Speaker 1: On scolds Austrodia.
Speaker 2: This is the Reader Panalty Show.
Speaker 3: Good evening and welcome to the Rita Panekey Show. I'm
Speaker 3: Danikiti Giorgio coming up tonight. The boss of nine Entertainment
Speaker 3: calls it quits as the company deals with the fallout
Speaker 3: from bullying and harassment complaints.
Speaker 4: Nick Cata will give us his take.
Speaker 3: Taylor Swift endorses Karmala Harris, but will it actually get
Speaker 3: young people voting? Clairo joins us to break it down.
Speaker 3: Kosha Gada will debunk all of Kamala Harris's lives during
Speaker 3: the presidential debate. The King embraces New Zealand's women's rugby team.
Speaker 3: Kinsey Schofield will show us the viral vision and of
Speaker 3: course Lefty's losing it, including the alleged disappearing.
Speaker 4: Pets of Ohio musical edition.
Speaker 5: You're Eating the Cats, eat the cat eating the eating
Speaker 5: You're eating the cats eat the cat eating the zogs.
Speaker 3: Joining me now is Mensi's Research Center Senior Fellow, Nick
Speaker 3: cat Nick. Great to have you on. Thank you so
Speaker 3: much for joining me. I want to start with that
Speaker 3: breaking news that Nine's executive Nine's Entertainment's chief executive Mike Sneezeby.
Speaker 4: He has today called it quits.
Speaker 3: He's standing down and will leave the media company at
Speaker 3: the end of the month. Nick, I feel like this
Speaker 3: is a long time coming. The company, of course, has
Speaker 3: been in some turmoil for the last few months.
Speaker 4: Are you surprised at all by his decision?
Speaker 6: Not one iota. I'm surprised it wasn't sooner, actually, because
Speaker 6: it's very tough in the media game at the moment,
Speaker 6: as do you know, as people at Sky I know,
Speaker 6: as anybody involved in commercial media knows, it's a very
Speaker 6: tough environment and the business model is changing. But I
Speaker 6: think nine has really accelerated the decline of a once
Speaker 6: grade station by failing to deal with some very basic
Speaker 6: issues of bullying which should have been stamped on very
Speaker 6: early on. And I thought the the ultimate sin for
Speaker 6: or for Sneezeby was when he went to the Parish
Speaker 6: Olympics and decided it was a good idea to run
Speaker 6: with a torch at the same time they were laying
Speaker 6: off staff back in Sydney and expecting people to tighten
Speaker 6: their belts. It was incredibly poor management, incredibly poorly judged,
Speaker 6: incredibly self indulgent. And if that's any indication of the
Speaker 6: way the man's been running the organization, I'd be saying
Speaker 6: they're better off without him.
Speaker 4: Yeah, absolutely, I mean the optics of that.
Speaker 3: When the company's in turmol and you're trotting about Paris
Speaker 3: with the Olympic flame, it just doesn't work. Now, look,
Speaker 3: let's talk about the anti Israel and anti war protests
Speaker 3: in Melbourne. As we know, that city was unrecognizable yesterday
Speaker 3: as these idiots ran riot. They were back at it
Speaker 3: again today, but certainly not to the extent it.
Speaker 4: Appears as we saw yesterday.
Speaker 3: Nick, I've got to say it's very telling the Greens
Speaker 3: did not back the police response, despite the fact that
Speaker 3: the police were being pelted with horsepoo, acid canned food.
Speaker 4: It was appalling.
Speaker 3: And yet the Victorian Greens are calling for an independent
Speaker 3: inquiry into the use of force by police.
Speaker 6: Can you believe which inquiring of the use of horsemen
Speaker 6: who protested. Now, it's appalling behavior. They've really crossed over
Speaker 6: the crossed over the line here well. And truly, anybody
Speaker 6: who thinks that that is a legitimate way to protest
Speaker 6: any cause, whatever their cause of the day might be,
Speaker 6: it plainly is not. And plainly the police, I thought,
Speaker 6: compared to the way they treated some of the COVID demonstrations,
Speaker 6: were very restrained, possibly too restrained from my liking. Actually,
Speaker 6: I mean, I think the police had every right to
Speaker 6: end this as they did, and I every right to
Speaker 6: come down hard on the protesters who were as you know,
Speaker 6: they were blindfolded. They were deliberately trying to hide their
Speaker 6: identity as they deliberately went out to break the law
Speaker 6: and cause violence and danger and disrupt the city. There's
Speaker 6: no words really strong enough to condemn these absolute idiots.
Speaker 6: And they're certainly not winning any friends for their cause,
Speaker 6: aren't they. I mean, who's going to they suddenly going
Speaker 6: to persuade us that we've got to support I don't
Speaker 6: know what is it today, Palestinians or whatever, because this behavior, no,
Speaker 6: of course not, and that's not what they're trying to do.
Speaker 6: They're just making an exhibition of themselves. This is performative demonstrating.
Speaker 3: It's embarrassing, and they are feral. I mean that they're
Speaker 3: just they're out of control.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 3: Look, speaking of the Greens, one of their MP's, Gabrielle
Speaker 3: de Vietri, blew off parliament to attend one of those
Speaker 3: anti war protests this week, and she is the same
Speaker 3: one that got suspended for posting a selfie to social
Speaker 3: media in support of a climate protest, forcing Parliament over
Speaker 3: there to be adjourned.
Speaker 4: Nick.
Speaker 3: Look, it's become clearer the Greens are the MPs. They're
Speaker 3: they're not really politicians, they're activists. They're in there for
Speaker 3: their own their own self worth. They don't actually care.
Speaker 4: About the people they're supposed to be representing.
Speaker 6: If you have the privilege of being elected as a
Speaker 6: member of Parliament, then you have a platform and a
Speaker 6: voice and you're able to execute real change within the
Speaker 6: democratic system. That she had to step outside of it
Speaker 6: and join the lawless mob on the street shows that
Speaker 6: she's not serious. She's not serious about her job. She's
Speaker 6: not serious about the way our democracy works or negotiating
Speaker 6: things with other people who might disagree with her. And
Speaker 6: that's I think the frightening thing about what we're seeing
Speaker 6: in the Greens, particularly but in others too, that they
Speaker 6: just they're not prepared to have a debate. It's their
Speaker 6: way or the highway, and I'm sorry, that's not democracy
Speaker 6: as we understand it.
Speaker 4: Yeah, that looks I've.
Speaker 3: Got to stick with the Greens because today they are
Speaker 3: calling for companies found guilty of price gouging on essential
Speaker 3: products and services like rent to energy and groceries to
Speaker 3: be hit with a maximum penalty of fifty million dollars.
Speaker 3: What are your thoughts on this plan, Nickel, A total
Speaker 3: at work.
Speaker 6: It's bonkers economics, that's what it is. Everybody knows, you know.
