WEBVTT - Sharri | 18 June

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Line Sharry Well, good evening. I'm James Macpherson filling in

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>for Sharry Marks And Last week Prime Minister Anthony Albanese

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>was asked about prices at a sausage sizzle in Sydney.

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Triple M radio host Mick malloy told the PM that

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Vivid Festival was charging Australian's eight dollars fifty for a

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>sausage in bread, and he wondered what Albanese he thought.

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 2>The PM replied immediately that it was and I quote

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 2>rubbish and UnAustralian. Absolutely have listened.

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 3>Eight dollars fifty for a sausage sizzle at Vivid.

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:39.599
<v Speaker 4>Can you do something about that?

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 5>No, that's just rubbish, isn't it.

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 4>It's un Australian.

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you it is Australian absolutely, So there you go.

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>The PM can take a stand when he wants to.

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just a pity that he reserves his strongest condemnation

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>for the price of a snag in bread. If only

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese premiere was a sausage. Whilst standing firm on

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the rights of Australians to access affordable sausage sizzles, the

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>PM was rather less firm on the rights of Australian

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>journalists to not be physically intimidated, harassed or blocked on

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>home soil by foreign agents. When asked today what he

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>thought about the way in which Chinese officials had treated

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Australian journalists Chang Lay during a press conference in Canbury yesterday,

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the PM had only this to say, we.

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 5>Have different values in different political systems, and we saw

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 5>some of that yesterday. I've got to say with the

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 5>attempt that was pretty ham fisted to block Cheng Lay,

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 5>the Australian journalists who were able to get brought home

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 5>at the press conference, and there was a clumsy attempt

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 5>really to just stand in between where the cameras were

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 5>and Chang Lay.

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Ham fisted and clumsy. It's an interesting choice of words

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to describe an attempt by Chinese officials to bully an

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Australian journalist. You might have expected our national leader to

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>describe the behavior as unacceptable or wrong.

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 2>But you don't need to.

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Ask the PM about a sausage sizzle to elicit that

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 1>kind of moral clarity, or rather, you would need to

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>ask him about a sausage sizzle to describe the treatment

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>dished out to Chang lay as clumsy is to imply

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't anything inherently wrong with what the Chinese did.

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>It was just the way in which the Chinese did it,

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>those clumsy authoritarians. If only they exercised their totalitarian instincts

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>on our people in a more graceful and skillful way.

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>The Prime Minister dismissed the incident as an example of

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and they quote different values and different political systems, Well, yeah,

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese premiere comes from a different political system. It's

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 1>an authoritarian dictatorship in which political opponents are harassed, harangued,

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and in some cases jailed for long periods without trial.

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>In fact, that's exactly what happened to Chang Li, who

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>has released less than a year ago after spending more

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>than three years in a dank prison cell on trumped

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>up chargers. For Chinese officials to treat any Australian journalists

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 1>the way they did yesterday is unacceptable.

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 2>But to do it to a woman who'd been.

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>A pawn in Beijing's hostage diplomacy as recently as last

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>October is not clumsy or ham fisted.

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 2>It's outrageous. Later in the day, the Prime Minister told

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 2>ABC Radio.

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 5>Our officials have followed up with the Chinese embassy to

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 5>express our concern.

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Great so our people have told their people that their

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>people ought to be less clumsy when harassing our people.

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh and we hope this doesn't mean we won't be

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>getting our pandas. Describing the treatment of chang Lay as

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>clumsy reminds me of Albanesi describing the treatment of our

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>servicemen as unprofessional after a Chinese jet led off flares

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>in front of one of our.

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Helicopters last month.

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>What is unprofessional in those circumstances, even mean it was

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>an amateurish attempt.

0:03:58.160 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 2>At endangering our forces.

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Chinese are going to down one of our helicopters over

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the Yelloca, they should do it properly, you know, in

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a professional manner. Last November, when a Chinese warship used

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>sonar to injure Australian Navy divers in International wars off

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the coast of Japan, Albanzi described the incident as regrettable,

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>which begs the question regrettable for whom? For the Chinese,

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>hardly for the Australian Navy diver who was injured, undoubtedly

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>for Anthony Albanesi well most certainly he seemed then as

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>he does now to highly regret being put in a

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>position where he has to defend Australians and Australian interests

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>from the Chinese Commonist Party. Little wonder Beijing dubbed him

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>their handsome boy. It's not the Chinese who are clumsy

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>or unprofessional, and it's certainly not the Chinese who have regret.

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>They continue to push our buttons while boasting about how

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:55.359
<v Speaker 1>mature and respectful the relationship is. What's regrettable is that

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the Albanese government seems so intent on normalizing relations with China,

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>prepared to normalize abuse from China. As my grandfather would

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>say if he was still alive, Albanezi is one silly sausage.

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Coming up on the program tonight, the government's early learning

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>framework that's turning out toddlers into activists. I'll ask whether

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>parents even know what's going on at their child's daycare.

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Interest rates are on whole, but inflation is here to stay.

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Plus the new South Wales budget continues a trend of

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>rising state debt. I'll have the latest analysis from leading

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>economist Warren Hogan and from the rise of Nigel Faraja's

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 1>Reform Party to the death of the Tories and the

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>prospect of a man's summer calling slippery and unprincipled becoming PM.

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.919
<v Speaker 1>The UK election is shaking up. Will cross live to

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>London for the latest, but first let's go to my

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>panel former Speaker of the House Bromwin Bishop and National's.

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 2>MP Keith Pitt.

0:05:57.480 --> 0:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to you both, Thanks for joining me. I want

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>to start with you, Bronwan. What's your reaction to Prime

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Minister Anthony Albernese's response to the way that Changli was

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.919
<v Speaker 1>treated Changli rather was treated yesterday.

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 6>Look, I think the Chinese would be very satisfied. I

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 6>think the Chinese when the Prime Minister said different values

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:23.240
<v Speaker 6>and different ways, that's putting it mildly. We are a

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 6>democracy there at totalitarian state. They see Australia as a

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 6>vassal state to pay tribute and they would be very

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 6>satisfied with the way in which Albanesi responded. That means

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 6>that the Chinese Communist Party have got Albanese in his

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 6>government just where they want them, and that in turn

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 6>raises the question of Communist Party of China interference in

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 6>our coming election, whether or not those people who turned

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 6>out to welcome the Premier. Are they going to be

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 6>subject to getting how to vote information in the coming election?

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 6>I think it is a very very series condition that

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 6>we have seen. The weakness of the Prime Minister is

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 6>inability to stand up for Australia and showing that he

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 6>will do anything to appeace Chinese approval. It just is

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 6>a very worrying time.

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Keith, what do you think, how should the Prime Minister

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>have responded to the events of yesterday. I mean it

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>was quite extraordinary that an Australian journalist will be treated

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>in that fashion, but even more extraordinary for the Prime

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Minister to not come out immediately and condemn it.

