WEBVTT - ‘WARRIORS’ HAKA MAGIC’: Metcalf stuns Penrith as Panthers' spine crumbles | Round 23 review

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Hello everyone, and welcome to the Code NURL Monday edition.

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>You probably realize Bulldog is not here, and neither is Soapy,

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>So Tyson Jackson filling in with Fatima Fatima, how was

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>your weekend? Big weekend of footy?

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 2>It was a big weekend of footy. It was a

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 2>very good weekend. What about you?

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was. It was an interesting weekend. I think

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>we've got a lot of answers this weekend that we

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>probably didn't have before, and we've probably got a few

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>more things to talk about.

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Before we talk about NRL footy. Do you want to

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 2>talk about your local footy? You saunted in here saying

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 2>you've done a long weekend of celebrating what yes, yes.

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Del ourself second grade. We are the minor premiers. So yeah,

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>it was a good weekend. It was nice. Got the

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:49.480
<v Speaker 1>weekend off now and then into a Door Di semi

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>final next week, so I'm excited. Can arrest the body,

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>get ready.

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 2>To catch up on some sleep.

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Catch up on some sleep, and then I'm retiring. So

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're we're on a good star.

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:02.279
<v Speaker 2>Last ride is that what you call last ride?

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>There's not going to be a documentary like Michael Jordan,

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>but going to We're going to do some celebrating, I'm sure,

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>but let's dive into a footy because after my celebrating,

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll stop by the Dragon Sharks game yesterday, and what

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a game that was. I mean, I tipped the Sharks.

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought it would be closed, but I thought the

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Sharks just have way too much class. I thought the

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Sharks would go the rest of this year without having

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a loss. But this is a big issue. I feel,

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>what did you make of that game?

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I was brave enough to tip the Dragon,

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 2>so I think I tipped the Sharks. But as sort

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 2>of we got closer to the game, I thought, if

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 2>the Dragons are a real shot here because and I

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 2>know the Sharks had been playing so well. They were

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 2>on a high. Niko Hines was sort of gunning for

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 2>hazarm l Masriz what is it, thirty five thirty six, Yeah,

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 2>goals in a row. The rest of it. There was

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot of good things happening at the Sharks, but yeah,

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 2>it was really disappointing from them. You know, look, the

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Dragons have been competitive. You have to give them that

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 2>last couple of weeks, but to come against come up

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 2>against the side that he's running last. That's what one

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 2>game so far this year for the Dragons. Two games

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 2>and instead of I don't know whether a win is

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 2>a statement win against a team you know running last,

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 2>but to not come away with the win is pretty disappointing.

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 2>And craigfits given after the game nailed it. He said

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 2>the Dragons simply ran harder, tackled harder, and that was

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 2>the difference. So, yeah, you know, Bulldog has been banging

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 2>on for a few weeks now that he reckons that

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 2>the Sharks still pretenders. What do you think?

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, after yesterday, I probably tend to agree with Bulldog

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I don't know if I'd be brave

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>enough to call them pretenders, but I just think we're

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>going to get a bit more of the same from

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the Sharks. And I thought we were past that. I thought.

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I said someone the other day before yesterday

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that I could see like a rooster, Sharks ran final.

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I could see. That's how good I thought the Sharks were.

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>But I mean now I just don't know, like you said,

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>they just the Dragons did the simple things right. Yesterday.

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Damie Cook spent the entire game on the bench yesterday,

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 1>like these are all things, et cetera. Two came off

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the bench on the wing the FI guy and came

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 1>out and absolutely tore shreds off the Sharks. And the

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I think I really got to meet

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>was that last try from cent two. It was off

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a scrum. The Sharks had done so well to hold

0:03:22.760 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>out the Dragons when Adam fanil Blake had been simpin,

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:26.839
<v Speaker 1>which is probably going to be drama with as well

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>shoulder straight to the head, but then to just let

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.239
<v Speaker 1>such a soft try in a we are we seeing

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the same Sharks as we always do? Which is which

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>is what I was asking myself, and I think the

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>answer sadly yes, Like you know, they're a good team

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's what they are every year. They're a top

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>four team every year. But it's taking that next step.

