WEBVTT - The Media Show | 17 January

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the Media Show with Jack.

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Outing, Hello and welcome to the Media Show. Tonight we'll

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 2>take a look at the toxic culture inside the Guardian

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Australia's newsroom, a war between Anthony Albanesi and Elon Musk,

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 2>and towards the end of the show, we're going to

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 2>sit down with media watchdog columnist Jared Henderson to keep

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 2>an eye on the ABC. But first, everyone will have

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 2>seen the heartbreaking footage of the bushfires in California, but

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 2>not everyone will have taken the time to read about

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 2>the widespread criticism of California's leadership, which some have argued

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.480
<v Speaker 2>have made the fires more difficult to contain. Now, one

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.319
<v Speaker 2>marketing clip which has gone viral does a pretty good

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 2>job of summarizing the obsession with identity politics which is

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 2>infected leadership of critical emergency services.

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 3>You want to see somebody that responds to your house,

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 3>your emergency, whether it's a medical call or a fire call,

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 3>that looks like you. It gives that person a little

0:00:56.800 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 3>bit more ease knowing that somebody might understand their situation better.

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Is she strong enough to do this? Or you couldn't

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 3>carry my husband out of a fire, which my response

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 3>is he got himself from the wrong place if I

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 3>have to carry him out.

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Of a fire.

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 2>This woman is a Los Angeles Fire Department diversity chief,

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 2>and she is making the argument that it is your

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 2>fault if you are trapped in a burning building and

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 2>a female firefighter isn't strong enough to save you. Now,

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 2>that's pretty disgusting and reprehensible commentary. It isn't very inclusive either,

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 2>as people with disabilities can be caught in fires, and

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 2>we know the fires are so fast moving in California

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 2>that simply anyone can get caught out. And this is

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:40.839
<v Speaker 2>what their marketing team proudly published as well. It's their culture,

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 2>an aggressive victim blaming culture of identity politics above all.

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 2>And of course this rubbish was called out by many people,

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:53.279
<v Speaker 2>including Elon Musk, which prompted media organizations like The Sydney

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Morning Herald to criticize him. Reporter Bianka Hall writes disinformation

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 2>rains as bushfires dev state California, and speaking about Musks,

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 2>she alleged diversity equity and inclusion DEI investments and hiring

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 2>processes he has repeatedly said have caused deaths that could

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 2>otherwise have been avoided if more white men were fighting

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 2>the fires. Now, he actually never explicitly said that, and

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 2>if he had, she would have quoted directly what he said.

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 2>She just verbaled him. And it is false, And it's

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 2>an effort to straw man a broader and legitimate argument

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 2>about these insane priorities and racist hiring practices at some

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 2>emergency services. In fact, the reporting was so unhinged that

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 2>one of their own writers called it out in a

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 2>tweet which has since been deleted SMH. Columbus Parnell McGinnis

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 2>took aim at her own Masterthead for basically misrepresenting Musk's position.

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:54.679
<v Speaker 2>She said that credible outlets make themselves less credible by

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 2>making up misinformation about misinformation. Musks suggested that fire services

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 2>should not preference DEI hires over people who could do

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 2>the job, a subtle but important difference to what is

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:11.919
<v Speaker 2>implied here. Now, either of these reporters such as Bianker Hall,

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 2>are so stupid that they don't understand the argument, or

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 2>they simply don't care, And for the record, if it

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 2>is the latter, then that is a real case of disinformation.

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Joining me on the show this week is the Australians

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 2>Darren Davidson and Sky News contributor Louise Roberts. Louise, what

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 2>we saw in that clip from this very senior fire

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 2>chief telling people that if they're the ones trapped in

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 2>the building, well they've done the wrong thing. They're the

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 2>ones who've got themselves in the wrong spot. I find

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 2>it astonishing that journalists are somehow defending that and also

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 2>trying to make the argument that it's almost immoral to

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 2>point out that that's just clearly wrong.

