 3: over thirty percent of the vote at the election, if
Speaker 3: the polls are right. Now that's double Emmanuel mccron's party,
Speaker 3: you suggest it. So, whether or not it's a majority
Speaker 3: of French people, it's certainly more than it's certainly more
Speaker 3: French people than Macron himself speaks for. So clearly these
Speaker 3: guys do not have their finger on the pulse. They
Speaker 3: are not recognizing it's again, it's exactly the same thing
Speaker 3: that happened in England with Brexit, where you had in
Speaker 3: the north, working class traditional labor voters all voting for Brexit,
Speaker 3: and London is completely blindsided by it because of course
Speaker 3: everyone they knew at all their cool little hip bars
Speaker 3: that they went to, was appalled by the idea of Brexit,
Speaker 3: and indeed David Cameron promised it, assuming that promised it,
Speaker 3: believing and assuming that it would get absolutely smashed. And
Speaker 3: again I think the same mistakes were made in the
Speaker 3: Voice referendum here as well. It's like, of course everyone
Speaker 3: supports it. I don't know anyone who doesn't support it,
Speaker 3: and sure enough it only takes a good sort of
Speaker 3: negative campaign and suddenly you're harnessing all this dispossession. And
Speaker 3: I don't think it's a matter of racism. I think
Speaker 3: what people don't like is the idea of losing control.
Speaker 3: So it's not necessarily even the levels of immigration themselves
Speaker 3: or what they might worry about, losing their jobs to
Speaker 3: someone from coming in from another country or whatever, But
Speaker 3: it's more that we've lost control of our borders, that
Speaker 3: you know, you're no longer Another thing people forget is
Speaker 3: that people who are less rich and less afflient, and
Speaker 3: less secure in their own personal kind of authority or
Speaker 3: standing or wealth or prestige in the community. They care
Speaker 3: very very much about things that they identify with, and
Speaker 3: that might be their nationality, that, you know, the country
Speaker 3: that live, in their football team, whatever it is. You
Speaker 3: denigrate that sort of stuff. And there's so many examples
Speaker 3: of people looking down their nose at that you'll basically
Speaker 3: tell that person you're nothing, because you're telling the person
Speaker 3: who's proud to be Australian or proud to be English,
Speaker 3: or proud that you know acid Villa one or whatever
Speaker 3: it is, that you know, they're just stupid, their knuckle draggers,
Speaker 3: and they should be off, you know, like going to
Speaker 3: Yale and studying climate communications.
Speaker 10: And then they become disenfranchised, and then they become disenfranchised,
Speaker 10: and then they these people see all these elites, see
Speaker 10: all these people who are having these meetings using words
Speaker 10: they don't understand because the communications is terrible in a
Speaker 10: sort of senate left center right consensus, that they're not
Speaker 10: bothering to explain to the great unwash because they wouldn't
Speaker 10: understand anyway.
Speaker 3: And then when some unlike la pen or Trump or
Speaker 3: Boris or whoever it is, comes along and says things
Speaker 3: that are often very simplistic sometimes downright wrong. Nonetheless, these
Speaker 3: people say, well, hang on a minute. At least I
Speaker 3: can understand you, at least I know what you're saying,
Speaker 3: and at least you're promising to do something for me.
Speaker 1: I don't know. We can say pin saying things are
Speaker 1: the downright wrong on one particular side.
Speaker 3: Well in brexit that things in Brexit that was saying
Speaker 3: things are absolutely it's clearly completely wrong.
Speaker 4: I think it's also a little bit simpler than that
Speaker 4: as well. People are You don't have to have several
Speaker 4: degrees to be like you've trashed my country. Okay, I've
Speaker 4: lived here for long enough to remember that ten years
Speaker 4: ago we didn't have crime rates like this. Our streets
Speaker 4: were clean, homeless weren't lining city streets, et cetera, et cetera,
Speaker 4: and so on. You've got people there who are old
Speaker 4: enough to just go the demographic the crime rates so
Speaker 4: much has changed for the negative.
Speaker 6: You guys can go jump. So it doesn't.
Speaker 4: Necessarily come down to all my senses of identity or anything.
