WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 29 October

0:00:02.650 --> 0:00:08.270
<v Speaker 1>This is Paul Murray Live. Thank you, Shari. Welcome to

0:00:08.289 --> 0:00:10.610
<v Speaker 1>the Man Cave. An awful lot to get to this evening.

0:00:11.110 --> 0:00:13.270
<v Speaker 2>Now, are we surprised that the people who write the

0:00:13.310 --> 0:00:16.689
<v Speaker 2>rules for business don't really understand business? Why do I

0:00:16.710 --> 0:00:19.670
<v Speaker 2>talk so much about business? Because so many of you

0:00:19.770 --> 0:00:22.610
<v Speaker 2>are watching right now who have decided to build a

0:00:22.660 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 2>life outside of the triangle of dependence.

0:00:25.620 --> 0:00:26.419
<v Speaker 1>That's where I live.

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.580
<v Speaker 2>It's where I believe the majority of Australians live or

0:00:29.620 --> 0:00:32.260
<v Speaker 2>at least want to live. But it's not what this

0:00:32.300 --> 0:00:35.019
<v Speaker 2>government's interested in. They want a big state where, of course,

0:00:35.100 --> 0:00:37.620
<v Speaker 2>it works one of three ways. You either work for

0:00:37.659 --> 0:00:40.100
<v Speaker 2>the government, you're taking money from the government as welfare,

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.199
<v Speaker 2>or if you're in business, well, of course, the client

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 2>is the government. And a perfect example of how they

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 2>don't understand business was the tap-and-go thing a few weeks ago. Now,

0:00:50.979 --> 0:00:53.420
<v Speaker 2>the Reserve Bank made a decision which was no longer

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 2>can customers be charged directly for the use of a

0:00:57.260 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 2>tap-and-go card for either credit or the old FPOS system.

0:01:02.140 --> 0:01:04.020
<v Speaker 1>We were told a lie by the Prime Minister at

0:01:04.060 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the time.

0:01:04.459 --> 0:01:09.140
<v Speaker 3>From today, they're banned. Saving you money every time you tap.

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.940
<v Speaker 3>So whether you're at the supermarket paying bills or buying

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.059
<v Speaker 3>a cup of coffee, the price you see is the

0:01:14.100 --> 0:01:14.820
<v Speaker 3>price you pay.

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:17.490
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the price didn't disappear.

0:01:17.510 --> 0:01:22.670
<v Speaker 2>Small business was very clear what the problem was for

0:01:22.709 --> 0:01:27.910
<v Speaker 2>them because they were still getting charged by the financial institutions, meaning.

0:01:29.250 --> 0:01:30.090
<v Speaker 1>Major backlash.

0:01:30.580 --> 0:01:33.780
<v Speaker 4>Small business owners say they've been left to foot the bill.

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 5>Traders warn the looming policy still threatens to shutter local businesses.

0:01:38.580 --> 0:01:41.180
<v Speaker 6>But instead it's had to be absorbed by businesses.

0:01:41.980 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>So as long as.

0:01:42.459 --> 0:01:45.820
<v Speaker 2>There is a financial institution, the customer at the end,

0:01:45.980 --> 0:01:47.170
<v Speaker 2>the business in the middle.

0:01:47.750 --> 0:01:48.970
<v Speaker 1>There's still the charge.

0:01:48.990 --> 0:01:52.490
<v Speaker 2>You just moved from the customer back to the business

0:01:52.510 --> 0:01:56.230
<v Speaker 2>because they were still being charged by the financial institutions. But,

0:01:56.250 --> 0:01:58.900
<v Speaker 2>of course, the greatest government of all time said, that's

0:01:59.220 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 2>not true, because we said so.

0:02:02.060 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 4>And it will lower fees for businesses, as I said,

0:02:04.820 --> 0:02:09.090
<v Speaker 4>by about $ 910 million a year. And that it's all

0:02:09.150 --> 0:02:13.870
<v Speaker 4>about saving businesses, especially small businesses, more than $ 900 million

0:02:13.910 --> 0:02:15.429
<v Speaker 4>a year in interchange fees.

0:02:16.410 --> 0:02:18.690
<v Speaker 2>Now, you know, the next part of this story, which

0:02:18.750 --> 0:02:22.470
<v Speaker 2>was the government itself via the Australian Tax Office, which

0:02:22.510 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 2>of course collects the revenue, belled the cat that there

0:02:26.060 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 2>was still a fee to be paid. So much so that...

0:02:29.590 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 2>When this policy was announced as a saving for everyone,

0:02:33.740 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 2>they told anyone who pays a tax bill, business or private,

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:39.179
<v Speaker 2>if you do it with a credit card, you can't

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 2>do it anymore.

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:44.830
<v Speaker 1>Why? Because they, the tax office, the government, would end

0:02:44.870 --> 0:02:45.410
<v Speaker 1>up having.

0:02:45.230 --> 0:02:50.210
<v Speaker 2>To wear the fees. We remember the announcement when it

0:02:50.250 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 2>took place. Well, of course, the government tried to pretend

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:56.860
<v Speaker 2>that they were a little bit surprised.

0:02:56.340 --> 0:02:58.430
<v Speaker 1>By this position of the tax office.

0:02:58.690 --> 0:03:01.330
<v Speaker 2>So rather than cancelling the decision, they just got them

0:03:01.350 --> 0:03:03.010
<v Speaker 2>to delay it for six months.

0:03:03.510 --> 0:03:05.350
<v Speaker 1>Well, that, of course, turned out to be a lie too.

0:03:05.950 --> 0:03:06.269
<v Speaker 6>Why?

0:03:06.889 --> 0:03:10.990
<v Speaker 2>Because the Assistant Treasurer told us that he knew in

0:03:11.130 --> 0:03:14.109
<v Speaker 2>July that the tax office was going.

0:03:14.030 --> 0:03:19.269
<v Speaker 1>To be doing that in the first place. So what

0:03:19.290 --> 0:03:21.850
<v Speaker 1>was news to us wasn't news to them.

0:03:23.530 --> 0:03:25.730
<v Speaker 2>And of course, all of that meant that there was

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.940
<v Speaker 2>only one real thing that any medium to small business

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 2>could do, and that was they couldn't absorb the fees.

0:03:32.580 --> 0:03:34.940
<v Speaker 2>They had to hand it on in higher prices. So

0:03:34.980 --> 0:03:39.780
<v Speaker 2>prices have gone up since this decision was made. Anyone

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:41.710
<v Speaker 2>who's been to a cafe knows it. Anyone who's dealt

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:44.970
<v Speaker 2>with a small business knows it. Now, of course, it's

0:03:45.150 --> 0:03:48.490
<v Speaker 2>not going to anyone's profit apart from the financial institutions,

0:03:49.590 --> 0:03:53.540
<v Speaker 2>but Why would, of course, no-one in the government realise

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:58.460
<v Speaker 2>that this would be a consequence? Because, of course, basically

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:02.060
<v Speaker 2>no-one in the government and virtually no-one in the Cabinet,

0:04:02.380 --> 0:04:05.380
<v Speaker 2>and definitely not the Prime Minister, have any experience actually

0:04:05.540 --> 0:04:09.580
<v Speaker 2>running a business. You see, they've worked for someone, or

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:14.460
<v Speaker 2>most likely the Labor Party, the unions or the government. So,

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:19.230
<v Speaker 2>minister after minister, no after no... That is the list

0:04:19.410 --> 0:04:21.630
<v Speaker 2>of the Australian Federal Cabinet and whether it has run

0:04:21.670 --> 0:04:23.860
<v Speaker 2>a small business or not. We could find two examples.

0:04:24.650 --> 0:04:27.419
<v Speaker 2>One was a Northern Territory senator who ran their own

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 2>media company. The other was a South Australian senator who,

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 2>of course, ran a wine label in between stints in

0:04:32.900 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 2>the Senate. Everything else, no connection whatsoever. Now, I've made

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 2>all of these points before, but there's another element to

0:04:42.990 --> 0:04:45.770
<v Speaker 2>why the system doesn't understand the impact or just doesn't

0:04:45.850 --> 0:04:48.270
<v Speaker 2>care about what the impact is on those who want

0:04:48.290 --> 0:04:51.070
<v Speaker 2>to live away from the government, who want to be

0:04:51.150 --> 0:04:53.550
<v Speaker 2>able to earn their own living, to be able to

0:04:53.610 --> 0:04:56.989
<v Speaker 2>increase their living by getting up earlier, going to bed later,

0:04:57.370 --> 0:05:01.849
<v Speaker 2>working longer hours, working extra days, trying to shove that

0:05:02.150 --> 0:05:06.180
<v Speaker 2>one extra job into the day and in order to

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:08.300
<v Speaker 2>be able to make more money for their family because,

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.020
<v Speaker 2>just like for everyone else, the cost of everything's gone up,

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 2>including a small business person or any business person who's.

0:05:15.500 --> 0:05:16.690
<v Speaker 1>Trying to pay off their house because.

0:05:16.730 --> 0:05:21.930
<v Speaker 2>Remember, that's got 17 times worse under this government because

0:05:21.950 --> 0:05:25.390
<v Speaker 2>that's how many interest rate rises there have been. Well,

0:05:25.500 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 2>adding another layer on all of this is the professional

0:05:28.380 --> 0:05:33.279
<v Speaker 2>bureaucracy that advises the professional politicians, all of which get

0:05:33.339 --> 0:05:37.350
<v Speaker 2>paid by the government, all of which have government super

0:05:37.490 --> 0:05:39.289
<v Speaker 2>and a whole bunch of perks. And of course, none

0:05:39.310 --> 0:05:41.950
<v Speaker 2>of it comes out of their wage. They still fly

0:05:41.970 --> 0:05:46.700
<v Speaker 2>for free, all the rest of it. And the tax commissioner, Well,

0:05:46.740 --> 0:05:50.700
<v Speaker 2>he gave evidence in the past 24 hours about realising, yeah,

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 2>I suppose if we do tell people that one of

0:05:53.140 --> 0:05:55.460
<v Speaker 2>the ways they pay their tax bills, they can't pay

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.490
<v Speaker 2>their tax bills anymore, that might annoy a few people

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.330
<v Speaker 2>in business. This is what he told the Senate committee.

0:06:03.050 --> 0:06:04.190
<v Speaker 2>I mean, hindsight's a wonderful thing.

0:06:04.630 --> 0:06:07.870
<v Speaker 7>As I said, with the benefit of hindsight, and, you know,

0:06:07.930 --> 0:06:09.470
<v Speaker 7>one always hopes to live a bit longer to get

0:06:09.490 --> 0:06:09.750
<v Speaker 7>a bit.

0:06:09.670 --> 0:06:14.150
<v Speaker 1>Wiser, at an early stage... if we'd had.

0:06:14.330 --> 0:06:18.070
<v Speaker 7>A much more open conversation with relevant stakeholders to then say, well,

0:06:18.089 --> 0:06:20.150
<v Speaker 7>what are these other options? I had jumped to the

0:06:20.190 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 7>conclusion that managing cash flow related to a situation where

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 7>a person or a business might be struggling.

0:06:29.700 --> 0:06:33.180
<v Speaker 2>Now, is it dangerous for a pay-as-you-go employee to be

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:34.860
<v Speaker 2>making any comments about the tax commissioner?

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:36.460
<v Speaker 1>Yes, but still I will.

0:06:36.779 --> 0:06:38.669
<v Speaker 2>And if there is an audit, I will think it

0:06:38.750 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 2>might be linked back to this particular conversation. But I

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:46.460
<v Speaker 2>wanted to show you, of course, the reality of why

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 2>credit cards matter to businesses.

0:06:48.620 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 8>A credit card gives us some way to play with

0:06:52.700 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 8>our cash flow within the business.

0:06:54.740 --> 0:06:56.580
<v Speaker 9>It just makes us more operational.