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 7>Well, with apologies to the Simpsons. Here in Australia, we

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 7>don't tolerate that sort of crap. That's the reality. And

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 7>unfortunately we have a federal Labor government who appear very

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 7>weak on this. They consider it to be reckless, awkward, uncomfortable.

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 7>But here in Australia we support freedom of the press,

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 7>freedom of expression, we support a democracy, a separation of

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 7>powers and that is something that's been defended in this

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 7>nation for decades and willing to the future. I think

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 7>it's an incredibly important thing that we must maintain.

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 2>One little slip, one little.

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 7>Opening, one little opportunity for communism, socialism to take an

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 7>even greater hold in this country I think will be

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 7>detrimental to.

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 2>All of us into the future.

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 7>And it starts with this sort of nonsense. And the

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 7>Federal Labor government shouldn't have allowed it. Their response should

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 7>have been stronger, and they've still got the opportunity to

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 7>fix it.

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think the reaction, which has been poor, to

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>say the least, only in Bolden's China to continue to

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.160
<v Speaker 1>treat us in that fashion because they know there will

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 1>be no consequences.

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's move on.

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>In somewhat non shocking news, a Labour senator called for

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the immediate recognition of a Palestinian state. A Fatima Payman,

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>well known for her history of anti Israel sentiment, wrote

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>an opinion piece published in El Jazeera. She said quote

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>by recognizing a Palestinian state, Australia would be affirming its

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>commitment to this universal principle that's of peace and frustrate

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Israel's bid to crush such aspirations of the Palestinians. This

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>same Labor senator used the phrase from the River to

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the Sea, which Anthony Alberzi then had to come out

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and say was unacceptable to use that phrase.

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 2>It was a call for violence.

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>She pretty much ignored the Prime Minister and now she's

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:22.599
<v Speaker 1>continuing ignoring labor policy, calling for immediate recognition of Palestine.

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:25.479
<v Speaker 1>What should Anthony ALBERESI do about.

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 6>This senator, Well, they have to consider her position obviously

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 6>next time she's up for reelection, that's for sure. But

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 6>I think he has to take a much more positive

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 6>stance that says you are there to represent the interests

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:43.840
<v Speaker 6>of Australia and to serve the people you are elected

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:48.479
<v Speaker 6>for your state that you come from, not to pursue

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 6>this absolute falsehood of genocide being perpetrated by the Israelis.

0:09:56.320 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 6>Genocide means this. In nineteen thirty nine, there were sixteen

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 6>million Jews in the world in nineteen In twenty twenty four,

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 6>there are still sixteen million Jews in the world because

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 6>six million were murdered. That is genocide, not a war

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 6>where Gaza invader or Haas invaded Israel and slaughtered twelve

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 6>hundred people and took hostages. I've not heard a word

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 6>from this woman about hostages or about the mutilation of women.

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 6>She comes from a country where she should really appreciate

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 6>the freedom that she has in this country. And when

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 6>she calls for from the River to the Sea, that

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 6>is calling for more genocide and the murder of Jews.

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 6>There's no two ways about it. That's exactly what it means.

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 6>And she has to be reprimanded by the Prime Minister,

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 6>but of course he'll just show weakness again.

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, Keith.

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Both the Coalition and the Labor Government slammed the Greens

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the other week for stirring up hatred and creating social division.

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>But here the Labor Party have got one of their

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>own senators. I mean, in this article for El Jazeira,

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>she praised the student activists who have set up encampments

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:21.839
<v Speaker 1>in universities across the country to the point where Jewish

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.839
<v Speaker 1>students have been afraid to go to class. So it's

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a bit rich for the Labor Party to criticize the

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Greens while they've got their own senator effectively doing the

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>same kinds of things.

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 7>Well, that's exactly right. I'm on a jointstanding committee with Fatimur.

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 7>I got to tell you much. She's smart and articulate,

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 7>and on this issue, I disagree with her.

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 2>Completely and wholeheartedly.

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 7>But in the Labor Party they don't reward disobedience.

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 8>Brody knows where I'm going here.

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 7>They will crack down on this like a ton of

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 7>bricks have hit the poor senator from Western Australia because

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 7>her comments today, she's effectively said that the Prime Minister

0:11:59.920 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 7>is spineless, has not held and not continuing to hold

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 7>a long held position that he had before he became

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 7>Prime Minister, before Labor came into government. I mean, that's

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 7>quite an extraordinary statement from a sitting senator in WA

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 7>in the Labor Party, and I don't think the unions

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 7>will let this continue. So I feel a bit sorry

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:21.439
<v Speaker 7>for Fatima. Her comments are wrong. I disagree with them completely,

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 7>but in terms of the politics, I know what's coming

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 7>for and the Union basket will take her out.

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 2>I think that's the most likely outcome. Yeah, well, I'm

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 2>not sure there'll be too for it at all. I

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:33.559
<v Speaker 2>thought you might say.

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 6>I think she needs to be where she needs to

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 6>face the reckoning because what she's doing is just so wrong.

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 6>I mean, if anyone who analyzes the history of what

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 6>has happened in the Middle East in this area will

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 6>remember that in nineteen forty one, the Grand Mufti of

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 6>Jerusalem went to Hitler and said, please come and help

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 6>us kill the Jews in Israel, and Hitler said he

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.439
<v Speaker 6>would do that food finished killing them in Europe because

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 6>the Grand Rouffi of Jerusalem wanted to be the leader

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 6>of a new Palestinian state.

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, if you do what Fatima is calling for,

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>if you recognize Palestine immediately effectively, you're recognizing a terrorist

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>state because of course it's still run by Hamas. Let's

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>move on to more local politics. Simonhomes of Courts Climate

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>two hundred, group that bankrolled the Teal independent wave at

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:28.319
<v Speaker 1>the last election, now has set its sites on unseating

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>more Coalition MPs. The group has identified at least nine

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>seats it will target at the next election, all of

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>which were won by the Coalition in twenty twenty two.

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Bromwin the Liberal Party may be vulnerable, but of course

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>last time the Teals won seats Scott Morrison was in office.

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 1>This time with a labor government and the cost of

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>living pressures etc. Will the Teals have quite the same

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>appeal with their luxury beliefs.

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think there are two points to make. First

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 6>of all, I don't think the same amount of money

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 6>is going to be available in the seat of mckella.

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 6>The Teal spent one point two million dollars. There is

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 6>already one of their biggest donors who gave half a

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 6>million dollars last time won't be giving it this time.

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 6>So I think it's a different ballgame. The second thing

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 6>is they stood on a platform of integrity and climate

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 6>change integrity. We've seen none on the climate change issue.

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 6>Where are the Teals campaigning about these monstrous proposals to

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 6>put these huge windmills out into the sea and interrupt

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 6>the whales transgression movements and so on.