Speaker 6: It's more just like, look around you, this is bad.
Speaker 6: We need someone to fix it. These guys are strong leaders.
Speaker 6: You've had your chance, you blew it. We're going in
Speaker 6: the other doors.
Speaker 1: It shows that people power does work. Take heart, you
Speaker 1: can fight against the system. Is proof of it. Let's
Speaker 1: hope we get some good outcomes out of it. While
Speaker 1: we're on the topic of immigration, you might remember last
Speaker 1: week Joe Biden sent down this I was going to
Speaker 1: say prime ministerial, but thank god, they don't have a
Speaker 1: prime minister and a president in the United States. They've
Speaker 1: only got a president who can't think for himself. Anyway.
Speaker 1: He sent down a direction that most asylum seekers should
Speaker 1: be banned. Almost legal immigrant should be banned from claiming
Speaker 1: asylum in the United States. And that all lasted for
Speaker 1: about five minutes, because now we have seen an internal
Speaker 1: memo from the Border Patrol in San Diego which basically
Speaker 1: says most of these people should be let in the
Speaker 1: country anyway. According to this memo, adults single adults from
Speaker 1: all but six countries in the Eastern Hemisphere are to
Speaker 1: be declared as hard or very hard to remove, which
Speaker 1: means we simply let them go. The only countries that
Speaker 1: they have said people should not be allowed to claim
Speaker 1: asylum in the US is Russia, Georgia, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Moldova,
Speaker 1: and Kurdistan, every one else. It's too hard. We can't
Speaker 1: do anything about it. We can't send them back in
Speaker 1: you come. So it didn't even last five minutes, the
Speaker 1: idea that these people wouldn't be allowed into the country,
Speaker 1: and you kind of got to scratch your head and
Speaker 1: go okay. So Joe Biden's got an election coming up
Speaker 1: later this year. He knows that immigration, illegal immigration is
Speaker 1: a big problem for him. He's got Donald Trump, who's
Speaker 1: running on this, ran on it last time, actually shut
Speaker 1: the border, which Biden.
Speaker 6: Has got to build a wall.
Speaker 1: And Biden for the last few months has been umming
Speaker 1: and ahring about whether or not he has the power
Speaker 1: to issue an edict to close the border. Now, maybe
Speaker 1: we need to do it legislatively because I don't know
Speaker 1: if I can do it unilaterally, which is all rubbish
Speaker 1: because Trump did it before and then he unwound it
Speaker 1: unilaterally when he came to power. So he goes, Okay,
Speaker 1: I'm going to do something about it. I'm going to
Speaker 1: send the edict down. We're going to close the border,
Speaker 1: but then very quietly, through another little piece over here,
Speaker 1: we're actually just gonna leave it open because we want
Speaker 1: all the people in here in the hopes that one
Speaker 1: day they'll become citizens and then they'll vote for Yeah.
Speaker 6: It was a turtle pr exercise.
Speaker 4: He knows this is a big issue and so he
Speaker 4: wants to look like he's doing something. But who would
Speaker 4: trust him anyway. This is a man who is let
Speaker 4: in excess of ten million illegal aliens pour over the border.
Speaker 4: Not only that, he's been caught out flying them in,
Speaker 4: literally flying.
Speaker 6: Them almost like if we get those stories.
Speaker 4: We've played footage on this program before of him getting
Speaker 4: the border guards to cut the barbed wire to let
Speaker 4: people through into America. This has always been an invasion
Speaker 4: by design. There is absolutely no other explanation for it.
Speaker 4: And the hilarious thing is those six countries Cable had
Speaker 4: just rattled off.
Speaker 6: They already know that's not where these people are coming from,
Speaker 6: because you.
Speaker 3: Can watch the Projuico Stard thread is real.
Speaker 6: I'm telling the border and ask them where are you from?
Speaker 6: Where are you from? Where are you from? We already
Speaker 6: know where they're coming from.
Speaker 4: It's certainly none of those guys, which means it's businesses.