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 10>If somebody doesn't have a decent cash reserve available to

0:06:59.860 --> 0:07:03.170
<v Speaker 10>then buy stock for, you know, Black Friday and Christmas trading,

0:07:03.260 --> 0:07:06.150
<v Speaker 10>how are they then supposed to use that money that

0:07:06.170 --> 0:07:09.029
<v Speaker 10>they would have paid their bills to the ATO with card?

0:07:10.210 --> 0:07:10.370
<v Speaker 7>Well.

0:07:10.830 --> 0:07:14.310
<v Speaker 2>Why put perhaps the government be blind to the reality

0:07:14.330 --> 0:07:16.930
<v Speaker 2>of business and the head of the tax office be

0:07:16.970 --> 0:07:19.380
<v Speaker 2>blind to business? Well, let's have a look at the

0:07:19.450 --> 0:07:21.950
<v Speaker 2>biography of the tax commissioner, who I'm sure is.

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.460
<v Speaker 1>An excellent tax commissioner. Again, please don't audit me.

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Not because I'm dodgy, but it's a lot of work

0:07:27.020 --> 0:07:29.620
<v Speaker 2>for everyone and there's nothing going to be found, right?

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.540
<v Speaker 1>Well, guess what? He has a long career in the.

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Australian Public Service, beginning in 1989 when he was a

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 2>graduate at the Australian Customs Service. Over 35 years, he

0:07:40.300 --> 0:07:44.690
<v Speaker 2>accumulated diverse experience across policy developments and program delivery in

0:07:44.730 --> 0:07:47.630
<v Speaker 2>a range of portfolios. Again, fine, fair enough, but this

0:07:47.690 --> 0:07:50.470
<v Speaker 2>is not an experience in business, meaning when somebody was

0:07:50.510 --> 0:07:52.370
<v Speaker 2>sitting around the table, they'd go, oh, hang.

0:07:52.310 --> 0:07:54.290
<v Speaker 1>On, that's going to be difficult for people.

0:07:55.270 --> 0:07:58.260
<v Speaker 2>Mr Heffernan has represented Australia in international forums, including the

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:03.900
<v Speaker 2>United Nations and the International Energy Agency Organisation for Economic

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Co-operation and Development as well. For almost 20 years, Mr

0:08:06.780 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Heffernan's interests and expertise in economics and tax policy have

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 2>led him to various roles inside the Australian Tax Office

0:08:12.980 --> 0:08:17.180
<v Speaker 2>and the Commonwealth Treasury. So now we can add the

0:08:17.340 --> 0:08:21.430
<v Speaker 2>Tax Office to the Prime Minister, to the Cabinet, to

0:08:21.500 --> 0:08:23.670
<v Speaker 2>much of the public service, who, of course, make all

0:08:23.690 --> 0:08:28.030
<v Speaker 2>the rules for small business but have no experience in it, meaning...

0:08:28.210 --> 0:08:31.230
<v Speaker 2>They don't know what the real-world consequences of their decisions are.

0:08:31.570 --> 0:08:35.460
<v Speaker 2>No matter how noble, no matter how efficient, the reality

0:08:35.620 --> 0:08:37.500
<v Speaker 2>is there are millions of people who want to live

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 2>outside of the purview of government, not because they're secret

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:45.990
<v Speaker 2>sovereign citizens or right-wing nutjobs. They're just people who want

0:08:46.050 --> 0:08:49.270
<v Speaker 2>to be in determination of their own future, knowing the

0:08:49.390 --> 0:08:53.870
<v Speaker 2>only way they get a pay rise is to work harder. Unlike,

0:08:53.910 --> 0:08:57.070
<v Speaker 2>of course, the pay rises which are just automatically handed out.

0:08:58.010 --> 0:09:01.290
<v Speaker 2>to politicians, to the top levels of the public service,

0:09:01.809 --> 0:09:04.350
<v Speaker 2>and to the public service itself.

0:09:05.110 --> 0:09:07.349
<v Speaker 1>But, of course, nothing to see here.

0:09:09.770 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Now, I haven't done this for a little while, but

0:09:11.100 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 2>it's still worth mentioning. Can they please cut the petrol tax?

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Why? Because petrol is still very expensive.

0:09:17.220 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 9>Why?

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:19.179
<v Speaker 1>Yes, because of the war in Iran.

0:09:19.620 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it was not started by the Australian government, but

0:09:22.070 --> 0:09:26.610
<v Speaker 2>the Australian government takes 52 cents per litre, not to

0:09:26.670 --> 0:09:31.010
<v Speaker 2>mention the 10% GST on top of the final cost

0:09:31.250 --> 0:09:36.830
<v Speaker 2>of petrol. So every time petrol costs more, the GST

0:09:36.910 --> 0:09:39.350
<v Speaker 2>take of it increases and, of course, that money goes

0:09:39.410 --> 0:09:43.229
<v Speaker 2>back through the federal two state governments. Now, you would think,

0:09:43.350 --> 0:09:46.559
<v Speaker 2>because the government's not being asked about this 52 cents

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:50.380
<v Speaker 2>per litre, that somehow petrol had gone back through the floor. Well,

0:09:50.620 --> 0:09:52.260
<v Speaker 2>I know that's not the case, but as you know,

0:09:52.300 --> 0:09:55.780
<v Speaker 2>I prefer to show receipts than just have feel opinions here.

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 2>And as you can see, it is still way higher

0:10:00.179 --> 0:10:03.660
<v Speaker 2>than it was in August, way higher than it was

0:10:04.059 --> 0:10:06.590
<v Speaker 2>in September. And now it's pretty much been in the

0:10:06.630 --> 0:10:08.670
<v Speaker 2>same spot for a while. The top one of those

0:10:08.730 --> 0:10:11.290
<v Speaker 2>is the unleaded 91 and E10 in Sydney. The bottom

0:10:11.330 --> 0:10:16.110
<v Speaker 2>is in Brisbane. Same picture, of course, in Melbourne. Now, again,

0:10:16.170 --> 0:10:17.890
<v Speaker 2>back to the theme at the start of the program

0:10:17.910 --> 0:10:20.340
<v Speaker 2>about it's very difficult to understand people's plight if you

0:10:20.380 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 2>don't walk, like, a quarter of a mile in their

0:10:24.580 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 2>shoes every now and then. So, of course, the Prime Minister,

0:10:28.620 --> 0:10:31.850
<v Speaker 2>who has been an MP for 30 years... And has,

0:10:31.890 --> 0:10:34.510
<v Speaker 2>of course, had all the travel allowances that means even

0:10:34.550 --> 0:10:37.500
<v Speaker 2>if he drives his quote-unquote own car, the own car

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:39.179
<v Speaker 2>is one, of course, that's given to him as a

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 2>local MP. And when he goes to the petrol station,

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:43.339
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't pay for it.

0:10:43.380 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 5>Why?

0:10:43.820 --> 0:10:46.900
<v Speaker 2>Because as a member of parliament, as a minister, as

0:10:46.940 --> 0:10:48.959
<v Speaker 2>an opposition leader, as a prime minister, you get a

0:10:49.020 --> 0:10:52.540
<v Speaker 2>fuel card. So you need to be briefed about the

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:55.859
<v Speaker 2>problems when it comes to petrol prices. Of course, Jim

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.030
<v Speaker 2>Chalmers would be exactly the same. as firstly a Member

0:10:59.050 --> 0:11:03.700
<v Speaker 2>of Parliament, then a Shadow Minister, now the Treasurer. And

0:11:03.780 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 2>why should they be cutting 52 cents per litre of

0:11:07.100 --> 0:11:10.339
<v Speaker 2>every litre of petrol and diesel that they charge in

0:11:10.380 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 2>the country? Because they say stuff like this.

0:11:14.620 --> 0:11:17.809
<v Speaker 4>So this is about easing the cost of living, easing

0:11:17.850 --> 0:11:19.270
<v Speaker 4>some of the pressure on people.

0:11:19.490 --> 0:11:22.450
<v Speaker 3>Any cost of living measures are ones that not just

0:11:22.550 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 3>address providing help for people today, but building a stronger economy.

0:11:27.950 --> 0:11:28.510
<v Speaker 1>Tomorrow.

0:11:28.590 --> 0:11:30.250
<v Speaker 4>We took some of the sting out of these cost

0:11:30.270 --> 0:11:33.050
<v Speaker 4>of living pressures earlier in the year.

0:11:33.110 --> 0:11:36.530
<v Speaker 2>So we can't do it now because petrol is not

0:11:36.630 --> 0:11:37.890
<v Speaker 2>quite as high as it was before?

0:11:38.010 --> 0:11:39.500
<v Speaker 1>It's still a punish.

0:11:40.260 --> 0:11:42.099
<v Speaker 2>And when everything else keeps going up, and the Prime

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:45.420
<v Speaker 2>Minister himself is talking about part of the problem with

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 2>the war in the Middle East is that everything gets

0:11:46.940 --> 0:11:49.380
<v Speaker 2>transported around on trucks and therefore the cost of transferring

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:50.540
<v Speaker 2>is being passed on to everyone.

0:11:50.860 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Sure.

0:11:51.380 --> 0:11:55.150
<v Speaker 2>So stop clipping the ticket along the way. The government

0:11:55.250 --> 0:11:57.230
<v Speaker 2>is in a deficit and will be for the next

0:11:57.230 --> 0:12:00.089
<v Speaker 2>40 years. This is not going to be the difference,

0:12:00.830 --> 0:12:04.530
<v Speaker 2>but it might be the difference between the python turning

0:12:04.570 --> 0:12:09.370
<v Speaker 2>you robina purple and slightly light robina purple in terms

0:12:09.410 --> 0:12:13.170
<v Speaker 2>of the cost of living crisis. Surveyed today in the

0:12:13.210 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 2>News Corp newspapers was very clear. 78% of people either

0:12:17.220 --> 0:12:22.630
<v Speaker 2>agree or strongly agree that that the federal government should

0:12:22.770 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 2>reinstate the fuel excise tax cut to make fuel cheaper. But,

0:12:28.860 --> 0:12:30.900
<v Speaker 2>of course, the government wouldn't be doing that any time

0:12:30.940 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 2>soon because we know when it affects politicians, it is

0:12:34.380 --> 0:12:36.660
<v Speaker 2>the lead story forever. When it affects you and me,

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:38.320
<v Speaker 2>you get tough love.

0:12:39.940 --> 0:12:43.340
<v Speaker 4>People shouldn't expect to see in the budget on Tuesday

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:48.750
<v Speaker 4>night an extension of that because we've made it really

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:50.809
<v Speaker 4>clear that it's a temporary thing.

0:12:51.940 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 2>John Rolfe is part of the group that put that

0:12:54.540 --> 0:12:56.300
<v Speaker 2>poll together. We will have a chat to him about

0:12:56.340 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 2>that and a bunch of consumer issues and why he

0:12:57.780 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 2>should be backing Australia in a moment or two's time.

0:13:01.140 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk about the grants rorts next here,

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:07.370
<v Speaker 2>the latest that we have heard about. Well, the Prime Minister,

0:13:07.470 --> 0:13:09.970
<v Speaker 2>who is now continuing to dig such a hole when

0:13:10.010 --> 0:13:13.050
<v Speaker 2>it comes to these grants, like the Marrickville Golf Club,

0:13:13.070 --> 0:13:15.030
<v Speaker 2>that he's going to need another grant to fill the

0:13:15.070 --> 0:13:16.590
<v Speaker 2>hole that he has been digging.

0:13:17.850 --> 0:13:19.670
<v Speaker 1>As we know, the Marrickville....

0:13:20.230 --> 0:13:23.630
<v Speaker 2>Golf Club is emblematic of an overall half billion dollar

0:13:23.710 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 2>electoral slush fund that was put in place by this government. Now,

0:13:29.140 --> 0:13:31.700
<v Speaker 2>we know that he misled the parliament because his excuse

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:35.140
<v Speaker 2>for all of this was about sewage, but his office

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:36.740
<v Speaker 2>should have known that it was nothing to do with

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 2>sewage because the New South Wales government got involved in that.