Speaker 6: Any sort of price control like that, it's not going
Speaker 6: to work. I mean, the best way to get prices
Speaker 6: down is more competition in the market. There is a
Speaker 6: lot of competition in the grocery sector, by the way,
Speaker 6: and it's a very keenly fort business. I had a
Speaker 6: email from somebody who's run pubs in Adelaide the other
Speaker 6: day sending me his electricity bill this July as opposed
Speaker 6: to last July, and in some of his pubs it
Speaker 6: is almost double, so you know, and same goes to supermarkets.
Speaker 6: They're paying more for their fridges, they're paying more for
Speaker 6: the diesel that gets the stuff to the supermarkets. So
Speaker 6: I have some sympathy for them. And it's up to
Speaker 6: the government to tackle inflation at the proper level, which
Speaker 6: is to start with their own spending and that will
Speaker 6: start bringing the kind of relief that everybody seeks in supermarkets,
Speaker 6: not this sort of It's the sort of thing you'd
Speaker 6: see out of a command economy, isn't it like the
Speaker 6: Soviet Union. It's ridiculous, It doesn't work and it shouldn't
Speaker 6: be tried.
Speaker 3: More thought bubble politics by the Greens as always. Now
Speaker 3: we know, of course that the King and Queen will
Speaker 3: be coming down Under in October, but the King has
Speaker 3: canceled the walkabouts from his Australian tour to avoid offending
Speaker 3: indigenous communities. Instead, the official itinery of the King and
Speaker 3: Queen will replace the Royal walk about with an opportunity
Speaker 3: to meet the public.
Speaker 4: Nick.
Speaker 3: I think this personally is ridiculous. Now you're not allowed
Speaker 3: to say walk about when you're referring to a meet
Speaker 3: and greet with the royal family, even though the UK
Speaker 3: actually still uses the walk about term.
Speaker 4: When where does it end?
Speaker 6: He's a sensitive soul, isn't here. I really thought this
Speaker 6: was a problem. I mean, people come up through the
Speaker 6: street and say, you know, he's calling it a walk about. No,
Speaker 6: it's an entirely made up problem. But the important thing
Speaker 6: is he's going to be here, and I don't care
Speaker 6: what he calls it. If I get a chance to
Speaker 6: stand in the crowd and just near the King, who
Speaker 6: I think is doing a magnificent job of uniting his
Speaker 6: country and hopefully ours two, I will do so. I
Speaker 6: don't care what he calls it.
Speaker 4: No neither, And I too have the utmost respect for
Speaker 4: the King and Queen.
Speaker 3: And the monarchy. But I've got to say this is
Speaker 3: a shaka.
Speaker 4: Nick.
Speaker 3: Now let's talk about Queensland Premier Stephen Miles. He has
Speaker 3: really outdone himself, this time posting a bizarre video to
Speaker 3: social media captioned gangs all here.
Speaker 4: To protect women in Queensland. Have a look at this
Speaker 4: look Nick, This is.
Speaker 3: Very weird, strange, bizarre, particularly because the Minister for Women
Speaker 3: who was there, Shannon Fentamen, she can't even define what
Speaker 3: a woman is.
Speaker 4: She doesn't know.
Speaker 3: She claims it's someone who identifies as a woman.
Speaker 4: But never mind, they've got your back if you are
Speaker 4: a woman. Apparently, what are they trying to do here?
Speaker 6: Who came up with that idea of let's find them
Speaker 6: in sacma immediately? I mean, so crazy, isn't it. Whatever
Speaker 6: they're talking about isn't going to work with this sort
Speaker 6: of look like this. It's amateur out, but I agree.
Speaker 6: I think that they can't define a woman, then it's
Speaker 6: half for them to protect one, isn't it. And they
Speaker 6: do get down down this terrible road of gender identity,
Speaker 6: which of course is not protecting women. It's doing the
Speaker 6: very opposite. And so they're on the way out. And
Speaker 6: the more of this kind of stuff they do, the
Speaker 6: more thumping the victory for the LMP will be in
Speaker 6: the forthcoming election.
Speaker 4: Absolutely not long to go.
Speaker 3: Now, now, before we let you go, Nick, lawmakers in
Speaker 3: Mexico have approved controversial reforms that will make it the
Speaker 3: first country to.
Speaker 4: Allow voters to elect all judges.
Speaker 3: And this was hours after protesters disrupted the Senate to
Speaker 3: disrupt debate on it.
Speaker 4: Have a look at that. It was getting dangerous and violent, Nick.
Speaker 3: This country is rife with drugs and cartels, probably some
Speaker 3: of the worst of the world.
Speaker 4: How dangerous could this be? Then?
Speaker 3: I mean it makes the judicial process, the whole reform
Speaker 3: process quite compromised.
Speaker 6: Well, that's right, presuming if you start electing them, they're
Speaker 6: going to have to have campaign funds. Who's going to
Speaker 6: provide that money? Under what circumstances. It's very dodgy, doesn't it.
Speaker 6: But I think, you know, look a look at this,
Speaker 6: and I think how lucky we are. Oh yeah, we
Speaker 6: have inherited Britten, the British Westminster tradition and the.
Speaker 1: Rule of law.
Speaker 6: You know that what protects us against corrupt judges is
Speaker 6: having a sound institutions of the judiciary. And we complain
Speaker 6: about it from time to time, but it's a damn
Speaker 6: sight better than anywhere else in the world.
Speaker 3: Far better than Mexico, that's for sure, Nick Kate, great
Speaker 3: to see you. Thank you so much for joining me
Speaker 3: on the show this evening. Well, we know Carmla Harris
Speaker 3: thinks she is down with the cool kids, or of
Speaker 3: courses she says out on the streets. But will the
Speaker 3: brat vibes and memes actually translate to votes?
Speaker 4: And what about the celebrity endorsements.
Speaker 3: Taylor Swift the latest to endorse Krmala Harris for President
Speaker 3: of the United States. Joining me now is child and
Speaker 3: adolescent psychologist and Sky News contributor.
Speaker 4: Claire row Claire, good to see you.
Speaker 3: What does the Taylor Swift endorsement mean for the November election?
Speaker 3: Will it actually get young people turning out and voting
Speaker 3: for Carmela.
Speaker 7: Yeah, it's interesting, isn't it.
Speaker 8: And it's so different to our politics here where we
Speaker 8: really don't like the celebrity endorsement. I think it's seen
Speaker 8: as quite elitist by Australians, but it's a whole different
Speaker 8: ballgame over there, and this has been one of the
Speaker 8: most hotly anticipated celebrity endorsements. It's, first of all, no
Speaker 8: surprise that she's come out in support of the Democrats.
Speaker 8: She supported Biden four years ago. I think the timing
Speaker 8: of her post on Instagram, where she's got literally hundreds
Speaker 8: of millions of people following her, the timing was really interesting.
Speaker 8: It was minutes after the debate ended, where I think
Speaker 8: that Kamala Harris did slightly better than everyone expected, and
Speaker 8: so I think it will kind of do their campaign
Speaker 8: in terms of keeping momentum going.