Speaker 3: But I don't think this is not a pool factor. Well,
Speaker 3: there's a poor factory in terms of everyone wants to
Speaker 3: go to the US, or go to the UK, or
Speaker 3: go to Australia because we're awesome. Countries are not as
Speaker 3: racist as everyone keeps telling us we are. They're a
Speaker 3: huge amount. There's there is there is not a there
Speaker 3: is not a deliberate there's not a deliberate strategy for
Speaker 3: there's no secret conspiracy for there's no great replacement theory.
Speaker 3: There's no secret conspiracy for the Democrats.
Speaker 4: You literally do not know that. Explain that to the
Speaker 4: taxpayers you've got you.
Speaker 3: Have got huge numbers that you have got huge numbers
Speaker 3: of pet people from South and I know that.
Speaker 4: I know that people who don't even can't truly just
Speaker 4: clogging all the city.
Speaker 3: But yet that's right, and they are a political headache
Speaker 3: for the Democrats. Whould know they about the problem is.
Speaker 4: The only way the problem was into the country was
Speaker 4: because they were ferried in by the Democrats.
Speaker 3: The vast majority.
Speaker 6: You can argue that this wasn't deliberate.
Speaker 3: Hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of thousands and millions and
Speaker 3: millions and millions of asylum seekers who were streaming up
Speaker 3: from South America through.
Speaker 6: This never happened under all the administration no, that's.
Speaker 3: Right because the borders of process being soft and so
Speaker 3: like they're doing in Australia.
Speaker 4: Everybody, let's go soft due to this government saying come one,
Speaker 4: come all Australia.
Speaker 5: Things.
Speaker 1: It is as simple as when Trump was president, he
Speaker 1: closed the border. He did it through memorandum, he did
Speaker 1: it through edict. The border was closed. One of the
Speaker 1: first things Joe Biden did when he became president was
Speaker 1: under all all of those orders and open the ball.
Speaker 3: Because that's because that's what happens. Because the Left went
Speaker 3: in opposition. It forgets all the hard lessons of learning
Speaker 3: government think, oh, no, we have to be humanitarian. Oh
Speaker 3: we're terribly.
Speaker 6: Privileged, trying to make this innocent. Ten million illegal aliens
Speaker 6: in a.
Speaker 4: Subservatives a conspiracy over the company theory. You're staring the
Speaker 4: facts in the face and saying, oh, this is just
Speaker 4: because they didn't want to be perceived as me.
Speaker 3: Are you kidding your Have you ever met a lefty?
Speaker 6: Have you seen the districe? That's what they're like in
Speaker 6: terms of crime rates.
Speaker 1: I know, I know, I'm not.
Speaker 3: Saying it's good.
Speaker 6: I believe in I believe in hard waters American cities.
Speaker 3: I believe These are the sort of people who keep
Speaker 3: destroying the Labor Party in opposition and keeps threatening to
Speaker 3: destroy every time.
Speaker 1: They're arguing that.
Speaker 6: There's no nefarious motive this government just happened to them. No, no,
Speaker 6: there's not.
Speaker 3: There's no secret plot from the deep state, there's no
Speaker 3: secret plot from the ale Pacer. We need more voters
Speaker 3: in twenty.
Speaker 6: Years of ridiculous.
Speaker 3: God, these guys can't even plan a bloody piece up
Speaker 3: in a brewery. They're not gas. We had another boat
Speaker 3: wote of asylum sea days. I've got a branch meeting
Speaker 3: down in South.
Speaker 1: They have managed to allow the reopening of the border,
Speaker 1: and we are today seeing exactly what that has done.
Speaker 1: It's not a mistake that the border was opened, nor
Speaker 1: is the fact that it has remained open for the
Speaker 1: last three years or so, coming on to four years.
Speaker 1: But now, if you were watching that then and thinking,
Speaker 1: oh my god, I'm actually feeling a bit like I'm
Speaker 1: sympathetic for Joe Biden, I have the answer for you.
Speaker 1: Go down to the gym tomorrow morning and start working out,
Speaker 1: Because would you believe a columnist over at the Guardian
Speaker 1: where else but the Guardian, which of course the Australian
Speaker 1: version that our friend Paul Murray likes to call the
Speaker 1: Turnbull Times has written a column saying that getting fit
Speaker 1: is great, as you can see there on the screen,
Speaker 1: but it could.
