WEBVTT - How Erin Patterson almost got away with murder: Greg Haddrick Pt.2

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>The public has had a long held fascination with detectives.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:08.039
<v Speaker 1>Detective sy aside of life the average person is never

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>exposed to. I spent thirty four years as a cop.

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>For twenty five of those years I was catching killers.

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>That's what I did for a living. I was a

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>homicide detective. I'm no longer just interviewing bad guys. Instead,

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm taking the public into the world in which I operated.

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>The guests I talk to each week have amazing stories

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>from all sides of the law. The interviews are raw

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and honest, just like the people I talk to. Some

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of the content and language might be confronting. That's because

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>no one who comes into contact with crime is left unchanged.

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Join me now as I take you into this world.

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Part two of my chat with Greg Hadrick,

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>the LOGI Award winning screenwriter behind some of the country's

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>biggest crime series and the author of the book The

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Mushroom Murders. We have been taking an in depth look

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>at the and Patterson case. In part two, we take

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you into the trial. In preparation for writing the book,

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Greg witnessed the proceedings of the trial and had access

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to the court transcripts, so Greg knows this case better

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.839
<v Speaker 1>than most. We talk about the strength of the prosecution

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:19.039
<v Speaker 1>case and how the defense team attempted to create enough

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>doubt in the minds of the jury. A lot of

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>things came up that you may or may not be

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>aware of. My chat with Greg gave me a much

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>greater understanding of what went on in one of the

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>biggest murder trials in the country. If you thought you

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>knew everything about the case, have a listen to our

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>conversation and you might be surprised. Greg Hadrick, welcome back

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to part two. Thank you Gary of your second time

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 1>on Eye Catch Killers.

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:46.839
<v Speaker 2>Greg.

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>In part one, we were talking about the circumstances leading

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>up to the victims of this murder getting sick, the

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>serving of the pie and the taken the hospital, and

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Eron's reaction to to what happened. I think we left

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>off on part two with the police starting to become involved.

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>That you've had a lunch, four people are critically ill,

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>and the person that served the lunch is going about okay,

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and homicide would notified at that point.

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 2>In time they were, and they for about it won't

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 2>happen very quickly. I think for about a day they had.

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 2>The informant was Detective Steve Eppingstall Yep, and he says

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 2>they sort of watched it for a day and then

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 2>on the fourth.

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>There was a comment in your book and it reminded me,

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's a bit of black humor that comes in

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.959
<v Speaker 1>the world of policing and homicide that we're not the nearly.

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Homicide because and I had a bit of a chuckle,

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 2>and you know, this.

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 1>Is a very serious case we're talking about, but that

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>was very much the narrative in homicide that well, often

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 1>we get called about anything that's happened, and you get

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that many calls when you're on call, you have to

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>draw the line say look, we will come if the

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 1>person and is dead. Up until that point in time,

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>unless it's obvious, we don't go out.

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 2>So I had a bit of a chuckle. That was

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 2>police jargon, police jargon. Side squad, nearly the homicide squad.

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 2>They so they had to. They started the third They

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 2>are looking at it and they've been told about it,

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 2>and it's a roundabout. Then when Aaron takes the dehydrator

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 2>to the kunar a tip, I think that happens on

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 2>the second. Actually on Wednesday, the second, and I think

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:34.839
<v Speaker 2>she well, she says she took that because she knew

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 2>that the child protection workers were doing a home they

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 2>had to visit the home environment to check that the

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 2>kids would be okay, and so she knew that they

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 2>were going to arrive in an hour's time, and there

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 2>was a food dehydrator on the kitchen bench. So she

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 2>decided get rid of that, get rid of.

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>That, covering up the evidence. Before we talk how the

0:03:56.000 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>case built against Aaron. The three of the four died

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>from who consumed the consumed the meal. It became apparent

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>in the reading of your book and stuff that I've

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 1>picked up in the media, how horrendous their deaths were.

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, we talk about this and

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>their errands attracted the attention of people for so many

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>different reasons. But we got three good people who have

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>lost their lives in a.

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 2>Very valuaful, torturous It was. It was terrible, and Justice

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Bill made a point of that in his sentencing remarks

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 2>as well, that the language when you say people are

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 2>killed by mushrooms makes it sound soft. You know, it's

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 2>not a knife, it's not a gun, it's you know,

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 2>it's not an axe. It's a mushroom, and yet you know,

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 2>the autopsies on poor Galeen Heather showed that their entire

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 2>livers were dead, and that most of their bowers dead,

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 2>most of their kidneys were They had suffered through being

0:04:56.880 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 2>killed from the inside out, which is a the book

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 2>for me, is almost like being drawn and quartered. It's shocking.

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 2>It was horrendous. Yeah, it was horrendous.

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>And I hadn't even picked up on the fact that

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you say it didn't seem like a violent death because

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>it's mushroom mushroom pie, and you know, we sort of

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>have a bit of a snicker about that, but we

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 1>should really understand the pain that these people are. People

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>went through and the survivor.

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Of course, and indeed, not.

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 1>Only he lost his wife, but he was in the

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>cama for a very long time.

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Three weeks I think, yeah, before he was finally excubated,

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 2>and then in rehab for weeks after that claims and

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure he's telling the truth. Ian is a very

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 2>honest guy that you know his self will never be

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 2>the same. Yeah, you know, what they went through was

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 2>was a horrific ordeal and it shouldn't be forgotten when

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 2>people go mushroom lady and mushroom killer. That that language

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 2>softens what was really happening. Very very real.

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Victims are very horrendous, horrendous crime. We've got the homicide involved,

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>We've got they're starting to look at the case. And

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>when the victims passed away, I would imagine that it

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>was led by homicide.

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 2>Who was two am on. So they're starting, they are

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 2>becoming more involved. On the third Steve epping Still said,

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, we knew by the way they had medical

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 2>information that particularly Heather and Gale, we're not going to survive. Yeah,

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 2>So they were doing a report for the coroner, blah

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 2>blah blah, and then two am on the morning of

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 2>the fourth overnight, Heather that's the first one to die,

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 2>and at that point it became a homicide case. Okay,

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 2>So by seven o'clock that morning or seven thirty that morning,

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Steve epping Still and his team are there. So within

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 2>five or six hours of Heather dying, it's an active

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 2>homicide case.

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Now did they I would imagine they went to

0:06:58.680 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Aeron's home.

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, first of all, they got the bank records. They

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 2>actually didn't go to They went to Eron same on

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 2>the fifth, so this is now. So the sequence of

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 2>events for them was they however, you know, you know

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 2>more than I about you know what you've got to

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 2>do to go through to get people's bank records. But

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 2>they got them for the previous two months. I think

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 2>it was Meg, I forget her name, I should know

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 2>was looking through them from the third back, so she

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 2>was from the latest day back and.

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Looking I would imagine that the purchase of the mushrooms

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that it's not just gathering evidence to prove the offense,

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>it's to discount version.

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Of all of that. And pretty within a couple of hours,

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 2>she comes across the transaction where Aaron has gone, you know,

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 2>to the local tip to the kuna A transfer station

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 2>literally two days before, and she took that to Stephen,

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 2>going will she chucked something out? What she chucked out?

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 2>They get straight onto the office at the Kunrara transfer station.

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 2>He goes to the CCTV and says, because they know

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 2>the time of the transactions done, the drop yeah, And

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 2>there she is getting out of a car and taking

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 2>a big box and putting it in the tip and

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 2>so they send a worker down there to get it

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 2>out and it's a it's a dehydrator, and Steve calls

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.120
<v Speaker 2>the local cops and says, can you pick it up

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 2>for us one thanky, And they went later that afternoon

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 2>and picked it up. So before the end of the

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 2>day of the first day of the investigation, they had

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Erin's dehydrator that she'd thrown out two days.

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Before, okay, and had Aaron mentioned that mushrooms that she

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 1>put in the dehydrator. At this stage, she's still claiming

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 1>she never foraged anything, right, okay, So she's claiming, and

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>so the cops then they wait until it's later that

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.839
<v Speaker 1>night on the fourth, so it's still happening on the fourth.

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>The two am on the fourth is when Heather dies.

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 1>That day of the fourth is when they get the

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>dehydrator from the tip. That night of the fourth Gale dies.

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:03.599
<v Speaker 2>Yep. And on the fifth they raid. They go and

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 2>search the house. And what did they find anything of

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 2>interest at the house, Well, they found several computers which

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:17.559
<v Speaker 2>they were looking for communication devices. They found the manual

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 2>of the dehydrator with some other manuals, which was handy.

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 2>They were looking for the dinner plates, but by then

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 2>there were no gray plates any longer. But they took

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 2>photos of everything in the kitchen and took some phones,

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 2>not all the phones, but some of the phones, and

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 2>of course they asked, they asked Aaron to hand over

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 2>the her phone, her main phone she's been using all year,

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 2>and that's when she had while the house was being searched.

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 2>She switched her phones.

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>Down for it because this yeah, yeah, so this is

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>from February.

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 2>She bought a new Samsung A twenty three that had

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 2>a phone number in that was the phone number that

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.959
<v Speaker 2>everyone contacted her, which ended in seven eighty three, and

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 2>that's been her main phone throughout all these months that

0:10:07.920 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 2>she's been doing whatever planning has been necessary for this crime.