Speaker 7: It will certainly help.
Speaker 8: I'm not sure if it will move the needle much
Speaker 8: as far as the election results, but as you said,
Speaker 8: I think what it will do is energize people to
Speaker 8: register to vote, and last time that Taylor encouraged people
Speaker 8: to do this, apparently they had thirty five thousand new
Speaker 8: registrations within a few hours, mostly of young females. So
Speaker 8: that's where she kind of sits. I think she's very smart,
Speaker 8: she's certainly not silly in the way she does it.
Speaker 8: She says, this is who I'm voting for. You go
Speaker 8: do your research and you decide. He's the link to register.
Speaker 8: And when Taylor speaks, the swift is listen, and she's.
Speaker 7: Got an army there to mobilize. So I think as far.
Speaker 8: As momentum, it will help the Democrats. I think that
Speaker 8: it will help those registrations come through of younger Americans.
Speaker 8: I'm not sure if it will play.
Speaker 7: Too much into the final election result.
Speaker 3: Yeah, and a long way to go still between now
Speaker 3: and November. Now, Anthony Albanezi has indicated he will preference
Speaker 3: increasing the minimum age when teenagers can access social media
Speaker 3: platforms to sixteen.
Speaker 4: Claire, as a child and adolescent.
Speaker 3: Psychologist, do you think that this is actually a good proposal.
Speaker 4: Yes.
Speaker 8: So, Look, this conversation has come so far, hasn't In
Speaker 8: a short period of time, I have been out on
Speaker 8: the front foot, you know, supporting the ban of social
Speaker 8: media for young children, and the question has been what
Speaker 8: age are we going to put the limit on? I
Speaker 8: think if it's thirteen or fourteen years old. It won't
Speaker 8: actually make any dent into what we're trying to do here.
Speaker 7: I don't think it's old enough.
Speaker 8: These platforms already say that you have to be thirteen
Speaker 8: years old to.
Speaker 7: Get on them.
Speaker 8: Of course, if you're younger than that, you can put
Speaker 8: in a fake birth date, and that's, you know, a
Speaker 8: parental responsibility issue. I know that other states are proposed, well,
Speaker 8: you know, between thirteen and fifteen years old, we could
Speaker 8: have parental consent. Well that's what we have now. I mean,
Speaker 8: it should be parental consent now.
Speaker 7: And so what it does it doesn't.
Speaker 8: Alleviate the pressure on parents, which is what the legislation
Speaker 8: hopefully will do. So I think it does need to
Speaker 8: be sixteen years old. And thereforeans of these thirteen fourteen
Speaker 8: year olds that are completely trapped on these social media platforms,
Speaker 8: we'll be able to have the confidence to be able
Speaker 8: to say no, it's against the law, you can't have it.
Speaker 8: But I think it needs to be sixteen. I don't
Speaker 8: think younger actually helps it all.
Speaker 4: No fair enough.
Speaker 3: Look, it's an interesting conversation. It looks like it's the
Speaker 3: momentum is there. I meanwhile, wa Senator Fatima payment has
Speaker 3: slammed the social media ban proposal and delivered her message.
Speaker 3: I've got to say, with a very bizarre and cringe speech.
Speaker 9: To the Sigmas of Australia, I say that this goofy
Speaker 9: air government have been capping, not just now but for
Speaker 9: a long time. A few of you may remember when
Speaker 9: they said there will be no phantom tax under the
Speaker 9: government I lead.
Speaker 4: They're kappa holics. They're also yappoholics.
Speaker 9: They yap NonStop about how their cost of living measures
Speaker 9: are changing lives for all Australians. Just put the fries
Speaker 9: in the bag, little bro.
Speaker 4: They tell us that they're locked in.
Speaker 9: On improving the housing situation in this country. They must
Speaker 9: have brain rot from watching too much Kaisinet and forgot
Speaker 9: about their plans to ban social media for kids under fourteen.
Speaker 9: If that becomes law, you can forgore schol emoji all
Speaker 9: about watching Juke Dennis or catching a dub with the
Speaker 9: Bros on FOURT chat.
Speaker 10: Is this Prime Minister serious?
Speaker 3: Please please make it stop, Claire. It is cringe, It
Speaker 3: is horrible, Please make it stop.
Speaker 4: What on earth is she trying to achieve here?
Speaker 8: Oh my goodness, I don't know that this is like
Speaker 8: the Raygun apology.
Speaker 7: I don't know.
Speaker 8: What is going on here. I don't know if it's
Speaker 8: because I've just celebrated a bit of a milestone birthday,
Speaker 8: so I'm clearly middle aged because I don't understand a thing.
Speaker 8: But I will tell you, as someone who works with
Speaker 8: adolescents every day, there's one thing that adolescents hate, and
Speaker 8: that's adults trying to.
Speaker 7: Be cool and use their language. It does not work.
Speaker 8: It does not certainly doesn't work in the Chamber of Parliament.
Speaker 7: And you know, I'm totally confused by the message.
Speaker 8: If she's against the social media ban as well, that's concerning.
Speaker 8: She clearly just wants kids online being able to stumble
Speaker 8: over some of these ideologies that she puts forward.
Speaker 7: But I don't understand it.
Speaker 4: No, look neither do I. It's cringe.
Speaker 3: I wish these people would stop trying to be down
Speaker 3: with the coolkins, as they say, Clara, good to have
Speaker 3: you on, Thank you so much for joining us. For
Speaker 3: still to come, Lefties Losing It plus Kosher Garda joins
Speaker 3: the show for a presidential.
Speaker 4: Debate backed check. You won't want to miss it.
Speaker 3: Now it's time for Lefties Losing it, Starting with Trump
Speaker 3: and the Haitian migrants, plus cats and dogs, and of
Speaker 3: course the alleged disappearing pets of Ohio.
Speaker 4: But make it a dance.
Speaker 5: You're eating the cat, eat the cat.
Speaker 4: The cat eating the door.
Speaker 5: Eating the cat, eat the cat, eat the cat, eating
Speaker 5: the cat. You're eating the dogs, eat the cat, eat
Speaker 5: the cat. The cat eat the cat, eat the cat.
Speaker 5: The cat, eat the cat, eat the cat.
Speaker 4: You're eating the dogs.
Speaker 5: You're eating the cat, eat the cat, Eat the cat.
Speaker 11: The cat.
Speaker 3: I mean, this is what happens when lefties have way
Speaker 3: too much time on their hands.
Speaker 4: Though, I've got to say it is quite catchy. And
Speaker 4: this next clip though, is titled it fell out of
Speaker 4: a coconut tree.
Speaker 12: If you got something to say something, if you do
Speaker 12: something to say Donald, if you got something to say Donald,
Speaker 12: if you got something to say Donald.