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Where is their integritcy?

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>You've got to destroy the environment to save it, don't

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you know that?

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 8>Well?

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 6>There, of course was the same argument with the Vietnam War.

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 6>Wasn't that as destroy the village to save it?

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 2>So you don't think the Teals will be as successful

0:14:59.400 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 2>next time?

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't all right, Keith the Nationals leader David Little Proud,

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>he's just gathing attack against voters in Teal seats, accusing

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>them of being out of touch with the struggles of

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.080
<v Speaker 1>regional Australians have listened to what he.

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 9>Said, I just say to those viewers that are from

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 9>till seats, just take a little visit out west and

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 9>understand the burden you're asking us to bear. For you

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 9>to put your head on a pillow at night and

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 9>think that you've saved the world, you've actually destroyed much

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 9>of the environment where I live.

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Talk to me about the frustration that's being held being

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>felt by people in regional areas. Obviously, David Little Proud,

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>he seemed quite emotional actually speaking out about that today.

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Just how annoying is it for people in regional areas

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to I guess they feel carry the burden of the

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>renewable project.

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 7>Well, every day Australians can't afford more teals. That's the

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 7>reality that they can't afford to pay more for electricity,

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 7>they can't afford to pay more for the car they

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 7>kind of paid Ford to pay more for food and

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 7>rent and housing. And this is the reality of Labour's

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 7>policies which the Teals are supporting and.

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Out in regional areas.

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 7>I mean, this is the practical, this is the front line,

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 7>this is the common sense, and what labor is doing

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 7>is millions of hectares of solar panels, for example, which

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 7>need to be replaced every twenty years. Tens of thousands

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 7>of wind turbines in regional areas, they don't want them.

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 7>Just look at the blow up you've got now for

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 7>or shore that's proposed for the south coast. Well, how

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 7>about we put them in the harbor. I mean Sydney

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 7>Harbor's a great spot. It's pretty windy there. I'm sure

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 7>bron would like to look out the window and see

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 7>a whopping, great big wind turbine that's higher than the

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 7>Harbor bridge. It'll attract tourisms for sure. I mean, I'm

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 7>sure that the Japanese and the Chinese will fly from

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 7>all over the world to come and see a harbor

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 7>full of wind turbines.

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Well either, Keith, I know you've been sarcastic, but I

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>remember Anastasia Palage seriously proposing that a wind farm in

0:16:58.360 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Queensland would become a major tourist attraction. People get on

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>buses and drive out to look at these turbines.

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 2>I remember seriously saying that, well they.

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:09.679
<v Speaker 7>Might come and look at them when they're on fire.

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 7>That would be something to see, which potentially can happen.

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 7>But for the regions the numbers are just extraordinary, and

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 7>I think there's a lot of there's challenges for us

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 7>to try and get across to people just how big

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 7>an area this is. I mean, we've seen reports for

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.880
<v Speaker 7>Gladston hydrogen, for example, needing two and a half thousand

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 7>square kilometers of solar panels just for Gladston hydrogen. It's

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 7>really we're going to level two and a half thousand

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 7>square kilometers and you really think you'll get an environmental

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 7>approval for that, and you'll get it through an indigenous

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.479
<v Speaker 7>land use agreement and you'll pay royalties through native title

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 7>and that'll be all tickety boo. I don't think so.

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 7>So if we accept that this stuff's just not going

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 7>to happen, well you need another solution, and nuclear is

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 7>that baseload net zero solution. It's got no emissions, it

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 7>works one hundred percent of the time, and we just

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 7>need people to actually have a conversation about it so

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 7>that we can get some information to them that's factual

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 7>and it's not just based on feelings, because the proposal

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 7>from Labor is all about a feeling.

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Keith, we're going to go to a break in a moment.

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>First want to ask you tomorrow morning there's a Coalition

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:21.120
<v Speaker 1>party room meeting to talk about the plans for nuclear

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>What sort of announcement will we get from the Prime

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Minister tomorrow? Will we find out the locations of proposed

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>reactors tomorrow?

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Is that the plan?

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 7>Oh, I'd love to give you an insight, but A

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 7>I don't know, and be if I did, I wouldn't

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 7>tell you. Unfortunately, you're right out of luck. But I'd

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 7>imagine that'll be plenty to say. There's lots going on

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 7>tonight that I'm aware of, and you know you've obviously

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 7>been informed a better potential meeting tomorrow. I would assume

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 7>that would be the discussion. But we've got two weeks

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 7>of parliamentary sittings coming up as well, and I'm sure

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 7>colleagues will have plenty to say. It'll be a good discussion.

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.200
<v Speaker 6>Well, the important thing is that there's a plan out

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 6>there which is an alternate, and I think people will

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 6>see it. As I said, the two spent an enormous

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 6>amount of money, reportedly in mcallo one point two million.

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 6>But the point is this, there is now a real

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 6>argument going on which was absent in twenty twenty two.

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 6>There was a real alternative to encompass all Astra content.

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, indeed, there'll definitely be a contest at the next election, Keith,

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>That's for sure, Bronwin, Bishop Keith Pitt.

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much to both of you.

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll stick around because coming up we'll talk more about

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>why the PM must stand up to China's bully boy tactics.

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 2>Plus rates on hold.

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:35.199
<v Speaker 1>But the RBA isn't happy about big spending federal and

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 1>state governments.

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 2>All of that in a moment.

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Well I spoke at the top of the program about

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the disgraceful stunt pulled by Chinese officials at Parliament House yesterday,

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a stunt aimed at one of my Sky News colleagues,

0:19:51.840 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Chang Lai. Now, of course, after being questioned about it yesterday,

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the Prime Minister finally condemned the move today, saying Australia

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 1>had lodged a complaint with the Chinese embassy over the incident.

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Just to remind you, here's the PM.

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 5>We have different values in different political systems and we

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 5>saw some of that yesterday. I've got to say with

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 5>the attempt that was pretty ham fisted to block Chang Lai.

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 5>The Australian journalists who were able to get brought home

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:51.880
<v Speaker 5>at the press conference, and there was a clumsy attempt

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 5>really to just stand in between where the cameras were

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 5>and Chang Lai and the Australian officials did the right

0:20:58.119 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 5>thing and intervened.

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Opposition Lyder Peter Dutton says the PM's response is not

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 1>good enough.

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 10>I do want to point out that the Prime Minister

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 10>clearly misled the Australian people yesterday when he got up

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 10>and did a press conference and said that he heard

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 10>nothing of it. He didn't understand what the question was

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 10>or didn't know anything about it. It's completely inconceivable and

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 10>the Prime Minister needs to stand up today to explain

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 10>the discrepancy, explain why he didn't tell the truth yesterday,

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 10>and please grow a backbone, stand up for our country.