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 2>And in the trial she claims that the phone started

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 2>playing up and had a screen which froze a bit

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 2>conveniently just a day or two before the raid. That said,

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 2>she's still using it and it's still accepting and receiving

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 2>text and calls, et cetera, right up until the raid.

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 2>And Steve Epping still as the informant, is walking around

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 2>with her and mostly sort of accompanying her around the

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 2>house while the cops do the search, and at some

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 2>point she manages to take the SIM card out of

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 2>that phone. We know it was in it at twelve

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 2>oh one, and we know it was out of it

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:51.079
<v Speaker 2>by one. So sometime in that hour and a half,

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 2>she's taken the SIM card out of her main phone,

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 2>put the main phone somewhere, and put a SIM card

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 2>from her tablet which had a different phone number in

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 2>the eight three five into a second handset, which she said, Oh,

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 2>I just wanted to stop Simon from bothering me, and

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 2>so I was going to change my phone number anyway,

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 2>but she decides to do it in the middle of

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 2>a police search. And then when the cops at the

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 2>end of the search ask at a syrender her phone,

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 2>the one she gives them is Phone B, which she

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 2>had also factory reset while she was walking around with

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 2>the cops the editing off it, and that's the one

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 2>that you see her hand over. And the seven eighty three,

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:39.719
<v Speaker 2>the A twenty three phone, which had been the one

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 2>which would have any history of what website she's visited,

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 2>what Google search is she's done, et cetera. That is

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 2>never found, the cops never find it.

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Tells me something about it. I've seen organized crime types

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that have got that calmness to seeing there talking as

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:58.559
<v Speaker 1>they're changing the same card in their bone and all that.

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>But it shows a little bit about her, doesn't it.

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 2>It does.

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>But I suppose callous enough to invite people over and

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.559
<v Speaker 1>know you're going to feed them a lethal meal, can

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 1>sit there and calmly manage to hold your metal enough

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to change a SIM card in the phone. Why police

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>are executing the search warrant for suspected murder.

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's family members. That's pretty extraordinary. Yeah, callous. She

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 2>manages to do that. She then puts that seven eight

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 2>three SIM into a different into a Nokia phone. And

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 2>as I say, we've never have found no one's ever

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 2>found that her main phone. The cops take that phone

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 2>at that point they think that is her main phone.

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 2>She's done that jattically fool them. And it's in a

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 2>safe in Steve wapping Stool's office in Spencer Street. And

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 2>that night Aaron wonders if they've turned it off or

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 2>disconnected it from the Internet, and she does find my

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 2>phone search and realizes they haven't, so even though she

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have to because it's already clean, she fact she

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 2>resets it remotely again again at five o'clock in the

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 2>morning from her bedroom and lean gather. Yeah, that tells

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot a bit, Yeah, it tells a lot. And

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 2>why this is going on, there's some other things that

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 2>are coming out. She's not reacting the way that you

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 2>would think, like.

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>If these people are so close to her, the closest

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>family she's got. She's invited them to lunch and they're

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:24.559
<v Speaker 1>all in hospital on their way to dine or have died,

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and she doesn't seem to be reacting.

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 2>She never asks how they are, never says can I

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 2>go and see them? Can I just you know, maybe

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 2>apologize profusely for you know, whatever I did the court, nothing, okay,

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 2>never goes near the complains that no one tells her

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 2>what's going on, But then she doesn't ask. She could

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 2>have easily called Simon and said, how are they going.

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 2>It's the cops who arrive and tell her that Heather

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 2>and Gale have both died, But even then she doesn't

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 2>call anyone to offer any condolences that we were told

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 2>at court, yeah at all. And and the first interview

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot of which you know can out find online.

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 2>That happens after that police search. So that search finishes

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 2>around about three or four o'clock in the afternoon.

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of image there of them sitting at

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the table that's.

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 2>All that search, while that search is happening, and all

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 2>of that was presented at court, and you know, while

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 2>she's sitting at that table. I mean, I have the

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 2>other thing that the police did I think, I'm not

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 2>sure if you've read this in the book, is that

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 2>they catalog all the things they took during the search.

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 2>But there were a few laptops, a couple of laptops

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 2>that were left there, and it did make it look

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 2>like it was a bit of a sloppy search and

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 2>they missed things that they really should have picked up.

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 2>And I just wondered, knowing from other cases, from other

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 2>homicide cops here and you know what you think, but

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 2>that I suspect that that was deliberate. That poker face, Yes,

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 2>those just listening there as a poker face, But I'd

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 2>be very surprised if they hadn't left them there to

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 2>see if she continued in from eating behavior. But that

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 2>never came out in court. That's just me from knowledge

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 2>of other cases going. No, I don't think that was sloppy.

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 2>I think they knew exactly what they were doing there.

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>They certainly would have would have had their focus on her.

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>What about the item taken from the tip that she

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>disposed of?

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, so she that is now back at one

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 2>thaky station, which is where the cops take her after

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 2>the search for her interview. So they they start asking,

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, why she had the lunch and she says,

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, I just wanted to stay in touch with

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 2>my family and my grandparentst. Cetera. Then they talk about

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 2>whether she ever foraged for any food. She denies her foraging.

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Did you ever dry or dehydrate any food? And they

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 2>go and she goes, no, never, and the dehydrator is

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 2>in the next room. It's literally they've already got it

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 2>and it's in the next room. It's nice locking people

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 2>in the lies when you know they're line. Yeah, and

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 2>so yeah, he knew that right off the bat and

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 2>hang herself. Yeah, And then I think it's a you know,

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 2>it's a great interview in the sense that he then

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 2>goes back to her presentation at hospital and ask her

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 2>about that and when she did end up at Monash

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Medical Center for a day and was under observation, what

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 2>the doctors thought then and when she found out about

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, what might have actually caused the other guests

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 2>to be unwell. Et ce so goes all of that,

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 2>and then he comes back and says, let me go

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 2>through what we took from the house. First of all,

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 2>this manual for a sunbeam dehydrator. What's that about? And

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 2>she denies it again, And I thought, she to me,

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 2>I think they've given her every opportunity They've been fair

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 2>to think through this. Have a think now, I a're

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 2>going to give you another chance. What can you tell us?

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 2>And she denies it again and never had one, might

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 2>have had one years and years ago. But again those.

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Vague gas that give you a little bit of leeway

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>either way.

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 2>And so they finished that interview, and Steve actually drove

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 2>it back home that night, and it's that night that

0:16:58.400 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 2>she factory resets the phone remote in the office. But

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 2>I think you can tell from from what they've already got.

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 2>But they already recovered the way she behaved in the interview,

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:12.120
<v Speaker 2>the way she lied about everything. They'd be thinking, you're

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 2>thinking you've got a case.

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>But as was highlighted in your dis secting the trial,

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the beyond reasonable doubt three murders and the temp murder,

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the evidence looks overwhelming, but the element of doubt can

0:17:29.000 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 1>be it was an accident?

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Was it an accident?

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>And the defense have just got to chip away in

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the minds of a couple of the jury members, and

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, this person.

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.640
<v Speaker 2>You get that because you know she's lying because she's

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:45.239
<v Speaker 2>dead scared that she's going to be accused of killing them,

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 2>and you go, well, yes, but does that explain everything?

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm looking at some of the things from breaking

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>down the notes I've made from reading the book and

0:17:57.040 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the other media accounts of what's gone on, like the

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.719
<v Speaker 1>points you'd be looking at like how strong was her

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>anger against Simon?

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, she's not going to say I wanted to

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 2>kill him?

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 1>But what was there evidence there suggesting that there was

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a hatred or an anger towards Simon?

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Well there was back in December, yeah, but in the

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 2>months leading up to the lunch not so much. I mean, yeah,

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 2>he'd said no, I don't want to come to lunch

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 2>with you, But other than that, there's nothing in particular

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 2>the prosecution could point to that illustrated you know, building hatred. Yeah.

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>It makes it hard because the jury, like we sit

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and struggle sometimes with motive or we were talking about

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>struggling with motive. The jury if yeah, if she's making threats,

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you're going to regret what you've done to me and

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>all that. But so the prosecution can present, well, they've separated,

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 1>but the defense can go, well, there's lots of people

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>who have separated, and play it off that way. Why

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>did she invite the guests to lunch, well, claims to

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>tell them about her cancer diagnosis? How did she explain

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 1>another way in the trial.

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 2>In the trial, she admitted that she had to admit

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 2>that was a lie because there is no record of

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 2>any cancer diagnosis, and the prosecution was saying she was

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 2>expecting all four of them to be dead, and no

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 2>one would know that she'd ever said that. But in

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 2>the trial she said, look, I did have a real

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:29.239
<v Speaker 2>medical issue. I've been embarrassed about my weight and it

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 2>had been a growing issue, and I'd been balemic for

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty years and I was stressing me out and I

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 2>had to do something about it. And I'd made a

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 2>booking to investigate doing gastric bypass surgery, and that was

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 2>really the medical issue that was on my mind. But

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 2>I was too embarrassed to actually say that to them,

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 2>But I was looking at being in hospital for that surgery,

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 2>and this was her giving evidence at the trial. At

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 2>the trial, the prosecution, as far as I know, I'm

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 2>pretty sure of this, they had no idea of this

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 2>her evidence in chief at the very end of the trial.

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And just to bring people up the speed, sorry

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I've jumped ahead, but how long after the death of

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the three people was she charged?

