WEBVTT - The Media Show | 2 May

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>This is the Media Show with Jack Outing.

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to the Media Show. Tonight we'll look

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:12.040
<v Speaker 2>at a major court victory for soldier Ben Roberts Smith,

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 2>and then of course we'll sit down with media watchdog

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 2>columnist Jared Henderson.

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>But first, here.

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:21.280
<v Speaker 2>We are on the eve of another federal election, and

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 2>now I could talk about how the Coalition has squandered

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 2>an early polling lead with an absence of policy depth

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 2>and a series of missteps, but you already know all

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 2>of that, and this show is about the media. So

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 2>we're going to take some time to look at the

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 2>respective media strategies of each major party because there have

0:00:38.760 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 2>been some shocking changes in the wake of AI.

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Chick and tracking your money or your life.

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 3>You're a smarter than.

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>You look, authorized by ew Strain, Labor Party Westpeth.

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, what you just watched there was a series of

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 2>AI enhanced social media memes which are having a devastating

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:33.039
<v Speaker 2>impact on the coalition. Now these are official, authorized clips,

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 2>which include dressing Peter dutten up as an evil sith

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 2>lord uses a lightsaber to slash the healthcare system. And

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 2>there's any of it true, not a word. It is

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 2>brutal politics strategically targeting a young audience and people who

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 2>don't have ours to spare in their busy lives to

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 2>study politics. It is a scattergun approach, throw mud and

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 2>see what sticks, and some of these clips are reaching

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 2>hundreds and thousands of young voters. Now, we've been tracking

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Labour's new AI misinformation blits across social media very closely

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 2>and worked out they spent three point eight million dollars

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 2>on Google ads including YouTube between March twenty eight and

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 2>April twenty six, and a further one point one million

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 2>on meta platforms such as Facebook and Instagram, and that

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 2>is more than double the amount of money the coalition

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 2>assigned to social media. Make no mistake, this sort of

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 2>disreperency kills campaigns. And what truly irks me about this

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 2>new bold form of campaigning is that Labour has spent

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the last few years lecturing Australians about misinformation. Albanezi personally

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 2>blamed his failed Voice referendum on misinformation and his parting

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 2>even tried to outlaw it on social media, although politicians

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 2>were going to be exempt from those laws.

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 4>It is a lot of misinformation out there, but it's

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 4>a very clear proposition continue to counter some of the

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 4>misinformation which is out there. There will be misinformation out there,

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 4>we say you all, sir, There's been a whole lot

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 4>of misinformation out there. Some of the misinformation out there

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 4>is extraordinary. People in public office and public life have

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 4>a responsibility to not spread misinformation, to talk about the facts.

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>How times have changed.

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:27.919
<v Speaker 2>And also, this was what Albanezi had to say back

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 2>in twenty nineteen about fake political adverts.

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 4>But what happens when it turns out that what politicians

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 4>are allegedly saying isn't actually real at all? Facebook usually

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 4>won't do anything at all about it. That happened to

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 4>me just last week when men's rights activists Lead Erickson

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 4>docted a social media image from my Facebook page.

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 2>It looks like if you stay in politics long enough,

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 2>you become the villain you once despised. Well, joining me

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 2>on the panel this week a Sky News contributors James

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Bolt and Louise Roberts. Of course, Louise, what do you

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 2>make of this? You pivot the use of AI and

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 2>the willingness to lie to win an election?

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, the willingness to lie to win an election? Gee,

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 5>that's not a new concept. I don't think and certainly

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 5>in recent weeks has it been so I think, you know,

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 5>this is the way to win our hearts and minds

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 5>tomorrow ahead of the vote. I don't think so. And

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 5>it's a very cynical way of them trying to attract

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 5>or speak to young voters who will be turning off

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 5>from this sort of messaging by the thousands because it

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:38.799
<v Speaker 5>is appalling and what an appalling waste money as well,

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 5>millions of dollars spend on these stupid ads in making

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 5>look like a sith lord, you know, photoshopping him into

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 5>various things, which that are really struggling to understand the

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 5>messaging behind these ads, despite all the money they're spent

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 5>on it. So to me they're completely counterproductive.

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean James that they're equal parts light and funny.

0:04:57.040 --> 0:05:00.159
<v Speaker 2>So you've got him dressed up as Darth Maul with

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 2>a lightsaber, but there is a brutality to it in

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 2>that he's cutting through medicare and it does kind of work.