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Strategic Analysis Australia Director Peter Jennings joins me. Now, Peter,

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks for your time. It's a pretty not just delayed,

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:43.360
<v Speaker 1>but weak response from the PM.

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 11>Yes it is, James, and good evening. Once again we

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 11>get from Prime Minister Albanezier sort of a description of

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 11>the event like he's a spectator at the scene. I

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 11>don't think it's appropriate to call this a cultural difference.

0:21:58.520 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 4>What China.

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 11>Chinese officials were deliberately trying to do was to hide

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 11>from the cameras a person who they had illegally jailed

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 11>on fake spying charges for three years until she was

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 11>finally released and brought to Australia. And so this is

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 11>the behavior of the thugish Chinese Communist Party, not a

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 11>cultural practice which was tolerated in the Parliament of Australia.

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 11>And then the Prime Minister said that he knew nothing

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 11>about it, and then the following day he talks about

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 11>a complaint being made. So it's nothing to do with him.

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 11>You know, why didn't he take the opportunity James to.

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 4>Take it up with Premier Lee.

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 11>I thought it was a typically poor quality performance, a

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 11>failure of leadership, and it creates this impression that he's

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 11>all too willing to please the Chinese, whereas I think

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 11>what most Australians want mister Albenezi to do is actually

0:22:58.240 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 11>stand up for Australia's interests.

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I remember Anthony Alberanzi once saying I love fighting tories,

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 1>but he really doesn't like speaking out against the Chinese.

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.719
<v Speaker 1>In fact, in that radio clip that we played just

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a moment ago. Anthony Albanese actually does a half laugh

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 1>as he talks about this incident.

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 2>But as you say, it reaffirms the.

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Complete incompatibility between Australia's political system and political culture and

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that of the Chinese. And it's no small difference. These

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>are major ideological differences. So a failure to stand up

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 1>for Chang Lay is really a failure to stand up

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>for liberal democracy and for the freedoms that we all

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>take for granted, is it not?

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 6>It is?

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 11>And you know, I think it's a pattern of behavior

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 11>that we're seeing from this government too, that the emphasis

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 11>on panda diplomacy being pro panda, all of these horribly

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 11>poor quality jokes, the failure on several occasions now too

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 11>publicly speak out in defense of Australian defense fools personnel

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 11>coming under attack in a helicopter on board ship by

0:24:09.960 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 11>the Chinese People's Liberation Army. You know, I think from

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 11>this visit, the Chinese Communist Party can conclude justly that

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.640
<v Speaker 11>they have Australia where they want us to be, which

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 11>is quite in subservient doing their business, laughing at their jokes.

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 11>I just think the Prime Minister has misread this situation

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 11>and how Australians will react to it, and part of

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:38.959
<v Speaker 11>that is driven by sort of a very tribal view

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 11>inside the government that or they've shown that they're better

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 11>than the previous coalition government at managing China relations. And

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 11>I just don't think that's the case, James. They happen to, frankly,

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:56.360
<v Speaker 11>get lucky after COVID, when China decided that it's aggressive

0:24:56.359 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 11>wolf warrior diplomacy wasn't helping it anywhere or in Europe

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 11>or elsewhere, and so they quietened down, and that's what

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 11>has enabled the resumption of contact.

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 4>But it's contact without substance.

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 11>If our Prime minister can never raise difficult issues, then

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 11>all we have is photo opportunities to suit the interests

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 11>of the Communist Party and nothing which really suits the

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 11>interests of Australia.

0:25:20.880 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's pretty easy to manage a relationship if you

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:27.120
<v Speaker 1>give the other party everything they want. The Prime Ministers

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>said that he and the Chinese premier have agreed to

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>establish a military communications line to avoid further what should

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>we call them, regrettable incidents at sea and in the air,

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:42.680
<v Speaker 1>such as you described earlier. How believable is this idea

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of military communications between the two nations as a way

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 1>of avoiding further mishaps.

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 11>Well, you know, tactically, communications happen all the time, and

0:25:55.160 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 11>I've heard recordings of aircraft to aircraft discus Ushians or

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 11>ship to ship discussions where our navy is telling the

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 11>Chinese navy that they're sailing in international waters and the

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 11>Chinese Navy replies, no, you're in Chinese sovereign territory.

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 4>Move away.

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 11>Those communications happen all the time. I don't know what

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 11>it is that the Prime Minister claims to have heard

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 11>from Premier Lee other than some sort of throwaway comment.

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 11>Because here's the key point, James. Since twenty twenty one,

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 11>there have been over two hundred of these incidents at

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 11>sea involving US, the Americans, of Filipinos and other navies.

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 11>This is not a failure on the part of China

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 11>to communicate. It is them unrolling a strategy of intimidation.

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 11>That's what China is doing. They're trying to intimidate other

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 11>navies and air forces to stay away from what they

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 11>call sovereign territory. And so no amount of Australian discussion

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 11>about better communications is going to change this issue the China.

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 11>His military is doing exactly what it wants to do,

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.159
<v Speaker 11>and our PM shouldn't be so silly as to be

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 11>sort of fobbed off by a passing comment from Premier Lee,

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 11>who is not in the Chinese military chain of command

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 11>and has no authority over them. These discussions about communications

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 11>will go nowhere.

0:27:18.720 --> 0:27:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Very interesting, Peter Jennings, I appreciate your insights tonight. Well,

0:27:23.400 --> 0:27:26.880
<v Speaker 1>there was a reprieve of sorts for mortgage holders today. Well,

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>rates didn't come down, at least, the RBA hasn't raised

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>them yet. The cash rate has been left at four

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 1>point three five percent, but don't hold your breath waiting

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>for a reduction. Well, interest rates are on hold for now.

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 1>Economists say the door has still been left open for

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>an increase later in the year if inflation remains stubbornly high.

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Judo Banks chief economic advisor Warren Hogan joins me. Now, Warren,

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.919
<v Speaker 1>thanks for your time. Is this the calm before the storm?

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Rates on hold?

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:57.679
<v Speaker 2>But do you think they could go up in the

0:27:57.720 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 2>near future?

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Hi, James, thanks for having me on the show.

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 3>I think that's what the governor was sort of intimating,

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 3>is that this inflation risk.

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 4>They're on high alert.

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how you can read it any other

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 3>way than that, you know, there's a real chance they

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 3>might have to raise rates. They're showing extreme patients. They've

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 3>got a very different strategy to what would traditionally be followed.

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 3>That is, you really lean into inflation. And of course

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:27.120
<v Speaker 3>this is what other central banks have got. The RBA's

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 3>cash rate at four point three five, as you just showed,

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 3>compared to to New Zealand at five and a half

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:35.880
<v Speaker 3>in the US and five and a half, we're actually

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 3>taking a very different path and the course, if it

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:41.920
<v Speaker 3>doesn't work, and we're getting evidence this year that the

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 3>economy is proving resilient and inflation is proving sticky, then

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 3>the question is what's next. And of course I think

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 3>with a message today was that we may see another

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 3>rate hu.