Speaker 6: Turn you into a right wing joke.
Speaker 1: Oh no, Zoey Williams wrote in The Guardian quote there's
Speaker 1: a dark side to wellness which I always for shorthand
Speaker 1: thought of as political. Getting fit makes you more right wing?
Speaker 4: Don't durn dun now.
Speaker 1: What Zoe is essentially saying is that when you go
Speaker 1: and get fit, you actually start to feel good about yourself,
Speaker 1: and then you become a bit more self righteous, and
Speaker 1: then you look at other people around you and you go, hang.
Speaker 2: On, you're complaining about your diabetes, and you can plaining
Speaker 2: about this, and you complaining about that.
Speaker 1: Why don't you just do what I did, which is
Speaker 1: pull myself up by my bootstraps and get on with
Speaker 1: the job and get myself fit. Who knew that the
Speaker 1: only thing you had to do was to be a
Speaker 1: right winger was just go down to the gym. Now
Speaker 1: I don't know what that says about me, because I've
Speaker 1: never been to a gym in my life and the
Speaker 1: only exercise I really do apart from the odd walk
Speaker 1: is to pick up a wine glass and sort of
Speaker 1: move it towards my mouth, So that's good for my
Speaker 1: arm exercises. I don't think it's made me left winger,
Speaker 1: but I mean, can you imagine you pick up the paper,
Speaker 1: Oh God, I go to the gym. I must be
Speaker 1: a right winger.
Speaker 4: I don't think any right ringer would be stupid enough
Speaker 4: to a read the Guardian or be believe this stupid article.
Speaker 4: But the fact that with a consistent fitness routine you
Speaker 4: will become self righteous and judgmental.
Speaker 6: And that's her idea of right winger, am I the lady.
Speaker 6: We don't have to work out.
Speaker 4: To be self righteous and judgmental. We just have cold,
Speaker 4: hard facts on our side.
Speaker 6: It's called reality, and so that does instill in people
Speaker 6: a certain confidence when we're fighting.
Speaker 4: You lot which are just full of feelings, much like
Speaker 4: this completely unbased rubbish you've spewed out in your article.
Speaker 4: Thanks for nothing, Zoe, and enjoy at the gym.
Speaker 1: Also.
Speaker 3: A little bit judgmental and self right.
Speaker 6: This also does explain the physical fitness of a lot
Speaker 6: of lefties.
Speaker 3: Oh it certainly does not. I've bet them and I
Speaker 3: can tell you two fittest premiers in Australia Chris Min's Petermelelawscus,
Speaker 3: both from the New South Wales right go.
Speaker 1: To and look even for a lifter, you're pretty spelt yourself,
Speaker 1: I have to say. Anyway, we'll get into the papers
Speaker 1: after the break. The Chinese premieer is bringing something with
Speaker 1: him to Adelaide. Now you might be worrying and Adelaide,
Speaker 1: what is it? What's he going to do? Is he's
Speaker 1: bringing the Huawei phones. It's a little bit until you
Speaker 1: happen this. Let's get stuck into the papers where Joe
Speaker 1: Tomorrow the Courier Mail has a fantastic.
Speaker 3: Yes and thank you so much team for giving me
Speaker 3: the first cup off the rank. Tonight in the Courier,
Speaker 3: marlets Dick's Big Freeze and just as the reverse kicker
Speaker 3: up the top explains exclusive sweeteners for all, I'm not
Speaker 3: sure I want to ever see the words sweeteners and freeze. Look,
Speaker 3: it's probably headline.
Speaker 1: Every every man at home now is like clenching his
Speaker 1: legs together very tightly. But I mean it's great because
Speaker 1: a new you know, working in newspapers like I have.
Speaker 1: If you're walking through the shops tomorrow and you see
Speaker 1: emblazoned on the front of the paper Dick's Big Freeze.
Speaker 1: You're gonna pick the paper up, aren't you?