0:13:39.940 --> 0:13:41.930
<v Speaker 2>He did recognise it. Oh, I might have made a mistake,

0:13:41.950 --> 0:13:44.150
<v Speaker 2>but wouldn't dare correct the record. Wouldn't dare even use

0:13:44.170 --> 0:13:49.199
<v Speaker 2>the word mistake. Well, he was asked further questions about

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:52.609
<v Speaker 2>it today and the 19th hole got deeper for the

0:13:52.630 --> 0:13:55.250
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister on the Marrickville golf course.

0:13:56.390 --> 0:13:59.830
<v Speaker 3>Why won't the Prime Minister provide a single document confirming

0:14:00.130 --> 0:14:01.910
<v Speaker 3>that the money was to pay for the sewerage works?

0:14:03.030 --> 0:14:07.429
<v Speaker 1>After you, sir. The premise of the question, however, is wrong.

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.460
<v Speaker 3>This wasn't about invite only. This is an election commitment.

0:14:12.660 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Ah, the only problem is, where does this invite-only thing

0:14:15.970 --> 0:14:21.170
<v Speaker 2>come from? Oh, that's right, the Centre for Public Integrity. Remember,

0:14:21.210 --> 0:14:24.710
<v Speaker 2>these were the people who, of course, so outraged Helen

0:14:24.750 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Haynes that she was able to weaponise this politically. The

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister, of course, tried to weaponise on her with

0:14:30.740 --> 0:14:32.740
<v Speaker 2>the dirt sheet that, of course, definitely wasn't.

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>A dirt sheet, it just was a compliment sheet. I'm

0:14:34.580 --> 0:14:36.460
<v Speaker 1>sure there's 151.

0:14:35.660 --> 0:14:38.060
<v Speaker 2>Of them for every member of Parliament sitting in the

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:42.729
<v Speaker 2>Prime Minister's filing cabinet somewhere. Well, also, inside the explanation

0:14:43.130 --> 0:14:46.170
<v Speaker 2>about all of this was, no public explanation has been

0:14:46.190 --> 0:14:47.110
<v Speaker 2>given as to why.

0:14:46.990 --> 0:14:49.350
<v Speaker 1>A closed process was.

0:14:49.410 --> 0:14:54.710
<v Speaker 2>Used or how eligibility to be invited was determined, contrary

0:14:54.850 --> 0:15:00.190
<v Speaker 2>to the Commonwealth Grants Rules and Principles of 2024. To

0:15:01.610 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 2>make it a little clearer for everyone sitting at the

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 2>back and not paying full attention, he talks about this

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 2>not being an invite-only system and Well, it's even worse

0:15:11.810 --> 0:15:12.290
<v Speaker 2>than that.

0:15:12.710 --> 0:15:15.510
<v Speaker 1>And take it from a friend of the government to

0:15:15.550 --> 0:15:15.950
<v Speaker 1>tell you.

0:15:17.050 --> 0:15:20.910
<v Speaker 11>Whereas the sports rort scandal involved a selection process that

0:15:20.930 --> 0:15:25.670
<v Speaker 11>was corrupted by politics, Labor's infrastructure grants program seemed to

0:15:25.710 --> 0:15:29.710
<v Speaker 11>have no process at all except to curry political favour.

0:15:30.630 --> 0:15:33.530
<v Speaker 2>Well, guess who's back with another thorn in the side

0:15:33.550 --> 0:15:37.410
<v Speaker 2>of the Prime Minister as that 19th hole at Marrickville Golf.

0:15:37.210 --> 0:15:40.130
<v Speaker 1>Club gets deeper and deeper and deeper and deeper and deeper.

0:15:41.470 --> 0:15:43.850
<v Speaker 2>And regardless of what the actual position on the sewerage is,

0:15:44.090 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 2>the stink is obvious to everyone, no matter where you

0:15:46.860 --> 0:15:49.220
<v Speaker 2>live in the country. The Centre for Independent Studies put

0:15:49.260 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 2>out another report, independent report, into this today. A write-up

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:59.540
<v Speaker 2>of it says 98% of Labor's invite-only grants, the premise

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 2>was wrong with that question, were just tick and flick

0:16:03.820 --> 0:16:06.140
<v Speaker 2>by the public service because, of course, the decision had

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:11.109
<v Speaker 2>already been made. department scrutiny and political handpicked infrastructure grants

0:16:11.130 --> 0:16:13.750
<v Speaker 2>had been exposed as little more than a rubber stamp.

0:16:14.270 --> 0:16:17.900
<v Speaker 2>With new research finding almost 98% of projects invited to

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:22.020
<v Speaker 2>apply for funding under the Albanese government schemes ultimately.

0:16:21.660 --> 0:16:23.700
<v Speaker 1>Received taxpayer money.

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:26.740
<v Speaker 2>So when there's only one application and you know what

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:28.780
<v Speaker 2>the application is because you asked them to put the

0:16:28.830 --> 0:16:33.970
<v Speaker 2>money in because it so lines up with your election commitments,

0:16:34.650 --> 0:16:37.170
<v Speaker 2>and as the Minister for Infrastructure told us this week,

0:16:37.510 --> 0:16:41.730
<v Speaker 2>It all went via Labor HQ. It's a giant slush fund.

0:16:41.770 --> 0:16:47.030
<v Speaker 2>It's not election promises. It's half a billion dollars. Oh,

0:16:47.050 --> 0:16:49.830
<v Speaker 2>but we're so much better than the Liberals because they

0:16:50.170 --> 0:16:51.570
<v Speaker 2>were dumb enough to put it all down on a

0:16:51.590 --> 0:16:52.570
<v Speaker 2>colour-coded sheet.

0:16:53.670 --> 0:16:55.430
<v Speaker 1>Well, of course, back to where Andrew Probin said.

0:16:55.750 --> 0:16:59.660
<v Speaker 2>The point is this one didn't have any sheets connected

0:16:59.700 --> 0:17:02.100
<v Speaker 2>to it because they didn't need to because they were

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:03.460
<v Speaker 2>the ones picking and they were picking in.

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.140
<v Speaker 1>The places that they knew they were going to win

0:17:06.580 --> 0:17:09.959
<v Speaker 1>or they wanted. to win. But, you know, nothing to

0:17:10.030 --> 0:17:10.530
<v Speaker 1>see here.

0:17:13.369 --> 0:17:15.949
<v Speaker 2>Again, something that has been a dominant story over the

0:17:15.970 --> 0:17:18.369
<v Speaker 2>past couple of weeks has been the threats that are

0:17:18.410 --> 0:17:22.900
<v Speaker 2>posed to politicians, both federal and state. And we know

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:24.780
<v Speaker 2>that there have been plenty of people that are concerned

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 2>about their safety, and rightly so. There is no part

0:17:27.300 --> 0:17:30.100
<v Speaker 2>of me that minimises the seriousness of this.

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:36.580
<v Speaker 12>Members of Parliament are being inundated with abuse and threats

0:17:36.900 --> 0:17:39.260
<v Speaker 12>and often threats of physical harm and violence.

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:44.030
<v Speaker 3>Encouraging the sort of violent threats which we've seen become

0:17:44.310 --> 0:17:45.530
<v Speaker 3>far too prevalent.

0:17:46.330 --> 0:17:47.550
<v Speaker 1>One is one too many.

0:17:47.810 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 12>We don't accept that our safety and our family's safety

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:52.939
<v Speaker 12>and our staff's safety is.

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:53.700
<v Speaker 8>Put at risk.

0:17:55.450 --> 0:17:57.730
<v Speaker 2>Correct, and as I've argued before, this government can find

0:17:57.810 --> 0:18:00.130
<v Speaker 2>extra staff for MPs when it is for making bad

0:18:00.190 --> 0:18:01.250
<v Speaker 2>social media videos.

0:18:01.530 --> 0:18:02.950
<v Speaker 1>Total cost, $ 150 million.

0:18:03.210 --> 0:18:06.389
<v Speaker 2>If they want to turn that into extra security, a

0:18:06.510 --> 0:18:09.130
<v Speaker 2>physical person to be with politicians, I have no problem

0:18:09.150 --> 0:18:10.490
<v Speaker 2>with it whatsoever, all right?

0:18:10.890 --> 0:18:11.110
<v Speaker 9>None.

0:18:11.190 --> 0:18:13.710
<v Speaker 2>Regardless of whether I like or dislike the politician, their

0:18:13.750 --> 0:18:17.129
<v Speaker 2>safety is beyond question for obvious reasons. I mention all

0:18:17.150 --> 0:18:19.730
<v Speaker 2>of this because there has been a couple of politicians

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:23.580
<v Speaker 2>which have been disappointed by the way courts eventually deal...

0:18:23.890 --> 0:18:28.300
<v Speaker 2>with situations like this. Two people in the South Australian government,

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.340
<v Speaker 2>Labor MPs, one a minister, one a backbencher.

0:18:32.020 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, here's the story.

0:18:35.180 --> 0:18:37.369
<v Speaker 12>For Lucy Hood, it began a long time ago, the

0:18:37.550 --> 0:18:41.030
<v Speaker 12>confronting and concerning behaviour happening in front of her children,

0:18:41.050 --> 0:18:44.669
<v Speaker 12>while member for Elizabeth, Ella Shaw, says she first had

0:18:44.710 --> 0:18:49.010
<v Speaker 12>contact with the alleged stalker six months ago online before

0:18:49.050 --> 0:18:52.619
<v Speaker 12>he followed her back to her car recently after a

0:18:52.660 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 12>community event.

0:18:54.619 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 1>Not cool.

0:18:56.100 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 2>Well, all of this has begun its process in the courts,

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.700
<v Speaker 2>and guess what? The courts are, from the outside looking in,

0:19:03.980 --> 0:19:07.460
<v Speaker 2>not delivering what those politicians previously would have wanted or

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:08.500
<v Speaker 2>we would have wanted.

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>As protection for the police.

0:19:09.580 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 9>Why?

0:19:09.820 --> 0:19:13.330
<v Speaker 2>Because a man has been cautioned over alleged stalking of

0:19:13.380 --> 0:19:16.570
<v Speaker 2>two Labor MPs. A man who allegedly stalked two South

0:19:16.609 --> 0:19:20.590
<v Speaker 2>Australian members of Parliament has been cautioned, police have revealed.

0:19:21.050 --> 0:19:24.149
<v Speaker 2>The 44-year-old man from Adelaide's northern suburbs was issued with

0:19:24.190 --> 0:19:28.409
<v Speaker 2>a stalking caution in relation to the MPs. They relate

0:19:28.450 --> 0:19:32.229
<v Speaker 2>to separate instances involving Hood and Shaw that are not connected.

0:19:32.619 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 2>The man was also charged with an unrelated offence of

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:40.139
<v Speaker 2>breaching bail. So the charge wasn't about the behaviour here. Instead,

0:19:40.180 --> 0:19:40.899
<v Speaker 2>it was bail.

0:19:41.380 --> 0:19:44.679
<v Speaker 1>And caution is what police have handed out.

0:19:47.140 --> 0:19:50.210
<v Speaker 2>Again, a disappointment that is felt by many people who

0:19:50.250 --> 0:19:55.880
<v Speaker 2>expect more of the court system. Again, there are gradients

0:19:55.910 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 2>of offending, which means there are gradients of punishment. And yes,

0:19:59.700 --> 0:20:02.780
<v Speaker 2>caution would be at the very, very, very lowest level.

0:20:03.740 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 2>But what about some weekend detentions? What about something in between?