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 2>And I see some of these clips have thirty thousand shares,

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, hundreds of comments in it, and they do

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 2>permeate through the zeitgeist. I think of that demographic we'll

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:21.159
<v Speaker 2>have to see if it worked. But it looks like

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 2>if you're looking at the polls now that it's definitely

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 2>had an impact.

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and we're talking about it, so therefore it is

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 6>working a lot better than a lot of Liberal ads

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 6>on it, and especially this medi scare thing.

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 7>So you know when Anne Rustin talks.

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 6>To ask a Godseeller wrote that article that we featured,

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 6>and she goes, oh, this is just political games from Labor.

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 6>It's just dir like first election campaign, where are your

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:40.799
<v Speaker 6>political games?

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 7>I mean medi scare.

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 6>Laby got to this quicker, meaner and louder than the

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 6>Liberal Party, and dune't spent the whole campaign having to

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 6>just say it, reject another narrative and rather than set

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 6>his zones and no matter what happens on Saturday, major

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 6>wake up call for the Liberal Party about not being

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 6>fast enough on social media, not getting AI quick enough,

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.679
<v Speaker 6>and not being able to set an agenda from the start.

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 2>The misinformation laws side of this, we were going to

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 2>have to have I guess discourse policed by these laws. Now,

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 2>in hindsight, when we've seen the strategies, when we've seen

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 2>the way that that Labor is campaigning, it looks very hypocritical.

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 5>Now it does completely because we I think as parents

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 5>as well, we sort of expected these laws to protect

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 5>our children's That's where really put out faith in for

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 5>the government.

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:28.799
<v Speaker 1>Has targeted at children.

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:30.479
<v Speaker 5>That's right, that was the point I was going to

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:34.720
<v Speaker 5>make Exactly, it's going straight to young voters with you know,

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 5>sort of saddled with dealing with and voting on issues

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 5>which are not of their making. They haven't created the

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 5>housing crisis, they haven't created the cost of living crisis.

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 5>They're looking to the government or the future party to

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.919
<v Speaker 5>actually solve these issues for them. Instead, they're having to

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 5>weigh through these social media means, which you know, yes,

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 5>probably do come through to a certain extent, but they

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 5>don't actually give them anything tangible to think how, how

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 5>is a political party going to fix this for me?

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 5>What's the change be for me as a young person

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 5>living in Australia.

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 6>I think that, but though, like how many young voters

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 6>actually are out there going well, what's tangible for me?

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I really think every election comes down to

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 6>who would you rather have a beer with? And when

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 6>you've got the Labor Party, I mean, look, they're not

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 6>adds for me, They're not adds for us, they don't

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 6>speak in the language of the watpake.

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 7>But for some people.

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 6>That could just be the stuff like, Ah, this Labor party,

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 6>they're kind of fun Like that could.

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 7>Just be enough to win over a vote.

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe.

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's another element to this social media campaigning which

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 2>is also killing the coalition. Now, Labour's advertising team might

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 2>be shameless liars, but the coalition's team is simply weird.

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 2>How is the coalition fighting against the five million dollar

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 2>labor blitz? Well with asenine clips like this, please vote

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 2>for me.

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 8>Screamed Dane bond Albanesi in a desperate attempt to clutch

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 8>a dub in the last four days of the Fortnite election.

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 8>Despite his best efforts to camp his way to victory

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 8>the players in the lobby, Moses time was for the

0:07:57.280 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 8>last three seasons of an easy had dramas the chief

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 8>rightem sharp, but the price for the battle pass kept

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 8>rising and causing many players to crash out. The rage

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 8>continue this album as he hosted a mini event on

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 8>the island where he spent four hundred and fifty million

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 8>taxpayer v bucks on a voice referendum, and now with

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 8>the storm closing in the choice is clear a camping

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 8>default or dunten who will clutch up and get the

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 8>dub for Aussies with cheaper.

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Petrol and energy authorized by a host liberal camera.

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 2>If you publish that as an ad, you deserve to lose.

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 2>There is no gray area here. The Coalition fumbled this

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 2>campaign because it did not have a message. Instead, it

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 2>employed a bunch of low IQ young liberals who are

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 2>obsessed with Fortnite to produce this utter garbage. It reeks

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 2>of an older audience desperately trying to attract Gen Z

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 2>voters by throwing buzzwords at them. Ironically, this sort of

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 2>thing quickly becomes toxic. No policy details, no plans, just memes,

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 2>and it will cost them dearly. So Luise, you've got

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 2>to give labor Alis some credit. There was at least

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 2>some creativity there in the misinformation campaign, and when you

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 2>compare it to some of the ads at the liberal parties,

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 2>the way that they're trying to emulate that strategy very

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 2>cringe worthy. And I think that you can see online

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 2>it's getting mocked by a lot of that generation.

