WEBVTT - 'SHOULD NOT HAVE COME BACK'. Readie's call on Doueihi's NRL return | Round 22 Preview

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Code and I Roll Show Michael carry

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>On showing by Brenton.

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 2>Ree Ready, just two of us, make very intimate.

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Where's your man, Dave.

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 2>He's somewhere assignment. He's probably the sharks.

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Sharks, that's all he does.

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying that you've just said that.

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Concord. The other day, I heard him asking Hard let's start.

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to bang on about the Tigers because

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it has been the story of the last two weeks.

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Though just quickly. You're quite critical around Adam Dewey and

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>been recorded back to the side of earlier this week.

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:42.279
<v Speaker 1>I was with you like I thought, yes, you were,

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 2>But after you sound like you had a backtrack there

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I am.

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I am reversing. After the press conference, I'm quite comfortable

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:51.279
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to play.

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Look, I didn't think he should have come back

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 2>in the side straight away. I thought he should have

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 2>come back through news to the last Cup. I made

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 2>that pretty clear clear. I still stand by that. But

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 2>I can understand why Benji's done it when you consider

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 2>they were both pretty well. I wouldn't say they're both

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 2>remorse at the press conference this week, but they took Yeah,

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:14.759
<v Speaker 2>you could see there was a bit of yeah, you're right,

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.680
<v Speaker 2>ownership on both sides. And the other issue they've got

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 2>is if you look at their hearts at the moment,

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 2>farn who's suspended, Jock Madden's injured, Jav and Andrews played

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 2>last week and look, I mean, with due respect, the

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 2>Javin's first game in the NNA. He's going to be

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 2>a role player for a long time. But he found

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 2>the going really tough. So you've really only got Lua

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 2>and Dewey to play. So I can understand why do

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 2>you back on the side, because you know what, above

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 2>all else, Mick, they need to win footy games like

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 2>it's so die there at the moment, and the only

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 2>way you stop a lot of the negative headlines and

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the negativity around the football club is

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 2>to actually win. And Adam gives you the best then

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 2>their best chance of winning.

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because the narrative would have been if they lost

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>on signy, Adam wasn't out or wide and you play

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Adam when he had to play Adam right, And look,

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>they still we'll probably lose like that. It'll be a

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>tough game. It will be an interesting game against Paris.

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 2>There are a chance there are any money chance.

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>The reason I'm comfortable with him playing with him playing

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>is I really like what I heard from Benji and

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Adam in terms of ownership, in terms of accountability, in

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of remorse around the way the whole week played

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>out as well, and some contrition, particularly from Adam's party,

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>was quite honest, saying he can be pigeted and hard

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to deal with and these sort of things, and working

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>with you, please, I've never walked out. I think I

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>think it was. Yeah, I thought I thought it trade

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>some maturity, some levelheadedness, and because of that, I'm comfortable.

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Do you think did you believe Hi when he said

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:43.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to be here, I've never broken a contract.

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 2>I'll be here for the next three years.

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>When he said I'm going to be here for the

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>next I've never broken a contract. Pretty strong words. Oh yeah,

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think he's going to be there. You're

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>not convinced.

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm not one hundred percent convinced. I think my gut

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.239
<v Speaker 2>feelings said yeah, he will be I'm about ninety five

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 2>ninety five.

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Would where were you in the lead up to that

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>press conference?

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Fifty to fifty? I reckon. But when you front the

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 2>media like that and you speak like that, and you're

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 2>so definitive and so convicted, and what you say like that,

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going anywhere. I've got a contract. I've never

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 2>broken a contract. I love this club. It's hard to

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 2>turn around from that. It's hard to then turn around

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 2>the off season and go I'm going to walk out

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:31.919
<v Speaker 2>of this joy. So look, I think you'll stay he

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 2>was obviously Yeah, I think he's going to stay there,

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 2>which I think is good news that Footag club because

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 2>there's not a lot of halves in the mud. Well

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 2>there's some good helves coming off at the end of

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 2>next season, right, But they need him, they need him.

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, with Lua next year, you can't start the season

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>with no Jerome and no Adam. My issue is around

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>what's doing with his shoulder, Like if he does need

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a reconstruction.