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.460
<v Speaker 2>What about the community service order? What about something other

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 2>to show that just like perjury or contempt of court

0:20:16.300 --> 0:20:19.220
<v Speaker 2>are highly punished by courts because they are an attack

0:20:19.260 --> 0:20:23.379
<v Speaker 2>on the system, that anyone who is doing anything as

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:27.449
<v Speaker 2>allegedly direct as what is being alleged here, again, they

0:20:27.490 --> 0:20:33.010
<v Speaker 2>are dealt with almost disproportionately because it is the attempt

0:20:33.030 --> 0:20:35.110
<v Speaker 2>to tell the rest of society, don't even think about this,

0:20:35.130 --> 0:20:38.350
<v Speaker 2>because there is no leniency. But we would think that

0:20:38.470 --> 0:20:40.790
<v Speaker 2>about when you close down the Sydney Harbour Bridge for

0:20:40.810 --> 0:20:43.190
<v Speaker 2>a climate protest, when you glue your hands to the

0:20:43.230 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 2>streets of Brisbane, when you set fire to things outside

0:20:47.710 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 2>the parliament, when you tear up a politician's office. Of course,

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 2>the punishment so rarely fits the crime. But sadly, these

0:20:59.880 --> 0:21:02.419
<v Speaker 2>politicians are now exposed to what the rest of us are,

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.900
<v Speaker 2>which is a giant gulf between the hard work police

0:21:05.940 --> 0:21:08.540
<v Speaker 2>have to do to go and find somebody, the hard

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 2>work to be able to build a case against them,

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:18.580
<v Speaker 2>only for the person sitting at the big table to decide.

0:21:19.780 --> 0:21:20.379
<v Speaker 1>Caution will do.

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Now, After we were in Karratha on the weekend, I

0:21:26.020 --> 0:21:28.679
<v Speaker 2>couldn't help but think about all those amazing shows, you know,

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.150
<v Speaker 2>the Aussie gold hunters, Aussie gold diggers, all those things.

0:21:31.250 --> 0:21:34.070
<v Speaker 2>I love all those shows too. Well, there was one

0:21:34.230 --> 0:21:36.770
<v Speaker 2>heck of a story which came out of Broken Hill

0:21:37.390 --> 0:21:39.810
<v Speaker 2>in the past couple of days. It has been a

0:21:40.050 --> 0:21:42.669
<v Speaker 2>mighty find of gold. Now, this was us in Broken

0:21:42.710 --> 0:21:45.109
<v Speaker 2>Hill not that long ago. Go and see this. I

0:21:45.150 --> 0:21:46.830
<v Speaker 2>love that red dirt. As soon as you start to

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.580
<v Speaker 2>go right out... It is spectacular. Broken Hill is a

0:21:49.780 --> 0:21:53.300
<v Speaker 2>ripping part of Australia and in Broken Hill somebody found

0:21:53.619 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 2>something that's changed their life.

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 13>The man who wants to remain anonymous has found a

0:22:00.060 --> 0:22:04.300
<v Speaker 13>nugget weighing a whopping 1.2 kilograms. You didn't find the

0:22:04.340 --> 0:22:05.770
<v Speaker 13>nugget but you know who did.

0:22:05.810 --> 0:22:06.869
<v Speaker 6>What was his reaction?

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.949
<v Speaker 1>I think he was pretty excited.

0:22:11.010 --> 0:22:15.030
<v Speaker 5>He FaceTimed me from the field where he found it

0:22:15.190 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 5>and Yeah, it's a bit pumped up, but you would

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 5>be if you found a piece that size.

0:22:19.420 --> 0:22:20.260
<v Speaker 12>How much is it worth?

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:28.459
<v Speaker 5>Spot price when it was discovered, so probably it was

0:22:28.460 --> 0:22:32.629
<v Speaker 5>$ 6, 000 an ounce. So looking at that, probably $ 185, 000, $ 190, 000

0:22:32.250 --> 0:22:36.010
<v Speaker 5>at the time. The gold's come down a bit, but yeah,

0:22:36.030 --> 0:22:38.389
<v Speaker 5>just not bad for a rock that looks like a potato.

0:22:39.130 --> 0:22:41.250
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, that's a very good way of describing it. We

0:22:41.270 --> 0:22:43.810
<v Speaker 13>have been watching it, and yes, it looks exactly like

0:22:43.910 --> 0:22:44.350
<v Speaker 13>a potato.

0:22:45.700 --> 0:22:47.540
<v Speaker 2>John Rolfe works for The Daily Telegraph and he's doing

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.740
<v Speaker 2>national coverage at the moment, which is all about supporting Australia,

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:54.060
<v Speaker 2>supporting Australian business and industry. He was the bloke that

0:22:54.100 --> 0:22:57.350
<v Speaker 2>presented the polling today that made it fairly obvious 78%

0:22:57.350 --> 0:22:59.310
<v Speaker 2>of people want a cut in fuel tax and he's

0:22:59.350 --> 0:22:59.890
<v Speaker 2>in the man cave.

0:22:59.910 --> 0:23:00.570
<v Speaker 1>Lovely to see you, John.

0:23:00.630 --> 0:23:01.410
<v Speaker 8>Great to see you too.

0:23:01.550 --> 0:23:04.170
<v Speaker 2>Does it surprise you at all that when people see

0:23:04.230 --> 0:23:06.830
<v Speaker 2>government clipping the ticket of something that is, you know,

0:23:06.970 --> 0:23:10.129
<v Speaker 2>going up pretty steadily, that they see government as the

0:23:10.170 --> 0:23:12.750
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to say, hey, look, can you just make this

0:23:12.830 --> 0:23:13.449
<v Speaker 2>easier for me?

0:23:13.530 --> 0:23:13.649
<v Speaker 7>Mm.

0:23:13.980 --> 0:23:15.659
<v Speaker 8>The only thing that surprises me is what are the

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:19.710
<v Speaker 8>other 22% thinking? They mustn't drive. They must be people

0:23:19.770 --> 0:23:24.030
<v Speaker 8>in Ubers. The Uber driver knows it's gone up substantially. So, look,

0:23:24.290 --> 0:23:27.139
<v Speaker 8>not at all, to answer your question. It's crazy and

0:23:27.490 --> 0:23:30.070
<v Speaker 8>The Jim Chalmers defence here is, well, this was never

0:23:30.109 --> 0:23:32.409
<v Speaker 8>meant to be permanent. Well, no-one's saying it has to

0:23:32.450 --> 0:23:35.650
<v Speaker 8>be permanent. We're not saying that the US-Iran conflict will

0:23:35.670 --> 0:23:38.300
<v Speaker 8>go on forever. What we're saying is some temporary relief

0:23:38.340 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 8>would be nice, thanks very much, because we're getting hammered.

0:23:41.020 --> 0:23:44.340
<v Speaker 2>But also, I will say that I'm happy for it

0:23:44.380 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 2>to move towards permanent because, yes, government always needs to

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 2>find revenue, but I think excise taxes, to me, is

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 2>a pretty lazy way of raising money. I mean, we've

0:23:55.820 --> 0:23:58.449
<v Speaker 2>certainly seen when it comes to the tobacco taxes, what

0:23:58.470 --> 0:24:00.810
<v Speaker 2>the consequences of that's been in terms of the black market.

0:24:01.090 --> 0:24:04.149
<v Speaker 1>The idea that, you know, what, 63%, 68%? I think

0:24:04.170 --> 0:24:05.880
<v Speaker 1>a Bundy rum is tax.

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.140
<v Speaker 2>That this is something that's meant to be, OK, look,

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:12.139
<v Speaker 2>you know, if there's $ 100 being spent on something, if

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.580
<v Speaker 2>we could just have, you know, three or four of it,

0:24:14.619 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 2>eventually we'll get there.

0:24:16.140 --> 0:24:17.810
<v Speaker 1>But it steadily keeps.

0:24:17.609 --> 0:24:19.770
<v Speaker 2>Going up and it is now the highest it's ever

0:24:19.790 --> 0:24:21.830
<v Speaker 2>been at 52 cents per litre.

0:24:22.430 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 8>And, of course, it hits people who drive more the hardest.

0:24:25.859 --> 0:24:28.660
<v Speaker 8>So people who live in outer suburban areas who have

0:24:28.700 --> 0:24:31.939
<v Speaker 8>less public transport, people who live in the regions, drive

0:24:32.040 --> 0:24:35.220
<v Speaker 8>bigger cars, drive diesel cars, they're the ones who cop

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 8>it in the neck. It's not people in Albo's electorate

0:24:38.010 --> 0:24:40.570
<v Speaker 8>who are feeling this, and certainly not Albo, as you

0:24:40.609 --> 0:24:43.550
<v Speaker 8>explained earlier on, because he's not paying the bills. So

0:24:43.890 --> 0:24:46.010
<v Speaker 8>I think that they're very much removed from this down

0:24:46.050 --> 0:24:49.189
<v Speaker 8>in Canberra, where they've got their light rail line there

0:24:49.210 --> 0:24:51.590
<v Speaker 8>that they all take. or work from home so they

0:24:51.609 --> 0:24:53.449
<v Speaker 8>don't have the problem of driving to work as it is.

0:24:53.830 --> 0:24:56.010
<v Speaker 8>So I think that very much they're removed from the

0:24:56.050 --> 0:24:59.430
<v Speaker 8>reality here and it's hitting people hard where the cost

0:24:59.450 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 8>of living is already hurting the most.

0:25:01.180 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>But also, you know, speak to it or bat it away,

0:25:03.900 --> 0:25:04.420
<v Speaker 1>feel free.

0:25:05.619 --> 0:25:07.020
<v Speaker 2>To what I was mentioning at the start of the

0:25:07.060 --> 0:25:09.500
<v Speaker 2>show about the tap and go staff and how many

0:25:09.540 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 2>people have an exposure to business, right? And again, I

0:25:12.270 --> 0:25:14.210
<v Speaker 2>get how dangerous it is even pointing this out about

0:25:14.230 --> 0:25:17.430
<v Speaker 2>the tax commissioners. But still, you've got only two people

0:25:17.470 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 2>in the federal cabinet that have any sort of connection

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 2>back to running a business. Again, an absolute expert in

0:25:22.740 --> 0:25:24.919
<v Speaker 2>how the public service works, but it means when they

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 2>come up with things like the tap and go scenario

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 2>and they try to turn around and say to everyone, oh, look,

0:25:30.100 --> 0:25:33.140
<v Speaker 2>we've just saved you this charge, but the charge still exists,

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 2>that nobody sitting around the table thinks, well, hang on,

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:37.649
<v Speaker 2>the charge still exists and isn't it just going to

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:38.530
<v Speaker 2>cost everyone more?

0:25:39.210 --> 0:25:42.450
<v Speaker 8>Well, I was too screening it last night, watching the

0:25:42.490 --> 0:25:45.210
<v Speaker 8>test cricket on the TV, and I was watching the

0:25:45.250 --> 0:25:47.410
<v Speaker 8>Senate with the ATO hearing on the other.

0:25:48.050 --> 0:25:49.909
<v Speaker 1>Rock and roll! Oh, yeah, I was living it up

0:25:49.950 --> 0:25:51.850
<v Speaker 1>last night. What a night at the Rolf household.

0:25:52.330 --> 0:25:55.970
<v Speaker 8>But what really struck me was that he laid out

0:25:56.020 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 8>what the options were that they considered. And one of

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 8>them was, why don't we just ask the government for

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 8>some more funding to pay the fees that we've now

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:05.609
<v Speaker 8>got to absorb? Wouldn't it be great if you as

0:26:05.690 --> 0:26:08.330
<v Speaker 8>a small business owner could say to the government, hey, look,

0:26:08.490 --> 0:26:10.449
<v Speaker 8>I've got this new fee, would you mind covering it?

0:26:10.770 --> 0:26:14.100
<v Speaker 8>That's what the ATO did, or said, sorry... Too bad,

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.300
<v Speaker 8>so sad for all those businesses who are managing their

0:26:16.340 --> 0:26:20.180
<v Speaker 8>cash flow, making wrong assumptions about who was doing it

0:26:20.300 --> 0:26:21.900
<v Speaker 8>and why, because they didn't ask.

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Correct. All right, let's talk about Back Australia.

0:26:23.940 --> 0:26:27.199
<v Speaker 2>It's a campaign that you're able to present in the

0:26:27.220 --> 0:26:30.260
<v Speaker 2>papers and online. Tell us about what it means. Tell

0:26:30.300 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 2>us about what the average consumer can do tomorrow.