Speaker 3: Yes, it is a colt, and sadly the Camela colt
Speaker 3: has turned so bitter, triggered, get exhausted, snappy. Kamla Vosa
Speaker 3: is a struggling big time. In fact, it has become
Speaker 3: a real scourge. Have a look out of my face now,
Speaker 3: now it was very rude of you. Get out of
Speaker 3: my face.
Speaker 4: You want to go to jail. Sir, ma'am, I don't
Speaker 4: really know what to call you. I'm done, police, you
Speaker 4: just insulted you. Later, well, listen here, pow. I mean
Speaker 4: you are gonna go to jail, but I can tell
Speaker 4: the police to get you. I'm vegan, so don't say that. Listen,
Speaker 4: you really get them out of my wait right now? Okay, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 4: we'll do that. You do not have a release, I
Speaker 4: will sue you. You're gonna assume them. Don't see them, man,
Speaker 4: because we're trying to I don't you.
Speaker 13: Do not have a release.
Speaker 4: If you imposed this, I will destroy you. I will
Speaker 4: destroy you. Now. That's not very lady like behavior at all?
Speaker 1: Is it?
Speaker 4: Not mindful? And certainly not demure. It's clear cuckoo Kamla.
Speaker 4: Lefties have officially cracked Kamala rhetoran. Her name is Kamala.
Speaker 2: Actually all right, calma lah like my sign cammakama law lah.
Speaker 4: I didn't know what's spelled with the comment.
Speaker 1: That's crazy is that Kamala.
Speaker 2: Obviously that she leans towards more like like a weird
Speaker 2: generals kind of like racist almost.
Speaker 4: I know I'm saying rhetoric.
Speaker 8: Stop with your rhetoric goals I mean serious like her
Speaker 8: rhetorics type.
Speaker 4: No, it's not racist. Trump is a racist. Not a
Speaker 4: racist though. You can't walk away though.
Speaker 3: But just kind of hack the truth and have a
Speaker 3: look at this second grey group.
Speaker 4: About five thousand bucks on it your money, we're.
Speaker 13: You're miss.
Speaker 4: He's the racist, He's.
Speaker 6: A felon what the liberals the January six?
Speaker 7: What happened Janary six?
Speaker 4: I'm yelling, yo, joining joining.
Speaker 7: The We're going full force.
Speaker 14: Of the lips America.
Speaker 15: Hey, yo, way, way money way.
Speaker 4: Guys, changed my mind. I'm a Kamala supporter.
Speaker 6: Way you yellow?
Speaker 4: Why the yelling and screaming, get some help?
Speaker 3: Just relax and please please send that memo to Rosio
Speaker 3: Donald Yes, poor old affected battler Rosio.
Speaker 4: Guys.
Speaker 3: I've got to say I am really worried for her
Speaker 3: because the Trump derangement syndrome.
Speaker 4: Has really really taken its toll.
Speaker 3: Now here is Rosio before the presidential debates.
Speaker 16: This is our chance to be seen and heard, respected
Speaker 16: and for once leading the way instead of following men.
Speaker 16: We followed a lot of men for a lot of years.
Speaker 16: Let's give it a try. What do you say can't
Speaker 16: get worse than of Donald Trump?
Speaker 13: Can't be worse. There's no worse than him.
Speaker 16: Dictatorship is what happens if he gets in hives, Amir.
Speaker 13: All he does is lie.
Speaker 3: It's frightening, isn't it. She's really struggling old Rosio. And
Speaker 3: here is Rosio after the debate, and yes, just letting
Speaker 3: you know, this is Rosie.
Speaker 16: At the end of this, we will have written him
Speaker 16: out of the history books and into prison where he
Speaker 16: deserves to be.
Speaker 13: Open your eyes, people, open your eyes. It's okay. We're
Speaker 13: gonna be okay. We're gonna come together as a nation.
Speaker 16: The media will have to apologize for their part in
Speaker 16: this mass hypnosis cult thing that's been going on with
Speaker 16: Donald Trump since the Celebrity Apprentice.
Speaker 13: Thank you, Mark Burnette. Hold him responsible, I really do.
Speaker 13: All right, I'm sorry, I gotta go off again. I
Speaker 13: like me with red hair, piceal.
Speaker 4: What can I say?
Speaker 3: She is now identifying as a feral cartoon, though it
Speaker 3: is better than the original, And over to the unhinged
Speaker 3: lunatics at the view.
Speaker 4: They never learn, do they?
Speaker 3: Here is Joy Behar, who is actually devoid of all joy,
Speaker 3: desperately trying to impose her warped with and obsessive views
Speaker 3: about Trump onto celebs like Usher.
Speaker 15: In this emergency that we're in.
Speaker 16: I think that the Who's artists just come out and
Speaker 16: speak for Kamala against Donald Trump because he is an
Speaker 16: existential threat to the country.
Speaker 4: What do you say to that.
Speaker 13: You know what.
Speaker 14: I don't get too deep into politics. I didn't get
Speaker 14: a chance to watch the debate last night. I obviously
Speaker 14: have been watching like everybody else. I think voting is
Speaker 14: an individual choice. I think that you're right. You have
Speaker 14: to look at the reality of the country that we
Speaker 14: are and the country that we want to be. The
Speaker 14: candidate that you feel both are.
Speaker 4: Who fits the.
Speaker 14: Category of where we want to be, and that's what
Speaker 14: you vote based off of who you highlight and how
Speaker 14: you choose to highlight it on whatever platform you have
Speaker 14: is your prerogative.
Speaker 4: Yeah, you got her on that one.
Speaker 3: And in the words of Usher himself, when you're feeling
Speaker 3: hate the same and your body don't want to got
Speaker 3: to let it go and let it burn.
Speaker 4: Joy, Please let it burn.
Speaker 3: Let's unpack The chronic debate live pedaled by Kamla Harris
Speaker 3: and of course endorsed by the Woke Network Liberals over
Speaker 3: at ABC News, starting with the incorrect fact checking of
Speaker 3: Donald Trump over late term abortions.
Speaker 17: But her vice presidential pick says abortion in the ninth
Speaker 17: month is absolutely fine. He also says execution after birth,
Speaker 17: it's execution, no longer abortion because the baby is born
Speaker 17: is okay. And that's not okay with me.
Speaker 3: There is no state in this country where it is
Speaker 3: legal to kill a baby after it's born.
Speaker 1: Mount and Vice President want to get your response to
Speaker 1: President Trump.
Speaker 3: Well, according to former Virginia Governor Ralph Northam, third trimester
Speaker 3: abortions and post birth procedures happen in that state.
Speaker 18: When we talk about third trimester abortions, these are done
Speaker 18: with the consent of obviously the mother, with the consent
Speaker 18: of the physicians, more than one physician, by the way,
Speaker 18: and it's done in cases where there may be severe deformities,
Speaker 18: there may be a fetus that's non viable. So in
Speaker 18: this particular example, if a mother is in labor, I
Speaker 18: can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would
Speaker 18: be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the infant
Speaker 18: would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the
Speaker 18: family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the
Speaker 18: physicians and the mothers.