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>That's what we wanted to see from the Sharks this year,

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and I just don't know if they can do it.

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>And if they can't do it this year with the

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>players they're losing next year, I think their premiership windows

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>closing and I think that's going to put pressure on

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Craig fits Given.

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's interesting because speaking of last ride, they'd sort

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 2>of adopted that with you know, all the players that

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 2>are leaving at the end of the year. I mean,

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 2>I said, beating the Dragons probably isn't a statement win.

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 2>But when I think back on that, actually local derby

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 2>in congrat it really was a chance for them to

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 2>blow the Dragons off the park and they didn't. Yeah,

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 2>in terms of Premiership windows, when you look at the

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 2>guys that are leaving, probably it is not shutting completely

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 2>for them. But I felt like going into this round

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 2>they were probably in a better position to shake up

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 2>the final series than ever before. And now I'm a

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 2>little bit worried because you know, I was just disappointed

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 2>with them on the weekend. But the Dragons, good on them.

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 2>You were talking, your mate was celebrating. They're pretty hard,

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 2>so look and they deserve the win.

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they were were great, unbelievable actually like that, Like

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>like you mentioned, they did the simple things right. But

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 1>I think it was actually a really good glimpse into

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the future. I'm quite excited for the Dragons next year.

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 1>I think they will compete for the top eight. I

0:04:57.920 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know if they'll make it or not.

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 2>It's funny you say that because when I was watching them.

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking about should I write that in my tackle?

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Am I ballsy enough to say that the Wooden Spooners

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 2>are going to make the top eight next year? But

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 2>you look at yeah, exactly, but you look at how

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 2>competitive they've been, You look at the guys coming in,

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, even the emergence of liking Kingtongia. You know,

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 2>we saw Caid Reid with glimpses of Caid Reid earlier

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 2>in the year. He went okay without setting the ball

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 2>on fire, but all of a sudden, you know, even

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Kyle flanningg and Kyle flang And had his moments. He

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 2>wasn't perfect on Sunday, but he's been playing some good footie.

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 2>So I really like what I'm seeing from them. And

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 2>when you think about the guys that are coming in, yeah,

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe they are a genuine chance of making the finals

0:05:42.560 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 2>next year.

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>You gonna say this about Kyle before we move on

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>from the Dragons, but I think Kyle has copped a

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of crap purely because of what his last name is.

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually really glad that Dean Young has taken the

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>risky move by dropping Daniel Atkinson. Who's this guy that

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be their long term half. Now I

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>don't think Kyle or Daniel will be at the club

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>long term anymore. Obviously, Cody nik Koreima and Luke Metcalf,

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>which we will get to, are coming next year. But

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Flanaghan, Dean Young stuck to his guards. He said,

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Flanagan is the best guy for this spot, which

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 1>I think he has been all year. He's a genuine seven.

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>He just kicked the ball along. He can set up

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>plays and organize the field, which is what he's done,

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's a big part of the reason they won yesterday.

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 1>So I think Dean Young deserves a massive rap because

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>we talk about balls and having having, you know, the

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>guts to do something like that. Dean Young has shown

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in so early on to his coaching career that he

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>will make the tough calls. No matter how much to

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>pay Danielakinson to come and be their guy. He's not

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 1>their guy. They've got two guys coming next year. But

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Flanaghan right now is the best for that job,

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'm glad that they've stuck with him.

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 2>What do you think happens to down at CONSAI next year?

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 2>How does he fit in.

