Speaker 1: My news Ostroudia starts now A lot of this is outside.
Speaker 1: Good morning, and welcome to Outsiders. The show that is
Speaker 1: to socialism, communism, wokeism, and climate alarmism. What young white,
Speaker 1: college educated democrat women are to a strong grasp on
Speaker 1: reality and the workings of the free market. Here's one
Speaker 1: young woman who will be voting for Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2: What is Kumla's greatest achievement as VP? You literally don't know.
Speaker 2: I have no idea.
Speaker 3: You don't know.
Speaker 2: Anything she's done. No, I don't. But she's still the
Speaker 2: better choice, Yes, because I know a lot of things
Speaker 2: that he has done, Like you know a lot of
Speaker 2: things about Trump that are negative. Yeah, he's racist, he's sexist. Okay,
Speaker 2: well what has he done that's specifically?
Speaker 4: I don't watch anything with Trump and it I just
Speaker 4: see the clip.
Speaker 2: I don't watch things politically, so you just have an opinion,
Speaker 2: but you don't really know why.
Speaker 4: Yeah. Well, at least has got the young white, stupid
Speaker 4: woman vote sewn up. But will the black community come
Speaker 4: out for Kamala?
Speaker 5: Not so?
Speaker 4: According to well, someone who should know, we had not.
Speaker 6: Yet seen the same kinds of energy and turned in
Speaker 6: all courts of our neighborhoods and to your musicians.
Speaker 7: So I was running.
Speaker 6: Now. I also want to say that that seems to
Speaker 6: be more pronounced with the.
Speaker 5: Brothers, Oh dear, and it looks like even the kids
Speaker 5: are now mocking Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3: I'll be running for president.
Speaker 1: Of the United States, and we have sticks.
Speaker 8: And then.
Speaker 1: You want my opinion, Trump's gonna win this thing in
Speaker 1: a landslide. But will it be enough to outweigh all
Speaker 1: the corruption and cheating. Only twenty four days till we
Speaker 1: find out. But in the meantime, let's grab the latest
Speaker 1: Outsiders news. Well tomorrow, it's a year since the voice
Speaker 1: Anthony Albanese's precious voice came crashing down the Australian people.
Speaker 1: A mainstream conservative majority of sixty one to thirty nine
Speaker 1: said no, thanks, this ain't for us. We do not
Speaker 1: divide this nation by race, and they carry on. Hopefully
Speaker 1: we'll carry on saying that through to the next election.
Speaker 1: Although those who supported the Yes case, who were so
Speaker 1: convinced that the gravy train would roll on this massive
Speaker 1: bureaucracy dedicated to the voice, they've been coming out with
Speaker 1: all sorts of excuses, rita and jams as to why
Speaker 1: it failed, and of course chief among those reasons would
Speaker 1: be racism and white supremacy and terrible evil Australian white
Speaker 1: people reata what do.
Speaker 4: You think yes? And of course misinformation and disinformation, And
Speaker 4: this is another reason why we must have these Awhellian
Speaker 4: laws implemented, so never again can the elite have their
Speaker 4: little plans frustrated by the great majority of Australians who
Speaker 4: said no, thank you, sixty one percent. And that's despite
Speaker 4: the ES camp having the overwhelming amount of resources to
Speaker 4: fight this battle, not just having every sporting club, every
Speaker 4: corporate and every celebrity, but the money they had, the
Speaker 4: No camp couldn't even run proper campaigns in Melbourne and
Speaker 4: Sydney because the ads were so expensive. And yet they
Speaker 4: still won every single state. That tells you plenty. But
Speaker 4: the complaining, the delusion from the Yes advocates has not stopped.
Speaker 4: That have continued to misunderstand what actually happened here and
Speaker 4: they just are not accepting reality. Yeah, this is delusional stuff.
Speaker 4: It's sad almost that the only understanding that have of
Speaker 4: why their side was defeated that there was something some
Speaker 4: evil conspiracy a well information.
Speaker 5: Well, you know, the fascinating thing to me here now
Speaker 5: as we go to year one as of tomorrow of
Speaker 5: the victory of the NOCAP, is that this is now
Speaker 5: to be an absolute case study in exactly why these
Speaker 5: misinformation laws that Labor is trying to push through are
Speaker 5: so sinister. Because Professor meegh And Davis of UNSW she's
Speaker 5: now a visiting professor at Harvard, she has come out
Speaker 5: and said that they need the misinformation legislation and they
Speaker 5: wish that they had the misinformation legislation yes at the
Speaker 5: time of the campaign, because then they would have been
Speaker 5: able to get their message out. Then you know, we
Speaker 5: wouldn't have had all of these awful sort of uh
Speaker 5: things telling people facts. And here's the thing, Rita. You know,
Speaker 5: let's remember they talk about misinformation, but you know a
Speaker 5: couple of things, Rita. You mentioned the amount of money
Speaker 5: of the each side had, So the Yes camp had
Speaker 5: all the money for the TV spend, the No camp
Speaker 5: very wildly spent the money online, targeted where to submit
Speaker 5: where do the misinformation people want to target? They want
Speaker 5: to target online because they want to have control over
Speaker 5: every bit of information.
Speaker 3: So that you don't get the wrong idea.
Speaker 5: And yet you know, I covered the No Yes debate
Speaker 5: so much, so it was, you know, so intense for
Speaker 5: that year, and the Yes campaign was guilty of so
Speaker 5: much misinformation and disinformation every.
Speaker 3: Step down the road.
Speaker 5: You know, they couldn't even give you a straight answer
Speaker 5: on how many pages the ULARU statement from the heart was.
Speaker 3: You said, oh, oh, it's a simp.
Speaker 5: But in their own book about the Yes campaign, which
Speaker 5: they had all printed up before the debate over how
Speaker 5: many pages was and then it got shipped out the
Speaker 5: week before and put on shelves the week before the vote,
Speaker 5: it said, oh it's more than one page. It's a
Speaker 5: multiple page document about this. If you go and you
Speaker 5: read all of the writings of people like Began Davis,
Speaker 5: Gabriel Applebee, many of the legal academics, it is quite
Speaker 5: clear that the voice was not, as Albanezi said, a
Speaker 5: simple request and generous, gracious thing from the heart. All
Speaker 5: of this, this was a whole plan to entirely rewrite
Speaker 5: the nature of Australian law and the role of the
Speaker 5: individual and group think and identity politics, and even the
Speaker 5: very legitimacy of the Australian nation. So it's such a
Speaker 5: good thing that the people saw through it, but it
Speaker 5: is so sinister to me that you know they still
Speaker 5: want to look at it and take the lessons that
Speaker 5: the people were right, lessons they've taked from it. So
Speaker 5: people are wrong and they need to have their thoughts control.
Speaker 4: Voice architects were the biggest assets of the No camp.
Speaker 4: I wrote about this case this issue extensively as well,
Speaker 4: and the most impactful pieces was basically quoting word for
Speaker 4: word what the Voice architects themselves said about their plans.
Speaker 4: Very static. So it was just going back and they
Speaker 4: were damned by their own words. They were damned by
Speaker 4: their own plans. That's what the Australian people rejected. The
Speaker 4: Australian people went bamboozled by disinformation misinformation. It was the
Speaker 4: Yes advocates who a couple of weeks ago were telling
Speaker 4: us they were completely sidelined and silenced. No, you had
Speaker 4: a platform when every media outlet, most of it uncritically,
Speaker 4: and yet when people hurt those arguments, they said no,
Speaker 4: and they haven't accepted it. We still are having this
Speaker 4: push for this race based division and that the Left
Speaker 4: is pushing a year on. They still haven't accepted the
Speaker 4: umpire's decision.
Speaker 1: Were not accepting it. They're turning around James and talking
Speaker 1: about trumpion disinformation. They're trying to pretend that there's some
Speaker 1: whole thing. You're right to point out the misinformation and
Speaker 1: disinformation that came from the Yes campaign throughout and the
Speaker 1: people of Australia said no thanks when they woke up
Speaker 1: to it. But a few things are really worth focusing
Speaker 1: on here. One is, of course, just center Price's brilliant
Speaker 1: analysis of the She was one of the leading voices
Speaker 1: against the Voice, but her analysis is superb as always,
Speaker 1: which is why I was saying last week, wouldn't it
Speaker 1: be great if she was leading the National Party, so
Speaker 1: she would be the deputy prime Minister in a coalition
Speaker 1: government and would be standing alongside Peter Dutton. Just Center
Speaker 1: Price and Peter Dutton. The magic team that won the
Speaker 1: Voice would win the next election in a landslide. Maybe
Speaker 1: David Little Proud can take one for the team and
Speaker 1: stand aside and let just sent to take that role
Speaker 1: so that Australia can be saved from this hideous labor
Speaker 1: government of lessons. The fact of the matter was that,
Speaker 1: Asrita said, the massive amount of push that the Yes
Speaker 1: campaign the Voice got from Corporate Australia. Unbelievable aeroplanes painted
Speaker 1: with yes. Every corporation, every shop you went into there
Speaker 1: it was yes, yes, Yes. And something that has come
Speaker 1: out from a year on from the Voice is why
Speaker 1: on Earth? And Janet Olbertson writes about this very well
Speaker 1: in The Australia this week. Why on Earth is Corporate
Speaker 1: Australia are still playing this game. And the reason is
Speaker 1: it's called Reconciliation Australia. And they have a thing called
Speaker 1: the Reconciliation Australia Plans raps. And what happens is companies
Speaker 1: sign up to this thing. They think they earn points.
Speaker 1: They earn points on the share market because they've signed
Speaker 1: up to Reconciliation Australia. All they have to do whack
Speaker 1: up a few things on the shelves saying oh yeah
Speaker 1: we want the Voice, or yes, we want welcome the
Speaker 1: country or we want acknowledgement of country. Stick a few
Speaker 1: signs up and suddenly they get points which play into
Speaker 1: the share market. Massive conflict of interest obviously I call
Speaker 1: it corruption, but anyway, Janital Albertson makes the point that
Speaker 1: Reconciliation Australia has failed abysmally. There's a big conference coming
Speaker 1: up in two weeks time where they'll trot out all
Speaker 1: the usual stuff. Corporate Australia, wake up, walk away from
Speaker 1: this garbage. More importantly, consumers should be saying, no thank you.
Speaker 1: We don't want welcome to country, no thank you, we
Speaker 1: don't want acknowledgement the country, no thank you. We're fed
Speaker 1: up with all this rubbish. It all went out with
Speaker 1: the voice, we don't want any more of it, stopped
Speaker 1: playing us for mugs.
Speaker 4: Corporate Australia RITA absolutely and this esg philosophy in business
Speaker 4: goes beyond the voice racial division. It is trans issues,
Speaker 4: it's climate change. It is just absolutely completely at odds
Speaker 4: with what the business community should be focused on. And
Speaker 4: I think the Business Council of Australia has acknowledged the
Speaker 4: new leadership there that a lot of the ill will
Speaker 4: towards the business community is actually completely self inflicted because
Speaker 4: have got involved in these divisive games instead of actually
Speaker 4: focusing on things they should be focused on, like serving
Speaker 4: their stakeholders, their staff, their shareholders, their customers, instead of
Speaker 4: playing social engineering games. You know, leave that for the
Speaker 4: AFL well, and they still are not getting it. I
Speaker 4: still they think they've got fully the lessons from the
Speaker 4: sound boardrooms.
Speaker 1: They're overpaid, the they're too lazy in they so, oh,
Speaker 1: let's sign off on an rap a reconciliation plan, not
Speaker 1: recognizing the fact, James, that they are doing nothing for
Speaker 1: Indigenous Australians out there in these communities. These kids aren't
Speaker 1: getting my school, they're not getting proper education, they're not
Speaker 1: getting the jobs. In Corporate Australia go oh look we
Speaker 1: stuck up a sign saying welcome to country. Aren't we good?
Speaker 1: Haven't we done well? Shame on you, Corporate Astrola. Actually
Speaker 1: get real for a change. Scrap this reconciliation Scrap welcome
Speaker 1: to country, Scrap all the virtue signaling. Let's get real.
Speaker 1: Let's back just into price Warren Mundane, people like that
Speaker 1: who have genuine plans to bring jobs, education and private
Speaker 1: property ownership to Indigenous Australians. Everything else is a foce.
Speaker 1: And until this happens, nobody is going to be helping
Speaker 1: Indigenous Australians unless you get behind those plans that people
Speaker 1: like just Center and Warren James.
Speaker 5: Well, you know the thing is, it's great to say
Speaker 5: all that, but what has to be done first is
Speaker 5: to dismantle the network of these bodies like Reconciliation, like
Speaker 5: some of the groups that deal with gay and trans issues.