Speaker 3: And in twenty nineteen, Kamala Harris vote against emotion to
Speaker 3: give protections to babies born alive after failed abortions. Not
Speaker 3: only that, but according to the National Review, Tim Woll
Speaker 3: signed legislation that guaranteed an unqualified right to abortion up
Speaker 3: until the moment of birth and even gutted protections for
Speaker 3: children born.
Speaker 4: Alive after abortion.
Speaker 3: Joining me now is Sky News contributor Kosha Gada. Kosha,
Speaker 3: thank you so much for joining us. Look, ABC, you
Speaker 3: spent a lot of time fact checking Trump during the
Speaker 3: presidential debate, but according to this evidence, the moderators made
Speaker 3: a lot of mistakes, particularly when it comes to the
Speaker 3: issue of late term abortions.
Speaker 4: And this is a key line that Kamla is peddling
Speaker 4: out to win over women. But why is it so
Speaker 4: important that this gets corrected?
Speaker 19: Yes, then fact checked Trump, I think each times, and
Speaker 19: never fact checked her even once, including on this issue,
Speaker 19: which is a key issue for the female voard. It's
Speaker 19: actually the only issue Democrats a little bit of a
Speaker 19: structural advantage after Roby Wade. There's a lot of heated
Speaker 19: momentum around this issue, and there have been some legislation
Speaker 19: on builds in different states, including quite ruby red states
Speaker 19: that are seeing that the public has moved and is
Speaker 19: a little bit to the left of where even those
Speaker 19: deep Republican states are. So she's got the momentum on
Speaker 19: this one issue and definitely wants to play that. However,
Speaker 19: as you very correctly showed here, the left is actually
Speaker 19: very much outside of the mainstream of where most Americans are.
Speaker 19: They are generally pro choice up to the first trimester
Speaker 19: or thereabouts more or less, but not until the moment
Speaker 19: of birth. And that's kind of the point that Trump
Speaker 19: was trying to make. The moderator interjected herself and took
Speaker 19: it very literally about killing the baby, the words that
Speaker 19: he used, But as you pointed out, it's not about that.
Speaker 19: It's about giving life saving care in situations where they
Speaker 19: abortion was not successful and the baby actually is born alive.
Speaker 19: So she sort of helped Kamla Harris whitewatch that. And
Speaker 19: I think you know the reason for it with this
Speaker 19: whole debate is that they are not in the business
Speaker 19: of fleshing out where the candidates actually stand on these issues.
Speaker 19: But it's about a narrative shaping and narrative engineering. From
Speaker 19: that perspective, the moderators did their job.
Speaker 3: I've got to say one of the big issues that
Speaker 3: was raised was about Charlottesville because Kabla Harris invoked that
Speaker 3: Charlottesville right accusation and have a listen to these.
Speaker 10: Let's remember Charlottesville where there was a mob of people
Speaker 10: carrying tiki torches spewing anti Semitic hate, and what did
Speaker 10: the president then at the time say? There were fine
Speaker 10: people on each side?
Speaker 3: But this is what Donald Trump actually said at the time,
Speaker 3: And you had some.
Speaker 20: Very big people in that group, but you also had
Speaker 20: people that were very fine people on both sides. You
Speaker 20: had people in that group. Excuse me, you had people
Speaker 20: and I'm not talking about the neo Nazis and the
Speaker 20: white nationalists because they should be condemned totally, but you
Speaker 20: had many people in that group other than neo Nazis
Speaker 20: and white nationalists.
Speaker 4: Okay, Kosher.
Speaker 3: It's very important to fact check this because the Charlottesville
Speaker 3: comment was debunked a long time ago. Trump did not
Speaker 3: call neo Nazis fine people, as he's just explained there.
Speaker 3: Why are the Democrats continuing with this line though.
Speaker 19: It feels a little bit like they're looking in the
Speaker 19: rear view mirror of what some of the strategies and
Speaker 19: tactics were in past cycles. Both of the last two
Speaker 19: cycles that you could argue were a little bit successful
Speaker 19: against Trump, at least in twenty twenty. But to your point,
Speaker 19: this story is so old nobody cares about it really anymore,
Speaker 19: in terms not that what happened that day wasn't something
Speaker 19: that people care about, but in terms of how it
Speaker 19: relates to why they're making their choice for who they
Speaker 19: want to vote for in this current election. And it
Speaker 19: has been debunked, including by very left leaning or left
Speaker 19: friendly outlets like Snopes.
Speaker 1: That's one that people point to.
Speaker 19: President Trump didn't do himself any favors, and how he
Speaker 19: rebutted that in the debate because he pointed to people
Speaker 19: like Laura Ingram and Sean Hannity as those who debunked it.
Speaker 19: He should have pointed to Snopes, but leaving out where
Speaker 19: it may Aside from that, many people have debunked this,
Speaker 19: and I think they keep doing it because it fits
Speaker 19: into again that narrative engineering of casting him as this bigoted,
Speaker 19: horrible person who thinks of they're refined people on the
Speaker 19: other side, And I think they're going to continue to
Speaker 19: run with that in the sixty days that we had left.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's a long time to go to keep peddling
Speaker 3: the same lines, isn't it. But look, Kamala also repeated
Speaker 3: this blood barth hoax and claimed that Trump said that
Speaker 3: there will be a blood bath if he's not elected.
Speaker 4: This is her at the debate.
Speaker 10: And be clear on that point, Donald Trump, the candidate,
Speaker 10: has said in this election, there will be a bloodbath
Speaker 10: if this and the outcome of this election is not
Speaker 10: to his liking.
Speaker 3: But if she'd actually listened to the full clip, it
Speaker 3: shows that Donald Trump was referring, in fact, to the
Speaker 3: auto industry.
Speaker 21: China now is building a couple of massive plans where
Speaker 21: they're going to build the cars that met ago and
Speaker 21: think they think that they're going to sell those cars
Speaker 21: into the United States with no tax at the border.
Speaker 21: Let me tell you something to China, you think you're
Speaker 21: going to get that, you're going to not hire Americans
Speaker 21: and you're going to sell the cars. Now, We're going
Speaker 21: to put a one hundred percent tower for in every
Speaker 21: single car that comes across the line, and you're not
Speaker 21: going to be able to sell those guys.
Speaker 13: If I get elected.
Speaker 20: Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be
Speaker 20: a bloodbath.
Speaker 4: Kosher.
Speaker 3: I think it's really important to make the distinction here.
Speaker 3: Kamla is basically implying violence. But as Donald Trump's tried
Speaker 3: to explain, he says he was talking about the Democrats
Speaker 3: destroying the auto industry.
Speaker 4: That's two very different scenarios.
Speaker 1: Completely different.