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there's an interesting I think there's an interesting

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that's going to happen with Daniel Atkinson and with

0:06:55.680 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Clint Gutson. One of them, unless if you play Clint

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Gutson in the Centers, I think one of them will

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 1>have to be the eighteenth or nineteenth man. Clint Guts'

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>obviously on a lot of money. He's not gonna be

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>there full back next year, and I probably wouldn't play

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>him the Centers either. I don't think he makes the

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Dragon's Best seventeen next year, but I thought he played

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>well yesterday. I will say that. But just with the

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>amount of talent they have, so I think one of

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>them has to go. If I'm Daniel Atkinson, I think

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the writing's on the wall. They've signed two genuine halves

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>over me, two top eight halves who there's no question

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>who they're like. It's not even a race, right. Cody

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Nikarima and Luke Metcalf will be their halves next year.

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>So Daniel Atkinson I think needs to swallow his pride

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit and make the call himself to get

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>out and find somewhere else, because there's places that will

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>take him. I mean he'd be a great signing for Perth.

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't worked at the Dragons and so be it.

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>That's not gonna work everywhere you go. But I genuinely

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>believe that he will be a better fit somewhere else,

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and for his sake, he's probably best to go to

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the club and ask for a release and find another club. Fatima.

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>My favorite game of the round was the Penrith Warriors game.

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 1>And I'm going to go out there and say, and

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a Warriors fan, they should be allowed to

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>do the hawker before every single one of their games.

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's an unfair advantage. Yeah, but I like it.

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I like the theatrics, and any team that has to

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>go there to play a finals game this year I

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>feel sorry for. First of all, what did you make

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of that game? I mean, we talk about top of

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the table clashes, we talk about epic clashes. I don't

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>think it gets much better than that.

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 2>No, it was Yeah, like you said, it started off

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 2>obviously it was indigenous round with the hawker, which was

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 2>an amazing touch. But the atmosphere was just incredible. You know.

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 2>I heard a couple of times in the commentary comparing

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 2>it to a nightclub. It's just it feels like, you know,

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 2>the fans are riding this high. I noticed on and

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if this is a new thing, maybe

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 2>it's been there all season, but on the Warriors Instagram

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 2>page in the profile, it's got our year and that

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 2>sort of caught my attention on the weekend and I thought,

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 2>you know what it might just be and you look

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 2>at the immergence of you know, Leccha Hellaesima. I know

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 2>people want to compare him to Sunny Bill the rest

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 2>of it, but he's just a different beast onto himself.

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean he was he turned you know what was it?

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 2>I think he turned Nathan Cleary into a speed hump

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 2>a couple of times there in that run. Look, they've

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 2>got depth, which I think has has been the difference,

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.559
<v Speaker 2>and we've seen that with Luke Metcalff come in and

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Luke Mtcuff had to bide his time, he had to

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 2>be patient, and then he comes in and you know what,

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:33.559
<v Speaker 2>to his credit, he was absolutely brilliant in that game.

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 2>What did he score two tries? So yeah, it'll be

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 2>an interesting one to see what Andrew Webster does with them.

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 2>But I just you know, look, you look at their

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 2>forward pack. You've got lek A hell A Seema, who

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 2>is probably the best young forward in the game, but

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.199
<v Speaker 2>he's playing out in the centers. You know, You've got

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:54.719
<v Speaker 2>guys like Tanna, Jacob Laban, dimitric Bymonga, all of them

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 2>who have sort of gone to another level this year.

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 2>Lots of excitement and striking outside backs. And yeah, I

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 2>think if they're the team, if anybody's going to challenge Penrith,

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 2>who are looking a bit wobbly at the moment, I

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 2>think it's it's the Warriors.

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>We will get to Penrith. But I just think when

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the Warriors, like you said, Andrew Webbs

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.559
<v Speaker 1>has got such a tough decision to make because I

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>think tomorrow Martin has been great, but I think the

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Warriors haven't looked that good all year. I love that

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Luke Metcalf came out with the point to prove, and

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>he also didn't make that a secret. After the game,

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.079
<v Speaker 1>I was listening to his interview on Triple M, I believe,

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:37.319
<v Speaker 1>and Charlie from Triple M asked him, oh, do you

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>want to keep this number seven jersey? And he just

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>flat out and said yes, So I want this jersey,

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 1>this is my team. I feel like we don't have