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 2>How she was charged on second of November twenty twenty three.

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 2>They died in the first week of war, So three months, okay,

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 2>three months she's charged.

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Now we're sort of fast forward to the trial and

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>we're at the trial with the trial again, just so

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>people understand that an accused person doesn't have to give evidence.

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>It's up to the prosecutors to prove the case, prove

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the allegations against the accused, and then once they've done that,

0:20:40.359 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>then the accused presents their defense and the accused doesn't

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>have to get in the witness box. And very rarely

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>do accuse people getting the witness box, especially at murder trials,

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 1>because it opens it up to all sorts of cross

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>examination and invariably goes bad for them. She chose to

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 1>get in there. Why do you think she chose to

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 1>get in there.

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 2>I there were things in her story that I think

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 2>only she could explain, she had an explanation for, and

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:14.880
<v Speaker 2>I think she felt if she had any chance of

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 2>being able to create reasonable doubt in the minds of

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 2>a jury, it would be her who would be able

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 2>to do that. Okay, I think that's why.

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>So your reading of it listening to it following it

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.879
<v Speaker 1>was she was pretty well jammed up after the prosecution

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 1>finished their case and she had to present something, and

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>she had no witnesses to come into saying no she

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>was in the state at the time or whatever it was.

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>In that type of case, she had no one except

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>for herself who could explain it, and so rolled the

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>dice and thought that she get away of it. Getting

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>back to what you were talking about before the cancer.

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 1>She agrees it wasn't cancer, but what it was it

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>was an embarrassing medical condition, and she had actually booked

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>in to get Yeah.

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 2>A gastric band? Is it? What's it called? Gastric When

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 2>did you have it? Last? So during her evidence in chief,

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 2>when Colin Mandy was asking her these questions, she just

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 2>said she was giving her history of being balamic in

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 2>her history of having terribly embarrassing issues with her with

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 2>her weight and needing to address it, and that she

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 2>had a plan to do gastric bypass surgery. That's that's

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 2>all in her evidence in chief. When Nanette Rodgers was

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 2>cross examining her, this is in the last two or

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 2>three days of the trial, and she she's challenging you

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 2>know what she said the lunch was about, and gets

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 2>to the point where, you know, this apparent plan for

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 2>gastric surgery, and Nannette says something like, but it was

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 2>nothing more than a plan, was it. You know, you're

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 2>just sort of making this up. And she said, no,

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 2>I haven't. I had an appointment, and that really threw silence.

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 2>It was like what and she said, no, we're with

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 2>and you know, with the Enrich Clinic in Melbourne. I

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 2>had an appointment to see someone to discuss this surgery.

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 2>And that was a that was a shoe drop moment

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.199
<v Speaker 2>in the trial because the prosecution did not know that

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 2>at all, and so they had that was on a

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:27.439
<v Speaker 2>Friday morning, and they literally had Friday afternoon to try

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 2>and figure out what the hell that was all about,

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:35.199
<v Speaker 2>because they only had another day we finished. Yeah, and

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 2>even I remember listening to it and thinking, that does

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:42.479
<v Speaker 2>put it different if she really had an appointment to

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 2>do this, you know, with a surgeon who was going

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 2>to do this surgery for her, and she's given this history,

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, you're thinking, oh, my god, well

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 2>that that does explain the lunch.

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>That's where it's on that delicate balance, isn't it, because

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 1>that you buy into that? And yet oh, she's telling

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the truth there And I understand she's embarrassed to talk

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 1>about the nature of the surgery, but it was a

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 1>medical condition. That's all explainable, So says little things that

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:08.360
<v Speaker 1>can make a difference, they can.

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And you know, this is at the very end

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 2>of the trial, and you know, I'm trying to think

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 2>like a duror, going, well, now I've got to relook

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 2>at a whole host of other bits of evidence where

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 2>you went. You know, it's ninety percent sure, but there's

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 2>a ten percent chance this could have happened. But if

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 2>if they can prove that she was going to have

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 2>this surgery.

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's credibility to the lunch, to her version of events.

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.640
<v Speaker 1>So the prosecutors would have scrambled I would imagine there'd

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>be people running out of the court and making call it.

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Imagine. They did scramble, and they scrambled very well, and

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 2>because what they discovered was that Aaron did have an appointment.

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 2>What she'd remembered is that she had made an appointment

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 2>with the Enridge Clinic and she had What Aaron didn't

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 2>realize was that the Enridge Clinic doesn't offer that surgery. Right, Okay,

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 2>that's the problem. So again it was a big problem,

0:25:01.320 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 2>and you go, oh, so she wasn't telling the truth.

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 2>It was she's well again, as you know people who

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 2>are so good at lying, there was there was part

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 2>of it was truth Smidge and the truth Smidge and

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 2>the truth and the rest wasn't. So yes, she was.

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 2>She made a booking to Enrich to do something. Now

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 2>it's mostly and this is no apparently highly respected clinic,

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 2>but it's mostly cosmetic surgery. It's it's not you know,

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 2>genuine surgical procedures for for serious health issues. How did

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 2>that play out in court? Did they set the trap

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 2>for him? They did? They came back first thing Monday morning,

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 2>and Nanette did a string of questions which sort of

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 2>let her down the trap and then finally was saying,

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 2>but he do you agree that's you know what Enrich offers.

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 2>He is their website blah blah blah, and can you

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 2>see that it does not offer gastric bypass surgery? And

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 2>she went, oh, well, I thought it did. And then

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 2>then it took Colin Mandy in his re examination on

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 2>the very last day of the trial to say that

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 2>there was it didn't even now offer lip per suction.

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 2>But back then there was one of one of their

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 2>practitioners who did off a liper section, so he was

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 2>trying to sort of to soften soften the lie and

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 2>honest mistake. It was honest mistake. Yeah, and she would

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 2>have looked at this, but there were just too many

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 2>times where you try and take care in it her word,

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 2>and then you realize you can't.

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>In the way she responded when she was called out,

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>is there still that calmness about her, like it's not

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of collapse ahead or no?

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.199
<v Speaker 2>There was no, There wasn't. There was never a collapsed

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 2>head moment. There was never oh my god, I'm done

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 2>for just I've lost a point here. I'll keep going,

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 2>keep adding.

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>A couple of other things, like serving of the food

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>gray plates a separate plate for her.

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 2>Did that play out in the trol Yeah, that there

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of discussion about the plates, because she

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 2>obviously claimed she never had four gray plates, and Ian

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 2>was adamant. Ian was adamant that she had. And the

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 2>plates the police found during this search, and I think

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 2>there are two black ones, and there are two black

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 2>and red ones, and there was one there was one

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 2>that her daughter had made at kindergarten somewhere which was

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 2>sort of multicolored one. There weren't many and in fact,

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 2>Simon said to the police, he said she never did

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 2>have many plates, but those were the only ones the

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 2>police could find when they did their search, and they

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 2>matched what Aaron had said she'd put the beef Rington's on,

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 2>not at all what Ian said she put the beef

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Wellington on. And Ian just he was a very credible witness,

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 2>particularly because you know, he couldn't remember exactly what people

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 2>said in the conversation blah blah blah. When he wasn't

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 2>entirely sure. He was quite honest about saying, I'm not

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 2>entirely sure, but when he was sure, he just had

0:27:55.960 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 2>lock it in a quiet certainty that he just couldn't resist,

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 2>And then what they jumping forward a little bit. What

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 2>we didn't know until all the pre trial rulings on

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 2>admissibility in admissibility of evidence, which were lifted four weeks

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 2>after the trial. The jury never got to hear this

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 2>during the trial proper. But the minute the lunch was

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 2>finished at three o'clock, when Don and Gale and Ian

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 2>and Heather drove off and the boys are in the

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 2>TV computer room, she took a box of rubbish to

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 2>the tip and that happened within fifteen minutes of the

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 2>lunch ending.

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>And are you privy to the logic of the ruling

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of that being excluded.

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 2>To believe yes, that has been that's been released, that

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 2>they're not trying to hide it. I believe it's because

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 2>when the police found out about that trip to the tip,

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 2>it was about a week and a week and a

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 2>half later, and they couldn't recover what she'd thrown out.

0:28:56.120 --> 0:29:00.040
<v Speaker 2>So because there was no evidence that it was just

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 2>innocuous so it was just food scraps, they said it

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 2>to be too prejudicial to put it in, thinking it

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 2>might have been something prejudicial.

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Because next time she took something to the tip, it

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>was definitely.

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 2>It definitely was.

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I suppose we do in those protections in place, but.

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 2>I wonder, I mean, I suppose that.

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, I'm trying to be reasonable for you, Greg, I

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to become across race.

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 2>I can I can understand that. I can understand the

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 2>reasoning behind that I and this is I haven't done

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:38.719
<v Speaker 2>in big legal surveys and forensic examination of the of it,

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 2>but just listening to the number of crime cases I've

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 2>listened to and followed, the law and judges are very

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 2>strong on saying to a jury, you are the arbiters

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 2>of fact. You are the ones who decide what is

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 2>and is in fact. Let me deal with what law

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 2>is and make sure it's a fair trial, but you

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 2>decide what's fact. Time and again, you guys, they can

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 2>only decide what's fact and what's presented to them. And

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of times, like with that trip to the

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:12.239
<v Speaker 2>tip immediately after lunch, why couldn't you say to a

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 2>jury it might have been innocuous, we have no evidence,

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 2>but it did happen, and let the jury be the

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 2>arbitis the fact that you say they are.

