WEBVTT - The Rita Panahi Show | 12 September

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:04.479
<v Speaker 1>On scolds Austrodia.

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 2>This is the Reader Panalty Show.

0:00:08.600 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Good evening and welcome to the Rita Panekey Show. I'm

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Danikiti Giorgio coming up tonight. The boss of nine Entertainment

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 3>calls it quits as the company deals with the fallout

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 3>from bullying and harassment complaints.

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 4>Nick Cata will give us his take.

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 3>Taylor Swift endorses Karmala Harris, but will it actually get

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 3>young people voting? Clairo joins us to break it down.

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Kosha Gada will debunk all of Kamala Harris's lives during

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 3>the presidential debate. The King embraces New Zealand's women's rugby team.

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Kinsey Schofield will show us the viral vision and of

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 3>course Lefty's losing it, including the alleged disappearing.

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 4>Pets of Ohio musical edition.

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 5>You're Eating the Cats, eat the cat eating the eating

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 5>You're eating the cats eat the cat eating the zogs.

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 3>Joining me now is Mensi's Research Center Senior Fellow, Nick

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 3>cat Nick. Great to have you on. Thank you so

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 3>much for joining me. I want to start with that

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 3>breaking news that Nine's executive Nine's Entertainment's chief executive Mike Sneezeby.

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 4>He has today called it quits.

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 3>He's standing down and will leave the media company at

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:23.119
<v Speaker 3>the end of the month. Nick, I feel like this

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 3>is a long time coming. The company, of course, has

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 3>been in some turmoil for the last few months.

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 4>Are you surprised at all by his decision?

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 6>Not one iota. I'm surprised it wasn't sooner, actually, because

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.559
<v Speaker 6>it's very tough in the media game at the moment,

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 6>as do you know, as people at Sky I know,

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:42.320
<v Speaker 6>as anybody involved in commercial media knows, it's a very

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 6>tough environment and the business model is changing. But I

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 6>think nine has really accelerated the decline of a once

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 6>grade station by failing to deal with some very basic

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 6>issues of bullying which should have been stamped on very

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 6>early on. And I thought the the ultimate sin for

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 6>or for Sneezeby was when he went to the Parish

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 6>Olympics and decided it was a good idea to run

0:02:03.920 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 6>with a torch at the same time they were laying

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.519
<v Speaker 6>off staff back in Sydney and expecting people to tighten

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 6>their belts. It was incredibly poor management, incredibly poorly judged,

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 6>incredibly self indulgent. And if that's any indication of the

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 6>way the man's been running the organization, I'd be saying

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 6>they're better off without him.

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, absolutely, I mean the optics of that.

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 3>When the company's in turmol and you're trotting about Paris

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 3>with the Olympic flame, it just doesn't work. Now, look,

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:31.959
<v Speaker 3>let's talk about the anti Israel and anti war protests

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 3>in Melbourne. As we know, that city was unrecognizable yesterday

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 3>as these idiots ran riot. They were back at it

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 3>again today, but certainly not to the extent it.

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 4>Appears as we saw yesterday.

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Nick, I've got to say it's very telling the Greens

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 3>did not back the police response, despite the fact that

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 3>the police were being pelted with horsepoo, acid canned food.

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 4>It was appalling.

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 3>And yet the Victorian Greens are calling for an independent

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 3>inquiry into the use of force by police.

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 6>Can you believe which inquiring of the use of horsemen

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 6>who protested. Now, it's appalling behavior. They've really crossed over

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 6>the crossed over the line here well. And truly, anybody

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 6>who thinks that that is a legitimate way to protest

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 6>any cause, whatever their cause of the day might be,

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 6>it plainly is not. And plainly the police, I thought,

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 6>compared to the way they treated some of the COVID demonstrations,

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 6>were very restrained, possibly too restrained from my liking. Actually,

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:31.519
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I think the police had every right to

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 6>end this as they did, and I every right to

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 6>come down hard on the protesters who were as you know,

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 6>they were blindfolded. They were deliberately trying to hide their

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 6>identity as they deliberately went out to break the law

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 6>and cause violence and danger and disrupt the city. There's

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 6>no words really strong enough to condemn these absolute idiots.

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 6>And they're certainly not winning any friends for their cause,

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 6>aren't they. I mean, who's going to they suddenly going

0:03:57.400 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 6>to persuade us that we've got to support I don't

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 6>know what is it today, Palestinians or whatever, because this behavior, no,

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 6>of course not, and that's not what they're trying to do.

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 6>They're just making an exhibition of themselves. This is performative demonstrating.

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 3>It's embarrassing, and they are feral. I mean that they're

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 3>just they're out of control.

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Look, speaking of the Greens, one of their MP's, Gabrielle

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 3>de Vietri, blew off parliament to attend one of those

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 3>anti war protests this week, and she is the same

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 3>one that got suspended for posting a selfie to social

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 3>media in support of a climate protest, forcing Parliament over

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 3>there to be adjourned.

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 4>Nick.

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Look, it's become clearer the Greens are the MPs. They're

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 3>they're not really politicians, they're activists. They're in there for

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 3>their own their own self worth. They don't actually care.

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 4>About the people they're supposed to be representing.

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 6>If you have the privilege of being elected as a

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 6>member of Parliament, then you have a platform and a

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 6>voice and you're able to execute real change within the

0:04:56.880 --> 0:05:00.159
<v Speaker 6>democratic system. That she had to step outside of it

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 6>and join the lawless mob on the street shows that

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 6>she's not serious. She's not serious about her job. She's

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 6>not serious about the way our democracy works or negotiating

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 6>things with other people who might disagree with her. And

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 6>that's I think the frightening thing about what we're seeing

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 6>in the Greens, particularly but in others too, that they

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 6>just they're not prepared to have a debate. It's their

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 6>way or the highway, and I'm sorry, that's not democracy

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 6>as we understand it.

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that looks I've.

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 3>Got to stick with the Greens because today they are

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:31.440
<v Speaker 3>calling for companies found guilty of price gouging on essential

0:05:31.480 --> 0:05:34.359
<v Speaker 3>products and services like rent to energy and groceries to

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 3>be hit with a maximum penalty of fifty million dollars.

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 3>What are your thoughts on this plan, Nickel, A total

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:41.359
<v Speaker 3>at work.

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 6>It's bonkers economics, that's what it is. Everybody knows, you know.

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 6>Any sort of price control like that, it's not going

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 6>to work. I mean, the best way to get prices

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 6>down is more competition in the market. There is a

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 6>lot of competition in the grocery sector, by the way,

0:05:56.720 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 6>and it's a very keenly fort business. I had a

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 6>email from somebody who's run pubs in Adelaide the other

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 6>day sending me his electricity bill this July as opposed

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 6>to last July, and in some of his pubs it

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 6>is almost double, so you know, and same goes to supermarkets.

