WEBVTT - Bonus ep: Why One Nation’s win changes the game

0:00:01.200 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Ruby Jones and you're listening to seven Am. It's

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>something Pauline Hanson has been eyeing for years, and on

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the weekend she finally got it a seat in the

0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Lower House. Her candidate for Farah, David Farley, did even

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>better than expected. He was elected on fifty seven percent

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of the vote. It changes things, not just for Pauline

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Hanson and One Nation, but for the country. Today. Contributing

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>editor for The New Daily, Amy Ramikus on the power

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of populism right now and what One Nation wants next.

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>It's Monday May eleven.

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Will like a mason with a chisel and a hammer

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 2>and we recarving the letters into the Australian democracy.

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 3>One Nation has reached the end of its.

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:17.319
<v Speaker 1>Beginning, so Amy, One Nation's victory in Farah was historic.

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>It's the first time One Nation has won a federal

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Lower House seat since Pauline Hanson herself was elected back

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties. She is, of course synonymous with the party,

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>so tell me about how she's taking credit for this.

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Pauline Hanson is having a victory lap at the moment.

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 1>I think it's maybe the happiest that I've ever seen

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:40.759
<v Speaker 1>her in thirty years of watching her on the national stage.

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 4>Because even when she was elected it was as an independent.

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 4>Barnaby Joyce jumped ship from the Nationals. But this is

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 4>people putting one next to a one Nation candidate at

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 4>the voting booth.

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 2>This is no only wind for it's a win for

0:01:55.880 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 2>the rest of Australia. I'm seeing a sea of these

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 2>proud Australians faces here in front of me, hundreds of

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 2>you that manions are watching you on TVs now, and

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 2>I believe it's giving them hope.

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 4>While the Liberals and the Nationals had preference David Farley,

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 4>in the end he didn't even really need those preferences

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 4>because he was so far ahead on first preferences that

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 4>you know, it was overwhelmingly he was the choice of

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 4>the electorate.

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 3>When I was walking out of here earlier and I.

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Looked up and I saw the sky called it that

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 2>we won the seat.

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:39.239
<v Speaker 3>I actually got a tier of my own. So yeah,

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Pauline Hanson is very very happy. And she started.

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.799
<v Speaker 4>Talking about you know, one nation's dominance, and to which

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 4>an extent that is absolutely true. What we're seeing as

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 4>a reordering of the right when it comes to mainstream

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:58.079
<v Speaker 4>politics in Australia, One Nation's rise has corresponded with the

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 4>coalition's decline. It's all happened quite rapidly after the last

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 4>federal election.

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:09.919
<v Speaker 2>And who may be watching this coming after those other seats.

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 3>Forgotten anymore.

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 4>So what Pauline Hanson now is doing is talking about

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 4>where one Nation is heading next, and that's national seats,

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 4>but it's also outer suburban seats. And Pauline Hansen has

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 4>said that Western Sydney is on her list, including in

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 4>the Liberal held seat of Lindsay, which Melissa Macintosh, who

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 4>considers herself one of the future leaders of the Liberal

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 4>Party currently holds. And the Liberal Party is quite worried

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 4>about One Nation's impact on seats like Lindsay and what

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 4>that's going to mean over the next couple of years.

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>And it was the most regional parts of the seat

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of Farah that voted the most emphatically for One Nation.

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 3>So how do you think.

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>That those voters and people who are in these regional

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>seats suburban seats in general are thinking about the country

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that they want to live in. And how much anger

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>do you think there is?

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 4>I think there is a lot of anger, but there

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 4>always has been, particularly in Regional Australia. Regional Australia feels

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 4>are very abandoned by mainstream politics.

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 3>That's not new. We need to change.

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 5>All the others are liars.

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 3>They don't back up on their promises. We've had enough

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 3>and it's time to bring in some new blood.

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 6>I think therefore, the people I feel our local areas

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 6>being neglected for a fairly long time.

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 4>And in a lot of cases their right to feel abandoned.

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean Barnaby Joyce, when he was National's leader, used

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 4>to make a point of saying that the Nationals electorates

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 4>were the poorest in the country. He did not change

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 4>that while he was National's leader, and while he had

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 4>a lot of influence over the Nationals. The Coalition who

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 4>have been in government for most of the time over

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 4>the last thirty years, have not changed that in terms

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 4>of the National electorates. They have not been able to

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 4>create new industry, new opportunity, or address the inequality between

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 4>the regions and the more urban seats in Australia.

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:14.799
<v Speaker 6>Everybody else has had a bit of a gout trying

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 6>to get this country into order. And I love Pauline

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 6>Hanson's straightforward approach and doesn't hold back and says exactly

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 6>what the normal everyday Australian is thinking that the country

0:05:27.200 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 6>needs a good turnover.

