WEBVTT - Paul Murray Live | 8 October

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>From the Skying Center. This is Paul Murray Live. Thank you,

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:09.960
<v Speaker 1>sharing again an excellent hour of television. Congratulations to her

0:00:10.039 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and the team that's putting it together both over there

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and here. Welcome to a show where we don't muck around,

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>We don't miss the point. We go straight after it

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>each and every night. And one of the weirder moments

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:22.799
<v Speaker 1>of American politics of the past couple of years was

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>an obvious low point for Donald Trump when he was

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>considered to be mocking a disabled reporter during the twenty

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>sixteen campaign. Written by a NASA reporter. Now, the poor guy.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 2>You got to see this guy.

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I don't know what I said. Ah, I don't remember.

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 3>He's got like I don't remember. Oh, maybe that's what

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 3>I said. Here's fourteen years ago. He's still They didn't

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:46.480
<v Speaker 3>do a retraction.

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, a version of it has happened in Australia today

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and it comes from no less a figure than the

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Australian Prime Minister. In question time today, things were heated,

0:00:57.760 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>things were back and forth, and there was an exchange

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 1>where the Shadow treasurer Angus Taylor was speaking while Albernizi

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:09.479
<v Speaker 1>had the microphone interjections and nothing new in the Australian

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>political vernacular, but it was well and truly on show today.

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>What you see is the Prime Minister mocking disability, the

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 1>idea that where have you got Tourett's.

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 4>Or something.

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, you know, you see there, babble babble, bab order.

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 5>I we draw, Missus Speagher, I we draw, we draw,

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 5>I we draw and apologize.

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Now this bloke is so high on his own supply

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that he thinks that he can punch down in that fashion,

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that somehow Turetts is something that he could mock publicly.

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Now this is the bloke who was, of course from

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the woke side of the woke political spectrum, yet he

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>decided to do that as a way of littling and

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>potentially dehumanizing his political opponents. Now I want you to

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>watch this time, the same clip but no sound, because

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>have a look at the different reactions that take place

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>when the Prime Minister makes his statement. Firstly, you can

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>see the Deputy Prime Minister who realizes that this is

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>not a great moment. And then on the other side

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of things, if we can roll at one more time,

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you can see Annli who's going to be sitting there

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>on the right hand side. Now, she is a minister

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>who often sits behind the Prime Minister to sort of

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>be this performance puppet behind him, going oh, who's in

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>this hilarious and shocking? Well, she realizes even in that

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>moment what the Prime Minister didn't remember. The Prime Minister

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't immediately say sorry. Instead, he said sorry because he

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>was about to be confronted. Well, the Prime Minister thought

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>this was a story that would be noticed by no one.

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>If it was, it'd be noticed by people who he

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 1>thinks he can frankly ignore. Well, it did turn up

0:02:57.960 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 1>tonight as a story on the six PM News is

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>close to the lead story in many online news sites

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>tonight as a disgraceful lack of judgment from the Prime Minister.

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>So he has walked back into the Parliament. But I

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>need you to know he walked back into the Parliament

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>about an hour ago. Now, those statements, of course, were

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 1>made in and around the two o'clock hour in Canberra.

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>He waited another six hours before issuing an apology, but

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>only after the story had become one that he could

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>not ignore and one that he would have to presumably

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>answer for when the sun comes up tomorrow. Here is

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>his apology not delivered immediately but many hours later, In fact,

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>two hours after the story was on widespread six PM

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>news tonight.

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 6>Today in question time, I made comments that were unkind

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 6>and hurtful. I knew it was wrong as soon as

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 6>I made the comment. I apologized and I withdrew as

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 6>soon as I said it.

0:03:57.880 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>But it shouldn't have happened.

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 6>So I want to apologize to all Australians who suffer

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 6>from this disability. I regret saying it was wrong, it

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 6>was insensitive, and I apologize.

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm going to be a hard mark on the

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister here despite the apology, because this is what

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>happened in real time. Did he look like he immediately

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>regretted what he said or once the opposition rose to

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>make it a point, you tell me.

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 6>The idea that where have you got Tourett's or something?

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 4>You know, you know you see there, babble babble, bab or.

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 5>I we draw, mister Spegher, I we draw, we drawn,

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 5>I we join and apologize.

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Disgraceful stuff. We'll talk about that and a whole lot

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>more in the panel a little bit later tonight. Meantime,

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>another poll has pointed out that the Prime Minister is

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>on the wrong side of history when it comes to

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>actually dealing with the economic crisis that many Australians are

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>feeling and failing each and every day. This got lost

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>in much of the October seven coverage. We mentioned it

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>briefly last night, but it shows that fifty two percent

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of Australians believe that the person and people and organization

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>who has most responsibility for dealing with inflation is not

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the Reserve Bank. There's just twenty nine percent of people.

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>These are the hardcore lefties. Instead, the majority of the

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 1>country fifty two percent says that it is the federal

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>government and specifically the Treasurer. Now because the Prime Minister

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Treasurer have actually failed to deal with how

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>much money they keep pumping into the economy via increased spending,

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>including yes, increased welfare spending. The Reserve Bank has made

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 1>the decision twelve times since Jim Chalmers became the Treasurer

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of Australia, and now it easy became the Prime Minister

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to raise interest rates. Well, today we started to see

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the working documents behind their decision not to

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>increase but more importantly not to cut interest rates. At

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>their meeting a couple of weeks ago. The Board minutes

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>they make it very clear that the Reserves Bank's message

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>that is not ruling in or out a hike or

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a cut, is set against the diagnosis of a decidedly

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:21.359
<v Speaker 1>weak economy, according to the minutes of the discussion that

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>took place, so there is still a potential here of

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a rate rise rather than a further rate pause or

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:31.119
<v Speaker 1>rate cut. Further, financial conditions might need to be even

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 1>tighter or looser at the present to achieve the Board's objectives. Remember,

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the Board's objectives is to get inflation consistently back between

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>two and three percent. It is currently below three percent,

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>but that is because of millions of dollars being spent

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>by the government to artificially drop the prices of power

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and therefore to frankly buy an inflation result. The Reserve

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.239
<v Speaker 1>Bank is waiting to see what happens about the real

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 1>inflation result time. Economists are suggesting that there will be

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a rate cut and a most likely will happen before

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the next federal election. Now, again, as we've said, the

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>orthodox thinking in Canberra is that if it goes up

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>before the election, the government's going to be in a

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>world of trouble. But I've got some breaking news for

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>some of these people. Twelve intrastraight rises has created a

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>huge amount of pain for millions of Australians. A third