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, the governor was quite careful to say, you know,

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it could go this way, it could go that way.

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>But of course everybody is listening for the the hidden messages.

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>What's between the lines you say that could well go up.

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>What were the things she said specifically that gave that

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>impression and do you think she was deliberately trying to

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>prepare people for a possible rate rise in the future.

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 3>I think she was trying to send that message without

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 3>saying it, and it is quite perplexing. And of course

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 3>we're learning about this governor. She's only been doing the

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 3>job for a while. And of course we've got this

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of big overhaul happening at the RBA. Even though

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 3>the legislation hasn't passed, she's actually getting on with sort of,

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, changing the way the place operates.

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 4>So we're still learning what she's sort of doing.

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:40.920
<v Speaker 3>And today was a little bit confusing, I must I

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 3>must admit I was sort of trying to really get

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 3>to the bottom of it. Central bankers are always a

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 3>little bit opaque. They don't want to say too much,

0:29:48.120 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's the key part of her strategy.

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 4>Is not to get put into a corner.

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 3>The biggest mistake they've made lately is that twenty twenty

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.959
<v Speaker 3>four guidance from the Pandemic with Phil Low. But I

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 3>think the message coming through is we see what's happening

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 3>in the economy, which is strong employment growth, inflation showing

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 3>signs of stabilizing at four percent, way too much higher

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 3>than their target, and they can't walk away from this

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 3>because of course their credibility will be damaged if they're

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 3>not seen to be on top of what's happening in

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 3>the economy. So look, we'll learn more about how she

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 3>wants to play this, but they've made it quite clear

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 3>that next quarterly inflation number, which comes out in late July,

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 3>is absolutely critical. And if that comes in like it

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 3>did in Q one, the number we got in late

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 3>April as around one percent, I just don't think they

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 3>can walk away from that, and I think they'll probably

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 3>have to high rates. And the issue actually is with

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 3>all this sort of government spending, which they noted in

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 3>their statement, is actually whether they're going to have to

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 3>do multiple rate hikes because the economy actually is proving

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 3>resilient and it's about to get a big injection of

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 3>money from state and federal governments from one July.

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was going to ask you about the fact

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>that she did reference big spending in the federal budget,

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and of course we've just had a Queensland budget. I

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>think they've handed out some like eleven billion dollars in

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 1>incentives for people to vote for Steven Miles to win office.

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>So it was interesting that the RBA governor did mention

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that as being a factor that may mean interest rates

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>stay high. Speaking of budgets, Labour's second budget was announced

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>today in New South Wales and it certainly continues a

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>trend of rising state debt. This is the New South

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Wales Labour's second deficit budget and they predict operating deficits

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>for the next four years of the forward estimates, so

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that would make six deficits in a row. I wanted

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to ask you have state governments lost the ability to

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>constrain debt and run surpluses. It seems like no one's

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>able to do it anymore.

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there certainly isn't a lot of budget surpluces going around,

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 3>and I think the thing that I'm worried about with

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 3>the government sector is it's just getting very large. We

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 3>can see from the National Accounts. The GDP figures that

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 3>government consumption across all levels of government, and when they

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 3>call it consumption that means they're operating spending is at

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:15.959
<v Speaker 3>a record proportion of the economy at around twenty two percent.

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 3>It's taken a big step up from really what it

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 3>was averaging around eighteen nineteen percent all through the eighties.

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 4>Nineties and noughties last decade.

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 3>It's been happening for about ten years, but it's the

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 3>biggest step up in government spending as a proportion of

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 3>the economy since the early seventies, since the Lyndon Johnson

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Great Society, Whitlam all that stuff. So government's getting bigger,

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 3>and of course the other side of that is the

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 3>tax take is getting bigger, so income taxes that we're

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 3>paying back to where they were when Howard and Costello

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 3>introduced the GST. So we've actually still got the GST,

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 3>but income taxes back where it was when they brought

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 3>it in. And of course this is a potential big

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 3>shift in our economy. It's going to squeeze out the

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 3>private sect, particularly around finding staff. So yeah, the government

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 3>today in New South Wales, I think it was an

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 3>okay budget, but there was a big shift up in

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 3>spending about five billion a year and of course they

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 3>are going to be deficits for as far as I

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 3>can see, and of course debt's going from about one

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 3>hundred billion up to about one hundred and forty.

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Gee, Warren, you've done nothing to encourage me at all

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:19.240
<v Speaker 1>this evening. Thanks a lot for that Warren Hogan. I

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate your time as always. Well, we're going to

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>go to a break, but stick around because coming up

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:28.360
<v Speaker 1>from indigenous rights to sexuality, you don't believe some of

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the government programs being force fed to toddlers in childcare

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that's coming up shortly.

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back well.

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 1>A new learning framework for Australia's childcare centers has been

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>accused of turning toddlers into cultural activists. In analysis conducted

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>by the Institute of Public Affairs, the government's Early Years

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Learning Framework was found to mention diversity, inclusion and equity

0:33:56.880 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and forty nine times, and the terms Aboriginal

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and Torres Strait Islanders and reconciliation ninety six times. Have

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I guessed how many times the terms mother or father

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>or parent were referenced? You guessed it, not even once.

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>The framework also states that social justice in Early Years

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is an exciting opportunity to explore issues around gender, sexuality,

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>race and culture.

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 2>God help us.

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Joining me is my panel Sky News host Caleb Bond

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and News Corp columnist Angela Mollard.

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Caleb, what does it tell you when you put.

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Your kids into daycare and they're taught about diversity and

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:41.439
<v Speaker 1>equity and inclusion, but mom and dad and never ever

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 1>reference well.

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:44.839
<v Speaker 12>It tells you that we're happy little socialists, as bright

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 12>as Brad can be. To paraphrase a good old Australian ad. Seriously,

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 12>I mean, look, is anyone really surprised by this? We've

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 12>known the long march through the institutions has been going

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 12>on for some time. And if you really want to

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 12>capture the kids and promulgate your ideology, you have to

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 12>get them as young as possible. And of course we

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 12>keep hearing about we need to get kids into early

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 12>learning earlier and earlier and earlier. I mean, you know,

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 12>I think it's what two or three years old now.

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:12.839
<v Speaker 12>They want to get them into early learning. If they

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 12>find a way to do it while they're still in

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 12>the womb, they'll probably do that as well. But the

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:19.919
<v Speaker 12>earlier you capture them, the earlier you can get hold

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:22.239
<v Speaker 12>of their brains. It's as simple as that, and this

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:24.240
<v Speaker 12>lays it bear Angela.

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 1>The IPA said that most parents don't even realize these

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 1>sorts of things are being taught in childcare. Do you

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:33.799
<v Speaker 1>agree that most parents just oblivious to this sort of thing.