Speaker 5: All of these groups, you know, these companies pay to
Speaker 5: get certified by them, and then they submit to these
Speaker 5: groups what they do, and then they get points for that,
Speaker 5: and then they get points for doing business with each other.
Speaker 5: And people wonder why is it that the corporates are
Speaker 5: all woke. Well, it's not just that, you know, they
Speaker 5: just sort of walk in and go, oh, ladida, we're
Speaker 5: going to do this that you know, it's that actually.
Speaker 1: Do that again.
Speaker 3: And that's what it looks like from the outward face.
Speaker 3: But inside inside those.
Speaker 5: C suites, inside those executive floors, what's happening is there's
Speaker 5: this network of bodies, Reconciliation as one of them. You
Speaker 5: remember that the ABC themselves got pinged for some of
Speaker 5: their coverage about trans issues because one of the groups
Speaker 5: that accredits them was giving them points based on their
Speaker 5: coverage and media Watch actually quite rightly, I'll give them
Speaker 5: a little credit this time, ping them for that. You
Speaker 5: recall these groups that overlay the way corporate governance works.
Speaker 5: These are the real threat, you know, they are a
Speaker 5: threat to shareholders, they're a threat to the community there.
Speaker 5: As you say, Rowan, they wind up doing absolutely nothing
Speaker 5: and Jana Albertson says this very particularly herself. They do
Speaker 5: absolutely nothing for the people that they're supposed to be helping.
Speaker 5: But there's a lot of glad heading, a lot of
Speaker 5: gallon dinners, and a lot of using corporations to push
Speaker 5: hard left agendas on a whole number of issues through ESG.
Speaker 5: That's how it works. It's those networks of bodies that
Speaker 5: are credit companies. Those are what need to be dismantled.
Speaker 1: That's literally a massive woke Ponzi scheme. That's exactly what
Speaker 1: it is. Is nothing underpinning it. It's a massive scan.
Speaker 1: They're all in on it together. And the people who
Speaker 1: suffer the most are the Indigenous Australians who think someone
Speaker 1: is out there giving them a hand up. They're not.
Speaker 1: They're giving them nothing. They're looking after themselves. They're getting
Speaker 1: into the chairman's lounge, they're getting all the champagne, they're
Speaker 1: getting all this stuff because they sign off on this
Speaker 1: Reconciliation Australia rubbish. And there's a conference coming up in
Speaker 1: two weeks time. In Brisbane or somewhere other they'll all
Speaker 1: be there. I'll be swilling back the bubbly doing all this.
Speaker 3: Aren't we great?
Speaker 1: Aren't we doing a great job for reconciling Australia. You're
Speaker 1: doing nothing. Your frauds, your con men, you crooks, the
Speaker 1: lot of you. In my opinion, this being an opinion show.
Speaker 1: Now let's talk about more Ponzi schemes. We've got the
Speaker 1: judiciary now being told, oh oh, therapeutic jurisprudence. This is
Speaker 1: the idea.
Speaker 3: Talk about a woke Ponzi scheme.
Speaker 1: Now our judges are being told they have to take
Speaker 1: into account Islamic sensibilities, and they have to take into
Speaker 1: account so called indigenous sensibilities. More woke Ponzi schemes. Where
Speaker 1: now our judges are going, oh oh oh, I've got
Speaker 1: to understand, you know, intergenerational trauma, all this woke rubbish.
Speaker 1: It's been infused into corporate Australia. We're trying to pull
Speaker 1: it out again. It's being infused at the same time
Speaker 1: into the judiciary retail.
Speaker 4: Absolutely and all it's going to do is undermine public
Speaker 4: trust in the justice system, which is already pretty low
Speaker 4: for a number of reasons, but this whole notion of
Speaker 4: you know, you have to consider the pervasive intergenerational effects
Speaker 4: of settler colonialism. You are looking at an indigenous effenda.
Speaker 4: We have to look at the tenants of the Islamic
Speaker 4: faith and as some of the quotes from the actual
Speaker 4: two hundred page docum are frankly disturbing, and the fact
Speaker 4: that it's been endorsed is worrying, but it just shows
Speaker 4: you that if the judiciary isn't above being politicized, if
Speaker 4: the judiciary it's going to be captured by this far
Speaker 4: left ideology, then that is just an institution that you
Speaker 4: cannot afford to lose public faith there.
Speaker 5: This is a perfect example of something that we talk
Speaker 5: about on this program an awful lot. And this is
Speaker 5: the idea that just because you're not interested in the
Speaker 5: culture wars doesn't mean the culture wars aren't interested in you.
Speaker 5: And when you look at the language, as you say,
Speaker 5: setular colonialism, this is the same sort of thing that
Speaker 5: we hear about on university campuses when they talk about
Speaker 5: the Israel Palestine conflict, you know, all of these other things,
Speaker 5: you know, Islam invoking their sort of thing. This is again,
Speaker 5: this is what happens when these university academic obsessions then break.
Speaker 3: Out in the wider world.
Speaker 5: This is why, on a broader level, I think what
Speaker 5: everybody who watches this program is concerned about. This shows
Speaker 5: exactly why they're right to be concerned, because it doesn't
Speaker 5: stop at the campus gates. It winds up now on
Speaker 5: the bench of the judiciary, absolutely, and in.
Speaker 4: The boardroom, And in the boardroom we just discussed absolutely.
Speaker 1: Now I want to talk a little bit about Israel.
Speaker 1: Of course. We had the anniversary this week of October seventh,
Speaker 1: big week for annivers series, as we said last week
Speaker 1: on our live show, and thank you everybody who turned
Speaker 1: up to our live show at Sea Packet was a
Speaker 1: great event. We really enjoyed it and so obviously did.
Speaker 3: So many of you, and it was great.
Speaker 1: Hopefully we'll get to do something similar again. But on
Speaker 1: that anniversary of October seventh, we've got a great guest
Speaker 1: coming up in a minute. He's made a film about
Speaker 1: October seventh. We'll be chatting to him. But James I
Speaker 1: was particularly interested in the comments by Mike Pizulla. We've
Speaker 1: talked about him before. He's one of the top Canberra
Speaker 1: bureaucrats in kind of defense those sort of areas. He's
Speaker 1: come out and made the points, and it's a very
Speaker 1: good point that needs to be reinforced that Australia should
Speaker 1: actually be grateful to Israel for taking on Hezbala, Hamas
Speaker 1: and all the proxies of Iran, because it is the
Speaker 1: Iran China, Russia Axis, North Korea, North Korea that access
Speaker 1: of those four that is the biggest threat to the
Speaker 1: world to democracies like ours, And for Israel's actually in
Speaker 1: the frontline taking the fights up to Iran. Hopefully they'll
Speaker 1: go in hard on Iran in the next few weeks.
Speaker 1: But that is what Australia should be saying, thank you,
Speaker 1: not like the Albanizi government running around like headless chucks
Speaker 1: going oohs fine, James.
Speaker 5: Well look, I mean this is this is this is
Speaker 5: the problem of the moral vacuum that we have at
Speaker 5: the time of this government. You know, Ethne Albanizi cannot
Speaker 5: talk about antiseptism without also talking about Islamophobia. Ethne Albanizi,
Speaker 5: I believe, was one of the founders of Parliamentary Friends
Speaker 5: from Palestine back in nineteen ninety nine. He's from the
Speaker 5: left faction his views on Israel have always been this
Speaker 5: sort of thing. Almost all of the people in Labor
Speaker 5: who used to have very strong views that were would
Speaker 5: normally be called reasonable about Israel. You know, most of
Speaker 5: them have exited the party or their exiting parliament. So
Speaker 5: now you know, it's all being taken over by this
Speaker 5: hard left. The problem with that, though, is that we
Speaker 5: are unable now to take sides in a conflict where
Speaker 5: sides must be taken, you know, Albinizi and Labor wants
Speaker 5: to pretend like, oh, look, they're good people on both sides,
Speaker 5: you know, like they once said, Trump said, you know,
Speaker 5: and all people are hurting on both sides. So we're
Speaker 5: just going to try and stay out of it. No,
Speaker 5: I'm sorry. The thing is about Hensbellah. The thing about
Speaker 5: i Ran is the thing about all of the nations
Speaker 5: that you just mentioned there that want to control the
Speaker 5: Eurasian land mass is They don't just want to get
Speaker 5: rid of Israel.
Speaker 3: This is not just about Israel.
Speaker 9: This is not just.
Speaker 3: About Jewish people.
Speaker 5: As bad as the attempt to a live Israel and
Speaker 5: Jewish people is I thought we said never again about
Speaker 5: all of that. This is about a fundamental reorder of
Speaker 5: the world away from Western civilization. Now, the left, as
Speaker 5: we know, isn't a huge fan of Western civilization.
Speaker 3: So they look at hes blood they say.
Speaker 5: Well, okay, you know, what're kind of interesting what you
Speaker 5: gotta say here, you know, And maybe we shouldn't go
Speaker 5: too hard on them, because you know they've got a
Speaker 5: side point. But the fact is, you know, when Israel
Speaker 5: blows up heads FELA terrorists, they are doing the world
Speaker 5: a service. I don't know why this is so hard
Speaker 5: for people to say, except I do know because there's
Speaker 5: a bunch of voters in Western Sydney and Melbourne that
Speaker 5: they want to keep.
Speaker 10: On telling that.
Speaker 4: I think it's more deeper than that. It's it's it's
Speaker 4: an ideological position as much as it is of course,
Speaker 4: it's a matter of convenience and looking at those particular
Speaker 4: electrics where they've got a couple of labor ministers who
Speaker 4: would be feeling nervous. We've heard Kamala Harris say the
Speaker 4: same thing, that this isn't a binary conflict, trying to
Speaker 4: both sides it. And when Trump was in and he
Speaker 4: does not get enough credit for this, he does get
Speaker 4: a little bit of credit for the Abraham Accords, and
Speaker 4: normalizing relations between Muslim majority countries and Israel. But what
Speaker 4: he did was he isolated and impoverished the Iranian regime.
Speaker 4: He went to China and put enormous pressure on China
Speaker 4: basically said, if you buy Iranian oil, I'm going to
Speaker 4: put a massive tariff on all your products into America.
Speaker 4: Guess what, the Chinese they stopped doing that much business
Speaker 4: with the iron broke and all of that good work
Speaker 4: where the Iranian regime was on its knees was reversed
Speaker 4: almost immediately by the Biden Harris administration, and we are
Speaker 4: seeing the effects now. The Iranian regime is emboldened, it's enriched,
Speaker 4: it's got this alliance with China, Russia, North Korea, that
Speaker 4: the axis of evil if you want to call it.
Speaker 4: And you can defeat her mass, you can defeat Herzbola.
Speaker 4: As long as the Uranian regime is there, which funds
Speaker 4: both those groups, there'll be another threat to Israel. So
Speaker 4: that's something that has to be acknowledged as well, that
Speaker 4: what's the long term plan? Because once these groups go, yeah,
Speaker 4: you're going to have another one.
Speaker 1: Right as I was saying, it's been it is a
Speaker 1: year since October seventh, and the sheer horror when Hamas
Speaker 1: terrorist orchestrated the You know, it was beyond repugnant what
Speaker 1: happened there in southern Israel, single deadliest attack on the
Speaker 1: Jewish people since the Holocaust. Now, Pierre Rahov is a
Speaker 1: renowned filmmaker, and he couldn't believe what followed on October
Speaker 1: eighth of twenty twenty three, the pro Palestinian demonstrations erupting
Speaker 1: all around the world. We saw it here, the disgusting
Speaker 1: scenes at the Sydney Opera House and out in western Sydney.
Speaker 1: So to mark the one year anniversary of this, he's
Speaker 1: released a documentary called Program, and he joins us now
Speaker 1: from Israel to discuss it. Pierre, first of great to
Speaker 1: have you here on the show. Thanks for staying up.
Speaker 1: We realize how later it is in Israel. Is very
Speaker 1: good to you. This stay up in chat to us.
Speaker 1: So you've released Program, tell us first of all, what
Speaker 1: is a program?
Speaker 11: First of all, thank you very much for having you
Speaker 11: again on your show. A program, as a versimple definition,
Speaker 11: it's a way of hurting or killing a maximum number
Speaker 11: of people just because of what they are. And usually
Speaker 11: programs the term program was applied to the Jews of
Speaker 11: Poland and Russia and Ukrain and all those places towards
Speaker 11: the end of nineteenth century. A lot of gages have
Speaker 11: been destroyed, a lot of people have been massacred, I mean,
Speaker 11: in the most horrible conditions. So the term program officially
Speaker 11: leads to that. And when you say program, even to
Speaker 11: a Jew automatically thinks of the spread of time and
Speaker 11: those countries. But I came myself from a Muslim country.
