WEBVTT - Does anti-Israel sentiment equal antisemitism? 

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>From The Australian. Here's what's on the front. I'm Claire Harvey.

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>It's Monday, December ninth. Syria is in full blown civil

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>war as rebel forces who stunned the dictator Bashah al

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Assad by taking Aleppo last week, move into the capital Damascus,

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Asad has reportedly fled the country. It changes everything in

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East, and at the Australian dot com dot

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:34.279
<v Speaker 1>a U we have live reporting and analysis of this

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>fast moving story. The fire bombing of a Melbourne synagogue

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>was terrorism. That's what Anthony Albanezi says is his personal view,

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>as a manhunt continues for the arsonists and law enforcement

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>leaders gather this week to consider declaring the attack a

0:00:56.040 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>terror event. It comes after Israeli PM Benjamin Eettana, who

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>condemned the Albanese government's handling of events since October seven,

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three. Nettania who said anti Israel sentiment is

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:15.919
<v Speaker 1>the same as antisemitism. Today, our correspondent Joanni Bisham joins

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>me to explore one of the thorniest issues of our age,

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>how we think and talk about the Middle East. Before

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>we start. Today's episode contains some explicit language. There's outrage

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>from around the world tonight after an arson attack on

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a synagogue in Melbourne's Jewish heartland of Rippon Lee. This

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>in Melbourne and this in Sydney.

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Jewish Australians were barricaded inside Sydney's Great Synagogue last night

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 2>after a noisy and aggressive pro Palestinian group decided to

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 2>protest on the street right outside.

0:01:56.640 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>After condemnation from Israeli Prime Minister Benjaminettanna who and three

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>days of pressure led by Josh Fridenberg and Peter Dutton.

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>On Sunday, Anthony Alberanzi defended his record on standing up

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to antisemitism.

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 3>If you want my personal view, quite clearly, terrorism is

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 3>something that is aimed at creating fear in the community,

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 3>and the atrocities that occurred at the synagogue in Melbourne

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 3>clearly were designed to create fear in the community and therefore,

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:34.519
<v Speaker 3>from my personal perspective, certainly fulfill that definition of terrorism.

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Joanni Bishan is a senior journalist with The Australian. Johnnie,

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>what's your interpretation of Anthony Alberanese's remarks? There is this

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a new stance for Albanesi or is this business as

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>usual for him?

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 4>It's business as usual in the sense that it takes

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 4>some time with Albo to.

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 5>Take a bold stance and call something what it is.

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 4>So Anthony Alberanesi calling the fire bombing attack on the

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 4>ADUs Israel Synagogue as a terrorist act or what he

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 4>sees is personally being a terrorist act, well he's doing

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 4>what the Jewish community in Australia did in about three seconds.

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 5>We all saw what happened, we knew what it was.

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 4>The fact it took him two days to pronounce it

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 4>as a terrorist act, well that's in keeping. That's bau

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 4>for Albow. But he is right in one sense, which

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 4>is that the technical definition of a terrorist act is

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 4>something that needs to be decided by the law enforcement agencies.

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 5>They're going to be.

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 4>Meeting on Monday, and in the past it's taken many

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 4>months for these vary agencies to figure out whether, for example,

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 4>the Link Cafe siege was a terrorist attack or not.

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 4>Everyone who watched that new almost on site that they

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 4>were watching hostages being held up in a cafe with

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 4>a shotgun while they were holding a Shaharta flag, and

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 4>they knew what it was.

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 5>They were calling it a terroristack.

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 4>But for many months it was described as an instance

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 4>of a mentally ill manned.

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 5>So these things can take time.

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>There's an author called Alex Rifchin who's also co chief

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>executive of an advocacy group called the Council of Australian Jury.

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>He's written a book about antisemitism called The Seven Deadly Myths.

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>In it, he says antisemitism is as diverse as Jewishness.

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>You can be a Jew if you are very religious,

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>or even if you have no religious faith at all,

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and if you're born into a Jewish family, or if

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>you're a convert to the religion. Alex Rifchin writes that

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>antisemitism is similar. You can be an anti Semite if

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you despise the Jewish faith on religious grounds, but you

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:41.479
<v Speaker 1>don't hate the ethnic group of Jews, or like the Nazis,

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you can hate the Jews as an ethnic group without

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>really focusing on their religious practices. And then he says

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 1>this one can adorn the state of Israel with all

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>manner of antisemitic conspiracy theory, yet hold Judaism and Jewish

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>culture in high regard, as has become common in some

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 1>sectors of the far left.

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 5>Yanni.

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 1>This is the idea I'm keen to dig through with

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 1>you today, and it's big and complex. On Saturday, Israel's

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister Benjamin Netna who took to social media to

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 1>declare anti Israel sentiment is anti Semitism, and he was

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>talking particularly about Australia. So let's start with that idea.

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Would you agree with NTNYA, who is anti Israel sentiment

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the same thing as antisemitism.

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, the first thing I would start off by saying

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 4>is that there's a tendency even among Jews to interpret

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 4>Netanya who's phrasing here as any criticism of the government

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 4>of Israel or its policies is akin to anti Semitism.