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, I do wonder what to Christine Larson's sort of

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 4>position is It is she somehow all by extension blaming

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 4>the good people of Los Angeles for the current fire situation,

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 4>the people who've lost their homes and the businesses have

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 4>burned to the ground, and the absolute devastation, the multi

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars of damage that's been caused. I do find

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 4>that when Parnell sort of called out her own paper

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 4>for whitewashing the issue and sort of somehow suggesting that

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 4>Musk had made this comment saying there should be more

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 4>white men being hired rather than more diverse candidates. You know,

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 4>people are really recognized DEI as being a major factor

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.360
<v Speaker 4>in why these fires are not under control and why

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:37.279
<v Speaker 4>the priority has been for training firefighters and not enough

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 4>water in the fire hydrants. I mean, from my point

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 4>of view, it's a campaign, a three year campaign within

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 4>that fire department, which should.

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Be stopped now.

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I think there's Darren, Let's bring you in here,

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 2>because there's clearly a cultural element in the fire department

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 2>as well, which is important to talk about, because it's

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 2>not like journalists went sorting through archive footage and this

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 2>was leaked from their internal serve internal training material. This

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 2>was published by the fire servers as part of this

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 2>identity politics propaganda push what they do when they're all

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 2>trying to be pro identity politics, they've published this commentary

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 2>out there. It's come back to bite them. Obviously it

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 2>was an older video, but it goes to show how

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 2>they think about it.

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>It does.

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 5>I actually lived in the area from twenty twenty one

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 5>until twenty twenty two where the fires are happening right now.

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 5>My son was born there, so I had a very

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 5>good exposure to the way that local resources are managed.

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 5>And I think a lot of the commentary in some

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:43.599
<v Speaker 5>of the commentary referenced, it's just a clear attempt to

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 5>distract from the failure of state and local government to

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 5>contain fires that often accompany the Santa and A fires,

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 5>which are part of the climate in that region. Look,

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 5>no question, human activity impacts climate, but you often have

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 5>dry season following wet seasons. That's very very common. That's

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 5>been happening in California for hundreds of years. What's actually

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 5>happened here is that Gavin Newsom and the Democrats have

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 5>mismanaged local resources. They've underinvested in water storage and land management.

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 5>If you look at the federal budget the state budget

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 5>for California coming up, they've slashed resource management for Cow

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 5>Fire by half, which is a huge, huge reduction, and

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 5>that's why these fires are happening. It's very very sad

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 5>someone that lived there. It's actually devastating to see what's

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 5>happening to those people's homes and those community communities which

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 5>actually devastated. And I really do hope and we see

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 5>some a change in how those local resources are managed

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 5>and how the state is led by Gavin Newsom, who

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 5>is an absolute he's a disaster. And we've seen this

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 5>around the US in recent years, and it's one of

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 5>the reasons why Trump's back in the White House. Which

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 5>is that a lot of these cities have been really,

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 5>really grossly mismanaged at the state on local level in

0:06:58.160 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 5>somes of resourcing.

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well said, well, let's move on, because as we

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 2>go to air tonight, the world was still waiting for

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 2>confirmation of a ceasefire deal in Gaza which would.

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>See the release of hostages.

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Now it is expected to be formalized this weekend, and

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 2>the good news has led to both sides of politics

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:19.679
<v Speaker 2>taking credit. Both Joe Biden and Donald Trump claimed credit

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 2>for the deal because both parties were involved, and for

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 2>the most part, the media coverage around this was fair.

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 2>The New York Times called it an extraordinary act of

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 2>collaboration between outgoing and incoming presidents. Biden and Trump defy

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 2>the history of animosity to seal Gaza ceasefire. The two

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 2>presidents directed their advisors to work together to push Israel

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 2>and Hamas over the line for an agreement to halt

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 2>the fighting that has ravaged Gaza and release hostages who

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 2>have been held there for fifteen months, and Biden himself

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 2>explained this for reporters pretty clearly at the press conference.

