WEBVTT - Fake bands, real weapons: How Spotify is fuelling the arms race

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Daniel James, and you're listening at seven am.

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Spotify has transformed the way the world listens to music.

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:16.919
<v Speaker 1>But as it's grown, the company behind it and it's founder,

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Eck, have been reshaping more than just the music industry.

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Eck has become a key figure in the global defense industry,

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>investing hundreds of millions into artificial intelligence based military technology.

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>While Spotify itself has a brace to AI, it weighs

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>many artists say undermine their work today. Author and journalist

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Liz Paley on how Spotify has pursued for power and profit,

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>is changing music, and what listeners can do to take

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>back control. It's Friday, July eleven. Liz, thanks for speaking

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>with me. Is fan that Daniel Lick has just invested.

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I have a one billion Australian dollars into an ird

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>military company. You've been tracking Spotify and Daniel Lick fiez,

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>So can you tell me about X history when it

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>comes to investments like these?

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 3>So, Daniel Ck first invested in this company called Helsing,

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 3>which is a AI military tech company, in twenty twenty one,

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 3>but not only invested in it, he also co authored

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 3>an op ed for Politico, where he was advocating for

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:38.199
<v Speaker 3>increased investment into AI military technology. This latest tabline, I think,

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, it was really interesting to me because not

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 3>only of the dollar amount that was attached to it,

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 3>but you know, they also announced that he'd become the

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 3>chairman of the board of this company, and Daniel Eck

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 3>and Spotify have really become like embedded in the defense industry.

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 3>In addition to Ck, also last year Spotify announced that

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 3>their new CFO with someone who had previously worked at SOB,

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 3>which is another Swedish defense company. So you know, there's

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 3>there's some deeper ties between Spotify and the military industrial complex,

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 3>even beyond just Daniel Ck.

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Daniel k has become very rich off the back of Spotify.

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>He's a Brillian name many times, Eva, can you tell

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.679
<v Speaker 1>me about his rise and what he first envisached for

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the platform.

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So, Daniel X's background before Spotify was in the

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 3>advertising industry. In two thousand and six, he started this

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 3>company with Martin Lawrenson, who also had a background in

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 3>the advertising industry too, and their original idea was for

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:46.839
<v Speaker 3>a company that would pair advertising revenue with free streaming media.

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't even necessarily one hundred percent clear that this

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 3>was solely going to be a music company. I do

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:54.959
<v Speaker 3>think that, Like, you know, over the years, it seems

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 3>like there have been attempts to kind of rebrand the

0:02:58.200 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 3>co founders of.

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Spotify as music guys.

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you look back, you can find press

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 3>photos of Daniel lackholding and guitar. There also was an

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 3>attempt to sort of shape this narrative that you know,

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 3>Spotify's goal was to save the music industry.

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 2>So early on, like nineteen ninety nine and naps are

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 2>changed pretty much the whole world for me. I mean,

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 2>it's the internet service that changed my life the most.

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 2>I would say it's but the enfortunate part was obviously

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:31.359
<v Speaker 2>they didn't pay artists. So really at that point when

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 2>naps are shut down, I started thinking about how can

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 2>you make it better?

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 3>And and you know, Spotify was leveling the playing field

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:42.119
<v Speaker 3>for independent musicians or contributing to democratizing music and culture.

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, these creators are really spectacular individual people who

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 2>want to connect, want to grow, and we want to

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 2>create that platform for them where they can thrive.

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 3>And those are kind of like buzzwords that we heard

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 3>associated for like a lot of tech companies and platforms

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 3>in the mid twenty ten But it was important to

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of like interrogate those those ideas a little bit

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 3>and look into, like, you know, okay, what's actually behind

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 3>this company, who's behind it, who serves to benefit from

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 3>the rise of streaming.

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>We live in an age of streaming services. Headed Spotify

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>become the biggest music streaming service in the world, Can

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you talk me through the business decisions that led to

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>that happening.

