WEBVTT - Trumped or stumped…your sharemarket dilemma 

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:13.399
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to the Australians Money Puzzle podcast. I'm

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.479
<v Speaker 1>James Kirby. Welcome aboard everybody. Now, for investors in shares,

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the single biggest question I believe this year is how

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you as an investor deal with the market, the share market,

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the global market under the influence if you like, of

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the US and Donald Trump. And if you get this right,

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you will win in the market, as has

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:39.840
<v Speaker 1>been the case for some time now since the election

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of Trump. And if you get it wrong, your share

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>portfolio I think would be something of a sorry sight

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in a few months time. And the same goes for

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.560
<v Speaker 1>people who are professionals in the market, who are specialists

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>in the market. And my guest today is a specialist

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in the market. It's Nick Griffin. He is the co

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>founder and chief investment officer at the Monro Group. The

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Monro Group is a fund manager has about six billion

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars under management at the moment. It's an active manager.

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>They are stock pickers. They select a relatively small amount

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of stocks and go with it. How are you, Nick?

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Good? Thanks James yourself?

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Good? Thank you. Nice to have you on the show.

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a funny thing as we sit here midyear, mid

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>calendar year on the show for all the dramas, and

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>I imagine a lot of traders or lost a lot

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of money. But for all the dramas, things have almost

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 1>back to where they started. On Trump. By that I

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>mean shares. They're not greatly up or greatly down on

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 1>the market so far, but that's by no means indicates

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>that Trump has settled down. Is Trump and his administration

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>and their activities do they really, to a large extent

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>director affect how your outcomes will be this year and

0:01:57.840 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>going forward?

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 2>So great question, and yes, they obviously have some influence.

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 2>We have a tagline at Monroe Partner's which is called

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 2>invest in the Journey. We run global equity products that

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.919
<v Speaker 2>invest in global growth companies, so any company outside of

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Australia that we think can grow over time. And it

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 2>has been a journey in the first half of the year,

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 2>that's for sure. What we're seeing here is the share

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 2>markets sort of get used to the way Trump does business,

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 2>which is to, you know, do something really big and

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 2>see what breaks and then roll it back. We sort

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 2>of should know this because that's what he did last

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 2>time as well. But ultimately it's important for all the

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 2>listeners to remember that ultimately that the global equities and

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 2>stocks generally follow their earnings. And so what you've really

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 2>got to analyze out of Trump is he doing anything

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 2>that's going to change the earnings outlook for these companies.

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 2>And I would argue in some cases that's correct. Yes,

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you're affected by tariffs, your earnings will

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:55.119
<v Speaker 2>be affected. If you're expecting an economic recovery this year,

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 2>that may not happen. But in other cases, like for instance, Microsoft,

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 2>you know is a good example, it's not really going

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 2>to change how much money Microsoft's going to make this year,

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 2>and it's probably not going to change what they're going

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 2>to make next year. And so many people have used

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 2>this volatility as an opportunity to invest in things that

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 2>they feel confident to get to grow earnings regardless of

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 2>the environment. That's sort of how i'd frame the discussion.

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, I see you as a fund manager, and I

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>see and you are an active fund manager. I won't

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 1>say old style, that's not because that's probably not what

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to hear, but you're an active fund manager, right,

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>So your proposition to the investor is, look, I'm going

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to charge you a fee and if I outperform beyond

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>what my benchmark is, I'm going to charge an extra

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>fee performance fee, and I am going to select from

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, thousands and thousands of stocks a relatively small

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>amount twenty to forty in your two big funds, and

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to come with me, as you say, on

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>this journey. This area has been a minefield of recent times,

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and the big names that we all knew, Midgellen and Platinum,

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>they've all come undone to the uninitiated, you're doing something

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>awfully similar, but you are growing and have had good results,

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>particularly since your inception. So what is your approach? What

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>is your could you try and to steal your distinct

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>approach why you've managed to grow when others around you

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>are struggling.

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thank you for the opportunity. So I think a

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 2>lot of people look at the share market the wrong way.