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 6>This deal was developed and negotiated under my administration, but

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 6>terms will be implemented for the most part by the

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 6>next administration. In these past few days, we've been speaking

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 6>as one team.

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 2>But just one minute after those comments, Biden went to

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 2>turn around and he was baited by a reporter.

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 5>Thank you looks.

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Credit for this, mister President?

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 7>You or child?

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 6>Is that a job? Oh? Thank you.

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Media pundits and so called esque experts will continue debating

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 2>who should be praised for the deal if it goes ahead.

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 2>But over at MSNBC, the conspiracy started to festa. It

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 2>could not possibly be that Trump did something good. Host

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Joy Reid had a different theory.

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 8>And Prime Minister Benjamin Netsanyahu has made it no secret

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 8>that he prefers Trump and wanted to deliver him a win.

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 8>The Washington Post reporter that Israel would gift something to Trump,

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 8>but it was believed to be a deal on Lebanon.

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 2>This is supposed to be a legitimate news service, and

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 2>Joy read is just making up theories that the entire

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 2>war being halted was because of a secret deal between

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Israel and Trump. Well, Louise, those kind of conspiracy theories

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 2>get very close to the Jews are controlling the media,

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 2>and they're controlling the government.

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>My problem with this.

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 2>There's nothing of substance that she possibly could have other

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 2>than reports that they've had conversations. Of course they're going

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 2>to have conversations. He is the incoming president of the

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 2>United States. They're going to be talking. But she's actually

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 2>gone to air alleging that he has waited. So it's

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 2>by the way that the onus is then on Israel.

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 2>It's all Hermas was coming to the table, but Israel

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 2>was waiting, and Nanayu was waiting to give Trump a

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 2>good present for him to start.

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 1>It's so absurd, it's absurd.

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 4>It's actually offensive to Jewish people somehow, allowing hostages to

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 4>remain in those times and suffer while a little tidy

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 4>deal was done to make Trump look good once he

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 4>gets into the White House. And also the way that

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 4>Biden sort of throws that nasty comment over his shoulder,

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 4>you're joking, even in a situation where he's leaving the

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 4>Oval office, he cannot give Trump any sort of, you know,

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 4>credit for pushing this deal. In fact, it was Trump's

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 4>Middle East envoy who actually got Benjamin mcnawhu to actually

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 4>agree to the deal, So there was no harm in

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 4>Biden actually saying yes, it was truly bipartisan approach and

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 4>thank you mister Trump for your help. But he couldn't

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 4>bring himself to do it, which says everything to me

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 4>about his administration and leaning towards a very left conspiracy theory.

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I would have liked to see both leaders. Actually,

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, Darren, let's bring you in. I would have

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 2>liked to see both leaders probably praise the other person

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 2>because there were two parties involved in that. If it

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 2>does go ahead, and it will be a wholly good

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 2>thing for everyone involved. The other element to this story, though,

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 2>is you've got these organizations. The left is very quick

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 2>to talk about misinformation and regulating against this fake news,

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. They publish this absolute nonsense, CaAl conspiratorial. It's

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 2>just conjecture about something they think Trump might have done.

0:11:16.000 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 2>I think it's going to get much worse as he

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 2>takes offers. What do you make of it in this situation.

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 5>I agree Biden's touting his record on foreign policies he

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 5>leaves office, but it's it's a really questionable track record

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 5>over the last four years. I mean, on Israel itself.

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 5>He opposed nearly every single military decision that Israel made

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:41.079
<v Speaker 5>and it's really only Israel that's established de terrence against

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 5>Iran in that region. You know that, I think the

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 5>greatest failure of Biden's foreign policy is that so many

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 5>adversaries around the world have kind of moved in to.

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Feel this vacuum.