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Greg, I'm with you on that. We've got the jury system,

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>because we want to rely on being judged by your

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 1>peers on the available evidence, and they're put on this

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>pedestal to make judgment on another one of their peers,

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>but they're only provided limited informations.

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think if you're you either trust them

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 2>that they understand what prejudice and biases and know how

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 2>to take that into account, or you don't. And if

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 2>you do, I think I think more should be ruled

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 2>and admissible than the law currently allows. That's not to

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 2>say it should be open slather and everything, but I

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 2>think at the moment the pendulums just swung a bit too.

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Much, and the judges in their judges summing up, give

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the warnings the necessary warnings, and they could explain to

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the way the way that you just explain it. But

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>it's frustrating from a policing point of view watching seeing

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the jury sit there and you can see them literally

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>scratch their heads sometimes and there's something missing here. We

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 1>know something missing. Why was that just cut off? Or

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:25.959
<v Speaker 1>why have we been excluded from the court. We're judging

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>whether this person is guilty of murder and they've just

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>had three hours of v legal argument and we've been excluded.

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Shouldn't we be part of that? Shouldn't we?

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I think that's it's interesting my reading and my understanding

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 2>I could be corrected on this is that the jury

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 2>the jury system began hundreds of years ago because you

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 2>would be tried not only by your peers and by

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 2>your community, but by people who knew you. Yes, And

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 2>the irony is now you can only be tried by

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 2>jurors who don't know you. Yeah. And and in fact,

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 2>if you have any connection with the accused of their relatives,

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, then you've got to excuse yourself from the jury.

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 2>If you have any connection with any of the witnesses,

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 2>you excuse yourself from the jury. So the jury, who

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 2>are not allowed to talk or interact with people, are

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 2>meant to judge facts purely on a highly curated set

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 2>of evidence which is presented to presented to them. Whereas

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 2>the system began with yeah, I know Joe blow over there,

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 2>and you know, I know you don't get aware of them,

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 2>and I got aware of them. And then you've got

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 2>twelve of us here, all have different relationships with them.

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Do you reckon.

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Did he punch out John on the pub or not?

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the evolution of the jury system. I think

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>we need to evolve, especially now with you're covering the crimes,

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>where the warning there you're not to read the afternoon paper,

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you're not to watch the news. Well, now we're gone

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>past that. We have gone going to happen. So we

0:32:57.240 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 1>know you're going to look and the moment you walk

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>out of this call room, you're going to google how

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>this case is going and how has it been reported.

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>But as a DURA you can only rely on what's

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 1>presented in the court. That should be enough of a warning.

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>It should be enough.

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, it's I just I guess I'm just coming

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 2>up from the point of view, shouldn't shouldn't we start

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 2>a conversation about whether the system can be reviewed and

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 2>improved a bit. And it's a system that I fully support, yes, completely,

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 2>I just think it could be better.

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, you talk the pendulum, and sometimes the pendulum have

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>swung too far and we need to bring it back

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>back a bit. But I have long held a bugbear

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of the jurors aren't presented with all the facts, and

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>if they are to adjudicate on the facts given, provide

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:45.239
<v Speaker 1>them all the facts. That's right, and then they can

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>put what weight they think necessary on it. But yeah,

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting argument or interesting discussion. Her claims of

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 1>having diarrhea, this trapter didn't it because we talked briefly

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>in in part one that she said the onset of

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 1>diary came in the afternoon, and whereas if it's from

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the ingredients that the others were suffering, the diary that

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 1>was eight to ten hours later, and that so then

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 1>she's left with this conundrum of yeah, I said I

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 1>was sick, but now I'm not that sick, And she

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 1>started to give different versions of events of how sick

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>she was or no, she got really sick. Later talk

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 1>us through that, because that was a miscalculation.

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 2>On that home. I think it was a miscalculation on

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 2>her behalf, because Simon was pretty adamant that, you know,

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 2>on the phone the first time they talked, she said

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 2>that she initially started feeling a little bit woozy four

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 2>thirty ish in the afternoon. Now, even if he's got

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:45.760
<v Speaker 2>that a little bit wrong, she was an normal gastor

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 2>reaction to a lunch at one o'clock would be about that.

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 2>And then, as I said, she said to too many

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 2>people that she was suffering from diarrhea when she drove

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:00.879
<v Speaker 2>her son's mate home. That she sort of locked into

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:04.879
<v Speaker 2>a version of that, even though she was the master

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 2>sort of watering things down, you know, when she's in

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:10.239
<v Speaker 2>the backtracking, Yeah, just walking back a little bit, when

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 2>she's giving her evidence and building up what she was

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 2>saying happened after midnight on Sunday night. That's when three

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 2>days later she first used of the word explosive diary,

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 2>which was I think to Salianne Atkinson, to the health expert.

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 2>And so now she's trying to make it sound like

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:37.919
<v Speaker 2>her strong symptoms didn't happen un till roughly the same time. Yeah,

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 2>but you could never get away from the fact that

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 2>she told too many people that really by seven o'clock

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:48.799
<v Speaker 2>she was happened happened earlier. So then Colin Mandy's only

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 2>answer to that was he'd done, in my mind, a

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 2>very good job of he did try and cover that.

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 2>He did do uncover up very well. So she was

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 2>she was saying, she added, this is now let's go

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 2>back to nine o'clock in the morning, nine thirty in

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 2>the morning, and she's making the mushroom mixture for the

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:07.919
<v Speaker 2>beef Wellington's a little bit of a tast, a little

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:10.760
<v Speaker 2>bit of a taste test, and realizes that they'd really

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:12.959
<v Speaker 2>bit bland and don't have any flavor, and that's why

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 2>she adds the dried mushrooms from the Asian grosser from

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 2>some shop you can't remember. Then comes the issue, well,

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 2>most home cooks, if you've started tasting something and you

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 2>think it's not doesn't have the right flavor, and you

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 2>add something to it, you taste again. Yes, that's what

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 2>almost everybody does. If you're not a taster, fine, but

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 2>if you are tasting to check the flavor and you

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 2>add something, you taste again. The defense couldn't say that

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning because the question people were why isn't

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:46.399
<v Speaker 2>she dead, you know, or at least in intensive care

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 2>if she was tasting, if she was adding death cap

0:36:48.680 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 2>mushrooms to it, So that was skipped over until Colin

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Mandy realized at the end of the trial. I think

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 2>he realized at the end of the trial. Certain how

0:36:56.480 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 2>it came out that one explanation for her feeling diarrhea

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:03.839
<v Speaker 2>at seven o'clock is that she had tasted a bit.

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 2>So all of a sudden tasting is mentioned on the

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:11.279
<v Speaker 2>second last day of the trial, just the clock back

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:14.320
<v Speaker 2>and you go, well, okay, so, but it must have

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 2>tasted because she had no liver damage. And this is

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 2>where in terms of just just doubt, all you need

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 2>is doubt. So the defense colin Man had also accessed

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:31.320
<v Speaker 2>one journal from Germany, and there's there's more research into

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 2>death cap mushrooms over in europecause there's more of them.

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 2>There's more de cap mushrooms that say there are four stages,

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 2>and just because you eat the same thing doesn't mean

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 2>everyone ends up with the same stage. You can have

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 2>someone just having very small reaction and someone else is

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:51.399
<v Speaker 2>eating the same thing have a different reaction. And he

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 2>was using that to try and cast doubt in the

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:58.080
<v Speaker 2>jury's mind that in fact Erin's claimed diarrhea and there

0:37:58.120 --> 0:38:00.799
<v Speaker 2>were just enough medical symptoms when you finally did get

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:02.400
<v Speaker 2>any one of hospital to go where she probably did

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 2>suffer something. Maybe it did if you've murdered three people,

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:11.760
<v Speaker 2>but you must have just tasted a tiny, tiny, tiny

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 2>enough amount to feel sick at seven o'clock at night.

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:19.839
<v Speaker 2>But you're now starting to ask people to believe a lot. Yeah,

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 2>but again.

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>It's putting in doubt and also, I think the body

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 1>weight of a person and the age of the people

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that died, it could react. And if you have the

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 1>professor or the expert witness there saying well, it's possible,

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>because most things are possible.

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 2>And that's what they're very good at asking that question. Yeah,

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:43.240
<v Speaker 2>not what's most likely, but it is it at all possible?

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 2>You've been caught too long. Yeah, I've heard that question

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 2>too many times and the answers, well, yes, it's a

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:55.560
<v Speaker 2>hard one to say no too. But you did then

0:38:55.640 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 2>have to go, well, that's weighed up with. So she

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.840
<v Speaker 2>tasted enough to realize there wasn't enough flavor added Asian

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:07.160
<v Speaker 2>dried mushrooms, then just tasted a tiny little quarter of

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:11.799
<v Speaker 2>tea spooned luckily apparently nothing else, and that was enough

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 2>that you know, when she started to feel simpto that

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 2>seven o'clock it was because of that. And you go, okay,

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 2>but the difference you still come back to thinking and

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:26.880
<v Speaker 2>I think that what you're putting doubt in someone's mind.

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 2>But then you go, three people died, one very very

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:36.359
<v Speaker 2>nearly died, and she was discharged after a couple of hours. Yeah,

0:39:37.400 --> 0:39:39.960
<v Speaker 2>and you know that that's not just an incremental difference.