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>enough of that in the NRL. We're very used to

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the generic whatever's best of the team, what this whatever

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>is that after the weekend, I think Luke Metcalf is

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:54.559
<v Speaker 1>what's best for this team. And I've said, I've said

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to a few people. I've said to a few Dragons

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:58.719
<v Speaker 1>fans that have come up to me and asked, we're

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be great next year. I said, I hope

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:04.439
<v Speaker 1>you guys are signing Luke Metcalf the Warriors half and

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>not you know, a half back that had struggled before

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>he went to the Warriors. Because that's what Luke Metcalf's

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>career was. And we've seen every player that stepped into

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that number seven jersey for the Warriors that's played great footy.

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>So is it a Warrior's thing or a Luke Metcalft thing. Well,

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:20.719
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Luke Metcalf came back and did what

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.079
<v Speaker 1>he did on the weekend, I think it's almost a

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Luke Metcalf thing. Now I can say confidently that I

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:28.959
<v Speaker 1>think Luke Metcalf is the best number seven they have

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:31.719
<v Speaker 1>at that club. You put ego aside, you put the

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 1>fact that he's not going to be there next year.

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the Warrior's chance to win a premiership and

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>they need Luke Metcalf there. And I think the reason

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>why this is the chance for the Warriors to win

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a premiership Isaiahoh. I think a lot of people will

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 1>brush over it, or a lot of people will say

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>they've still got Nathan Cleary, They've still got this awesome team,

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>which they do. But Isaiaho, if he's ruled out for

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the year or ruled out for a

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>long period, it's looking like a torn peck. He might

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>make it back for the Grand Final if they make

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it that far, but I just don't know if they

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>can do it without him.

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm it's so hard. They're a champion team. It's

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 2>almost muscle memory, you know, when they get to the finals.

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 2>What is interesting for me is, and you know what,

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Isaia Yo could be in any team and there would

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 2>not be a likeful like replacement, But they just don't

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 2>have that like for like replacement. I mean, I think

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.959
<v Speaker 2>there's there's a word that you know, we're assuming that

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Yo is going to be out at least for a

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 2>couple of weeks. We're waiting to hear exactly the extent

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 2>of the injury that Lindsay Smith will be the guy

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:35.679
<v Speaker 2>to go in there. How do you think, how do

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 2>you think that'll go?

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I like Lindsay Smith. I think Lindsay Smith is as

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>close to a like for like replacement as Isaiah Yoh.

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>He's a tough ball carrier, he's got a great, great

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>passing game. His defense, like all of the Panish Panthers,

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 1>is on song. So I do like, I do like

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay Smith, but it's just not the same. And it's like,

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you move Lindsay Smith from it, it's a trickle ef thing.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you move Lindsay Smith from prop to lock, you

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>lose Isaiaho, then Liam Henry has to come and replace

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay Smith. Then you lose a bit of punch off

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 1>the bench and trickles and trickles and trickles and trickles,

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>And then we get to a point where there's going

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to be times like there was on the weekend where

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>they just they just can't get it done. And once

0:13:17.760 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>it gets the finals, sure they can lose the first week,

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>but then it still will die. Then it's any anyone

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>could be It could be anyone's day could be anyone's game.

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>All it takes Nathan clearly to have an off game,

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and we don't say that often. We don't see him

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>having an off game often, but all of a sudden,

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:39.839
<v Speaker 1>the favorites could be done and that could leave I

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>think will be the Grand Final. Now bold statement, A

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Rooster's Warriors Grand.

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you're going Rooster's Warriors. Look, it's It's interesting because

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 2>I think we're also underestimating what an impact of Dylan

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Edwards and Mitch Kenny not being there. So I think

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 2>that changes a narrative little bit when those two come back.

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Dylan Edwards I believe might be a chance this week.