Speaker 19: So this day and age that we live in of
Speaker 19: constant twenty four to seven news and things get chopped
Speaker 19: up and clipped and you can just take one sentence
Speaker 19: out of context and circulate it. The good news is
Speaker 19: is that it cuts both ways. So while in that
Speaker 19: debate those things went unchecked, the fact of the matter
Speaker 19: is about sixty five million people viewed that debate. Most
Speaker 19: the vast majority of them are decided. They are very
Speaker 19: few undecided voters left who haven't heard these things. Maybe
Speaker 19: so ok did play a role with them, but for
Speaker 19: everybody else in the aftermath and the days and weeks
Speaker 19: that followed, this kind of stuff will get checked and
Speaker 19: corrected on X on programs like this one, on various
Speaker 19: other outlets in the independent media sphere, primarily, and I
Speaker 19: do think at the end of the day, when it
Speaker 19: washes through. That line of attack about who Trump is
Speaker 19: just doesn't land anymore. Everybody knows who he is from
Speaker 19: a character perspective, and it's really going to come down
Speaker 19: to the things that matter to people the economy, inflation, immigration,
Speaker 19: et cetera.
Speaker 1: And I think all of this is going to wash through.
Speaker 3: Yeah, look, I think that's an absolutely fair comment, but
Speaker 3: this one blew my mind though. This was a very
Speaker 3: start contrasting comments. There was a comment made at the
Speaker 3: debate by Kamala Harris about Donald Trump's plans for IVF
Speaker 3: treatment for families.
Speaker 10: This is what she said, And understand what has been
Speaker 10: happening under Donald Trump's abortion bands, couples who pray and
Speaker 10: dream of having a family are being denied IVF treatments.
Speaker 3: Now, that just does not quite sound like what Donald
Speaker 3: Trump has actually previously announced about IVF.
Speaker 22: This is what he said, under the Trump administration, your
Speaker 22: government will pay for or your insurance company will be
Speaker 22: mandated to pay for all.
Speaker 17: Costs associated with IVF treatment fertilization for women.
Speaker 14: IVF treat.
Speaker 17: Because we want more babies.
Speaker 4: To put it very nicely.
Speaker 3: So, coach, we've got a situation where Donald Trump's actually
Speaker 3: announced free IVF treatment for women. So where on earth
Speaker 3: is Kamala Harris getting this claim that he's denying couple's
Speaker 3: IVF treatment from?
Speaker 19: Yeah, that one was probably one of the more egregious
Speaker 19: things that sort of just seems to have been made
Speaker 19: up out of thin air, you know. I think where
Speaker 19: it comes to is back to that point around abortion
Speaker 19: and more broadly reproductive rights is how they frame it
Speaker 19: because they're very good at kind of the linguistic games
Speaker 19: and reframing things. That's an issue where broadly Democrats are
Speaker 19: a little bit ahead in the polls with the women,
Speaker 19: especially in swing state votes, and so what they try
Speaker 19: to do is conflate anything under that umbrella term of
Speaker 19: reproductive rights. It could be abortion, it could be IVF,
Speaker 19: it could be anything in between, and they're trying to
Speaker 19: say for all of that stuff, the Republican Party and
Speaker 19: Trump are against you and against your reproductive rights.
Speaker 1: I think he is.
Speaker 19: Onto that, and that's why he announced that program about
Speaker 19: government funded IVF, which, by the way, many people in
Speaker 19: the Republican Party didn't like because of the fiscal conservatives.
Speaker 19: They are like, well, how are you going to pay
Speaker 19: for that? How are you going to execute it? He
Speaker 19: even got some criticism from his own side for it.
Speaker 19: But the reason he did that is to try and
Speaker 19: create that fracturing under this notion of reproductive rights.
Speaker 1: And it's very different.
Speaker 19: And when you talk about IBF and being pro fertility
Speaker 19: and pro birth, which he in the Republican Party typically is,
Speaker 19: it's very different from do stand for late term abortion
Speaker 19: in the ninth month. And he's trying to separate that.
Speaker 19: She's trying to conflate it altogether. And it's going to
Speaker 19: be up to the voters to hut through that noise
Speaker 19: and figure out where book candidates stand.
Speaker 3: Well, I mean, it's just such stark differences in the
Speaker 3: comments made is extraordinary. Now I've got to talk to
Speaker 3: you about Project twenty twenty five. The Democrats seem to
Speaker 3: be obsessed with talking about it. They're constantly pedaling out
Speaker 3: these theories and claims about it.
Speaker 4: This is Kamala Harris's take.
Speaker 10: What you're going to hear tonight is a detailed and
Speaker 10: dangerous plan called Project twenty twenty five that the former
Speaker 10: president intends on implementing if he were elected to gain.
Speaker 3: And this is the reality which was actually reported by
Speaker 3: the left leaning see it.
Speaker 2: N Trump did not write Project twenty twenty five. The
Speaker 2: project's big policy document, published by the Heritage Foundation think tank,
Speaker 2: lists dozens of people as authors, editors, contributors.
Speaker 4: Donald Trump is not among them. Yeah, there you Goven.
Speaker 3: The liberal media say it, but even the former director
Speaker 3: of Project twenty and twenty five says Trump had nothing
Speaker 3: to do with it.
Speaker 22: Trump has nothing to do with Project twenty twenty five. Sure,
Speaker 22: a lot of us have worked in the ad and
Speaker 22: it came together, but this started long before he even
Speaker 22: announced for president.
Speaker 4: Kosher.
Speaker 3: Why are the Democrats desperately trying to link Trump to
Speaker 3: Project two thousand and twenty five. It's constant. We've been
Speaker 3: hearing this now for months. This is one of their
Speaker 3: key attack lines.
Speaker 19: Why you know, I think back to that narrative shaping
Speaker 19: and engineering. It feels like something ominous like Project twenty
Speaker 19: twenty five. I've had people refer to it as Manifesto
Speaker 19: twenty twenty five, things like that. It's some sort of
Speaker 19: thing that could be evil. I think also, it's really
Speaker 19: wonky because nobody's going to sit there and read a
Speaker 19: nine hundred page document, which is what it is. Most
Speaker 19: people who are living their lives, so it's easy to
Speaker 19: sort of just create an nuendo and suggests that it's
Speaker 19: a really radical agenda and if you vote for him,
Speaker 19: he's going to implement that agenda and it's a threat
Speaker 19: to democracy. So all these sort of high level platitudes
Speaker 19: hoping that that message trickles down and scares the few
Speaker 19: people that are still undecided to not vote for Trump.
Speaker 19: I think that's the strategy as opposed to articulating what
Speaker 19: your own strategy is. That's something that we have not
Speaker 19: seen a lot of from that side. And it's going
Speaker 19: to be really amazing to see how this selection turns
Speaker 19: out despite that, because you've got just narrative engineering versus
Speaker 19: actual policies. That's really what the selection is coming down to.
Speaker 19: And it's quite scary when you think about it in
Speaker 19: those terms.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it certainly is. Look, let's talk now about fracking.
