WEBVTT - Finals strategy, killer PODs, and SC Draft 101 | SuperCoach AFL

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Hello, super Coaches, Welcome to the AFL Supercoach Show, your

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>in and out guide to the greatest game on Earth

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>AFL super Coach. We've got round twenty in the bag

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and round twenty to preview. Your regular host, James Clements

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>is on leave, so hi Al Paydenham in the hosting

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.079
<v Speaker 1>chair today and I will be joined by three of

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the brightest super coach minds on this little blue marble

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>we call planet Earth. I think that's how James normally

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>does is the Phantom will be jumping on very soon

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk. Well, there's not too many bubble boys, but

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:35.599
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty to talk about. Still with the Fantom and

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 1>in studio. This is a big day because back with

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>us is Patch.

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Hello, welcome, good a. How are you. I'm good and very excited,

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 2>very excited. Do you do you want to? Should I

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:47.319
<v Speaker 2>introduce him?

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 3>You're introducing him now? I suppose that it's the host

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 3>spoke job. Yes, sitting between us is.

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>One of the great men of the fantasy world of

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>super Coach fandom out there.

0:00:57.640 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 3>Will know let Dog.

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>As readers of Code Sports might know him from the

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>byline on some articles you've been writing this year. But

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>welcome for the first time to the official podcast in

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 1>this form, but certainly not the first time sitting beside

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the great patch to record a Super Coach podcast.

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 4>No, well, thank you for having me al And it

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 4>is very weird having done like ten almost ten years

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.119
<v Speaker 4>with the podcast and never being in the same room

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 4>as the man next day. So the first one we've

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 4>done together in the same room, and it's for someone else,

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 4>but it's for someone else. It's a very good podcast

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 4>to be joining each other on.

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 5>It's Oh, it's very nice to be able to see

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 5>your face in the flesh and being able to hang

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 5>out in person.

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 4>And we can touch, we can touch. It's fantastic. We

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 4>can kiss, we could and we will we will later

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 4>at the end.

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Of describer only content can be up there.

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>But if you're not familiar with the Great Jock Reynolds podcast,

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of course some pats with the merge there now sadly

0:01:57.560 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in the rear vision mirror. But some of the piney

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of Supercoach podcasting is these two gentlemen, of course, part

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of that great institution. So great to have you on

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 1>board and just keep the flame alive a little bit

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>for the great job community which is still out there

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>still out there.

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 4>Some of them have their own websites, most of them

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 4>are on Twitter. It's great and I'm still in leagues

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 4>with everyone that used to listen, so it's fantastic.

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's lovely.

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Remember this show is proudly brought to you by Supercoach Plus.

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Follow your Supercoach scores live on Game Day plus break

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>evens projected scores, a great optimizer button. We'll get to

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 1>that in a minute, and lots more. Check out the

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 1>show notes to subscribe. As always, let's start with the

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>rap and the heroes and villains from round twenty.

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 3>Do you want to kick us off patch?

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I think if my Twitter scanning was accurate over the weekend,

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you use your final trade.

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 5>I did use, so we'll start with the villain and

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 5>the villain is sitting next to me. Hello, Lec Dog, Hello.

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 5>So I used my final trade this week. I had

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 5>to get rid of Zach Fisher out. The rule was

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 5>if he was out out of a donut, he was out.

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 5>Mckirschell was out as well, So two donuts, one trade.

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 2>What's a going to do? Panic?

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 5>Anyway, Fisher had to go because I hope, think, maybe

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 5>pray that mckirsch will be back next week. I had

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 5>Zach Fisher's four hundred and seventy odd one thousand dollars

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 5>plus my big bank of five hundred dollars, and I

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 5>turned to the person I always turned to an a crisis,

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 5>being lack, and asked him what the hell I should do?

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Who do I bring in?

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 4>Like?

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 5>Surely is just Jesse Hogan right? And turns out it wasn't.

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 5>Jesse Hogan was the correct answer.

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Do you want to talk?

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 3>Sogan scored ninety something on the weekend?

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, something like that.

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Make it on my field. I had him on the bench.

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 5>So do you want to tell all the wonderful people

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 5>at home who did end up coming in?

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, there was a lot of back and forth.

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 2>There was a lot of back and forth.

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 4>We've decided ultimately that having DPP mid forward cover would

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 4>be best suited for your specific circumstances. I think that's

0:03:57.920 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 4>still true.

0:03:58.560 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it is true.

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 4>We had plenty of off like James Petling was thrown out.

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 4>He scored one hundred and thirty three.

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 5>Was he was your first option? And I pushed back

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 5>saying he'll be the sub at some point. Still believe

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 5>that because GWS don't like him, he ran over to

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 5>Adam Kingsley Cat obviously, so he was out and we

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 5>ended up.

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 4>With Mason Wood.

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 5>Naturally, very good year for the most part he's had.

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 5>He's a very very good draft like very like left

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 5>field draft selection, which is what is now your wheelhouse

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 5>is where I live on that front. But yeah, it

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 5>was just very funny that I had Mason Wood scoring

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 5>sixty something as every other secular player turned up and

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 5>touristened into shreds and yeah, so that he's my villain

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 5>this week. I just need to shout out the inside

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 5>Mids who managed to be the one of twenty seven

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 5>guesses on Twitter who actually figured out that it was

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:51.119
<v Speaker 5>Mason Wood.

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Heroes Harry shecheesel with a VC was Chef's kiss.

0:04:58.279 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 3>And score ranked do we talk about it?

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 5>It was twenty and three hundred and something. But like

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 5>I keep sliding backwards, I will continue sliding backwards in

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 5>rank as long as I have Mason Wood in my

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 5>side and with no more trades with slide and baby.

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And leg How did you go in round twenty and

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.479
<v Speaker 1>maybe a quick recap of your season so far?

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I finally got into the top one percent

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 4>for the year I've been. That's sort of my goal

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 4>each year is to finish in the top one percent.

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 4>So we've hit that with four trades and two hundred

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 4>and something came in the bank, So feeling all right

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 4>twy five hundred and seventy two on the weekend, and

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 4>that's with some loopholing that didn't quite work. Hey, that's

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 4>the risk you take with loop holing. My year's been

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 4>pretty standard, to be honest, I always aim to sort

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 4>of jump the ranks from the buyers onwards. Outside of

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 4>round two and three, I never sideways any primo. So

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 4>that's probably partly why I've kind of maintained my rank

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 4>because I've just backed in Kristen Cherry and Brody Grundy

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 4>all year and they've just kind of done their job.

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 4>I had no interest in sidewaysing them when Grundy had

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 4>a bit of perform at the start of the year.

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, outside of sideways, Like my first team for

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 4>some reason had Alex with It in it at the

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 4>end of round one and he scored twelve and was dropped,

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 4>so he got axed. Mason Redmond got suspended and he

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 4>got axed, and then the next week Haden Young went

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 4>who in hindsight probably should have been a hold. But

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 4>aside from that, I've just backed in, bought in primos

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 4>when I felt like they would make money and score points.

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 4>From that point logically that makes sense. Didn't trade out

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 4>any primos all year, and generally outside a bond, just

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 4>started guys that I thought that were a bit underpriced,

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 4>and at this stage it's going pretty.

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Well and taking a big break in the middle of

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 3>the year to go over there. He's headed that impact

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 3>your possib.

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 4>Positively because I either couldn't make trades and didn't have

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 4>access or forgot about it, or I didn't have time

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 4>to think about it. So I just made the first

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 4>trades that have that came to heapmind and to be honest,

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 4>aside for some greedy points chasing ones with trading in zeros,

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 4>it's worked. So I've had Hogan on the bench, Kerno,

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 4>Hogan and Kerno swapping on the bench in the fard line.

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 4>I've had a board in guys like Walsh and Brashaw.

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 4>I've had all year who's finally coming climbing good and

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 4>he's probably my hero for the week, to be honest.

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 4>One hundred and thirty seven from him, So, yeah, life's

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 4>been pretty good lately, to be honest.

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 5>Well, there's an interesting correlation that we found between like

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 5>being on a podcast and also being in Europe that

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 5>correlates very nicely the supercoach scoring.

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, history says between the two of us that if

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 4>you go overseas and you stop worrying about supercoach, like

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 4>worrying about podcasting and making your team run smoothly, it

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 4>just can't of organize itself and you do really well.

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 4>And then I did further into it and looked at

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 4>my overall finishing position year on year, and every year

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 4>I haven't done a podcast, I've been in the top

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 4>one percent. Every year I have done a podcast, I

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 4>finished about twenty five thousand. So I don't know what

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 4>that tells you. Over it probably means I was overthinking

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:56.119
<v Speaker 4>some things.

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe hopefully we don't have to bring you down by

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>bringing you back on into the podcasting world. My quick

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>wrap up of the weekend a little bit of a

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I've been sliding for a few weeks and sort of

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>resurrected things a tiny bit on the weekend twenty five

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>six A weeks good to get over the twenty five hundred,

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>though there were some pretty big.

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Scores out there.

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Shot back up the rankings about forty spots to just

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>outside the top five hundred. So I guess that's probably

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>my goal if I can get back in the top

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>five hundred. Over the last month.

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 3>Give achieved your first goal going past the Phantom.

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Going past the Phantom.

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 3>That was a little more hmgoing the other way to

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 3>be honest, but.

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I'm sure we'll bring that up when it

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 5>comes on, which I think is the only reason you

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 5>brought him one of the podcast this week.

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 3>There's no rookies or anything, but you just needed to gloat.

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 3>I think that's very fair.

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 1>I brought in Tristan Cherry this week, played about two

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred and grand more for him than Nudileck, but still,

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>finally that was a very good move put the VC

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>on him, so absolutely wrap with one hundred and fifty

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>one points first up from him. And that was my

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>second last trade going into the week. I think I

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>had I was going to get two or three doughnuts

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. I've still got Fisher, I've still got m Kircher,

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and neither of those guys obviously were playing. But I

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>used the medico Optimizer to somehow I've got Billy Dowling

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>from my midfield into my forward line, even though I

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>couldn't figure out how to do that.