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 5>You know, we have we had so many conflicts around

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 5>the world during during Biden's term. I find it really

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 5>hard to buy into this attempt to kind of paint

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 5>this picture of a really strong foreign policy record. I

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 5>think it's quite the opposite. In fact, par securely in

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 5>the Middle East.

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a really good point.

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 2>And the other element to this is if it was

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 2>all Biden, as his supporters are suggesting, then why didn't

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.839
<v Speaker 2>he do it six months ago? Why has it coincidentally

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 2>taken up until he's about to take office.

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 4>Interestingly though, that the New York Post did a great

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 4>coverage of this, and they actually got some quotes sort

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 4>of off the record from Biden's admin who said that

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 4>Trump's influence was very important to actually securing this as well.

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 4>So while everyone around him acknowledges it, he still wants

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.839
<v Speaker 4>to sort of take full credit for something, as you say,

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 4>he could have done six months ago. And ended the

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 4>suffering of many hostages.

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and in Biden's scripted statement, he does actually reach

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 2>out and say, you know, this was a team effort,

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 2>so that there was a bit of bipartnersan.

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 4>Commentary body language when he leaves elector and I think

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 4>says it all.

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>He was told he doesn't know what he's saying, you know,

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't know where he is.

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 4>I don't think it's authentic. He's been told be magnanimous

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 4>to mister Trump.

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 2>But in his heart there's a script and then there's

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 2>what he actually wants to say. But look, let's move on.

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Because Mark Zuckerberg has finally dismantled the corrupt and biased

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 2>fact checking system which polices his platforms in the United States.

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 2>He spent hours explaining the decision in a podcast with

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Joe Rogan.

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 9>We tried to put in place, you know, a system

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 9>that would deal with it, you know, and early on

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 9>tried to basically make it so that it was really limited.

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 9>We're like, all right, we're just gonna have the system

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 9>where the these third party fact checkers and they can

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 9>check the worst of the worst stuff, right, so things

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 9>that are very clear hoaxes that there's like it's not like,

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 9>like we're not parsing speech about whether something is slightly

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 9>true or slightly false, like Earth is flat, you know,

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 9>things like that. Right, So that was sort of the

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 9>original intent we put in place the system, and it

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 9>just sort of veered from there. I think to some

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 9>degree it's because some of the people whose job is

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 9>to do fact checking, a lot of their industry is

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.079
<v Speaker 9>focused on political fact checking, so they're just kind of

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 9>veered in that direction, and we kept on trying to

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 9>basically get it to be what we had originally intended,

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 9>which is just you know, it's not the point is

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:16.080
<v Speaker 9>and to like judge people's opinions. It's to provide in

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 9>this layer to kind of help fact check some of

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 9>the stuff that seems the most extreme.

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>But it just, you know, it was just.

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 9>Never accepted by people broadly. I think people just felt

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 9>like the fact checkers were too biased, not necessarily even

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 9>so much and what they ruled, although sometimes I think

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 9>people would disagree with that, a lot of the time,

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 9>it was just what types of things they chose to

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 9>even go in fact check in the.

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>First time in the first place.

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Zuckerberg also shed light on how political censorship had become.

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 2>He revealed when he pushed back against Joe Biden's team,

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 2>his company started getting investigated.

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 9>These people from the Biden administration would call up our

0:14:57.880 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 9>team and like scream at them, and and it's like,

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 9>these documents are it's all kind of out there.

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Did you record any of those phone calls? I don't know.

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think.

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 9>I don't think we were, but I think, oh, listen,

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 9>I mean there are emails, the emails are published, it's

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 9>all it's all kind of out there, and they're like

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 9>and basically it just got to this point where we

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 9>were like, no, we're not gonna We're not gonna take

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 9>down things that are true.

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>That's ridiculous.