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 4>And that's not what I think Netanyahu meant at all.

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 4>I think what he's talking about here is the anti

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 4>Israel movement that broadly speaking, denies the right of Jews

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 4>to live in their ancestral homeland. The anti Israel movement

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 4>at its worst is not one that seeks too state solution.

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 4>It's one that actually doesn't seek Israel to exist at all.

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 4>But it's also and I guess this is the part

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 4>that aligns a little more closely with the Albanesi government.

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 4>It's a mindset that tends to apportion all of the

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 4>blame for all of the situation in the Middle East

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 4>on Israel itself, and that's partly why Netanyahu responded so

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 4>forcefully on Friday night with that tweet. So he's responding

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 4>to Australia's fresh positioning at the UN and a number

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 4>of hostile steps taken by the Albanese government to distance

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 4>itself from Israel over the past year, when Israel, with

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 4>whom Australia is supposed to be a very warm ally,

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 4>was the one that was attacked in the first place

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 4>on October seven.

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Over the past year and a bit since October seven,

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you've been back and forth to Israel, covering the conflict

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>as it's unfolded, and covering the development of sentiment within

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Israel itself. I've been struck in your reporting that Israel

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>is itself a very diverse place. There have always been

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Arab members of the parliament, for example, there our villages

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>in Israel, and there are plenty of Israelis who strongly

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>disagree with Netnya, who on vs On all sorts of things.

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>So how do we square that the idea of Israelis

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>who don't like Nettnya who and don't like the conduct

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of the war. With the idea that anti Israel sentiment

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is anti Semitic by definition.

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 5>They really are two different things.

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 4>So again there's ordinary political dissent and disagreement, and this

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 4>is abundant in Israel, as anyone who has been there

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 4>will to test, and since the war began last year,

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 4>there's been extraordinary disagreement over how the government, for example,

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 4>should be negotiating the release of the hostages. And separate

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 4>to that, there's ample criticism of Netna who himself. That's

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 4>not anti semitism. No one would suggest that that's anti semitism.

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 4>But protesters standing outside Central Synagogue in Sydney, holding Jews

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 4>here accountable for the actions of the Israeli government and

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 4>forcing them to be locked inside the synagogue for their safety,

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 4>that's anti Semitic. Protesting in the streets calling for an

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 4>anti five or of violent uprising against Jews, that's anti Semitic.

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 4>When the police tell Jews they shouldn't venture into parts

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 4>of the city because their safety cannot be assured, as

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 4>they were told on October nine last year, there's a

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 4>word for that too. So people use the cover of

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 4>anti Israel critique to mask an anti Semitism. They're never

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 4>critiquing the government's domestic policies or its foreign policies. They're

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 4>critiquing Israel's right to exist and boycotting Jewish products and

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 4>blaming Jews in Sydney and Melbourne for events unfolding a

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 4>world away. And that's what I think Bibie was talking about.

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Here in Australia. Since October seven, twenty twenty three, we've

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>seen a few different types of reaction. First, of course,

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>was the Opera House protest on October nine, where protesters

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>were chanting something that was either fuck the Jews or.

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:49.679
<v Speaker 5>Where's the Jews?

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>That has been widely interpreted, particularly in the community, as

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>anti Semitic as well as anti Israel. What's your take

0:08:57.760 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>on that.

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, it was a curtain raiser, wasn't like, not just

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 4>in terms of the grotesque messaging and violence that we've

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 4>seen in the months that followed, but the response from

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 4>government at the state and federal level was what.

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 5>Many would describe as totally lacking.

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 4>There were no arrests, There was yes condemnation, but that

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 4>condemnation has always counted in language quite merely on the

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 4>tongue and this is where federal labor.

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 5>In particular, I feel has repeatedly failed.

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 4>For example, why doesn't every statement made by this government

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 4>about Israel and Gaza just start with the words release

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 4>the hostages, Like, surely that's not a position.

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 5>They don't support.

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 4>Those words make it into the press statements, but they're

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 4>often buried under convoluted statements about restraint and ceasefires. But

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 4>generally speaking, my feeling about October nine is.

0:09:45.040 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 5>The leaders were probably.

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 4>Experiencing a collective state of denial about what they themselves

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 4>were witnessing, and they were probably unwilling to be sensible

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 4>and call out what they were witnessing, or they were

0:09:55.880 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 4>hoping it would go away, and that was naive.

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 1>So after October nine here in Australia we've seen protests

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>through city streets every weekend and university encampments inspired by

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the ones in America, and at those encampments and on

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the protests we've seen a couple of different types of people.

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>There's people of Middle Eastern descent and then there's white

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Australians and they're chanting slogans like Israel is a terrorist state,

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>accusing Israel murdering babies. So how do we interpret all

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of that from that group of people. Is that level

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of protest do you think anti Israel or is it

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:38.439
<v Speaker 1>anti Semitic? And what would be the difference in this context?

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm asking, is there a way to disagree

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>with the way Israel is conducting the war in Gaza

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>from here in Australia and still be an ally to Jews?