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 3>But there's some magic going on there for.

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>People who have super Coach Plus and can use Optimizer,

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 1>And it got Billy down to cover for me in

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the forward line and brought in Humphreys a couple of

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:17.959
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago, paid about ninety grand more for him than

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>most people did, but he provided some cover in the

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>back line for mckirchie. So that's a sort of helped

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>me scrape through this week. And then ideally those guys

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>will be back and put the cover back on the bench.

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>But all in all, not too bad a week.

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 5>In shout out as well another hero for me, Tim

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 5>Mitchell for trading out Jack Steele. Jack Steel is finally

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 5>good again. We were speaking about correlations. Tim Mitchell no

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 5>longer owning a player is great for their supercoach scoring.

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 4>I feel like he's had a lot of trades that

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.079
<v Speaker 4>have been Jack Steel related.

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 5>I feel like I see somehow gone through sixty trades.

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:53.679
<v Speaker 5>I don't know how, but he has.

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Was a film.

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there was just a few seventies scores. I mean,

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Luke Ryan's an interesting one. I guess with Alex Pierce

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 1>out he maybe had to play a bit more key

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>defense he did, but yeah, score is obviously no I

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 1>near what he was doing in the first half of

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the year.

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 3>So just the seventy five from him, I guess.

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.319
<v Speaker 1>Most people sort of around just in the ranks have him,

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>so it's not killing you. But yeah, if you had

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>someone else in that spot who was scoring over one hundred,

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>like a Tom Stewart or someone.

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 3>You'd be pretty happy.

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, Now into the super coach news for the week,

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and I wouldn't say it's massive carnage that we've had

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in recent times, but we do have a couple of

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>little things.

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 3>And we need to be aware of.

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.839
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Ridley got subbed oubt in that famous Essenon game

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>on Saturday. Practice match, just the thirty three points at

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that stage, and he's got a hip flexustrain and apparently

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>will miss at least this week's game against Frio. So

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>if you do have him, it's probably a trade at

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>this stage of the year if you can facilitate that.

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>There was a little bit of news from the Mrrow

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>last night. A week for NAT five people anyone still

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>has him a week for body yuland which probably not

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>too many super coaches have him in their team, but

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it might be good news for Alex Sexton, who might

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>be able to come back.

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 3>In to replace him. Maybe maybe yeah, maybe I'm reading

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 3>there's enough.

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 5>Then maybe Matt five will challenge that one week at

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 5>the tribunal as well, So maybe there's good luck for

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 5>anyone that's got him.

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.439
<v Speaker 1>And the other one as I did mention Fisher and mccurchis,

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>so mckirche was there with just general soreness.

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 3>The general. We haven't actually had the General too often

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:25.199
<v Speaker 3>this year, but.

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 5>Well no, because now injuries have names because people are

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 5>a bit smarter, I guess. But when we started the

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 5>part it was General Sowness.

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 4>General Sawns was a way to hide concussions before that

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.079
<v Speaker 4>was well that, to be honest, it was.

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>And then Zach Fisher we were worried to get dropped,

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and then he was out with a foot injury apparently.

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think that might have been away disguised the

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 5>fact that he'd been booted from the team.

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, we'll be a watch on those two guys.

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>And then I guess Jordan Dawson missed a week with

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>concussion and then curvis as well. You would think they'll

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>be back this week. I guess they have to get

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>through training and prove it there they're ready to go

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>for this week. But yes, certainly Dawson will be has

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>been on a few benches, so people will be happy.

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 4>I'll see him back on the lower end of the

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.559
<v Speaker 4>scale because I think I'm the only owner in super

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 4>Coach that has these two players. Zane True was injured

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 4>in the first opening contest of that game, but apparently

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 4>it's only whitlash, not a concussion. I don't know. And

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 4>Joe Fonti I think his first name is Joe. He's

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 4>on my bench and he's been covered for the last

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 4>couple of weeks, but he didn't even get activated as

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 4>a sub. So I'm filled with dread.

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 2>You've been named the last few weeks here human being?

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 4>Was he's a playing human being?

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 2>He got last week?

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.839
<v Speaker 1>Who sub's not getting activated? What about the probably the

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 1>unluckiest man in super Coach. You're obviously big Carlton man

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>David Cunningham last week or was the sub never got activated?

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Scored zero Super Coach points this week? Started injured in

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>his first contest of the game, subedubt with zero Super

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Coach points.

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 4>Yes, unfortunately, that's what we've come to express expect from

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 4>our friend David Cunningham. So I look forward to finding

0:12:58.120 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 4>out what he's doing for a job next year.

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And on that note, we're going to jump straight over

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to South Australia to check in with the Phantom and now,

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>as he does every week, dialing in from Parts Unknown,

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the Phantom joins us. Now, Fantom, I can't quite give

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.319
<v Speaker 1>you the introduction that James does every week, but great

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to have you on checking in.

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 3>First of all, how did you go on the weekend?

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 3>What's your rank?

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 6>Looking like this is unbelievable. Our Peyton's gone back past

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:34.239
<v Speaker 6>me in the overall rankings, booted James off the podcast,

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:38.719
<v Speaker 6>taken the host chair. He's pretty up and about how

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 6>to go on me. I did slide down the rankings.

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 6>You know my ranking, so don't ask me that out.

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 6>But an indifferent week in Supercoach. No terrible scores from me,

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.959
<v Speaker 6>but no big scores from my pods either. Very tight

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 6>at the top end. I've still got my sights set

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 6>on you. You might have a bit more wigoroom with

0:13:57.040 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 6>your trades, but I reckon, I've got your covered now.

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Normally we have you on to talk about bubble boys

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and rookies, but we've finally done it.

0:14:05.280 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 3>After twenty rounds. There's no bubble boys.

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Even normally every week you look at the most traded

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>in players and people are finding cheapies room somewhere, but

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 1>there's really none around it all this week. But one

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>name that is on the trading list was a very

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>popular rookie at the start of the season, and I

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>know a fantom favorite, Maddi Roberts, South Australian product now

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 1>bouncing back producing massive scores for the Sydney Swes. I'm

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>sure when we get into some trade talk will bring

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>his name up at three hundred and eighty K. But

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>if you had a trade, you see someone you would

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>consider this week.

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 6>Lair Zone Maddie Roberts. So there was some doubters over

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 6>there in Victoria, maybe one or two on this podcast

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 6>and ex members of the podcast who doubted his stand

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 6>for under eighty numbers. He played three games in his

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 6>draft year. We banged home about one hundred and seventy five,

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 6>one hundred and eighty eight and two hundred and forty

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 6>yaries three totals as a June. He's always been a

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 6>bull bang that he's shown that this year. Given the

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 6>role across half back to start the year, he was

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 6>a great early season cashcow and now he's really flourishing.

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 6>I guess with more license to get the foot in

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 6>three ninety k awkward price would be, you know, a

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 6>weird trade. Really, if you look by we get to

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 6>the end of the year, we look back and you've

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 6>traded Matt Robertson ahead of round twenty one, would be

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 6>a weird thing. But here's a proven score, a big,

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 6>big pod. When I say proven, I mean we know

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 6>he's a ball magnet. We know he's got a super

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 6>coach friendly game. It's just about the opportunity at top level.

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 6>And hopefully Horse does stick with him because he could

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 6>bring him in. He's shown he's got the ceiling and

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 6>these are the types of guys and trades you need

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 6>to maybe win a league final.

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 2>He was taking a lot of kickings on the weekend

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 5>I was watching that Woodog's game as I sprang at

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 5>all around the swelling SCG. But the fact that he

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 5>was taking them really consistently Jake Lloyd ESQ role. Perhaps,

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 5>I mean.

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>What was most impressive there was that the fandom just

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>knew those samful under eight numbers straight up the top

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of he said, no preparation whatsoever there. But I mean

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the other name that we know, the Phantom and the

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Lea loves is Billy Dowling and surprised to see him

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>pop up on the most traded out players this week

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>second most traded out players, nearly two thousand people trading

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>him out.

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 3>What do you make of that.

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 6>Interesting one? Well done to you out there. If you

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 6>do have enough trays to maybe make an upgrade, and

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 6>that's probably what you're doing there. You'd think six in

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 6>the sixties for Billy Dowling. On the weekend, Hawthorne torched

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 6>the Crows at Adelaide Oval. On Sunday, Billy did a

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 6>few nice things again, working up and down the ground.

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 6>No big forty point last quarter finish off unfortunately, But again,

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 6>if you do have the trades, got some cash in

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 6>the bank. Billy's made a lot of money now, so

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 6>that's probably what you're doing. But otherwise, here's good cover.

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 6>He's showing his good cover, reliable cover with the ability

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 6>to throw in a ninety or one hundred. We saw

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 6>him with the first super coach tun of his career

0:16:58.920 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 6>a few weeks ago.

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 4>So if you can get to.

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 6>A premium, if you've got trades in cash, do it

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 6>otherwise easy.

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Coverlet throw this question, how would you value cover for

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the last four rounds versus you know, just throwing it

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>out there and trading in someone like a Billy Dowling

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>if it can get you a hopefully at higher score

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 1>on field.

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 4>Well, if I'm trading Dowling, it's to get more cover.

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 4>Last year, I sort of jumped up the ranks at

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 4>the back end of the year because I had cover

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 4>on each line. I think I'd George Hewart in the

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:29.880
<v Speaker 4>midfield and someone in the forward line. This year, I've

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 4>got Charlie Kurno to cover forward line, and I'm looking

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 4>at trading Dowling out this week to someone like an

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 4>Ed Richards. Maybe two trades could get me basically anyone

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 4>in the game. But looking at one trade Richards, and

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 4>I think having that the person on the bench who

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:45.719
<v Speaker 4>can score is going to be more important than saving

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 4>one trade for the last round or trying to bring

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 4>in someone super cheap. So if you can't get from

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 4>dowling up to a primo. I think you're whold Dowling,

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 4>but if you can trade him, I agree with Fan,

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 4>go for it.