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of Australians that are paying off a house, and presumably

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>most of the third that are renting are in a

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>house that is being paid off by somebody else. Even

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>if there is a quarter or half percent increase, we

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>will still be dealing with generation high interest rates. So

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>don't fall for what is about to be the media spin,

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>which is well, inflation is going down. No, its prices

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>are still going up. The speed with which they are

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>going up may will be slightly changing. And secondly, if

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>there is a reduction in interest rates, that's good obviously

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>for everyone who's paying things off. But because there's been

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>twelve of them, that's the damage that needs to be

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>put right. It needs to go down half a dozen

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>times before people are going to start to notice any

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of relief. And as I've shown you before, again

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>let's deal with the data and then we can put

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the opinion on top of it. There is a huge

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>explosion in the amount of money that people are having

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to spend to pay off their mortgages right now. In fact,

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the average homeowners overall are now paying five billion dollars

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>more than they were a couple of years ago to

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>actually pay off their mortgages. This means there's been a

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>sixty one percent increase in the total amount of money

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that people have had too fine to pay back interest

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.600
<v Speaker 1>rates since this Prime Minister and this Treasurer took over.

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>So yes, any cut will be great, but it's because

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a signal that it's not going to get worse.

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 1>Any rate cut, while accepted and celebrated, will not get

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the government off the hook because the effective financial pain

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>has been twelve rate rises in the making. Bring it

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>down by one and bring it down by two, Okay,

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that's better, But if the damage is twelve, then one

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>is hardly going to touch the sides in terms of

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 1>people actually feeling any better. Meantime, interesting polling coming from

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the Turmbal Times otherwise known as The Guardian, that shows

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 1>us here about the government's role and what Australians believe

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the government's role is when it comes to the variety

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of issues. When it comes to cost of living. Now again,

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 1>this government will try to tell you that everything's fine,

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 1>everything's all right. Well, they say here, how much impact

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>do you think the government has in reducing the following, Well,

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the best part, pardon me, of seventy almost eighty percent

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of people think that health the government could cut there again,

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 1>about eighty percent. When it comes to energy, they believe

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the government plays a role in that. The same number

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to education. When it comes to housing, mortgages,

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, again, seventy eight percent of Australians believing the

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>federal government plays a key role in all of that. Hence,

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>why if it comes down by one it is not

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>going to make the difference that the political people will

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>tell you that it's the case seventy seven percent when

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>it comes to transport and overall when it comes to groceries.

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>It is interesting here that people who believe a large

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 1>or moderate impact. Well again there you're dealing with more

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>than sixty five percent of people who believe the government

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>has a position to play in those particular areas. So

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>what are Australians looking for? To what extent do you believe?

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you support or oppose the following economic measures to

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>introduce price caps? And this is frightening that Australians are

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>so frustrated by the cost of living crisis, which has

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>been exacerbated by a government that, among other things, took

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>money off people. Remember a couple of budgets ago when

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>it came to the local middle income tax offset. Well,

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>again you can see the best part there. Of seventy

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>percent of people believe that the government could introduce price

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>caps on groceries, rent energy bills. Pretty much the same

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to increasing taxes on big corporations, reducing

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>personal income tax again about sixty five percent, fun more

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>social services as some way of dealing with the economy. Again,

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>more than half of people run a budget surflus to

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>reduce inflation. Well it doesn't, but you can see there again,

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>more than half of people think that's the right thing

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to do. Raise the level of income support for people

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.080
<v Speaker 1>who are unemployed again more than fifty percent, and reduce

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.839
<v Speaker 1>tracks tax breaks like negative gearing. Now interestingly, here again

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at a number of more than fifty percent.

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 1>So these are in many ways very left wing proposals

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>as to how to deal with situations, which is why

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister thinks is in the right place when

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it comes to shrinkflation. It's also why the Greens think

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.079
<v Speaker 1>they're in an even better place because they will actually

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>suggest some of these things. But a bit of an

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>indication that when pressure has been the way that it

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>has been for as long as it has been, people

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>are willing for any solution, no matter how counter productive

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>it is to the concept of an open and free market. Now,

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you remember last year the Prime Minister told us that

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>he was going to cut immigration. This was because, of course,

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>it's wildly out of controllers. We've shown you before the

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>best part of almost a million people have come to

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the country at a time when there's not a mini

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>new houses being built. In fact, I remember the headlines

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>at the time that labor is determined to have the

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>record post pandemic migration. In fact, the Prime Minister even

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 1>said this on three aw.

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 7>But what we are projecting is that the non the

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 7>net overseas migration is projected to come down to two

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 7>hundred and fifty thousand in the coming financial year in

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty four to twenty five.

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 1>Now, of course, one of the problems with too many

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 1>people coming in and not enough infrastructure being built, specifically housing,

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is the rental cues They are as long as they

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 1>currently are. Where places like in Ipswich, even a two

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>bedroom joint that is available more than one hundred people

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>try to apply for it. In places like Western Australia

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Tasmania in particular, there's less than one percent of all

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>of the available housing that is available for rent right now.

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:11.599
<v Speaker 1>You add a Midian people to that, guess what, the

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>queue gets longer. The issue gets tougher when it comes

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to the infrastructure that states have to produce. We know

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that ambulance ramping is the worst it has been in

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>every single state Queensland. You have an opportunity, in just

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks time to send a message that

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>this is not okay that when you call Triple O,

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>an ambulance may or may not turn up. If you

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:30.719
<v Speaker 1>are on the back of the ambulance, you may or

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>may not, But most likely we'll end up sitting in

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the back of the ambulance because there's no room in

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the hospital. Why because in part a million more people

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>have been added to the country. And by the way,

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>just in case you think it's me making this up

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>as a talking point, I want to point you to

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.079
<v Speaker 1>a study from Maccuarra University that says ambulance ramping is

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>getting worse in Australia. Now they suggest what can be

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>done about it, But there is a whole collection of

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>data points there that prove what I have said, that

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>this thing is out of control, that it is a

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>problem in almost every single state where we are at

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>record numbers because there are numbers of people trying to

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>call an ambulance if it is ever needed at any

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 1>one time. So you see migration matters because more people,

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>well they do sometimes create more problems. Now, this is

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>not a hit on people to come from different parts

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of the world. It's not a soft race comment. You

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>know how many times and almost every night have to

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>say the same thing because we know somebody's going to

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>run off to the umpire and try to dob me

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in for saying something that I am clearly not. But

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>guess what the government is about to miss its own targets,

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the one that was apparently going to dramatically drop things

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>by a hundred thousand people. Yes, an entire MCG is

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>how wrong they have got it. Australia as net migration

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>target for the last financial year risks being overshot by

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>as much as one hundred thousand labor likely to eclipse

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>its targets on the current annual intake as ongoing strength

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>in domestic jobs market keeps workers in Australia and attracts

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>overseas arrivals. As Maxwell Smart would say, missed it by

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that much. If only it was funny. Now back to

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the protests and the ongoing carry on that we need

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to be dealing with because people want to bring the

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>problems on the other side of the world to this country.