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a good question, because you know, they weren't

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 3>necessarily the first. But one of the things that is

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 3>unique about Spotify is a rise of the Spotify playlist

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:40.640
<v Speaker 3>as a cultural phenomenon and the strategic thinking that informed

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 3>the prioritization of a playlist as a way of growing

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 3>their subscriber base. Twenty sixteen to twenty nineteen was this

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 3>sort of time where the Spotify playlist playlists made by

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 3>in house editors, had this really kind of unique cultural

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 3>ate over how people discovered music, and just in the

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 3>music industry, was considered like a really important part of

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 3>the promotion process for a new record, for example. So

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 3>artists were being convinced that these editorial playlists were going

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 3>to be an important part of how they connected with

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 3>and sort of gained new fans in some ways. Around

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty fifteen twenty sixteen, you started to see headlines in

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 3>the music business press claiming that Spotify was filling its

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 3>playlists with music by artists who didn't exist, with fake

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 3>artists in order to pay out fewer royalties. You know,

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 3>the public had been calling me as fake artists. There

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 3>actually was an internal term at Spotify perfect fit content,

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 3>which is this phrase that they used to describe music

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 3>commissions to fit certain moods and playlists with improved margins.

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.279
<v Speaker 3>So it's clearly a cost saving initiative in order to

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 3>kind of squeeze value in some ways out of listeners,

0:05:55.400 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 3>but also musicians. There are so many different ways in

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 3>which processes of algorithmic recommendation and automated decision making have

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 3>shaped not just the sound of music, not just the

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 3>type of music, not just the reality of generative AI

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 3>music on these platforms, but shapes the way people think

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 3>about meaning in music and the way music is contextualized

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 3>and recommended. Spotify and other streaming services allow generative AI

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 3>content onto their platforms, and the generative a question, you

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:29.359
<v Speaker 3>know only continues to be more urgent, and it says

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 3>a lot I think about the reality that you know,

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 3>not just Daniel Ck, but a lot of people who

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 3>end up in positions of power in the music industry

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 3>like aren't super.

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Interested in music.

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 3>They're interested in growing their wealth. So yeah, definitely not music, guys.

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>After the break, it's your new favorite middle of the

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>road old country band. Even real.

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 4>List.

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 1>We know Spotify uses AI to keep you listening on

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>their platform, so what do we know about their plans

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>for using Generative II further.

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so it's hard to like speculate about what they

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 3>might do when it comes to generative AM music on

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 3>the platform. But you know, what we do know is

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 3>that there's like tens of thousands of Generative AI tracks

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 3>being uploaded to streaming services every day, and there's been this,

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, story of this viral generative AI band called

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 3>the Velvet Sundown.

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 4>If you've been on Spotify recently, you might have seen

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 4>a band called the Velvet Sundown on your feed. Now,

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 4>at first glance, it seems like any other indie rock group,

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 4>but none of their members actually exist. The Velvet Sundown

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 4>has now amassed almost one million monthly listeners, with songs

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 4>including Dust on the Wind and End the Pain among

0:07:52.200 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 4>their top hits. Take a Listenstrom, you know, one.

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Of the big threats of generative AI material is the

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 3>way in which it could potentially undercut the creative labor

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 3>of artists and users should be able to make informed

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 3>decisions about what they're listening to. And you could say, well,

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, people should listen more closely or do their

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 3>own research. But I think that if the technology is

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 3>there to label this material, it should be labeled because

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 3>there are so many different concerns that people in the

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 3>artist community have about generative AI, about their music as

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 3>being users training data, how it will be credited, how

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 3>they'll be compensated, how compensation might be driven down by

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 3>the existence of generative AI music on these huming platforms.

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 5>More than a thousand musicians are releasing a silent album

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 5>to campaign against the British government's plans to change copyright laws,

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 5>which could allow tech funds to train artificial intelligence models

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 5>using real performers' voices. Artists including Annie Lennox, Kate Bush,

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 5>and Andrew Lloyd Webber back the campaign. They say the

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 5>changes would rev us.

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Right now what we're seeing is a lot of the

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 3>discourse that has sort of played out around generative AI

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:09.479
<v Speaker 3>music has been around deep fakes.

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 4>I.

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 6>At first, it's quite convincing. Creator ghost writer nine seven

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 6>seven claims the song is AI generated, artificial or not.

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 6>It quickly generated real numbers over six hundred thousand streams

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 6>on Spotify before Drake's label had it pulled, and that's important.

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 3>It's important that you know if someone's likeness is being used,

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:39.679
<v Speaker 3>that they have the ability to get that work removed.

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 3>But in reality, like the types of artists that are

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 3>going to have the legal muscle to actually be able

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 3>to do anything about that are pop stars, people who

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 3>have really big legal teams behind them. There's also all

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 3>sorts of ways in which generative AI undercuts the labor

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.320
<v Speaker 3>of indie artists and DIY artists and smaller artists who

0:09:57.400 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 3>might not have the same name recognition or legal team

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 3>behind them to be able to take action against situations

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 3>like that.

