WEBVTT - Sharri | 23 October

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Why on Sky News. This is Sharry.

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Good Evening and I have a massive show ahead tonight.

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Insiders reveal panic in the Albanese government that Trump could

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 2>be about to win the election. The mistake Albanzi has

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 2>already made. More on this story in a minute. Also tonight,

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 2>I can exclusively reveal a Jewish SBS journalist is considering

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:32.959
<v Speaker 2>legal action after the public broadcaster censored interviews that were

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 2>positive towards Israel. This includes an interview with Richard Kemp

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 2>which SBS completely removed from online. This is an explosive

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 2>story only here in a moment, and Lydia Thorpe accused

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 2>of hypocrisy over accepting largess like Chairman's lounge membership, Whilest

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 2>slamming the Commonwealth class. I've got the polling pointing to

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 2>a Dutton victory. Upholster will give us the inside. Das

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:04.039
<v Speaker 2>tells live and an exclusive interview with a world leading

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 2>authority on urban warfare. He reveals whether Israel is truly

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 2>committing war crimes. Holly hre Is, Michael Kroger, Graham, Richardson,

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Daniel Melino, John Spencer and Moore Or coming up on

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 2>the show. But first, the Albaneze government is getting nervous

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.279
<v Speaker 2>about the possibility of a Trump win, which is looking

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 2>more likely by the day. The race is tight, it

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 2>could go either way, but Trump is inching ahead in

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the seven Swing States. Momentum is now in his favor,

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 2>with Kamala Harris bizarrely taking a day off today, just

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 2>two weeks out from the election.

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 3>Gooda hell takes off your fourteen days left, and she'll

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 3>take a couple of more days off too. You know why.

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.559
<v Speaker 3>She's lazy as hell, and she's got that reputation. She's

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 3>a radical left lunatic. She's further left than Bernie Sanders

0:01:58.520 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 3>or PoCA Hunters.

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Labor is now panicking at the thought of a Donald

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Trump presidency. One labour sauce told me today, people were

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 2>relieved that Biden left because they were worried that Trump

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 2>was going to win. They were openly excited about Kamala

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Harris coming in, and now they're worried about Trump again.

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Another senior political figure put it more bluntly when he said,

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 2>and I quote the Albanezy government and defat were where

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 2>you can read the rest of that sentence for yourselves.

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 2>Albin Ezi and Donald Trump couldn't be more different. Their

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 2>views on fundamental policy areas just world's apart. This is

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.959
<v Speaker 2>the case for everything from a climate change to Israel,

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 2>to immigration to China to energy. Climate change is one

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 2>of Albanzi's top concerns, but Trump has previously described climate

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 2>science as a hoax.

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 4>Taking advantage all the global transition to net zero. That

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 4>is so important. We have a forty three percent reduction

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 4>target by twenty thirty. That just sided in net zero

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 4>by twenty fifty.

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>That just said, I haven't heard, Mike, I haven't heard.

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 3>They don't ever talk about the environment anymore. You know why, Mike,

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 3>you said, don't talk about it now? No, it's one

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 3>of the great scams of all time. You know why

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 3>they don't talk about it because people aren't buying it anymore.

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Trump previously pulled out of the Paris Agreement, and he

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 2>could have gained withdraw from international targets. He won't want

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 2>climate to be a major feature of the Quad as

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:45.119
<v Speaker 2>it has been with Joe Biden and alban Easy. Their

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 2>positions on Israel as well. This is alban Easy and

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Trump's couldn't be more different. Trump unequivocally supports Israel. He

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 2>moved America's embassy to Jerusalem during his time in office,

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 2>but Albin Easy has spent much of his parliamentary Korea

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 2>as an anti Israel campaigner, even yelling into a microphone

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 2>at a pro Palestinian rally.

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 4>We encourage all parties to engage constructively to de escalate

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 4>the current tensions. International humanitarian war must be respected. We

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 4>also reiterate our call for an immediate cease firing Gaza.

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 3>And when I'm back in the Oval Office, I will

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 3>support Israel's rate to win its war on Terra. They

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 3>have to have a right to win the war, thank you,

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 3>and I will give Israel the support that it needs

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 3>to win, but I do want them to win fairs.

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Now, there's already a concerning gap between Alban Easy and

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden when it comes to support for Israel. In

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 2>one glaring example, the Biden administration was deeply disappointed that

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Penniwong refused to vote against that Prohamus resolution that was

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 2>put forward by the Palestinian leadership and the United Nations

0:04:56.400 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 2>General Assembly recently, and Penniwang, when she was over in

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 2>the States met with the Palestinian leadership, but she didn't

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 2>even sit in Congress to listen to Netanyahu's speech. Under Trump,

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 2>the differences will be even more stark. And then there's immigration.

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Trump signed in executive order banning people from six Muslim

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 2>majority countries from entering the US back in twenty twenty,

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 2>but meanwhile, Anthony Alberezi issued nearly three thousand visas to

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Gazans despite serious concerns about security vetting in the Hamas

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 2>controlled territory.

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 4>A whole group of people who are suffering enormously, something

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 4>that we see on our TV screens every night. We

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 4>have when it comes to security processes. We have five

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 4>in our intelligence agents.

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.919
<v Speaker 5>We do not need our once great cities to become

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 5>hotbeds of terrorism. And on day one of the Trump presidency,

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 5>I'm restoring the travel band, suspending refugee admissions, and keeping

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 5>terrorists the hell out of our country like I had

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 5>it before.

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 2>If Trump does become president in just under two weeks,

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 2>there'll be deep disappointment in the senior ranks of the

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Albanese government. One figure familiar with the Trump camp told

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 2>me today that Trump will be well briefed on how

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 2>left wing Albanzi and Penny Wong have been. They said

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 2>that Trump will have a cursory call with Albinizi, but

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 2>then he won't bother with him because he's got an election.

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 2>He'll think that he's probably going to lose, and everyone

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 2>tells him Dutton is a good guy. In fact, this

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 2>told me that Albanzi has already made a mistake because

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:56.799
<v Speaker 2>he didn't phone Trump after the assassination attempt. Other world

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 2>leaders like Keir Starmer did. In fact, the only Australian

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 2>who's spoken to Trump personally in the last year and

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 2>maybe even more, is Scott Morrison. But it's also not

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 2>a good starting point that Albanezy appointed Rudd Kevin Rudd

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 2>as ambassador to the United States, despite the fact he

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 2>described Trump in the past as nuts, a traitor to

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 2>the West and guilty of rancid treachery.

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 6>And Donald as we know, is not.

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>A leading intellectual force.