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>We know how ridiculous things were yesterday when even on

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>October the seventh, people were deciding to listen to a

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>collection of speakers, one including somebody who's visiting from the

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>United States saying, in my belief, completely inappropriate and disgraceful

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>things to be said on the day where the Jewish

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>community in Australia deserves its right to mourn it's dead.

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 8>Today is not fully a day of mourning in many respects,

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:45.119
<v Speaker 8>today is also a day that marks considerable celebration, considerable progress,

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.119
<v Speaker 8>and in some respects, considerable privilege.

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Now this bloke is a visitor in our country. I

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know why he is still in the country after

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>what was said. Now, this bloke works for the Arizona

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>State Universe. I have blacked out the contact information. I

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>don't suggest anyone goes looking for it. I'm not suggesting

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 1>anyone gets in contact with him other than the authorities

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>who should cancel his visa. Now again, I believe that

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>it's completely legitimate for the people to be in standing

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Palestinian cause talking about the tens of thousands

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of people who have died since October the seventh. But

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the people who were saying what they were saying on

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>October the seventh were not really talking about the Palestinian

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>people in my view. They were using the plight of

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the Palestinian people to overtly antagonize the Australian Jewish community.

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>The fact that that event was happening on the steps

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of a mosque was again an attempt from the people

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>who were making those comments to make sure that no

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>one would shut it down because it was a religious ceremony.

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>But again, this bloke has got plenty of form. You

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>can find what he's had to say online. He's got

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>his Instagram feed, his Twitter feed. Can you believe this

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>bloke's followed by two point three million people on Instagram.

0:16:57.560 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to read his words. But we were looking

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>at his social media feed today, including in the past

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>few days, the celebration seemingly of at least fourteen Israeli

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 1>soldiers who were dying. Why because they were attempting to

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>invade Lebanon. As for the overall protest situation, there's an

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>interesting word that is starting to come out now from

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>the new soobals premiere. Now, the new Soba's premier we

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>know wants to crack down on the worst elements of

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>this stuff again, the new ones. In the conversation, I've

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>already stated tonight that I understand that for fifty two

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>weeks people have been recognizing what's been happening in Gaza.

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>I understand that the people with the Hesbala flags, the

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>people saying what's been said in the past twenty four

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to forty eight hours, that's a completely different story. But

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister, as sorry, the premier, i should say

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in New South Wales, says that it's costing at least

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:49.360
<v Speaker 1>five maybe eleven million dollars to police what has been

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:51.360
<v Speaker 1>going on of recent times. This is what he said.

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I think on the radio today it's.

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 9>My view that police should be able to be in

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 9>a position to deny a request for a march due

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 9>to stretched police resourcing. And I'm not talking about a

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 9>union rally against the government over a wage deal. But

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 9>when you've got someone putting in an application every seven

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 9>days for fifty one weeks to march through Sydney streets,

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 9>this is costing millions of dollars and I think taxpayers

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 9>should be in a position to be able to say

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 9>we would prefer that money is spent on road side

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 9>breath testing, domestic violence investigations, knife crimes, rather than the

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 9>huge resources that's going into the city and the community.

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Now, there's two other little things that I want to

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>put a little pin in because I think it's going

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to be interesting to see exactly what are the consequences

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>for people who continuously are on the wrong side of

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>what the police or the government are trying to say

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is reasonable or excessive protest. Now a story today that

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 1>there is a person who has been fired from their

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 1>job because of activism and repeated activism. What will be

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting here is to work out when presumably this matter

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>goes before a work tribune, or whether that is going

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to be why a company or an organization can sever

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>its links from someone watch this space meantime, in Victoria,

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>the first person to actually be successfully charged and found

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>guilty of holding up offensive symbols, well, he again was

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>found guilty today, but we will find out again. Put

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a pin in it here. Now, Remember the maximum for

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>things like Nazi salutes or Hezbollah flags or swastikas in

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Victoria is tens of thousands of dollars and maybe a

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>year in jail. Now, whatever the judge decides to be

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the punishment will then end up being the standard. Now

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>remember what I've just said there about how much money

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and how long in prison, Well, all of that is,

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:48.719
<v Speaker 1>of course just the absolute maximum that can be handed

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Nine times out of ten, we know that judges for

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>all different reasons decide to not hand out that maximum.

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 1>So we'll truly find out what the actual standing penalty

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>is rather than the one that politicians just announce. Also

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 1>worth noting here too, we'll talk tonight about what happened

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>in the Parliament, about the motion that was first put

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>forward by the Opposition leader, then changed by the Prime Minister,

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:13.199
<v Speaker 1>and all that happened in and around this today. But

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to show you that pole that I showed

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 1>you last night Now it says here that what the

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>best part of less than twenty percent of people believe

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that we should be having the marches in Australia. Now again,

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 1>only eight percent of people think that that's okay when

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>it's in the name of Hamas, only seven percent. When

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Israel. In terms of voicing principal support

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>one way or the other, again, it's only thirty five

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>percent of people that have a strong position on that

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>in favor of one or the other. And in terms

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of refugees again it's twenty four percent. Now, I understand

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 1>how passionate this issue is for a certain series of people,

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>with the vast majority of people in every version of

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that pole echo my position from last night, which is,

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>we understand, but Australia is different than the other parts

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of the world and if generationally, parents, grandparents, or even

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you yourself fled those places, then you leave the grievances there.

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Can have strong political opinions, fine and fair enough, but

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 1>we live in this country under a new harmony. And

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a new harmony is that literally two people who diametrically

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>oppose each other can live next door to each other,

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>can work in the same workplace, can occupy the same

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>public square. I just thought that was worth reminding everyone

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>who seems to think that this is the only thing

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>people want to talk about. It isn't. Meantime, eighteen days

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.679
<v Speaker 1>left for Queensland to finally pass its judgment on that

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>idiot to Stephen Miles, old giggles Miles, and of course

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>he is a merry band of fools who currently parade

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>themselves as the Labor Party government in Queensland. Now. Amazingly,

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Miles, trying to win the seat of Bunderberg, which

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:56.159
<v Speaker 1>had been decided ultimately by just nine votes at the

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>last election, was out and about at the side of

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:03.239
<v Speaker 1>a hospital that was promised four years ago. You may

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>well notice no hospital has been built. I doubt the

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 1>people of Bunderberg are going to fall for it twice.

