Speaker 1: On scoring Lis Oustrodia. This is the Reader Panalty Show.
Speaker 2: Good evening and welcome to the Riata Paniny Show. Coming
Speaker 2: up a massive program for you tonight, Queensland Opposition leader
Speaker 2: David chris A fully pledges to keep cold fired power
Speaker 2: stations open and to dump the truth Telling and Healing Inquiry.
Speaker 2: Douglas Murray will join you shortly to discuss the latest
Speaker 2: from the US and the Middle East. Also on the
Speaker 2: program tonight Kosher Gator, Nick Kata and Kinsey Schofield and
Speaker 2: we never neglect Lefty's losing it, including this Kamala fan.
Speaker 2: She seems nice. God damn but first judges have been
Speaker 2: told to be trauma informed when handing down judgments. In
Speaker 2: a new manual commissioned by the New South Wales Judicial
Speaker 2: Watchdog and endorsed by the Australasian Institute of Judicial Administrationation,
Speaker 2: the guide's focus is on a postmodern legal concept called
Speaker 2: therapeutic jurisprudence. The goal is to make sure that consequences
Speaker 2: for breaking the law have a positive impact on the
Speaker 2: wellbeing of defendants. The manual, authored by lawyer and psychologist
Speaker 2: doctor Ronda water Worth, gives guidance on how to handle
Speaker 2: cases involving defendants of certain backgrounds. For Indigenous Australians, it
Speaker 2: says they are still dealing with the pervasive intergenerational effects
Speaker 2: of settler colonialism, as well as the impact of successive
Speaker 2: generations of externally imposed government policies and discriminatory legislation which
Speaker 2: have marginalized, exploited, forced the removal of children, and otherwise
Speaker 2: undermined First Nations communities. The legacy of trauma and dispossession
Speaker 2: is interconnected with other aspects of First nation's disadvantage, such
Speaker 2: as the disproportional high incarceration rates. The guide also tells
Speaker 2: judges to look to the clear moral and ethical guidelines
Speaker 2: of the Islamic faith when dealing with Muslim defendants, as
Speaker 2: the religion has a strong principle of justice that focuses
Speaker 2: on reconciliation and making amends rather than mere punishment. This
Speaker 2: approach can facilitate the healing process for both offenders and victims,
Speaker 2: fostering a sense of accountability and personal growth. Indeed, there
Speaker 2: is a whole section devoted to encouraging judges to consider
Speaker 2: aspects of the Islamic faith, including this on Muslim defendants
Speaker 2: having a sense of personal responsibility to react to world
Speaker 2: events in the context of religious injunctions to support others
Speaker 2: of the same faith. Goodness me Joining me now for
Speaker 2: more on this is senior fellow at the Menzi's Research Center,
Speaker 2: Nick cat Nick. This two hundred page guidebook is endorsed
Speaker 2: by the country's peak judicial body. Is it going to
Speaker 2: enhance or undermine the public's faith in the justice system?
Speaker 3: Well, I think you know the answer to that, READO,
Speaker 3: and I'll come to that in a minute. First, I
Speaker 3: think we've got to unpick this mumbo jumbo one piece
Speaker 3: of time, haven't we. If there's any literature, any studies,
Speaker 3: any peer reviewed evidence of intergenerational trauma to show how
Speaker 3: this is somehow passed down over multiple generations. So somebody
Speaker 3: is traumatized today because of a bad instant that might
Speaker 3: have happened to their long distance ancestor let's put it
Speaker 3: on the table, because right now I don't think there
Speaker 3: is any such evidence, So that whole idea of intergenerational
Speaker 3: trauma is just a complete made up furfee. I'm sorry
Speaker 3: to say that, but that's what it is. On this
Speaker 3: other question of whether we should, you know, judges should
Speaker 3: take account of Islamic morality or whatever it may be. Well,
Speaker 3: you know they might want to do that in their
Speaker 3: spare time, you know, if they want to study Islamic
Speaker 3: history or something, go ahead. But you're there in a
Speaker 3: different capacity. You're there to enforce the law, the Australian law,
Speaker 3: and you're there to do it according to the rule
Speaker 3: of law, which means that everybody gets treated absolutely equally.
Speaker 3: And I think the idea here is you give special
Speaker 3: treatment to at least two categories of people that we've mentioned,
Speaker 3: possibly more, because I dare say, all, you know, some
Speaker 3: of the other people in that intersectional district get some
Speaker 3: mentioned somewhere. But I think this is very dangerous. I
Speaker 3: think everyone should be able to go into court and
Speaker 3: have their case treated on its own merits, according to
Speaker 3: the law, not according to some made up stuff.
Speaker 2: This is just seems to be ideological idiocy. And you
Speaker 2: now that they're you're supposed to be equal before the law,
Speaker 2: regardless of who you are, what your background, You're supposed
Speaker 2: to be treated the same. It's supposed to be a
Speaker 2: pillar of our justice system. And that seems to be
Speaker 2: an old fashioned view these days. Now, let's go to Queensland.
Speaker 2: The L and P there is finally standing for something.
Speaker 2: This is nice to see. Opposition leader David Chris of
Speaker 2: Foley is promising to scrap Queensland's Truth Telling and Healing
Speaker 2: Inquiry if the Coalition do when the upcoming state election.
Speaker 2: The inquiries chaired Joshua Cremer has said this would be
Speaker 2: a significant step backwards for reconciliation and it will keep
Speaker 2: Queensland's true history hidden.
Speaker 4: Nick.
Speaker 2: I think it was around more than sixty eight percent
Speaker 2: of Queenslanders who voted no in the race based referendum.
Speaker 2: It's about time that politicians listen to them.
Speaker 3: Yeah, it's taken David Chris Foley what almost a year
Speaker 3: to catch up on this, and thank goodness he has,
Speaker 3: But I thank truth telling commissions. Rita, You and I
Speaker 3: would be absolutely in favor of any commission that would
Speaker 3: actually tell the truth about our history, about our past
Speaker 3: warts and all good sides, bad sides. But we know
Speaker 3: that's not what we're going to.
Speaker 1: Get from this truth Commission.