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Mitch Kenny we're probably not going to see him until

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 2>the finals. So even if they don't have Isaiah, you

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:13.439
<v Speaker 2>inject those two guys back in the spine. I think

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 2>we're having a different conversation. But you know what I

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 2>know watching that game on the weekend, Yes, Penrith weren't

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 2>at their best. They were off, you know, in that

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 2>last twenty minutes fifteen minutes, Nathan Cleary sort of took

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 2>that team on his back and almost got them home.

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 2>But I realized he can't do it on his saying,

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 2>So they're going to they're going to need Mitch Kenny back,

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 2>and they're going to need Dylan Edwards back, hopefully, you know,

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 2>as fit as he possibly can be at this time

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 2>of the year. And I think that makes a difference

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 2>if they lose another spine guy between now and the finals.

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to write them off, but I don't

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 2>think they look as dangerous as they did. You know

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 2>at the start of the year, what did.

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>You make of Blasee Talani not getting put onto the field?

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>We heard word twenty four hours before that Jack Coggar

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't make the trip. The news break that blaslong he

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>was going to get recalled into that side, but Ivan

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Cleary decided to go Jack Cole instead of Jack Cole

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and Nathan Cleary combination. Do you reckon it's just Blaze,

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you just got to wait, We just we just want

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to keep you out for a bit, or do you

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>reckon this is a sign that maybe they don't feel

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to be there guy going into into September.

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Good question, and I think it's a little bit of both,

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, like because we know what Blaze can do

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to, you know, creating opportunities the attack

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 2>and the rest of it. But the problem is that

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 2>edge in defense has been a problem, and it has

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 2>been a problem all year. And we saw when he

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 2>first came to the club that you know, Ivan Cleary

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 2>had no problem with letting him, you know, get to

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 2>learn their systems, bide his time before he you know,

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 2>blooded him. And Ivan's just making what he thinks. I

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 2>think it's a defensive thing. What is best for the team,

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 2>What that means for him going forward, I'm not sure.

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Jack Coggar stayed back because his missus was

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 2>having a baby, so obviously that changes. I'm assuming this

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 2>week he's back, and I think I think that Jack

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Coga Nathan Cleary combination works better for them. I don't

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 2>know what your thoughts are on that, and I understand

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 2>why people questioning what it means for Blaze, but I

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 2>think in terms of being a foil for Nathan Cleary,

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 2>I think Jack Cogger that probably does that a bit

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 2>better at than Blaze to Lungey, And I think defensively,

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Ivan is worried about that edge really really being a

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 2>weakness for them going into the finals.

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree with you on. It's definitely a defensive

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>thing and that edge has struggled, and then you've got

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got to make a decision if you're eitheran is

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a Blazer is a Casey McLean that you drop We

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>all know what Casey McLean is. Now, he's an origin player.

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>You know he's one of the best centers in the competition.

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel as though Blaze is being a bit of

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the fall guy here, a bit of escapegoat because at

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the start of the year when parents were dominating and

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>we didn't think they'd lose a game all year, Blaze

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>were scoring tries, were setting up tries, taking short sides,

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>his creative playoff the back of eighth and actually, what

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>I really enjoyed about Pedis at the start of the

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>year was Nathan's kicking game along with Blazers chase. Because

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you had an extra Chaser in there, all of a sudden,

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>you put more pressure on the defense and you can

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>put you can get a drop ball, you can get this,

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 1>you can get that. He's getting a lot of results.

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, I think if you're gonna don't don't mess

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 1>with Blazer's head, right, If Blaze is if Blaze is

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be or five to eighth. You know, sure,

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>let him you dropped him. Once he starts getting better,

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:32.359
<v Speaker 1>you have to put him back in that team. I

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.479
<v Speaker 1>think I don't think they can win a premiership without Blaze,

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, because I think Blaze is just and

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.199
<v Speaker 1>you say whatever you want about his defense and whatnot,

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 1>but you need flair, you need attack. And that's the

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>one thing on the weekend watching Penrith and I went,

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>they're struggling to score points. They're struggling to score points.

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>So this is a team that doesn't struggle to score points.