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people sort of and a lot of

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:30.839
<v Speaker 2>those companies you mentioned, they would look at the share

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 2>market and basically say, this is what we think the

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 2>global economy is going to do, and we want to

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 2>be overweight certain countries because that country's economy is going

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 2>to do better and this other country economy is can

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.359
<v Speaker 2>do worse, and this sector will be better, and this

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 2>sector will do worse. And we would say that's just

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 2>all noise and probably, quite frankly, a bit of a

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 2>waste of time. The reality is, in our opinion, the

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.359
<v Speaker 2>equity market is made up of very few great companies

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 2>and thousand thousands of mediocre ones. The reality is the

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 2>S and P five hundred is not actually the it's

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 2>the best five hundred companies in the United States, and

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 2>it's made up of these exceptional businesses that are doing

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 2>exceptional things, and that exceptional things that they do create

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 2>strong earnings growth, and their earnings growth creates share price growth.

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 2>So when we look at the world, what we're trying

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 2>to do for our clients to say, we have the

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 2>entire world to choose from. There's more than thirty thousand

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 2>listed companies. We're going to do our best effort to

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 2>pick the most exceptional twenty to forty that we think

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 2>we can buy at good valuations, that they think can

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 2>grow structurally sustainably over a long period of time.

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>So you're you're a bottom up, well, it's very much

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 1>bottom up and very much what you described that you

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>don't make is top down. Okay, so you're associated you've

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>had a good run beyond doubt by being involved in

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the Magnificent seven stocks and they did very well for you.

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>If we take a long period of time in the

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>last few years as IF fund manager, that's what allowed

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you to grow. And they are the outstanding sort of

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>champions of you. Like all of the arguments you're making,

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>will they continue to be.

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:09.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? And so to do this well, what you should

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 2>do is not look at the economy or the sectors,

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 2>look at the big structural changes and who's going to win.

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 2>So that's what we do. We try and identify the

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 2>big structural changes and you identify who win. You talked

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 2>about the Magnificent seven. They are the big digital winners. Okay,

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 2>So everybody on this phone call remembers, you know, when

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 2>we used to read newspapers on the train. We don't anymore.

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.799
<v Speaker 2>We read our phone and generally we're looking at Facebook

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 2>or Instagram, or we're looking at Google, etc. And so

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 2>they have structurally won from digital advertising. There's no reason

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.919
<v Speaker 2>why that one continue. They've structurally won by the shift

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 2>to the cloud. So anybody who hosts anything in the

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 2>cloud has to host it at three companies. Amazon Google

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 2>or Microsoft. They're the only cloud providers on the planet.

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 2>And so what's generally happening here is digitalization is creating

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 2>network effects around these companies, and they become the advertising

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 2>company for the world, they become the software company for

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 2>the world. And so all they're doing is taking share

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 2>from Channel seven, Channel nine, Fairfax, et cetera, and bring

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:07.280
<v Speaker 2>that back to the US. So coming back to my point,

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 2>they're not really linked to the US economy. They're linked

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 2>to the point that digital takes share.

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>From their their global they're global and they're base in

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>But I actually when I was asking you at the

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>start that Magnificent seven, they're all in your top what

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>top ten? Would that be fair?

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Not all of them? No, So we would own four

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 2>of the seven today. And so we like in Video

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:29.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot, we like Meta a lot, we like Amazon

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 2>a lot, and we like Microsoft a lot.

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Okay, So tell us that's who you like. And

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe we could have guessed that to some degree. When

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I looked at the top holdings in the fund, there

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>were some names that weren't at all tech or digital

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that you like. Give us an example of some of those.

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So if you're investing in structural changes. There's lots

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 2>of structural changes in the world. They don't necessarily have

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 2>to be tech. The really simple one for the last

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 2>decade is being cashed to card. You know, you can

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 2>invest in MasterCard or Visa slightly taking but the reality

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 2>is everybody on this this podcast doesn't use cash anymore.

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 2>They benefited from that. But another great example for US

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 2>has been security. We've been investing in, for instance, European

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 2>defense companies for more than three years because we felt

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 2>that the war would cause a structural shift in defense spending,

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 2>and that's what's happened the Ukraine War. Yes, and we've

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 2>invested in things like homeland security, so we own companies

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 2>like Axel and Motorolo solutions that you help police with policing,

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 2>help with body cameras, et cetera, et cetera. So all

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 2>of these areas are basically you're basically trying to identify

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 2>the area structural change and identify the winner. Healthcare is

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 2>another obvious area where we've goun things like Lily and

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.079
<v Speaker 2>Orice that producers and Munjara. So these are big structural

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 2>changes that occur in the world, and as a global investor,

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 2>we can identify the change and investor benefit for our clients.