Speaker 11: I was born in the north in North Africa, and
Speaker 11: many years ago I made a film. But the plight
Speaker 11: of Jews had been expelled from Muslim countries between nineteen
Speaker 11: forty eight and nineteen seventy four, and whom nobody wanted
Speaker 11: to talk about because the Reunited nations into care ware
Speaker 11: of them. Nobody actually said that you were refugees. And
Speaker 11: sixty percent of them obviously moved to Israel, the rest
Speaker 11: to France and America, et cetera. So I know a
Speaker 11: little bit more about the region, and I know also
Speaker 11: enough of history. Its a lot, but problems happened often,
Speaker 11: even more often in the most mold that it actually
Speaker 11: happened in Russia, Ukrain, et cetera. I could give you
Speaker 11: a few quickly, a few dates Wuchua nineteen oh seven,
Speaker 11: nineteen twenty nine, had you had Rebron nineteen forty one,
Speaker 11: the farhoud In in Baghdad, And there were also a
Speaker 11: program against the Christian population of Lebanon the city of
Speaker 11: Damu in nineteen seventy eight, by one hundred forty Christians killed,
Speaker 11: not killed, massacred, and not massacred in a way, you know,
Speaker 11: arriving with a sword and kid. No, they were burnt alive,
Speaker 11: torture to death, whom pregnant women with a belly open.
Speaker 11: Everything that we saw twenty miles so from where I live,
Speaker 11: because I lived only miles so north of Gaza. What
Speaker 11: we saw on October seven, they so that in Da
Speaker 11: Mur and they saw that many many other times. Actually,
Speaker 11: there was a program in the city of Uran in
Speaker 11: Algeria the day after the liberation of Algeria, when Algeria
Speaker 11: became an independent country. We're talking there at about seven
Speaker 11: hundred people who were massacred in the streets of Oran.
Speaker 11: And it part of obviously not all of Islam, but
Speaker 11: it's a it's a it's part of a certain belief
Speaker 11: of the way they should behave because according to fundamentalists Muslims,
Speaker 11: when you are dealing with Jews or other people who
Speaker 11: don't recognize the allahs, God and the prophet, the royal Prophet,
Speaker 11: these people both do. Fantime, Montalists are no longer considered
Speaker 11: as a human being in Islam. They say that we
Speaker 11: only attack people when they are themselves aggressed. It's kind
Speaker 11: of retaliation. But for them, the idea of retaliation is
Speaker 11: we are the good people. You should become Muslims like us,
Speaker 11: and if you don't, if you don't accept what we say,
Speaker 11: then you're this is an equation, you're attacking us, so
Speaker 11: we have to fight back. So basically, if you don't convert,
Speaker 11: we kill you.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 4: So for the for the isms, total submission or you're
Speaker 4: worthy of what you've just described. Who do you think
Speaker 4: would benefit most from saying this documentary? Should it be
Speaker 4: shown in university campuses and beginners.
Speaker 11: I wanted to make this film for people to understand
Speaker 11: not what happened on September on the September of October,
Speaker 11: but why it happened and in which historical context it happened.
Speaker 2: So my.
Speaker 11: First question, my first answer would be to tell you, yes,
Speaker 11: every university is every school. Because everything in the film,
Speaker 11: I didn't put a voice over, I didn't put my
Speaker 11: personal opinion in the film. Everything in the film is
Speaker 11: told by people who know what we are talking about,
Speaker 11: and with images which are real images. Nothing is fact.
Speaker 11: It's fact one in fact after the fact.
Speaker 5: How depressed did you find it? Because I found it
Speaker 5: horrifying when after October seventh it seemed like people who
Speaker 5: were you know, not to radical Islam, not even Muslim,
Speaker 5: just you know, regular Westerners. This virus of anti Semitism
Speaker 5: seemed to come out in the West in the same
Speaker 5: way that we saw it in Europe in the nineteen thirties,
Speaker 5: in Russia in previous decades. And what do you attribute
Speaker 5: it to? I, you know, had kind of naively thought
Speaker 5: that maybe this that sort of old school anti semitism
Speaker 5: was the thing.
Speaker 3: In the past.
Speaker 5: But it feels like and even the fact that we're
Speaker 5: using the word program tells me that it is still
Speaker 5: something that needs to be fought.
Speaker 11: Well, absolutely absolutely. It's also you know, two big type
Speaker 11: to be forms of anti Semitism that's encounter each other.
Speaker 11: There was all on tai Semitism, Christian anti semitism, you know,
Speaker 11: the mythology of Jews having killed the Christ and all
Speaker 11: this for years and years and years, and then it
Speaker 11: became kind of a social form ati Semitism. All this
Speaker 11: is a europe mostly a little bit in America later on,
Speaker 11: but mostly this is a European or European thing, and
Speaker 11: more still Christian thing.
Speaker 8: And now you have another kind.
Speaker 11: Of anti Semitism which is promoted at a much much
Speaker 11: higher level by by Islam, by the Muslims in general,
Speaker 11: I mean the Islamists. And this is unshrine in most
Speaker 11: of the adits, which is the representation of what their
Speaker 11: profit did during the last last time. Is that is life.
Speaker 11: So the contry, the you know, the alliance of the
Speaker 11: two forces negative forces multiply, it's not only one plus
Speaker 11: one in post two. With two forces going, you have
Speaker 11: one hundred and add to that that Qatar is spanning
Speaker 11: about one thousand billions of dollars every year for self power,
Speaker 11: meaning corrupted, corrupting as many people as they can in
Speaker 11: the Western world, giving money to the university's twining professors.
Speaker 11: I mean, I don't know all the things to do
Speaker 11: with this money, but one billion dollars are flying you
Speaker 11: around a lot of people are ready to have an ideology.
Speaker 6: That's a problem.
Speaker 1: Absolute, Pierre Rah, thanks so much for coming on so
Speaker 1: people can check out your documentary programs. I urge people
Speaker 1: to see it. Obviously a work of passion there. And
Speaker 1: thanks so much Pierre for staying up and chatting to us,
Speaker 1: say late there in Israel. Thanks for coming on Outsiders.
Speaker 1: We're going to take a short break back in ATIP.
Speaker 4: You're watching Outsiders with your host Rowan junk Degrees, Dan
Speaker 4: James Wakademia Morrow and I'm ready to panney here. And yes,
Speaker 4: the wacky world of academia was in the spotlight again
Speaker 4: this week as we learn how tens of millions of
Speaker 4: our howd and dollars were being spent on absurd research projects. Absurd.
Speaker 4: You want to know how absurd? How about around half
Speaker 4: a million dollars going towards identifying the causes of gender
Speaker 4: bias in the staged English language translations of ancient Greek tragedies.
Speaker 4: The Australian Research Council there's also seen fit to grant
Speaker 4: more than three point seven million for a project which
Speaker 4: aims to advance the role of the arts as the
Speaker 4: missing link in global movements of multi species justice using
Speaker 4: innovative musical approaches to communicate the urgency of climate change
Speaker 4: and lead social change. I wish I was kidding, but
Speaker 4: that is a direct quote from the Australian Research Council's
Speaker 4: own website. That money went to Sydney UNI and there
Speaker 4: was another twenty million odd going to equally fruity projects.
Speaker 4: Every far left obsession was catered for, from race, slavery, colonialism,
Speaker 4: to transissues to global warming. Indeed, the climate cult getting
Speaker 4: a big chunk of the large Just look at some
Speaker 4: of the projects your taxes are funding. More than three
Speaker 4: point one million going to Monash University to innovate new
Speaker 4: ethnographic methods to investigate the role of future human values
Speaker 4: in developing a path towards technologically supported environmental sustainability. If
Speaker 4: you want to know what that all means. That project
Speaker 4: is concerned with the impact of human futures on Australia's
Speaker 4: digital and net zero transition. Over six hundred thousand going
Speaker 4: to Southern Cross University for advancing child and youth let
Speaker 4: climate change education with country. We are told this project
Speaker 4: conceptualizes and advances climate change education in country. The academics
Speaker 4: argue that climate change education is not adequately understood within
Speaker 4: Western science, and Western perspectives on climate crisis are in
Speaker 4: deep contrast to Indigenous perspectives in mesh in continuous story
Speaker 4: with descendants, ancestors and country, six hundred and eight thousand
Speaker 4: for that one. R MIT will receive more than four
Speaker 4: hundred and forty thousand to look at how the art
Speaker 4: sector engages with colonial history, and the University of Western
Speaker 4: Australia will get six hundred and fifty eight thousand to
Speaker 4: bring Australia into the global history of slavery by exploring
Speaker 4: the legacies of British slavery in South Australia and Victoria,
Speaker 4: and to produce a new history of the continuing impact
Speaker 4: of slavery wealth in shaping colonial immigration, investment and law.
Speaker 4: Can't wait for that one. Just what we need more
Speaker 4: racial guilt and grievance. If these topics appear highly political,
Speaker 4: it's because they are, and all in the one direction.
Speaker 4: There are too many to mention here, but I'll end
Speaker 4: on this one. Four hundred and thirty four thousand going
Speaker 4: to Sydney University to undertake a comprehensive study of the
Speaker 4: relationship between policing and popular music. In Australia, which academics
Speaker 4: claim meets the national interest test because the Australian colonial
Speaker 4: nation state has always had a particular relationship to crime,
Speaker 4: with sovereign land stolen and First Nations people police in
Speaker 4: order to build a penal colony, colony based on punishment
Speaker 4: and redemption. Sorry, seriously, in the midst of a cost
Speaker 4: of living crisis. Colony. It's a hard word. This is
Speaker 4: what the labor government is spending your tax dollars on.
Speaker 4: Now before I go, we have seen woke corporate giants
Speaker 4: like Nike back a bunch of leftist causes. In the
Speaker 4: case of Nike, everything from BLM to Burgers. They even
Speaker 4: had transactivists Dylan mulvany promoting their female clothing range. Seriously,
Speaker 4: they cop deserved backlash for that, but they only double
Speaker 4: down on that activism. But now there is a new
Speaker 4: campaign by xxxy Athletic. It's calling out the apparelled giant
Speaker 4: for failing to protect female athletes. It's quite superb.
Speaker 2: Dear Nike, Dear.
Speaker 4: Nike, Dear Nike, why won't you stand up for me?
Speaker 2: Why won't you stand up for me?
Speaker 8: Why won't you.
Speaker 2: Why do you claim to support women and girls.
Speaker 3: Yeah, oh we need you most.
Speaker 10: You remain silent.
Speaker 1: Today.
Speaker 2: Males are claiming our identity.
Speaker 8: Our sports, our spaces.
Speaker 10: Men and boys are stealing opportunities, metals, trophies, and our future.
Speaker 4: And it's not pre or just.
Speaker 8: In fact, it's often dangerous.
Speaker 2: Yet you refuse to use your platform to stand up.
Speaker 10: You say you're for social justice and progress.
Speaker 2: So why do you allow men's rights to come before on.
Speaker 4: I'm back on it. Yes not. You might talk a
Speaker 4: big game about equality with women's rights, women's empowerment, all
Speaker 4: those nice topics, but when it counts, they're on the
Speaker 4: side of the file left ideologue. So you don't know
Speaker 4: what a woman eats that rather prioritize the interest of
Speaker 4: men pretending to be women over real women, even when
Speaker 4: that means girls and women who've trained for years for scholarships,
Speaker 4: for opportunities at the elite level miss out. It's time
Speaker 4: Nike and other corporate virtue signalers were called out for
Speaker 4: their incoherent activism. Hold their feet to the fire. Girls,
Speaker 4: you have a.
Speaker 8: Chance to do the right thing, not just do the
Speaker 8: easy thing. So we're asking you Nike.
Speaker 2: So we're asking you Nike, So.
Speaker 3: We're asking you, Nike, as the biggest voice in all
Speaker 3: of sports.
Speaker 4: Will you stand up for me? Will you stand up
Speaker 4: for me? Will you stand up for me?
Speaker 2: Will you stand up for me? Will you? Will you?
Speaker 8: Will you just do it?
Speaker 1: Fantastic Thanks for Ether and what a great ad calling
Speaker 1: out Nike for women's sports. I mean it's about time
Speaker 1: these big corporations, as you were saying, we've got off
Speaker 1: the woke Ponzi scheme, because that's what it all is about.
Speaker 1: Now we also know about the perans of cancel culture
Speaker 1: and the whole political correct woke brigade. The left just
Speaker 1: does not understand humor. They're scared of humor. That's why
Speaker 1: they don't like it, because humor is the best way
Speaker 1: to dismantle the lies and the misinformation of the left.
Speaker 1: So they run around canceling comedians whenever they get the chance.
Speaker 1: To remember, Barry Humphreys was canceled for you know, the
Speaker 1: great Barry Humphrey's name, Edna canceled because of our transgender things.
Speaker 1: Remember last week we had Leo Curse on the show
Speaker 1: There at Sea Pack He was canceled again from Perth.