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 2>That's a huge, huge and there was a reluctance to

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 2>get tested and the reluctance to bring the kids in.

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 2>The other thing that I found from your book, from

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 2>your Dura, and I think this is the type of

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 2>thing that goes through Dura's mind where you're sitting there,

0:39:56.239 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 2>and I think it was just sort of reflection of

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:00.799
<v Speaker 2>what goes on in the dur Dura mind that she's

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Aaron was saying that she had a I think it

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 2>was a three hour round trip that she had to

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 2>take to drop her son somewhere trying and she was

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 2>getting around in white pants and like the Duras just

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 2>thinking and this I'm sure and it's not legal basis.

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:21.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure this is how the Duras process stuff. If

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 2>you had diarrhea, would you be wearing white pants?

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Like little things like that, But these are all

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the type of things that grow through the mind. Getting

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:34.959
<v Speaker 1>rid of the dehydrator. We've talked about that, But what

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 1>explanation did she give when she was in the witness

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 1>box for getting rid of the dehydrated.

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Sheer panic that she thought if it was left there,

0:40:43.120 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 2>and she thought that Katrina Crypts from Child Protection was

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 2>coming around that afternoon, and if she saw that she

0:40:50.920 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 2>had a dehydrator which still had mushroom crumbs on it,

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:55.320
<v Speaker 2>because that's how they found.

0:40:55.200 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, that she was likely to be blamed for it,

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 3>for it and did she and I might have this wrong,

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 3>But didn't she allude to or claim that Simon also

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:09.759
<v Speaker 3>accused her at some did you voice.

0:41:09.640 --> 0:41:13.360
<v Speaker 2>No, that's that that happened. So what before she gets

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:15.759
<v Speaker 2>rid of the dehydrated Yeah, So that's the other The

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:19.360
<v Speaker 2>other reason is it's a contested reason. When she was

0:41:19.719 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 2>admitted to monashing, the kids were there as well, and

0:41:21.920 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 2>they're just going through through tests. The kids were asking

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:27.239
<v Speaker 2>why they'd been taken out of school. I think you

0:41:27.280 --> 0:41:30.760
<v Speaker 2>know what's all this about, and she was saying, well,

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:33.720
<v Speaker 2>they think that it's the lunch I did on Saturday

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:35.799
<v Speaker 2>and the mushrooms in it that might have made you know,

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Pop and Nanna a bit sick. And the kids were saying,

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 2>but why are we here because she took the mushrooms

0:41:41.640 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 2>off the one that we ate, et cetera. And it

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:48.920
<v Speaker 2>started a conversation about mushrooms, and that led to the

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 2>description that the kids knew an Aaron knew that when

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 2>she first bought the dehydrator. She crushed up dried button

0:41:57.200 --> 0:41:59.799
<v Speaker 2>mushrooms and put them in muffins because you know her

0:41:59.840 --> 0:42:03.279
<v Speaker 2>do she didn't like mushrooms and she wanted to feed

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 2>some good veggies. And the daughter actually really preferred the

0:42:06.880 --> 0:42:09.120
<v Speaker 2>mushies with the mushrooms in than the ones without the

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:13.439
<v Speaker 2>mushrooms in. And that of course telling that story. Yeah,

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned the dehydrator that she used to actually put

0:42:17.239 --> 0:42:22.319
<v Speaker 2>the mushrooms in the muffins. And according to Aaron, this

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:25.000
<v Speaker 2>was on the Monday afternoon, I think. And that's when

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:28.799
<v Speaker 2>Simon said to her, is that how you poison my

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 2>parents with that dehydrator? Right? And that she says, that's

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the moment when she realized she was going to get

0:42:35.600 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 2>blamed for everything.

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so again is trying to write off her actions

0:42:40.360 --> 0:42:44.800
<v Speaker 1>at the sound very damning towards her. Is I panic

0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 1>because Simon was accusing me of.

0:42:47.320 --> 0:42:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Killing his mom and dad. Now Simon point blank denied ever,

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 2>saying that to her, it comes down to do you

0:42:53.040 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 2>take Aerin at a word. If you do take Aerin

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 2>at a word, it's consistent with what she said she did.

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:01.840
<v Speaker 2>She had Simon already blaming her. She was feeling panicked.

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 2>She knew child Protection was coming around the next day. Stress,

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:07.879
<v Speaker 2>this is all going to come back at me. I've

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:10.800
<v Speaker 2>got to hide whatever I can and takes the dehydrated

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:11.320
<v Speaker 2>to the tip.

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 1>What about her foraging for mushrooms? When did that break?

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:19.040
<v Speaker 1>When did she acknowledge that she.

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Was that happened? It wasn't during the record of you

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:25.280
<v Speaker 2>with the police. It was after the fifth of August.

0:43:26.080 --> 0:43:28.840
<v Speaker 2>By the time they did. It was the autopsies that

0:43:29.400 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 2>sort of showed beyond doubt it was a death cat,

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 2>that it was death cap mushrooms that killed Don and Gale.

0:43:35.680 --> 0:43:39.279
<v Speaker 2>And the DNA testing on the crumbs from the trays

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:42.800
<v Speaker 2>and the dehydrator showed that there were death cap mushrooms

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 2>on the dehydrator. Right, So the combination of scientific evidence

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:51.040
<v Speaker 2>that was beyond doubt as opposed to, you know, there's

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:54.759
<v Speaker 2>a ten percent chance of this. There was no explanation

0:43:55.800 --> 0:43:59.880
<v Speaker 2>for that other than she had used forage mushrooms in

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:02.880
<v Speaker 2>those beef Wellington's. Then on top of that, and I

0:44:02.880 --> 0:44:05.480
<v Speaker 2>think this was the other thing they finally when they

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 2>went through there was an SD card with photos on

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:12.759
<v Speaker 2>it and there was a tablet that she'd used that

0:44:13.000 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 2>had thumbnails of photos from the memory cash from Google photos,

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 2>and they showed photos she'd taken of mushrooms on the

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:26.280
<v Speaker 2>dehydrator and some of the particularly some of the photos

0:44:26.280 --> 0:44:30.239
<v Speaker 2>were clearly foraged mushrooms. Particularly there was one set that

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Dr Tom May, who was a mycologist, again he said

0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:36.560
<v Speaker 2>with a very high level of confidence they were death

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:39.279
<v Speaker 2>cap mushrooms. He couldn't say beyond all doubt, but with

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 2>a very high level of confidence. And given the crumbs

0:44:42.000 --> 0:44:44.800
<v Speaker 2>and the DNA were there, you sort of go with it.

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:47.880
<v Speaker 2>So over the course between August and November when she

0:44:48.000 --> 0:44:51.719
<v Speaker 2>was charged, the evidence that she must have foraged and

0:44:51.760 --> 0:44:55.759
<v Speaker 2>death cap mushrooms cannot be cultivated. They can only grow

0:44:55.800 --> 0:44:58.719
<v Speaker 2>on roots of oak trees, so you have to go

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 2>out to a park somewhere where there's specific So put

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:06.640
<v Speaker 2>all those facts together and you can't keep denying it.

0:45:06.800 --> 0:45:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Yeah, And did she when she was giving evidence,

0:45:10.000 --> 0:45:11.080
<v Speaker 1>did she?

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:14.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she said she had. She She then said she

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 2>started foraging mushrooms during COVID, so all of a sudden

0:45:17.560 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 2>it started three years ago. And there are photos of

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 2>her on I think the rail trail and again with

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:27.440
<v Speaker 2>the kids were you know, they're on their scooters and

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:30.520
<v Speaker 2>she's picking mushrooms. There's photos of her in her kitchen

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 2>in the house before the ones she earned at Lee Gathera,

0:45:32.680 --> 0:45:35.440
<v Speaker 2>the one before that, and again there's foraged mushrooms that

0:45:35.520 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 2>she says she just got in the backyard, which are

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 2>on the kitchen bench. So all of a sudden, once

0:45:40.680 --> 0:45:44.759
<v Speaker 2>that wall came down. Forager. She's a forager. What she

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:49.600
<v Speaker 2>denies ever doing is deliberately foraging death caps. She said,

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 2>obviously I must have at some point because they're in

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 2>the dehydrator and they're in the beef. Wellington's terrible accident

0:45:54.719 --> 0:45:56.439
<v Speaker 2>again put that little bit of doubt.

0:45:56.520 --> 0:46:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm just looking all different parts that the trial

0:46:02.120 --> 0:46:04.960
<v Speaker 1>was hinging. It would have been an interesting trial to

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:07.520
<v Speaker 1>listen to because you'd be walking out each day thinking

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:10.640
<v Speaker 1>we've got her. I'm talking from a police point there,

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:15.239
<v Speaker 1>or she's she came out on top here, creating those doubt.

0:46:15.320 --> 0:46:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, several nights when I was talking to my kids

0:46:17.520 --> 0:46:21.400
<v Speaker 2>in my life about it, and they were just reading headlines,

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 2>and had read headlines for months ago ago. Why is

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 2>it taking so long? You shouldn't they lock her up?

