1 00:00:04,160 --> 00:00:06,680 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Fear and Greed summer series. I'm Sean Almer. 2 00:00:06,720 --> 00:00:09,920 Speaker 1: Today I'm talking to Simon kusten Maher, co founder and 3 00:00:09,960 --> 00:00:15,040 Speaker 1: director at the Demographics Group about gen X's dirty fantasy, 4 00:00:15,440 --> 00:00:19,479 Speaker 1: the four day work week. Simon, welcome back to Fear 5 00:00:19,520 --> 00:00:19,880 Speaker 1: and Greed. 6 00:00:20,520 --> 00:00:22,680 Speaker 2: It's great to be honest, great to talk about the 7 00:00:22,800 --> 00:00:23,920 Speaker 2: forgotten generation. 8 00:00:24,680 --> 00:00:27,680 Speaker 1: Well, and I'm part of the forgotten generation. And what 9 00:00:27,760 --> 00:00:30,760 Speaker 1: upsets me with the premise here is that you're suggesting 10 00:00:30,840 --> 00:00:33,680 Speaker 1: all our dirty fantasy is a four day work week. 11 00:00:33,720 --> 00:00:36,680 Speaker 1: When did we become so boring, Simon? When did we 12 00:00:36,760 --> 00:00:40,840 Speaker 1: lose the zest for life that it's all about work? Well, 13 00:00:40,920 --> 00:00:45,000 Speaker 1: so it's never been all about work for gen X 14 00:00:45,080 --> 00:00:49,360 Speaker 1: at all. Gen X of course, saw their parents work 15 00:00:49,440 --> 00:00:54,200 Speaker 1: themselves to death, and gen X saw was the first 16 00:00:54,200 --> 00:00:57,760 Speaker 1: generation that saw their moms enter the workforce at scale. 17 00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:01,680 Speaker 1: So therefore you created in gen X this absolute obsession 18 00:01:01,960 --> 00:01:05,760 Speaker 1: with work life balance, with ensuring that you get the 19 00:01:05,800 --> 00:01:08,880 Speaker 1: most out of life, not just by maximizing your income 20 00:01:08,959 --> 00:01:11,600 Speaker 1: through working constantly, but also to ensure that you have 21 00:01:11,720 --> 00:01:15,160 Speaker 1: enough time to actually enjoy all the good things that 22 00:01:15,200 --> 00:01:18,800 Speaker 1: the world has to offer, and that of course ultimately 23 00:01:19,160 --> 00:01:22,080 Speaker 1: now that gen X enters the top leadership positions. Gen 24 00:01:22,240 --> 00:01:24,960 Speaker 1: X is in the mid fifties now, and that is 25 00:01:25,160 --> 00:01:27,920 Speaker 1: the time of the life cycle when we hand over 26 00:01:28,480 --> 00:01:31,760 Speaker 1: the top C suite type jobs, when we hand over 27 00:01:32,680 --> 00:01:36,080 Speaker 1: prime ministerships and so forth. Okay, so that ford I 28 00:01:36,200 --> 00:01:40,080 Speaker 1: work week. Then I know that you've been slightly cynical 29 00:01:40,120 --> 00:01:43,039 Speaker 1: on that one, Simon what does the evidence suggest? 30 00:01:43,400 --> 00:01:47,199 Speaker 2: Yeah? So I always thought. We discussed in a previous 31 00:01:47,200 --> 00:01:51,000 Speaker 2: episode that we run out of workers in Australia demographically speaking, 32 00:01:51,360 --> 00:01:55,640 Speaker 2: and we know what a system does when it runs 33 00:01:55,640 --> 00:01:58,640 Speaker 2: out of workers, It works the remaining staff to death. 