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.559
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely who it's meant to appeal to. It's almost like

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 5>they got into a bunker and went, oh my god,

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 5>we've got to quickly do an aiad who knows how

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 5>to use chat GPT quickly, let's cobble something together. I

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 5>don't think politicians should be allowed to use any type

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 5>of AHI because clearly they've got no idea how it

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 5>works or what the messaging is. But I mean, I

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 5>agree with your point.

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I think James as well.

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 2>It's the kids that maybe don't have real world experience,

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 2>and the older members of Liberal Party maybe don't understand

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 2>social media, and they have deferred to the younger generation

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 2>and their party that don't.

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Have the experience.

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 2>They're probably a little bit nerdy, they're probably not the

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 2>most likable people you wouldn't want to go have a

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 2>beer with. Yes, and we're getting this kind of advertising

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 2>from people that really don't have anything interesting say or

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 2>anything of substance, lots of things.

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 6>So watching that ad, like, I've never played Fortnite, but

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 6>I'm assuming it's just hitting buzzword after buzzword after buzzword

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 6>about Fortnite. And the difference with the labor One that

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 6>we just played was that it always came back to

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 6>duttonmal Cup medicicare, Like there was a point to what

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 6>it was saying exactly. Now, the other part of this ad,

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 6>because like you can say it's terrible, and it is,

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 6>and you guys have covered that. But the other part

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 6>of it is it came out yesterday. Four million people

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Speaker 6>had already voted by the time it came out. That

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 6>is one in for nearly one in four people on

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.160
<v Speaker 6>the electoral role who can't change their minds, like not

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 6>won't change their minds.

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 7>They can't change their minds.

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 6>So even if that ad were good, it's ultimately kind

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 6>of useless. So I mean the Liberal campaign, they came out,

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 6>they say, okay, well from the last week of the campaign,

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 6>that's where now spending is going to really go up.

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 7>We're really going to focus in on that last week.

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 6>But so many people have either voted, they have completely

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 6>made up their minds. They might have made up their

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.439
<v Speaker 6>minds three months ago. They're not people that you can

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 6>get anymore. I just think that the Liberal Party has

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 6>this whole Super Bowl mentality of like everything got to

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 6>lead up to game day, It's all about that Saturday,

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:07.199
<v Speaker 6>and that is just not how people think.

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 7>Getting more a great people just.

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 6>Like they don't want to vote on Saturday because the

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 6>lines are too long. It's not that they've just can't

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 6>wait to vote. It's just the concept of election day.

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 6>It's a political animal thing. It is not a regular

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 6>person thing any.

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 2>And we were talking before, we were before the show,

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 2>and there might be some indication that people have switched off.

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 2>They're going out to vote simply because they just don't

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 2>care anymore. They want to get it done.

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>It's true they have.

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 5>To, they just don't want to get a fine if

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 5>they ever get a fine in the post. But the

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 5>whole atmosphere of the democracy sausage and going there and

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 5>getting the hat to vote cards and taking kids along

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 5>and all that community, I really feel is is on

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 5>the decline, which is a real shame because democracy is

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 5>such a part of our fabric and framework. And to

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 5>your point, Jane's about the combalition leaving everything to the

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 5>last minute, That show is a very bad understanding of

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 5>how media now works and how we consume media as well,

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 5>that we're not waiting to the last minute to sort

0:11:58.320 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 5>of suddenly check who we're going to vote for.

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 6>But also your own political momentum, because they had a

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:04.839
<v Speaker 6>lead this year, how do you not go even harder

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 6>at that moment or rather than just like stepping back

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 6>and going okay, well wait wait, wait, no, no, no, you

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:12.319
<v Speaker 6>have to attack when they're at their webs.

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 2>They need a lot of help in terms of media strategy,

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 2>and that's particularly where they've let them down.

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:19.559
<v Speaker 1>Also, they need to have a look at their policies.

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 2>I think the policies really if they resonate, then it

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 2>does the job for you. But they don't really have

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 2>anything tangible to latch on rather than this abstract petrol

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.199
<v Speaker 2>thing that's going to disappear in a year anyway. Moving

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.599
<v Speaker 2>on now, media watchers, Linton Besser took aim at the

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 2>ABC's chair Kim Williams this week, and it exposed a

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 2>major fight brewing at the national broadcaster now. Besser revealed

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 2>that Williams had personally intervened to get a washed up comic,

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Sandy Gutman, airtime so that he could sell tickets to

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 2>ABC viewers.