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 6>They're paying more for their fridges, they're paying more for

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 6>the diesel that gets the stuff to the supermarkets. So

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 6>I have some sympathy for them. And it's up to

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 6>the government to tackle inflation at the proper level, which

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 6>is to start with their own spending and that will

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 6>start bringing the kind of relief that everybody seeks in supermarkets,

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 6>not this sort of It's the sort of thing you'd

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 6>see out of a command economy, isn't it like the

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 6>Soviet Union. It's ridiculous, It doesn't work and it shouldn't

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:39.559
<v Speaker 6>be tried.

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 3>More thought bubble politics by the Greens as always. Now

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.720
<v Speaker 3>we know, of course that the King and Queen will

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 3>be coming down Under in October, but the King has

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 3>canceled the walkabouts from his Australian tour to avoid offending

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 3>indigenous communities. Instead, the official itinery of the King and

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Queen will replace the Royal walk about with an opportunity

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 3>to meet the public.

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 4>Nick.

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 3>I think this personally is ridiculous. Now you're not allowed

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 3>to say walk about when you're referring to a meet

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 3>and greet with the royal family, even though the UK

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 3>actually still uses the walk about term.

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 4>When where does it end?

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 6>He's a sensitive soul, isn't here. I really thought this

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 6>was a problem. I mean, people come up through the

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 6>street and say, you know, he's calling it a walk about. No,

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 6>it's an entirely made up problem. But the important thing

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 6>is he's going to be here, and I don't care

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 6>what he calls it. If I get a chance to

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 6>stand in the crowd and just near the King, who

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 6>I think is doing a magnificent job of uniting his

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 6>country and hopefully ours two, I will do so. I

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 6>don't care what he calls it.

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 4>No neither, And I too have the utmost respect for

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 4>the King and Queen.

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 3>And the monarchy. But I've got to say this is

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 3>a shaka.

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 4>Nick.

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Now let's talk about Queensland Premier Stephen Miles. He has

0:07:56.520 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 3>really outdone himself, this time posting a bizarre video to

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 3>social media captioned gangs all here.

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 4>To protect women in Queensland. Have a look at this

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 4>look Nick, This is.

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Very weird, strange, bizarre, particularly because the Minister for Women

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 3>who was there, Shannon Fentamen, she can't even define what

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 3>a woman is.

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 4>She doesn't know.

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 3>She claims it's someone who identifies as a woman.

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 4>But never mind, they've got your back if you are

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 4>a woman. Apparently, what are they trying to do here?

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 6>Who came up with that idea of let's find them

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 6>in sacma immediately? I mean, so crazy, isn't it. Whatever

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 6>they're talking about isn't going to work with this sort

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 6>of look like this. It's amateur out, but I agree.

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 6>I think that they can't define a woman, then it's

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 6>half for them to protect one, isn't it. And they

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 6>do get down down this terrible road of gender identity,

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 6>which of course is not protecting women. It's doing the

0:08:56.240 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 6>very opposite. And so they're on the way out. And

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 6>the more of this kind of stuff they do, the

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 6>more thumping the victory for the LMP will be in

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 6>the forthcoming election.

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:09.439
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely not long to go.

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Now, now, before we let you go, Nick, lawmakers in

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Mexico have approved controversial reforms that will make it the

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 3>first country to.

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 4>Allow voters to elect all judges.

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 3>And this was hours after protesters disrupted the Senate to

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 3>disrupt debate on it.

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 4>Have a look at that. It was getting dangerous and violent, Nick.

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 3>This country is rife with drugs and cartels, probably some

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 3>of the worst of the world.

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 4>How dangerous could this be? Then?

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean it makes the judicial process, the whole reform

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:38.599
<v Speaker 3>process quite compromised.

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 6>Well, that's right, presuming if you start electing them, they're

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 6>going to have to have campaign funds. Who's going to

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 6>provide that money? Under what circumstances. It's very dodgy, doesn't it.

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 6>But I think, you know, look a look at this,

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 6>and I think how lucky we are. Oh yeah, we

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 6>have inherited Britten, the British Westminster tradition and the.

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Rule of law.

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 6>You know that what protects us against corrupt judges is

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 6>having a sound institutions of the judiciary. And we complain

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 6>about it from time to time, but it's a damn

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 6>sight better than anywhere else in the world.

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Far better than Mexico, that's for sure, Nick Kate, great

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 3>to see you. Thank you so much for joining me

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 3>on the show this evening. Well, we know Carmla Harris

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 3>thinks she is down with the cool kids, or of

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 3>courses she says out on the streets. But will the

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.559
<v Speaker 3>brat vibes and memes actually translate to votes?

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 4>And what about the celebrity endorsements.

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Taylor Swift the latest to endorse Krmala Harris for President

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 3>of the United States. Joining me now is child and

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 3>adolescent psychologist and Sky News contributor.

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 4>Claire row Claire, good to see you.

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 3>What does the Taylor Swift endorsement mean for the November election?

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Will it actually get young people turning out and voting

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 3>for Carmela.

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's interesting, isn't it.

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 8>And it's so different to our politics here where we

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 8>really don't like the celebrity endorsement. I think it's seen

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:04.199
<v Speaker 8>as quite elitist by Australians, but it's a whole different

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 8>ballgame over there, and this has been one of the

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 8>most hotly anticipated celebrity endorsements. It's, first of all, no

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 8>surprise that she's come out in support of the Democrats.

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:19.119
<v Speaker 8>She supported Biden four years ago. I think the timing

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 8>of her post on Instagram, where she's got literally hundreds

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 8>of millions of people following her, the timing was really interesting.

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 8>It was minutes after the debate ended, where I think

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 8>that Kamala Harris did slightly better than everyone expected, and

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 8>so I think it will kind of do their campaign

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 8>in terms of keeping momentum going.

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 7>It will certainly help.

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 8>I'm not sure if it will move the needle much

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 8>as far as the election results, but as you said,

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 8>I think what it will do is energize people to

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 8>register to vote, and last time that Taylor encouraged people

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 8>to do this, apparently they had thirty five thousand new

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 8>registrations within a few hours, mostly of young females. So

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 8>that's where she kind of sits. I think she's very smart,

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 8>she's certainly not silly in the way she does it.

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 8>She says, this is who I'm voting for. You go

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 8>do your research and you decide. He's the link to register.

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:24.359
<v Speaker 8>And when Taylor speaks, the swift is listen, and she's.

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 7>Got an army there to mobilize. So I think as far.

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 8>As momentum, it will help the Democrats. I think that

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 8>it will help those registrations come through of younger Americans.

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:38.959
<v Speaker 8>I'm not sure if it will play.

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 7>Too much into the final election result.

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and a long way to go still between now

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:48.239
<v Speaker 3>and November. Now, Anthony Albanezi has indicated he will preference

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 3>increasing the minimum age when teenagers can access social media

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 3>platforms to sixteen.

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.319
<v Speaker 4>Claire, as a child and adolescent.

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 3>Psychologist, do you think that this is actually a good proposal.