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, DPP is just almost, isn't it for So

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you've got cover as crossed as many lines as possible.

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I think that's why a guy like Ed

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.399
<v Speaker 4>Richards appeals to me, because you can cover both lines.

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 4>There's probably more forward mid zeros in your team, so

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 4>dowling does give you added value there than there are

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 4>defensive mid zeros. But you know you can make it work.

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 4>But dowling is important if you have no casual traits.

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, which is plenty of are in that situation.

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 2>So did everyone turned to look at me?

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 5>Love that big fan changing the topic very rapidly, Phantom,

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 5>We're going to talk about leagues a fair bit because

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 5>it's now all attention on league finals which kick off

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 5>and for people that might not listen to the Phantom's

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 5>Layer podcast. Might you be aware of You should, absolutely

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 5>you should might be aware of how intense the Tizer

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 5>office league can get. Do you want to give us

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:53.120
<v Speaker 5>a bit of a rundown of the high stakes over

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 5>an Adelaide.

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 6>Big business super coach over here in the Advertiser building.

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 6>We used to have five tier competition. We're down to

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 6>two tiers given numbers, but still very competitive promotion and relegation.

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 6>If you do listen to the Lair Hipster Matt Turner's

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 6>been down the bottom of the top tier in the

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 6>Work League. Had to win on the weekend to survive relegation.

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 6>Unfortunately he did win, so he won't be going down,

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 6>He'll be staying up in the bottom tier two. We've

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 6>got the new kids on the block in the Lair

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 6>Phantom Junior as he likes to call himself. Another lowly

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 6>week for him, which is great content for the Lair

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:36.880
<v Speaker 6>listen this week. We'll sure lead off and spend most

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 6>of our time on Dossi's weekend. But he's in the

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 6>finals up against Bear Bear Torius, other new member of

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 6>the pod and two different strategies. Dos no trades left

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 6>like me just hanging on till the end. Bears kept

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 6>his trades. He's a league man. He's going to trade

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 6>his way through the finals now. So if you've done that,

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 6>well done, because it is important I know you get

0:20:00.720 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 6>into these league finals. If you've got a couple of

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:05.360
<v Speaker 6>trades in the bank. You can use them on the weekend.

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 6>You don't have to use them going into the round.

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 6>See how your match up is going. If you start

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 6>slow and need a big pod to finish off, or

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 6>need someone different, or there's a laid out that your

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 6>opponent can't cover, having one or two trades could be

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 6>the difference between making it to the Grand Final or

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 6>bowing out early. So there's a lot of different strategies

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 6>around to do that. But well done if you've done that,

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 6>and keep till it. You've got this far with trades

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 6>in the bank. Don't burn them all now, of course

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 6>if you want to get through to the next week,

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 6>but they can be important.

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, any questions for the fansom before we sign off, I'll.

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 4>Just throw one random name at you that's in my head.

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:47.199
<v Speaker 4>And he hasn't done anything since returning, But is there

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 4>a chance that Callum Mills returns to the form of

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 4>old Well.

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:53.920
<v Speaker 6>We need to get Dan Batton back on the show

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 6>because I think early on the year Dan might have

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 6>started almost started with Calum here as we know he

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 6>missed for weeks. I think Dan might have missed that,

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 6>but low time on ground again for him on the weekend.

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 6>We know he's arrested after one week nurse through again,

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 6>you think that probably only increases to the finals. Now

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 6>they can't get to the last week around twenty four

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:17.399
<v Speaker 6>and he's playing half a game. They needing to be

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 6>playing a full game. So I don't mind it. These

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 6>are the type of options like a Matt Roberts a

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 6>little bit out there, a lot of risk involved, but

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:27.919
<v Speaker 6>again you have to take a risk some time to

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 6>win it, So I don't mind it. I think you

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 6>get this guy back on our historic podcast, Lick and

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 6>Patch back together. It's going to be some.

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Show, absolutely, thank you Fantom, and will pencil Kellum Mills down.

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I know Patch's working on an article which people can

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye for coming up soon on Code Sports

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 1>and all the platforms about players. We're just watching with

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>one eye to twenty twenty five, and I reckon Callum

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Mills might be on that list.

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:55.719
<v Speaker 2>He will absolutely be under consideration.

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 3>Very good news, Thank you Fansom. We'll talk next week.

0:21:58.880 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 4>Enjoy guys.

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Thank you Phantom.

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Always great to hear where he is ranked, obviously, and

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:10.439
<v Speaker 1>some news out of South Australia on the hot topics

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 1>this week. I'm going to start with leagues, which we

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>touched on there with Fantom, because four weeks to go

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in the home and away season means it's finals time

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>for most super coach head to head leagues.

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 3>So do we switch.

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm certainly someone who's been paying most attention to rankings

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>overall up until this point of the season, But do

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 1>we need to change things around now and start looking

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>at leagues who we're playing?

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Are we knock out finals?

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, how does this influence how we approach going

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 1>into this weekend the next four weeks patch?

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, yeah, I mean very much. Now if you are

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 5>switching into that mode, if you've you know, sliding down

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 5>the ranks, you know I repentive hypothetically where you beyond

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 5>saving from a rankings perspective, Yeah, like I will certainly

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 5>be switching to the leagues, and you look at those matchups,

0:22:57.320 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 5>figure out if you can v se someone that they

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 5>don't have gives you that real edge. Whereas you know,

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:03.959
<v Speaker 5>if you both VC Bond and Peali and you know,

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 5>both take the score, doesn't really give you any leeway.

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 5>So if you can v see someone they don't have

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 5>any final, that's good. You start prioritizing your leagues, picking

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:15.360
<v Speaker 5>like this is my cash league that I could win

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 5>something from. I'll focus on this one and focus on

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:20.360
<v Speaker 5>the matchups there, and then you know there's other ones

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 5>are may be less important, or you know I can

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 5>win those, or I can't win that matchup, so I'm

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 5>going to forget about it this week, and you just

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 5>kind of, you know, case by case play it pretty

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 5>strategically for those leagues, I think.

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Because you're sort of in a stronger position going into

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 1>League four and as was that by design or it's

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 1>just worked out that way.

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, I did say this year I was going to

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 4>focus on leagues instead of overall, and I am on

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 4>track to have my best overall finished since twenty fourteen,

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know if that teaches anything, but having

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 4>trades heading in. If you do have trades, it's for

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 4>particularly for must win matchups. It's you can either trade

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 4>to mitigate okay, bring in a player that they do

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 4>have so you don't have to worry about their POD,

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 4>or you can do the opposite, which is what I

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 4>always do, and just go for the biggest swing hopefully

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 4>it returns something. This guy's only in two percent of

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 4>teams and he scored one hundred and twenty last week.

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm bringing him in, but you can. It does help.

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:14.719
<v Speaker 4>If you have trades, you can be a bit more

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 4>flexible and you don't have to cop the Zeros that

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 4>might lose you that game, or.

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Worse, the mason Woods that might lose you that game.

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm tell it, he'll come good. You'll have three turns

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 4>out of him before the year's over.

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 2>I will hold you to that at gunpoint.

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 1>And as Phantom said, you can play it, you know,

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>really watching the scores over the weekend, tracking your matchups,

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>and like you say, with captains or even you know,

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>holding back those trades. You know, if Sunday comes around

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and you're two hundred point ahead, maybe you just stick

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the trade in the back pocket or you pick a

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>safe captain, whereas if you're behind, you can roll the

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:47.640
<v Speaker 1>dice and do take a few more risks.

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I always, even though at the moment, I do

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 4>my trades on Thursday and don't think about it again,

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 4>or Friday whenever the locker just before final lockout. But

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.280
<v Speaker 4>with if you're playing to win a league, having that

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 4>trade in the bank, even if it's one trade, if

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 4>there's a laid out of a I don't know, Zach

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 4>Butters is a laid out and you're able to pivot

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:11.199
<v Speaker 4>from him to Adam Trelaw. It could be the difference

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 4>for your season. So I like to hold on now

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 4>for the last four weeks as long as possible to

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:17.679
<v Speaker 4>pull the trigger on those trades.

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely.

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Just scanning my leagues, I did finish on top of

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the ladder in one league in the office. When playing

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Glenn McFarlane in a qualifying final this weekend and looking

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>at his team, he's got a few handy pods that

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't have. So he's got just Jackson Clearish not

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>just saying Claire, one of the great names from the past,

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>but he's got Tim English in the RK, Delan Moore

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and Jeremy Cameron up Ford a bit of a pod

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>who could go be or not depending on the given

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>matchup on the weekend. But in the other main work league,

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I finished outside the top four and I'm in an

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:51.479
<v Speaker 1>elimination final playing the AFEL editor who's got a very

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>strong team. He's got Whitfield, Hayden, Young, Dunkley Caldwell and

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>he's also got Dilan Moore.

0:25:56.800 --> 0:26:00.840
<v Speaker 3>So a few names it will keep me nervous this weekend.

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I guess it's like you say, you've got

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to try and prioritize which one you're worrying about the most.

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, And if we are able to make trades like

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 1>and you're in this fortuitous position, so maybe we just

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>throw to you on this one.

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 2>How many trades do you have leg for those playing

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:17.640
<v Speaker 2>along at home?

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 4>I have four, and in the last three weeks, I've

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 4>traded in two zeros intentionally, so I had eight as

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 4>of you two weeks ago, old man.

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 3>And I've got one.

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're in slightly different positions because really

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to use that trade, even looking at leagues,

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, maybe if I was going to get

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>knocked out in the first week, I might get desperate

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday. But I'm really holding that back into I

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>did consider using it last week, and you know, Jack

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:44.199
<v Speaker 1>Sinkley was someone I really would have loved to get in,

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>but I just would have left me potentially exposed with

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 1>no cover on the bench, and I had enough bench

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>players to at least not get a zero this week,

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:52.880
<v Speaker 1>So I thought I'll just ride it for another week.