Speaker 3: We've got to go here because Kamala Harris, her flip
Speaker 3: flopping on this matter is enough.
Speaker 4: To give you whiplash. Here she was at the debate.
Speaker 10: I will not band fracking. I have not banned fracking
Speaker 10: as Vice President of the United States, and in fact,
Speaker 10: I was the tie breaking vote on the Inflation Reduction
Speaker 10: Act which opened newly for.
Speaker 3: Fracking, and let's que that infamous twenty nineteen tape.
Speaker 23: Will you commit to implementing a federal ban on fracking
Speaker 23: your first day in office? Adding the United States to
Speaker 23: the list of countries who have banned this devastating practice.
Speaker 10: There's no question I'm in favor of banning fracking.
Speaker 4: So yeah, kosher.
Speaker 3: It's tying her up in knots this fracking issue. It's
Speaker 3: another word salad by by a Kamala Harris. But the
Speaker 3: problem is is as well that ABC News failed to
Speaker 3: pick her up on that. She has changed her mind
Speaker 3: so many times, but where was ABC News.
Speaker 19: Yes, for their goal of propping her up and giving
Speaker 19: her a boost, they did exactly what they should have
Speaker 19: done and fulfilled their duty because their goal is not
Speaker 19: to check her on that.
Speaker 1: But the fracking one.
Speaker 19: Is so egregious because they are actual, direct sound bites
Speaker 19: like you just played of her seeing one thing and
Speaker 19: now seeing another.
Speaker 1: And that's fine.
Speaker 19: People involve their positions. She's allowed to evolve her position
Speaker 19: if it were true. And the way to get to that,
Speaker 19: because very few people believe that it is true, is
Speaker 19: to probe her a little bit more about why did
Speaker 19: you change your mind, you know, did you see some
Speaker 19: new information that led you to do that? Is there
Speaker 19: something that you came across that led you to believe
Speaker 19: your thinking was wrong before nobody's done that. Dana Bash
Speaker 19: sort of did a little bit in the CNN interview.
Speaker 19: But this one I don't think is working with what
Speaker 19: she's doing, because this goes straight to Pennsylvania, which is
Speaker 19: on the critical path for her. Especially Pennsylvania runs through
Speaker 19: every path to victory for her based on how she's polling.
Speaker 19: She knows that, and I just don't know that the
Speaker 19: coal miners and the people that are directly affected from
Speaker 19: this in Pennsylvania are buying that her change of heart
Speaker 19: is genuine.
Speaker 1: Remains to be seen, but she clearly.
Speaker 19: Knows that she has to say what she's saying now,
Speaker 19: and she's going to keep doing it for the next
Speaker 19: sixty days, notwithstanding the many video clips of her out
Speaker 19: there saying the opposite of her past.
Speaker 3: Yeah, the many words salad clips that are doing the rounds.
Speaker 3: I want to talk to you about performance polling. According
Speaker 3: to a CNN poll, sixty three percent of voters believe
Speaker 3: Kamala Harris turned in a better performance prior to the debate,
Speaker 3: the same voters were actually evenly split on which candidate
Speaker 3: would do better, so it was fifty percent Harris and
Speaker 3: fifty percent Trump, Whereas dials monitoring the reaction of a
Speaker 3: Fox News focus group during the debate showed that independent
Speaker 3: voters overlapping with Republicans in support of Trump's immigration policies.
Speaker 3: In particular, it says the focus group comprised seven Democrats,
Speaker 3: five independents, and five Republicans and was represented by blue, yellow,
Speaker 3: and red lines, respectively. When Trump spoke of the rising
Speaker 3: crime at the hands of illegal immigrants, the yellow line
Speaker 3: monitoring the independent reaction rose drastically in Trump's favor, overlapping
Speaker 3: with the red Republican line. That itself is very telling, kosher,
Speaker 3: how do you read this result?
Speaker 19: You know, I would question everybody to take these focus
Speaker 19: groups with the green of soil just because there are
Speaker 19: a snapshot in a moment of time. They're anecdotal, they're
Speaker 19: not statistically significant, so you know, taking it in context,
Speaker 19: that said, this seems to be what's emerging, and we'll
Speaker 19: see it in the next week when those anecdotes can
Speaker 19: actually turn into data. That there seems to be a
Speaker 19: bit of a paradox here where from a performance perspective,
Speaker 19: I think it is widely regarded that Kamala did better.
Speaker 19: A lot of Trump supporters that I know are quite
Speaker 19: disappointed actually with him because he can be on message.
Speaker 19: We've seen him do that and he wasn't yesterday. But
Speaker 19: it's not translating through into how people see her. Did
Speaker 19: she earn more trust from those undecided? Did she actually
Speaker 19: change anybody's mind if someone who was on the fence
Speaker 19: voting for her, you're not seeing that in this focus group.
Speaker 19: And if that holds through, I think it's a reflection
Speaker 19: of Okay, maybe she was more polished and she put
Speaker 19: on a good performance and met the bar that was
Speaker 19: for her where she didn't completely fall over. She did better,
Speaker 19: but she's not Actually it wasn't a knockout blow where
Speaker 19: she's winning hearts and minds. And it also, I think
Speaker 19: is a reflection of just the irrelevance increasingly of these
Speaker 19: debates on mainstream media news outlets, where nobody cares or
Speaker 19: trusts you know what the outcome was or what the
Speaker 19: respective performances were if it doesn't translate to their votes,
Speaker 19: which is ultimately all that matters.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's a really fair point, Kosha Gata, appreciate your time.
Speaker 3: Thank you so much for joining us this evening, or
Speaker 3: do stay with us Coming.
Speaker 4: Up after the break.
Speaker 3: Celebrities react to the presidential debate and King Child break
Speaker 3: standard royal procedure for a hum Kinsey Schofield joins me next.
Speaker 4: Welcome back, joining me now.
Speaker 3: With celebrity and royal reporter Kinsey Schofield. Kinsey, thanks for
Speaker 3: joining us. Let's start with the reaction to the presidential
Speaker 3: debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump.
Speaker 4: What are celebrity is saying about it?
Speaker 11: Will you have your usual suspects chaming in and taking digs?
Speaker 11: But Middler tweeted she won, case closed, Bravo, and actor
Speaker 11: Mark Ruffalo tweeted, Honestly, I was anxious about this debate,
Speaker 11: but what is clear is that Kamala not only has
Speaker 11: a vision for the future and lifting America up, but
Speaker 11: she is just so much even tempered and so much
Speaker 11: smarter than Trump.
Speaker 15: She crushed him. We've got one hit, wonder.
Speaker 11: Mark Hamill, Luke Skywalker taking swipes at Trump. I'd love
Speaker 11: to send him to a galaxy.
Speaker 15: Far far away.
Speaker 11: But most damaging, without a doubt, was Taylor Swift's reaction,
Speaker 11: Taylor Swift endorsing Kamala Harris for all of the childless
Speaker 11: cat ladies out there.