Speaker 3: That's not what they're there to do. They're there to
Speaker 3: further distort our history, to tell us how bad our
Speaker 3: ancestors were, what a terrible country this is, instead of
Speaker 3: pointing out that it's actually the best country on Earth,
Speaker 3: and that the Aboriginal people have the same rights as
Speaker 3: everybody else. That's just the fact.
Speaker 2: And David chris A fully has also vowed to keep
Speaker 2: Queensland's coal fired power stations open indefinitely, and this is
Speaker 2: to ensure there is reliable and affordable energy during the
Speaker 2: transition to renewables. Nick, I'm glad he's keeping the coal
Speaker 2: fired power stations open, but is he going to embrace
Speaker 2: nuclear power or is he going to persist with this
Speaker 2: renewable fantasy.
Speaker 3: One step at a time, one baby step at a time.
Speaker 3: This is looking. This is a very important thing that
Speaker 3: he's done. It's obvious and we need this here in
Speaker 3: New South Wales as much as anything because we can
Speaker 3: habitually run short of power and the renewable nonsense which
Speaker 3: is just ripping apart beautiful parts of native bushland and
Speaker 3: farmland in Queensland has to stop. It has to stop
Speaker 3: the moment he gets into office. He needs to put
Speaker 3: a complete stop on it and a review, and then
Speaker 3: of course, inevitably you get to nuclear. If you think,
Speaker 3: as we seem convinced, that we have to keep our
Speaker 3: electricity supply one carbon free, then there is only one
Speaker 3: option for baseload carbon free power, and that's nuclear. And
Speaker 3: he will come round to that, just as you know
Speaker 3: Microsoft has and the United States government under even Joe
Speaker 3: Biden has to realize that this is it's not a
Speaker 3: cushion of if it's it's inevitable, if you want to
Speaker 3: keep the lights on.
Speaker 2: It's disappointing how it's taking to come to these very
Speaker 2: obvious positions, particularly for someone who's supposed to be leading
Speaker 2: a center right coalition. Now former Labor senator, she's now
Speaker 2: an independent. Fatima Payment has launched her political party with
Speaker 2: the help of the Preference whisperer Glenn Drury, who's now
Speaker 2: her chief of staff. But a decision to name the
Speaker 2: party Australia's Voice has sparked outrage within some activist circles.
Speaker 2: Some have accused her of rebranding the Voice for her
Speaker 2: own agenda. Indigenous entrepreneurs Sean Gordon said that the use
Speaker 2: of the term Voice by Fatima Payment for her new
Speaker 2: political party is a further attempt by the pro Palestinian
Speaker 2: movement to leverage off the back of Aboriginal antrres, Strait
Speaker 2: Islander people and Ularu dialogue Coachair Mighan Davis described Senator
Speaker 2: Payman's announcement as curious timing given it's the anniversary of
Speaker 2: the referendum and many of our people are still nicka.
Speaker 2: I do hate it when the lefties turn on each other.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I don't mind the voice part, but it's the
Speaker 3: Australian part that I don't like.
Speaker 1: Australian voice.
Speaker 3: It should be called the un Australian voice from some
Speaker 3: of the things that sended a Payment has said in Parliament.
Speaker 3: But she's having trouble, isn't she. And I thought there
Speaker 3: were some very interesting and very considered points made by
Speaker 3: some of the critics from the Indigenous community saying that
Speaker 3: they're sick of the Indigenous, the Aboriginal cause being hijacked
Speaker 3: by the Palestinians. That's what the Palestinians have done. They've
Speaker 3: attempted to draw some moral equivalence between the ills that
Speaker 3: are supposedly happening to them and the ills happening to
Speaker 3: the Indigenous people. No, no, they's nothing at all to
Speaker 3: do with it.
Speaker 1: Well, I'm just going to have trouble.
Speaker 3: Establishing this party, isn't it. It's going to be the
Speaker 3: party of one. I think the way it's going, well, we'll.
Speaker 2: See how she goes. But if you've ever gone along
Speaker 2: to any of those pro Palestinian protests, you'd see that
Speaker 2: messaging is very, very prevalent tying what's happening in Israel
Speaker 2: and Gaza with what's happening in Australia and saying those
Speaker 2: causes are very similar. That's a topic for another day,
Speaker 2: and Nikita, thank you for your time this evening. Joining
Speaker 2: me now is best selling author and commentator Douglas Murray.
Speaker 2: Douglas Kamala Harris has gone from hiding from interviews to
Speaker 2: doing a multitude of them in recent days, from the
Speaker 2: vacuous and risque Call Her Daddy podcast to sitting down
Speaker 2: with the Ladies of the View. She also talked to
Speaker 2: Howard Stern and Stephen Colbert. Colbert asked her how she's
Speaker 2: different to Joe Biden when.
Speaker 5: We think about the significance of what this next generation
Speaker 5: of leadership looks like were I to be elected president,
Speaker 5: it is about Frankly, I love the American people and
Speaker 5: I believe in our country. I love that it is
Speaker 5: our character and nature to be an ambitious people. You know,
Speaker 5: we have aspirations.
Speaker 2: Douglas, Would you like to translate that for us? Are
Speaker 2: you fluent in a word salad?
Speaker 1: Well, I am, now like all of our rita, I've
Speaker 1: learned as we all have had two in the last
Speaker 1: few months. This has been the same sort of thing
Speaker 1: that she's done in every interview that you've just mentioned.
Speaker 1: In recent days, people said for a long time, why
Speaker 1: is Kamala Harris not giving interviews? We knew why it
Speaker 1: was because of this. She was asked in another this
Speaker 1: week about the border policy and she started talking about
Speaker 1: how you know, the American people are and opportunity, and
Speaker 1: it's the same thing. She just flounders like this, and
Speaker 1: it's just terrifying, quite frankly. She can't answer a straight question,
Speaker 1: she can't answer a policy question. She does these horrible,
Speaker 1: vague ramble and she hasn't even it seems, got them
Speaker 1: to just think on her feet. I mean, when she's asked,
Speaker 1: you know, about Joe Biden, she should be able by
Speaker 1: now to have a stock answer about how terrific he was,
Speaker 1: but how there's more to do and so on, and
Speaker 1: she can't do that despite all of these Democrat cheerleaders
Speaker 1: in the media giving her the softest of softball questions.