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 9>Ostentatious, whose real name is Sandy Goodman, has featured regularly

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 9>on the ABC, celebrating his briefly famous monologue and sprooking

0:12:58.960 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 9>his upcoming show.

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 1>Across the country, these days.

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 6>The crowds are much more receptive and I get far

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 6>less alcohol thrown at me than I did back in

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 6>the early days.

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 9>Since July last year, Goodman has received more than ninety

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 9>minutes of free publicity on the public broadcaster. There's no

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 9>fewer than eleven segments, all of which promoted specific upcoming gigs.

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 5>You can book your seat for dinner and then also

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.439
<v Speaker 5>the show if you jump onto the pub's website.

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Some ABC staff pushback against the idea of having a

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 2>no name failed comic given a platform to sell tickets,

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 2>and they were right to push back.

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 9>But we've learned that not all of the ABC's radio

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 9>staff loved the idea of Austin Tatious on their show

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 9>and declined to put him to air. The comedian would

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 9>have the last laugh, however, because, as these regional bureau

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 9>soon learned, Sandy Goodman had a man on the inside,

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 9>none other than Kim william chairman of the ABC.

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm friends with Kim.

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:06.839
<v Speaker 7>I would have known him for forty years. I asked

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 7>him if he could get a couple of interviews.

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>He did.

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 9>Kim Williams denies the two of friends and describes Sandy

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 9>Goodman as a mere acquaintance.

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 10>We had a brief involvement some twenty seven years ago.

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 9>Whatever the relationship, Sandy Goodman has used it to great success,

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 9>beginning on August five last year.

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Williams used his slippery statement to dance around the issue,

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 2>but the facts are clear. He had a connection to

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 2>a professional comic and he pressured EBC journalists to help

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 2>him sell tickets on air. Now, if that isn't a

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 2>breach of the charter, then nothing is and Williams appears

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 2>to be in trouble here. We reported after the fallout

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 2>of the Media Watch episode that the MAAA Journalist Union

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 2>was getting calls with similar complaints. They say there are

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 2>more stories like this to come. And the ABC's new

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 2>managing director, Hu Mar, who should be the person running

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 2>the editorial content, not Williams, had some interesting words to

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 2>say in the matter.

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 10>Kim and I are very clear. Kim's responsibility is to

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 10>run the board and to run and to be the

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 10>advocate in chief for the ABC, and management needs to

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 10>have the ability to run the organization. The board exists

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 10>proper governance to review what management does. Kim does not

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 10>have any question with that, That's very clear, James.

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Really interesting work by Linton Besser. There it's always a

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 2>bit awkward when they're turning the microscope on their own employers.

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 2>But in this situation, I can see why ABC journalists

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 2>are incredibly angry. He is directly influencing it. And there

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 2>was this one comment from a journalist that they played

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 2>on Media watchual we didn't share was if he's focusing

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 2>on something that's this petty and this irrelevant and what

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 2>else is he doing?

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I just can't believe Kim Williams is risking it

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 6>all for ostentatious.

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 7>That's the craziest fust You know what this person is

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 7>I ever heard of it?

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 6>Slightly aware of the how much King Kohalabev I've been

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 6>producer here that clip every now and then get shown

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 6>if you recognized if he came up to me on

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 6>the street and hit me, I would not know who

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 6>he is, but man ostentatious. But like so, the serious

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 6>point of this it is just we pay for it.

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 6>We pay for the ABC, We pay for these ego trips,

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 6>We pay for everything. Like they're editorializing, they do away

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 6>from the ostentatious stuff.

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 2>And it's not him Williams personal broadcast.

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>And he's not a good talent correct me. Do you

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>know who he is?

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 5>I know of the name, but he's of a different vintage.

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 5>I mean, certainly nobody on the street would even be

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:42.840
<v Speaker 5>able to mention any of his jokes or these TV

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 5>shows or anything like that as well, or we stand

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 5>up routine. But the point I was going to make

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 5>is how refreshing we now have an MD at the ABC.

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 5>He's not afraid to push back and defend journalists. We

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 5>haven't had that for a long time. So I think

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 5>you know, full marks to Hugh Marks for that as well.

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Saying it publicly is publicly. I don't know how Williams

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 2>will feel about that well.

