Speaker 1: Lateens.
Speaker 2: Welcome to the Lake du Blades.
Speaker 3: Happy Thursday, and thanks for your company. I'm Liz stra
Speaker 3: and here with me this evening is Caleb Bond and
Speaker 3: Joe Hildebrand Coming up tonight, an epic showdown between two
Speaker 3: American neighbors. It's a case of rabbit trumped arrangement syndrome
Speaker 3: versus maga. Who will win? And coming up in the papers,
Speaker 3: Dan Andrews, now chairman of a board for youth mental health,
Speaker 3: pocketing seventy five k for the privilege? Will he donate
Speaker 3: it to charity You'll find out later.
Speaker 1: And lastly, a Queensland candidate.
Speaker 3: What what will you make of this?
Speaker 1: One? Is campaigning on bringing back the cane.
Speaker 3: Two schools, thoughts, feelings, I remember that thing we had
Speaker 3: the paddle. But first tonight, our UN Envoy James Larzen
Speaker 3: has earlier this week asked China to just abide by
Speaker 3: the recommendations in a UN report regarding the atrocities. China
Speaker 3: is committing toward a well well over a million wigas
Speaker 3: in the Shinjang profnce. We know that they are in
Speaker 3: re education camps and we know the conditions are far
Speaker 3: less than humane. This has been going on for years.
Speaker 3: It's not the first time, and we're not the first
Speaker 3: country that the UN has called upon China to release
Speaker 3: these people or at the very least treat them humanely
Speaker 3: or let independent viewers into the country so that they
Speaker 3: can at least be made aware of the conditions there
Speaker 3: on the ground. Of course, China has for many years
Speaker 3: forbidden this and they're not changing their tune. Check out
Speaker 3: their response today. Imagine our shock Australia. According to China,
Speaker 3: we're the ones who are full of human rights abuses
Speaker 3: here in Australia. Lin Yang responded from the Chinese Ministry
Speaker 3: of Foreign Affairs, says Australia, long plagued by systemic racism
Speaker 3: and hate crimes, have severely violated the rights of refugees
Speaker 3: and immigrants and left Chinese indigenous not Chinese indigenous people.
Speaker 3: Left indigenous people with vulnerable living conditions. Australian soldiers have
Speaker 3: committed to barrant crimes at Afghanistan and other countries during
Speaker 3: their military operations overseas. These Western countries turn a blind
Speaker 3: eye to their own severe human rights issues at home,
Speaker 3: but in the meantime put their fingers appoint their fingers
Speaker 3: at other countries. This says a lot about their hypocrisy
Speaker 3: on human rights. Can you believe it doesn't this remind
Speaker 3: you of the famous Marxist comments saying you must accuse
Speaker 3: your enemy of doing what you're doing while you're doing it, just.
Speaker 1: To confuse people.
Speaker 3: Of course, this was said on state media in China,
Speaker 3: so no one would out what this guy is saying.
Speaker 3: But take a look at alban Ezy today. He wasn't
Speaker 3: having a bar of it.
Speaker 4: We of course will always stand up for Australia's interests
Speaker 4: and when it comes to China, we've said we'll cooperate
Speaker 4: where we can, we'll disagree where we must, and we'll
Speaker 4: engage in our national interest and we've raised issues of
Speaker 4: human rights with China. We've done that in a consistent
Speaker 4: and clear way.
Speaker 3: Very diplomatic, nicely said mister Albaniz. Yes, your favorite guy
Speaker 3: there he is. We must be diplomatic at all time.
Speaker 5: Come on, now, you're being racist and ablest.
Speaker 3: Who choose an opposition loster of having to.
Speaker 5: Ret I love it where I love it.
Speaker 6: When China does this, they pull the race card out
Speaker 6: all the time. He says, they're not learning stuff any
Speaker 6: looking at all. The little Wokester's all the little identity
Speaker 6: politics they called ID polls for the kids, all of
Speaker 6: the identity politics activists in the US and on campuses here.
Speaker 5: Oh, you can just call anyone a racist, can you?
Speaker 2: Oh?
Speaker 6: Okay, I don't like you, You're a racist. And it's
Speaker 6: a learning game and they're doing it and it's just
Speaker 6: absolutely hilarious. Soon they'll be invading us for being so racist.
Speaker 3: They've already got very much soft power.
Speaker 6: They'll put us into re education harams and force us
Speaker 6: to build cheap electronic devices and sell them on TIMU
Speaker 6: until we get educated about just how racist we.
Speaker 7: Are exactly, all in the name of anti racism, I
Speaker 7: mean seriously. And the sad thing is that there are
Speaker 7: probably people out there who do believe this, but we
Speaker 7: in China would yeah, yeah, And we kind of have
Speaker 7: this coming for us, as you alluded to, Joe, because
Speaker 7: we denigrate ourselves. Not we, I mean those of us
Speaker 7: sitting on the desk tonight excluded, but as a country,
Speaker 7: we so often denigrate ourselves, and so many people who
Speaker 7: live here say that we are a racist nation. If
Speaker 7: you say something enough times, people will start to believe it,
Speaker 7: you know, people start to believe their own bull le
Speaker 7: s HR right, And so if you sell that message
Speaker 7: hard enough overseas, well, yeah, people will start to think
Speaker 7: Australia is a racist country. But I think it should
Speaker 7: be pointed out. And these are only the most recent
Speaker 7: numbers I could find, but in June twenty twenty two,
Speaker 7: there were roughly six hundred thousand Chinese born people living
Speaker 7: in Australia, not an insignificant number at that time. That
Speaker 7: was about two and a half three percent of the
Speaker 7: Australian population was Chinese born. Now, the latest numbers for
Speaker 7: Australians living in China I could find was twenty ten,
Speaker 7: so you may assume there are a few more living
Speaker 7: there now. But six hundred thousand Chinese in Australia, how
Speaker 7: many Australians direck and there were in China thirteen thousand.
Speaker 2: I mean, what does that.
Speaker 7: Tell you we're such a horrible racist country that all
Speaker 7: the Chinese people want to come and live here. They
Speaker 7: send their kids to our universities because of course they
Speaker 7: want to send their kids to be taught how real
Speaker 7: racism works, don't they. I mean they don't even believe
Speaker 7: it themselves. It's simply to score points. It's utter nonsense.
Speaker 7: But look, if we keep saying we're a racist country,
Speaker 7: then we may as well believe we're a racist country
Speaker 7: and everyone else may.
Speaker 6: Sorry, I know we've had a terrible I know there's
Speaker 6: been a couple of glitches this week, but I've just
Speaker 6: realized we've done it again. This quote Australia long plagued
Speaker 6: by systemic racism and hate crime. It's not the Chinese
Speaker 6: Foreign Ministry at all. Law A tinglested the wrong text
Speaker 6: into a group email.
Speaker 7: Well, look, Lydia thought close the job.
Speaker 5: The other mounding of the waters.