Speaker 1: Seems to be an Australian thing and the Australian Left
Speaker 1: and the Australian comics don't seem to like comedy very
Speaker 1: much well. Adelaide based comedian Video Lachlan has claimed her
Speaker 1: upcoming stand up performance has been canceled due to her
Speaker 1: jokes about wait for it, guess, oh what could it be?
Speaker 1: Transgender people? Biddy, I'm delighted to say, joins us. Now, Biddy,
Speaker 1: great to see you. You're a comedian, you come from
Speaker 1: a family. Your mum was a famous comedian, so it's
Speaker 1: there in the blood. Let's just take a quick peek
Speaker 1: at a look at one of your shows. Then we'll
Speaker 1: have a chat. Here we go, all war time, everybody
Speaker 1: for Biddy or lost? Then everyone mixing life for Bitty
Speaker 1: everyone sixty seconds I'm interrupted. Hi.
Speaker 10: Hi, my name's Biddy. I'm from Australia and my pronounce
Speaker 10: I'm Irish, Australian and I don't drink anymore. So my
Speaker 10: ancestors are pissed, and they're pissed.
Speaker 1: Very good, fantastic, Biddy. So tell us you've been canceled
Speaker 1: for transgenders and tell us the story what happened?
Speaker 8: Thank you.
Speaker 10: So I've been canceled for over three years, but I've
Speaker 10: been soft canceled, as in friends, some family and colleagues
Speaker 10: have you know, banned me in a social sense and
Speaker 10: at work of just not being given opportunities and things
Speaker 10: like that. And despite this devastation to my career and confidence,
Speaker 10: I've continued to talk about women's rights on social media.
Speaker 10: And then I finally met some real life turfs in
Speaker 10: twenty twenty three on the steps of Essay Parliament for
Speaker 10: Kelly J. Keanes standing for Women, and I gave a speech,
Speaker 10: and then I got more involved on the ground with
Speaker 10: the Women's Rights Network and stuff like that. And this
Speaker 10: time last year I started doing stand up comedy about
Speaker 10: trans people and my experience as a turf, and so.
Speaker 1: I just spell out to have it be sorry, We'll
Speaker 1: just spell out for the audience, turf is.
Speaker 10: A trans exclusionary Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, trans exclusion radical feminists. So you're feminist who believes
Speaker 1: in women, and you believe, basically, and I'm not putting
Speaker 1: words in your mouth, but you believe that biological men
Speaker 1: shouldn't have the rights to be in the spaces that
Speaker 1: women occupy naturally or that effect. So you started laughing
Speaker 1: at gender community or aspects of transgenderism in your show,
Speaker 1: which I'm sure was great.
Speaker 10: What happened, well, the first time I did it was
Speaker 10: around this time last year, and I filmed the gig
Speaker 10: thinking it may be my last gig ever, because I
Speaker 10: was quite disheartened by the comedy scene and my colleagues
Speaker 10: blacklisting me. They call it soft cancelation when you just
Speaker 10: don't get the opportunities or the gigs. So I thought
Speaker 10: this might be my last gig, and I got it
Speaker 10: filmed specifically for that reason, and sure enough, the pub,
Speaker 10: which was the Crown and Anchor, got a complaint and
Speaker 10: the guy who runs the comedy club said, please don't
Speaker 10: use that footage anywhere if you've got our name associated
Speaker 10: with it, and the girl who filmed it also said,
Speaker 10: please don't credit me for filming it. So I thought
Speaker 10: I wasn't going to use that footage because it takes
Speaker 10: a long time to polish material, but I just wanted
Speaker 10: to film it as I thought it would be my
Speaker 10: last gig, and it may well have been. And then
Speaker 10: I went to the States last year with my three
Speaker 10: year old she was two at the time, on the
Speaker 10: smell of an oily rag, trying to seek work because
Speaker 10: I wanted to get out of Australia because I just
Speaker 10: couldn't see me getting any work here. I've got a
Speaker 10: film degree and I can't get work in film television.
Speaker 10: One benefit to being a turf is you don't get
Speaker 10: cast in the Australian version of the office.
Speaker 3: And I went.
Speaker 10: I went to America. I met with the Daily Wire producer.
Speaker 10: Unfortunately they couldn't hire me, but he's a lovely man
Speaker 10: and a friend and then my friend I was in
Speaker 10: America and my friend said, go to Austin. So I
Speaker 10: went to Austin and I went and I did an
Speaker 10: open mic at Joe Rogan's Comedy Club, and I fell
Speaker 10: in love with stand up comedy again and I felt
Speaker 10: like there is a future for comedy. And I did
Speaker 10: that show that you did, the clip of a big
Speaker 10: show called kill Tony. And I came back to Australia
Speaker 10: determined not to give up, to keep doing my comedy
Speaker 10: to get better. And I went to the open mic
Speaker 10: every Monday. And I don't just talk about trans things, obviously,
Speaker 10: I talk about all sorts of issues.
Speaker 12: Monday.
Speaker 10: I was ready to do my trans material again to
Speaker 10: test it out, and as soon as I did, I
Speaker 10: was censored. They said please don't do that at the
Speaker 10: open mic anymore. Yeah, you're welcome to be here, but
Speaker 10: you're not allowed to do that material. This was a
Speaker 10: different open mic to the Cranker Comedy, which is the
Speaker 10: Crown and Anchor comedy. So the Cranker was the only
Speaker 10: place I wasn't censored. So I continued to whip out
Speaker 10: my trans jokes whenever I was there because I need
Speaker 10: to work on them. And then finally the non binary
Speaker 10: bar staff got a bit cranky that I know what
Speaker 10: sex I am and they had me banned jams. And
Speaker 10: one good thing about it.
Speaker 5: Bitty, was it a hat that you wore on an
Speaker 5: Instagram post that said make women great Again?
Speaker 3: Wasn't that part of the female but we were feel again.
Speaker 5: That we see there on the screen here was that
Speaker 5: was part of the issue that somebody had seen that
Speaker 5: had gotten offended by that.
Speaker 3: I'm just quite clever quip on your hat.
Speaker 10: Yeah, I believe that it's my social media your presence,
Speaker 10: not so much my jokes on stage. Because the bar
Speaker 10: staff at the Cranker they wouldn't have seen my comedy,
Speaker 10: they just would have heard about it. It's a different
Speaker 10: room that the comedy's done in, but it was my
Speaker 10: social media presence I believe that ultimately had me canceled.
Speaker 10: And even though it was hurting me in my career,
Speaker 10: I continued to speak on social media because it is
Speaker 10: the public square, and because I'd lost so much and
Speaker 10: suffered so much as a turf that I thought, you know,
Speaker 10: I can't stop now or all of that will be
Speaker 10: in vain and my daughter will just have to fight
Speaker 10: this fight in twenty years.
Speaker 1: So, Biddy, where can people see you? Because we outside
Speaker 1: the fans would love to see you. So where can
Speaker 1: they go and prove that they're happy to listen to
Speaker 1: trans jokes and all other jokes so long as they're funny.
Speaker 1: Of course, where can people see you?
Speaker 10: Well, I'm not sure yet. I'm trying to get a
Speaker 10: tour happening. I don't have a lot of capital behind me,
Speaker 10: and I've been discriminated against institutionally by arts funding. I
Speaker 10: haven't got a grant to help me get on my feet.
Speaker 10: In coincidentally, as many years as I've been saying a
Speaker 10: woman is an adult human female, I set up a
Speaker 10: fundraiser thing through the Australian Cultural Fund the other day
Speaker 10: which I hope to have set up by today, but
Speaker 10: it still hasn't been approved, so it's really hard. So
Speaker 10: just follow me on Instagram and you'll be updated and
Speaker 10: I'll hopefully have some gig dates soon.
Speaker 1: Fantastic. Well all the best, Biddy. It's absolutely ridiculous how
Speaker 1: comedians can be canceled for the jokes they tell. It's insane.
Speaker 1: Thanks so much, Vidia Lachlan, and catcha where you can
Speaker 1: there on Instagram. After the break, We've got a bit
Speaker 1: of net Zaney left you, lunacy, whackademia, so much more
Speaker 1: here on outside is back in aid you watching Outsiders,
Speaker 1: and thank you so much for watching us. We certainly
Speaker 1: do appreciate it. Every Sunday morning. Well net Zany the wacky,
Speaker 1: crazy world of net zero policies. I've often said here
Speaker 1: that climate change alarmism is child abuse. That's what it
Speaker 1: amounts to, terrifying children that the world's going to wind
Speaker 1: and however many years time, that there's no future for them.
Speaker 1: It's all going to be doom and destruction because people
Speaker 1: drive around in cars and cows fart. That's the bottom line.
Speaker 1: It's it is child abuse. Have a listen to this character,
Speaker 1: Bill Nye. I don't know if you've heard of him,
Speaker 1: but he's in the States. He has a kids program,
Speaker 1: or a kind of scientific kids program, and here he
Speaker 1: is basically telling people that the hurricanes can be stopped
Speaker 1: if you vote for Kamala Harris. That's the bottom line
Speaker 1: of what he's telling children. Have a listen.
Speaker 3: If you have young voters out there, encourage them to vote.
Speaker 1: People say, what can I do about climate change? If
Speaker 1: we were talking about it associating it with big storms
Speaker 1: like this, that would be really good.
Speaker 3: But the main thing is vote.
Speaker 1: So James, let me get this right. You vote for
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris like Barack Obama. She'll stop the ocean's rising,
Speaker 1: She'll stop the wind blowing, so no more hurricanes. She'll
Speaker 1: stop the bushflyer's burning, so no more fire. And that's
Speaker 1: why young children should vote for Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3: Have I got it correct? Yeah?
Speaker 5: Well, books, I mean, look, this is science. This is science.
Speaker 5: You know remember that Rowan and Rita Rodria. Look, you're
Speaker 5: laboring under some sort of misconception that you know, with
Speaker 5: this sort of science, that the rules apply everywhere, like
Speaker 5: in physics or with gravity.
Speaker 3: No no, no, no, no, no.
Speaker 5: You see what the whole game is here is that
Speaker 5: it is the West, It is conservatives, it is the
Speaker 5: right that are responsible for the ocean's rising, for hurricanes
Speaker 5: being more severe than ever. And by the way, you know,
Speaker 5: people like JD. Advance have gone and blown up comprehensively
Speaker 5: this idea that this Hurricane Milton that came through Florida
Speaker 5: was somehow stronger than anything they've ever seen before. Completely
Speaker 5: not true. But what is so galling about this is
Speaker 5: that if you are somebody who does believe even fully
Speaker 5: in the whole climate change narrative that CO two is
Speaker 5: the problem and all that you're not protesting against, you know,
Speaker 5: Donald Trump, You're not protesting against Republicans or liberals here
Speaker 5: in Australia. Your protesting gets China, right, and you're protesting
Speaker 5: against those massive admitterors. But no, you don't care about
Speaker 5: that because they're against the West. Therefore they get a pass.
Speaker 5: That's what this is all about. Let's not have any
Speaker 5: illusions that any of this sort of politicized climate science
Speaker 5: is anything about science, But it's all about the politics.
Speaker 1: He's very clever, this Donald Trump character. He's responsible for
Speaker 1: the voice and misinformation on the voice. He's responsible for hurricanes,
Speaker 1: He's responsible for he's very clever past Flanda.
Speaker 4: Has never had hurricanes. I mean, if you look at
Speaker 4: the record books one hundred years, one hundred and fifty
Speaker 4: years ago, they weren't having strong hieracany. Really, it is
Speaker 4: so idiotic. But we see this every single time there
Speaker 4: is a natural disaster, this attempt to link it to
Speaker 4: climate change, even when there have been far stronger storms,
Speaker 4: more frequently in the past. They still don't let that
Speaker 4: sort of data get in their way of this scare mongering.
Speaker 4: And that guy is absolutely bonkers, but no more bonkers
Speaker 4: than the British government, right, And what are they doing.
Speaker 4: They've got a new plan where they're going to burn
Speaker 4: biomass important from places like North Korea and Afghanistan. How
Speaker 4: is this going to save the world?
Speaker 1: This saves the planet. Biomass, by the way, is just
Speaker 1: kind of wood chips and leftover what you put out
Speaker 1: in the green recycling.
Speaker 3: This is.
Speaker 5: This is this is what's going on here. They're actually
Speaker 5: again this have to see this in the context of
Speaker 5: the Jill politics and the politics. You know, they couldn't
Speaker 5: do deals with North Korea and Afghanistan. I either Taliban
Speaker 5: by the way, you know who aren't rich enough from
Speaker 5: all the military equivalent billions of dollars that Joe Biden
Speaker 5: left behind there.
Speaker 3: So let's put that aside.