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 8>Well, we've got the ability to determine how our hard-earned

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.860
<v Speaker 8>gets spent. We decide whether or not we buy from

0:26:40.900 --> 0:26:43.899
<v Speaker 8>Timu and Sheen and Amazon... or whether we spend it

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:46.580
<v Speaker 8>with local businesses in our high street or the local

0:26:46.740 --> 0:26:49.990
<v Speaker 8>industrial park. And that is really the ultimate power that

0:26:50.030 --> 0:26:52.370
<v Speaker 8>we have here. And we know from surveys we did

0:26:52.670 --> 0:26:54.390
<v Speaker 8>when we started this a year ago and when we've

0:26:54.410 --> 0:26:58.030
<v Speaker 8>done it more recently, that people have, they really are

0:26:58.090 --> 0:27:00.629
<v Speaker 8>awake to this idea that if they don't make a

0:27:00.630 --> 0:27:04.650
<v Speaker 8>decision about where their spending goes, then more businesses will

0:27:04.670 --> 0:27:07.310
<v Speaker 8>go out the back door. And they're willing to spend

0:27:07.490 --> 0:27:10.790
<v Speaker 8>a little bit more or a little greater share with

0:27:10.850 --> 0:27:13.330
<v Speaker 8>local businesses to see them survive, but they want the

0:27:13.410 --> 0:27:16.629
<v Speaker 8>feds to do more. They want them to be doing

0:27:17.380 --> 0:27:23.100
<v Speaker 8>more than just saving an aluminium smelter and really working

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 8>on solar panels to compete with China if that ever

0:27:25.780 --> 0:27:30.220
<v Speaker 8>actually materialises, or a quantum computer. So I really feel

0:27:30.260 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 8>that this is one of the ways that we do

0:27:32.580 --> 0:27:35.540
<v Speaker 8>have loud voices at The Telegraph and the other tabloids.

0:27:35.780 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 8>This is a way we can use that loud voice

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:42.439
<v Speaker 8>to say, hey... Albo and others, wake up, pay attention,

0:27:42.900 --> 0:27:45.380
<v Speaker 8>because this is all going to end if you don't

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:48.740
<v Speaker 8>do something about it. Just as people who are already

0:27:48.780 --> 0:27:51.740
<v Speaker 8>doing it tough say, yes, I am prepared to pay

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:53.540
<v Speaker 8>a little bit more because I know it matters.

0:27:53.820 --> 0:27:56.270
<v Speaker 1>Oh, because if I know if the dollar stays here,

0:27:56.290 --> 0:27:58.550
<v Speaker 1>it moves... Absolutely correct. All right, John.

0:27:58.570 --> 0:27:58.990
<v Speaker 9>Great to talk.

0:27:59.230 --> 0:27:59.610
<v Speaker 1>All the best.

0:27:59.650 --> 0:28:02.409
<v Speaker 2>Enjoy the double-screen experience. Get a third and whack us

0:28:02.470 --> 0:28:02.870
<v Speaker 2>on as well.

0:28:03.410 --> 0:28:04.030
<v Speaker 1>You're doing all right.

0:28:04.090 --> 0:28:04.429
<v Speaker 9>OK.

0:28:04.650 --> 0:28:06.550
<v Speaker 1>All right, quick break. Back with more here on Paul

0:28:06.590 --> 0:28:09.380
<v Speaker 1>Murray Live. Winners and losers of the week. Some fired-up

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:09.820
<v Speaker 1>debate and.

0:28:09.780 --> 0:28:11.880
<v Speaker 2>A couple of surprises in a moment or two's time here,

0:28:12.260 --> 0:28:14.459
<v Speaker 2>including some of the people who are appearing at these

0:28:14.500 --> 0:28:15.139
<v Speaker 2>Senate estimates.

0:28:15.290 --> 0:28:17.990
<v Speaker 1>Oh, don't show me on the internet. Everyone's mean.

0:28:18.590 --> 0:28:25.689
<v Speaker 2>Um, OK. Thank you very much for watching wherever you

0:28:25.710 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 2>happen to be. Joe Hildebrand is in the Man Cave

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:28.300
<v Speaker 2>right now, always here to help.

0:28:28.340 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 12>How are you, my friend?

0:28:28.900 --> 0:28:30.140
<v Speaker 9>Always great to be here, my friend.

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Lovely to be here.

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.500
<v Speaker 2>Sean Bell, the One Nation Senator for New South Wales,

0:28:33.540 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 2>he's joining us as well from Canberra where oh so

0:28:36.140 --> 0:28:38.750
<v Speaker 2>much fun happens and he has to share that.

0:28:38.990 --> 0:28:40.130
<v Speaker 1>Big red chamber with the Greens.

0:28:40.270 --> 0:28:40.490
<v Speaker 5>Yay!

0:28:40.970 --> 0:28:44.890
<v Speaker 2>So, again, a collection of public servants do not like

0:28:45.370 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 2>that their testimony.

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>in.

0:28:47.420 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Senate estimates is able to be cut up by the

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:53.740
<v Speaker 2>people asking them the questions because there are people who

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:56.310
<v Speaker 2>say nasty things once the videos of the things they

0:28:56.370 --> 0:29:01.170
<v Speaker 2>say in Senate estimates end up hitting the internet. Now, Sean, again,

0:29:02.190 --> 0:29:04.990
<v Speaker 2>anyone who's into the abuse game, not cool with me,

0:29:05.310 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 2>do I wish there was a function to automatically report

0:29:07.630 --> 0:29:08.020
<v Speaker 2>this stuff?

0:29:08.060 --> 0:29:08.700
<v Speaker 1>Fine and fair enough.

0:29:09.060 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 2>But in the same way that if I wanted to

0:29:12.060 --> 0:29:14.820
<v Speaker 2>find a clip of you saying something in the Senate

0:29:15.060 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 2>on a Tuesday afternoon.

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Part of the.

0:29:18.020 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Protection of Senate estimates is that it's all on the record.

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:25.420
<v Speaker 2>It's just easier for people to get it via social

0:29:25.460 --> 0:29:28.060
<v Speaker 2>media than to go and find the clip of the

0:29:28.100 --> 0:29:30.510
<v Speaker 2>Senate as a whole. But it's all in public. There's

0:29:30.530 --> 0:29:32.030
<v Speaker 2>no secret recordings here.

0:29:32.050 --> 0:29:37.810
<v Speaker 14>Well, Paul, these are public servants. These are public hearings.

0:29:38.010 --> 0:29:40.980
<v Speaker 14>I think there's a clue in the name there. These

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:44.220
<v Speaker 14>are public events on purpose. It's a feature, not a bug.

0:29:44.980 --> 0:29:47.100
<v Speaker 14>This is a pillar of our democracy, to have estimates,

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.820
<v Speaker 14>to have these hearings in public so that people can see.

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 14>You know, the public have a right to see these

0:29:52.340 --> 0:29:55.230
<v Speaker 14>things and there should be scrutiny. And if you're putting

0:29:55.270 --> 0:29:57.110
<v Speaker 14>your hand up for a job that has the word

0:29:57.290 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 14>public in the description... then you're going to need to

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:01.220
<v Speaker 14>expect that scrutiny.

0:30:02.550 --> 0:30:03.410
<v Speaker 1>Well, I agree completely.

0:30:03.450 --> 0:30:06.250
<v Speaker 2>I mean, again, Joe, I understand what comes with any

0:30:06.270 --> 0:30:07.990
<v Speaker 2>of this sort of, you know, like hot taking on

0:30:08.010 --> 0:30:10.709
<v Speaker 2>the internet, but it is a public forum. This was

0:30:10.750 --> 0:30:13.810
<v Speaker 2>not a secret behind closed-door meeting. And if you don't

0:30:13.910 --> 0:30:15.430
<v Speaker 2>know where the money is.

0:30:15.830 --> 0:30:18.670
<v Speaker 1>Guess what? You look stupid because you look stupid.

0:30:18.730 --> 0:30:19.300
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, that's right.

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:20.500
<v Speaker 15>It's a bit like if you don't want it printed,

0:30:20.540 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 15>don't let it happen.

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:24.180
<v Speaker 9>Social media is a sewer. It is a swamp.

0:30:24.980 --> 0:30:27.820
<v Speaker 15>I've got out of it because it's... just completely useless

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:30.740
<v Speaker 15>for any sort of true read on what real people

0:30:30.780 --> 0:30:33.140
<v Speaker 15>are actually thinking. It is the worst possible barometer you

0:30:33.180 --> 0:30:36.110
<v Speaker 15>can have if you're someone who tries to understand politics

0:30:36.450 --> 0:30:38.330
<v Speaker 15>and wants to know where public sentiment is.

0:30:38.730 --> 0:30:40.770
<v Speaker 9>But again, you know, Sean is right.

0:30:40.810 --> 0:30:44.270
<v Speaker 15>If you don't want to be scrutinised by the public,

0:30:44.430 --> 0:30:47.470
<v Speaker 15>do not be a public servant. Do not take public

0:30:47.530 --> 0:30:51.850
<v Speaker 15>taxpayer money into your bank account. that we are paying

0:30:51.910 --> 0:30:54.810
<v Speaker 15>for and then say, but, no, you can't actually find

0:30:54.930 --> 0:30:57.130
<v Speaker 15>out if I'm doing my job properly or not because

0:30:57.150 --> 0:31:00.580
<v Speaker 15>that might be a bit embarrassing for me. Again, social media,

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:04.540
<v Speaker 15>you know, it's a cesspit, but, you know, maybe Albo

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 15>could come up with $ 6 million to cleanse it like

0:31:06.820 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 15>he did for the golf club.

0:31:08.620 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>You brought it up.

0:31:09.340 --> 0:31:12.730
<v Speaker 9>No, no, no, I couldn't resist. I couldn't resist. But, again,

0:31:12.850 --> 0:31:13.450
<v Speaker 9>he is going.

0:31:13.470 --> 0:31:15.950
<v Speaker 1>That 19th hole he's digging for himself is fantastic.

0:31:15.990 --> 0:31:20.310
<v Speaker 15>Guess what my column's about this week, then. But, yeah, again,

0:31:20.330 --> 0:31:22.490
<v Speaker 15>you know, if they're still worried, Albo's going to clean

0:31:22.530 --> 0:31:23.950
<v Speaker 15>up the internet for you anyway.

0:31:24.230 --> 0:31:24.990
<v Speaker 9>Little lovies.

0:31:25.500 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 2>And Sean will be there voting along and saying, more

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:29.900
<v Speaker 2>digital duty of care, please.

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:32.860
<v Speaker 9>But of all the departments to say, oh, this is bullying. Defence.

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:34.380
<v Speaker 1>Defence, yeah, yeah, yeah, correct.

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:36.660
<v Speaker 9>What are they going to do when the Chinese come over?

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:37.220
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, correct.

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:40.060
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk a bit of Victorian politics here as, of course,

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:43.370
<v Speaker 2>we edge ever so closer to within that month range

0:31:43.450 --> 0:31:46.110
<v Speaker 2>now of the election on the last Saturday afternoon.

0:31:46.540 --> 0:31:47.479
<v Speaker 1>In November.

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:49.700
<v Speaker 2>There is, of course, the debate about debates. We've got

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Jess Wilson in a couple of weeks' time in a

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:54.740
<v Speaker 2>pub test, so there will be the opportunity for locals

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 2>and viewers of this program to be able to ask

0:31:56.700 --> 0:31:58.010
<v Speaker 2>the potential Premier a question.

0:31:58.350 --> 0:32:00.750
<v Speaker 1>But does a debate about debates.

0:32:00.610 --> 0:32:04.170
<v Speaker 2>Help anyone other than the people hosting the debates, Sean,

0:32:04.290 --> 0:32:06.930
<v Speaker 2>or is there something a little bigger here that some

0:32:06.970 --> 0:32:07.550
<v Speaker 2>may be missing?

0:32:09.330 --> 0:32:12.350
<v Speaker 14>Well, Paul, I think this is very shabby from Jess Wilson.