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Do it now?

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, what are they waiting for now? Like they got

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to buy next week.

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm not waiting put him out the pasture, get the

0:03:58.560 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 2>surgery done.

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Blade Lebanon like obviously in the World Cup. But like

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>they need him, they without your Rome, they need him

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and they need him for a large chunk of pre

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>season next year. So if he doesn't need a reconstruction.

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not waiting.

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're fair cool. No, I'm with your mick. I mean,

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 2>it looks mathematically they're still stop it, but mathematically they are,

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 2>and you've got to give your fans some hope. You can't.

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 2>I think once we're out of mathematical contention, then maybe

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 2>you put him out to pass.

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you do.

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>What numbers you're using, they're not playing for one?

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 2>How many games they won? Seven?

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 1>Don't care?

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 2>It's six left this week weekend? It's official. They lose

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 2>this weekend, they're gone, ski right, officially gone, officially.

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Give you the tip.

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm not arguing with you. What I'm saying is they're

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 2>mathematically still hope. So what message does it sending.

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>The second last?

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 2>How many wins are they got?

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>They've got seven?

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:54.239
<v Speaker 2>How many games left? Six?

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, it's six.

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that's right.

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>We're not even arguing about this. They're not playing.

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 2>We are. You've started, you have started argument about it.

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>So you think they're going to play. Do you think

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>they can play? You think they can play?

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 2>For no?

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, I'm not saying you they will, But

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>you think they can play finals.

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, know what I said was they're mathematically actually you

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 2>know what, I've actually got it wrong. They've only got

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 2>five games left, so theoretically they if even if they

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 2>win five more games, only win twelve games, and twelve

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 2>probably doesn't get you there. So they probably are out

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 2>of math mathematical contention already. So yeah, she's telling me

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 2>going already. So yeah, I'm with you now. They probably

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 2>if he needs surgery, get the seon.

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>If he needs a reco if it's just a clean

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>out or whatever, fine, no where he can put off.

0:05:42.160 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>But if he needs a shoulder reconstruction, I'm not wasting

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>time now, I'm getting it done. And during bulls the

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>other one, because he needs shoulder reconstruction.

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because he hasn't. He's looked a shadow of himself.

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 1>They've all looked a shadow. With a big game up

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>against Paramatto, been up and down, a.

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Very winnable game.

0:05:58.480 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>It definitely is a winner.

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 2>It's interested in the Jerome Blue Eye up against his

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 2>future one year club.

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>He's probably thankful in a way that Adam's taking all

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the pressure off Jerome around Jerome, right, But because of

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the Adam situation, who you're tipping in in that one.

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm actually gonna tip the Tigers. Mick, I think the

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Tigers might get them. What do you reckon?

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I've got no confidence, no confidence at all, the second

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:28.280
<v Speaker 1>last up against third last word, no confidence in either

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of them. But you're going.

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Tigers the Tigers.

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm going to Speaking of size at the

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>bottom of the ladder, Saint George Laurie, Dragons, Rising Dragons.

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Depends on if you're going to have a silly take.

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 2>On night, it's probably guaranteed a silly take.

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>So they signed cod nick Arema this week. That adds

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to Scott drink Water obviously. Nick Arema Watson metcalf Army

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>coll coma tonguey six six players players that five of

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 1>them will walk into their starting thirteen and Connor Watson

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>just depends on how you use it, but is a

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>weekly starter for or weekly fixture in their seventeen right,

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 1>So five out of thirteen locked in probably six with

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Connor if you're going to start him at thirteen is

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>probably where I like to play him, But just depends

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>on that situation.

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Look at Hamish Stewart, they haven't had thirteen, yeah, but

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:20.119
<v Speaker 2>thirteen at that footy club.

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>But depending on where you think Hamish's best position is

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>on edge, oh whatever, but like so five locked in

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and then Connor's in there seventeen every week of course,

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>So where realistically, where can the Dragons finish next year?