Speaker 6: They do, though, and this is interesting so that they
Speaker 6: always bring up the refugees right now. Obviously there are
Speaker 6: different sizes of the story about whether or not or
Speaker 6: how we should deal with people who enter the country
Speaker 6: undocumented and without prior authorization, and obviously we detain them offshore.
Speaker 6: But these are not obviously Australian nationals. So when it
Speaker 6: comes to the Vegas in their educator, these are meant
Speaker 6: to be Chinese people. These are meant to be that
Speaker 6: there are people who they're imprisoning and putting in these
Speaker 6: so called you know, re education, and while they're getting
Speaker 6: re educated, they do a bit of work, so there's a.
Speaker 5: Complete application Organs.
Speaker 3: Well we're at it.
Speaker 6: Then that's oh, and you're terrible to Indigenous Australians as well,
Speaker 6: blah blah.
Speaker 5: I'm not sure.
Speaker 6: And I am the first person to say we need
Speaker 6: to fix the problem and close the gap between Indigenous
Speaker 6: and non Indigenous Australia. I'm not sure we put any
Speaker 6: of them in concentration camps.
Speaker 3: No, no, I do have trouble remembering us doing that.
Speaker 6: So again, well, look in the past, wouldn't want to
Speaker 6: go there, but these days certainly so. China is just
Speaker 6: incredibly good at muting the waters. But there are people
Speaker 6: out there who will believe it, and there are people
Speaker 6: there here who actively fuel it. There are activists, there
Speaker 6: are people online YouTubers, you.
Speaker 5: Know, certain ABC.
Speaker 6: Who again, you could actually copy and paste a sentence
Speaker 6: like this and say, right, who said it, and you
Speaker 6: wouldn't know.
Speaker 3: Well, NA probably gets their talking points from these guys
Speaker 3: were tuned into the ABC copy paste and well this
Speaker 3: is what you guys say about your own country.
Speaker 1: We're pointing it out at all.
Speaker 7: I like to see how the indigenous population, let alone
Speaker 7: the rest of us, would fare under Chinese rule. But
Speaker 7: Lydia Thorpe might quite like it, because, of course, in
Speaker 7: communist China there are no kings, are there now? Some
Speaker 7: kids went to visit to Parliament House in New South
Speaker 7: Wales this week and they thought they would get to
Speaker 7: learn about democracy and how parliament works and what MPs
Speaker 7: do and god forbid what all the staffers do. Well,
Speaker 7: by golly did they get an edge of imcation, but
Speaker 7: not the one they thought they were going to get.
Speaker 2: How good is this? A bunch of kids get in
Speaker 2: the lift.
Speaker 7: They're going a few floors up at Parliament House in
Speaker 7: New South.
Speaker 2: Wales and apparently a number of the kids got cut off.
Speaker 7: They had to wait for another lift because a number
Speaker 7: of politicians wanted to use the lift in front of them.
Speaker 7: Listen to a Liberal staff for describing what went down
Speaker 7: and what the kids heard. This Liberal staffer is describing
Speaker 7: an interaction between a National's MP and a Labor MP.
Speaker 7: The Liberal stafficeys he had been waiting for a lift
Speaker 7: to go up with a group of us.
Speaker 2: They were also there were also.
Speaker 7: People sorry coming from the chamber. I heard him say
Speaker 7: this is the Labor MP. F off back to the
Speaker 7: bush to someone as the lift doors closed. I turned
Speaker 7: to him and said that was out of order. I
Speaker 7: pulled him up on it. As the teacher looked really embarrassed,
Speaker 7: he told me to mind my own business.
Speaker 2: It was just appalling. I mean, you can just imagine it.
Speaker 2: These poor kids from the Catholic school have.
Speaker 7: Come along to see just how good and civil the
Speaker 7: running of our society is through parliament and government. And
Speaker 7: there they are watching two politicians squibble, squabble, sorry with
Speaker 7: each other, and one telling the other to f off
Speaker 7: back to the bush.
Speaker 2: Well.
Speaker 7: The Labour MP, Hugh McDermot, he came out and apologized.
Speaker 7: He said a number of MPs pushed in front of
Speaker 7: school children who've been waiting for the lift. I told
Speaker 7: them they were rude, and they dismissed me, and so
Speaker 7: I swore at them. I didn't realized and turned around
Speaker 7: and apologized to the teachers and kids.
Speaker 2: It was a loss of judgment.
Speaker 7: I don't like bullies and they were pushing in front
Speaker 7: of the kids. Half the kids had gone up and
Speaker 7: we were waiting for the next lift to join them. Well,
Speaker 7: if they had not already lost their confidence in.
Speaker 2: Politics, I'm sure as hell lost its.
Speaker 5: Awesome. This is just like school he said they.
Speaker 3: Were there to learn how parliament works. I think this
Speaker 3: is a perfect example of how parliament works. Wait till
Speaker 3: you watch Q and A kids Question and Answer Time.
Speaker 3: What a trait that will be. This is democracy manifest.
Speaker 3: But I love how the way Hugh McDermott tells the story.
Speaker 3: He's actually the hero. Yeah, they were being the bullies.
Speaker 3: I was stepping in and I was saving the day.
Speaker 3: Let's let's get your stories straight here. I absolutely love it.
Speaker 3: Like most MPs, he's the legend in his own lunch box,
Speaker 3: and he wants everyone to.
Speaker 6: Know actually is a legend in not just his lunchbox,
Speaker 6: but also my lunchbox.
Speaker 5: Is awesome he does. He's not one of those angry
Speaker 5: I think a.
Speaker 6: Lot of the context has probably been lost here. He's
Speaker 6: very funny, very colorful. He's from the as far right
Speaker 6: in the labor right as you can possibly get. Good
Speaker 6: Catholic boy himself and these were Catholic school kids, so
Speaker 6: he had the Lord on his side. He's a good
Speaker 6: mat of Tony Abbott as well, so he's he's a
Speaker 6: good guy. He's not one of those angry, angry trots.
Speaker 3: Which is the way it was portrayed.
Speaker 6: By the media, which obviously is the way it's portrayed
Speaker 6: by the man. Of course, you know, of course, if
Speaker 6: someone says that it gets busted saying that it's going
Speaker 6: to create a huge media store.
Speaker 5: But I'm just saying it's the sort of thing you'd say.
Speaker 6: Over pub table to something he otherwise gone along quite
Speaker 6: well with.
Speaker 5: And I think all the feigned outrage, and I'm one
Speaker 5: of those people.
Speaker 6: I don't get artrage when Barnaby Joyce is colorful, or
Speaker 6: when other politicians do all this stuff.
Speaker 5: And I don't think we can need to.
Speaker 6: Clutch our pearls at good old Hugh. He's doing a
Speaker 6: bit of Google Nationals member. He might have lost their
Speaker 6: way to their electorates, so it's that way.
Speaker 5: Anyway. I think it's very beautiful.