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 4>And Rob Harris from the Nine Newspapers went to Griffith,

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 4>which is one of the more multicultural seats within Farah

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 4>and he did a profile ahead of the by election

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 4>where the general view what that he was quoting from

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 4>voters was f the lot of use, which is I

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 4>think really indicative of people just saying to the major parties,

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 4>we had done with what you're offering. The regions and

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 4>the outer suburban seats is always where one nation has

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 4>had its biggest success. But the problem now for the

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 4>major parties is that people a little bit more in

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 4>from the regions are starting to listen to one nation.

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 4>They're really showing a lot of discontent with the status

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 4>quo and Anthony Albanezi is starting to weave in a

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 4>lot more people are telling us that they no longer

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 4>want to see things done as they always have been

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 4>and we have to respond to that change.

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 3>Quite clearly.

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:29.919
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of people under financial pressure who feel

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 5>like the system isn't working for them and that's a

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 5>message for all political parties in the system.

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 4>He has a little bit more room to respond to

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:42.559
<v Speaker 4>that change than the Liberal Party do, who are under

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 4>a lot of threat from one nation and the Nationals

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 4>who may very well find themselves wiped out at the

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 4>next election.

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 3>But Labor would.

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 4>Be very foolish to ignore these signs, particularly if they

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 4>don't start to give people a little bit more hope

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 4>that there is going to be economic reform that addresses

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 4>the inequality and the iniquity in Australia's economy.

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting any if you look at what's happening

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>in the UK. Nigel Farage's Reform Party also had a

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>significant win late last week and there's now speculation about

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>him being the next UK Prime Minister.

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 3>So how similar is what is happening here.

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that we're going to end up looking

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>back on this moment as the beginning of the far

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>rights political assent in Australia.

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's really interesting because we can also go back

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 4>to Trump and what happened in the United States. You know,

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 4>like Pauline Hansen was being Trump before Trump was Trump,

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 4>you know, at least in Australia, and Nigel Farage is

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 4>probably the closest Paul Enhansen character in the United Kingdom,

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 4>having played a major role in Brexit. And what links

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 4>the three movements is that economic discontent. It is blaming

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 4>people who are not necessarily to migrants for government failures

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 4>in infrastructure and policy over the last three decades.

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 2>And we want people that want the Australians. I don't

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 2>love the immigration by no means, but I want people

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 2>to come here to this country.

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't want sharia law on our doors.

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 4>We're seeing economic instability in all three countries, which has

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 4>been worsened by a global inflation crisis that some analysts

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 4>say is going to be bigger than the GFC and

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 4>also potentially bigger and longer than what we saw in

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.320
<v Speaker 4>the early stages of COVID. And that is going to

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 4>force more people into that real politics of grievance mindset

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 4>because they are not seeing the same benefits.

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 3>As previous generations.

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 4>And also no real hope. But the other thing is

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 4>that in the UK, the center left government labor of

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 4>the UK has not responded in ways that their platform

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 4>would suggest that they would respond. They've gone for more

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 4>austerity style policies when it comes to economics, rather than

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 4>leaning into some of those old school labor values of

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 4>giving people money and you know, trying to artificially inflate

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 4>the economy to ensure that people can get through it.

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 4>We've also seen that with the Democrats, who did not

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 4>address the economic inequality and in fact, you know, upheld

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 4>a lot of corporate.

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:28.199
<v Speaker 3>America in their policies.

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 4>And in Australia we're sort of at that tipping point

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 4>with this next budget.

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Is Labor going to start addressing some of those issues

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 3>that have been.

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 4>Embedded for the last twenty years or so and follow

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 4>through with some of what Labor's platform says that its

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 4>values are or is it going to maintain the status quo?

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 4>And a lot of voters they're going for a disruptor,

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump, Nigel Farrage, Pauling Hanson potentially in Australia to

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 4>break up the status quo and hopefully shock the major

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 4>institutions into doing something different. And I think that's going

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.319
<v Speaker 4>to be the story of this period of time.

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Coming up. Could the Libs, Matts and One Nation ever

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:28.319
<v Speaker 1>form a new proposition? Can we talk a little more

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.839
<v Speaker 1>amy about the effect on the Liberal Party. I mean,

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>they were already extremely worried about One Nation. That concern

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>costs them a leader. It's behind recent policy pivots. So

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>has that concern turned into blind panic.

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm not sure if it's blind panic from the

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 4>parliamentary wing, but it's getting to be blind panic in

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the apparatus that supports it, I think,

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 4>and I think we're going to be I think Angus

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 4>Taylor would be very lucky to be leading the Liberal

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.559
<v Speaker 4>Party and the Coalition at the next election, and if

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 4>he is, it will be because they haven't yet come

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 4>up with another answer as to who might be able

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 4>to fend off one nation.