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Sorry for the myriad of reasons, many of which we've

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>touched upon, people have deact divided this Spotify accounts honest

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to form their music from Spotify. But the lightest Ioli

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>military investment was the last strual for many people. What

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>does that tell you?

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, I think that because the economic model

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 3>is the same across the board for most streaming services,

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 3>I think people are going to start looking into these

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 3>other things like, well, does this streaming service have ties

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 3>to the military industrial complex? Does the streaming service use

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 3>generative AI music and not label it? I'm not someone

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 3>who is really in the business of like putting the

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 3>streaming services side by side and saying, well, this one

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:45.439
<v Speaker 3>pays a few penny fractions more than this one, so like,

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 3>so you should be subscribed? Here was there? Like, I

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 3>don't really like playing the role of consumer guide because

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 3>the vast majority of streaming services operate under the same

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Proorada model that is really, I think an unfair model,

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 3>you know. I'm I think that a better way of

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:04.560
<v Speaker 3>doing streaming economics to be something called user centric, which

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 3>is basically like I pay ten dollars to a streaming service,

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 3>they take their thirty percent cut, the remaining money goes

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:12.119
<v Speaker 3>to the artists I stream.

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>And finally, is what would you say to people who

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>are stocking the convenience of using Spotify or rather streaming services?

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>How did I break free?

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, if as a music fan, you are concerned with

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:27.839
<v Speaker 3>making sure that the money that you spend on music

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 3>doesn't accidentally end up in the military industrial complex, doesn't

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 3>accidentally end up going to a generative AI band. Your

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 3>best bet would be buying music directly from from the artists,

0:11:38.640 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 3>whether it's through band camp or through their website, or

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 3>through their record label, or through supporting an independent record store. Yeah, Like,

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 3>the combination of buying music directly plus listening to independent

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 3>community radio, for me, is kind of like a winning combination. Like,

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 3>I understand that music is vast. People listen to music

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 3>for different reasons, and people engage with music for different reasons.

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 3>So I don't expect every single person who really cares

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 3>about music to start building an MP three library again

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 3>and to buy an FM radio, even though those are

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 3>the things that I would.

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Totally suggest me too.

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 3>I do think though, that like that's kind of like

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 3>our best bet in this moment, remembering that it's never

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 3>been super convenient to be a fan of independent music,

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 3>and that you know, being our participant in independent music

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 3>culture like does require a little bit of friction in

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 3>many ways.

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 1>It's the inconvenience that Mike's are cool. Lise thanks so

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>much for speaking with this.

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much for having me.

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Liz Pally's book is called Mood Machine, The Rise of

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Spotify and the Costs of the Perfect Playlist. She'll be

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>speaking in Melbourne at the Wheelers Cinda on Thursday, twenty

0:12:55.520 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>ninth of August. Also in the news, anti Semitism in

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Australia has reached deeply traveling levels, according to Anthony Albanesi.

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>The Prime Minister yesterday launched a report by Australia's Special

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Envoid to combat anti Semitism, Gillian Siegel, which recommended sweeping

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>changes across universities, the media, policing and migration. Miss Siagal's

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>report recommends the government withhold funding from universities who failed

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to stamp out anti Semitism, along with encouraging public broadcasters

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to accurately and positively represent Jewish history and culture. It

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>also calls on the government to screen visa applicants for antisemitism.

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>The recommendations will now be considered by government and the

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 1>United Nations. Special raponteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories has

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>been sanctioned by the Trump administration. Francesca Albanesi is a

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>human rights lawyer and independent expert appointed to report to

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the UN on human rights issues. She has been outspoken

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:03.199
<v Speaker 1>on allegations of war crimes in Gaza. When announcing the sanctions,

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>US Secretary of State Marco Rubio accused Miss Alberanezi of

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>unabashed anti Semitism and said she has expressed support for

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>terrorism and open contempt of the United States, Israel, and

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the West. Seven Am was a daily show for Solstice Media.

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>It's made by Adigus Bastow, Shane Anderson, Chris Danegate, Ruby Jones,

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Sarah mcvee, Travis Evans, Zoltenfet Joe and Me, Daniel James.

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Our theme music is by Ned Beckley and Josh Hogan

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of Envelope Boudier. Thanks for listening and have a great weekend.