Speaker 6: I tell you what, I don't know much about art,
Speaker 6: but I know what I don't like. And what I
Speaker 6: don't like is this next bit of artwork. This is
Speaker 6: an acquisition by the w A Museum, which is you
Speaker 6: might actually be familiar with it. It is a Frederick
Speaker 6: mccobban painting, I believe famous, very famous.
Speaker 5: It's the guy sitting in the middle of the sitting
Speaker 5: in the middle of the virus. It's part of a
Speaker 5: triptich I think that's part of It's called down on.
Speaker 6: His Luck, Down on his luck and he's sitting there,
Speaker 6: you know, kind of plating his life.
Speaker 5: The West Australian Museum has has purchased this.
Speaker 6: This fine, fine artwork. In fact, they've had it for
Speaker 6: some time. Actually, I'm strange to have actually purchased it.
Speaker 6: And it's because it's been vandalized by a bunch of
Speaker 6: evil hippie activists have jumped in and defaced this to face,
Speaker 6: this masterpiece with an anti pro climate change of anti woodside.
Speaker 5: A bit of paint. And this activist has come in and.
Speaker 6: Explained obviously the incredibly highly intellectually loaded reasons for their action.
Speaker 6: Take a bit of a listen to why she says
Speaker 6: she did it. A great friends, Australia's largest, Australia's oldest.
Speaker 3: Resids in the world.
Speaker 4: Religious, also strange.
Speaker 5: Planet, how good is sorry? Start over? So can we can't?
Speaker 5: Can we do that? This is live?
Speaker 6: She actually goes says, this is in protest a grants
Speaker 6: the greatest threat to the planet in all history, which.
Speaker 5: Is climate change. I don't even know what they're protesting.
Speaker 5: They have to read it out in.
Speaker 3: The headline this is my moment, What do I do?
Speaker 7: And it was apparently what she's talking about there in
Speaker 7: terms of the woodside operations in the pilber Is you know,
Speaker 7: some rock carvings, etcetera, which she describes as the largest
Speaker 7: art gallery in Australia in the world. I mean, yes,
Speaker 7: Australia is in the world, so that was kind of already.
Speaker 2: But I cannot believe this. And I've written my column
Speaker 2: for the Advertiser about this as well, because we talked
Speaker 2: the last plug.
Speaker 7: We talked last week about that sculpture that they've approved
Speaker 7: down in Mount Gambia in South Australia, which some dog
Speaker 7: ugly bigafauna marsupial thing looks like causimotive.
Speaker 2: It's really depressed.
Speaker 3: You really can't define it.
Speaker 7: And I was just getting over that until I read
Speaker 7: this morning about the fact that the Western Australian Museum
Speaker 7: is eating what is a piece of vandalism as though
Speaker 7: it were a piece of that and it made me
Speaker 7: really angry about the state of art today. But they
Speaker 7: are putting they're saying that they have acquired this because
Speaker 7: it is a piece of historical significance, right, and they're
Speaker 7: putting it on the same level as pieces of history
Speaker 7: relating to women's suffrage and the decriminalization of homosexuality, et cetera.
Speaker 2: I mean even say, it's so.
Speaker 7: Idiot who didn't even know the cause she was actually
Speaker 7: there to protest for, who turned up with a spray can,
Speaker 7: glued herself to the wall and she didn't even damage
Speaker 7: the actual painting. It was on top of perspects, that
Speaker 7: was on top.
Speaker 2: Of the pack.
Speaker 7: And this is apparently a piece of historical significance that
Speaker 7: we must hold forever more in the Western Australian Museum.
Speaker 7: That's not going to encourage more people to go and
Speaker 7: do this kind of thing.
Speaker 2: I don't know what is.
Speaker 7: And she is saying today that she feels vindicated, and
Speaker 7: of course she would say she feels vindicated because she
Speaker 7: is now made out to be their hero kind of
Speaker 7: historical figure who was standing up against injustice. No, you're
Speaker 7: just a dope with a spray can. I mean I
Speaker 7: could find one of them at the front of any
Speaker 7: bus stop or shopping center about fifteen years old, all
Speaker 7: over the country.
Speaker 2: Why is she anymore?
Speaker 3: Okay, well, let's not misrepresent this. So the perspex is
Speaker 3: not on display and there are no plans to put
Speaker 3: it on display. The museum chief simply said, look, we
Speaker 3: collect pieces of history. This is history in the making.
Speaker 3: Museums collect things pertaining to current relevant issues that are
Speaker 3: affecting the society of the day. That's what we were doing.
Speaker 3: You may remember back in twenty twenty, museums around America
Speaker 3: were snaffling up paraphernalia from the Black Lives Matter protests
Speaker 3: that burnt countless buildings to the ground in several cities.
Speaker 3: They don't care. It was a protest the Vietnam War
Speaker 3: that mass protests in America. Heaps of paraphernale. You're in
Speaker 3: museums about that. Heck, you can go to France and
Speaker 3: check out a guillotine from the French Revolution.
Speaker 1: This is what museums do. And I think a.
Speaker 3: Lot of the outrage from this is due to the
Speaker 3: lack of firstly telling people it's not being put on
Speaker 3: display as a piece of art. They're simply keeping it
Speaker 3: in the back room one day or a rainy day.
Speaker 3: But there is a massive difference between an art gallery
Speaker 3: and a museum. So this is.
Speaker 7: Black Lives Matter was a moment in history. I don't
Speaker 7: think a woman rocketing.
Speaker 2: Out the Western Australia with a spray can was a moment.
Speaker 1: It is a museum's way of look.
Speaker 3: I don't think it's a great idea either, but it
Speaker 3: is simply their way of saying, this is how we
Speaker 3: document history as it happens, and you've got to grab
Speaker 3: stuff at the time because there's no u sixty years
Speaker 3: later being like, remember when all those climb activists were
Speaker 3: going into museums and.
Speaker 2: All.
Speaker 5: I wonder where she is now. I want to know
Speaker 5: if she ended up with that guy who was just
Speaker 5: sort of standing there.
Speaker 6: Go Oh, man, I hope I get lucky tonight, because
Speaker 6: I just stand here long enough, she's bound to go
Speaker 6: out with me.
Speaker 3: I think you're projecting there, Joe.
Speaker 6: Yeah, that's why you want to be motus operandi. It
Speaker 6: never worked out. They always just left you for someone
Speaker 6: even more revolutionary.
Speaker 5: It was terrible.
Speaker 6: Yeah, But I think the problem is when you went
Speaker 6: sort of and again there's legitimate sort of stuff and
Speaker 6: people have there are debates around whether or not you
Speaker 6: should leave, for example, graffiti that's on you know, statues,
Speaker 6: statues that have been defaced, for example, you know the
Speaker 6: slave different slav No, No, it's exactly the same. A
Speaker 6: slave owner in Bristol, you know, and people write his name,
Speaker 6: you know, say slave owner, you're evil. Do you leave
Speaker 6: that there, because that is a historical representation of the
Speaker 6: time that these people found out their local town hero
Speaker 6: is a slave owner.
Speaker 5: Then where do you stop.