34 00:01:59,480 --> 00:02:02,040 Speaker 2: And I'm saying this is the wrong decade to call 35 00:02:02,120 --> 00:02:04,080 Speaker 2: for a four day work week, where, of course de 36 00:02:04,160 --> 00:02:06,600 Speaker 2: fantasy is that you work for four days instead of 37 00:02:06,600 --> 00:02:08,520 Speaker 2: five days, but you still get the five days worth 38 00:02:08,560 --> 00:02:11,720 Speaker 2: of pay and you magically remain as productive as you 39 00:02:11,800 --> 00:02:15,120 Speaker 2: were beforehand. That seemed too good to be true for 40 00:02:15,280 --> 00:02:18,399 Speaker 2: me as a bit of a cynic myself. And then 41 00:02:18,520 --> 00:02:21,320 Speaker 2: I looked at the data, because that's my job, so 42 00:02:21,360 --> 00:02:25,240 Speaker 2: I figured let's have a look, and worldwide, all the 43 00:02:25,480 --> 00:02:31,880 Speaker 2: trial data about the four day work week is surprisingly optimistic. 44 00:02:32,560 --> 00:02:37,200 Speaker 2: So the best case study probably comes from Britain who 45 00:02:37,200 --> 00:02:41,120 Speaker 2: in twenty twenty two ran this big study where sixty 46 00:02:41,160 --> 00:02:44,760 Speaker 2: one companies across the multitude of sectors. They ran this 47 00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:47,480 Speaker 2: for a little while and turns out that this actually worked. 48 00:02:47,800 --> 00:02:51,720 Speaker 2: That these firms had their productivity either stagnate so they 49 00:02:51,720 --> 00:02:54,320 Speaker 2: stayed stable or maybe even improved. Only for few it 50 00:02:54,360 --> 00:02:57,680 Speaker 2: went down, which is pretty remarkable. If you work less 51 00:02:57,919 --> 00:03:01,519 Speaker 2: a few hours and they light it. The employees are happy, 52 00:03:01,720 --> 00:03:05,560 Speaker 2: less stress, fewer sick days, better work life balance. So 53 00:03:05,639 --> 00:03:07,760 Speaker 2: it seems too good to be true. 54 00:03:08,760 --> 00:03:11,400 Speaker 1: And just explain that why it worked, because I know 55 00:03:11,440 --> 00:03:14,680 Speaker 1: there was it studies in Japan as well, similar outcomes. 56 00:03:15,080 --> 00:03:16,720 Speaker 1: Why is it You said few a sick days? So 57 00:03:16,760 --> 00:03:18,239 Speaker 1: you're alluded to why it worked? 58 00:03:18,720 --> 00:03:21,160 Speaker 2: Well, what part of this is that people just seem 59 00:03:21,240 --> 00:03:24,000 Speaker 2: to recover more and you come to the office or 60 00:03:24,040 --> 00:03:26,639 Speaker 2: the workplace in a more relaxed fashion and you can 61 00:03:26,720 --> 00:03:31,280 Speaker 2: then you can then exercise better or you well, exercise 62 00:03:31,440 --> 00:03:34,320 Speaker 2: is actually the the metaphor the gym metaphor. You can't 63 00:03:34,360 --> 00:03:37,400 Speaker 2: work out at full maximum capacity seven days a week. 64 00:03:37,520 --> 00:03:38,280 Speaker 1: That's impossible. 65 00:03:38,760 --> 00:03:41,680 Speaker 2: So if you want to lift heavy, you lift heavy 66 00:03:41,800 --> 00:03:43,680 Speaker 2: once or twice a week, and maybe you do a 67 00:03:43,720 --> 00:03:46,960 Speaker 2: bit of other lifting days throughout the week. You can't 68 00:03:47,000 --> 00:03:50,520 Speaker 2: go full steam ahead all the time. We know this 69 00:03:50,600 --> 00:03:55,080 Speaker 2: from exercise, and this same is the case intellectually speaking. 70 00:03:55,520 --> 00:03:57,600 Speaker 2: So okay, so maybe we can paste this better and 71 00:03:57,640 --> 00:03:59,800 Speaker 2: we give people a bit more time off to actually 72 00:04:00,120 --> 00:04:03,040 Speaker 2: recuperate so that there are more productive at work. That 73 00:04:03,200 --> 00:04:06,680 Speaker 2: is pretty good, But so does that mean that we 74 00:04:06,720 --> 00:04:10,839 Speaker 2: are facing a decade or decades now of four day 75 00:04:10,880 --> 00:04:14,920 Speaker 2: work weeks. And I'm still skeptical about this because we 76 