WEBVTT - Sharri | 12 June

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Showing well, good evening and first tonight the Albanezi governments

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that Climate Change Authority is aiming for an even higher

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>emissions reduction target of sixty five to seventy five percent

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>by twenty thirty five. This is a massive increase on

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the current target of forty two percent by twenty thirty Now,

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>while the Prime Minister wouldn't answer questions about his twenty

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty five target, today I can reveal the Climate Change

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Minister Chris Bowen, has written to his agency asking for

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>advice on what the emissions reduction targets should be by

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty five, and documents show that the agency once

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a target of between sixty five to seventy five percent,

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>even though electricity prices are already through the roof. In

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>this letter I've obtained, Chris Bowen writes, and I quote,

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I request the Climate Change Authority provide me with advice

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>on potential national greenhouse gash emissions reduction targets for twenty

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty five, and he's asked for this new advice urgently,

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>he wrote, in order to allow for sufficient time for

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>consideration of all relevant issues. The government would appreciate the

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:26.199
<v Speaker 1>Authority providing its advice no earlier than first of October

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four. Now, the Climate Change Authority is on

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>record in these documents saying that the emission's reduction target

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.839
<v Speaker 1>needs to be even higher than the current twenty thirty

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>target of forty two percent, which labor is already unlikely

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to meet. Tony Wood from the Gratin Institute has said

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the government will face immense challenges trying to meet even

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>its current target.

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 2>We're about halfway there, but it's taken this the last

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty years to get halfway there. We've got, you know,

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 2>only five years to get the other half, and that

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 2>looks really hard. Is it possible technically? Is but looks

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 2>to be very challenging.

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 3>Well, now let's go to the documents.

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Chris Bowen's agency once a target of sixty

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>five to seventy five percent, as you can see in

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>this twenty twenty four issues paper they've produced, and it

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>states the evidence to date suggests the Authority consider targets

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>broadly within the sixty five percent to seventy five percent range. Now,

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>just to show you how extreme that is, it was

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the Green's policy at the last election to have a

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>target of seventy five percent by twenty thirty. So here's

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Chris Bowen's own agency recommending that same Green's target of

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy five percent just five years later. And they admit

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in this document that this will need to meet that target,

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>there will need to be even more action by households

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 1>in businesses, and they say that ambitious targets could impact

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>on our economy and society. And I quote the evidence

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the Authority has considered so far suggests a twenty thirty

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>five target in the range of sixty five to seventy

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>five percent below two thousand and five levels would be

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>ambitious and could be achievable and sustainable if additional action

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>is taken by governments, businesses, investors and households to achieve it.

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>They say, however, attempting to go much faster could risk

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>significant levels of economic and social disruption and put progress

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>at risk significant levels of economic and social disruption. Now,

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>electricity prices have already gone up by around twenty five

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>percent a year since the election in twenty twenty two,

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and there are warnings that we could face blackouts in

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>New South Wales and Victoria come summer.

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 3>This is partly why labor.

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Premier are Chris Mins, the premiere in New South Wales,

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>has now extended the life cycle of the state's largest

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>coul fired power station.

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 1>The Opposition leader Peter Dutton said today that if Australia

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>has a forty two percent target, well, he says, imagine

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>what a sixty five percent target would do.

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 5>We saw the Prime Minister and his very angry state

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 5>that he was in telling people that he couldn't really

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 5>explain what a sixty five to seventy five percent target

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 5>looks like. In February of next year, the government's going

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 5>to have to sign up to a new target by

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 5>twenty thirty five. What does it mean for families who

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 5>are struggling at the moment where Anthony Albnezi promised at

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 5>the last election that there would be a two hundred

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 5>and seventy five dollars decrease in your power bill. Instead

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 5>there's been one thousand dollars increase in your power bill.

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 5>But how much higher will your electricity prices go under

0:04:58.160 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 5>this prime minister?

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>And the Prime Minister was asked about his twenty thirty

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>five targets today and it's a relevant question given they

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>need to be submitted to the UN by February next year,

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>but Albin Easy didn't want to speak about what their

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty five target would be.

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 3>He wouldn't say a word. Can you gallantee?

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 6>He will announce it thirty private target for minutes year.

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 7>I'm guaranteeing the twenty thirty target that we have legislated,

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 7>as well as knit zero by twenty fifty. What we're

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 7>concentrating on is delivering forty three percent by twenty thirty

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 7>and we've got a mechanism to get there well.

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:40.679
<v Speaker 8>Now.

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>As I've revealed tonight, Chris Bowen has given his agency

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>until the first of October to prepare their formal advice

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>on their twenty thirty five targets. But his own agency's

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 1>analysis from this year shows that they do want an

0:05:56.720 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>even more aggressive target of sixty five to say five percent,

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and there are concerns that this will have major social

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and economic consequences. Now, everyone can have their own view

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>on what our targets should be, but there is one

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>thing that we can all agree on that more ambitious

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:18.919
<v Speaker 1>targets in just a decade's time is something that the

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:23.599
<v Speaker 1>Alban Eazy government should be clear, transparent, honest and open

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>about it. Shouldn't take us tracking down the detail to

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:31.119
<v Speaker 1>tell you about what they're planning. It's just like before

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the federal election when they took a small target agenda

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to the polls and then implemented radical change that they

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>never told you about, whether it was on Middle East

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 1>foreign policy, on border security, on immigration levels, or on

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>ir reform. Once again, we're seeing alb and Easy today

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>waving away questions, and you just saw it waving away

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>questions about twenty thirty five targets when their own documents

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>show plans are currently underway for extremely ambitious and aggressive targets,

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>targets at the Greens held.

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 3>In just a decade's time. Now.

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll discuss this with my panel in a moment. But

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>also tonight, Labor under threat from Muslim independent candidates. This

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is partly why alban EASi is taking such a strong.

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Anti Israel stance.

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:27.679
<v Speaker 1>To discuss this, my exclusive interview tonight with former Labor

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Minister Mike Kelly on how his own party.

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Is betraying the Jewish community.

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Also American concerns about Australia's commitment to ORCUS. Shadow Defense

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Minister Andrew Hasty will be on the show live and

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the President's son Hunter Biden found guilty in his gun trial.

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Across Live to Washington for the latest. But first now

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>let's bring in tonight's panel labor legend Graham Richardson and

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Liberal Senator James McGrath.

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to you both.