0:32:13.940 --> 0:32:16.510
<v Speaker 14>I mean, the people of Victoria are desperate for change,

0:32:16.670 --> 0:32:18.630
<v Speaker 14>and yet what we're seeing here from the Liberals is

0:32:18.910 --> 0:32:24.489
<v Speaker 14>it's politics, strategy, it's prevailing over principle. And I mean,

0:32:24.510 --> 0:32:26.790
<v Speaker 14>so if you're a conservative voter and you're in Victoria,

0:32:27.350 --> 0:32:29.790
<v Speaker 14>I say look to the conservative team that's showing up

0:32:29.810 --> 0:32:32.430
<v Speaker 14>to this debate. Look to Warren Pickering, who continues to

0:32:32.470 --> 0:32:34.700
<v Speaker 14>show up. Because if you want change and you don't

0:32:34.740 --> 0:32:38.060
<v Speaker 14>want politics as usual, you're not going to get that

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 14>from the Liberals. Because if you cannot show up to

0:32:40.060 --> 0:32:42.140
<v Speaker 14>a debate, how can you run a state, Paul?

0:32:43.190 --> 0:32:46.070
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, my thing on this, Joe, is I'm fascinated.

0:32:46.510 --> 0:32:48.330
<v Speaker 2>I noticed it was Chip Legrand, I think, writing in

0:32:48.350 --> 0:32:51.490
<v Speaker 2>The Age Today, who was making reference to Geoff Kennett,

0:32:51.510 --> 0:32:53.870
<v Speaker 2>who was writing in The Herald Sun, about, hey, just

0:32:53.930 --> 0:32:56.810
<v Speaker 2>be careful, nothing's in the bag. And I do remember,

0:32:56.830 --> 0:32:59.450
<v Speaker 2>and I've said this when things look like the tide's

0:32:59.490 --> 0:33:02.630
<v Speaker 2>coming in or the tide's going out, right? Nothing is inevitable.

0:33:02.970 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 2>And yes, polling might point to a certain result, but

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 2>no one's there yet.

0:33:08.210 --> 0:33:08.300
<v Speaker 9>So.

0:33:08.870 --> 0:33:12.230
<v Speaker 2>I can understand from the purely tactical perspective inside Liberal

0:33:12.250 --> 0:33:15.870
<v Speaker 2>land about Labor's only got really two shots, a couple

0:33:15.890 --> 0:33:17.430
<v Speaker 2>of shots to fire. One of them's going to be

0:33:17.670 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 2>one nation, one nation, one nation, Liberals, Liberals, one nation.

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:23.260
<v Speaker 2>And a polite g'day mate at a debate becomes the

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 2>photo they will never stop shutting down people's throats. Conversely,

0:33:27.340 --> 0:33:30.870
<v Speaker 2>for Ben Carroll, if you're going out, well, you want

0:33:30.890 --> 0:33:33.430
<v Speaker 2>to try to land a few punches on the way out. So, yeah,

0:33:33.470 --> 0:33:36.630
<v Speaker 2>he wants to be there. I think the issue is, again,

0:33:36.650 --> 0:33:39.540
<v Speaker 2>that one nation debate. voter and how they take it all,

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:40.100
<v Speaker 2>but what do you think?

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:42.580
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I think it's actually probably a pretty smart move

0:33:42.620 --> 0:33:45.350
<v Speaker 15>by the Libs, and I found it a little bit strange,

0:33:45.370 --> 0:33:48.090
<v Speaker 15>you know, don't take it for granted that you've got

0:33:48.110 --> 0:33:48.850
<v Speaker 15>this in the bag.

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:51.500
<v Speaker 9>That assumes that.

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 15>Them showing up to the debate would actually, you know,

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 15>assist their chances.

0:33:58.040 --> 0:33:59.980
<v Speaker 9>That's not a correct assumption.

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:00.220
<v Speaker 10>Yes.

0:34:00.340 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 15>I think if they're still nervous that they could lose this,

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 15>what they're going to want to do is make sure

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 15>they don't expose themselves to any risk and to hunker down,

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:11.930
<v Speaker 15>consolidate the support they have and not risk it blowing out. Like,

0:34:11.950 --> 0:34:15.250
<v Speaker 15>for example, Joe Biden probably thought that he had it

0:34:15.330 --> 0:34:15.790
<v Speaker 15>in the back.

0:34:16.070 --> 0:34:16.250
<v Speaker 9>So.

0:34:17.260 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 15>So I think debates always favour opposition leaders over incumbents.

0:34:22.780 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 15>That's almost a golden rule because, of course, they can attack.

0:34:25.940 --> 0:34:28.109
<v Speaker 15>They don't have to defend their legacy. They can just

0:34:28.219 --> 0:34:30.629
<v Speaker 15>go for the jugular. The difference with this one, of course,

0:34:30.650 --> 0:34:34.610
<v Speaker 15>the three-cornered one, is suddenly I think that favouritism falls

0:34:34.670 --> 0:34:37.689
<v Speaker 15>to Warren Pickering and One Nation because, of course, they

0:34:37.730 --> 0:34:41.220
<v Speaker 15>can just throw rocks at both of them. It's easy

0:34:41.380 --> 0:34:45.250
<v Speaker 15>for Ben Carroll because he can just... attack both of

0:34:45.310 --> 0:34:47.689
<v Speaker 15>them and lump them in the same basket and say,

0:34:48.300 --> 0:34:50.379
<v Speaker 15>hate One Nation, you're going to get them. Hate the Libs,

0:34:50.460 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 15>you're going to get them.

0:34:51.100 --> 0:34:52.610
<v Speaker 2>Which is why, if the Libs are talking about it,

0:34:52.620 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 2>then maybe it should be, hey, can we just bring

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:55.100
<v Speaker 2>a fourth podium in here?

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>It's the Greens. Because if everyone's going to be represented,

0:34:57.520 --> 0:34:58.460
<v Speaker 1>let's get them all in.

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 9>Here, right? Again, that would be a smart move. But

0:35:00.660 --> 0:35:02.379
<v Speaker 9>Jess Wilson is in the worst position.

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:06.020
<v Speaker 15>of both worlds because she can get attacked on both sides.

0:35:06.060 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 15>So she doesn't have that sort of edge of an

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 15>opposition able to throw rocks. One nation get that. And

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:14.430
<v Speaker 15>she doesn't have the advantage of being able to attack

0:35:14.610 --> 0:35:15.330
<v Speaker 15>both sides.

0:35:16.030 --> 0:35:18.169
<v Speaker 2>Sean, one thing that is always very interesting, and, again,

0:35:18.210 --> 0:35:20.910
<v Speaker 2>people don't get this, they don't see it inside sort

0:35:20.930 --> 0:35:23.090
<v Speaker 2>of the existing media ears.

0:35:24.060 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 1>When you are shunned.

0:35:25.450 --> 0:35:28.210
<v Speaker 2>God forbid, by the ABC, there is a world outside

0:35:28.290 --> 0:35:30.770
<v Speaker 2>of the ABC, right? If you're shunned by the 6pm news,

0:35:30.810 --> 0:35:32.989
<v Speaker 2>there's a world outside of it, right? One thing One

0:35:33.030 --> 0:35:37.070
<v Speaker 2>Nation particularly has done and done particularly well that created

0:35:37.130 --> 0:35:41.009
<v Speaker 2>the opportunities for multiple senators to be entered into the

0:35:41.050 --> 0:35:43.240
<v Speaker 2>parliament for One Nation in 2025 was the online campaign.

0:35:45.020 --> 0:35:45.780
<v Speaker 1>I mean, let's be honest.

0:35:46.020 --> 0:35:47.839
<v Speaker 2>Malcolm Roberts doesn't do an awful lot of interviews, but

0:35:47.860 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Malcolm Roberts got sent back to Parliament in part of

0:35:50.620 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 2>the power of social media. So for Warren Pickering, yes,

0:35:55.660 --> 0:35:58.520
<v Speaker 2>it might be the cherry on the top, but is

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:01.580
<v Speaker 2>he doing the work on socials to make the case

0:36:01.660 --> 0:36:03.300
<v Speaker 2>to the people of Victoria?

0:36:03.340 --> 0:36:03.980
<v Speaker 1>Are they doing.

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 2>What does One Nation do to actually get out and

0:36:06.780 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 2>see people and not need the media to help them

0:36:10.140 --> 0:36:10.440
<v Speaker 2>do it?

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:15.060
<v Speaker 14>I mean, of course Warren's out there on socials and

0:36:15.100 --> 0:36:17.319
<v Speaker 14>on the streets every day. I mean, one thing that

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:20.380
<v Speaker 14>I think is interesting is One Nation, for all the

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:22.919
<v Speaker 14>talk about candidates in the field, One Nation had every

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 14>seat filled before any other party. We are out there

0:36:26.380 --> 0:36:29.460
<v Speaker 14>in force in Victoria and whether it's on social media,

0:36:29.840 --> 0:36:31.739
<v Speaker 14>whether it's door knocking, whether it's on the streets or

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:34.500
<v Speaker 14>whether it is on the debate stage, One Nation is

0:36:34.540 --> 0:36:36.460
<v Speaker 14>there showing up for the people of Victoria.

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Now, one thing that I think also, regardless of which

0:36:39.940 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 2>way the people of Victoria or the people watching on

0:36:43.030 --> 0:36:45.710
<v Speaker 2>may or may not be moved by a debate. When

0:36:45.750 --> 0:36:49.390
<v Speaker 2>you see this image of the Premier, I think it

0:36:49.410 --> 0:36:51.830
<v Speaker 2>kind of already confirms what may have been made up

0:36:51.850 --> 0:36:53.430
<v Speaker 2>in people's minds, which is, do.

0:36:53.370 --> 0:36:55.660
<v Speaker 1>I really want another four years of this? This was

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 1>him entertaining the media at a local Macca's this week.

0:37:07.330 --> 0:37:08.220
<v Speaker 3>I can recommend it.

0:37:08.230 --> 0:37:09.350
<v Speaker 9>Sweet and savoury.

0:37:09.410 --> 0:37:10.790
<v Speaker 15>I've done it before.

0:37:11.090 --> 0:37:12.380
<v Speaker 9>Sweet and savoury.

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:17.300
<v Speaker 1>We saved you the head-on shot. Wow, that was awkward, right?

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:20.739
<v Speaker 2>Now, again, I remember at a time when I would

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:23.410
<v Speaker 2>have got very involved in a conversation about what it

0:37:23.469 --> 0:37:25.550
<v Speaker 2>means or doesn't mean for a politician to eat something.

0:37:25.790 --> 0:37:26.660
<v Speaker 1>Just avoid it.

0:37:26.730 --> 0:37:27.570
<v Speaker 9>Just don't eat.

0:37:27.610 --> 0:37:31.850
<v Speaker 15>There is no right way to eat anything on camera.

0:37:32.070 --> 0:37:35.569
<v Speaker 15>I actually genuinely, as just a tick that I have,

0:37:35.820 --> 0:37:37.760
<v Speaker 15>I don't even like eating in front of other people.

0:37:39.640 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 15>And I saw last night, I didn't see that exact clip,

0:37:43.060 --> 0:37:44.040
<v Speaker 15>but I did see last night.

0:37:44.900 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh, the ice cream.

0:37:45.980 --> 0:37:47.890
<v Speaker 9>Of him just trying to get around the ice cream.

0:37:48.489 --> 0:37:50.630
<v Speaker 15>There's just no– I say this as a friend, Ben.

0:37:50.650 --> 0:37:53.439
<v Speaker 9>There's just no winners in this. There is no– it's just,

0:37:53.900 --> 0:37:57.730
<v Speaker 9>you know, if you want to look cool, just– Have

0:37:57.770 --> 0:37:58.589
<v Speaker 9>a whiskey on the rocks.

0:37:58.610 --> 0:37:59.590
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, correct, correct.