Speaker 2: Well, this is what's remarkable. She has had these soft
Speaker 2: questions and she's still flounders on the view. She was
Speaker 2: asked about how she would have done things differently over
Speaker 2: the last four years, and she said she couldn't think
Speaker 2: of a thing she would do differently. To Joe Biden,
Speaker 2: I would have thought, if you're the change candidate, you'd
Speaker 2: have at least a couple of things you'd mentioned there.
Speaker 2: Now we are hearing in this election time a lot
Speaker 2: of talk about disinformation and misinformation fact checks. You wrote
Speaker 2: in the New York Post recently that fact checks have
Speaker 2: become politicized and it's now not about the objective truth,
Speaker 2: but what's in the eye of the beholder. Tell me
Speaker 2: about that. Because it was a time where you could
Speaker 2: trust a fact check, you knew that was just going
Speaker 2: to be unequivocally accurate. No longer, Oh.
Speaker 1: That's the case. I mean, I thought this was particularly
Speaker 1: striking during the vice presidential debates last week. The debate
Speaker 1: last week when the moderator, once again, as with the
Speaker 1: presidential debates, only really fact checked one side, which is
Speaker 1: of course some Republicans. And when they did this with JD.
Speaker 1: Vance as they'd done it with Donald Trump before. He
Speaker 1: pushed back against the fact checker and said, actually, what
Speaker 1: you just said is inaccurate, and he was right as
Speaker 1: it happened on that occasion. There's this effort at the
Speaker 1: moment to pretend that the southern border has been pretty
Speaker 1: secure in recent years because Kamala Harris was for a
Speaker 1: looser border four years ago. She's for strong board and
Speaker 1: now it seems to extent that one can divine anything
Speaker 1: as I say. But JD Vance, you know, picked up
Speaker 1: on this thing. What the fact checkers were doing was
Speaker 1: trying to pretend that people who had got a Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris era effectively slip on immigration were in some ways
Speaker 1: fully holy American And how dare you say that these
Speaker 1: guys in Springfield, Ohio weren't as American as you and me?
Speaker 1: JD was effectively the point of the question. This is
Speaker 1: something that the media and American in particular, is doing.
Speaker 1: And it's very striking to me because I've said many
Speaker 1: times that you know, facts and truth in journalism are
Speaker 1: absolutely vital, but the very institutions that talk about how
Speaker 1: vital they are, like for instance, the BBC, which has
Speaker 1: set up something called BBC Verify in the last year
Speaker 1: to tell you about facts and to fact check. Keep
Speaker 1: on getting things wrong and not just wrong. But what's
Speaker 1: always noticable is they get them wrong in a particular direction.
Speaker 1: There's a pattern.
Speaker 6: Now.
Speaker 1: You know. You could say objectivity in journalism is completely impossible.
Speaker 1: Complete objectivity is impossible. Fine, at least you know where
Speaker 1: some people are coming from. At least you know, as
Speaker 1: I said in the New York Post, you know that
Speaker 1: if you pick up a New York Post, we at
Speaker 1: the New York Post are not soft on crime. We
Speaker 1: don't love the stuff, we don't like it. So you
Speaker 1: know where the Post is coming from. On the issues of,
Speaker 1: for instance, being allowed to ransack your local CVS good
Speaker 1: or bad, you know the Post will be against that.
Speaker 1: But these other media, the BBC, ABC and someone that,
Speaker 1: they all do the same thing. They pretend to be
Speaker 1: in martial fact checkers. In actual fact, they're just not
Speaker 1: that subtly pushing everything in a very specific lockstep ideological direction.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, And on the New York Post, it had a
Speaker 2: remarkable front page recently about Kamala Harrison's husband, Doug Ermhoff,
Speaker 2: who's accused of slapping a former girlfriend. The allegations. They
Speaker 2: are terrible. This week there were fresh allegations of misogynistic
Speaker 2: and inappropriate behavior towards female staff during his stint at
Speaker 2: a top law firm in Los Angeles. And we know
Speaker 2: Douglas in his first marriage he cheated on his wife
Speaker 2: with a nanny, apparently got the nanny pregnant. But their
Speaker 2: remarkable thing is, despite the salacious nature of these allegations,
Speaker 2: the media is largely uninterested in following this, and in fact,
Speaker 2: some segments of the media have painted him as some
Speaker 2: sort of model of modern healthy masculinity.
Speaker 1: Oh well, well, that's straightforward. How the latter bit happened.
Speaker 1: He rainbow washed himself, as you saw there. All you
Speaker 1: have to do now is to wear a Love is
Speaker 1: Love t shirt and appear at some you know, pride baraide,
Speaker 1: and then that can sort of absolve you. It's like
Speaker 1: the Catholic Church throwing holy water on you in the past.
Speaker 1: So that's why he gets away with that. That and
Speaker 1: the fact that he's married to the Democrat candidate. You
Speaker 1: can look, I mean, these allegations, you know, if they
Speaker 1: were if they were against JD. Vance or Donald Trump
Speaker 1: or their spouses, if you know. But this would be
Speaker 1: absolutely front page news. I mean, j d Vance can't
Speaker 1: grow a beard without the entire Democrat media becoming obsessed
Speaker 1: about it and asking what it means for the future
Speaker 1: of the republic or something. If Jadie Vance had been
Speaker 1: found to have treated women in the ways that Doug
Speaker 1: Emhoff is accused of treating them, well, you can't pretend
Speaker 1: that this isn't something that they would take an interest in.
Speaker 1: Or again, okay, one removed the spouse of the candidate.
Speaker 1: It's just another demonstration of something. As I say, all
Speaker 1: of the public can see now. The interesting thing about
Speaker 1: the era of social media, among other things, is that
Speaker 1: it's made a lot of this old media completely transparent
Speaker 1: to the public. They can see the game now they didn't.
Speaker 1: We didn't used to be able to see the whole
Speaker 1: game like it's visible now. What was visible to journalists,
Speaker 1: people who had worked in journalism all their lives twenty
Speaker 1: years ago is now common knowledge to everybody. You know,
Speaker 1: the New York Times and stuff. They don't have secrets
Speaker 1: setting what they think they do, but they don't. We
Speaker 1: can see them.