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Blaze fixes that. Fatima. We are heading in to the

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>pointy end of the year and crunch from numbers of

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>how to look at you've got? We've got drop? I

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>dropped maths in a year eleven okay, but the calculator

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>still does work on my phone. So we're all right

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the team. We are heading in to the pointy end

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 1>of the year and crunch from numbers. I've had to

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>look at you you've got We've got drop? I dropped

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>maths in a year eleven okay, but the calculator still

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>does work on my phone, so we're all right. There

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 1>is a few teams that are locked into the eight

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>so Pentis, Panthers, locked in, Roosters, Warriors, Sharks, the Dolphins,

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Knights.

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Which I mean, you're looking at the Knights, Okay, Well, I.

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Don't believe they need any more wins. I think they're

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>locked in. So I think seventh and eighth are the

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>two spots up for grabs. Now. The Rabbit O's will

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:47.479
<v Speaker 1>need two out of four wins, the Cowboys one out

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 1>of three wins, the Bulldogs three out of four wins,

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Manly four out of four wins, and then the Storm Raiders, Eels, Tigers, Titans,

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Broncos and Dragons. Sadly we're going to put a line

0:18:59.320 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>through them.

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's fair enough.

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think this is interesting because we've got the

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Rabbits and the Dogs facing off against each other yep,

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and you just feel as though whoever loses this game

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>is going to fall out. The Cowboys, they are a

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>team that got eighty two points to put on them

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the other week. I can almost guarantee that they're going

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to play finals out of the easy show coming home. Ye,

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>requiring one out of three wins got the buy. I

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>think the ridings of the ball and The Cowboys are

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a momentum team as well. If they can go on

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a run into the finals, they get Tom diden back

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>who knows where they can finish? Who knows where? Like

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you know yet week one, Week two of the finals.

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:44.719
<v Speaker 1>They're a team that has enough talent that they can

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>put on a I.

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Know, but a team with that much talent shouldn't get Yes, yes,

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, smacked by eighty points thinking about that momentum, right,

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 2>and you're right, they do have a Of those teams,

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 2>they have the softest run, which includes a buy so

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Ils Tigers, right you think, you know, no offense to

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 2>both of our teams at the moment, and even the Eels, who,

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 2>let's face that, haven't been amazing for the last couple

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 2>of weeks. But even if they win all those games,

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 2>that's a pretty soft momentum going into the finals, I think,

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:18.560
<v Speaker 2>you know what I mean, Like, I don't think that

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 2>sort of gives them enough of that competitive edge going in.

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 2>But having said that, I just simply don't trust them,

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 2>like you know the Raiders. You know, the Raiders can

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 2>be a thorn in the sides of a couple of

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 2>teams to in the season, but yeah, you're right, Like,

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 2>looking at that draw, you think you should at least

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 2>hope that, you know, they should make it. The Dogs

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 2>and the Rabbit O's are interesting, Like you said, they

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 2>play each other. The Dogs play the Dragons, Panthers and

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 2>the Broncos and then the Rabbit O's after the Dogs

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 2>game finished with the Warriors Titans Roosters, and that's probably

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 2>the the tougher run with the Warriors and finishing that

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 2>final round with the rooster So yeah, I know, Cannaby right,

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 2>three from four. Yeah, yeah, I think looking at that,

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 2>I reckon they should beat the Rabbit O's. They'll beat

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 2>the Dragons, they've beaten Penrith before, they'll give them a

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.199
<v Speaker 2>bit of confidence, and who knows what the Broncos are

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 2>going to offer up and the final round of the season.

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So you think you think could do it?

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 2>I think they can. I still think they're ironing out

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 2>some things which we saw clearly in that Rooster's game.