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 6>Have you looked at a Trump rally and how many

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 6>angry white men there are in those rallies.

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Now it has to be said that Rudd is now

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 2>working overtime to forge connections in the Republican Party and

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:49.119
<v Speaker 2>I'm told he's making headway. Sure, but what he said

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 2>can't be unset and that's why he wasn't a wise appointment.

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 2>His past comments might be forgiven, they won't be forgotten

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 2>and this isn't going to help australia national interest. And Trump,

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 2>for one, certainly hasn't forgotten them.

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know much about him. I heard he was

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 3>a little bit nasty. I hear he's not the brightest bulb.

0:08:11.760 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 3>But I don't know much about him. But if he's

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 3>at all hostile, he will not.

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 7>Be there long.

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:21.239
<v Speaker 2>One senior figure said to me today that Kevin Rudd

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 2>has put his head down and he's working hard to

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 2>rebuild relationships, but they doubt he'll be invited around for

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 2>margaritas at Marilago. The confidence meanwhile, in the Trump camp

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 2>is growing. Fourteen days out, Real cleopolling has trumped slightly

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 2>ahead by one point one percent in the seven battleground

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 2>states that will decide the outcome of this election, and

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 2>of course that's Wisconsin, Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 2>and Nevada. And nationally, according to Real Clear Politics, Kamala

0:08:56.480 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 2>Harris does lead by zero point nine percent. Four years ago,

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden was ahead at this point in the campaign

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 2>by seven point nine percent. That's a major difference. Kamala

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Harris has enjoyed a honeymoon period for most of the campaign,

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 2>and she initially surged ahead of Biden's position, But in

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 2>recent weeks there've been lingering questions over what she stands for,

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 2>how she'd be different from the Biden administration, and there

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 2>are concerns over her ability to deal with media scrutiny.

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Her performance when under serious questioning from Brett Bayer was disastrous.

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 2>That was pitiful for a presidential candidate. She's failed to

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 2>explain whether she's changed her views from the radical positions

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 2>she took in the past, and this has led to

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 2>devastatingly effective adverts like this one.

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 8>Kamala supports taxpayer funded sex changes for prisoners.

0:09:55.880 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 7>Surgery for prisoners, for prisoners, every time transgender in me

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 7>in the prison system would have access.

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 2>The polls are close, and there'll be a sigh of

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 2>relief from the Albaneze government if there is a Harris presidency,

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 2>but most informed commentators are at this point telling me

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 2>they're expecting a narrow Trump victory. Now to our major

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 2>exclusive story tonight, the SBS has censored interviews with prominent

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 2>international figures like Colonel Richard Kemp because they were too

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 2>supportive of israel I can Tonight reveal that SBS has removed, edited,

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 2>or refused to run four interviews that presented Israel's side

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 2>of the story, and the public broadcaster has claimed that

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 2>they didn't meet their editorial standards. A Jewish SBS journalist

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 2>I met Rehak, who did these interviews, is now considering

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 2>legal action. He resigned in August. Now. SBS removed from

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 2>online an interview that did with distinguished British Commander Richard Kemp,

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 2>in which he said that Israel was taking care not

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 2>to kill civilians. Amit also did an interview with a

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 2>relative of a hostage, but it was never broadcast. Management

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 2>told him he couldn't broadcast it a relative of a hostage.

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 2>I also understand that SBS was unhappy with an interview

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 2>with an anti Semitism activist from Germany, Oriana Mari Gruger.

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 2>SBS management edited amits interview to remove a section where

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 2>she gave her opinion on the Israel Gaza war, saying

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 2>that the state of Israel was being demonized. That was

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 2>her opinion. In a formal letter, the public broadcaster accused

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 2>AMT of a breach of policy, claiming that his interviews

0:11:53.559 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 2>lacked balance, impartiality and didn't have a wide representation of views. Now,

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Richard Kemp is a distinguished figure. He led the British

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Army in Iraq and Afghanistan. Like Israel's allies Australia and

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 2>the United States, Britain has supported Israel's fight against terror. Now,

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 2>I had Richard Kemp in my program when I was

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 2>in Israel, and this is what he said.

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 6>The leaders in these Western countries understand the threat, they

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 6>know that Israel's doing the right thing. They're just afraid

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 6>of a country standing up for itself. They've forgotten how

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 6>a country needs to stand up for yourself to survive.

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Is that a man who should be censored, who should

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 2>have his whole interview removed from online as SBS did.

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 2>We can presume that Richard Kemp did make similarly support

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 2>of comments of Israel in his interview with SBS, as

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 2>is his right and even duty as a high profile

0:12:55.120 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 2>commander who has personally fought terrorism. Ffteen minute interview with

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Kemp did go to air on SBS radio in late May.

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 2>It was published online, but a few hours later was

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 2>removed emit later received a formal reprimand from SBS, where

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 2>his managers accused him of a lack of challenging questions

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 2>and bias. The letter said the interview lacked impartiality and balance,

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 2>had leading questions, and that there was a lack of

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 2>representation of multiple perspectives and insufficient critical follow up. This

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 2>is extraordinary a journalist respectfully allowing a senior war commander

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 2>to have his say, and he receives a formal letter

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 2>accusing him of breach of employment. We've all seen interviews

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 2>from the ABC and SBS where the journalists don't ask

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 2>tough questions and they show anti Israel bias. Yet have

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:03.439
<v Speaker 2>you ever heard of a formal will reprimand before SBS

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 2>tonight In a statement to me, they admitted to the censorship.

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 2>They said the two stories you raise were reviewed and

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 2>edited or removed as they did not meet our editorial

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 2>standards of balance and impartiality. They said SBS does not

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 2>take editorial positions and is committed to accuracy, balance and

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 2>impartiality in all its coverage, including in relation to the

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 2>current conflict in Israel. Gaza and Lebanon. Now, both SBS

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 2>and ABC have published interviews with the likes of Anthony Lowenstein,

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 2>along with others who are highly critical of Israel, and

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 2>their views are egregious in my view. They often utter

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 2>false accusations against the Jewish state. Now SBS has also

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 2>made separate allegations against Omit, which he strongly denies. Amitt

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 2>had worked at the broadcaster for twelve years and he'd

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 2>expect to continue his journalistic career there. He's been distressed,

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 2>upset and shocked at the censorship and the allegations. For

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 2>three months now, SBS has not broadcast it's Hebrew language

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 2>broadcast for the first time in fifty years. SBS admitted this,

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 2>and they said to me that it was currently in

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 2>recess after emits resignation. They said that resuming this service

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 2>was a high priority. All right, Well, to discuss this,

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 2>let's bring in now former Victorian Liberal Party president Michael

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Kroger and former Labor minister Graham Richardson. Welcome to you both.