0:37:59.790 --> 0:38:02.350
<v Speaker 2>I mean, again, in candidate vetting in One Nation, do

0:38:02.390 --> 0:38:04.490
<v Speaker 2>you ask them to eat an ice cream in front

0:38:04.510 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 2>of you, Sean, so you can say, no, no, no, no,

0:38:06.390 --> 0:38:07.860
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be filmed this way, or is the

0:38:07.890 --> 0:38:11.320
<v Speaker 2>advice to everyone, you can sink a pint, maybe a

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:15.299
<v Speaker 2>sausage roll, maybe a soso sandwich, but anything else, don't

0:38:15.340 --> 0:38:18.140
<v Speaker 2>go near it, as well as anything like a soft

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:19.060
<v Speaker 2>serve at Macca's.

0:38:20.390 --> 0:38:22.500
<v Speaker 14>That's an interesting suggestion. I might add that to the

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 14>list for vetting candidates in New South Wales, Paul. But

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:27.779
<v Speaker 14>what I'd say is, I mean, the thing about that,

0:38:28.080 --> 0:38:31.100
<v Speaker 14>that wasn't actually the most cringeworthy photo shoot that I

0:38:31.180 --> 0:38:33.580
<v Speaker 14>saw Mr Carroll engaging this week. The one where he

0:38:33.620 --> 0:38:36.259
<v Speaker 14>was there filling in a pothole for the cameras, I mean,

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:37.730
<v Speaker 14>that one really got my.

0:38:37.660 --> 0:38:39.570
<v Speaker 1>Cringe meter skyrocketing.

0:38:39.730 --> 0:38:41.790
<v Speaker 14>I mean, you've had 12 years as a Labor government

0:38:41.910 --> 0:38:43.730
<v Speaker 14>and then now you're coming out and filling potholes.

0:38:43.750 --> 0:38:45.009
<v Speaker 1>I mean, cut us a break.

0:38:45.530 --> 0:38:47.390
<v Speaker 14>I mean, that was actually, to me, that was way

0:38:47.430 --> 0:38:48.410
<v Speaker 14>worse than the soft serve.

0:38:48.739 --> 0:38:49.220
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's fair.

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Can I also say, I think I saw Angus Taylor

0:38:50.860 --> 0:38:54.300
<v Speaker 2>again today, you know, visiting the small business and doing

0:38:54.340 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 2>the thing that the small business is.

0:38:57.480 --> 0:38:59.989
<v Speaker 1>Not his strongest suit, right? Not his strongest suit at

0:39:00.030 --> 0:39:00.550
<v Speaker 1>this moment.

0:39:00.570 --> 0:39:02.069
<v Speaker 2>So you've got to play to your strengths and, hey,

0:39:02.290 --> 0:39:05.690
<v Speaker 2>support small business, be around, high-five people, show me what

0:39:05.750 --> 0:39:10.370
<v Speaker 2>you do. But the 6pm news, for some reason, they

0:39:10.410 --> 0:39:12.500
<v Speaker 2>need you to be the performing monkey as much as

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:13.339
<v Speaker 2>anything else, right?

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 1>So people play to it, don't do it.

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:16.060
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, absolutely right.

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 15>I would also say, remember Bill Shorten ate a sausage

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:21.219
<v Speaker 15>sandwich from the side, so even that's not safe.

0:39:21.500 --> 0:39:22.529
<v Speaker 9>No exceptions.

0:39:22.590 --> 0:39:25.210
<v Speaker 2>The only reason I backtracked ever so slightly and said

0:39:25.390 --> 0:39:27.530
<v Speaker 2>the Sanger was OK is because I remember how bad

0:39:27.610 --> 0:39:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Turnbull looked when he turned one down.

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:31.779
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. What is this common.

0:39:32.060 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 9>I revise my advice. Never eat and never not eat.

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Because we'll get you out of it.

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:38.739
<v Speaker 9>Because whatever it is, don't.

0:39:39.100 --> 0:39:40.919
<v Speaker 1>All right. Winner and loser of the week, Sean Bell,

0:39:40.980 --> 0:39:41.739
<v Speaker 1>what is it for you?

0:39:43.500 --> 0:39:45.360
<v Speaker 14>The loser of the week, I'm going to go the

0:39:45.420 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 14>East Safety Commissioner, Julia Marne-Grant, because when she came out

0:39:48.540 --> 0:39:51.440
<v Speaker 14>and she said that the horrible attack on Helen Haynes

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:53.609
<v Speaker 14>was an opportunity we shouldn't be squandered, I mean, that

0:39:53.670 --> 0:39:55.290
<v Speaker 14>shot her straight to the top of my loser list.

0:39:55.530 --> 0:39:56.110
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:39:56.210 --> 0:39:58.070
<v Speaker 14>But on a brighter note, the winner, I'm going to

0:39:58.110 --> 0:40:00.530
<v Speaker 14>say for all the cricket fans out there, Josh Inglis,

0:40:00.969 --> 0:40:04.090
<v Speaker 14>just scoring another tonne. So he's got two tonnes, 0.50,

0:40:04.090 --> 0:40:07.360
<v Speaker 14>so he retains a complete 100% conversion rate for 50s

0:40:07.469 --> 0:40:08.980
<v Speaker 14>to 100s for all the cricket nerds out there.

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:10.340
<v Speaker 1>That's a win. Well done.

0:40:10.460 --> 0:40:11.940
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know you were a cricket nerd. Good to

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:13.899
<v Speaker 2>know that it's there and go Australia. All right, Joe,

0:40:13.940 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 2>winner or loser this week?

0:40:15.140 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 15>I'm going to go just with a winner, and that

0:40:17.100 --> 0:40:20.109
<v Speaker 15>is the Royal and Ancient Marrickville Golf Club because they

0:40:20.170 --> 0:40:24.210
<v Speaker 15>have got so much free publicity this week and they

0:40:24.230 --> 0:40:24.750
<v Speaker 15>have also.

0:40:24.770 --> 0:40:27.630
<v Speaker 2>It's working off the principle that any publicity is good publicity.

0:40:27.650 --> 0:40:30.089
<v Speaker 9>But they've also pocketed the money, Paul. They've also got

0:40:30.090 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 9>$ 6 million, which.

0:40:31.219 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 15>From what I can gather, they can do anything they

0:40:33.140 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 15>want with.

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:36.319
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, name the 19th after... Just take the money, guys.

0:40:36.340 --> 0:40:37.300
<v Speaker 9>There's no strings attached.

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Lean into it. Call it Albo's Bar.

0:40:39.400 --> 0:40:42.400
<v Speaker 15>As someone who actually lives next door to the golf club,

0:40:42.580 --> 0:40:44.810
<v Speaker 15>I've never swung a club in anger, but I run

0:40:44.850 --> 0:40:46.430
<v Speaker 15>around on it with the dog all the time.

0:40:46.850 --> 0:40:50.290
<v Speaker 9>Fantastic. I'm one of the few.

0:40:50.090 --> 0:40:52.049
<v Speaker 15>Who thinks this is a great policy decision by the

0:40:52.110 --> 0:40:55.009
<v Speaker 15>Albanese government and never a worthier recipient.

0:40:55.050 --> 0:40:57.250
<v Speaker 2>Perfectly explained the whole year long. All right, thank you, guys.

0:40:57.270 --> 0:40:59.359
<v Speaker 2>Do appreciate it. All right, Megan Kelly joins us next.

0:40:59.380 --> 0:41:01.860
<v Speaker 2>We're getting ready, of course. Wednesday morning Australian time is

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 2>going to be the midterm elections. And I cannot see

0:41:04.300 --> 0:41:06.720
<v Speaker 2>any poll anywhere that's going to give Republicans hope, plus

0:41:06.820 --> 0:41:19.630
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of other things to mention, including Halloween. It

0:41:19.670 --> 0:41:20.750
<v Speaker 2>is that time of the week to talk to our

0:41:20.790 --> 0:41:22.230
<v Speaker 2>favourite person in the world, the one, the only, the

0:41:22.250 --> 0:41:23.130
<v Speaker 2>wonderful Megan Kelly.

0:41:23.170 --> 0:41:24.190
<v Speaker 1>Megan, lovely to see you.

0:41:24.210 --> 0:41:25.190
<v Speaker 6>Great to be here.

0:41:25.489 --> 0:41:29.410
<v Speaker 2>So this time next week, we will start the midterm process,

0:41:29.469 --> 0:41:32.270
<v Speaker 2>even though voting's been going on for weeks, and in

0:41:32.330 --> 0:41:34.819
<v Speaker 2>some places it'll still be counted weeks after.

0:41:35.219 --> 0:41:37.419
<v Speaker 1>But look, let's be honest, let's be straight here.

0:41:37.460 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 2>There isn't a poll that is good for Republicans, and

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:43.780
<v Speaker 2>in fact it feels like it gets worse every day.

0:41:44.380 --> 0:41:45.980
<v Speaker 1>We know what's behind it all, but.

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:49.610
<v Speaker 2>Are you a believer in the blue wave or the

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:52.710
<v Speaker 2>blue tsunami that might be coming in a week's time?

0:41:53.690 --> 0:41:55.830
<v Speaker 6>I wish I knew. I don't know. And I don't

0:41:55.850 --> 0:41:58.270
<v Speaker 6>want to make a prediction because I have nothing. I mean, like,

0:41:58.790 --> 0:42:01.029
<v Speaker 6>none of us knows. Nobody knows nothing about nothing. That's

0:42:01.190 --> 0:42:03.759
<v Speaker 6>really the bottom line here. I mean, the Republicans, right,

0:42:03.980 --> 0:42:06.379
<v Speaker 6>it's not a good sign. The objective bad signs for

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:09.299
<v Speaker 6>Republicans are that all of the polls are bad for

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:13.359
<v Speaker 6>them and none is really trending their way. Maybe one

0:42:13.460 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 6>outlier here or there, but for the most part, all the...

0:42:15.940 --> 0:42:17.940
<v Speaker 6>The public polls, and we're told that they match the

0:42:17.980 --> 0:42:21.859
<v Speaker 6>private polls, don't look good for them. They do tend

0:42:21.900 --> 0:42:24.660
<v Speaker 6>to have about a three-point advantage over what the polls are.

0:42:24.900 --> 0:42:28.800
<v Speaker 6>And all those races that they're supposedly going to lose

0:42:28.989 --> 0:42:33.069
<v Speaker 6>are within three points. So if that three-point secret vote

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:37.610
<v Speaker 6>comes out, they could not lose. So that's frustrating. But

0:42:37.630 --> 0:42:40.730
<v Speaker 6>there's a reason that you have President Trump going to

0:42:41.310 --> 0:42:46.219
<v Speaker 6>South Carolina. I mean, it's incredible. Like Mississippi, Texas, These

0:42:46.260 --> 0:42:50.450
<v Speaker 6>are red states. So it's all defense. Our biggest players

0:42:50.489 --> 0:42:55.100
<v Speaker 6>over on Team Rational are all in defensive crouches. trying

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:57.500
<v Speaker 6>to shore up the Republican base. They're not swinging for

0:42:57.520 --> 0:43:00.180
<v Speaker 6>the fences. And the one state where it looked like, well,

0:43:00.219 --> 0:43:02.630
<v Speaker 6>maybe the Republicans could really pick one up rather than

0:43:02.650 --> 0:43:07.810
<v Speaker 6>just defending theirs, which is this race in Minnesota between

0:43:08.210 --> 0:43:10.890
<v Speaker 6>the lieutenant governor, who's a nutcase, who does land acknowledgments

0:43:10.930 --> 0:43:14.700
<v Speaker 6>before every appearance, Peggy Flanagan, who says, listen to trans

0:43:14.739 --> 0:43:16.700
<v Speaker 6>children when they tell you at age six, if they

0:43:16.739 --> 0:43:19.620
<v Speaker 6>say they're secretly a girl, they are, period. Okay, right, Peggy.

0:43:20.180 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 6>She's running against this Michelle Tafoya, who's really likable. She

0:43:23.020 --> 0:43:27.280
<v Speaker 6>spent a lifetime on... doing sideline sports for NBC. Really cool.