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 2>And even you know, for all of the fanfare over

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:32.959
<v Speaker 2>the Lachlan Galvin Stephen Crichton combination, and it has been

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 2>good and Galvin has been playing some decent footy, creating opportunity,

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 2>scoring tries really he's sort of, you know, been one

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 2>of their only spucks in attack in the last couple

0:21:42.040 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 2>of weeks. I'm not fully sold on it. You know,

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 2>Galvin was on The Maddie John Show last night on

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Sunday and I don't think he's him said openly put

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 2>his hand up and said he's not an organizer. That's

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 2>not his thing. Well neither he even Crichton. That that's

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 2>going to be a problem. And I think we saw

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of that, that lack of game management

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 2>in that Roosters game where they just sort of didn't

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Pepper Cody Ramsey under the high ball as much as

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 2>they should have, and just little things like that. The

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 2>combination sort of you know, there was a moment there

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 2>between Galvin and Crichton. Mc Galvin had a bit of

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 2>a goal at Creator for that ball handling error when

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 2>they were shifting to the left.

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I think I like that though. I like that from it.

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>It might be a game organizer, but if you're going

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to be the half back and you throw and it

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>was a fine pass, yes, Stephen crid has just made

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>an error. You having the balls to go up to

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Creator and say what he said, whatever it was, we

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 1>all saw the optics of it. I think that shows

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.880
<v Speaker 1>an everlution in Galvin's game because I think I don't

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>remember if it was last year or the year before. Galvin,

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>mister tackle and creator, has just blasted him. Yeah, you know,

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>now all of a sudden, we're in a stage where

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>if Locke is that main guy, if he is that

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 1>number seven, then he has to be to do that.

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>The only thing that's frustrating me about the Dogs at

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the moment he mentioned kicking game. You have one of

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the best kickers in the competitionary team in Matt Burden,

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>who does not kick the ball. I know he's playing

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in the centers. BO see him do it in Origin

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 1>and we were told when he moved to the centers

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that his kicking game would still be a part of

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>their game plan. But it's been completely eradicated. He does

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 1>not kick.

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 2>Now he doesn't kick, but he hasn't really sort of

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 2>kicked that. If you're talking about the big spiral bomb, don't.

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Have to be a big bomb. He's got the biggest

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>boot on the team.

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think to what by the end of the game.

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 2>I think he kicked once in the first half and

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 2>then kicked on the last maybe three two, three times

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 2>in the second half, but towards the end of the

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:42.359
<v Speaker 2>second half. But you're right. Overall, that weapon that he

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 2>has has I don't not say nullified, but you know

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 2>he has sort of put it in the back pocket.

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 2>But that's not anything new, Like you know, Siro's sort

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 2>of spoken about that. I think even as as far

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 2>back as last year, I sort of remember him in

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 2>particular the spiral bomb.

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's not a fan of the spiral bom.

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Putting it away. So look, I think something like the

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 2>spiral bomb when you've got you know, you know the

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 2>back three are shaky or a shakey fullback. You know,

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 2>sometimes they're not expecting it to come from a center

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 2>that's a last play option. They haven't. They should have

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 2>gone to it a bit more against the Roosters than

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 2>they didn't. But yeah, it's when you look at the

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:22.439
<v Speaker 2>playmakers they have. Fret is capable, Galvin's capable, But you're right,

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 2>it's the kicking game where they're probably lacking the most.

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Now it's time for our BS Messages of the Week,

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and guys, we want to hear from you. If you

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:33.400
<v Speaker 1>have your BS, what you find BS about our game?

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Send them in to Code Sports dot com dot Au.

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:38.959
<v Speaker 1>Now let's dive straight into it. We got Phil from

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:42.479
<v Speaker 1>Bunderberg and I quite like this one because it's been

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>giving me. I'm not going to say what's been given me,

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>but give me something for quite some time. How does

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>it take five minutes to find a reason to rule

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>out a try? Just give it and let us bloody celebrate, mate.

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree. I sat at Cogra last night on

0:24:57.640 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the hill, neutral fan. I'm not a fan of either team,

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and I watched them dissect if I think it was

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>set to to his foot went over the sideline or

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>not with five minutes to go. We've all got pair

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 1>of we've all got a pair of eyes. We can

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>all see. It doesn't take long. You can watch one

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 1>replay and find out and then the insufficient evidence comes

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 1>in and this and that the team of how do

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you find it? Because it does my head in.