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:36.160
<v Speaker 13>I think they're oblivious to them because children can't come home,

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 13>they can barely tell you who they've had lunch with,

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:40.720
<v Speaker 13>let alone the fact that they've learned some social justice

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 13>theory that day. Look, I don't think parents are really aware.

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:45.919
<v Speaker 13>I was shocked when I read this story. But as

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:49.720
<v Speaker 13>someone who's seen their children go through from early childhood

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 13>right through now in university, the level of diversity, equality

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 13>and inclusion learning and a communications degree, I'm worried my

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 13>daughter is going to qualify without actually knowing anything about communications.

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 13>But she knows a heck of a lot about diversity

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 13>and include I've read a couple of her essays. But look,

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:08.799
<v Speaker 13>my mum always said, and she was a teacher for

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 13>fifty sixty years, that childhood is preparer is not preparation

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 13>for life, it is life. We are not there to

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 13>turn them into woke little puppets. We're there to read

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 13>them the hungry caterpillar.

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 1>Well, I dare say our kids were happier and healthier

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and probably smarter before we started propagating all this DEI stuff.

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Another thing in this report, they found that it's recommended

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:35.359
<v Speaker 1>childcare start every day with an acknowledgment of country, so

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't tell me that's not deliberate in doctrination.

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Of course it is.

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 12>The idea is just to make it as easy as possible.

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:44.919
<v Speaker 12>Once you normalize it, the kids just believe that that's

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 12>part of the deal.

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, then the kids think that Mum and dad, who

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:49.239
<v Speaker 1>may say I live unnecessary.

0:36:49.960 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they go around. We need to sell the house.

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 2>We're living in a stolen house.

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:55.839
<v Speaker 12>What are we going to do about it?

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Which if we want to go down that track, I mean,

0:36:57.680 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the point of socialism is to separate children from the

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:02.240
<v Speaker 1>appearance and create enmity.

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's move on.

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>In the desperate pursuit of net zero, our labor government

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:09.880
<v Speaker 1>is now considering get this greenhouse gases omitted by the

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 1>transport sector when deciding what roads to build. The government's

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Transport and Infrastructure net zero roadmap includes a section that

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:20.759
<v Speaker 1>warns I couldn't believe it when.

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 2>I read this.

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>The building of roads could increase the emissions from light

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:29.319
<v Speaker 1>and heavy vehicles by enabling this transport mode. It goes

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>on to say this needs to be taken into consideration

0:37:31.920 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 1>when deciding what roads to build. So calib if I've

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 1>got this right, The Transport Department have figured out that

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:41.480
<v Speaker 1>building roads enables cars to travel.

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Strange, isn't it. Yeah, I didn't startling inside.

0:37:44.880 --> 0:37:46.839
<v Speaker 12>I know I say this all the time, but there's

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 12>yet another government contract. I think I could probably snag

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 12>pretty easily because I understand roads. Can you believe it?

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 12>But I think there is potentially merit to this right

0:37:56.520 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 12>because of course, if we're going to have population expansion,

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 12>we will need more roads. You can't just have a

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 12>train in and out of the new subject. There has

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 12>to be a road of some description. And one of

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:09.280
<v Speaker 12>the things that contributes to carbon emissions is cars stopping

0:38:09.320 --> 0:38:11.360
<v Speaker 12>and starting all the time, which means you need a

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 12>good flow of traffic, which means you don't need roundabouts

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:17.319
<v Speaker 12>and you don't need traffic lights. So if they can

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:19.799
<v Speaker 12>have no traffic lights and I can drive to work

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 12>in the morning with no red lights, not only do

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 12>I get places faster, it's better for the environments.

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:26.319
<v Speaker 3>But the other thing, of.

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:29.400
<v Speaker 12>Course, is that if you want a seriously environmentally friendly

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 12>road in terms of emissions, it's got to go on

0:38:31.200 --> 0:38:33.080
<v Speaker 12>a straight line. You can't go around.

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Hills and past trees.

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 12>So we've just got to raise all the land because

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 12>that'll be good for the environment. So we can have

0:38:38.680 --> 0:38:39.760
<v Speaker 12>lower missions roads.

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I like a perfect sent Peter Dutton could go to

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the next election, save the environment, create an autobahn.

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 12>I'm on board.

0:38:47.239 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 2>That's absolutely amazing, Angela.

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Would they really decide not to build roads so that

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>we have less cars?

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 13>Oh, what are we going to do? Go back and

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 13>live in caves and burn wood And that obviously has

0:38:57.600 --> 0:39:00.359
<v Speaker 13>a mission anyway. But there's a problem in your thing though.

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 13>You build that big autobarn and then you've got your

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 13>CO two emissions.

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:03.719
<v Speaker 10>Right.

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:05.839
<v Speaker 13>What I think we should be putting our energy into

0:39:06.040 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 13>is thinking about and really working hard on that technology

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 13>that looks at how we do manage to pull se

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 13>COEO two out of the atmosphere, different ways of doing that.

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 13>Instead of always looking at what we had before, how

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:20.840
<v Speaker 13>we can improve on the old, Let's look at the

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 13>really dynamic, exciting new Let's put science in tech at

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 13>the forefront of that. Let's make Australia that that we are.

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 2>And Scott Morrison.

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:30.479
<v Speaker 13>Hinted at this a couple few years ago. He said,

0:39:30.480 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 13>you know, let he he trusted that we would find

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:37.319
<v Speaker 13>the way to solve the emissions problem. So if we're

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:39.359
<v Speaker 13>constantly looking, yeah, look there are great ways to make

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 13>better roads, better aggregates, that sort of thing. But I'm

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:43.719
<v Speaker 13>really pro tech.

0:39:43.920 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm protech as well as long as I can still

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:48.920
<v Speaker 1>drive my forward Mustang, which I don't actually have. But

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Caleb says, my birthday's coming up soon, and I'll get Ah.

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:56.120
<v Speaker 1>The White House has come out in defense of Joe Biden,

0:39:56.239 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 1>insisting the presidence.

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Multiple gaffes and blunders fake news.

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:05.800
<v Speaker 14>It tells you everything that we need to know about

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 14>how desperate, how desperate Republicans are here.

0:40:10.120 --> 0:40:10.239
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 14>And instead of talking about the President's performance in office,

0:40:14.600 --> 0:40:16.840
<v Speaker 14>and what I mean by that is his legislative wins,

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 14>what he's been able to do for the American people

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:22.760
<v Speaker 14>across the country, we're seeing these deep fakes, Uh, these

0:40:22.880 --> 0:40:24.320
<v Speaker 14>manipulated videos.

0:40:25.360 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, I suppose if anyone is an expert on fake news,

0:40:27.960 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 1>it's the Biden White House.

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 2>But if Biden's blunders are.