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>How do you get an edge on that you're sitting

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 1>in Australia, how do you say that drug in that

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>big farmer company is going to be the one that

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>moves the dial. And what competitive advantage could you possibly have.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 2>That's a great question. So what we think and Monroe,

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 2>in case you don't know, is a word for Scottish mountains.

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Mountains over three thousand feet of Monroe's and I spent

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:15.199
<v Speaker 2>a lot of my career living and working in Edinburgh,

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 2>and if you go to other places in the world

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 2>like Edinburgh, there are fund managers who sit in a

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 2>very far away place in the world and take long

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.439
<v Speaker 2>term views of the world. When I looked at those

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 2>fund managers, that's what we wanted Monroe to be in Australia.

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 2>So we have roughly thirty one people here in Melbourne, Australia,

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 2>and we are just trying to solve one problem. Who

0:09:30.760 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 2>are these exceptional companies We look in these areas of

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 2>structural growth and obviously we do heaps of research and

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 2>we travel extensively.

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so your cultural training was in that well that

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Scottish Aberdeen, Scottish widows, Bill Gifford, whoever. They're all in Edinburgh, Canny.

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>We know that, but that's your cultural context, correct.

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And so the word Monroe is you know, a

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:54.839
<v Speaker 2>bit of homage, because that's how we want it to

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 2>be like them. And so to answer your question specifically,

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 2>we travel a lot, we talk to everybody in an area,

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 2>so we might know the whole world well, but these

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 2>areas of structural growth, we know them really well. And

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 2>so next week I'm off to see these states. I'm

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 2>off to see in Video Gain. I've been going to

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 2>see in Video for six years now. We've owned the

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 2>company since twenty eighteen. Every time we speak to them,

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 2>they tell us what they're doing. Every time we go back,

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 2>they're roughly achieving what they say. And so this just

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 2>comes from experience and research quite frankly, just extensive research

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 2>to help you find those few winners.

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>And you find getting in front of the companies still

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>very important. Do are you sitting face to face?

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Sitting face to face for the companies and also with

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:40.079
<v Speaker 2>their customers. So in in videos case, for instance, their

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 2>biggest customers are other companies we own, like Meta and

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Google and Amazon. And they will tell us that in

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Video's the best chips. They've been telling us in Video

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 2>is the best chips for ten years. So that just

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 2>checks out what the other companies told you. And this

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 2>is just again but I come back to the first point.

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.559
<v Speaker 2>Different to our peers. This is all we're trying to solve.

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 2>We're not trying to solve the economy. I'm not trying

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 2>to solve what French retail sales are doing. I'm just

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 2>trying to solve who are the big structural winners and

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 2>as over time we just the more we do it,

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 2>the better we get at it.

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right now. One of the things I'm really

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.559
<v Speaker 1>interested and hear your view, which seems to be the

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>big question for the Australian investor this year and the

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:18.719
<v Speaker 1>big question for the big super funds this year, and

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about it on stage and they're giving different answers,

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>is whether you should stick with the US, whether after

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>all these years, it can keep doing what it's doing

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>because it's been so good. And there's been some big

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>fund address saying we're coming back to Australia, some saying no,

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>we're sticking with the US. They've been tested, that's for sure.

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to come back to that after a break. Hello,

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.319
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. James Kirby

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>here talking to Nick Griffin of the Monroe Partners Investment Group,

0:11:56.040 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>specialist really in global investing, offshore investing with a well.

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>As he's explaining the first part of the show, he's

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>really interested as picking companies bottom up based on their

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>numbers and their promise, if you like, of a structural

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>change which gives them a leap in profitability. I mean,

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously you mentioned the video. Why wouldn't you. That's the

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>one that's everyone's favorite right now and it's staying up,

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>which is fascinating. But Nick, what about that issue then

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that how could the US possibly continue to return the

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:30.960
<v Speaker 1>level of returns. It's not that it's been better than

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the ASEX, like it's been multiples better than the ASEX

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:38.679
<v Speaker 1>for years and years. Do you think that's forever now?