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 3>Angus Taylor has.

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 4>Come out in an interview with the Australian Financial Review

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 4>where he said that the answer is to go back

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:23.839
<v Speaker 4>to some of the Howard principles, being culturally conservative as

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 4>well and economically rational. But the problem with that is

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 4>that the Howard principles worked because Australia was in a

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 4>once in a generation mining boom, which meant that there

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 4>were rivers of gold flowing into Australia's treasury, and no

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 4>government since has had that same impact in terms of

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 4>having a sudden influx in resources, rent and in tax

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 4>receipts flowing into the economy. What Angus Taylor has is

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 4>the legitimacy of one nation, helped along by a Liberal

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 4>party that is legitimizing their message. Angus Taylor's most recent

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 4>speeches on migration, where he advocates for a return to

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 4>a discriminatory migration policy, is very much in line with

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 4>what One Nation has been offering.

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 5>Not everyone wanting to migrate to Australia has a noble intent.

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 5>Not everyone wanting to migrate to Australia will be a

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 5>net benefit to Australia.

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Indeed some will be a net train.

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 4>And then they're preferencing one nation as well, which is

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 4>what one former Liberal MP told me was maybe the

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 4>stupidest suicide note for a modern political party. And so

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 4>they do need to be worried because the seats that

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 4>are going to fall to one nation, or the seats

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 4>that are currently most in danger of falling to one.

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Nation, are coalition seats.

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 4>Marinoah was in trouble even before One Nation's most recent rise, Capricornia,

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 4>Herbert Lindsay, Latrobe, these are all seats that are at

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:55.319
<v Speaker 4>risk of falling to one nation.

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 3>We've seen research too.

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 4>There's been studies that have been done that have looked

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 4>at you know what's happened to political parties that have

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 4>gone further to the right to try to appease the right,

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 4>And basically what's happened is they've just legitimized the far

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 4>right and people go to the originator rather.

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 3>Than the imitator. So it is a reordering of the right.

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 4>It does not look like the modern Liberal Party is

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 4>going to make it through this. It does not look

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.559
<v Speaker 4>like the Coalition will make it through this. That doesn't

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 4>mean that center right politics won't exist. It just means

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 4>that we're probably going to see something new emerge. And

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 4>Barnaby Joyce was openly saying that recently where he was

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 4>saying this might be it, they might be done.

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 7>Obviously the Liberal Party really do have to do some

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 7>soul searching after the weekend that was catastrophic. That is

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 7>almost that's almost a signal that things might be over.

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 4>And that's because he's looked at the electoral landscape as

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 4>somebody who was a member of the National Apparatust and

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 4>is now a member of one Nation and he's seeing

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 4>which way those votes flow. Not just say that Labor

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 4>won't be in trouble, but at the moment, the most

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 4>immediate danger to a major political party is to the coalition,

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 4>and they do not seem to have the answers of

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 4>how they're going to address that.

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>And I know that senior Liberal politicians are distancing themselves

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>from this now. But there has been speculation about whether

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the Liberal Party would form a new coalition, one that

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>includes one Nation.

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, the thropalition has been in play, I think for

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 4>a while, but that only makes sense if there's new

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 4>seats to be one because if it's just one nation

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 4>taking coalition seats, then it's just a one nation takeover

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 4>of the coalition. One of the reasons why the Liberal

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 4>Party lost the inner city seats to the Teel Independence

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 4>was because it was becoming increasingly difficult for small l

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 4>liberals to uphold and apologize for the policies that the

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 4>Liberal Party was creating to try and address the one

0:14:57.600 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 4>nation threat.

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 3>So until they can come up with a way to

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 3>win inner city seats that are.

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 4>Not as open to the politics of grievance in the

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 4>same way that we're seeing with one nation voters, until

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 4>they can come up with a way to convince them

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 4>to vote for one nation and the coalition, we're not

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 4>going to see any sort of successful thropalition which would

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 4>lead to them taking government. Well any thank you so

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 4>much for your time, anytime.

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Seven am. We'll be back tomorrow with an episode on

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the case against Coals and Woollies, as a judge weighs

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the evidence. Will they be found to have conned customers?

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>And what are the implications for shoppers everywhere?

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 5>It is a huge one, especially because of who we're

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 5>dealing with here. I mean, we're not just this is

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 5>in the corner store. This is everyone's call to store.

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 5>Coles and Woolies dominate the supermarket industry. But the good

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 5>thing is that it will have broader implications for all businesses.

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 3>No one else.

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 5>Will be able to do this. If the a troop

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 5>will see.

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Wins, that'll be in your feed tomorrow. I'm Ruby Jones.

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.