Speaker 3: Yes, yes, yes you are, Caleb. What you then do
Speaker 3: with it, I think is another great headline. It's an
Speaker 3: absolute crack up. Well, unfortunately Dick's Big Freeze doesn't result
Speaker 3: in any shrinkage because they're throwing more money than they
Speaker 3: know what to do with at this upcoming Queensland state election.
Speaker 3: A freeze on every government fee and charge for the
Speaker 3: coming year will be a pre ingredient and a budget
Speaker 3: that will have five a billion dollars worth of voter
Speaker 3: sweeteners baked in. See what I did there, sweeteners baked
Speaker 3: in well, but also the fees and charges frozen, hence
Speaker 3: the Big Freeze. This has got everything. This has got
Speaker 3: the stovetop, the ovan, the freezer, the eye cream afterwards.
Speaker 3: This is a three course meal with entrey, mains and
Speaker 3: dessert and story.
Speaker 1: You know what the dessert is, right, spotted Dick. But
Speaker 1: they had the Big Freeze down in Melbourne today at
Speaker 1: the MC they did the King's Birthday match. But you
Speaker 1: know they are so devoid of anything real in Queensland
Speaker 1: because they know that they're stuffed in terms of youth
Speaker 1: crime and whatever that they're simply going right. We are
Speaker 1: going to throw the kitchen sink, by which they mean
Speaker 1: the purse at this to try and win this election.
Speaker 1: They have nothing other than throwing money around because they've failed.
Speaker 3: I hate to correct it, but it's not just youth crime.
Speaker 3: They also have middle aged crime. This is the second
Speaker 3: story in the career. I attacked in a car park.
Speaker 3: An astounding incident of car park rage at a Gold
Speaker 3: Coast school has left a grandmother hospitalized with a head
Speaker 3: injury and a broken leg after she was allegedly attacked
Speaker 3: by a forty three year old vetor. What is going
Speaker 3: on in Queensland?
Speaker 4: So she opened her car door, It dinged, the car
Speaker 4: next to it, knits the car next to it, as
Speaker 4: happens sometimes it's a windy do this guy, assuming it
Speaker 4: was a guy, must have just lost it at her.
Speaker 4: But a head injury and a broken leg, my goodness,
Speaker 4: to the front page.
Speaker 6: Of the Canberra Times.
Speaker 4: Now panic buying fares as eggs sales limit impose. Shoppers
Speaker 4: have been urged not to panic buy eggs after a
Speaker 4: mounting bird flu outbreak prompted a supermarket giant to introduce
Speaker 4: limits on egg purchases, so Cohal's customers in every state
Speaker 4: and territory except wa can now only buy a maximum
Speaker 4: of two egg cartons.
Speaker 6: What I can't believe when we do have there's a
Speaker 6: bird flu or.
Speaker 4: Something else like foot and mouth disease, whatever, whatever the way,
Speaker 4: the government stuffs it up so hard and makes life
Speaker 4: impossible for the little guy. Check out this beautiful letter
Speaker 4: written by Wes Eggs, which is one of the egg
Speaker 4: farms in Victoria now affected by this. They basically say, look,
Speaker 4: we've had this restriction placed on us. None of our
Speaker 4: eggs can leave our farm, and this is our income.
Speaker 6: We've still got staff to pay, We've still got.
Speaker 4: A family to feed, We've still got chickens to feed,
Speaker 4: a business to run, and our other financial commitments. Our
Speaker 4: egg income is our only income. We don't know when
Speaker 4: these restrictions will be lifted. We don't have the Abian
Speaker 4: bird flu, but we're still living under these restrictions. Seriously,
Speaker 4: you can't set up some sort of testing system where
Speaker 4: they can still sell their eggs. But these these suppliers
Speaker 4: are the ones that say calls will worth other ones
Speaker 4: that test them the eggs system. Whereby or seriously, are
Speaker 4: you just shutting down every egg farm in Victoria because
Speaker 4: you've found a few cases like this? Does my head
Speaker 4: in before exactly this kind of thing sees businesses hit
Speaker 4: the wall, never to come back, and sometimes then the
Speaker 4: government will be like, oh, well, let's spend tax payer
Speaker 4: money getting you back off the ground. But for small
Speaker 4: businesses like West Eggs, it doesn't mean that you can
Speaker 4: get your clientele back, and your entire livelihood has just
Speaker 4: been pieced up a wall by a government who couldn't
Speaker 4: think of anything smarter than just be like, everyone laying
Speaker 4: eggs in the country, you can't sell your eggs anymore,
Speaker 4: Like what.