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>But when asked today the Health minister, that's the health

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:18.199
<v Speaker 1>minister who is responsible for, remember, among other things, hospital ramping,

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>among other things, taking out patients from hospitals to accommodation

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>at sea world. A person who is very sorry when

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody lost their life because they gave up waiting for

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>an ambulance, Well, this is what she says about a

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>patch of dirt four years after they promised it would

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 1>be a hospital.

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 5>Sarah, did you.

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 9>Not see all of those trucks right?

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 10>So they have to absolutely make sure that all of

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 10>the earthworks has done first and over the next month

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:51.919
<v Speaker 10>the contractors were just telling us things were really going

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 10>to ramp up.

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Pathetic, pathetic. Bundy won't fall for it, Queen's Land won't

0:22:57.640 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>fall for it. They are just spinning their tires, sucking

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>up days before inevitably they are wiped from political history.

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Do not assume that everyone else will do it. If

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>you are in Queensland, you can do it. You can

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>do it. In my view, you must do it by

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:15.360
<v Speaker 1>voting for anything but certainly not the Greens, but anything

0:23:15.359 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>but at this upcoming election. Meantime, shout out to the

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.359
<v Speaker 1>state political reporter for Channel nine. Great story that they've

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>had in the past twenty four hours about a labor candidate.

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:30.919
<v Speaker 11>The nine News can exclusively reveal the labor candidate in

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 11>the marginal seat of Burleigh, Claire Carlin, who joined the

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 11>campaign trail as recently as Saturday, has made repeated social

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 11>media posts across a number of years abusing police. These posts,

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.959
<v Speaker 11>which have now been deleted, include in two thousand and

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 11>nine saying we don't like the police because they kick

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 11>and punch, another a year later saying on the count

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 11>of three, sayf the police, and another in twenty eleven,

0:23:57.200 --> 0:23:58.960
<v Speaker 11>again F the police.

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 1>Now, presumably the social media history that was available to

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Channel nine was available to the Labour Party, but the

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Labor Party didn't think that anyone would go back and look.

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Well they did, and the reporter confronted the person who

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>would like to be a member of Parliament. I think

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>after this performance, I can guarantee she won't.

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:18.680
<v Speaker 11>What are your views on the Queensland Police. I'm actually

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 11>just about to go somewhere and I'm not able to

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 11>talk at the moment.

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry.

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 11>Okay, Well, you've seen some of your tweets where you've

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 11>repeatedly tweeted F the police. Can you comme in on that?

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 11>If elected, would you support the Queensland Police?

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Of course I support the Queen's and police.

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 11>Can you explain those tweets?

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm not aware of what you're talking about at the moment.

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 5>I'm just about to go and see my mum.

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 3>If I can show you here, I don't know.

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 6>I can't actually read that while i'm there.

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:42.360
<v Speaker 4>You completely stop and have a look.

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 9>It's that clarsy is that you?

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>What a disgrace? Court red handed and then pretends I

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have time. I'm going to visit my mom. Giggle, giggle, runoff.

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Don't vote for that lady. Now, A couple of other

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>things to mention before I get to American politics, which

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>has got a really nice segment for you tonight. One

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>of the greats of Australian radio has decided to retire again,

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 1>but this time forever. John Laws is of course radio legend,

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>member of the Hall of Fame, a man who has

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>made his impact multiple times before. In fact, can we

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>roll that tape again because that was when he retired

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 1>from TUI. Pay attention to the far left hand corner

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of that footage because you're going to see me. I'm

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>holding up a triple M microphone because that's where I

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>worked at the time. There he is, Oh, well, see

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I was a reporter at one point period of time,

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>so I was there the first time that he retired.

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:38.680
<v Speaker 1>He of course went back and worked two sm and

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Bill Carlos for many years. Bill's now passed on. Since then,

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>John's lost his wife and now it's time to pull

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>upin at the end of the year on his radio career.

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 12>It's time for a rest, is what I think. But

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 12>I still feel young, I still feel healthy, and when

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 12>I call it a day.

0:25:57.480 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>It'll be a day.

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 12>I'm not going to go away and then come back

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 12>again and say, oh, it was all a mistake. It

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 12>may well be a mistake, but there'll be no return.

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll try and have a chat to Lawsey before he

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>is done. In the meantime, of course, we wish him

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>nothing but the best and one of my favorite Australians

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of all time. Like it's kind of Peter Brock and

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:20.639
<v Speaker 1>John Farnham. I don't have any other faces that I

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 1>need on my Mount Rushmore. I'll just stick with those two. Well,

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>John Farnham is finally sitting down and he's written in

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>an autobiography. We know how crook he's been of recent times. Well,

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>we started to hear his voice for the first time. Obviously,

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I would doubt he's ever going to sing again when

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you hear his voice, But Jesus, it's good to hear

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>him up and kicking, isn't it.

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 12>I don't enjoy talking about myself, I really don't.

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:44.919
<v Speaker 9>I'll get me wrong.

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 12>I'm an ego maniak, but judging up the fast and

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 12>figuring through what has and hasn't been it's just not

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 12>something I've ever really enjoyed.

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 1>I've never met him. It was always my dream to

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>interview him. Clearly, that won't happen now. But I love

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that man. Now I don't quite love Kamala Harris. I

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>think I've made that clear from now. And we thought

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that the worst thing that was going to happen to

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:10.479
<v Speaker 1>her this week was when her teleprompter failed and she

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>couldn't add lib.

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 2>And did youse Magic Johnson.

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 13>Remember his number?

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Thirty two.

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 11>Today?

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 1>We got thirty two days.

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 2>It's all the election, So thirty two days, thirty two days.

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 14>Okay, we got some business to do.

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 2>We got some business to do, all right, thirty two days.

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 1>Well, it got worse. She was interviewed on sixty minutes

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, and it's the toughest interview that

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 1>she's got. And I've got to say well done to

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.239
<v Speaker 1>the reporter who did it. Not perfect, but hey, this

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 1>is the best we're going to get. He followed up

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the astro top question. He followed up and he called

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Bayes on her. For example, all of the ideas that

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 1>she has, how are you going to pay for it?

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 14>My plan is about saying that when you invest in

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 14>small businesses, you invest in the middle class, and you

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 14>strengthen America's economy. Small businesses are part of the backbone

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 14>of America's economy.