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's start with that climate change topic. And we

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>saw today Peter Darton accusing the Prime Minister of destroying

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the economy while trying to meet net zero targets. Let's

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>have a look at what he had to say.

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 5>We want to make sure that we've got an energy

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 5>policy that's working for Australians, not against them. I'm not

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 5>going to sign up to an arrangement that destroys our

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 5>economy and sends families and small businesses into bankruptcy.

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 7>What Peter Dutton is saying is that he won't have

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 7>a twenty thirty target. This is an extraordinary failure of

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 7>leadership from Peter Dutton. It shows he's not up to

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 7>the job of being the alternative prime minister of this country.

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, as The Nightly put it, the Prime Minister's attack

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 1>on Peter Dutton's decision to dump the twenty thirty emissions

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.679
<v Speaker 1>target was and I quote, a hollow distraction from the

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>real issues of cost of living and how our nation

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to handle the inflation challenge. All right, rich O,

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 1>you think do you agree with that analysis there in

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the Nightly? Do you think the Prime Minister has dredged

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>up the climate was once again as a distraction from

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 1>his detainee scandal and in the hopes of scoring some

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:16.839
<v Speaker 1>political points over Dutton after that disastrous news poll for

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>him just earlier this week.

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I don't think this is Anthony's finest hour, and

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 9>I think Dutton has had the best of the week,

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.080
<v Speaker 9>and I think there's been quite a gap between them.

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 9>Dutton hasn't had a tremendous time as opposition leader, but

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 9>he's coming into his own.

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 10>Now and he's doing very well.

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 9>Labor ought to be taking very very closely over, watching

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 9>very very closely everything he does, because this thinks he

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 9>can get there.

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Look, James, let's bring you in here.

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.959
<v Speaker 1>What is the coalition argument on rejecting net zero by

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.839
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty, Because if as Peter Dutton says, and as

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the analysts say, just like Tony Wood from the Gratin Institute,

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>if Labour's not going to meet those targets anyway, why

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>not just put pressure on labor over that point.

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 8>Because labor are misleading the Australian people. They've got these targets,

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 8>they know they're not going to reach them. And what

0:10:15.840 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 8>they're doing is what I call dead cat politics. You

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 8>get a dead cat, you put it on the table.

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 8>Everyone's looking the dead cat and forgetting about the real issues.

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:25.959
<v Speaker 8>And politicians do this all the time and Albanize is

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 8>doing it. The number one issue in Australia at the

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 8>moment is cost of living. It is everywhere. I was

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 8>at Farmfest last week in Twomba and that's what people

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:39.440
<v Speaker 8>were talking about. And for labor to have these unrealistic targets,

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 8>but targets are actually hurting businesses, hurting Australian families because

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 8>it's driving up the cost of electricity. The Coalition's position

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 8>is pretty clear. We support net zero by twenty fifty,

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 8>but we want electricity to be affordable and reliable and

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 8>we want to look at all forms of energy rich I.

0:10:58.600 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Do you agree with that?

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you think they're it'll be voter frustration with Albanezi

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>returning to climate was when, as James McGrath says, cost

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of living is the central issue that families are really

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>struggling with right now.

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think Albow is going to have a hell

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 9>of a battle on his hands to convince people that

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:20.199
<v Speaker 9>his priority is greater than their cost of living.

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 10>Cost of living, cost of living, they're the first.

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 9>Three issues, and you can't pretend that anything else is

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 9>going to knock one of.

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 10>Those three off. That's it, and you know.

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 9>We have to work within that framework, and that's what

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:35.319
<v Speaker 9>labor's not doing at the moment.

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Look, it's going to be a big issue.

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>And of course we hear the news that it now

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>looks like interest rates aren't going to be cut until

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>at least twenty twenty five. So just sticking with you

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>for a minute, Richo, that's going to do You think

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that would rule out any early election this year because

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the argument for an early election was off the back

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of an interest rate cut.

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 9>I think certainly, were I in the job, I would

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 9>not be going to the places this year. There'll be

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 9>no relief inside and therefore you've got absolutely no advantage

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 9>in going early. And you know people in the past

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 9>you go early if you think it's going to be

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 9>a big help to you. Well, I can't see any

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 9>aid whatsoever going to Labor over this, so I'd be

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 9>keep him a power to dry and I'd be looking

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 9>at next year.

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>And that is what the PM keeps saying. He keeps

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>saying he intends to serve his full term. But the

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>reports are James, that your side, the coalition is preparing

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>for an early election. So are you expecting that Labor

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>might go later this year?

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 8>Our Poland House last week was full of rumors about

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 8>an early election, whether it's going to be in August

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.599
<v Speaker 8>or There is one well known cabinet minister who was

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 8>telling people to prepare for an early December election. Good

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 8>oppositions always prepare for an early election. I know that

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.520
<v Speaker 8>Andrew Hurst as the Federal director and they can follow

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 8>as the people NATS director, and David will Proud and

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:03.559
<v Speaker 8>Peter Dutton are getting their teams ready. We've got candidates

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 8>being pre selected. We want an election sooner rather than

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 8>later because we know that that Alban Easy is not

0:13:11.000 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 8>up to the job of being Prime Minister.

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>James, can I just pull you up on and what

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you just said said there which cabinet minister was talking

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>about a December election.

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 8>I don't want to say that, but the building was full.

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 8>The building was full of rumors about this particular Labor cabinet.

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 10>Minus always and.

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 8>Those rumors are true.

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 10>Also probably started them.

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 3>It's just friends, tell us cabinet minister.

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 8>That's officious and hurtful allegation. No, I won't say that,

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 8>but what I'm going to say is that clearly the

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 8>Labor Party are also looking at an early election. The

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 8>Prime Minister has not ruled out calling an election this year,

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 8>and to Richo's point, he will go when he thinks

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.959
<v Speaker 8>he can win, and I think in hees rates stay

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 8>as they are. He probably won't go this year because

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 8>of the economic circumstances. But all right, things can get

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 8>a lot worse. So be scared, mister Albanizy, be scared.

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm honest warning that.

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's have a look at the advice today

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>from Australia's former Deputy Chief Health Officer, doctor Nick Coatesworth.

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>He's told ben Fordham on t GB that he's not

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>going to get another COVID vaccine.

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 3>Have a listen.

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 6>I've had my influenza vaccine and I'm still being vaccinated

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 6>for COVID. No, when did you stop doing that? About

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 6>two years ago?

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 3>I had three vaccines and that's been enough for me.