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Now I know you both you're both hearing that story

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 2>for the first time. They're that exclusive report that SBS

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 2>has censored interviews, including with world famous British commander Richard Kemp. Michael,

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 2>what's your reaction to this?

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's extremely distressing. In the SBS response, show will

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 9>have to be a lot stronger than the one they

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 9>gave you tonight. I've met Richard Camp, he's been in Australia.

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 9>I've seen a film he produced. He's an outstanding commentator.

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 9>His will record is, as you said, well known. It's

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 9>distressing because SBS, much like the ABC, appears to be

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 9>wandering into this territory that anything that is seen to

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 9>be pro Israel or defending Israel is seen to be

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 9>one sided and not warranting publications. So you've got this

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 9>extremely subjective view of balance and questioning, etc. I must

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 9>say I was very unconvinced by their responses, and let's

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 9>hope in the next few days they can do better, Shari,

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 9>because on face value, this looks like very strong censorship

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 9>of a reasonably pro Israel position, which you need for

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 9>balance on the public broadcasters.

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, I think we forget that isral

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 2>is actually Australia's ally and that the terrorists are the enemy. Here.

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 2>This seems to be forgotten, Richo, because SBS is censoring

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 2>anyone that's put forward Israel's position. Richard Kemp, the family

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 2>member of a hostage. How can this be sensitive and

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 2>yet they're happy to run the likes of Anthony Lowenstein,

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 2>who in many interviews accuses Israel are the most egregious

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 2>war crimes. Graham Richardson.

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I must say I find it a little curious

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 10>that SBS would be would be going in this direction.

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 10>There's no need to, there's no evidence, and yet they

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 10>seem to be increasingly anti Israel. I don't know why.

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 10>But I'll tell you what. If I was the boss

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 10>of the SBS, somebody's bummerd get kicked, and I'd say,

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 10>I don't expect you to be all the way with Israel,

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 10>but I do expect you to be fair and not

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 10>be all the way with the PLO. And I just

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 10>don't think that that mesa is getting across.

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I also want to ask both of your views

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 2>on the other topic I spoke about just then, how

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 2>nervous the Albanezy government is becoming at the prospect of

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 2>a Trump presidency. Michael, this would be very difficult for

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 2>the left wing Albo and Pennywong to deal with.

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, it would be.

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 9>You know, Trump's obviously made those public comments about Kevin Rudd,

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 9>and you can be rest assured that people will remind

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 9>Trump of those remarks if he gets three elected. Despite

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 9>Kevin scurrying around Washington trying to say no, no, no,

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 9>I'm actually a good guy. I think he'll either have

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 9>to be recalled or he'll just you know, have his

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:49.199
<v Speaker 9>term shortened by Peter Dutton if Peter Dutt wins. But

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:53.200
<v Speaker 9>you clearly can't have someone in Washington who's called Trump

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 9>crazy in a danger and I mean, you know Trump's

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 9>not going to put up with that. So obviously it's

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 9>going to be difficult for Australia if he remains ambassador

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 9>if Trump is elected.

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 2>But it's not only about Kevin rud Richo. It's also

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 2>crucial and fundamental differences on central policy areas, the different

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 2>positions on China, the different positions on Israel, the different

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 2>positions on climate change. This will be difficult for the

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Albanezy government to deal with if Trump does win.

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 10>Difficult, but not impossible.

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 7>I think.

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 10>I can't see how Kevin Rudd can deal with them

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 10>at all. You know, he's positioned in regards to Trump

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 10>is simply not capable of being rescued. You know, you

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 10>can't say what he has said about Trump and then

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 10>turn around the next day and say, by the way,

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 10>I think he's a good bloke. No one will accept that.

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 10>I think that's a real problem. I think you know

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 10>what's going to happen is that somebody's got to get

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 10>that big hook and just get him off the stage.

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, you are, you are an out and out Kamala

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 2>har I supporter, Richard. We'll see how only a couple

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 2>of weeks and then we'll be breaking down the results

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 2>here on a Wednesday night, because you both are regulars

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 2>on a Wednesday. Now Lydia Thorpe's hypocrisy is being exposed

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 2>after she pulled that embarrassing stunt in front of the

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 2>Royals on Monday. It has now been revealed that she

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 2>enjoys all the pucks that come with participating in colonial

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 2>structures like taxpayer funded into state travel. She even has

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 2>a membership to the exclusive VIP Quantus chairman's lounge along

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 2>with other politicians. Michael, do you think there is an argument,

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:39.959
<v Speaker 2>and I've seen others express legal arguments behind it for

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 2>her to now resign.

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:45.920
<v Speaker 9>Well, there's no obligation on her to resign, but look,

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 9>you know, the practical things is she's stolen that seat

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 9>from the Greens. You know, she wasn't elected because she

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 9>was Lydia Thorpe. She was elected because she was a

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 9>Green number one on the Green's ticket, and that's why

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 9>she got elected. She stolen the seat from the Greens.

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 9>She should hand it back. She's complicit in theft. She's

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 9>taken something from the Greens and she should hand it back.

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 9>But you know what hypocrisy I mean, you know the

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 9>colonial structures. I mean, there she is sitting in one

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:14.439
<v Speaker 9>of the great parliaments of the world on two hundred

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 9>and sixty thousand dollars plus souper and other benefits. It's

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 9>probably a package of three hundred thousand dollars or more

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 9>when you add in airfares and flights and everything else.

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 9>I mean, what a hypocrite sitting there on three hundred

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 9>thousand and complaining, well, you know, there's fifteen or sixteen

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 9>or eighteen million adult Australians. It's what places with her tomorrow?

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 9>Shari quite frankly, Yeah.

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 2>It's an extraordinary salary rich so she clearly just takes

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 2>it for granted.

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 10>Yeah she does. I mean, she's just a huge pain

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 10>in our political bum and the sooner we get rid

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 10>of the better. I don't think that there's any saving

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 10>graces with her at all. I can't think of one

0:21:55.520 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 10>reason why she should remain in the parliament, particularly if

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 10>we're so bad, If this is such a terrible nation,

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 10>why does she want to serve in the parliament.

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 2>No, it's a very good point. You'd have to think,

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 2>why did she swear allegiance to the Commonwealth if she

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 2>feels this way so strongly. But as I've said all week,

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 2>I strongly think this is Albanesi's fault because he shouldn't

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 2>have invited her to this prestigious reception. Anyone could have

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 2>told you that this is how she was going to

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 2>carry on. There's no opportunity, there's no event where she

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 2>doesn't stage a protest. So this is on them and

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 2>it has humiliated the whole country on the international stage. Right,

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Michael Kroger, Grahem Richardson, thank you both for your time. Now.