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe if it gets down to two or even three

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>weeks left, the calculation changes slowly, but when you have

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:00.360
<v Speaker 1>four you definitely can afford to be doing some things.

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>So who would you potentially be looking at this weekend?

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean we mentioned with the Phantom Matt Roberts is

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the form players of the Company's only three

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighty K, and there's some some cheaper guys

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:11.159
<v Speaker 1>out there, but money's probably not so much an issue

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 1>in your position.

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Would two hundred game to be?

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 4>Yes? If I make two trades, I can buy anyone

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 4>in the game. If I make one trade, I think

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 4>Ed Richards, as I mentioned to Phantom is probably my target.

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 4>But Caleb's wrong as someone I haven't had this year.

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 4>I know he's a popular selection, but I've just he's

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 4>never I've never had him. I know some people jumped

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 4>off when he had a bit of a down patch,

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 4>but came back another one to eleven on the week.

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:34.360
<v Speaker 4>I think he won the medal as well. He's five

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:35.640
<v Speaker 4>point fifty K, which.

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Is third medal.

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 4>I think, yeah, well, yeah, that's a third medal in

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 4>that matchup, right, So seventy K cheaper than he was

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 4>at the start of the year. Freemantle or on fire,

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:47.160
<v Speaker 4>and I think they're relatively good in terms of when

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 4>their games land.

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 2>So hats on the weekend as well.

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 4>Oh is that the matchup this week?

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Matchup?

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 4>I highly recommend anyone from Freemantle this.

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Week and Chamswrakowski get on.

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the Dogs, I mean Richards and Trelaw of

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 1>two names that have been touched on. They have potentially

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the best run home for midfielders. When we saw they

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:10.400
<v Speaker 1>just blew Sydney away, but then they've got Melbourne midfield,

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you be decimated at the moment. Adelaide doesn't have the

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>strongest midfield and North GW we also to be tougher in.

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 3>The final round.

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:18.360
<v Speaker 1>But given that and you've got plenty in the bank,

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, would you just go straight for Tillay?

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:21.400
<v Speaker 3>You look at you like a pot.

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he's only in about five percent of team

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 1>still despite averaging near one hundred and twenty.

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, no season. I do like him. He's a delicious selection.

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:32.400
<v Speaker 4>My issue with him is that everyone in my midfield

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:35.399
<v Speaker 4>and mid only, so I'm really looking for either a

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 4>mid ford but probably a mid defender so that I

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 4>can sort of cover decos and maybe probably turn Max

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 4>Holmes into my bench player rather than have him on field.

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:46.719
<v Speaker 4>So because he's a little bit down on form at

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 4>the moment, Trellaw is a great selection. He's just limited

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 4>in that in a super coach sense and that he

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 4>can only play midfield, and I think that means I'm

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 4>playing Walsh or Tom Green on the bench every week,

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 4>and I feel like there's more value in finding a

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 4>DPP for me personally. Highly recommend for a Law as

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 4>a selection if you can, if you can get to.

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Him, Yeah, absolutely, any other names that you like this week,

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just in the hypothetical.

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 5>World that you get in a wonderful world where I

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 5>had trades, I haven't. I would a shocking learn. I

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 5>haven't really thought about it all that much this week.

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:29:19.840 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 5>I mean, if you need someone really cheap, like you

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 5>mentioned before, James Petling, that big James Petling fan, he

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 5>got a right up in the tackle. Robo pointed him

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 5>out as playing his best game. Surely the Giants now

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 5>after that, don't pull him back in. He's in that

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 5>rounded k price bracket. If you've got a bit a

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 5>spare cash laying around and you've got someone like Nathan

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 5>Krueger on your bench, I would be heavily considering like

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 5>a James Peteling.

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Or basically when he plays, he scores, and that's whether

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it's in the VFL or Yeah, AFL is just staying

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>in the team and not being the sub with you only, I.

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 4>Do have a sneaking suspicion he's out of contract, and

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 4>there's obviously talk about Harry Perriman leaving, and since he's

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 4>come back, he's basically been in the midfield in the guts,

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 4>so I feel like they might be like going, no, please,

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 4>don't leave. I think they might be kind of convincing

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 4>him to stay at the moment, so that encourages me

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 4>for him as a selection.

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>And the other name you mentioned earlier too in your

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 1>team already is Andrew Brashaw really coming good when and

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Freo have a nice matchup this week.

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 3>As you mentioned some of the Freer players.

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>The wrong picking up a little bit lately, but obviously

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Luke Ryan, you know know, any of the scores he

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:30.479
<v Speaker 1>was earlier in the year.

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, brace was really really coming good at the

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 3>right time.

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So when I picked my starting team, because Brashaw

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 4>was in it at the start, I try to pick

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:38.920
<v Speaker 4>guys who. I think at the end of the year

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 4>they are total points, they'll be in the top twenty ish.

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 4>Right now, he's twenty fourth for total points across all positions.

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 4>He's had one hundred and thirty seven the last two

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 4>weeks I believe, or two of the last three weeks

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 4>three round average of one hundred and twenty five basically, so

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 4>he's certainly coming good at the right time. If you

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 4>can afford him, grab him.

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 5>I do actually have a pod only there was one

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 5>sliding around in the back of my head. If you're

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 5>looking for a midfield up. Mid only is a bit annoying,

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 5>as you've just mentioned. But Tim Kelly is coming off

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 5>one O six ninety seven one thirty nine against Frio

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 5>in the Derby, has Gold Coast, North Melbourne, Carlton and

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 5>Geelong on the run home three of those sides. I

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 5>would back him in to score a bunch of points in.

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 3>The midfield that expensive.

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 5>I don't think he is five hundred and seven thousand

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 5>dollars four hundred so I think that's very good value

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 5>for someone in the midfield who has the capability to

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 5>do you know, an average of one fifteen of those

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 5>last couple of games and is in no side whatsoever

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 5>he is in.

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 4>He hasn't even picked himself.

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 2>He maybe not.

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 5>Let me find how many teams he is in. He's

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 5>in one thousand, one hundred and eleven teams, so maybe

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 5>you could be oney one hundred and twelve.

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>We're speaking of low ownership and another night I'll just

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>throw out there. You know, you'd have to be pretty

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>brave to pick him in the four line. Sharman looked

0:32:01.400 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>up in the top sorry to elect special, in the

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:08.960
<v Speaker 1>top ten percent. He's owned by one player.

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 4>And that's not just sure, it's not you.

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 5>No, it's not in credits for the backstory lect Dog

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 5>and I own a keeper league where you do need

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 5>to play keep position players. And we'll probably touch on

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 5>this a bit more on a second, but you own

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 5>every single sin killed to forward. That's not Max Kins,

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 5>not Max King. Yeah, so you own all the bad ones.

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, not Cooperman the greatest player of all.

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 5>Cooper Coleman Sharman, that's what they'll call him. Atter he

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 5>wins five in a row.

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>He's actually i mean one nine on the weekend, but

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>he did score eighty two and eighty eight before that,

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 1>so it wasn't No, he's totally out of knowing.

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 4>It's been reasonable three.

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Forty two K. But that is a brilliant segue.

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Patch, because any want to talk a little

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of Super Coach Draft with Like we mentioned earlier,

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 1>has been writing some articles, great articles for Code Sports

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>during the season, pointing out some of the best waiver

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>wire targets for your Super Coach Draft league. So we

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>don't talk about draft really enough on this show, but

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously that's something that you guys love and know a

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>lot about it, probably.

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 3>More than me, to be honest, because I really focus

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 3>on the classic game.

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>So can you give us the two minute to sell

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>on what's so great about Super Coach Draft and what's

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 1>happening in those leagues at this time of year?

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Yes? So well, at the moment, it's in finals for

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 4>Super Coach Draft for all formats, basically Supercoach Draft. It's

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 4>different to Super Coach Classic. There's no salary cap. It's

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 4>just pick your players in a draft format, believe it

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 4>or not, and that's the team you get. And you

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 4>can drop players at the wave of wire, pick them

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 4>up through the year, trade team to team. But the

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 4>beauty of it is that everyone's team is different because

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 4>a player can only be selected once, so you can't

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 4>you don't end up with everyone having I don't know,

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 4>Sam Flanders, Yeah, Sam Planners or micros sponsoraneity because he

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 4>can only be selected once. And it does let you

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 4>find guys like James Petling or Cooper Shaman or guys

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 4>like that off the wave of wire because you're looking

0:33:56.880 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 4>because all of the good players in quotation have been

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 4>selected in the draft. So you've got to really watch form,

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 4>look at upcoming oppositions, look at historical averages. You know

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 4>who averages well against the upcoming opponents. You kind of

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 4>got to make decisions based on limited information, and you

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 4>tend to find gems every now and then. And I've

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:20.800
<v Speaker 4>been putting together a few articles for Code Sports. One

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 4>that just came out last week was sort of guys

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:25.879
<v Speaker 4>that you should target towards the end of the year,

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:27.239
<v Speaker 4>and we can go through a couple of those names

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:29.399
<v Speaker 4>because a few of them fired on the weekend. But

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:32.799
<v Speaker 4>right now, in draft world, if you're in a redraft league,

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 4>which is just your draft for this season this season

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:38.240
<v Speaker 4>only you're in finals or you've been kicked out of finals,

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 4>and you can start worrying about who you're targeting next year,

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:43.360
<v Speaker 4>and if you're in a keeper league or a dynasty league,

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 4>this is the part of the year where you're sort

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:47.439
<v Speaker 4>of assessing who you might want to keep moving into

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 4>next season, or who you might want to put up

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 4>for sale or trade to other players and for draft

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:54.760
<v Speaker 4>picks and all that sort of stuff.

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Would you want to just pick out a couple of

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 3>those names.