Speaker 2: Well. Absolutely. It's possibly why trust in the media is
Speaker 2: at historic lows, certainly in the US there's been polling
Speaker 2: showing only one in ten Republicans trust the media. Social
Speaker 2: media has been a godsend in a lot of ways.
Speaker 2: Earlier this week, we marked October seven, the first anniversary
Speaker 2: of the biggest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, and
Speaker 2: segments of the media use the date to attack Israel
Speaker 2: and its ongoing war with her mass The Independent in
Speaker 2: the UK had this front page, three hundred and sixty
Speaker 2: five days of horror since October seven, Douglas. They went
Speaker 2: on to list the number of bombs Israel has dropped,
Speaker 2: the number of hospitals damaged in Gaza, the number of buildings.
Speaker 2: You get the idea. They used October seven to highlight
Speaker 2: the impact of the ca ounter or offensive, not what
Speaker 2: actually started the war.
Speaker 1: Yeah, of course it did. I mean, it's completely sick.
Speaker 1: But you know, it's a remarkable thing, this reta. And
Speaker 1: I've been thinking about this this week because a very
Speaker 1: brilliant skylar called Ruth Wise, ameritus professor at Harvard back
Speaker 1: from the days when institutions like Harvard really produced top
Speaker 1: rate people, said, it's quite hard to send thing knew
Speaker 1: about October seventh, you know, even a year on, because
Speaker 1: we can see it in plain sight. The terrorists broadcast everything,
Speaker 1: They didn't hide anything. Ruth Wise said something very interesting.
Speaker 1: She said, some people in the West have got the
Speaker 1: ability to understand what that day was against the Jewish state.
Speaker 1: Not everybody can. The Independent and some other idiots can't
Speaker 1: tell that. They can't even commemorate an anniversary without trying
Speaker 1: to flip it onto and another aspect of the story.
Speaker 1: But what she said that really struck me was she said,
Speaker 1: we may have the courage to do that, but the
Speaker 1: West is not displayed the ability to have the courage
Speaker 1: to identify the perpetrators. Had the courage Some people have
Speaker 1: had the courage the recognition of who the victims were,
Speaker 1: but the perpetrators. A year on, How is it possible
Speaker 1: that there are pro Hamaz demonstrations in Australia, in America,
Speaker 1: in Canada, across Europe. How come so much of the
Speaker 1: media has, like the Independent you just showed, they're the
Speaker 1: extent that it is still a paper. How have they
Speaker 1: ended up just regurgitating Hamaz figures? Why have we ended
Speaker 1: up in this period this was, as you say, it
Speaker 1: was the biggest mass produced since the Holocaust. We have
Speaker 1: the ability to identify that, But why not to identify
Speaker 1: the Nazis? Why not to identify the people who did it?
Speaker 1: Why not ask why it is? In countries like Australia,
Speaker 1: I have seen these demonstrations of supporters of the Nazis,
Speaker 1: of the people who did the massacres. Why do we
Speaker 1: have to see mobs in New York's smashing at car
Speaker 1: windows screaming support for the Nazis who carried out October
Speaker 1: seventh is because we met some people still have the ability,
Speaker 1: thank goodness, to recognize who the victims were, but almost
Speaker 1: nobody has the courage to identify who the perpetrators were,
Speaker 1: what's driving them and the fact that they are among
Speaker 1: us in the West.
Speaker 7: Ah.
Speaker 2: That is an excellent point. That is so true. And
Speaker 2: you would think all those protesters, how much more credibility
Speaker 2: they would have and how much more support if they
Speaker 2: could just condemn her mass even if you want to
Speaker 2: see the war end that their refusal to could, and
Speaker 2: in fact, the hostility to those who up to a
Speaker 2: protest holding a her massa terrorist sign I think speaks
Speaker 2: volumes before you go. A Russian arms dealer who was
Speaker 2: known as the Merchant of Death, who was released by
Speaker 2: the US to Russia as part of a prisoner swap
Speaker 2: in exchange for w NBA player Britney Griner, He's reportedly
Speaker 2: selling weapons to the Hooti terrorists who are wreaking havoc
Speaker 2: in the Red Sea. This looks like a terrible exchange
Speaker 2: for the US.
Speaker 1: Douglas, it does rather. Brittany Groiner has spent all of
Speaker 1: her time since being swapped by the US government. She
Speaker 1: has spent all of her time moaning about how awful
Speaker 1: the US is. Meantime, this guy ends up continuing his
Speaker 1: career in this case, arming terrorists wasn't a good deal
Speaker 1: that you know, maybe there's I mean, I always think that,
Speaker 1: you know, you can't judge what somebody, somebody who's been
Speaker 1: arrested and detained in the way that Brittany grind has.
Speaker 1: You can't judge what they they do to some extent
Speaker 1: because they've been through a terrible circumstance. But you'd have
Speaker 1: thought that there could be some gratitude to the country
Speaker 1: that nurtured them, made them rich, that they had slightly
Speaker 1: let down, and which had saved them. But no, no,
Speaker 1: of course, in our time, as you know, Reacher, as
Speaker 1: we've spoken about before, You can never express gratitude to
Speaker 1: a Western democracy. It's got to be moaning and carping
Speaker 1: and all of that and whining, but never gratitude, never
Speaker 1: realizing how lucky we are in the West, how lucky
Speaker 1: we are in America, in Australia and Britain and Europe.
Speaker 1: Never that, never gratitude, always whining.
Speaker 2: Yes, it's all about victimhood. That's the currency these days. Douglas.
Speaker 2: Thank you so much for your time this evening.
Speaker 1: It's a great pleasure. Thank you.
Speaker 2: Still to come a lefties are losing it. Plus Kamala
Speaker 2: Harris kicks back with a beer while Florida prepares great
Speaker 2: deadly hurricane. Welcome back, and now it's time for lefties
Speaker 2: losing it. And you may have heard about the white
Speaker 2: dudes for Kamala group. They're typically described as weak, COVID crazy,
Speaker 2: soy boy losers, but that sort of characterization is deeply unfair.