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:01.079
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:04.760
<v Speaker 8>So, Look, this conversation has come so far, hasn't In

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 8>a short period of time, I have been out on

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 8>the front foot, you know, supporting the ban of social

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 8>media for young children, and the question has been what

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 8>age are we going to put the limit on? I

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 8>think if it's thirteen or fourteen years old. It won't

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 8>actually make any dent into what we're trying to do here.

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 7>I don't think it's old enough.

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 8>These platforms already say that you have to be thirteen

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 8>years old to.

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 7>Get on them.

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 8>Of course, if you're younger than that, you can put

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 8>in a fake birth date, and that's, you know, a

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 8>parental responsibility issue. I know that other states are proposed, well,

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 8>you know, between thirteen and fifteen years old, we could

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 8>have parental consent. Well that's what we have now. I mean,

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 8>it should be parental consent now.

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 7>And so what it does it doesn't.

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 8>Alleviate the pressure on parents, which is what the legislation

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 8>hopefully will do. So I think it does need to

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 8>be sixteen years old. And thereforeans of these thirteen fourteen

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 8>year olds that are completely trapped on these social media platforms,

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 8>we'll be able to have the confidence to be able

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 8>to say no, it's against the law, you can't have it.

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 8>But I think it needs to be sixteen. I don't

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 8>think younger actually helps it all.

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 4>No fair enough.

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Look, it's an interesting conversation. It looks like it's the

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 3>momentum is there. I meanwhile, wa Senator Fatima payment has

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 3>slammed the social media ban proposal and delivered her message.

0:14:26.520 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 3>I've got to say, with a very bizarre and cringe speech.

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 9>To the Sigmas of Australia, I say that this goofy

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 9>air government have been capping, not just now but for

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 9>a long time. A few of you may remember when

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 9>they said there will be no phantom tax under the

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 9>government I lead.

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 4>They're kappa holics. They're also yappoholics.

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 9>They yap NonStop about how their cost of living measures

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 9>are changing lives for all Australians. Just put the fries

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 9>in the bag, little bro.

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 4>They tell us that they're locked in.

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 9>On improving the housing situation in this country. They must

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 9>have brain rot from watching too much Kaisinet and forgot

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 9>about their plans to ban social media for kids under fourteen.

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 9>If that becomes law, you can forgore schol emoji all

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 9>about watching Juke Dennis or catching a dub with the

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 9>Bros on FOURT chat.

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 10>Is this Prime Minister serious?

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Please please make it stop, Claire. It is cringe, It

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 3>is horrible, Please make it stop.

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 4>What on earth is she trying to achieve here?

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 8>Oh my goodness, I don't know that this is like

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 8>the Raygun apology.

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 7>I don't know.

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 8>What is going on here. I don't know if it's

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 8>because I've just celebrated a bit of a milestone birthday,

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 8>so I'm clearly middle aged because I don't understand a thing.

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 8>But I will tell you, as someone who works with

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 8>adolescents every day, there's one thing that adolescents hate, and

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 8>that's adults trying to.

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 7>Be cool and use their language. It does not work.

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 8>It does not certainly doesn't work in the Chamber of Parliament.

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 7>And you know, I'm totally confused by the message.

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 8>If she's against the social media ban as well, that's concerning.

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 8>She clearly just wants kids online being able to stumble

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 8>over some of these ideologies that she puts forward.

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 7>But I don't understand it.

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 4>No, look neither do I. It's cringe.

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 3>I wish these people would stop trying to be down

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 3>with the coolkins, as they say, Clara, good to have

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 3>you on, Thank you so much for joining us. For

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 3>still to come, Lefties Losing It plus Kosher Garda joins

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 3>the show for a presidential.

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 4>Debate backed check. You won't want to miss it.

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Now it's time for Lefties Losing it, Starting with Trump

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 3>and the Haitian migrants, plus cats and dogs, and of

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 3>course the alleged disappearing pets of Ohio.

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 4>But make it a dance.

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 5>You're eating the cat, eat the cat.

0:16:57.960 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 4>The cat eating the door.

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 5>Eating the cat, eat the cat, eat the cat, eating

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 5>the cat. You're eating the dogs, eat the cat, eat

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 5>the cat. The cat eat the cat, eat the cat.

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 5>The cat, eat the cat, eat the cat.

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 4>You're eating the dogs.

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 5>You're eating the cat, eat the cat, Eat the cat.

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 11>The cat.

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is what happens when lefties have way

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 3>too much time on their hands.

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 4>Though, I've got to say it is quite catchy. And

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 4>this next clip though, is titled it fell out of

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 4>a coconut tree.

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 12>If you got something to say something, if you do

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 12>something to say Donald, if you got something to say Donald,

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 12>if you got something to say Donald.

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it is a colt, and sadly the Camela colt

0:17:57.040 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 3>has turned so bitter, triggered, get exhausted, snappy. Kamla Vosa

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 3>is a struggling big time. In fact, it has become

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 3>a real scourge. Have a look out of my face now,

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 3>now it was very rude of you. Get out of

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 3>my face.

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 4>You want to go to jail. Sir, ma'am, I don't

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 4>really know what to call you. I'm done, police, you

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 4>just insulted you. Later, well, listen here, pow. I mean

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 4>you are gonna go to jail, but I can tell

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 4>the police to get you. I'm vegan, so don't say that. Listen,

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.640
<v Speaker 4>you really get them out of my wait right now? Okay, yeah, yeah,

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 4>we'll do that. You do not have a release, I

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:36.959
<v Speaker 4>will sue you. You're gonna assume them. Don't see them, man,

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 4>because we're trying to I don't you.

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 13>Do not have a release.

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 4>If you imposed this, I will destroy you. I will

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 4>destroy you. Now. That's not very lady like behavior at all?

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Is it?

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 4>Not mindful? And certainly not demure. It's clear cuckoo Kamla.

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:59.120
<v Speaker 4>Lefties have officially cracked Kamala rhetoran. Her name is Kamala.

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Actually all right, calma lah like my sign cammakama law lah.

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 4>I didn't know what's spelled with the comment.

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 1>That's crazy is that Kamala.

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Obviously that she leans towards more like like a weird

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 2>generals kind of like racist almost.

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 4>I know I'm saying rhetoric.

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 8>Stop with your rhetoric goals I mean serious like her

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 8>rhetorics type.

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 4>No, it's not racist. Trump is a racist. Not a

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 4>racist though. You can't walk away though.

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 3>But just kind of hack the truth and have a

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 3>look at this second grey group.

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 4>About five thousand bucks on it your money, we're.

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 13>You're miss.

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 4>He's the racist, He's.

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:37.480
<v Speaker 6>A felon what the liberals the January six?

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:38.360
<v Speaker 7>What happened Janary six?

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm yelling, yo, joining joining.

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 7>The We're going full force.

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 14>Of the lips America.

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 15>Hey, yo, way, way money way.

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 4>Guys, changed my mind. I'm a Kamala supporter.