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So there was a few that sort of stood

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 4>up on the w week and that I liked. Jaden

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 4>Hunt was one that wasn't massively owned. I think he

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 4>scored about ninety six. From Stephen May and jud mcavay

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 4>both scored reasonably well as well. For Stephen may's a

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 4>lot more highly owned than McVeigh, but you kind of

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:15.839
<v Speaker 4>got to find the guys who are owned. I think

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 4>McVay scored eighty. And then the one that I really

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 4>liked and was really hot on was Connor McDonald from Hawthorne,

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 4>who I believe he got well over the ton on

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:27.800
<v Speaker 4>the weekend and he's someone that I would be targeting

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 4>for his run home because their opposition tend to give

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 4>up points to sort of those forward midfield he kind

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 4>of players, but also for if you're in a keeper

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 4>league or a dynasty league, he's someone you should be

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:40.720
<v Speaker 4>trying to get your hands on because I think he's

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 4>pretty close to exploding next year.

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 5>So a keeper league and dynasty leagues for those that

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 5>haven't heard of those, like we're on obviously a couple together.

0:35:49.840 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm a huge fan of them. Do you want to

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:54.359
<v Speaker 5>give the spiel on what those leagues are and wanting

0:35:54.400 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 5>towers in terms of you know, keeping players year to year.

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:02.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, sure. So a keeper league generally you'll keep or

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 4>it depends you can set it up, but at the

0:36:04.080 --> 0:36:06.799
<v Speaker 4>end of the season, a lot of keeper leagues, you

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 4>keep half of your team and then you redraft the

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 4>other half next next year. So you'll keep your best

0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:14.960
<v Speaker 4>fifteen or your best ten players, and then you'll draft

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 4>ten more next year. A dynasty generally is it requires

0:36:19.680 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 4>a lot of Excel spreadsheets, but keeping an entire list

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 4>of AFL players. So we are in one with like

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:30.080
<v Speaker 4>forty six players on each list. So you have players

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 4>who are rookie list category B players who you're hoping

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 4>just get that contract extension, and then you have guys

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 4>as good as much as bonspelling your team. Generally dynasty,

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 4>you keep everyone and you have draft picks, and generally keepers,

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 4>you don't keep your entire team, but you keep a

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 4>portion of it for the next year then draft again.

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming those You know, if you're in a keeper league,

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that obviously changes the values of players, and you know,

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 1>how do you trying to weigh that up whether you

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously you know something like a Harry Sheesel, you know,

0:36:57.560 --> 0:36:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you right at the top of the list because it

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>be so good for so long. But then yeah, when

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at new guys coming in, how are you

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:07.000
<v Speaker 1>weighing up you know some first year players like I

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 1>don't know McCall of a Richmond versus you know, some

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 1>of these other mid tier type of guys that you're

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about it with scoring points now.

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 5>Oh yeah, and now this is the time of the

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 5>year where a lot of people will make the plays

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 5>for you know, if you've if you're a finalist and

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 5>you've got a Cane Mccaaloff on your lift list and

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 5>someone comes calling and says, hey, I've got this Travis

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:25.760
<v Speaker 5>Boke who will be good for maybe four more games,

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:28.320
<v Speaker 5>maybe he goes around again next year, but he's largely

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 5>the sub you know, as from a long term super

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 5>coach value proposition worth not a lot aside from the

0:37:35.760 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 5>next four weeks, or someone like a Mark Pittnette who

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:42.799
<v Speaker 5>you've spoken up a lot. You can then you know,

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 5>go go to market and try and drag out some

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 5>of these younger guys who you know, maybe they've got

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 5>a lot of potential, they haven't shown it. You get

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 5>to do some really fun horse trading and then you know,

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 5>throwing in draft picks as well, where you know, you

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:58.360
<v Speaker 5>give me a third round pick as well. It really

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:01.839
<v Speaker 5>does kind of simulate trade week, but you just kind

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 5>of get to do it with you know, imaginary versions

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 5>of footballers, which can be a lot of fun.

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:10.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a lot of fun that deciding am I

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 4>going to go for the flag this year? But it's

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:14.760
<v Speaker 4>going to cost me my first Like whoever I drafted

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:16.960
<v Speaker 4>in the first round last year? Can I stomach that?

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 4>And historically I say yes, I can stomach that. However,

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 4>it's only worked once. But that's that's the fun of it.

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:25.360
<v Speaker 1>And it's really that real list management isn't by the

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:26.880
<v Speaker 1>sound of it, that you're trying to You need to

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 1>know where your list is at, Like, you know, are

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you aiming for a flag now or maybe in three years, and.

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 3>That would dictate your strategy.

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, Like I went through the big Rebeld where I

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 5>sold off, I took over the team, sold off everyone

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 5>had five top ten draft picks, and drafted row Sarong,

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 5>Jackson Green, and then sold off one of the other

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:48.400
<v Speaker 5>picks for later picks. And yeah, you can like go

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:50.400
<v Speaker 5>hard at the rebuild and bottom out and crash, or

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 5>you can kind of try and do what let does

0:38:52.560 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 5>and kind of stagger it and make sure you're fielding

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 5>aside the whole way through. And yeah, I know it's

0:38:57.280 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 5>kind of very interesting and very fun and we'll dynamic

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 5>mech As opposed to everyone having the same.

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:05.359
<v Speaker 4>Players, well, I mean it's ended up with guys like

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 4>in my personal team, James Petling, Cooper Sharm and Matt Welfie.

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 4>There are like some of my better players because just

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 4>because they play games. And as a result, every year

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 4>I finish about eighth, So I'm a really middling team.

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 4>But I'm okay with it because it's fun and I

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 4>get to watch Matt gwelf you play.

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:24.399
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you get late in depth discussions about how much

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:27.320
<v Speaker 5>Matt Kennedy is worth at the trade table exactly.

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I mean yeah, I mean one of the

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 1>things I love about too, because it's just, you know,

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:32.440
<v Speaker 1>it gives you a lot more reason to watch games

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:34.360
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend, a lot more investment in you know,

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:37.279
<v Speaker 1>you're watching Frero a g WUS play, but yeah, this

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:39.479
<v Speaker 1>time a lot of you know, looking at those pods

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 1>in some of those finals matchups. You know, watching Freo,

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone's you know that I'm Playing's got Ryan and then well, what's.

0:39:43.760 --> 0:39:47.759
<v Speaker 5>The wrong You might have five players that are different, Yeah,

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:49.879
<v Speaker 5>in in a final this weekend.

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:52.960
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, that's we got draft it's and yeah, the

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:55.759
<v Speaker 1>value of an eighty point performance suddenly is worth a

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 1>hell of a lot more.

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 5>And that The one thing we haven't mentioned that's one

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:01.760
<v Speaker 5>of the big draw cards for draft is draft day itself.

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 5>You talk about draft day if you're doing just a redrafts,

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:08.160
<v Speaker 5>you're doing your pick your team, that's your team for

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 5>the year.

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 2>End of the year.

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 5>You know, next season you're picking an entirely different team.

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 5>Draft Day is the day of the year. It's Christmas.

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it is. It's exactly that. It's Christmas. So we

0:40:18.560 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 4>have a draft, we get together, we supply barbecued foods,

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:27.240
<v Speaker 4>American barbecued foods and beers and soft drinks, and.

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 5>We put Draft Day or Moneyball on in the background.

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 4>Yes, or most of the time both both. We've got

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 4>a big on the sheet on the wall where we

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:37.360
<v Speaker 4>have everyone's name their draft picks, and then they have

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 4>to as they're selecting, they have to go up write

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 4>the name on the board and while everyone's watching and

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:44.480
<v Speaker 4>so like, it's very dramatic when you reveal who the

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 4>first selection of the draft is going to be. And

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 4>it's just a lot of fun and it's a great

0:40:48.520 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 4>way to get together and it kind of obviously you've

0:40:50.680 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 4>done a bit of research leading up to that, but

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 4>for us it kind of kicks off the super coach season.

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:55.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, you know you play around hypothetically with Classic whenever

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 5>Team Picker opens it. Yeah, once you start doing your

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 5>first draft, that's that's when it's footy season.

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 4>I'll say this, I think if you're if you're a

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:10.799
<v Speaker 4>draft enthusiast, and particularly in deep league drafts where you've

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 4>got a lot of players on your list, I tend

0:41:12.680 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 4>to reckon you find you do better in terms of

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:19.239
<v Speaker 4>finding rookies or cash cows in Classic because you kind

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 4>of done the research, like the way Phantom knows Maddie

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:25.239
<v Speaker 4>Roberts stats from juniors. You kind of have to know

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 4>that if you're drafting, particularly in a keeper league or

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:31.480
<v Speaker 4>a dynasty league, you have to know what the young

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 4>players do and where they might fit into their teams.

0:41:34.120 --> 0:41:35.279
<v Speaker 4>So it does give you a little bit of a

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 4>leg up in that in that sense, I find.

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this week I'm looking at you know, someone like

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:40.759
<v Speaker 1>a Peeling or Keeper Sharman have just suddenly popped up

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 1>on the radar for Classic, but you're all over them

0:41:43.080 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>because you've been watching them closely for draft this whole time.

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:48.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they've featured in a few Code Sport articles over

0:41:48.760 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 4>the journey.

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 5>Subscribe if somebody wants to get into Supercoach Draft. Obviously

0:41:54.320 --> 0:41:57.239
<v Speaker 5>the Supercoach platform doesn't really have the capacity to do

0:41:57.280 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 5>the dynasty leagues, but obviously reading some of your stuff

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:03.959
<v Speaker 5>at the start of the year and you'll do stuff

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:06.880
<v Speaker 5>over summer, hopefully talking about where to get started. But

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:08.759
<v Speaker 5>for somebody that's interested and wants to know more, like

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 5>what's the how would you go about starting a new

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:12.840
<v Speaker 5>draft from scratch?