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Now, it is all very well for Zuckerberg to say

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 2>that his fact checking system is corrupt and biased, so

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 2>he is fixing it in America, But what about for

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 2>us here in Australia. We've been locked in very public

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 2>disagreements with activist fact checkers here in Australia which have

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 2>been paid astonishing amounts of money by Zuckerberg to sensor journalism.

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 2>And these activists will still have the power to censor

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 2>your thoughts at the upcoming election in a few months,

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 2>we asked Meta about how it could possibly justify keeping

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 2>the Australian industry going and allowing r MI t back

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 2>onto Facebook's payroll, and they gave.

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Us this statement.

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 2>No changes to Meta's third party fact checking program in

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Australia will happen before the federal election. We are beginning

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 2>with rolling out community notes in the US. Building this

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 2>type of community takes time and we will continue to

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 2>improve it over the course of the year before considering

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 2>expansion to other countries. In addition, before rolling out any

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 2>changes to our fact checking program outside the US, we

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 2>will carefully consider our legal and regulatory obligations in each country,

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 2>including Australia. R MIT's Lookout is a Meta third party

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 2>fact checker in Australia. R MIT have undergone some changes,

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 2>including management, and their renewal application has been approved by

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 2>the IFCN. On the new website they detail a code

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 2>of practice which includes commitment to impartiality and fairness, etc.

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Etc.

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 2>We all know that they never did that. Let's bring

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 2>the panel back in. They did have a code of

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 2>conduct r MIT, they didn't adhere to it, which is

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 2>why basically we got them shut down and Russell Skelton

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 2>was sacked. That's the change of management we're talking about,

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 2>but it's still the same core team that's running it

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 2>that've been allowed back there into Facebook. They're going to

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 2>be able to censor content during the federal election. So, Louise,

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 2>my problem with this it's how can these two things

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:23.719
<v Speaker 2>be true. You've got the CEO of a company saying

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 2>this system's flawed. It's so flawed that we lost control

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 2>of it. It's become political. In that podcast and other

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 2>sections we didn't play, they discussed it being paramount to

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 2>election interference as well, and the example given was, you

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 2>know the Hunter Biden laptop, which they obviously took off Facebook.

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 2>How many more votes would that have impacted during the referendum.

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 2>We were prevented from reporting about the length of the

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 2>ULARU document.

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>By this group.

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Now this impacts how people vote because one there is

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 2>an argument that it's misinformation.

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't misinformation. They were wrong.

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 2>They were too uneducated to understand the argument that there

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 2>was a bundle of documents. It just was what it was,

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 2>whether they like it or not. These people, how could

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 2>on one hand.

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>This scheme not be fit for practice in the US.

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 2>But don't worry about those people in backwater Australia and

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 2>their elections.

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 4>It's offensive, isn't it, Because you would think that with

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 4>an election coming up and the fact they've mentioned electoral

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 4>interference before and it's been an issue for them in

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 4>their fact checkers. I don't see why they can't just

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 4>stop the service right now. I mean, it's a digital platform,

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 4>so why does it take so long to roll it

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 4>out and test it an America and see about how

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:37.360
<v Speaker 4>that works and figure it.

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 2>I think he is very scared of Trump because I

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 2>think that if he can get hauled before some congressional

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 2>inquiry and all these emails, you know, it's all very

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 2>well for him to say, oh, the Biden administration made

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 2>us do it.

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Well, you did it.

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:52.719
<v Speaker 10>Well, they did it.

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 2>You know you're not you're complaining about it. Now that

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 2>there's a new administration, right, it would be very easy

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 2>for them to get hauled over the coals.

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm think you're right there as well. But I think

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:05.639
<v Speaker 4>it's bad news for young voters, perhaps young people who

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 4>are voting for the first time in a federal election

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 4>and are going to platforms like Facebook and Instagram to

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.199
<v Speaker 4>get their election coverage and to work out what the

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 4>candidates stand for, that's going to be corrupted and skewed.

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Darren, let's bring you in.