Speaker 5: And now they're going to go and sell biomass, which
Speaker 5: is as you say, it's basically refuse and you know,
Speaker 5: green rubbish to go for Britain to burn to get
Speaker 5: through the winter. Of course Britain has all of this call,
Speaker 5: but they've just closed their last plant. They're not doing
Speaker 5: that anymore.
Speaker 4: Good news, they're opening all these solar farms because it's
Speaker 4: such a sunny climate. It's going to work beautifully. Can
Speaker 4: you just imagine all the heat that all the energy
Speaker 4: they're going to get from their solar farms, so burn
Speaker 4: completely bonker.
Speaker 1: It is completely bonkers, you know. And you make the
Speaker 1: point Rita about you know, the different all the different
Speaker 1: ways I've forgotten what I was going to say, Trump
Speaker 1: got the.
Speaker 4: Trump doesn't do that. Trump, as he explained in that
Speaker 4: fantastic podcast City with Andrew Schultz, he weaves. So he'll
Speaker 4: talk about something and he'll go off on a tangent,
Speaker 4: but he weaves his way back to the original point
Speaker 4: and continues. So that is such a.
Speaker 5: Whole different thing. That's being a wrap on tour. That's up.
Speaker 1: Well, you both saved me there, So let's move on
Speaker 1: to so school back tracks. Wait for this one. This
Speaker 1: is from JK Rowling and she's put out a tweet
Speaker 1: pointing out the absolute absurdity that in certain schools you
Speaker 1: have to if the girl wants to, you know, have
Speaker 1: a sick day because she's got a period, she has
Speaker 1: to kind of prove that she's actually had the period.
Speaker 1: But a boy readacrom wander around saying, ihn't a girl?
Speaker 4: No prove I can go into the girl's locker rooms, bathrooms,
Speaker 4: no problems there. Yeah, this is a war on girls,
Speaker 4: it really is. And sadly, the biggest supporters of these
Speaker 4: sort of crazy policies are women. And all the data
Speaker 4: shows that it's men who are most opposed to this
Speaker 4: gender confusion, and it's the women who push these policies
Speaker 4: that are just terrible for their daughters, for themselves, but
Speaker 4: they're blind to it. They think it's an act of compassion.
Speaker 5: They think it's about inclusion, which is about this you know,
Speaker 5: horrendous word that's been you know, well abused.
Speaker 3: But isn't it just ironic?
Speaker 5: The JK Rowling, who made herslute fortune off of books
Speaker 5: about fantasy, seems to be the most grounded person in
Speaker 5: science and reality in Great Britain today.
Speaker 3: God figure.
Speaker 1: Now, Also, while we're on the whole DEI diversity inclusion
Speaker 1: equity thing, apparently a New Zealand ship went down. The
Speaker 1: Navy ship went down, and as well, there were there
Speaker 1: were suggestions Rita that perhaps the captain of the ship,
Speaker 1: who was a diversity and inclusion higher, might not have
Speaker 1: been the best pick to be the captain of the ship.
Speaker 1: But there are others who say, no, no, no, it
Speaker 1: was nothing to do with her.
Speaker 4: Well, that is a deeply misogynistic narrative. As they have
Speaker 4: called a ship.
Speaker 1: I'm sure it's just of course, it's secretly one hundred
Speaker 1: million dollar Navy ship gone down. We're going to take
Speaker 1: a short break when we come back. What's more happening
Speaker 1: here on Outsiders back in a tick? Hello, you're watching
Speaker 1: Outsiders with Rita dressed like a teal? Panicy. Sorry, I've
Speaker 1: got all these emails people saying why is Reta dressed
Speaker 1: like a pit teal today? Well, it's a beautiful color
Speaker 1: and it's been sullied by that particular group of politicians
Speaker 1: James wearing a blue tie Morrow as he should do,
Speaker 1: and myself are Rowan Dean back in the Sydney studio
Speaker 1: after our trip to Brisbane last week for our live
Speaker 1: show at Seapack, and what a great show. Was so
Speaker 1: great to meet so many outsiders there and thank you
Speaker 1: to everyone who made it possible. Now I mentioned on
Speaker 1: that show the non binding but insidious United Nations Packed
Speaker 1: for the Future which the increasingly deranged and dangerous Albanesi
Speaker 1: government signed us up to. Albanesian charmers can't even manage
Speaker 1: the present day Australian economy, yet they have signed this
Speaker 1: nation up to this preposterous Orwellian totalitarian Packed for the Future.
Speaker 1: They've committed us to the United Nations net zero climate policies,
Speaker 1: to the United Nations Global governance policy that's co COVID
Speaker 1: mandates on steroids, and the United Nations misinformation and disinformation measures.
Speaker 1: Just listen to this buffoon. The United Nations Secretary General
Speaker 1: Antonio guitarists.
Speaker 13: Digital platforms are being misused to subvert science and spread
Speaker 13: disinformation and hate to billions of people. This clear and
Speaker 13: present global threat demands clear and coordinated global action. Our
Speaker 13: policy brief on information integrity on digital platforms puts forward
Speaker 13: the framework for a concerned international response.
Speaker 1: Albanesi and Co. Sign us up to this nonsense. How
Speaker 1: dare that particular character lecture the world on misinformation and disinformation?
Speaker 1: This bloke Antonio Guitarra, Secretary General of the UN, is
Speaker 1: the same bloke that weighed out into the shallows to
Speaker 1: pose for a cover of Time magazine claiming the planet
Speaker 1: is sinking when even the ABC admitted in twenty twenty
Speaker 1: one that hundreds of Pacific islands were getting bigger than smaller,
Speaker 1: so complete misinformation gu terrorists. Is also the same bloke
Speaker 1: who told us we are living in an era of
Speaker 1: global boiling.
Speaker 14: Of global warming has ended the idea, the hera of
Speaker 14: global boiling has arrived. The airth is unbriathable, the hitt
Speaker 14: is unbearable.
Speaker 1: Again total disinformation. The air on planet Earth is not
Speaker 1: unbreathable to the vast majority of human beings on this planet,
Speaker 1: and the heat on planet Earth is also not unbearable
Speaker 1: to the vast majority of human beings. And as for
Speaker 1: global boiling, literally nowhere on the planet has climate change
Speaker 1: caused water or liquid to boil. That speech did not
Speaker 1: qualify any of those remarks as being hyperbole, has been
Speaker 1: creative license, being joked, no, nothing. So that is literally
Speaker 1: three pieces of miss or disinformation from the head of
Speaker 1: the United Nations within a fifteen second sound grab, and
Speaker 1: they want us to be censored. But it's not just
Speaker 1: the United Nations. Former Democrat presidential candidate now Trump supporter
Speaker 1: Tulsei Gabbard warned this week about the United States deep
Speaker 1: State weaponizing misinformation and disinformation. This is terrifying stuff.
Speaker 15: More dangerous than any baseless smear our own government institutions,
Speaker 15: which exist to serve the people, they are being weaponized
Speaker 15: against US. The Department of Homeland Security declared a heightened
Speaker 15: domestic terrorism threat due to three factors, the first of
Speaker 15: which is quote the proliferation of false or misleading narratives
Speaker 15: which so discord or undermine public trust in US government institutions.
Speaker 1: End of quote.
Speaker 15: They are the ones who get to decide what those
Speaker 15: false or misleading narratives are.
Speaker 1: So be very afraid when you learn that when it
Speaker 1: comes to quote misinformation and disinformation. Albanesi has signed US
Speaker 1: up to the United Nations censorship regime, and that is
Speaker 1: what all this current Albanesi misinformation and disinformation laws.
Speaker 16: And social media age restrictions are really all about compliance
Speaker 16: with the socialist one world government fantasies of the United Nations.
Speaker 1: I am fervently of the opinion that the United Nations
Speaker 1: is a dangerous and deluded organization, and we should demand
Speaker 1: of a future coalition government that we within draw from
Speaker 1: that discredited and disingenuous body. Just to give one current
Speaker 1: example of what a disgrace the United Nations is, I've
Speaker 1: mentioned many times on this show the outfit called ANOIR,
Speaker 1: which stands for the United Nations. Yes, the United Nations
Speaker 1: Relief and Works Agency sounds innocuous enough, kind of like
Speaker 1: packed for the future, bland even benign sounding words. Yet
Speaker 1: UNWAH is the same mob that Penny Wong encouraged by
Speaker 1: the Teals. Where's my letter? I've got my letter here
Speaker 1: that they all signed. They keep financing and funding UNHIR
Speaker 1: with more and more Australian taxpayer dollars. AUNWAH has been
Speaker 1: responsible for the education of Palestinians for over a generation
Speaker 1: with your and my money and the full weight of
Speaker 1: the impremature of the United Nations. His guitarists again sprooking
Speaker 1: this mob.
Speaker 3: In the midst of all the upheaval.
Speaker 13: Udwa more than ever is indispensable, und more than ever
Speaker 13: is irreplaceable.
Speaker 1: Yes, anwar and here's my letter. The tills all signed
Speaker 1: the letter wanting more money to go to anwar. Really now,
Speaker 1: I've often shown you items from the horrific education tools
Speaker 1: reportedly employed by teachers within Anoir that's in Gaza, and
Speaker 1: the Pala that's in Gaza. But this report from the
Speaker 1: Israeli media advocacy group Honest Reporting spells it out succinctly.
Speaker 1: Have a listen.
Speaker 17: Why do so many Palestinian youth turn to terrorism? It
Speaker 17: starts with indoctrination and it's very real. From kindgarten. Palestinian
Speaker 17: textbooks funded by UNRA don't just teach, They demonize Israel's
Speaker 17: glorify martyrdom and promote you hatred, and by martyrdom they
Speaker 17: mean terrorism. This violent brainwashing isn't limited to schools. Hamas
Speaker 17: run media, even children's TV shows openly push for the
Speaker 17: slaughter of Jews, turning hatred into entertainment. Instead of regular
Speaker 17: summer camps, Palestinian kids are sent to terror training camps
Speaker 17: run by Hamas and Islamic Tree Had. They're taught to
Speaker 17: handle weapons and perform mock kidnappings of Israelis. These are
Speaker 17: factories grooming the next generation of terrorists. Unfortunately, even their
Speaker 17: playtime isn't innocent. Puzzles like these encourage violence. Replica rocket
Speaker 17: launchers and suicide belts are as common as dolls, but
Speaker 17: it doesn't stop them.
Speaker 1: It's disgusting. The other day it was reported that Hamas's
Speaker 1: leader in Lebanon, who was fortuitously killed by an Israeli strike,
Speaker 1: well he had previously worked under cover as a teacher
Speaker 1: with anwar and then being suspended. That must have been
Speaker 1: quite the class to be a kiddie in. It is
Speaker 1: anwah that Pennywog and the teals want to keep funding.
Speaker 1: And laughably, it is anwah who were nominating for the
Speaker 1: Nobel Peace Prize. Mercifully they didn't get it, I might add,
Speaker 1: but nonetheless just the nomination proved yet again what a
Speaker 1: dangerous farce these leftist globalist elitist outfits have become. I
Speaker 1: was also interested to watch this interview with a former
Speaker 1: resident of Gaza about how Hamas not only infiltrated the
Speaker 1: schools via ANOIR, but also infiltrated all of Ghazan society
Speaker 1: at every level, particularly in line with the fact that
Speaker 1: the Albanezi government is bringing around three thousand Gazans without
Speaker 1: proper security vetting into Australia. Who are we bringing in?
Speaker 15: Growing up in Gaza, how did that shape your views
Speaker 15: about Hamas?
Speaker 4: What did you witness, what did you feel?
Speaker 1: What did you grow up under?
Speaker 10: Saw?
Speaker 18: How they manipulated the social fabric of society against the
Speaker 18: Palestinian authority, against the prospects of peace, against the hope
Speaker 18: for a Palestinian secular state that could emerge, and instead
Speaker 18: wanted to perpetuate this never ending resistance in pursuit of
Speaker 18: the destruction of Israel. And as Hamas grew in power,
Speaker 18: so did its access to more of Gaza's infrastructure, people, schools, mosques.
Speaker 18: The mosque where I grew up attending was fully taken
Speaker 18: over by Hamas, and so they would have their clerics,
Speaker 18: they would have their their their their their people there
Speaker 18: having lessons for the younger people, and it's a longer
Speaker 18: term project for them that unfortunately paid off.
Speaker 1: I was also intrigued, actually somewhat alarmed by the terrifying
Speaker 1: words of this man on social media. Nor Dari, who
Speaker 1: identifies as a Muslim Zionist.
Speaker 19: Well, the last years, since I've become a Zionist Muslim Zionist,
Speaker 19: I was advocating peace coexistence between Muslims and the Jewish community.
Speaker 3: But I changed my narrative.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 19: Maybe for you people, Amas is payers of Alism. For me,
Speaker 19: Hammas is idelgy. Hammas is not only in person. You
Speaker 19: have seen in the streets of Torrents. They are sympathizers, supporters.