Speaker 6: Does it go to you know, Winston Churchill and the
Speaker 6: Bengal famine, you know, Captain Cook known, you know, indigenous
Speaker 6: genocidal maniac.
Speaker 5: According to Lydia Thorpe Big.
Speaker 3: A monument in a public park is kind of different.
Speaker 3: This is a museum collecting bits and pieces, collecting from
Speaker 3: the current social movements affecting society.
Speaker 5: Something the defacement of a work of.
Speaker 3: Art, Well, it wasn't because it wasn't just protect whereas
Speaker 3: what you're talking about is an actual monument being.
Speaker 1: Defaced, an actual work of art.
Speaker 3: No, it wasn't because it was covered in perspects and
Speaker 3: they knew that at the time. So he just whipped
Speaker 3: off the book place something else. I just think for
Speaker 3: that reason the argument doesn't stick.
Speaker 1: They are two very different things.
Speaker 3: But let's go to America now, where we all know
Speaker 3: Harris is failing in the polls. It is a painful
Speaker 3: death to watch, but that doesn't mean it isn't very
Speaker 3: very entertaining. Her latest appearance on the campaign trail was.
Speaker 1: A town hall meeting on CNN.
Speaker 3: She had a big go at Donald Trump because he
Speaker 3: decided not to come to this one, and she made
Speaker 3: a big deal out of that. Of course, he'd simply
Speaker 3: decided not to come because a he doesn't need to,
Speaker 3: He's doing very handsomely in the polls without it, and
Speaker 3: be CNN not a friendly audience for the Trump campaign.
Speaker 3: You're not really going to run many CNN viewers over,
Speaker 3: are you.
Speaker 1: So he decided to save his time.
Speaker 3: She had the floor all to herself, and wasn't it entertaining.
Speaker 3: She literally took one question and took the opportunity to
Speaker 3: answer it by explaining why she wasn't going to be
Speaker 3: very quick or good at answering the questions. The whole
Speaker 3: purpose of a town hall, so.
Speaker 8: I may not'd be quick to have the answer as
Speaker 8: soon as you ask it about a specific policy issue
Speaker 8: sometimes because I'm going to want to research it. I'm
Speaker 8: going to want to study it. I'm kind of a
Speaker 8: nerd sometimes.
Speaker 3: I confess, Lady, Nobody believes that you study anything you
Speaker 3: don't even study your briefing notes.
Speaker 1: She was also asked is she a religious person? Does
Speaker 1: she pray?
Speaker 3: And here was her answer, just days after two guys
Speaker 3: were evicted from one of her ally's for shouting out Jesus' Lord.
Speaker 5: Do you pray every day?
Speaker 8: I do pray every day. I do pray every day,
Speaker 8: sometimes twice a day.
Speaker 3: Oh yeah, she's so devout. How do we not know
Speaker 3: that until now? I'm not sure who she's praying to.
Speaker 5: What I know why she prays. In fact, I'll show
Speaker 5: it to you right now. She got to pray just
Speaker 5: to make it to den.
Speaker 2: I mean, she's got to pray to hope she can
Speaker 2: get through this bloody campaign.
Speaker 6: But I think I turned to prayer during the Voice camp,
Speaker 6: and it doesn't because.
Speaker 3: The Lord was on our side.
Speaker 2: It is so bad. I didn't think it could get
Speaker 2: any worse for Kamala.
Speaker 3: And we know that's not saying that. You know it
Speaker 3: can look every bottom. There is a trap door with.
Speaker 2: This woman's But you know we knew about the word
Speaker 2: sellards and whatever.
Speaker 7: But to first open by saying that I'm sorry if
Speaker 7: I can't answer the question, because I don't have the
Speaker 7: answer to the question, well, why did you come to
Speaker 7: an event where the sole purpose is to answer questions?
Speaker 3: You're taken two.
Speaker 1: Days off to prepare for this town hall? Why were
Speaker 1: you doing that all the time.
Speaker 7: What she means is I don't know what my policies are,
Speaker 7: which is exactly what happened in the Fox News interview
Speaker 7: with Brett Bayer, where all she did was talk about
Speaker 7: Donald Trump, And of course Brett Bay gets to the
Speaker 7: end of the interview and says to her, well, I'm
Speaker 7: really glad you talked about Donald Trump all this time,
Speaker 7: and I kind of.
Speaker 2: Wish we'd talked about some policy stuff. I hope you
Speaker 2: hit all the points you wanted to hit.
Speaker 7: To which her response was, well, you can go to
Speaker 7: Kamala Harris dot com and there's eighty pages of she
Speaker 7: did that in.
Speaker 3: This town hall as well. It was just she absolutely
Speaker 3: did this in this So she was like Sora to
Speaker 3: keep referring you to a website, but and then just
Speaker 3: referred them to the website. This woman cannot probably all.
Speaker 6: Play many many, many many years ago. I made a
Speaker 6: very simple and pragmatic decision simply never to lie. I
Speaker 6: wasn't a big lie beforehand, but I thought I just thought,
Speaker 6: if I was ever uncertain about anything and ever tempted
Speaker 6: to just tell a tiny little untruth or just sort
Speaker 6: of smudge things over, what would I would simply just
Speaker 6: not do it, except, of course, when you're lying to
Speaker 6: your kids, you can do that all the time.
Speaker 5: But and the reason is very simple. It's not actruistic.
Speaker 5: But when you are just telling the truth, and when
Speaker 5: you are saying what you're really.
Speaker 6: Think, and I'm very frank, and I'm an open book
Speaker 6: and everyone knows that, and I say stuff that other
Speaker 6: people are too scared say blah blah blah blah blah,
Speaker 6: it's actually, in the long run, much much easier because
Speaker 6: when you are lying or reading from the script or
Speaker 6: saying something that you don't actually believe, you have to
Speaker 6: remember every single thing.
Speaker 5: You have to remember every single top point, and that
Speaker 5: is very, very hard to do. So when anyone asks
Speaker 5: Carmala Harris a question, what do you think about fracking?
Speaker 5: You know, what is your plan for the economy? She can't.
Speaker 5: She can't answer it because she doesn't know.
Speaker 6: She doesn't know in her own heart and soul what
Speaker 6: she thinks or even how she feels about stuff. She
Speaker 6: can't have been articulated, and she doesn't know, Brian, what
Speaker 6: she's actually going to do about it. Because she doesn't
Speaker 6: know what she's going to do about it, and because
Speaker 6: the thing that she was going to do about it
Speaker 6: a year ago or four years ago, or when she
Speaker 6: was running in the primaries in twenty nineteen.
Speaker 5: It's completely different to the things she's saying now.
Speaker 6: She's constantly trying to remember all these different things that
Speaker 6: have changed, and basically, you know what her latest you know.
Speaker 5: Law, what her latest position is. And it's impossible. And
Speaker 5: this is what happened.
Speaker 3: It's impossible for someone without single firing neuron. I mean,
Speaker 3: this question was a very simple one. Have you made
Speaker 3: any mistakes? This isn't even necessarily policy related. She couldn't
Speaker 3: even answer this succinctly.