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 5>And we did say that would be his biggest hurdled,

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 5>didn't we that when he took that job that had

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 5>to deal with the Kim issue would be the biggest

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 5>sort of hurdle for him.

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's already gone out racing. We can't have people

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 2>selling commercial tickets on the ABC's completely inappropriate. But moving on,

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Soldier Ben Robert Smith won a major victory against nine

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 2>this week when audio recording which was uncovered by Sky

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 2>News was admitted into court as he seeks to overturn

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 2>his damaging defamation loss.

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 11>Victoria Cross recipient Ben Robert Smith has had a legal

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 11>win in the Federal court today as he seeks to

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 11>overturn his defamation loss. His lawyers successfully argued that a

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 11>secretly recorded phone call should be admitted as evidence.

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 12>Striding into court to try and clear his name, decorated

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.920
<v Speaker 12>Soldier Ben Roberts Smith is hoping to reopen the defamation

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 12>appeal against the journalist and newspaper who accused him of

0:17:58.000 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 12>war crimes because of this.

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I've just preached my doing that this is where like

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>this is.

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 12>A secretly recorded phone conversation between Nick mackenzie and a

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 12>woman known as Person seventeen.

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>James.

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 2>A big win for Ben Robert Smith, but also Shari Markson,

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.959
<v Speaker 2>who broke that story. She uncovered that audio and now

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 2>it appears it's going to be very central to this appeal.

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 6>I mean it is explosive audio and what Nick mackenzie

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.440
<v Speaker 6>was saying yes at court yesterday was also very interesting.

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 6>So this is definitely something to be watching very closely

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 6>for the next couple of days and weeks.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, louis your thoughts.

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 5>I think if you're going to accuse someone of being

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 5>a war criminal, you have to make sure every facet

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 5>of your house is in order, So very interesting to

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 5>see where this goes from.

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 2>And his testimony, because Nick mackenzie obviously took the stand

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 2>and he made some admissions that in certain situations he

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 2>will act deceptively if he thinks the public interest argument

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 2>is there. But it will be definitely one to watch,

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 2>particularly for us on this show. Well, James Louise, thank

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 2>you so much for the time quick break. When we return,

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Carmala Harris rise from the political grave. Welcome back to

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 2>Stars and Gripes, where we revel in the absurdity of

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 2>US media shenanigans. But big news tonight, Kamala's back rallying

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 2>the resistance against the evil, democratically elected leader of her

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 2>own country.

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 13>Well, friends, that is called a constitutional crisis, and that

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 13>is a crisis that will eventually impact everyone because it

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 13>would mean that the rules that protect our fundamental rights

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 13>and freedoms that ensure each of us has a say

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:55.040
<v Speaker 13>about how our government works will no longer matter. And

0:19:55.119 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 13>if that happens, the one check, the one balance, the

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 13>one power that must not fail is the voice of

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 13>the people.

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 2>It was good to see Kamala Harris take a break

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 2>from selling time shares on the Gold Coast, and her

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 2>resurgence appear to send shivers down the spine of the

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration.

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 13>Just to add on the Kamala Harris point, I think

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 13>I speak for everyone at the White House. We encourage

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 13>Kamala Harris.

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 6>To continue going out and speaking do speaking engagements.

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, joining me this week to discuss is the president

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 2>of the Center of the American Experiment, John Heinderek. John,

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.880
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much as always for joining me at

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Kamala's back. They don't seem too perturbed by her resurgence though.

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 3>No, that clip you just showed of Kamala Harris brings

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 3>back a lot of bad memories, doesn't it. She talked

0:20:57.600 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 3>there about the voice of the people. Well, the voice

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 3>of the people told her, Kamala, it's time for you

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 3>to retire, and we all hope that's what she will do.

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 3>But I will say this, you know, to be fair,

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 3>I think the position that she has in mind to

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 3>run for is governor of California, and she could possibly

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 3>get elected as governor of California in part because all

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 3>of these sensible people have left that state.

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a very good point.

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's very funny for me to say, Kamala there

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 2>because she's actually doing a conference on the Gold Coast

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 2>talking about real estate, which is quite a fool from

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 2>Grace when you're at one point the prospective leader of

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 2>the free world and then you're on, you know, one

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 2>of the mid sized cities in Australia talking to a

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 2>real estate conference.

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 3>I take it she was getting paid for that. You're right,

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 3>it's kind of a cutdown. But one thing she was

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 3>not doing was giving interviews. She doesn't like to give

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 3>interviews to anybody if she can't count on them to

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 3>edit the tape to make her sound a little more coherent.