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:28.080
<v Speaker 2>And I was going, you know, she might not be

0:46:28.120 --> 0:46:31.880
<v Speaker 2>convicted here. Yeah, and they were quite surprised. But the

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:36.360
<v Speaker 2>more I there were several days through the middle and

0:46:36.400 --> 0:46:38.880
<v Speaker 2>second part of the trial where I'm going this isn't

0:46:39.200 --> 0:46:40.839
<v Speaker 2>necessarily over. There's a there.

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:46.480
<v Speaker 1>The assummation of the case that I look at, like,

0:46:46.520 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 1>we've gone through the trial, she's given evidence.

0:46:48.840 --> 0:46:51.040
<v Speaker 2>How long was she in the witness box for about

0:46:51.040 --> 0:46:53.960
<v Speaker 2>six or seven days. That's a long time, A long time.

0:46:54.200 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 2>I think she was three days giving her evidence in

0:46:56.239 --> 0:47:00.400
<v Speaker 2>chief and three or four days in crossmains in the

0:47:00.520 --> 0:47:04.799
<v Speaker 2>armor of breaking down a motion anything. Not really it

0:47:04.840 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 2>was a pretty good performance.

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Okay, this is a summation of just what we've

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:12.840
<v Speaker 1>talked about, but of the case against Saron. So for

0:47:12.880 --> 0:47:15.799
<v Speaker 1>you presenting the prosecution case, Aaron had forage for wild

0:47:15.880 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 1>mushrooms near Mike Parks and trails. She had hydrated deaf

0:47:20.040 --> 0:47:23.920
<v Speaker 1>cap mushrooms in her dehydrator. The mushroom mixture in her

0:47:23.960 --> 0:47:28.160
<v Speaker 1>beef Wellington's had included those dehydrated death mushrooms. The beef

0:47:28.200 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Wellington had killed three of her lunch guests and very

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:35.040
<v Speaker 1>nearly killed the fourth that had killed all their livers.

0:47:35.120 --> 0:47:39.719
<v Speaker 1>That's the result. By contrast, Aaron had not suffered any

0:47:39.840 --> 0:47:42.000
<v Speaker 1>liver damage at all. So if you're going to summarize

0:47:42.040 --> 0:47:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the case, it sort of gets back to the start

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of it, doesn't it Your fictional dura and I just

0:47:50.800 --> 0:47:52.719
<v Speaker 1>take this quote out of the book because I thought

0:47:52.760 --> 0:47:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it was a good way of explaining it. They were

0:47:56.120 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 1>five points I just read out there. The first four

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:01.520
<v Speaker 1>could be explained by a tragic accident or a deliberate

0:48:01.560 --> 0:48:04.880
<v Speaker 1>act with murderous intent. The fifth makes a tragic accident

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 1>less likely explanation and an active murderous intent a more

0:48:08.280 --> 0:48:11.640
<v Speaker 1>likely explanation. So that fifth one, if Aaron had not suffered,

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:15.160
<v Speaker 1>if she got sick and survived, it would be hard

0:48:15.239 --> 0:48:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for anyone to convict her.

0:48:18.800 --> 0:48:21.040
<v Speaker 2>It's a difficult one, is it? It is?

0:48:21.440 --> 0:48:25.920
<v Speaker 1>And the judge was it Justice Bill, Justice Bill in

0:48:26.000 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 1>his summing when we talk about what the role of

0:48:28.680 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the jurors, and this is from the transcripts, if you

0:48:32.520 --> 0:48:35.520
<v Speaker 1>find that the accused lied about something, you can use

0:48:35.520 --> 0:48:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that fact to help you decide whether or not you

0:48:38.160 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 1>believe the other things the accused has said. That is

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:43.360
<v Speaker 1>not to say that just because you find that she

0:48:43.480 --> 0:48:46.440
<v Speaker 1>lied about one matter, you must also find she has

0:48:46.480 --> 0:48:49.319
<v Speaker 1>been lying about everything else, But you can use the

0:48:49.360 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 1>fact that she lied to help you determine the truthfulness

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:56.400
<v Speaker 1>of other things that she has said. Do not reason

0:48:56.480 --> 0:48:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that just because a person is shown to have told

0:48:58.600 --> 0:49:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a lie about something must be guilty. Evidence that she

0:49:02.040 --> 0:49:05.280
<v Speaker 1>told these lies is not evidence of guilt. These alleged

0:49:05.320 --> 0:49:08.640
<v Speaker 1>lies are only relevant if all in assessing her credibility.

0:49:08.760 --> 0:49:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Now there's a lot of warnings.

0:49:09.920 --> 0:49:10.360
<v Speaker 2>There isn't it.

0:49:10.360 --> 0:49:13.680
<v Speaker 1>There's a lie getting in there and lie through your teeth,

0:49:13.760 --> 0:49:16.600
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean you're guilty. So that's why it

0:49:16.760 --> 0:49:19.760
<v Speaker 1>makes like you and I both understand the court system.

0:49:19.760 --> 0:49:23.359
<v Speaker 1>We've seen it enough, being involved in it enough. But

0:49:23.400 --> 0:49:25.879
<v Speaker 1>for a dura you'd be sitting there scratching your head

0:49:25.880 --> 0:49:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and going, well, we know she told this lie, this lie,

0:49:28.760 --> 0:49:31.200
<v Speaker 1>this lie, this lie, But the judge is saying, well,

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't make it guilty.

0:49:33.920 --> 0:49:36.440
<v Speaker 2>It's hard and that's what I think makes it such

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:39.600
<v Speaker 2>a strong conviction with all of those warnings and thinking

0:49:39.640 --> 0:49:41.920
<v Speaker 2>we can't take that step, we can't take that step,

0:49:41.920 --> 0:49:44.440
<v Speaker 2>we can't take that step. And yet still when you

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:49.200
<v Speaker 2>look at the totality of the evidence, there's no other

0:49:49.239 --> 0:49:54.480
<v Speaker 2>reasonable explanation. There's just too many places where the stretch

0:49:54.560 --> 0:49:57.600
<v Speaker 2>is too big where you know or maybe that didn't

0:49:57.600 --> 0:50:00.440
<v Speaker 2>happen for five percent of this reason, But when you

0:50:00.480 --> 0:50:04.120
<v Speaker 2>string twenty of them together and you know that so

0:50:04.239 --> 0:50:06.840
<v Speaker 2>many times she's only told the truth when she's had to,

0:50:06.880 --> 0:50:10.040
<v Speaker 2>when she's been caught in a lie, and she's lied

0:50:10.080 --> 0:50:12.880
<v Speaker 2>so much so that her credibility is if you assume

0:50:12.920 --> 0:50:16.080
<v Speaker 2>she has very little credibility left to begin with, then

0:50:16.120 --> 0:50:19.719
<v Speaker 2>you look at the whole line. And then I think

0:50:19.760 --> 0:50:23.240
<v Speaker 2>for my juror, it was feeding the kids the leftovers

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:25.759
<v Speaker 2>on the Sunday night, Well that's a big gun. That

0:50:25.840 --> 0:50:28.879
<v Speaker 2>for me is yeah, that's a big not take that risk,

0:50:29.480 --> 0:50:31.719
<v Speaker 2>cannot be No, yeah, that's not a well there's a

0:50:31.719 --> 0:50:36.239
<v Speaker 2>five percent chance maybe you know you right do it?

0:50:36.320 --> 0:50:38.279
<v Speaker 2>You don't do it now as soon as you start

0:50:38.320 --> 0:50:41.759
<v Speaker 2>taking that out and go, well, she must have known

0:50:41.920 --> 0:50:45.200
<v Speaker 2>that those people are uncontaminated. And I think Justice Bill

0:50:45.239 --> 0:50:46.840
<v Speaker 2>said that that's the other thing he's looking to do

0:50:46.960 --> 0:50:51.360
<v Speaker 2>is you can only convict if it's the only reasonable

0:50:51.480 --> 0:50:55.680
<v Speaker 2>explanation for the whole of the evidence. And I believe

0:50:55.719 --> 0:50:59.680
<v Speaker 2>that's that's the position the jury reached, having been warned

0:50:59.680 --> 0:51:02.920
<v Speaker 2>again and again and again not to leap to that conclusion.

0:51:03.200 --> 0:51:06.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, they are all the warnings in there. I

0:51:06.400 --> 0:51:10.000
<v Speaker 1>always look at people where because that's drummed into you

0:51:10.080 --> 0:51:14.440
<v Speaker 1>early throughout your policcing career or investigative career as a detective,

0:51:14.480 --> 0:51:17.359
<v Speaker 1>that you know lies that don't make them guilty when

0:51:17.360 --> 0:51:21.799
<v Speaker 1>they're self serving lies. I start the former, like, none

0:51:21.840 --> 0:51:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of her lies have been detrimental to her. They're all

0:51:26.200 --> 0:51:29.799
<v Speaker 1>self serving lies. And when people tell me, oh, look

0:51:30.040 --> 0:51:33.160
<v Speaker 1>there might be a mental health issue, but every sort

0:51:33.160 --> 0:51:35.960
<v Speaker 1>of thing that's coming out of their mouth is self serving,

0:51:36.880 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I wagh that some people are lives, we've all met them,

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:43.360
<v Speaker 1>like the compulsive liars. But when they're self serving lies,

0:51:43.520 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I start to look at it a little bit differently.

0:51:45.840 --> 0:51:49.200
<v Speaker 1>And what I see from all her lies everything was

0:51:49.320 --> 0:51:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to distance her from every defense that she's committed.