Speaker 9: Is there something you can point to in your life,
Speaker 9: political life, or in your life in the last four
Speaker 9: years that you think is a mistake that you have
Speaker 9: learned from.
Speaker 8: I mean, I've made many mistakes, and they range from
Speaker 8: you know, if you've ever pair rented a child, do
Speaker 8: you know you make lots of mistakes too. In my
Speaker 8: role as vice president, I mean, I've probably worked very
Speaker 8: hard at making sure that I am well versed on issues,
Speaker 8: and I think that is very important. It's a mistake
Speaker 8: not to be well versed on an issue and feel
Speaker 8: compelled to answer a question.
Speaker 3: So firstly, she hasn't parented any children, and secondly, you
Speaker 3: then answered the question by saying, well, I'm well versed,
Speaker 3: and it's a mistake not to be well versed. But
Speaker 3: that's not a mistake I'm making. So I'm not making
Speaker 3: that mistake another word sound.
Speaker 5: I even remember what's meant to be the mistake and
Speaker 5: what it is. She actually truly believes that was a mistake.
Speaker 6: When I opposed it or when I was for it,
Speaker 6: was that a mistake? And again even with the parents stuff,
Speaker 6: like she said, oh, this is a great line. When
Speaker 6: you're a parent, you made lots of mistakes, and she
Speaker 6: forgot it. She's not a parent, like she just created
Speaker 6: this entirely. And again I called her recently a costume
Speaker 6: in search of a character. She's created this entirely fake
Speaker 6: persona that is a complete fabrication.
Speaker 5: Is it completely artificial? And there is nothing underneath it?
Speaker 6: There was absolutely zero, and that is why Donald Trump
Speaker 6: is going to absolutely cream her.
Speaker 7: Yeah, creat and you saw exactly how annoyed she got
Speaker 7: when she was pushed on policy, and you know, she
Speaker 7: continually tries to afford these questions. That's why she said
Speaker 7: at the stat I'm sorry if I can't answer them.
Speaker 7: I don't know what the answers are. But she was
Speaker 7: pushed on the border and her significant change on the border.
Speaker 7: Once upon a time she said that building the wall
Speaker 7: was an American and it was wrong, et cetera. Now
Speaker 7: she says she'd bring back the border bill and build
Speaker 7: the wall, et cetera. She was pushed on it, and
Speaker 7: she really got her heckles up, let's just.
Speaker 2: Fix the problem.
Speaker 9: To fix the problem, you're doing this compromise bill. It
Speaker 9: does call for six hundred and fifty million dollars. That
Speaker 9: was your merchant Trump to actually still go to build
Speaker 9: the world.
Speaker 8: I'm not afraid of good ideas where they occurred.
Speaker 1: You don't think it's stupid anymore.
Speaker 8: I think what he did and how he did it
Speaker 8: was did not make much sense because he actually didn't
Speaker 8: do much of anything.
Speaker 3: Huh, you're what you almost feel sorry for this woman, right,
Speaker 3: because what we see in Kamala Harris is a candidate
Speaker 3: that has entirely been created by the media machine she
Speaker 3: has no record of. Note she was never even properly
Speaker 3: endorsed by her own party back when she ran in
Speaker 3: twenty twenty, didn't even get enough votes to get past
Speaker 3: the first debate. This is a woman who has no
Speaker 3: track record to speak of except for a very embarrassing one,
Speaker 3: and she's just been completely hyped up by the media.
Speaker 3: All the very significant Dems suddenly got around her when
Speaker 3: it looks like, oh, we're pushing out Joe Biden now
Speaker 3: and you're the chosen one. She has no foundation. So
Speaker 3: to watch her flounder like this and clearly being surrounded
Speaker 3: by a team who are convincing her you're all that,
Speaker 3: and then some you've got it, You're amazing. She genuinely
Speaker 3: believes it and can't cannot see how ridiculous she is.
Speaker 7: Well, I thought, you know, Joe Biden was possibly one
Speaker 7: of the best cases of self immolation I've ever seen
Speaker 7: on live television.
Speaker 2: I think Harris was giving him a pretty good run
Speaker 2: for his money.
Speaker 7: And of course, hot on the heels of that, she's going,
Speaker 7: holy hell, this is not going well.
Speaker 3: What can I do?
Speaker 7: I need something to gain some ground on Donald Trump.
Speaker 7: So she's gone to the grab bag. She's gone What
Speaker 7: can I say?
Speaker 2: Want something new? An attack I can use against Donald Trump,
Speaker 2: that he's a fascist? Yes, she's gone back, yes, nut.
Speaker 7: Now she sees on comments from John Kelly, who was
Speaker 7: Trump's one time chief of staff, a chief of staff
Speaker 7: that Trump said he fired like a dog and that
Speaker 7: was one of the dumbest people he ever met in
Speaker 7: So you can understand why there might be a little
Speaker 7: bit of beef here.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 7: Where all this originates from is Kelly saying that when
Speaker 7: Trump was president, he said to him that Hitler had
Speaker 7: apparently done some good things.
Speaker 5: She would connors of more than once, that you did
Speaker 5: some good things too.
Speaker 2: That is That's literally all she's got to go on. Right.
Speaker 7: A bloke who has beef with Donald Trump says that
Speaker 7: Donald Trump says something that Donald Trump denies he ever said.
Speaker 7: But we've got around the attack now right, So here
Speaker 7: she is today saying he's an evil fascist.
Speaker 8: It is deeply troubling and incredibly dangerous that Donald Trump
Speaker 8: would invoke Adolf Hitler, the man who is responsible for
Speaker 8: the deaths of six million Jews and hundreds of thousands
Speaker 8: of Americans. All of this is further evidence for the
Speaker 8: American people who Donald Trump really is. This is a
Speaker 8: window and to who Donald Trump really is.
Speaker 5: Oo. It's scary, isn't it?
Speaker 7: And clearly she thinks she's onto a winner here because
Speaker 7: she's put out so many damn tweets about this. Let
Speaker 7: me run you through some of them. We start with
Speaker 7: Donald Trump is out for unchecked power. He wants a
Speaker 7: military like Adolph Hitler had, who will be loyal, not
Speaker 7: our constitution. He is unhinged, unstable. Remind you of someone
Speaker 7: named mister Biden perhaps, and given a second term, there
Speaker 7: would be no one to stop him from pursuing his
Speaker 7: worst impulses.
Speaker 2: Yes, I think we have courts for that. Anyway. Let's
Speaker 2: go on to the second tweet. Donald Trump vowed.
Speaker 7: To be a dictator on day one, Taking that will
Speaker 7: out of context, he vowed to use the military to
Speaker 7: carry out personal and political ben debtas not like you've
Speaker 7: used the court to carry out personal political vendettas his
Speaker 7: former chief of staff said.
Speaker 2: He wanted generals like Hitler's. Again, the same man we
Speaker 2: said that he fired like a dog. Trump wants unchecked power.