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're going to have to send a reporter out anyway,

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 2>whether whether she likes it or not.

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>We might be able to get a grab.

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 2>But moving on now to an interesting rare moment on

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 2>television were sixteen minutes host Scott Pelley a tax paramount

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 2>his parent company after the resignation of his boss, Bill Owens.

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 2>The allegations are that paramount was interfering in news coverage

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 2>so that Trump would approve a merger.

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 14>Bill resigned Tuesday. It was hard on him and hard

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 14>on us, but he did it for us, and you

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 14>stories we pursued for fifty seven years are often controversial.

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 14>Lately the Israel Gaza war and the Trump administration. Bill

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 14>made sure they were accurate and fair. He was tough

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 14>that way. But our parent company, Paramount is trying to

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 14>complete a merger. The Trump administration must approve it. Paramount

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 14>began to supervise our content in new ways. None of

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 14>our stories has been blocked, but Bill felt he launch

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 14>the independence that honest journalism requires.

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 2>Now Pedley can try and act with moral superiority. But

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 2>what they've failed to tell audiences is sixty Minutes adopted

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 2>a Kamala Harris interview in the middle of the campaign

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 2>to try and make her rambling answers look better.

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.919
<v Speaker 13>The work that we do diplomatically with the leadership of

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 13>Israel is an ongoing pursuit around making clear our principles. Well,

0:23:28.240 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 13>let's start with this on this subject. The aid that

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 13>we have given Israel allowed Israel to defend itself against

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:40.400
<v Speaker 13>two hundred ballistic missiles.

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 7>That were just.

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:48.120
<v Speaker 13>Meant to attack the Israelis and the people of Israel.

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.439
<v Speaker 13>And I think that is the most recent example of

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 13>why what we do to assist in their defense around

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 13>military aid is important. And when we think about the

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 13>threat that Hamas Hezbela presents Iran, I think that it

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:11.239
<v Speaker 13>is without any question are imperative to do what we

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 13>can to allow Israel to defend itself against those kinds

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 13>of attacks. Now, the work that we do diplomatically with

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 13>the leadership of Israel is an ongoing pursuit around making

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 13>clear our principles, which include the need for humanitarian aid,

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 13>the need for this war to end, the need for

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 13>a deal to be done which would release the hostages

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:37.880
<v Speaker 13>and create a ceasefire.

0:24:39.520 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, John really interesting editing scandal there Karmala's clip and

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 2>the one that went to where initially it was succinct,

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 2>it was sharp, it was on point, it had a

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:53.120
<v Speaker 2>clear message. The one that actually the conversation actually took

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 2>place with the reporter was rambling. She didn't get to

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 2>the point, and that was one of the biggest criticisms

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 2>against her. So I find it very hard to believe

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 2>that the extra interference is about this conspiracy with Trump's

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 2>going to approve the merger. And it appears to me

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:11.640
<v Speaker 2>to be more that management is taking a closer look

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 2>at the editorial standards of a program that has triggered

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 2>a twenty million dollar lawsuit.

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's right. I mean what Scott Pelley did was

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 3>absolutely shocking. He refers to sixty minutes having a long

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 3>history of being accurate and fair. Sixty minutes has never

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 3>been either accurate or fair. My website got well known

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 3>in two thousand and four when we helped to expose

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 3>the fact that sixty minutes was putting out fake documents

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 3>to try to impugne President George W. Bush's service in

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 3>the Texas Air National Guard. They have a long history

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 3>of propagating fake news on behalf of the Democratic Party,

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:55.360
<v Speaker 3>and so I agree with you. It's possible that Sherry Redstone,

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.479
<v Speaker 3>who controls Paramount, is concerned about the merger. I don't know,

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 3>but I would say it's at least equally possible that

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 3>she's generally appalled at the low journalistic standards at sixty minutes.

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Moving on now, Donald Trump sat down with ABC News

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 2>this week to feel questions about the global perception of America,

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 2>and it went about as well as you would expect.

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Do you think the reputation in the United States has

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 3>gone down under your presidence?

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:23.120
<v Speaker 15>No, I think it's gone way up. And I think

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:26.360
<v Speaker 15>we're a respected country again, we were left at all

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 15>over the world. We had a president that couldn't walk

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 15>up a flight of stairs, couldn't walk down a flight

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 15>of stairs, couldn't walk across the stage without falling. We

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 15>had a president that was grossly incompetent. You knew it.

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 15>I knew it, and everybody knew it, but you guys

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 15>didn't want to write it because you're fake news.