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 2>I reckon ten's a good finish for the next year,

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:40.239
<v Speaker 2>tense great finish when you consider their stone muddlust last

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 2>this year they've won two games. You need to win

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 2>thirteen games, twelve to thirteen games to make the finals

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 2>next year, right, that's the standard amount of games. I

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 2>don't think to win another ten or eleven games, eight

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 2>or nine games sorry next year in additional eight and

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 2>nine games, that's a big leap. Not many teams make

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 2>that leap. And I'm not sure. I still think if

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 2>you look at the sides outside the eight currently Melbourne

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 2>camera the Bulldogs are all outside the eight. Yeah, I

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 2>think they're all better squads than the Dragon's going to

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 2>have next year. So I'm not sure that. I think

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of talking about that and then pushing

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 2>for the top eight, and I'm sure inside the camp

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 2>that's what they're aiming for. I think it might be

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 2>beyond them.

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>But if you've got them at tenth, they're pushing for

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the top eight.

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but I think it's one of those tenths where

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 2>you know they're always on the proof free and never really.

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it's a tenth, but a tenth

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that's pushing for the eight. Okay, Like, do you know

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I think if we're here this time next year, if

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we're still going, you know, they'll be they'll.

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Be you and I on the podcast either.

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Top eight contention. And if you're saying they're going to

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>come tenth, you have to be agreeing with me.

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, I don't think they're a realistic.

0:08:57.440 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Five minutes ago that the Tigers are a chance of

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:00.479
<v Speaker 1>playing finals footy.

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.839
<v Speaker 2>Have four hundreds and third on mathematical.

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 1>And at the moment, okay, tenth right now is mainly okay,

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>do meinly have a hope playing finals footy this year?

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, of course they do.

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>So the Dragons, you assume, by that same metric, have

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a hope playing finals footing.

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 2>No, because I differ in my view of them. Right.

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 2>My view of them is they'll never never never. Really

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 2>mainly it's been in the eighth this year, right, they've

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 2>just fallen out of it. My view is they'll never

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 2>realistically be in contention, laws be floating around that tenth

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 2>to fourteenth.

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Fourteenth would be a bad season. Yeah, I think tenth.

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I think tenth is part.

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Everyone's raving about their signings and I agree they've made

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 2>good signings, right, But there's still some holes in that

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 2>so le even their spine, even their spine, right, their

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 2>spine to me, even with the signings they've made, there's

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot of question marks over that spine.

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Agree there is a risk factor to it that.

0:09:55.000 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Cuff hasn't played a lot of footing. Cody's thirty odd what, Yeah,

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 2>hooker will be little.

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.199
<v Speaker 1>Probably hopefully it's little because Connor not.

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 2>A and drink his drink. What is a really good player? Right?

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 2>And people are bagging me because I said he wasn't

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 2>the top you know, the top eight fullbacks in the

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 2>comp And look, he's probably played at that level this year.

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 2>He has been very good for the Cowboys, but if

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 2>you stack them all up, he's not. He's not the

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.839
<v Speaker 2>top tier of fullback. So I still think there's a

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 2>and for me, I always look at when I look

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 2>at Premiership threats to top eight sides, final sides, I

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 2>always like to look at this spine. I think that's

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:38.720
<v Speaker 2>for me, the most important part of any footy team, right,

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 2>And I still say that spine is not among the

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 2>elite spines in the comp. It's probably not in the

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 2>top eight spines in the comp. That's the worry for me.

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 2>And the outside backs are a bit lean.

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.199
<v Speaker 1>As we say, outside backs the number one issue. But

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:54.839
<v Speaker 1>you look at that that forward park and Keon it

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>is very good, right, it is very good.

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 2>You bang on about this for he is very young.

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>And on into the mix, who's an world class player

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>like that? And they've like they've marched up the field

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>this year most games, most games they've at least matched

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the opposition forward pack. The next year, you know, if

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that's half the battle that they'll get, they will get

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to good positions on the field. They just can't score.

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Points they need. It's taken on a step forward. I think,

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:28.199
<v Speaker 2>of course, I can I ask you this. I meant

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 2>to ask you this on three sixty last night about

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 2>the halves Metcalfe, Nick Arema, like, how do you think

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 2>that'll do? You think that will work?