0:40:30.840 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 1>All fake news, gee, there's been a lot of fake

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 1>news recently, We'll.

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:51.759
<v Speaker 4>Never forget anyway. I just think that.

0:40:54.719 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 2>Lord a Small Business Winnerward Winner. It's all just fake news.

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 1>But of course they do say denial is the first

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:04.920
<v Speaker 1>stage of grief.

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Is that what's happening to the mainstream media in the States.

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 12>Not just a river in Egypt, is it? And it's

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 12>amazing to see the Biden camp now adopting the term

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:17.480
<v Speaker 12>fake news, because of course fake news was popularized by

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:20.759
<v Speaker 12>Donald Trump, and at the time, all the Democrats and

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:22.960
<v Speaker 12>all the anti Trump is like, oh, you know, when

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 12>he says fake news, that really just means news he

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 12>doesn't like. So why don't we just turn that back

0:41:28.200 --> 0:41:30.440
<v Speaker 12>on the Democrats and say, well, if you're saying this

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 12>is fake news, let's live by your standards. It must

0:41:34.120 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 12>just be news you don't like, because we can all

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 12>see that Biden ain't all there try and claim that's

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 12>fake news.

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 1>The irony is that the White House spokesperson was saying

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that these videos are deep fakes. Well, that's fake news

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 1>because videos Angela. The Democrats surely are desperate if that's

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the best they've got.

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:55.440
<v Speaker 2>These videos have all been edited to.

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Show Biden as senile, when really he's fighting, fit and ready.

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:01.879
<v Speaker 13>To go and look in same as within Normandy. Those

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 13>those images from Normandy A just I think they're really shocking. Look,

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 13>I think it's really interesting that debate. The first debate

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:11.320
<v Speaker 13>is next Thursday. That's a ninety minute debate. There's no props,

0:42:11.480 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 13>there's no notes. I'm really interested to see how he

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 13>goes there. There's a long time obviously, between the end

0:42:17.760 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 13>of June and November. I think the Democrats have made

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 13>that early, so then I actually have a think about

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:24.719
<v Speaker 13>whether he is fit for presidents know what.

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:26.360
<v Speaker 12>They do have Angela what rugs?

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Rugs and they will find everyone.

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 13>Are they mostly sedatives? I can't if it was a good.

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Joe, That's the last thing Joe Biden needs well. Sticking

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:38.720
<v Speaker 2>with America.

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 1>After mandating masks and threatening to hunt down people if

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:44.239
<v Speaker 1>they refuse to mask up, New York City officials are

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:47.520
<v Speaker 1>now proposing to ban masks in public places or let

0:42:47.560 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Mayor Eric Adams explain.

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:53.719
<v Speaker 15>People have hid under the guise of wearing a mask

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:57.320
<v Speaker 15>for COVID to commit commit criminal action and bile. Actually

0:42:57.400 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 15>nineteen now on the time to go back to the

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:02.719
<v Speaker 15>wear work pre COVID. You should not be able to

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 15>wear a mask at protest in our subway systems and

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:06.360
<v Speaker 15>other police.

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So help me, Caleb. It's hard to keep up with this.

0:43:09.560 --> 0:43:12.880
<v Speaker 1>First you had to wear masks. Now you mustn't wear masks.

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 12>If it's not the consequences of your actions. Hey, I mean,

0:43:16.160 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 12>who would have thought once upon a time if someone

0:43:18.680 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 12>said that you had to wear a mask to go

0:43:20.640 --> 0:43:22.239
<v Speaker 12>into a bank, you would have told them to go

0:43:22.280 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 12>to the looney bin. It seemed that crazy, And then

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 12>of course that's what happened. And now they've realized that.

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 12>And it was when I was a court reporter during COVID.

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 12>All these people would go into court and then they

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:34.200
<v Speaker 12>come out of court with a hoodie on and a

0:43:34.239 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 12>mask over their face, because of course they didn't want

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 12>to have their photo taken to pop up in the paper.

0:43:39.000 --> 0:43:41.560
<v Speaker 12>They worked out very quickly that it was the greatest

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 12>way to not be detected and get away with it

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 12>because you're doing a good thing for public health. I

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:48.840
<v Speaker 12>love when these things blow up in their faces.

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Andrew, as Caleb said, it is to be expected.

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:43:52.640 --> 0:43:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Once you've got people wearing masks everywhere, criminal elements see

0:43:56.920 --> 0:43:58.279
<v Speaker 1>it as a wonderful opportunity.

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 13>I think it's fantastic opportunism actually, but I'm really worried it.

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 13>Like flu season, they're not going to have their masks

0:44:04.000 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 13>on in New York, and if you're on the subway

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 13>in New York during winter, you actually want people to

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:11.799
<v Speaker 13>have their masks and so yeah, look but great opportunism

0:44:11.840 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 13>by these guys, fantastic.

0:44:13.200 --> 0:44:15.840
<v Speaker 1>It is very hard to keep up with government advice.

0:44:15.960 --> 0:44:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Caleb Angela, thanks so much for joining me tonight.

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, next over in the UK.

0:44:21.120 --> 0:44:24.840
<v Speaker 1>The rise of Nigel Faraga's reform UK Party is shaking

0:44:24.960 --> 0:44:28.719
<v Speaker 1>up the election as the Conservative's head for an historic wipeout.

0:44:29.080 --> 0:44:36.359
<v Speaker 1>I'll be catching up with Tom Slater in just a moment. Well,

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 1>let's turn to the UK election. The Conservative Party is

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:42.239
<v Speaker 1>fully imploding and Labor by all accounts, is set for

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a landslide victory. What's not certain is the future of

0:44:45.440 --> 0:44:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the opposition. With Rishi Sunek's Conservative Party set to be

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:51.759
<v Speaker 1>smashed at the polls, is Nigel Farage about to become

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:55.439
<v Speaker 1>the main opposition? Farage is promising to ax net zero,

0:44:55.640 --> 0:45:00.400
<v Speaker 1>introduce mandatory life sentences for drug dealers, freeze non essential integration,

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 1>pulled the UK out of global's bodies like the World

0:45:03.200 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Health Organization and reject the influence of the World Economic Forum.

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in Spiked Online editor Tom Slater. Tom, thanks

0:45:11.080 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 1>for joining me. A fascinating time in UK politics. Just

0:45:14.640 --> 0:45:17.319
<v Speaker 1>before we get to feras you've described the Tories as

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:20.439
<v Speaker 1>a pointless husk, which is a bit full on. How

0:45:20.520 --> 0:45:22.960
<v Speaker 1>is it the Tories have lost so much of the

0:45:22.960 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 1>British population's confidence.

0:45:26.360 --> 0:45:28.520
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think that the Tories in the way of

0:45:28.600 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 8>Brexit had a golden opportunity to kind of remake themselves.