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 2>So from our point of view over the medium term

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 2>the answers yes, over the medium term. Over the short term,

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 2>I can see why multiples in the US might be

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 2>too high and multiples in the UK and France are

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 2>too low and they should converge with each other for

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 2>a period of time, but in the end it's earning scritter.

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 2>As I said before, the Drivestock prices, And if you

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 2>want to invest in cloud computing, you have to invest

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 2>in the US. If you want to invest in semiconductive development,

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 2>you pretty much have to invest in the US. Outside

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 2>oft SA Tearsom see in.

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan, there's the emergence of structural tariffs.

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Tariffs, and I agree that tariffs are an issue, but

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 2>they are sort of a one time issue. So it's

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 2>a one time cost to these companies that will that

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 2>they'll deal with, but then they'll go back to doing

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 2>what they do before, which is, you know, be positioned

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 2>in these great areas. And it's not I want to

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 2>be clear on the call, it's not the Australian's fault

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 2>that this is happening in the US. It happens in

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 2>the US not because they're smarter than US. It happens

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:38.680
<v Speaker 2>because they've just got more people and they've got more money.

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 2>And so if you think about it, and I've said

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 2>this example a lot, if Google was invented in Australia,

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 2>it still wouldn't have won. But when Google's invented in

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 2>the US, everyone looks at Google, so everyone has to

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 2>be on Google. So everyone looks at Google, so everyone

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 2>has to be on Google, and then Google becomes the

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 2>dominant search engine in the world.

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Someone just reminded me the other day that the Australian

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>company looks smart.

0:13:58.600 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah poor.

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Once upon a time met a bit for Google one time,

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>which would have been really good if Big got it.

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, well, you can have a lot of funny at

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Alta Vista, ask Jeeves. Yeahoo, there was exortent. But now

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Google has a ninety seven percent market share. That's network

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 2>effects at work. Microsoft does this as well. You're the

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 2>biggest software company, so everyone uses Microsoft server and has

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 2>to be on Microsoft server, news microphones Exactly. The same

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 2>thing's happening at Netflix. And so these network effects around

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 2>digitalization is concentrating wealth in companies that happened to be

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 2>listed in the US. Why because they were. They have

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 2>the biggest population based on money base to start with,

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 2>not because they're smarter.

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you worry at all that the Trump and this

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>is the second term of Trump, and it's stronger obviously

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>than ever, more confident if you could imagine such a thing,

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>but more confident in his position in power, do you

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>worry that this core worry that the US itself, that

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it's bond market, that it's currency may be at a

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>period where it's about to decline, Like all empires decline,

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>nothing lasts forever, and it's an empire and it's the

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>beginning of its decline, and Trump, in some ways is

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the personification of that. What do you say to that view.

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Of the world. That is a very good question. So

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 2>I think we can all agree that these companies are

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 2>clearly stronger and potentially more powerful and more likely to

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 2>grow than say a French supermarket or a Japanese trading company.

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 2>So I think most people can see that and they

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 2>want to invest in the US. But the point you

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 2>make is a good one. So, but the problem is

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 2>what happens if the currency goes down? What happens if

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 2>the bond market riots, etc. These are what we would

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 2>call exogenous shocks. The currency is less of an issue

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 2>because we can hedge that out for instance, and vice versa.

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 2>A lot of these companies are foreign earners, so they

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 2>actually end up their ownings going up as the currency

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 2>going down. But the bond market things a big issue

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 2>because if the bond market at it for in some

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 2>point then that would cause you know, a significantly bigger

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 2>economic slowdown, and I can see some reasons to diversify there.

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 2>The only last thing I'd say is, look, obviously, people

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 2>have been predicting this for twenty years, and that's twenty

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 2>years of great returns they missed out on. It could

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 2>and may happen one day, maybe today's day. Maybe it's not.

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 2>But obviously that's something we're watching very closely. But fundamentally,

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 2>the corporates in the US are growing faster, they're more dynamic,

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 2>they're more advantaged, and so ultimately we prefer at least

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 2>having at least a good chunk of our money there

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 2>because the companies we like the most there.