Speaker 19: They've never been in Gaza, never been in Polistan, they
Speaker 19: never made even Polictin.
Speaker 3: They never met even the Jewish Israeli person.
Speaker 19: Seventh or two, but they celebrated three days continually. They
Speaker 19: were celebrating. Then after they cease fire. Every single hmmas terrorists.
Speaker 19: He was murdering innocent people, and they were saying, Allah,
Speaker 19: a lie is great. Every single child, every single woman
Speaker 19: and girl is a hostage.
Speaker 1: I would not celebrate anys.
Speaker 6: Wake up.
Speaker 19: This war has just started. They will not end on
Speaker 19: only in Israel. This is a war of civilization, this
Speaker 19: war between dark forces and civilized people. And they have
Speaker 19: taken over capitals, institutions, parliaments, cities, Waco.
Speaker 1: His words and warnings were echoed this week in the
Speaker 1: European Parliament by a woman I mentioned before here on Outsiders,
Speaker 1: the vice chair of the European Conservatives and Reformist group
Speaker 1: The Brave. I may pay for Belgium. Asita Canker, who
Speaker 1: was born and grew up a Muslim in Bikina Faso,
Speaker 1: but moved to Europe in two thousand and one and
Speaker 1: became a proud human rights and women's rights activist. And
Speaker 1: as now, as I said in the European Parliament, anyone.
Speaker 20: Tell me how ripping, mutilating and kidnapping an innocent woman
Speaker 20: parading with her health neked body on a laurie, chanting
Speaker 20: a la akbar, spitting on her can improve the life
Speaker 20: of anyone. How was this supposed to be something good
Speaker 20: for the Palestinians. This was not about a two state solutions,
Speaker 20: but about Ira the Jews and destroying the West. Today,
Speaker 20: October seventh, we must honor the victims and acknowledge the
Speaker 20: profound impact of this massacre on communities across the globe.
Speaker 20: Learn at last, our countries and universities are being taken
Speaker 20: over by so called pro Palestinian demonstrators. Our institutions are
Speaker 20: being infiltrated by politicians who confuse Hamers with Palestinians repe
Speaker 20: with resistance, They between and endangered the heart of European
Speaker 20: democracy by standing by terrorists. This danger is not only
Speaker 20: to the Jews, but to all of us. Radical Islam
Speaker 20: and its tero groups have no borders. The intention of
Speaker 20: the Muslim brotherhood and affiliated criminal organizations like Hammers and
Speaker 20: Zbola is to establish a.
Speaker 4: Caliphate on earth.
Speaker 20: Only justice and the courage to send for our values
Speaker 20: can stop them.
Speaker 1: Wonderful woman, how idiotic are our parliamentarians and this labor government?
Speaker 1: Where are the politicians smart enough to appreciate the dangers
Speaker 1: we face and the very real threats to Western civilization?
Speaker 1: Well I can name one another conservative, No surprise there
Speaker 1: the Canadian opposition leader Pierre Polliere, who will trounce the
Speaker 1: ghastly Justin Castro, Sorry slip at the tongue, I mean
Speaker 1: Justin Trudeau at the next election.
Speaker 21: So that yesterday you said that you endorse Israel proactively
Speaker 21: defending itself by hitting around nuclear sites, which is something
Speaker 21: that President Joe Biden does not endorse.
Speaker 4: Do you not feel like this could lead to a likelihood.
Speaker 21: Of an all out conventional war between Iran and Israel
Speaker 21: and are you do you not agree with Joe Biden
Speaker 21: in his assessment.
Speaker 22: I think the idea of allowing a genocidal, theocratic, unstable
Speaker 22: dictatorship that is desperate to be to avoid being overthrown
Speaker 22: by its own people to develop nuclear weapons he is
Speaker 22: about the most dangerous and irresponsible thing that the world
Speaker 22: could ever allow. And if Israel were to stop that genocidal, theocratic,
Speaker 22: unstable government from acquiring nuclear weapons, it would be a
Speaker 22: gift by the Jewish state to humanity.
Speaker 1: And that's what I call the great Conservative leader. And
Speaker 1: Peter Dutton, by the way, he's being terrific on this issue.
Speaker 1: But with all the gloom and the horror surrounding the
Speaker 1: anniversary of this week of the October seventh atrocities, I
Speaker 1: really wanted to play you this next clip. It's terrific
Speaker 1: from a young Jewish woman. It's her own personal message
Speaker 1: to Hamas.
Speaker 23: This is a message to Hamas. If you are not Hammas,
Speaker 23: keep scrolling. Hey there, Jewish woman here. I just wanted
Speaker 23: to let you know that October seventh, you know, the
Speaker 23: day when you tried to wipe us out and humiliate
Speaker 23: us and cause pain and grief and immense sorrow.
Speaker 4: Which you did. You did do that, but you.
Speaker 23: Did something else too, And I want to give you
Speaker 23: credit where credit is due. You awoke the entire Jewish diaspora.
Speaker 23: For every Jew that you unlived on October seventh, you
Speaker 23: awoke one hundred more. You united the entire Jewish world.
Speaker 23: You ignited something in us that made us proud to
Speaker 23: be Jewish, more interested in our Judaism than ever, more
Speaker 23: connected to our Jewish homeland than ever. You lit the
Speaker 23: spark that was dormant in all of us, that existed
Speaker 23: in our ancestors who survived people just like you. You
Speaker 23: hoped that we would cower in fear, but instead we
Speaker 23: have been louder, prouder, more defiant than ever.
Speaker 1: What an amazing woman. And yes, I say to the
Speaker 1: Jewish people of Australia, you have Australia. Australia has your
Speaker 1: back and we won't let you down. Yes, the West
Speaker 1: must learn from the past twelve months. Put not our
Speaker 1: faith in authoritarian, censorious governments. Put not our faith in
Speaker 1: multinational institutions, taxpayer funded gravy trains, and totalitarian globalist powers.
Speaker 1: We must trust the values and beliefs of our proud
Speaker 1: Judeo Christian Western heritage, and place our faith in the everyday,
Speaker 1: common sense conservatism of the mainstream majority, that wonderful sixty
Speaker 1: forty oussie mainstream majority, and never be ashamed of our
Speaker 1: history and our democracies, but rather fight for them every
Speaker 1: single day. And with less than four weeks until the
Speaker 1: US selection day, the presidential race between Donald Try and
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris's immensely close comes as a new Wall Street
Speaker 1: Journal poll that found little separation between Trump and Harris
Speaker 1: in seven battleground states. Joining us now to discuss all
Speaker 1: this from the center of the American Experiments, Greight Front
Speaker 1: of the Show editor and Poweline Blog John Heindereker. John,
Speaker 1: always great to see you now. You have a very
Speaker 1: special insight for us because you have lived these past
Speaker 1: few years under the stewardship of Tim Waltz. Tell us
Speaker 1: all about Tim Walds lucky man.
Speaker 11: John, what.
Speaker 7: I got it back up just for a moment, because
Speaker 7: as you started off by saying, this election is going
Speaker 7: to be election is going to be very close. We've
Speaker 7: never seen polls like this in swing state after swing state,
Speaker 7: and the Democrats picked Tim Wallas as their vice presidential
Speaker 7: nominee in part at least because they thought he could
Speaker 7: appeal to rural America, small town America, where they had
Speaker 7: to do very, very poorly. And apparently they didn't realize
Speaker 7: that Tim Walls is despised in rural Minnesota in part
Speaker 7: because he's on record. He's on tape telling Democrats they
Speaker 7: should worry about all these red rural areas across the
Speaker 7: United States of America because there's really not much in
Speaker 7: those rural areas other than rocks and cows, right, And
Speaker 7: so Tim Walls kind of stumbled right out of the
Speaker 7: gates when people started investigating, you know, who is this guy?
Speaker 7: And then he had the disastrous debate against J. D.
Speaker 7: Vance in which vance frame was quite brilliant, and Walls
Speaker 7: revealed that he's just like Kamala Harris. He can barely
Speaker 7: string a couple of sentences together in a coherent manner.
Speaker 7: He just blathers, and at one point of the debate
Speaker 7: he made the epic confession that he is a knuckle
Speaker 7: in the Hall of Fame of debate moments. So we
Speaker 7: in Minnesota have lived with the Tim Walls for about
Speaker 7: six years now. My organization has been documenting the utter
Speaker 7: failure of his administration, the negative impact on our state's economy.
Speaker 7: For the first time in our history. We've become a
Speaker 7: high crime state. Our educational attainment has gone drastically downhill,
Speaker 7: even as they spend more and more money. And we
Speaker 7: have joined states like California and New York as a
Speaker 7: state that people are hurrying to move out of, not
Speaker 7: to move into. And so that's the record that the
Speaker 7: Democrats bought into when they selected this guy as their
Speaker 7: vice presidential nominee.
Speaker 1: James Well.
Speaker 5: John isn't also part of the problem that they picked,
Speaker 5: of all people, Tim Waltz to try and create a
Speaker 5: kind of a masculine aura around the Harris Woltz's campaign,
Speaker 5: which is a bit an interesting thing. Earlier today, just
Speaker 5: a few hours ago, he was out pheasant hunting to
Speaker 5: show just what a band's man he is. Let's have
Speaker 5: a little look. I think we had a little clip
Speaker 5: of him trying to load his shotgun. We'll just see
Speaker 5: some some some of this here and he's struggling here
Speaker 5: to load his up.
Speaker 3: Now, John, heinricher.
Speaker 5: This is supposed to be a guy who was a
Speaker 5: military man who he said carried weapons of war in war,
Speaker 5: but people are saying.
Speaker 3: Well, he's not really connecting.
Speaker 5: Not only this, but he's lost the big union endorsements,
Speaker 5: very heavily, mail Longshoreman's and other endorsements. This all seems
Speaker 5: very patronizing to me.
Speaker 7: Tell us about it, James, I'm glad you brought that up,
Speaker 7: because the rumor is that both of the campaign's internal
Speaker 7: polling is starting to show Donald Trump pulling away, especially
Speaker 7: among men, and especially among black and Hispanic men, and
Speaker 7: the betting odds have shifted now in Trump's favor, and
Speaker 7: I think the Democrats are panicking over the fact that
Speaker 7: they can't get men to vote for them. They have
Speaker 7: released a couple of the most absurd and hilarious ads
Speaker 7: anyone has ever seen in the last fourty eight hours.
Speaker 7: One of them is, you know, be man enough to
Speaker 7: vote for Kamala Harris, like this is a triumph of masculinity.
Speaker 7: And they've got another one that's about Tim Walls again
Speaker 7: as a supposed macho man. And all I can say,
Speaker 7: James is that if you're looking for a masculine hero,
Speaker 7: you better keep looking because satisfy that description.
Speaker 4: Now even Saturday Night Live is mocking this teamer. They
Speaker 4: mock the vice presidential debate. Do we have a little
Speaker 4: clip just to.
Speaker 23: Amook out there is doing this thing, whatever that may be.
Speaker 3: Come on, just relax. You know you haven't had a
Speaker 3: night off in three months.
Speaker 15: Do you want to watch something less stressful like the
Speaker 15: Menendez Brothers show.
Speaker 4: I don't know, Daddy. I kind of wish I had
Speaker 4: picked Josh right now.
Speaker 24: Oh Josh Shapiro, No Josh Cabernette.
Speaker 3: So it'll be fine. It's not like he's going to
Speaker 3: say something crazy. I'm be called friends with school Shooters.
Speaker 4: The material rights itself. But Kamala herself has had a
Speaker 4: shocking week if you ask me. She's been doing interviews left,
Speaker 4: right and center. She did the Call Her Daddy podcast
Speaker 4: Stephen Colbert Howard Stern sixty minutes, and she's so inauthentic. John,
Speaker 4: She is so boring. Really, she just repeats the same
Speaker 4: lines no matter the setting. Like on Call Her Daddy.
Speaker 4: You would think you would see a different side of her,
Speaker 4: maybe a more down to earth, relaxed version, But no,
Speaker 4: there's just the politician repeating these rehearsed lines and not
Speaker 4: even doing a good job of doing that.
Speaker 7: She can't even handle softball interviews. Meeta, which are the
Speaker 7: only ones she takes on. She gets asked the same
Speaker 7: question over and over again, how are you different from
Speaker 7: Joe Biden? A lot of people want to know, right,
Speaker 7: and she cannot.
Speaker 8: Answer that question.
Speaker 7: She's been asked it like four times and she still
Speaker 7: does not have a coherent answer. And now, of course
Speaker 7: she's on the cover of Vogue magazine. This is not
Speaker 7: what she needs. You don't win the presidential election by
Speaker 7: going on call her Daddy or whatever it is and
Speaker 7: being on the cover of Vogue magazine. I mean, this
Speaker 7: is not appealing to the voters that Kamala Harris needs
Speaker 7: to persuade.