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:14.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Well, the first thing I'd do is just find

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 4>a few friends who are interested. Keep it simple for

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:20.359
<v Speaker 4>the first first year, get ten people together, let's call

0:42:20.400 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 4>it ten people, and just have a basic we're you

0:42:23.200 --> 0:42:25.840
<v Speaker 4>going to do a draft just for this year. Whatever

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:28.360
<v Speaker 4>it is five defenders, five mids, five forwards and a

0:42:28.440 --> 0:42:31.160
<v Speaker 4>ruck or whatever the numbers and end up being, and

0:42:31.560 --> 0:42:34.360
<v Speaker 4>just have a crack. Then you can practice on the

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 4>super coach platform there is in the preseason. There's like

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:40.799
<v Speaker 4>practice drafts, mock drafts you can join. There's also open

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 4>leagues you can just join if you want to. There's

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 4>always message boards and stuff and social media as well.

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:49.319
<v Speaker 4>There's always people looking for draft leaks. But just have

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 4>a crack. Basically, it's a lot of fun and I

0:42:52.239 --> 0:42:54.239
<v Speaker 4>get way more out of enjoyment out of it or

0:42:54.280 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 4>for filment out of it than classic classics fun and

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 4>it's always been there, but it probably doesn't require the

0:43:00.160 --> 0:43:02.840
<v Speaker 4>depth frustrating research this draft.

0:43:02.880 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 5>You don't need to know you know, six hundred of

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 5>the eight hundred players on AFL list. You just need

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:10.239
<v Speaker 5>to know maybe you know in one hundred of them.

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I don't need to know. Isaac Keel is kicking

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 4>two goals a week for Saint Kilda's VFL. You do

0:43:15.680 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 4>not know for Supercoach Classic.

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:19.799
<v Speaker 5>I don't need to be tracking Cane Baldwin's injury each

0:43:19.840 --> 0:43:21.560
<v Speaker 5>and every week on the Esendon injury list.

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 4>Ryan Gardner doesn't feature much prominence in Coach Classic. But yeah,

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:27.719
<v Speaker 4>so it's just a lot of fun. So if you're

0:43:27.719 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 4>out there play Supercoach Draft, there's going to be plenty

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 4>of resources next year, I hope. So there will be

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:35.840
<v Speaker 4>plenty of resources next year to teach you how to play.

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:43:36.440 --> 0:43:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, it's a mission for me for next year is

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:40.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely to get more into it, even for no other

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 1>reason that I can understand what's going on when someone

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:44.920
<v Speaker 1>wanders around to Patch in the office and says, come on,

0:43:44.960 --> 0:43:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you've got to give me two future picks for Tom McDonald.

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:51.239
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not sure what that was going on.

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 2>No, neither do I.

0:43:53.000 --> 0:43:57.880
<v Speaker 5>Tom McDonald's not worth much so anyway, Yeah, no, it

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 5>is great fun, big fan, and I'm hoping that we'll

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 5>be able to do some more content around it next

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:02.760
<v Speaker 5>year as well.

0:44:02.880 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah hopefully.

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that is the plan. So there's a wrap quick

0:44:06.320 --> 0:44:08.319
<v Speaker 1>prime BEFO. We're on Super Coach Strift. We better get

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 1>into the last few segments for the show, starting with

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Stats with Our, which is normally where James throws to

0:44:14.640 --> 0:44:15.279
<v Speaker 1>l who is me?

0:44:15.440 --> 0:44:17.720
<v Speaker 3>So, oh yeah, it's.

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:20.319
<v Speaker 2>Time for stats with Al with al Al, do you

0:44:20.360 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 2>have any stats for us?

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:23.359
<v Speaker 3>I do have some, says thank you, Patch. I touched

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:23.840
<v Speaker 3>on it earlier.

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Alex Sexton kicked five goals in the VFL scored one

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty two super Coach points. So if you've

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>got him on the bench as a but he a

0:44:31.040 --> 0:44:32.520
<v Speaker 1>chance he could come back in what position?

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Was he playing?

0:44:33.680 --> 0:44:35.799
<v Speaker 3>Well, he kicked five goals, so he probably fought.

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:37.680
<v Speaker 2>But he then comes in as a defender, you reckon?

0:44:37.800 --> 0:44:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Or does he Well?

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he played forward and a bit of wing

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:42.040
<v Speaker 1>last time he was in it, So I mean it's

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of a positive that he can play anywhere, but

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess you'd rather be playing defense if he's in your.

0:44:46.440 --> 0:44:49.279
<v Speaker 2>Super Coach team. Does he does his flexibility mean he

0:44:49.320 --> 0:44:50.719
<v Speaker 2>might come back the sub.

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, possibly, But I mean if he comes back and

0:44:55.120 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Fisher comes back, all of a sudden, you've got this

0:44:56.760 --> 0:44:58.319
<v Speaker 1>forward defense swing back again.

0:44:58.360 --> 0:44:59.719
<v Speaker 3>Which is that looks great for me?

0:44:59.719 --> 0:45:01.319
<v Speaker 1>About three or four weeks ago and then it all

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:03.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of went out the window, but just quickly scanning

0:45:03.520 --> 0:45:05.719
<v Speaker 1>some of the supercoach numbers from the VFL and the

0:45:05.760 --> 0:45:08.200
<v Speaker 1>second tier leagues. You can see all of these on

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a Code Sports as of I think tomorrow morning. But

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:13.280
<v Speaker 1>a few other bench players who did pretty well Joe Clark,

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Revel, Hugo Ghusslie all scored over one hundred, so

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 1>as a chance we might see a few of them

0:45:17.719 --> 0:45:19.840
<v Speaker 1>back in the selection mix, which could be handy if

0:45:19.880 --> 0:45:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you're just looking for some more warm bodies going into

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the finals. And another name that bobbed up scoring a

0:45:24.480 --> 0:45:26.920
<v Speaker 1>season high ninety three super coach points in the waffle

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Cohen Livingston, which throw the cat amongst the pigeons.

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:32.719
<v Speaker 3>If he came in for a debut.

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 2>That would be a wild term events, so.

0:45:37.120 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Just would't to keep it on. I think Matt Flyinn

0:45:38.560 --> 0:45:41.160
<v Speaker 3>scored abou one hundred and fifty, so you'd think.

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:41.920
<v Speaker 2>He might be in first.

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, maybe it's three goals for Cohen, so just keep

0:45:45.239 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 1>an eye out for that one. So onto quick fire

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:49.919
<v Speaker 1>around we'll try and actually keep this quick. We haven't

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:51.920
<v Speaker 1>done very good job of this all year of actually

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:54.760
<v Speaker 1>making this quick fire. But ask both of you, gentlemen,

0:45:54.840 --> 0:45:57.359
<v Speaker 1>yes or no, could you if you had trades like

0:45:57.640 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the great leg although you've got some money in the

0:45:59.000 --> 0:46:00.799
<v Speaker 1>bank so you probably don't need to be Could you

0:46:00.840 --> 0:46:04.959
<v Speaker 1>potentially consider trading Luke Ryan in the form and roll

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that he's in at the moment legally?

0:46:07.760 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I mean yeah, he's in a bad role. He's

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:15.600
<v Speaker 5>in everyone's team. Would be a great non pod for

0:46:15.640 --> 0:46:18.080
<v Speaker 5>as long as Alex Pears is out. Yes, I don'

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:20.759
<v Speaker 5>get ever while boy, yeah, well his armies in a

0:46:20.760 --> 0:46:23.200
<v Speaker 5>big cast, so that's probably a decent indication to be

0:46:23.280 --> 0:46:23.879
<v Speaker 5>out for a while.

0:46:24.480 --> 0:46:27.319
<v Speaker 4>Yep, yes, you can trade him, but if you don't

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:31.400
<v Speaker 4>have cash, the options, I would say, are relatively limited,

0:46:31.560 --> 0:46:34.920
<v Speaker 4>so it's you basically got to go up from him

0:46:35.080 --> 0:46:36.600
<v Speaker 4>for it to be a value prospect.

0:46:36.640 --> 0:46:38.000
<v Speaker 3>In my eyes, how much money is he lost?

0:46:38.000 --> 0:46:41.600
<v Speaker 4>What he's about? What is he five twenty four? Kow?

0:46:41.880 --> 0:46:43.200
<v Speaker 3>It was like seven hundred grand?

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:45.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yes, yes he was when I got him, and

0:46:46.239 --> 0:46:50.520
<v Speaker 4>over the last five rounds he's averaging what ninety seven

0:46:50.560 --> 0:46:52.200
<v Speaker 4>which isn't a lot for a defender, but.

0:46:52.360 --> 0:46:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Is Lucky Whitfield worthy.

0:46:54.200 --> 0:46:57.440
<v Speaker 4>Whitfield is five hundred and ninety seven thousand. Good Lord

0:46:57.520 --> 0:46:59.480
<v Speaker 4>got him at sub five hundred I believe.

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:01.799
<v Speaker 2>I was very tempted, but Tim talked me out of it.

0:47:01.800 --> 0:47:02.319
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Tim.

0:47:02.960 --> 0:47:03.080
<v Speaker 3>There.

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:05.000
<v Speaker 5>When Tim traded him out of him, it was Yeah,

0:47:05.040 --> 0:47:07.400
<v Speaker 5>that was part of the reason why I was considering trading.

0:47:08.680 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Anyway.

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:11.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the issue with him is that everyone who's informed

0:47:11.840 --> 0:47:13.399
<v Speaker 4>basically costs more money.

0:47:13.480 --> 0:47:13.600
<v Speaker 6>Then.

0:47:13.719 --> 0:47:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so you need some cash in the bank. Maybe

0:47:15.640 --> 0:47:18.279
<v Speaker 1>you could trade out a billy dealing to free up

0:47:18.320 --> 0:47:20.799
<v Speaker 1>some money next year. We'll go through a lot more

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of these, maybe over the next few weeks. But just

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:24.600
<v Speaker 1>one name off the top of my head, Tom Green,

0:47:25.520 --> 0:47:27.200
<v Speaker 1>would you be starting him next year based on.