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, well, fairly for some support for the

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>US market there, Okay, while we have you. For anyone

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that's listening to you, what they love to hear from

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>someone like you is what you see as hotspots and

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>black spots basically in the coming year, well, this particular climate,

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>this market, what are the sort of companies and you

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>have to some extents illustrated what you do like, what

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you've always liked. Is there anything new that are a

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>new theme that you are keen on and are there

0:16:57.440 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>themes that you keep away from?

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Great And so just to clarify the last question, it

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 2>doesn't mean we don't just invest outside the US. We do.

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:08.360
<v Speaker 2>We do. We do like companies like TSMC, for instance,

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 2>in Taiwan. And I already talked about European defense stocks earlier.

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 2>So if we can find structural growth in other parts

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 2>of the world, by all means, we'll invest in Okay,

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 2>going forward, this is an exciting time and I know

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 2>Trump is causing volatility, and I know it's hard to

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:25.239
<v Speaker 2>keep track of. But in the background we have the

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 2>emergence of AI, and so artificial intelligence, we think is

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 2>probably going to be the biggest structural change in the

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:33.120
<v Speaker 2>next decade. This is the fourth tectonic shift in computing,

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 2>if you think about it. So we went through a

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 2>mainframe era, we went through a PC era, we went

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 2>through a mobile era. We're now in an AI era.

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 2>And so what's going to happen is you're going to

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 2>connect every device on the planet to the Internet, and

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 2>AI is going to process that data to give us

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.879
<v Speaker 2>better outcomes. The beauty of AI, which is really interesting,

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 2>is it doesn't just affect software and consumer application and

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 2>infects things like autonomous driving, robotics, like drug discovery, and

0:17:56.119 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 2>like security. And so we are finding today companies that

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 2>can harness this technology are seeing a massive structural shift

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 2>in their ownings growth at a big structural shift in

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 2>the attractiveness of their product.

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Can you give me an example of somebody.

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I'll give you a couple of examples. So

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 2>one example i'd mentioned is again those security companies I

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 2>talked about before. So if you're a company selling security cameras,

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 2>for instance, you sell security cameras, you can now put

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 2>software on those security cameras, and you can identify who's

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 2>at your front door. You can identify threat detection faster

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 2>and better, and so you sell hardware and now software

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 2>and software. That's quite frankly, everyone is cool. Everyone's podcast

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 2>can see is quite useful. That would be one example.

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:39.679
<v Speaker 2>If you think about medical technology or MRI technology, you

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 2>can now get an MRI and potentially identify cancer.

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Two years earlier diagnostics acceleration.

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and so you basically and everybody would know that

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 2>finding cancer earlier is obviously what we'd all like to

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 2>do to stay live longer. So there's a general benefit

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 2>for using the technology and a reason why people would

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 2>pay for it. In both those examples, those would be

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 2>two i'd give you off the bat. But the last

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 2>one is obviously software. You know, we can summarize this podcast.

0:19:06.520 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 2>You can drop it into a GPT and it'll just

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 2>tell you what the summary was without having to listen

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 2>to the whole thing. You can summarize the good parts.

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>If you do that, yeah, you're going to miss jokes.

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about what you don't like.

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 2>So what we don't like. So honestly, just mediocre companies.

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying they're bad. I'm just saying that they're

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 2>stuck in competitive industries that that ultimately I don't have

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 2>an edge versus say someone else who's looking at it.

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 2>So i'd give you an example here is like banks.

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean banks are great and obviously in Australia they

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 2>have done well, but they're not growing that much and

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 2>you rely on interest rates in the economy and a

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 2>whole bunch of things that I have a view on,

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:48.880
<v Speaker 2>but I don't have an edge. I've got an edge

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 2>on AI I think we do, and that's how we're

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 2>making money. Other areas would be you know, a consumer

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 2>fashion is hard like, it's hard. I'm not very fashionable,

0:19:58.240 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 2>but I have people on my team who are fashionable.