Speaker 4: Well, you said she can't answer the question, how are
Speaker 4: you different to Joe Biden? How are you the change candidate?
Speaker 4: She also did the View this week and she was
Speaker 4: asked what would you have done differently in the last
Speaker 4: four years and she said nothing, I would have nothing
Speaker 4: comes to mind. So to me, that was the biggest
Speaker 4: failure of her week. But tell us about sixty minutes
Speaker 4: trying to save her because they deceptively edited an answer
Speaker 4: about question about Israel to try to make a look
Speaker 4: decisive and strong instead of delivering the incoherent word salad,
Speaker 4: which was her actual answer, which is unbelievable.
Speaker 6: Read.
Speaker 7: I mean, whenever they ever done this before, editing video
Speaker 7: to try to make a politician look good when in
Speaker 7: fact a politician looked dumb. You know, they cleaned up
Speaker 7: her answers. I would love to see the original unedited
Speaker 7: tape of that interview, but they're not going to show
Speaker 7: it to us because they know how bad it makes
Speaker 7: Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3: Look.
Speaker 1: John Henderrenger, always great to chat to you. I think
Speaker 1: I can hear in the background the removalists have arrived.
Speaker 1: You're moving out to a less getaway from Tim Waltz
Speaker 1: to another state. You're joining all those other Minnesotans fleeing
Speaker 1: the city, or you're not gonna leave aya, John Rowan,
Speaker 1: I am.
Speaker 7: Going to stay here and fight for a better Minnesota,
Speaker 7: in the better United States of America.
Speaker 1: Good Man. Almost great to chat to. John Heindereker. They
Speaker 1: rate him on Paline Blog. Great stuff. Back in a tick.
Speaker 1: We've got what's more happening here on Outsiders?
Speaker 5: Hello, you're watching Outsiders. I'm James Borrow here as always
Speaker 5: with my colleagues, Rita. I don't need no stinking teleprompter,
Speaker 5: paihy and rowan man enough to vote for a woman,
Speaker 5: so long as that woman is Margaret thatcher Dee. And
Speaker 5: speaking of teleprompters, Vice President and would be future Madam President,
Speaker 5: Kamala Harris found herself speaking without a teleprompter this week.
Speaker 5: Let's see what sort of off the cuff words and
Speaker 5: wisdom she had to offer, shall we?
Speaker 15: So when we think about what's at stake in this election, well,
Speaker 15: it's packed with some stuff.
Speaker 4: It's packed with some fundamental stuff, I say rather articulately.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, oh yeah, it's packed with some.
Speaker 3: Stuff, all right.
Speaker 5: Who Anyway, despite these sorts of near daily performances from Harris,
Speaker 5: the race between Donald Trump and Kamala is effectively tied.
Speaker 5: But there are some serious warning bells that key demographic groups,
Speaker 5: groups without whom Harris cannot win the election, are abandoning
Speaker 5: her in droves, like, for example, mail voters who are
Speaker 5: worried about the economy, and they're and for the most part,
Speaker 5: don't know what a brat summer is and don't respond
Speaker 5: to the democrats scare campaign on abortion, which is about
Speaker 5: all the Democrats have left these days. So to win
Speaker 5: them back, the Democrats or rather a grassroots group of
Speaker 5: Democrats supporting ad executives and media types calling themselves creatives
Speaker 5: for Harris Well. They made an ad that Well to say,
Speaker 5: is as precisely as patronizing and out of touch as
Speaker 5: you would expect a man as an ad made by
Speaker 5: a bunch of lefty and execs and media types made
Speaker 5: by quote unquote real men might be.
Speaker 3: Let's have a look, shall we. I'm a man, I'm
Speaker 3: a man.
Speaker 8: I'm a man man, and I'm man enough. I'm man
Speaker 8: enough to enjoy a barrel proof bourbon meat, man enough
Speaker 8: to cook my steak rare.
Speaker 4: Man enough to deadlift five hundred and then bring out
Speaker 4: of my daughter.
Speaker 23: You think I'm afraid to rebuild a carburetor, I eat
Speaker 23: carburetors for breakfast.
Speaker 8: I'm afraid of bears. That's what beer hugs were for.
Speaker 8: I'll tell you another thing. I sure I'm not afraid
Speaker 8: of women. I'm not afraid of women.
Speaker 4: I'm not afraid of women.
Speaker 8: They want to control their bodies, I say go for it.
Speaker 8: They want to use IVY, have to start a family.
Speaker 8: I'm not afraid of families.
Speaker 3: They want to be child as cat ladies have all
Speaker 3: the cats you want.
Speaker 8: Woman wants to be president, well, I hope.
Speaker 24: She has the guts to look right in the eye
Speaker 24: and accept my bull throated endorsement.
Speaker 8: Because I'm man enough to support women.
Speaker 3: Man enough to know what kind of doing nuts.
Speaker 24: I like man enough to admit I'm lost, even when
Speaker 24: I refuse to ask for directions.
Speaker 18: Man enough to not ban young women from reading Little
Speaker 18: Women or.
Speaker 8: One of those pants books that the sisters like. Man
Speaker 8: enough to raw dog of Flights it sucked, not worth it.
Speaker 8: I'm man enough to be emotional in front of my wife,
Speaker 8: in front of my keche, in front of my horse.
Speaker 2: I'm man enough to tell you that I cry.
Speaker 8: I love actually goodwill hunting. I wish i'd a story.
Speaker 8: I'm predian, and I'm sick of so called men domineering
Speaker 8: but little and controlling women just so they can feel
Speaker 8: more powerful. That's not how my mama raised. I love women.
Speaker 8: I love women who support their families, women who decide
Speaker 8: not to have families, women.
Speaker 1: Who take charge, and I'm man enough to help them win.
Speaker 3: Ladies and gentleman.
Speaker 5: Right there, the crisis in masculinity in a nutshell.
Speaker 1: The lord of the election, Donald Trump's Donald Trump's won
Speaker 1: in election.
Speaker 3: This was like this ad.
Speaker 5: Those ninety seconds were like one of those awful white
Speaker 5: dudes for Harris Zoom calls come to life.
Speaker 3: Look, every single thing of.
Speaker 5: Everything about this ad was wrong, from the guy who
Speaker 5: was talking about eating carburetors for breakfast and by the way,
Speaker 5: a car has not been sold in the US with
Speaker 5: a carburetor since nineteen ninety four, to the entire present
Speaker 5: premise that men are afraid to vote for a woman,
Speaker 5: That is nonsense. Look, let me clue any Democrats watching
Speaker 5: what this is all about. Guys are not afraid to
Speaker 5: vote for a woman. They just don't want to vote
Speaker 5: for an airhead. And even more than that, they don't
Speaker 5: want to vote for a Democrat party that seems to
Speaker 5: think that masculinity and the stuff men like to do
Speaker 5: is toxic every day of the year except election day.
Speaker 3: Like, seriously, how many years.
Speaker 5: It's been, like more than a decade that the left
Speaker 5: has been screaming that things like working out and being fit,
Speaker 5: or enjoying red meat, or God help us, this is
Speaker 5: the worst finding attractive women attractive, telling us that those
Speaker 5: are all basically one step away from joining your local
Speaker 5: branch of the ku Klux Klan.
Speaker 3: That's the Democrats say. That's what the media says. This
Speaker 3: is what this is all about.
Speaker 5: The Democrats are the party of identity. They think you
Speaker 5: man or woman should vote for a female candidate because
Speaker 5: it's simply time we had a woman as president. They
Speaker 5: also think minorities, another demographic where Democrats are also losing
Speaker 5: their grip, should vote for a person of color like
Speaker 5: Kamala Harris, not because they'd be any good at the job,
Speaker 5: but because of the color of their skin. Indeed, here
Speaker 5: was Barack Obama fretting that black men, or as he
Speaker 5: calls them, here the brothers are not doing their bit
Speaker 5: for Kamala.
Speaker 6: We had not yet seen the same kinds of energy.
Speaker 3: And turned in all courts.
Speaker 6: How our neighborhoods and to your musics, we saw I.
Speaker 10: Was right.
Speaker 12: Now.
Speaker 6: I also want to say it that seems to be
Speaker 6: more pronounced with the brothers.
Speaker 5: The brothers, honestly, I mean, it was so nice of
Speaker 5: Barack Obama to come down out of one of his
Speaker 5: twenty eight room mansions to lecture young African American men
Speaker 5: about politics. But again that ad we just saw by
Speaker 5: the lefty dudes for Harris, that dressing down by Obama
Speaker 5: tells me that the Democrats are I think, really starting
Speaker 5: panic because Americans, it seems, and as can only be
Speaker 5: hoped in November, are rejecting this Democrat vision of identity politics,
Speaker 5: which is trying to guilt men into voting to being
Speaker 5: male feminists, just like they are trying to tell black
Speaker 5: men that they need to vote for Kavala Harris because
Speaker 5: she is a person of color. This is identity politics.
Speaker 5: It is deeply on American and all. It represents the
Speaker 5: sort of dangerous tribal politics that generations of Americans and
Speaker 5: their forebears crossed the ocean to escape. Democrats can complain
Speaker 5: all they want that Donald Trump is dividing Americans, but
Speaker 5: the fact is it's their side, the Democrat side, the
Speaker 5: left side of politics, that is actually doing it.
Speaker 3: Great stuff.
Speaker 1: James, Well, let's talk also about briefly about what's happened
Speaker 1: with the hurricanes, etc. And you have the Federal Emergency
Speaker 1: bureaucracy there FEMA, which has been infused with this same
Speaker 1: woke Ponzi scheme we were talking about earlier. Have a
Speaker 1: listen here. They believe somehow that if you have more
Speaker 1: non white people in the emergency service somehow this is
Speaker 1: going to work out better. This is how sick the
Speaker 1: iracism of identity politics has become. It's now even tampering
Speaker 1: with emergencies. Services have a.
Speaker 25: Listen also, No, the more our workforce resembles the nation
Speaker 25: we serve, the better that we will serve it. We
Speaker 25: are adapting our recruiting efforts to reach individuals from underrepresented communities.
Speaker 25: They're partnering with organizations like historically black colleges and universities
Speaker 25: and other minorities serving institutions RITA.
Speaker 1: This diversity insanity, it's destroying every institution at March is through.
Speaker 4: It is a cancer. It's in public institutions. It's been
Speaker 4: in public institutions for some time, but as we discussed
Speaker 4: in the first hour, it's also now in the private sector,
Speaker 4: and it's in the schools. It is everywhere. You've got
Speaker 4: to fight it when you see it. Don't just blindly
Speaker 4: obediently go along with it. When you can take a stand,
Speaker 4: do so because it has deadly consequences. And FEMA We've
Speaker 4: discussed it the previous week, but we've now had Hurricane
Speaker 4: Milton hit as well. They have just been hope in
Speaker 4: doing what they're supposed to do, which is helping people
Speaker 4: who are victims of these natural disasters. And the Biden
Speaker 4: Harris administration itself has really been lacking in what it's done,
Speaker 4: how much assistance it's given. And a lot of people
Speaker 4: are making the comparisons between the money that it's devoted
Speaker 4: to court overseas compared to helping instial citizens.
Speaker 5: This is a really important point. It comes back to
Speaker 5: something we were talking about earlier in the show, and
Speaker 5: that's the way that they use misinformation to shut down
Speaker 5: any criticism. The charge of misinformation. You know, there's been
Speaker 5: a line going around that FEMA has been spending all
Speaker 5: of its money, and it has spent hundreds of billions
Speaker 5: of dollars, billions of dollars right there on their website
Speaker 5: resettling migrants brought into the country by the Harris Biden administration,
Speaker 5: by their millions.
Speaker 3: And there's no denying this. And yet when you go out.
Speaker 5: And say, well, hang on, when they say that they've
Speaker 5: got not enough money for the rest of hurricane season,
Speaker 5: maybe there's had too much money on the migranting and think,
Speaker 5: stop spreading dangerous misinformation. And this is what it's all about. Misinformation.
Speaker 5: When they say that it's not about something that's actually incorrect,
Speaker 5: it's about facts that don't get the preferred narrative.
Speaker 1: And this is why we have to fight against this misinformation, distribution, misinformation, disinformation.
Speaker 1: All that stuff has to go. Trust me, it's the
Speaker 1: end of democracy. Literally, it's no no hyperbole to say
Speaker 1: it is the end of democracy. If this all is
Speaker 1: combating misinformation disinformation, stuff gets up e safety commissioners, all
Speaker 1: that stuff has to go to Liberal party. You've got
Speaker 1: to change tack on this stuff. You oppose the combating misinformation,
Speaker 1: well done, you've got to oppose the safety commissioner as well.