0:19:58.560 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 6>Way you yellow?

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 4>Why the yelling and screaming, get some help?

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Just relax and please please send that memo to Rosio

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Donald Yes, poor old affected battler Rosio.

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 4>Guys.

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 3>I've got to say I am really worried for her

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 3>because the Trump derangement syndrome.

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 4>Has really really taken its toll.

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Now here is Rosio before the presidential debates.

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 16>This is our chance to be seen and heard, respected

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 16>and for once leading the way instead of following men.

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 16>We followed a lot of men for a lot of years.

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 16>Let's give it a try. What do you say can't

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:49.959
<v Speaker 16>get worse than of Donald Trump?

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 13>Can't be worse. There's no worse than him.

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 16>Dictatorship is what happens if he gets in hives, Amir.

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 13>All he does is lie.

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 3>It's frightening, isn't it. She's really struggling old Rosio. And

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.959
<v Speaker 3>here is Rosio after the debate, and yes, just letting

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:14.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, this is Rosie.

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 16>At the end of this, we will have written him

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 16>out of the history books and into prison where he

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 16>deserves to be.

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 13>Open your eyes, people, open your eyes. It's okay. We're

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 13>gonna be okay. We're gonna come together as a nation.

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 16>The media will have to apologize for their part in

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:44.199
<v Speaker 16>this mass hypnosis cult thing that's been going on with

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 16>Donald Trump since the Celebrity Apprentice.

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 13>Thank you, Mark Burnette. Hold him responsible, I really do.

0:21:53.560 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 13>All right, I'm sorry, I gotta go off again. I

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:07.360
<v Speaker 13>like me with red hair, piceal.

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 4>What can I say?

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 3>She is now identifying as a feral cartoon, though it

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 3>is better than the original, And over to the unhinged

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 3>lunatics at the view.

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 4>They never learn, do they?

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Here is Joy Behar, who is actually devoid of all joy,

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 3>desperately trying to impose her warped with and obsessive views

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 3>about Trump onto celebs like Usher.

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 15>In this emergency that we're in.

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 16>I think that the Who's artists just come out and

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 16>speak for Kamala against Donald Trump because he is an

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 16>existential threat to the country.

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 4>What do you say to that.

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 13>You know what.

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:44.479
<v Speaker 14>I don't get too deep into politics. I didn't get

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 14>a chance to watch the debate last night. I obviously

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 14>have been watching like everybody else. I think voting is

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 14>an individual choice. I think that you're right. You have

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 14>to look at the reality of the country that we

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 14>are and the country that we want to be. The

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 14>candidate that you feel both are.

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 4>Who fits the.

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 14>Category of where we want to be, and that's what

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 14>you vote based off of who you highlight and how

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 14>you choose to highlight it on whatever platform you have

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 14>is your prerogative.

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you got her on that one.

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 3>And in the words of Usher himself, when you're feeling

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 3>hate the same and your body don't want to got

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 3>to let it go and let it burn.

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 4>Joy, Please let it burn.

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's unpack The chronic debate live pedaled by Kamla Harris

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 3>and of course endorsed by the Woke Network Liberals over

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 3>at ABC News, starting with the incorrect fact checking of

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump over late term abortions.

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 17>But her vice presidential pick says abortion in the ninth

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 17>month is absolutely fine. He also says execution after birth,

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.440
<v Speaker 17>it's execution, no longer abortion because the baby is born

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 17>is okay. And that's not okay with me.

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:02.919
<v Speaker 3>There is no state in this country where it is

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 3>legal to kill a baby after it's born.

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 1>Mount and Vice President want to get your response to

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>President Trump.

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, according to former Virginia Governor Ralph Northam, third trimester

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 3>abortions and post birth procedures happen in that state.

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 18>When we talk about third trimester abortions, these are done

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 18>with the consent of obviously the mother, with the consent

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 18>of the physicians, more than one physician, by the way,

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 18>and it's done in cases where there may be severe deformities,

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 18>there may be a fetus that's non viable. So in

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 18>this particular example, if a mother is in labor, I

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 18>can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 18>be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the infant

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 18>would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 18>family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 18>physicians and the mothers.

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 3>And in twenty nineteen, Kamala Harris vote against emotion to

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:05.959
<v Speaker 3>give protections to babies born alive after failed abortions. Not

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 3>only that, but according to the National Review, Tim Woll

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:14.959
<v Speaker 3>signed legislation that guaranteed an unqualified right to abortion up

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 3>until the moment of birth and even gutted protections for

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 3>children born.

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 4>Alive after abortion.

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Joining me now is Sky News contributor Kosha Gada. Kosha,

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much for joining us. Look, ABC, you

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 3>spent a lot of time fact checking Trump during the

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 3>presidential debate, but according to this evidence, the moderators made

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:36.959
<v Speaker 3>a lot of mistakes, particularly when it comes to the

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 3>issue of late term abortions.

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.399
<v Speaker 4>And this is a key line that Kamla is peddling

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 4>out to win over women. But why is it so

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 4>important that this gets corrected?

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 19>Yes, then fact checked Trump, I think each times, and

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 19>never fact checked her even once, including on this issue,

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:57.679
<v Speaker 19>which is a key issue for the female voard. It's

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:00.679
<v Speaker 19>actually the only issue Democrats a little bit of a

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:05.399
<v Speaker 19>structural advantage after Roby Wade. There's a lot of heated

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 19>momentum around this issue, and there have been some legislation

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 19>on builds in different states, including quite ruby red states

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:15.159
<v Speaker 19>that are seeing that the public has moved and is

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 19>a little bit to the left of where even those

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 19>deep Republican states are. So she's got the momentum on

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 19>this one issue and definitely wants to play that. However,

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 19>as you very correctly showed here, the left is actually

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 19>very much outside of the mainstream of where most Americans are.

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 19>They are generally pro choice up to the first trimester

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 19>or thereabouts more or less, but not until the moment

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 19>of birth. And that's kind of the point that Trump

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 19>was trying to make. The moderator interjected herself and took

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 19>it very literally about killing the baby, the words that

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:46.439
<v Speaker 19>he used, But as you pointed out, it's not about that.

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 19>It's about giving life saving care in situations where they

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 19>abortion was not successful and the baby actually is born alive.

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 19>So she sort of helped Kamla Harris whitewatch that. And

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 19>I think you know the reason for it with this

0:26:57.480 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 19>whole debate is that they are not in the business

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 19>of fleshing out where the candidates actually stand on these issues.

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 19>But it's about a narrative shaping and narrative engineering. From

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 19>that perspective, the moderators did their job.

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 3>I've got to say one of the big issues that

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 3>was raised was about Charlottesville because Kabla Harris invoked that

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Charlottesville right accusation and have a listen to these.

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 10>Let's remember Charlottesville where there was a mob of people

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:31.120
<v Speaker 10>carrying tiki torches spewing anti Semitic hate, and what did

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 10>the president then at the time say? There were fine

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 10>people on each side?