Speaker 5: Is wrong with you?
Speaker 3: I don't think it's the farmers who are actually laying
Speaker 3: the eggs, but.
Speaker 1: Yes, that's absolutely right, they would be laying exactly here.
Speaker 3: And again even for not just businesses, but even for consumers.
Speaker 3: You think, oh, there's an egg shortage, our eggs are
Speaker 3: running out. I can handle that. But wait till you
Speaker 3: combine it with this story that I dug up, because
Speaker 3: did you know there's also a bacon shortage?
Speaker 1: There was in twenty twelve, according to them.
Speaker 3: Okay, you got me on the let's train there. But
Speaker 3: if those two k was there was a bacon shortage,
Speaker 3: it would be.
Speaker 1: It would be a very sad day.
Speaker 6: Was it due to the government shutting down?
Speaker 1: They will They probably shut on this stand, they'll shut everything. Look,
Speaker 1: you know governments build toilets with sea three doors on them,
Speaker 1: and they shut down each arms.
Speaker 3: Let's blame and is.
Speaker 1: If there's any great way to get people to panic by,
Speaker 1: it's to tell them not to panic by. I thought
Speaker 1: for all this before we know how it went with
Speaker 1: toilet paper. I can't wait for the fights in the
Speaker 1: supermarkets over the eggs. Let's go to the advertiser tomorrow.
Speaker 1: Of course it does note on the front page the
Speaker 1: death of former South Australian premiere turned senator turned federal
Speaker 1: MP Steel Hall, but it says on the left inside
Speaker 1: Ji's right hand man to visit South Australia. Chinese Premier
Speaker 1: Li Jiang, second in command to President Jijingping, is expected
Speaker 1: to visit Adelaide this month and deliver good news about
Speaker 1: Adelaide Zoo's giant pandas. And the good news is that
Speaker 1: he's apparently going to announce the Wang Wang and Funi,
Speaker 1: which are the two pandas that are there at the moment,
Speaker 1: and they're the only ones in the giant in the
Speaker 1: Giant hemis with the Southern Hemisphere, the only giant panas
Speaker 1: in the Southern Hemisphere are.
Speaker 2: Going to be replaced by a new yah, which is
Speaker 2: great because Wang Wang and Funi have failed to do
Speaker 2: the deed the whole time they've been there and breed,
Speaker 2: which is what they really wanted.
Speaker 1: And now it finally makes sense.
Speaker 2: When the Prime Minister went to China and he talked
Speaker 2: to Jijing Ping, and they asked him, what did you
Speaker 2: talk about?
Speaker 6: This is what he said.
Speaker 7: He spoke about the Tasmanian devils as being cute animals
Speaker 7: in Australia. They're probably not as cute as pandas, and
Speaker 7: I relayed the disc I think we had at a
Speaker 7: press conference yesterday about about pandas. It reminded us of
Speaker 7: the fact that not all pandas are cute by relaying
Speaker 7: the Kung Fu panda story as well.
Speaker 1: Finally, it wasn't all for naught, Joe.
Speaker 3: It's amazing. Do you think the reason that not all
Speaker 3: pandas are cute is why Funi and Wang Wang didn't. Didn't. Sorry,
Speaker 3: it's not you, it's me. Something something wrong with my
Speaker 3: wang wang. I just can't.
Speaker 1: He didn't think that joke was very FUNI to be
Speaker 1: perfectly honest, but.
Speaker 6: It's not getting funnier.
Speaker 3: But we can leave. You have to stay here. You're
Speaker 3: going to be here next week. My reputation can take this.
Speaker 1: Well, this is true, but I think you've got to
Speaker 1: come back very quickly. We've only got thirty seconds to
Speaker 1: the break, Liz, but you.
Speaker 2: Know, good news.
Speaker 1: We're going to get some pandas. If only they could
Speaker 1: sort out some you know, real issues with China.