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 15>The pardoning that Advice President, the question was how are

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 15>you going to pay for it?

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 14>He one of the things, I'm going to make sure

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 14>that the richest among us who can afford it, pay

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 14>their fair share and tax. It is not right that

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 14>teachers and nurses and firefighters are paying a higher tax

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 14>rate than billionaires and the biggest corporations. And I plan

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 14>on making that face what you're.

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 15>Dealing with the real world here, But the real world

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 15>includes how are you going to get this to Congress?

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 14>You know, when you talk quietly with a lot of

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 14>folks in Congress, they know exactly what I'm talking about,

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 14>because their constituents know exactly what I'm.

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Talking about about. But blah blah blah. The garbage, garbage, garbage, garbage, garbage, garbage.

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>And again, the reporter was great because again in all

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the interviews that she's done, there's sort of a question about, look,

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>you've changed your mind a lot from the time you

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>ran for president, for when you were vice president, and

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>now all of those positions we know you definitely lose on.

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>So you've put out all these statements that you've changed

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>your mind on this issue and that issue. But this

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>is the best version of that question that he's thrown

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>at her.

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 4>Let me tell you what your critics and the colum

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 4>this say.

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.959
<v Speaker 15>Okay, they say, the reason so many voters don't know

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 15>you is that you have changed your position on so

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 15>many things. You were against fracking, now you're for it.

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 15>You supported looser immigration policies, now you're tightening them up.

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 15>You were for medicare for all, now you're not.

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 4>So many that.

0:29:56.320 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 15>People don't truly, I can't believe or what you stand for.

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Middle Stone. You've hurled that.

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 14>In the last four years. I have been vice president

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 14>of the United States, and I have been traveling our country,

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 14>and I have been listening to folks and seeking what

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 14>is possible in terms of common ground. I believe in

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 14>building consensus. Do you We are diverse people geographically regionally

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 14>in terms of where we are in our backgrounds.

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, see the American.

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 14>People do want is that we have leaders who can

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 14>build consensus where we can figure out and understanding.

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>The opposite of what you use your.

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 14>Values to find common sense solutions.

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>And that has been my approach. And then finally on

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the issue of immigration, where the reality is millions of

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>people have been able to as a result of the

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>policies of Joe Biden Kamala Harris. Borders are, whether she

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>wants to admit it or not, the evengel the country

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>illegally now again, migration fantastic, illegal migration not great, this reporter,

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the best question hits a roight between the oys.

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 15>There was an historic flood of undocumented immigrants coming across

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 15>the border the first three years of your administration. As

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 15>a matter of fact, arrivals quadruple correct from the last

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 15>year of President Trump. Was it a mistake good to

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 15>loosen the immigration policies as much as you did.

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 14>It's a long standing problem and were at hand and

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 14>from day one, literally you.

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Saw undoing all of the Trump stuff.

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 15>What I was asking was was it a mistake to

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 15>kind of allow that flood to happen in the first place.

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:58.479
<v Speaker 14>I think the policies that we have been proposing are

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 14>about fixing a problem, not promoting a problem.

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 15>Okay, but the numbers did quadruple, and the.

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:08.000
<v Speaker 14>Number today because of what we have done. We have

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 14>cut the flow of illegal immigration half. Should we have

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 14>to cut the flow of fentanyl by half? But we

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 14>need Congress to be able. Congress actually fixed the problem.

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 15>You have accused Donald Trump of using racist troops when

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 15>it comes to Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio.

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, surprise, surprise, well done, reporter spectacular, her performance terrible.

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 1>You can see the frightened behind her eyes, which is

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>why the interview she's doing in the next twenty four hours.

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Howard Stern, who has said that he hates Trump's supporters,

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 1>not just Trump, and Stephen Colbert, who of course had

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>people dress up like the vaccine. So we get the

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>cuddles that she's going to get, but at least a

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 1>serious interview and surprise, surprise, the mental ginger that she's playing.

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>The tower fell down. But I need to discuss and

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>debate in the next little while. Make sure you join

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>us Nigel Farage in a couple of minutes time as well.

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>You can join us anytime via email to Polotskuynews dot

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>com dot a you and a reminder we are coming

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to Tasmania a couple of Sunday's time outdown at sky

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:18.360
<v Speaker 1>News dot com. If you want to join us in

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 1>long Ceys then on October the twentieth. All right, two

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 1>quick things. Apologies for the voice. I don't know what's

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>going on. It just so it maybe feels worse than

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 1>it actually sounds, but my apologies. And secondly, Asher made

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>this for me today. Love your darlin, so that's why

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it's on Telly all right here loving their kids as

0:33:39.520 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 1>well as Senator Holly Hughes and future Senator Joe Hildebrand

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 1>because he's going to be pushing it uphill tonight. All right,

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:48.479
<v Speaker 1>So we saw what the Prime Minister had to say

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>when it came to mocking Tourette's. He then took a

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 1>grand total of six hours before issuing the apology. Now

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>remember this is the bloke who in real time wanted

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Barnaby Joyce to say sorry for calling him a sook.

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 1>So I don't buy Alvo's version of the apology, which

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 1>is while I immediately withdrew it, he didn't immediately withdraw it.

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>He doubled down, kept going and then eventually when he

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>realized it was a problem, and then hoping that it

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't turn up on the six pm news. He waited

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 1>until eight o'clock at night when everyone in the press

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 1>gallery had gone home. Well, thankfully we were rolling on it,

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 1>so you got this apology.

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 6>Today in question time, I made comments that were unkind

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:34.359
<v Speaker 6>and hurtful. I knew it was wrong as soon as

0:34:34.400 --> 0:34:37.799
<v Speaker 6>I made the comment. I apologized and I withdrew as

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:38.759
<v Speaker 6>soon as I said it.

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>But it shouldn't have happened.

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 6>And I also want to apologize to all Australians who

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 6>suffer from this disability. I regret saying it was wrong,

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 6>it was insensitive, and I apologize.

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Holly metaphorical freak from the Senate end.

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 13>Look, it is just beyond belief that he came out

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 13>with this today and then the way he's handled it.

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 13>Richard Miles's face was I think the personification of exactly

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.880
<v Speaker 13>what it should have been. You could see on Miles's face,

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:20.799
<v Speaker 13>just the look of abject horror the second Albanese said it.

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:24.359
<v Speaker 13>You know, as the parent of a child with a disability,

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 13>you know, I go crazy when I hear people say, oh,

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 13>we're all autistic, or we're all a bit on the

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 13>spectrum because it denigrates the experience of those people like

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:39.320
<v Speaker 13>my son who suffer considerable disability because of their autism.