Speaker 1: All that stuff's got to go retail.
Speaker 4: You can't be half pregnant. And the liberals have been
Speaker 4: or they were the ones who appointed Julie Inman Grant
Speaker 4: to that role. That was a grave mistake, yes, and
Speaker 4: they still haven't really disavowed that appointment and said that
Speaker 4: office has been corrupted. It's not corrupt, let me be clear,
Speaker 4: but it has been corrupted by politics. It has become
Speaker 4: a politics play out as opposed to what it was
Speaker 4: supposed to do, which was children's a safety to make
Speaker 4: sure children.
Speaker 3: This is how it always happens it's just mission creep.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 5: It's the same thing with all sorts of things we
Speaker 5: see around Internet freedom and Internet safety and all of
Speaker 5: this sort of stuff. You know, remember when they wanted
Speaker 5: to harvest people's metadata, and they always say it's all
Speaker 5: about for drug dealers, repetity using the metadata for all
Speaker 5: sorts of other things, including I think one local council
Speaker 5: wound up using it to find somebody who was messing
Speaker 5: up their recycling.
Speaker 1: I say, after the break, we can take a short break.
Speaker 1: After the break, more disinformation and misinformation in the Canberra
Speaker 1: Clown Show. Roll up, roll up, step right this way.
Speaker 1: It's the wackiest, craziest show on earth. Yes, it's the
Speaker 1: Kamala clown Show. Sorry, did we say the Kamala Clown Show?
Speaker 1: Surely we mean the Canberra Clown Show. Nope, we mean
Speaker 1: the Kamala Clown Show.
Speaker 20: Well, if anything, would you have done something differently than
Speaker 20: President Biden during the past four years?
Speaker 1: There is done a thing that comes to mind in
Speaker 1: terms of and I've been a part of most of
Speaker 1: the decisions that have had impact the wonders of digital spoofs.
Speaker 3: What fine?
Speaker 1: Meanwhile, this week we also had the Carvellous Clown Show
Speaker 1: when Patricia carvellis the ABC radio star being moved sideways
Speaker 1: because of her well poor Ratings was also forced to
Speaker 1: apologize after one of her guests described government policy as schizophrenic,
Speaker 1: thereby mocking the disabled. Who'd ever do a thing like that?
Speaker 1: Why only the Prime Minister of Australia, of course, who
Speaker 1: also chose to insult Shadow Minister Angus Taylor by mocking
Speaker 1: another disability, the idea, I mean.
Speaker 12: This nonsense that they carry on with the idea that
Speaker 12: where have you got Tourettze or something?
Speaker 3: You know, you know.
Speaker 1: Albo of course, is not alone in mocking Turetts. Here's
Speaker 1: his favorite sidekick, Penny Wong, also known as Penny Wise,
Speaker 1: the clown, mocking Turette's sufferers back in twenty thirteen.
Speaker 3: I haven't you can't stop talking?
Speaker 4: Add well, yeah, that's.
Speaker 6: What I'm breaking.
Speaker 1: What exactly is Tourette's syndrome? Why well, why do labor
Speaker 1: ministers find it all so hilariously funny? Well, it's a
Speaker 1: nervous tick apparently, that can include eye blinking, head jerking,
Speaker 1: nose twitching, and involuntary vocal outbursts, including swearing in the past,
Speaker 1: people in Hollywood films tended to make fun of Tourette's syndrome.
Speaker 1: But unfortunately for the Prime Minister, mocking.
Speaker 3: Disabilities is they no no.
Speaker 1: These days, albo So poor old Albozo had to scurry
Speaker 1: back into the Burley Griffin big Top and make a
Speaker 1: groveling apology to Angus Tourette's Taylor.
Speaker 12: Today in question Time, I made comments that were unkind
Speaker 12: and hurtful. I knew it was wrong as soon as
Speaker 12: I made the comment. I apologized and I withdrew as
Speaker 12: soon as I said it. But it shouldn't have happened.
Speaker 12: And I also want to apologize to all Australians who
Speaker 12: suffer from this disability. I regret saying it was wrong,
Speaker 12: it was insensitive, and I apologize.
Speaker 1: Oh dear mind you, you could be excused for thinking
Speaker 1: that half the Labor front bench of some form or
Speaker 1: other nervous ticks, or perhaps it's more a case of
Speaker 1: failing their anger management counseling.
Speaker 24: That's the wise, mister speaker, that's the way contempt.
Speaker 1: Oh yes, there are a couple of senior clowns in
Speaker 1: the labour circus. Sorry caucus there. Remind me again what
Speaker 1: Albozo promised us we.
Speaker 12: Were going to change the tone of politics in this country.
Speaker 12: We want to make sure there's a less shouting and
Speaker 12: more delivery.
Speaker 1: Of course you do, Albozo. Meanwhile, speaking of Penny Wong
Speaker 1: and Tony Burke, as we were, the Canberra labor clown
Speaker 1: Show has distinguished itself recently by bringing in loads of
Speaker 1: gardens without it would appear adequate vetting, which could be
Speaker 1: one reason why we end up with headlines like this
Speaker 1: with the Daily Telegraph demanding to know quote how a
Speaker 1: man was granted a visa to Australia by previously hosting
Speaker 1: a meeting of terror group political leaders and having multiple
Speaker 1: family members connected to the same organizations. How Indeed, of course,
Speaker 1: with all the kafaffle in the Middle East, let's not
Speaker 1: forget Canberra's repatriation program, with our public servants repatriating all
Speaker 1: sorts of entertaining characters, bringing all their baggage back home
Speaker 1: with them back to Australia.
Speaker 4: Belal, do you blame Hasbella for having to leave your home?
Speaker 6: No?
Speaker 9: No, no, of course not his blood are defending Lebanon
Speaker 9: from there, the Israeli invade is really the invade Lebanon
Speaker 9: they invade Lebanon many times before, and he's Zoe who
Speaker 9: are defending our land and they have the right to
Speaker 9: fight the Israeli invasion.
Speaker 1: Maybe he could have left some of that packaged luggage
Speaker 1: back home, that baggage, but anyway, Yes, the joys of
Speaker 1: multiculturalism still. Say what you want about the clowns running
Speaker 1: the Canbra circus. Albozo's always got a good excuse handy
Speaker 1: when things don't go entirely according to plan.
Speaker 21: And I can contact with the Iranian embassada following those
Speaker 21: stripes overnight.
Speaker 1: No, hope.
Speaker 12: Well, I've been here in Melbourne, so.
Speaker 3: No, I have not.
Speaker 12: Is he So we're hearing that an asylum secret boat
Speaker 12: has arrived off to the Western Australian coastline.
Speaker 8: Do you know anything about that?
Speaker 12: I've been traveling in the car, so I'm not. I
Speaker 12: haven't been advised about that.
Speaker 1: Yep, no phone reception there in the car. And finally,
Speaker 1: wouldn't it be It wouldn't be a decent clown show
Speaker 1: without paying our respects to the good folk over at
Speaker 1: the ABC, who, let's face it, don't need any excuses
Speaker 1: when it comes to reminding Australians whose land they think
Speaker 1: we are on.
Speaker 26: Hello, Thank you ros Hello, welcome Jinjawala in the language
Speaker 26: of my ancestors, the Bungelong people of the far north
Speaker 26: coast of New South Wales. Thank you Managing Director David
Speaker 26: Anderson for joining us here. So in recognition of that,
Speaker 26: just acknowledging we're here today on Gadigal country, paying respects
Speaker 26: to elders past and present, and just respecting the manner
Speaker 26: in which that we have this conversation.
Speaker 3: Thanks Miriam.
Speaker 26: Look, I'd also like to acknowledge the traditional custodians the
Speaker 26: land upon which we're meeting today, the Gadical people of
Speaker 26: the Aora nation, and paying my respects to elders past
Speaker 26: and present.
Speaker 1: And you pay for that when your taxes. Well, no
Speaker 1: shortage of wordsmith through there. Well take a short break now,
Speaker 1: but as we like to say here at the Parliamentary
Speaker 1: Turet's Society, we'll be back in a tick. As for
Speaker 1: all those ministers yelling at the top of their voices,
Speaker 1: what would tears for fears say, hyperbol extreme exaggeration or
Speaker 1: just interesting things that people say. Here's Donald Trump talking
Speaker 1: to Andrew Schultz. I'm good with names.
Speaker 3: You know you are.
Speaker 27: Pokerhunters.
Speaker 3: What about and there is tampon?
Speaker 1: Tim was good?
Speaker 27: What about with tamp It's hard to say. In other words,
Speaker 27: it's a lot and you can't stutter it through when
Speaker 27: you call it. It's really a lousy word to say,
Speaker 27: but it's quite accurate. Comrade Kamala, it's a little hard
Speaker 27: to say she's comrade because she's obviously a communist. She's horrible,
Speaker 27: So I call her comrade and it's not bad, but
Speaker 27: when you put the names together, it's a little You
Speaker 27: gotta be able to pune. You're got to put it
Speaker 27: out there.
Speaker 4: He do get credit for how funny he is. He's
Speaker 4: the funniest president we've ever had, we'll ever possibly have.
Speaker 4: He is comedic timing. He's there with four comics and
Speaker 4: he's cracking them up.
Speaker 3: This is the funny.
Speaker 4: It's genuinely funny, and you could hate him as much
Speaker 4: as you like. But the fact that the left fails
Speaker 4: to recognize that is actually funny. That take everything he
Speaker 4: says as gospel. They don't recognize the jokes he has
Speaker 4: in there, whilst his supporters recognized the jokes.
Speaker 3: Well, here's the thing.
Speaker 5: He's actually like, if he watches rallies, and I've been
Speaker 5: watching them for years. So followed Trump for decades because
Speaker 5: I grew up in New York and he was a
Speaker 5: big part of the media landscape there when he was
Speaker 5: a property developer, even before you know, he became famous
Speaker 5: on TV, he was and he was always funny. And
Speaker 5: I saw somebody on the left side of the Oh,
Speaker 5: you know, Donald Trump is really sinister because he never laughs,
Speaker 5: like but he says, but he says funny things all
Speaker 5: the time, and he doesn't laugh at his own jokes.
Speaker 5: And the opposite to that, of course, is Kabola Harris.
Speaker 3: Who laughs all the time and never anything that is
Speaker 3: remotely funny. So I mean, I know which one I prefer.
Speaker 4: Yeah, but the media tells you one's the joy candidate.
Speaker 1: Please give you want. Brad talk briefly about King Charles,
Speaker 1: who's coming here to Australia. Rita well.
Speaker 4: State premiers, including Victorian Premier Dias and Alan are turning
Speaker 4: down invitations to meet with the King. People are saying
Speaker 4: this is a monumental insult perhaps, But I've got to say,
Speaker 4: if you are a staunch Republican, I think it's consistent
Speaker 4: to perhaps decline and making unless it's something of the
Speaker 4: it's necessary. If it's just a friendly get together, if
Speaker 4: it's no business of government being done, then that's a
Speaker 4: consistent approach.
Speaker 3: Disagree.
Speaker 5: I disagree because you know what, no matter what you
Speaker 5: think about the institution of the monarchy in governing this nation,
Speaker 5: and I think it works just fine, thank you very much,
Speaker 5: No matter what you think about King Charles the third
Speaker 5: personal positions, but doesn't matter. He is visiting and these
Speaker 5: people are ministers of the crown, and I think that
Speaker 5: it is only respectful to take those meetings and not
Speaker 5: you know, stand on your high horse to go satisfied.
Speaker 4: I'm sorry, or the king regular meeting with the British
Speaker 4: Prime Minister, where there's.
Speaker 1: A respect for the institution. Absolutely disrespect for the institution.
Speaker 1: We've got a show a receiving at eight pm. Make
Speaker 1: sure you watch. We've got to show there. Well we're
Speaker 1: on now, yes, but make sure you watch the saving
Speaker 1: at eight pm. That's on the Royals. And also go
Speaker 1: to the Australians for Constitutional Monarchy website. They're having a
Speaker 1: special function on and you should check out their website
Speaker 1: and see what's on there for them. Let's talk about
Speaker 1: briefly the Safety Commissioner.
Speaker 4: She seems to have given up, abandoned that legal fight
Speaker 4: with X with Elon Musker. We can understand why. It
Speaker 4: was a ridiculous fight.
Speaker 5: It was over the footage of the bishop.
Speaker 4: Yeah, terror attack. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Well she's lost that fight, thank goodness, and Elon Musk
Speaker 1: has won. But this is just shows you had she
Speaker 1: won that fight. She was using that position for politics.
Speaker 1: We have to stop this political interference with the free speed.
Speaker 1: The people of Australia got to go.
Speaker 8: Now.
Speaker 1: That's it for outsiders. We'll see you next Sunday morning
Speaker 1: at nine am. See you then,