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 3>But this is what Donald Trump actually said at the time,

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 3>And you had some.

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 20>Very big people in that group, but you also had

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 20>people that were very fine people on both sides. You

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 20>had people in that group. Excuse me, you had people

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:55.199
<v Speaker 20>and I'm not talking about the neo Nazis and the

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:58.919
<v Speaker 20>white nationalists because they should be condemned totally, but you

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:02.359
<v Speaker 20>had many people in that group other than neo Nazis

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 20>and white nationalists.

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Kosher.

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 3>It's very important to fact check this because the Charlottesville

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 3>comment was debunked a long time ago. Trump did not

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 3>call neo Nazis fine people, as he's just explained there.

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 3>Why are the Democrats continuing with this line though.

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 19>It feels a little bit like they're looking in the

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 19>rear view mirror of what some of the strategies and

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:29.360
<v Speaker 19>tactics were in past cycles. Both of the last two

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 19>cycles that you could argue were a little bit successful

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.640
<v Speaker 19>against Trump, at least in twenty twenty. But to your point,

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 19>this story is so old nobody cares about it really anymore,

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 19>in terms not that what happened that day wasn't something

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 19>that people care about, but in terms of how it

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 19>relates to why they're making their choice for who they

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 19>want to vote for in this current election. And it

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 19>has been debunked, including by very left leaning or left

0:28:50.360 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 19>friendly outlets like Snopes.

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>That's one that people point to.

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 19>President Trump didn't do himself any favors, and how he

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 19>rebutted that in the debate because he pointed to people

0:28:58.520 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 19>like Laura Ingram and Sean Hannity as those who debunked it.

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 19>He should have pointed to Snopes, but leaving out where

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 19>it may Aside from that, many people have debunked this,

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 19>and I think they keep doing it because it fits

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 19>into again that narrative engineering of casting him as this bigoted,

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 19>horrible person who thinks of they're refined people on the

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 19>other side, And I think they're going to continue to

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 19>run with that in the sixty days that we had left.

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a long time to go to keep peddling

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 3>the same lines, isn't it. But look, Kamala also repeated

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 3>this blood barth hoax and claimed that Trump said that

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 3>there will be a blood bath if he's not elected.

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 4>This is her at the debate.

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 10>And be clear on that point, Donald Trump, the candidate,

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:41.959
<v Speaker 10>has said in this election, there will be a bloodbath

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:45.239
<v Speaker 10>if this and the outcome of this election is not

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 10>to his liking.

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 3>But if she'd actually listened to the full clip, it

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 3>shows that Donald Trump was referring, in fact, to the

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 3>auto industry.

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 21>China now is building a couple of massive plans where

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 21>they're going to build the cars that met ago and

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 21>think they think that they're going to sell those cars

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 21>into the United States with no tax at the border.

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 21>Let me tell you something to China, you think you're

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 21>going to get that, you're going to not hire Americans

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 21>and you're going to sell the cars. Now, We're going

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 21>to put a one hundred percent tower for in every

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 21>single car that comes across the line, and you're not

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 21>going to be able to sell those guys.

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 13>If I get elected.

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 20>Now, if I don't get elected, it's going to be

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 20>a bloodbath.

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 4>Kosher.

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 3>I think it's really important to make the distinction here.

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Kamla is basically implying violence. But as Donald Trump's tried

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 3>to explain, he says he was talking about the Democrats

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 3>destroying the auto industry.

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 4>That's two very different scenarios.

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Completely different.

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 19>So this day and age that we live in of

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 19>constant twenty four to seven news and things get chopped

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 19>up and clipped and you can just take one sentence

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 19>out of context and circulate it. The good news is

0:30:57.320 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 19>is that it cuts both ways. So while in that

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 19>debate those things went unchecked, the fact of the matter

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 19>is about sixty five million people viewed that debate. Most

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 19>the vast majority of them are decided. They are very

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 19>few undecided voters left who haven't heard these things. Maybe

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:13.479
<v Speaker 19>so ok did play a role with them, but for

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 19>everybody else in the aftermath and the days and weeks

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 19>that followed, this kind of stuff will get checked and

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 19>corrected on X on programs like this one, on various

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 19>other outlets in the independent media sphere, primarily, and I

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:26.479
<v Speaker 19>do think at the end of the day, when it

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 19>washes through. That line of attack about who Trump is

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 19>just doesn't land anymore. Everybody knows who he is from

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 19>a character perspective, and it's really going to come down

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 19>to the things that matter to people the economy, inflation, immigration,

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 19>et cetera.

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think all of this is going to wash through.

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, look, I think that's an absolutely fair comment, but

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:47.440
<v Speaker 3>this one blew my mind though. This was a very

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 3>start contrasting comments. There was a comment made at the

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 3>debate by Kamala Harris about Donald Trump's plans for IVF

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 3>treatment for families.

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 10>This is what she said, And understand what has been

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 10>happening under Donald Trump's abortion bands, couples who pray and

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 10>dream of having a family are being denied IVF treatments.

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 3>Now, that just does not quite sound like what Donald

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Trump has actually previously announced about IVF.

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 22>This is what he said, under the Trump administration, your

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 22>government will pay for or your insurance company will be

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 22>mandated to pay for all.

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 17>Costs associated with IVF treatment fertilization for women.

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 14>IVF treat.

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 17>Because we want more babies.

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 4>To put it very nicely.

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 3>So, coach, we've got a situation where Donald Trump's actually

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 3>announced free IVF treatment for women. So where on earth

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 3>is Kamala Harris getting this claim that he's denying couple's

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 3>IVF treatment from?

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 19>Yeah, that one was probably one of the more egregious

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 19>things that sort of just seems to have been made

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 19>up out of thin air, you know. I think where

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 19>it comes to is back to that point around abortion

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 19>and more broadly reproductive rights is how they frame it

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:16.479
<v Speaker 19>because they're very good at kind of the linguistic games

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 19>and reframing things. That's an issue where broadly Democrats are

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 19>a little bit ahead in the polls with the women,

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 19>especially in swing state votes, and so what they try

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 19>to do is conflate anything under that umbrella term of

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 19>reproductive rights. It could be abortion, it could be IVF,

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 19>it could be anything in between, and they're trying to

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 19>say for all of that stuff, the Republican Party and

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 19>Trump are against you and against your reproductive rights.

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he is.

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 19>Onto that, and that's why he announced that program about

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 19>government funded IVF, which, by the way, many people in

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 19>the Republican Party didn't like because of the fiscal conservatives.

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 19>They are like, well, how are you going to pay

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 19>for that? How are you going to execute it? He

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:53.239
<v Speaker 19>even got some criticism from his own side for it.

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 19>But the reason he did that is to try and

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 19>create that fracturing under this notion of reproductive rights.

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's very different.

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 19>And when you talk about IBF and being pro fertility

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:05.959
<v Speaker 19>and pro birth, which he in the Republican Party typically is,

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 19>it's very different from do stand for late term abortion

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 19>in the ninth month. And he's trying to separate that.