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:45.400
<v Speaker 13>But then to use turetts as an insult is just offensive.

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 13>And it's not only offensive, as I said, I was

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:51.359
<v Speaker 13>offended as the mother of an autistic child. It's offensive

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:56.439
<v Speaker 13>to anyone in the disability community that anyone's disability would

0:35:56.480 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 13>be used to mock someone, to denigrate someone. And I

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 13>think his apology was embarrassing. I think it was inadequate.

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:09.320
<v Speaker 13>Obviously someone in his office has said, quick, get yourself

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 13>out there and do it now.

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Just six hours later.

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 7>With that.

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:15.799
<v Speaker 13>Look, I mean you could you could even hear it

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 13>in the speaker's voice, you know, Milton Dick, that you

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:22.799
<v Speaker 13>could hear when he spoke over the top, that everyone

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 13>was appalled at what he said. And you know, this

0:36:26.640 --> 0:36:30.440
<v Speaker 13>is the Prime Minister who promised he'd do politics differently,

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 13>at Gendler politics and a kind Agendler. And I can

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:37.439
<v Speaker 13>tell you it's been nothing but worse than it's ever

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 13>been under this mob. And this is just another example.

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Joe, what are we missing?

0:36:45.000 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 4>I will defend him.

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 16>I think this is I can understand the frustration that

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:51.399
<v Speaker 16>the left gets incredibly outraged when anyone on the right

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 16>does it. I don't think that makes it right for

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:57.719
<v Speaker 16>the right to get ridiculously outraged. I mean, the same

0:36:57.719 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 16>people who say everything's political correctness gone man say this,

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:03.320
<v Speaker 16>he was not. He was not insulting people with tourets.

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 16>He was using a very very common vernacular term that

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:07.959
<v Speaker 16>Australians use all the time.

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 4>I have I have plenty of I have plenty of

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:11.720
<v Speaker 4>people extremely.

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 16>Close to me who have had profound and have profound disabilities,

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:18.840
<v Speaker 16>including my brother and my best mate. I was not

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 16>in the remotest offended by it any more than I

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 16>would be if someone said that a policy was schizophrenic

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:26.839
<v Speaker 16>because it went all over the place. Does that mean

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:28.839
<v Speaker 16>it's that you're insulting schizophrenic people?

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 1>But you're missing the second part of it. I didn't

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:33.879
<v Speaker 1>just say Toretz it was it was it was the.

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 4>Something.

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:38.839
<v Speaker 16>This is someone who can't can't stop talking and he's

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:41.840
<v Speaker 16>using he's using what every Australian I reckon in the

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 16>pub at some point or another would have said.

0:37:44.120 --> 0:37:45.959
<v Speaker 1>So you think the pub test on this is.

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 16>Well, if you say to someone, mate, are you are

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:53.800
<v Speaker 16>you psycho? Is that insulting. I mean, is as mental

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 16>as anything? Are they insulting? Where was the outrageous.

0:37:59.640 --> 0:37:59.839
<v Speaker 1>Team?

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 16>I think I think it's different when it's the other side.

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 16>And this is the thing as someone who.

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 1>You think in the same way. One side is too sensitive.

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 16>That's right, And I see it all the time and

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 16>it does my head in because I get caned by

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 16>both sides were actually saying no, we've got to actually

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:15.439
<v Speaker 16>draw back here.

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 4>There are plenty of people in the chamber laughing, I.

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Think on both sides. But I look, I think that's

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 1>when you're the Prime minister. You're supposed to be above

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. And look, all human beings, especially ones that

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 1>are speaking extemporaneously, ad libbing or adversarial conversation. You might

0:38:31.000 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 1>go too far. You should have the sensitivity around yourself

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:37.439
<v Speaker 1>to know you've gone too far and not just go oh,

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 1>because there's going to be a point of ward. There's

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a way to say sorry six hours later.

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 4>But he did it. He did it straight away.

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 16>He did it, was already he already said said two

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:53.919
<v Speaker 16>or three times that he withdrew it, and he said

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 16>that he apologized straight afterwards.

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 4>It is there in the audio.

0:38:57.160 --> 0:38:58.879
<v Speaker 1>You cannot so why did he go back in six

0:38:58.920 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 1>hours later.

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 16>To make it even clearer, Because we live in a

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 16>culture of ridiculous outrage that has just hold the proportion

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:09.279
<v Speaker 16>they were in the chamber debate, but one holdating the

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 16>war in Gaza and.

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:12.399
<v Speaker 4>This is what people get upd about.

0:39:12.400 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 16>You've got a million displaced lebantes. You've got it as

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 16>part of the overall question time, and and there was

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 16>that there was Peter Dunn saying, we're so pro is

0:39:23.560 --> 0:39:26.880
<v Speaker 16>we're going to refuse to back a motion that's and

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 16>now we're going to get to get upset that you

0:39:29.760 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 16>said that last word quickly.

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 13>It wasn't about Gaza at all, Joe, And it was

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:40.360
<v Speaker 13>about that. It was a question around the family home

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 13>and capital gains tax, so it actually had nothing to

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:44.240
<v Speaker 13>do with the Gaza.

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:45.800
<v Speaker 4>The number one question.

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:48.840
<v Speaker 13>Question time and you ask a mother of a child

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:52.120
<v Speaker 13>with dread and if it's something that's so colloquial and

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 13>so acceptable in the pub test, why did he come

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 13>back in six hours later and apologize? So I think, Joe,

0:39:58.480 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 13>because that I love you are trying to pull it

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 13>very long, but I.

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:03.399
<v Speaker 4>Love you too.

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:06.400
<v Speaker 16>And but but the idea he knows that there that

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:09.280
<v Speaker 16>these things can be whipped up, that they can be mischaracterized,

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:10.319
<v Speaker 16>that people will point you.

0:40:10.560 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Would he have done if it was Scott Morrison? You

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what.

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 13>I said that were blessed during the debate.

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 4>That's right, thank you, and I did. I did not

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:22.319
<v Speaker 4>get outraged. Sure not get out by that.

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not holding you responsible for what he says.

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:27.320
<v Speaker 4>You're consisted in your life and that's outrage.

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 16>Machine needs to take a good, long, hard look at

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 16>itself and ask why it's not outraged about this, because

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 16>you know what, you've got to look at the context,

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:35.360
<v Speaker 16>you've got to look at the intent behind things, and

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 16>you've got to have a sense of proportion about what

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 16>you get outraged about, because when you know.

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:41.120
<v Speaker 4>The world's on the brink of World War three.