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 8>Any reason why?

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Because I don't think I need any more, Ben and

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 3>the science tells me that I don't. Rich.

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh, people would be very frustrated hearing this, given Nick

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Coatesworth encouraged everyone.

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 3>To get a vaccine.

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it was mandated you couldn't go to a

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 1>cafe with our one. And now he says, I know

0:14:57.680 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I haven't had one for two years.

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 9>So find that a bit extraordinary given what he has

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 9>said in the past, and the way he said it

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 9>so nonchalantly, just really surprises me.

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 10>And it's got to say it disappoints me.

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>What do you think, James, I mean, the advice around

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>vaccines has changed dramatically, And you know what is worrying

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>about this is that the reports are now that the

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>take up rate for regular non COVID vaccines for children

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>is now falling because people have lost confidence in vaccines

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>as a result of the COVID pandemic.

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 8>And that would be disappointing if that's the case, because

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 8>I'm someone who believes that people should be vaccinated and

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 8>should get the JAB, especially children. But what is concerning

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 8>with what doctor Coatsworth said is is that he stopped

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 8>at three, but he also did say to follow scientific advice.

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 8>And I'm not a scientist, I'm not a medical professional.

0:15:57.560 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 8>I will do what my doctor tells me to do

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 8>and what the scientists tell me to do, and hopefully

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 8>they've got my best interest at heart, and I would

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 8>encourage other people to listen to those people in relation

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 8>to their own health matters.

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, I have to say the advice has been confusing,

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>especially Nick Coatesworth was a figure that a lot of

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>people trusted and here he is saying he's only had

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>three James McGrath, Graham Richardson. Great to see you both

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>this evening and thanks for your time. Now coming up,

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll be joined by the former Labor minister who is

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 1>now urging the Prime Minister to preference the Greens. Last,

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>why won't Albanezi say that he's going to do this?

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Stay tuned after the break.

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back.

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 8>Well.

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>The alban Ezy government today announced an extra ten million

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars for Gaza, on top of the sixty two million

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars it has already given since October seven since the

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>terror attacks on October seven, sixty two million, and none

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of it to Israel Foreign Minister Pennywong has this week

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>refused as well to celebrate the brave rescue of four

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Jewish hostages from the grips of Hamas terrorists, and Labour

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 1>shut down debate on a judicial inquiry into anti Semitism

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 1>on university campuses twenty four hours after the Prime Minister

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>himself claimed to care about the issue in question Time. Now,

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason for Labour's moral confusion is pure politics.

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Labor is under threat from the.

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Greens in inner city areas of Sydney and Melbourne, and

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 1>now it's under threat from the rise of Muslim independent

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>candidates in Southwest Sydney. It's something Peter Dutton referred to

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>when I interviewed him ten days ago.

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 5>Even though the first term government hasn't lost since nineteen

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 5>thirty one, that the best outcome from a Labor Party

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:57.880
<v Speaker 5>perspective is that they could form a minority government which

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 5>would include the Greens and the Teals and potentially, as

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 5>you say, Muslim independent candidates from Western Sydney or perhaps elsewhere.

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:08.120
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:12.640
<v Speaker 1>The excellent journalist at The Australian, Alexei Dimitriadi reports today

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that community leader with Sam Shakawi is mobilizing the Muslim

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:21.719
<v Speaker 1>vote across Keys Southwest Sydney federal seats to topple Labor

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>at the next election as prominent figures won the alp

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of electoral abandonment. He writes that although Sheik Shikawi campaign

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>may not run candidates, several pro Palestine independents will run

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>as viable protest votes and likely would be.

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Endorsed by it now.

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 1>The Labor and PAS under threat include Andrew Charlton in Parramatta,

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Tony Burke and Watson, Jason Clare in Blacksland, An Stanley

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>in Werrowa and the new South Wales Premier Chris Mints.

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.719
<v Speaker 1>And the Vote for Palestine group is planning a rally

0:18:55.840 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>outside of Tony Burke's office this Saturday. In an Instagram post,

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.160
<v Speaker 1>they've said to Tony Burke in twenty twenty.

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 3>Five, we will vote you out well. Shakhawi said on

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 3>social media.

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>That we are grassroots, mobilizing, funded and coming for your seats,

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>and he also wrote on Instagram that he was mobilizing

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>for the federal election with a video taken outside of

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>our regular guest Labor and P Andrew Charton's office. Have

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a look at these two clips that he's posted on

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 1>his Instagram page.

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 12>Need people who can echo the voices of the Palestinians

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 12>who are being decimated and subject to genocide. We need

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 12>people to come out. We need people to echo their voices.

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 12>We don't need people to work behind the scenes. We

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:52.199
<v Speaker 12>don't want a seat at the table. We want you

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 12>to speak out. We want you to be opened, We

0:19:55.800 --> 0:19:57.879
<v Speaker 12>want you to lobby. We want you to speak on

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 12>behalf of your constituents, which you promise to speak on

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 12>behalf of. To some of these politicians, the facts don't matter.

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 12>We've said it before and we'll say it again. The

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 12>definitions of genocide don't matter. The definitions of apartheip don't matter.

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 12>The definitions of ethnic cleansing don't matter.

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 11>They only understand one language.

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 13>And that's votes, and that's power, and that's people power.

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 13>That's the only language that they understand. Are we going

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 13>to let them hear our voice? The date, not a

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 13>single not a single major MP of government, both state

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 13>and federal, has said the words Israel and condemn in

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 13>the same breath.

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, the political pressure in areas of Southwest and Western

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Sydney are thanks to the changing demographics and this is

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason labor at a federal level is

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>so anti Israel. It needs to hold on to Western Sydney,

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>needs for the Prime Minister himself.

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 3>To remain in the top job.

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>But this is putting politics and self interest above the

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>national security interest. It's putting politics above the need for

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the law to be upheld on our streets, and it's

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 1>putting politics ahead of the need for social cohesion, for

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>an end to anti Semitism, and for a safe environment

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>for all Australians.

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 3>Including Jews, to live and grow up in.

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's bring in tonight my special guest, former

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Federal Labor Minister Mike Kelly. Mike, thank you very much

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>for joining me tonight. It's wonderful to have you with us.

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Look what's your reaction sure to this what we've just seen,

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>this new political pressure on labor and how this is

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>influencing Australia's foreign policy and even our national security.

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 14>Well, look, I think it's possible for any one person

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 14>to claim they're representing the entire Muslim community in Australia.