0:51:54.520 --> 0:51:58.120
<v Speaker 2>How long were the jury out? Eight days? I think okay,

0:51:59.000 --> 0:52:01.400
<v Speaker 2>which seemed long at the but I'm not sure is

0:52:01.480 --> 0:52:04.319
<v Speaker 2>all that long for a nine ten week trial.

0:52:04.480 --> 0:52:06.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's a lot to a lot of process. Yeah,

0:52:07.200 --> 0:52:10.880
<v Speaker 1>they would have known the pressure was on with their decisions.

0:52:12.040 --> 0:52:15.080
<v Speaker 1>When they came back. Were you surprised or what were

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you thinking?

0:52:15.920 --> 0:52:21.200
<v Speaker 2>The result? But when they came back, I was in

0:52:21.200 --> 0:52:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the camp of thinking Aaron was guilty. I'm not sure

0:52:25.239 --> 0:52:27.280
<v Speaker 2>if I was a juror, I still had that corner

0:52:27.280 --> 0:52:29.239
<v Speaker 2>of a doubt that it would only take one or

0:52:29.239 --> 0:52:31.600
<v Speaker 2>two of them to go. It's not quite we can't

0:52:31.640 --> 0:52:36.280
<v Speaker 2>beyond reasonable. So if you'd asked me the day before,

0:52:36.719 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 2>I would have said maybe seventy thirty being convicted, But

0:52:39.920 --> 0:52:43.160
<v Speaker 2>it wouldn't have surprised me. Yeah, having heard the whole

0:52:43.280 --> 0:52:45.000
<v Speaker 2>what was the media pack like with it?

0:52:45.120 --> 0:52:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Because I know the media pack are always discussing them

0:52:48.880 --> 0:52:51.040
<v Speaker 1>having bets on which way it's going to get.

0:52:51.120 --> 0:52:53.440
<v Speaker 2>I think more people I don't think there were very

0:52:53.480 --> 0:52:56.359
<v Speaker 2>few who thought she was innocent. And again I think

0:52:56.400 --> 0:52:59.919
<v Speaker 2>that the minority were still not sure if she'd be convicted. Right.

0:53:00.440 --> 0:53:04.160
<v Speaker 2>The majority thought she would be and deserved to be,

0:53:04.360 --> 0:53:07.600
<v Speaker 2>but not by huge It wasn't ninety nine percent. It

0:53:07.640 --> 0:53:11.160
<v Speaker 2>had been a you know, the defense had done a

0:53:11.239 --> 0:53:16.080
<v Speaker 2>very good job of muddying enough moments. But at the

0:53:16.160 --> 0:53:18.080
<v Speaker 2>end of the day, you know, as even Colin Mandy

0:53:18.080 --> 0:53:21.080
<v Speaker 2>said in the sentencing hearings, you know, it was very

0:53:21.080 --> 0:53:25.719
<v Speaker 2>grave offending. But it was a fascinating case to hear

0:53:25.880 --> 0:53:32.480
<v Speaker 2>every detail and track the journey of how a jury

0:53:32.960 --> 0:53:37.040
<v Speaker 2>deals with, as I said, the curated and limited bits

0:53:37.080 --> 0:53:41.239
<v Speaker 2>of evidence they have, but looking in their totality to

0:53:41.320 --> 0:53:44.160
<v Speaker 2>reach a conclusion that there was no other reasonable explanation.

0:53:45.680 --> 0:53:48.759
<v Speaker 1>We touched on one of the pieces of information the

0:53:48.800 --> 0:53:51.360
<v Speaker 1>fact that she went to the tip straight after the lunch.

0:53:52.040 --> 0:53:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Also the fact that there was three other charges that

0:53:55.160 --> 0:53:57.480
<v Speaker 1>for attempt murder of Simon, her husband.

0:53:57.600 --> 0:54:00.319
<v Speaker 2>They were and they were part of the of the

0:54:00.360 --> 0:54:02.799
<v Speaker 2>trial right up until I think two days before the trial,

0:54:03.440 --> 0:54:07.880
<v Speaker 2>So she was charged with other murders. Yeah, so she

0:54:08.000 --> 0:54:13.320
<v Speaker 2>was actually facing seven charges. Justice Bill had i think

0:54:14.280 --> 0:54:16.600
<v Speaker 2>ruled three of those charges anyway, he didn't want three

0:54:16.600 --> 0:54:18.280
<v Speaker 2>of them to proceed. I'm not sure what the legal

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:21.920
<v Speaker 2>term is. And the prosecution took that to the the

0:54:21.920 --> 0:54:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Court of Appeal in Victoria and they came back with

0:54:25.440 --> 0:54:31.680
<v Speaker 2>quite a lengthy ruling. And in that ruling were descriptions

0:54:31.719 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 2>of those three insidants. And when you read.

0:54:34.560 --> 0:54:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Them, could you give us just a brief to tell them?

0:54:37.760 --> 0:54:40.160
<v Speaker 1>And we bear in mind that she hasn't been convictioned,

0:54:40.200 --> 0:54:43.359
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been disclaimer, but these were the allegations.

0:54:45.000 --> 0:54:46.719
<v Speaker 2>It started with her suggesting that they go on a

0:54:46.760 --> 0:54:50.600
<v Speaker 2>walk I think to Wilson's promontory and without the kids,

0:54:50.640 --> 0:54:54.279
<v Speaker 2>just to discuss something whatever they co parenting discussion needed

0:54:54.280 --> 0:54:58.880
<v Speaker 2>to happen. She'd packed separate lunch for them, but she

0:54:58.960 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 2>had one lunch and someone had the other, and he

0:55:02.640 --> 0:55:05.920
<v Speaker 2>started getting very sick that night and ended up I

0:55:05.920 --> 0:55:07.480
<v Speaker 2>think she took him to the hospital. They say it

0:55:07.520 --> 0:55:09.719
<v Speaker 2>in an airbnb and he just got sicker, and about

0:55:09.760 --> 0:55:11.560
<v Speaker 2>two days later she took him to Lean Gath the

0:55:11.560 --> 0:55:14.440
<v Speaker 2>hospital and he was in hospital for days and they

0:55:14.480 --> 0:55:19.640
<v Speaker 2>never could find out what it caused. Was But a

0:55:19.680 --> 0:55:23.240
<v Speaker 2>few months later, because they hadn't got to their lovely

0:55:23.400 --> 0:55:26.480
<v Speaker 2>nature walk to discuss whatever the matter they wanted to discuss,

0:55:27.360 --> 0:55:30.880
<v Speaker 2>she suggested they do it again and she brought you know,

0:55:31.040 --> 0:55:33.480
<v Speaker 2>another prepackaged lunch over, I think the second one. She

0:55:33.560 --> 0:55:35.560
<v Speaker 2>brought it to his house and they were due to

0:55:35.560 --> 0:55:38.960
<v Speaker 2>go the next day or whatever, and the same thing happened.

0:55:38.960 --> 0:55:41.160
<v Speaker 2>He had that he had the food she'd brought over

0:55:41.200 --> 0:55:43.640
<v Speaker 2>that night. The next day he was sick as a

0:55:43.640 --> 0:55:46.000
<v Speaker 2>dog and was in hospital again for a long time.

0:55:46.440 --> 0:55:48.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the second time was the longest. I think

0:55:48.080 --> 0:55:49.920
<v Speaker 2>there was like two or three weeks and it was

0:55:50.160 --> 0:55:55.000
<v Speaker 2>very sick, and again they couldn't the doctors. I should

0:55:55.040 --> 0:55:56.320
<v Speaker 2>have the details in front of me, but the doctors

0:55:56.320 --> 0:56:00.160
<v Speaker 2>couldn't nail down exactly what had caused the illness us.

0:56:01.160 --> 0:56:03.440
<v Speaker 2>And this I think that would have happened while she

0:56:03.520 --> 0:56:07.160
<v Speaker 2>was moving houses into lean gather. And then the third one,

0:56:07.200 --> 0:56:10.239
<v Speaker 2>they went to Haqua I think the place is called,

0:56:10.280 --> 0:56:12.400
<v Speaker 2>or they were planning a trip there, and again it

0:56:12.440 --> 0:56:14.799
<v Speaker 2>was another you know, let's go away on a just

0:56:14.880 --> 0:56:16.919
<v Speaker 2>you and me, and we'll discuss what has to happen

0:56:16.960 --> 0:56:20.440
<v Speaker 2>with the kids. And the same thing. She brought prepackaged

0:56:20.480 --> 0:56:24.080
<v Speaker 2>food and you know, he had one that was wrapped

0:56:24.120 --> 0:56:25.759
<v Speaker 2>up and he had there was a chicken carry for

0:56:25.800 --> 0:56:27.840
<v Speaker 2>him and a chicken carry for her, but separate things

0:56:28.480 --> 0:56:31.880
<v Speaker 2>and the same thing. So it was three times in

0:56:32.600 --> 0:56:34.399
<v Speaker 2>about over the course of a year, maybe a bit

0:56:34.440 --> 0:56:38.919
<v Speaker 2>longer than a year. And after that third time, which

0:56:38.920 --> 0:56:40.880
<v Speaker 2>again it wasn't just oh sick, I've got to go

0:56:40.920 --> 0:56:42.760
<v Speaker 2>to the toilet for half a day, it was in hospital.