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 2>But fashions change and so it's hard to get a

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.679
<v Speaker 2>three to five year viewpoint. We've got some companies in

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 2>this area that we like, but it is harder those

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I think you know, things like airlines

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 2>and stuff are rather anything that's a highly competitive industry. Lastly,

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 2>anything you know that the Chinese get into. If the

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Chinese turn up, generally the profits leave.

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>That sounds like the car. That sounds like that sounds

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>like cars.

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, cars, Cars is a terrible business, you know, basically

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 2>margins disappearing at speed in a massive technology race, environmental race.

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 2>It's hard and all these national champions that are quite

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 2>frankly going to disappear.

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, thanks cars, fashion companies. You heard it here first,

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, I have some actually very I've kept a

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of questions off my sleeve for you, Nick, and

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact the very first one is on airlines. So

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>we will be back in a moment with some very

0:20:52.119 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>good questions for me. Hello, oh, and welcome back to

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the Australian's Money Puzzle podcast. I'm James Kirby and I'm

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:08.400
<v Speaker 1>talking to Nick Griffin, fund manager at Monroe Partners, specialist

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 1>in overseas investing, primarily the US, but oh anywhere in

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the world that he thinks he can find value over

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and above what your ETF is going to do. And

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>your premise, Nick, which I didn't give you a chance

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:24.199
<v Speaker 1>to explain, obviously, I mentioned that you have fees. But

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>your proposal, obviously is you're going to beat the benchmark

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>being probably been the Mogen Standy Capital Internationally INDICX or whatever.

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>And to what extent have you managed to do that?

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 2>So in our call long any product the manner of

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 2>concentrated Global Growth Fund, which is our relative return fund,

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 2>we've made it by five percent per annum since.

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>In such Okay, all right, very good. Now, question Anthony.

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>I am interested in the airline sector. This is on

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the ASEX I hold Quantus and they have had a

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>great recovery, Anthony, they have had a great recovery. I

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>had no idea. I hadn't watched them. You know, everybody's

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with them during the allen joyce Vanessa Hudson. Maybe

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you know it was a nice time to come in

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to take over an airline in any event, I mean

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.439
<v Speaker 1>quite just has tripled since the bad days of COVID,

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's one of the better stops of the year. Now,

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Anthony's question is this, what is your investment take on airlines?

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>And I mean he mentions obvious things nick like like

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the price of aviation fuel, currencies, conflagrations around the world.

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>But in passing there on the second segment of the show,

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you basically said you didn't like airlines.

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'd put this, Yeah, so I'd put this in

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the you know, it's in the hard camp because you

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 2>need to I think the viewer poses the question, Well,

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.719
<v Speaker 2>you need to understand what's happening with fuel, you understand

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 2>what's happening with demand, you need to understand what's happening

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 2>with interest rates. These are things that are notoriously hard

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 2>to predict. And I'm not saying it's a bad investment,

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 2>and value investors could look at it and you can

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 2>trade it really well. I would just prefer to say that,

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, software is going to be an increasing share

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 2>of my wallet over a long period of time, and

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft's probably going to get it. And I just think

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 2>that's an easy event and a longer term bet. And

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 2>so I just encourage people to say, just as a screen,

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 2>if you're looking at a company and you can't tell

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 2>with extreme confidence what the earnings are going to be

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 2>three years from now, that it's probably not investment. It's

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 2>a train.

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Do you actually believe someone sits in front of you

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and says our earnings in three years time should be X.

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you really take that seriously?

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 2>I think from many companies in the world you can

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 2>actually and this is where it helps to be global.

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 2>You can actually predict that they're in such a strong

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 2>competitive position and you know that demand will grow. You

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 2>can predict that whether you want to pay them multiple

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 2>that you have to pay for it to get that.

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 2>It's a different story.

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>So this will be utility types companies, and I don't

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>by that, I don't necessarily mean pipelines. I would imagine

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Amazon to some extent is utility type.

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Tru fact, Amazon is a good example of this. Amazon's

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 2>a good example of this. TSMC is a good example

0:23:56.080 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 2>of this. Companies that live in industries where they're oligobalistic, monopolistic,

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 2>you know the industry's going to grow, and yes there

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 2>might be bumps, but you can say with a reasonable

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 2>amount of confidence over the next three to five years,

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.439
<v Speaker 2>that the earnings are going to be significantly higher, and

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 2>then you're just going to get her out in the multiple.