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 14>It's an incredibly diverse community with very differing views, and

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 14>I know most of them. The number one priority is

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 14>putting food on the table, getting jobs, education for their kids,

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 14>and the Middle East is very far from their thoughts

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 14>for most occasions. A lot of them aren't even from

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 14>the region, of course, so you know, I wouldn't take

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 14>them seriously as claiming to speak for the Muslims of Australia.

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 14>But of course at least they're talking about working within

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 14>a democracy, which is something that doesn't exist throughout the

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:39.200
<v Speaker 14>entire Middle East other than in Israel, so perhaps they've

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 14>learned something. But the other side of this coin, too

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 14>is to misunderstand the huge subterranean feelings amongst the Australian

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 14>community about Islamistic extremism. Frankly, you know, we've been on

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 14>the receiving end of it in Bali and the World

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 14>Trade Center in London and Barcelona, so a lot of

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.199
<v Speaker 14>Australians understand perfect what that threat is.

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 6>And I think the.

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 14>European elections just recently show where the sentiments of people

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 14>are in that respect, and it was also reflected even

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 14>in the Eurovision votes. So to ignore that va subterranean

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 14>sentiment in the Australian community is to not understand the

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 14>political dynamics of Australian's security concerns and our domestic desire

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 14>for social cohesion and adherence to the rule of law.

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 3>Such a good point, because I agree with you.

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Mainstream Australians are sick of the lawlessness that we've seen

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing, the vandalism, the hate speech and basically

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>very few, if any.

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Arrests over it.

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask you, Mike, I mean you were part

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of the Labor Party. I have other people on here,

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>like Michael Danby who also were part of Federal Labor.

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's changed so much in its attitude towards Israel.

0:23:55.240 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you think this is a reflection on the politics

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:02.119
<v Speaker 1>of marginal seats or do you think it's more the

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 1>figures of Anthony Albanesi and Pennywong coming from the socialist

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>left and the beliefs that they've held over a lifetime.

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 14>Well, certainly the Middle East issue has been a plaything

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 14>of the factions in the past without really any knowledge

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 14>significantly existing on the side of that debate. Most of

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 14>the time. It's just not simply a matter of putting

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 14>on a kafir and becoming a geopolitical or international law

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 14>or laws of conflict expert. But it's just simply was

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 14>previously one of those factional game playing issues which have

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:44.360
<v Speaker 14>delineated the two factions. Of course, these days it's more

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 14>a question of looking at each individual MP and what

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 14>their opinions and attitudes are. But there's been of course

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:55.439
<v Speaker 14>a massive campaign of emailing these MPs, and of course

0:24:55.520 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 14>the horrendous and vile disobeying of the law through the

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 14>vandalism that we've seen, the boycotting and blockading of MP's officers.

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 14>They're interfering with the democratic process in this respect. And

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 14>the thing is that these demonstrators, they're not the lovely,

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 14>huggable sort of peace activists of the Summer of Love

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 14>and the sixties. This is the winter of hate. What

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 14>they're advocating is actually an escalation of the war. They

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 14>want to eliminate the state of Israel and see a

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:33.959
<v Speaker 14>genocide happen of the Jewish community there, and promoting so

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 14>called resistance but really just violence. And they're legitimizing and

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 14>the Greens and promoting this Hamas propaganda and commentators who

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 14>do this are legitimizing violence not only against Israel, but

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 14>against Jews in general, because as we well know, the

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:56.360
<v Speaker 14>Hamas Covenant designates all Jews to be killed, and that's

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 14>what they showed us they wanted to do and would

0:25:58.560 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 14>do given the opportunity.

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 8>On the of October.

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, indeed, and actually we've just seen in the Wall

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal comments from the Hamas leader, from Jaha Sinwa,

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and they show that the terrorist organization is using civilian

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.080
<v Speaker 1>casualties as part of their strategy to.

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Win the war with Israel.

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 1>In one message that was released, they call them and

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I quote necessary sacrifices. And the Wall Street Journals reporting

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that in an April eleventh letter to Hamas political leader

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.719
<v Speaker 1>is Mael Honeyeer, after three of his adult sons were

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.919
<v Speaker 1>killed by an Israeli air strike, Sinhwa wrote that their

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>deaths and those of other Palestinians would infuse life into

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.239
<v Speaker 1>the veins of this nation, prompting it to rise to

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>its glory and honor. But Mike Kelly, again, this isn't

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>reflected in the political debate. We hear every day criticism,

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 1>condemnation from Penny Wang and often from Anthony Albanizi about Israel,

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>and you know, there's no recognition, of very little recognition

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that actually it's Harmas that is using human shields, that's

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 1>embedding their weapons in civilian sites and infrastructure, and that

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>was holding hostages in the middle of a refuge e cap.

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 14>These are their standard tactics, and I've seen it all

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 14>before during my year long service in Iraq during that

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:28.399
<v Speaker 14>war and then dealing subsequently with the ISIS threat and

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 14>the horrendous activities they conducted, and knowing that to eliminate

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 14>them and liberate Iraqis The Siege of Moses, for example,

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:41.959
<v Speaker 14>was exactly this scale of urban conflict, producing exactly the

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 14>same really unfortunate and tragic destruction and damage and loss

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 14>of life, because that's the only choice you have left

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 14>to you when you're dealing with an evil of this

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:55.160
<v Speaker 14>scope and dimension. But to tell you the truth, Hamas

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 14>has really exceeded anything I saw from ISIS or l

0:27:58.240 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 14>CADA in Iraq.

0:27:59.440 --> 0:27:59.640
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 14>Their systematic rape and their gratuitous and sadistic sexual mutilation

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:09.880
<v Speaker 14>conducted on a massive scale, is nothing that I've ever

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 14>seen before. And the depths to which they have plum

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 14>really means that we do as you say, I mean,

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 14>we do have to recognize that this was a war

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 14>of aggression launched by HAMAS. Now that is an international

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 14>war crime. If they were a state they would have

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 14>been held accountable for that, but of course it's actually

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 14>a Ran that's pulling their strings, so we should be

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 14>taking Iran to the International Criminal Court. But in any event,

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:40.479
<v Speaker 14>they have complete agency in this conflict, and so the

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 14>pressure and the international voice of unity should be to

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 14>direct and demand that Hamas end this fighting, end their aggression,

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 14>release the hostages, and allow the free flow of relief

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 14>to the Gazans because they've been hoarding and stealing it

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.479
<v Speaker 14>and selling it on the black market and interfering with

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 14>it because of the combat activities they conduct against the IDF.