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 2>I feel like this year we are taking far more

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 2>time to come to a decision on things. And I

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 2>get that, but if we had the opposite where you know,

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 2>tries were just being given and then all of a

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:37.640
<v Speaker 2>sudden they show a different replay and then there's you know, yeah,

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:40.919
<v Speaker 2>I just want, whether it's the referee or the bunker,

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:42.919
<v Speaker 2>to get it right as many times as possible.

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>We I'll tell you this, Phil, just for your information.

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I was having a conversation with the Great Mitchell Pierce

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago, and he told me in France,

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>where he's currently coaching at the moment, our five minutes

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 1>is like twenty minutes over there, so we may have

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>it lucky. I still don't like it. I'm with you there.

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's get rid of it. Let's be able to celebrate.

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to see the Tigers win games. I don't

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>want to see you try to take it off the Tigers.

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into the next one. John from Illawan great area, Ellawong,

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>what about the new Grand Final Week proposal? What do

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:13.879
<v Speaker 1>you guys think? Now, for those who don't know, there

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:17.680
<v Speaker 1>is a proposal to make Grand Final Week a bit

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 1>more footy orientated. We'll get a couple more games. This

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>talks of an all stars match, under twenty one match

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>and a third v Fourth match. Now I'll start with

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a third v Fourth match for Tema. This comes off

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the back of the World Cup third place qualifier, sorry

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>not third place qualifier. A third Place Metal whatever you

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 1>call it, where France and England put on an absolute show.

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Both teams decided not to play defense and we saw

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a football match go to like five six goals a piece. Right,

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't work in rugby league. I think once your

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>season is over, once you get knocked out, you do

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>not want to go and play the third place. Boys

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:57.360
<v Speaker 1>want to go on Mad Monday. They want to celebrate.

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>The season is long enough as it is already, and

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, it's it's it's concerning that we're getting

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to this stage because is it going to just be

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>a game full of reserve grader? Is these clubs we

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>heard there's a monetary thing. There's a monetary thing involved,

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>but clubs don't need money.

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:16.159
<v Speaker 2>Isn't there a monetruy thing involved in the preseason Challenge?

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know sometimes that in that final week

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 2>of the preseason Challenge, we see the best, but you know,

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 2>most of it it's forty man squads and the rest

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 2>of it. And I get why they do that. It's

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 2>to sort of give people a chance before round one.

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 2>But that's the thing. Our season starts at the preseason Challenge.

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 2>We've got Round one that's split into two weeks now

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 2>because of Vegas. You know, you throw Origin in between that.

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:43.719
<v Speaker 2>Plus this year, this year is a World Cup year.

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 2>The season's done, Like you said, it is long enough.

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Why do we need to play third v Fourth? So

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't hate the under twenty one's Origin.

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't like that because what are we going to

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>have two under Origin game?

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, we've got under nineteens.

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:05.199
<v Speaker 1>Ah, yes, it's under nineteen twenty ones, but not.

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 2>In Grand Final week. Like I wouldn't mind seeing another

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 2>like Origin because the under nineteens is a one off. Right,

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 2>We've got everything. It's great, but not at the end

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 2>of the year. Or I think All Stars was the

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:20.959
<v Speaker 2>other one that was proposed. Maybe, but again it's one

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 2>of those things that you're asking players potentially whose season

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 2>had finished a few weeks before that, to then come

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 2>back into camp. You know, I just yeah, let the

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 2>players have a break. It really really is a long season,

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 2>plus as well Cup this year. No, I don't like it.

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this, John, Let's let's let the players decide.

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I like what Fatima said. You know, let's let's see

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>what the players want to do. It's all good for

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>these clubs to have have ideas and whatnot. But I

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>like that. Let's see what the players want to do

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and just remember sending your best messages of the week.

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Go to code sports dot com dot au. We want

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to hear from you. We have two great ones today

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and we want more next week