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 2>The Prime Minister is struggling to claw back popularity among voters,

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 2>with the latest Freshwater Strategy poll revealing that Peter Dutton

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 2>is closing in on Anthony Alberanzi as preferred prime minister. Meanwhile,

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 2>the Coalition continues as the favorite and the two party

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 2>preferred vote, with a clear majority of voters saying that

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 2>the country is headed in the wrong direction. Well, this

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 2>is extraordinary, these results. It shows the momentum is in

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.719
<v Speaker 2>Peter Dutton's favor. To bring it down. Let's bring in

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 2>now the director of Freshwater Strategy, the polling phone that

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 2>did those figures, Leo Shanahan and Leo joines me here now, Lea,

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 2>thank you for your time. Look, what are the key

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 2>issues that you'll finding are behind this momentum that's giving

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Peter Dutton the support.

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 11>Look, it's that key issue of cost and standard of

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 11>living and we've been seeing that for a long time now.

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 11>But the government is struggling to make up any ground.

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:41.400
<v Speaker 11>It's lost over twenty four points on that very point

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 11>in the last year and it's living costs. Housing is

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 11>another one, Housing and cost of housing, managing the economy

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 11>a third, health and social care, and then crime and

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 11>social order. But the interesting thing is when you look

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 11>at those top five issues, the Coalition is winning out

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:03.919
<v Speaker 11>of four of them. Now that will drive the vote

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 11>towards the coalition. So as pulses, you look to not

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 11>just the pure numbers, but what are the issues? What

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 11>are those issues driving those numbers, and in this case

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 11>the cost of standard of living as we've talked about

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 11>housing accommodation. But it's interesting that crime and social order

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 11>too is now in that top five list. And we

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:24.920
<v Speaker 11>can speak about Queensland, but it's obviously a major issue

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 11>in that election as well.

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, so one of the biggest issues affecting voters

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 2>housing aforidability. We know there's a crisis in Australia at

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 2>the moment. You would have been in the field when

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 2>the news broke that Albanezy had bought a four point

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 2>three million dollar cliff top mansion. How do you think

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 2>this has impacted his perception among Australians.

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 11>Look, it's interesting because in the last since our last

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 11>poll in this month, in the October poll, we did

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 11>have Peter Dutton coming within one point. As you've said,

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 11>on preferred Prime minister, it has never happened before. It's

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 11>forty four to forty three now and that's the closest

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 11>he's been on preferred Prime minister. The two pp hasn't

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 11>changed a lot, but the Coalition is still ahead now

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 11>reflecting in newspoll as well. So the trend is very

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 11>much in the wrong direction for the government on this

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 11>issue itself. Look, people, thirty six percent voters say that

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 11>their perception of him is worse as a result of

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 11>this decision. A majority fifty two percent say the purchase

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 11>had no impact on their view of him, and a

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 11>small percentage or actually quite in favor must be those investors.

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.400
<v Speaker 11>But look, it should be said on this point. I mean,

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 11>I don't think it's really fundamentally hurt the government or

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 11>the Prime Minister personally, because if you break down those.

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Numbers, well, it has thirty six percent of voters say

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 2>they have a worse view of him.

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 11>If you look at those voters, those are voters that

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 11>already had a negative perception of him, among Green's voters

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:02.400
<v Speaker 11>and particularly among a hard line of Coalition photos. So

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 11>generally speaking, his personal his personal decisions in his investments

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 11>hasn't really hurt. It's those fundamental issues that is hurting

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 11>the government.

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 2>We're seeing the Queensland election on Saturday. The polls had

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 2>been showing that it would be allow inside win for

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 2>David CHRISTI. Fully, we're now seeing that Labor appears to

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 2>be closing the gap somewhat do you think the L

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 2>and P will still be able to win a majority government?

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 11>Oh well, look, I think it firstly should be said

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 11>that it was never going to be easy for David

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 11>CHRISTI fully. I mean, this is only the third time

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 11>since nineteen eighty nine. Well, yes, it's only the third

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 11>time since nineteen eighty nine they'd aim for a majority

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 11>government and you see the dominance of the Labor Party

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 11>in queens Now. He needs those twelve seats, he should

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 11>get them. But the assumption that this is going to

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 11>be a lay down masaire, I think is a little misguided. Look,

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 11>I think they'll win, but it won't be as easy

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 11>as many people think. I think those key issues though,

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 11>of crime, where David Crysta full in the LMP of

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 11>campaigned very well and it just shows up its showing

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 11>up in the numbers now nationally. We saw last night

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 11>the Sky News debate in Queensland, one of ten of

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 11>those audience members were affected by crime, and I think

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 11>that has shown to be the key issue. I think

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 11>this abortion issue was a bit of a distraction. Labor

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.440
<v Speaker 11>made some ground on it, but since the Catter parties

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 11>have effectively seated on that point, I don't think it's

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.120
<v Speaker 11>really going to be as damaging. So look, I think

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:39.439
<v Speaker 11>you'll get David chrystal Fully's premier comes Saturday night. But

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 11>I don't think it's going to be as easy as

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 11>many people say. And it's never going to be easy

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 11>in Queensland because of the way Queensland is structured between

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 11>the city, the Southeast Queensland, these suburban sprawl in the regions.

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Yep, all right, Leah Shanahan, really appreciate your time. That

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 2>was fascinating, Thank you, Thank you. Now still to come

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 2>the connections behind Labour's Future Made in US Australia policy.

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 2>This has now been called the Future Mates policy. This

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 2>is making it more than a gravy train of easy money.

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Plus alban Easy lectures us about renewables being the cheapest

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 2>form of energy, but this was contradicted in an astonishing

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Senate inquiry Today. All of this plus my exclusive interview

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:27.400
<v Speaker 2>with the Warfare Expert coming up on the show Welcome

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Back Well. The minute that the Albanezi government announced its

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:35.919
<v Speaker 2>Future Made in Australia policy worth billions of dollars, eyebrows

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 2>were raised, especially over the eyewatering one billion dollar investment

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 2>into American company sigh quantum to build a quantum computer. Now,

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 2>As my regular guest on this show, Cameron Milner put

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 2>it in The Nightly, there's now a stench hanging over

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Labour's signature policy. He says this is more appropriately known

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 2>as future made for mates. He argues this because, he says,

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 2>it's become little more than a gravy train of easy

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 2>money and taxpayer funds at that he is uncovered in

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 2>this article he's published in The Nightly a spiderweb of

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 2>labor aligned connections that PSI Quantum has, including an economics

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 2>firm Mandala headed by a former Labour staffer, amidst Singh.