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 19>She's trying to conflate it altogether. And it's going to

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 19>be up to the voters to hut through that noise

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:17.760
<v Speaker 19>and figure out where book candidates stand.

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, it's just such stark differences in the

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 3>comments made is extraordinary. Now I've got to talk to

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 3>you about Project twenty twenty five. The Democrats seem to

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 3>be obsessed with talking about it. They're constantly pedaling out

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 3>these theories and claims about it.

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:35.359
<v Speaker 4>This is Kamala Harris's take.

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 10>What you're going to hear tonight is a detailed and

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:43.760
<v Speaker 10>dangerous plan called Project twenty twenty five that the former

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:47.240
<v Speaker 10>president intends on implementing if he were elected to gain.

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 3>And this is the reality which was actually reported by

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 3>the left leaning see it.

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 2>N Trump did not write Project twenty twenty five. The

0:34:56.840 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 2>project's big policy document, published by the Heritage Foundation think tank,

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:04.399
<v Speaker 2>lists dozens of people as authors, editors, contributors.

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:07.720
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump is not among them. Yeah, there you Goven.

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 3>The liberal media say it, but even the former director

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 3>of Project twenty and twenty five says Trump had nothing

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 3>to do with it.

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 22>Trump has nothing to do with Project twenty twenty five. Sure,

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 22>a lot of us have worked in the ad and

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.359
<v Speaker 22>it came together, but this started long before he even

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 22>announced for president.

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 4>Kosher.

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Why are the Democrats desperately trying to link Trump to

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Project two thousand and twenty five. It's constant. We've been

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 3>hearing this now for months. This is one of their

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 3>key attack lines.

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:41.840
<v Speaker 19>Why you know, I think back to that narrative shaping

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 19>and engineering. It feels like something ominous like Project twenty

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:47.799
<v Speaker 19>twenty five. I've had people refer to it as Manifesto

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 19>twenty twenty five, things like that. It's some sort of

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:52.839
<v Speaker 19>thing that could be evil. I think also, it's really

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 19>wonky because nobody's going to sit there and read a

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 19>nine hundred page document, which is what it is. Most

0:35:57.280 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 19>people who are living their lives, so it's easy to

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 19>sort of just create an nuendo and suggests that it's

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 19>a really radical agenda and if you vote for him,

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 19>he's going to implement that agenda and it's a threat

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:09.399
<v Speaker 19>to democracy. So all these sort of high level platitudes

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:12.919
<v Speaker 19>hoping that that message trickles down and scares the few

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 19>people that are still undecided to not vote for Trump.

0:36:16.280 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 19>I think that's the strategy as opposed to articulating what

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 19>your own strategy is. That's something that we have not

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:23.839
<v Speaker 19>seen a lot of from that side. And it's going

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:25.959
<v Speaker 19>to be really amazing to see how this selection turns

0:36:25.960 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 19>out despite that, because you've got just narrative engineering versus

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 19>actual policies. That's really what the selection is coming down to.

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 19>And it's quite scary when you think about it in

0:36:35.520 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 19>those terms.

0:36:36.360 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it certainly is. Look, let's talk now about fracking.

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 3>We've got to go here because Kamala Harris, her flip

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 3>flopping on this matter is enough.

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 4>To give you whiplash. Here she was at the debate.

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 10>I will not band fracking. I have not banned fracking

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 10>as Vice President of the United States, and in fact,

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:57.800
<v Speaker 10>I was the tie breaking vote on the Inflation Reduction

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 10>Act which opened newly for.

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Fracking, and let's que that infamous twenty nineteen tape.

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 23>Will you commit to implementing a federal ban on fracking

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 23>your first day in office? Adding the United States to

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:15.720
<v Speaker 23>the list of countries who have banned this devastating practice.

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:17.760
<v Speaker 10>There's no question I'm in favor of banning fracking.

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, kosher.

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:22.279
<v Speaker 3>It's tying her up in knots this fracking issue. It's

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 3>another word salad by by a Kamala Harris. But the

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 3>problem is is as well that ABC News failed to

0:37:30.080 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 3>pick her up on that. She has changed her mind

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 3>so many times, but where was ABC News.

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:42.439
<v Speaker 19>Yes, for their goal of propping her up and giving

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 19>her a boost, they did exactly what they should have

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:47.400
<v Speaker 19>done and fulfilled their duty because their goal is not

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 19>to check her on that.

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:49.720
<v Speaker 1>But the fracking one.

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 19>Is so egregious because they are actual, direct sound bites

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 19>like you just played of her seeing one thing and

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 19>now seeing another.

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:56.479
<v Speaker 1>And that's fine.

0:37:56.520 --> 0:37:59.240
<v Speaker 19>People involve their positions. She's allowed to evolve her position

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 19>if it were true. And the way to get to that,

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 19>because very few people believe that it is true, is

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 19>to probe her a little bit more about why did

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 19>you change your mind, you know, did you see some

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 19>new information that led you to do that? Is there

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 19>something that you came across that led you to believe

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 19>your thinking was wrong before nobody's done that. Dana Bash

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 19>sort of did a little bit in the CNN interview.

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 19>But this one I don't think is working with what

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 19>she's doing, because this goes straight to Pennsylvania, which is

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 19>on the critical path for her. Especially Pennsylvania runs through

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 19>every path to victory for her based on how she's polling.

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 19>She knows that, and I just don't know that the

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:36.879
<v Speaker 19>coal miners and the people that are directly affected from

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:39.839
<v Speaker 19>this in Pennsylvania are buying that her change of heart

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:40.680
<v Speaker 19>is genuine.

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:42.759
<v Speaker 1>Remains to be seen, but she clearly.

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:44.399
<v Speaker 19>Knows that she has to say what she's saying now,

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:45.960
<v Speaker 19>and she's going to keep doing it for the next

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 19>sixty days, notwithstanding the many video clips of her out

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 19>there saying the opposite of her past.

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:53.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the many words salad clips that are doing the rounds.

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 3>I want to talk to you about performance polling. According

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 3>to a CNN poll, sixty three percent of voters believe

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:04.600
<v Speaker 3>Kamala Harris turned in a better performance prior to the debate,

0:39:04.640 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 3>the same voters were actually evenly split on which candidate

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 3>would do better, so it was fifty percent Harris and

0:39:10.600 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 3>fifty percent Trump, Whereas dials monitoring the reaction of a

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Fox News focus group during the debate showed that independent

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 3>voters overlapping with Republicans in support of Trump's immigration policies.

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 3>In particular, it says the focus group comprised seven Democrats,

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:31.800
<v Speaker 3>five independents, and five Republicans and was represented by blue, yellow,

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 3>and red lines, respectively. When Trump spoke of the rising

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 3>crime at the hands of illegal immigrants, the yellow line

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:44.360
<v Speaker 3>monitoring the independent reaction rose drastically in Trump's favor, overlapping

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:48.880
<v Speaker 3>with the red Republican line. That itself is very telling, kosher,

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 3>how do you read this result?