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 14>So the walk it end right now as we speak

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 14>if her Maas laid down their weapons, and that's where

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 14>the pressure should be applied.

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely completely agree Mike Kelly.

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you know it is so refreshing to hear a

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:22.479
<v Speaker 1>labor figure speak with such clarity. If only you were

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 1>still in the federal government, if only Michael Danby was,

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and the late Kimberly Kitching, I think we wouldn't be

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing the levels of anti Semitism that we are at

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the moment. That strength is certainly missing. Thank you very

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>much for your insights and intelligence here tonight. Now let's

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>return to or let's talk about orcus. This is the

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 1>key method with which we can protect ourselves should there

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>be Chinese aggression.

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Now incint estimates.

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Today it was revealed that WA Labor Premier Roger Cook

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>had only met with the Director General of the Australian

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Submarine Agency twice amid infrastructure concerns.

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Have a look at this.

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 15>You're saying that you'd had what is it eighteen or

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 15>sixteen or eighteen meetings with the I think that was

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 15>a few. So that was with Premier mill and marsus

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 15>have you met with How many times have you met

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 15>with the WA Premier?

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 6>So I've met twice.

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 10>I think Anmiral Buckley has met.

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 6>I've not met with the Premier.

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Center those comments last week, not today, I should have

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>clarified now. This comes as representatives from the US have

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>already raised concerns about just how prepared Australia is for August,

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>particularly the infrastructure needed in the HMAS Sterling vicinity. Well,

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 1>to discuss this, let's bring in now Shadow Defense Minister

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Hasty. Andrew, thank you for your time. Look what

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>has concerned you about what unfolded in Senate estimates there

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>last week?

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 6>There are a number of things sharing which concern me.

0:30:56.440 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 6>The first is the lack of commitment from the way

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 6>state government to deliver ucas on time. As your viewers

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 6>would know, from twenty twenty seven, there'll be a base

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 6>Submarine Rotational Force West out in Perth which will host

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 6>up to four nuclear submarines, three from the US, one

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:16.719
<v Speaker 6>from the UK. We've got two years to get that ready.

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:19.239
<v Speaker 6>What we learn in estimates is that we're behind on

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 6>schedule with the building of the infrastructure. And we've also

0:31:22.520 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 6>uncovered that Premier Cook, the WA Premier, is not serious.

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 6>He's only met twice in fact, with Jonathan Mead, the

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 6>Admiral who heads up the Australian Submarine Agency, whereas if

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 6>you compare that to Premier Malinowskis since South Australia he's

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 6>met sixteen times. So there's a lack of drive and

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 6>aucas is a national mission. All local governments, all state

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 6>governments and the federal government has to be driving hard

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 6>to make this happen in twenty twenty seven and then

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 6>by the start of the next decade when we get

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 6>our first Virginia class submarines.

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 1>And just how concerned do you think that the US

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is over the pace that Australia is moving.

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 6>Well, I've had plenty of feedback from the US and

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 6>the UK. There is an ambivalence about August, particularly in

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 6>Western Australia from the state government, and I think Richard

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 6>Miles and the Prime Minister needs to be doing more

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 6>to drive this. Premier melanowskis, I've got to give credit

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 6>to him. He is mission focused. He said a couple

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 6>of weeks ago in Canberra that UCAS is a single

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 6>mission for the six states, that they all should be

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 6>working to deliver it, along with the leadership of the

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 6>federal government. And I think that's the message that we

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:39.960
<v Speaker 6>need to take going forward. So there is concerns and

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 6>we've also uncovered last week that there's an offshore wind farm.

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 6>Well we know the offshore wind farm is being proposed

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 6>by Chris Bowen off the coast of Wa, eight thousand

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 6>square kilometers in fact, just to the south of the base,

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 6>which is also a problem.

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, keep coming back to that topic because

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>it is incredibly important. Nothing more important for our national

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 1>secure right now than ocus. But I want to ask

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you about Chinese Premier's upcoming visit. Of course, the Prime

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 1>minister announced.

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 3>That just yesterday.

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you expect Albanesi will address the problems that exist

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>with the aggression we've seen from Beijing, not just in

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the South China Sea, but to our navy divers, to

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>our recent fighter pilot jets. Do you expect Albanzi will

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>actually raise these things that he has failed to do

0:33:26.440 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>so far at any sort of ministerial level.

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 6>That's right. I think it definitely should be on the table.

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 6>In any relationship, there has to be boundaries, and the

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 6>Chinese military has breached a number of boundaries over the

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 6>last year. We saw last year our navy divers experience

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 6>as sonar attacked whilst unt the water from a Chinese destroyer,

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 6>and just recently we saw a Chinese fighter fire flares

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:53.959
<v Speaker 6>at a Royal Australian Navy Seahawk, which was very, very

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 6>high risk behavior in both instances, and the government failed

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 6>to raise this at the appropriate levels. Anthony Alberanzi had

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 6>an opportunity last year to raise it with President g

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 6>he didn't, and so I think this is a perfect

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:08.760
<v Speaker 6>opportunity to do that and also to raise outstanding cases

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 6>Young Jen Hung, who's still being held by the Chinese government.

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 6>There are plenty of things that we can raise even

0:34:15.239 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 6>while we talk about our trade relationship, which is important.

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Exactly exactly, we still have an Australian imprisoned in China.

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:23.399
<v Speaker 3>We can't forget that.

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Just lastly, before you go, the Prime Minister, in his

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 1>press conference late yesterday, was asked whether he'd follow our

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>other like minded allies, the US and UK and take

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 1>action against TikTok.

0:34:36.760 --> 0:34:38.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, have a look at his response.

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 16>US and kind the governments are both considering in terms

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 16>of TikTok potentially fanning they.

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:48.839
<v Speaker 4>Sight serious concerns about democracy.

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 16>Is our intelligence the same He's so worrying we're going

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 16>down the same path.

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:56.239
<v Speaker 4>And if we're not, why not?

0:34:57.440 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 7>Well, I'm surprised you asked me to to reveal what

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 7>our intelligence should be at a press conferences. Well, our

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 7>position hasn't changed.

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:10.720
<v Speaker 3>Next question, Andrew.

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he didn't even seriously consider the question, and

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 1>it is a reasonable question given the action that is

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:20.360
<v Speaker 1>being taken by UK and the US.