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 2>He also says there's links between Blackbird Ventures and various

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 2>friends in the labor party. Well, someone else who's been

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 2>following this very closely is Shadow Minister for Science and

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 2>the Arts, Paul Fletcher, and he joins me, Now, Paul,

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for your time. What can you

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 2>tell me, because you've already uncovered some of these labor

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 2>connections yourself, You've been on the case from the beginning.

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 2>What can you tell me about some of the labor

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 2>connections behind this billion dollar grant to this quantum computing

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 2>company that isn't even based in Australia.

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 10>You're right.

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 12>PSI Quantum is based in the US and this extraor

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 12>her decision was announced in April this year that the

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 12>Commonwealth and Queensland Labor governments were jointly going to invest

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 12>almost a billion dollars of taxpayers money. Now, as Cameron

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 12>Milner has pointed out, and of course as a former

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 12>Queensland Labor State Secretary he knows the labor culture very well,

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 12>there's a lot of very well connected former labor staffers

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 12>involved in providing advice to PI Quantum. So for example,

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:29.520
<v Speaker 12>there's a company called Brookline Advisory which was retained by

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 12>SI Quantum. Lydia Ivanowski is former chief of staff to

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 12>Richard Miles Jered Richardson as a former advisor to Charmers.

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 12>As the company you mentioned Mandala, which are economic advisors,

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 12>they produced a report saying what a great piece of

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 12>economic policy. This was paid for, of course by SI Quantum.

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 12>What we also know is that two executives of Blackbird

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 12>Ventures were appointed by Ed Husick. Two important committees, so

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 12>the National Quantum Advisory Committee, A lady called Claire Birch,

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 12>who's a sener executive at Blackbird, and a lady called

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 12>Kate Glazebrook was appointed to the Industry, Innovation and Science

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 12>Australia Board in December twenty twenty two. Now, the importance

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 12>of this is that Blackbird is a major investor in

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 12>side Quantum. Side Quantum has raised money over for funding rounds,

0:31:18.280 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 12>so they've got a lot of investors. No criticism of

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 12>them for doing that. One of those investors is Blackbird

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 12>in Australian venture capital business. No problem with being a

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 12>venture capital business. But the question for taxpayers is in

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 12>view of the fact that Blackbird is an investor in

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 12>si Quantum and that once this announcement of a big

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 12>government investment was made it was going to boost the

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 12>value of the existing investments. What processes were put in

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 12>place to manage any conflicts of interest in the decision

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 12>being made by Minister Hugh Sick and his office.

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 2>The problem is this is actually a massive story. This

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 2>is a very big story, pol but it's hard to

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 2>explain it, I think to people. I think one of

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 2>the major issues as well that I want to ask

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 2>you about is the timeline for this. When did Blackbird

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 2>start getting involved in these discussions compared to other firms.

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 12>Well, what we know is that psy Quantum approached the

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 12>Australian government in mid to late twenty twenty two sprooking,

0:32:14.840 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 12>making an unsolicited offer for the Australian Government to invest.

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 12>We know that Minister Husick met with them twice in

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 12>twenty twenty two, including in December twenty twenty two, and

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 12>then in January twenty twenty three he visited py Quantum's

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 12>head office in California. Now this is at the same

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 12>time that other Australian quantum businesses like Silicon Quantum Computing,

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 12>Durrak Quantum, Brilliance qu Control, the industry generally was being

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 12>told there is no money for quantum. You just have

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 12>to apply through the National Reconstruction Fund like everybody else.

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 12>The big question is how did SI Quantum get through

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 12>the gates so quickly and be in a position where

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 12>they were meeting with the minister and all of a

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 12>sudden the government was looking at making this investment and.

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 2>With billion dollars a billion a billion dollar, we're out

0:33:10.280 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 2>of time, but very quickly. You've called for an inquiry

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 2>from the Order to General Wear's that up to so I've.

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 12>Written to the Order to General laying out some of

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 12>these facts. The Order General has written back to saying

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 12>investigations being considered. So I'll continue to press for that

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 12>because it's very important. And as Cameron Milner's article points out,

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 12>there's a web of labor mates here and taxpayers would

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 12>rightly be very concerned about the basis on which almost

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:33.720
<v Speaker 12>of billion dollars their money has been spent.

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 2>Quite aside from all of this, I personally don't think

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 2>that tax pay funds should be going into startups like

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 2>this anyway. There's enough venture capital money out there. Why

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 2>do we need tax paper.

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:46.240
<v Speaker 12>That's right, venture capital budget, Crist' it's a there's a

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 12>big private sector venture capital sector in Australia. That's good news.

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 12>Let them get on with making these risky.

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Investors exactly right, Paul Fletcher, thank you very much, Thank

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 2>you time. That is a truly big story. Will stay

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 2>on it now after the break. Is the Albanese government

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 2>planning to make abortion an issue in the federal election

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 2>after Labour's scare campaign in Queensland. I'll discuss that with

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 2>my political panel right after the break. Plus the hypocrisy

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 2>from mainstream media claiming Israel is targeting journalists and workers.

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Will an international expert on this subject would join me

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:29.440
<v Speaker 2>exclusively on the show. Welcome back Well. Australia's energy regulator

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:33.360
<v Speaker 2>told the Senate this afternoon that they couldn't guarantee that

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Labour's renewable energy policies will bring down power bills. Have

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 2>a look, okay, but.

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:46.720
<v Speaker 13>You're saying you cannot guarantee that the current government policy

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:50.320
<v Speaker 13>settings which you model will deliver lower power process.

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 14>I can't guarantee that, no, And what I would say

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 14>is we would try to be quite clear about the communication.

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 14>Our message, which is that the integrated system plan, which

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:10.319
<v Speaker 14>considers these things generation, storage and major transmission upgrades, is

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:14.439
<v Speaker 14>the lowest cost pathway. It doesn't refer to whether it's

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 14>cheaper or more expensive for that wholesale component.

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's bring in our political panel, Labor and

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 2>p Daniel Malino and Liberal Senator Holly Hughes. Welcome to

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 2>you both. Daniel, starting with you, is this an admission

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 2>from Australia's energy regulator that your government's renewable policies just

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 2>aren't going to lower the cost?

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:39.919
<v Speaker 15>Oh, hi, Charien, thanks for having me on.