Speaker 7: In thirteen days, the American people will decide what they want.
Speaker 7: She continues, Trump is unstable and unhinged. If elected, his
Speaker 7: Project twenty twenty five agenda, which Trump has said he
Speaker 7: has nothing to do with, would give him virtually unchecked.
Speaker 2: Power to fill the government with loyalists.
Speaker 7: There would be no one to stop him from carrying
Speaker 7: out his darkest impulse. Oh and then she goes on further.
Speaker 7: The American people deserve a leader who maintain certain standards
Speaker 7: about the role and responsibility of the president of the
Speaker 7: United States, certainly not comparing oneself in a clearly admiring
Speaker 7: way to Hitler.
Speaker 2: I mean, for goodness sake, how desperate can this woman?
Speaker 3: This is what she's come up with out of pure hearsay.
Speaker 3: By the way, so you've got Kelly who was fired.
Speaker 3: Here's here's Trump's truth social post about him, posted last year.
Speaker 3: By the way, he wrote, Kelly is the dumbest of
Speaker 3: my military people.
Speaker 1: He's incapable of doing a good job.
Speaker 3: It was too much for him, and I couldn't stand
Speaker 3: the guy, so I fired him like a dog. So
Speaker 3: this guy has beef, he's oozing sour grapes. He says
Speaker 3: a one liner about Trump once said Hitler did good
Speaker 3: things too. I imagine he's just talking about the literal
Speaker 3: reconstruction of Germany post pol World War One. It was
Speaker 3: a massive feat. He did do plenty of good stuff
Speaker 3: before he turned into one of the most evil mentory.
Speaker 2: What's that.
Speaker 5: I think Hitler was always pretty evil.
Speaker 6: I don't think you could say, oh, come, I need
Speaker 6: the economic I mean, there were people at the time
Speaker 6: who were impressed by Germany's economic story.
Speaker 3: But what I'm saying is that was probably what Trump
Speaker 3: was referring to talking about good. He's not talking about
Speaker 3: the Hitler that all of us think of the minute
Speaker 3: we hear his name. But what you have here is
Speaker 3: this morsel of hearsay. And and she's got how many
Speaker 3: tweets in the space of just ten hours and goes
Speaker 3: behind the presidential podium to address the nation to say,
Speaker 3: Trump is Hitler, this is it, He's darkest important.
Speaker 6: It's actually a cliche in politics and in any argument
Speaker 6: generally that the minute you invoke Hitler, you've lost the argument.
Speaker 5: The minute you're lost the argument.
Speaker 6: And it is so just undergraduate and sad that the
Speaker 6: Democrats and all these people advising her, because it wouldn't
Speaker 6: be her just on the tweets going there'd be people
Speaker 6: advising her saying this and saying all right, we're going
Speaker 6: to put this out and this is going to be
Speaker 6: the magic bullet. Now, there is not a single Trump
Speaker 6: supporter right now on the planet who wouldn't have already
Speaker 6: seen and heard all of these attacks where they're justified
Speaker 6: or not. Ever since January twenty sixth, all of these attacks,
Speaker 6: all these comparisons with him later has been out there
Speaker 6: for all to seat on the global stage for literally years,
Speaker 6: and they seem to think if they just do one
Speaker 6: more that that would change, suddenly change all this is,
Speaker 6: this is how, this is how literally brain damage, like
Speaker 6: seriously mentally impaired the democratic the collective democratic party machine
Speaker 6: and progressive elites in the US generally, are they honestly
Speaker 6: think they've demonized Donald Trump till there's no tomorrow. You know,
Speaker 6: there have been many valid criticisms about him, but again
Speaker 6: they've gone after him. They've overad the omelet, They've gone
Speaker 6: too hard. That's turned people against them, not him. And
Speaker 6: then when that momentum is building because of his martyrdom,
Speaker 6: they think, what are we going to do, We'll go
Speaker 6: after him even harder, to the point where you have
Speaker 6: again her calling him, you know, hitler again after that
Speaker 6: was accused of being one of the reasons why people.
Speaker 5: Started trying to assassination and.
Speaker 6: Joe Biden just in the last few days saying, oh,
Speaker 6: we should lock him up. How did that go for
Speaker 6: your last time? Joe gave him a three point bounce
Speaker 6: in the polls. Like, these people are literally not functioning.
Speaker 3: They are all but most they are all but begging
Speaker 3: their nutjob supporters try again. He's literally Hitler, who wouldn't
Speaker 3: kill Hitler if given the chance. Here's your chance.
Speaker 1: He's still alive and walking around.
Speaker 3: You can get him before we go to the polls.
Speaker 3: That's basically what is being encouraged, especially when you factor
Speaker 3: in the kind of nutjobs who are very, very passionate
Speaker 3: full of trumped arrangement syndrome.
Speaker 1: But before we leave you for a break tonight.
Speaker 3: Texas is suing the Biden Harris administration after the Feds
Speaker 3: refuse to help them out verify four hundred and fifty
Speaker 3: thousand ineligible people on their voter roll. A lot of
Speaker 3: the states are trying to especially the red states like Texas, are.
Speaker 1: Trying to clean up their voter roles.
Speaker 3: Texas checked it out, figured we've got four hundred and
Speaker 3: fifty thousand people here that we're not sure should be voting.
Speaker 3: But it's the FEDS with the records who can prove it.
Speaker 1: Will you help us out?
Speaker 3: The Feds refused, and so Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton
Speaker 3: has written, although I have no doubt the vast majority
Speaker 3: of the voter on the list are citizens who are
Speaker 3: eligible to vote, still just a question mark. I'm not
Speaker 3: saying they're not. I am equally certain that Texas have
Speaker 3: no way of knowing whether or not any of the
Speaker 3: voters on the list are non citizens who are ineligible
Speaker 3: to vote. And the AGE has said previously that this
Speaker 3: is very important given by what a fine margin many
Speaker 3: counties in Texas are decided by. So all you need
Speaker 3: in some counties is a handful of ineligible voters doing
Speaker 3: the wrong thing, and it goes the other way for
Speaker 3: the wrong team. We've got to go to a break now.
Speaker 3: But when we come back, Dan Andrew's getting seventy five
Speaker 3: k a year, like he is not already handsomely compensated
Speaker 3: to sit on a youth.
Speaker 1: Mental health council?
Speaker 3: Will he donate it to charity that coming up soon?
Speaker 1: Welcome back.
Speaker 3: We are bringing you Tomorrow's News tonight, starting off with
Speaker 3: the year old son the Big Splash reads skin in
Speaker 3: the game Life saving world first breakthrough as burn's victim
Speaker 3: is successfully given tissue grown in Melbourne lab Go Australia.
Speaker 3: Human like skin grown in a laboratory has been successfully
Speaker 3: given to a Melbourne burns patient in.
Speaker 1: A world first trial.