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 1>You speak to Luke. Luki is so sure of himself,

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and I want just to come across the wrong way

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 1>because he's not arrogant. He's confident, right, he's so sure

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:47.599
<v Speaker 1>that he can run off footy side and direct a

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>footy side and be I did Vegas with him last year,

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>so speaking to him last year, he was he's a

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>risk because what is he twenty seven to twenty eight

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>hasn't played fifty first grade games? Crazy, So it's a

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 1>weird stat line and it's weird to generally give someone

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that sort of money given their lack of footy that

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>they've played. But I think it's very good player and

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>what they will have in them. They're going to chance

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>their arm. They're going to be a little bit loose

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>at times. And you know Scott drink Water's got a

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 1>clanger in him, right, we've seen it. That's going to

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>be under the micros because he's at the Cowboys. Whilst

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>he's been the main man this year because of Didon's injury,

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't had the expectation or the pressure to be

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>like the main man that's going to arrive once against Sydney,

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>like in Sydney next year at a big club. So

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 1>that's that's going to be a different approach for him.

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>And but I just think their creativity between the three

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of them will give the Dragons something they desperately crave.

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 1>And I can't be critical of the club for getting

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>themselves in a position now that for so long they've

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>bought poorly and I've been so I've been so critical

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of the over the last few years. Right, I can't

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>sit here and be critical of them because I can

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>see the direction and the gaps that they need to

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>fill in terms of the style of plower they've done that.

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm not being critical of the club for signing those

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 2>guys like I think they could all potentially be great signings. Right, Drink,

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:18.199
<v Speaker 2>he might be a great signing for them if he

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 2>maintains his form and this.

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Year Drink and I said at the time was the

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>length of three years and the amount of money. That

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>was what I was critical with at the time.

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 2>And Metcalf Luke Metcalf may be a sensational signing.

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 1>He'll either be great or element we've seen.

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 2>We've seen the form he showed it last year. I

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 2>started last year before he did his need unbelievable. Right,

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 2>So they might be great signings, but there is a

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 2>sense of there is a question mark over him.

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>And Jacob Little is the other one who nine Who's

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I really like Jack a little as a player, but

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>durability hasn't been any strength. Yeah, but he's another guy

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>like he's fast, he's dynamic once he gets out of

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>dumby half. So they've just got this well what it's

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>given them now and this will help the outside backs. Right,

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 1>They've got players that are threats now inside at the moment.

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Atkinson, Clink Guthas and Kyle Flanagan. They're not threats

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 1>with the footy, right, So.

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 2>I'll have some points in them, there's no doubt about and.

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll like get it right. I've been quite

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>critical Valentine jins this like vow showing glimpses when he

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>gets some space. He's still got speed and footwork, right,

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>So if these guys can create those opportunities and he

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>gets more one on one option like one on one opportunities,

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.359
<v Speaker 1>I think there's still life in val at that point.

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>But the questions, as you said, is around their center spot.

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Does Guttherson play there, There's Atkinson play there, there's most

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>of Souley resurrect his career and play there. You know

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that's that's an issue for him. And you know what

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>they do with Atkinson and Kyle Flannagan, Now where do

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>they sit in terms of peck in order. They got

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>high hopes for caid Reid, so you know, I think

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>cad Read is probably the back up half. That's the

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>intention is that next year that cad Reid is the

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>backup half. So there's a lot of dissect there and

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like guthuson Atkinson planning again, or we know

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Sulei's on the market, but if any club came knocking

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>for any of those players that they'd be open to

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>let them go.

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 2>You win me over, Mick. You're slowly winning me over

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 2>with this.

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, but I'm not because I'm not saying anything that's unrealistic.

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying they're a top four side. They're far

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>from the top five side, right, But I think this

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>time next year that will be they should be in

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>finals contention because they've recruited really, really well and they

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>could jagging outside back if some other things move. You know,

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>they've shown that they're not going to be conservative in

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the player market. They're going to be active and then

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>they can get deals done. The cod Nick Arema deal

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 1>came out of nowhere. Really, we hadn't heard I don't

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>heard a whisper about it. We thought he was going

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to I don't heard a whisper about it till about

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours before it all sort of came out right,

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>So it all happened discreetly. And I think he's a

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>good signing from interesting Dragons Dolphins. Cody nick Arema plays

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>on Friday up against the club that he's very rare

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that you get announcement of a player joining the club

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>in the week that they're playing. But the Drags were

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>absolutely disgraceful last weekend. They were wakeful. It was like

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the Dragons of old. Like it was like the Dragons

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Week five.