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, thank you.

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 15>By the way, ABC is one of the worst.

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 7>I have to be honest.

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, thank you, Josh.

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:52.880
<v Speaker 2>It's classic Trump, isn't it. I don't know why these

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.439
<v Speaker 2>journalists think if they're going to take a shot at him.

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:57.400
<v Speaker 1>They seemed patterned.

0:26:57.480 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 2>They seemed to be taken aback by the fact that

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 2>He's going to attack them personally. Have they not learnt

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 2>their lesson?

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, Trump has got to be the most transparent

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 3>president in history. In the first hundred days of his administration,

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 3>he has given more interviews than Joe Biden did in

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 3>four years. And he'll talk to anybody, you know, He'll

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 3>talk to people who have made up fake stories about him.

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 3>He'll talk to people like this guy Moran from ABC News.

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 3>And he takes no grief from them, they ask him

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 3>these unfair questions and he will just push back time

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:34.400
<v Speaker 3>after time. It's really fun to see, and frankly, it's

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 3>one of the reasons why so many Americans really like Trump.

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:40.159
<v Speaker 2>It's a good point. And you can see when he

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 2>does these big press conferences as well, that he's fielding

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 2>questions in a way that Biden just wasn't able to

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 2>do because he wasn't sentient in the same way or

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 2>arguably at all. So it is a stark difference to

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 2>the way that Trump is actually able to engage in

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 2>the meet with the media.

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, poor Joe Biden. I mean, by the end he

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 3>couldn't even read a teleper and even at the beginning,

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:04.919
<v Speaker 3>reading a talentprapt was all he was up to. And

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 3>so how the contrast is really really striking.

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 2>John Hundraka, thank you so much for joining me. Really

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 2>appreciate it. We're going to take a quick break, but

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 2>when we return we'll take a look at issues in

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 2>the ABC with Jared Henderson.

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back.

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Joining me now as he does each and every week,

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:32.400
<v Speaker 2>is Sky News Australia's media watchdog columnist Jared Henderson. Jared,

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:34.439
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much for joining me as always, and

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:37.640
<v Speaker 2>you've got some cracker topics that you've come across, as

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 2>you always provide us the first one Channel seven. Now

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 2>we know it is difficult to get a panel of

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 2>undecided voters, but let's take a look at how seven did.

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 5>Let's head to a living room there political science students

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 5>from Flinders University.

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 7>Pretty strong and clear reaction.

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 9>Have a listen.

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 2>I think Done tells a lot of lies around nuclear energy,

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 2>particularly around who's going to get these jobs. He'd done

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 2>them just lies all the time about housing. Every single

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 2>issue that he identifies with housing has the complete wrong

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 2>meaning behind it. I don't think they've made their mind

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 2>up yet. They seem very objectively undecided.

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 16>You've got to share a share house of political science

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 16>students in Adelaide and they're against dutn't I mean quell surprised.

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 16>Who could have imagined it? And it went on. I

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 16>mean there were four of them. Eventually I picked out

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 16>two of them, but they all agreed with one another.

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 16>Was like a little Marxist sell there, and that's fine.

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 2>There's little mart Sells everywhere, particularly among political scientists. But

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 2>I guess the problem is the media trying to pass

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 2>this off as being oh, well, these are our objective.

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 16>Well passed it off as the view of young Australians. Now,

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 16>some young Australians hold those views, but if you went

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 16>into other places, you'd find young Australians who don't know

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 16>those views.

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 3>And I could.

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 16>Introduce them to some of them if Channel seven were interested,

0:29:58.800 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 16>and I'm sure you could too.

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a bit lazy.

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 2>They could have gone to multiple Marxist cells as well,

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes they good. I could have had a divergence of opinions.

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 16>There and some Trotsky guards as well, different views.

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 2>Now, John Lyons, you've been following him very close. Yes,

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 2>he's taken on a big job in the US, so

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess he's over there working hard for the taxpace.

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 16>Well, I've been tuning in to getting because he said,

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 16>as you know, he said he was going to translate

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 16>the Trump administration for people like me and you.

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 5>We couldn't work it.

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Out, so silly we need him to say.

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 16>They've sent John Lyons over there, And he was filmed

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 16>in Washington saying he was going to do this, and

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 16>we showed this on the show a month or so ago.