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 2>What do you make of Mark Zuckerberg's just more broadly

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 2>the moves to get rid of it in the US,

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 2>but the inconsistency that we still have to deal with

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 2>this scheme that he says is bad.

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, unfortunately, And it's consistent with Facebook's behavior and actions

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:39.640
<v Speaker 5>in Australia over many, many years now. They just show

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 5>a complete disregard for values and Australian law and we've

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 5>seen that with the Bargaining Enterprise Code that was introduced

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.400
<v Speaker 5>a couple of years ago and their actions over that,

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 5>which is still yet to be resolved. I find it

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 5>really amusing that Mark Zuckerberg goes on the Rogan podcast

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 5>and seems astonished and outrage that a politician or his

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 5>staff would call up and complain and scream at them.

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:10.959
<v Speaker 5>And you know, this is a daily occupational hazard for journalists,

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 5>as you know, Jack, we get that all day long

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 5>from politicians and contacts and other stakeholders in the publishing

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 5>business and we just get on with it. And that's

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 5>part of the job. And it's just another example of

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 5>why you know, Facebook is a publishing platform, is the

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 5>world's largest publish publishing platform, but it's not fit for purpose.

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we're one of the most heavily regulated media

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 2>environments in the world where Akmo oversees us from a

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 2>broadcasting point of view. If we ever make a mistake,

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 2>we've got corrections, policies and everything. I don't need some

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty two year old indigenous rights activists who's wormed their

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 2>way into a university to tell me and my team

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 2>whether a document is six pages or one page. But

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:53.239
<v Speaker 2>that's what was happening, and that's the flaw with this

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 2>whole thing. He's admitted it's not fit for purpose, but

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 2>we're still using it. It's crazy to me. We're going

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:01.239
<v Speaker 2>to take a quick break, but when we return. An

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 2>investigation into The Guardian has shed light on the toxic

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 2>culture inside the Woke news room.

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back.

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Joining me now as you will each and every Friday

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 2>is The Australians Media Watchdog columnist Jared Henderson. Now, Jared,

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 2>you've done some fantastic investigatory work.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:23.439
<v Speaker 3>It's something that.

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 2>You've come across the ABC is their proclivity to maybe

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 2>give their mates a few softball questions. Can you tell

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 2>us a bit more about that.

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 10>Yes, Zebbie Daniel was one of my ABC fabes when

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 10>she was on the ABC and then she zipped off

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 10>the ABC and then she became the Teal Independent for

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 10>gold Scene, which is not far away from ABC headquarters

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:47.199
<v Speaker 10>at South Bank. And what I've noticed is over the

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 10>two and a half years she gets an awful lot

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 10>of runs on the ABC for someone who is not important,

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 10>because if you're if you're an independent in the Senate

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 10>with a vote, you matter because you've got the balance

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.120
<v Speaker 10>of power. If you're an independent in the current House

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 10>of Representative, you have no power at all. But she

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 10>may after the next election or she may not. But

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 10>she got a very soft run the other day with

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 10>Karlie Morris, which I think there might be a clip

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 10>off here.

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's have a listen.

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:15.639
<v Speaker 11>Finally, Zoe, your set of Goldstein is home to a

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 11>significant number of Jewish Australians. During his rally on the weekend,

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:23.159
<v Speaker 11>Peter Dutton highlighted the spike in anti Semitic incidents that

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 11>we've seen in Australia and again blamed the Prime Minister

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 11>and Labor for playing a role in that. Do you

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 11>believe the government shares any responsibility.

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 7>The spike in antisemitism in this country and across the

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 7>world has been caused by a horrendous terrorist attack followed

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 7>by a horrendous conflict in the Middle East. It should

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 7>not be politically weaponized. It's terrible and it should not

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 7>be happening. And it is of great concern to me

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 7>in regard to what's happening in the community of Goldstein

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 7>and antisemitism towards Jewish Australians. We should all be working

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 7>together to resolve that, throwing fuel on it for the

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 7>sake of politics.