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 2>It still feels like they've got that game in them

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 2>every now and then, right, I mean.

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought they'd gone beyond that a bit. But I

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>think the Dolphins could win and win well.

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Really yeah, I think I think I tip the Dolphins. Yeah,

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 2>I can never remember.

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Tip I can, but there's no way you tipped the Dragon.

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Tipped the Dragons once this year last week. Unluckly, I

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 2>tipped the Titans last week and get up son, Yeah, Dolphins,

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 2>I tip a couple of times next year, given some

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 2>players coming.

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>They played the Tigers later this year. Who that's going

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to be an interesting one that.

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Will be an interesting game depends if the Tigers have

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 2>sent after squad for surgery.

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Thursday night kicks off Cowboys v. Rooster's big game.

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>But one player that won't be playing is Tom did

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>And Read Money won't be playing for North QUEENSLANDA because

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of the concussion protocols as well. Daniel Tupa missing for

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the Roosters. Lindsay Collins still side and probably a week away.

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay Collins from being back. But lots of talk and

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>chatter over the last six months around Tom did And

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>injured at the moment. But what's your take on the

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Tom did in situation. The story is the rumblings that

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 1>we've all heard.

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 2>Well, this started in the pre season. I remember, I

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 2>can't know where he was, but Triple M did a whisper,

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 2>and the whisper was that Tommy did and was going

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 2>to wanted to move to Sydney right because his partner

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 2>is lives in Sydney and she's now pregnant. She wasn't

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.639
<v Speaker 2>pregnant at the time. She's now pregnant, and obviously the

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Cowboys at the time shut it down, but it's subsequently

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 2>emerged and been some talks between his management and the

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Cowboys about his situation. Right his situation situation the Cowboy

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.199
<v Speaker 2>was given his partner lives in Sydney, has a business

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 2>in Sydney, and whatever. Out of those talks, I believe

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 2>tom agreed to stay and sort of try and work

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 2>through things and see if he could work through things

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 2>with his partner moving up to towns Were. Now Obviously

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:02.239
<v Speaker 2>the whistlers haven't gone away, Mick. You've heard him. I've

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 2>heard him. They've rumbled again this week because he's part

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 2>of us, I said, is now pregnant and she's due

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 2>later this year. And as I understand that she's going

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 2>to move up there, live in Townsville. See how it goes.

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't think this is over though, Mick.

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think my sense is that at some

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 2>point it might reretate again. At the moment, it's pretty

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 2>it sounds like they've sort of the situation out the Cowboys,

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 2>but there's club's keeping an eye on the situation with

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Tommy did because he's such a good player.

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Such a good player, but he's on big money, right,

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.439
<v Speaker 1>huge money. You had this around what's what's what's his contract?

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 2>So his contract is next year he's on about I

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 2>think it's around one two, one three, and then the

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 2>year after he's on I believe twelve percent of whatever

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 2>the salary cap is, So if the Caps will imagine

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 2>it will be about fifteen sixty million, so he'll be

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 2>on one point one point nine million.

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 1>That would probably make him the highest player in the

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 1>game just about.

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:56.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he be given be given a nudge. I mean,

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 2>I think Mitch and Mitch Ma's and Nathan clearly highest paid.

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 2>I believe they both probably got ratchets and their deals,

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 2>so they might go beyond him actually, but yeah, it's

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 2>a significant amount of money and the Cowboys have made

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 2>that investment in him and they don't want to see

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 2>him go, right, So it's one of those ones you've

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:15.360
<v Speaker 2>got to watch and see where this goes. Mick down

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 2>the track. I don't think it's there's anything imminent.

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>So you think he's at the Cowboys next year?