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 6>Precisely, I think it was a weak answer from a

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 6>week Prime Minister, particularly when it comes to national security matters.

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 6>It's very clear that TikTok has a very close relationship

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:34.439
<v Speaker 6>with the Chinese government. There's a reason why the US

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 6>is banning it, and we know already that the Australian

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:42.800
<v Speaker 6>government won't allow TikTok to be installed on Australian government phones.

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 6>So there is a problem there, and we need to

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 6>think about how we're going to protect the data of

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:51.240
<v Speaker 6>young Australians which will be harvested by TikTok and potentially

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:54.799
<v Speaker 6>end up in the hands of the Chinese government. So

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 6>these are really important questions and I think that was

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 6>just a very offhand and weak response from Prime Minister.

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 1>He didn't even take the question seriously. All right, Andrew Hasty,

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for joining us this evening. Now

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>coming up, the man behind the Paris Agreement says the

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:12.799
<v Speaker 1>future coalition government will not be kicked out of the

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 1>international treaty. My political panel would join me to debate

0:36:16.840 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 1>the twenty thirty target after the break. Welcome back with

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:27.319
<v Speaker 1>the man who drafted the Paris Agreement has said that

0:36:27.360 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a future coalition government would not be pushed out of

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the accord if it endorsed a lower twenty thirty emissions

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:38.400
<v Speaker 1>reduction target. Let's bring it now Tonight's political panel. National

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Senate Leader Bridget McKenzie and Labor and.

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 3>P Daniel Melino. Welcome to you both.

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Bridget, what's the thinking here. Do you think there is

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be continued pressure on the opposition leader to

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>say what is twenty thirty target would be prior to

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the election?

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 4>Well, that shouldn't be.

0:36:57.280 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 16>This is simply the Labor Party attempting a scare campaign.

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 16>The reality is the Labor Party set a twenty thirty

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 16>target that they can't meet and in the middle of

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:12.319
<v Speaker 16>a cost of living crisis, Australians are absolutely sick of

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:17.479
<v Speaker 16>a federal government who can't get the story straight. I've

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:21.359
<v Speaker 16>been out tonight here in Woodonga meeting with locals who

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 16>are having renewable projects rolled out through their communities, through

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:29.759
<v Speaker 16>their own properties, and they've got no recourse.

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:31.720
<v Speaker 4>Here in Victoria thanks to the state Labor government.

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 16>So this is about having a pathway to net zero

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:39.840
<v Speaker 16>that is credible, that is based on science and technology.

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:42.959
<v Speaker 4>And that Australians can have confidence in will get us there.

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 16>Right now under Anthony Albanizi, with Bowen's plan, we're just

0:37:47.680 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 16>trashing the joint prices are going up and we're not

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:53.319
<v Speaker 16>even going to meet our mission's target. And I think

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:56.919
<v Speaker 16>that's that's a great tragedy and it undermines our credibility

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 16>as a middle power globally because typically Australia is the

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 16>country that when we say we're going to do something,

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 16>we do it. And unfortunately under Albow, that's not going

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:08.600
<v Speaker 16>to be the case with the twenty thirty.

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Target, Daniel as a government and p are you disappointed

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:15.479
<v Speaker 1>and concerned that your own government isn't going to meet

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>at this point the targets that it's set of forty

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:20.399
<v Speaker 1>two percent by twenty thirty.

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 17>Well, look, I wouldn't concede that we're not going to

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 17>meet it, but what I would say is I agree

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 17>with Bridget that we need to have science based policy making.

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:33.360
<v Speaker 17>But after that, I think we differ in that the

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:37.240
<v Speaker 17>opposition criticizes the trajectory that we're on, but they're voted

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 17>consistently against just about every practical measure to bring down emissions,

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 17>whether it be the safeguard mechanism, whether it be a

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 17>mission standards for vehicles, where one of the few countries

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:50.640
<v Speaker 17>in the world without one, and they're running constant scare

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:53.880
<v Speaker 17>campaigns on a whole range of renewables policies. So what

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 17>I'd like to hear from the opposition is what's their

0:38:56.600 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 17>credible strategy to get emissions down. They really have left

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:03.280
<v Speaker 17>a massive goals when it comes to their own policy.

0:39:03.800 --> 0:39:06.279
<v Speaker 17>All they do is criticize our trajectory and yet vote

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:07.960
<v Speaker 17>against every single practical measure.

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you both agree that the public right now is

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 1>worried about cost of living and doesn't want to have

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 1>this debate about the climate laws again?

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 16>I know it's like groundhog Day, Shahi, and you know

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 16>it's too cute by half.

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:24.760
<v Speaker 4>Daniel. You guys are in government now.

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:29.800
<v Speaker 16>You've set aggressive targets on emission reductions that are cruling

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 16>our economy, whether it's advanced manufacturing as you send energy

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 16>prices through the roof, or the private property rights of

0:39:37.680 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 16>the communities that I represent out in the regions.

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 4>On any measure, you've got it wrong.

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 16>You're more interested in having a fight with the Greens

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 16>and out greening the Greens in inner City than actually

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 16>having a credible pathway to twenty fifty. No one else

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:55.400
<v Speaker 16>in the world is doing one hundred percent renewables.

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 4>They all have gas or.

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 16>Nuclear as part of the firm being power behind their

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 16>renewable trajectories. So you're just setting us up for a

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 16>pathway to fail. We're interested in having a credible proposition,

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:13.839
<v Speaker 16>and Shari, I think people are absolutely sick of this.

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:17.360
<v Speaker 16>We've put this to bed. The Coalition is committed to

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:19.720
<v Speaker 16>net zero by twenty fifty.

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 4>We're on the journey.

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:24.560
<v Speaker 16>We're just not doing it for short political gains, all right, which.

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:26.880
<v Speaker 4>Is why Labour's targets are over aggressive.

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:29.280
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's have a look at the latest Shari.

0:40:29.360 --> 0:40:32.320
<v Speaker 17>Can I just correct on one quick point? Go for it, Danielle,

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 17>I'm certainly not trying to outgreen the Greens. Look, I'm

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 17>in hand to hand combat with the Greens in my

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 17>seat day and day out on a whole range of issues,

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 17>including climate.

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 6>Labor has the middle path here.