0:23:03.359 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 10>Well, what you've got there is a leading question by

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 10>the interviewer as if and was the only question asked

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 10>about Israel and Gaza on that segment in spite of

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 10>the fact that the Zoey Daniels electorate of Goldstein has

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 10>many Jewish Australians in there.

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>So you have a.

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 10>Suggestion in the question the only question that does on

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 10>the topic that the essential problem with any Semitism in

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:27.679
<v Speaker 10>Australia is the fact that the Opposition leader Peter Dutton

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 10>has expressed concerned about it. And then Zoey Daniel comes

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 10>back and says, well, it's the only person she points

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 10>her finger at is Peter Dutton. So talk about a

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 10>soft question for a teal who may want to be

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 10>part of minority government with Peter Dutton after the next

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 10>election or may not. But I just think it's very unprofessional.

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 10>I mean, it's if you're going to talk about Israel Gaza,

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:49.959
<v Speaker 10>there are more things to talk about than what an

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 10>opposition leader has said. I mean, you might want to

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 10>talk about what a government leader has said more important.

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:56.879
<v Speaker 10>But they're sort of mates.

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 7>I mean.

0:23:57.680 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 10>The other point there is that someone should have said, well,

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 10>Zoe Daniel, who's now the Member for golds See, there's

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 10>a long time ABC reporter. We were colleagues because Karli

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 10>Morris is on the ABC, were colleagues and that would

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 10>be reasonable. But to suggest that somehow there's no relationship

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 10>between the two, or that Zoey Daniel's coming on the

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 10>ABC because she's a teel independent. Well, in the House

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:20.400
<v Speaker 10>of Representatives, I think all up there about thirteen independents.

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 10>None of them get the coverage that Zoe Daniel gets.

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 10>She gets it because it mates essentially no. She was

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 10>a good journalist and she's a good performer, but she

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 10>might get a tough question occasionally. Wouldn't do any harm,

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 10>you know.

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 2>I think it would give them more credibility if they

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 2>asked a tough question, and supposedly if she's such a

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 2>good operator, she could be able to handle it.

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 10>Well, it's run through this whole week. I mean there

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 10>was a there was a soft interview with Adam bant

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 10>on one day, a tough interview with the liberal senator

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:55.959
<v Speaker 10>Joan Hume, a soft interview this morning with a Palestinian

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 10>representative who spoke quite well, but he was a selft

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 10>interview with him, tough interview with Simon Birmingham, who's the

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 10>Opposition shadow Foreign Minister. So what you've got is these

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 10>sort of soft interviews with your ideological mates and sometimes

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 10>your personal mates.

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 2>And quite scathing when it's someone on the other.

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 10>Side, and a tough one of somehow Peter Dutton gets

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 10>in there.

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's move on now, because you've also had a

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 2>look at the ABC seven thirty report, yes, where they've

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 2>taken swing and Mark Zuckerberg.

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of it?

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 10>Well, there was a late last night and at the

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:27.680
<v Speaker 10>end of the program last night there was a special

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.879
<v Speaker 10>mention about Zuckerberg and how Zuckerberg has now realized that

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 10>Facebook was being biased, that he has said this, that

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 10>the fact checkers I've covered this in my column and

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 10>the Weekend Australia tomorrow, that the fact checkers have been

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 10>biased against right of scent of views, and he's coming

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 10>back to his more libertarian past. So the ABC does

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 10>a program on it, a brief one in seven point thirty,

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.679
<v Speaker 10>A reasonable thing to do. But the two commentators they

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 10>have on are both various strong critics of Zuckerberg, including

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 10>Lizzie O'sche, well known left wing lawyer from Melbourne. But

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 10>you know, if you're going to get a comment from her.

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Could have had a comment from us. Those fact checkers

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.440
<v Speaker 2>came after us during the referendumness came after Peter Kredlin.