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 2>And the multiple is a different conversation, but that's more

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 2>of an investment. The ones where you can't predict it,

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 2>you're ultimately trading. And that's okay. People are really good

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 2>at that, and other people did. It's just not how

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:22.439
<v Speaker 2>we do it.

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>The problem with bottom up investing is the course that

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the on four that the black swan, the thing you

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>can't see coming. Like you mentioned t SMC and I'm

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>sure our listeners know that's Taiwan, the key semi conductor

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:36.959
<v Speaker 1>company in the world, based in Taiwan. I'm sure it's

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 1>earnings are great, it's in Taiwan. There's political risks there.

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you how do you factor that in?

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so obviously that's something I didn't say. I want

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 2>to say you sit here with confidence and say you

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 2>think that's going to happen. It doesn't mean it's going

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 2>to happen.

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:51.959
<v Speaker 1>And of course we presume you don't know the future.

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 2>But there's plenty of companies you can sit here today

0:24:53.800 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 2>and you say I can't actually predict this, but I'm

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 2>going to invest anyway, that's what we don't do. So

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 2>this is what we think will happen. So I mean,

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Taiwan does not get invaded, semikin demand's going to go up.

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 2>TSMC's a monopoly and their earnings will go up all

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 2>over time and probably double over the next five years.

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 2>But obviously things can go wrong, and that's what liquidity

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 2>is for. That's what things like stop losses are for,

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 2>and because sometimes you're going to make mistakes and you

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 2>should be obviously aware of that.

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Actually, the next question is on stop losses, which again

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I've curated especially for you, Huie. He says capital protection

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and position sizing is often mentioned as having a large

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 1>impact on investor returns. I was hoping you could discuss

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the use of stop losses for your average investor. Now

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>here's something really interesting, Hue. And of course, as always, folks,

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>none of this is advice information, only that Nick I

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>saw reports a few months ago. I knew you. I

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>knew as a fund that you guys were well into

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the US, and then I saw how the Trump there

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:53.360
<v Speaker 1>was the Trump sort of scare, if you like. In

0:25:54.520 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>when was it February when the market's really tumbled when

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 1>he launched the tower. He launched the tower. Really, I

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>saw where you had stop losses and at one stage

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that allowed your That meant your cash, which I imagine is

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 1>normally sitting at something like five to ten percent in

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 1>your funds, blew up to thirty percent of your fund

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>So I expect that was useful as long as you

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>applied it very smartly. Afterwards, I don't know how you did,

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>and I know, and I think it's worth putting on

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the record that this last quarter, I mean, you haven't

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>matched the index in this quarter for because whatever you're

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 1>up to strategically, which I'm sure you're hoping will work

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>out better. But that's worth putting on the table in

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>an event for a Hue Week about stop losses. They're useful.

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain, if you would, what you think about

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>them for the every day investor who's listening to the show.

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So it's a great question, and it's very misdute. Okay,

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 2>So if you think about it, you're trying to find

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 2>the top twenty to forty companies in the world, and

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 2>you're looking at the universe of thirty thousand. Let's take

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 2>it statistically, you're probably going to make some mistakes. In fact,

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 2>take it to the bank. You are going to make

0:26:56.680 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 2>some mistakes. Every investor will, and to listening to this

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 2>podcast has probably got a company that they owned that's

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.160
<v Speaker 2>sitting in the bottom drawer that they've lost ninety percent

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 2>of their money on and they can't bring themselves to

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 2>look at it. Seemed like a good idea at the time,

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 2>but they just and then they just kept hanging on

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 2>and hang in. We all o that, and trust me,

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 2>it's easy to do. So what a stop loss does

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 2>is you just basically pick a number minus ten, minus twenty, whatever,

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:24.199
<v Speaker 2>and you force yourself to look at the company. So

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 2>you don't have to sell it. You just force yourself.

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 2>We force ourselves to repitch the investment case. And when

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 2>we repitch that investment case, we say, has anything changed?

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 2>And if nothing's changed, then you know our mass is

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 2>still right. We're still happy to own the company. But

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 2>often if you force yourself to look at it before

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:42.399
<v Speaker 2>it turns into ninety percent, you might recognize that actually

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 2>something's changed. And in this case it was tariff's tariffs changed.