Speaker 2: Just look at this strapping young man charging like a
Speaker 2: buck wild bull at a Trump supporter. You can tell
Speaker 2: which ones are Kamala fans. They're the ones wearing masks
Speaker 2: outdoors in twenty twenty four, and they're the ones screaming
Speaker 2: abuse and threats Ida. She seems nice if she doesn't
Speaker 2: want her boy man handled, and perhaps tell him not
Speaker 2: to attack folks. Pretty simple, I would have thought. Now.
Speaker 2: CNN might be chock full of left is losing it,
Speaker 2: but sometimes they have a lone conservative up against the
Speaker 2: crazy Libs. And often that lone conservative is Scott Jennings,
Speaker 2: and God bless him, he just keeps recording w's.
Speaker 7: This is what Kamala Harrison Tom is that is none
Speaker 7: of your business what women do with their body, and
Speaker 7: so stay out of our doctor's offices and stay out of.
Speaker 2: Our bat well.
Speaker 6: I guess I had to speak up for the babies.
Speaker 6: They're not here to speak with themselves.
Speaker 7: Lord of mercy.
Speaker 2: Now, Kamala has been doing interviews with lefties all week,
Speaker 2: from the Call Her Daddy podcast to Stephen Colbert to
Speaker 2: the truly vile ho Howard Stern, who is apparently a
Speaker 2: male feminist nowadays.
Speaker 6: Do you think there are people who will not vote
Speaker 6: for a woman because she's a woman. You know, my
Speaker 6: best associations in radio and in business have been collaborating
Speaker 6: with women, and I don't understand this philosophy, especially guys
Speaker 6: who have daughters and sisters and mothers.
Speaker 2: This is the same Howard Stern who fantasized about sexually
Speaker 2: assaulting school shooting victims and sexualized the Olsen twins when
Speaker 2: they were just thirteen years old.
Speaker 6: There was like really good looking girls running out of
Speaker 6: there with their hands.
Speaker 1: Over their heads.
Speaker 5: Ye are still working?
Speaker 6: Does kids try to have sex with any of the
Speaker 6: good looking girls? They didn't even do that at least
Speaker 6: if you're going to go kill yourself and kill all
Speaker 6: the kids, why wouldn't you have some sex? And then
Speaker 6: they said, oh, get the Olsen twins, Mary Kate and
Speaker 6: Ashley Olsen.
Speaker 5: Where did they have to?
Speaker 6: Well, those are the two kids from Full House? Remember
Speaker 6: the two little girls from Full House? Here another like
Speaker 6: thirteen and they're pieces of ass.
Speaker 2: And he wasn't just vile about women and children. He
Speaker 2: also thought this was funny.
Speaker 6: Hey Rabin, what does you call a black rocket scientist?
Speaker 2: I don't know, but you know, anything can be forgiven
Speaker 2: and forgotten if you become a rabbit anti Trumper. Here's
Speaker 2: Howard Stern talking about how much he hates Trump voters.
Speaker 6: I don't hate the game. I hate the people who
Speaker 6: vote for him. I think they're stupid. I do I'll
Speaker 6: be honest with you. I have no respect for you.
Speaker 2: Joining me now with the latest from the US is
Speaker 2: Guy News contributor Kosher Gaeta Kosher. While Florida is hit
Speaker 2: with Hurricane Milton, which has pounded the state with ferocious
Speaker 2: one hundred mile per hour winds, producing a series of
Speaker 2: devastating tornadoes, the Vice President, the woman who wants to
Speaker 2: be leader of the free world, was kicking back having
Speaker 2: a beer with late night lefty TV hosts Stephen Colbert.
Speaker 1: I'm just curious.
Speaker 5: Okay, the last time I had beer was at a
Speaker 5: baseball game with Dougs. Okay, cheers, there you.
Speaker 2: Go, Kosher. We have hundreds dead after Hurricane Helene. We've
Speaker 2: got many more missing, injured, homeless. Hurricane Milton was about
Speaker 2: to make landfall in Florida, and the VP is lying
Speaker 2: about the Florida Governor Ron DeSantis and giggling and drinking
Speaker 2: beer with Colbert. I mean to me, that should be
Speaker 2: the next Trump ad.
Speaker 7: And it probably very well will be heater before this
Speaker 7: hour is up. He's been doing this thing where he
Speaker 7: just takes live raw footage of her and says, I'm
Speaker 7: Donald Trump. I approved this message. Look, I think on
Speaker 7: a macro level. It is interesting to see that she's
Speaker 7: suddenly doing this media blitz abeit with friendly outlets. It
Speaker 7: is I think telling a little bit because it's an
Speaker 7: about turn from the strategy her campaign was pursuing in
Speaker 7: the last thirty five days or so. But the specific outlet,
Speaker 7: the way it was set up with the beer and
Speaker 7: the laughing and all of that with the backdrop of unfortunately,
Speaker 7: despite the evacuation orders, we are going to see hundreds
Speaker 7: of people die, and hundreds of people already did with
Speaker 7: Hurricane Helene. It's a fair point. It does come across
Speaker 7: as not the best judgment or a little bit tone deaf.
Speaker 7: And I'll make another second quick point too. I get
Speaker 7: late night TV and it's meant to be sort of
Speaker 7: fun and drinking and all that on there is appropriate
Speaker 7: millions of people do. But I don't think it was
Speaker 7: actually the smartest move for her, because there have been
Speaker 7: memes on the internet about her, you know, maybe being
Speaker 7: a little bit more prone to the drinking and also
Speaker 7: just just trying to establish herself as a serious person,
Speaker 7: and I don't know that that really helps advance that.
Speaker 7: So on multiple levels, I don't think it was a
Speaker 7: wise move, but you know, in the media cycle that
Speaker 7: we're in, it'll probably be forgotten and covered with her
Speaker 7: next and some of the next double what she's going
Speaker 7: to do.
Speaker 2: You're right there, Kosha. Even Saturday Night Live that made
Speaker 2: some jokes about Kamala's fondness for wine. I think it's
Speaker 2: a little bit unfair, but that narrative is certainly out
Speaker 2: there now. Hurricane Milton has made land fall. Over five
Speaker 2: million Floridians have been forced to evacuate, marking the largest
Speaker 2: mass evacuation in over a decade. Over one million homes
Speaker 2: are without power. Here's what Florida Governor Ron Dessanta's had
Speaker 2: to say.