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:40.359
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 15>Look, I don't think so I think understandably the energy

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:47.239
<v Speaker 15>regulator doesn't want to be giving guarantees in relation to

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 15>energy when there are so many moving parts. But for me,

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 15>the key thing about his testimony, and this backed up

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 15>positions that they've taken and others have taken on a

0:35:56.640 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 15>number of occasions, is that a strong push towards knewables

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 15>firmed by gas is the least cost pathway going forward.

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 15>That's the real choice Australian's face. And it's a better

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 15>way forward. It's a more reliable way forward and a

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 15>cheaper way forward than trying to build a nuclear industry

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:17.720
<v Speaker 15>from scratch. The latter path won't deliver us any energy

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 15>for fifteen to twenty years and it's going to be

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 15>incredibly expensive. So what Australians really want is the least

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:27.839
<v Speaker 15>cost path going forward, and that's what he confirmed, although.

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 2>He did say he couldn't guarantee it would mean any

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:33.319
<v Speaker 2>reduction in power bills. Holly, what do you have to

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:35.839
<v Speaker 2>say with what to what Daniel just said there that

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 2>this is still the least cost pathway moving forward, cheaper

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 2>than going down a nuclear energy model.

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:45.320
<v Speaker 16>Well, it's still based on the provisions around the eighty

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 16>two percent missions reduction at zero by twenty fifty. So

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 16>they're doing modeling within the framework and policy positions that

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 16>the government's putting forward. The government hasn't I would hesitate

0:36:56.960 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 16>a guess given them the scope to say, what's the

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 16>cost if we put more coal fire power stations in?

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 16>What's the cost if we did go down a nuclear pathway?

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 16>And I think it's a fallacy that it's fifteen to

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:12.920
<v Speaker 16>twenty years away, particularly when this government is still obsessed

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 16>with hydrogen which every time we turn around, another project's

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:18.280
<v Speaker 16>being canceled or funding being.

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:19.839
<v Speaker 2>Removed from Australians.

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 16>No, this is an absolute pipe drain being pushed by

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 16>Chris Bowen that is just going to cost them more money.

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:30.880
<v Speaker 16>The government during the election campaign put a figure of

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 16>two hundred and seventy five dollars reduction by twenty twenty five.

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:38.319
<v Speaker 16>That is just around the corner. And Australians don't really

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 16>understand what the wholesale cost is. They don't understand the

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:43.880
<v Speaker 16>cost of generation or transmission. What they understand is what

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 16>their power bills are. And what they know is their

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 16>power bills are continuing to go up and that is

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:51.760
<v Speaker 16>in start contrast to what the Labor government promised.

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it doesn't look like the two hundred and

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:55.880
<v Speaker 2>seventy five dollars they're.

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:59.000
<v Speaker 16>All saying it's doubled in price from the so called

0:37:59.040 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 16>reduction we will get.

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Now, we've seen that the issue of abortion has become

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 2>a scare campaign or distraction if you like, depending on

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 2>which way you look at it during the Queensland state

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 2>election campaign. Well, senior female Liberals Jane Hume and Susan

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Lay are now saying that they don't want abortion laws

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:20.799
<v Speaker 2>to be a feature at the upcoming federal election. Have

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:21.280
<v Speaker 2>a look.

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 17>What I can assure you and assure your viewers and

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:30.280
<v Speaker 17>assure all voters is that a Dutton led coalition government

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 17>has no plans, no policy, and no interest in unwinding

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:37.760
<v Speaker 17>women's reproductive rights.

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:42.759
<v Speaker 8>We have no intention to change the settings from a

0:38:42.800 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 8>federal health perspective. Obviously, individuals have their own views and

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 8>Jainer is entitled as a member of the National Party

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:51.479
<v Speaker 8>to her own view.

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 2>And as you heard Susan Lay, they're just referred to

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Jacinda Jacenterprice, who had told the City Morning Herald that

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 2>she did want abortion on the nation agenda. Daniel, do

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 2>you think this was in the Queensland state election campaign

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 2>a scare campaign because David Chris Fooley said the laws

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:09.840
<v Speaker 2>were never going to change.

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 15>Look, Schrry, I haven't been following every single in and

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:19.839
<v Speaker 15>out of the Queensland state election. My understanding is that

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 15>this came up in the Queensland state election because one

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:27.760
<v Speaker 15>or more backbenches in the opposition indicated that they wanted

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 15>to put it on the agenda, and then that put

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 15>that question back to the leader of the opposition. So

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 15>I don't think it was so much a scare campaign

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 15>as an issue raised by some backbenches in the opposition.

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 15>But look, I don't think this is going to be

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 15>an issue at the next federal election. I think the

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:45.280
<v Speaker 15>next federal election is going to be fought on cost

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 15>of living. It's going to be fought on who people

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 15>trust more to give them tax cuts that give them

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 15>real benefits, and on energy. So I don't think this

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 15>is going to feature at a federal level. It's a

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:55.920
<v Speaker 15>state issue.

0:39:56.520 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 2>What do you think, Holly, do you have the confidence

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 2>that Dania has that Labor I won't try and have

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 2>a scare campaign on this issue because it has worked

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:05.919
<v Speaker 2>in the United States, It worked in Queensland and.

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 18>Look, I was on one of your colleague shows last

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:11.120
<v Speaker 18>night and said I cannot believe the americanization of politics

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:13.680
<v Speaker 18>in them trying to grasp onto this issue and Labor

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:16.240
<v Speaker 18>have made it a scare tactic in the Queensland election.

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:17.799
<v Speaker 2>I hope Daniel's right.

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:20.399
<v Speaker 16>I hope the federal election campaign is fought on cost

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:22.440
<v Speaker 16>of living, is caught on who's going to bring your

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 16>energy prices down? And is around who's going to best

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 16>serve Australians in the tax system, because I can tell

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 16>you it's not this Albanezi labor government and Australians you know,

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:35.399
<v Speaker 16>we know they're number one, two, three, four and five

0:40:35.440 --> 0:40:38.319
<v Speaker 16>top issues a cost of living. I don't think you're

0:40:38.320 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 16>going to see these issues come up as certainly vote changes.

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:45.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it'll definitely be interesting. All right, Daniel Melino, Holly Hughes,

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 2>thank you both very much for your time. Now still

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 2>to come. We've seen accusations from Media Watch and Sky

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 2>News UK that Israel is targeting journalists and aid workers deliberately.

0:40:58.560 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Well just how true these claims? My exclusive interview with

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:06.400
<v Speaker 2>the world renowned expert on modern warfare after this quick

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 2>break welcome back, Well, anti Israel media outlets like the

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:19.719
<v Speaker 2>ABC and Sky News UK are accusing Israel of serious

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 2>war crimes like deliberately killing journalists and aid workers, emergency workers,

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 2>of civil defense workers, Red crossworkers, all telling us that they.