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 2>I think, yeah, I think he'll be. Well, I think

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 2>he will be, but I wouldn't put my house on it,

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 2>just because when you're dealing with situations like this where

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 2>potentially a partner may may be unsettled because as I said,

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 2>she's from Sydney, got a business in Sydney. I imagine

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 2>her family's in Sydney and she's about about to have

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 2>their first child. You know that that can be difficult, right,

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 2>So I think again, I think it's a watch and

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 2>see thing with.

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Tommy, Cowboys, Roosters. What's your tip?

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 2>My tip is the Roosters. I think for memory watch

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 2>of you on the TI in situation.

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, it's something that we've all heard, right, and clubs,

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure in the background we're doing their calculations to

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>see if they could try and get him in and

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.199
<v Speaker 1>what would take. And there's no way the Cowboys were

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>even going to contemplate let him go unless they've got

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>an elite player in return at the moment to hard

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 1>basket for that to happen. But I feel like, as

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you said, maybe they've committed see how it goes in Townsville.

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>If they can settle as a new fan like new

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:31.400
<v Speaker 1>parents and things like that, then he might see out

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>his contract. But there was no doubt rumblings that we'd

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>all heard and clubs were made aware of his not

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>his availability, but the potential for his availability.

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 2>And but look, he's such an important player, such a

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 2>good player.

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Without drink water there turn out like he becomes so

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>important because you know Perdue will go to fullback that

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>becomes really young and things like that. So it didn't. Yeah,

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>he is the long term Queensland potentially Queensland captor. You know,

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>like he's got everything going for him. So on the Cowboys.

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Obviously I'm not letting him go without a fight. But

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>so you've tip roosters, Tip the roosters. Who got me

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to a couple more games to run through radio Friday night,

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>second game Storm the Bulldogs storm. Any hope, well there

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>hope there still thought you would say that there's a.

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:23.479
<v Speaker 2>Hot tip that hated a young kid will make us

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 2>to do in this game. Hayden Watson, good player, young

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 2>nine in year old queens and kid. He was a

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 2>strange schoolboys hooker. He's a half years a hooker. He

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 2>played a lot of hooker as a kid. But they've

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 2>moved into half half five eighted that the storm he's

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.160
<v Speaker 2>been playing. New said last cup, killing it, New said,

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 2>last cup. Strong marlet he will actually start this game.

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not sure what's going on there, but.

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean Tyrone wish I to hooker or would that

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>mean he plays hooker.

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure what the movie is Mick that I'm

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 2>not aware of, but tip keep an eye him because

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 2>he is a gun. My tip is.

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Bulldogs, Me too, Bulldogs Top eight.

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 2>I reckoning you to make it. You know them well camera,

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 2>one of them will sneak in. They're most flying.

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>He drops out Newcastle, I feel so. I hope Newcastle. Actually,

0:22:09.520 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 1>I hope Newcastle don't drop out. They don't deserve they

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>don't deserve to. But Titans Warriors. Titans really impressive against

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 1>the Dragon the Warriors. We're talking about how bad the

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Dragons were. The Warriors were diabolically against the Titans.

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 2>Where is this?

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of Luke Metcalf. We spoke around

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Luke Metcalf. Does he need to come back into that side?

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Mickle. I've actually been saying for an eternity that I

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 2>think they need they need him in the team, but

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 2>I haven't seen. Now he's been going on Caper, so

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm told he's been going good. I think they're a

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 2>better team when he's in it and playing well, So

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:48.479
<v Speaker 2>I think they've got to bring him back eventually. They

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 2>want to make a dent in the finals. I think

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 2>gold Coaster win this game.

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Warriors.

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 2>They're just playing so well.

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Play well. They are playing well by the Warriors need

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to bounce back. They look like a bottom four side. Really.

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Panthers Raiders the Mudgie Mudgie clash. What do you make

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of that?

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you what big change of the Panthers dropping

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Blaze to Lungey out?

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I do you agree with that?

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to second guess Ivan Cleary, right, I

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 2>think defensively, we've all known defensively that's been a spot

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 2>area for them, right, If you want to get at them,

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:26.360
<v Speaker 2>you target that left side of their defense where Blaze

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.160
<v Speaker 2>and Casey McLean. He's missed a lot of tackles this year.