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 17>The Greens have incredibly high and unrealistic and unmodeled strategies,

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:52.880
<v Speaker 17>which I've critiqued in a number of ways publicly and

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:56.239
<v Speaker 17>in the chamber. Labour has a path that has been

0:40:57.040 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 17>endorsed at the last election by the BCA, and a

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 17>range of business interests which they want certainty going forward.

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:06.719
<v Speaker 17>So look, Labor is definitely the party that is providing

0:41:06.800 --> 0:41:07.399
<v Speaker 17>the middle way.

0:41:07.880 --> 0:41:09.920
<v Speaker 3>All right. Let's move on to interest rates.

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 1>The ANZ has pulled cold water on the prospector of

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the RBA cutting.

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 3>Rates this year.

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 1>It now looks like the RBA won't reduce interest rates

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:22.920
<v Speaker 1>until at least February twenty twenty five, although of course

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that could change. This is one forecast. Daniel, you follow

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 1>economics closely, do you agree with this analysis that you

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:33.360
<v Speaker 1>know we're looking at either rates staying the same or

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 1>actually potentially going up this year.

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:42.399
<v Speaker 17>So, look, Paul Samuelson is arguably the greatest economists since

0:41:42.400 --> 0:41:44.239
<v Speaker 17>World War Two, and you know he's somebody as a

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 17>macroeconomist I look up to.

0:41:45.800 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 6>Look.

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 17>He famously equipped in the nineteen sixties that economists have

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:52.960
<v Speaker 17>successfully predicted nine of the last five recessions. And he

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:56.360
<v Speaker 17>wasn't having a gratuitous go at his professional colleagues, but

0:41:56.400 --> 0:42:00.840
<v Speaker 17>really just saying that predicting the macroeconomy is extra reemly difficult.

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:02.319
<v Speaker 6>And I think what we're seeing.

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 17>Here is that as new information comes to hand, some

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 17>economists are adjusting their models in different ways. I mean,

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:11.239
<v Speaker 17>the A and Z has tweaked its model in the

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:13.239
<v Speaker 17>way you just referred to, But there are a whole

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:17.480
<v Speaker 17>bunch of other macroeconomists who think that interest rates need

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 17>to come down. Look, what I think is being confirmed

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:22.720
<v Speaker 17>by the data that's coming out is that the government

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 17>was right to put well calibrated cost of living in

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 17>the budget and that in the medium term everybody is

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:29.959
<v Speaker 17>expecting inflation to continue to track down.

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Look, Daniel, they're referenced, you know, predictions about recessions, but

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 1>bridget we're not in a technical recession. I mean, we've

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:40.399
<v Speaker 1>had growth of zero point one percent, but we are

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in a per capita recession, so it feels the same

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of families.

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:48.800
<v Speaker 4>That's exactly right, Shahi.

0:42:49.320 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 16>You know, Daniel can talk the talking points out of

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:56.359
<v Speaker 16>Jim Chalmer's office all he likes. The reality is Australians

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 16>aren't feeling it, and they're not feeling it because they're

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 16>mortgage rent payments are going up higher than their wages are,

0:43:04.200 --> 0:43:08.399
<v Speaker 16>so the household is going backwards and every single month

0:43:08.520 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 16>is getting harder and harder to get the school fee

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:14.960
<v Speaker 16>bill out of the way. Are the kids going to go,

0:43:15.600 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 16>How the swimming lesson's going to be paid for?

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:19.759
<v Speaker 4>Etc? Just to keep the roof over their head?

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:24.080
<v Speaker 16>And this is coming because labor hasn't got inflation under

0:43:24.120 --> 0:43:28.879
<v Speaker 16>control and the RBA therefore can't reduce interest rates when

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 16>we have an inflationary environment like we do at the

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:34.280
<v Speaker 16>moment here at home, and it's home grown, thank.

0:43:34.120 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 4>You, Jim Chalmers. Is it is the vulnerable that pay

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:41.719
<v Speaker 4>the most. It is the poorest in our society that

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 4>actually feel it the most.

0:43:43.440 --> 0:43:47.360
<v Speaker 16>And until labor gets their spending under control, these interest

0:43:47.440 --> 0:43:50.480
<v Speaker 16>rates won't go down and households won't have relief.

0:43:50.960 --> 0:43:53.720
<v Speaker 1>And this is going to be the predominant issue leading

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 1>into the next election, no question. Bridget McKenzie, Daniel Melino,

0:43:57.680 --> 0:44:00.319
<v Speaker 1>thank you both very much for your time the break.

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:04.479
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Biden now a convicted felon, he faces present time

0:44:04.880 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 1>after being found guilty, and yet the media treatment of

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:11.520
<v Speaker 1>him and Donald Trump couldn't be more different. Will cross

0:44:11.520 --> 0:44:19.239
<v Speaker 1>live to Washington for the latest. Okay, welcome back. Let's

0:44:19.239 --> 0:44:23.160
<v Speaker 1>bring in now the Australians. Washington correspondent Adam Crichton, Adam,

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 1>great to see you. Look, let's get to Hunter Biden

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 1>in a minute, but I want to get your take

0:44:28.680 --> 0:44:32.160
<v Speaker 1>first on Marine La Penn and the French EU election.

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:37.799
<v Speaker 11>Well, I mean it's not really surprising her support, her

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:40.279
<v Speaker 11>party support has been growing now for years. Remember she

0:44:40.360 --> 0:44:43.839
<v Speaker 11>ran for president in twenty seventeen, in twenty twenty two,

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 11>and her support's been growing each time, and all the

0:44:45.960 --> 0:44:48.680
<v Speaker 11>forecasts are that she'll probably win in twenty twenty seven.

0:44:49.600 --> 0:44:52.319
<v Speaker 11>You know, the so called far right parties, the growth

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:55.800
<v Speaker 11>of them is a symptom of widespread dissatisfaction with a

0:44:55.920 --> 0:44:59.480
<v Speaker 11>rampant immigration, with rising prices. And you'd probably also have

0:44:59.520 --> 0:45:02.520
<v Speaker 11>to say the European case, fear of a war with Russia.

0:45:03.600 --> 0:45:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, let's turn to the big story today, Hunter Biden.

0:45:06.920 --> 0:45:09.520
<v Speaker 1>This is history making the first child of a sitting

0:45:09.560 --> 0:45:11.800
<v Speaker 1>president to be convicted of a crime.

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:14.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested in the different media treatment.