Speaker 8: We have seen a weakening of the storm over the
Speaker 8: last twenty four hours. We also saw it sped up,
Speaker 8: which means it's hitting the Gulf coast prior to high tide,
Speaker 8: which we hope will help mitigate some of the storm surge.
Speaker 8: There's already been one hundred and sixteen tornado warnings, with
Speaker 8: nineteen confirmed touchdowns throughout the state, nine flash flood warnings,
Speaker 8: and four additional flood watches, with many many more to come.
Speaker 2: Kosher. This is the second major storm to hit the
Speaker 2: US this month and famous response has been widely criticized
Speaker 2: as inadequate and this organized How much of an issue
Speaker 2: is this going to be coming up to the election
Speaker 2: because this has hit multiple states. It's not just Florida
Speaker 2: with Hurricane and Helene. We saw Georgia, North South Carolina
Speaker 2: all impacted.
Speaker 7: It is on top of just the natural disaster and
Speaker 7: the loss of life, it is becoming a political story
Speaker 7: on two fronts. One is it's highlighting another dysfunction in
Speaker 7: the government or misaligned priorities where the FEMA funding has
Speaker 7: been slow to come out or constrain to seven hundred
Speaker 7: dollars per person and were juxtaposed against the thousands of
Speaker 7: dollars that are being spent on housing illegal immigrants, on
Speaker 7: foreign interventions and all of that. It's just not about
Speaker 7: a good look and it certainly goes to the heart
Speaker 7: of the contrast between the two campaigns. Secondarily, it's also
Speaker 7: going to potentially play a role in the actual mechanics
Speaker 7: of the election, especially Georgia and North Carolina that are
Speaker 7: swing states and that have been won and lost in
Speaker 7: the last two elections. On Razor Raiser within margins ten
Speaker 7: fifty thousand votes, you could see that coming to bear
Speaker 7: if certain people can't actually get to the polls or
Speaker 7: the mail in ballots got destroyed in flooding, you know,
Speaker 7: wherever they were in the postal system. So that's a
Speaker 7: real problem too. There is thirty days or twenty eight
Speaker 7: days left to try and remedy that, but it very
Speaker 7: well could have an impact now.
Speaker 2: As Kamala Harris ramps up her last minute media blitz,
Speaker 2: Donald Trump has joined comedian Andrew Schultz on his podcast Flagrant,
Speaker 2: and Trump was in a fine form joking about Joe
Speaker 2: Biden's ability to fall asleep at the beach when you're
Speaker 2: ready two.
Speaker 9: Typically bathing suits are going to make you look great.
Speaker 9: You're not going to be enhanced, all right, It's just
Speaker 9: one of those things.
Speaker 2: I can't be sure about that.
Speaker 9: But typically you know he's packing.
Speaker 5: He could.
Speaker 9: I don't know why the helly's packing, but I don't
Speaker 9: want to and I don't want to know. I don't know,
Speaker 9: but he has an ability to fall asleep while on camera.
Speaker 9: He can lie down on one of those things and
Speaker 9: in minutes he's stone called out kosher.
Speaker 2: He also gave an insight into consequential matters, including his
Speaker 2: relationship with various world leaders, His comments about Mody were
Speaker 2: particularly interesting. He said, he's as tough as nails.
Speaker 9: He's the nicest human being. But we had a couple
Speaker 9: of occasions where somebody was threatening India.
Speaker 6: I said, let me help.
Speaker 9: I'm very good with those people.
Speaker 1: Let me help.
Speaker 9: I will do it. I will do it, and I
Speaker 9: will do anything necessary. We've defeated them for hundreds of years. Wow,
Speaker 9: he was talking about a certain country you can probably
Speaker 9: get but I said, WHOA, what happened there? So No,
Speaker 9: they're all tough, and they're all smart, and some of
Speaker 9: very good people. He's a good person, Some are good people,
Speaker 9: and some aren't good people, but they're all at the
Speaker 9: top of their game.
Speaker 2: Kosher just the world apart from what we see with
Speaker 2: Kamala's podcast appearance, whether it's a call her Daddy, where
Speaker 2: she was just giving platitudes, just doing the usual messaging
Speaker 2: that she would do on CNN or anywhere else. She
Speaker 2: didn't seem to relax and understand the medium. And even
Speaker 2: with Stephen Colbert there just was an authenticity there. They're
Speaker 2: just very different. And I do wonder whether these appearances
Speaker 2: they're doing on podcasts and platforms we don't normally see candidates.
Speaker 2: It's going to have a real impact leading up to
Speaker 2: that pole date on November five.
Speaker 7: I think that's the open question. It remains to be seen,
Speaker 7: but it is clear that Trump, his sense of humor,
Speaker 7: I've always said, is actually very underreaded. He actually really
Speaker 7: is quite funny. If people are able to look past
Speaker 7: the various quirks of his personality that many people don't like,
Speaker 7: he's actually really funny. And he has that common touch
Speaker 7: where he's able to just go and engage with people
Speaker 7: from all sorts of different ages and generations and formats
Speaker 7: and Bob and weave between making a joke of how
Speaker 7: when you're eighty two probably shouldn't be wearing a bathing
Speaker 7: suit in public, to talking about world affairs and Prime
Speaker 7: Minister Remodi of India and everything in between. And you're right,
Speaker 7: she does come across as more I've used this word
Speaker 7: synthetic or inauthentic or manufactured, where she's sort of got
Speaker 7: these programming notes in her head. You can see it,
Speaker 7: and she just keeps going back to those phrases or
Speaker 7: catchphrases or buzzwords that we've heard so many times, as
Speaker 7: opposed to be able to go with the flow. I
Speaker 7: think the fact that Trump is going on these podcasts
Speaker 7: and even Kama Harris will call her daddy is going
Speaker 7: to be interesting to see. Is it going to get
Speaker 7: out younger voters? These are typically listeners of these media
Speaker 7: outlets who don't show up to vote in general as much.