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, to go to what you just mentioned, I would

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:55.439
<v Speaker 4>say it's certainly anti Israel, and many would rightfully argue

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 4>that it's flagrantly anti Semitic, as I would as well.

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 4>What fascinates me about these cac cries is that the

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 4>people saying them seem to display a sort of willful

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 4>disregard of Hamas's involvement in this tragedy altogether. So let's

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 4>just clear away one thing first. Israelis themselves they're appalled

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 4>by the civilian deaths in Gaza, as any sensible human

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 4>being would.

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 5>Be Bibi himself.

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 4>The hardline is in the Israeli government, believe it or not,

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 4>they don't want innocent people to die either, but they

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 4>do see Hamas as culpable for those tragedies, and rightfully so.

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 4>The Australian government seems to hold a slightly different view.

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 4>But to the protesters in the streets, with their kafirs

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 4>and the signs calling for Antifada and other slogans, I

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 4>often wonder why they aren't acknowledging what brave Palestinians in

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 4>Gaza are saying themselves, which is that Hamas wilfully endangered

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.200
<v Speaker 4>their lives by turning their homes into rocket launching sites,

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 4>or that Hamas deliberately embedded itself in hospitals and schools,

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 4>or in the aid camps where the population now seeks shelter,

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 4>or that Hamas wasted billions in eight dollars on building tunnels,

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Speaker 4>and to state the bleeding obvious that Hermas launched this

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 4>war and are still holding more than one hundred hostages.

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 4>The protesters always have to work very hard to justify

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 4>that point, to justify that morally reprehensible starting point. But

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 4>to answer your original question, there's a very simple way

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 4>to disagree with the war, and that is say whatever

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 4>you like about it, have a view, without punctuating your

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 4>point or framing your argument by saying that Israel has

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:33.719
<v Speaker 4>no right to exist in the first place and has

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 4>no right to defend itself.

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 5>It's pretty simple.

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Coming up. How did anti Israel sentiment become fashionable for

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the progressive left? That's after the break. There are plenty

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of Australians you would never show up at a protest,

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:04.839
<v Speaker 1>but for many of them, Palestine has now moved from

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the fringe where it was once the pet subject of

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the labor left or the Greens for example, to being

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>now a very fashionable cause. So these are people who

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you would normally think of as the progressive left, and

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I would think they would describe themselves like that, their

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>pro gay rights, their pro reconciliation for example. So how

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>have they ended up being anti Israel although Israel is

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>really the only place in the Middle East where ideas

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that they believe in gay rights and women's rights are

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 1>fully embraced.

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 4>What I would say is that if you're in your

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 4>twenties and political activism is a form of identity and expression,

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 4>then you can't sit on the fence. There is an

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 4>imperative to voice your moral outrage, and you have to

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 4>choose wisely what side you'll take or risk excommunication from

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 4>your group, and you have to participate in the rituals

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 4>of that group, like posting to social media or sharing

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 4>and liking, or attending a protest. So there's a lot

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 4>of stake, and the incentives, which are always to be

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 4>like to be accepted, are the same as they've always been.

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:06.960
<v Speaker 4>The incentive isn't to be historically literate, it's just to

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 4>be aghast at something. And we've seen this before with

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 4>Israel and Gaza. We're all partly surrendering ourselves to the

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 4>distortion of our own social media algorithms, much as we

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 4>did during debates over the vaccines and Trump and Black

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 4>Lives Matter and Ukraine and Russia. What I would say

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 4>is that it would seem to me that in this debate,

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 4>all roads lead back to where our attention is being focused,

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 4>the information we're being provided, and in large respect, social media.

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>So here in Australia there are some very vocal Jewish

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>people who say Israel doesn't represent me. I don't want

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to be included in this group who believes that even

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Israel has a right to exist. How do you think

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>those sentiments, express very vocally by certain people here have

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>influenced the bigger conversation.

0:14:58.480 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure if they have.

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 4>I know that there is a vocal minority that exists

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 4>and who hold that view, But they are again a

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 4>vocal minority, and they are part of a vanishingly small

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 4>minority of the Jewish population in this country, which, for

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 4>anyone wondering, is also tiny.

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 5>It's about one hundred thousand strong nationally. I would say the.

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 4>Overwhelming majority of Jews in this country are Zionus who

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 4>believe in Jewish self determination and the right of Jews

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 4>to live in their ancestral homeland. And I believe a

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 4>bulk of them also live in hope of a country

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 4>that's at peace with its Arab neighbors. And if you

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 4>think that's not possible, just consider there is peace between

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 4>Israel and Jordan, Israel and Egypt. These were countries with

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 4>which Israel was once fiercely at war, but no longer.

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 4>So it's not impossible, but it is impossible while genocidal

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 4>Iranian proxy groups like Hamas and tresbolare running around destroying

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 4>the joint and destroying the lives of their own populations.

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Joli Bishan is a senior tojournalist with The Australian. He's

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>reported for US multiple times from the Middle East this year,

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and also writes our must read business column margin call.

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>You can check out Yo on his work right now

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>at the Australian dot com dot au