0:45:14.920 --> 0:45:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Initially, the Hunter Biden laptop story was fake. You know,

0:45:18.920 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it was pulled off social media. The established media refused

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:25.600
<v Speaker 1>to cover it. You know, most of that he hasn't

0:45:25.680 --> 0:45:30.279
<v Speaker 1>been prosecuted for or even investigated for. Here this is

0:45:30.560 --> 0:45:32.480
<v Speaker 1>drug addiction and a gun crime.

0:45:36.239 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 11>Yes, well, look certainly, I mean the big takeaway for me,

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:40.919
<v Speaker 11>I think the long term impact of this case is really,

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:43.399
<v Speaker 11>as you suggest, the verification of that laptop. I mean,

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:46.000
<v Speaker 11>this was a censored it was obviously real. The FBI

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:48.719
<v Speaker 11>had this laptop. In fact, as you probably know, from

0:45:48.760 --> 0:45:51.280
<v Speaker 11>twenty nineteen, so they knew it was real. I certainly

0:45:51.360 --> 0:45:54.000
<v Speaker 11>knew it was real, and yet the story from the

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:56.719
<v Speaker 11>New York Post was censored in October twenty twenty. That's

0:45:56.760 --> 0:46:00.080
<v Speaker 11>just extraordinary stuff. And so, you know, the confirmation that

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:03.279
<v Speaker 11>that the laptop is real really is extremely embarrassing for

0:46:03.360 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 11>most of the mainstream media and of course those famous

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:08.440
<v Speaker 11>fifty one intel experts.

0:46:09.520 --> 0:46:12.640
<v Speaker 1>All of the media, the left media presented the outcome

0:46:12.680 --> 0:46:16.480
<v Speaker 1>today is our very sad story for the Biden family.

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:19.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, many families in America are going through this.

0:46:20.239 --> 0:46:23.440
<v Speaker 1>But then there was this desperation to get Trump.

0:46:23.920 --> 0:46:25.680
<v Speaker 3>Is this purely politics?

0:46:28.280 --> 0:46:32.359
<v Speaker 11>Well, look, I think both. I really think that both

0:46:32.440 --> 0:46:34.400
<v Speaker 11>men are the subject. I think the victim rather of

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:37.319
<v Speaker 11>the weaponization of the justice system. Certainly, in the case

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:39.920
<v Speaker 11>of Donald Trump, he saw the Democrat Party hankering for

0:46:40.000 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 11>him to be prosecuted. But I think it's also fair

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:44.840
<v Speaker 11>to say that the only reason that Hunter Biden was

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 11>prosecuted was because he's the president's son and there were

0:46:48.239 --> 0:46:51.880
<v Speaker 11>constant calls from Republicans for him to be prosecuted. I

0:46:51.920 --> 0:46:54.160
<v Speaker 11>don't think if he was an ordinary Joe blow in

0:46:54.200 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 11>the US that he would have been prosecuted for this crime, which,

0:46:57.680 --> 0:47:01.240
<v Speaker 11>after all, is extremely hard to whether or not someone

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 11>is taking drugs at the time when they buy a gun.

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:06.799
<v Speaker 11>But of course, in the president's son's case, there was

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:09.600
<v Speaker 11>so much scrutiny of his private life that it was

0:47:09.640 --> 0:47:12.400
<v Speaker 11>well known that he was so Look, I think it's

0:47:12.440 --> 0:47:16.080
<v Speaker 11>a pretty sad day for the for the US justice system,

0:47:16.160 --> 0:47:18.319
<v Speaker 11>for both cases. But you know, the irony is that

0:47:18.360 --> 0:47:20.640
<v Speaker 11>I don't think it's really going to have any effect

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:23.880
<v Speaker 11>on the political the political outcomy that for Trump or

0:47:23.880 --> 0:47:24.800
<v Speaker 11>for the Biden family.

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we thought many people expected Trump would be

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:32.520
<v Speaker 1>further ahead in the polls by now. The fact that

0:47:32.640 --> 0:47:36.760
<v Speaker 1>he's not overwhelmingly ahead of Joe Biden, does this show

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:40.279
<v Speaker 1>that the criminal cases have had an impact perhaps with

0:47:40.480 --> 0:47:41.600
<v Speaker 1>undecided voters.

0:47:44.560 --> 0:47:46.880
<v Speaker 11>Well, look, I think both of them are very weak candidates.

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:48.880
<v Speaker 11>I mean, Trump is ahead in the polls, he's ahead

0:47:48.920 --> 0:47:51.319
<v Speaker 11>in the betting markets, and I think the takeaway, you know,

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:53.320
<v Speaker 11>from the hush money case is that it didn't really

0:47:53.400 --> 0:47:55.879
<v Speaker 11>seem to effect his standing a very much at all.

0:47:55.920 --> 0:47:57.840
<v Speaker 11>I mean, of course, sentencing hasn't happened yet, that's on

0:47:57.880 --> 0:48:01.200
<v Speaker 11>the eleventh of July. That could change things. I suppose

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:04.360
<v Speaker 11>if he's sent to prison, but he remains ahead. And

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:06.120
<v Speaker 11>of course you know from the hush money case, he

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:08.920
<v Speaker 11>raised about one hundred million dollars or more for his campaign,

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 11>so if anything, it may have actually helped him. I mean,

0:48:11.560 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 11>I think on the Biden side, I think the tax

0:48:14.080 --> 0:48:16.359
<v Speaker 11>evasion case, which is going to be heard in California

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:19.680
<v Speaker 11>later this year, that could be more politically damaging for

0:48:19.760 --> 0:48:21.640
<v Speaker 11>Biden because of course in that case you're going to

0:48:21.680 --> 0:48:24.800
<v Speaker 11>hear more about the extravagant spending, and of course you

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:27.279
<v Speaker 11>know there'll be more allegations of corruption in relation to

0:48:27.760 --> 0:48:31.759
<v Speaker 11>Joe Biden and Hunter Biden's finances and their operations in

0:48:31.840 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 11>Ukraine and China when the older Biden was vice president.

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 11>So I think that could be more politically damaging.

0:48:38.400 --> 0:48:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, it will not be out of the

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:42.960
<v Speaker 1>news for long. Adam Krichton, thank you very much for

0:48:43.040 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 1>joining us tonight. Thanks everyone for watching.

0:48:45.160 --> 0:48:47.040
<v Speaker 3>I'll see you tomorrow at eight pm.

0:48:47.080 --> 0:48:53.280
<v Speaker 1>And right now, here's Paul Murray