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:34.880
<v Speaker 8>Feel they are now the targets of Israeli strike.

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 13>To the war in the Middle East. And yet more

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 13>did journalists, the latest being Hassan Hamad. Hassan was killed

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:43.239
<v Speaker 13>by an Israeli airstrike in Gaza, but there has been

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 13>little or nothing in the mainstream media, which is remarkable.

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 13>Are we now so hardened to journalists being targeted.

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:55.840
<v Speaker 2>And this reporting is just going unchallenged. Now. I've extensively

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:58.920
<v Speaker 2>spoken on this show about the lengths that Israel goes

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 2>to to avoid civilian casualties, but to find out the

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:06.880
<v Speaker 2>objective truth, I spoke with the internationally renowned Chair of

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Urban Warfare Studies at the Modern War Institute, John Spencer.

0:42:12.120 --> 0:42:16.319
<v Speaker 2>In mainstream media outlets, Israel has been accused of deliberately

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 2>targeting both aid workers in Lebanon and journalists in Gaza.

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Have you seen any evidence of this?

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:26.400
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely not, and that's just to me, a continuation of

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:30.440
<v Speaker 7>the disinformation about all the operations the fact that the

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:32.440
<v Speaker 7>United States has said many times is there is not

0:42:32.560 --> 0:42:35.279
<v Speaker 7>one bit of evidence to show that Israel has targeted

0:42:35.600 --> 0:42:42.440
<v Speaker 7>civilians period, journalists, aid workers. There has been accidents, but

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 7>the fact that Israel has done more to prevent and

0:42:45.600 --> 0:42:49.279
<v Speaker 7>to safeguard civilians and those on the battlefield. But this

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:54.120
<v Speaker 7>is war, Israel is being attacked, Israel is conducting massive operations.

0:42:54.160 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 7>I don't think people understand the scale. Even in the North,

0:42:57.600 --> 0:43:00.839
<v Speaker 7>where Israel has now deployed five divisions. Israel doesn't have

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:04.719
<v Speaker 7>five divisions, it has two divisions, So those are Israelis

0:43:05.120 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 7>who are trying to get in. The North has blood

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 7>to stop raining rockets down on Israel. And then you

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 7>have Gaza where Hamas is still launching rockets. So I

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 7>think that's just more of the disinformation. Everything from the

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 7>fact that there is no genocide, there is no targeting

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 7>of civilians. There's actually the opposites, like weird counterfactuals. When

0:43:27.400 --> 0:43:32.320
<v Speaker 7>Israel sends hundreds of trucks in daily, does these evacuations,

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 7>then gets accused of doing something wrong when it's like

0:43:37.160 --> 0:43:41.440
<v Speaker 7>this tiny nation under attack from all these different directions,

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 7>who is actually doing everything anybody's ever tried in war

0:43:46.080 --> 0:43:49.439
<v Speaker 7>to permit civilian harm, to get them out of harm's way.

0:43:49.760 --> 0:43:50.719
<v Speaker 1>But this is war.

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 2>You were in Gaza, I believe earlier this year. What

0:43:54.600 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 2>about the figure of forty thousand civilians killed in Gaza?

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Is that figure, as far as you are concerned, is

0:44:01.040 --> 0:44:04.920
<v Speaker 2>it accurate? And how do you compare the civilian casualties

0:44:05.040 --> 0:44:07.160
<v Speaker 2>in Gaza with other wars?

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:10.560
<v Speaker 7>Sure, and I've been to Gaza three times since October seventh.

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:12.839
<v Speaker 7>I was last year in July. I can tell you

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 7>that the now Hamas Gaza Health Ministry number of forty

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:20.319
<v Speaker 7>two thousand killed in Gaza is a lie. It's just

0:44:20.360 --> 0:44:23.040
<v Speaker 7>not true. There's no way you could know the number.

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:26.800
<v Speaker 7>But that number itself isn't those that have been killed.

0:44:26.840 --> 0:44:29.760
<v Speaker 7>That's anybody who has died since October seventh. It includes

0:44:29.920 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 7>anybody who died of natural causes, anybody who died by

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 7>Hamas's hand, who.

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Murdered, to include just this week, people trying to flee

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:41.120
<v Speaker 1>when they get the notices. It includes anybody who's missing

0:44:41.160 --> 0:44:43.120
<v Speaker 1>they just don't know the name. It includes people that

0:44:43.160 --> 0:44:45.920
<v Speaker 1>died years ago. I can tell you from being on

0:44:45.960 --> 0:44:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the ground that that.

0:44:47.120 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 7>Number is a lie and that Israel is actually the

0:44:50.120 --> 0:44:53.360
<v Speaker 7>civilian to combatant ratio if we knew the number. Although

0:44:53.400 --> 0:44:55.839
<v Speaker 7>in Gaza there's some type of magic system that can

0:44:55.880 --> 0:44:58.800
<v Speaker 7>tell you how many civilians died. It can't tell you

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:01.120
<v Speaker 7>how many combatants die, but they'll tell you how many

0:45:01.160 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 7>civilians died within hours. That's never happened in war and

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:06.960
<v Speaker 7>it never will, but they'll tell you within hours. And

0:45:06.960 --> 0:45:10.719
<v Speaker 7>then mass media runs with it like thirty killed, five

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:11.600
<v Speaker 7>hundred killed.

0:45:11.880 --> 0:45:14.239
<v Speaker 1>But that number is it's a lie. It's not true.

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:18.800
<v Speaker 7>Israel's civilian to combatant ratio is actually lower because they say,

0:45:19.040 --> 0:45:21.680
<v Speaker 7>and I believe them more than I believe Alamas.

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 1>But even if I take both numbers.

0:45:23.840 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 7>Israel's actually killed like twenty to twenty two thousand Hamas

0:45:28.440 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 7>and then the rest are what.

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Is believed to be civilians.

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:34.120
<v Speaker 7>But there actually is no way to tell that, and

0:45:34.360 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 7>when you have this reporting system that's just full of lives.

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:42.360
<v Speaker 2>In terms of the international community accusing Israel of breaching

0:45:42.440 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 2>international law, in your view, has Israel been guilty of

0:45:47.160 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 2>war crimes?

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely not, And I've written that from every angle, every accusation,

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:56.320
<v Speaker 7>from the fact that Israel has not been discriminated, It

0:45:56.320 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 7>has been very it has not been indiscriminate, has been

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 7>very discriminated, and who it targets the enemy, only the enemy.

0:46:03.760 --> 0:46:06.799
<v Speaker 1>It has not been excessive in the use of force.