Speaker 3: Yeah, that was an interesting sign out that she put there. Look,
Speaker 3: there's still a long way to go, Kinsey between now
Speaker 3: in November, so we will see whether or not Taylor
Speaker 3: Swift's influence will materialize to get young people out of
Speaker 3: voting remains to be seen.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 3: Dree Barrymore cringe not a fan of her interview style,
Speaker 3: but she has spoken out about that. In fact cringe
Speaker 3: interview that she had with Kamala Harris.
Speaker 4: Remember this a shocking moment.
Speaker 10: You have that one mother and I'm the second mother.
Speaker 15: Mamala, Right, Mamala, we all need a mom.
Speaker 14: I've been thinking that we really all need a tremendous
Speaker 14: hug in the world right now. But in our country,
Speaker 14: we need you to be Mamla of the country.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: No matter how many times I have seen a Kinsey,
Speaker 3: it still sends shivers up my spine the word Mamala.
Speaker 3: But what's Drew Barrymore now had to say about that
Speaker 3: infamous interview.
Speaker 11: I mean, unfortunately, I think she's completely oblivious to the
Speaker 11: fact that our body is rejecting what we just witnessed
Speaker 11: right now. You know, she just said that it was
Speaker 11: her scariest interview and that she was very concerned about
Speaker 11: putting Kamala in a negative light. That she really kind
Speaker 11: of worked her way around that interview trying to ensure
Speaker 11: that Kamala would come out nice and clean and squeaky
Speaker 11: clean on the other side, because as you know, it's
Speaker 11: very hard to get Kamala to sit down for an interview.
Speaker 11: And you know, that's just how annoying that Drew Barrymore
Speaker 11: tiptoed around this woman when we're supposed to try her
Speaker 11: to run our country. Drew Barrymore should be giving us
Speaker 11: some authenticity.
Speaker 3: Yeah, she totally blew it. She reaches quite a big audience,
Speaker 3: Drew Barrymore. So this would have been an actual prime
Speaker 3: opportunity to ask some serious questions, and she blew it
Speaker 3: and it will forever go down as a shocking interview.
Speaker 3: We were just talking there about Taylor Swift's endorsement of
Speaker 3: Kamala Harris. But we've actually had some reaction from Donald
Speaker 3: Trump about this endorsement.
Speaker 4: How's he taking it? What does he think about it?
Speaker 11: Well, Trump said he wasn't even a Taylor Swift fan
Speaker 11: and didn't want her endorsement anyway. Joking well, I actually
Speaker 11: like missus Mahomes much better, which is Taylor's friend, Britney Mahomes.
Speaker 11: Their Brittany's husband and Taylor's boyfriend, both Chiefs football players.
Speaker 11: But we know that this was sour grapes because we
Speaker 11: saw Trump a few weeks ago post to AI images
Speaker 11: of Taylor endorsing him. This is just his personality and
Speaker 11: I I get a huge kick out of him, but
Speaker 11: I'm sure that it did kind of hurt.
Speaker 15: His feelings that Taylor Swift didn't endorse him. But you
Speaker 15: know what, who needs Taylor Swift?
Speaker 4: Look, who needs Taylor Swift? Trun Trump runs rings around people.
Speaker 4: He goes for it himself.
Speaker 3: He doesn't need all these celebrity endorsements, so I don't
Speaker 3: think for him it really matters. Look, speaking of Taylor Swift,
Speaker 3: I think the relationship between her and Travis Kelcey there
Speaker 3: it's just becoming more and more cringe. But it would
Speaker 3: particularly cringe at the US Open when they both were embracing,
Speaker 3: looking very awkward, belting out their rock song. I believe
Speaker 3: it a thing called love by the darkness now this
Speaker 3: vision has gone viral, Kinsey, But how to know?
Speaker 4: Do you think it was too much?
Speaker 15: Absolutely?
Speaker 1: It was.
Speaker 15: You know, I'm going to tell you something.
Speaker 11: Every week I come on here and reader asks me
Speaker 11: when I'm going to turn in my Swifty card, and
Speaker 11: it's here. It's now. I'm absolutely done. I will not
Speaker 11: be listening to any Taylor Swift songs. I'm changing my
Speaker 11: ring tone. No more erastour for me. I just can't
Speaker 11: deal with it. It's just it gives off an air
Speaker 11: of desperation, like we get it, guys, you are in love.
Speaker 11: Sometimes I watch it and I think, is she trying
Speaker 11: to show her ex boyfriend who is so secretive the actor?
Speaker 11: Is she trying to show him what he's missing? And
Speaker 11: that just feels kind of.
Speaker 15: Gross for a thirty year old woman. You're an adult.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you spot on, Kinsey, and I'm glad that you're
Speaker 3: saying the light with Tyler Swift here because it's just
Speaker 3: gone on a whole other direction. Not a fan, not Kine.
Speaker 3: It's just getting too much. Now let's pivot and talk
Speaker 3: about the Royals, because King Charles has met the New
Speaker 3: Zealand women's rugby union team, the Black ferns. Now they
Speaker 3: asked the King for a hug, and then this is
Speaker 3: what happened, Kinsey.
Speaker 4: I'm gonna say, I really really love this.
Speaker 11: It's a start contrast from the racist royal family that
Speaker 11: refuses to hug that Meghan Markle won't stop complaining about.
Speaker 11: I think the King looks awfully cuddly there. He looked
Speaker 11: I just flirt alert. He loved that attention and he
Speaker 11: I mean, you could just tell he was so happy
Speaker 11: to be there and so happy to embrace them.
Speaker 15: What a sweet man.
Speaker 11: And it completely contradicts the complaints we've heard from Meghan
Speaker 11: Markle over the last four years. These people have heart,
Speaker 11: These people care about their subjects, and these people they
Speaker 11: know how to love.
Speaker 4: They love, they know how to love. They do love.
Speaker 3: And I'm going to ask you, Kinsey. It's also good
Speaker 3: to see him laughing and smiling. And that was also
Speaker 3: breaking royal protocol, I've got to say, because normally you're
Speaker 3: not allowed to touch the royals. But it's good to
Speaker 3: see him back out there after that cancer diagnosis. And
Speaker 3: don't you think he looked right at home back where
Speaker 3: he belongs.
Speaker 4: Very comfortable.
Speaker 11: Absolutely, And it's my understanding that he really wants to
Speaker 11: be out there much more than he is right now,
Speaker 11: so he is pushing it to the limit.
Speaker 15: And you've got Queen Camilla saying.
Speaker 11: You need to get back home, get back home, get
Speaker 11: over here, and you know he's in his element. He
Speaker 11: waited so long for this moment and he is just
Speaker 11: really enjoying it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, you can really tell. Kinsey Schofield, good to speak
Speaker 3: with you. Thank you very much for joining us on
Speaker 3: the show this evening. Well that's it from me.
Speaker 4: Up next is news Night, good Night.