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.439
<v Speaker 2>And you've got these twenty two year old activists trying

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 2>to rule on how long a document is. Is it

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 2>one page, is a six page? Doesn't matter?

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 10>I mean the ABC presents misinformation and disinformation as if

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 10>there's only one view on it, but matters that some

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 10>people classify as misinformation are classified is true by others.

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 10>And so you've got a lot of young left wing

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:37.200
<v Speaker 10>people working around censori Essentially and zuckerb. Zuckerberger said, after

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 10>a number of years, he said, look, we're not going

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 10>to do there's anymore. We're going to do a different

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:44.199
<v Speaker 10>way of looking at it. But on the ABC last night,

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 10>you wouldn't have any idea about that.

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And there's a lot of nuance with that as well. Now,

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:51.439
<v Speaker 2>we often get some very vocal and strong predictions in

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 2>the media, but I know there's one particular journalist who's

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 2>quite bolshy with her predictions, who maybe something from the

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 2>past has turned out to be not so true.

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think there's one clip on this, and I

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:05.400
<v Speaker 10>think I think there's something I've put up. I mean,

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 10>as someone who's followed the Liberal Party for many decades,

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 10>too many decades, I guess I can at least go

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 10>back to the nineteen eighties when journalists and commentators were

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 10>predicting the end of the Liberal Party. But Laura Tingle

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 10>this as recently as twenty eighteen that when Malcolm Turnbull

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 10>got turfed out, she basically said, look, this is the

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 10>end of the modern Liberal Party as we know it.

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 10>I think we've got a grab And there's another graph

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.920
<v Speaker 10>of what she said. Later on, when the Voice was on,

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 10>she also made a similar comment about Peter Dutton and

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 10>the Voice.

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's have a lesson.

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 10>I don't think it's necessarily going to do any good

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 10>for Peter Dutton if the No case wins in the

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:53.880
<v Speaker 10>long term. Well there you are the ABC's television designated

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:57.439
<v Speaker 10>expert on politics, which were taking the Labor Party, the

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 10>Liberal Party, the Nationals, the Greens, the Independence and whatever else.

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 10>So in twenty eighteen you predict the party is going

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 10>to die because you make Malcolm Turble's not there anymore.

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 10>I mean there's a group of ABC reporters who will

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 10>tolerate a coalition government providers led by someone like Malcolm Turnbull,

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 10>but not like Tony Abbott or like Peter Dutton. So

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:18.959
<v Speaker 10>you make that prediction the modern Liberal Party is at

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 10>its death rows, but under Scott Morrison wins the next selection.

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 10>And then you come up to the Voice referendum where

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:28.239
<v Speaker 10>Peter Dutton takes a controversial view and says he's going

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 10>to support No, and virtually I mean I can't think

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 10>of anyone in the ABC who would have voted No,

0:28:33.640 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 10>although sixty percent of Australian instead. But as the lead

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 10>up comes to the referendum and all the polls are

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 10>indicating NO is going to win. Laura Tingle says that

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 10>if No does win, it won't doing Dutton any good

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 10>any rate. No No, we know whether you agree with

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 10>the yes case or you don't. We know that Dutton's

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 10>opposition to the No was very successful with the support

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 10>of dissenter Price and Warramundine and others, and send it

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 10>Laddell from South Australia was very successful. But there's Laura

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 10>s engleson was if No wins or Night, it won't

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 10>help Dunton. Well that's just profoundly wrong. So it seem

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 10>to me if you're making all these profoundly wrong predictions

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 10>about the Liberal Party, perhaps you might retire from the

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 10>Liberal Party and just talk about the Greens or something

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 10>for change. But no one's predicted at the end of

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 10>the Greens.

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 2>But there you go, brilliant Jared Anderson, thank you so

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 2>much for taking us slips all of that. That's all

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 2>the time that we have for tonight. But up next

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 2>is Newsnight.