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:44.319
<v Speaker 1>Don't disagree, but it's just the standard is only going

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to apply now when it's you know, metaphorically you're got.

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:50.919
<v Speaker 4>All everyone else, then we wouldn't have to have these.

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 1>In And okay, we've got Nigel up in a couple

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of seconds, so let's quickly talk about the motion commotion

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that took place today. So Saturday, I think was when

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Peter dun'ts look, we should talk about October seven. When

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Parliament goes back, it won't be on October seven, but

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>it'll be on October eight. Back and forth about what

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the words would be because it started to broaden out

0:41:10.640 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>from what Dunton wanted it to be. Dunn't says he

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 1>wasn't going to sign up to it. In fact, he

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:17.839
<v Speaker 1>ended up saying this because the motion wasn't what he

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>was planning it to be.

0:41:20.719 --> 0:41:23.400
<v Speaker 10>There are other sections here which go well beyond the

0:41:23.440 --> 0:41:26.400
<v Speaker 10>intent of what should be a motion to mark the

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:30.840
<v Speaker 10>loss of life of twelve hundred people on the first anniversary.

0:41:31.160 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 10>That's what this motion was to be about. But of

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 10>course the Prime Minister is trying to speak out of

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:40.759
<v Speaker 10>both sides of his mouth and that is not something

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 10>that we will support in relation to this debate.

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:45.359
<v Speaker 1>All right, Holly, you've had it good, so now it's

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>time for you to feel slightly wobbly here. Right. The

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 1>polling out of Resolve, No never, The polling out of

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Resolve showed right that basically thirty percent of people when

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 1>questions about what should our standing, what should our response be,

0:42:01.160 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 1>what should refugees, they have a very diffinite view about

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Israel versus garsa okay, thirty percent of people okay now

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 1>and another twenty percent. You can get to fifty percent

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and they're saying, well, both sides right, And then there's

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the other half that says, okay, we get it, but

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't want it to dominate our conversation all day

0:42:17.239 --> 0:42:21.240
<v Speaker 1>every day. Your response to that polling and the endless

0:42:21.280 --> 0:42:24.919
<v Speaker 1>priority of it in the Parliament from everyone from your

0:42:25.040 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>side to the Greens.

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:30.640
<v Speaker 13>Look, the Australian people are doing it incredibly tough with

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:32.879
<v Speaker 13>cost of living pressures at the moment. We know that

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:36.040
<v Speaker 13>that is their top first, second, third, fourth and fifth

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 13>issue is cost of living. We know that the situation

0:42:39.280 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 13>in Israel and Gaza and Lebanon is not their top

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 13>of mind. But the reality is what we're talking about

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:51.920
<v Speaker 13>was a commemoration of October seventh, the biggest murder per

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:56.880
<v Speaker 13>grom of Israeli and Jewish citizens since the Second World War.

0:42:57.200 --> 0:42:58.200
<v Speaker 1>We were talking.

0:42:57.920 --> 0:43:02.480
<v Speaker 13>About one day commemoration, one year anniversary of when that

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:08.839
<v Speaker 13>terrible crime occurred, when that terrorist attack occurred. We're not

0:43:09.000 --> 0:43:10.879
<v Speaker 13>you know, this isn't about talking about it every day.

0:43:11.040 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 13>What occurred in the Parliament today was a break with

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:17.239
<v Speaker 13>a very long standing of decades and decades of bipartisanship

0:43:17.520 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 13>when it came to standing with Israel, which you know,

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 13>as Bob Hawk said, if the bell tolls for Israel,

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 13>it tolds for all of us.

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>So, Joe, do you think that the motion, I mean,

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:29.799
<v Speaker 1>you're going to disagree that the motion strayed from that

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:33.360
<v Speaker 1>central point. But again, look, I'm going to annoy a

0:43:33.400 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of people. People are going to send me emails us. Again,

0:43:36.080 --> 0:43:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I understand what's going on in the world, and I'm

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:39.400
<v Speaker 1>not saying don't talk about it. I'm just saying, for

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 1>everyone who thinks that they can make the ultimate endless

0:43:41.960 --> 0:43:45.320
<v Speaker 1>points about this, I don't think that's where the majority

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:45.879
<v Speaker 1>of people are.

0:43:46.239 --> 0:43:48.799
<v Speaker 16>No, and I think that I actually agree with you.

0:43:48.840 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 16>I think this is something that people are scared to

0:43:51.280 --> 0:43:55.160
<v Speaker 16>even engage with. It's something that people quite frankly don't

0:43:55.160 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 16>want to touch with a barge pole, and they don't

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:56.880
<v Speaker 16>want it.

0:43:56.920 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 4>Over here overwhelmingly.

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 16>That's another thing that resolving that the idea that you

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:03.239
<v Speaker 16>would turn what's happening over there into a conflict on

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:05.359
<v Speaker 16>of all days, the anniversary of October seventh.

0:44:05.440 --> 0:44:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Hence why I was as clear as the jewishy Elert.

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 16>Absolutely get him out of here, get him on the

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:13.000
<v Speaker 16>first had disgrace. I think this was a motion that

0:44:13.080 --> 0:44:17.279
<v Speaker 16>tried to say something simple and mournful and positive, and

0:44:17.320 --> 0:44:19.960
<v Speaker 16>I think Peter Dutton and the Coalition rejected it at

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 16>their peril.

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:22.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, this was fun. Thank you guys, do appreciate it.

0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Love you see well again next week. Everyone loves everyone.

0:44:24.920 --> 0:44:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Nobody's wabbling. We're all great, all right, quick break back

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:29.400
<v Speaker 1>with more. Nigel Farage standing by in London. Lots to

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:32.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about about what's happening in the UK, and we'll probably.

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:32.400
<v Speaker 6>Talk about.

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:39.759
<v Speaker 1>Our mate. Nigel Farage is joining us from the UK

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:41.799
<v Speaker 1>right now and he's making quite the point about the

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:44.680
<v Speaker 1>new Labor government. In fact, the Reform Party's put out

0:44:44.960 --> 0:44:47.239
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a piss take video about the new

0:44:47.280 --> 0:44:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Labor government rollo tape.

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:53.440
<v Speaker 4>We bring you Labor's Britain.

0:44:54.880 --> 0:45:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Featuring shivering grandparents with no winter feel allows free clothing, glasses,

0:45:03.040 --> 0:45:08.800
<v Speaker 1>accommodation and tickets as long as you're a Labor MP storry,

0:45:10.080 --> 0:45:15.720
<v Speaker 1>free gear gear rubbing Rachel in association with the Trade

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Unions Labor's Britain. I love it, Nigel. You're a happy

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:22.880
<v Speaker 1>warrior on the trial and you continue to be so

0:45:23.000 --> 0:45:25.399
<v Speaker 1>in the Parliament. Ah, I love it. I love it.