0:56:43.040 --> 0:56:46.319
<v Speaker 2>It was again hospitalized I think the second one who

0:56:46.320 --> 0:56:48.560
<v Speaker 2>was actually in a coma for five or six days.

0:56:48.560 --> 0:56:52.280
<v Speaker 2>It was very serious. So those were the three attempted

0:56:52.360 --> 0:56:55.280
<v Speaker 2>murder charges that the prosecution also wanted to bring against

0:56:55.400 --> 0:56:59.400
<v Speaker 2>erin the circumstantial case of the similarity between oh, you know,

0:56:59.520 --> 0:57:02.160
<v Speaker 2>I've packed your food and I've prepacked mine and he

0:57:02.239 --> 0:57:06.600
<v Speaker 2>gets sick the next day. But medically there was no

0:57:06.800 --> 0:57:10.040
<v Speaker 2>concrete evidence of what had caused his illness and whether

0:57:10.040 --> 0:57:12.439
<v Speaker 2>it was related to that food. Where the failing, that's

0:57:12.440 --> 0:57:15.880
<v Speaker 2>where the failing was. So there was no you couldn't

0:57:15.920 --> 0:57:19.560
<v Speaker 2>point to a doctor saying it was something here, this

0:57:19.640 --> 0:57:22.440
<v Speaker 2>is what did it, and it was in this chicken curry.

0:57:23.760 --> 0:57:27.520
<v Speaker 2>So because of that break in the line of evidence,

0:57:28.640 --> 0:57:30.520
<v Speaker 2>circumstantially you look at it and you go, well, it's

0:57:30.520 --> 0:57:31.440
<v Speaker 2>pretty obvious.

0:57:31.160 --> 0:57:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Well tendency in coincidence. And just to clarify that, the

0:57:36.720 --> 0:57:41.040
<v Speaker 1>DPP dropped those charges against Aaron in regards to Simon.

0:57:41.400 --> 0:57:45.120
<v Speaker 2>So that was a problem. Yeah, and I think the

0:57:45.120 --> 0:57:47.439
<v Speaker 2>prosecution I don't quite understand the law here, but bear

0:57:47.440 --> 0:57:50.040
<v Speaker 2>with me for a second, was saying, because of what

0:57:50.160 --> 0:57:53.880
<v Speaker 2>happened with the beef Wellington lunch on July twenty nine,

0:57:54.760 --> 0:57:57.480
<v Speaker 2>you can use that as evidence for saying she must

0:57:57.520 --> 0:58:00.880
<v Speaker 2>have poisoned Simon with these three right, But the Court

0:58:00.920 --> 0:58:03.520
<v Speaker 2>of Appeal was saying, you can't present those three on

0:58:03.560 --> 0:58:08.200
<v Speaker 2>the same ticket as evidence for that lunch. Who's if

0:58:08.200 --> 0:58:10.400
<v Speaker 2>she's guilty of that then becomes evidence for the lunch.

0:58:10.400 --> 0:58:13.680
<v Speaker 2>It's it becomes circular, circular argument. You go's a circular argument.

0:58:14.040 --> 0:58:16.000
<v Speaker 2>And so you're needing the result on one to prove

0:58:16.040 --> 0:58:17.760
<v Speaker 2>those three, and yet you want those three to be

0:58:17.840 --> 0:58:20.320
<v Speaker 2>used to prove the other, and you can't do that,

0:58:20.360 --> 0:58:23.840
<v Speaker 2>and they won't. No, not allowed. Okay, So I can

0:58:24.320 --> 0:58:28.200
<v Speaker 2>understand that, really, And so they were separated from the indictment.

0:58:29.120 --> 0:58:30.960
<v Speaker 2>But the jury knew there had been because it had

0:58:30.960 --> 0:58:33.680
<v Speaker 2>been in the press. The jury knew there had been

0:58:33.800 --> 0:58:36.880
<v Speaker 2>three other attempted murder charges. They weren't informed, but they

0:58:37.080 --> 0:58:38.520
<v Speaker 2>were not informed. They were told put it out of

0:58:38.560 --> 0:58:40.760
<v Speaker 2>your mind, and they never knew any details about it.

0:58:40.920 --> 0:58:43.440
<v Speaker 2>So this is this is a hard thing for the juris,

0:58:43.520 --> 0:58:46.480
<v Speaker 2>isn't it? Because you what was that about?

0:58:46.640 --> 0:58:49.400
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure the conversation is happening in the jury

0:58:49.480 --> 0:58:50.959
<v Speaker 1>room going what was that about?

0:58:51.080 --> 0:58:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Then we ask you about that? Can you find out

0:58:52.640 --> 0:58:55.680
<v Speaker 2>what was what that was? You know, the prosecution two

0:58:55.760 --> 0:58:57.959
<v Speaker 2>days away from a trial, now we can't know anything

0:58:57.960 --> 0:58:58.439
<v Speaker 2>about it.

0:58:58.480 --> 0:59:01.720
<v Speaker 1>That's a complex system, isn't it. It really is so

0:59:02.920 --> 0:59:06.400
<v Speaker 1>come back guilty and she's recently been sentenced. What did

0:59:06.440 --> 0:59:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Patterson get to these her endless crimes?

0:59:09.520 --> 0:59:13.960
<v Speaker 2>The headline sentence was life imprisonment, which was not contested

0:59:14.280 --> 0:59:18.160
<v Speaker 2>by the defense. What was contestant was a non parole period.

0:59:18.440 --> 0:59:22.440
<v Speaker 2>The prosecution was arguing that she should never be released.

0:59:22.680 --> 0:59:26.640
<v Speaker 2>The defense was saying because of the harshness of her

0:59:27.080 --> 0:59:31.960
<v Speaker 2>situation in custody, she's so notorious, because of the massive

0:59:32.000 --> 0:59:35.520
<v Speaker 2>fame of the case, that she's in solitary confinement and

0:59:36.000 --> 0:59:38.680
<v Speaker 2>because of that duress, that there should be some non

0:59:38.720 --> 0:59:41.720
<v Speaker 2>parole period. And in the end, Justice Buell accepted that

0:59:42.320 --> 0:59:46.360
<v Speaker 2>argument and put a non parole period of thirty three years,

0:59:46.560 --> 0:59:49.040
<v Speaker 2>so she'll be in her early eighties when she gets out. Okay,

0:59:49.120 --> 0:59:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Well still yeah, heavy significant sentence. It's a significant sentence.

0:59:53.520 --> 0:59:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Greg, I have enjoyed our chat again with the book.

0:59:59.120 --> 1:00:01.840
<v Speaker 2>Is there a TV series in it? Is there a movie? Look,

1:00:04.080 --> 1:00:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I've been concentrating on getting the book finished first. Let's hope.

1:00:07.840 --> 1:00:10.720
<v Speaker 2>I know there is a screen series in development with

1:00:10.800 --> 1:00:14.720
<v Speaker 2>the ABC with another production company. But if any of

1:00:14.760 --> 1:00:19.760
<v Speaker 2>the big streamers and other broadcasters you know, read the

1:00:19.800 --> 1:00:21.520
<v Speaker 2>book and want to develop a series out of it.

1:00:21.560 --> 1:00:24.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm certainly here to help them. Well.

1:00:24.360 --> 1:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>The Mushroom Murders a fascinating read and a really novel

1:00:28.920 --> 1:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>concept looking from a juror's point of view. I obviously

1:00:32.440 --> 1:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>read a lot of true crime books, and I was

1:00:35.680 --> 1:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>sitting down about the start that I've thought, this is

1:00:38.480 --> 1:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a novel idea like looking from a juris point of view.

1:00:41.240 --> 1:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>But it really took you into the case, and it

1:00:43.880 --> 1:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>took me into the intensity of the trials. Like quite

1:00:47.840 --> 1:00:51.600
<v Speaker 1>often I say with a murder trial, how exhausting they are,

1:00:51.760 --> 1:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's an emotional roller case. Do you think you're

1:00:53.960 --> 1:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>in front, then step back, And it really took us

1:00:57.560 --> 1:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>inside that and give us a bit of an insight

1:01:00.240 --> 1:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>into what the.

1:01:00.960 --> 1:01:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Jura is all about.

1:01:01.880 --> 1:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm glad you've sort of done a new turn

1:01:05.160 --> 1:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in your career or partially, and there you see yourself

1:01:08.160 --> 1:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>as a writer. Any other cases that you're looking.

1:01:10.400 --> 1:01:14.840
<v Speaker 2>At, I will now I'm going to try and get

1:01:14.840 --> 1:01:19.120
<v Speaker 2>back on the eye catch killers. If you can get

1:01:19.680 --> 1:01:23.120
<v Speaker 2>that is definitely something worth striving for. I'm really glad

1:01:23.120 --> 1:01:25.479
<v Speaker 2>you enjoyed the read, and I have enjoyed the pivot

1:01:25.520 --> 1:01:28.120
<v Speaker 2>into authorship and hopefully it'll continue.

1:01:28.200 --> 1:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>It's an interesting way of telling the stories in a book,

1:01:31.080 --> 1:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you get so much detail and look, people have enjoyed

1:01:34.720 --> 1:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. What we're talking about. We've literally just scratched

1:01:38.040 --> 1:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the surface of what's in the book.

1:01:40.120 --> 1:01:44.040
<v Speaker 2>So the Mushroom Murders. Thank you Gary, Okay, Thanks Greg,