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Blaze lunge her second most, I mean five. The comp

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 2>behind as a man, So I can understand why they've

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 2>done it, But I'll be interested to see how long

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 2>it continues for I don't think it's a permanent thing, Mick.

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I think Jack Holler could do a real good job there,

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and if he does, it could be not a long

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>term player, but in terms.

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Of the Philip the more dangerous side with the ball.

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 2>When Blaze plays as opposed to Jack Couger. That fair enough.

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 1>But when you've got points of attack on Dylan Edwards's

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 1>back as I Nathan Cleary, Papa Lee, he Casey McLean,

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Tom Jenkins, do you need a date?

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:04.959
<v Speaker 2>Like? Maybe not?

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what I mean? Like? It's there's enough

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>points of attack there. He's obviously a better attacking player

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 1>than more dangerous than Jack. But I don't know. I

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>think I actually like to move. I really like it

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>because I think they've been vulnerable and makes a.

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Little suggestion here for Blaze to ling if I'm Paramatta right,

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 2>he's in November one guy. Yes, I'm dead to having

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 2>a last to try and get him back to Paramatta.

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 2>Why not if he can't get a deal done in

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 2>Penrith his brother still Paramatter. Yeah, I'm that they need

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:36.640
<v Speaker 2>a six. We know that they've also got to run

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 2>there next year, but it's a twelve month thing. I

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 2>know they've got some kids coming through, but Blaze telling

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 2>is a para kid. I'm having to go to get

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 2>him back.

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe he hasn't got a doing it next

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:49.479
<v Speaker 1>year Ronald Walkman. Obviously he's not at the top end,

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>but in terms of backup halves, he's been so good

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>for Paramatta, so serviceable. You know me, gosh, next to

0:24:57.800 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>nothing to have him in your books.

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 2>It's unbelievable, because you're right, he's been very good for

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:07.199
<v Speaker 2>par of this. He's surprised, surprisingly good right in difficult circumstances.

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 2>And I can't believe the club hasn't sign him either,

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 2>because you're right, he won't cost your bomb. He's a

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 2>bargain basement pick up. Should pick him, make it happened.

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Broncos up against the Knights, Broncos. Broncos have done the Bronx.

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I really feel sorry. I'm tipping the Broncos too, but

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I really feel sorry for the night.

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 2>That's the worst time.

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I hope it's just been. I don't observe it even

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>like to get within a point of that game last

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>week when they had the players they have got injured,

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>plus no Callen and Seffeti and back this week and

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>he's been named so yeah, they they they definitely need him.

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Lucas and Dylan Brown gone for the season, so

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:50.919
<v Speaker 1>huge two outs for him. But Broncos. For me too,

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the last time we haven't spoken about Sharks for Rabbits

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>can Cronolin winning his competition like have they they've served?

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>So for mine it was Penrith, then two three were

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>very close in terms of Rooster's Warriors, and then I

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>found the Sharks Dolphins sort of as that next tier.

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Sharks are now in that next tier above.

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 2>Have they jumped the Warriors?

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>They jumped the Warriors, Bryan in terms of their last performance.

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>So for me now it goes Penrith dip Brewster, Sharks

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>dip Warriors dip.

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I agree with you man. They're playing such good

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 2>Footio Nicko and Nicko's skin and trindle, but the question

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 2>mark always with is the finals, whether they can do

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 2>it in the finals.

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>That's been They look different this year, but I do agree,

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>not this year, the last six weeks that looked different.

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Nick We've looked at them before and thought this, so

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 2>I can do something.

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Look I'm looking at a bit differently now. Well something

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of course, but there's just something a little bit different

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>about it, with a bit more freedom or a bit

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>more confident, a bit more swagger that like they don't

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be some big games before the finals,

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 1>but they don't have that that era of uncertainty around

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>them at the moment. So I'm really liking what I'm saying.

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you. I think there's a different look

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 2>to them, but I still want to see it in

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 2>September until they do it. When the whips are cracking

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 2>pointing into the season, what are the cliches can I

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 2>drag out? That's when I believe in them, right, because

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 2>they've got a great coach, like he's an unbelievable coach, FITZI.