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:57.040
<v Speaker 19>You know, I would question everybody to take these focus

0:39:57.040 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 19>groups with the green of soil just because there are

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 19>a snapshot in a moment of time. They're anecdotal, they're

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 19>not statistically significant, so you know, taking it in context,

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 19>that said, this seems to be what's emerging, and we'll

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 19>see it in the next week when those anecdotes can

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 19>actually turn into data. That there seems to be a

0:40:12.680 --> 0:40:15.799
<v Speaker 19>bit of a paradox here where from a performance perspective,

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:18.360
<v Speaker 19>I think it is widely regarded that Kamala did better.

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:20.359
<v Speaker 19>A lot of Trump supporters that I know are quite

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:22.960
<v Speaker 19>disappointed actually with him because he can be on message.

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 19>We've seen him do that and he wasn't yesterday. But

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:29.879
<v Speaker 19>it's not translating through into how people see her. Did

0:40:29.920 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 19>she earn more trust from those undecided? Did she actually

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 19>change anybody's mind if someone who was on the fence

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 19>voting for her, you're not seeing that in this focus group.

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 19>And if that holds through, I think it's a reflection

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:43.120
<v Speaker 19>of Okay, maybe she was more polished and she put

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 19>on a good performance and met the bar that was

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 19>for her where she didn't completely fall over. She did better,

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:51.799
<v Speaker 19>but she's not Actually it wasn't a knockout blow where

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:54.200
<v Speaker 19>she's winning hearts and minds. And it also, I think

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:57.239
<v Speaker 19>is a reflection of just the irrelevance increasingly of these

0:40:57.280 --> 0:41:01.239
<v Speaker 19>debates on mainstream media news outlets, where nobody cares or

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:03.319
<v Speaker 19>trusts you know what the outcome was or what the

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:05.919
<v Speaker 19>respective performances were if it doesn't translate to their votes,

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:07.200
<v Speaker 19>which is ultimately all that matters.

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a really fair point, Kosha Gata, appreciate your time.

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much for joining us this evening, or

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 3>do stay with us Coming.

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:14.840
<v Speaker 4>Up after the break.

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Celebrities react to the presidential debate and King Child break

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 3>standard royal procedure for a hum Kinsey Schofield joins me next.

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:32.960
<v Speaker 4>Welcome back, joining me now.

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:36.840
<v Speaker 3>With celebrity and royal reporter Kinsey Schofield. Kinsey, thanks for

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 3>joining us. Let's start with the reaction to the presidential

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 3>debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump.

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 4>What are celebrity is saying about it?

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:49.400
<v Speaker 11>Will you have your usual suspects chaming in and taking digs?

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:53.600
<v Speaker 11>But Middler tweeted she won, case closed, Bravo, and actor

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:57.240
<v Speaker 11>Mark Ruffalo tweeted, Honestly, I was anxious about this debate,

0:41:57.520 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 11>but what is clear is that Kamala not only has

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:01.920
<v Speaker 11>a vision for the future and lifting America up, but

0:42:01.960 --> 0:42:04.719
<v Speaker 11>she is just so much even tempered and so much

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 11>smarter than Trump.

0:42:05.719 --> 0:42:08.760
<v Speaker 15>She crushed him. We've got one hit, wonder.

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:11.839
<v Speaker 11>Mark Hamill, Luke Skywalker taking swipes at Trump. I'd love

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 11>to send him to a galaxy.

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:14.280
<v Speaker 15>Far far away.

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:18.800
<v Speaker 11>But most damaging, without a doubt, was Taylor Swift's reaction,

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:22.600
<v Speaker 11>Taylor Swift endorsing Kamala Harris for all of the childless

0:42:22.600 --> 0:42:23.640
<v Speaker 11>cat ladies out there.

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:27.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that was an interesting sign out that she put there. Look,

0:42:27.960 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 3>there's still a long way to go, Kinsey between now

0:42:30.160 --> 0:42:33.240
<v Speaker 3>in November, so we will see whether or not Taylor

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:36.480
<v Speaker 3>Swift's influence will materialize to get young people out of

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:37.920
<v Speaker 3>voting remains to be seen.

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:38.720
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Dree Barrymore cringe not a fan of her interview style,

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 3>but she has spoken out about that. In fact cringe

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 3>interview that she had with Kamala Harris.

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:50.800
<v Speaker 4>Remember this a shocking moment.

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 10>You have that one mother and I'm the second mother.

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:58.320
<v Speaker 15>Mamala, Right, Mamala, we all need a mom.

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:01.680
<v Speaker 14>I've been thinking that we really all need a tremendous

0:43:01.760 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 14>hug in the world right now. But in our country,

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:08.320
<v Speaker 14>we need you to be Mamla of the country.

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:12.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 3>No matter how many times I have seen a Kinsey,

0:43:14.719 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 3>it still sends shivers up my spine the word Mamala.

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 3>But what's Drew Barrymore now had to say about that

0:43:22.280 --> 0:43:23.400
<v Speaker 3>infamous interview.

0:43:24.360 --> 0:43:27.319
<v Speaker 11>I mean, unfortunately, I think she's completely oblivious to the

0:43:27.360 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 11>fact that our body is rejecting what we just witnessed

0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 11>right now. You know, she just said that it was

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:36.800
<v Speaker 11>her scariest interview and that she was very concerned about

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:41.239
<v Speaker 11>putting Kamala in a negative light. That she really kind

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:44.600
<v Speaker 11>of worked her way around that interview trying to ensure

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:47.920
<v Speaker 11>that Kamala would come out nice and clean and squeaky

0:43:47.960 --> 0:43:50.439
<v Speaker 11>clean on the other side, because as you know, it's

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:53.280
<v Speaker 11>very hard to get Kamala to sit down for an interview.

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:56.719
<v Speaker 11>And you know, that's just how annoying that Drew Barrymore

0:43:56.760 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 11>tiptoed around this woman when we're supposed to try her

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:04.920
<v Speaker 11>to run our country. Drew Barrymore should be giving us

0:44:04.920 --> 0:44:05.920
<v Speaker 11>some authenticity.

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, she totally blew it. She reaches quite a big audience,

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Drew Barrymore. So this would have been an actual prime

0:44:12.320 --> 0:44:15.640
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to ask some serious questions, and she blew it

0:44:15.719 --> 0:44:18.080
<v Speaker 3>and it will forever go down as a shocking interview.

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:21.920
<v Speaker 3>We were just talking there about Taylor Swift's endorsement of

0:44:22.000 --> 0:44:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Kamala Harris. But we've actually had some reaction from Donald

0:44:25.960 --> 0:44:28.279
<v Speaker 3>Trump about this endorsement.

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:30.799
<v Speaker 4>How's he taking it? What does he think about it?