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:11.719
<v Speaker 7>It has not been you're overwhelming, as in not what

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:14.880
<v Speaker 7>the law of war says in my analysis to include

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:17.880
<v Speaker 7>being on the ground and going with the actual units

0:46:17.920 --> 0:46:22.000
<v Speaker 7>on the ground. They're following the law of war, following

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:25.759
<v Speaker 7>rules of engagement that are very stringent against the complexity

0:46:25.760 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 7>of this enemy in underground cities that nobody else is

0:46:28.760 --> 0:46:32.759
<v Speaker 7>also faced in war. No Isruel is following, is going

0:46:32.840 --> 0:46:39.399
<v Speaker 7>beyond the legal requirements and is following their moral ethical way.

0:46:39.520 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 7>Militaries fight and doing everything to prevent some light arms.

0:46:42.760 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 7>So all of the starvation not true, all of it.

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:50.120
<v Speaker 1>It's all a farce of lies.

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:53.520
<v Speaker 2>John, what's your comment on the United Nations, both from

0:46:53.600 --> 0:46:57.680
<v Speaker 2>the positions expressed from its senior leadership but also that

0:46:58.040 --> 0:47:01.640
<v Speaker 2>pro har Mass resolution that was put forward that had

0:47:01.719 --> 0:47:05.719
<v Speaker 2>majority support in the United Nations General Assembly. Do you

0:47:05.800 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 2>think the UN has become an enabler for terrorism?

0:47:09.880 --> 0:47:11.880
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely, we didn't get here, and I think that's what

0:47:11.880 --> 0:47:16.160
<v Speaker 7>we're seeing, especially in Northern Israel, where the United Nations

0:47:16.239 --> 0:47:20.440
<v Speaker 7>Security Council resolution seventeen oh one and the mandate of

0:47:20.600 --> 0:47:24.839
<v Speaker 7>UNIFIL of over eighteen thousand United Nations forces that we

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 7>members of the United Nations paid for, who have completely

0:47:29.640 --> 0:47:34.280
<v Speaker 7>allowed the entire area to be combat areas for HESBLA,

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 7>massive bunkers and stockpiles.

0:47:36.719 --> 0:47:38.040
<v Speaker 1>The UN is failing.

0:47:38.920 --> 0:47:41.560
<v Speaker 7>This has been the greatest test of the United Nations

0:47:41.600 --> 0:47:43.920
<v Speaker 7>since the end of World War Two, and it's failing

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 7>with the Islamic regime in Iran, with all these proxies,

0:47:47.880 --> 0:47:50.480
<v Speaker 7>with the way it determines what the law war was,

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:53.799
<v Speaker 7>how it's been co opted by humanitarian rights groups, how.

0:47:53.680 --> 0:47:55.840
<v Speaker 1>It has become just a political.

0:47:56.760 --> 0:48:02.560
<v Speaker 7>Theater, basically problematic when this is the organization that's to

0:48:02.560 --> 0:48:05.800
<v Speaker 7>prevent war and it has guided us to the situation.

0:48:05.600 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Where we are now and we need leadership.

0:48:09.520 --> 0:48:13.320
<v Speaker 2>The United States is sending a fad battery missile defense

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:16.960
<v Speaker 2>system to Israel, yet at the same time it's issued

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:21.600
<v Speaker 2>a letter threatening to withhold weapons if the situation doesn't

0:48:21.640 --> 0:48:26.920
<v Speaker 2>improve in Gaza. What message do these conflicting messages send

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 2>to Iran?

0:48:28.000 --> 0:48:30.239
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I think so for Iran, I mean I

0:48:30.239 --> 0:48:34.399
<v Speaker 7>think it's we are in an election season. War is politics.

0:48:35.320 --> 0:48:38.000
<v Speaker 7>I think that's a huge sign of the strong relationship

0:48:38.400 --> 0:48:41.440
<v Speaker 7>and the iron plaid agreements, and that I'm proud of

0:48:41.480 --> 0:48:45.200
<v Speaker 7>as an American that the United States will defend Israel,

0:48:45.560 --> 0:48:49.319
<v Speaker 7>especially from attacks from another nation state like Iran. So

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:52.880
<v Speaker 7>the sending of this very advanced air defense system that

0:48:52.960 --> 0:48:56.719
<v Speaker 7>will integrate with other defense systems, there is a very

0:48:56.719 --> 0:49:00.840
<v Speaker 7>big signed to Iran to not continue to itack Israel

0:49:01.160 --> 0:49:04.520
<v Speaker 7>and the iron clad relationship because that comes with American

0:49:04.560 --> 0:49:07.759
<v Speaker 7>soldiers part of that air defense system. It's not the

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:10.400
<v Speaker 7>first time it's happened, but it's a huge step and

0:49:10.800 --> 0:49:14.480
<v Speaker 7>I think opposed to this letter, which is you need

0:49:14.520 --> 0:49:18.000
<v Speaker 7>to do more about humanitarian aid, it's a giant sign

0:49:18.040 --> 0:49:21.680
<v Speaker 7>of the actual iron cloud relationship between the United States

0:49:21.719 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 7>and Israel, as Israel is fighting a seven front war

0:49:24.920 --> 0:49:30.040
<v Speaker 7>which includes drones, missiles, ballistic missiles from.

0:49:31.480 --> 0:49:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Seven different directions.

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:35.319
<v Speaker 2>To be honest, John Spencer, thank you very much for

0:49:35.400 --> 0:49:41.040
<v Speaker 2>your time. And that was my interview with John Spencer earlier.

0:49:41.080 --> 0:49:44.640
<v Speaker 2>He is so impressive. Now, two quick things before I go. Firstly,

0:49:44.760 --> 0:49:47.439
<v Speaker 2>a shout out to my colleague Chris Kenny. He did

0:49:47.520 --> 0:49:51.640
<v Speaker 2>a sensational interview earlier today on a Legras Spender and

0:49:51.680 --> 0:49:54.760
<v Speaker 2>the teals. Make sure you check it out online. Also,

0:49:54.800 --> 0:49:56.840
<v Speaker 2>if you miss my exclusive from the start of the

0:49:56.880 --> 0:50:01.400
<v Speaker 2>show about SBS censoring pro Israel, that'll be up on

0:50:01.440 --> 0:50:05.240
<v Speaker 2>the Sky News website soon. I've written an article Otherwise,

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:07.720
<v Speaker 2>that's it from me. I'll see you tomorrow at eight o'clock.

0:50:08.000 --> 0:50:09.560
<v Speaker 2>And right now, here's Paul Mara