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 2>The tariff policy was much worse than everyone predicted, including us,

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 2>And if that has changed, for the company, and that's

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 2>going to change the earnings, then you should change your view.

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.120
<v Speaker 2>And so what we're trying to do there is it's

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 2>a reaction function. We're trying to force ourselves to look

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 2>at it quickly to change our view. And you made

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 2>the point earlier. You know, there was eleven search engines once,

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 2>and I could have been sitting here with my Yahoo

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.360
<v Speaker 2>stock saying, yeah, who's going to be the one. It's

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 2>going to be the one. But eventually, at some point

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:13.400
<v Speaker 2>it would have stopped out or stop lost. I would

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 2>have forced myself to look at it. I would have

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 2>gone I probably shouldn't be in Yahoo, and then I

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 2>probably would have ended up at Google. So not only

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 2>does it not only does it force you out of

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 2>your mistakes, it can often force you towards the winner

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:25.400
<v Speaker 2>that you missed the first time.

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Right. And the stop loss is where you see to

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:31.719
<v Speaker 1>the broker, if this stock goes under fifteen percent from

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 1>where it is, or pick a number ten twenty percent,

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>sell it.

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 2>So that's a direct that's how it can be interpreted.

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 2>But that's not what we do. So we're not forced

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 2>to sell it, We're just forced to review it.

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So an alarm bell rings for you.

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 2>And our alarm bell rings. Yes, and we're reviewing it

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 2>and then we can keep it. If we all decide

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 2>to keep it, we can keep it, but we can

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 2>only keep it for thirty days, and then you have

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 2>to review it again. And then in thirty days time,

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 2>you have to review it again, and eventually you realize

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 2>the mistake, you mate. And I think the simple way

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 2>to think about this, James, is, Look, the reality is

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 2>people spend all their time doing research buying stocks, and

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 2>then they buy them, but they don't do the same

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 2>amount of research when they're selling stocks. They just assume

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 2>every one of them is going to be great. But

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 2>statistically we know that's not what's going to happen. So

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 2>your cell decision is as important as your buy decision.

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 2>And so all we're doing is putting some discipline around

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 2>that rather than just assuming everything's going to be fine

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 2>the whole time, because as you pointed out earlier, everything's

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 2>not going to be fine the whole time. You know,

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 2>and you know, BlackBerry wasn't the smartphone winner, and eBay

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 2>wasn't the e commerce winner, and you know, and the

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 2>list goes on, and so you just got to be

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 2>wary that you're looking in the right place, but you

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 2>made a mistake, Accept the mistake, and go find the

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 2>next one. Otherwise it just sits in your bottom drawer,

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 2>it's away at your head, and it's stopping you from

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 2>making your next best decision. When mistakes is part of

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 2>this business. Everyone makes them, including us.

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>So it sounds like you think it's a damn good

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>idea really for someone like all the Hueyes of the

0:29:57.040 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>world out there to actively have stop last positions on

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>on not on all stocks, I imagine, but on volatile stocks, correct.

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 2>I think all you're saying is the price is potentially

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 2>forcing you to say question your view now often most

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 2>of the time, we decided to keep it Amazon, we've

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 2>owned for a decade. It would have stoped lost twenty

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 2>times over that period, and we never sold it. We

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 2>kept it the whole way. In Video, we've owned for

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 2>six years. It would have stoped lost twenty times over

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 2>the whole period, but we forced ourselves to requestion the

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 2>investment case and forever Nvidia, I can assure you there's

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 2>another five that didn't work out like that, where the

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 2>stop loss saved us a lot of money.

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, terrific, very good, I'm very interesting. I think we

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>leave it there.

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Nick.

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>We haven't had you on the show before. I'm delighted

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>we did hope to have you on again. Thank you

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>for your time.

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Thanks very much for having me.

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Lovely to have you Okay, folks, keep the emails rolling.

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Love to have some more on the markets too, because

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>we've been distracted by other issues of late particularly super etc.

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>But hey, you know you make your money in the markets.

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's have some questions the money puzzle at the Australian

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>dot com dot Hey, you talk to you soon.

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Servan