0:44:32.239 --> 0:44:35.200
<v Speaker 11>Well, Trump said he wasn't even a Taylor Swift fan

0:44:35.360 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 11>and didn't want her endorsement anyway. Joking well, I actually

0:44:39.719 --> 0:44:43.640
<v Speaker 11>like missus Mahomes much better, which is Taylor's friend, Britney Mahomes.

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 11>Their Brittany's husband and Taylor's boyfriend, both Chiefs football players.

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:52.239
<v Speaker 11>But we know that this was sour grapes because we

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 11>saw Trump a few weeks ago post to AI images

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:59.399
<v Speaker 11>of Taylor endorsing him. This is just his personality and

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:02.799
<v Speaker 11>I I get a huge kick out of him, but

0:45:03.040 --> 0:45:04.760
<v Speaker 11>I'm sure that it did kind of hurt.

0:45:04.560 --> 0:45:07.400
<v Speaker 15>His feelings that Taylor Swift didn't endorse him. But you

0:45:07.400 --> 0:45:10.280
<v Speaker 15>know what, who needs Taylor Swift?

0:45:10.920 --> 0:45:15.240
<v Speaker 4>Look, who needs Taylor Swift? Trun Trump runs rings around people.

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:16.800
<v Speaker 4>He goes for it himself.

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:20.120
<v Speaker 3>He doesn't need all these celebrity endorsements, so I don't

0:45:20.160 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 3>think for him it really matters. Look, speaking of Taylor Swift,

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:28.640
<v Speaker 3>I think the relationship between her and Travis Kelcey there

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:31.520
<v Speaker 3>it's just becoming more and more cringe. But it would

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:36.160
<v Speaker 3>particularly cringe at the US Open when they both were embracing,

0:45:36.280 --> 0:45:39.360
<v Speaker 3>looking very awkward, belting out their rock song. I believe

0:45:39.360 --> 0:45:42.200
<v Speaker 3>it a thing called love by the darkness now this

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:46.319
<v Speaker 3>vision has gone viral, Kinsey, But how to know?

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 4>Do you think it was too much?

0:45:49.560 --> 0:45:50.520
<v Speaker 15>Absolutely?

0:45:50.680 --> 0:45:50.960
<v Speaker 1>It was.

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:52.360
<v Speaker 15>You know, I'm going to tell you something.

0:45:52.520 --> 0:45:55.080
<v Speaker 11>Every week I come on here and reader asks me

0:45:55.200 --> 0:45:57.799
<v Speaker 11>when I'm going to turn in my Swifty card, and

0:45:57.840 --> 0:46:02.319
<v Speaker 11>it's here. It's now. I'm absolutely done. I will not

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 11>be listening to any Taylor Swift songs. I'm changing my

0:46:05.280 --> 0:46:08.840
<v Speaker 11>ring tone. No more erastour for me. I just can't

0:46:08.880 --> 0:46:10.719
<v Speaker 11>deal with it. It's just it gives off an air

0:46:10.760 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 11>of desperation, like we get it, guys, you are in love.

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 11>Sometimes I watch it and I think, is she trying

0:46:17.120 --> 0:46:21.440
<v Speaker 11>to show her ex boyfriend who is so secretive the actor?

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 11>Is she trying to show him what he's missing? And

0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:25.279
<v Speaker 11>that just feels kind of.

0:46:25.239 --> 0:46:27.280
<v Speaker 15>Gross for a thirty year old woman. You're an adult.

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you spot on, Kinsey, and I'm glad that you're

0:46:32.200 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 3>saying the light with Tyler Swift here because it's just

0:46:35.080 --> 0:46:39.240
<v Speaker 3>gone on a whole other direction. Not a fan, not Kine.

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:42.880
<v Speaker 3>It's just getting too much. Now let's pivot and talk

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:46.319
<v Speaker 3>about the Royals, because King Charles has met the New

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:50.440
<v Speaker 3>Zealand women's rugby union team, the Black ferns. Now they

0:46:50.600 --> 0:46:54.200
<v Speaker 3>asked the King for a hug, and then this is

0:46:54.320 --> 0:47:17.400
<v Speaker 3>what happened, Kinsey.

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:19.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna say, I really really love this.

0:47:21.480 --> 0:47:24.319
<v Speaker 11>It's a start contrast from the racist royal family that

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:27.920
<v Speaker 11>refuses to hug that Meghan Markle won't stop complaining about.

0:47:28.000 --> 0:47:31.520
<v Speaker 11>I think the King looks awfully cuddly there. He looked

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 11>I just flirt alert. He loved that attention and he

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:37.360
<v Speaker 11>I mean, you could just tell he was so happy

0:47:37.400 --> 0:47:39.480
<v Speaker 11>to be there and so happy to embrace them.

0:47:39.800 --> 0:47:40.960
<v Speaker 15>What a sweet man.

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:45.279
<v Speaker 11>And it completely contradicts the complaints we've heard from Meghan

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:48.360
<v Speaker 11>Markle over the last four years. These people have heart,

0:47:48.760 --> 0:47:52.480
<v Speaker 11>These people care about their subjects, and these people they

0:47:52.520 --> 0:47:53.279
<v Speaker 11>know how to love.

0:47:53.320 --> 0:47:56.879
<v Speaker 4>They love, they know how to love. They do love.

0:47:57.040 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 3>And I'm going to ask you, Kinsey. It's also good

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:02.360
<v Speaker 3>to see him laughing and smiling. And that was also

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:04.960
<v Speaker 3>breaking royal protocol, I've got to say, because normally you're

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:06.960
<v Speaker 3>not allowed to touch the royals. But it's good to

0:48:07.000 --> 0:48:09.840
<v Speaker 3>see him back out there after that cancer diagnosis. And

0:48:09.840 --> 0:48:11.919
<v Speaker 3>don't you think he looked right at home back where

0:48:11.920 --> 0:48:12.520
<v Speaker 3>he belongs.

0:48:12.640 --> 0:48:13.320
<v Speaker 4>Very comfortable.

0:48:14.280 --> 0:48:18.400
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely, And it's my understanding that he really wants to

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:21.040
<v Speaker 11>be out there much more than he is right now,

0:48:21.120 --> 0:48:22.760
<v Speaker 11>so he is pushing it to the limit.

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 15>And you've got Queen Camilla saying.

0:48:24.280 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 11>You need to get back home, get back home, get

0:48:27.080 --> 0:48:29.759
<v Speaker 11>over here, and you know he's in his element. He

0:48:29.840 --> 0:48:32.319
<v Speaker 11>waited so long for this moment and he is just

0:48:32.440 --> 0:48:33.440
<v Speaker 11>really enjoying it.

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you can really tell. Kinsey Schofield, good to speak

0:48:37.000 --> 0:48:38.920
<v Speaker 3>with you. Thank you very much for joining us on

0:48:39.000 --> 0:48:42.319
<v Speaker 3>the show this evening. Well that's it from me.

0:48:42.600 --> 0:48:44.600
<v Speaker 4>Up next is news Night, good Night.