Speaker 3: The artificial tissue was grown from the man's own skin cells,
Speaker 3: with the procedure held as one of the biggest breakthroughs
Speaker 3: for burns care in decades. Reconstructive plastic surgeon Heather Clelland
Speaker 3: said it had to the potential to save lives of
Speaker 3: those who would otherwise not survive.
Speaker 1: This is incredible.
Speaker 3: I'm not a medical person at all, but when you
Speaker 3: read about breakthroughs like this where we're going to be
Speaker 3: able to say to an incredibly burnt victim, hey, we're
Speaker 3: just gonna take some of your skin cells, grow a
Speaker 3: heap of your own skin for you and whack it
Speaker 3: back on.
Speaker 1: This is incredible.
Speaker 7: Oh, I mean, look at any kind of advancement like
Speaker 7: this when we punch above waight is good news for Australia.
Speaker 7: And as someone who has had some skin grafts not
Speaker 7: for for burns and This is not an uncommon thing
Speaker 7: with people who've had skin grafts. Of course, they need
Speaker 7: somewhere on the body to take the skin from to
Speaker 7: then graft it somewhere else. And if they take skin
Speaker 7: from a part of the body that grows hair and
Speaker 7: then put it on a part of the body that
Speaker 7: does not grow hair, you have like just patches.
Speaker 1: Of hair that grow in very touch of hair.
Speaker 2: That I'm not disclosing, but.
Speaker 3: Exclusive on the la ladies and gentlemen, can we zoom it?
Speaker 2: I'm not, I'm not. I'm not giving you that level
Speaker 2: of detail. If you want that, you can pay millions
Speaker 2: and millions of dollars for it on only fans or something.
Speaker 7: I don't know, but I'm sure an sure there.
Speaker 2: Are people out there who would.
Speaker 8: Pay for it.
Speaker 3: It is escalated quickly later, but both the kids are
Speaker 3: in bed, but I'm.
Speaker 7: Sure for a lot of people it would also give
Speaker 7: them a level of comfort to know that, you know,
Speaker 7: the disfigiven whatever and the shame that then comes from
Speaker 7: how you look after having a skin graft. Presumably through
Speaker 7: this sort of that'll be able to make something that
Speaker 7: looks like the skin that.
Speaker 2: Would have been there in the first place, so incredible stuff.
Speaker 3: Just incredible. To the second splash on the front of
Speaker 3: the Herald's son show some charity, Dan, Well, that's small
Speaker 3: than we could ask of him. As Premiere. Daniel Andrews
Speaker 3: will get seventy five thousand dollars a year for his
Speaker 3: new role as chairman of a youth mental health service
Speaker 3: that has refused to say if he will donate it
Speaker 3: to charity, even though he already pockets a generous taxpayer
Speaker 3: funded parliamentary pension. Origins decision to announce the former premiere
Speaker 3: as chairman has drawn outrage, with mental health advocates saying
Speaker 3: it's a slap in the face due to his COVID lockdowns,
Speaker 3: which we know. I don't even know if we know
Speaker 3: the total number of youths that took their lives during
Speaker 3: those lockdowns, but I remember some very harrowing headlines. Does
Speaker 3: this guy not already have enough money? He's got his
Speaker 3: premiere pension because he spent so long in the job,
Speaker 3: so we know that he's getting two hundred and twenty
Speaker 3: five thousand dollars over his three year term. Then he
Speaker 3: gets more than three hundred dollars a year thanks to victorians.
Speaker 3: I mean you're already on a really good wicket. Why
Speaker 3: wouldn't you just say, oh, absolutely, I'm donating this to charity,
Speaker 3: especially given the damage I did.
Speaker 6: Well, this is just an amazing bit of this really
Speaker 6: good sort of got your TABLOI journalist might say that
Speaker 6: very admiringly, but obviously this person just.
Speaker 5: Wrung up and said, all right, we're going to donate you.
Speaker 6: You know, someone said, I ask him if he's going
Speaker 6: to donate it to charity, which is exactly what any
Speaker 6: self respecting news boss would.
Speaker 5: Do, right, And of course you know I've gone and
Speaker 5: made the phone call.
Speaker 6: And Dan Andrews just gone Harold's sign, you know, if
Speaker 6: you know, he freezes out anyone who doesn't like and
Speaker 6: the Herald sign is the top of that list. And
Speaker 6: so of course he hasn't responded, and then you've got
Speaker 6: your story. He's refused to say whether he will give
Speaker 6: it to charity, simply because he's just hasn't even added
Speaker 6: the fights.
Speaker 3: But isn't that a master's because then he's forced into
Speaker 3: saying I'm doing then you will have to come.
Speaker 6: Out and say that as he bloody well should on
Speaker 6: the But it is obviously that I was very very
Speaker 6: posed in some cases to the COVID lockdowns, especially the
Speaker 6: closure of schools, that was unforgivable, and Dan Andrews sadly
Speaker 6: was first and foremost among the advocates of that when
Speaker 6: there was no scientific basis for it, and that has
Speaker 6: been proven again again in terms of suicide rate. The
Speaker 6: numbers I have seen is that the suicide rate did
Speaker 6: not in fact spike, but that there was a lot
Speaker 6: of suggestion that because so many more resources were put
Speaker 6: into monitoring because they knew it would be a risk
Speaker 6: factor for suicides. There were so many more resources put
Speaker 6: into monitoring that and making sure and watching for any
Speaker 6: warning science that that could have been one of the reasons.
Speaker 6: One of the things that did come out of it, though,
Speaker 6: it was a huge amount of kids suffering from anxiety
Speaker 6: and depression who didn't get to associate with their peer groups,
Speaker 6: which is a matter of life.
Speaker 3: And I find it hard to believe that suicides didn't spike,
Speaker 3: because I have friends in Victoria who lost.
Speaker 5: Friends and that is always that is always tragic. But
Speaker 5: I do not believe that there is a oh.
Speaker 3: That's just the standard suicide rate in Victoria.
Speaker 2: Wow.
Speaker 6: Yeah, yeah, I mean, obviously the suicide rate full stop
Speaker 6: is a terrible thing for kids.
Speaker 5: But it was other stuff.
Speaker 6: It was other anxieties, it was other depression, isolation, it
Speaker 6: was all these.
Speaker 3: There's contributing factors, but you wouldn't know whether people during
Speaker 3: the world's longest lockdown would have otherwise taken their lives.
Speaker 6: I'm telling you there were stats that was done and
Speaker 6: there were comparisons done that showed that there was no
Speaker 6: spike of suicide during the lockdown with the government funded research.
Speaker 7: Was it. While we're talking about children, let's go to
Speaker 7: the Canns post. Now a novel idea to get on
Speaker 7: top of bad behavior.
Speaker 2: Bring back the caine. This is a cattera Australia.
Speaker 7: Party candidate and and he woke Far North candidate who
Speaker 7: supports caning children in school, says he's winning over residents
Speaker 7: in a bell where the seat ahead of this weekend
Speaker 7: state election, but not all voters at the early voting
Speaker 7: center in Smithfield shared his opinions on Thursday. I'm sure
Speaker 7: they didn't, particularly ones who've just come out of school.