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 2>There's their squad looks cherry right right. Their halves are

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 2>playing well and the key, the key for them is

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 2>always their halves.

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 2>When those halves play well, they're capable of beating anyone.

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 2>They just need to do it in Septembers with you chucks,

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 2>oh ducks.

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, Time for the b s Messages of the weak.

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 2>I've got a message today, bick you do yeah for

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 2>the fans. For the fans. I was looking on the

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 2>ABC Instagram Yes this morning, Yes, and there was a

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 2>clip up Dennis can't Dennis Carahan, I think that's his name.

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:55.919
<v Speaker 2>He's done a song song comparing you and about you,

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 2>and Michael Chammas.

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Carry Nis and Chammers kick for the press. Carryanas and

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Chammers are such a pretty pair. Carrianas and Chammers. One's

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>good and one's a pass.

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:14.120
<v Speaker 2>How you always get mixed up? Which does happen? Quite free?

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Bananas in pajamas?

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Bananas and pajamas. You're dressed up as a banana and

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 2>pajamas thoughts.

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>They played it on Sunday and it was quite very amusing.

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Dennis is a genius. But poor Dennis hasn't had a

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>hit since That's in Queensland. He's a one hit one.

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>So this is his back. Baby. I've made him relevant again,

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>but I have made him relevant again, So den Dog,

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you're welcome.

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:42.239
<v Speaker 2>Did you get a cover of the royalties on that

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 2>or what happened to? Well?

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>ABC stuffed up the Bluey right, Hopefully they don't stuff

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>up the Best Messages of the Week soft cause Dodger

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>reviews by rounds. Nobody wanted. It's time to call it out.

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>This is I call BS a segment where we tackle

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the nonsense in including the best messages you submit each

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 1>week at Code sports dot com to AU. So let's

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>get into it. This is from Steve from North Humberine, Tambourine.

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Tambourine is that look? Is that in Queensland. That's in Queensland.

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 2>And there you go downs.

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>The l persist with time wasting scrums. The scrum rules

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>are ignored. Just give the board to the relevant team.

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>So should they get rid of scrums?

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 2>No, they shouldn't get rid of scrums. That is Tambourine.

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.479
<v Speaker 2>I think that's in Queensland near the Gold Coast. If

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 2>it's Mount Tambourine north, you know what I'm saying. There's

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 2>a place called Mount Tambourine, so maybe it's north Mount Tambourine. Anyway, No,

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 2>they shouldn't get rid of.

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Steve knows where he's from.

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 2>You got to keep scrums. It's part of the fabric

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 2>of the game. What would you get rid of a

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 2>basically redundant now anyways, let's just you know, they'ren't neat

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 2>and tidy these days, and attack gives teams an attacking.

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I wish it would give teams they never use that.

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 2>We saw it great? Great? What about the great scrum

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 2>playing origin with Queensland scored.

0:29:56.760 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Great when they there were scrumb and they just turned

0:29:58.960 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>an inside ball into.

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 2>A Yeah, yeah, boring. I'm with you.

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 1>That should be banned forwards in the stainless scrum.

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you should push for that rule.

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't be bothered. Dale from Campbelltown. Time to drop

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 1>leu Iron Dewey to reserve a out and close the

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>door behind them. Talk to talk now, walk the walk Marshall. Wow,

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:23.479
<v Speaker 1>we disagree with that. Yeah, we're just a good disagree

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>with everyone.

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't think they can at the moment. They're

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 2>a bit short short.

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm only saying, yes, he's going to get get his

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 1>shoulder record had a shoulder. Okay, have you.

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 2>From what I'm told and what I'm told from what

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm told about your football.

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>But didn't do much at wasn't your chance? They did

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>do a playing footy though, Did you kept dissiccating?

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 2>I'll be able to put the shop put it back in.

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Did you? You're one tough hombro.

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that wraps up. That wasn't the bees by the way.

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>That wraps up second for this week.

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Who want to hear We want to see his stay.

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 2>That was a long time ago.

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 1>If you've got something that's driving you mad in footy

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 1>or Brent Reid's driving you crazy, and you want to

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>get it off your chest, Share with us on our

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>BS message board at cod sports dot com dot A

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you