Speaker 7: And if we see a little bit of a lift
Speaker 7: in this election of the young vote, I do think
Speaker 7: that some of it probably could be attributed to the
Speaker 7: fact that they've really broadened the landscape of media outlets
Speaker 7: that they speak to as opposed to just sticking with
Speaker 7: the five corporate media outlets.
Speaker 2: Now to another knucklehead moment from Kamala Harris's running mate
Speaker 2: Tim Walls, who said the US needs to get rid
Speaker 2: of the electoral college. The comments were made during his
Speaker 2: speech at a fundraiser at the home of far left
Speaker 2: California Governor Gavin Newsom. The Harris Walls campaign has walked
Speaker 2: back those comments, already, saying in a statement that Walls
Speaker 2: believes that every vote matters in the electoral college and
Speaker 2: that he was merely commenting commenting to a crowd of
Speaker 2: strong supporters about how the campaign is built to win
Speaker 2: two hundred and seventy electoral votes. I don't know how
Speaker 2: they can explain that comment in those terms. But Tim
Speaker 2: Walls just seems to be a walking, talking disaster. Every
Speaker 2: time he's in front of a microphone, something goes wrong,
Speaker 2: whether it's a debate, an interview, or at a fundraiser.
Speaker 7: Here, Yes, and you know, maybe calls into question how
Speaker 7: much vetting had been done when you have this truncated
Speaker 7: campaign and she's just basically came out of nowhere to
Speaker 7: come along the ticket in seventy five days. Maybe this
Speaker 7: is a consequence of that. Not that Tim Waltz hasn't
Speaker 7: been around. He has been for a while, but not
Speaker 7: on the national stage. In terms of the electoral college thing,
Speaker 7: the Democrat Party has been crying about that for a
Speaker 7: long time because they do tend to win the popular
Speaker 7: vote even if they lose the electoral college. Hillary Clinton
Speaker 7: famously had that happen to her and made sort.
Speaker 2: Of jabs similar jobs.
Speaker 7: They talk about packing the Supreme Court, which is another
Speaker 7: thing that they flirt with, where if you don't like
Speaker 7: the current balance, you can have more judg justice added
Speaker 7: to it to change the ratio. They talk about giving
Speaker 7: statehood to Puerto Rico, which would also go to damaging
Speaker 7: the electoral College in its current state. So I think
Speaker 7: that is a belief held in many corners of the
Speaker 7: Democrat Party, and he just let it come out.
Speaker 2: Yep, he said. The Quiet out loud has done that
Speaker 2: a few times. And this is what's so remarkable about
Speaker 2: this election because Trump is presented as this threat to democracy,
Speaker 2: threat to norms, threat to the republic. But it's the Democrats,
Speaker 2: as you've just explained, who are challenging everything from the
Speaker 2: legitimacy of the Supreme Court to the electoral college system.
Speaker 2: Now sixty Minutes has come under intense criticism. We talked
Speaker 2: about this last night. It seems they've tried to save
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris removing one of her most incoherent answers from
Speaker 2: what was aired on Monday evening in the US. Here's
Speaker 2: a preview clip that Sixty Minutes themselves posted on Sunday.
Speaker 2: It's her full answer, which was widely mocked.
Speaker 8: But it seems that Prime Minister in Netnya who is
Speaker 8: not listening well.
Speaker 5: Bill, The work that we have done has resulted in
Speaker 5: a number of of movements in that region by Israel
Speaker 5: that we're very much prompted by or a result of
Speaker 5: many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen
Speaker 5: in the region.
Speaker 2: But he is what view is actually sold on Monday,
Speaker 2: not on television.
Speaker 1: But it seems that Prime Minister Netanyahho is not listening.
Speaker 5: We are not going to stop pursuing what is necessary
Speaker 5: for the United States to be clear about where we
Speaker 5: stand on the need for this war to end.
Speaker 2: How do you explain that Kosher.
Speaker 7: The power of editing, it can take the rambling and
Speaker 7: the ribos and make it look more coherent, even though
Speaker 7: I will say even the edited piece had far too
Speaker 7: many words, like she always uses ten to twelve words
Speaker 7: where one word would suffice, and really effective communicators are
Speaker 7: good at using fewer words. Because you make the point sharper.
Speaker 7: It also goes to the point of how there are
Speaker 7: two realities. And there's sort of the younger group or
Speaker 7: the more high information consumers out there who live in
Speaker 7: social media and on the internet and on x who
Speaker 7: did see and we'll see those unedited comments they went viral.
Speaker 7: And then you've got the more traditional maybe more baby boomers,
Speaker 7: people still consuming only corporate media, intelligence media.
Speaker 2: We'll see that will be Nune the wiser kosher, they'll
Speaker 2: be numb the wiser. Thank you so much for your time.
Speaker 2: This evening still to come. The shocking sexual abuse allegations
Speaker 2: made by Lisa Marie Presley in her posthumously released memoir
Speaker 2: You're Watching the Reader Panny Show. Joining me now is
Speaker 2: celebrity and royal commentator Kinsey Schofield. Kinsey Ellen de Generes
Speaker 2: has copped major backlash on social media after reposting this,
Speaker 2: you can't tell someone you love them and then vote
Speaker 2: for someone that will hurt them. Here are some of
Speaker 2: the top comments underneath her posts. There were literally thousands.
Speaker 2: One user said, I'm gay and I'm voting for Trump.
Speaker 2: Do I hate myself? Absolutely not. Messages like this are
Speaker 2: what spreads hate. Another user said Trump respects gays, even
Speaker 2: hosts their weddings at mare Lago, and another one said,
Speaker 2: as a lesbian, I had more under Trump. He's got
Speaker 2: my vote, and I read through hundreds of these. Obviously
Speaker 2: I didn't read it. Over all, twenty seven thousand odd
Speaker 2: and overwhelmingly they were attacking Ellen DeGeneres for the position
Speaker 2: she took, calling it simplistic, saying it was spreading hate
Speaker 2: and doing the opposite of what she was claiming, what
Speaker 2: do you make of this little saga?
Speaker 4: I mean, Ellen's been counseled since twenty twenty. America loves
Speaker 4: a good comeback story. But for the love of God,
Speaker 4: please go away. You've got plenty of money, you have
Speaker 4: a trophy wife that's way too good for you. You're
Speaker 4: a hypocrite and we see read through you. I mean,
Speaker 4: please just go away. That is what I would say.