0:47:27.280 --> 0:47:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Now, I'll consider it. Yep.

0:47:29.640 --> 0:47:31.360
<v Speaker 5>We're saying that he can be a fantasy black, a

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:34.719
<v Speaker 5>super coach beast when he gets going. If he looks

0:47:34.719 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 5>like he might get going, then I will probably start him.

0:47:38.320 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 4>No, I'm not starting him. He he scored five of

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 4>the week I traded him in and since, and he's

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:48.600
<v Speaker 4>averaged about one hundred, So I'm not interested. It's all right,

0:47:48.960 --> 0:47:49.799
<v Speaker 4>My gut was right.

0:47:50.040 --> 0:47:52.200
<v Speaker 5>But if you ignore all of his bad scores, he

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:53.440
<v Speaker 5>averages one hundred and fifty.

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 4>That's true. That is true, that's maths.

0:47:56.200 --> 0:47:58.480
<v Speaker 5>I believe that is mass Thus talking like a draft

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:01.920
<v Speaker 5>like used castles. When to sell someone in a draft

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 5>league to someone who know all these bad scores.

0:48:04.120 --> 0:48:04.719
<v Speaker 2>He's really good.

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:07.760
<v Speaker 4>No, I think I think we're going to have plenty

0:48:07.760 --> 0:48:09.359
<v Speaker 4>of value next year, and I don't think he's going

0:48:09.400 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 4>to be providing it.

0:48:10.160 --> 0:48:13.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, mid only does hurt. Yeah, anyway, Yes.

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Talking about keeper leagues and draft leagues, if you had

0:48:16.120 --> 0:48:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to pick one of Nick Dacos or Harry Shecheezel, Oh,

0:48:20.640 --> 0:48:24.040
<v Speaker 1>could you choose between them?

0:48:24.360 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 4>It's win win to be honest, is Nick Dakos going

0:48:27.640 --> 0:48:28.600
<v Speaker 4>to retain deep?

0:48:28.640 --> 0:48:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's kind of the next part of the question. Yeah,

0:48:30.120 --> 0:48:32.719
<v Speaker 1>would you pick Daikos if he's a mid only? Would

0:48:32.760 --> 0:48:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you pick Cheesel if he's a mid only? In Classic?

0:48:36.680 --> 0:48:40.800
<v Speaker 5>Based on Yeah, I think I would for on both counts.

0:48:41.760 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:48:43.960 --> 0:48:47.600
<v Speaker 5>Maybe just go with Dekos just ahead. But gee whiz,

0:48:47.640 --> 0:48:49.960
<v Speaker 5>I'd be very happy with either of them.

0:48:50.160 --> 0:48:52.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's a lot of moving parts in the north Side,

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:54.880
<v Speaker 4>so I need to know Shecheezel's role. I think Dakos

0:48:55.000 --> 0:48:57.200
<v Speaker 4>is a safer bed. We saw on the weekend what

0:48:57.280 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 4>he can do in both contested and uncontested. But I

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:04.960
<v Speaker 4>love it when a DPP or a player changes into

0:49:05.000 --> 0:49:07.920
<v Speaker 4>mid only because they become an instant pod, so she

0:49:07.960 --> 0:49:10.640
<v Speaker 4>has a defense. Everyone would pick him. Comes amid, everyone

0:49:10.640 --> 0:49:12.879
<v Speaker 4>goes ah. I don't really know about his role, but

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:15.399
<v Speaker 4>he'll be in a lot less teams and he'll be very,

0:49:15.680 --> 0:49:17.040
<v Speaker 4>very interesting.

0:49:17.239 --> 0:49:20.279
<v Speaker 5>From a long term keeper perspective. The slight worry is

0:49:20.280 --> 0:49:24.160
<v Speaker 5>because she's had such a highly tattered junior prospect as

0:49:24.160 --> 0:49:27.400
<v Speaker 5>a forward and if they know these mids do develop

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:30.960
<v Speaker 5>for North Melbourne, maybe he becomes like the reverse Iszacini

0:49:31.840 --> 0:49:33.839
<v Speaker 5>and becomes more of a forward and where he could

0:49:33.880 --> 0:49:37.239
<v Speaker 5>be a fantastic player but not as supercut relevant. So

0:49:37.239 --> 0:49:39.759
<v Speaker 5>I think that's the only thing that could tilt it.

0:49:39.800 --> 0:49:43.319
<v Speaker 5>Also probably not going to happen. It was incredible and I.

0:49:43.320 --> 0:49:45.799
<v Speaker 4>Think three goals against the Blues and looked pretty good.

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:49.760
<v Speaker 5>But yes, yeah, I think he's I think he's.

0:49:49.040 --> 0:49:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Thinking differently when you're talking about the long term keeper leagues.

0:49:51.480 --> 0:49:53.719
<v Speaker 1>What's he going to be doing in five years if

0:49:53.760 --> 0:49:56.319
<v Speaker 1>obviously you're playing a fee bit for him now. And

0:49:56.520 --> 0:49:59.480
<v Speaker 1>random question, just to finish off enjoying the Olympics, what

0:49:59.600 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 1>have you got a favorite sport?

0:50:00.600 --> 0:50:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Maybe one of the more off Broadway.

0:50:03.560 --> 0:50:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I'll give me competitions, give me some European handball.

0:50:05.920 --> 0:50:07.520
<v Speaker 3>That's what I had down. I love the European it.

0:50:07.680 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Was so good.

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:09.480
<v Speaker 5>I think we were talking about this in the office

0:50:09.480 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 5>in the day. It's just I love it. It's fantastic,

0:50:12.760 --> 0:50:15.680
<v Speaker 5>bizarre sport. I adore it.

0:50:15.760 --> 0:50:19.240
<v Speaker 4>A breakdancing obviously at the top of my list.

0:50:19.719 --> 0:50:22.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean you are obviously an amateur breakdancer.

0:50:23.000 --> 0:50:26.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think you do enough Google searching, you'll find

0:50:26.080 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 4>me doing some breakdancing on the internet for sure.

0:50:28.719 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 5>You just got to sort through all the breakdown videos

0:50:30.960 --> 0:50:31.960
<v Speaker 5>from the breakdancing.

0:50:32.080 --> 0:50:36.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, that was intentional, all right, that wasn't it.

0:50:36.040 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 1>It was expecting back to super coach. Can we pick

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:41.799
<v Speaker 1>a captain this weekend? Obviously it was massive last weekend

0:50:41.800 --> 0:50:43.160
<v Speaker 1>if you got a cheesel or if you've got a

0:50:43.280 --> 0:50:45.960
<v Speaker 1>cherry versus people. We were relying on a bond and

0:50:45.960 --> 0:50:48.160
<v Speaker 1>then we had obviously Dacas went pretty big as well.

0:50:48.200 --> 0:50:51.040
<v Speaker 1>But seeing anyone we like this weekend, actually think it's

0:50:51.040 --> 0:50:56.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty tough, partially because for some bizarre reason, maybe Olympics related,

0:50:56.040 --> 0:50:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the AFL has scheduled two matches on Friday night, including

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:02.320
<v Speaker 1>West Coast versus Gold Coo. So our friend Cohen Livingston

0:51:02.360 --> 0:51:05.200
<v Speaker 1>if he doesn't make the team popular loophole. But he'll

0:51:05.200 --> 0:51:07.759
<v Speaker 1>be playing on Friday, so that does, yeah, make things

0:51:07.760 --> 0:51:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit more tricky.

0:51:08.880 --> 0:51:14.160
<v Speaker 5>Good thing, I've got six other guys show are not playing. Yeah,

0:51:14.200 --> 0:51:16.200
<v Speaker 5>that does throw the spanner in the works a little bit.

0:51:17.360 --> 0:51:21.160
<v Speaker 5>I mean the bondsibous one that stands out, or any

0:51:21.200 --> 0:51:25.120
<v Speaker 5>of those Bulldogs players or Max Gorn on Friday, if

0:51:25.160 --> 0:51:27.640
<v Speaker 5>you had a law or oh if you've got Trelaw,

0:51:27.719 --> 0:51:31.359
<v Speaker 5>absolutely slap it on him, that would be. Yeah, that'd

0:51:31.400 --> 0:51:35.160
<v Speaker 5>be my shout. I'm looking at Harry Cheezel against Richmond.

0:51:35.400 --> 0:51:37.839
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I think that's that's the one that really stands out.

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:40.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean midfielder's end sort of. Half backs have both

0:51:40.760 --> 0:51:44.279
<v Speaker 1>scored extremely well against Richmond this year, including Deekos as

0:51:44.280 --> 0:51:46.360
<v Speaker 1>we saw on the weekend, and they decided not to

0:51:46.400 --> 0:51:48.399
<v Speaker 1>tag him for a quarter and that didn't go so well,

0:51:48.480 --> 0:51:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and then sort of had a bit of a Liam

0:51:50.600 --> 0:51:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Baker a bit of seth gamble running around with him.

0:51:52.840 --> 0:51:55.399
<v Speaker 1>Slowed him down a signy bit. But yeah, I'd still

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:57.359
<v Speaker 1>back in Harry. Sheees to go pretty well and even

0:51:57.400 --> 0:51:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you know an LDU type or of mkirche comes back

0:51:59.520 --> 0:52:00.560
<v Speaker 1>should score well as well.

0:52:00.680 --> 0:52:03.560
<v Speaker 4>Yep, yeah, I think Bonds the obvious one, except I

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:06.000
<v Speaker 4>have a rule that I won't VC on the first

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:08.839
<v Speaker 4>night of the round. I don't know why that's the rule.

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:10.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't understand it.