0:45:31.480 --> 0:45:33.239
<v Speaker 8>For a very long time, it wasn't clear what they

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:35.920
<v Speaker 8>were for who they were for. But because of Brexit

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:38.680
<v Speaker 8>in twenty nineteen and Boris Johnson, they suddenly had this

0:45:38.760 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 8>new working class base that was the one chance for renewal,

0:45:42.560 --> 0:45:45.879
<v Speaker 8>and then they completely blew it. They reverted to backstabbing type.

0:45:45.920 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 8>They let everyone and his dog have a go at

0:45:48.200 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 8>being leader of the Conservative Party, leader of the country

0:45:50.920 --> 0:45:53.280
<v Speaker 8>after they got rid of Boris Johnson, and they completely

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:56.680
<v Speaker 8>forgot the voters, those working class voters in the middlelands of.

0:45:56.680 --> 0:45:58.160
<v Speaker 4>The North who put them there.

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:00.160
<v Speaker 8>So I do kind of think they deserve every thing

0:46:00.200 --> 0:46:03.279
<v Speaker 8>they're getting at this point. And whilst I understand the

0:46:03.320 --> 0:46:06.920
<v Speaker 8>concerns about what a huge labor landslide might mean for

0:46:06.960 --> 0:46:09.839
<v Speaker 8>our civil liberties for our country, I think it's fair

0:46:09.920 --> 0:46:13.680
<v Speaker 8>seven stories have brought this on themselves, including the Farage insurgency,

0:46:13.719 --> 0:46:15.759
<v Speaker 8>which I'm sure we're going to come on to as well.

0:46:16.000 --> 0:46:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk about that.

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've pointed out how bad the Conservatives are,

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:25.680
<v Speaker 1>but obviously Farage is pretty good and winning favor amongst people.

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Some of the policies I mentioned in the introduction there

0:46:28.960 --> 0:46:31.359
<v Speaker 1>is that what is sort of making headway as are

0:46:31.360 --> 0:46:34.440
<v Speaker 1>those sorts of things resonating with your average britge or

0:46:34.520 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>is something else going on for Farage?

0:46:38.000 --> 0:46:40.600
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think that the primary thing that he's tapped

0:46:40.600 --> 0:46:43.600
<v Speaker 8>into is concerns about immigration, and this is something which

0:46:43.600 --> 0:46:46.520
<v Speaker 8>obviously both of the two main parties, Conservatives and Labor,

0:46:47.200 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 8>have terrible records on as far as votes as a concerned,

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 8>and he's very much tried to frame this as the

0:46:52.680 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 8>immigration election in a situation in which neither parties wanted

0:46:56.200 --> 0:46:58.279
<v Speaker 8>to talk about it too much. That's been very effective.

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:00.799
<v Speaker 8>I think also he's been a better fishtory of the

0:47:00.840 --> 0:47:03.359
<v Speaker 8>fact that there is a very anti politics mood at

0:47:03.360 --> 0:47:06.440
<v Speaker 8>the moment. It's something that has benefited the Labor Party.

0:47:06.520 --> 0:47:08.960
<v Speaker 8>But I think a lot of twenty nineteen voters in particular,

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 8>who were thinking of even not voting, sitting on their hands,

0:47:12.080 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 8>maybe some of them would go back into the Labor

0:47:14.120 --> 0:47:16.799
<v Speaker 8>column have now got something which more aligns with what

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:18.239
<v Speaker 8>it is they want to vote for. And I think,

0:47:18.440 --> 0:47:20.360
<v Speaker 8>regardless of what you think of for I think sickly

0:47:20.360 --> 0:47:21.839
<v Speaker 8>for those of us whore having to cover this. Even

0:47:21.880 --> 0:47:24.279
<v Speaker 8>his worst enemy would admit that he's live and things up.

0:47:24.600 --> 0:47:26.399
<v Speaker 8>Up until this point we were faced with the most

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:30.520
<v Speaker 8>deathly dull kind of competition between Kiir Sarma and Rishie Sunak,

0:47:30.520 --> 0:47:33.719
<v Speaker 8>who are essentially two competing flavors of Blemond. So I think,

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:35.920
<v Speaker 8>aside from anything else, it has stirred up a genuine

0:47:35.960 --> 0:47:38.480
<v Speaker 8>debate about the future of the country, which would have

0:47:38.520 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 8>been completely absent had he not thrown his hat into

0:47:40.520 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 8>the ring so emphatically a week or two ago.

0:47:43.120 --> 0:47:45.359
<v Speaker 1>When you say that voters there are faced with two

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:48.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty bland options. I was watching the debates and I

0:47:48.480 --> 0:47:51.560
<v Speaker 1>had to laugh when Rishie Sunek was asked tell us

0:47:51.600 --> 0:47:54.440
<v Speaker 1>something about yourself that will make people like you again,

0:47:54.520 --> 0:47:58.319
<v Speaker 1>which must have been incredibly humiliating. How we've only got

0:47:58.320 --> 0:47:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of time left. But I wanted to

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:04.200
<v Speaker 1>quickly ask you about Kis Starmer, who obviously will likely

0:48:04.239 --> 0:48:07.719
<v Speaker 1>be the next UK Prime minister. You call him the slipperiest,

0:48:07.800 --> 0:48:11.720
<v Speaker 1>most unprincipled politician the UK has seen in many years,

0:48:11.719 --> 0:48:14.799
<v Speaker 1>and possibly the most slippery PM the UK will ever

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:17.279
<v Speaker 1>have had. In that thirty seconds, why do you say that?

0:48:17.320 --> 0:48:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about him?

0:48:19.880 --> 0:48:23.120
<v Speaker 8>He is you turned on essentially everything every issue you

0:48:23.160 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 8>could imagine. You could talk about Brexit, you could talk

0:48:25.239 --> 0:48:27.439
<v Speaker 8>about women's rights, you can talk about the gender issue,

0:48:27.480 --> 0:48:29.799
<v Speaker 8>you talk about the environment, any of these questions. He

0:48:29.840 --> 0:48:31.720
<v Speaker 8>does just point which every way the wind is blowing.

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:34.080
<v Speaker 8>And I think that's a big problem in a democracy.

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:36.239
<v Speaker 8>When you voted a politician, you've hoped to know what

0:48:36.280 --> 0:48:38.400
<v Speaker 8>they stand for. Even at this point we have no

0:48:38.520 --> 0:48:40.160
<v Speaker 8>clue where Kis star More is.

0:48:40.200 --> 0:48:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately well, we are all watching to see what happens.

0:48:43.840 --> 0:48:47.319
<v Speaker 1>Tom Slader, appreciate your time. That's all I've got time

0:48:47.400 --> 0:48:50.000
<v Speaker 1>for tonight, But don't go anywhere. Coming right up is

0:48:50.120 --> 0:48:50.879
<v Speaker 1>Paul Murray Live.