0:43:27.340 --> 0:43:29.210
<v Speaker 6>She's run a good campaign. She was like neck and neck.

0:43:29.230 --> 0:43:30.790
<v Speaker 6>She was leading in a couple of polls. The New

0:43:30.810 --> 0:43:33.110
<v Speaker 6>York Times just put out a poll showing Michelle losing

0:43:33.150 --> 0:43:37.040
<v Speaker 6>by 14 points. That's got to be an outlier. But

0:43:37.060 --> 0:43:39.940
<v Speaker 6>my point simply was that was the one potential pickup

0:43:40.180 --> 0:43:44.240
<v Speaker 6>for Republicans. Now it's showing they're behind by 14 points.

0:43:45.000 --> 0:43:48.640
<v Speaker 6>And look, Elon Musk has poured like $ 300 million into

0:43:48.660 --> 0:43:51.550
<v Speaker 6>these races, like $ 200 million of it down in Texas

0:43:51.570 --> 0:43:55.209
<v Speaker 6>to save Ken Paxton from near certain defeat. He hasn't

0:43:55.230 --> 0:43:58.710
<v Speaker 6>been ahead in any poll. Ken Paxton's been trailing like

0:43:59.450 --> 0:44:02.450
<v Speaker 6>for many, many weeks. I just, all those signs are

0:44:02.530 --> 0:44:05.890
<v Speaker 6>bad for Republicans. Does it mean absolute failure? you know,

0:44:05.930 --> 0:44:08.169
<v Speaker 6>guaranteed doom and gloom on election day? Of course not.

0:44:08.770 --> 0:44:11.020
<v Speaker 6>Of course not. But if you, you know, wanted to

0:44:11.080 --> 0:44:13.700
<v Speaker 6>play the odds, you wouldn't be putting down big money

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:15.719
<v Speaker 6>on the Republicans having a good night.

0:44:15.739 --> 0:44:18.660
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if this news has made it across

0:44:18.700 --> 0:44:21.290
<v Speaker 2>your desk because I know the inbox, the old Kelly

0:44:21.330 --> 0:44:23.430
<v Speaker 2>file is still full of all matters to do with

0:44:23.450 --> 0:44:27.799
<v Speaker 2>Meghan Markle. A TV station here in Australia has rehired

0:44:27.910 --> 0:44:30.760
<v Speaker 2>her to be part of the MasterChef program here.

0:44:30.780 --> 0:44:33.900
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what Australia did wrong. We got her

0:44:34.060 --> 0:44:36.300
<v Speaker 1>once and now we're bringing her back.

0:44:37.620 --> 0:44:40.940
<v Speaker 6>Let me tell you something. This should not happen. I

0:44:40.980 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 6>actually wouldn't be surprised if this falls through because the

0:44:44.060 --> 0:44:49.380
<v Speaker 6>news about her sitting on the revelations about her father

0:44:49.860 --> 0:44:54.240
<v Speaker 6>allegedly being a child molester for eight years, she did

0:44:54.430 --> 0:44:59.390
<v Speaker 6>absolutely nothing to protect the children in Mexico, in the Philippines,

0:44:59.710 --> 0:45:03.989
<v Speaker 6>in the United States, nothing. Why on earth would any

0:45:04.090 --> 0:45:08.880
<v Speaker 6>program designed to target children includes such a person as

0:45:08.910 --> 0:45:13.140
<v Speaker 6>their guest host. That is completely boneheaded. She is in

0:45:13.160 --> 0:45:16.060
<v Speaker 6>the news right now, yes, for the revelations about her father,

0:45:16.340 --> 0:45:19.510
<v Speaker 6>but just as prominent is the news that she did

0:45:19.890 --> 0:45:23.390
<v Speaker 6>absolutely nothing to protect the children. who were allegedly getting

0:45:23.410 --> 0:45:27.560
<v Speaker 6>molested by her own father. And her ostensible excuse is, well,

0:45:27.580 --> 0:45:30.259
<v Speaker 6>they told me they were investigating. But we now know, A,

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:32.940
<v Speaker 6>that doesn't appear to be true, because the Metropolitan Police

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:35.860
<v Speaker 6>in the UK were not investigating, either at the time

0:45:36.030 --> 0:45:38.390
<v Speaker 6>they showed her this letter that was submitted by her

0:45:38.810 --> 0:45:43.270
<v Speaker 6>father's first husband to the police, and have never investigated.

0:45:43.650 --> 0:45:45.870
<v Speaker 6>So I don't believe that they went to her and said,

0:45:46.469 --> 0:45:50.839
<v Speaker 6>sit tight, keep quiet, we're investigating. What reason would they

0:45:50.900 --> 0:45:53.359
<v Speaker 6>have to say that to her when they weren't investigating,

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:57.200
<v Speaker 6>they would never be investigating, and they'd be advising her

0:45:57.219 --> 0:46:00.450
<v Speaker 6>to keep quiet over what? So that story does not

0:46:00.510 --> 0:46:04.090
<v Speaker 6>hold up. But even if we credit it for purposes

0:46:04.210 --> 0:46:06.210
<v Speaker 6>of argument, that it was all true, that's what they

0:46:06.250 --> 0:46:08.149
<v Speaker 6>said to her, and they told her to be quiet,

0:46:08.190 --> 0:46:11.570
<v Speaker 6>not to say anything about her dad. Eight years later,

0:46:12.150 --> 0:46:15.590
<v Speaker 6>she thought the investigation was ongoing? That's a bunch of

0:46:15.610 --> 0:46:19.460
<v Speaker 6>bulls * * t. I don't believe one word of

0:46:19.500 --> 0:46:22.549
<v Speaker 6>that story. There is no way eight years later she

0:46:22.650 --> 0:46:25.150
<v Speaker 6>thought the investigation was still going on and she had

0:46:25.190 --> 0:46:28.210
<v Speaker 6>to stay tight-lipped about it. What did she do? Did

0:46:28.230 --> 0:46:30.250
<v Speaker 6>she call the Metropolitan Police? Did she write to them?

0:46:30.290 --> 0:46:33.110
<v Speaker 6>Did she contact the person who contacted her and allegedly

0:46:33.130 --> 0:46:34.920
<v Speaker 6>gave her this letter saying, hey, watch out? And let's

0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:38.739
<v Speaker 6>not forget, the police could not find the letter. The

0:46:38.780 --> 0:46:41.109
<v Speaker 6>only reason the Metropolitan Police came out and said, okay,

0:46:41.150 --> 0:46:43.109
<v Speaker 6>we confirmed the story that we showed her this letter,

0:46:43.570 --> 0:46:46.460
<v Speaker 6>is because she went to them and said, here's the

0:46:46.480 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 6>letter you gave me. And they appeared to have taken

0:46:49.060 --> 0:46:51.620
<v Speaker 6>her word for it that they showed that to her.

0:46:51.860 --> 0:46:54.529
<v Speaker 6>That hasn't been proven, if we're being really specific here

0:46:54.590 --> 0:46:58.390
<v Speaker 6>on the chain of custody. But even if they had

0:46:58.450 --> 0:47:01.469
<v Speaker 6>done all of that, Why wouldn't she have gone back

0:47:01.489 --> 0:47:03.150
<v Speaker 6>to them to say, how did it turn out? What

0:47:03.170 --> 0:47:05.270
<v Speaker 6>did you find? Will there be an indictment? Is there

0:47:05.290 --> 0:47:07.589
<v Speaker 6>going to be a trial? Has he been cleared? And

0:47:07.630 --> 0:47:09.390
<v Speaker 6>we know that they never told her that he was

0:47:09.469 --> 0:47:14.050
<v Speaker 6>cleared because in December of 2025, she had a certified

0:47:14.090 --> 0:47:16.330
<v Speaker 6>letter sent to him delivered in the Philippines as his

0:47:16.410 --> 0:47:19.890
<v Speaker 6>leg was being cut off by the hospital administrator and

0:47:19.950 --> 0:47:22.299
<v Speaker 6>a lawyer who insisted on filming him and getting his

0:47:22.340 --> 0:47:25.799
<v Speaker 6>consent to being filmed so that Megan's letter breaking up

0:47:25.840 --> 0:47:29.140
<v Speaker 6>with him in which she accused him of being a

0:47:29.340 --> 0:47:34.189
<v Speaker 6>child sex abuser, not just a purveyor of child sex

0:47:34.230 --> 0:47:37.049
<v Speaker 6>abuse material. Like people who look at pictures, they are

0:47:37.150 --> 0:47:39.989
<v Speaker 6>also child abusers, but I'm talking about in-person sex abuser.

0:47:40.940 --> 0:47:43.759
<v Speaker 6>She accused him of that in this letter. So she

0:47:43.780 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 6>did not think he'd been exonerated all the way through

0:47:46.440 --> 0:47:51.529
<v Speaker 6>from from January of 2019 to December 2025. We know

0:47:51.850 --> 0:47:53.830
<v Speaker 6>she was never told he was exonerated because why else

0:47:53.850 --> 0:47:56.310
<v Speaker 6>did she send that letter to that entire time? Paul,

0:47:56.770 --> 0:47:59.150
<v Speaker 6>she wants us to believe she thought, oh, gee, maybe

0:47:59.190 --> 0:48:03.339
<v Speaker 6>it's just the slowest investigation for us on Earth. Absolutely not.

0:48:03.380 --> 0:48:05.600
<v Speaker 6>That is obvious misleading.

0:48:10.469 --> 0:48:12.950
<v Speaker 1>Before we go, you've been working very hard this week.

0:48:12.989 --> 0:48:16.060
<v Speaker 2>Politicians don't, but, of course, they get extra staff, extra

0:48:16.200 --> 0:48:18.420
<v Speaker 2>money to make bad social media videos, hence why we

0:48:18.460 --> 0:48:21.000
<v Speaker 2>end the show. Every night with While You Were Working,

0:48:21.040 --> 0:48:24.300
<v Speaker 2>they were doing what? Well, this is Sarah Mansfield. She

0:48:24.489 --> 0:48:27.390
<v Speaker 2>is with the Greens in Victoria, and let's have a

0:48:27.390 --> 0:48:29.830
<v Speaker 2>look at her Scorsese-level filmmaking.

0:48:30.860 --> 0:48:34.580
<v Speaker 12>I don't care if your native grasslands are critically endangered.

0:48:34.920 --> 0:48:36.359
<v Speaker 12>You're too poor to stop me.

0:48:36.380 --> 0:48:42.299
<v Speaker 6>The thing is, my sister had a baby and I

0:48:42.320 --> 0:48:45.259
<v Speaker 6>took it over because she passed away. I'm going to

0:48:45.280 --> 0:48:47.640
<v Speaker 6>stop you right there. If I saved you, I'd have

0:48:47.680 --> 0:48:49.220
<v Speaker 6>to return this big bag of money.

0:48:49.239 --> 0:48:51.380
<v Speaker 1>Mama's got her eye on a Birkin bag.

0:48:53.100 --> 0:48:53.400
<v Speaker 9>Really?

0:48:53.420 --> 0:49:00.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's how undergraduate, how street theatre of the greats.

0:49:00.890 --> 0:49:03.049
<v Speaker 2>That's our show for tonight. We'll see you again Sunday night. Now,

0:49:03.070 --> 0:49:05.910
<v Speaker 2>of course, next week is massive with the midterms. I'll

0:49:05.930 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 2>be here as part of the live coverage with KG,

0:49:08.520 --> 0:49:11.739
<v Speaker 2>Pete Stefanovic, Laura Jays, the whole team on Wednesday morning.

0:49:11.760 --> 0:49:13.859
<v Speaker 1>But we've got a lot of telly between now and then.

0:49:13.920 --> 0:49:17.410
<v Speaker 2>Don't forget, Jess Wilson joins us for her first major

0:49:17.489 --> 0:49:19.150
<v Speaker 2>event in the campaign, and that was going to be

0:49:19.510 --> 0:49:19.950
<v Speaker 2>our pub test.

0:49:20.530 --> 0:49:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Have a great weekend go Tigers go Yankees