Speaker 4: You know, if she went away, we might have time
Speaker 4: to forgive and forget. But she just keeps reminding us why.
Speaker 4: She's just so annoying.
Speaker 2: She's and hypocrite is the key word, because she for
Speaker 2: so long, her entire image was about being kind, and
Speaker 2: then she was exposed as being anything but behind the scenes. Now,
Speaker 2: a number of celebrities have come forward to donate for
Speaker 2: relief efforts following two major hurricanes, and country music star
Speaker 2: Jason Oldean and his wife among them. They contributed five
Speaker 2: hundred thousand dollars personally to Donald Trump's GoFundMe, and the
Speaker 2: pair joined the former president to give over a seven
Speaker 2: million dollar check to Hurricane Helene victims. A number of
Speaker 2: other stars kin Zev also made personal donations, including other
Speaker 2: country music stars Morgan Wallen, Dolly Parton. Is there a
Speaker 2: major fundraising effort or concert or anything like that that's
Speaker 2: being organized. The widespread devastation in parts of the country,
Speaker 2: you would think would call for something more coordinated to occur.
Speaker 3: Absolutely.
Speaker 4: I think we will see that in the next coming
Speaker 4: you know, in the next few weeks. I believe we'll
Speaker 4: see something like that. What I can tell you is
Speaker 4: Taylor Swift five million, NFL collectively eight million, Miranda Lambert
Speaker 4: and Mutt Nation her Foundation one hundred thousand dollars to
Speaker 4: make sure that all of those pets are taken care of.
Speaker 4: Avanka Trump and her children went to volunteer in North
Speaker 4: Carolina and delivered three hundred starlink systems from SpaceX and Elon.
Speaker 4: So you know, there is a huge push. But bizarre
Speaker 4: that most of the people you and I list off
Speaker 4: are country stars. Where's George Clooney, Where's Harry and Meghan?
Speaker 4: Where are all of these virtue signalers? You and I
Speaker 4: just literally listed, you know, the Country Music Awards list,
Speaker 4: and not all of these Hollywood big wigs that tell
Speaker 4: us how we should spend our money and live our lives.
Speaker 2: Well, didn't beyond s go country. You would think she'd
Speaker 2: be donating something. One of the richest pop stars in
Speaker 2: the world, and she's put out of country album, so
Speaker 2: you would hope she's got some interest in that area. Now,
Speaker 2: the lawyers for the woman who has accused another country superstar,
Speaker 2: Garth Brooks, of sexual assault. Her lawyers have said they
Speaker 2: will be moving for maximum sanctions against Brooks after he
Speaker 2: publicly named the woman and announced that he's the victim
Speaker 2: of a shakedown. The woman's attorney said Garth Brooks just
Speaker 2: revealed his true self out of spite and to punish.
Speaker 2: He publicly named a rape victim. The woman's attorney also said,
Speaker 2: with no legal justification, Brooks outed her because he thinks
Speaker 2: the laws don't apply to him. What else can you
Speaker 2: tell us about this case? It's getting very ugly, isn't.
Speaker 4: It getting so ugly to the point where it feels
Speaker 4: too personal? And I will say that it is my
Speaker 4: personal opinion, based on covering this over the last week
Speaker 4: for Court TV, that this could be an extortion case,
Speaker 4: a consensual relationship that went south, and it's hard to
Speaker 4: digest allegations after you calm through the submitted evidence. And
Speaker 4: this woman in her attorney knew that this would hurt
Speaker 4: Garth and Tricia's pristine brand. But some of that evidence
Speaker 4: leaves real question marks surrounding the truth behind the relationship
Speaker 4: between this accuser and Garth Brooks.
Speaker 2: Well, you talked about some of that evidence that's public now.
Speaker 2: The text message exchanges are illuminating to say the laista,
Speaker 2: How is Garth Brooks's wife standing by him throughout this?
Speaker 4: And I do think that Tricia Yearwood is probably humiliated.
Speaker 4: We've discussed that there were rumors that they got together
Speaker 4: and he was married to another woman and she was
Speaker 4: married to another man. So this has to be I
Speaker 4: hate to use the word karmic, but it has to
Speaker 4: feel very awkward and awful for her. I don't you know,
Speaker 4: I think she's going to stand by her man, just
Speaker 4: tell me, why not? Said, I think she's just going
Speaker 4: to do it. But this is going If it turns
Speaker 4: out that he had this affair, it will hurt their brand,
Speaker 4: but it's not going to hurt their brand as much
Speaker 4: as a sexual assault would.
Speaker 2: Oh, of course, not, of course not now. Elvis Presley's
Speaker 2: late daughter, Lisa Marie Presley, has had a memoir From
Speaker 2: Here to the Great Unknown published and it's got some
Speaker 2: disturbing allegations in at Kinsey. In it, she alleges that
Speaker 2: she was molested by her mother, Priscilla's ex boyfriend, an
Speaker 2: actor called Mike Edwards, when she was just ten years old.
Speaker 2: What else can you tell us about this?
Speaker 4: Reader? In Mike Edward's nature eighty eight book Elvis, Priscilla
Speaker 4: and Me, Edwards wrote how he was craving Lisa sexually.
Speaker 4: He wrote that Priscilla and I had once been inseparable,
Speaker 4: and it was now Lisa and I who were together
Speaker 4: almost every day. Soon I found I was looking at
Speaker 4: my watch waiting for Lisa to get out of school,
Speaker 4: just as Elvis had once waited for Priscilla. He said
Speaker 4: he'd fallen in love with his girlfriend's daughter. Now he's
Speaker 4: denying these allegations today. But you could not write that
Speaker 4: nineteen eighty eight book today. That is disgusting. And you know,
Speaker 4: reading those words versus Lisa's, you have to it gives
Speaker 4: Lisa some credibility from beyond the grave.
Speaker 2: Oh, absolutely, that is disturbing. In day Kinsey, Schofield, thank
Speaker 2: you so much for your time, and that's all the
Speaker 2: time we have. I'll say you tomorrow and I for Left,
Speaker 2: he's losing it. At nine point thirty, good Night,