Speaker 7: I would imagine, but it's, you know, it's an old
Speaker 7: fashioned way of dealing with kids. I certainly didn't have
Speaker 7: to deal with the cane. You might have dated yourself
Speaker 7: a little bit.
Speaker 2: I remember the pla by telling us that you were
Speaker 2: copying it.
Speaker 7: But you know stories from parents and grandparents about you know,
Speaker 7: as kids, they were hit over their head with dictionaries
Speaker 7: by teachers and all sorts of stuff. You know, I'm
Speaker 7: glad it didn't happen to me. But sometimes I look
Speaker 7: at the rat bags getting around. Now, go, maybe you
Speaker 7: would actually benefit from them.
Speaker 3: Yeah, And now we've seen the tables flip so severely
Speaker 3: in schools where teachers are the ones being beset upon
Speaker 3: by rabid kids, and they know that if they so
Speaker 3: much lay a finger on those kids, even in self defense,
Speaker 3: they will be in massive trouble. My dad used to
Speaker 3: say of me with regards to physical discipline, it's the
Speaker 3: only language she understands. And I think for certain personality
Speaker 3: aon I literally no, we run one of those. We
Speaker 3: were one of the We were one of those households.
Speaker 3: Spare the rocks child, Oh yeah, yep. And didn't even
Speaker 3: take the notches off it. Yeah wow, And.
Speaker 5: That made you the woman you are today. I wouldn't be.
Speaker 3: I love my parents and I was a very strong
Speaker 3: willed child. I think it comes down to personality. But
Speaker 3: back in the day is this is what happened to kids.
Speaker 3: I wasn't paddled by.
Speaker 1: The way, not me personally at school, but that.
Speaker 3: Was something that was used on those kids who were
Speaker 3: simply giving the teachers hell. And like my dad would say,
Speaker 3: it's the only language they understand.
Speaker 7: Well, she seems to be impervious to our attacks here
Speaker 7: in the past. So next time, I'm just going to say,
Speaker 7: Lidzie cruising for a bruise and maybe that'll do a job.
Speaker 3: Let's go with it made me feel mate, I know
Speaker 3: exactly use my physical pain threashold.
Speaker 2: Let's go to do another story on the front of
Speaker 2: the Cans Post of Oro.
Speaker 7: Now you used to seeing Croc stories on the front
Speaker 7: of the n t Used But of course Cans is
Speaker 7: another part of the world up there and fan nor
Speaker 7: queens and where they get the crops. And they have
Speaker 7: brought in a clear voyant Croc to tell us who
Speaker 7: is going to win the Queensland election on Saturday.
Speaker 2: Top is the headline.
Speaker 7: And I can tell you if you don't have your
Speaker 7: hands on a copy of the Cans Post in Cans tomorrow,
Speaker 7: I can tell you that the CROC says Labour's going
Speaker 7: to win the election.
Speaker 3: What do we think about?
Speaker 6: Say that, mister blind because on the front page of
Speaker 6: The Australian there is a news poll which shows that
Speaker 6: while Labor will not be winning the election, neither will
Speaker 6: the LNP buy as much as it.
Speaker 5: Was expected to.
Speaker 6: If indeed these numbers are created, are actually just getting
Speaker 6: a message from one of our correspondents up there. It's
Speaker 6: basically gone from fifty five to forty five at the
Speaker 6: outset of the campaign to fifty two point five to
Speaker 6: forty seven point five at the closing sort of finish line.
Speaker 6: So it looks like you'll still David Kuisvulliam, the LP
Speaker 6: will still get a majority, but it doesn't look like
Speaker 6: it'll be as big a majority as they thought.
Speaker 7: And interestingly they've turned Miles into preferred premiere over christ
Speaker 7: which is a big.
Speaker 3: With a margin that's small, the Pulses will be better
Speaker 3: off just saying, look, we don't know it's anybody scarce.
Speaker 3: We'll be right back with an epic showdown between American neighbors.
Speaker 3: One's maga, one's got.
Speaker 1: A serious case of trumped arrangement syndrome.
Speaker 3: Who comes out on top. We'll see you soon. Welcome back.
Speaker 3: We've got to check out this neighborhood scrap between someone
Speaker 3: with a serious case of trumped arrangement syndrome and what
Speaker 3: is clearly a MAGA fan. Check it out.
Speaker 6: Are you the one that walks by here and always
Speaker 6: screaming with people?
Speaker 8: No, I haven't mind recently, Okay, we want people walk
Speaker 8: by screen.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm not.
Speaker 7: You are going for this?
Speaker 5: Know that?
Speaker 7: No?
Speaker 4: Why are you borrying for her?
Speaker 9: Because I believe he is a moral candidate?
Speaker 3: Oh my god, thank you for that one.
Speaker 7: That's more.
Speaker 8: That's how your side.
Speaker 6: Oh proud in your opinion?
Speaker 3: That's yeah, that's I'm sorry, haven't I say, Haven't I say? God, God,
Speaker 3: bless you.
Speaker 1: He's the most moral person.
Speaker 3: I love to see them. I love to see them.
Speaker 2: That is just utterly amazing, you know, now, bless you.
Speaker 2: You might have heard of the animal group Peter before
Speaker 2: p e t A. I am a member of it.
Speaker 7: To people for eating tasty animals, I'm sorry, there's another
Speaker 7: Peter group out there, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.
Speaker 7: They are a bunch of nut jobs. They come after
Speaker 7: jumps racing all the time. And you know how much
Speaker 7: I love jumps racing. And another thing, you know, a
Speaker 7: lost part of our country when it was great, of course,
Speaker 7: was rodeos and they seem to be slowly dying off,
Speaker 7: including the mount iSER Rodeo, which has now gone into administration.
Speaker 7: So Peter, the People for Ethical Treatment of Animals has
Speaker 7: written off to the administrator saying we're going to take
Speaker 7: it over, and they've got a novel idea of how
Speaker 7: they're going to do it. They say a mechanical ball
Speaker 7: championship could replace bull riding. Hobby horses could be used
Speaker 7: in barrel racing instead of traumatizing and crippling baby animals
Speaker 7: with calf roping. Competitors could instead ride electric bikes as
Speaker 7: they attempt to less remote control cars steered by their opponents.
Speaker 7: Now guess I know they're saying out lead with stuff
Speaker 7: with publicity, and we're giving it to them tonight. But
Speaker 7: they are just so dumb and hilariously dumb that we
Speaker 7: have to highlight this stuff because these people actually think.
Speaker 2: They can influence policy, and sometimes they do.
Speaker 6: Can you imagine the attendance rates Yesterday was World Edible
Speaker 6: Insects Day, where was Peter there?
Speaker 5: Exactly who's sticking up for the insects.
Speaker 3: And on that note, we got to leave you tonight,
Speaker 3: but stay around for the Rita Panakee show.
Speaker 2: See you later.