00:04:15,000 --> 00:04:18,440 Speaker 2: must remember that for all of those trials, these companies 77 00:04:18,440 --> 00:04:22,680 Speaker 2: weren't randomly selected. These companies volunteered. These are companies where 78 00:04:23,640 --> 00:04:26,640 Speaker 2: where the top leadership at the whole company was behind 79 00:04:26,839 --> 00:04:29,760 Speaker 2: this idea from the get go. So there is a 80 00:04:29,760 --> 00:04:33,120 Speaker 2: bit of a selection bias in this study to begin with. 81 00:04:33,839 --> 00:04:36,039 Speaker 2: And of course, these studies showed that there were a 82 00:04:36,200 --> 00:04:40,440 Speaker 2: couple of industries where this didn't work. And these were 83 00:04:40,480 --> 00:04:44,440 Speaker 2: sectors where you need around the clock coverage. So these 84 00:04:44,480 --> 00:04:49,360 Speaker 2: are hospitals and pilots and so yet all those things 85 00:04:50,040 --> 00:04:52,800 Speaker 2: we just need people on the ground physically, you need 86 00:04:52,800 --> 00:04:55,880 Speaker 2: constant cover, and that didn't work then. And so if 87 00:04:55,880 --> 00:05:00,000 Speaker 2: I'm looking at the whole workforce, the medical system, Therefore 88 00:05:00,080 --> 00:05:03,240 Speaker 2: it is probably kind of ruled out of this the 89 00:05:03,360 --> 00:05:06,000 Speaker 2: care system, you know, the massive increase in the edge 90 00:05:06,040 --> 00:05:09,000 Speaker 2: care system, that's probably not an option for them as well. 91 00:05:09,600 --> 00:05:13,400 Speaker 2: Podcasting every day definitely we need you guys on seven 92 00:05:13,480 --> 00:05:14,360 Speaker 2: days a week. 93 00:05:14,240 --> 00:05:17,040 Speaker 1: That's right, not an option. But the interesting thing though 94 00:05:17,080 --> 00:05:19,520 Speaker 1: is that, like as you're talking, so you know, whether 95 00:05:19,560 --> 00:05:22,520 Speaker 1: Australia adopts it or not, there may be certain sectors 96 00:05:22,640 --> 00:05:26,080 Speaker 1: which over could adopt it, and over time people could 97 00:05:26,120 --> 00:05:28,440 Speaker 1: migrate towards those sectors or away from them, depending on 98 00:05:28,800 --> 00:05:30,760 Speaker 1: how they want to treat work life balance and things 99 00:05:30,839 --> 00:05:32,599 Speaker 1: like that. But there could be some sectors in Australia 100 00:05:32,600 --> 00:05:34,400 Speaker 1: that could adopt it exactly. 101 00:05:34,520 --> 00:05:37,080 Speaker 2: And you want to think about those places that could 102 00:05:37,080 --> 00:05:41,440 Speaker 2: adopt it, they might have a significant competitive advantage over 103 00:05:41,560 --> 00:05:44,720 Speaker 2: their you know, their their fellow businesses in this industry. 104 00:05:45,040 --> 00:05:48,120 Speaker 2: If they offer same pay for four days, that is 105 00:05:48,160 --> 00:05:52,640 Speaker 2: a very very attractive proposition in a time where we 106 00:05:52,800 --> 00:05:55,840 Speaker 2: run out of workers and we're therefore the worker has 107 00:05:55,880 --> 00:05:58,040 Speaker 2: more leverage than they've done in the past. 108 00:05:58,400 --> 00:06:00,920 Speaker 1: Soimon, thank you for talking to Fearing read summer series. 109 00:06:01,160 --> 00:06:02,040 Speaker 2: That's been my pleasure. 110 00:06:02,560 --> 00:06:05,120 Speaker 1: There was Simon kusten Maha from the Demographics Group Don't 111 00:06:05,120 --> 00:06:07,159 Speaker 1: forget to follow on the podcast, I'm Sean Almer and 112 00:06:07,160 --> 00:06:09,000 Speaker 1: this is Fear and Greed summer series