Speaker 4: While you're heat, that would be marvelous, which is what
Speaker 4: made that presses so funny.
Speaker 6: Upon his return to China and we're like, did you
Speaker 6: sort him out? Did you talk Turkey?
Speaker 4: Maybe about the tariffs or something, And he's like, we
Speaker 4: talked about our respective country's furry animal.
Speaker 1: We didn't talk turkey. We talked Pannda. One thing that
Speaker 1: can be sorted out, apparently is homelessness. But how long
Speaker 1: does it take you?
Speaker 6: You'll find out after the front.
Speaker 1: Now, look, I'm very sorry. Before the break, I promised
Speaker 1: you a story about homelessness, but it turns out that
Speaker 1: the grab we wanted to show you has gone missing.
Speaker 1: It is homeless itself. So we've brought you the second
Speaker 1: best thing, which is a Trump speech.
Speaker 3: Do you lie and you know it, Caleb. We did
Speaker 3: it because we found the greatest ever speech ever given
Speaker 3: by any human being ever. This is Donald Trump at
Speaker 3: a rally in Las Vegas, for no apparent reason whatsoever,
Speaker 3: talking about what would happen if a submarine was attacked
Speaker 3: by a shark?
Speaker 8: Have a look, So I said, let me ask you
Speaker 8: a question, and he said, nobody ever asked this question,
Speaker 8: and most because of my relationship to Mit.
Speaker 6: Very smart.
Speaker 8: He goes, I say, what would happen if the boat
Speaker 8: sank from its weight and you're in the boat and
Speaker 8: you have this tremendously powerful battery, and the battery is
Speaker 8: now underwater, and there's a shark that's approximately ten yards
Speaker 8: over there by the way. A lot of shark attacks lately.
Speaker 6: Do you notice that a lot of shark which some.
Speaker 8: Guys justifying it today, Well, they weren't really that angry.
Speaker 8: They bit off the young lady's leg because of the
Speaker 8: fact that they were they were not hungry, but they
Speaker 8: misunderstood what who she was? He said, there's no problem
Speaker 8: with sharks. They just didn't really understand a young woman swimming.
Speaker 8: Now it really got decimated.
Speaker 4: In other.
Speaker 8: So, there's a shark ten yards away from the boat
Speaker 8: ten yards or here? Do I get electrocuted? If the
Speaker 8: boat is sinking? Water goes over the battery, the boat
Speaker 8: is sinking, Do I stay on top of the boat
Speaker 8: and get electrocuted? Or do I jump over the shark
Speaker 8: and not get electrocuted? Because I will tell you he
Speaker 8: didn't know. The entry said, you know, nobody's ever answered
Speaker 8: me that question. I said, I think it's a good question.
Speaker 8: I think there's a lot of electric current coming through
Speaker 8: that water. But you know what i'd do if there
Speaker 8: was a shark or you get electrocuted. I'll take electrocution
Speaker 8: every single time.
Speaker 3: Yes, yes, I love that man so much, it's amazing.
Speaker 3: So I presented with the idea of an electric bart said.
Speaker 3: I said, all right, well, what if there's a shot coming,
Speaker 3: I've got the battery. But even then, because he as
Speaker 3: a thinker, as a thinking about lockmay he knows that
Speaker 3: even an electric bat that's sinking is preferable to a shark.
Speaker 4: Is not a question, because if there's that electric current
Speaker 4: in the water.
Speaker 6: I would just wait till the shark go just be
Speaker 6: like electric jaws.
Speaker 5: Just down with me.
Speaker 1: If we're going to go down, you imagine take this shock.
Speaker 6: What do you need TV?
Speaker 1: This? This is what I've always seen, the shot. We
Speaker 1: belong in the water too. The sharks should all be killed.
Speaker 1: I don't want them in the water. They keep eating
Speaker 1: the human beings. I don't care if you come for me.
Speaker 1: We're number one for a reason. Sharks bugger off anyway.
Speaker 1: Let's sit from us tonight. The sharks are about to
Speaker 1: write it and Comflain up makes the ridd of panic
Speaker 1: show goodness