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 16>But then he sort of gone missing, and I inquired

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 16>of the ABC you know what might be the case,

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 16>and they came back and said, no problem, really, and

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 16>then they came back and said, oh, hang on, he's

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 16>back in Australia. So I didn't write about a moment

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 16>he watched. I could have been very courteous, and I

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 16>thought I'd give it another week. And then lomberhold on

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 16>Late Night Live the other night as I caught it

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 16>Late Light Late Night Left on the ABZ with David

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 16>matt Up jumps John Lyons. And he's back in Australia

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 16>flogging his latest book. So there am I and I

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 16>presumably you sort of waiting for a translation about not

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 16>only what's happening with Trump in Washington, but also with

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 16>the Canadians and the Canadian election. Because he's editor North,

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 16>he's the Editor America, so he covers the Americas from

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 16>the north to the south. And I can't get the

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 16>translation because he's back in Auspegia.

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 1>How am I going to know what to think? Now?

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Jared have no idea.

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 2>It's just gibberish. It's a different language if it hasn't

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 2>been translated.

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>So there you go.

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 16>So I've been watching it, but I imagine he will

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 16>be flying back there soon once he's launched his book.

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if he's doing some election stuff here. He's

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a heavy hitter.

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 16>Well, he's had a couple of things on online for

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 16>the ABC, but nothing on the main programs on the ABC,

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 16>and nothing on the main television or radio.

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Except plugging his book.

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 16>Of course, I accept Late Nightline Marie Men's book which Love,

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 16>which is on Ukraine, it's not on America.

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, Also Nicky Sava, she wrote in Holum, I think

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 2>she might have attributed a quote to Donald Trump that

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 2>he probably wishes was his quote.

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 16>Yes, he would, But the quote that she came up

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 16>with is, you know, do you feel you're better off

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 16>now than you were the last election is nearly half

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 16>a century old, and it's a famous quote from Ronald Reagan,

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 16>and it'd shown a lot on television clips are offer

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 16>show and think I saw one recently on Sky News

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 16>the other night. One of the programs had it on.

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 16>So it's very well known. But Nicky Saba, writing in

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 16>the Age and the Sydney Morning Herald, says that Trump's

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 16>talking about this, sorry, that Peter Dutton's talking about this,

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 16>and that's because he's into trump Ism. That Peter Dunton

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 16>got it from Trump, but Peter Dutton didn't get it

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 16>from Trump. I mean it's very common. But if he

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 16>got it from anyone, he got it from Ronald Reagan

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 16>in nineteen eighty, which is nearly half a century ago.

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 16>So there's Nicky Sava scribbling away. You know, Dutton's into Trump,

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 16>he's just following trump Ism because he's making this comment

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 16>when in fact it was made by Ronald Reagan when

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 16>Trump was probably middle aged or younger.

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Well doesn't that just show their depth as well?

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 2>But also I think is a mistake on the left

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 2>of the media to attribute anything which is controversial or

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 2>center right to that of Trump. And could it just

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 2>potentially be that people in Australia are not better off

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 2>than they were three years ago and it's an entirely appropriate,

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 2>domestically organic talking point.

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Well that's quite possible.

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 16>And also a metters like people say that Dutton's like

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 16>Trump because of border interest, but Dutton was talking about

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 16>border control before Trump became president.

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean the orders was twenty twelve, was it?

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 16>He said the other way around that Trump's following Dutton

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 16>or Duttonism, but of coause no one thinks of that.

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 16>I mean, it's just it's sort of lazy journalism. I mean,

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 16>Dutton is his own person.

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 2>It's lazy boogeyman journal boogyman. It's here as someone who

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 2>is i think statistically not liked in Australia, and that's

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 2>fair enough for whatever reasons. He definitely caused people super

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 2>annuation a bit of a hit, and you can understand

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 2>people are angry, so they latch on that and then

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 2>they connect it to Dutta and they know what they're doing.

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 2>They know very much what they're doing. Dutan is taking

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Trump's playbook. Fortunately it was roll of Reagan's playbook.

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, and Trump is causing Dutton some problems, that's for sure,

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 16>but it's not because Dutton's imitating Trump. I mean, in

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 16>this instance had nothing to do with Trump. He's just

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:19.839
<v Speaker 16>got a good line. But Bill Clinton used the same line.

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 16>I mean, there's a very since Ronald Reagan made that

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 16>statement in nineteen eighty many politicians have used it. It's

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 16>a very simple question, are you better off or not?

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 16>I mean it's a very good line, good question, brilliant line.

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>And probably how you should vote.

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Funny Jared Henderson Thank you so much, as always, really

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 2>appreciate your insights. That's all we have for this evening,

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 2>but up next is Newsnight.