0:45:28.360 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 17>So the broadcasting rules in the UK are very clear.

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:34.319
<v Speaker 17>We get a party political broadcast once every year or

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 17>so which goes out on the big channels BBC, ITV, etc.

0:45:39.560 --> 0:45:43.879
<v Speaker 17>But you're not allowed to use images of political opponents.

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 17>So what our bright young things in the office decided

0:45:47.680 --> 0:45:54.400
<v Speaker 17>is let's use AI representations of Kir Starmer, of Rachel Reeves,

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:57.359
<v Speaker 17>the Chancellor. And we said it to the broadcasters last

0:45:57.360 --> 0:46:00.719
<v Speaker 17>week and they told us we would love to refuse this,

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:04.000
<v Speaker 17>but we can't because you're within the rules. Now I

0:46:04.080 --> 0:46:07.480
<v Speaker 17>expect the rules will get rewritten. But it's had quite

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:10.800
<v Speaker 17>an impact. And you know what, it's a hard hitting

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:14.360
<v Speaker 17>political message, but it's also quite funny.

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, and I think if you can make them laugh

0:46:16.800 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 1>then you're halfway there to being able to convince somebody

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to whatever your position is. Now, tell me about a

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:25.520
<v Speaker 1>fight involving particular islands. What's happening?

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 17>This is awful. So the cha Gas Islands, Okay, I

0:46:30.480 --> 0:46:32.360
<v Speaker 17>know you've never heard of them. They're bang in the

0:46:32.360 --> 0:46:35.200
<v Speaker 17>middle of the Indian Ocean. They're a chain of islands

0:46:35.640 --> 0:46:38.680
<v Speaker 17>and the British have controlled. The British have sovereignty of

0:46:38.719 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 17>those islands. No one lives there for a variety of reasons.

0:46:42.280 --> 0:46:45.719
<v Speaker 17>But on the biggest island, Diego Garcia, there is a

0:46:45.960 --> 0:46:50.080
<v Speaker 17>massive US base. It's a US British base, but for

0:46:50.200 --> 0:46:54.280
<v Speaker 17>America it is one of their two most important assets

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:57.680
<v Speaker 17>in the East. And what the Labor government have decided

0:46:57.719 --> 0:47:01.960
<v Speaker 17>to do, basically because of colonial guilt about our past,

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:07.279
<v Speaker 17>using the spurious United Nations Maritime Court that's going to

0:47:07.320 --> 0:47:11.040
<v Speaker 17>rule against us, They've decided to give the sovereignty of

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 17>the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, which is oney three hundred

0:47:15.719 --> 0:47:19.719
<v Speaker 17>miles away from Chagos. And by the way, Mauritius have

0:47:19.840 --> 0:47:23.239
<v Speaker 17>never had control of them in the past either. What's

0:47:23.280 --> 0:47:26.279
<v Speaker 17>the problem with that? Well, the problem is that Mauritius,

0:47:26.680 --> 0:47:28.759
<v Speaker 17>run by a hard left labor government, and I went

0:47:28.800 --> 0:47:31.319
<v Speaker 17>there on holiday a couple of years ago, has a

0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 17>massive China town. The Chinese are investing huge amounts of

0:47:35.640 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 17>money in Mauritius. And what will happen here is whatever

0:47:40.520 --> 0:47:43.759
<v Speaker 17>the lease agreement says. We saw a lease agreement with

0:47:43.800 --> 0:47:47.080
<v Speaker 17>Hong Kong that was totally ignored. What will happen is

0:47:47.080 --> 0:47:49.720
<v Speaker 17>on one of the other islands, the Chinese will build

0:47:50.120 --> 0:47:55.120
<v Speaker 17>their own naval and air force base. This is a

0:47:55.160 --> 0:48:00.759
<v Speaker 17>strategic disaster, apparently supported by President by but then he's

0:48:00.760 --> 0:48:04.759
<v Speaker 17>got every single foreign policy decision wrong. And so I

0:48:04.840 --> 0:48:07.319
<v Speaker 17>raised the question yesterday in the House of Commons to

0:48:07.400 --> 0:48:10.799
<v Speaker 17>our Foreign secretary, well, what after November the fifth, when

0:48:10.800 --> 0:48:13.480
<v Speaker 17>Donald Trump wins, what's he going to think about this?

0:48:14.200 --> 0:48:17.080
<v Speaker 17>And what does this do to our relationship, our key

0:48:17.400 --> 0:48:21.359
<v Speaker 17>as with Australia, our key relationship with America. They must

0:48:21.360 --> 0:48:23.400
<v Speaker 17>be laughing their socks off in Beijing.

0:48:23.800 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 1>What's perfect metaphor for how the Western world? You know?

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:28.759
<v Speaker 1>But they have for one of a bit of term

0:48:28.800 --> 0:48:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a shop being fired. They're handing the keys back, and

0:48:32.000 --> 0:48:34.440
<v Speaker 1>it's something that we all find as hard againstation every

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:36.120
<v Speaker 1>day you do in the Parliament, we do it here.

0:48:36.320 --> 0:48:38.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm hardly happening about thirty seconds. So give me, give

0:48:38.920 --> 0:48:41.239
<v Speaker 1>me the rah rah. The latest poles are pretty good

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:45.320
<v Speaker 1>for Trump. A feeling yeah, looking good.

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:48.880
<v Speaker 17>Kamala Harris appeared on sixty Minutes The Big American Program

0:48:49.120 --> 0:48:51.920
<v Speaker 17>last night. She's avoided media up until now. She was

0:48:51.960 --> 0:48:54.839
<v Speaker 17>totally exposed. She couldn't answer the question about the number

0:48:54.840 --> 0:48:57.400
<v Speaker 17>of illegals crossing the border since she had been. The

0:48:57.440 --> 0:49:01.640
<v Speaker 17>borders are and the bedding markets and bananas last night,

0:49:01.920 --> 0:49:05.000
<v Speaker 17>and Trump is now a clear favorite.

0:49:05.200 --> 0:49:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Go get them Donald, fight, fight, fight, vote, vote vote,

0:49:08.280 --> 0:49:10.080
<v Speaker 1>as they say, thank you, mate, appreciate it. We'll talk

0:49:10.080 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to you soon. Nigel Faras will see him again next week.

0:49:12.239 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 1>That's our show for tonight, making Kelly tomorrow and he's

0:49:14.760 --> 0:49:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the late debate