0:52:10.120 --> 0:52:12.239
<v Speaker 4>I also have a set of rules I apply my

0:52:12.360 --> 0:52:14.360
<v Speaker 4>captaincy and vice seventy two. He's the only one that

0:52:14.400 --> 0:52:17.200
<v Speaker 4>actually passes those rules this week. But my other option,

0:52:17.440 --> 0:52:20.279
<v Speaker 4>my slight pottish option, is probably Tom Stewart, who won

0:52:20.400 --> 0:52:22.680
<v Speaker 4>thirty four, ninety nine and one seventy four in his

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:25.920
<v Speaker 4>last three against Adelaide. The one thirty four was from

0:52:26.000 --> 0:52:28.600
<v Speaker 4>this year, so a bit, and he seems to be

0:52:28.719 --> 0:52:31.120
<v Speaker 4>back in form at the cost of Max Holmes.

0:52:31.200 --> 0:52:33.720
<v Speaker 3>It looks like midfield.

0:52:34.360 --> 0:52:35.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean's Sam Flanders on a Friday night.

0:52:35.880 --> 0:52:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I was going to ask about him, your favorite

0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that we forget to mention every week, but I mean,

0:52:39.600 --> 0:52:42.319
<v Speaker 1>coming off of one thirty, yeah, plays.

0:52:42.000 --> 0:52:45.839
<v Speaker 5>The Eagles coming off of one forty, well, please our

0:52:46.080 --> 0:52:48.800
<v Speaker 5>disrespect to our Lord and savior, Sam Flanders.

0:52:48.840 --> 0:52:51.200
<v Speaker 4>He still hasn't dropped below one hundred this year, still

0:52:52.360 --> 0:52:56.040
<v Speaker 4>low one hundred. That's remarkable, incredible, that's remarkable.

0:52:57.000 --> 0:52:59.880
<v Speaker 5>So I think it'll be at Flanders into Sheeesel situation

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 5>for me, but also if you've got to bra sure

0:53:03.480 --> 0:53:06.160
<v Speaker 5>us a wrong, yeah, I don't.

0:53:06.600 --> 0:53:08.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to elaborate, but you know what I mean.

0:53:09.600 --> 0:53:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean the other team that gives up points to

0:53:11.000 --> 0:53:14.080
<v Speaker 1>defenders is some Kilda. I've got a reputation for that.

0:53:14.120 --> 0:53:17.000
<v Speaker 1>And you've got Dane zorco playing on Sunday the Saints

0:53:17.960 --> 0:53:20.120
<v Speaker 1>in some decent form at the moment, so maybe that

0:53:20.120 --> 0:53:22.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't quite apply. But yeah, that's been been a sort

0:53:22.200 --> 0:53:23.719
<v Speaker 1>of a long standing thing in Super Coach. And the

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:25.840
<v Speaker 1>only other one I'd keep in mind is Tristan Cherry

0:53:25.960 --> 0:53:28.719
<v Speaker 1>was obviously massive on the weekend. If Nank doesn't get up,

0:53:29.440 --> 0:53:32.120
<v Speaker 1>he'll be racking against you know, a combination of Samson

0:53:32.200 --> 0:53:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Ryan and Noah Bolter and Jacob Kaski. So you think

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you'd probably go right as well, you'd think so. Now,

0:53:39.480 --> 0:53:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I looked up the head to head prediction last week

0:53:41.040 --> 0:53:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and I in my memory this was definitely me backing

0:53:44.080 --> 0:53:47.640
<v Speaker 1>in Harry Sheesel versus James's Nick Dekos.

0:53:47.440 --> 0:53:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Allow its exactly.

0:53:48.960 --> 0:53:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Let's just go with that.

0:53:50.560 --> 0:53:54.600
<v Speaker 5>Anyone who objects, please raise their hand. No objections, all.

0:53:54.600 --> 0:53:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Right, chect the tape and it didn't exactly say, Harry Sheesel,

0:53:57.280 --> 0:53:59.440
<v Speaker 1>but that's I'm certain that's what it was.

0:53:59.480 --> 0:54:00.920
<v Speaker 3>So we'll we'll run, we'll call.

0:54:00.800 --> 0:54:03.000
<v Speaker 5>It, we'll call it a win to you and James

0:54:03.000 --> 0:54:06.160
<v Speaker 5>can mail in his objections from Noosera wherever he is.

0:54:06.840 --> 0:54:07.719
<v Speaker 3>Good, good plan.

0:54:08.040 --> 0:54:09.359
<v Speaker 1>So I don't actually have one down for this week

0:54:09.400 --> 0:54:11.799
<v Speaker 1>and James is in here, so do we just call

0:54:11.840 --> 0:54:12.239
<v Speaker 1>it a four.

0:54:12.160 --> 0:54:17.000
<v Speaker 4>Foot potentially yeah, football club versus Harry Sheesel's score.

0:54:18.280 --> 0:54:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Harry Chesel, I'm backing in the shees there.

0:54:24.160 --> 0:54:26.920
<v Speaker 1>And the last topic on the rundown is Monday moves.

0:54:26.920 --> 0:54:28.960
<v Speaker 1>But this is going to be a very short segment

0:54:29.000 --> 0:54:30.239
<v Speaker 1>to anything for you.

0:54:30.719 --> 0:54:34.520
<v Speaker 5>That I will be playing with some DPPs and swings.

0:54:34.920 --> 0:54:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean looking at those order of games quickly. Is

0:54:36.719 --> 0:54:39.640
<v Speaker 1>there any much loopholing we can do? Obviously, as you said,

0:54:39.640 --> 0:54:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you've got a few zero so it gives you some options.

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully I can loot mason Wood and Kolby mcirtchhill. Please

0:54:45.560 --> 0:54:46.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody else talk.

0:54:49.000 --> 0:54:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Begging.

0:54:51.280 --> 0:54:52.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've just got the one trade. I don't want

0:54:52.840 --> 0:54:55.000
<v Speaker 1>to use it, so probably no trades for me this weekend,

0:54:55.040 --> 0:55:00.319
<v Speaker 1>but like you will be well weariously.

0:54:58.600 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 4>Through are you trading as discussed earlier. It's it's a

0:55:02.200 --> 0:55:04.880
<v Speaker 4>decision if I use what twenty five percent of my

0:55:04.880 --> 0:55:08.360
<v Speaker 4>remaining trades or fifty percent. If it's twenty five percent, dowling,

0:55:08.440 --> 0:55:10.759
<v Speaker 4>the riches is locked in. If it's fifty percent, it's

0:55:10.800 --> 0:55:14.000
<v Speaker 4>going to be dowling to a Sinclare who was also

0:55:14.680 --> 0:55:19.359
<v Speaker 4>defense mid eligible bit Pottish scoring relatively well, and it

0:55:19.400 --> 0:55:21.840
<v Speaker 4>allows me to probably fix up one dead rookie in

0:55:21.840 --> 0:55:22.600
<v Speaker 4>the back line.

0:55:23.120 --> 0:55:26.120
<v Speaker 3>I like it, yeah, and simply as a great run home.

0:55:26.280 --> 0:55:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I think you were playing every game at Marble from

0:55:28.560 --> 0:55:31.520
<v Speaker 1>here on in, so I mean as Wane Miller for

0:55:31.560 --> 0:55:33.759
<v Speaker 1>another if you want more of an even more potty pod,

0:55:34.040 --> 0:55:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I like it.

0:55:34.600 --> 0:55:34.799
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:55:34.880 --> 0:55:36.719
<v Speaker 4>The only sure I have is I keep choosing. I

0:55:36.800 --> 0:55:39.400
<v Speaker 4>keep loopholing all these big scores and choosing the wrong one,

0:55:39.600 --> 0:55:43.120
<v Speaker 4>like taking Hogan's one fourteen last week and Kerno's one

0:55:43.239 --> 0:55:45.960
<v Speaker 4>nineteen this week. Actually lost fifty points both times. So

0:55:46.520 --> 0:55:48.719
<v Speaker 4>I just you know, you never know.

0:55:49.000 --> 0:55:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, let me go get my tiny vale.

0:55:54.000 --> 0:55:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Remember to subscribe to super Coach Plus to take your

0:55:57.239 --> 0:56:01.080
<v Speaker 1>game to the next level. Follow Code sports latest supercoaching

0:56:01.080 --> 0:56:03.240
<v Speaker 1>news and analysis, leave a rating or review on Apple

0:56:03.640 --> 0:56:06.200
<v Speaker 1>or Spotify, and subscribe on YouTube to get a notification

0:56:06.239 --> 0:56:09.520
<v Speaker 1>whenever the latest episodes drop. Of course, follow all the

0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:12.280
<v Speaker 1>official Super coach AFIL social accounts for all your finals

0:56:12.280 --> 0:56:15.520
<v Speaker 1>action and reaction across the week and across the weekend.

0:56:15.680 --> 0:56:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to Patch, Thank you, Hello, yes, hi, I think

0:56:20.040 --> 0:56:20.360
<v Speaker 3>we did that.

0:56:20.360 --> 0:56:20.919
<v Speaker 4>Hell long a bit?

0:56:21.400 --> 0:56:23.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah no, Thank you for having me yet again and

0:56:24.000 --> 0:56:26.000
<v Speaker 5>putting up with my utter nonsense.

0:56:25.840 --> 0:56:28.880
<v Speaker 3>And thanks huge. Thank you too, Lech for jumping on.

0:56:28.880 --> 0:56:31.560
<v Speaker 1>It's been an absolute pleasure talking draft and hearing about

0:56:31.560 --> 0:56:34.240
<v Speaker 1>your Supercoach adventures this season.

0:56:34.360 --> 0:56:36.040
<v Speaker 4>Oh great to be Thanks for having me.

0:56:36.120 --> 0:56:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully we'll get you back on pretty soon. And thanks

0:56:38.600 --> 0:56:41.399
<v Speaker 1>of course to the Phantom for jumping on as well.

0:56:41.400 --> 0:56:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks everybody for watching and listening. I've been Al Payton,

0:56:44.520 --> 0:56:47.120
<v Speaker 1>have a great Round twenty one and happy super coaching.